The present disclosure relates to vehicle technology, and more particularly, to a method and an apparatus for trailer angle measurement, as well as a vehicle.
Currently, with the development of the logistics transportation industry, vehicles with tractors and trailers (hereinafter referred to as semi-trailers), such as container trucks, are becoming increasingly popular. As a heavy transportation tool, a semi-trailer is more capable of improving overall economic benefits of road transportation than an ordinary truck. With the development of autonomous driving technology, a trailer angle (e.g., in
The existing method for trailer angle measurement can only measure small trailer angles. When the trailer angle is relatively large (e.g., larger than ±40°), it is difficult to obtain the trailer angle accurately. Thus, how to implement fast and accurate measurement of a trailer angle with a simple structure has become a problem to be solved.
The embodiments of the present disclosure provide a method and an apparatus for trailer angle measurement, as well as a vehicle, capable of achieving fast and accurate measurement of a trailer angle with a simple structure.
In order to achieve the above object, the following technical solutions are provided.
In an aspect, a method for trailer angle measurement is provided according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. The method is applied in a semi-trailer including a tractor and a trailer. At least one multi-line LiDAR is provided on each of two sides of the tractor. The method includes: obtaining, in a predetermined vehicle coordinate system, an initial trailer model corresponding to an initial trailer angle value, to obtain initial point cloud data in the initial trailer model; controlling the multi-line LiDAR provided on each of the two sides of the tractor to emit laser light, such that a surface of the trailer reflects the laser light emitted by the multi-line LiDAR; controlling each of the multi-line LiDARs to receive a corresponding laser point cloud reflected by the surface of the trailer; and calculating a trailer angle based on the corresponding laser point clouds received by the respective multi-line LiDARs and the initial point cloud data using a point cloud matching algorithm.
In another aspect, an apparatus for trailer angle measurement is provided according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. The apparatus is applied in a semi-trailer including a tractor and a trailer. At least one multi-line LiDAR is provided on each of two sides of the tractor. The apparatus is communicatively connected to the multi-line LiDARs. The apparatus includes a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored on the memory and executable by the processor. The processor is configured to, when executing the computer program, perform a process of trailer angle measurement. The process includes: obtaining, in a predetermined vehicle coordinate system, an initial trailer model corresponding to an initial trailer angle value, to obtain initial point cloud data in the initial trailer model; controlling the multi-line LiDAR provided on each of the two sides of the tractor to emit laser light, such that a surface of the trailer reflects the laser light emitted by the multi-line LiDAR; controlling each of the multi-line LiDARs to receive a corresponding laser point cloud reflected by the surface of the trailer; and calculating a trailer angle based on the corresponding laser point clouds received by the respective multi-line LiDARs and the initial point cloud data using a point cloud matching algorithm.
In yet another aspect, a computer-readable storage medium is provided according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. The computer-readable storage medium has a computer program stored thereon. The program, when executed by a processor, implements a process of trailer angle measurement. The process is applied in a semi-trailer including a tractor and a trailer. At least one multi-line LiDAR is provided on each of two sides of the tractor. The process includes: obtaining, in a predetermined vehicle coordinate system, an initial trailer model corresponding to an initial trailer angle value, to obtain initial point cloud data in the initial trailer model; controlling the multi-line LiDAR provided on each of the two sides of the tractor to emit laser light, such that a surface of the trailer reflects the laser light emitted by the multi-line LiDAR; controlling each of the multi-line LiDARs to receive a corresponding laser point cloud reflected by the surface of the trailer; and calculating a trailer angle based on the corresponding laser point clouds received by the respective multi-line LiDARs and the initial point cloud data using a point cloud matching algorithm.
In still another aspect, a vehicle is provided according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. The vehicle includes an apparatus for trailer angle measurement, a tractor, and a trailer. At least one multi-line LiDAR is provided on each of two sides of the tractor. The apparatus for trailer angle measurement is communicatively connected to the multi-line LiDARs. The apparatus for trailer angle measurement includes a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored on the memory and executable by the processor. The processor is configured to, when executing the computer program, perform a process of trailer angle measurement. The process includes: obtaining, in a predetermined vehicle coordinate system, an initial trailer model corresponding to an initial trailer angle value, to obtain initial point cloud data in the initial trailer model; controlling the multi-line LiDAR provided on each of the two sides of the tractor to emit laser light, such that a surface of the trailer reflects the laser light emitted by the multi-line LiDAR; controlling each of the multi-line LiDARs to receive a corresponding laser point cloud reflected by the surface of the trailer; and calculating a trailer angle based on the corresponding laser point clouds received by the respective multi-line LiDARs and the initial point cloud data using a point cloud matching algorithm.
With the method and apparatus for trailer angle measurement and the vehicle according to the embodiments of the present disclosure, at least one multi-line LiDAR is provided on each of two sides of the tractor. The multi-line LiDARs provided on two sides can radiate laser light to the surface of the trailer. Accordingly, a trailer angle can be calculated based on corresponding laser point clouds received by the respective multi-line LiDARs and the initial point cloud data using a point cloud matching algorithm. In addition, in the present disclosure, the trailer angle is calculated based on the corresponding laser point clouds received by the respective multi-line LiDARs and the initial point cloud data corresponding to the initial trailer angle value, instead of a laser point cloud of a single LiDAR, such that the accuracy of the result is greatly improved.
The other features and advantages of the present disclosure will be explained in the following description, and will become apparent partly from the description or be understood by implementing the present disclosure. The objects and other advantages of the present disclosure can be achieved and obtained from the structures specifically illustrated in the written description, claims and figures.
