Tidal flow hydroelectric turbine

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8864439
  • Patent Number
    8,864,439
  • Date Filed
    Friday, July 13, 2007
    17 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 21, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
A hydroelectric turbine for the production of electricity from tidal flow forces, the turbine having a rotor with an open center such that the blades are mounted between an inner rim and outer rim, wherein retaining members and anti-friction members are provided to limit movement of the rotor relative to the housing in either axial direction, such that water flow in either direction operates the turbine, but wherein the retaining members and the anti-friction members allow the rotor to shift in either axial direction in response to water flow. The anti-friction members limiting rotor travel in the axial direction are preferably of increased thickness, such that as the anti-friction members wear down, the rotor is able to shift relative to the housing in the axial direction.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates generally to the field of turbines or power plants that produce electricity from fluid flow, either air or water, and more particularly relates to such devices wherein the fluid flow causes rotation of a propeller-type or impeller-type rotor, with the rotation being transferred to generators to produce the electricity. Even more particularly, the invention relates to such devices wherein the rotor is an open center rotor capable of rotation in either direction in response to the water flow direction encountered in rising and falling tides.


Production of electricity using hydroelectric or wind-powered turbines is well known. The fluid flow causes rotation of a propeller-type rotor or blades. For wind-powered turbines, the devices are located in areas with steady air currents, and the devices are typically rotated so as to be oriented in the optimum direction for capturing the wind energy. For hydroelectric turbines, the devices are usually placed in fast moving water currents, typically as part of a dam structure. Such water flow conditions are known as high head conditions.


While most turbines are constructed to have a central rotating shaft, that is held in place by oil lubricated bearings, onto which the blades or runners are mounted, it has been found that open-centered turbine constructions can have benefits not found with turbines having centralized shafts. Turbines having open-centered rotors, where the blades are mounted between inner and outer annular rings or rims and where the energy is transferred through the outer rim, can be successful in low head conditions, i.e., in slower currents. This is due to several reasons, including the fact that elimination of the central shaft and centralized blade portions reduces drag and the fact that larger diameter rotors can be produced since weight is reduced, thereby increasing the surface area contacting the low head flow. Another benefit to open-centered turbines in hydroelectric applications is that since water flow through the central portion of the turbine is not obstructed by blades, fish are able to pass through. Examples of such open center turbines can be seen in U.S. Pat. No. 5,592,816 issued Jan. 14, 1997, and reissued as RE38,336 on Dec. 2, 2003, U.S. Pat. No. 6,648,589 issued Nov. 18, 2003, U.S. Pat. No. 6,729,840 issued May 4, 2004, and U.S. Patent Appl. Publication US2005/0031442 published Feb. 10, 2005 (Ser. No. 10/633,865).


Because the fluid flow in these turbines is unidirectional, the force applied against the blades and rotors is also unidirectional. Thus, to date it has only been necessary to address frictional issues on the down-stream or down-wind side of the rotor where the outer rim is retained by the housing, since the flow will exert pressure in only one direction. In open-centered turbines it is the trailing edge of the outer rim that must be supported by the housing, while the leading edge of the outer rim is not subjected to down-stream or down-wind pressure.


Examples of turbines subject to bidirectional fluid flow can be seen in U.S. Pat. No. 4,421,990 to Heuss et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,168,373 to Vauthier, U.S. Pat. No. 6,406,251 to Vauthier, U.K. Patent No. 2,408,294 to Susman et al., and WIPO International Publication WO 03/025385 to Davis et al.


It is an object of this invention to provide a hydroelectric turbine or power plant that is operational in bi-directional water flow without requiring physical reversal of the turbine, where bi-directional flow comprises flow in one direction over a certain time period and reversed flow in the opposite direction over a subsequent time period. It is a further object to provide such a turbine capable of producing electricity in bidirectional tidal flow applications. It is a further object to provide such a turbine wherein the rotor is able to shift in the axial direction, and in particular as the water lubricated axial bearings wear, such that the operational cycle of the turbine between replacement of bearings is greatly extended. It is a further object to provide such a turbine wherein the axial shifting of the rotor within the housing allows debris trapped between the rotor and the housing to be swept away. It is a further object to provide such a turbine wherein the axial shifting of the rotor within the housing results in less force being required to initiate rotation.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention is a device for the creation of electricity from a turbine operated by tidal flow or other bi-directional reversing water flow, where bi-directional water flow encompasses flow in a first direction over a first time period, such as a rising tide, followed by flow in the opposite direction over a following time period, such as a falling tide, with this cycle continuing. Such water flow is typically a low head condition, in that the current or water movement is not fast flowing or concentrated.


