Trailer wheel targetless trailer angle detection

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10807639
  • Patent Number
    10,807,639
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, July 10, 2018
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 20, 2020
    5 years ago
Abstract
A backup assist system for a vehicle and trailer combination includes a steering system, a camera generating an image of the trailer, and a controller. The controller receives the image and identifying a wheel therein, determines a trailer hitch angle using at least one of an aspect ratio or location of the wheel in the image, and implements a trailer backup mode including using the estimated hitch angle in view of a kinematic model of the vehicle and trailer combination to control the steering system in reversing the trailer along a user-selected path.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The disclosure made herein relates generally to steering assist technologies in vehicles and, more particularly, to a length estimation for a trailer using an image including a trailer wheel.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Reversing a vehicle while towing a trailer can be challenging for many drivers, particularly for drivers that drive with a trailer on an infrequent basis or with various types of trailers. Systems used to assist a driver with backing a trailer frequently estimate the position of the trailer relative to the vehicle with a sensor that determines a steering input for the vehicle based on an input trailer curvature path and determined a hitch angle. Both the hitch angle determination and the steering input determination require use of a kinematic model of the combined trailer and vehicle that includes both the length of the trailer, more particularly, from the point of attachment with the vehicle to the front axle thereof and an angle between the vehicle and the trailer at that point of attachment. While some systems have relied on user input for the trailer length, doing so may place an undesired burden on the user and may introduce inaccuracies that some such systems are unequipped to handle. The accuracy and reliability of the calculations involving trailer length can be critical to the operation of the backup assist system. Accuracy of the trailer-vehicle angle (also referred to as the “hitch angle”) is similarly important in determining the kinematic relationship. Accordingly, improvements related to automated system estimation of trailer length and hitch angle in an accurate manner may be desired.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to one aspect of the present disclosure, a backup assist system for a vehicle and trailer combination includes a steering system, a camera generating an image of the trailer, and a controller. The controller receives the image and identifying a wheel therein, determines a trailer hitch angle using at least one of an aspect ratio or location of the wheel in the image, and implements a trailer backup mode including using the estimated hitch angle in view of a kinematic model of the vehicle and trailer combination to control the steering system in reversing the trailer along a user-selected path.


According to another aspect of the present disclosure, a vehicle includes a steering system, a camera generating images of a predetermined area to a rear of the vehicle, and a system for assisting in reversing the vehicle with a trailer coupled therewith. The system includes a controller processing sequential images received from the camera to identify a wheel and determine at least one of an aspect ratio or position of a wheel therein, determining a trailer hitch angle using at least one of the aspect ratio or the position of the wheel in the sequential images, and implementing a trailer backup mode including using the estimated hitch angle in view of a kinematic model of the vehicle and trailer combination to control the steering system in reversing the trailer along a user-selected path.


According to another aspect of the present disclosure, a method for assisting a vehicle in reversing a trailer includes using a processor to identify a wheel and determine at least one of an aspect ratio or position of a wheel therein, determine a trailer hitch angle using at least one of the aspect ratio or the position of the wheel in the sequential images, and use the estimated hitch angle in view of a kinematic model of the vehicle and trailer combination to control a steering system of the vehicle in reversing the trailer along a user-selected path in a trailer backup mode.


These and other aspects, objects, and features of the present invention will be understood and appreciated by those skilled in the art upon studying the following specification, claims, and appended drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In the drawings:



FIG. 1 is a top perspective view of a vehicle attached to a trailer with one embodiment of a hitch angle sensor for operating a trailer backup assist system;



FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating one embodiment of the trailer backup assist system having a steering input device, a curvature controller, and a trailer braking system;



FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram that illustrates the geometry of a vehicle and a trailer overlaid with a two-dimensional x-y coordinate system, identifying variables used to determine a kinematic relationship of the vehicle and the trailer for the trailer backup assist system, according to one embodiment;



FIG. 4 is a schematic block diagram illustrating portions of a curvature controller, according to an additional embodiment, and other components of the trailer backup assist system, according to such an embodiment;



FIG. 5 is a plan view of a steering input device having a rotatable knob for operating the trailer backup assist system, according to one embodiment;



FIG. 6 is a plan view of another embodiment of a rotatable knob for selecting a desired curvature of a trailer and a corresponding schematic diagram illustrating a vehicle and a trailer with various trailer curvature paths correlating with desired curvatures that may be selected;



FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram showing a backup sequence of a vehicle and a trailer implementing various curvature selections with the trailer backup assist system, according to one embodiment;



FIG. 8 is an example of an image received from a camera including a trailer and wheel thereof that can be processed according to an aspect of the disclosure to determine a characteristic of the vehicle-trailer combination;



FIG. 9 is a schematic view of a projected ellipse derived from the image of FIG. 8 during processing thereof;



FIG. 10 is another example an image received from the camera including the trailer and wheel thereof that can be processed according to an aspect of the disclosure to determine the characteristic of the vehicle-trailer combination;



FIG. 11 is a schematic view of a projected ellipse derived from the image of FIG. 8 during processing thereof;



FIG. 12 is a schematic view showing the relationship between the image of the vehicle wheel and a length of the trailer;



FIG. 13 is a graphical representation between a view angle of the wheel in the image received from the camera and a length of the trailer;



FIG. 14 is a schematic view showing the relationship between the image of the vehicle wheel and an angle of the trailer relative to the vehicle;



FIG. 15 is a detail view of a portion of the schematic view of FIG. 15;



FIG. 16 is a further illustration showing an aspect ratio or an example ellipse derived from processing an image of the trailer wheel received from the cameral; and



FIG. 17 is a flow diagram illustrating a method of operating a trailer backup assist system using an operating routine for steering a vehicle reversing a trailer with normalized control of the desired curvature, according to one embodiment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

For purposes of description herein, it is to be understood that the disclosed trailer backup assist system and the related methods may assume various alternative embodiments and orientations, except where expressly specified to the contrary. It is also to be understood that the specific devices and processes illustrated in the attached drawings, and described in the following specification are simply exemplary embodiments of the inventive concepts defined in the appended claims. While various aspects of the trailer backup assist system and the related methods are described with reference to a particular illustrative embodiment, the disclosed invention is not limited to such embodiments, and additional modifications, applications, and embodiments may be implemented without departing from the disclosed invention. Hence, specific dimensions and other physical characteristics relating to the embodiments disclosed herein are not to be considered as limiting, unless the claims expressly state otherwise.


Referring to FIGS. 1-19, reference numeral 10 generally designates a trailer backup assist system for controlling a backing path of a trailer 12 attached to a vehicle 14 by allowing a driver of the vehicle 14 to specify a desired curvature 26 of the backing path of the trailer 12. In one embodiment, the trailer backup assist system 10 automatically steers the vehicle 14 to guide the trailer 12 on the desired curvature or backing path 26 as a driver uses the accelerator and brake pedals to control the reversing speed of the vehicle 14. To monitor the position of the trailer 12 relative to the vehicle 14, the trailer backup assist system 10 may include a sensor 44 that senses or otherwise determines a hitch angle γ between the trailer 12 and the vehicle 14. In one embodiment, the sensor 44 may operate with one or more rear view cameras 47a,47b of vehicle 14 (such cameras being potentially used in other systems included in vehicle 14) to obtain an image or sequential images of a one or more fields of view 51a,51b of the respective cameras 47a,47b, which may be carried out by, for example, controller 28 of system 10 (as shown in FIG. 2) or by a stand-alone processor within sensor 44. In this manner, the trailer angle “sensor” 44 may be a stand-alone device or may be discussed herein to refer to various components associated with vehicle 14 (that may be part of other vehicle systems or the like) that are used in monitoring the hitch angle γ. The image or images can be processed and analyzed to identify at least one of the wheels 55a,55b of trailer 12 and to determine an aspect ratio AR of the wheel 55a or 55b. As discussed further below, the aspect ratio AR can be used in determining, depending on the operation and other available information, one of the trailer length D and the hitch angle γ of the trailer 12 relative to the vehicle 14.


The controller 28 of the trailer backup assist system 10 may thereby determine a hitch angle γ based on the determined aspect ratio AR in view of a kinematic relationship between the trailer 12 and the vehicle 14 that may be dependent on include a value for the length D of the trailer 12. In a further aspect of such an embodiment, under predetermined conditions, trailer length D may first be determined using camera 47a and/or camera 47b, for example, in a similar manner to that which is used by sensor 44 in determining the hitch angle γ. As discussed further below, the predetermined conditions can be such that the trailer length D is obtained independent of γ such that the trailer length D can be determined prior to using system 10 in a trailer backing operation. Subsequently, the determined value for D can be used in view of the kinematic model and using sensor 44, as discussed below, to monitor the trailer hitch angle γ. In further embodiments, systems and methods for determining the trailer length D and the hitch angle γ can be implemented and used separately and independently from each other.


With reference to FIGS. 1-9, the general operation of the trailer backup assist system 10 is discussed. In particular, a steering input device 18 may be provided, such as a rotatable knob 30, for a driver to provide the desired curvature 26 of the trailer 12. As such, the steering input device 18 may be operable between a plurality of selections, such as successive rotated positions of a knob 30, that each provide an incremental change to the desired curvature 26 of the trailer 12. Upon inputting the desired curvature 26, the controller may generate a steering command for the vehicle 14 to guide the trailer 12 on the desired curvature 26 based on the estimated hitch angle γ and a kinematic relationship between the trailer 12 and the vehicle 14. Therefore, the accuracy of the hitch angle estimation, and accordingly, the trailer length estimation is important to operating the trailer backup assist system 10.


With reference to the embodiment shown in FIG. 1, the vehicle 14 is a pickup truck embodiment that is equipped with one embodiment of the trailer backup assist system 10 for controlling the backing path of the trailer 12 that is attached to the vehicle 14. Specifically, the vehicle 14 is pivotally attached to one embodiment of the trailer 12 that has a box frame 32 with an enclosed cargo area 34, a single axle having a right wheel assembly and a left wheel assembly, and a tongue 36 longitudinally extending forward from the enclosed cargo area 34. The illustrated trailer 12 also has a trailer hitch connector in the form of a coupler assembly 38 that is connected to a vehicle hitch connector in the form of a hitch ball 40. The coupler assembly 38 latches onto the hitch ball 40 to provide a pivoting ball joint connection 42 that allows for articulation of the hitch angle γ. It should be appreciated that additional embodiments of the trailer 12 may alternatively couple with the vehicle 14 to provide a pivoting connection, such as by connecting with a fifth wheel connector. It is also contemplated that additional embodiments of the trailer may include more than one axle and may have various shapes and sizes configured for different loads and items, such as a boat trailer or a flatbed trailer.


