Technical Field
The present disclosure relates to a touchscreen sensor applicable to an input display device that is capable of inputting information by a touch with a finger, a stylus pen and the like.
Background Art
In the related art, laminated film having a transparent conductor layer at both sides of a transparent base material is known (Japanese Laid-Open Patent Publication No. 2012-066477). Such a laminated film enables accurate patterning of each of the transparent conductor layers and thus has a high relative positional accuracy of transparent electrode patterns.
However, with a configuration as described above in which transparent electrode patterns are formed at both sides of the transparent base material, when a touchscreen sensor is fabricated by directly laminating an adhesive layer on each of the transparent electrode patterns, there is a problem that interference fringes may be produced when light from outside is incident thereon.
The present disclosure is directed to providing a touchscreen sensor that can suppress occurrence of the interference fringes.
According to an aspect of the present disclosure, a touchscreen sensor includes a transparent base material, a first transparent electrode pattern, a first index-matching layer and a first adhesive layer disposed in this order at one side of the transparent base material, and a second transparent electrode pattern, a second index-matching layer and a second adhesive layer disposed in this order at another side of the transparent base material, the first index-matching layer having a refractive index greater than a refractive index of the first adhesive layer, the second index-matching layer having a refractive index greater than a refractive index of the second adhesive layer, each of the first index-matching layer and the second index-matching layer having a thickness of 85 nm to 120 nm.
Preferably, a difference between the refractive index of the first index-matching layer and the refractive index of the first adhesive layer is 0.1 to 0.4, and a difference between the refractive index of the second index-matching layer and the refractive index of the second adhesive layer is 0.1 to 0.4.
Preferably, the refractive index of the first index-matching layer and the refractive index of the second index-matching layer are each 1.5 to 1.8.
Preferably, the thickness of the first index-matching layer and the thickness of the second index-matching layer are each 90 nm to 110 nm.
Preferably, the refractive index of the first index-matching layer is greater than the refractive index of the first adhesive layer and smaller than the refractive index of the first transparent electrode pattern, and the refractive index of the second index-matching layer is greater than the refractive index of the second adhesive layer and smaller than the refractive index of the second transparent electrode pattern.
According to the present disclosure, the first index-matching layer has a refractive index greater than a refractive index of the first adhesive layer, the second index-matching layer has a refractive index greater than a refractive index of the second adhesive layer, and each of the first index-matching layer and the second index-matching layer has a thickness of 85 nm to 120 nm. Accordingly, a touchscreen sensor that can suppress occurrence of interference fringes can be provided.
Further features of the present disclosure will become apparent from the following detailed description of exemplary embodiments with reference to the accompanying drawings.
As shown in
The index-matching layer 4 has a refractive index (relative refractive index) greater than a refractive index of the adhesive layer 5, and the index-matching layer 7 has a refractive index greater than a refractive index of the adhesive layer 8. Further, each of the index-matching layer 7 and the index-matching layer 8 has a thickness of 85 nm to 120 nm.
In the touchscreen sensor 1 configured as described above, the index-matching layer 4 having a specific property is disposed between the transparent electrode pattern 3 and the adhesive layer 5, and the index-matching layer 7 having a specific property is disposed between transparent electrode pattern 6 and the adhesive layer 8. By disposing in such a manner, a refractive index difference at an interface of laminated layers can be decreased. Thus, reflection of light from outside is weakened, and occurrence of interference fringes can be suppressed effectively.