In the following, the solutions according to the present disclosure will be described in detail with reference to the figures and embodiments.
In order to describe the technical solutions according to the embodiments of the present disclosure or the prior art more clearly, figures used in description of the embodiments or the prior art will be introduced briefly below. Obviously, the figures described below only illustrate some embodiments of the present disclosure, and other figures can be obtained by those of ordinary skill in the art based on these drawings without any inventive efforts.
In the following, the solutions according to the embodiments of the present disclosure will be described clearly and completely with reference to the figures. Obviously, the embodiments described below are only some, rather than all, of the embodiments of the present disclosure. All other embodiments that can be obtained by those skilled in the art based on the embodiments described in the present disclosure without any inventive efforts are to be encompassed by the scope of the present disclosure.
In order to allow those skilled in the art to better understand the present disclosure, some of the technical terms used in the embodiments of the present disclosure will be explained as follows:
Point cloud: a set of point data on an outer surface of an object as obtained by a measuring apparatus during reverse engineering.
ICP: Iterative Closest Point algorithm is mainly used for precise merging of depth images in computer vision by iteratively minimizing corresponding points of source data and target data. There are already many variants, mainly focusing on how to efficiently and robustly obtain a better merging effect.
SVD: Singular Value Decomposition algorithm is a reliable method for solving translation vectors and rotation matrices.
As shown in
The method for trailer angle measurement includes the following steps.
At step 301, in a predetermined vehicle coordinate system, an initial trailer model corresponding to an initial trailer angle value is obtained, to obtain initial point cloud data in the initial trailer model.
At step 302, the multi-line LiDAR provided on each of the two sides of the tractor is controlled to emit laser light, such that a surface of the trailer reflects the laser light emitted by the multi-line LiDAR.
At step 303, each of the multi-line LiDARs is controlled to receive a corresponding laser point cloud reflected by the surface of the trailer.
At step 304, a trailer angle is calculated based on the corresponding laser point clouds received by the respective multi-line LiDARs and the initial point cloud data using a point cloud matching algorithm.
Here, as shown in
However, as shown in
Here, in order to illustrate that at least one multi-line LiDAR 203 is provided on each of two sides of the tractor 201, as shown in
In order to enable those skilled in the art to better understand the present disclosure, a more detailed embodiment will be given below. As shown in
At step 401, in the predetermined vehicle coordinate system, a preconfigured external multi-line LiDAR is controlled to emit light to two sides of the trailer when the trailer angle is 0°, such that surfaces on the two sides of the trailer reflect the laser light emitted by the external multi-line LiDAR, respectively.
At step 402, the external multi-line LiDAR is controlled to receive laser point clouds reflected by the surfaces on the two sides of the trailer.
At step 403, the initial trailer model when the trailer angle is 0° is obtained based on the laser point clouds reflected by the surfaces on the two sides of the trailer using an ICP algorithm, to obtain the initial point cloud data in the initial trailer model.
In general, the above steps 401 to 403 can be implemented as follows. As shown in
At step 404, the multi-line LiDAR provided on each of the two sides of the tractor is controlled to emit laser light, such that the surface of the trailer reflects the laser light emitted by the multi-line LiDAR.
It is to be noted here that the multi-line LiDARs and the external multi-line LiDAR used in the embodiment of the present disclosure may be e.g., 16-line, 32-line, or 64-line LiDARs, and the present disclosure is not limited to any of these examples.
At step 405, each of the multi-line LiDARs is controlled to receive a corresponding laser point cloud reflected by the surface of the trailer.
Typically, the sampling frequency of each multi-line LiDAR can be 10 Hz, but the present disclosure is not limited to this. In addition, each multi-line LiDAR can emit laser light with its own identification, so as to ensure that when the multi-line LiDAR receives the laser point cloud reflected by the surface of the trailer, it can only receive its corresponding laser point cloud, without receiving the laser point clouds corresponding to other multi-line LiDARs. In addition, in order to sort initial trailer angles corresponding to the respective multi-line LiDARs based on collecting time in a current period at step 408 later, the collecting time of the respective multi-line LiDARs is preferably different, so as to avoid two or more initial trailer angles being collected at the same time and difficult to be distinguished from one another. In addition, due to the structural characteristics of the semi-trailer 20, when there is a certain trailer angle, generally only the multi-line LiDAR(s) on one side can receive the laser point cloud reflected by the surface of the trailer.
At step 406, the corresponding laser point cloud received by each of the multi-line LiDARs is preprocessed to obtain an initial trailer angle corresponding to the multi-line LiDAR based on the initial point cloud data and the preprocessed laser point cloud using an ICP algorithm.
Here, the step 406 can be implemented using an ICP algorithm.
At Step 1, the corresponding laser point cloud received by each of the multi-line LiDARs can be Area of Interest (AOI) filtered to obtain a laser point cloud within a predetermined area range.
Here, the predetermined area range can be determined as follows. Based on a trailer angle in a previous period and a trailer size known in advance, an area range having a predetermined distance from a peripheral of the trailer in the previous period can be determined as the predetermined area range.
For example, the following scheme can be used.
As shown in
At Step 2, the laser point cloud within the predetermined area range can be noise filtered to obtain a noise filtered laser point cloud corresponding to each of the multi-line LiDARs to form a current trailer model corresponding to the multi-line LiDAR.
Here, the noise filtering can be used to filter out outliers, so as to obtain a more accurate laser point cloud. Here, a set of points in the current trailer model is denoted as {Pn}, where n is a positive integer. For example, {P1} represents a set of points in the first trailer model.
At Step 3, for each point in the current trailer model, a point with a closest straight-line distance to the point in an initial point cloud data set can be determined as a target point.