The methodology comprises locating an open-centered hydroelectric turbine or power plant within the tidal flow, such that the bi-directional tidal flow operates the turbine and produces electricity with water flow in either direction without having to reverse the orientation of the turbine. The turbine comprises a rotor or rotating assembly defined by at least one set of rotating blades or similar propeller-type or impeller-type structures mounted within a stationary housing, the blades preferably being disposed between an interior annular rim and an exterior annular rim, such that a relatively large open center is defined that contains no structure. The water flow imparts rotation to the rotor and this energy is transferred to one or more generators to create electricity, or the rotor and housing itself is constructed to operate as a generator, wherein for example magnets are located along the perimeter of the outer rim and coils are located along the perimeter of the housing encircling the outer rim.


In order to account for water flow in opposing directions, it is necessary to provide bearing or anti-friction means to reduce contact and friction between the outer rim and the annular retaining flanges of the housing in both the inflow and outflow directions. In the preferred embodiment, journals and preferably water lubricated marine bearing plates are utilized to minimize rotational friction between the edges of the outer rim and the retaining flanges of the housing. In the most preferred embodiment, the bearing plates and/or the journals restricting movement in the axial directions are of increased thickness, such that the device remains operational over an extended period of time as these bearings/journals wear away, the rotor being able to shift in the axial direction in response to the direction of water flow.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a view of the hydroelectric turbine as seen from the axial perspective.



FIG. 2 is a view of the hydroelectric turbine as seen perpendicularly to the axial direction.



FIG. 3 is a partial cross-sectional view of a preferred embodiment, showing journals and marine bearing plates comprising the anti-friction means.



FIG. 4 is an alternative embodiment shown similarly to FIG. 3, wherein the anti-friction means comprises repelling magnets.



FIG. 5 is an alternative embodiment shown similarly to FIG. 3, where the anti-friction means comprises drive wheels transferring rotational energy to generators.



FIG. 6 is a partial cross-sectional view of the more preferred embodiment, wherein the bearings restricting movement in the axial directions are of increased thickness.



FIG. 7 is a partial cross-sectional view similar to FIG. 6, but showing the bearings in the worn condition and the rotor shifted in the direction of water flow.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

With reference to the drawings, the invention will now be described in detail with regard for the best mode and the preferred embodiment. In a most general sense, the invention is a device for producing electricity, referred to generally as a hydroelectric turbine or power plant, from low head bi-directional or reversing water flow, particularly and primarily bidirectional water flow resulting from tidal flow, i.e., the cycling movement of water between high tide and low tide conditions.


As shown generally in FIGS. 1 and 2, a preferred embodiment of the invention is an open-centered hydroelectric turbine 10 comprising a generally annular housing 21. The configuration of housing 21 shown is not meant to be limiting, as other configurations are possible provided the housing 21 accomplishes among other purposes retaining the rotating assembly or rotor 31 concentrically therein while permitting limited axial displacement of the rotor 31, in addition to allowing rotation of the rotor 31 about the rotational axis in both directions, and allowing transfer of the rotational energy to mechanically driven generator means 42 or actual participation in the production of electricity, such as by a combination of magnets 51 and coils 52. Housing 21 comprises a first retaining flange 22 and a second retaining flange 23 positioned on either side of an interior periphery surface 24 that together cooperate to define a limiting or retaining means which are dimensioned to permit limited axial movement of the rotor 31 in either axial direction, such flanges 22 and 23 preferably being annular in nature and each providing a generally planar interior surface facing the sides of the rotor 31. Alternatively, the retaining flanges 22 and 23 need not be continuous members.


The minimum distance between the flanges 22 and 23 is determined by the axial dimension of the outer rim 33, taking into account any anti-friction means such as journals 71a, 71b or bearings 72a, 72b disposed on the rotor 31 and housing 21, such that the rotor outer rim 33 can be received within the channel of the housing 21. In the embodiments shown in FIGS. 3 through 5, the interior distance between the retaining flanges 22 and 23, which defines the maximum travel distance of the rotor 31 in the axial direction, only slightly exceeds the dimension in the axial direction of the annular outer rim 33, such that axial shifting of the rotor 31 is allowed but remains relatively limited. In contrast, the distance between the flanges 22 and 23 in the axial direction of the embodiment shown in FIGS. 6 and 7 is significantly greater than the minimum distance required to receive the annular outer rim 33, such that greater movement of the rotor 31 in the axial direction is allowed.