As mentioned above, system 10 may also include a vision-based hitch angle sensor 44 for estimating the hitch angle γ between the vehicle 14 and the trailer 12. The illustrated hitch angle sensor 44 employs two cameras 47a,47b (e.g. video imaging cameras) that may be located along respective sides of vehicle 14 (such as the driver and passenger sides thereof) and may be positioned within respective side view mirror assemblies 52a,52b. Alternatively, a single camera located centrally, such as above a rear window or on tailgate 48, may be utilized. The depicted dual side camera arrangement, however, may be preferable, as the cameras 47a,47b are more likely to be able to capture respective wheels 55a,55b in their respective fields of view 51a,51b at low values of hitch angle γ. The illustrated cameras 47a,47b have respective imaging fields of view 51a,51b located and oriented to capture one or more images of the trailer 12, including a region containing the corresponding trailer wheel 55a,55b on the side of vehicle 14 corresponding to the respective camera 47a,47b. The illustrated cameras 47a,47b may include video imaging cameras that repeatedly capture successive images of the trailer 12 that may be processed to identify any one of wheels 55a,55b present within one of the fields of view 51a,51b and the wheel 55a or 55b location within the field of view 51a,51b. As mentioned above, such information can be used for determining movement of the trailer 12 relative to the vehicle 14 and the corresponding hitch angle γ or for determining the trailer length D, as discussed in greater detail below.


It should also be appreciated that the cameras 47a,47b may include one or more video imaging cameras and may be located at other locations on the vehicle 14 to acquire images of the trailer 12. Furthermore, it is contemplated that in an embodiment, only the below-described wheel aspect ratio based scheme for determining the trailer length D may be employed with additional embodiments of the hitch angle sensor 44 used for providing the hitch angle γ. Such embodiments may include one or a combination of a trailer-target based system, a potentiometer, a magnetic-based sensor, an optical sensor, a proximity sensor, a rotational sensor, a capacitive sensor, an inductive sensor, or a mechanical based sensor, such as a mechanical sensor assembly mounted to the pivoting ball joint connection 42, energy transducers of a reverse aid system, a blind spot system, and/or a cross traffic alert system, and other conceivable sensors or indicators of the hitch angle γ to supplement or be used in place of the vision-based hitch angle sensor 44 described herein.


The illustrated embodiment of the trailer backup assist system 10 receives vehicle and trailer status-related information from additional sensors and devices. This information includes positioning information from a positioning device 56, which may include a global positioning system (GPS) on the vehicle 14 or a handled device, to determine a coordinate location of the vehicle 14 and the trailer 12 based on the location of the positioning device 56 with respect to the trailer 12 and/or the vehicle 14 and based on the estimated hitch angle γ. The positioning device 56 may additionally or alternatively include a dead reckoning system for determining the coordinate location of the vehicle 4 and the trailer 12 within a localized coordinate system based at least on vehicle speed, steering angle, and hitch angle γ. Other vehicle information received by the trailer backup assist system 10 may include a speed of the vehicle 14 from a speed sensor 58 and a yaw rate of the vehicle 14 from a yaw rate sensor 60. It is contemplated that in additional embodiments, the hitch angle sensor 44 and other vehicle sensors and devices may provide sensor signals or other information, such as proximity sensor signals or successive images of the trailer 12, that the controller of the trailer backup assist system 10 may process with various routines to determine an indicator of the hitch angle γ, such as a range of hitch angles.


As further shown in FIG. 2, one embodiment of the trailer backup assist system 10 is in communication with a power assist steering system 62 of the vehicle 14 to operate the steered wheels 64 (FIG. 1) of the vehicle 14 for moving the vehicle 14 in such a manner that the trailer 12 reacts in accordance with the desired curvature 26 of the trailer 12. In the illustrated embodiment, the power assist steering system 62 is an electric power-assisted steering (EPAS) system that includes an electric steering motor 66 for turning the steered wheels 64 to a steering angle based on a steering command, whereby the steering angle may be sensed by a steering angle sensor 67 of the power assist steering system 62. The steering command may be provided by the trailer backup assist system 10 for autonomously steering during a backup maneuver and may alternatively be provided manually via a rotational position (e.g., steering wheel angle) of a steering wheel 68 (FIG. 1). However, in the illustrated embodiment, the steering wheel 68 of the vehicle 14 is mechanically coupled with the steered wheels 64 of the vehicle 14, such that the steering wheel 68 moves in concert with steered wheels 64, preventing manual intervention with the steering wheel 68 during autonomous steering. More specifically, a torque sensor 70 is provided on the power assist steering system 62 that senses torque on the steering wheel 68 that is not expected from autonomous control of the steering wheel 68 and therefore indicative of manual intervention, whereby the trailer backup assist system 10 may alert the driver to discontinue manual intervention with the steering wheel 68 and/or discontinue autonomous steering.


In alternative embodiments, some vehicles have a power assist steering system 62 that allows a steering wheel 68 to be partially decoupled from movement of the steered wheels 64 of such a vehicle. Accordingly, the steering wheel 68 can be rotated independent of the manner in which the power assist steering system 62 of the vehicle controls the steered wheels 64 (e.g., autonomous steering as commanded by the trailer backup assist system 10). As such, in these types of vehicles where the steering wheel 68 can be selectively decoupled from the steered wheels 64 to allow independent operation thereof, the steering wheel 68 may be used as a steering input device 18 for the trailer backup assist system 10, as disclosed in greater detail herein.


Referring again to the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 2, the power assist steering system 62 provides the controller 28 of the trailer backup assist system 10 with information relating to a rotational position of steered wheels 64 of the vehicle 14, including a steering angle. The controller 28 in the illustrated embodiment processes the current steering angle, in addition to other vehicle 14 and trailer 12 conditions to guide the trailer 12 along the desired curvature 26. It is conceivable that the trailer backup assist system 10, in additional embodiments, may be an integrated component of the power assist steering system 62. For example, the power assist steering system 62 may include a trailer backup assist algorithm for generating vehicle steering information and commands as a function of all or a portion of information received from the steering input device 18, the hitch angle sensor 44, the power assist steering system 62, a vehicle brake control system 72, a powertrain control system 74, and other vehicle sensors and devices.


As also illustrated in FIG. 2, the vehicle brake control system 72 may also communicate with the controller 28 to provide the trailer backup assist system 10 with braking information, such as vehicle wheel speed, and to receive braking commands from the controller 28. For instance, vehicle speed information can be determined from individual wheel speeds as monitored by the brake control system 72. Vehicle speed may also be determined from the powertrain control system 74, the speed sensor 58, and the positioning device 56, among other conceivable means. In some embodiments, individual wheel speeds can also be used to determine a vehicle yaw rate, which can be provided to the trailer backup assist system 10 in the alternative or in addition to the vehicle yaw rate sensor 60. In certain embodiments, the trailer backup assist system 10 can provide vehicle braking information to the brake control system 72 for allowing the trailer backup assist system 10 to control braking of the vehicle 14 during backing of the trailer 12. For example, the trailer backup assist system 10 in some embodiments may regulate speed of the vehicle 14 during backing of the trailer 12, which can reduce the potential for unacceptable trailer backup conditions. Examples of unacceptable trailer backup conditions include, but are not limited to, a vehicle 14 over speed condition, a high hitch angle rate, trailer angle dynamic instability, a calculated theoretical trailer jackknife condition (defined by a maximum vehicle steering angle, drawbar length, tow vehicle wheelbase, and an effective trailer length), or physical contact jackknife limitation (defined by an angular displacement limit relative to the vehicle 14 and the trailer 12), and the like. It is disclosed herein that the trailer backup assist system 10 can issue an alert signal corresponding to a notification of an actual, impending, and/or anticipated unacceptable trailer backup condition.


The powertrain control system 74, as shown in the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 2, may also interact with the trailer backup assist system 10 for regulating speed and acceleration of the vehicle 14 during backing of the trailer 12. As mentioned above, regulation of the speed of the vehicle 14 may be necessary to limit the potential for unacceptable trailer backup conditions such as, for example, jackknifing and trailer angle dynamic instability. Similar to high-speed considerations as they relate to unacceptable trailer backup conditions, high acceleration and high dynamic driver curvature requests can also lead to such unacceptable trailer backup conditions.


With continued reference to FIG. 2, the trailer backup assist system 10 in the illustrated embodiment may communicate with one or more devices, including a vehicle alert system 76, which may prompt visual, auditory, and tactile warnings. For instance, vehicle brake lights 78 and vehicle emergency flashers may provide a visual alert and a vehicle horn 79 and/or speaker 81 may provide an audible alert. Additionally, the trailer backup assist system 10 and/or vehicle alert system 76 may communicate with a human machine interface (HMI) 80 for the vehicle 14. The HMI 80 may include a vehicle display 82, such as a center-stack mounted navigation or entertainment display (FIG. 1). Further, the trailer backup assist system 10 may communicate via wireless communication with another embodiment of the HMI 80, such as with one or more handheld or portable devices, including one or more smartphones. The portable device may also include the display 82 for displaying one or more images and other information to a user. For instance, the portable device may display one or more images of the trailer 12 and an indication of the estimated hitch angle on the display 82. In addition, the portable device may provide feedback information, such as visual, audible, and tactile alerts.


As further illustrated in FIG. 2, the trailer backup assist system 10 includes a steering input device 18 that is connected to the controller 28 for allowing communication of information therebetween. It is disclosed herein that the steering input device 18 can be coupled to the controller 28 in a wired or wireless manner. The steering input device 18 provides the trailer backup assist system 10 with information defining the desired backing path of travel of the trailer 12 for the controller 28 to process and generate steering commands. More specifically, the steering input device 18 may provide a selection or positional information that correlates with a desired curvature 26 of the desired backing path of travel of the trailer 12. Also, the trailer steering commands provided by the steering input device 18 can include information relating to a commanded change in the path of travel, such as an incremental change in the desired curvature 26, and information relating to an indication that the trailer 12 is to travel along a path defined by a longitudinal centerline axis of the trailer 12, such as a desired curvature value of zero that defines a substantially straight path of travel for the trailer. As will be discussed below in more detail, the steering input device 18 according to one embodiment may include a movable control input device for allowing a driver of the vehicle 14 to command desired trailer steering actions or otherwise select and alter a desired curvature. For instance, the moveable control input device may be a rotatable knob 30, which can be rotatable about a rotational axis extending through a top surface or face of the knob 30. In other embodiments, the rotatable knob 30 may be rotatable about a rotational axis extending substantially parallel to a top surface or face of the rotatable knob 30. Furthermore, the steering input device 18, according to additional embodiments, may include alternative devices for providing a desired curvature 26 or other information defining a desired backing path, such as a joystick, a keypad, a series of depressible buttons or switches, a sliding input device, various user interfaces on a touch-screen display, a vision based system for receiving gestures, a control interface on a portable device, and other conceivable input devices as generally understood by one having ordinary skill in the art. It is contemplated that the steering input device 18 may also function as an input device for other features, such as providing inputs for other vehicle features or systems.


Still referring to the embodiment shown in FIG. 2, the controller 28 is configured with a microprocessor 84 to process logic and routines stored in memory 86 that receive information from the sensor system 16, including the trailer sensor module 20, the hitch angle sensor 44, the steering input device 18, the power assist steering system 62, the vehicle brake control system 72, the trailer braking system, the powertrain control system 74, and other vehicle sensors and devices. The controller 28 may generate vehicle steering information and commands as a function of all or a portion of the information received. Thereafter, the vehicle steering information and commands may be provided to the power assist steering system 62 for affecting steering of the vehicle 14 to achieve a commanded path of travel for the trailer 12. The controller 28 may include the microprocessor 84 and/or other analog and/or digital circuitry for processing one or more routines. Also, the controller 28 may include the memory 86 for storing one or more routines, including a hitch angle estimation routine 130, a trailer length estimation routine 131, an operating routine 132, and a curvature routine 98. It should be appreciated that the controller 28 may be a stand-alone dedicated controller or may be a shared controller integrated with other control functions, such as integrated with the sensor system 16, the power assist steering system 62, and other conceivable onboard or off-board vehicle control systems.


