1. Field of Invention
This invention relates to tiltable wheeled containers used for refuse and recycling storage, hitching and movement.
2. Description of Prior Art
Recycling bins have been used to store and move materials for over 40 years. The methods used are different for commercial and residential. Recycling was introduced long after refuse collection had be in place and has been treated as an independent operation. At first recyclable materials were piled separately, then bundled, then placed in a container, then more sophisticated containers were developed having multiple or divided containment areas. The problem with multiple bin units was that the contents had to be emptied into different larger containers making this a difficult task that required lifting all the contents and blocking the contents that were not to be dumped into the larger container . Residential recycle bin designs have been constrained by cost and lifting weight. The higher demand for separation of different recyclables has resulted in the need for two or more bins. Simple bins have been made stackable to reduce space and carts have been made to move the bins to the curb.
Recycle bins are presently a simple rectangular box with an edge for lifting and drain holes in the bottom since there is no cover from rain or snow. The size is determined by the lifting weight for the worst case scenario of wet newspaper. This bin requires bending to lift and must be held away from legs due to filth on the bin or rainwater that drips out of tilted cans and jars. This is very difficult especially for seniors or people with back problems. Recycle bins with wheels have not been commercially successful due to the maximum lifting weight does not allow the height of the container to reach an ergonomically suitable height to wheel the container. If the maximum size container was stretched to that height of about 34 inches free standing, then the base would be too small to be stable. The conventional 32 gallon wheeled refuse containers are already disliked by the collection workers for their instability and their narrow wheel base of the cylindrical shaped containers makes them difficult to roll. This has lead to square based containers to increase the wheel base and to prevent rolling in the wind when empty, even though the cylindrical shape provides greater structural integrity and simplicity of manufacture. The larger 60 gallon containers will not be emptied by the collection workers due to their excessive weight. Refuse and recycle containers that have dividers vertically such as in U.S. Pat. No. 4,834,253 to Crine are to difficult to dump because the entire weight must be lifted while only one portion is dumped and the remainder portions blocked.
The recycling cart of U.S. Pat. No. 5,192,092 to DIBENEDETTO (1991) is an expensive item by itself that would have to be unloaded and taken away from the curb or risk theft. The cart would then be brought back to the curb to pick up the empty bins. The cart still requires bins of which the owner may already have. The owner's bins may not fit the cart since recycle bins vary in dimension thus making universal cart manufacture difficult. The bins must also be secured and unsecured to the cart for rolling. The cart and bin of U.S. Pat. No. 4,821,903 to Hayes (1988) has the same problems of expense and theft but bins do not require securing. The bins are however custom made and are expensive to make and unsuitable for newspaper that would require “sliding in” instead of being “tossed on a pile”.
The stackable refuse system of U.S. Pat. No. 5,445,397 to EVANS (1994) offers a more economically viable solution for a multiple bin unit. It also has the advantage of nesting which allows for efficient distribution. It also has the advantage of forming a rigid entity from several bins by means of a flexible strap with a clasp, thus providing the required ergonomic height for tilt and rolling and reducing the effective lifting weight upon detachment. However the method of securing to form a rigid entity is not a system that secures individual bins to each other (adjoining bins) but rather a strap that compresses a number of bins and wheel assembly to form a single rigid entity that can be tilted. The wheels must be added by a separate wheel assembly because there is no individual means of securing wheels to of bottom bin or added by the alternate embodiment, of a cart, to overcome this problem. The wheels are not integral with the bottom bin resulting in additional user labor. The preferred embodiment has lids because if stacked without them it would result in the unit sloping over the wheels. The alternative embodiment uses an expensive metal tubing cart which would require the lids as well to avoid the sloping problem but then allows for the elimination of the flexible strap and having to bend over to pick it up. This design cannot be blow moulded. The wheel base of the preferred embodiment will not nest within itself thus adding to the distribution cost, and the metal frame cart is even more cumbersome to ship. The lids add expense and require the additional labor of securing or removal upon dumping and then reassembly.