At Step 4, each point is moved to its corresponding target point using an SVD algorithm to obtain a next trailer model, and a model matrix at a current iteration can be generated.
Here, the model matrix at the current iteration includes a rotation matrix at the current iteration and a translation matrix at the current iteration. The rotation matrix at the current iteration includes trigonometric function relationships for current deflection angles of three coordinate axes in the vehicle coordinate system.
The method returns to Step 3 after Step 4, until a distance between each point in the current trailer model and the target point becomes smaller than a predetermined distance threshold, and proceeds with Step 5.
In an embodiment of the present disclosure, after the multi-line LiDARs are installed, a LiDAR coordinate system is established. The position information of the laser point clouds of the multi-line LiDARs is based on the LiDAR coordinate system. For example, the LiDAR coordinate system as shown in
In this way, after each iteration, the obtained model matrix An can be denoted as
where Rn is the rotation matrix at the n-th iteration, which is a matrix with 3 rows and 3 columns; Tn is the translation matrix at the current iteration, which is a 3 rows and 1 column. The rotation matrix Rn at the n-th iteration is typically composed of 3 rotations, i.e., Rn=Rxn·Ryn·Rzn, where Rxn is the rotation matrix for the x-axis in the vehicle coordinate system at the n-th iteration, Ryn is the rotation matrix for the y-axis in the vehicle coordinate system at the n-th iteration, and Rzn is the rotation matrix for the z-axis in the vehicle coordinate system at the n-th iteration. For example, in one embodiment:
where θxn is the deflection angle of the x-axis in the vehicle coordinate system at the n-th iteration, θyn is the deflection angle of the y-axis in the vehicle coordinate system at the n-th iteration, and θzn is the deflection angle of the z-axis in the vehicle coordinate system at the n-th iteration.
The translation matrix at the current iteration can be denoted as
where an, bn, and cn are translation amounts at the n-th iteration.
At Step 5, the model matrices at respective iterations can be multiplied to obtain a result matrix.
Here, for example, if in total n iterations are performed, the model matrices at the respective iterations can be multiplied to obtain the result matrix as A=An·A(n−1)· . . . ·A2·A1. The result matrix includes a result rotation matrix and a result translation matrix. The result rotation matrix includes trigonometric function relationships for deflection angles of the three coordinate axes in the vehicle coordinate system. For example, the result rotation matrix R in the result matrix A can be represented as
where m00 to m22 indicate trigonometric function relationships for deflection angles at respective positions in the result rotation matrix R. Since the trigonometric function relationships here are complicated, details thereof will be omitted here.
At Step 6, the initial trailer angle corresponding to each of the multi-line LiDARs can be determined based on the result rotation matrix.
For example, when the result rotation matrix R is represented as
the following applies:
θx=a tan 2(m12,m22)
cos θy=√{square root over (m∞2+m012)}
θy=a tan 2(−m02,cos θy)
θz=a tan 2(sin θx·m20−cos θx·m10,cos θx·m11−sin θx·m21)
where θx, θy, and θz are the deflection angles in the current period around the x-axis, y-axis, and z-axis, respectively. θz is equivalent to the initial trailer angle.
At step 407, the initial trailer angles corresponding to the respective multi-line LiDARs are screened in accordance with a predetermined determination condition.
Here, the step 407 can be implemented in any of the following two schemes. Of course, it can alternatively be implemented in a combination of the two schemes:
Scheme 1
It can be determined whether a number of points in the noise filtered laser point cloud corresponding to each of the multi-line LiDARs is smaller than a predetermined number threshold.
The initial trailer angle corresponding to any multi-line LiDAR having the number of points in the noise filtered laser point cloud corresponding to the multi-line LiDAR smaller than the predetermined number threshold can be discarded, and the initial trailer angle corresponding to each multi-line LiDAR having the number of points in the noise filtered laser point cloud corresponding to the multi-line LiDAR greater than or equal to the predetermined number threshold can be retained.
Here, if the number of points in the noise filtered laser point cloud corresponding to any multi-line LiDAR is smaller than the predetermined number threshold, it means that the current trailer model corresponding to the multi-line LiDAR is fitted using a relatively small number of laser point clouds. If the current trailer model is fitted using only few laser point clouds, the obtained initial trailer angle may be highly inaccurate and should be discarded.
Scheme 2
When the current period is not the first period, it can be determined whether an angle deviation value between the initial trailer angle corresponding to each of the multi-line LiDARs in the current period and a Kalman filtered trailer angle obtained in a previous period is greater than a predetermined angle deviation threshold.
The initial trailer angle corresponding to any multi-line LiDAR in the current period can be discarded when the angle deviation value between the initial trailer angle corresponding to the multi-line LiDAR in the current period and the Kalman filtered trailer angle obtained in the previous period is greater than the predetermined angle deviation threshold.
The initial trailer angle corresponding to each multi-line LiDAR in the current period can be retained when the angle deviation value between the initial trailer angle corresponding to the multi-line LiDAR in the current period and the Kalman filtered trailer angle obtained in the previous period is smaller than or equal to the predetermined angle deviation threshold.
Here, since the time difference between two consecutive periods is small (typically only 0.1 seconds), the trailer angle will not change significantly. Therefore, if the angle deviation value between the initial trailer angle corresponding to the multi-line LiDAR in the current period and the Kalman filtered trailer angle obtained in the previous period is greater than the predetermined angle deviation threshold, it can be determined that the initial trailer angle corresponding to the multi-line LiDAR in the current period is invalid and should be discarded.
At step 408, the screened initial trailer angles corresponding to the respective multi-line LiDARs are sorted based on collecting time in a current period to form angle data to be processed.
