Transparent waveguide display for tiling a display having plural optical powers using overlapping and offset FOV tiles

Abstract
One embodiment provides an apparatus for displaying an image comprising: a first optical substrate comprising at least one waveguide layer configured to propagate light in a first direction, wherein the at least one waveguide layer of the first optical substrate comprises at least one grating lamina configured to extract the light from the first substrate along the first direction; and a second optical substrate comprising at least one waveguide layer configured to propagate the light in a second direction, wherein the at least one waveguide layer of the second optical substrate comprises at least one grating lamina configured to extract light from the second substrate along the second direction; wherein the at least one grating lamina of at least one of the first and second optical substrates comprises an SBG in a passive mode.
Description

There is a need for a compact transparent data display capable of displaying image content ranging from symbols and alphanumeric arrays to high-resolution pixelated images. Examples of transparent displays include HMDs, HUDs, HDDs and others. One important factor in each case is that the display should be highly transparent and the displayed image content should be clearly visible when superimposed over a bright background scene. The display should provide full color with an enhanced color gamut for optimal data visibility and impact—although monochrome will suffice in many applications. One important factor for Helmet Mounted Displays is that the display should be easy to attach to standard helmets or replicas thereof designed for training. The eye relief and pupil should be big enough to avoid image loss during head movement even for demanding military and sports activities. The image generator should be compact, solid state and have low power consumption. In automotive applications the ergonomic demands are equally challenging and aesthetic considerations make yet further demands on the form factor of the display, which ideally should be capable of being hidden within a dashboard when not in use. There is a growing need for more compact, cheaper and more efficient designs in many other application areas. The inventors note the growing demand for HUDs in airliners and small aircraft. Car manufactures are also looking to provide HUDs and HDDs in their future models. The systems described herein may be applicable to a helmet mounted head worn display for use in Augmented Immersive Team Training (AITT), essentially a live simulated training system for observer training that augments or replaces indirect fires and aircraft sorties needed to certify or sustain observer skills.


The above goals are not achieved by current technology. Current designs only manage to deliver see-through, adequate pupils, eye relief and field of view and high brightness simultaneously at the expense of cumbersome form factors. In many helmet-mounted display designs, weight is distributed in the worst possible place, in front of the eye. The most common approach to providing see-through displays relies on reflective or diffractive visors illuminated by off axis light. Microdisplays, which provide high-resolution image generators in tiny flat panels, do not necessarily help with miniaturization because the need for very high magnifications inevitably results in large diameter optics. The ideal transparent display is one that: firstly, preserves situational awareness by offering a panoramic see-through view with high transparency; and secondly, provides high-resolution, wide-field-of-view imagery. Such a system should also be unobtrusive; that is, compact, light-weight, and comfortable, where comfort comes from having a generous exit pupil and eye motion box/exit pupil (>15 mm), adequate eye relief (>25 mm), ergonomic center of mass, focus at infinity, and compatibility with protective head gear. Current and future conventional refractive optics cannot satisfy this suite of demands. Other important discriminators include: full color capability, field of view, pixel resolution, see-throughness (transparency), luminance, dynamic grayscale and power consumption levels. Even after years of highly competitive development, head-mounted displays based on refractive optics exhibit limited fields of view and are not adequately compact, light-weight, or comfortable.


Displays based on waveguide technology substrate guided displays have demonstrated the capability of meeting many of these basic demands. The concept has been around for well over a decade. Of particular relevance is a U.S. Pat. No. 5,856,842 awarded to Kaiser Optical Systems Inc. in 1999 which teaches how light can be coupled into a waveguide by employing a diffractive element at the input and coupled out of the same waveguide by employing a second diffractive element at the output. According to U.S. Pat. No. 5,856,842, the light incident on the waveguide needs to be collimated in order to maintain its image content as it propagates along the waveguide. That is, the light must be collimated before it enters the waveguide. This can be accomplished in a variety of ways and is not a concern here. With this design approach, light leaving the waveguide will be naturally collimated, which is the condition needed to make the imagery appear focused at infinity. Light propagates along a waveguide only over a limited range of internal angles. Light propagating parallel to the surface will (by definition) travel along the waveguide without bouncing. Light not propagating parallel to the surface will travel along the waveguide bouncing back and forth between the surfaces, provided the angle of incidence with respect to the surface normal is greater than some critical angle. For BK-7 glass, this critical angle is approximately 42 degrees. This can be lowered slightly by using a reflective coating (but this unfortunately diminishes the see-through performance of the substrate) or by using a higher-index material. Regardless, the range of internal angles over which light will propagate along the waveguide does not vary significantly. Thus, for glass, the maximum range of internal angles is <50 degrees. This translates into a range of angles exiting the waveguide (i.e., angles in air) smaller than 40 degrees and generally less, when other design factors are taken into account. To date, Substrate Guided Optics (SGO) technology has not gained wide-spread acceptance. This is largely due to the fact that waveguide optics can be used to expand the exit pupil but they cannot be used to expand the field of view or improve the digital resolution. That is, the underlying physics, which constrains the range of internal angles that can undergo TIR within the waveguide, limits the achievable field of view with waveguide optics to at most 40° and the achievable digital resolution to that of the associated imager. Nevertheless, the lure of a compact, light-weight HMD based on waveguide optics continues to inspire interest. One way to create a much larger field of view is to parse it into a set of smaller fields of view (each compatible with the optical limitations of the waveguide) and to time sequentially display them rapidly enough that the eye perceives them as a unified wide-angle display. One way to do this is with holographic elements that can be sequentially switched on and off very rapidly such as a Switchable Bragg Grating (SBG).


The optical design benefits of diffractive optical elements (DOEs) are well known including unique and efficient form factors and the ability to encode complex optical functions such as optical power and diffusion into thin layers. Bragg gratings (also commonly termed volume phase grating or holograms), which offer the highest diffraction efficiencies, have been widely used in devices such as Head Up Displays (HUDs). An important class of Bragg grating devices is known as a Switchable Bragg Grating (SBG). An SBG is a diffractive device formed by recording a volume phase grating, or hologram, in a polymer dispersed liquid crystal (PDLC) mixture. Typically, SBG devices are fabricated by first placing a thin film of a mixture of photopolymerizable monomers and liquid crystal material between parallel glass plates or substrates. Techniques for making and filling glass cells are well known in the liquid crystal display industry. One or both glass substrates support electrodes, typically transparent indium tin oxide films, for applying an electric field across the PDLC layer. Other types of transparent conductive coating may also be used. A volume phase grating is then recorded by illuminating the liquid material with two mutually coherent laser beams, which interfere to form the desired grating structure. During the recording process, the monomers polymerize and the holographic polymer-dispersed liquid crystals (HPDLC) mixture undergoes a phase separation, creating regions densely populated by liquid crystal micro-droplets, interspersed with regions of clear polymer. The alternating liquid crystal-rich and liquid crystal-depleted regions form the fringe planes of the grating. The resulting volume phase grating can exhibit very high diffraction efficiency, which may be controlled by the magnitude of the electric field applied across the PDLC layer. When an electric field is applied to the hologram (e.g., a suitably optimized hologram) via transparent electrodes, the natural orientation of the LC droplets is changed causing the refractive index modulation of the fringes to reduce and the hologram diffraction efficiency to drop to very low levels. Note that the diffraction efficiency of the device can be adjusted, by means of the applied voltage, over a continuous range from near 100% efficiency with no voltage applied to almost zero efficiency with a sufficiently high voltage applied. SBGs may be used to provide transmission or reflection gratings for free space applications. SBGs may be implemented as waveguide devices in which the HPDLC forms either the waveguide core or an evanescently coupled layer in proximity to the waveguide. In one particular configuration to be referred to here as Substrate Guided Optics (SGO), the parallel glass plates used to form the HPDLC cell provide a total internal reflection (TIR) light guiding structure. Light is “coupled” out of the SBG when the switchable grating diffracts the light at an angle beyond the TIR condition. SGOs are currently of interest in a range of display and sensor applications. Although much of the earlier work on HPDLC has been directed at reflection holograms, transmission devices are proving to be much more versatile as optical system building blocks.


Typically, the HPDLC used in SBGs comprise liquid crystal (LC), monomers, photoinitiator dyes, and coinitiators. The mixture frequently includes a surfactant. The patent and scientific literature contains many examples of material systems and processes that may be used to fabricate SBGs. Two fundamental patents are: U.S. Pat. No. 5,942,157 by Sutherland, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,751,452 by Tanaka et al. Both filings describe monomer and liquid crystal material combinations suitable for fabricating SBG devices.


One of the known attributes of transmission SBGs is that the LC molecules tend to align normal to the grating fringe planes. The effect of the LC molecule alignment is that transmission SBGs efficiently diffract P polarized light (i.e., light with the polarization vector in the plane of incidence), but have nearly zero diffraction efficiency for S polarized light (i.e., light with the polarization vector normal to the plane of incidence. Transmission SBGs may not be used at near-grazing incidence as the diffraction efficiency of any grating for P polarization falls to zero when the included angle between the incident and reflected light is small. A glass light guide in air will propagate light by total internal reflection if the internal incidence angle is greater than about 42 degrees. Thus the invention may be implemented using transmission SBGs if the internal incidence angles are in the range of 42 to about 70 degrees, in which case the light extracted from the light guide by the gratings will be predominantly p-polarized. Normally SBGs diffract when no voltage is applied and are switching into their optically passive state when a voltage is applied at other times. However SBGs can be designed to operate in reverse mode such that they diffract when a voltage is applied and remain optically passive at all other times. Methods for fabricating reverse mode SBGs are disclosed in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/573,066 with filing date 24 Aug. 2012 by the present inventors entitled IMPROVEMENTS TO HOLOGRAPHIC POLYMER DISPERSED LIQUID CRYSTAL MATERIALS AND DEVICES. The same reference also discloses how SBGs may be fabricated using flexible plastic substrates to provide the benefits of improved ruggedness, reduce weight and safety in near eye applications.


In a prior filing the inventors have disclosed a waveguide (SGO) display that produces a large field of view by parsing it into a set of smaller fields of view (each compatible with the optical limitations of the waveguide) and to time sequentially display them so fast that the eye perceives them as a unified image. This process is sometimes referred to as field of view tiling. One way to do this is with holographic elements that can be sequentially switched on and off very rapidly. In an earlier PCT Application No.: PCT/GB2010/000835, with International Filing date 26 Apr. 2010, by the present inventors entitled COMPACT HOLOGRAPHIC EDGE ILLUMINATED EYEGLASS DISPLAY which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety, the inventors have shown how multiple SBGs can be stacked together in the same waveguide and activated in rapid succession to time-sequentially tile a high-resolution, ultra-wide-field of view. Moreover, each subfield of view has the full digital resolution of the associated imager, allowing the formation of images that approach or even exceed the visual acuity limit of the human eye. While the tiling disclosed in this earlier filing overcomes the twin deficiencies of standard guided-wave architectures: limited field of view and limited pixel resolution, it has limitations when it is necessary to tile vertically and horizontally over large fields of view. For monochrome displays with modest FOV and expansion in only one direction, tiling can be accomplished by simply stacking the grating planes. However, when the field of view is expanded in both directions and color is added, the number of layers needed with this approach quickly becomes impractical. Each subfield of view is limited by the diffraction efficiency and angular bandwidth of the SBG. SBG grating devices typically have angular bandwidths in air of approximately ±5° (subject to material properties, index modulation beam geometry and thickness). The inventors have found that larger angles can be achieved in practice by using thinner SBGs typically, smaller than 3 microns. The increased bandwidth resulting from thinner SBGs will result in lower peak diffraction efficiency. Therefore it is usually necessary to increase the refractive index modulation. One way to avoid the need for separate RGB SBGs is to use multiplexed SBGs, in which the illumination is provided from opposite ends of the light guide as R and B/G illumination, compromising the color gamut somewhat. However, multiplexed gratings raise issues of fabrication complexity and cross talk.


An elegant solution to the tiling problem disclosed in United States Provisional patent with a filing date of 25 Apr. 2012 by the present inventors entitled WIDE ANGLE COLOR HEAD MOUNTED DISPLAY, is to compress the stack by interlacing or tessellating the SBGs, as opposed to simply stacking the gratings. The display disclosed in Application No. 61/687,436 comprises two elements: firstly, a multilayer waveguide device comprises layers of tessellated SBG arrays referred to as the DigiLens and, secondly, an optical system for providing input image data from one or more microdisplays referred to as an Input Image Node (IIN) which, in addition to the microdisplays, contains laser illumination modules, collimation and relay optics waveguide links and grating devices. The same terminology will be retained for the purposes of describing the present invention. In very basic terms the DigiLens provides the eyepiece while the IIN provides a compact image generation module that will typically be located above or to the side of the DigiLens according to the ergonomic constraints of the application. In Application No. 61/687,436, all SBG elements sharing a given prescription are activated simultaneously such that they diffract collimated wave guided image light into a predetermined FOV tile. The number of images that can be tiled is only limited by the input display refresh rate. The SBG elements would typically be a few millimeters in size. While this approach achieves significant economy in terms of layers, it suffers from the problems of illumination ripple owing to tessellated grating pattern used in the DigiLens), scatter from electrodes, and general optical and electrical complexity.


The motivation behind the present disclosure is to reduce the need for tessellating the DigiLens. A further problem of the prior art is that coupling the IIN output image into the waveguides is very inefficient, thus resulting in thick waveguides. A more efficient way of sampling the input image field is needed overcome this problem.


SUMMARY

In view of the foregoing, the Inventors have recognized and appreciated the advantages of a display and more particularly to a transparent display that combines Substrate Guided Optics (SGO) and Switchable Bragg Gratings (SBGs).


Accordingly, provided in one aspect of some embodiments is an apparatus for displaying an image, the apparatus comprising: a first optical substrate comprising at least one waveguide layer configured to propagate light in a first direction, wherein the at least one waveguide layer of the first optical substrate comprises at least one grating lamina configured to extract the light from the first substrate along the first direction; and a second optical substrate comprising at least one waveguide layer configured to propagate the light in a second direction, wherein the at least one waveguide layer of the second optical substrate comprises at least one grating lamina configured to extract light from the second substrate along the second direction. The at least one grating lamina of at least one of the first and second optical substrates may comprise an SBG in a passive mode.


In one embodiment, the at least one waveguide of at least one of the first and second optical substrates comprises a plurality of grating laminas, at least two of the plurality having the same surface grating frequency.


In one embodiment, the at least one grating lamina of at least one of the first and second optical substrates comprises non-switching Bragg grating recorded in a HPDLC material in at least one of forward and reverse modes. While the grating lamina may be an SBG in some instances, it need not be. Other types of suitable materials may also be used.


In one embodiment, the first and second optical substrates comprise an SBG in a passive mode.


In one embodiment, at least one of the first and second optical substrates comprises a plurality of waveguide layers, and each of the pluralities of waveguide layers is configured to propagate at least one of red, green, blue, blue/green mixed light, and one of a multiplicity of sub Field of Views (FOVs). In one instance, at least one of the first and second optical substrates comprises a plurality of waveguide layers, and when the plurality comprises three waveguide layers, the three waveguide layers are configured to propagate red, green, and blue light. Alternatively, when the plurality comprises two waveguide layers, the three waveguide layers are configured to propagate red light and mixed blue and green light.


In one embodiment, the at least one waveguide layer of the at least one of the first and second optical substrates comprises holograms with superimposed different color prescriptions.


In one embodiment, the at least one waveguide layer in at least one of the first and second optical substrates is lossy.


In one embodiment, the at least one grating lamina of at least one of the first and second optical substrates has a thickness that is less than about 3 microns. For example, the thickness may be less than about 2.5 microns, 2 microns, 1.5 microns, 1.2 microns, 1 micron, 0.5 micron, or even smaller.


In one embodiment, the at least one grating lamina of at least one of the first and second optical substrates has a varying thickness along the respective direction of light propagation.


In one embodiment, the apparatus described herein is a part of a device, wherein the device is a part of at least one of HMD, HUD, and HDD.


Provided in another aspect of some embodiments is an apparatus for displaying an image comprising: an input image node for providing image modulated light; a first optical substrate comprising at least one waveguide layer configured to propagate the modulated light in a first direction, wherein the at least one waveguide layer of the first optical substrate comprises at least one grating lamina configured to extract the modulated light from the first substrate along the first direction; a second optical substrate comprising at least one waveguide layer configured to propagate the modulated light in a second direction, wherein the at least one waveguide layer of the second optical substrate comprises at least one grating lamina configured to extract the modulated light from the second substrate along the second direction. The at least one grating lamina of the first optical substrate may be configured to couple the modulated light into the first substrate. The at least one grating lamina of the second optical substrate may be configured to couple the modulated light extracted from the first substrate into the second substrate. The at least one grating lamina of at least one of the first and second optical substrates may have a k-vector that varies along the respective direction of light propagation.


In one embodiment, the input image node comprises at least one of microdisplay, laser, and collimating optics. A microdisplay may be any type of microdisplay commonly used, including, for example, an emissive microdisplay. An emissive microdisplay may be an OLED, a QPI, and the like.


In one embodiment, the at least one grating lamina of at least one of the first and second optical substrates has a varying thickness. For example, the thickness may increase in a direction that is at least one of (i) parallel to a direction of the light propagation and (ii) orthogonal to the light propagation. Alternatively, the thickness may increase and then decrease (or vice versa) along the aforedescribed direction. The geometry is not limited.


In one embodiment, the at least one grating lamina of at least one of the first and second optical substrates comprises an SBG that is in a switching mode or in a passive mode.


In one embodiment, the at least one grating lamina in at least one of the first and second substrates comprises multiplex gratings of at least two different monochromatic prescriptions.


In one embodiment, the apparatus comprises multiple grating laminas having the same surface grating frequency but different k-vectors, wherein the multiple grating laminas are configured to divide the input image field of view into multiple angular intervals.


In one embodiment, at least one of the first and second optical substrates is curved in at least one orthogonal plane.


In one embodiment, the light extracted from the first and second optical substrates provides uniform illumination in any field of view direction.


Provided in another aspect of some embodiments is a method of displaying an image, the method comprising: coupling a modulated light from an input image into a first optical substrate; extracting the light from the first substrate; and coupling the extracted light from the first substrate into the second substrate. The first optical substrate may comprise at least one waveguide layer configured to propagate light in a first direction, wherein the at least one waveguide layer of the first optical substrate comprises at least one grating lamina configured to extract light from the first substrate along the first direction. The second optical substrate may comprise at least one waveguide layer configured to propagate light in a second direction, wherein the at least one waveguide layer of the second optical substrate comprises at least one grating lamina configured to extract light from the second substrate along the second direction. The at least one grating lamina of at least one of the first and second optical substrates may comprise an SBG in a passive mode.


In one embodiment, the method further comprises sampling the input image into a plurality of angular intervals, each of the plurality of angular intervals having an effective exit pupil that is a fraction of the size of the full pupil. In one stance, this surprisingly provides an advantage that the thickness of the first waveguide can be much smaller in comparison to pre-existing devices. Accordingly, the size and placement of the input gratings may be advantageously affected.


In one embodiment, the method further comprising improving the displaying of the image by modifying at least one of the following of the at least one grating lamina of at least one of the first and second optical substrates: grating thickness, refractive index modulation, k-vector roll profile, surface grating period, and hologram-substrate index difference.