A touchscreen sensor of the related art is fabricated by directly laminating an adhesive layer on each transparent electrode pattern. In such a touchscreen sensor, interference fringes occur due an interference phenomenon between reflected light that is reflected on a top surface of the transparent electrode pattern laminated at a front side (viewing side) of the transparent base material (an interface between the adhesive layer and the transparent electrode pattern) and reflected light that is reflected on a top surface of the transparent electrode pattern laminated at a reverse side (a side opposite to the viewing side) of the transparent base material (an interface between the transparent base material and the transparent electrode pattern). Accordingly, in the present disclosure, reflected light produced on the front side of the transparent base material is particularly taken into account, and the index-matching layer 4 is disposed between the transparent electrode pattern 3 and the adhesive layer 5. Thereby, the reflected light reflecting on the top surface of the transparent electrode pattern 3 can be weakened. Further, it is preferable to fabricate the touchscreen sensor in such a manner that a cross sectional structure thereof is front-and-back symmetrical, since there may be a case where the touchscreen sensor is arranged with front and back being reversed in the manufacturing process of a touch screen. Accordingly, the index-matching layer 7 is disposed between the transparent electrode pattern 6 and the adhesive layer 8. With this configuration, interference between the reflected light that is reflected on the top surface of the transparent electrode pattern 3 and the reflected light that is reflected on the top surface of the transparent electrode pattern 6 can be suppressed by weakening the reflected light reflecting on the top surface of the transparent electrode pattern 3.
Note that, unless otherwise specified, refractive indices in the present disclosure are values with respect to air measured at 25° C. using sodium D lines (wavelength 589.3 nm).
The touchscreen sensor 1 of the present disclosure includes the transparent electrode pattern 3 formed on the transparent base material 2, but it is not limited thereto. An easy adhesive layer (anchor coat layer) for increasing an adhesive strength, another index-matching layer, or a hard coat layer for increasing a surface hardness of the transparent base material may be provided between the transparent base material and the transparent electrode pattern.
Details of each component of the touchscreen sensor 1 will now be described below.
(1) Transparent Base Material
The transparent base material in the present disclosure supports each of the first and second transparent electrode patterns. The transparent base material has a thickness of, for example, 20 μm to 200 μm.
The transparent base material is preferably a polyethylene terephthalate film, a polycarbonate film or a polycycloolefin film, but it is not particularly limited thereto. Particularly, a polycycloolefin film is preferable from a point of view of improving sensitivity of the touchscreen sensor. Since a polycycloolefin film has permittivity lower than those of other materials, electrostatic capacity between the first transparent electrode pattern and the second transparent electrode pattern can be decreased. In a case where the touchscreen sensor of the present disclosure is used in a capacitive sensing type touchscreen, a change in electrostatic capacity that is produced as a finger comes close to the transparent electrode pattern becomes relatively large when an electrostatic capacity between the transparent electrode patterns is reduced, and thus touch sensitivity improves.
(2) Transparent Electrode Pattern
The first and second transparent electrode patterns in the present disclosure serve as a sensor for detecting a touch position. In general, the first and second transparent electrode patterns are electrically connected to a wiring (not shown) formed at an end portion of the transparent member, and the wiring is connected to a controller IC (not shown).
The first and second transparent electrode patterns are formed in a lattice form in a plan view with one of them being an electrode for X-coordinates and the other being an electrode for Y-coordinates (
The first and second transparent electrode patterns are typically made of a transparent conductor. The transparent conductor is a material that has a high transmittance in a visible light range (preferably greater than or equal to 80%), and a surface resistance value per unit area (Ω/□: ohms per square) of less than or equal to 500 Ω/□.
Normally, each of the first and second transparent electrode patterns has a refractive index of 1.9 to 2.5, which is the highest among refractive indices of members constituting the touchscreen sensor. A material forming the transparent conductor is, for example, an indium tin oxide (refractive index 2.0) or an indium zinc oxide (refractive index 2.3).
Each of the first and the second transparent electrode patterns has a height of preferably 10 nm to 100 nm, a width of preferably 0.1 mm to 5 mm, and a pitch of preferably 0.5 mm to 10 mm.
A method of forming the first and second transparent electrode patterns may be a method including forming a transparent conductor layer over an entire surface of the transparent base material by sputtering or vacuum evaporation, and thereafter patterning the transparent conductor layer by an etching treatment.
