Mixed reality computing devices, such as head mounted display (HMD) systems and handheld mobile devices (e.g. smart phones, tablet computers, etc.), may be configured to display information to a user about virtual and/or real objects in the field of view of the user and/or a field of view of a camera of the device. For example, an HMD device may be configured to display, using a see-through display system, virtual environments with real world objects mixed in, or real world environments with virtual objects mixed in. Similarly, a mobile device may display such information using a camera viewfinder window.
This Background is provided to introduce a brief context for the Summary and Detailed Description that follow. This Background is not intended to be an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter nor be viewed as limiting the claimed subject matter to implementations that solve any or all of the disadvantages or problems presented above.
An application running on a computing platform that employs three-dimensional (3D) modeling is extended using a virtual viewport into which 3D holograms are rendered by a mixed-reality head mounted display (HMD) device. The HMD device user can position the viewport to be rendered next to a real world 2D monitor and use it as a natural extension of the 3D modeling application. For example, the user can interact with modeled objects in mixed-reality and move objects between the monitor and the viewport. The 3D modeling application and HMD device are configured to exchange scene data for modeled objects (such as geometry, lighting, rotation, and scale) and user interface data (such as mouse and keyboard inputs). The HMD device implements head tracking to determine where the user is looking so that user inputs are appropriately directed to the monitor or viewport.
This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter. Furthermore, the claimed subject matter is not limited to implementations that solve any or all disadvantages noted in any part of this disclosure. It may be appreciated that the above-described subject matter may be implemented as a computer-controlled apparatus, a computer process, a computing system, or as an article of manufacture such as one or more computer-readable storage media. These and various other features may be apparent from a reading of the following Detailed Description and a review of the associated drawings.
Like reference numerals indicate like elements in the drawings. Elements are not drawn to scale unless otherwise indicated.
3D models can be generated by applications for a variety of purposes such as CAD (computer-assisted design), CAM (computer-assisted manufacturing), animation, and gaming. 3D models can often be large and complex and users are generally only able to view and work with them through limited 2D displays and cumbersome user interfaces. While the introduction of 3D printers has helped to make it easier for users to view and interact with 3D models more naturally, such printing can consume time and resources each time a design is iterated.
The present 3D viewport can be utilized much in the same way as a 3D printer by enabling the user to see and interact with a model in 3D in a natural manner, but without the printing wait time and expense. Faster iterations between model revisions can thus be achieved. The user can also utilize the viewport to view, manipulate, and move models between the viewport and monitor to provide increased 3D modeling flexibility and efficiency.
Turning now to the drawings, a mixed-reality or augmented-reality environment supported on an HMD device typically combines real world elements and computer-generated virtual elements to enable a variety of user experiences. In an illustrative example, as shown in
In another illustrative mixed-reality scenario shown in
The user can typically interact with the PC 205 when viewing the monitor 210 in the mixed-reality environment in substantially the same way as in the real world environment. For example, the user can interact with objects, elements, windows, etc., that are supported on a desktop 305. The PC 205 supports an application that renders a 3D model 315 on the monitor 210. The HMD device 104 locates a virtual 3D viewport 310 that is interoperable with the 3D application so that a model 315 can be rendered in 3D in the viewport and in 2D on the monitor. The HMD device 104 can expose controls to enable the user to configure the viewport 310 in terms of its location, size, shape, and other characteristics in some implementations in order to tailor the viewport to particular needs. In this example, the user has configured the viewport 310 as a rectangular volume having an overall size that approximately matches that of the monitor 210 and has located the viewport to be adjacent to the monitor. The borders of the viewport are visible in this example, and in alternative implementations the borders can be rendered in different ways, in some cases under user control, using objects such as lines and broken lines with various treatments and effects such as colors, transparency, animation, and the like.
The user may typically consider the viewport 310 as a tool that extends the functionality of the 3D application by enabling a 3D model to be viewed and worked on in the particular rendering mode—whether in 2D on the monitor 210 or in 3D in the viewport—that is most suitable to the task at hand. Models can be conveniently moved between the monitor and viewport and vice versa as illustratively shown in
The PC 205 and HMD device 104 may be configured for interoperability to support the mixed-reality environment with the 3D viewport 310.
A UI server 565 can provide UI data 520 to a UI client 580 on the HMD device. The UI data typically includes mouse messages 545 and keyboard messages 550. However, in alternative implementations, data relating to other user interfaces and input methodologies may be utilized.