With reference to FIG. 3, we now turn to a discussion of vehicle and trailer information and parameters used to calculate a kinematic relationship between a curvature of a path of travel of the trailer 12 and the steering angle of the vehicle 14 towing the trailer 12, which can be desirable for a trailer backup assist system 10 configured in accordance with some embodiments, including for use by a curvature routine 98 of the controller 28 in one embodiment. To achieve such a kinematic relationship, certain assumptions may be made with regard to parameters associated with the vehicle/trailer system. Examples of such assumptions include, but are not limited to, the trailer 12 being backed by the vehicle 14 at a relatively low speed, wheels of the vehicle 14 and the trailer 12 having negligible (e.g., no) slip, tires of the vehicle 14 having negligible (e.g., no) lateral compliance, tires of the vehicle 14 and the trailer 12 having negligible (e.g., no) deformation, actuator dynamics of the vehicle 14 being negligible, and the vehicle 14 and the trailer 12 exhibiting negligible (e.g., no) roll or pitch motions, among other conceivable factors with the potential to have an effect on controlling the trailer 12 with the vehicle 14.


As shown in FIG. 3, for a system defined by a vehicle 14 and a trailer 12, the kinematic relationship is based on various parameters associated with the vehicle 14 and the trailer 12. These parameters include:


δ: steering angle at steered front wheels of the vehicle;


α: yaw angle of the vehicle;


β: yaw angle of the trailer;


γ: hitch angle (γ=β−α);


W: wheel base of the vehicle;


L: drawbar length between hitch point and rear axle of the vehicle;


D: distance (trailer length) between hitch point and axle of the trailer or effective axle for a multiple axle trailer; and


r2: curvature radius for the trailer.


One embodiment of a kinematic relationship between trailer path radius of curvature r2 at the midpoint of an axle of the trailer 12, steering angle δ of the steered wheels 64 of the vehicle 14, and the hitch angle γ can be expressed in the equation provided below. As such, if the hitch angle γ is provided, the trailer path curvature κ2 can be controlled based on regulating the steering angle δ (where custom character is trailer yaw rate and custom character is trailer velocity).







κ
2

=


1

r

2







=



β
.


η
.


=




(

W
+


KV
2

g


)


sin





γ

+

L





cos





γ





tan





δ



D


(



(

W
+


KV
2

g


)


cos





γ

-

L





sin





γ





tan





δ


)









This relationship can be expressed to provide the steering angle δ as a function of trailer path curvature κ2 and hitch angle γ.









δ
=

tan

-
1











(



(

W
+


KV
2

g


)



[



κ
2


D





cos





γ

-

sin





γ


]




DL






κ
2


sin





γ

+

L





cos





γ



)


=

F


(

γ
,

κ
2

,
K

)






Accordingly, for a particular vehicle and trailer combination, certain parameters (e.g., D, W and L) of the kinematic relationship are constant and assumed known. V is the vehicle longitudinal speed and g is the acceleration due to gravity. K is a speed dependent parameter which when set to zero makes the calculation of steering angle independent of vehicle speed. For example, vehicle-specific parameters of the kinematic relationship can be predefined in an electronic control system of the vehicle 14 and trailer-specific parameters of the kinematic relationship can be inputted by a driver of the vehicle 14, determined from sensed trailer behavior in response to vehicle steering commands, or otherwise determined from signals provided by the trailer 12. Trailer path curvature κ2 can be determined from the driver input via the steering input device 18. Through the use of the equation for providing steering angle, a corresponding steering command can be generated by the curvature routine 98 for controlling the power assist steering system 62 of the vehicle 14.


In an additional embodiment, an assumption may be made by the curvature routine 98 that a longitudinal distance L between the pivoting connection and the rear axle of the vehicle 14 is equal to zero for purposes of operating the trailer backup assist system 10 when a gooseneck trailer or other similar trailer is connected with the a hitch ball or a fifth wheel connector located over a rear axle of the vehicle 14. The assumption essentially assumes that the pivoting connection with the trailer 12 is substantially vertically aligned with the rear axle of the vehicle 14. When such an assumption is made, the controller 28 may generate the steering angle command for the vehicle 14 as a function independent of the longitudinal distance L between the pivoting connection and the rear axle of the vehicle 14. It is appreciated that the gooseneck trailer mentioned generally refers to the tongue configuration being elevated to attach with the vehicle 14 at an elevated location over the rear axle, such as within a bed of a truck, whereby embodiments of the gooseneck trailer may include flatbed cargo areas, enclosed cargo areas, campers, cattle trailers, horse trailers, lowboy trailers, and other conceivable trailers with such a tongue configuration.


Yet another embodiment of the curvature routine 98 of the trailer backup assist system 10 is illustrated in FIG. 4, showing the general architectural layout whereby a measurement module 88, a hitch angle regulator 90, and a curvature regulator 92 are routines that may be stored in the memory 86 of the controller 28. In the illustrated layout, the steering input device 18 provides a desired curvature κ2 value to the curvature regulator 92 of the controller 28, which may be determined from the desired backing path 26 that is input with the steering input device 18. The curvature regulator 92 computes a desired hitch angle γ(d) based on the current desired curvature κ2 along with the steering angle δ provided by a measurement module 88 in this embodiment of the controller 28. The measurement module 88 may be a memory device separate from or integrated with the controller 28 that stores data from sensors of the trailer backup assist system 10, such as the hitch angle sensor 44, the vehicle speed sensor 58, the steering angle sensor 67, or alternatively the measurement module 88 may otherwise directly transmit data from the sensors without functioning as a memory device. Once the desired hitch angle γ(d) is computed by the curvature regulator 92 the hitch angle regulator 90 generates a steering angle command based on the computed desired hitch angle γ(d) as well as a measured or otherwise estimated hitch angle γ(m) and a current velocity of the vehicle 14. The steering angle command is supplied to the power assist steering system 62 of the vehicle 14, which is then fed back to the measurement module 88 to reassess the impacts of other vehicle characteristics impacted from the implementation of the steering angle command or other changes to the system. Accordingly, the curvature regulator 92 and the hitch angle regulator 90 continually process information from the measurement module 88 to provide accurate steering angle commands that place the trailer 12 on the desired curvature κ2 and the desired backing path 26, without substantial overshoot or continuous oscillation of the path of travel about the desired curvature κ2.


Specifically, entering the control system is an input, κ2, which represents the desired curvature 26 of the trailer 12 that is provided to the curvature regulator 92. The curvature regulator 92 can be expressed as a static map, p(κ2, δ), which in one embodiment is the following equation:







p


(


κ
2

,
δ

)


=


tan

-
1




(




κ
2


D

+

L





tan






(
δ
)






κ
2


DL






tan


(
δ
)



-
W


)






Where,


κ2 represents the desired curvature of the trailer 12 or 1/r2 as shown in FIG. 3;


δ represents the steering angle;


L represents the distance from the rear axle of the vehicle 14 to the hitch pivot point;


D represents the distance from the hitch pivot point to the axle of the trailer 12; and


W represents the distance from the rear axle to the front axle of the vehicle 14.


The output hitch angle of p(κ2, δ) is provided as the reference signal, γref, for the remainder of the control system, although the steering angle δ value used by the curvature regulator 92 is feedback from the non-linear function of the hitch angle regulator 90. It is shown that the hitch angle regulator 90 uses feedback linearization for defining a feedback control law, as follows:







g


(

u
,
γ
,
v

)


=

δ
=


tan

-
1


(


W

v


(

1
+


L
D



cos


(
γ
)




)





(

u
-


v
D



sin


(
γ
)




)


)






The feedback control law, g(u, γ, ν), is implemented with a proportional integral (PI) controller, whereby the integral portion substantially eliminates steady-state tracking error. More specifically, the control system illustrated in FIG. 5 may be expressed as the following differential-algebraic equations:













γ
.



(
t
)


=




v


(
t
)


D



sin


(

γ


(
t
)


)



+


(

1
+


L
D



cos


(

γ


(
t
)


)




)




v


(
t
)


W



δ
_











tan


(
δ
)


=


δ
_

=


W


v


(
t
)




(

1
+


L
D



cos


(

γ


(
t
)


)




)





(



K
P



(


p


(


κ
2

,
δ

)


-

γ


(
t
)



)


-



v


(
t
)


D



sin


(

γ


(
t
)


)




)







It is contemplated that the PI controller may have gain terms based on trailer length D since shorter trailers will generally have faster dynamics. In addition, the hitch angle regulator 90 may be configured to prevent the desired hitch angle γ(d) to reach or exceed a jackknife angle γ(j), as computed by the controller 28 or otherwise determined by the trailer backup assist system 10, as disclosed in greater detail herein.


As can be appreciated based on the foregoing, there are various ones of the kinematic parameters in the curvature κ2 and steering input δ equations that are generally fixed and correspond to the dimensions of the vehicle 14 and trailer 12 combination. Specifically, the length D of the trailer 12, the wheel base W of the vehicle 14, and the distance L from the hitch connection H to the rear axle of the vehicle 14 are generally fixed and may be stored in the memory 86 of system 10 (FIG. 2), whereas other kinematic parameters may be dynamic and obtained from trailer sensor module 20 and vehicle sensors 17 on an ongoing basis. It is noted that the wheel base of the vehicle 14 and the distance from the hitch connection to the rear axle of the vehicle 14 relate only to vehicle 14 itself, within which the controller 28 and, accordingly, memory 86, are installed. It follows, then, these parameters may be stored in memory 86 during manufacture of vehicle 14, or during installation of the relevant portions of system 10 therein, as they are known in relation to the specific make and model of the particular vehicle 14. On the other hand, the length D of the trailer 12, while fixed with respect to a particular initiated operating routine 132, may vary as different trailers 12 are hitched to vehicle 14 for towing thereby. Further, the particular trailer 12 with which a given vehicle 14 will be used may not be known during manufacture of vehicle 14 or installation of system 10, and a user of such a vehicle 14 may wish to use vehicle 14 in various operating routines 132 with various trailers 12 of different sizes and configurations. Accordingly, a routine 131 for system 10 obtaining the particular trailer length D of a trailer hitched with vehicle 14 may be used prior to system 10 implementing operating routine 132. In some embodiments, system 10 may be able to determine if the trailer 12 currently coupled with vehicle 14 is the same as one previously coupled with vehicle 14 during a prior implementation of backup routine 132, in which case, system 10 may use a prior-determined value for the trailer length D. Still further, system 10 may, in some embodiments be able to store a determined trailer length D in a data entry in memory 86 associated with the particular trailer 12 for which the length D has been determined. In this manner, a user, upon switching trailers 12, may be able to select the particular trailer 12 from a list of trailers with an already-determined length D associated therewith or may select an option to run estimation routine 131 for a new trailer 12.