For example, when two multi-line LiDARs are provided on each of the left and right sides of the front face of the tractor (e.g., assuming that only initial trailer angles corresponding to the two multi-line LiDARs on the left side are measured), the measurement period of the multi-line LiDARs is 0.1 s, and a difference between measuring time of the two multi-line LiDARs is 0.05 s, as shown in
At step 409, the angle data to be processed is Kalman filtered to obtain a trailer angle of the current period.
The reason behind the Kalman filtering here is that the surface of the trailer is not flat, and the multi-line LiDARs themselves also have observation errors, resulting in some error in the calculated initial trailer angles. This phenomenon is manifested as jumps of ±1° to 2° in the angles when the vehicle is stationary. In order to solve this problem, Kalman filtering can be used to reduce the noise in the initial trailer angles sorted based on the collecting time in the angle data to be processed, and fuse the initial trailer angles and a simple kinematics model of angle changes to obtain a smooth output result. In this way, it can not only ensure that the errors in the measured data of the trailer angles measured in the stationary state are within ±0.5°, but also ensure that the measured data can change accordingly in real time when the trailer angle changes rapidly, so as to avoid obvious delays.
After the above step 409, the method can return to the step 404 for the next cycle of trailer angle measurement.
It can be seen that the above steps 401 to 409 provide a method for fast and accurate measurement of a trailer angle with a simple structure.
In addition, an embodiment of the present disclosure also provides an apparatus for trailer angle measurement. The apparatus includes a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored on the memory and executable by the processor. The processor is configured to, when executing the computer program, implement the above method corresponding to
In addition, an embodiment of the present disclosure also provides a computer-readable storage medium. The computer-readable storage medium has a computer program stored thereon. The program, when executed by a processor, implements the above method corresponding to
In addition, as shown in
With the method and apparatus for trailer angle measurement and the vehicle according to the embodiments of the present disclosure, at least one multi-line LiDAR is provided on each of the two sides of the tractor. The multi-line LiDARs provided on two sides can radiate laser light to the surface of the trailer. Accordingly, a trailer angle can be calculated based on corresponding laser point clouds received by the respective multi-line LiDARs and the initial point cloud data using a point cloud matching algorithm. In addition, in the present disclosure, the trailer angle is calculated based on the corresponding laser point clouds received by the respective multi-line LiDARs and the initial point cloud data corresponding to the initial trailer angle value, instead of a laser point cloud of a single LiDAR, such that the accuracy of the result is greatly improved.
The basic principles of the present disclosure have been described above with reference to the embodiments. However, it can be appreciated by those skilled in the art that all or any of the steps or components of the method or device according to the present disclosure can be implemented in hardware, firmware, software or any combination thereof in any computing device (including a processor, a storage medium, etc.) or a network of computing devices. This can be achieved by those skilled in the art using their basic programming skills based on the description of the present disclosure.
It can be appreciated by those skilled in the art that all or part of the steps in the method according to the above embodiment can be implemented in hardware following instructions of a program. The program can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. The program, when executed, may include one or any combination of the steps in the method according to the above embodiment.
Further, the functional units in the embodiments of the present disclosure can be integrated into one processing module or can be physically separate, or two or more units can be integrated into one module. The integrated module can be implemented in any hardware or software functional unit. When implemented in software functional units and sold or used as a standalone product, the integrated module can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium.
It can be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the embodiments of the present disclosure can be implemented as a method, a system or a computer program product. The present disclosure may include pure hardware embodiments, pure software embodiments and any combination thereof. Also, the present disclosure may include a computer program product implemented on one or more computer-readable storage mediums (including, but not limited to, magnetic disk storage and optical storage) containing computer-readable program codes.
The present disclosure has been described with reference to the flowcharts and/or block diagrams of the method, device (system) and computer program product according to the embodiments of the present disclosure. It can be appreciated that each process and/or block in the flowcharts and/or block diagrams or any combination thereof, can be implemented by computer program instructions. Such computer program instructions can be provided to a general computer, a dedicated computer, an embedded processor or a processor of any other programmable data processing device to constitute a machine, such that the instructions executed by a processor of a computer or any other programmable data processing device can constitute means for implementing the functions specified by one or more processes in the flowcharts and/or one or more blocks in the block diagrams.
These computer program instructions can also be stored in a computer-readable memory that can direct a computer or any other programmable data processing device to operate in a particular way. Thus, the instructions stored in the computer-readable memory constitute a manufactured product including instruction means for implementing the functions specified by one or more processes in the flowcharts and/or one or more blocks in the block diagrams.
These computer program instructions can also be loaded onto a computer or any other programmable data processing device, such that the computer or the programmable data processing device can perform a series of operations/steps to achieve a computer-implemented process. In this way, the instructions executed on the computer or the programmable data processing device can provide steps for implementing the functions specified by one or more processes in the flowcharts and/or one or more blocks in the block diagrams.
While the embodiments of the present disclosure have been described above, further alternatives and modifications can be made to these embodiments by those skilled in the art in light of the basic inventive concept of the present disclosure. The claims as attached are intended to cover the above embodiments and all these alternatives and modifications that fall within the scope of the present disclosure.