Provided in another embodiment is an apparatus for displaying an image comprising: an input image node for providing image modulated light; first and second optical waveguiding substrates; a first optical means for coupling image modulated light into said first substrate; and a second optical means for coupling light extracted from the first substrate into the second substrate. The first optical substrate comprises at least one waveguiding layer that propagates light in a first direction. Each waveguiding layer contains at least one grating lamina operative to extract light from the first substrate, the light extraction taking place along the first direction. The second optical substrate comprise at least one waveguiding layer. Each waveguiding layer propagates light in a second direction. Each waveguiding layer contains at least one grating lamina operative to extract light for display from the second substrate, the light extraction taking place along the second direction. In one embodiment the first optical substrate selectively samples portions of the image modulated light, each portion being characterized by either angular field or spatial field.


It should be appreciated that all combinations of the foregoing concepts and additional concepts discussed in greater detail below (provided such concepts are not mutually inconsistent) are contemplated as being part of the inventive subject matter disclosed herein. In particular, all combinations of claimed subject matter appearing at the end of this disclosure are contemplated as being part of the inventive subject matter disclosed herein. It should also be appreciated that terminology explicitly employed herein that also may appear in any disclosure incorporated by reference should be accorded a meaning most consistent with the particular concepts disclosed herein.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The skilled artisan will understand that the drawings primarily are for illustrative purposes and are not intended to limit the scope of the inventive subject matter described herein. The drawings are not necessarily to scale; in some instances, various aspects of the inventive subject matter disclosed herein may be shown exaggerated or enlarged in the drawings to facilitate an understanding of different features. In the drawings, like reference characters generally refer to like features (e.g., functionally similar and/or structurally similar elements).



FIG. 1A is a schematic illustration of the optical geometry of a Bragg grating in the tangential plane.



FIG. 1B is a schematic illustration of the optical geometry of a Bragg grating in the sagittal plane.



FIG. 2A is a schematic side elevation view showing a first operational state in one embodiment.



FIG. 2B is a schematic side elevation view showing a second operational state in one embodiment.



FIG. 2C is a schematic front elevation view of one embodiment.



FIG. 3 is a schematic three dimensional view of the components of one embodiment.



FIG. 4 is a schematic side elevation view of the components of one embodiment.



FIG. 5 is a flow chart representing the formation of an image in one embodiment.



FIG. 6 is a schematic side elevation view of one embodiment.



FIG. 7 is a schematic side elevation view of one embodiment.



FIG. 8 is a schematic side elevation view of one embodiment.



FIG. 9 is a chart showing the diffraction efficiency characteristics of one embodiment.



FIG. 10 is a schematic cross sectional view of a horizontal beam expander in one embodiment.



FIG. 11 is a table provide diffraction efficiency characteristic of SBGs used in one embodiment.



FIG. 12A is a schematic three dimensional view showing a first operational state of one embodiment.



FIG. 12B is a schematic three dimensional view showing a second operational state of one embodiment.



FIG. 13A is a schematic three dimensional view showing a third operational state of one embodiment.



FIG. 13B is a schematic three dimensional view showing a fourth operational state of one embodiment.



FIG. 14A is an artist's impression of a first aspect of a HMD implement of the invention.



FIG. 14B is an artist's impression of a second aspect of a HMD implement of the invention.



FIG. 14C is an artist's impression of a third aspect of a HMD implement of the invention.



FIG. 15 is a schematic cross section view of a wedged profile waveguide grating used in one embodiment.



FIG. 16 is a schematic side elevation view of one embodiment



FIG. 17 is chart shown diffraction efficiency versus angle characteristics of one embodiment



FIG. 18 is a schematic side elevation view of one embodiment



FIG. 19A is a schematic side elevation view showing a first operational state of one embodiment.



FIG. 19B is a schematic side elevation view showing a second operational state of one embodiment.



FIG. 20A is a schematic side elevation view showing a first operational state of an input image node in one embodiment.



FIG. 20B is a schematic side elevation view showing a second operational state of an input image node in one embodiment.



FIG. 21 is a schematic plan view of a HBE containing slanted grating stripes.



FIG. 22 is a schematic three dimensional view of one embodiment using a HBE containing slanted grating stripes.



FIG. 23A is a schematic side elevation view showing a first operational state of a HUD provided by one embodiment.



FIG. 23B is a schematic side elevation view showing a second operational state of a HUD provided by one embodiment.



FIG. 24 is a schematic side elevation view of a HUD provided by one embodiment.



FIG. 25 is a schematic side elevation view of a HUD provided by one embodiment.



FIG. 26 is a schematic illustration of a prior art collimated image display.



FIG. 27 is a schematic side elevation view of a HUD according to the principles of the invention.



FIG. 28 is a schematic side elevation view of a holographic mirror.



FIG. 29 is a schematic side elevation view of a HUD provided by one embodiment.



FIG. 30 is a schematic side elevation view of a HUD provided by one embodiment.



FIG. 31 is a schematic side elevation view of a HUD provided by one embodiment.



FIG. 32A is a three dimension view of a color display provided by one embodiment



FIG. 32B is a chart showing the spectral characteristics of a light source used in a color display provided by one embodiment.



FIG. 32C is a table showing the spectral characteristics of a light source used in a color display provided by one embodiment.



FIG. 33 is a cross sectional view of a HUD integrated in a windscreen in one embodiments of the invention



FIG. 34 is a cross sectional view of a HUD integrated in a windscreen in one embodiments of the invention



FIG. 35 is a three dimensional view of a display provided by one embodiment



FIG. 36 is a three dimensional view of a display provided by one embodiment



FIG. 37 is a schematic side elevation view of a color display provided by one embodiment.



FIG. 38 is a schematic three dimensional view of a color display provided by one embodiment.



FIG. 39A is a schematic side elevation view of one embodiment



FIG. 39B is a schematic front elevation view of one embodiment



FIG. 40 is a cross sectional view of a HUD integrated in a windscreen in one embodiment



FIG. 41 is a flow chart illustrating image formation in a HUD in one embodiment



FIG. 42A is a chart show a first diffraction efficiency versus angle characteristic of a multiplexed DigiLens in one embodiment.



FIG. 42B is a chart show a second diffraction efficiency versus angle characteristic of a multiplexed DigiLens in one embodiment.



FIG. 43 is a schematic three dimensional view of a color multiplexed display in one embodiment.



FIG. 44 is a schematic side elevation view of a DigiLens used in a color multiplexed display in one embodiment.



FIG. 45 is a three dimensional illustration of an embodiment of a display in one embodiment in which there are provided three HBE waveguides and three DigiLens waveguides.



FIG. 46 is a schematic side elevation view showing the formation of a projected stop by the IIN.



FIG. 47 is a schematic plan view illustrating the coupling of light from the IIN into the HBE waveguide.



FIG. 48 shows a detail of the HBE waveguide of FIG. 47. The image input end illustrating the interaction of the beam with the gratings.



FIG. 49 is a schematic cross-sectional view of a four layer HBE in one embodiment.



FIG. 50 is a table showing the gratings used in the embodiment of FIG. 49.



FIG. 51 is a chart showing overlapping DE versus angle profiles in the embodiment of FIG. 49.



FIG. 52 is a three dimensional view of a wedge SBG grating in one embodiment.



FIG. 53A is a schematic illustration of a first operational state of the HBE in one embodiment.



FIG. 53B is a schematic illustration of a second operational state of the HBE in one embodiment.



FIG. 53C is a schematic illustration of a third operational state of the HBE in one embodiment.



FIGS. 54A-54B illustrates projection schemes in one embodiment that do not result in a projected pupil of the type discussed earlier in the description; the pupil may be formed inside the projection lens (FIG. 54A) or before the projection lens using the aperture 562 (FIG. 54B).



FIG. 55 shows a schematic illustration of the use of rolled k-vector gratings to maximize the peak DE of in-couple light in one embodiment.



FIG. 56 shows a schematic illustration showing the propagation of a typical ray through a waveguide section 580 containing rolled k-vector gratings in one embodiment.



FIG. 57 shows a plan view showing the HBE 590 and the VBE 591 in one embodiment.



FIG. 58 shows a schematic side elevation view of the HBE and the VBE in one embodiment.



FIG. 59 shows an unfolded view of the HBE showing the beam propagation inside the waveguide in one embodiment.



FIG. 60 illustrates an apparatus for fabricating the HBE using a contact copying process in one embodiment.



FIGS. 61A-61C, respectively, show a cross section of the Z=L end of the HBE 590 with the wider end of a cone shaped lens overlaid, a plan view of the lens, and the Z=0 end of the HBE with the narrower end of the lens overlaid in one embodiment.



FIGS. 62A-62C illustrate the generation of the conic section from a cone of tip 620 and base 621; the cone is shown in side view in FIG. 62A and in-front view in FIG. 62B; a view of the cut out optics projected from the base along the cut line is shown in FIG. 62C.



FIG. 63 shows the basic architecture of a waveguide in one embodiment.



FIG. 64 is an illustration of a waveguide in which the input gratings 635A-635C are stacked. Each grating has a unique k-vector 636A-636C in one embodiment.



FIG. 65 shows that the input gratings are disposed adjacent to each other along the waveguide propagation direction in one embodiment.



FIG. 66 illustrates that the principles illustrated in FIGS. 64-65 may also be applied in the output grating in one embodiment.



FIG. 67 shows a flow chart describing a process of one embodiment.



FIG. 68 shows a ray trace of a monochromatic version of the design in one embodiment.



FIG. 69 shows the approximate dimensions of the IIN of FIG. 63 in one embodiment.



FIG. 70 provides unfolded views of the optical layout of FIG. 64 in one embodiment.



FIGS. 71A and 71B illustrate the formation of a projected stop inside the HBE in one embodiment using a simplified thin lens representation of the microdisplay projection optics.



FIG. 72 illustrates one embodiment, in which the HBE that comprises a coupling grating at its input end and alternating SBG stripes of two different prescription, is inclined at 45 degrees.



FIG. 73 illustrates beam propagation from the IIN through a single layer of the DigiLens showing the four changes in direction that occur along the path to the exit pupil in one embodiment.



FIG. 74 shows plan view of the near eye geometry of the proposed helmet mounted display in one embodiment.



FIG. 75 shows side view of the near eye geometry of the proposed helmet mounted display in one embodiment.



FIG. 76 shows front view of the near eye geometry of the proposed helmet mounted display in one embodiment.



FIG. 77 shows the relationship of the DigiLens® aperture to the FOV, eye relief and eye box in one embodiment.



FIG. 78 shows partial binocular overlap in one embodiment.



FIG. 79 shows partial binocular overlap in another embodiment.



FIG. 80 shows a transparent waveguide display in one embodiment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Following below are more detailed descriptions of various concepts related to, and embodiments of, inventive a transparent display. It should be appreciated that various concepts introduced above and discussed in greater detail below may be implemented in any of numerous ways, as the disclosed concepts are not limited to any particular manner of implementation. Examples of specific implementations and applications are provided primarily for illustrative purposes.


The invention will now be further described by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings. It will apparent to those skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced with some or all of the present invention as disclosed in the following description. For the purposes of explaining the invention well-known features of optical technology known to those skilled in the art of optical design and visual displays have been omitted or simplified in order not to obscure the basic principles of the invention. Unless otherwise stated the term “on-axis” in relation to a ray or a beam direction refers to propagation parallel to an axis normal to the surfaces of the optical components described in relation to the invention. In the following description the terms light, ray, beam and direction may be used interchangeably and in association with each other to indicate the direction of propagation of light energy along rectilinear trajectories. Parts of the following description will be presented using terminology commonly employed by those skilled in the art of optical design. It should also be noted that in the following description of the invention repeated usage of the phrase “in one embodiment” does not necessarily refer to the same embodiment.


The present invention is made possible by two fundamental properties of SBGs that have not been exploited to date firstly the relatively wide angular bandwidth of Bragg gratings in the plane orthogonal to the plane of diffraction and secondly the wide angular bandwidths resulting from making SBGs very thin. As a result, the constraints of limiting the size of FOV tiles to around 10°×10° does not apply in this instance, thereby leading to the tessellation approach discussed above. Fewer bigger tiles may now be used as a result. As is shown in the following description the needed FOV may be divided into two tiles with one DigiLens for each. Other numbers of tiles may also be possible. With respect to the optical design this new approach may minimize, if not eliminate entirely, the problem of illumination ripple. By making the DigiLens passive the problems of scatter from electrodes and the not insignificant problems of wiring up large matrices of tessellation elements may be avoided. A passive SBG is no different from a switching SDBG in terms of its HPDLC formulation and recording process. The only difference is that no electrodes are needed. The diffracting properties of an SBG are normally specified in the tangential plane. In a grating design to diffract light in a plane, the tangential plane is the plane containing the incident and diffracted ray vectors and the grating vector. Following geometrical optical theory the plane orthogonal to the tangential plane is referred to as the sagittal plane. FIG. 1 illustrates the basic geometrical optics of a transmission SBG 90 containing slanted fringes such as 91 with grating vectors K aligned normal to the fringes. In Bragg gratings the a multiplicity of input and output rays will satisfy the Bragg condition provided the angles between the incident rays and the k-vector diffracted rays and the K-vector satisfy the Bragg equation. (Note that in practice, according to the Kogelnik theory of Bragg gratings, reasonably high diffraction will be obtain for off-Bragg angles having a small angular or wavelength deviation from the on-Bragg ray directions). In FIG. 1 these off-Bragg rays are illustrated by the ray cones 902,903 surrounding the on-Bragg (lying in the in-plane of the drawing) rays 900,901. As shown in FIG. 1A the locus of the on-Bragg ray-fringe intercepts is the circle 904. As shown in FIG. 1B rays 905,906 will also be on-Bragg. From consideration of the geometry of FIG. 1A it should be apartment that the Bragg diffraction angular bandwidth in the tangential plane is limited by the projections of the cones 902,903 onto the tangential plane. However, turning to FIG. 1B it should be apparent the effective angular bandwidth (“ABW”) in the sagittal plane is much large is it is provided by the projection of cone 904 into the sagittal plane. In practice the sagittal bandwidth is mainly limited by the TIR angle constraints set by the waveguide. As a consequence of the large sagittal plane (i.e. horizontal plane for our purposes) angular bandwidth of Bragg gratings (typically around 4× the tangential bandwidth) current horizontal FOV targets may be achieved for most display applications. In practice the bandwidth is only limited only by TIR angle range that can be sustained in the waveguide.


The inventors have already demonstrated that thin SBG gratings provide very wide angular bandwidths. An experimental SBG waveguide made using a low index modulation SBG RMLCM formulation has been shown to have a FWHM bandwidth of 21° with a 1 micron thick SBG layer.


In the following description many references to gratings are made, which should generally be understood to mean a Bragg grating and desirably an SBG. In many cases the SBGs will be operated in their normal switching mode as described above. However, in some cases SBGs will be used in a passive (e.g., completely passive) mode that is they will not be switchable. A non switching SBG is superior to a conventional passive hologram for the reason that the LC component of the HPDLC entangles much higher refractive index modulations than can be achieved in conventional holographic photopolymers. In certain embodiments of the invention the display will use a mixture of switching and non switching SBGs. The DigiLens output gratings will always be passive (non-switching), however. In one particular class of embodiments the displays will use all passive SBGs.


A transparent display according to the principles of the invention is illustrated schematically in FIG. 2. The DigiLens®, which provides a thin highly transparent eye piece (or HUD combiner) comprises two waveguides 101,102 for projecting the upper and lower halves of the field of view into the eye box (not shown). The waveguides each comprise non switchable SBG layers sandwiched between transparent substrates. Each waveguide has a switchable input grating and a non switching (passive) output grating labelled as DIGI-I1, DIGI-O1 and DIGI-I2, DIGI-O2 which are also indicated by the numerals 107,109 and 108,110 respectively. The waveguides are separated by a Half Wave Film (HWF) 106. (Note than in other embodiments to be described below the HWF will be disposed between the DIGI-I gratings and the DIGI-O gratings will be air (or low-index material) separated). An input image node (IIN) 103 which will be discussed later contains the microdisplay, laser module, beam expansion, collimation and relay optics. Schematic side elevation views are provided in FIGS. 2A-2B and a front elevation in FIG. 2C. FIGS. 2A-2B indicate the ray paths from the IIN through the DigiLens layers for the two switched states of the display. In the first state the grating DIGI-I1 is active and diffracts incident P-polarised light 1000 from the IIN 103 into the TIR path 1001. The TIR light is diffracted out of the waveguide along its light as indicated by 1002. The output grating is lossy, that is the diffraction efficiency is significantly less than unity such that a portion of the guide light gets diffracted out at each beam-grating interaction. The remaining light continues to undergo repeated TIR and diffraction until all of the light has been extracted from the waveguide. Uniform illumination across the output aperture is achieved by careful optimisation of diffraction efficiency (which depends on the refractive index modulation, grating thickness and other parameters). In general low diffraction efficiency is needed at the end of the waveguide nearest the TIN and the highest efficiency at the extreme end. Note that due to lossy extraction more peak energy (at 0°) is coupled into the DigiLens than at higher angles. Thus wider angle light is available for extraction at the end of a lossy grating. While the phrase “lossy grating” is employed in some embodiments, the phrase encompasses “lossy waveguide. Not to be bound by any theory, but this is because the “lossy” may be due to a combination not the grating efficiency and waveguiding action that may result in the uniform loss along the waveguide.


This helps to homogenize peak and edge angular variations, particularly at the thicker end of the waveguide where the DE curve narrows. The diffracted light 1002 has its polarisation rotated through 90 degrees (becoming S-polarised) by the HWF and therefore passes the second waveguide 102 without deviation since SBGs have relative low DE for S-polarised light. Note that one DigiLens® layer emits S-polarized light while the other emits P-polarised light. However, each SBG layer is P-diffracting.


The Horizontal Beam Expander (HBE) indicated by the labels HBE1, HBE2 (also referenced by the numerals (104,105) is a multilayer SBG waveguide using lossy high ABW gratings to expand the image light across a large pupil. In the above described embodiment the HBE runs along the top edge of the DigiLens. The HBE will be discussed in more detail later. Note that air gap between the front and rear DigiLens® elements. This may be replaced by a suitable low (near unity) index material. Since the output image light is a mixture of P and S polarized light it may be necessary to mount a quarter wave film on the output surface of the DigiLens for compatibility with Polaroid type eye ware which would otherwise result in the loss of half of the field of view.


Although it is referred to an HBE (and a VBE in an earlier filing) the terms horizontal and vertical in this context only have significance for the purposes of illustrating the invention In practice the invention allows many different configurations of the comments and several different ways of implement the beam steering the beam expansion may be vertical or horizontal. With regard to the term waveguide it should be noted that these may actually comprise multiple isolated waveguides stacked in layers. Finally with regard to grating components it should be understood that each of the three grating components may contain multiple gratings stack in layers, disposed adjacently in a single layer or holographically multiplexed in a single layer. The basic building block of the displays discloses is a waveguide containing a grating, normally a Bragg grating. As will be seen the function can in certain embodiments be accomplished with as few as one waveguide layer. However the number of waveguide layers will depend on the size of field of view and the color needed. The grating may be switchable (SBG) or it may be passive, that is, non switchable. Although in principle, any type of Bragg grating may be used to provide a passive grating. There is a strong advantage in using an SBG with no electrodes. SBG material has the advantage that the mixture of LC and polymer affords higher refractive index modulation than that of conventional holographic polymer materials. In the preferred embodiment of the invention n the output waveguide component uses only non tessellated passive gratings. This minimizes the potential problems of scatter from electrodes and illumination non uniformities. Term grating is employed to refer to a Bragg grating unless otherwise specified. Passive grating means a grating that is not electrically switched.