Referring now to FIG. 5, one embodiment of the steering input device 18 is illustrated disposed on a center console 108 of the vehicle 14 proximate a shifter 110. In this embodiment, the steering input device 18 includes a rotatable knob 30 for providing the controller 28 with the desired backing path of the trailer 12. More specifically, the angular position of the rotatable knob 30 may correlate with a desired curvature, such that rotation of the knob to a different angular position provides a different desired curvature with an incremental change based on the amount of rotation and, in some embodiments, a normalized rate, as described in greater detail herein.


The rotatable knob 30, as illustrated in FIG. 6, may be biased (e.g., by a spring return) to a center, or at-rest position P(AR) between opposing rotational ranges of motion R(R), R(L). In the illustrated embodiment, a first one of the opposing rotational ranges of motion R(R) is substantially equal to a second one of the opposing rotational ranges of motion R(L), R(R). In this manner, the input device 18 can provide a signal to controller 28 that includes both a direction (corresponding to the range, R(L) or R(R), in which knob 30 is turned) and an amplitude according to how far within that range knob 30 is turned. Accordingly, controller 28 can interpret the signal from input device 18 as a curvature input in the direction indicated by the signal. To provide a tactile indication of an amount of rotation of the rotatable knob 30, a torque that biases the knob toward the at-rest position P(AR) can increase (e.g., non-linearly) as a function of the amount of rotation of the rotatable knob 30 with respect to the at-rest position P(AR). Additionally, the rotatable knob 30 can be configured with position indicating detents such that the driver can positively feel the at-rest position P(AR) and feel the ends of the opposing rotational ranges of motion R(L), R(R) approaching (e.g., soft end stops). The rotatable knob 30 may generate a desired curvature value as function of an amount of rotation of the rotatable knob 30 with respect to the at-rest position P(AR) and a direction of movement of the rotatable knob 30 with respect to the at-rest position P(AR), which itself may correspond to a zero-curvature command. It is also contemplated that the rate of rotation of the rotatable knob 30 may also be used to determine the desired curvature 26 output to the controller 28. The at-rest position P(AR) of the knob corresponds to a signal indicating that the vehicle 14 should be steered such that the trailer 12 is backed along a substantially straight backing path 114 (FIG. 6) zero trailer curvature request from the driver), as defined by the longitudinal direction 22 of the trailer 12 when the knob was returned to the at-rest position P(AR). A maximum clockwise and anti-clockwise position of the knob (i.e., limits of the opposing rotational ranges of motion R(R), R(L)) may each correspond to a respective signal indicating a tightest radius of curvature (i.e., most acute trajectory or smallest radius of curvature) of a path of travel of the trailer 12 that is possible without the corresponding vehicle steering information causing a jackknife condition.


As shown in FIG. 6, a driver can turn the rotatable knob 30 to provide a desired curvature 26 while the driver of the vehicle 14 backs the trailer 12. In the illustrated embodiment, the rotatable knob 30 rotates about a central axis between a center or middle position 114 corresponding to a substantially straight backing path 26 of travel, as defined by the longitudinal direction 22 of the trailer 12, and various rotated positions 116, 118, 120, 122 on opposing sides of the middle position 114, commanding a desired curvature 26 corresponding to a radius of the desired backing path of travel for the trailer 12 at the commanded rotated position. It is contemplated that the rotatable knob 30 may be configured in accordance with embodiments of the disclosed subject matter and omit a means for being biased to an at-rest position P(AR) between opposing rotational ranges of motion. Lack of such biasing may allow a current rotational position of the rotatable knob 30 to be maintained until the rotational control input device is manually moved to a different position.


Referring to FIG. 7, an example of using the steering input device 18 for dictating a curvature of a desired backing path of travel (POT) of the trailer 12 while backing up the trailer 12 with the vehicle 14 is shown. In preparation of backing the trailer 12, the driver of the vehicle 14 may drive the vehicle 14 forward along a pull-thru path (PTP) to position the vehicle 14 and trailer 12 at a first backup position B1. In the first backup position B1, the vehicle 14 and trailer 12 are longitudinally aligned with each other such that a longitudinal centerline axis L1 of the vehicle 14 is aligned with (e.g., parallel with or coincidental with) a longitudinal centerline axis L2 of the trailer 12. It is disclosed herein that such alignment of the longitudinal axis L1, L2 at the onset of an instance of trailer backup functionality is not a requirement for operability of a trailer backup assist system 10, but may be done for calibration.


After activating the trailer backup assist system 10 (e.g., before, after, or during the pull-thru sequence), the driver begins to back the trailer 12 by reversing the vehicle 14 from the first backup position B1. So long as the rotatable knob 30 of the trailer backup steering input device 18 remains in the at-rest position P(AR) and no other steering input devices 18 are activated, the trailer backup assist system 10 will steer the vehicle 14 as necessary for causing the trailer 12 to be backed along a substantially straight path of travel, as defined by the longitudinal direction 22 of the trailer 12, specifically the centerline axis L2 of the trailer 12, at the time when backing of the trailer 12 began. When the trailer 12 reaches the second backup position B2, the driver rotates the rotatable knob 30 to command the trailer 12 to be steered to the right (i.e., a knob position R(R) clockwise rotation). Accordingly, the trailer backup assist system 10 will steer the vehicle 14 for causing the trailer 12 to be steered to the right as a function of an amount of rotation of the rotatable knob 30 with respect to the at-rest position P(AR), a rate movement of the knob, and/or a direction of movement of the knob 30 with respect to the at-rest position P(AR). Similarly, the trailer 12 can be commanded to steer to the left by rotating the rotatable knob 30 to the left. When the trailer 12 reaches backup position B3, the driver allows the rotatable knob 30 to return to the at-rest position P(AR) thereby causing the trailer backup assist system 10 to steer the vehicle 14 as necessary for causing the trailer 12 to be backed along a substantially straight path of travel as defined by the longitudinal centerline axis L2 of the trailer 12 at the time when the rotatable knob 30 was returned to the at-rest position P(AR). Thereafter, the trailer backup assist system 10 steers the vehicle 14 as necessary for causing the trailer 12 to be backed along this substantially straight path to the fourth backup position B4. In this regard, arcuate portions of a path of travel POT of the trailer 12 are dictated by rotation of the rotatable knob 30 and straight portions of the path of travel POT are dictated by an orientation of the centerline longitudinal axis L2 of the trailer 12 when the knob 30 is in/returned to the at-rest position P(AR).


In the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 7, in order to activate the trailer backup assist system 10, the driver interacts with the trailer backup assist system 10 and the automatically steers as the driver reverses the vehicle 14. As discussed above, the driver may command the trailer backing path by using a steering input device 18 and the controller 28 may determine the vehicle steering angle to achieve the desired curvature 26, whereby the driver controls the throttle and brake while the trailer backup assist system 10 controls the steering.


Turning now to FIGS. 8-13 and as discussed above, controller 28 can implement a trailer length estimation routine 131 as-needed to determine the trailer length D. In various examples described herein, this can be done separately from and prior to a hitch angle estimation routine 130. In particular, trailer length estimation routine 131 may utilize known characteristics of vehicle 14 in combination with determined characteristics of the image of one of trailer wheels 55a or 55b within the field of view 51a or 51b of one of cameras 47a or 47b to estimate the length D of trailer 12. In particular, as illustrated in FIGS. 8-11, the view angle of camera 47a relative to wheel 55a causes distortion of the image of wheel 55a. In particular, wheel 55a will appear as an ellipse 94 within the associated image 96 (FIGS. 8 and 10). In general, and depending on the particular locations and characteristics of cameras 47a, 47b wheels 55a and 55b will appear as very narrow ellipses or straight lines (if they are viewable at all) when the hitch angle γ is zero or close to zero, and will, eventually, appear as circles (i.e. a special case of an ellipse wherein both axes are equal) when the particular wheel 55a or 55b is facing the corresponding camera 47a or 47b. In general, controller 28 can be calibrated to recognize when both cameras 47a and 47b fail to show an image of a wheel 55a, 55b to indicate a zero hitch angle γ. Further, an instance when a wheel 55a or 55b faces camera 47a or 47b, it would necessarily correspond to a hitch angle above 90°, which in most cases wherein a fifth-wheel arrangement is not used, is not possible during a backing operation (particularly, when jackknife mitigation controls are present) and would not correspond with, for example, a maximum steering input δmax during a forward driving operation.


As can be seen in FIGS. 8 and 10, the particular characteristics of the ellipse 94 present in image 96 by the projection of wheel 55a changes with varying positions of trailer 12 with respect to vehicle 14 and, accordingly, within image 96. In particular, as shown in FIGS. 9 and 11, an aspect ratio AR of the ellipse 94 changes with hitch angle γ. As illustrated, the aspect ratio AR of ellipse 94 is characterized as the ratio of the minor axis b to its major axis a. In this manner, an ellipse 94 present in image 96 by the projection of wheel 55a when trailer 12 will increase in aspect ratio (i.e. increases to 1) as the hitch angle γ increases. For example, in the illustrated image 96 of FIG. 8, a lower aspect ratio AR of ellipse 94 is present by the minor axis b appearing shorter than in the image 96 of FIG. 10. As can further be seen, the smaller aspect ratio AR corresponds with a smaller hitch angle γ in the image 96 of FIG. 8. In this manner, controller 28 can utilize an image processing algorithm to detect the location of the trailer wheel 55a or 55b. By way of example, an algorithm may locate a wheel 55a or 55b by searching for a pattern of a tire and wheel and/or by searching for pixels that rotate about an axis in a quasi-steady state turn. Once identified, the ellipse 94 corresponding to wheel 55a or 55b can be analyzed to derive its aspect ratio. The ellipse 94 can be derived from either the wheel itself or the tire, as the aspect ratio thereof would be the same. Using the wheel may be more accurate, as it is not distorted by the weight of the trailer 12 on the ground.


As shown in FIGS. 12 and 13, this difference in aspect ratio AR of ellipses 94 present in images 96 by the projection of wheel 55a (or wheel 55b in the case of the other camera 47b) can be used to determine the length D of trailer. Using the geometric relationship in FIG. 12, where:


γm: maximum trailer angle in forward drive;


θ: offset angle of wheel 55a,55b relative to trailer 12 tongue 36;


βm: maximum view angle of wheel 55a,55b relative to lateral location of camera 47a,47b;


β: instantaneous view angle of wheel 55a,55b;


xm, ym: coordinates of wheel 55a,55b when trailer 12 angle is max γm in forward drive;


D: trailer 12 length;


B: half of track of trailer 12;


W: wheel base of vehicle;


L: distance from hitch pivot to vehicle rear axle;


δm: maximum steering angle; and


δ: steering angle,


a mapping relationship between maximum view angle βm of wheel 55a,55b and trailer length D can be established. In particular, according to trailer tow kinematic model, described above with respect to FIG. 3, the maximum trailer angle in forward drive γm is determined by:







cos






γ
m


=





-
LD








tan

-
2




(

δ
m

)



±

W




W
2

+


(


L
2

-

D
2


)




tan
2



(

δ
m

)










L
2




tan
2



(

δ
m

)



+

W

2








.






A wheel offset angle α relative to the trailer frame can be expressed as:






θ
=


tan

-
1





B
D

.







Further, the coordinates or the wheel 55a or 55b relative to the location of camera 47a or 47b, when trailer 12 reaches the maximum hitch angle γm are:

xm=√{square root over (B2+D2)}·sin(θ+γm) and
ym=√{square root over (B2+D2)}·cos(θ+γm).