The rotating assembly or rotor 31 comprises an inner annular rim member 32 and an outer annular rim member 33. Extending between inner rim 32 and outer rim 33 are a plurality of numbers or blade members 34, the blades 34 being angled or twisted in known manner such that movement of fluid in either of the axial tidal flow directions 99 results in rotation of the rotor 31. The particular number, configuration and material composition of the blades 34 may vary, but preferably the blades 34 are constructed to be as lightweight as possible without excessively sacrificing structural integrity.


The inner rim 32 defines a relatively large open center 35 that increases the effectiveness of the hydroelectric turbine 10 in low head conditions, since support for the rotor 31 is spread about the periphery of the outer rim 33 rather than being concentrated at a central shaft. This enables the housing 21 and rotor 31 to be constructed with a much larger diameter than possible with shaft mounted rotors, thereby allowing for a dramatic increase in the total surface area of the blade members 34, which enables the hydroelectric turbine 10 to function well in low head conditions.


In the preferred embodiment as shown in FIG. 3, the housing 21 and rotor 31 in combination define a generator for the production of electricity. This may be accomplished by locating a plurality of magnets 51 about the outer periphery of the outer rim 33 and locating a plurality of coils 52 about the inner periphery surface 24 of the housing 21, such that the housing 21 becomes in effect the stator of a generator. Rotation of the rotor 31 passes the magnets 51 across the coils 52 and electricity is produced in known manner.


It is also important to provide anti-friction means to minimize frictional drag between the rotor 31 and the housing 21 in addition to the lubrication provided by the water itself. In a preferred embodiment, this is accomplished utilizing a combination of journal members 71a, 71b and bearings 72a, 72b, such as water lubricated marine bearing plates, as shown in FIG. 3. By positioning the bearings on the external rim of the rotor, the bearing surface is increased, and thus the pressure per square inch on the bearings reduces to the point that a water lubricated bearing can be utilized.


The journals 71a, 71b are shown as being mounted at the inflow and outflow edges of the outer rim 33 and the marine bearing plates 72a, 72b as being mounted on the interior periphery of the housing 21 and retaining flanges 22 and 23, but the positions could be reversed. It should be appreciated that the terms “inflow” and “outflow” are, in the present application, relative terms, which are dependent on the direction of flow of water through the turbine 10, which is bi-directional in nature. The same relativity will obviously also apply to such terms as “upstream” and “downstream” or the like. Axial journals 71a correspond to axial or thrust bearings 72a and together control movement of the rotor 31 in the axial direction. Radial journals 71b and radial bearings 72b in combination control movement in the radial direction. The journals 71a, 71b are composed of a relatively low friction material, such as stainless steel or the like, and the marine bearing plates 72a, 72b are likewise composed of a relatively low friction material, such as a polymer, e.g., Teflon, ceramic or the like. These components, as well as all components in the device, must be resistant to salt water and other environmental damage, as the use of the invention will typically expose the components to such elements, in particular given that tidal flow typically comprises salt water or brackish water. The journals 71a, 71b and marine bearing plates 72a, 72b in combination reduce friction and drag in the radial direction and both axial directions, such that rotation of the rotor 31 relative to the housing 21 is minimally impeded.


By permitting axial displacement of the rotor 31 in response to tidal flow in either direction, the anti-friction means on the upstream side of the turbine 10 are not in contact in the axial direction, and so will not undergo wear during operation of the turbine for the period during which the tidal is flowing in that direction. Once the tide reverses, the rotor 31 will be displaced axially against what was previously the upstream side of the housing 21, such that the anti-friction means on the new upstream side of the turbine 10 will not be contacted, and therefore will not undergo wear. This arrangement ensures that only the anti-friction means on one side of the turbine 10 will undergo wear at any give time, thus reducing the overall wear on the anti-friction means.