In order to direct keyboard inputs to the appropriate model being rendered on either the monitor or viewport, the HMD device 104 tracks the user's view position in which an imaginary ray is projected from the HMD device that corresponds to the user's line of sight (i.e., the direction in which the user is looking). Such tracking is described in greater detail below in the text accompanying
For mouse inputs, in step 610 the UI server 565 tracks mouse movement through its connection with an operating system 560 on the PC 205. At decision block 615, if the mouse has not traveled beyond the limits of the screen of the monitor 210, then it is assumed that the user is still using the mouse on the desktop and control returns to step 610. If the mouse has traveled beyond the extent of the monitor, then in step 620 the UI server assumes control of the mouse and prevents mouse messages from propagating to other components executing on the PC 205.
In step 625, the UI server informs the UI client that the mouse is operating in the virtual world and it passes mouse messages such as mouse movements and user inputs (e.g., button clicks, scroll wheel actions, etc.) to the UI client. The UI client calculates an initial position for the cursor in the viewport based on exit point on the screen of the monitor in step 630, and computes the next position for the cursor based on changes in mouse movement in step 635. The cursor may be dynamically rendered in 3D using a size that is proportional to the cursor's distance from the user in the viewport. That is, it is typically rendered to be bigger when it is closer to the viewer and smaller when it is farther away. Such dynamic rendering according to distance can be beneficial as the user does not need to change his focal depth when looking at the cursor and any surrounding elements or objects in the viewport. The user is enabled to interact with the 3D model rendered in the viewport and the viewport itself (e.g., changing its configuration including location, size, and shape) using the mouse and keyboard among other inputs in step 640.
In step 645, the UI client calculates a ray between the next cursor position in the viewport and the current view position. If the calculated ray intersects the screen of the monitor, then the UI client informs the UI server that the cursor has transitioned back to the PC desktop in step 650 and reports the last cursor position to the mouse input server. The UI client discontinues rendering the cursor in the viewport and stops responding to mouse input events in step 655. The UI server calculates the cursor reentry position on the desktop using the last position reported by the UI client in step 660.
As shown in
In step 1005 of the illustrative method 1000 in
In step 1040, the HMD device can expose a user control to adjust viewport characteristics such as location in the mixed-reality space, size, and shape. In step 1045, enablement is provided so that the user can transfer 3D models between the monitor and viewport. Clipping is applied to rendered holograms to constrain the 3D model to the boundaries of the viewport in step 1050.
In the illustrative method 1100 shown in
In the illustrative method 1200 shown in
In step 1215, when the mouse movement indicates that the cursor is moving off the edge of the monitor, then the UI server takes control of the mouse messages and prevents them from propagating to other systems that are running on the device. Mouse and keyboard messages are sent to the HMD device over the network respectively in steps 1220 and 1225. In step 1230, the UI server receives a message from the UI client on the HMD device that the cursor has transitioned to the desktop on the monitor. In step 1235, an initial cursor position on the desktop is determined based on the last reported cursor position in the viewport. Control over the mouse and keyboard messages is released in step 1240, and the mouse and keyboard is enabled to be operated normally on the desktop.
Turning now to various illustrative implementation details, a mixed reality display device according to the present arrangement may take any suitable form, including but not limited to near-eye devices such as the HMD device 104 and/or other portable/mobile devices. A see-through display may be used in some implementations while an opaque (i.e., non-see-through) display using a camera-based pass-through or outward facing sensor, for example, may be used in other implementations.
The display system 1300 may further include a gaze detection subsystem 1310 configured for detecting a direction of gaze of each eye of a user or a direction or location of focus, as described above. Gaze detection subsystem 1310 may be configured to determine gaze directions of each of a user's eyes in any suitable manner. For example, in the illustrative example shown, a gaze detection subsystem 1310 includes one or more glint sources 1312, such as infrared light sources, that are configured to cause a glint of light to reflect from each eyeball of a user, and one or more image sensors 1314, such as inward-facing sensors, that are configured to capture an image of each eyeball of the user. Changes in the glints from the user's eyeballs and/or a location of a user's pupil, as determined from image data gathered using the image sensor(s) 1314, may be used to determine a direction of gaze.
In addition, a location at which gaze lines projected from the user's eyes intersect the external display may be used to determine an object at which the user is gazing (e.g. a displayed virtual object and/or real background object). Gaze detection subsystem 1310 may have any suitable number and arrangement of light sources and image sensors. In some implementations, the gaze detection subsystem 1310 may be omitted.
The display system 1300 may also include additional sensors. For example, display system 1300 may comprise a global positioning system (GPS) subsystem 1316 to allow a location of the display system 1300 to be determined. This may help to identify real world objects, such as buildings, etc. that may be located in the user's adjoining physical environment.
The display system 1300 may further include one or more motion sensors 1318 (e.g., inertial, multi-axis gyroscopic, or acceleration sensors) to detect movement and position/orientation/pose of a user's head when the user is wearing the system as part of an augmented-reality HMD device. Motion data may be used, potentially along with eye-tracking glint data and outward-facing image data, for gaze detection, as well as for image stabilization to help correct for blur in images from the outward-facing image sensor(s) 1306. The use of motion data may allow changes in gaze location to be tracked even if image data from outward-facing image sensor(s) 1306 cannot be resolved.