The display is shown in more detail in FIGS. 3-4. As a further aid to understanding how a collimated display (e.g., HMD) works, the initial focus is on the monochrome version of the design. Architecturally, the monochrome and color implementations of the HWD are very similar. As will be seen, an important difference is that the monochrome architecture can be achieved with fewer waveguiding layers and the possibility of using some passive grating components in the IIN and HBE, while a color implementation needs most components of the IIN and HBE to be switchable owing to the greater difficulty of managing the angular content of red, green and blue optical channels simultaneously. In both cases the DigiLens® remains a passive component.


While the present invention has many applications in the field of transparent visual displays it is first considered one particular application namely a Helmet Mounted Display for Augmented Reality (AR) application. The objective in this case is to meet the 52° H×30° V monocular field of view specification while achieving all of our original goals of high transparency, high resolution, ultra compact (thin) form factor, light weight and generous exit pupil. The target specifications are summarized in Table 1.









TABLE 1





Target HMD Specifications.


Helmet Mounted Display Specification
















Color
Monochrome - Extendable to Full Color


Total Field of View (FOV)
85° H × 30° V


Monocular Field of View
52° H × 30° V


Binocular Overlap
20°


Eye Box
25 mm. × 25 mm.


Eye Relief
25 mm.


Resolution
1080p


Form Factor
Ultra compact (thin)


DigiLens Active Area
49.4 mm. × 33.4 mm.


Transparency
>95%









The important components of the display are illustrated in the schematic three dimensional drawing of FIG. 3 and the side elevation view of FIG. 4. The display splits the FOV into upper and lower FOV tiles (referred to by the numerals 1, 2 in the drawing labelling) Note that the waveguide substrates of the DigiLens and HBE components have not been shown in order to simplify the explanation. The display comprises a DigiLens® comprised of two waveguide layers sandwiching a HWF is split into input and output components DIGI-I and DIGI-O. Note that wide sagittal angular bandwidth of SBGs removes the need to tile horizontally. Two Horizontal Beam Expanders HBE each comprising input gratings HBE-I and output gratings HBE-O are provided. The expanded output light from HBE-O1 enters the first DigiLens waveguide via DIGI-I11 and similarly for the second waveguide. Note that the above components are also referenced by numerals 130-145 in FIGS. 3-4. Two IIN are provided: one for the upper FOV and one for the lower FOV. The display panel in each IIN is a 1080p 5 mm×3 mm LCoS devices. One laser module may be used to illuminate both display panels. However, the invention does not place any restriction on the number of microdisplays to be used. A single microdisplay with a fast enough refresh rate and high enough resolution is likely to be sufficient for all but the most demanding display applications.


The DIGI-I is the most challenging grating in the system since it needs high input coupling efficiency at the projected pupil output point from the HBE-O, across the full angular range. The DIGI-I gratings switch, sampling the 52° horizontal×30° vertical field output by the HBE-O into the two DigiLens waveguides. It is desirable that this grating needs a high angular bandwidth and high DE. The DIGI-I comprises 2 SBGs each operating over 8.5° angular bandwidths overlapping to provide at least 15°. DIGI-I uses two 3 micron SBGs of DE approximately 87% with angular bandwidth of 8.5°-9.0° in air. The vertical field from −15° to 0° is switched by DIGI-I1 and the vertical field from 0° to +15° into DIGI-2. Hence DIGI-I1 provides 52° horizontal×−15° vertical and DIGI-I2 provides 52° horizontal×+15° vertical. All gratings in the DIGI-O are passive, and therefore can be thin gratings. One of each pair is for red and the other for blue/green. DIGI-O1 the rear grating providing the lower 15° and the front grating DIGI-O2 providing the upper 15° giving a total 52° horizontal×30° vertical. As shown in FIG. 4 the DigiLens® is tilted at a rake angle of ˜8-10°. This is found from ray-tracing analysis to give better DE than simply projecting image light normally into the DigiLens®.


A flow chart representing the interaction between the IIN, HBE and DigiLens in the image formation process is provided in FIG. 5. Since diffractive optical elements are dispersive it usually desirable where more than one grating is combined to configured them in a complementary fashion such that the dispersions introduced by the gratings cancel. Complementarily is normally achieved by designing the gratings to have the same grating pitch (that is, the spatial frequencies of the intersections of the Bragg gratings with the substrates are identical). It should be noted that HBE-I2 and HBE-O2 need to be complementary in the embodiment described above. However, HBE-I1 and HBE-I2 do not need to be complementary.


In one embodiment shown in FIG. 6 the HWF between the DigiLens waveguides (overlapping the DIGI-O gratings) is removed and a HWD is inserted in the spaced between the DigiLens DIGI-I input gratings. The air gap left by the HWP may be filled with a low index nanoporous material. Quarter Wavelength Film (QWF) is applied to opposing faces 157,158 of the front and rear waveguides with the effect that each TIR bounce results in a 90° polarization rotation allowing an approximately ×4 thinner grating and no interaction between the front and rear DigiLens®. FIG. 7 shows the propagation of upper and lower FOV light in the two DigiLens waveguides as represented by the ray paths 1010, 1012, 1014 in the first waveguide and 1011, 1013, 1015 The components shown in FIGS. 6-7 are also referenced by the numerals 150-159. FIG. 8 is a view of one of the DigiLens waveguides 160 illustrating the function of the QWF layer 162 in more detail. Input light from the HBE 1020 is deflected into the TIR path 1021 by the DIGI-I grating 161. Rays such as 1022 incident on the QWF coating have their polarization converted from P to circularly polarized light of a first sense. On reflection the polarization remains circular but in an opposing sense such that after passing through the QWF the second time the light emerges as S-polarized 1023. The S light is not diffracted by the SBG and therefore continues to undergo TIR. On the next reflection at the QWF film the light is converted to P polarized light 1024, which is off-Bragg with respect to DIGI-I and so does nor get diffracted back towards the HBE. The TIR of the beam then proceeds onto the DIGI-O grating where it is progressively extracted from the waveguide as described above.


In one embodiment the two stacked DIGI-I gratings may be provided in each DigiLens waveguide to increase the angular bandwidth. FIG. 9 is a chart showing the effect of combining the individual DE angular bandwidths to create upper and lower FOVs of approximately 15 degrees (FWHM) in air using two gratings of angular bandwidth 8.5 degrees (FWHM) in air. In other embodiments of the invention the DigiLens could comprised more layers, for example 3 DIGI-I layers combined with 2 DIGI-I layers in each waveguide. Note that DIGI-I and DIGI-O gratings do no need to be co-planar. However in fabrication terms it is advantageous to limit the number of grating, substrate, electrode layers and low index material layers to minimize material costs and process steps.



FIG. 10 shows the HBEs in cross section in relation to the DigiLens 170. There are two HBE waveguides 171, 172 each comprising 3 stacked gratings (HBE-I1A-C and HBE-I2A-C) and two lossy output gratings (HBE-O1A-B and HBE-O2A-B). The HBEs are coupled to the DigiLens 170 Two IINs (IIN1 and IIN2) are provided. The paths of light from the IIN to the DigiLens are indicated by rays 1030,1031,1034 and 1032,1033,1035. Note the components are also reference by numerals 170-183. Each LCoS provides a FOV of 26° H×30° V. Each HBE-I contains three gratings that operate on P-polarized light in 8.5° ABW steps to provide the 26° half horizontal field. The 30° field will couple in its entirety owing to the much increased ABW in the sagittal plane. The HBE-I SBGs are thick gratings allowing high DE but narrow ABW. There are two HBE-I implementation options to be considered: firstly, 26° H sampled by 2 HBE-I gratings, which gives lower DE, higher duty cycle SBGs; or, secondly, 26° H sampled by 3 HBE-I gratings, giving 3×8.5° angular bandwidth. This gives higher DE, lower duty cycle SBGs. The gratings are typically of thickness 1-2 micron and lossy such that light is extracted with uniform efficiency along the length of the grating. Lossy gratings have large ABW and low DE. The gratings of HBE-I1 and HBE-I2 do not need to be complementary (i.e. chromatic dispersion correcting). Gratings of HBE-I1 and HBE-O1 (as well as HBE-I2 and HBE-O2) need to be complementary. In a passive HBE-I a single unswitched grating needs to be thin to achieve higher angular bandwidth. With current materials roughly 30% peak DE with current materials, and 60% is within the range of expected material improvements may be achieved. In the case of a switching HBE-I a thicker grating of reduced angular bandwidth may be afforded. With current material refractive index modulations, the angular bandwidth approximately halves and DE doubles as grating thickness is increased from 1.4 to 2.0 micron. Typical DE and ABW characteristics of thin and thick SBGs are summarized in the table in FIG. 11.



FIGS. 12-13 provide a walkthrough of the process of projecting image light from one (left eye) IIN into the eyebox providing ±15° vertical and 0°-26° horizontal field of view. The components are identical to the ones shown in FIGS. 3-4. FIG. 12A illustrates the path 1040 from the LCoS panel to the output of the IIN. FIG. 12B shows the light path through the HBE indicating the TIR path 1042 within one of the waveguides and light extraction 1043 along its length. FIG. 13A shows the coupling of light 1044 extracted from the HBE into the DigiLens (vie DIGI-I). Finally FIG. 13B shows the downward propagation of light 1045 in the DigiLens with the output put image light 1046 providing the lower half of the FOV.



FIGS. 14A-14C shows three 3D views of the above invention implemented in a HMD 190. Threes difference perspectives 191-193 are shown. The display module includes a horizontal hinge 194. In the deployed position, the user will have full panoramic see-through with high transparency. In the stowed position, the user will be free to use range finders, night-vision systems, or other such equipment. As indicated in the drawings spectacle wearers are accommodated and the design will can also accommodate the use of Polaroid eyewear. In an alternative embodiment a simple display retracting mechanism allows the display to be hidden in a compact module under the brow of the helmet when not in use. In yet another embodiment of the invention the display when not in use is retracted vertically into the helmet. The currently preferred implementation uses a custom helmet is linked to a belt pack via an umbilical fiber-optic communications link and power supply connection. In training applications the belt pack would be wirelessly linked to the training center.


An important feature of the optical design is that the gratings used in one or both of the HBE and DigiLens will have a tailored DE profile achieved by varying the thickness of the gratings along the propagation direction as shown in FIG. 15. The wedge grating 203 is provided by including a small wedge in of the grating substrates 201. The second substrate 202 may be rectangular. Other ways of achieving wedge gratings will be apparent to those skilled in the art of optics. Where two stacked gratings are used the DE profiles of the two gratings would run in opposing directions. Desirably, the grating thickness may vary from 1.0-1.2 micron up to 2.8-3.0 micron, the lower thickness producing the largest bandwidth 1052 and lowest DE for a given output direction 1053. The higher thickness produces the lowest bandwidth 1050 and higher DE for a given output direction 1051. Note that the wedge angles are tiny and will have minimal impact on illumination uniformity and image quality.


A refractive index of approximately 1.585 is needed to support waveguide TIR angles typically not greater than 70° with respect to the TIR surface. In general it is desirable to limit the use of higher angles within the waveguide to avoid low numbers of interactions of the ray bundle with outcoupling grating which creates gaps in the waveguide. Higher angles (approximately 85°) can lead to image fold over where gratings are designed to provide very high angular bandwidth. Polycarbonates will enable a TIR angles up to approximately 72°.


While a monochrome display can be achieved with mostly passive grating components, in the case of a full color display HBE-I and HBE-O and the DigiLens input gratings DIGI-I are active with the only passive grating being the output grating DIGI-O. A further difference between monochrome and color HMDs is that in the latter separate waveguides are used in the HBE and to cover red and blue/green wavelengths. FIG. 16 illustrates a DigiLens used in an embodiment of the invention for color displays comprising two DigiLens doublet waveguides. Each doublet waveguide is similar to the embodiments of FIGS. 6-7. However, in each DigiLens waveguide doublet one of the waveguides operates on red light and the second one operates on a mixture of blue and green light. Note also that in each doublet, the red grating is placed after the B/G grating, i.e. closer to the eye. The input and output DigiLens gratings are represented by DIGI-IR and DIGI-OR in the case of the red doublet and DIGI-IB/G and DIGI-OB/G in the case of the blue/green doublet. The output grating portions of the waveguides sandwich a HWF. The input grating portions may sandwich an air gap as illustrated or preferably a low index material. QWFs are applied to the opposing face of the waveguides in each doublet. The components are also labelled by numerals 210-227. The red and blue/green waveguides are optically separated by air or a low index (near unity) material such as mesoporous silica which are not illustrated but will be described later. A HWF converts the rear output from P to S. As SBG gratings are P-sensitive, this prevents re-coupling of the light with gratings in front. The rake angle (8-10°) affords higher angular bandwidth, and lower chromatic dispersion enabling shared blue/green gratings. In most cases color imaging may need high index substrates and special coatings for enhancing the blue TIR angular range.


The ray paths for red light are indicated by the rays 1071, 1073, 1075. The ray paths for the blue/green light are indicated by 1070, 1072, 1074. As shown in the drawing, some of this light will couple into the second waveguide doublet, that is the light paths indicated by 1076, 1078 (blue/green) and 1077, 1079 (red). The risk of light diffracted from the rear waveguide interacting with the light on the layer above and coupling back into the waveguide is avoided in our HMD design. The red and blue/green gratings do not cross-couple due to the polarization management. Each color channel can cross couple with itself. However, this is mitigated by TIR occurring in the forward grating and reciprocity ensuring that outcoupling is in the correct output direction. The offset of the front and rear out-coupled beams due the staggered path helps to homogenize the output light. The effects on throughput of light getting re-coupled back into the DigiLens® are negligibly small. To provide immunity from grating coupling a HWP can be introduced at one layer in the passive waveguide stack. A half wave retarder layer converts the rear output light from P to S. The SBG gratings are P-sensitive only, and so this prevents re-coupling of the light with gratings in front. A 10° rake angle alleviates demands on grating prescription affording higher ABW and lower chromatic dispersion. This enables shared blue/green gratings. However, in most embodiments of the invention red may need a separate grating.


The graph in FIG. 17 shows calculated DE versus angles for each grating and the output DE for the layer minus the light coupled back into TIR. It is assumed that this light is not coupled back out again. The composite output of the gratings including the single interaction coupling loss is represented by circular symbols. Note that with the 2*l/e offset of the peak DE profile, and accounting for re-coupling effects of the rear grating into the front grating, that an effective doubling in the FWHM of a single grating is achieved. With secondary output coupling of re-coupled light, the profile will approach the lossless composite grating profile (triangular symbols).



FIG. 18 shows a further embodiment of the invention for color image. The DigiLens comprises two separated monochromatic doublet waveguides 230,231 one for red (DIGI-O1A,DIGI-O1B) and one for blue-green (DIGI-O2A,DIGI-O2B). The input SBGs (DIGI1A-1D, DIGI2A-2D) comprising a stack of four monochromatic red or blue-green gratings indicated by A-D. In all other respects the architecture is very similar to the embodiment of FIG. 16. HWF and QWFs are disposed as in FIG. 16. The doublets may be air separated or may sandwich a low index material. The components are also labelled by the numerals 230-246.


In an alternative embodiment of the invention similar to the one of FIG. 1 shown in FIG. 19 each DigiLens waveguide comprises a single SBG layer that supports red, green and blue TIR. Starting from the IIN the paths are illustrated by numerals 1080,1082,1083 in the first waveguide 250 and 1081,1084,1085 in the second waveguide 251. In each case the red, green and blue paths are referenced by characters R,G,B. The system components are labelled as in FIG. 1 and additionally referenced in FIG. 19 by the numerals 250-258. It should be appreciated that such an implementation of the invention needs careful control of the TIR angles to ensure that the diffracted light paths for the three colors overlap exactly. The inventors have found that additional coatings may be needed to improve the reflection at the blue end of the spectrum. In an alternative embodiment of FIG. 19 the DIGI-O gratings could be implements as a multiplexed grating.


An IIN design for use with the invention is shown in FIG. 20. The optical system comprises a waveguide 260 containing overlapping SBG elements 261,262, overlapping SBG elements 263,264 a beam splitter layer 265 a curved mirror 266, a prism 267 a projection lens 268 and a microdisplay panel 269. An air gap 270 between the curved mirror elements is provided to enable TIR of reflected light. As illustrated separate SBG input and output gratings are provided for each image field. The waveguide 260 and the gratings 263,264 in particular may provide the input gratings of the HBE. Alternatively it waveguide 260 may be used to couple light into the input grating of the HBE. It should be appreciated that the IIN may be configured in many different ways to satisfy constraints of space, cost and optical efficiency. In the embodiment illustrated half the image from the microdisplay is imaged into the HBE sequentially. Hence in FIG. 20A the gratings 261, 264 are in their active state and the others are inactive. Light from the image portion 1090 is projected into the path 1091 by the projection lens. It is then reflected by the prism into the ray path 1092 reflected at the curved mirror 266 into the path 1093 diffractive by grating 261 into the path 1094 undergoes TIR into the path 1095 and is diffracted out of the waveguide by the grating 264. FIG. 20B illustrate the light paths from the second image field 1097. Now the gratings 261,264 are switched to their inactive states and gratings 262,263 are switched to their active states. The path from the microdisplays is indicated by 1098-1104. In some embodiments of the invention the IIN couples the entire image into the HBE. However, splitting the input image into two enables more optimal coupling of the image into waveguide paths. In the following discussion also consider monochrome implementations only. Initial design calculation by the inventors show that the fundamental approach is sound, meeting near diffraction limited performance across the field in a compact design form while including features such as projected pupil (20 mm. ahead of the grating coupling point), telecentricity, a re-imaged stop and less than 2% geometric distortion. The design wavelength for the monochrome implementation of the IIN is 532 nm. The resolution is matched to 1080p LCoS vertically (LCoS pixel pitch: 2.8 micron; Nyquist frequency 178 lp/mm.). Note that a feature of the design is that IIN/HBE can be located on the same side of the waveguide as the eye without compromising grating reciprocity.


Light is projected from each LCoS at F/2.8 (focal length: 5.65 mm.) to provide a FOV of 26° H×30° V. Light enters the HBE-I grating at angles from 0° to +26°. The IIN is inclined at angle of 13°. For a typical 0° (input)/52° (in glass) grating, angular this increases angular bandwidth is increased by approximately 20%. Note that red colored rays in FIG. 13 strike the HBE-I at 0°, and diffract into TIR. The green colored rays strike the SBG at approximately 26°/n where the refractive index n is 1.592 (polycarbonate). Note that S-BAL25 glass which has a very similar refractive index to polycarbonate can be used for prototyping. The design can be extended to two and three colors. Initial results show that the fundamental approach is sound, meeting near diffraction limited performance across the field in a compact design form while including features such as projected pupil (20 mm. ahead of the grating coupling point), telecentricity, a re-imaged stop and less than 2% geometric distortion. The design wavelength is 532 nm. The resolution is matched to 1080p LCoS vertically (LCoS pixel pitch: 2.8 micron; Nyquist frequency 178 lp/mm.). Preliminary specifications for the TIN are provided in Table 2.









TABLE 2





Input Image Node (IIN) Specification.


Input Image Node (IIN) Optical Specification
















Glass
Polycarbonate (can use S-BAL25 glass for prototyping).


Image Format
LCoS aspect ratio of 3:2 in portrait.


Pupil Diameter
2 mm. projected pupil (20 mm. ahead of the grating coupling point)


LCoS Projection Lens
FOV of 26° H x 30° V; F/2.8; focal length 5.65 mm.


Color
Monochrome 532 nm. (proof-of-design); extendable to color.


Resolution
Near diffraction limited across the field; matched to



1080p LCoS vertical pixel pitch: 2.8 micron; Nyquist



frequency 178 line pair/mm.).


Geometric Distortion
<2%.


Telecentricity
Fully telecentric.