In a more preferred embodiment, as shown in FIGS. 6 and 7, the axial bearings 82a that restrict movement of the rotor 31 in the axial directions are initially of increased thickness, such that the interior distance between first and second retaining flanges 22 and 23 is significantly greater than the minimal distance necessary to retain the rotor 31 in the axial direction. This creates a short, cylindrical trackway 80 extending in the axial direction, allowing the rotor 31 to move axially within this trackway 80 in the same manner as a piston moves within a cylinder. When tidal flow 99 occurs in a first direction, the rotor 31 shifts in the direction of water flow, such that the low friction axial or thrust bearings 82a on the downstream side in combination with the axial journals 81 a limit the shift of the rotor 31 in that direction. When tidal flow 99 reverses to the second direction, the rotor 31 shifts to the opposite side, such that the low friction bearings 82a on the opposing side, which is now the downstream side, limit the shift of the rotor 31 in the second direction. This shifting of the rotor 31 in relation to the housing 21 can more easily occur because the rotor 31 is of the open center type, such that all retention occurs on the outer rim 33 as opposed to the type of turbine wherein the rotor is mounted onto a central shaft or axle, although it will be appreciated that such axial shifting could be implemented on a shaft based turbine. Over time, the oversize bearings 82a wear down due to friction effects. FIG. 7 illustrates a turbine 10 that has been in use for an extended time period, in that the axial bearings 82a have worn down significantly. With tidal flow 99 occurring in the left-to-right direction of the drawing, the rotor 31 shifts to the right. When the tidal flow 99 reverses, as shown by the dashed line, the rotor 31 shifts to the left. Because the housing 21 and axial bearings 82a are sized to allow for shifting movement of the rotor 31 in the axial directions and because the axial bearings 82a are of increased thickness such that working life of the bearings 82a is extended, the time between required maintenance and servicing based on the need to replace the bearings 82a is greatly extended. Thus the bearings 82a are designed to operate effectively even after significant wear in the axial direction. In particular, it is preferred that the turbine 10 can operate even if the bearings 82a have worn down, in the axial direction, in the range of 100%-10%, more preferably 100%-30%, and most preferably 100%-50% of the original thickness thereof. To accommodate the reciprocating axial shift of the rotor 31, it is preferable to provide extended or oversized radial bearings 82b relative to axial journals 81b in the axial direction. The magnet 51 and coil 52 combination is also structured to accommodate the axial shift without significant loss in production. An added feature of the axial shift of the rotor 31 relative to the housing 21 is that debris captured between the rotor 31 and the housing 21 is more readily flushed from the apparatus by the tidal currents, since expansion of the gap between the upstream flange 22 or 23 and the edge of the annular outer rim 33 allows increased current flow within that gap. Another positive feature is that less energy is required to initiate rotation of the rotor 31 from the stationary position, since rotation will begin prior to contact between the downstream anti-friction means and the outer rim 33.


Alternatively, the anti-friction means may comprise sets of repulsing magnets 61 as shown in FIG. 4. The repulsing magnets 61 are mounted in pairs on the outer rim 33 and the interior periphery surface 24 of housing 21 and retaining flanges 22 and 23 with opposite poles facing each other within a given set, such that the repulsive magnetic force prevents contact between the outer rim 33 and the housing 21 and retaining flanges 22 and 23. In still another alternative embodiment, as shown in FIG. 5, mechanical means may be utilized as the anti-friction means— for example, rollers or other rotating bearings. In the embodiment shown, the anti-friction means comprise drive wheels 41 that are connected by shafts 43 to generator means 42, the rotation of the rotor 31 being directly transferred to the generator means 42 to produce electricity. This final embodiment is the least desirable, as it will be difficult to properly seal these components against fouling and degradation over time.


To produce electricity from tidal flow, one or more hydroelectric turbines 10 are positioned submerged or within the body of water subject to tidal influences, preferably in open water, such that water will flow in one direction through the rotor 31 during rising or incoming tides and further that water will flow through the rotor 31 in the opposite direction during falling or outgoing tides. As the tide rises, the rotor 31 is turned in a first direction and electricity is generated as described. As the tide falls, the flow of water reverses and the rotor 31 is turned in the opposite direction, again generating electricity. Because of the open-center construction, the relatively large blade surface area and the dispersal of the supporting forces for the rotor 31 relative to the housing 21 and retaining flanges 22 and 23, the rotor 31 can be rotated in low head conditions, such that tidal flow is sufficient to produce electricity.