In addition, motion sensors 1318, as well as microphone(s) 1308 and gaze detection subsystem 1310, also may be employed as user input devices, such that a user may interact with the display system 1300 via gestures of the eye, neck and/or head, as well as via verbal commands in some cases. It may be understood that sensors illustrated in
The display system 1300 can further include a controller 1320 having a logic subsystem 1322 and a data storage subsystem 1324 in communication with the sensors, gaze detection subsystem 1310, display subsystem 1304, and/or other components through a communications subsystem 1326. The communications subsystem 1326 can also facilitate the display system being operated in conjunction with remotely located resources, such as processing, storage, power, data, and services. That is, in some implementations, an HMD device can be operated as part of a system that can distribute resources and capabilities among different components and subsystems.
The storage subsystem 1324 may include instructions stored thereon that are executable by logic subsystem 1322, for example, to receive and interpret inputs from the sensors, to identify location and movements of a user, to identify real objects using surface reconstruction and other techniques, and dim/fade the display based on distance to objects so as to enable the objects to be seen by the user, among other tasks.
The display system 1300 is configured with one or more audio transducers 1328 (e.g., speakers, earphones, etc.) so that audio can be utilized as part of an augmented reality experience. A power management subsystem 1330 may include one or more batteries 1332 and/or protection circuit modules (PCMs) and an associated charger interface 1334 and/or remote power interface for supplying power to components in the display system 1300.
It may be appreciated that the depicted display devices 104 and 1300 are described for the purpose of example, and thus are not meant to be limiting. It is to be further understood that the display device may include additional and/or alternative sensors, cameras, microphones, input devices, output devices, etc. than those shown without departing from the scope of the present arrangement. Additionally, the physical configuration of a display device and its various sensors and subcomponents may take a variety of different forms without departing from the scope of the present arrangement.
The visor includes see-through front and rear shields 1504 and 1506 respectively that can be molded using transparent materials to facilitate unobstructed vision to the optical displays and the surrounding real world environment. Treatments may be applied to the front and rear shields such as tinting, mirroring, anti-reflective, anti-fog, and other coatings, and various colors and finishes may also be utilized. The front and rear shields are affixed to a chassis 1605 as depicted in the partially exploded view in
The sealed visor 1502 can physically protect sensitive internal components, including an optics display subassembly 1702 (shown in the disassembled view in
As shown in
The computing system 2000 includes a logic subsystem 2002 and a storage subsystem 2004. The computing system 2000 may optionally include a display subsystem 2006, an input subsystem 2008, a communication subsystem 2010, and/or other components not shown in
The logic subsystem 2002 includes one or more physical devices configured to execute instructions. For example, the logic subsystem 2002 may be configured to execute instructions that are part of one or more applications, services, programs, routines, libraries, objects, components, data structures, or other logical constructs. Such instructions may be implemented to perform a task, implement a data type, transform the state of one or more components, or otherwise arrive at a desired result.
The logic subsystem 2002 may include one or more processors configured to execute software instructions. Additionally or alternatively, the logic subsystem 2002 may include one or more hardware or firmware logic machines configured to execute hardware or firmware instructions. The processors of the logic subsystem 2002 may be single-core or multi-core, and the programs executed thereon may be configured for sequential, parallel, or distributed processing. The logic subsystem 2002 may optionally include individual components that are distributed among two or more devices, which can be remotely located and/or configured for coordinated processing. Aspects of the logic subsystem 2002 may be virtualized and executed by remotely accessible, networked computing devices configured in a cloud-computing configuration.
The storage subsystem 2004 includes one or more physical devices configured to hold data and/or instructions executable by the logic subsystem 2002 to implement the methods and processes described herein. When such methods and processes are implemented, the state of the storage subsystem 2004 may be transformed—for example, to hold different data.
The storage subsystem 2004 may include removable media and/or built-in devices. The storage subsystem 2004 may include optical memory devices (e.g., CD (compact disc), DVD (digital versatile disc), HD-DVD (high definition DVD), Blu-ray disc, etc.), semiconductor memory devices (e.g., RAM (random access memory), ROM (read only memory), EPROM (erasable programmable ROM), EEPROM (electrically erasable ROM), etc.) and/or magnetic memory devices (e.g., hard-disk drive, floppy-disk drive, tape drive, MRAM (magneto-resistive RAM), etc.), among others. The storage subsystem 2004 may include volatile, nonvolatile, dynamic, static, read/write, read-only, random-access, sequential-access, location-addressable, file-addressable, and/or content-addressable devices.