(3) Index-Matching Layer
The index-matching layers in the present disclosure are transparent layers each having a refractive index that is adjusted to a particular value to suppress reflection on the transparent electrode patterns. The first index-matching layer is formed on one side of the transparent base material to cover the first transparent electrode pattern, and the second index-matching layer is formed on another side of the transparent base material to cover the second transparent electrode pattern.
The first and second index-matching layers are each formed of a material which is preferably a light cured inorganic-organic composite material composed of an organic component, which may be a photosensitive resin or a photosensitive monomer, scattered with inorganic particles, but it is not particularly limited thereto. The inorganic particles may be, for example, silica, alumina, zirconia, and titanium oxide. The inorganic-organic composite material can be used in wet coating, and, as compared to dry coating such as sputtering, the wet coating does not require considerable equipment investment such as vacuum devices and suitable for a larger area, and thus has an improved productivity. The inorganic-organic composite material may be a material of, for example, an OPSTAR Z series (manufactured by JSR Corporation).
The first index-matching layer has a refractive index greater than the refractive index of the first adhesive layer and preferably smaller than the refractive index of the first transparent electrode pattern. The second index-matching layer has a refractive index greater than the refractive index of the second adhesive layer, and preferably smaller than the refractive index of the second transparent electrode pattern.
A difference in refractive index Δn1 (relative difference in refractive index) between the first index-matching layer and the first adhesive layer is preferably 0.1 to 0.4, and a difference in refractive index Δn2 between the second index-matching layer and the second adhesive layer is preferably 0.1 to 0.4. In a case where the difference in refractive index Δn1 and the difference in refractive index Δn2 are smaller than 0.1, an effect of suppressing the occurrence of the interference fringes is small. In a case where the difference in refractive index Δn1 and the difference in refractive index Δn2 are greater than 0.4, new reflection is produced at an interface between the index-matching layer and the adhesive layer, and interference fringes due to this could occur.
From the view point of further suppressing occurrence of the interference fringes, the refractive index of each of the first and second index-matching layers is preferably 1.5 to 1.8, and more preferably, 1.5 to 1.7. When using an inorganic-organic composite material as the index-matching layer, the refractive index of the index-matching layer can be increased or decreased as appropriate by changing the type and the content of the inorganic particles.
Each of the first and second index-matching layers has a thickness of 85 nm to 120 nm, and preferably 90 nm to 110 nm from the view point of further suppressing occurrence of the interference fringes. Note that the material, the refractive index and the thickness of the first and second index-matching layers may be the same or may be different from each other.
(4) Adhesive Layer
The first and second adhesive layers in the present disclosure are laminated on the surfaces of the first and second index-matching layers, respectively. Each of the first and the second adhesive layers has a thickness of preferably 10 μm to 100 μm. From the viewpoint of uniformity and transparency, the material forming the first and second adhesive layers is preferably an acrylic adhesive. Each of the first and second adhesive layers has a refractive index of preferably 1.4 to 1.6.
As mentioned above, according to the present embodiment, since the refractive index of the first index-matching layer is greater than the refractive index of the first adhesive layer, and the refractive index of the second index-matching layer is greater than the refractive index of the second adhesive layer, and further, since each of the first index-matching layer and the second index-matching layer has a thickness of 85 nm to 120 nm, reflection of light from outside becomes weaker, and occurrence of the interference fringes can be suppressed.
In the above description, a touchscreen sensor of the present embodiment has been described, but the present disclosure is not limited to the embodiment described above, and various alterations and modifications can be made based on a technical concept of the present disclosure.
Examples of the present disclosure will be described below.
A hardcoat layer containing spherical particles of 3 μm in diameter and an index-matching layer having a refractive index of 1.65 and a thickness of 100 nm were formed sequentially on both sides of a transparent base material made of a polycycloolefin film (manufactured by Nippon Zeon Corporation, product name ZEONOR) having a thickness of 100 μm.