Still further, the view angle βm, i.e. the angle defined by a line from camera 47a to wheel 55a relative to the center of camera 47a parallel to the y-axis in FIG. 12, when at the maximum hitch angle γm is:







β
m

=



tan

-
1




(



x
m

-
B



y
m

+
D


)


.





Combining the above equations, it is seen that the maximum view angle βm is a function of a number of constants, including the unknown trailer length D. Specifically:

βm=f(L,W,δm,B,D).

Accordingly, the maximum view angle βm can simply be expressed as a function of trailer length D, as represented in FIG. 14.


In an embodiment, βm can be determined by the above-described ellipse 94 identification. In particular, the location of the cameras 47a,47b (at least in the lateral direction corresponding to the x-axis in FIG. 12) are fixed and, accordingly can be stored in memory 86. Further, the characteristics of cameras 47a and 47b are known and can be used in an algorithm such that by locating ellipse 94 within image 96, the xm coordinate of ellipse 94 (such as the center of ellipse 94, which can be identified when determining the aspect ratio AR thereof in the same algorithm) can be determined by controller 28 in processing image 96. Further, the aspect ratio AR of ellipse 94 can be used to determine the angle of wheel 55a or 55b, which is shown to be the same as hitch angle λ. Accordingly, as discussed above, an aspect ratio approaching zero (or failure to locate ellipse 94 by both cameras 47a and 47b) can indicate a zero hitch angle γ, an aspect ratio of one can indicate a hitch angle γ of 90°, and aspect ratios AR therebetween can be interpolated to correspond to particular values for hitch angle γ between zero and 90. As shown in FIG. 12, using the aspect ratio of wheels 55a or 55b and the xm value, controller 28 can determine the maximum view angle βm (as well as ym, if needed). Alternatively, βm can be determined using further image processing that takes into account the focal length of camera 47a or 47b. In such a process, controller 28 can instruct camera 47a or 47b to focus on wheel 55a or 55b, as identified using initial-stage image processing, controller 28 receiving an input regarding the focal length of camera 47a or 47b when focusing has been achieved. Alternatively, image processing can take into account blur in the image to interpolate distance based on constant focal length information received from camera 47a or 47b. The focal length information can then be used to determine both xm and ym, which can be used to determine the maximum view angle βm directly without identifying the aspect ratio AR for ellipse 94.


When the maximum view angle βm is determined, a lookup table stored in memory 86 (such as during vehicle manufacture or system 10 installation) can be referenced to correlate the given βm with the value for trailer length D. As illustrated in FIG. 13, when trailer length estimation routine 131 uses a maximum steering angle δm, a two-dimensional lookup table can be used. In such an embodiment, controller 28 can instruct a driver of vehicle 14 (such as by HMI 80) to drive forward at the maximum steering angle δm in either direction (left or right). When the steering angle δ is detected to be at the maximum steering angle δm, and trailer 12 is in a steady state position within image 96 (indicating that the hitch angle γ is at the maximum in a steady state condition), controller 28 can run the trailer length estimation routine 131 including measuring the view angle β, which can under such conditions be interpreted as the maximum view angle βm, and looking up the corresponding trailer length D in the lookup table.


In an alternative embodiment, the user can select a desired steering angle δ (i.e. above a predetermined range but, potentially, less than the maximum). The view angle β can then be expressed as a function of trailer length D and steering angle δ, with a three dimensional lookup table being referenced to determine the trailer length D using the measured view angle β corresponding with a measured steady-state steering angle δ. In such an embodiment, controller 28 can simply instruct the driver of vehicle 14 to hold a turn (with instructions to increase if below a predetermined minimum) until controller 28 observes a steady-state steering angle δ and position of trailer 12 in image 96. At such a point, the view angle β can be determined using either of the above schemes and the trailer length D can be determined by the corresponding value in the three-dimensional lookup table using the view angle β and the steering angle α as inputs.


When the trailer length D has been determined, it can be stored as a value in memory 86 and used in subsequent backing operations using curvature routine 98. In various embodiments, the trailer length D can be associated in memory 86 with a particular trailer 12 based on various identifying characteristics. Accordingly, the particular length D of a trailer 12 can be recalled if such trailer 12 is subsequently disconnected and reconnected with vehicle 14.


With continued reference to FIGS. 8-11 and with additional reference to FIGS. 14-16, the aspect ratio AR of an ellipse 94 corresponding to the projection of an identified wheel 55a or 55b in image 96 from camera 47a or 47b can also be used to determine the hitch angle γ during a backing operation using curvature routine 98. Again, as discussed above, when the hitch angle γ is zero, the trailer is straight and the wheel looks like a straight line section with an aspect ratio AR zero. As the hitch angle γ increases, the line section grows to an ellipse shape, and the aspect ratio AR of ellipse 94 increases up to 1. Given the aspect ratio AR of ellipse 94 determined during processing of the image 96 of either camera 47a or 47b, the projection angle α (FIG. 14) can be determined. Further, as discussed above given the position of ellipse 94 in image 96 (again, with the position of cameras 47a and 47b known with respect to, for example, coupling 40), the view angle β can be determined. In one example, the view angle β can be described according to the processes discussed above. Alternatively, since the trailer length D is known (having been derived using the image of wheels 55a,55b or otherwise) when controller 28 executes a backing maneuver using curvature routine 98, the view angle β can be determined geometrically using the position of ellipse 94 in image 96, particularly, the x-coordinate thereof. Knowing both the projection angle α and the view angle β, controller 28 can determine the trailer angle γ as the sum of projection angle α and view angle β, as shown in FIG. 14.


With reference to FIG. 17, a method of operating one embodiment of the trailer backup assist system 10 is illustrated, shown as one embodiment of the operating routine 132 (FIG. 2). In one aspect, system 10 can be configured to lock out or deactivate operating routine 132 until a trailer length D estimate has been obtained in step 160 (discussed further above with reference to FIGS. 8-13). At step 134, the method is initiated by the trailer backup assist system 10 being activated. It is contemplated that this may be done in a variety of ways, such a making a selection on the display 82 of the vehicle HMI 80. The next step 136, then determines the kinematic relationship between the attached trailer 12 and the vehicle 14. To determine the kinematic relationship, various parameters of the vehicle 14 and the trailer 12 must be sensed, input by the driver, or otherwise determined for the trailer backup assist system 10 to generate steering commands to the power assist steering system 62 in accordance with the desired curvature or backing path 26 of the trailer 12. As discussed above, the kinematic parameters to define the kinematic relationship include a length D of the trailer 12, a wheel base W of the vehicle 14, a distance L from a hitch connection to a rear axle of the vehicle 14, and a hitch angle γ between the vehicle 14 and the trailer 12, among other variables and parameters as previously described.


In one aspect, after the kinematic relationship is determined, the trailer backup assist system 10 may proceed at step 160 to determine the current hitch angle by processing the hitch angle estimation routine 130, as discussed above with respect to FIGS. 8, 9, and 14-16. At step 162 the position and rate of change is received from the steering input device 18, such as the angular position and rate of rotation of the rotatable knob 30, for determining the desired curvature 26. At step 164, steering commands may be generated based on the desired curvature, correlating with the position and rate of change of the steering input device 18. The steering commands and actuation commands generated may be generated in conjunction with processing of the curvature routine 98, as previous discussed. At step 166, the steering commands and actuation commands have been executed to guide the trailer 12 on the desired curvature provided by the steering input device 18. As shown, steps 160-166 can be iterated, continuously so long as the backup assist system 10 remains active.


It will be understood by one having ordinary skill in the art that construction of the described invention and other components is not limited to any specific material. Other exemplary embodiments of the invention disclosed herein may be formed from a wide variety of materials, unless described otherwise herein.


For purposes of this disclosure, the term “coupled” (in all of its forms, couple, coupling, coupled, etc.) generally means the joining of two components (electrical or mechanical) directly or indirectly to one another. Such joining may be stationary in nature or movable in nature. Such joining may be achieved with the two components (electrical or mechanical) and any additional intermediate members being integrally formed as a single unitary body with one another or with the two components. Such joining may be permanent in nature or may be removable or releasable in nature unless otherwise stated.


It is also important to note that the construction and arrangement of the elements of the invention as shown in the exemplary embodiments is illustrative only. Although only a few embodiments of the present innovations have been described in detail in this disclosure, those skilled in the art who review this disclosure will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible (e.g., variations in sizes, dimensions, structures, shapes and proportions of the various elements, values of parameters, mounting arrangements, use of materials, colors, orientations, etc.) without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of the subject matter recited. For example, elements shown as integrally formed may be constructed of multiple parts or elements shown as multiple parts may be integrally formed, the operation of the interfaces may be reversed or otherwise varied, the length or width of the structures and/or members or connector or other elements of the system may be varied, the nature or number of adjustment positions provided between the elements may be varied. It should be noted that the elements and/or assemblies of the system may be constructed from any of a wide variety of materials that provide sufficient strength or durability, in any of a wide variety of colors, textures, and combinations. Accordingly, all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present innovations. Other substitutions, modifications, changes, and omissions may be made in the design, operating conditions, and arrangement of the desired and other exemplary embodiments without departing from the spirit of the present innovations.


It will be understood that any described processes or steps within described processes may be combined with other disclosed processes or steps to form structures within the scope of the present invention. The exemplary structures and processes disclosed herein are for illustrative purposes and are not to be construed as limiting.


It is also to be understood that variations and modifications can be made on the aforementioned structures and methods without departing from the concepts of the present invention, and further it is to be understood that such concepts are intended to be covered by the following claims unless these claims by their language expressly state otherwise.