Obviously, various modifications and variants can be made to the present disclosure by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. Therefore, these modifications and variants are to be encompassed by the present disclosure if they fall within the scope of the present disclosure as defined by the claims and their equivalents.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
201811505593.1 | Dec 2018 | CN | national |
The present disclosure is a continuation of and claims priority to International Application No. PCT/CN2019/077075 entitled “TRAILER ANGLE MEASUREMENT METHOD AND DEVICE, AND VEHICLE”, filed Mar. 6, 2019 and which claims priority to Chinese Patent Application No. 201811505593.1, titled “TRAILER ANGLE MEASUREMENT METHOD AND DEVICE, AND VEHICLE”, filed on Dec. 10, 2018, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6084870 | Wooten et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6263088 | Crabtree | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6594821 | Banning et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6777904 | Degner | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6975923 | Spriggs | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7103460 | Breed | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7689559 | Canright | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7742841 | Sakai et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7783403 | Breed | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7844595 | Canright | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8041111 | Wilensky | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8064643 | Stein | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8082101 | Stein | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8164628 | Stein | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8175376 | Marchesotti | May 2012 | B2 |
8271871 | Marchesotti | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8346480 | Trepagnier et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8378851 | Stein | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8392117 | Dolgov | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8401292 | Park | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8412449 | Trepagnier | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8478072 | Aisaka | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8532870 | Hoetzer et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8553088 | Stein | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8706394 | Trepagnier et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8718861 | Montemerlo et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8788134 | Litkouhi | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8908041 | Stein | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8917169 | Schofield | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8963913 | Baek | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8965621 | Urmson | Feb 2015 | B1 |
8981966 | Stein | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8983708 | Choe et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8993951 | Schofield | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9002632 | Emigh | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9008369 | Schofield | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9025880 | Perazzi | May 2015 | B2 |
9042648 | Wang | May 2015 | B2 |
9081385 | Ferguson et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9088744 | Grauer et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9111444 | Kaganovich | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9117133 | Barnes | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9118816 | Stein | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9120485 | Dolgov | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9122954 | Srebnik | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9134402 | Sebastian | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9145116 | Clarke | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9147255 | Zhang | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9156473 | Clarke | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9176006 | Stein | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9179072 | Stein | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9183447 | Gdalyahu | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9185360 | Stein | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9191634 | Schofield | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9214084 | Grauer et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9219873 | Grauer et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9233659 | Rosenbaum | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9233688 | Clarke | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9248832 | Huberman | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9248835 | Tanzmeister | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9251708 | Rosenbaum | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9277132 | Berberian | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9280711 | Stein | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9282144 | Tebay et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9286522 | Stein | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9297641 | Stein | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9299004 | Lin | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9315192 | Zhu | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9317033 | Ibanez-guzman et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9317776 | Honda | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9330334 | Lin | May 2016 | B2 |
9342074 | Dolgov | May 2016 | B2 |
9347779 | Lynch | May 2016 | B1 |
9355635 | Gao | May 2016 | B2 |
9365214 | Ben Shalom | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9399397 | Mizutani | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9418549 | Kang et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9428192 | Schofield | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9436880 | Bos | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9438878 | Niebla | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9443163 | Springer | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9446765 | Ben Shalom | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9459515 | Stein | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9466006 | Duan | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9476970 | Fairfield | Oct 2016 | B1 |
9483839 | Kwon | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9490064 | Hirosawa | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9494935 | Okumura et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9507346 | Levinson et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9513634 | Pack et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9531966 | Stein | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9535423 | Debreczeni | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9538113 | Grauer et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9547985 | Tuukkanen | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9549158 | Grauer et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9555803 | Pawlicki | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9568915 | Berntorp | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9587952 | Slusar | Mar 2017 | B1 |