It may be appreciated that the storage subsystem 2004 includes one or more physical devices, and excludes propagating signals per se. However, in some implementations, aspects of the instructions described herein may be propagated by a pure signal (e.g., an electromagnetic signal, an optical signal, etc.) using a communications medium, as opposed to being stored on a storage device. Furthermore, data and/or other forms of information pertaining to the present arrangement may be propagated by a pure signal.
In some embodiments, aspects of the logic subsystem 2002 and of the storage subsystem 2004 may be integrated together into one or more hardware-logic components through which the functionality described herein may be enacted. Such hardware-logic components may include field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), program- and application-specific integrated circuits (PASIC/ASICs), program- and application-specific standard products (PSSP/ASSPs), system-on-a-chip (SOC) systems, and complex programmable logic devices (CPLDs), for example.
When included, the display subsystem 2006 may be used to present a visual representation of data held by storage subsystem 2004. This visual representation may take the form of a graphical user interface (GUI). As the present described methods and processes change the data held by the storage subsystem, and thus transform the state of the storage subsystem, the state of the display subsystem 2006 may likewise be transformed to visually represent changes in the underlying data. The display subsystem 2006 may include one or more display devices utilizing virtually any type of technology. Such display devices may be combined with logic subsystem 2002 and/or storage subsystem 2004 in a shared enclosure in some cases, or such display devices may be peripheral display devices in others.
When included, the input subsystem 2008 may include or interface with one or more user-input devices such as a keyboard, mouse, touch screen, or game controller. In some embodiments, the input subsystem may include or interface with selected natural user input (NUI) components. Such components may be integrated or peripheral, and the transduction and/or processing of input actions may be handled on- or off-board. Exemplary NUI components may include a microphone for speech and/or voice recognition; an infrared, color, stereoscopic, and/or depth camera for machine vision and/or gesture recognition; a head tracker, eye tracker, accelerometer, and/or gyroscope for motion detection and/or intent recognition; as well as electric-field sensing components for assessing brain activity.
When included, the communication subsystem 2010 may be configured to communicatively couple the computing system 2000 with one or more other computing devices. The communication subsystem 2010 may include wired and/or wireless communication devices compatible with one or more different communication protocols. As non-limiting examples, the communication subsystem may be configured for communication via a wireless telephone network, or a wired or wireless local- or wide-area network. In some embodiments, the communication subsystem may allow computing system 2000 to send and/or receive messages to and/or from other devices using a network such as the Internet.
A number of program modules may be stored on the hard disk, magnetic disk 2133, optical disk 2143, ROM 2117, or RAM 2121, including an operating system 2155, one or more application programs 2157, other program modules 2160, and program data 2163. A user may enter commands and information into the computer system 2100 through input devices such as a keyboard 2166 and pointing device 2168 such as a mouse. Other input devices (not shown) may include a microphone, joystick, game pad, satellite dish, scanner, trackball, touchpad, touch screen, touch-sensitive device, voice-command module or device, user motion or user gesture capture device, or the like. These and other input devices are often connected to the processor 2105 through a serial port interface 2171 that is coupled to the system bus 2114, but may be connected by other interfaces, such as a parallel port, game port, or universal serial bus (USB). A monitor 2173 or other type of display device is also connected to the system bus 2114 via an interface, such as a video adapter 2175. In addition to the monitor 2173, personal computers typically include other peripheral output devices (not shown), such as speakers and printers. The illustrative example shown in
The computer system 2100 is operable in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers, such as a remote computer 2188. The remote computer 2188 may be selected as another personal computer, a server, a router, a network PC, a peer device, or other common network node, and typically includes many or all of the elements described above relative to the computer system 2100, although only a single representative remote memory/storage device 2190 is shown in
When used in a LAN networking environment, the computer system 2100 is connected to the local area network 2193 through a network interface or adapter 2196. When used in a WAN networking environment, the computer system 2100 typically includes a broadband modem 2198, network gateway, or other means for establishing communications over the wide area network 2195, such as the Internet. The broadband modem 2198, which may be internal or external, is connected to the system bus 2114 via a serial port interface 2171. In a networked environment, program modules related to the computer system 2100, or portions thereof, may be stored in the remote memory storage device 2190. It is noted that the network connections shown in
Various exemplary embodiments of the present three-dimensional mixed reality viewport are now presented by way of illustration and not as an exhaustive list of all embodiments. An example includes a head mounted display (HMD) device operable by a user in a physical environment, comprising: one or more processors; a sensor package; a display configured for rendering a mixed reality environment to the user, a view position of the user for the rendered mixed-reality environment being variable depending at least in part on a pose of the user's head in the physical environment; and one or more memory devices storing computer-readable instructions which, when executed by the one or more processors, perform a method comprising the steps of: implementing a three-dimensional (3D) virtual viewport on the display, supporting extensibility to a 3D modeling application executing on a remote computing platform, the application supporting a 3D model, and rendering the 3D model as a hologram in the viewport.
