This invention relates to launchers used to fire projectiles from military and civilian plinths. In particular but not exclusively, the invention relates to a launcher used to fire countermeasure rounds off military ships. More particularly, the launcher is a trainable launcher configured to be adjustable for firing rounds in a range of arcs.
Trainable launchers are known. These consist of a bank of barrels on a base, the barrels are collectively trainable through an elevation arc and by rotation of the base can be trained through an azimuth arc in a plane orthogonal to the elevation arc.
One example of trainable launchers are the New Generation Dagaie System (NGDS). The NGDS is a NATO-compliant, flexible, self-defence electronic warfare unit based on decoy launchers and intended to counter multiple threats such as anti-ship missiles and torpedoes. With a mounting that can be elevated and traversed, the NGDS is integrated in the ship's combat system's detection and warning system. The system has been designed for integration onboard frigates but a lighter version is available for smaller ships (displacement below 1000 t).
A single NGDS system consists of two double-axis launchers each equipped with, for example 12 decoys on the common mounting and a computer that selects the best-suited countermeasure against a given threat. Against missiles the NGDS can employ both infrared and radar decoys and acoustic decoys or jammer against incoming torpedoes. The lighter version aimed at ships under 1,000 t only features a decoy launcher. So far, the NGDS have been selected for integration onboard the French Navy's La Fayette, Horizon and FREMM frigates.
Another example of a trainable launcher is the Rafael Integrated Decoy System (IDS). Whilst configured for different launcher layouts, the Rafael IDS is trained in much the same way as the NGDS.
Trainable launchers on warships need to strike a balance between meeting the requirement to fire as many rounds as possible, providing coverage over as wide a traverse and elevation range as ship safety will allow, minimising its deck footprint, meeting the required accuracy, and having a low centre of gravity and minimising weight.
As described, existing trainable launchers have two axes of freedom with an elevating structure containing all the rounds to be fired, supported through a trunnion arrangement onto a rotating plate. This results in high moments of inertia (MoI) when the launcher is required to align quickly to a new firing angle. This is compounded by significant out of balance forces which are prone to occur when countermeasure rounds are fired and an overall imbalance when they have left the launch tube. Consequently, large motors are needed to drive the launcher, the structure is heavy and its centre of gravity high. As the calibre, length and weight of the rounds increases, known trainable launcher designs for smaller calibres becomes impractical.
The present invention seeks to provide at economical cost, an effective, fully trainable launcher design suited to small and large calibre rounds alike.
In accordance with the present invention, there is provided a launcher comprising multiple barrels arranged on a rotatable plinth, each barrel configured such that its longitudinal axis can be moved through an arc from a first position where the axis is moveable through a plane substantially orthogonal to the plane in which the plinth and barrel assembly rotates to a second position and wherein one or more of the barrels can be moved independently of others carried on the plinth.
In another aspect the invention provides a launcher comprising multiple barrels arranged on a rotatable plinth, each barrel configured such that its longitudinal axis can be moved through an arc from a first position where the axis is moveable through a plane substantially orthogonal to the plane in which the plinth and barrel assembly rotates to a second position wherein the barrels are hinged at or near the rotatable plinth within about 20 cm of the plinth.
The second and third aspects may advantageously be combined with the first stated invention and relate to practical embodiments thereof, but also may be beneficial when utilised independently of the first stated invention.
Desirably, each barrel is moveable independently of the others. Optionally combinations of barrels may be moveable as a group. Desirably the barrels can be selectively positioned at any one of a range of positions between the first and second position to provide a maximum range of arcs for firing the countermeasures.
Desirably the barrels are interchangeable allowing different barrels to be installed for different countermeasure requirements.
Preferably the launcher also includes a cover which is independently rotatable on the rotatable plinth, the cover including closable access means through which a selected barrel can be deployed. In use, the selected barrel and the access means are aligned through rotation of the plinth and/or the cover to a position from which the barrel is to be tilted. Once aligned, the access means is opened and the barrel deployed through the access means to the desired angle of elevation. Optionally, the access means may also be used to provide access to barrels for loading as well as countermeasure deployment.
In an alternative and simpler embodiment, a cover may be provided in the form of a fabric cover, for example made from canvas.
In one unique embodiment designed by the Applicant, the rounds are stored close together vertically near to the vertical rotational axis. This minimises the moment of inertia about the vertical axis and, as only the barrel to be fired is set to the required elevation angle, the Moment of Inertia about the horizontal axis is effectively eliminated. The resulting launcher has a low centre of gravity and generates weight savings over prior known trainable launcher designs. Further, the design will allow easy exchange of barrels to accommodate both old and new rounds.
The smaller footprint provided by the above described embodiment allows for a cover to be provided in the form of a rotating dome or other solid shape with minimal radar cross section to be fitted over the launcher. With apertures only open for firing and loading, significantly improved environmental protection is provided against sea spray, rain, snow, ice and solar radiation effects. The latter may contribute to longer operational life and higher reliability of performance for countermeasure rounds. The cover also reduces husbandry and maintenance, contributing to minimisation of through life costs. This will ensure radar cross section is minimised Loading would normally be on the inboard aspect (or forward and aft if there is limited space). The existence of the cover also prevents third parties easily gaining intelligence on the launcher load, an important consideration when operating close inshore.
As a result of the rotating cover, and the ability to set a particular barrel at the optimum angle for the operator, loading times are minimised. A further advantage the improved ergonomics of the system is reduced risk of operator injury.
Overall the unique design result is a practical solution allowing countermeasure rounds to be fired at the required optimised traverse training and elevation angle. This significantly increases the operational effectiveness of a countermeasures system and reduces the need for ship manoeuvre, one of the major operational shortcomings of fixed launcher systems.
Figures of one embodiment of a launcher of the invention are attached.
It has been found that with the design and also contemplating modern day countermeasures, the barrels need not be solid in circumference but may be railed or otherwise discontinuous in circumference, this allows the launcher to be lighter and more responsive. It is envisaged that the proposed launcher can be adapted to carry a wide range of weight and calibre rounds including rounds of a calibre in excess of 130 mm.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0913637.5 | Aug 2009 | GB | national |
1004080.6 | Mar 2010 | GB | national |
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/800,982, filed May 26, 2010, which is based upon and claims the benefit of priority from Great Britain Patent Applications No. 0913637.5 filed on Aug. 5, 2009 and No. 1004080.6 filed on Mar. 11, 2010, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12800982 | May 2010 | US |
Child | 13948627 | US |