Wheeled objects that are tilted for rolling have never been secured together from their free standing position to form a single entity wheeled cart whether hitched or castor wheeled. Two wheel tilt and roll containers or any similar tilt and roll device, such as a luggage container, has never been hitched at the top end nor has there been a way to tilt the devices after being hitched. Trains of containers have be made for commercial application using hitched or linked dollies. These systems have the following disadvantages: requires independent dolly, the dolly has 4 wheels for stability, some or all of the wheels must have the ability to swivel to allow the train to go around corners, the castor wheels are small to keep reduce cost as well as reduce over all height to minimize vertical instability. The small wheels and instability limited the terrain to smooth indoor surfaces due to the inability for small wheels and swivel castors to roll over large bumps. The operator must be in a bent over position including the work and hardware to connect the containers to dollies. This work must the be undone and redone if there are any steps or stairs because the container dolly units cannot move independently in the vertical direction and the upper lateral movement is aggravated due to the height of the container since they are free to move independently at the top. Unless all 4 of the castors on the dollies are swivel type, the direction of train movement cannot be reversed and containers must be locked to the dollies thus limiting versatility.
In accordance with the present invention a tiltable modular recycle container system comprising a new use for handles to form a rigid entity from independent adjoining containers, and a means to bring combinations of refuse and recycle containers to the curb in a single trip by hitching them at the top for transport in a tited position.
Objects and Advantages
Accordingly, besides the objects and advantages of the tiltable modular recycle container system described in my above patent, several objects and advantages of the present invention are:
FIG. 1—Preferred Embodiment
A preferred embodiment of the present invention of the tiltable modular recycle container system is illustrated hitched to an existing 32 gallon Rubbermaid refuse container with a single recycle bin secured on top of it. This system allows for a single trip to the curb regardless of how many recycle bins or refuse containers are required without any carrying. The wheeled recycle bin 1 is preferably blow moulded or may be injection moulded, from the appropriate plastic for the type of manufacturing process used. The wheels 8 are located on the pulling side providing stability in the vertical rest position and a means for rolling near the center of gravity while tilted or moving. Refuse container lid 9 rests on the refuse container recycle bin 3. The flanged openings 7 has the flange protruding outward and allows items to be placed in without having to lift the upper and or middle recycle bin 2B or 2A. For indoor storage the recycle bins would have no opening in order to control odors. The handles 4 are used to secure the wheeled recycle bin 1 to the middle recycle bin 2A, middle recycle bin 2A to the upper recycle bin 2B, upper recycle bin 2B to the upper recycle bin lid 5, and the refuse container 10 to the refuse container recycle bin 3. The handle 4 of the refuse container recycle bin 3 is in the unsecured position and is hitched to the handle of the upper recycle bin 2B by the hitch 6.
From the description above, a number of advantages of my tilted modular recycle container system become evident:
The manner of operation of a handle 4 for securing containers on top of each other, specifically attached container on top of wheeled container, attached container on top of refuse container, and attached container on top of attached container, is similar to the present use for securing lids 9 to the Rubbermaid 32 gallon refuse container 10 and is described in detail in the Ferbrache U.S. Pat. No. 4,691,840 patent. In the secured position, the handle 4 is rotated about stud projection 18 in an upward and inward direction towards the center vertical axis of the wheeled recycle bin 1 until the tooth projection 16 is touching the indent 11. In the unsecured position the handle 4 is rotated about stud projection 18 in an outward and downward direction towards the center vertical axis of the wheeled recycle bin 1 until the handle rests on the container wall, or hangs freely.
The placement of the middle recycle bin 2A on the wheeled recycle bin 1 is different from refuse container lid 9 placement in that it may also be forced down while handles 4 are in the secured position. The sides of middle recycle bin 2A must also be aligned with the sides of the wheeled recycle bin 1 and the grips 21 of handles must be parallel to the axis of the wheels 8 when hitching. The middle recycle bin 2A is lowered so that it's lower portion nests inside the alignment edge 15 of the wheeled recycle bin 1 and the rest face 13 rests on the support face 14. The handles 4 that were initially in the secured position will have been displaced outwardly and then sprung back to the secured position by the elastic force of the stressed receptacle base recesses 19 on the lobe projections 17. Handles 4 that were initially in the unsecured position may now be moved to the secured position prior to tilting to form the rigid entity.