In another example, the HMD further includes a network interface and receiving extensibility data from the remote computing platform over the network interface, the extensibility data describing the 3D model and user inputs at the remote computing platform. In another example, the HMD further includes dynamically updating the rendered hologram in the viewport responsively to the user inputs. In another example, the HMD further includes obtaining sensor data from the sensor package, the sensor data associated with a physical environment adjoining a user of the HMD device; using the sensor data, reconstructing a geometry of the physical environment including any real world object located therein; and using the reconstructed geometry to determine a location of a monitor that is coupled to the computing platform within the physical environment. In another example, the sensor data includes depth data and the sensor data is generated using a depth sensor and surface reconstruction techniques are applied to reconstruct the physical environment geometry. In another example, the HMD further includes tracking the user's head in the physical environment using the reconstructed geometry to determine the view position, rendering a mouse cursor in the viewport when user input causes the mouse cursor to move off a desktop supported by the monitor, and consuming keyboard inputs when a ray projected from the view position intersects with the viewport. In another example, the HMD further includes discontinuing the rendering of the mouse cursor in the viewport when the projected ray indicates that the mouse cursor has transitioned to a desktop supported by the monitor. In another example, the HMD further includes providing a control to the user to control viewport characteristics including at least one of viewport location in the mixed-reality environment, viewport size, or viewport shape. In another example, the HMD further includes enabling the 3D model to be transferred between the desktop and viewport using a mouse or keyboard. In another example, the HMD further includes clipping the 3D model to constrain the 3D model to an extent of the viewport.
A further examples includes a method performed by a head mounted display (HMD) device supporting a mixed-reality environment including virtual objects and real objects, the method comprising: implementing a virtual three-dimensional (3D) viewport on a display of the HMD device; receiving extensibility data from a remote computing platform over a network connection, the extensibility data including scene data describing a 3D model supported by an application executing on the computing platform, and further including user interface (UI) data describing user inputs to the computing platform; and dynamically rendering the 3D model in the viewport using the received extensibility data.
In another example, the method further includes rendering a mouse cursor in the viewport based on mouse messages included in the UI data. In another example, the method further includes controlling rendering of the 3D model in the viewport using keyboard messages included in the UI data. In another example, the scene data includes at least one of 3D model data, environmental data, or camera parameters. In another example, the method further includes utilizing sensor data to determine a view position of a user of the HMD device and transitioning the cursor back to a desktop supported by a monitor coupled to the computing platform when a ray projected from the view position intersects the monitor. In another example, the method further includes modeling a physical environment in which the HMD device is located using a surface reconstruction data pipeline that implements a volumetric method creating multiple overlapping surfaces that are integrated and using the modeled physical environment at least in part to determine the view position or to determine a location of a monitor that is coupled to the computing platform within the physical environment.
A further example includes a computing device, comprising: one or more processors; an interface to a monitor, the monitor displaying a desktop; a mouse interface for connecting to a mouse and receiving signals from the mouse indicating mouse movement and inputs to mouse controls from a user of the computing device; a keyboard interface for connecting to a keyboard and receiving signals from the keyboard indicating keyboard inputs from the user; a network interface for communicating with a remote head mounted display (HMD) device over a network connection; and one or more memory devices storing computer-readable instructions which, when executed by the one or more processors implement a three-dimensional (3D) modeling application and a user interface (UI) server configured for tracking mouse messages that describe the mouse movements and inputs, tracking keyboard messages that describe the keyboard inputs, when a mouse movement indicates that a cursor associated with the mouse is moving beyond an edge of the monitor, taking control of the mouse messages and preventing propagation of the mouse messages to systems operating on the computing device, sending the mouse messages to the HMD device over the network connection, and sending the keyboard messages to the HMD device over the network connection.
In another example, the HMD device is configured for i) identifying a location of the monitor within a physical environment using one of surface reconstruction or observing a pre-determined, trackable image that is displayed on the monitor, and ii) supporting a mixed-reality environment on an optical display, the mixed-reality environment including a virtual 3D viewport into which hologram-based models from the 3D modeling application may be rendered. In another example, the computing device further includes tracking the mouse messages and keyboard messages by interacting with an operating system executing on the computing device. In another example, the computing device further includes receiving a message from the HMD device that the mouse cursor has transitioned to the desktop and calculating an initial cursor position on the desktop using a last reported position of the mouse cursor in the viewport.
Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/688,817, filed Apr. 16, 2015, entitled, “THREE-DIMENSIONAL MIXED-REALITY VIEWPORT”, which claims benefit and priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/029,351 filed Jul. 25, 2014, entitled “Head Mounted Display Experiences” which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5748189 | Trueblood | May 1998 | A |
5819206 | Horton et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5877748 | Redlich | Mar 1999 | A |
6012926 | Hodges et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6023275 | Horvitz et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6329986 | Cheng | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6396495 | Parghi et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6396497 | Reichlen | May 2002 | B1 |
6529331 | Massof et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6552698 | Walker et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6741241 | Jaubert et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6804607 | Wood | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6898266 | Griffith | May 2005 | B2 |
7274380 | Navab et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7386799 | Clanton et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7400322 | Urbach | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7486817 | Yanagawa et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7538775 | Ishihara | May 2009 | B2 |
7542210 | Chirieleison, Sr. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7557774 | Baudisch et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
8049750 | Gloudemans et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8266536 | Roberts et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8405680 | Cardoso et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8576247 | Avkarogullari et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8611015 | Wheeler et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8751969 | Matsuda et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8754931 | Gassel et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8780014 | Border et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8793620 | Stafford | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9372345 | Fujimaki | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9443352 | Glover et al. | Sep 2016 | B1 |
20010035845 | Zwern | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020044152 | Abbott, III et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020154214 | Scallie et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020181115 | Massof et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030091226 | Cahill et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20050024388 | Takemoto | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050143887 | Kinoshita | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050179703 | Johnson | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060050070 | Matsui | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060092178 | Tanguay et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060095207 | Reid | May 2006 | A1 |
20060241827 | Fukuchi et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060284792 | Foxlin | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070057946 | Albeck et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070116326 | Aonuma et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070132662 | Morita | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080174659 | McDowall | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080195315 | Hu et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080284864 | Kotake et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090160985 | Javidi et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090167785 | Wong | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090189974 | Deering | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090199275 | Brock et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090325699 | Delgiannidis | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100208035 | Pinault et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100208057 | Meier et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100226017 | Spaller | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100315413 | Izadi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110029903 | Schooleman et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110043627 | Werling et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110140994 | Noma | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120011445 | Gilboa | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120052917 | Kim | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120056876 | Lee et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120068913 | Bar-Zeev et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120092328 | Flaks et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120113092 | Bar-Zeev et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120195471 | Newcombe et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120237116 | Xiao | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120249741 | Maciocci et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120309522 | Westlund et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120313839 | Smithwick et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120327116 | Liu et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130044128 | Liu et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130050258 | Liu et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130050432 | Perez et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130083007 | Geisner et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130083018 | Geisner et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130088413 | Raffle et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130093789 | Liu et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130127860 | Hadap et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130127980 | Haddick et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130137076 | Perez et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130141419 | Mount et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130147686 | Calvin et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130194259 | Bennett et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130222589 | Lalonde et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130222647 | Ishihara et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130257751 | Stafford | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130257899 | Baron et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130287290 | Owechko | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130300637 | Smits et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130307855 | Lamb et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130326364 | Latta et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130328927 | Mount et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130335301 | Wong et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130335303 | Maciocci et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130336629 | Mulholland et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130342564 | Kinnebrew et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130342570 | Kinnebrew et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140002444 | Bennett et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140019874 | Li et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140049559 | Fleck et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140098009 | Prest et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140104142 | Bickerstaff et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140125557 | Issayeva | May 2014 | A1 |