In one embodiment there is no hard physical stop in the projection optics but instead a projected stop is provided. The benefits of a projected stop are decreased waveguide thickness. In one embodiment the stop is projected midway up the HBE to minimize aperture diameter within the waveguides, and hence minimizing the aperture width of the DigiLens waveguide coupler.


In one embodiment a graduated reflection profile underneath the SBG layer is used to control (or assist) with grating DE variation along length of the DigiLens waveguides. This normally achieved in SBG grating using index modulation. This may offer advantages the HBE where a low percentage of light is out coupled in 1st bounce, but high percentage is coupled out at the other end of the waveguide.


The volume of the IIN design is currently ×20×40 cubic mm. However, it will be clear from consideration of the drawings that there are many different ways to reduce the overall volume of the IIN design. For example the refractive elements of the design such as the bird bath mirror and the projection lens system could be replaced by diffractive optical elements. An SBG waveguide could be introduced in front of the microdisplay to provide a polarizing grating beamsplitter for illuminating the microdisplay and allowing polarization rotated reflected light to proceed through said wave guided towards the curved mirror.


In one embodiment illustrated in FIGS. 21-22 a HBE 281 comprises a coupling grating 283 (e.g., the HBE-I of the earlier embodiments) at its input end and an output grating (e.g., the HBE-O) comprising alternating SBG stripes of two different prescription 284, 285 inclined at typically 45 degrees. Although the stripes are shown as equally spaced their size and spacing may be varied for better illumination and image sampling control. However, making the strips too narrow may degrade the system MTF. In general the stripe geometry may need careful optimisation. FIG. 22 shows the HBE integrated in a display with a DigiLens 287 comprising DIGI-I 288 and DIGI-O 289 and an IIN 286. The ray paths from the IIN are indicated by 1105-1110 where the TIR paths in the HBE and DIGI-O are indicated by 1107,1109. The light coupled output of the HBE into the DigiLens (DIGI-I) is indicated by 1108. The output light from display from the DIGI-O is indicated by 1110.



FIG. 80 provides a transparent waveguide display in another embodiment. In this embodiment of the waveguide 8001, the amplitude of the refractive index modulation in at least one of the input grating 8003 and output grating 8002 varies by a small amount along the x direction. In this embodiment, the input and output grating pitches should be identical to satisfy the reciprocity requirement. The index modulation may also be varied in the z direction. In one instance, the design of this embodiment may help control the output light homogeneity, The principles illustrated in this embodiment may be applied to the vertical and horizontal beam expanders. In one instance, where switchable gratings are used the index modulation may be time-varied to adapt to temporal variations in the input image content.


In any of the embodiments of the invention efficient waveguiding may need that the TIR beams are confined between low index media. Air gaps are difficult to fabricate and maintain while the refractive indices of currently available low index materials such as Magnesium Fluoride (1.46) and Silicon Dioxide (1.39) are much too high to meet the tight TIR angle constraints needed in full color implementations of the HMD. The proposed solution is to use nanoporous (Mesoporous Silicon) materials. Nanoporous materials (e.g., mesoporous Silicon) are currently being used in many optical applications including anti reflection coatings and planar optical waveguides. Their high porosity enables the fabrication of high-quality low-dielectric constant thin films. Nanoporous materials can be fabricated in thin layers in a single coating step. To achieve very low, near unity, index the porosities need to be very high, approaching 95%. High transparency and low index can be achieved simultaneously with these films. Since they are highly efficient at absorbing water they must be carefully sealed against moisture. The best approach may be to seal the passive gratings, HWP and material together. SBG Labs is also investigating the potential role of nanoporous materials as high refractive index media. This would increase the range of TIR angles that can be sustained in our waveguides with potential for increasing the horizontal FOV from 40° to around 45°. Nanoporous materials are currently being used in many optical applications including anti reflection coatings and planar optical waveguides. It is reasonable to assume therefore that the technology will be accessible for our project. The manufacturing process should be translatable to specification desired. Nanoporous materials can be fabricated in single coating step. Alternatively graded index multi layer architectures can be used. SBG Labs is also investigating the potential role of nanoporous materials as high refractive index media. This would increase the range of TIR angles that can be sustained in our waveguides. In summary the chief benefits are a monolithic structure will provide greater mechanical stability and durability and better beam confinement leading to higher FOV.


Embodiments for Automotive HUDs


As already discussed, the invention may be used in many different applications. Some embodiments of the invention directed specifically at automobile HUDs will be discussed in the following paragraphs.



FIG. 23 is a is a schematic side elevation view of an in car HUD 300 with more than one exit pupil integrating DigiLens waveguides for the driver 301 and passenger 302. The display may be based on any of the embodiments described above. The DigiLens elements are integrated within a common waveguide structure with the input imagery being produced by an IIN 303 as described above. The ray paths to the driver exit pupil are indicated by the rays 1110-1113 with the pupil indicated by 1113. The ray paths to the passenger exit pupil are indicated by the rays 1114-1116 with the pupil indicated by 1117.



FIG. 25 is a schematic side elevation view of a show an embodiment of the invention similar to the one of FIG. 23 the exit pupil of the driver display is tiled using multiple overlapping DigiLens elements 305,306 to provide the abutting exit pupils 1120,1121. Ray paths to the pupil are indicated by 1118-1120.



FIG. 25 is a schematic side elevation view of a further embodiment of the invention based on the one of FIG. 23 in which overlapping DigiLens elements 311,312 are used to tile the FOV as indicated by 1131 with the abutting field of view tiles 1132 while providing a common exit pupil 1133.


In one embodiment waveguide a DigiLens may be used to form a pixelated collimated image. A simple classical analogue of such a display which is shown in the schematic side elevation view of FIG. 26 comprises a pixelated display panel 321 located at the focal surface of a collimating lens 320. A waveguide holographic version of this display is shown in FIG. 27. The input image is provided by a pixelated SBG 323 comprising a two dimensional array of switchable elements such as the one labelled by 324. Each element diffracts incident collimated light into a TIR path within the waveguide. The SBG array is illuminated by collimated light indicated by 1142,1143 from an external source which is not shown. The pixel 324 is illuminated by the collimated light 1145. Advantageously, the SBG pixels will have diffusing characteristics. The DigiLens elements 325,326 are not simple planar gratings such as the ones described so far but have optical power such that light originating at points on the surface of the SBG array is collimated to provide switchable fields of view (FOV tiles) bounded by the rays 1146,1147 for viewing through a pupil 1148. Hence the DigiLens elements provided a diffractive analogue of the lens in FIG. 27A. The DigiLens elements are configure to tile the FOV as in the embodiment of FIG. 25.


In one embodiment a DigiLens as described above may be configured to provide a mirror. FIG. 28 shows how a rear view mirror for automotive applications can be provided using transmission SBG 333 sandwiched between the substrates 330,331 and a mirror coating 332 overlaying the DigiLens. The SBG diffraction angles are designed such that light incident on the DigiLens following the path labelled by R1,R2 is diffracted by the SBG layer and reflected at the mirror layer while that the reflected path labelled R3,R4 leading to the drivers eyebox is off Bragg or in other words falls outside the angular range for diffraction by the SBG. The light paths are also labelled by the numerals 1151-1154. It should be apparent from consideration of FIG. 28 that the DigiLens can be configured to provide a range of different reflection angles by a suitable choice of grating prescription.



FIG. 29 shows a HUD 335 for relaying an external image to a viewing pupil near to the driver. Light 1155 from the external image source enters the waveguide via the DigiLens 338 undergoes TIR as indicated by 1156-1157 and is coupled out of the waveguide towards the viewer as light 1158 by DigiLens 336. This embodiment may be useful for viewing blind spots. The apparatus of FIG. 29 further comprises a beam splitter layer 337 which by splitting incident TIR light into multiple paths, can improve homogeneity and eliminate gaps in the output illumination. This principle may be applied in any of the other embodiments of the invention.



FIG. 30 is a front elevation view of a car HUD 340 comprising a IIN 341 and a DigiLens 342 according to the principles of the invention and further comprises a structured light source 343 emitting infrared light 1159 and detector 344 for detecting return infrared light 1159 for sensing driver hand movements for display control.



FIG. 31 is an embodiment of the invention similar to that of FIG. 26 in which the information contained in the field of view tiles (FOV Tile1,2) is presented at different ranges indicated by D1,D2. Image light from the IIN 351 is converted into wave guided light 1170. The DigiLens 354 forms an image at range D2 with an FOV of 1174 centered on the direction 1173 and the DigiLens 355 forms an image at D1 with FOV of 1171 centered on the direction 1172. The two FOV tiles are viewed through the pupil 1175.


In most applications of the invention the preferred light source is a laser particular where tight constraints on collimating and waveguide confinement need to be met. However, the invention may, with some modifications, be applied using LEDs and other relatively narrow band incoherent light source. FIG. 32A illustrates an embodiment of the invention in which SBGs are used to compensate for the spectral bandwidth of RGB LEDs in a color HUD. The red LED illustrated has a peak output at 639 nm. and FWHM bandwidth defined at the wavelengths 634 nm. and 644 nm. as shown in FIG. 32B. The DigiLens comprises a stack of RGB diffracting layers, each layer comprising input and output gratings. In each layer the SBGs are recorded to provide peak diffraction efficiency vs. wavelength characteristics (along the waveguide) shifted by small increments from the peak wavelength as indicated in the Table in FIG. 32C. The techniques for recording a Bragg grating that provides a wavelength shift in play back, which normally involve control of the construction wavelengths and recording angles, are well known to those skilled in the art of holography. The RGB SBG layers are switched sequentially and synchronously with the RGB LEDs. As shown in FIG. 32A the color display 360 comprises red green and blue DigiLens waveguides labelled by the symbols R,G,B and comprise DIGI-I gratings indicated by 360R,360G,360B and DIGI-O gratings indicated by 361R,361G,361B, red, green and blue light sources 362R,362G,362B providing light 1180 a microdisplay 363 a beam expander comprising the diffractive or holographic lenses 364,365 for providing collimated light 1182. After being coupled into the DigiLens elements the light undergoes TIR as described above and represented by 1183 and is diffracted out of the DigiLens as the red, green, blue light 1184R,1184G,1184B.


In one embodiment illustrated in FIGS. 33-34 the DigiLens is combined with a windscreen. A DigiLens is eminently suitably for such an implementation as it can be designed to operate in a curved waveguide and can be built up from very thin layers using substrates as thin as 100 microns sandwiching SBG layers of thickness 1.8-3 microns. The DigiLenses are separated by thin layers of mesoporous materials of the type described above. It should also be noted that typical car windscreens have radii of curvature typically of several thousand mm which does not present a great challenge for maintaining waveguiding.


In one embodiment the DigiLens is formed as a flexible layer 371 that can be bonded onto an existing windscreen 370 to the inner or exterior surfaces as shown in FIG. 33. The IIN 372 would typically be located below the dashboard.


Alternatively, the DigiLens layers can be integrated within a windscreen as part of the screen fabrication process as shown in FIG. 34. Typically, a windscreen comprises an outer toughened glass layer 373; two or more layers of PVB 374,376 for UV blocking and an inner toughened Glass layer 377. The DigiLens 375 would be sandwiched by two of the PVB layers. In one embodiment the windscreen integrated DigiLens fabrication processes includes the steps of spraying RMLCM onto PVB film and sandwiching it with a second PVB film prior to recording an SBG in a holographic recording step.


In one embodiment shown in FIG. 35 there is provided a transparent display comprising the waveguide components DIGI-I. DIGI-O HBE-I, HBE-O and an IIN similar to the ones described above. However in this case each said waveguide component comprises a single SBG layer. Note that only the SBG layers in the above waveguides are illustrated with the substrates and electrodes being omitted. The ray paths from the IIN are indicated by 1200-1203 include the TIR path in the HBE 1201, the extraction of the expanded beam from the HBE 1202, TIR within the DigiLens 1203 and extraction of light for display 1204 from the DigiLens. The components are also reference by the numerals 390-394.


In one embodiment shown in FIG. 36 there is provided a transparent display DIGI-O, HBE-I and an IIN similar to the ones described above. The two waveguide components HBE-O and DIGI-I are combined into a single waveguide component labelled HBE-O/DIGI-I that performs the dual functions of beams expansion and beam turning. The advantage of this arrangement is the change in beam direction is accomplish without the need to exit and then re-enter the waveguide gratis as for example in FIG. 35 and most of the other embodiments. This may need that the gratin in the DIGI-I is slanted in the plane of the drawing, in most cases of practical interest at an angle of 45 degrees. Hence within the DIGI-I waveguide the TIR path is rotate through 90 degrees and proceed into the DIGI-O. The ray paths from the IIN are indicated by 1205-1208. The components of the displays are also reference by the numerals 400-403.


It should be apparent from the drawing and early description that in this case and indeed in most of the embodiment of the inventions the HBE-I and HBE-O and the DIGI-I and DIGI-O may be implemented in a single SBG layer. However while this reduce the number of layers overall there is the penalty the overall size of the display will increase. The widths of the HBE and DIGI-O will to a large extend be terminated by the microdisplay dimensions and the field of view needed. While in HUD and HDD applications the space needed to implement the DIGI-O and HBE components are small relative to the size of the DIGI-O, the trade-off becomes more challenging in HMD and near eye applications which will use similar size microdisplays and will have more demanding FOV demand, which will further increase the relative widths of the HBE and DIG-I waveguides.


In a further embodiment of the invention directed at a color display illustrated in FIG. 37 the DigiLens comprises separate red green and blue waveguides Advantageously the waveguides are optically isolated from each other which may need that they are air separated or separated by a thin layers of low index film. The preferred option is to use nanoporous materials. The DigiLens waveguides are shown in FIG. 37 the layers being referenced by numerals 1-3 in the DIGI-I and DIGI-O labels (the waveguide components also reference by numerals 415-420. The IIN and HBE components are not shown in detail but are simply indicated by 421.


Typically the DigiLens will be inclined at a rake angle of around 10° to enable the most favorable diffraction angles within the waveguides as shown in FIG. 1 The IIN and HBE may be on the side of the display nearest the eye 422 as showing in the drawing. However it should be apparent that many other configurations are possible. A ray path to the eye is indicated by the rays 1210-1212. FIG. 3 is a three dimension view of the same display shown the three DigiLens lens.



FIG. 38 shows a color display based on the embodiment of FIG. 35. This implementation has three DigiLens layers 410-412, one for each color, with the DIGI-I and HBE-I being combined in turning/beam expansion gratings such as the ones indicated by 436 red green and blue ray paths from the IIN are indicated by 1220-1223 with red, green and blue being labeled by the symbols R,G,B. Note that the HBE-I component which is not illustrated will be similar to the one shown in FIG. 35 but with separate layers for red, green a blue.


In auto HMDs fields of view are relatively modest compared with those of HMDs a field of view of 10 degree vertical by 25 deg. horizontal is considered to be a long term goal. Such angular content can easily be handled by a waveguide using a single layer SBG. However since there is interest in color this will make further demands on the information handling capacity of the waveguides In one embodiment shown in FIG. 39 there is provide a passive single SBG layer DigiLens which waveguides and diffracts at least two colors using holographic multiplexing. Multiplexing is the ability to record multiple Bragg gratings in the same layer. Firstly it can be used to produce improved angular profiles by combining two gratings of similar prescription to extend the diffraction efficiency angular bandwidth and giving better luminance uniformity and color balance across the exit pupil and field of view. Secondly multiplexing may be used to encode two distinct diffraction prescriptions which may be design to project light into distinct field of regions or diffract light of two different wavelengths into a give field of view region. Multiplexing also offers the significant benefit of reducing the number of layers in the waveguiding structure. Care is needed to ensure that there is no competition between gratings during recording leading to unequal Des and cross talk between gratings in playback. The apparatus of FIG. 39 is similar to that of FIG. 35 differing mainly in that the DIGI-O component is now a multiplexed grating. The components are also referenced by the numerals 470-474 and ray paths from the IIN through the HBE and DigiLens by numerals 1240-1243. Advantageously, the Horizontal Beam Expander (HBE) would run along bottom edge of the DigiLens® to enable the IIN to be hidden below the dashboard. Typically such a HUD would have an eyebox of 145 mm. horizontal by 80 mm. vertical at an eye relief of 800-900 mm. The target field of view would be 10°-15° vertical×10°-15° horizontal. The windscreen would have a transparency greater than 75%. Typically windscreens have curvature of Horizontal: 3000 mm.; Vertical 9000 mm. The IIN could be accommodated within a volume of 1-2 litres.


The integration of the DigiLens into the windscreen is shown in FIG. 40. The stack of layers in the windscreen comprises Glass (External) 1.60 mm.; PVB (3 layers): 0.8 mm.; Glass (Internal): 2.0 mm. TOTAL 4.4 mm. The SBG layer would comprise an SBG of 5 microns sandwiched by substrates of 50-100 microns, the SBG cell sandwiched by low index layers of 0.5-2 microns thickness. A UV glue gasket line limits the SBG material fill, bounding the effective area of the display. Gaps between grating areas are filled with clear acrylic and UV-cured for full transparency. This multilayer architecture allows very strong lamination and does not rely at all on the SBG film for lamination strength. FIG. 41 is a follow chart illustrating the implementation of the embodiment of FIG. 39 in an automobile HUD.


The color multiplexing used in the embodiment of FIG. 39 can be provided in two ways: firstly using two multiple gratings: for example, red and blue/green diffracting; or secondly using three multiplexed gratings: i.e. using multiplexed red green and blue gratings. The design problem is to determine the optimal prescription using two or more multiplexed gratings for a vertical (or more precisely tangential plane) field of 10 degrees. The design variables are Bragg wavelengths and TIR angles for each color; DE profiles (i.e., grating thickness and modulation. Since the DigiLens will be bonded to or in some cases embedded with a windscreen the waveguides will be sandwiched by low index material (unless air gaps can be tolerated). A nanoporous material layer refractive index of 1.2 has been assumed. For an SBG index of 1.52 this corresponds to a minimum TIR angle of 52 deg. In designing a multiplexed grating special attention may be needed to achieve the shape of the DE profile is important and, in general, narrower DE profiles are preferred to avoid crosstalk between the colors. The desired DE profiles can be achieved by optimizing the thickness and refractive modulation of the gratings. Simulated diffraction efficiency (DE) versus TIR angle profiles based on the Kogelnik diffraction theory for typical red, green and blue diffracting gratings multiplexed in a single SBG layer are shown in FIGS. 42A-42B. The curves represent the DE profiles for each of the three multiplexed gratings. The rectangular regions represent the approximate RGB TIR angle ranges. FIG. 42A shows the case where the multiplexed grating is illuminated with red light. FIG. 42B shows the case where green or blue light illuminates the grating. Note that the curves shift owing to the angles satisfying the Bragg condition shift as the illumination wavelength changes. Since the TIR range for the blue green band is below the TIR range for red, there is no cross talk between the two color bands.