9599712 | Van Der Tempel et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9600889 | Boisson et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9602807 | Crane et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9612123 | Levinson et al. | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9620010 | Grauer et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9625569 | Lange | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9628565 | Stenneth et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9649999 | Amireddy et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
9652860 | Maali | May 2017 | B1 |
9669827 | Ferguson et al. | Jun 2017 | B1 |
9672446 | Vallesi-Gonzalez | Jun 2017 | B1 |
9690290 | Prokhorov | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9701023 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9712754 | Grauer et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9720418 | Stenneth | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9723097 | Harris | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9723099 | Chen | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9723233 | Grauer et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9726754 | Massanell et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9729860 | Cohen et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9738280 | Rayes | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9739609 | Lewis | Aug 2017 | B1 |
9746550 | Nath | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9753128 | Schweizer et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9753141 | Grauer et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9754490 | Kentley et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9760837 | Nowozin et al. | Sep 2017 | B1 |
9766625 | Boroditsky et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9769456 | You et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9773155 | Shotton et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9779276 | Todeschini et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9785149 | Wang et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9805294 | Liu et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9810785 | Grauer et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9823339 | Cohen | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9953236 | Huang | Apr 2018 | B1 |
10147193 | Huang | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10223806 | Yi et al. | Mar 2019 | B1 |
10223807 | Yi et al. | Mar 2019 | B1 |
10410055 | Wang et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
11073601 | Nian | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11333766 | Kozak | May 2022 | B2 |
20030114980 | Klausner et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030174773 | Comaniciu | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040264763 | Mas et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20070067077 | Liu et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070183661 | El-Maleh | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070183662 | Wang | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070230792 | Shashua | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070286526 | Abousleman | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080249667 | Horvitz | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090040054 | Wang | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090087029 | Coleman | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100049397 | Lin | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100111417 | Ward | May 2010 | A1 |
20100226564 | Marchesotti | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100281361 | Marchesotti | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110142283 | Huang | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110206282 | Aisaka | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110247031 | Jacoby | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110257860 | Getman et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120041636 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120105639 | Stein | May 2012 | A1 |
20120114181 | Borthwick et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120140076 | Rosenbaum | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120274629 | Baek | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120314070 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130051613 | Bobbitt et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130083959 | Owechko | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130182134 | Grundmann et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130204465 | Phillips et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130266187 | Bulan | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130329052 | Chew | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140072170 | Zhang | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140104051 | Breed | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140142799 | Ferguson et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140143839 | Ricci | May 2014 | A1 |
20140145516 | Hirosawa | May 2014 | A1 |
20140198184 | Stein | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140321704 | Partis | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140334668 | Saund | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150062304 | Stein | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150269438 | Samarsekera et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150310370 | Burry | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150353082 | Lee et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160008988 | Kennedy | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160026787 | Nairn et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160037064 | Stein | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160094774 | Li | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160118080 | Chen | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160129907 | Kim | May 2016 | A1 |
20160165157 | Stein | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160210528 | Duan | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160275766 | Venetianer et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160280261 | Kyrtsos et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160321381 | English | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160334230 | Ross et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160342837 | Hong et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160347322 | Clarke et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160368336 | Kahn et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160375907 | Erban | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170053169 | Cuban et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170061632 | Linder et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170080928 | Wasiek et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170124476 | Levinson et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170134631 | Zhao et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170177951 | Yang et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170301104 | Qian | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170305423 | Green | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170318407 | Meister | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170334484 | Koravadi | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180057052 | Dodd et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180151063 | Pun | May 2018 | A1 |