Then, the transparent base material was placed in a sputtering device in which a sintered target containing indium oxide of 97% by weight and tin oxide of 3% by weight was installed, and an indium tin oxide layer having a thickness of 27 nm was formed at one side of the transparent base material by sputtering. Thereafter, a process similar to the above was performed at the other side of the transparent base material, and an indium tin oxide layer having a thickness of 27 nm was formed. Then, the transparent base material provided with the indium tin oxide layer at both sides was heat-treated at 150° C. for 90 minutes, and each of the indium tin oxide layer was converted from amorphous to crystalline.
Thereafter, the indium tin oxide layer formed at one side of the transparent base material was protected by laminating a protective layer of a polyester film (manufactured by Sun A. Kaken Co., Ltd.) thereon. On the indium tin oxide layer formed at the other side, a photoresist was applied in a striped shape and thereafter immersed in hydrochloric acid to form a transparent electrode pattern. Subsequently, a similar process was performed on the indium tin oxide layer formed at the other side of the transparent base material, and the transparent electrode patterns were formed at both sides of the transparent base material.
Then, at one side of the transparent base material, an inorganic-organic composite material (manufactured by JSR Corporation, product name OPSTAR KZ6661) in which inorganic particles are scattered in an organic component of a photosensitive monomer was applied so as to cover the transparent electrode pattern and light cured to form the first index-matching layer having a refractive index of 1.65 and a thickness of 100 nm. A similar process was performed on the other side of the transparent base material to form the second index-matching layer.
Then, on a surface of each of the first and second index-matching layers, an acrylic adhesive layer (manufactured by Nitto Denko Corporation, product name LUCIACS) having a refractive index of 1.5 was laminated to fabricate a touchscreen sensor.
A touchscreen sensor was fabricated with a method similar to the method of Example 1, except that a thickness of each of the first and second index-matching layers was 85 nm.
A touchscreen sensor was fabricated with a method similar to the method of Example 1, except that a thickness of each of the first and second index-matching layers was 120 nm.
A touchscreen sensor was fabricated with a method similar to the method of Example 1, except that a thickness of each of the first and second index-matching layers was 60 nm.
A touchscreen sensor was fabricated with a method similar to the method of Example 1, except that a thickness of each of the first and second index-matching layers was 140 nm.
Then, each of the touchscreen sensors of Examples 1 to 3 and Comparative Examples 1 and 2 fabricated as described above was placed on a smooth evaluation table and a glass plate (manufactured by Corning Incorporated, product name GORILLA) was disposed at a viewing side and a black tape for antireflection was attached at the back side to provide a mock touchscreen. The touch screen was illuminated with a three-wavelength fluorescent lamp from the viewing side and a degree of occurrence of the interference fringes was evaluated by visual observation. The results are shown in Table 1. In Table 1, “◯” denotes a case in which almost no interference fringes were viewed and “X” denotes a case in which interference fringes were viewed clearly.
As shown in Example 1 of Table 1, when the refractive index of the first and second index-matching layers is 1.65, the refractive index of the first and second adhesive layers is 1.5, and the thickness of each of the first and second index-matching layers is 100 nm, almost no interference fringes were viewed in a touch screen. Also, in Example 2, when the refractive index of the first and second index-matching layers is 1.65, the refractive index of the first and second adhesive layers is 1.5, and the thickness of each of the first and second index-matching layers is 85 nm, almost no interference fringes were viewed in a touch screen. In Example 3, when the refractive index of the first and second index-matching layers is 1.65, the refractive index of the first and second adhesive layers is 1.5, and the thickness of each of the first and second index-matching layers is 120 nm, almost no interference fringes were viewed in a touch screen.
On the other hand, as shown in Comparative Example 1, when the refractive index of the first and second index-matching layers is 1.65, the refractive index of the first and second adhesive layers is 1.5, and the thickness of each of the first and second index-matching layers is 60 nm, interference fringes were clearly viewed in a touch screen. Also, as shown in Comparative Example 2, when the refractive index of the first and second index-matching layers is 1.65, the refractive index of the first and second adhesive layers is 1.5, and the thickness of each of the first and second index-matching layers is 140 nm, interference fringes were clearly viewed in a touch screen.