FIGS. 43-44 illustrated a further embodiment of the invention comprising a IIN, two HBE components each comprising a HBE-I and HBE-O; two DigiLens components each comprising a DIGI-I, DIGI-O and beam splitter (B/S) the DIG-I sandwich a half wave film (HWF). FIG. 43 shows a three dimension view. FIG. 44 is a cross sectional view of the DigiLens only showing the ray paths. The HBE-O and DIGI-O gratings multiplex red and blue-green diffracting gratings as indicated by the solid and dashed rays respectively in FIG. 44. The red rays in the rear DigiLens waveguide 460 follow the path 1231,1232,1239. The blue-green rays in the same waveguide follow the ray path 1230,1233,1239. The ray paths in the forward waveguide are labelled by the numerals 1234-1237. The rear and forward waveguide components are referenced by numeral 1, 2 respectively and are also referenced by the numerals 440-447. The HBE comprises two waveguiding element (i.e., two switchable SBG layers separated by suitable substrates) each supporting 20 degrees horizontal×22.5 degrees vertically. The HBEs are switchable. Each HBE waveguide is separated from the other by a low index layer. The IIN would use a HD 1366×768 (0.37″ diagonal LCoS microdisplay such as the one supplied by Himax Inc. An alternative microdisplay is the Syndiant 720P (0.37″ display) supplied by Syndiant Inc. This would give a resolution of 1.76 arc min/pixel (over the full 40 degree×22.5 degree FOV). Each grating provides approximately 10 degrees in air (equivalent to about 6.5 degrees in glass) of angle width for a single color. There is a slight bias of angular space due to the HBE rake angle (on side entry of IIN) which causes the fields to be slightly unequal e.g. 18 degrees and 22 degrees Note that switching of gratings adjacent in angular space ensures cross coupling will not occur between adjacent gratings. Angles in each waveguide are minimized. Green is arranged close to TIR angle with a small tolerance margin (e.g. +0.5 to 1.0 degrees). Each waveguide is narrowband blue mirror coated to extend the waveguide angular range. The light output from each HBE into the DigiLens is: −20 to 0 degrees horizontal (approximately)×±11.25 degrees vertical; and 0 to +20 degrees g horizontal (approximately)×±11.25 degrees vertical. This gives a composite field is −20 to +20 degrees horizontal×±15 degrees (i.e., 40 degrees×22.5 degrees). The preferred material is polycarbonate (n=1.585), or equivalent. The substrate thickness is 0.5 mm. Each cell is 1.0 mm thick, so that each HBE waveguide is 2.0 mm thick. Both HBE waveguides are 4.0 mm thick with a small air or low index material gap. The HBEs would be multiplexed for color as discussed above. The HBE dimensions are: 70 mm in width×11 mm in height. Note that the height includes a 1 mm margin on vertical edges. The IIN used in the embodiment of FIGS. 43-44 has a focal length of 1.3 mm. The microdisplay (LCoS) pixel pitch is 6.0 micron. The optics F-number is 4.6. By matching the Airy disc to LCoS pixel pitch, approximately 75% contrast at the Nyquist limit is obtained. The aperture of the TIN is 2.4 mm. The optical design of FIGS. 43-44 may need two DigiLens waveguides (i.e., two SBG layers separated by suitable substrates), each supporting 11.25 degrees vertical×40 degrees horizontal. The input DIGI-I elements would be switchable. The DIGI-O elements would be passive. Both input and output gratings would be multiplexed red and green-blue gratings as described earlier. The dimension of DigiLens substrate is 50 mm width×61 mm height. In one embodiment the input gratings are switchable, and not multiplexed, that is four switchable input gratings are used in this case. Importantly, the input and output prescriptions are reciprocal. The input light must be P-polarised (since the DigiLens only diffracts P-polarised light). Each waveguide has a QW film down full length: This permits a 2× thinner waveguide. TIR reflections are rotated by a half wave (owing to the double pass through the QW film). Ray extraction from the waveguide thus occurs only at every other interaction with SBG. The output of the rear DigiLens (i.e., the one nearest the TIN as shown in FIGS. 43-44) experiences two QW film interactions, rotates to S and therefore does not interact with the forward DigiLens. Hence the output from the display is mixed P and S polarized light.


In one embodiment illustrated in FIGS. 45-52 there is provided a transparent display based on completely passive HBE and DigiLens waveguide components. As will be explained in the following description this embodiment uses a HBE-I configured for sampling the aperture and/or FOV of the image light from the TIN. This embodiment will now be described with reference to a 52 degree×30 degree FOV monochrome display such as may be used to provide a HMD. However, it should be apparent from the following description and drawings that this embodiment may with the benefit of the teachings presented herein be used to provide a wide range of different FOVs.


An Embodiment Using all Passive SBGs



FIG. 45 is a three dimensional illustration of an embodiment of a display in one embodiment in which there are provided three HBE waveguides and three DigiLens waveguides. The HBE waveguides are indicated by numerals 541 and the DigiLens waveguides by 542 with the HBE waveguides being labelled by symbols W-Z as before and the DigiLens waveguides by symbols P-R. Each HBE waveguides contains a HBE-I and HBE-O also referenced by 543,544 respectively and each DigiLens contains a DIGI-I and a DIGI-O also referenced by 545,546 respectively. The IIN is indicated by 394. A ray path from the TIN through the HBE waveguide 541Z and DigiLens waveguide 542R is shown using the rays 1330-1334. Note that the pupil; has been combined before the DIGI-I so that the full 52 degree horizontal×30 degrees vertical FOV exist at this stage.


One embodiment is related to a projected stop. FIG. 46 is a schematic side elevation view showing the formation of a projected stop by the IIN. Light from an image pixels at the center and edges of the image displayed on the microdisplay 500 passes through a stop 502 to provide the marginal beams 1300,1302 and the on axis beam 1301. The projection lens 501 collimates this light to provide the collimated beams 1303-1305 which overlap at the projected stop 1306. Light from other points in the input is similarly converged into the projected stop. Note that the projection optics has been simplified in FIG. 46 and in practice the projection lens will be a multi-element system as discussed earlier. As will also be appreciated by those skilled in the art of optical design the need for a physical stop 502 be minimized (or even eliminated) by limiting the numerical aperture (NA) at the microdisplay by suitable design of the illumination delivery optics. It should be noted that the distance from the lens to the projected stop is very large compared to the thickness of the HBE stack.



FIG. 47 is a schematic plan view illustrating the coupling of light from the TIN into the HBE waveguide 503. The input grating or HBE-I comprises the two gratings 504,505 having a small separation along the waveguide propagation axis. Importantly, the two gratings have substantially non-overlapping DE versus angle characteristics. The HBE-O grating is located further down the waveguide as indicated by 506. In contrast to the input gratings the output grating multiplexed two different grating prescriptions as will be explained below. The advantage of this coupling scheme is that it enables mapping of the angular content of the input light to defined gratings areas 504,505 allowing the input gratings (HBE-I) of the HBE to be separated along the waveguide optical axis. This effect is accentuated by having small entrance pupil diameters. For simplicity illustrated herein are just two ray paths through the waveguide. In the first path an incident rays 1307 is diffracted into a first TIR path 1309 by the first grating element 504 of the HBE-I. In the second path incident ray 1308 is diffracted into a second TIR path 1308 by the second grating element 505.


The interaction of the beam with the gratings is illustrated in more detail in FIG. 48 which shows a portion of the HBE waveguide containing the input gratings of FIG. 47. The incident ray 1307 is diffracted by the first grating 504 into the ray path 1311. After the first TIR reflection the reflected ray 1312 is off Bragg and therefore passes through the first grating without deviation. After the second reflection the ray just skirts the trailing edge of the first grating avoiding diffraction. TIR now proceeds to the next grating. After the third reflection the ray 1314 skirts the leading edge of the second grating. After the fourth reflection the resulting ray 1315 is off Bragg. Finally, after a fifth reflection the ray 1316 skirts the edge trailing of the second grating and proceeds to the HBE-O. Clearly this simplistic explanation only applies to the chief ray and does not adequately describe the behavior of a divergent beam which will result in unwanted diffractions of rays that intercept the gratings. However, the narrow beam angles within the waveguide will reduce the impact of unwanted beam-grating intersections.



FIG. 49 is a schematic cross-sectional view of the four layer HBE shown in FIG. 45. Following the above description each waveguide layer comprises a HBE-I gratings comprising two separate gratings and a HBE-O comprise a multiplexed grating. The waveguides may be separated by air gaps or preferably by thin layers of nanoporous low index material. The input gratings are labelled by the numerals 511,512 and the output grating by the numerals 510 with the waveguide layers being referenced by the symbols W, X, Y, and Z. The drawing shows input rays from the projection lens 514 interacting with each of the input gratings in each layer. Note that the output light from waveguide layer W may interact with one or more of layers X-Z. However, as already discussed the property of grating reciprocity maintains the beam angle for any such interactions. The result beam shifts resulting from such interlayer interactions may provide beamsplitter or homogenizer. For example, consider the input ray 1320. This ray is diffracted by the first grating 511W into a TIR path 1321 which propagates through the second grating 512W without deviation and continues its TIR path 1322. At the output grating 510W a portion of this light is diffracted into the ray 1323 in waveguide 510X. On entering the second waveguide a portion of this light is diffracted into the TIR path 1324 the remainder proceeding in the direction 1323. Further interactions with the grating 510Y are indicated by the rays 1325 and 1326.



FIG. 50 is a table showing the pairings of multiplexed gratings used in each waveguide layer of the embodiment of FIG. 48. Each pair of gratings must have DE versus angle bandwidths with sufficient separation to avoid appreciable overlap. Since the gratings will be lossy thin gratings characterized by low DE peaks and wide angular bandwidths this separation needs to be quite large. FIG. 51 is a chart showing one possible scheme for overlapping the DE versus angle profiles in the embodiment of FIG. 45. Each pair of gratings corresponds to a 26 degree chief ray angular separation. It is assumed that the total horizontal FOV is 52 degrees. For a thin (low peak DE, high ABW) grating the ABW is approximately 13 degrees. Assuming that the input HBE gratings have ABWs of 6.5 degrees referring to the angle ranges: −6.6 degrees to 0 degrees as A and the angle range: 0 degrees to 6.5 degrees as B. It is recognized that A and B should not be used in the same waveguide owing to: firstly, DE versus angle overlap and secondly, lack of reciprocity. The grating separations are based on the FWHM. However, other measures may provide better optimization of the overall illumination profile. For example the grating overlaps could be at the 30% of peak angles. Assuming FWHM this gives 8 gratings to span a FOV of 52 degrees (i.e., 8×6.5 degrees).


Achieving high illumination uniformity is an important issue in SGO design. The chief design parameters are thickness and index modulation. As discussed earlier, applying a small wedge angle to the grating layer allows the peak DE and angular bandwidth to be tuned along the waveguide. However, the light remaining in the waveguide at the end of the propagation path will tend to accumulate at larger angles leading to uneven output illumination. At present the inventors believe that this effect may not be very significant. A more sophisticated strategy in cases where very tight illumination control is needed is to shape the grating layer by applying tilt in two directions. As a further refinement the surfaces of the grating could be curved. Since the needed grating thickness variations are very tiny typically 1-2 microns across the waveguide the effect on collimation and MTF are negligible in most implementations. FIG. 51 is a three dimensional view of an SBG grating 530 characterized by two orthogonal slants. The four different corner heights with respect the plane of the waveguide resulting from the orthogonal slants are indicated by 531-532. However, preliminary ray-tracing analysis by the inventors has yielded some evidence that the optimal DE profile needed within the waveguide is a one dimensional function and is a function of the length of the waveguide not the number of bounces of the beam within the waveguide. The ray angle displacements (i.e., ±angles) around the chief ray) appear to need the same grating thickness profile as the chief ray (as a function of the length of the waveguide). This suggests that a 2D profile may not be needed for optimum uniformity. Note that to first order DE must scale as the reciprocal of the difference between the waveguide length and the distance traveled by the beam.



FIGS. 53A-53C are schematic illustrations of a three operational states of the HBE in one embodiment. A portion of the waveguide 551 and the projection of the IIN projection lens 550 is shown in each cased with three collimate beam portions indicated by 1341-1342. The shaded areas correspond to the HBE cross sections seen by each DigiLens waveguide for each of the three separate 10 degree vertical FOV bands coupled into one of the DigiLens waveguides to give the 30 degree total vertical FOV. The shaded areas in FIGS. 53A-53C also show the portion of the DIGI-I that accepts light from the HBE-O for the three vertical FOV regions. Only ⅓ of the aperture is collected by DIGI-I in each state. By keeping the effective aperture low in this way it is ensured that the DigiLens waveguides do not need a large thickness. It is estimated that the total thickness needed for the three DigiLens waveguides using the above aperture method (as well as the polarization management mentioned earlier in the description) will result in an overall thickness of 6 mm. This assumes a rectangular exit pupil. If a circular pupil is acceptable the need to achieve the extreme diagonal angles is removed resulting in a lower overall thickness


Although all passive grating as described above is feasible in monochrome it is likely that switching will need to be introduced to provide full color to ensure that crosstalk is overcome.


It is important to note that a unique feature of the above embodiment is the way in which the HBE selectively samples portions of the input image each portion being characterized by either angular field or spatial field. This approach ensures that the waveguides in particular the DigiLens can be made very thin. This is a particularly important feature in HMDs and near eye. The process of sampling the input image described above should be distinguished from the process of switching the entire input image into the waveguides used in FOV tiling, as disclosed in earlier filings.


Exemplary Features


In one embodiment optical power may be provided in at least one of the gratings used in the HBE and DigiLens waveguides. The recording of lens prescriptions in diffractive optical elements is well known. In the present invention this offers potential for fine tuning the focus of the display without the need for auxiliary lenses. Such a lens could also be used for correcting aberrations. A switching hologram offers the potential for a solid state (no moving parts) solution for providing images at different ranges. This may need multiple layers. This would provide an attractive feature in HUD and HDD applications. Recording holographic lens of appreciable optical power may need careful attention to overcoming off-axis holographic aberrations. The construction optics are potentially more complicated but once a master hologram is made, the contact copy process is the same as any other hologram.


In one embodiment a multilayer thin film coating is applied to a reflection surface of the DigiLens waveguide is to enhance the waveguiding range beyond the TIR range. Glasses and plastics do not allow the range of TIR angles need for large field of view. For example Rays below 39° are not supported by polycarbonate TIR (refractive index at 532 nm=1.585). The problem boils down to achieving a minimum waveguide angle 30 degree angle which is well below critical angle for plastics and low cost glasses. The coating design problem is to achieve a reflectivity coating prescription that achieves the needed reflectivity, without image degradation or loss of see-through transmission. The coating may need optimizing for wavelength polarisation, angle, scatter, Loses from absorption. One benefit of applying dielectric films on the substrate significantly reduces the amount of diffractive power needed, thereby improving grating angular bandwidth. The dielectric coating has the following characteristics: a) high reflectivity for S&P light for angles of 30° (in glass) to 39° (TIR angle). b) high transmission for 0°±13° (in glass) for P-light; equates to 35°×20° corner fields in air; c) good angular control of reflectivity can be achieved due to narrow band nature of sources; and d) high see through for non-laser notch wavelengths on all layers.


In one embodiment the input gratings in at least one of the HBE or DigiLens, i.e., the gratings HBE-I and DIGI-I, comprises stacks of gratings of different k-vectors to provided DE versus angles characteristically distributed uniformly over the range of beam angles to be transmitted through the HBE and DigiLens. Typically the gratings will be separated by 200 micron (or even 100 micron) substrates) to keep the stack as thin as possible. Ultimately, the inventors believe that the minimum practical grating stack thickness can be achieved using spin coating techniques.


In one embodiment an alternative scheme of multiplexed gratings of different k-vectors avoids the need for stacking.


Any of the above-described embodiments using laser illumination may incorporate a despeckler device for eliminating laser speckle disposed at any point in the illumination path from the laser path to the eyeglass. Advantageously, the despeckler is an electro-optic device. Desirably, the despeckler is based on a HPDLC device.


In one embodiment the display incorporates a homogenizer that combines beam shaping and despeckling. Desirably, the SBG array used to perform the above functions are themselves diffractive waveguide devices that can be implemented seamlessly as additional SBG layers within one or more of the waveguides or in the IIN. Despeckling is achieved by a combination of angular and phase diversity. Exemplary waveguide homogenizers are disclosed in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/796,795, entitled COMPACT LASER ILLUMINATOR INCORPORATING A DESPECKLER, with filing date of 20 Nov. 2012 and PCT Application No. US2008/001909, with International Filing Date: 22 Jul. 2008, entitled LASER ILLUMINATION DEVICE. It should be apparent from consideration of the drawings and descriptions that the invention offers several opportunities for integrating such devices within the IIN and the waveguide components of the display.


The invention provides a transparent display based on a DigiLens which comprises one or more passive SBG waveguides, each one projecting a portion of the vertical field of view or a specific color. The invention is enabled by improvement in diffraction efficiency angular bandwidth obtained from using thinner SBGs and taking advantage of the intrinsically broad sagittal angular bandwidth of Bragg gratings. The invention can deliver large field of view, for example 52° horizontal×30° vertical, without sacrificing any of the usual goals of high transparency, high resolution, ultra compact (thin) form factor, light weight and generous eyebox. The waveguide components and compact input image node are consistent with a small form factor, path to curved visor, and slim-line goals. With the benefit of expected improvements in angular bandwidth and optical efficiency, it is believed that the above FOV can be increased. The display modular design approach permits ready growth from monochrome to color with no major architecture redesign being needed. Reasonable imaging performance can be delivered out to 1.0 cyc/mr for both color and monochrome solutions. Optical performance in the monochrome will exceed the 1.4 cyc/mr display pixel resolution. The best resolution will be achieved in monochrome, but good performance can be achieved also for a color display. In a HMD the invention can provide a 25 mm wide eye box at 25 mm. eye relief. This will permit 90% of the population to be accommodated without any adjustment. Substrate guided diffractive optics are used everywhere except in the Input Image Node (IIN). However, the refractive components can be replaced by diffractive elements in future developments of the design to yield further form factor compression, and manufacturing benefits. The IIN may be mounted above or to the side of and at the front or rear of the DigiLens. This allows a range of ergonomic demands to be met while preserving core DigiLens functionality. The design may need no partitioning or tessellation of the near eye DigiLens, eliminating the problems of illumination ripple and discontinuities and scatter from electrodes. A transparent display according to the principles of the invention will also benefit from results from plastic SBG technology disclosed in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/573,066 with filing date 24 Aug. 2012 by the present inventors entitled IMPROVEMENTS TO HOLOGRAPHIC POLYMER DISPERSED LIQUID CRYSTAL MATERIALS AND DEVICES.


The present invention assumes the teachings of earlier filings as specified as above. In particular the invention may make use of a scheme for polarization recycling disclosed in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/687,436 with filing date 25 Apr. 2012 by the present inventors entitled WIDE ANGLE COLOR HEAD MOUNTED DISPLAY. This particular feature may be relevant in the event that polarization is not maintained with an SBG outcoupling waveguide, either by virtue of the properties of the and SBG material (current or one developed in future), or where a polarization rotation component is deliberately introduced in the waveguide, then opens the opportunity for: polarization recycling and increased device efficiency through polarization recycling. Specifically: a thinner DigiLens waveguide can be used if linearly polarized light is input into the DigiLens waveguide (i.e., p light coupled from HBE into the waveguide), and light is converted to a mixture of S and P polarized light. This may allow up to a factor of two times reduction thinness of the waveguide.


The present invention may incorporate beam splitters layers in a waveguide to achieve uniformity. As a further refinement a beam splitter offset in waveguide may be obtained—i.e., not in middle of waveguiding surfaces, but offset from waveguide midpoint to maximize uniformity following multiple bounce interactions. A yet further refinement is to use different reflectivity in beam splitter to optimize and tailor beam mixing. The concept is that by varying the reflectivity % of the beam splitter to something other than 50/50, or by varying the tx/Rx split along a B/S length, so the pupil fill can be homogenized and optimized.


Note that the thickness of the holograms shown in the drawings has been exaggerated. Typically the gratings will be 1.8-3 microns in thickness sandwiched by substrates of thicknesses of 100-200 microns. The transparent electrodes applied to opposing faces of the substrates are measured in nanometers.