It is to be understood that equivalents and substitutions for certain elements set forth above may be obvious to those skilled in the art, and therefore the true scope and definition of the invention is to be as set forth in the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A turbine for producing electricity from bi-directional water flow in a first water flow direction and an opposite second water flow direction without reversing the position of said turbine relative to the water flow direction, comprising: a rotor comprising blades extending from an outer rim, said rotor capable of rotating in a first rotation direction and a second rotation direction;a housing configured to retain said rotor in an axial direction and a radial direction, said housing allowing, in use, said rotor to shift in either axial direction responsive to the bi-directional water flow, said housing including a first retaining member to retain said rotor in a first axial direction and a second retaining member to retain said rotor in a second axial direction;said outer rim and said housing both including anti-friction members arranged to reduce frictional drag between said housing and said rotor in both the axial direction and the radial direction when in use;wherein said housing is shaped and dimensioned such that the outer rim axially contacts said first retaining member and does not axially contact said second retaining member when in use in the first water flow direction, and such that the outer rim axially contacts said second retaining member and does not axially contact said first retaining member when in use in the second water flow direction.
  • 2. The turbine of claim 1, wherein said first retaining member and said second retaining member comprise a first retaining flange and a second retaining flange.
  • 3. The turbine of claim 1, wherein said anti-friction members comprise journals positioned on said outer rim and marine bearing plates positioned on said first retaining member and said second retaining member.
  • 4. The turbine of claim 1, said housing further comprising an interior periphery surface between said first retaining member and said second retaining member, and wherein said anti-friction members on said housing are positioned on said first and second retaining members and said interior periphery surface.
  • 5. The turbine of claim 4, further comprising magnets disposed in said outer rim and coils disposed in said interior periphery surface.
  • 6. The turbine of claim 1, wherein said housing is shaped and dimensioned such as to permit, in use, said rotor to begin rotating from a stationary position prior to contact between a downstream side of said rim and said first retaining member or said second retaining member.
  • 7. The turbine of claim 1, wherein said anti-friction members, in use, reduces drag between said outer rim and said first retaining member and said second retaining member.
  • 8. The turbine of claim 1, wherein said anti-friction members comprise journals and marine bearing plates, wherein the amount of movement by said rotor in the axial direction increases as the thickness of said anti-friction members decreases from friction effects.
  • 9. The turbine of claim 8, wherein said journals are composed of stainless steel and said marine bearing plates are composed of a low-friction polymer.
  • 10. The turbine of claim 9, wherein said journals are positioned on said outer rim and said marine bearing plates are positioned on said first retaining member and on said second retaining member.
  • 11. The turbine of claim 9, said housing further comprising an interior periphery surface, wherein said marine bearing plates are also positioned on said interior periphery surface.
  • 12. The turbine of claim 1, said housing further comprising an interior periphery surface, and wherein magnets are disposed in said outer rim and coils are disposed in said interior periphery surface.
  • 13. The turbine of claim 1, wherein said rotor comprises an inner rim defining an open centre, said blades being captured between the inner and outer rim.
  • 14. The turbine of claim 1, wherein said anti-friction members comprise water lubricated marine bearing plates.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