20180158197 | Dasgupta | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180260956 | Huang | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180283892 | Behrendt | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180341021 | Schmitt et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180373980 | Huval | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190025853 | Julian | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190065863 | Luo et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190066329 | Yi et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190066330 | Yi et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190066344 | Yi et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190084477 | Gomez-Mendoza et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190108384 | Wang et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190132391 | Thomas | May 2019 | A1 |
20190132392 | Liu | May 2019 | A1 |
20190170867 | Wang et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190210564 | Han | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190210613 | Sun | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190236950 | Li | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190266420 | Ge | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20210291902 | Wang | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210356261 | Jin | Nov 2021 | A1 |
20220343535 | Ip | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20230114328 | Tan | Apr 2023 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
105547288 | May 2016 | CN |
106340197 | Jan 2017 | CN |
106781591 | May 2017 | CN |
107728156 | Feb 2018 | CN |
107980102 | May 2018 | CN |
108010360 | May 2018 | CN |
108132471 | Jun 2018 | CN |
108278981 | Jul 2018 | CN |
108519604 | Sep 2018 | CN |
108717182 | Oct 2018 | CN |
108749923 | Nov 2018 | CN |
108761479 | Nov 2018 | CN |
108761481 | Nov 2018 | CN |
208059845 | Nov 2018 | CN |
108959173 | Dec 2018 | CN |
2608513 | Sep 1977 | DE |
102016105259 | Sep 2016 | DE |
102017125662 | May 2018 | DE |
890470 | Jan 1999 | EP |
1754179 | Feb 2007 | EP |
2448251 | May 2012 | EP |
2463843 | Jun 2012 | EP |
2761249 | Aug 2014 | EP |
2946336 | Nov 2015 | EP |
2993654 | Mar 2016 | EP |
3081419 | Oct 2016 | EP |
2513392 | Oct 2014 | GB |
2001334966 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2005293350 | Oct 2005 | JP |
3721911 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2012225806 | Nov 2012 | JP |
2022515355 | Feb 2022 | JP |
100802511 | Feb 2008 | KR |
1991009375 | Jun 1991 | WO |
2005098739 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2005098751 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2005098782 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2010109419 | Sep 2010 | WO |
2013045612 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2014111814 | Jul 2014 | WO |
2014166245 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2014201324 | Dec 2014 | WO |
2015083009 | Jun 2015 | WO |
2015103159 | Jul 2015 | WO |
2015125022 | Aug 2015 | WO |
2015186002 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2016090282 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2016135736 | Sep 2016 | WO |
2017079349 | May 2017 | WO |
2017079460 | May 2017 | WO |
2017013875 | May 2018 | WO |
2019040800 | Feb 2019 | WO |
2019084491 | May 2019 | WO |
2019084494 | May 2019 | WO |
2019140277 | Jul 2019 | WO |
2019168986 | Sep 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Japanese Patent Office, 1st Examination Report for JP 2021-533593, Mailing Date: Feb. 22, 2023, 6 pages with English translation. |
Office Action in Chinese Patent Application No. 201811505593.1 dated Sep. 29, 2021. |
Nyberg, Patrik, “Stabilization, Sensor Fusion and Path Following for Autonomous Reversing of a Full-Scale Truck and Trailer System,” Master of Science in Electrical Engineering, Department of Electrical Engineering, Linköping University, 2016, 50 pages, Sweden. |
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report for EP 19896541, Mailing Date: Jul. 8, 2022, 10 pages. |
Chinese Patent Office, Third Office Action for CN 201811505593.1, Mailing Date: Nov. 3, 2022, 10 pages with English translation. |
Chinese Patent Office, Second Office Action for CN 201811505593.1, Mailing Date: Jul. 5, 2022, 33 pages with English translation. |
Carle, Patrick J.F. et al. “Global Rover Localization by Matching Lidar and Orbital 3D Maps.” IEEE, Anchorage Convention District, pp. 1-6, May 3-8, 2010. (Anchorage Alaska, US). |
Caselitz, T. et al., “Monocular camera localization in 3D LiDAR maps,” European Conference on Computer Vision (2014) Computer Vision—ECCV 2014. ECCV 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8690. Springer, Cham. |
Mur-Artal, R. et al., “ORB-SLAM: A Versatile and Accurate Monocular SLAM System,” IEEE Transaction on Robotics, Oct. 2015, pp. 1147-1163, vol. 31, No. 5, Spain. |
Sattler, T. et al., “Are Large-Scale 3D Models Really Necessary for Accurate Visual Localization?” CVPR, IEEE, 2017, pp. 1-10. |
Engel, J. et la. “LSD-SLAM: Large Scare Direct Monocular SLAM,” pp. 1-16, Munich. |
Levinson, Jesse et al., Experimental Robotics, Unsupervised Calibration for Multi-Beam Lasers, pp. 179-194, 12th Ed., Oussama Khatib, Vijay Kumar, Gaurav Sukhatme (Eds.) Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014. |
International Application No. PCT/US2019/013322, International Search Report and Written Opinion Mailed Apr. 2, 2019. |
International Application No. PCT/US19/12934, International Search Report and Written Opinion Mailed Apr. 29, 2019. |
International Application No. PCT/US18/53795, International Search Report and Written Opinion Mailed Dec. 31, 2018. |
International Application No. PCT/US18/57848, International Search Report and Written Opinion Mailed Jan. 7, 2019. |
International Application No. PCT/US2018/057851, International Search Report and Written Opinion Mailed Feb. 1, 2019. |
International Application No. PCT/US2019/019839, International Search Report and Written Opinion Mailed May 23, 2019. |
International Application No. PCT/US19/25995, International Search Report and Written Opinion Mailed Jul. 9, 2019. |
Geiger, Andreas et al., “Automatic Camera and Range Sensor Calibration using a single Shot”, Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 1-8, 2012 IEEE International Conference. |
Zhang, Z. et al. A Flexible new technique for camera calibration. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (vol. 22, Issue: 11, Nov. 2000). |
International Application No. PCT/US2018/047830, International Search Report and Written Opinion Mailed Dec. 28, 2018. |
Bar-Hillel, Aharon et al. “Recent progress in road and lane detection: a survey.” Machine Vision and Applications 25 (2011): 727-745. |
Schindler, Andreas et al. “Generation of high precision digital maps using circular arc splines,” 2012 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Alcala de Henares, 2012, pp. 246-251. doi: 10.1109/IVS.2012.6232124. |
International Application No. PCT/US2018/047608, International Search Report and Written Opinion Mailed Dec. 28, 2018. |
Hou, Xiaodi and Zhang, Liqing, “Saliency Detection: A Spectral Residual Approach”, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR'07—IEEE Conference, pp. 1-8, 2007. |
Hou, Xiaodi and Harel, Jonathan and Koch, Christof, “Image Signature: Highlighting Sparse Salient Regions”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 194-201, 2012. |
Hou, Xiaodi and Zhang, Liqing, “Dynamic Visual Attention: Searching For Coding Length Increments”, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 21, pp. 681-688, 2008. |
Li, Yin and Hou, Xiaodi and Koch, Christof and Rehg, James M. and Yuille, Alan L., “The Secrets of Salient Object Segmentation”, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 280-287, 2014. |
Zhou, Bolei and Hou, Xiaodi and Zhang, Liqing, “A Phase Discrepancy Analysis of Object Motion”, Asian Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 225-238, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010. |
Hou, Xiaodi and Yuille, Alan and Koch, Christof, “Boundary Detection Benchmarking: Beyond F-Measures”, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR'13, vol. 2013, pp. 1-8, IEEE, 2013. |