Claims
  • 1. A backup assist system for a vehicle and trailer combination, comprising: a steering system;a camera generating sequential images of the trailer; anda controller: continuously receiving and identifying a wheel in the sequential images and identifying a wheel therein;continuously determining an instantaneous trailer hitch angle using at least one of an aspect ratio or location of the wheel in a most recent one of the sequential images; andimplementing a trailer backup mode including using the instantaneous hitch angle in view of a kinematic model of the vehicle and trailer combination to control the steering system in reversing the trailer along a user-selected path.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, further including a curvature input device outputting a first curvature signal, wherein: the user-selected path is a backing path having a curvature according to the first curvature signal.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the camera is positioned on a side of the vehicle and the wheel is a trailer wheel on a side of the trailer corresponding to the side of the vehicle.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the controller further determines a length of the trailer using at least one of an aspect ratio or location of the wheel in at least one of the sequential images.
  • 5. The system of claim 4, wherein the length of the trailer is determined by correlating a wheel view angle derived using the location of the wheel within the at least one of the images with a selection of trailer length values in a lookup table.
  • 6. The system of claim 5, wherein the wheel view angle is a maximum wheel view angle derived from a selected one of the images received during a maximum steering angle vehicle condition.
  • 7. The system of claim 1, wherein the trailer hitch angle is determined as a sum of: a projection angle of the wheel calculated using the aspect ratio of the wheel; anda view angle of the wheel relative to the camera derived from the location of the wheel within the image.
  • 8. The system of claim 1, wherein the instantaneous trailer hitch angle is continuously updated from the most recent one of the sequential images of the trailer at least during control of the system in the trailer backup mode.
  • 9. A vehicle, comprising: a steering system;a camera generating sequential images of a predetermined area to a rear of the vehicle; anda system for assisting in reversing the vehicle with a trailer coupled therewith and including a controller: continuously processing the sequential images received from the camera to identify a wheel and determine at least one of an aspect ratio or position of a wheel, when present in the sequential images;continuously determining an instantaneous trailer hitch angle using at least one of the aspect ratio or the position of the wheel in the sequential images; andimplementing a trailer backup mode including using the instantaneous hitch angle in view of a kinematic model of the vehicle and trailer combination to control the steering system in reversing the trailer along a user-selected path.
  • 10. The vehicle of claim 9, further including a curvature input device outputting a first curvature signal, wherein: the user-selected path is a backing path having a curvature according to the first curvature signal.
  • 11. The vehicle of claim 9, wherein the controller further determines a length of the trailer using at least one of an aspect ratio or location of the wheel in at least one of the sequential images.
  • 12. The vehicle of claim 11, wherein the length of the trailer is determined: using a selected one of the sequential images; andby correlating a determined wheel view angle determined using the position of the wheel within the image with a selection of trailer length values in a lookup table.
  • 13. The vehicle of claim 12, wherein: the selected one of the images corresponds with a maximum steering angle vehicle condition; andthe wheel view angle is interpreted as a maximum wheel view angle.
  • 14. The vehicle of claim 13, wherein the trailer hitch angle is determined as a sum of: a projection angle of the wheel calculated using the aspect ratio of the wheel; anda view angle of the wheel relative to the camera derived from the location of the wheel within the predetermined area.
  • 15. The vehicle of claim 9, wherein the instantaneous trailer hitch angle is continuously determined from the sequential images of the trailer during control of the system in the trailer backup mode.
  • 16. A method for assisting a vehicle in reversing a trailer, comprising: using a processor to: identify a wheel and determine at least one of an aspect ratio or position of a wheel in sequential images received from a camera;continuously determine an instantaneous trailer hitch angle using at least one of the aspect ratio or the position of the wheel in a most recent one of the sequential images; anduse the instantaneous hitch angle in view of a kinematic model of the vehicle and trailer combination to control a steering system of the vehicle in reversing the trailer along a user-selected path in a trailer backup mode.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, further including using the controller to receive a first curvature signal, wherein: the user-selected path is a backing path having a curvature according to the first curvature signal.
  • 18. The method of claim 16, further including determining a length of the trailer by correlating a wheel view angle derived using the position of the wheel within a selected one of the sequential images with a selection of trailer length values in a lookup table.
  • 19. The method of claim 18, wherein the wheel view angle is a maximum wheel view angle derived from an image received during a maximum steering angle vehicle condition.
  • 20. The method of claim 16, wherein: the trailer hitch angle and is determined as a sum of: a projection angle of the wheel calculated using the aspect ratio of the wheel; anda view angle of the wheel relative to the camera derived from the position of the wheel within the image; andwherein the trailer hitch angle is continuously determined from the sequential images of the trailer during control of the steering system in the trailer backup mode.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/233,458, filed Aug. 10, 2016, entitled “TRAILER WHEEL TARGETLESS TRAILER ANGLE DETECTION”, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.