0601471 Jul 2006 EP regional
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/EP2007/006235 7/13/2007 WO 00 6/25/2009
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2008/006602 1/17/2008 WO A
US Referenced Citations (127)
Number Name Date Kind
228467 Maclay Jun 1880 A
928536 Pino Jul 1909 A
1710103 Nelson Apr 1929 A
2054142 Sharp Sep 1936 A
2470797 Thomas May 1949 A
2501696 Souczek Mar 1950 A
2563279 Rushing Aug 1951 A
2658453 Walters Nov 1953 A
2782321 Fischer Feb 1957 A
2792505 Baudry May 1957 A
2874547 Fiore Feb 1959 A
3078680 Wapsala Feb 1963 A
3209156 Struble, Jr. Sep 1965 A
3292023 Korber Dec 1966 A
3342444 Nelson Sep 1967 A
3355998 Roemisch Dec 1967 A
3384787 Schwartz May 1968 A
3422275 Braikevitch et al. Jan 1969 A
3477236 Burrus Nov 1969 A
3487805 Satterthwaite et al. Jan 1970 A
3708251 Pierro Jan 1973 A
3986787 Mouton, Jr. et al. Oct 1976 A
3987638 Burkhardt et al. Oct 1976 A
4095918 Mouton et al. Jun 1978 A
4163904 Skendrovic Aug 1979 A
4219303 Mouton Aug 1980 A
4274009 Parker, Sr. Jun 1981 A
4367413 Nair Jan 1983 A
4421990 Heuss et al. Dec 1983 A
4427897 Migliori Jan 1984 A
4496845 Ensign et al. Jan 1985 A
4523878 Richart et al. Jun 1985 A
4541367 Lindberg Sep 1985 A
4613762 Soderholm Sep 1986 A
4720640 Anderson et al. Jan 1988 A
4740711 Sato et al. Apr 1988 A
4744697 Coppens May 1988 A
4744698 Dallimer et al. May 1988 A
4810135 Davenport et al. Mar 1989 A
4867605 Myers et al. Sep 1989 A
4868408 Hesh Sep 1989 A
4868970 Schultz et al. Sep 1989 A
4990810 Newhouse Feb 1991 A
5517383 Webb May 1996 A
5592816 Williams Jan 1997 A
5606791 Fougere et al. Mar 1997 A
5609441 Khachaturian Mar 1997 A
5656880 Clark Aug 1997 A
5662434 Khachaturian Sep 1997 A
5715590 Fougere et al. Feb 1998 A
5800093 Khachaturian Sep 1998 A
5998905 Fougere et al. Dec 1999 A
6039506 Khachaturian Mar 2000 A
6109863 Milliken Aug 2000 A
6166472 Pinkerton Dec 2000 A
6168373 Vauthier Jan 2001 B1
6232681 Johnston et al. May 2001 B1
6242840 Denk et al. Jun 2001 B1
6300689 Smalser Oct 2001 B1
6367399 Khachaturian Apr 2002 B1
6406251 Vauthier Jun 2002 B1
6409466 Lamont Jun 2002 B1
6445099 Roseman Sep 2002 B1
6476709 Wuidart et al. Nov 2002 B1
6612781 Jackson Sep 2003 B1
6648589 Williams Nov 2003 B2
RE38336 Williams Dec 2003 E
6729840 Williams May 2004 B2
6770987 Sogard et al. Aug 2004 B1
6777851 Maslov Aug 2004 B2
6806586 Wobben Oct 2004 B2
6840713 Schia et al. Jan 2005 B1
6843191 Makotinsky Jan 2005 B1
6857821 Steenhuis et al. Feb 2005 B2
6894416 Leijon et al. May 2005 B1
6957947 Williams Oct 2005 B2
6995479 Tharp Feb 2006 B2
6998730 Tharp Feb 2006 B2
7190087 Williams Mar 2007 B2
D543495 Williams May 2007 S
7275891 Owen et al. Oct 2007 B2
7352078 Gehring Apr 2008 B2
7378750 Williams May 2008 B2
7425772 Novo Vidal Sep 2008 B2
7471009 Davis et al. Dec 2008 B2
7527006 Khachaturian May 2009 B2
7611307 Owen et al. Nov 2009 B2
7845296 Khachaturian Dec 2010 B1
7874788 Stothers et al. Jan 2011 B2
20020034437 Williams Mar 2002 A1
20030044272 Addie et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030137149 Northrup et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030168864 Heronemus et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030193198 Wobben Oct 2003 A1
20030218338 O'Sullivan et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040021437 Maslov et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040201299 Naritomi et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040227500 O'Meara Nov 2004 A1
20040232792 Enfourth Nov 2004 A1
20040262926 Hansen Dec 2004 A1
20050005592 Fielder Jan 2005 A1
20050031442 Williams Feb 2005 A1
20050073151 Diamontopoulos Apr 2005 A1
20060261597 Gehring Nov 2006 A1
20070018459 Williams Jan 2007 A1
20070063448 Kowalczyk Mar 2007 A1
20070231072 Jennings et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070291426 Kasunich et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080012538 Stewart et al. Jan 2008 A1
20100025998 Williams Feb 2010 A1
20100026002 Spooner Feb 2010 A1
20100068037 Ives Mar 2010 A1