Hou, Xiaodi and Zhang, Liqing, “Color Conceptualization”, Proceedings of the 15th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 265-268, ACM, 2007. |
Hou, Xiaodi and Zhang, Liqing, “Thumbnail Generation Based on Global Saliency”, Advances in Cognitive Neurodynamics, ICCN 2007, pp. 999-1003, Springer Netherlands, 2008. |
Hou, Xiaodi and Yuille, Alan and Koch, Christof, “A Meta-Theory of Boundary Detection Benchmarks”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1302.5985, 2013. |
Li, Yanghao and Wang, Naiyan and Shi, Jianping and Liu, Jiaying and Hou, Xiaodi, “Revisiting Batch Normalization for Practical Domain Adaptation”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.04779, 2016. |
Li, Yanghao and Wang, Naiyan and Liu, Jiaying and Hou, Xiaodi, “Demystifying Neural Style Transfer”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.01036, 2017. |
Hou, Xiaodi and Zhang, Liqing, “A Time-Dependent Model of Information Capacity of Visual Attention”, International Conference on Neural Information Processing, pp. 127-136, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006. |
Wang, Panqu and Chen, Pengfei and Yuan, Ye and Liu, Ding and Huang, Zehua and Hou, Xiaodi and Cottrell, Garrison, “Understanding Convolution for Semantic Segmentation”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08502, 2017. |
Li, Yanghao and Wang, Naiyan and Liu, Jiaying and Hou, Xiaodi, “Factorized Bilinear Models for Image Recognition”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.05709, 2016. |
Hou, Xiaodi, “Computational Modeling and Psychophysics in Low and Mid-Level Vision”, California Institute of Technology, 2014. |
Spinello, Luciano, Triebel, Rudolph, Siegwart, Roland, “Multiclass Multimodal Detection andTracking in Urban Environments”, Sage Journals, vol. 29 Issue 12, pp. 1498-1515 Article first published online: Oct. 7, 2010; Issue published: Oct. 1, 2010. |
Matthew Barth, Carrie Malcolm, Theodore Younglove, and Nicole Hill, “Recent Validation Efforts for a Comprehensive Modal Emissions Model”, Transportation Research Record 1750, Paper No. 01-0326, College of Engineering, Center for Environmental Research and Technology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, date unknown. |
Kyoungho Ahn, Hesham Rakha, “The Effects of Route Choice Decisions on Vehicle Energy Consumption and Emissions”, Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, Blacksburg, VA 24061, date unknown. |
Ramos, Sebastian, Gehrig, Stefan, Pinggera, Peter, Franke, Uwe, Rother, Carsten, “Detecting Unexpected Obstacles for Self-Driving Cars: Fusing Deep Learning and Geometric Modeling”, arXiv:1612.06573v1 [cs.CV] Dec. 20, 2016. |
Schroff, Florian, Dmitry Kalenichenko, James Philbin, (Google), “FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clustering”, CVPR 2015. |
Dai, Jifeng, Kaiming He, Jian Sun, (Microsoft Research), “Instance-aware Semantic Segmentation via Multi-task Network Cascades”, CVPR 2016. |
Huval, Brody, Tao Wang, Sameep Tandon, Jeff Kiske, Will Song, Joel Pazhayampallil, Mykhaylo Andriluka, Pranav Rajpurkar, Toki Migimatsu, Royce Cheng-Yue, Fernando Mujica, Adam Coates, Andrew Y. Ng, “An Empirical Evaluation of Deep Learning on Highway Driving”, arXiv:1504.01716v3 [cs.RO] Apr. 17, 2015. |
Tian Li, “Proposal Free Instance Segmentation Based on Instance-aware Metric”, Department of Computer Science, Cranberry-Lemon University, Pittsburgh, PA., date unknown. |
Mohammad Norouzi, David J. Fleet, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, “Hamming Distance Metric Learning”, Departments of Computer Science and Statistics, University of Toronto, date unknown. |
Jain, Suyong Dutt, Grauman, Kristen, “Active Image Segmentation Propagation”, In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, Jun. 2016. |
MacAodha, Oisin, Campbell, Neill D.F., Kautz, Jan, Brostow, Gabriel J., “Hierarchical Subquery Evaluation for Active Learning on a Graph”, In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2014. |
Kendall, Alex, Gal, Yarin, “What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision”, arXiv:1703.04977v1 [cs.CV] Mar. 15, 2017. |
Wei, Junqing, John M. Dolan, Bakhtiar Litkhouhi, “A Prediction- and Cost Function-Based Algorithm for Robust Autonomous Freeway Driving”, 2010 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA, Jun. 21-24, 2010. |
Peter Welinder, Steve Branson, Serge Belongie, Pietro Perona, “The Multidimensional Wisdom of Crowds”; http://www.vision.caltech.edu/visipedia/papers/WelinderEtaINIPS10.pdf, 2010. |
Kai Yu, Yang Zhou, Da Li, Zhang Zhang, Kaiqi Huang, “Large-scale Distributed Video Parsing and Evaluation Platform”, Center for Research on Intelligent Perception and Computing, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China, arXiv:1611.09580v1 [cs.CV] Nov. 29, 2016. |
P. Guarneri, G. Rocca and M. Gobbi, “A Neural-Network-Based Model for the Dynamic Simulation of the Tire/Suspension System While Traversing Road Irregularities,” in IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 19, No. 9, pp. 1549-1563, Sep. 2008. |
C. Yang, Z. Li, R. Cui and B. Xu, “Neural Network-Based Motion Control of an Underactuated Wheeled Inverted Pendulum Model,” in IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 25, No. 11, pp. 2004-2016, Nov. 2014. |
Stephan R. Richter, Vibhav Vineet, Stefan Roth, Vladlen Koltun, “Playing for Data: Ground Truth from Computer Games”, Intel Labs, European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 2016. |
Thanos Athanasiadis, Phivos Mylonas, Yannis Avrithis, and Stefanos Kollias, “Semantic Image Segmentation and Object Labeling”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 17, No. 3, Mar. 2007. |
Marius Cordts, Mohamed Omran, Sebastian Ramos, Timo Rehfeld, Markus Enzweiler Rodrigo Benenson, Uwe Franke, Stefan Roth, and Bernt Schiele, “The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understanding”, Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, Nevada, 2016. |
Adhiraj Somani, Nan Ye, David Hsu, and Wee Sun Lee, “DESPOT: Online POMDP Planning with Regularization”, Department of Computer Science, National University of Singapore, date unknown. |
Adam Paszke, Abhishek Chaurasia, Sangpil Kim, and Eugenio Culurciello. Enet: A deep neural network architecture for real-time semantic segmentation. CoRR, abs/1606.02147, 2016. |
Szeliski, Richard, “Computer Vision: Algorithms and Applications” http://szeliski.org/Book/, 2010. |
Office Action Mailed in Chinese Application No. 201810025516.X, Mailed Sep. 3, 2019. |
Luo, Yi et al. U.S. Appl. No. 15/684,389 Notice of Allowance Mailed Oct. 9, 2019. |
International Application No. PCT/US19/58863, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Feb. 14, 2020, pp. 1-11. |
US Patent & Trademark Office, Non-Final Office Action mailed Apr. 29, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/174,980, 6 pages. |
US Patent & Trademark Office, Final Office Action mailed Sep. 8, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/174,980, 8 pages. |
International Application No. PCT/CN2019/077075, International Search Report and Written Opinion Mailed Sep. 10, 2019, pp. 1-12. |
International Application No. PCT/CN2019/077075, International Preliminary Report on Patentability Mailed Jun. 8, 2021, pp. 1-4. |
European Patent Office, Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for EP Appl. No. 19896541.0, mailed on Feb. 19, 2024, 6 pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, Notice of Refusal for JP 2023-129340, Mailing Date: Apr. 19, 2024, 4 pages with English translation. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210349217 A1 | Nov 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/CN2019/077075 | Mar 2019 | WO |
Child | 17343489 | US |