In one embodiment, a holographic brightness enhancing film, or other narrow band reflector, is affixed to one side of the display, the purpose of which is to reflect the display illumination wavelength light only; the see-through display can be made invisible (and hence secure) in the opposite direction of view. Here the reflected display illumination is effectively mirrored and therefore blocked in one direction, making it ideal for transparent desktop display applications in customer or personal interview settings, common in bank or financial services settings.


An important performance parameter in the present context is the see-through transmission of the display. The variables that have an impact on transmission are the ITO coating (0.995), the AR coatings (0.99), and the absorption of the substrates and holographic layers. There will also be Fresnel losses at the interfaces between the waveguides and the low-index bonding layers. The needed transmission for the color display is >70%, with an objective of >90%. Assuming three waveguides per display and two substrates per waveguide, the calculated transmission is 93%, meeting the stipulated objective. Note that it is our intent to implement this design using 100-micron glass substrates. With three waveguides and three substrates per waveguide (note: two holographic layers may need three substrates), the total thickness of the display of the color display is still less than 1 mm. The thicknesses of the holographic layers (including the coatings) are negligible; each contributes only 4-5 microns to the overall thickness. Since weight is always an issue, this is an extremely important feature of our approach. When plastic is employed, the weight may be reduced even further.


In the preferred embodiment the SBGs operate in reverse mode such that they diffract when a voltage is applied and remain optically passive at all other times. The SBGs will be implemented as continuous SBG lamina separated by thin (as thin as 100 microns) substrate layers as shown. Ultimately the design goal is to use plastic substrates with transmissive conductive coatings (to replace ITO). Plastic SBG technology suitable for the present application is being developed in a parallel SBIR project. This is a planar monolithic design harnessing the full assets of narrow band laser illumination with monolithic holographic optics


The present invention has a suite of advantages ideally suited for substrate guided optics. First, component costs are greatly reduced. The optical complexity is contained in the various holographic optical elements. Once the non-recurring engineering (NRE) associated with creating a set of masters is complete, the replication costs are relatively insignificant compared to the recurring material costs associated with discrete refractive components. Second, assembly time is greatly reduced. Not only is part count greatly reduced, but the assembly process is much faster. The planar structures can be cost-effectively laminated together with very high optical precision using alignment fiducials. The touch labor is greatly reduced compared to that of building a piece-part assembly to exacting standards. Third, the optical precision is much greater. One of the biggest challenges in designing a new optical design is controlling the roll-up of tolerances on the piece parts, the mechanical housings, and the assembly procedure. With holographic optical elements (HOEs), “gold standards” can be assembled by senior engineers and this level of quality captured in the HOE masters during the NRE phase. Besides the fact that optical alignment of the HOEs can be accomplished with great precision, the individual HOEs are more tolerant of variations in alignment. Thus, the overall yield of high quality devices is much higher. Lastly, size and weight are greatly reduced by this monolithic design, as is the ruggedness of the entire subsystem.


It will be clear that in any of the above embodiments the eye lens and retina may be replaced by any type of imaging lens and a screen. Any of the above described embodiments of the invention may be used in either directly viewed or virtual image displays. Possible applications range from miniature displays, such as those used in viewfinders, to large area public information displays. The above-described embodiments may be used in applications where a transparent display is needed. For example, the invention may be used in applications where the displayed imagery is superimposed on a background scene such as heads up displays and teleprompters. The invention may be used to provide a display device that is located at or near to an internal image plane of an optical system. For example, any of the above described embodiments may be used to provide a symbolic data display for a camera viewfinder in which symbol data is projected at an intermediate image plane and then magnified by a viewfinder eyepiece. It will be clear the invention may be applied in binocular or monocular displays. The invention may also be used in a stereoscopic wearable display. Any of the above described embodiments of the invention may be used in a rear projection television. The invention may be applied in avionic, industrial and medical displays. There are also applications in entertainment, simulation, virtual reality, training systems and sport.


The preferred light source for the display is a laser which is the ideal match to the diffractive optical elements and therefore unleashes the full power of our HMD, HUD and HDD designs. In terms of brightness, resolution and color gamut, the invention could also in some applications where optical performance is not very important to be applied using LEDs.


Currently, SBGs for use in one embodiment are manufactured using stand-off exposure. However, the processes can be readily converted to a contact-copy process. The TIN may be implemented as an assembly of discrete refractive components. However, it is highly desirable to convert the design to a laminated stack of planar holographic elements. With sufficient volume, such an implementation of the TIN would achieve a very attractive price point. Advantageously, the substrates used in the waveguide would be fabricated from ballistic-quality plastic substrates. Proof of feasibility has been established and process optimization activities are underway. Replacing refractive components with laminated plastic-based planar holographic elements will make displays based on the invention inherently more rugged.


Further Embodiments

The following embodiments are directed at a display that uses a single waveguide HBE. This particular embodiment is presently considered to be more suitable for lower field of view devices such as HUDs. However, recognizing that the size of the HBE is likely to be manageable, there is no reason in theory why the same embodiment could not be used for higher FOV applications such as HMDs. As will be discussed, the prerequisite is a non-projected pupil.



FIG. 54 illustrates projection schemes that do not result in a projected pupil of the type discussed earlier in the description. The pupil may be formed inside the projection lens, as shown in FIG. 54A, or before the projection lens using the aperture 562 as shown in FIG. 54B. Such projection schemes result in an angular diversity at some distance along the z axis or optical axis that is less than the full FOV. For example turning to FIG. 54A, if light from the source image points 1350A-1350C is considered, which is collimated by the lens 560 into the collimated ray bundles 1351A-1351C, overlap exits between the bundles 1351A,1351B and between the bundles 1351B,1351C. From basic geometry the angular diversity to first order is given by the projection lens exit pupil aperture D and the distance along the optical axis z.



FIG. 55 is a schematic illustration of the use of rolled k-vector gratings to maximize the peak DE of in-couple light, (for example in the HBE-I grating). The k-vector roll for the grating elements 572A-572C in the waveguide section 570 is indicated by the differing orientates of the k-vectors 573A-573C. The surface grating pitch P is constant along the length of the waveguide. The grating vectors are optimized to diffract the rays 1360A-1360, representing the chief rays and off-axis rays, with high diffraction efficiency. The use of rolled k-vectors enables high efficiency input coupling into a grating, and also allows the beam spread angle to be optimized to minimize the thickness of the waveguide; this may need balancing the waveguide thickness, the angular bandwidth of the input grating, and the spread of field angles at any given point on the input grating. The low angular response of gratings as the k-vector is rolled (and surface pitch maintained) prevents output coupling, allowing the waveguide thickness to be minimized



FIG. 56 is a schematic illustration showing the propagation of a typical ray through a waveguide section 580 containing rolled k-vector gratings. The dimension a separating the points X and Y is approximately twice the waveguide thickness t for a 45 degree TIR angle in the waveguide. The propagation path is indicated by the rays 1370-1371. The point X corresponds to the point at which the ray 1370 couples into the grating. The chief ray angle may be needed to change by an amount greater than or equal to the FWHM angular bandwidth of the grating. At point Y the ray angle is off Bragg. Hence, reciprocal output coupling at Y is not obtained. The design aim is to ensure maximum input coupling at X and at the same time to design the distance along z to minimize the angular diversity such that the grating thickness can be minimized without reciprocally out-coupling at position Y.



FIGS. 57-59 show perspective view of an embodiment that uses k-vector rolling to provide exit pupil expansion in orthogonal directions. FIG. 57 is a plan view showing the HBE 590 and the VBE 591. FIG. 58 is a schematic side elevation view of the HBE and the VBE. FIG. 59 is an unfolded view of the HBE showing the beam propagation inside the waveguide. A Cartesian XYZ coordinate system is provided for reference. The lossy output grating of the HBE is indicated by 592. The input grating is indicated by 593. The input and output gratings have common surface grating pitch. At Z=0 and Z=L along the HBE, it may be desired to have high input coupling within the VBE. As the angular diversity diminishes as the limit Z=L is approached (angular diversity scales as 1/L), the grating thickness can be increased. This is beneficial as the beam fill W at Z=L is much greater than at Z=0 so that light in-coupled to the VBE with thickness t will experience more grating interactions in waveguide following in-coupling. A thicker grating reduces out-coupling. The angular diversity can be used to fine-tune the thickness of the VBE.



FIGS. 60-62 illustrate an apparatus for fabrication the waveguide illustrated in FIGS. 57-59. Referring to FIG. 60, all points along the ray 1390A such as 600A-602C must have identical surface grating pitches and parallel k-vectors. The k-vectors are rolled in planes orthogonal to the z axis. FIG. 60 illustrates an apparatus for fabricating the HBE using a contact copying process. FIG. 61A shows a cross section of the Z=L end of the HBE 590 with the wider end of a cone shaped lens overlaid. FIG. 61B shows a plan view of the lens and FIG. 61C shows the Z=0 end of the HBE with the narrower end of the lens overlaid. The grating layer is indicated by 611 and the rolled grating is indicated by the detail 612. The paths of the collimated recording beam incident on the lens are indicated by 1391,1393. The convergent rays that are used to form the rolled grating are indicated by 1392,1394. The lens is illustrated as a refractive element. In one embodiment a diffractive lens of equivalent prescription may be used. The cone-shaped lens contact copying set-up may need careful attention to overcome holographic off-axis aberrations, which may need to be compensated at the recording stage.



FIG. 62 illustrates the generation of the conic section from a cone of tip 620 and base 621. The cone is shown in side view in FIG. 62A which indicates the cut out optic and the cut line and in-front view in FIG. 62B, which again indicates the cut out optic. A view of the cut out optics projected from the base along the cut line is shown in FIG. 62C. The conic section is obtained by cutting parallel to cone edge. Rays parallel to the z-axis then remain non-deflected (i.e., with no refracted component) in the y-axis. The amount of deflection (refraction) in the x-axis is a function of the position the ray strikes the y-axis.



FIGS. 63-66 illustrate the principles of k-vector rolling. FIG. 63 shows the basic architecture of a waveguide according to the principle of the invention. The waveguide 630 comprises a multiplicity of grating lamina which can be grouped into input gratings 631 and output gratings 632. In each case associated with each Bragg grating there will be a surface grating as indicated by 633,634. Input image light is represented by the collimated beams 1400-1402 where characters A, B indicate the extremes rays of each beam. The corresponding output image light is represented by three collimated beams 1410-1412 with characters A, B again indicating the extreme rays. The output beam has a greatly expanded pupil owing to the extraction of light along the waveguide as discussed above. Typically the output gratings will be much longer extending over most of the length of the waveguide. The DIGI-I, HBE-I gratings discussed in relation to certain embodiments are examples of input gratings while DIG-O, HBE-O gratings are examples of output gratings. In each group multiple gratings may be stacked or disposed in a layer adjacent each other. FIG. 64 is an illustration of a waveguide in which the input gratings 635A-635C are stacked. Each grating has a unique k-vector 636A-636C. The k-vector 636A is designed to give high diffraction efficiency for a field of view centered on the beam direction 1401. The k-vectors 636B, 636C are optimized for high diffraction efficiency around the incident beam directions 1400, 1402, respectively. Thus the input image is sampled into a plurality of angular intervals. Each angular interval is associated with an effective exit pupil that is a fraction of the full pupil.


In the embodiment as shown in FIG. 65, the input gratings are disposed adjacent to each other along the waveguide propagation direction. The waveguides are indicated by 637A-637C and the k-vectors by 638A-638C. The inventors have coined the term “rolled k-vector” to describe the varying orientation of the k-vectors along the waveguide propagation direction.


The principles illustrated in FIGS. 64-65 may also be applied in the output grating as illustrated in FIG. 66. Here the output grating comprises a multiplicity of adjacently disposed gratings such as 639A-639C with k-vectors 640A-640C. In alternative embodiments of the invention the output grating may be comprised of stacked gratings based on the principles of FIG. 64.


A method of displaying an image is one embodiment of the invention in accordance with the basic principles of the invention is shown in the flow diagram in FIG. 67. Referring to the flow diagram, the method may comprise the following steps:


At step 650 providing: a first optical substrate for propagating light in a first direction; a second optical substrate for propagating light in a second direction; and an Input Image Node (IIN), the first and second optical substrates comprising at least one waveguide layer, each at least one waveguide layer comprising at least one grating lamina, and the at least one grating lamina comprising a passive mode SBG.


At step 651 providing image modulated light using the IIN.


At step 652 coupling the image light into the First Optical Substrate;


At step 653 extracting light from first optical substrate along the first direction;


At step 654 coupling image light into the second optical substrate;


At step 655 extracting light from the first optical Substrate along the second direction;


At step 656 providing image light for display.


Summary of Some Embodiments

At least some embodiments provided herein use separate vertical and horizontal beam expansion waveguides to provide an enlarged exit pupil (or eye box). Each waveguide contains input and output Bragg gratings. Each of the waveguides may comprise more than one waveguide layer. In color embodiments a separate monochromatic waveguide may be used for each primary color. Another option for providing color is to record multiplexed gratings, in which holograms with different color prescriptions are superimposed, into a waveguide.


Collimated image light is fed into the horizontal beam expansion waveguide with a Field of View (FOV) defined by the microdisplay and collimating optics. The invention allows the input or “coupling” optics to be configured in many different ways ranging from classical optical lens-mirror designs to more compact designs based entirely on diffractive (holographic) optics.


The horizontal beam expansion waveguide is lossy, that is, it is designed to extract light out of the waveguide uniformly along its length. The extracted light is then coupled into the vertical expansion waveguide.


The vertical expansion waveguide, which is also lossy, completes the beam expansion to provide a vertically and horizontally expanded exit pupil.


A unique feature of the invention is that all of the above can be accomplished using passive gratings (although the use of switchable gratings is still an option for some applications). Conventional passive gratings would not work. The chief benefit of using passive SBGs is that the refractive index modulation of the grating can be tuned from very low to very high values with a correspondingly broad range of diffraction efficiencies. The high index modulation of SBGs results from the alternating bands of polymer-rich and LC-rich regions that form the Bragg fringes.


While lossy gratings are known in the prior art, the present invention is unique in achieving efficient and uniform extraction from the waveguide by varying the thickness (and modulation) across the grating. In its simplest case this entails creating a wedged grating (by inclining the cell walls) such that the hologram thickness increases in the direction of propagation. Typically, the grating thickness may vary from 1.0-1.2 micron up to 2.8-3.0 micron, the lower thickness producing the lowest efficiency (and largest angular bandwidth). The invention allows more sophisticated control of extraction by varying the thickness in orthogonal directions, using two wedge angles, or in a more general fashion by applying curvature to one or both faces of the grating.


A further unique feature of the beam expansion gratings is that they can be made very thin (well below 3 micron) which results in very broad diffraction efficiency angular bandwidth which, in turn, results in a wide FOV. By optimizing thickness and refractive index modulation it is possible to meet all of the needed grating characteristics needed in the display, i.e., very high efficiency for coupling into gratings and large dynamic range for the efficient, uniform extraction needed for beam expansion.


An extremely important feature of the invention that has implications for image transfer inefficiency and form factor is the use of image sampling. Coupling wide FOV image light into a waveguide would normally result in some loss of image angular content owing to the limited range of angles that can be efficiently propagated down a waveguide. Some of this light may couple out of the waveguide. The invention overcomes this problem by sampling the input image into multiple angular intervals, each of which has an effective exit pupil that is a fraction of the size of the full pupil, the thickness of the waveguide being reduced correspondingly.


Uniquely, the invention combines fixed frequency surface gratings at the input and output of each waveguide with rolled k-vectors along the waveguide. The surface grating is the intersection of the Bragg fringes with the substrate edge and accounts (approximately) for the basic ray optics of the waveguide. The k-vector is the direction normal to the Bragg grating and accounts for the diffraction efficiency vs angle characteristics of the grating. By varying the k-vector direction along the waveguide propagation direction (k-vector rolling) it is possible to, firstly, provide efficient coupling of image light into the waveguide and, secondly, ensure that once coupled-in, all of the needed angular content is transmitted down the waveguide with high efficiency. The k-vector rolling would desirably be augmented by grating thickness control as discussed above. To our knowledge this principle has not been applied in the prior art.


With regard to color imaging, making the input and output gratings in each waveguide have the same surface gratings frequencies as discussed above allows colors to be implemented in separate waveguides that are free from cross talk. This is believed to be a unique feature of the invention.


In general, the propagate of angular content down the waveguide can be optimized by fine tuning of one or more of the following: grating thickness; refractive index modulation; k-vector rolling; surface grating period; and the hologram-substrate index difference.


The apparatuses and methods described herein may be applied to HMD, HUD and HDD.


EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS

The various aspects of the apparatus, systems, and methods described herein may be further described in the various embodiments provided below:


In one embodiment the first optical substrate selectively samples portions of the image modulated light, each portion being characterized by either angular field or spatial field.


In one embodiment at least one grating lamina in each optical substrate comprises an input grating operative to diffract light coupled into said substrate into a TIR path and an output grating operative to diffract light from said TIR path out of said substrate.


In one embodiment extraction from said second substrate takes place through a face of the waveguiding layer.


In one embodiment extraction from second substrate takes place through a waveguiding layer edge.


In one embodiment the grating vectors of grating lamina in the first substrate lie in a plane substantially orthogonal to the faces of the first substrate.


In one embodiment the grating vectors of grating lamina in the first substrate lie in a plane substantially parallel to the faces of the first substrate.


In one embodiment the waveguide layers are transparent dielectrics.


In one embodiment the waveguiding layers propagate monochromatic light.


In one embodiment first, second and third waveguiding layers are provided in at least one of the first or second substrates for the purpose of propagating red, green and blue light.


In one embodiment first and second waveguiding layers are provided in at least one of the first or second substrates for the purpose of propagating red light and mixed blue and green light.


In one embodiment waveguiding layers in at least one of the first or second substrates sandwich a half wave film.


In one embodiment waveguiding layers in at least one of the first or second substrates sandwich an air space.


In one embodiment grating lamina in at least one of the first or second substrates multiplex gratings of at least two different monochromatic prescriptions.


In one embodiment grating lamina in at least one of said first or second substrates multiplex gratings of at least two different colors.


In one embodiment the first substrate provides pupil expansion along the first direction and the second substrate provides pupil expansion along the second direction.


In one embodiment light extracted from the first and second substrates provides uniform illumination in any field of view direction.


In one embodiment each grating in at least one of the first substrate or second substrates has first and second diffracting state. The first diffracting state is characterized by high diffraction efficiency and the second diffraction state is characterized by low diffraction efficiency.


In one embodiment the diffracting state occurs when an electric field is applied across the grating and a non-diffracting state exists when no electric field is applied.


In one embodiment the non diffracting state occurs when an electric field is applied across the grating and a diffracting state exists when no electric field is applied.


In one embodiment the first and second propagation directions are orthogonal.


In one embodiment at least one of the substrates is curved in at least one orthogonal plane.


In one embodiment at least one of the waveguiding layers includes a beam splitter lamina.


In one embodiment quarter wavelength film is applied to at least one face of the waveguiding layer in either the first substrate or the second substrate.


In one embodiment a reflective thin film coating is applied to at least one face of the waveguiding layer in either the first substrate or the second substrate.


In one embodiment the first coupling means comprises at least one grating lamina substantially overlapping a portion of the first substrate.


In one embodiment the first coupling means comprises at least one grating lamina disposed within the waveguiding layer.


In one embodiment the first coupling means comprises at least one grating lamina. Each grating lamina comprises at least two multiplexed gratings of different prescriptions. Each grating lamina substantially overlaps a portion of the first substrate.


In one embodiment the second coupling means comprises at least one grating lamina substantially overlapping the first substrate.