20100172698 Ives et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100201129 Holstein et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100232885 Ives et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100295388 Ives et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110018274 Ives et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110088253 Ives et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110110770 Spooner et al. May 2011 A1
20110291419 Dunne et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110293399 Dunne et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110298216 Ives et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110304148 Dunne et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120027522 Ives et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120175877 Ives et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120187680 Spooner et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120235412 Dunne et al. Sep 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (96)
Number Date Country
2388513 Aug 2000 CA
2352673 Jan 2003 CA
260699 Apr 1947 CH
146935 Aug 1983 CH
3116740 Nov 1982 DE
3638129 May 1988 DE
3718954 Dec 1988 DE
19948198 Apr 2001 DE
10101405 Jul 2002 DE
20308901 Sep 2003 DE
10244038 Apr 2004 DE
102007016380 Oct 2008 DE
1318299 Dec 2003 EP
1564455 Jan 2005 EP
1691377 Feb 2006 EP
1876350 Jan 2008 EP
1878912 Jan 2008 EP
1878913 Jan 2008 EP
1879280 Jan 2008 EP
1878911 Sep 2008 EP
1992741 Nov 2008 EP
1885047 Dec 2008 EP
1980670 Jul 2009 EP
2088311 Aug 2009 EP
2110910 Oct 2009 EP
2112370 Oct 2009 EP
1980746 Jun 2010 EP
2199199 Jun 2010 EP
2199598 Jun 2010 EP
2199599 Jun 2010 EP
2199601 Jun 2010 EP
2199602 Jun 2010 EP
2199603 Jun 2010 EP
2200170 Jun 2010 EP
2071709 Sep 2010 EP
2209175 Sep 2010 EP
2241749 Oct 2010 EP
2302204 Mar 2011 EP
2302755 Mar 2011 EP
2302766 Mar 2011 EP
2823177 Oct 2002 FR
2859495 Mar 2005 FR
204505 Oct 1923 GB
924347 Apr 1963 GB
980575 Jan 1965 GB
1131352 Oct 1968 GB
1413835 Nov 1975 GB
2316461 Feb 1998 GB
2344843 Jun 2000 GB
2408294 May 2005 GB
2431628 May 2007 GB
2434413 Jul 2007 GB
2447514 Sep 2008 GB
59203881 Nov 1984 JP
63055370 Mar 1988 JP
01043908 Feb 1989 JP
2000341818 Dec 2000 JP
2005069025 Mar 2005 JP
2005248822 Sep 2005 JP
2006094645 Apr 2006 JP
2007255614 Oct 2007 JP
2007291882 Nov 2007 JP
9844372 Oct 1998 WO
WO9844372 Oct 1998 WO
9852819 Nov 1998 WO
9966623 Dec 1999 WO
0077393 Dec 2000 WO
0134973 May 2001 WO
0134977 May 2001 WO
02099950 Dec 2002 WO
03014561 Feb 2003 WO
WO03025385 Mar 2003 WO
03046375 Jun 2003 WO
2004015264 Feb 2004 WO
2004027257 Apr 2004 WO
2004107549 Dec 2004 WO
WO2004113717 Dec 2004 WO
2005045243 May 2005 WO
2005061887 Jul 2005 WO
2005078233 Aug 2005 WO
2005080789 Sep 2005 WO
2005116443 Dec 2005 WO
WO2006029496 Mar 2006 WO
2007043894 Apr 2007 WO
WO2007055585 May 2007 WO
2007083105 Jul 2007 WO
WO2007086814 Aug 2007 WO
2007125349 Nov 2007 WO
2008004877 Jan 2008 WO
2008006614 Jan 2008 WO
2008050149 May 2008 WO
2008081187 Jul 2008 WO
2010118766 Oct 2010 WO
2011039249 Apr 2011 WO
2011039255 Apr 2011 WO
2011039267 Jul 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (11)
Entry
Kranert et al., Large diameter turbogenerator for generating electrical energy at high power, May 1988, Abstract of DE3638129.
PCT International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/EP2007/006235 dated Nov. 20, 2007.
PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority (Nov. 20, 2007).
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability including claims 1-13 as amended with demand for examination.
Request for Processing of International Application (Jul. 13, 2007).
U.S. Appl. No. 13/133,235, filed Jun. 7, 2011, including the specification, claims and drawings.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/133,805, filed Jun. 9, 2011, including the specification, claims and drawings.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/133,504, filed Jun. 8, 2011, including the specification, claims and drawings.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/133,507, filed Jun. 8, 2011, including the specification, claims and drawings.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/133,832, filed Jun. 9, 2011, including the specification, claims and drawings.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/264,667, filed Oct. 14, 2011, including specification, claims and drawings.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20090278357 A1 Nov 2009 US