Therefore, it was found that occurrence of interference fringes can be sufficiently suppressed when the refractive index of the index-matching layer is higher than the refractive index of the adhesive layer and the thickness of the index-matching layer is 85 nm to 120 nm.
The use of the touchscreen sensor of the present disclosure is not particularly limited, and it is preferably a capacitive sensing touch screen that is used in portable terminals such as smartphones or tablet terminals (Slate PCs).
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2013-111286 | May 2013 | JP | national |
This is a continuation application of International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2014/060368 filed Apr. 10, 2014, which claims the benefit of Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-111286, filed May 27, 2013, the full contents of all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
9207482 | Nashiki | Dec 2015 | B2 |
20050083307 | Aufderheide | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20080138589 | Wakabayashi | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080152879 | Nashiki | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20100225612 | Ishizaki | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110147340 | Nashiki | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120114919 | Nakajima et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120241199 | Kobayashi et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130048214 | Kalkowski et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130113757 | Tanaka et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130194220 | Lee | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130258570 | Nashiki et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140028570 | Guard | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140049827 | Fujii | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140050905 | Hao | Feb 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202351830 | Jul 2012 | CN |
102652340 | Aug 2012 | CN |
2009-73090 | Apr 2009 | JP |
2011-194679 | Oct 2011 | JP |
2011-253546 | Dec 2011 | JP |
2012-66477 | Apr 2012 | JP |
2012-203701 | Oct 2012 | JP |
2013-8099 | Jan 2013 | JP |
10-2011-0061685 | Jun 2011 | KR |
10-2012-0012329 | Feb 2012 | KR |
10-2012-0047828 | May 2012 | KR |
10-2012-0109267 | Oct 2012 | KR |
200741753 | Nov 2007 | TW |
201220327 | May 2012 | TW |
201238763 | Oct 2012 | TW |
201314246 | Apr 2013 | TW |
2012073990 | Jun 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Approval Decision Letter from the Intellectual Property Office dated Nov. 27, 2015, issued in counterpart Taiwanese Application No. 103118310, with English translation. (5 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Form PCT/IB/373) issued in counterpart International Application No. PCT/JP2014/060368 dated Apr. 10, 2014, with Form PCT/ISA/237. (4 pages). |
Written Opinion dated Oct. 6, 2014, issued in counterpart International Application No. PCT/JP2014/060368, with English translation. (4 pages). |
Korean Office Action dated Nov. 26, 2015 issued in counterpart Korean Patent Application No. 10-2014-7022547, with English translation. (7 pages). |
International Search Report dated Jun. 10, 2014, issued in corresponding application No. PCT/JP2014/060368. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jun. 10, 2014, issued in corresponding application No. PCT/JP2014/060368. |
Office Action dated Jul. 14, 2015 issued in counterpart Taiwanese Application No. 103118310, with English translation (13 pages). |
Office Action dated Jun. 3, 2016, issued in counterpart Chinese Patent Application No. 201480001155.5, with English translation. (14 pages). |
Decision for Grant of Patent dated Sep. 21, 2016, issued in counterpart Korean Patent Application No. 10-2014-7022547, with English translation. (3 pages). |
Decision to Grant a Patent dated Aug. 29, 2016, issued in counterpart Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-111286, with English translation. (6 pages). |
Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2016, issued in counterpart Korean Patent Application No. 10-2014-7022547, with English translation. (8 pages). |
Office Action dated Mar. 2, 2017, issued in counterpart Korean Application No. 10-2016-7035516, with English translation. (5 pages). |
Request for Consultation dated Mar. 2, 2017, issued in counterpart Korean Application No. 10-2016-7035516, with English translation. (3 pages). |
Office Action dated Mar. 21, 2017, issued in counterpart Chinese Application No. 201480001155.5, with English translation. (13 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150022222 A1 | Jan 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/JP2014/060368 | Apr 2014 | US |
Child | 14508366 | US |