In one embodiment the second coupling means comprises at least one grating lamina. Each grating lamina comprises at least two multiplexed gratings of two different prescriptions. Each grating lamina substantially overlaps the first substrate.


In one embodiment the second coupling means is disposed within the second substrate.


In one embodiment grating vectors of grating lamina in the first substrate lie in a plane substantially parallel to the faces of the substrate and the first substrate grating provides the second coupling means.


The invention may be used to provide one eye piece of a HMD, a HHD or a HUD.


In one embodiment at least one grating in the first or second substrates encodes optical power.


In one embodiment the second substrate is embedded within a windscreen.


In one embodiment the waveguiding layers have at least one face in contact with a nanoporous film.


A display according to the principles of the invention may further comprise an eye tracker.


A display according to the principles of the invention may further comprise a beam homogenizer


In one embodiment the input image node comprises a microdisplay, laser and collimating optics.


In one embodiment the grating lamina are switchable Bragg gratings.


In one embodiment the grating lamina used in at least one of the first or second substrates are non switching Bragg gratings recorded in HPDLC material.


In some embodiments described herein, instead of an HPDLC material, a POlymer Liquid CRYstal Polymer Slice (“POLICRYPS”) may be employed.


HPDLC materials may be characterized by alternating bands of LC-rich (e.g., high LC concentration and low polymer concentration) and polymer-rich (e.g., high polymer concentration and low LC concentration) material. Since the LC has a droplet morphology in many instances HPDLC may suffer from two problems: scatter from the LC droplets and low grating contrast (which may ultimately limit the peak diffraction efficiency). A new class of materials, of which POLICRYPS is an example, combines LC and polymer to provide a more uniform morphology that overcomes both the above problems. While the grating is formed by a diffusion process similar to the one that occurs in HPDLC, the end result in POLICRYPS may be a grating comprising alternate bands of homogeneous highly-aligned LC and homogeneous polymer. Particulate scattering losses may be almost, if not entirely, removed by a lack of LC droplets. The grating may be of very high contrast with a refractive index modulation close to the theoretical limit set by the bulk LC birefringence. As a result, diffraction efficiency values as high as about 98% (or in some instances even higher) may be readily obtained.


Grating pitches covering the range of interest for practical displays may be achieved without difficulty; in fact, in one embodiment the material may sustain pitches as low as 0.2 microns and as high as 15 microns. In electro-optical terms, POLICRYPS may be similar to conventional HPDLC. In some instances, the switching speed of POLICRYPS may be higher than HPDLC and the switching voltage is at least equal to or lower than that of HPDLC. In one embodiment, like HPDLC gratings POLICRYPS grating may be utilized both in transmission and in reflection and may be implemented in waveguides. The holographic recording process in POLICRYPS may be the same as that in HPDLC and may involve standard commercially-available monomers and LCS. In one embodiment, one challenge of POLICRYPS is that a high temperature process may be needed. In this embodiment, the temperature should be high enough to maintain isotropic mixture and to prevent isotropic-to-nematic transition during exposure.


POLICRYPS was developed at LICRYL (Liquid Crystals Laboratory, IPCF-CNR), Center of Excellence and Department of Physics, University of Calabria, Italy). An example of POLICRYPS is described in Caputo, R. et al., Journal of Display Technology, Vol. 2, No. 1, March 2006, pp. 38-50, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. Further details of POLICRYPS may be found in U.S. Patent Application No. 2007/0019152 by Caputo, R.; et al., entitled “Holographic Diffraction Grating, Process for Its Preparation and Opto-Electronic Device Incorporating It”, published in Jan. 25, 2007, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.


Another uniform morphology grating technology that may be employed is POlymer Liquid Crystal Polymer Holograms Electrically Manageable (“POLIPHEM”), which was developed by the Fraunhoffer Institute for Applied Polymer Research, Potsdam (Germany). In one embodiment, POLIPHEM is similar to POLICRYPS in basic momhological and electro-optical terms. One advantage of using POLIPHEM over POLICRYPS is that former may avoid the high temperature processing needed in POLICRYPS in some instances by optimizing the properties and proportions of LC and monomer in the material recipe. Details of materials and methods for fabricating POLIPHEM gratings may be found in the international patent publication No.: WO2006002870 (PCT/EP2005/006950) by Stumpe, J. et al., entitled “Method for the Preparation of High Efficient, Tunable and Switchable Optical Elements Based on Polymer-Liquid Crystal Composites”, published January 2006, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.


In one embodiment, it may be desirable for the gratings described here to provide both high diffraction efficiency and wide angular bandwidth. However, in one embodiment these two goals conflict in that wide angular bandwidth dictates that the gratings should be thin, while thin gratings may suffer from progressively diminishing diffraction efficiency as the thickness is reduced. One solution is to stack a multiplicity of thin gratings, such that each grating may diffract the 0-order light from the grating beneath it, so that most of the input light eventually may get diffracted. In some embodiments, the grating layers may be separated by spacers. Such a stratified grating structure may be considered to be equivalent to diffraction by a thick or volume (i.e., Bragg) grating with at least one benefit of a much wider bandwidth resulting from using thin gratings as a basic building block.


In one embodiment, the thin gratings may desirably operate in the Bragg regime (rather than thin gratings according to the Raman Nath regime) to avoid higher order diffraction. In one embodiment, when the thin gratings operate in the Raman-Nath regime, careful optimization of the thickness and pitch may be employed to ensure that the relative phasing of the diffraction orders as they propagate from layer to layer give rise to a unique notched diffraction response f the +1 order (for the case of Bragg incidence). In another embodiments, Bragg gratings may be recorded in a stratified grating structure known as a Stratified Volume Holographic Element (SVHOE). An example of SVHOE is described in Nordin, G., et al., J. Opt. Soc. Am., A., Vol. 9, No. 12, December 1992, pp. 2206-2217, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.


A more complete understanding of the invention can be obtained by considering the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like index numerals indicate like parts. For purposes of clarity, details relating to technical material that is known in the technical fields related to the invention have not been described in detail.


Additional Embodiments

The following embodiments are taken from the claims of the provisional application Ser. No. 61/849,853, filed Feb. 4, 2013, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.


1. An apparatus for displaying an image comprising:


an input image node for providing image modulated light;


a first optical substrate comprising at least one waveguiding layer, each said waveguiding layer propagating light in a first direction, each said waveguiding layer comprising at least one grating lamina operative to extract light from said first substrate along said first direction;


a second optical substrate comprising at least one waveguiding layer, each said waveguiding layer propagating light in a second direction, each said waveguiding layer containing at least one grating lamina operative to extract light for display from said second substrate along said second direction;


a first optical means for coupling said image modulated light into said first substrate; and


a second optical means for coupling light extracted from said first substrate into said second substrate.


2. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein said first optical substrate selectively samples portions of said image modulated light, each said portion being characterized by either angular field or spatial field.


3. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein said at least one grating lamina in each said optical substrate comprises an input grating operative to diffract light coupled into said substrate into a TIR path and an output grating operative to diffract light from said TIR path out of said substrate.


4. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein said extraction from said second substrate takes place through a waveguiding layer face.


5. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein said extraction is carried out from second substrate through a waveguiding layer edge.


6. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein grating vectors of grating lamina in said first substrate lie in a plane substantially orthogonal to the faces of said substrate.


7. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein grating vectors of grating lamina in said first substrate lie in a plane substantially parallel to the faces of said substrate.


8. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein said waveguide layers are transparent dielectric.


9. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein said waveguiding layers propagate monochromatic light.


10. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein first, second and third waveguiding layers are provided in at least one of said substrates for propagating red, green and blue.


11. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein first and second waveguiding layers are provided in at least one of said substrates for propagating red light and mixed blue and green light.


12. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein waveguiding layers in at least one of said first or second substrates sandwich a half wave film.


13. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein waveguiding layers in at least one of said first or second substrates sandwiches an air space.


14. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein grating lamina in at least one of said first and second substrates comprises multiplex gratings of at least two different monochromatic prescriptions.


15. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein grating lamina in at least one of said first and second substrates comprise multiplex gratings of at least two different colors.


16. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein said first substrate provides pupil expansion along said first direction and said second substrate provides pupil expansion along said second direction.


17. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein said light is extracted from said first and second substrates provides uniform illumination in any field of view direction.


18. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein each said grating in at least one of said first substrate or second substrate has a first diffracting state wherein said first diffracting state is characterized by a high diffraction efficiency and said second diffraction state is characterized by a low diffraction efficiency.


19. The apparatus of embodiment 17 wherein said diffracting state occurs when an electric field is applied across said grating and a non diffracting state exists when no electric field is applied.


20. The apparatus of embodiment 17 wherein said non diffracting state occurs when an electric field is applied across said grating and a diffracting state exists when no electric field is applied.


21. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein said first and second propagation directions are orthogonal.


22. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein at least one of said substrates is curved in at least one orthogonal plane.


23. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein at least one of said waveguiding layers includes a beam splitter lamina.


24. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein quarter wavelength film is applied to at least one face of said waveguiding layer in either said first substrate or said second substrate.


25. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein a reflective thin film coating is applied to at least one face of said waveguiding layer in either said first substrate or said second substrate.


26. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein said first coupling means comprises at least one grating lamina substantially overlapping a portion of said first substrate.


27. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein said first coupling means comprises at least one grating lamina disposed within said waveguiding layer.


28. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein said first coupling means comprises at least one grating lamina, each said grating lamina comprising at least two multiplexed gratings of two different prescriptions, each said grating lamina substantially overlapping a portion of said first substrate.


29. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein said second coupling means comprises at least one grating lamina substantially overlapping said first substrate.


30. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein said second coupling means comprises at least one grating lamina, each said grating lamina comprises at least two multiplexed gratings of two different prescriptions, each said grating lamina substantially overlapping said first substrate.


31. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein said second coupling means is disposed within said second substrate


32. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein grating vectors of grating lamina in said first substrate lie in a plane substantially parallel to the faces of said substrate, wherein said first substrate grating provides said second coupling means.


33. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein said apparatus provides one eye piece of a HMD, a HHD or a HUD.


34. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein at least one grating in said substrates encodes optical power.


35. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein said second substrate is embedded within a windscreen.


36. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein said wave guiding layers have at least one face in contact with a nanoporous film.


37. The apparatus of embodiment 1 further comprising an eye tracker.


38. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein further comprises a beam homogenizer.


39. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein said input image node comprises a microdisplay, laser and collimating optics.


40. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein said grating lamina in at least one of said first or second substrates is an SBG.


41. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein said grating lamina in at least one of said first or second substrates are non switching Bragg gratings recorded in HPDLC material.


42. The apparatus of embodiment 1 wherein said grating lamina in at least one of said first or second substrates are SBGs recorded in a reverse mode material.


REFERENCES

The following patent applications are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties:

  • U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/687,436 with filing date 25 Apr. 2012 by the present inventors entitled WIDE ANGLE COLOUR HEAD MOUNTED DISPLAY.
  • U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/689,907 with filing date 25 Apr. 2012 by the present inventors entitled HOLOGRAPHIC HEAD MOUNTED DISPLAY WITH IMPROVED IMAGE UNIFORMITY.
  • PCT Application No. US 2008/001909, with International Filing Date: 22 Jul. 2008, entitled LASER ILLUMINATION DEVICE;
  • PCT Application No.: US 2006/043938, entitled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING A TRANSPARENT DISPLAY;
  • PCT Application No.: PCT/GB2010/001982 entitled COMPACT EDGE ILLUMINATED EYEGLASS DISPLAY;
  • U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/573,066 with filing date 24 Aug. 2012 by the present inventors entitled IMPROVEMENTS TO HOLOGRAPHIC POLYMER DISPERSED LIQUID CRYSTAL MATERIALS AND DEVICES.
  • PCT Application No.: PCT/GB2010/002023 filed on 2 Nov. 2010 by the present inventors entitled APPARATUS FOR REDUCING LASER SPECKLE;
  • PCT Application No.: PCT/GB2010/000835 with International Filing Date: 26 Apr. 2010 entitled COMPACT HOLOGRAPHIC EDGE ILLUMINATED EYEGLASS DISPLAY;
  • U.S. Pat. No. 6,115,152 entitled HOLOGRAPHIC ILLUMINATION SYSTEM, issued 5 Sep. 2000; and
  • U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/796,795 entitled COMPACT LASER ILLUMINATOR INCORPORATING A DESPECKLER with filing date 20 Nov. 2012.


Additional Example


FIG. 68 is a ray trace of a monochromatic version of the design. FIG. 69 shows the approximate dimensions of the IIN of FIG. 68. FIG. 70 provides unfolded views of the optical layout of FIG. 69.


The IIN stop is formed by controlling profile of input illumination. There is currently no hard physical stop in the projection optics. The benefits of a projected stop are decreased waveguide thicknesses. A stop is projected midway up the HBE to minimize aperture diameter within the VBE, and hence minimizing the aperture width of the VBE to DigiLens waveguide coupler, i.e., reducing the width of the 1st axis expander limits the thickness of the 2nd axis expansion optic. FIGS. 71A and 71B illustrate the formation of a projected stop inside the HBE using a simplified thin lens representation of the microdisplay projection optics.


In one embodiment a graduated reflection profile underneath SBG layer is used to control (or assist) with grating DE variation along length (normally achieved in SBG grating using index modulation). This may be useful in cases such as the HBE, where a low percentage of light is out coupled in 1st bounce, but a high percentage is coupled out at the other end of the expander.


An Embodiment Using a Striped HBE


In one embodiment the HBE comprises a coupling grating at its input end and alternating SBG stripes of two different prescriptions are inclined at 45 degrees within the plane as shown in FIG. 72. Although the stripes are shown as equi-spaced, their size and spacing may be varied for better illumination and image sampling control. However the stripes should not be made too narrow as this may impact the MTF. In general, the stripe geometry may need careful optimization as there are, for example, rays from extremities of a stripe that may result in a phase difference in the pupil. The input SBGs need a large angular bandwidth and a high efficiency while the DigiLens passive gratings is lossy. Although the angular bandwidths of the gratings have pronounced center-to-edge variations, the extraction from the passive gratings is found to result in more light being diffracted from the center of a beam extracted, creating an effective inversion of the illumination profile at the end of the waveguide. This effect can be used to advantage in balancing the overall illumination profile. FIG. 73 illustrates beam propagation from the IIN through a single layer of the DigiLens showing the four changes in direction that occur along the path to the exit pupil. The optical path is labelled by numerals 1-7.


FOV, Eyebox and Eye Relief Geometry


The near eye geometry of the proposed helmet mounted display is shown in plan view in FIG. 74, in side view in FIG. 75, and in front view in FIG. 76. The relationship of the DigiLens® aperture to the FOV, eye relief and eye box is also shown in FIG. 77. Note that the DigiLens® aperture will scale with eye relief.


Binocular Overlap


As shown in FIG. 78 and FIG. 79, partial binocular overlap can be provided using convergent or divergent optics. In either case binocular overlap can provide up to 1.4× contrast improvement. Convergent overlap may be better for avoiding binocular rivalry. As a very rough guide, mostly distance work may need only low overlap, while mostly close-up work (typically at arm's length) may need higher overlap. In general, published data on FOV vs. task performance is often anecdotal or limited to small and specialized samples. Extrapolating data from one application domain to another can be risky. There is no research that examines the FOV vs. task performance tradeoffs for a particular type of display. Consequently, the effects of eyebox, geometric distortion, form factor etc., are not fully reflected in the literature. The eyes tend to stay in the saccadic eye movement range (from 0° up to approximately ±10° to ±15°). Outside this range the head will tend to move to re-center the image. If no head tracker is provided all important information must lie with the saccadic region. Some applications need a balance between adequate peripheral cue presentation and central image quality. Some research suggests that if the binocular overlap falls below around 20° binocular rivalry leading to effects such as luning (shadowing around the edges of the overlap regions) will start to become a problem for a significant number of users. The HWD overlap, in the range 20-25, has been chosen to maximize the overall horizontal field of view while minimizing the risk of binocular rivalry.


Inter Pupillary Distance (IPD)


The Inter-Pupillary Distance (IPD) target is to have no interpupillary distance adjustment for the majority of the adult population (90%). More than 90% of the adult population has IPDs in the range of 57 mm to 70 mm (+/−6.5 mm range). The pupil position change due to eye roll+/−20° is +/−4.5 mm. The tolerance of helmet placement/visor slip (budget) is +/−6.4 mm. Alignment may be estimated using the formula: Alignment=√[IPD90%+Eye Roll)2+Slip2]=√[6.3 mm+4.5 mm)2+6.4 mm2]=+/−12.5=25.0 mm wide eye box. Note that for the 10% of the population with IPDs outside of the range, full field of view vision is provided. For optimal alignment only one side of the field of view will be lost for one eye only. The other eye will still see the other side of the field, i.e., 90% of the population get 100% overlap. The remaining 10% of the population (within 52 mm to 75 mm IPD) will get 100% of the field of view with some overlap dependent on IPD and display alignment. In conclusion, a 25 mm wide eye box will permit 90% of the population to be accommodated without any adjustment, assuming the above alignment parameters. Improved alignment tolerances of the visor/head gear to the eye will enable a reduction in the eye box dimensions if needed. This can be later traded off against system brightness.


Low Index Materials


Efficient waveguiding needs the TIR beams to be confined between low index media. Air gaps are difficult to fabricate and maintain while the refractive indices of currently available low index materials such as Magnesium Fluoride (1.46) and Silicon Dioxide (1.39) are much too high to meet the tight TIR angle constraints needed in full color implementations of the HMD. The proposed solution is to use nanoporous (Mesoporous Silicon) materials. Nanoporous materials (e.g., mesoporous Silicon) are currently being used in many optical applications including anti reflection coatings and planar optical waveguides. Their high porosity enables the fabrication of high-quality low-dielectric constant thin films. Nanoporous materials can be fabricated in thin layers in a single coating step. To achieve very low, near unity, index the porosities need to be very high, approaching 95%. High transparency and low index can be achieved simultaneously with these films. Since they are highly efficient at absorbing water, they must be carefully sealed against moisture. The best approach may be to seal the passive gratings, HWP and material together. SBG Labs is also investigating the potential role of nanoporous materials as high refractive index media. This would increase the range of TIR angles that can be sustained in our waveguides with potential for increasing the horizontal FOV from 40° to around 45°. Nanoporous materials are currently being used in many optical applications including anti reflection coatings and planar optical waveguides. It is reasonable to assume therefore that the technology will be accessible for our project. The manufacturing process should be translatable to manufacturing needs. Nanoporous materials can be fabricated in single coating step. Alternatively, graded index multilayer architectures can be used. SBG Labs is also investigating the potential role of nanoporous materials as high refractive index media. This would increase the range of TIR angles that can be sustained in our waveguides.


CONCLUSION

All literature and similar material cited in this application, including, but not limited to, patents, patent applications, articles, books, treatises, and web pages, regardless of the format of such literature and similar materials, are expressly incorporated by reference in their entirety. In the event that one or more of the incorporated literature and similar materials differs from or contradicts this application, including but not limited to defined terms, term usage, described techniques, or the like, this application controls.


While the present teachings have been described in conjunction with various embodiments and examples, it is not intended that the present teachings be limited to such embodiments or examples. On the contrary, the present teachings encompass various alternatives, modifications, and equivalents, as will be appreciated by those of skill in the art.


