The following relates to a tower.
Wind turbine towers, especially tubular steel or concrete towers for large wind turbines, are large in diameter and weight. This may cause difficulties concerning the transportation of a tower to the wind farm and the used infrastructure. Usually, the steel or concrete towers for wind turbines are produced as sections in shops and the sections are then transported to the place of installation. The towers are typically constructed of a number of sections which have a cylindrical or conical shape. In the wind industry, the requirements for larger turbines have resulted in corresponding requirements for larger wind turbine towers. Larger wind turbine towers have typically lead to larger tower section diameters and longer and heavier tower sections. The dimensions of tall towers for large wind turbine have reached limits defined by the infrastructure of various countries. The limiting aspects are typically physical limits such as free height under bridges and tunnels, allowable weights or the turning radii of roundabouts.
The increasing number of turbines in large wind projects has also caused difficulties since the equipment which is needed to transport the largest tower sections by road or by rail is highly specialised and is not found in the quantities necessary for the present number of transportations. Consequently, when a large number of projects require a substantial amount of transportation time by road, the availability of special equipment may become difficult in the project phase.
The problem has been addressed by dimensioning, by the use of hybrid towers or by the use of modular towers. Dimensioning accepts the height and width restrictions of transportation routes and uses the restrictions as a design basis. This means in practice that the external tower diameter is fixed at a certain maximum value, typically 4.2 meters. When the diameter is fixed, then the wall thickness is dimensioned to provide the necessary stiffness and strength. For large turbines and tall towers this will typically lead to significantly higher weight. This causes higher costs compared with when no diameter restrictions are applied.
In a hybrid solution, the problem is circumvented by extending the concrete foundations significantly above ground level, for example, as a cylindrical structure of, for instance, 10 meters height. This increases the effective hub height of a wind turbine where the tower design is not significantly influenced by a diameter restriction. However, above a certain practical height an extended foundation is expensive. Compared with a diameter restricted tower, a hybrid solution tower reaches an additional height of perhaps 15 meters.
A wide range of modular precasted concrete towers are well known in literature and in practice. Using a longitudinal split, such solutions overcome the dimensional restrictions on transportation. However, difficulties occur in the assembly and the complexity of the modular elements.
WO 03/069099 A1 discloses a wind turbine comprising a stationary vertical tower on which the moving part of the wind turbine is arranged, which mast is at least partly composed from prefabricated wall parts with several adjacent wall parts forming a substantially annular mast part. WO 01/07731 discloses a tower manufactured by a slip form technique. This slip form technique uses vertical moving slip forms which are casting the whole circumference of tower in one process. However, it is difficult to vary the diameter of the tower.
An aspect relates to a low-cost wind turbine tower with a variable dimensions.
Embodiments of the technique is a spiral moving continuous pouring process, where a slip form is moved substantially horizontally along the circumference of the structure to be built, while constantly building new concrete on top of already casted and hardened concrete. Embodiments of the invention can be advantageous in that the assembly is relatively simple with low moulding-tool and production costs. Embodiments of the invention can be further advantageous in that the circular reinforcement can be applied as the spiral is made.
Some of the embodiments will be described in detail, with reference to the following figures, wherein like designations denote like members, wherein:
The ducts 26 are vertical holes 26 which are introduced circumferentially into the tower 1 and can be used for pre-tensioning wires. The holes 26 can be produced by fixing cylindrical, preferably slightly rejuvenating pins 27 vertically into the holes 26 of hardened concrete 10, by disposing the fluid concrete 10 on the top of the end face 11 of the tower 1 and by removing the pin 27 after hardening of the disposed concrete 10.
The device to manufacture the tower 1 comprises some carrying structure 5 which supports the slip form 2 itself. The carrying structure 5 is at least partly able to perform a spiral formed guidance of the slip form 2 as indicated by arrows in
Wet, i.e. liquid and non-hardened concrete 10 is pumped by a concrete pump 20 through a concrete guide 9 and poured into the slip form 2 which distributes the concrete 10 to the top of the tower. The slip forming is a spiral/helical moving continuous pouring process, where the slip form 2 is moved substantially horizontally along the circumference of the structure, e.g the tower 1 to be built, while constantly building new concrete 10 on top of already casted and hardened concrete of the tower 1.