20140130041 | Luxenberg et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140132484 | Pandey et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140132715 | Raghoebardayal et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140139639 | Wagner et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140140579 | Takemoto | May 2014 | A1 |
20140145988 | Ishizawa | May 2014 | A1 |
20140168264 | Harrison et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140176530 | Pathre | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140184550 | Hennessey et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140204117 | Kinnebrew et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140221090 | Mutschler et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140240351 | Scavezze et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140253605 | Border et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267400 | Mabbutt et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140317555 | Choi | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140363073 | Shirakyan et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140372957 | Keane et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150091780 | Lyren | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150138239 | Kim | May 2015 | A1 |
20150143459 | Molnar et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150145887 | Forutanpour | May 2015 | A1 |
20150153833 | Pinault et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150178956 | Davis et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150186016 | Li | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150205106 | Norden | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150243078 | Watson et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150261293 | Wilairat et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150325176 | Koyama | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150355709 | Lee | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150356788 | Abe et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101540020 | Sep 2012 | CN |
103761085 | Apr 2014 | CN |
1521482 | Apr 2005 | EP |
2164045 | Mar 2010 | EP |
2013-238693 | Nov 2013 | JP |
2009128781 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2013029097 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2013052855 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2013057649 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2013085193 | Jun 2013 | WO |
2013155217 | Oct 2013 | WO |
2014188798 | Nov 2014 | WO |
2015108887 | Jul 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Steinicke, et al., “Natural Perspective Projections for Head-Mounted Displays”, In Proceedings of IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 17, Issue 7, Jul. 2011, pp. 888-899. |
Steptoe, et al., “Eye Tracking for Avatar Eye Gaze Control during Object-Focused Multiparty Interaction in Immersive Collaborative Virtual Environments”, In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Conference (VR), Mar. 14, 2009, 8 Pages. |
Suma, et al., “Sharing Space in Mixed and Virtual Reality Environments Using a Low-Cost Depth Sensor”, In Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on VR Innovation, Mar. 19, 2011, pp. 353-354. |
Urban, John, “Five Free Tools for Multi-Monitor Computer Set-Ups”, Retrieved from <<http://sixrevisions.com/tools/five-free-tools-for-multi-monitor-computer-set-ups/>>, Sep. 16, 2009, 17 Pages. |
Peterson, et al., “Evaluation of Alternative Label Placement Techniques in Dynamic Virtual Environments”, In Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Smart Graphics, May 22, 2009, 7 Pages. |
Pierce, et al., “Image Plane Interaction Techniques in 3D Immersive Environments”, In Proceedings of the Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, Apr. 30, 1997, 10 Pages. |
“Touchscreen interface for seamless data transfer between the real and virtual worlds”, Retrieved from <<https://web.archive.org/web/20130418052838/http://www.diginfo.tv/v/13-0025-r-en.php>>, Apr. 15, 2013, 8 Pages. |
“Virtual Reality (VR) and Mixed Reality (MR) technologies”, Retrieved from <<http://www.vr-hyperspace.eu/about-vr-hyperspace/technology/77-virtual-reality-vr-and-mixed-reality-mr-technologies>>Retrieved Date: Sep. 12, 2014, 5 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/611,447”, dated Dec. 27, 2016, 20 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/611,447”, dated Aug. 16, 2017, 2 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/611,447”, dated May 16, 2017, 5 Pages. |
Amar, et al., “Synthesizing Reality for Realistic Physical Behavior of Virtual Objects in Augmented Reality Applications for Smart-Phones”, In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality (VR), Mar. 18, 2013, pp. 123-124. |
Angley, Natalie, “Glasses to make you a real-life Tony Stark”, Retrieved from <<http://edition.cnn.com/2013/10/31/tech/innovation/meta-augmented-reality-glasses/>>, Oct. 31, 2013, 4 Pages. |
Bo, Howe, “Holographic Computer Monitor”, Retrieved from <<www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHlxj7fY-38>>, Mar. 30, 2008, 2 Pages. |
Chen, Jian, “A Virtual Environment System for the Comparative Study of Dome and HMD”, In Master Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Houston, May, 2002, 104 Pages. |
Duchowski, Andrew, “Chapter 7—Head-Mounted System Software Development”, In Book Eye Tracking Methodology, Theory and Practice, Part 2, Jan. 1, 2007, pp. 69-86. |
Gemmell, et al., “Gaze Awareness for Videoconferencing: A Software Approach”, In Journal of IEEE Multi Media, vol. 7, Issue 4, Oct. 1, 2000, pp. 26-35. |
Hiner, Jason, “Future iPhone concept: Laser keyboard and holographic display”, Retrieved from <<http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/tech-sanity-check/future-iphone-concept-laser-keyboard-and-holographic-display/>>, Aug. 31, 2011, 6 Pages. |
Hogue, Dave, “What Are Index and Alpha Transparency?”, Retrieved from <<http://www.idux.com/2011/02/27/what-are-index-and-alpha-transparency/>>, Feb. 27, 2011, 14 Pages. |
Jimenez, et al., “Gaze-based Interaction for Virtual Environments”, In Journal of Universal Computer Science, vol. 14, Issue 19, Nov. 1, 2008, pp. 3085-3098. |