US Referenced Citations (381)
Number Name Date Kind
3542390 Fikes et al. Nov 1970 A
3605088 Savelli Sep 1971 A
3787077 Sanders Jan 1974 A
3833928 Gavit et al. Sep 1974 A
3860257 Mesley Jan 1975 A
4040006 Kimmel Aug 1977 A
4042132 Bohman et al. Aug 1977 A
4122390 Kollitz et al. Oct 1978 A
4212483 Howard Jul 1980 A
4366966 Ratsko et al. Jan 1983 A
4727419 Yamada et al. Feb 1988 A
4735432 Brown Apr 1988 A
4752080 Rogers Jun 1988 A
4778060 Wessner, Jr. Oct 1988 A
4848449 Martinet et al. Jul 1989 A
4852901 Beasley et al. Aug 1989 A
4943080 Reimer Jul 1990 A
5001639 Breen Mar 1991 A
5056905 Jensen Oct 1991 A
5097250 Hernandez Mar 1992 A
5108123 Rubenzik Apr 1992 A
5108158 Breen Apr 1992 A
5132851 Bomar et al. Jul 1992 A
5152544 Dierker, Jr. et al. Oct 1992 A
5191328 Nelson Mar 1993 A
5244226 Bergh Sep 1993 A
5246242 Penzotti Sep 1993 A
5247442 Kendall Sep 1993 A
5282641 McLaughlin Feb 1994 A
5289892 Notsu Mar 1994 A
5290057 Pellerito Mar 1994 A
5455557 Noll et al. Oct 1995 A
5521633 Nakajima et al. May 1996 A
5523947 Breen Jun 1996 A
5541778 DeFlorio Jul 1996 A
5558350 Kimbrough et al. Sep 1996 A
5559696 Borenstein Sep 1996 A
5579228 Kimbrough et al. Nov 1996 A
5631656 Hartman et al. May 1997 A
5650764 McCullough Jul 1997 A
5690347 Juergens et al. Nov 1997 A
5719713 Brown Feb 1998 A
5747683 Gerum et al. May 1998 A
5821852 Fairchild Oct 1998 A
5980048 Rannells, Jr. et al. Nov 1999 A
6041582 Tiede et al. Mar 2000 A
6042196 Nakamura et al. Mar 2000 A
6124709 Allwine Sep 2000 A
6151175 Osha Nov 2000 A
6198992 Winslow Mar 2001 B1
6217177 Rost Apr 2001 B1
6218828 Bates et al. Apr 2001 B1
6223104 Kamen et al. Apr 2001 B1
6223114 Boros et al. Apr 2001 B1
6268800 Howard Jul 2001 B1
6292094 Deng et al. Sep 2001 B1
6301548 Gerum Oct 2001 B1
6351698 Kubota et al. Feb 2002 B1
6472865 Tola et al. Oct 2002 B1
6480104 Wall et al. Nov 2002 B1
6483429 Yasui et al. Nov 2002 B1
6494476 Masters et al. Dec 2002 B2
6498977 Wetzel et al. Dec 2002 B2
6539288 Ishida et al. Mar 2003 B2
6568093 Kogiso et al. May 2003 B2
6577952 Geier et al. Jun 2003 B2
6668225 Oh et al. Dec 2003 B2
6704653 Kuriya et al. Mar 2004 B2
6712378 Austin Mar 2004 B1
6801125 McGregor et al. Oct 2004 B1
6806809 Lee et al. Oct 2004 B2
6820888 Griffin Nov 2004 B1
6838979 Deng et al. Jan 2005 B2
6854557 Deng et al. Feb 2005 B1
6857494 Kobayashi et al. Feb 2005 B2
6879240 Kruse Apr 2005 B2
6956468 Lee et al. Oct 2005 B2
6959970 Tseng Nov 2005 B2
6999856 Lee et al. Feb 2006 B2
7005974 McMahon et al. Feb 2006 B2
7006127 Mizusawa et al. Feb 2006 B2
7008088 Pisciotti Mar 2006 B2
7028804 Eki et al. Apr 2006 B2
7032705 Zheng et al. Apr 2006 B2
7046127 Boddy May 2006 B2
7058493 Inagaki Jun 2006 B2
7089101 Fischer et al. Aug 2006 B2
7154385 Lee et al. Dec 2006 B2
7159890 Craig et al. Jan 2007 B2
7167785 Lohberg et al. Jan 2007 B2
7170285 Spratte Jan 2007 B2
7171330 Kruse et al. Jan 2007 B2
7204504 Gehring et al. Apr 2007 B2
7219913 Atley May 2007 B2
7225891 Gehring et al. Jun 2007 B2
7229139 Lu et al. Jun 2007 B2
7239958 Grougan et al. Jul 2007 B2
7269489 Deng et al. Sep 2007 B2
7272481 Einig et al. Sep 2007 B2
7295907 Lu et al. Nov 2007 B2
7401871 Lu et al. Jul 2008 B2
7405557 Spratte et al. Jul 2008 B2
7413266 Lenz et al. Aug 2008 B2
7425889 Widmann et al. Sep 2008 B2
7447585 Tandy, Jr. et al. Nov 2008 B2
7451020 Goetting et al. Nov 2008 B2
7463137 Wishart et al. Dec 2008 B2
7504995 Lawrence et al. Mar 2009 B2
7532109 Takahama et al. May 2009 B2
7540523 Russell et al. Jun 2009 B2
7548155 Schutt et al. Jun 2009 B2
7568716 Dietz Aug 2009 B2
7623952 Unruh et al. Nov 2009 B2
7648153 Metternich et al. Jan 2010 B2
7690737 Lu Apr 2010 B2
7715953 Shepard May 2010 B2
7731302 Tandy, Jr. et al. Jun 2010 B2
7793965 Padula Sep 2010 B2
7798263 Tandy, Jr. et al. Sep 2010 B2
7878545 Rhymer et al. Feb 2011 B2
7904222 Lee et al. Mar 2011 B2
7905507 Perri Mar 2011 B2
7950751 Offerle et al. May 2011 B2
7953536 Katrak May 2011 B2
7974444 Hongo Jul 2011 B2
8010252 Getman et al. Aug 2011 B2
8010253 Lundquist Aug 2011 B2
8036792 Dechamp Oct 2011 B2
8038166 Piesinger Oct 2011 B1
8044779 Hahn et al. Oct 2011 B2
8073594 Lee et al. Dec 2011 B2
8157284 McGhie et al. Apr 2012 B1
8165770 Getman et al. Apr 2012 B2
8167444 Lee et al. May 2012 B2
8170726 Chen et al. May 2012 B2
8174576 Akatsuka et al. May 2012 B2
8180543 Futamura et al. May 2012 B2
8190364 Rekow May 2012 B2
8191915 Freese, et al. Jun 2012 B2
8192036 Lee et al. Jun 2012 B2
8215436 DeGrave et al. Jul 2012 B2
8223204 Hahn Jul 2012 B2
8244442 Craig et al. Aug 2012 B2
8260518 Englert Sep 2012 B2
8267485 Barlsen et al. Sep 2012 B2
8280607 Gatti et al. Oct 2012 B2
8308182 Ortmann et al. Nov 2012 B2
8326504 Wu et al. Dec 2012 B2
8342560 Albers et al. Jan 2013 B2
8380390 Sy et al. Feb 2013 B2
8380416 Offerle et al. Feb 2013 B2
8393632 Vortmeyer et al. Mar 2013 B2
8401744 Chiocco Mar 2013 B2
8427288 Schofield et al. Apr 2013 B2
8469125 Yu et al. Jun 2013 B2
8498757 Bowden et al. Jul 2013 B2
8504243 Kageyama Aug 2013 B2
8547401 Mallinson et al. Oct 2013 B2
8548680 Ryerson et al. Oct 2013 B2
8548683 Cebon et al. Oct 2013 B2
8571777 Greene Oct 2013 B2
8576115 Basten Nov 2013 B2
8626382 Obradovich Jan 2014 B2
8675953 Elwell et al. Mar 2014 B1
8755984 Rupp et al. Jun 2014 B2
8768535 Kossira et al. Jul 2014 B2
8807261 Subrt et al. Aug 2014 B2
8811698 Kono et al. Aug 2014 B2
8825328 Rupp et al. Sep 2014 B2
8833789 Anderson Sep 2014 B2
8886400 Kossira et al. Nov 2014 B2
8888120 Trevino Nov 2014 B2
8909426 Rhode et al. Dec 2014 B2
8930140 Trombley et al. Jan 2015 B2
8939462 Adamczyk et al. Jan 2015 B2
8955865 Fortin et al. Feb 2015 B2
8972109 Lavoie et al. Mar 2015 B2
9008913 Sears et al. Apr 2015 B1
9026311 Pieronek et al. May 2015 B1
9042603 Elwart et al. May 2015 B2
9082315 Lin et al. Jul 2015 B2
9102271 Trombley et al. Aug 2015 B2
9108598 Headley Aug 2015 B2
9114832 Wang et al. Aug 2015 B2
9120358 Motts et al. Sep 2015 B2
9120359 Chiu et al. Sep 2015 B2
9132856 Shepard Sep 2015 B2
9156496 Greenwood et al. Oct 2015 B2
9164955 Lavoie et al. Oct 2015 B2
9180890 Lu et al. Nov 2015 B2
9187124 Trombley et al. Nov 2015 B2
9227474 Liu Jan 2016 B2
9238483 Hafner et al. Jan 2016 B2
9248858 Lavoie et al. Feb 2016 B2
9296422 Lavoie Mar 2016 B2
9315212 Kyrtswosw et al. Apr 2016 B1
9321483 Headley Apr 2016 B2
9335162 Kyrtsos et al. May 2016 B2
9340228 Xu et al. May 2016 B2
9352777 Lavoie et al. May 2016 B2
9393996 Goswami et al. Jul 2016 B2
9428188 Schwindt et al. Aug 2016 B2
9434414 Lavoie Sep 2016 B2
9437055 Kuehnle et al. Sep 2016 B2
9500497 Lavoie Nov 2016 B2
9610974 Herzog et al. Apr 2017 B2
9616923 Lavoie Apr 2017 B2
9623904 Lavoie et al. Apr 2017 B2
9676377 Hafner et al. Jun 2017 B2
9731568 Wuergler et al. Aug 2017 B2
9798953 Hu Oct 2017 B2
9802542 Lu et al. Oct 2017 B2
9827818 Hu et al. Nov 2017 B2
9836060 Ghneim et al. Dec 2017 B2
9840278 Lavoie et al. Dec 2017 B2
10046800 Hu et al. Aug 2018 B2
20010024333 Rost Sep 2001 A1
20010037164 Heckner Nov 2001 A1
20020128764 Hecker et al. Sep 2002 A1
20040017285 Zielinski et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040021291 Haug et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040093139 Wildey et al. May 2004 A1
20040130441 Lee et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040215374 Shepard Oct 2004 A1
20040222881 Deng et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050000738 Gehring et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050074143 Kawai Apr 2005 A1
20050128059 Vause Jun 2005 A1
20050206224 Lu Sep 2005 A1
20050206225 Offerle et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050206229 Lu et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050206231 Lu et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050236201 Spannheimer et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050236896 Offerle et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060041358 Hara Feb 2006 A1
20060071447 Gehring et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060076828 Lu et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060103511 Lee et al. May 2006 A1
20060111820 Goetting et al. May 2006 A1
20060142936 Dix Jun 2006 A1
20060155455 Lucas et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060244579 Raab Nov 2006 A1
20070027581 Bauer et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070090688 Haemmerling et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070132560 Nystrom et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070152424 Deng et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070216134 Padula Sep 2007 A1
20070285808 Beale Dec 2007 A1
20080147277 Lu et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080231701 Greenwood et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080312792 Dechamp Dec 2008 A1
20090005932 Lee et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090079828 Lee et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090085775 Otsuka et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090093928 Getman et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090198425 Englert Aug 2009 A1
20090228182 Waldbauer et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090248346 Fennel et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090280859 Bergh Nov 2009 A1
20090300701 Karaoguz et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090306861 Schumann et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100063702 Sabelstrom et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100171828 Ishii Jul 2010 A1
20100272370 Schilling et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100332049 Sy et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110001825 Hahn Jan 2011 A1
20110018231 Collenberg Jan 2011 A1
20110022282 Wu et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110087398 Lu et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110112721 Wang et al. May 2011 A1
20110125457 Lee et al. May 2011 A1
20110160956 Chung et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110181457 Basten Jul 2011 A1
20110257860 Getman et al. Oct 2011 A1
20120041658 Turner Feb 2012 A1
20120086808 Lynam et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120095649 Klier et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120109471 Wu May 2012 A1
20120112434 Albers et al. May 2012 A1
20120185131 Headley Jul 2012 A1
20120200706 Greenwood et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120221168 Zeng et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120271512 Rupp et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120271514 Lavoie et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120271515 Rhode et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120271522 Rupp et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120283909 Dix Nov 2012 A1
20120283910 Lee et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120310594 Watanabe Dec 2012 A1
20130006472 McClain et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130024064 Shepard Jan 2013 A1
20130027195 Van Wiemeersch et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130082453 Padula Apr 2013 A1
20130158863 Skvarce et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130179038 Goswami et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130207834 Mizutani et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130226390 Luo et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130250114 Lu Sep 2013 A1
20130261843 Kossira et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130268160 Trombley et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130321347 Kim Dec 2013 A1
20140005918 Qiang Jan 2014 A1
20140012465 Shank et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140025260 McClure Jan 2014 A1
20140052337 Lavoie et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140058614 Trombley et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140058622 Trombley et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140058655 Trombley et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140058668 Trombley et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140067154 Yu et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140067155 Yu et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140085472 Lu et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140088824 Ishimoto Mar 2014 A1
20140160276 Pliefke et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140172232 Rupp et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140183841 Jones Jul 2014 A1
20140188344 Lavoie Jul 2014 A1
20140188346 Lavoie Jul 2014 A1
20140210456 Crossman Jul 2014 A1
20140218506 Trombley et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140218522 Lavoie et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140222288 Lavoie et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140236532 Trombley et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140249691 Hafner et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140267688 Aich Sep 2014 A1
20140267689 Lavoie Sep 2014 A1
20140277941 Chiu et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140277942 Kyrtsos et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140288777 Rupp Sep 2014 A1
20140297128 Lavoie et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140297129 Lavoie et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140303847 Lavoie Oct 2014 A1
20140309888 Smit et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140324295 Lavoie Oct 2014 A1
20140343795 Lavoie Nov 2014 A1
20140358429 Shutko et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140379217 Rupp et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150002670 Bajpai Jan 2015 A1
20150035256 Klank et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150057903 Rhode et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150066296 Trombley et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150066298 Sharma et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150105975 Dunn Apr 2015 A1
20150115571 Zhang et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150120141 Lavoie et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150120143 Schlichting Apr 2015 A1
20150134183 Lavoie et al. May 2015 A1