The placement of the upper recycle bin 2B on middle recycle bin 2A is similar to placement of the middle recycle bin 2A on wheeled recycle bin 1.
The placement of the upper recycle bin lid 5 on the upper recycle bin 2B is different from cylindrical refuse container lid 9 placement in that it the sides of the upper recycle bin lid 5 must also be aligned with the sides of the upper recycle bin 2B. The upper recycle bin lid 5 is lowered so that it's lower portion nests inside the alignment edge 15 of the upper recycle bin 2B and the lid rest face 13A rests on the support face 14. Handles 4 that were initially in the unsecured position may now be moved to the secured position.
The placement of the refuse container recycle bin 3 on the refuse container 10 is the same as refuse container lid 9 placement. Handles 4 that were initially in the unsecured position may now be moved to the secured position prior to tilting.
The hitching, also referred to as connecting, of refuse containers 10 and tiltable modular recycle containers, and multiple combinations there of, requires the same operation. The containers are easier to hitch when in the free standing vertical rest position but may also be hitched while one or both are tilted and when handles 4 are secured or not secured. The hitch 6 is placed preferably on the lower radius of the grip 21 so that the axial center of one of the clasps 37 is aligned with the axial center of the grip 21 and the outer clasp projection 38 and the inner clasp projection 35 rest on radius of the grip 21. The other clasp 37 is preferably located furthest from tooth projections 16. The clasp 37 and grip 21 are squeezed together, between fingers and palm, causing the flexible groove body 39 to straighten, increasing the distance between the inner clasp projection 35 and the outer clasp projection 38, until they pass the maximum outer diameter of the grip 21 after which clasp groove 39 will seat itself along the grip 21 as flexible groove body 39 returns to it natural unstressed shape. The clasp 37 is now free to rotate about the grip 21. The other unsecured clasp is similarly secured on the grip 21 of the container to be hitched. The unhitching of containers requires a force applied, preferably with the thumb, to release grip 32 in a direction tangential to the circumference of the grip 21 while supporting the handle 4 with fingers of hand or other hand. The tilting of independent containers is preferably achieved by placing one's foot in front of the base of the wheeled side of the container and pulling the container lid toward one's body with one hand holding the grip 21 of the handle 4 with the other hand. Hitched containers are tilted the same manner but preferably the rear container 10R is first tilted by placing one's foot in front of the wheeled side of it and pushing with foot while unsecuring handle 4 of the center container 10C adjacent to the wheels 8, and rolling the rear container 10R away from the center container 10C until the unsecured handle 4 is at handle tilted rest point 64. The center container 10C is tilted second, after tilting rear container 10R, in the same manner, and then the lead container 10L is tilted.
Conclusions, Ramifications and Scope
Accordingly, the reader will see that the tiltable modular recycle bin system of this invention fulfills a long felt need for a low cost container system to bring refuse and a number of recyclables to the curb in a single trip without carrying. The invention of forming a single rigid entity from adjoining independent units allows tilted transport while overcoming the lifting constraints and eliminating the cart. This coincides with new use for the Ferbrache style of handles as a means for securing containers to form a single rigid entity, single recycle bins on the top of refuse containers, and hitching tiltable containers at the top. This would also include such things as tiltable luggage or suit cases that are wheeled and general purpose utility carts for indoor and outdoor use.
Thus the scope of the invention should be determined by the appended claims and their legal equivalents, rather than by the examples given.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
581322 | Winters | Apr 1897 | A |
3269580 | Tolbert, Jr. | Aug 1966 | A |
4691840 | Ferbrache | Sep 1987 | A |
5445397 | Evans | Aug 1995 | A |
5558254 | Anderson et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
6176559 | Tiramani et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6347847 | Tiramani et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020014488 A1 | Feb 2002 | US |