Kalkofen, et al., “Visualization Techniques for Augmented Reality”, In Handbook of Augmented Reality, Published by Springer New York, Jul. 13, 2011, pp. 65-98. |
Kim, et al., “3D Reconstruction of Stereo Images for Interaction between Real and Virtual Worlds”, In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, Oct. 7, 2003, 9 Pages. |
Kinoshita, et al., “A Fast and Robust 30 Head Pose and Gaze Estimation System”, In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition, Nov. 2, 2006, 2 Pages. |
Kuhl, et al., “HMD Calibration and its Effects on Distance Judgments”, In Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, Aug. 9, 2008, 24 Pages. |
Lavoie, et al., “Constructing 3D Virtual Reality Objects from 2D Images of Real Objects Using NURBS”, In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Virtual Environments, Human-Computer Interfaces and Measurement Systems, Jun. 25, 2007, pp. 117-124. |
Li, et al., “On the Anisotropy of Perceived Ground Extents and the Interpretation of Walked Distance as a Measure of Perception”, In Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol. 39, Issue 2, Apr. 2013, 33 Pages. |
Li et al. “The Underestimation of Egocentric Distance: Evidence from Frontal Matching Tasks”, In Proceedings of Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, vol. 73, Issue 7, Oct. 1, 2011, 15 Pages. |
Lzadi, et al., “Kinectfusion Real-Time 3d Reconstruction and Interaction Using a Moving Depth Camera”, In Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Oct. 16, 2011, 10 Pages. |
Maimone, et al., “Computational Augmented Reality Eyeglasses”, In Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), Oct. 1, 2013, 10 Pages. |
McCarthy, Mike, “HP intros new Versions of its Mobile and Tower Workstations”, Retrieved from <<http://postperspective.com/hp-intros-new-versions-pro-offerings/>>, Sep. 8, 2014, 5 Pages. |
Murray, et al., “Comparison of Head Gaze and Head and Eye Gaze within an Immersive Environment”, In Proceedings of Tenth IEEE International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real-Time Applications, Oct. 2, 2006, 7 Pages. |
Nakashima, et al., “A 2D-3D Integrated Environment for Cooperative Work”, In Proceedings of the ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology, Nov. 7, 2005, pp. 16-22. |
Nilsen, et al., “Tankwar—Tabletop War Gaming in Augmented Reality”, In 2nd International Workshop on Pervasive Gaming Applications, PerGames, vol. 5, 2005, 5 Pages. |
Nóbrega, et al., “Magnetic Augmented Reality: Virtual Objects in Your Space”, In Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, May 21, 2012, pp. 332-335. |
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041861”, dated Oct. 13, 2016, 7 Pages. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041861”, dated Oct. 30, 2015, 11 Pages. |
“Second Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041861”, dated Jun. 20, 2016, 6 Pages. |
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041862”, dated Oct. 13, 2016, 6 Pages. |
“International Search Report & Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041862”, dated Nov. 16, 2015, 11 Pages. |
“Second Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041862”, dated Jun. 13, 2016, 5 Pages. |
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041863”, dated Oct. 13, 2016, 8 Pages. |
“International Search Report & Written Opinion Received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041863”, dated Nov. 16, 2015, 12 Pages. |
“Second Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041863”, dated Jun. 15, 2016, 7 Pages. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041864”, dated Oct. 26, 2015, 11 Pages. |
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041865”, dated Oct. 19, 2016, 8 Pages. |
“Second Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041865”, dated Jun. 15, 2016, 8 Pages. |
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041866”, dated Oct. 27, 2016, 9 Pages. |
“International Search Report & Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041866”, dated Nov. 27, 2015, 12 Pages. |
“Second Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041866”, dated Jun. 27, 2016, 7 Pages. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041867”, dated Nov. 25, 2015, 11 Pages. |
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041868”, dated Oct. 13, 2016, 8 Pages. |
“Second Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041868”, dated Jul. 1, 2016, 6 Pages. |
“International Search Report and the Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041865”, dated Jan. 25, 2016, 12 Pages. |
“International Search Report and the Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041868”, dated Oct. 28, 2015, 10 Pages. |
Ponto, et al. “Perceptual Calibration for Immersive Display Environments”, In Proceedings of IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 19, Issue 4, Apr. 2013, pp. 691-700. |
Regenbrecht, et al., “Interaction in a Collaborative Augmented Reality Environment”, In Proceedings of Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Apr. 20, 2002, pp. 504-505. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/600,774”, dated Mar. 24, 2017, 29 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/612,850”, dated Oct. 12, 2017, 9 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/628,539”, dated Jan. 22, 2018, 29 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/628,539”, dated Apr. 7, 2017, 20 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/679,997”, dated Oct. 19, 2017, 17 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/628,539”, dated Nov. 17, 2016, 17 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/628,539”, dated Sep. 14, 2017, 24 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/688,817”, dated Dec. 22, 2016, 56 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/688,817”, dated Mar. 23, 2017, 57 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/688,817”, dated Aug. 4, 2016, 50 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/722,942”, dated Nov. 24, 2017, 14 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/723,065”, dated Dec. 21, 2017, 42 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/723,065”, datd Feb. 7, 2017, 37 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/723,065”, dated Sep. 26, 2016, 29 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/723,065”, dated Jul. 24, 2017, 38 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/628,539”, dated Jun. 27, 2018, 29 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/697,109”, dated May 17, 2018, 23 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/600,774”, dated May 17, 2018, 35 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/723,065”, dated May 2, 2018, 41 Pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180101994 A1 | Apr 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62029351 | Jul 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14688817 | Apr 2015 | US |
Child | 15841047 | US |