The concrete tower 1 is made by an apparatus comprising a slipform 2, which is circumferentially guided in such a way that the slipform slides helically on top of the end face 11 of the tower 1. Concrete is disposed through the concrete guide 9 and by the slipform 2 to the end face 11 of the tower 1. The slipform 2 is carried by the support device 5, 7, which is circumferentially guided by a geometric shape 11, 21, 22 of the tower 1 in such a way that the slipform 2 slides helically on top of the end face 11 of the tower 1. The support device 5, 7 is guided on wheels 8 on the end face 11 of the tower 1 in vertical direction. The inner vertical walls of the slipform 2 are guided by the inner surface 21 and outer surface 22 of the tower 1 in radial direction. The diameter of the support device 5, 7 can be varied to create a tower 1 with varying diameters. The geometric shape 11, 21, 22 of hardened concrete 10 provided in one of the previous circumferential rotations of the slipform 2 on top of the tower 1.
Optionally, the thickness, i.e. the inner width W, the angle α in relation to the axis A of the tower 1 and/or the height h of the slip-form 2 can be varied, so that the tower 1 can be designed free, e.g. to create a different width or diameter DT of the tower 1 or a tapered tower 1 with a diameter decreasing with increasing height of the tower 1.
In
As can be seen in
The slip form 2 has a degree of freedom so that the assembly is possible to move in the horizontal direction in order to vary the diameter of the casted tower 1—as indicated by arrows 7 in
For one embodiment of the invention shown in
This distal part 40 may comprise a linear (spiral) increase in height along its top-circumference with an abrupt discontinuity 44 at some “full circle” point. This abrupt discontinuity 44 may be the starting location for the invented moulding assembly to be applied. From this point, the moulding assembly/slipform 2 will take over and mould the rest of the tower 1 in a spiral slip form moulding manner.
The sliding of the slipform 2 starts on top 11 of a precasted tower element 40 at the step, i.e. the discontinuity 44 of the precasted tower element 40 in circumferential direction. This distal part 40 may be casted in one piece on site, multiple pieces on site or may be precasted elements casted from an external element production site.
In the
In another embodiment, the mould assembly with a slipform 2, a concrete guide 9 and a carrying structure/support device 50, 46, 47, 48 is schematically illustrated in
This application claims priority to PCT Application No. PCT/EP2013/052858, having a filing date of Feb. 13, 2013, based off of U.S. Application No. 61/601,270 having a filing date of Feb. 21, 2012 and U.S. Application No. 61/600,165 having a filing date of Feb. 17, 2012, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2013/052858 | 2/13/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/120889 | 8/22/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1075454 | Whipple | Oct 1913 | A |
1225356 | Polk | May 1917 | A |
1891160 | Jespersen | Dec 1932 | A |
2314468 | Urschel | Mar 1943 | A |
2339892 | Urschel | Jan 1944 | A |
2339893 | Urschel | Jan 1944 | A |
2837910 | Steed | Jun 1958 | A |
3443276 | Smith et al. | May 1969 | A |
3497579 | Barron | Feb 1970 | A |
3510098 | Fox | May 1970 | A |
3659982 | Svensson et al. | May 1972 | A |
4081227 | Bohmer et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4193750 | Nielson | Mar 1980 | A |
20030033772 | Russell | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20050129504 | DeRoest | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20100281819 | Thompson | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110223272 | Stiesdal | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110315691 | Skovholt | Dec 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1933856 | Jan 1970 | DE |
2149157 | Apr 1972 | DE |
2735674 | May 2014 | EP |
2011220042 | Nov 2011 | JP |
0107731 | Feb 2001 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion; PCT/EP2013/052858; International Filing Date: Feb. 13, 2013; Siemens Aktiengesellschaft; 8 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140348662 A1 | Nov 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61601270 | Feb 2012 | US | |
61600165 | Feb 2012 | US |