20150138340 Lavoie May 2015 A1
20150149040 Hueger et al. May 2015 A1
20150158527 Hafner et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150165850 Chiu et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150197278 Boos et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150203156 Hafner et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150210254 Pieronek et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150210317 Hafner et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150217693 Pliefke Aug 2015 A1
20150269444 Lameyre et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150344010 Kurtovic Dec 2015 A1
20160001705 Greenwood et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160009288 Yu Jan 2016 A1
20160039456 Lavoie et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160059780 Lavoie Mar 2016 A1
20160059888 Bradley et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160059889 Herzog et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160096549 Herzog et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160129939 Singh et al. May 2016 A1
20160152263 Singh et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160153778 Singh et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160229452 Lavoie et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160280267 Lavoie et al. Sep 2016 A1
20170073005 Ghneim et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170101130 Lavoie Apr 2017 A1
20170106796 Lavoie et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170174130 Hu et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170177949 Hu et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170267284 Shepard Sep 2017 A1
20170297619 Lavoie et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170297620 Lavoie et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170313351 Lavoie Nov 2017 A1
20180251153 Li et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180253608 Diessner et al. Sep 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (100)
Number Date Country
102582686 Sep 2013 CN
106250893 Dec 2016 CN
3923676 Jan 1991 DE
3931518 Apr 1991 DE
9208595 Aug 1992 DE
19526702 Feb 1997 DE
10030738 Aug 2001 DE
10031244 Jan 2002 DE
10065230 Jul 2002 DE
10122562 Jul 2002 DE
10154612 May 2003 DE
10312548 May 2004 DE
10333998 Feb 2005 DE
102004050149 Apr 2006 DE
102005042957 Mar 2007 DE
102005043466 Mar 2007 DE
102005043467 Mar 2007 DE
102005043468 Mar 2007 DE
102006002294 Jul 2007 DE
102006048947 Apr 2008 DE
102006056408 Jun 2008 DE
102008020838 Nov 2008 DE
102007029413 Jan 2009 DE
102008045436 Mar 2010 DE
102006035021 Apr 2010 DE
102006035021 Apr 2010 DE
102008043675 May 2010 DE
102009007990 Aug 2010 DE
102009012253 Sep 2010 DE
102009027041 Dec 2010 DE
102009038552 Feb 2011 DE
102010006323 Aug 2011 DE
102008004158 Oct 2011 DE
102008004159 Oct 2011 DE
102008004160 Oct 2011 DE
102010021052 Nov 2011 DE
102010029184 Nov 2011 DE
102010045519 Mar 2012 DE
102011104256 Jul 2012 DE
102011101990 Oct 2012 DE
102012005707 Oct 2012 DE
202012010517 Dec 2012 DE
102011108440 Jan 2013 DE
102011120814 Jun 2013 DE
102012006206 Oct 2013 DE
102012206133 Oct 2013 DE
102012019234 Apr 2014 DE
102013000198 Jul 2014 DE
0418653 Mar 1991 EP
433858 Jun 1991 EP
1361543 Nov 2003 EP
1593552 Mar 2007 EP
1593552 Mar 2007 EP
1810913 Jul 2007 EP
2388180 Nov 2011 EP
2452549 May 2012 EP
2487454 Aug 2012 EP
2551132 Jan 2013 EP
2644477 Oct 2013 EP
2803944 Nov 2014 EP
2515379 Apr 1983 FR
2265587 Oct 1993 GB
2342630 Apr 2000 GB
2398048 Aug 2004 GB
2398049 Aug 2004 GB
2398050 Aug 2004 GB
61006458 Jan 1986 JP
615491 Mar 1986 JP
6385568 Jun 1988 JP
01095980 Apr 1989 JP
01095981 Apr 1989 JP
09267762 Oct 1997 JP
09328078 Dec 1997 JP
10001063 Jan 1998 JP
11124051 May 1999 JP
11278319 Oct 1999 JP
2002012172 Jan 2002 JP
2002068032 Mar 2002 JP
2003034261 Feb 2003 JP
2003148938 May 2003 JP
3716722 Nov 2005 JP
2008027138 Feb 2008 JP
2012105158 May 2012 JP
2012166647 Sep 2012 JP
2014002056 Jan 2014 JP
8503263 Aug 1985 WO
0044605 Aug 2000 WO
2005005200 Jan 2005 WO
2005116688 Dec 2005 WO
2006042665 Apr 2006 WO
2012059207 May 2012 WO
2012103193 Aug 2012 WO
2014019730 Feb 2014 WO
2014037500 Mar 2014 WO
2014070047 May 2014 WO
2014092611 Jun 2014 WO
2014123575 Aug 2014 WO
2015074027 May 2015 WO
2015187467 Dec 2015 WO
2017123880 Jul 2017 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (50)
Entry
Novak, Domen; Dovzan, Dejan; Grebensek, Rok; Oblak, Simon, “Automated Parking System for a Truck and Trailer”, International Conference on Advances in the Internet, Processing, Systems and Interdisciplinary Research, Florence, 2007, WorldCat.org, 13 pgs.
“Ford Super Duty: Truck Technologies”, Brochure, Sep. 2011, 2 pages.
Kristopher Bunker, “2012 Guide to Towing”, Trailer Life, 2012, 38 pages.
A. Gonzalez-Cantos, “Backing-Up Maneuvers of Autonomous Tractor-Trailer Vehicles using the Qualitative Theory of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems,” International Journal of Robotics Research, Jan. 2009, vol. 28, 1 page.
L. Chu, Y. Fang, M. Shang, J. Guo, F. Zhou, “Estimation of Articulation Angle for Tractor Semi-Trailer Based on State Observer”, ACM Digital Library, ICMTMA '10 Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Measuring Technology and Automation, vol. 2, Mar. 2010, 1 page.
M. Wagner, D. Zoebel, and A. Meroth, “Adaptive Software and Systems Architecture for Driver Assistance Systems” International Journal of Machine Learning and Computing, Oct. 2011, vol. 1, No. 4, 7 pages.
F.W. Kienhöfer; D. Cebon, “An Investigation of ABS Strategies for Articulated Vehicles”, Cambridge University, Engineering Department, United Kingdom, date unknown, 13 pages.
C. Lundquist; W. Reinelt; O. Enqvist, “Back Driving Assistant for Passenger Cars with Trailer”, ZF Lenksysteme GmbH, Schwäbisch Gmünd, Germany, 2006 (SAE Int'l) Jan. 2006, 8 pages.
Zhe Leng; Minor, M., “A Simple Tractor-Trailer Backing Control Law for Path Following”, IEEE, Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) IEEE/RSJ International Conference, Oct. 2010, 2 pages.
Kinjo, H.; Maeshiro, M.; Uezato, E.; Yamamoto, T., “Adaptive Genetic Algorithm Observer and its Application to Trailer Truck Control System”, IEEE, SICE-ICASE International Joint Conference, Oct. 2006, 2 pgs.
J. Roh; H. Lee; W. Chung, “Control of a Car with a Trailer Using the Driver Assistance System”, IEEE, International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics; Phuket, Thailand, Dec. 2011, 6 pages.
A. Gonzalez-Cantos; J.I. Maza; A. Ollero, “Design of a Stable Backing Up Fuzzy Control of Autonomous Articulated Vehicles for Factory Automation”, Dept. of Systems Engineering and Automatic Control, University of Seville, Spain, 2001, 5 pages.
Altafini, C.; Speranzon, A.; Wahlberg, B., “A Feedback Control Scheme for Reversing a Truck and Trailer Vehicle”, IEEE, Robotics and Automation, IEEE Transactions, Dec. 2001, vol. 17, No. 6, 2 pages.
Zare, A. Sharafi; M. Kamyad, A.V., “A New Approach in Intelligent Trailer Parking”, IEEE, 2010 2nd International Mechanical and Electrical Technology (ICMET), Sep. 2010, 1 page.
Tanaka, K.; Sano, M., “A Robust Stabilization Problem of Fuzzy Control Systems and its Application to Backing up Control of a Truck-trailer”, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, May 1994, vol. 2, No. 2, 1 page.
Sharafi, M. Zare; A. Kamyad; A.V. Nikpoor, S., “Intelligent Parking Method for Truck in Presence of Fixed and Moving Obstacles and Trailer in Presence of Fixed Obstacles: Advanced Fuzzy Logic Technologies in Industrial Applications”, IEEE, 2010 International Electronics and Information Engineering (ICEIE), Aug. 2010, vol. 2, 1 page.
Hodo, D. W.; Hung, J.Y.; Bevly, D. M.; Millhouse, S., “Effects of Sensor Placement and Errors on Path Following Control of a Mobile Robot-Trailer System”, IEEE, American Control Conference, Jul. 2007, 1 page.
Sharafi, M. Zare; A. Kamyad; A.V. Nikpoor, S., “Intelligent Parking Method for Trailers in Presence of Fixed and Moving Obstacles”, IEEE, 2010 3rd International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering (ICACTE), Aug. 2010, vol. 6, 1 page.
Chieh Chen; Tomizuka, M., “Steering and Independent Braking Control for Tractor-Semitrailer Vehicles in Automated Highway Systems”, IEEE, Proceedings of the 34th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Dec. 1995, vol. 2, 1 page.
P. Bolzern, R.M. Desantis, A. Locatelli, “An Input-Output Linearization Approach to the Control of an n-Body Articulated Vehicle”, J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control, Sep. 2001, vol. 123, No. 3, 3 pages.
Dieter Zöbel, David Polock, Philipp Wojke, “Steering Assistance for Backing Up Articulated Vehicles”, Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics; vol. 1, No. 5, date unknown, 6 pages.
J.R. Billing; J.D. Patten; R.B. Madill, “Development of Configurations for Infrastructure-Friendly Five- and Six-Axle SemiTrailers”, National Research Council of Canada and Ontario Ministry of Transportation, date unknown, 11 pages.
Jesus Morales, Anthony Mandow, Jorge L Martinez, and Alfonso Garcia-Cerezo, “Driver Assistance System for Backward Maneuvers in Passive Multi-Trailer Vehicles”, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Oct. 2012, 7 pages.
Cedric Pradalier and Kane Usher, “Experiments in Autonomous Reversing of a Tractor-Trailer System”, 6th International Conference on Field and Service Robotics, inria-00195700, Version 1, Dec. 2007, 10 pages.
Andri Riid, Alar Leibak, Ennu Rüstern, “Fuzzy Backing Control of Truck and Two Trailers”, Tallinn University of Technology; Tallinn, Estonia, date unknown, 6 pages.
Jane McGrath, “How to Avoid Jackknifing”, A Discovery Company, date unknown, 3 pages.
Claudio Altafini, Alberto Speranzon, and Karl Henrik Johansson, “Hybrid Control of a Truck and Trailer Vehicle”, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, HSCC 2002, LNCS 2289; 2002, 14 pages.
Jujnovich, B.; Roebuck, R.; Odhams, A.; David, C., “Implementation of Active Rear Steering of a Tractor Semitrailer”, Cambridge University, Engineering Department; Cambridge, United Kingdom, date unknown, 10 pages.
A.M.C. Odhams; R.L. Roebuck; C. Cebon, “Implementation of Active Steering on a Multiple Trailer Long Combination Vehicle”, Cambridge University, Engineering Department; Cambridge, United Kingdom, date unknown, 13 pages.
Cedric Pradalier and Kane Usher, “Robust Trajectory Tracking for a Reversing Tractor-Trailer System”, (Draft), Field and Service Robotics Conference, CSIRO ICT Centre, Jul. 2007, 16 pages.
Stahn, R.; Heiserich, G.; Stopp, A., “Laser Scanner-Based Navigation for Commercial Vehicles”, IEEE, 2007 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Jun. 2007, 1 page.
Lee Yong H.; Weiwen Deng; Chin Yuen-Kwok Steve; McKay Neil, “Feasibility Study for a Vehicle-Trailer Backing Up Control”, Refdoc.fr, SAE Transactions, vol. 113, No. 6, 2004, 1 page.
A.M.C. Odhams; R.L. Roebuck; B.A. Jujnovich; D. Cebon, “Active Steering of a Tractor—Semi-Trailer” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, SAGE Joumals, vol. 225, No. 7, Jul. 2011, 1 page.
Haviland, G S, “Automatic Brake Control for Trucks—What Good Is It?”, TRID, Society of Automotive Engineers, Sep. 1968, 1 page.
William E. Travis; David W. Hodo; David M. Bevly; John Y. Hung, “UGV Trailer Position Estimation Using a Dynamic Base RTK System”, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, date unknown, 12 pages.
“VSE Electronic Trailer Steering”, ETS for Trailers, version 2009, VSE Trailer Systems B.V., 2009, 28 pages.
“Telematics Past, Present, and Future,” Automotive Service Association, www.ASAshop.org, May 2008, 20 pages.
“Fully Automatic Trailer Tow Hitch With LIN Bus,” https://webista.bmw.com/webista/show?id=1860575499&lang=engb&print=1, date unknown, 5 page.
“VBOX Yaw Rate Sensor With Integral Accelerometers,” Racelogic, www.racelogic.co.uk, date unknown, 2 pages.
P.D.C.R Jayarathna; J.V Wijayakulasooriya; S.R Kodituwakku, “Fuzzy Logic and Neural Network Control Systems for Backing up a Truck and a Trailer”, International Journal of Latest Trends in Computing, vol. 2, No. 3, Sep. 2011, 8 pages.
Olof Enqvist, “AFS-Assisted Trailer Reversing,” Institutionen för systemteknik Deartment of Electrical Engineering, Jan. 27, 2006, 57 pages.
Sh. Azadi, H.R. Rezaei Nedamani, and R. Kazemi, “Automatic Parking of an Articulated Vehicle Using ANFIS”, Global Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology (ISSN: 2322-2441), 2013, pp. 93-104, Issue No. 14.
F. Cuesta and A. Ollero, “Intelligent System for Parallel Parking of Cars and Tractor-Trailers”, Intelligent Mobile Robot Navigation, STAR, 2005, pp. 159-188, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Olof Enqvist, “AFS-Assisted Trailer Reversing,” Institutionen för systemteknik Deartment of Electrical Engineering, Jan. 27, 2006, pp. 1-57.
Tofel, Kevin C., “How to measure anything with a camera and software”, Feb. 6, 2007, 6 pgs. [Retrieved from http://giaom.com/2007/06/how_to_measure/ on Sep. 4, 2014].
Sonnenberg, Jan, “Service and User Interface Transfer from Nomadic Devices to Car Infotainment Systems”, Second International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Automotive UI), Nov. 11-12, 2010, pp. 162-165.
Ratajczak, Robert; Grajek, Tomasz; Wegner, Krzysztof; Klimaszewski, Krzusztof; Kurc, Maciej; Domański, Marek, “Vehicle Dimensions Estimation Scheme Using AAM on Sterescopic Video”, date unknown, pp. 4321-4325.
“Measure and Calculate Distance”, Help Forum, Google Maps, 1 pg. [Retrieved from https://support.google.com/maps/answer/1628031?hl=en on Sep. 4, 2014].
De Brito, Jr., Jailson A.; De Campos, Luis Edmundo Prado; “Automatic Vehicle Classification Using Learning-based Computer Vision and Fuzzy Logic”, Departmento de Ciencia da Computacao, Instituto de Matematics, Universidade Federal da Bahia, date unknown, 4 pgs.
Dlagnekov, Louka; Belongie, Serge, “Recognizing Cars”, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, San Diego, CA, date unknown, pp. 1-8.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180319437 A1 Nov 2018 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 15233458 Aug 2016 US
Child 16031417 US