While various inventive embodiments have been described and illustrated herein, those of ordinary skill in the art will readily envision a variety of other means and/or structures for performing the function and/or obtaining the results and/or one or more of the advantages described herein, and each of such variations and/or modifications is deemed to be within the scope of the inventive embodiments described herein. More generally, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that all parameters, dimensions, materials, and configurations described herein are meant to be exemplary and that the actual parameters, dimensions, materials, and/or configurations will depend upon the specific application or applications for which the inventive teachings is/are used. Those skilled in the art will recognize many equivalents to the specific inventive embodiments described herein. It is, therefore, to be understood that the foregoing embodiments are presented by way of example only and that, within the scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereto, inventive embodiments may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described and claimed. Inventive embodiments of the present disclosure are directed to each individual feature, system, article, material, kit, and/or method described herein. In addition, any combination of two or more such features, systems, articles, materials, kits, and/or methods, if such features, systems, articles, materials, kits, and/or methods are not mutually inconsistent, is included within the inventive scope of the present disclosure.


Also, the technology described herein may be embodied as a method, of which at least one example has been provided. The acts performed as part of the method may be ordered in any suitable way. Accordingly, embodiments may be constructed in which acts are performed in an order different than illustrated, which may include performing some acts simultaneously, even though shown as sequential acts in illustrative embodiments.


All definitions, as defined and used herein, should be understood to control over dictionary definitions, definitions in documents incorporated by reference, and/or ordinary meanings of the defined terms.


The indefinite articles “a” and “an,” as used herein in the specification and in the claims, unless clearly indicated to the contrary, should be understood to mean “at least one.” Any ranges cited herein are inclusive.


The terms “substantially” and “about” used throughout this Specification are used to describe and account for small fluctuations. For example, they can refer to less than or equal to ±5%, such as less than or equal to ±2%, such as less than or equal to ±1%, such as less than or equal to ±0.5%, such as less than or equal to ±0.2%, such as less than or equal to ±0.1%, such as less than or equal to ±0.05%.


The phrase “and/or,” as used herein in the specification and in the claims, should be understood to mean “either or both” of the elements so conjoined, i.e., elements that are conjunctively present in some cases and disjunctively present in other cases. Multiple elements listed with “and/or” should be construed in the same fashion, i.e., “one or more” of the elements so conjoined. Other elements may optionally be present other than the elements specifically identified by the “and/or” clause, whether related or unrelated to those elements specifically identified. Thus, as a non-limiting example, a reference to “A and/or B”, when used in conjunction with open-ended language such as “comprising” can refer, in one embodiment, to A only (optionally including elements other than B); in another embodiment, to B only (optionally including elements other than A); in yet another embodiment, to both A and B (optionally including other elements); etc.


As used herein in the specification and in the claims, “or” should be understood to have the same meaning as “and/or” as defined above. For example, when separating items in a list, “or” or “and/or” shall be interpreted as being inclusive, i.e., the inclusion of at least one, but also including more than one, of a number or list of elements, and, optionally, additional unlisted items. Only terms clearly indicated to the contrary, such as “only one of” or “exactly one of,” or, when used in the claims, “consisting of,” will refer to the inclusion of exactly one element of a number or list of elements. In general, the term “or” as used herein shall only be interpreted as indicating exclusive alternatives (i.e. “one or the other but not both”) when preceded by terms of exclusivity, such as “either,” “one of,” “only one of,” or “exactly one of” “Consisting essentially of,” when used in the claims, shall have its ordinary meaning as used in the field of patent law.


As used herein in the specification and in the claims, the phrase “at least one,” in reference to a list of one or more elements, should be understood to mean at least one element selected from any one or more of the elements in the list of elements, but not necessarily including at least one of each and every element specifically listed within the list of elements and not excluding any combinations of elements in the list of elements. This definition also allows that elements may optionally be present other than the elements specifically identified within the list of elements to which the phrase “at least one” refers, whether related or unrelated to those elements specifically identified. Thus, as a non-limiting example, “at least one of A and B” (or, equivalently, “at least one of A or B,” or, equivalently “at least one of A and/or B”) can refer, in one embodiment, to at least one, optionally including more than one, A, with no B present (and optionally including elements other than B); in another embodiment, to at least one, optionally including more than one, B, with no A present (and optionally including elements other than A); in yet another embodiment, to at least one, optionally including more than one, A, and at least one, optionally including more than one, B (and optionally including other elements); etc.


In the claims, as well as in the specification above, all transitional phrases such as “comprising,” “including,” “carrying,” “having,” “containing,” “involving,” “holding,” “composed of,” and the like are to be understood to be open-ended, i.e., to mean including but not limited to. Only the transitional phrases “consisting of” and “consisting essentially of” shall be closed or semi-closed transitional phrases, respectively, as set forth in the United States Patent Office Manual of Patent Examining Procedures, Section 2111.03.


The claims should not be read as limited to the described order or elements unless stated to that effect. It should be understood that various changes in form and detail may be made by one of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the appended claims. All embodiments that come within the spirit and scope of the following claims and equivalents thereto are claimed.

Claims
  • 1. An apparatus for displaying an image comprising: at least one source of image modulated collimated light over an angular range;at least one waveguide layer comprising gratings for: coupling said light into a waveguide path;wherein said gratings comprise a first element and a second element for forming an exit pupil configured to view a tiled field of view (FOV) displaying the image modulated light;wherein each element diffracts light out of the waveguide towards the exit pupil and provides a beam expansion in a first direction;wherein the first element and the second element are partially overlapping and laterally offset;wherein the tiled FOV comprises a first FOV tile and a second FOV tile;wherein the first FOV tile and the second FOV tile are partially overlapping and laterally offset;wherein the source of image modulated collimated light is configured to be electronically switchable between displaying first image data for projection within the first FOV tile and displaying second image data for projecting within the second FOV tile;wherein the first element has a first optical power for forming the first FOV tile at a first distance from the exit pupil;wherein the second element has a second optical power for forming the second FOV tile at a second distance from the exit pupil; andwherein the first distance and the second distance are different.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said gratings are selected from a Bragg grating, a SBG, a HPDLC grating, a uniform modulation grating, a reverse mode HPDLC grating and a surface relief grating.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 1, comprising a plurality of waveguide layers, wherein when the plurality of waveguide layers comprises three waveguide layers, the three waveguide layers are configured to propagate red, green, and blue light, andwherein when the plurality of waveguide layers comprises two waveguide layers, the two waveguide layers are configured to propagate red light and mixed blue and green light.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein at least one of said gratings comprises at least one characteristic from the group consisting of: rolled k-vectors; multiplexing of at least two different grating prescriptions; an overlap with at least one other grating; and a thickness varying across at least one waveguide.
  • 5. A vehicle or aircraft head up display (HUD) comprising the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the device is a part of at least one of HMD, HUD, or HDD.
  • 6. The vehicle or aircraft HUD of claim 5, wherein said at least one waveguide layer further comprises at least one structure selected from the group consisting of: a plurality of different field of view tiles having different angular ranges,at least one grating structure for providing separate exit pupils for a driver and a passenger,an image sensor for capturing images of one or more objects external to said vehicle and in signal communication with the at least one source such that the image modulated collimated light contains information concerning the one or more objects,a reflecting layer overlaying at least one grating,a windscreen and wherein the at least one waveguide is combined with or integrated within the windscreen,a windscreen and wherein the at least one waveguide is a flexible layer bonded onto an inner or an outer surface of the windscreen, andat least one waveguide curved in at least one plane.
  • 7. The vehicle or aircraft HUD of claim 6, wherein said at least one source is configured to provide images of objects external to said vehicle captured by the imaging sensor.
  • 8. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said at least one source comprises a microdisplay in optical communication with a collimation optic.
  • 9. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising a source of structured infrared radiation in optical communication with an infrared detector.
  • 10. The apparatus of claim 9, wherein the source of the structured infrared radiation and the infrared detector are configured to perform at least one function selected from the group consisting of: gesture detection, detection of objects in the vicinity of the display, and eye tracking.
  • 11. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said at least one source of image modulated collimated light comprises a two-dimensional array of grating lenses, wherein each of the grating lenses diffracts incident collimated light into a total internal reflection (TIR) path within the at least one waveguide layer.
  • 12. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the at least one source is at least one light emitting diode (LED) having a peak emission wavelength and further comprising a plurality of gratings with peak diffraction efficiency vs. wavelength characteristics shifted by small increments from said peak emission wavelength such that the diffraction efficiency loss in a spectral bandwidth of the at least one LED is compensated.
  • 13. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said gratings further comprise an expansion grating configured to provide a beam expansion in a second direction orthogonal to the first direction.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/943,590, filed Apr. 2, 2018, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/044,676, filed Oct. 2, 2013, which is a continuation-in-part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/844,456, filed Mar. 15, 2013, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Nos. 61/796,632, filed Nov. 16, 2012, and 61/849,853, filed Feb. 4, 2013, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.

US Referenced Citations (1751)
Number Name Date Kind
1043938 Huttenlocher Nov 1912 A
2141884 Sonnefeld Dec 1938 A
3482498 Becker Dec 1969 A
3620601 Leonard et al. Nov 1971 A
3741716 Johne et al. Jun 1973 A
3804496 Crane et al. Apr 1974 A
3843231 Borel et al. Oct 1974 A
3851303 Muller Nov 1974 A
3885095 Wolfson et al. May 1975 A
3940204 Withrington Feb 1976 A
3965029 Arora Jun 1976 A
3975711 McMahon Aug 1976 A
4028725 Lewis Jun 1977 A
4035068 Rawson Jul 1977 A
4066334 Fray et al. Jan 1978 A
4082432 Kirschner Apr 1978 A
4099841 Ellis Jul 1978 A
4133152 Penrose Jan 1979 A
4178074 Heller Dec 1979 A
4218111 Withrington et al. Aug 1980 A
4232943 Rogers Nov 1980 A
4248093 Andersson et al. Feb 1981 A
4251137 Knop et al. Feb 1981 A
4309070 St. Leger Searle Jan 1982 A
4322163 Schiller Mar 1982 A
4386361 Simmonds May 1983 A
4389612 Simmonds et al. Jun 1983 A
4403189 Simmonds Sep 1983 A
4418993 Lipton Dec 1983 A
4472037 Lipton Sep 1984 A
4523226 Lipton et al. Jun 1985 A
4544267 Schiller Oct 1985 A
4562463 Lipton Dec 1985 A
4566758 Bos et al. Jan 1986 A
4583117 Lipton et al. Apr 1986 A
4643515 Upatnieks Feb 1987 A
4647967 Kirschner et al. Mar 1987 A
4688900 Doane et al. Aug 1987 A
4711512 Upatnieks Dec 1987 A
4714320 Banbury Dec 1987 A
4728547 Vaz et al. Mar 1988 A
4729640 Sakata et al. Mar 1988 A
4743083 Schimpe May 1988 A
4749256 Bell et al. Jun 1988 A
4765703 Suzuki et al. Aug 1988 A
4775218 Wood et al. Oct 1988 A
4791788 Simmonds et al. Dec 1988 A
4792850 Liptoh et al. Dec 1988 A
4799765 Ferrer Jan 1989 A
4811414 Fishbine et al. Mar 1989 A
4848093 Simmonds et al. Jul 1989 A
4852988 Velez et al. Aug 1989 A
4854688 Hayford et al. Aug 1989 A
4860294 Winzer et al. Aug 1989 A
4884876 Lipton et al. Dec 1989 A
4890902 Doane et al. Jan 1990 A
4928301 Smoot May 1990 A
4933976 Fishbine et al. Jun 1990 A
4938568 Margerum et al. Jul 1990 A
4946245 Chamberlin et al. Aug 1990 A
4960311 Moss et al. Oct 1990 A
4964701 Dorschner et al. Oct 1990 A
4967268 Lipton et al. Oct 1990 A
4970129 Ingwall et al. Nov 1990 A
4971719 Vaz et al. Nov 1990 A
4994204 Doane et al. Feb 1991 A
5004323 West Apr 1991 A
5007711 Wood et al. Apr 1991 A
5009483 Rockwell et al. Apr 1991 A
5011624 Yamagishi et al. Apr 1991 A
5016953 Moss et al. May 1991 A
5033814 Brown et al. Jul 1991 A
5035734 Honkanen et al. Jul 1991 A
5053834 Simmonds Oct 1991 A
5063441 Lipton et al. Nov 1991 A
5076664 Migozzi Dec 1991 A
5079416 Filipovich Jan 1992 A
5096282 Margerum et al. Mar 1992 A
5099343 Margerum et al. Mar 1992 A
5109465 Klopotek Apr 1992 A
5110034 Simmonds et al. May 1992 A
5117285 Nelson et al. May 1992 A
5117302 Lipton May 1992 A
5119454 McMahon et al. Jun 1992 A
5124821 Antier et al. Jun 1992 A
5138687 Horie et al. Aug 1992 A
5139192 Simmonds et al. Aug 1992 A
5142357 Lipton et al. Aug 1992 A
5142644 Vansteenkiste et al. Aug 1992 A
5148302 Nagano et al. Sep 1992 A
5150234 Takahashi et al. Sep 1992 A
5151958 Honkanen Sep 1992 A
5153751 Ishikawa et al. Oct 1992 A
5159445 Gitlin et al. Oct 1992 A
5160523 Honkanen et al. Nov 1992 A
5181133 Lipton Jan 1993 A
5183545 Branca et al. Feb 1993 A
5187597 Kato et al. Feb 1993 A
5193000 Lipton et al. Mar 1993 A
5198912 Ingwall et al. Mar 1993 A
5198914 Arns Mar 1993 A
5200861 Moskovich et al. Apr 1993 A
5210624 Matsumoto et al. May 1993 A
5210801 Fournier et al. May 1993 A
5218360 Goetz et al. Jun 1993 A
5218480 Moskovich et al. Jun 1993 A
5224198 Jachimowicz et al. Jun 1993 A
5225918 Taniguchi et al. Jul 1993 A
5239372 Lipton Aug 1993 A
5240636 Doane et al. Aug 1993 A
5241337 Betensky et al. Aug 1993 A
5242476 Bartel et al. Sep 1993 A
5243413 Gitlin et al. Sep 1993 A
5251048 Doane et al. Oct 1993 A
5264950 West et al. Nov 1993 A
5268792 Kreitzer et al. Dec 1993 A
5284499 Harvey et al. Feb 1994 A
5289315 Makita et al. Feb 1994 A
5295208 Caulfield et al. Mar 1994 A
5296967 Moskovich et al. Mar 1994 A
5299289 Omae et al. Mar 1994 A
5303085 Rallison Apr 1994 A
5306923 Kazmierski et al. Apr 1994 A
5309283 Kreitzer et al. May 1994 A
5313330 Betensky May 1994 A
5315324 Kubelik et al. May 1994 A
5315419 Saupe et al. May 1994 A
5315440 Betensky et al. May 1994 A
5317405 Kuriki et al. May 1994 A
5327269 Tilton et al. Jul 1994 A
5329363 Moskovich et al. Jul 1994 A
5341230 Smith Aug 1994 A
5343147 Sager et al. Aug 1994 A
5351151 Levy Sep 1994 A
5359362 Lewis et al. Oct 1994 A
5363220 Kuwayama et al. Nov 1994 A
5368770 Saupe et al. Nov 1994 A
5369511 Amos Nov 1994 A
5371626 Betensky Dec 1994 A
5400069 Braun et al. Mar 1995 A
5408346 Trissel et al. Apr 1995 A
5410370 Janssen Apr 1995 A
5410376 Cornsweet et al. Apr 1995 A
5416510 Lipton et al. May 1995 A
5416514 Janssen et al. May 1995 A
5418584 Larson May 1995 A
5418871 Revelli et al. May 1995 A
5428480 Betensky et al. Jun 1995 A
5437811 Doane et al. Aug 1995 A
5438357 McNelley Aug 1995 A
5452385 Izumi et al. Sep 1995 A
5453863 West et al. Sep 1995 A
5455693 Wreede et al. Oct 1995 A
5455713 Kreitzer et al. Oct 1995 A
5462700 Beeson et al. Oct 1995 A
5463428 Lipton et al. Oct 1995 A
5465311 Caulfield et al. Nov 1995 A
5471326 Hall et al. Nov 1995 A
5473222 Thoeny et al. Dec 1995 A
5476611 Nolan et al. Dec 1995 A
5481321 Lipton Jan 1996 A
5481385 Zimmerman et al. Jan 1996 A
5485313 Betensky Jan 1996 A
5493430 Lu et al. Feb 1996 A
5493448 Betensky et al. Feb 1996 A
5496621 Makita et al. Mar 1996 A
5499140 Betensky Mar 1996 A
5500671 Andersson et al. Mar 1996 A
5500769 Betensky Mar 1996 A
5510913 Hashimoto et al. Apr 1996 A
5515184 Caulfield et al. May 1996 A
5516455 Jacobine et al. May 1996 A
5524272 Podowski et al. Jun 1996 A
5528720 Winston et al. Jun 1996 A
5530566 Kumar Jun 1996 A
5532736 Kuriki et al. Jul 1996 A
5532875 Betemsky Jul 1996 A
5537232 Biles Jul 1996 A
RE35310 Moskovich Aug 1996 E
5543950 Lavrentovich et al. Aug 1996 A
5559637 Moskovich et al. Sep 1996 A
5572248 Allen et al. Nov 1996 A
5572250 Lipton et al. Nov 1996 A
5576888 Betensky Nov 1996 A
5579026 Tabata Nov 1996 A
5583795 Smyth Dec 1996 A
5585035 Nerad et al. Dec 1996 A
5604611 Saburi et al. Feb 1997 A
5606433 Yin et al. Feb 1997 A
5612733 Flohr Mar 1997 A
5612734 Nelson et al. Mar 1997 A
5619254 McNelley Apr 1997 A
5619586 Sibbald et al. Apr 1997 A
5621529 Gordon et al. Apr 1997 A
5621552 Coates et al. Apr 1997 A
5625495 Moskovich et al. Apr 1997 A
5629259 Akada et al. May 1997 A
5631107 Tarumi et al. May 1997 A
5633100 Mickish et al. May 1997 A
5646785 Gilboa et al. Jul 1997 A
5648857 Ando et al. Jul 1997 A
5661577 Jenkins et al. Aug 1997 A
5661603 Hanano et al. Aug 1997 A
5665494 Kawabata et al. Sep 1997 A
5668614 Chien et al. Sep 1997 A
5668907 Veligdan Sep 1997 A
5677797 Betensky et al. Oct 1997 A
5680231 Grinberg et al. Oct 1997 A
5680411 Ramdane et al. Oct 1997 A
5682255 Friesem et al. Oct 1997 A
5686931 Fuenfschilling et al. Nov 1997 A
5686975 Lipton Nov 1997 A
5691795 Doane et al. Nov 1997 A
5694230 Welch Dec 1997 A
5695682 Doane et al. Dec 1997 A
5701132 Kollin et al. Dec 1997 A
5706108 Ando et al. Jan 1998 A
5706136 Okuyama et al. Jan 1998 A
5707925 Akada et al. Jan 1998 A
5710645 Phillips et al. Jan 1998 A
5724189 Ferrante Mar 1998 A
5724463 Deacon et al. Mar 1998 A
5726782 Kato et al. Mar 1998 A
5727098 Jacobson Mar 1998 A
5729242 Margerum et al. Mar 1998 A
5731060 Hirukawa et al. Mar 1998 A
5731853 Taketomi et al. Mar 1998 A
5742262 Tabata et al. Apr 1998 A
5745266 Smith et al. Apr 1998 A
5745301 Betensky et al. Apr 1998 A
5748272 Tanaka et al. May 1998 A
5748277 Huang et al. May 1998 A
5751452 Tanaka et al. May 1998 A
5757546 Lipton et al. May 1998 A
5760931 Saburi et al. Jun 1998 A
5760960 Lin et al. Jun 1998 A
5764414 King et al. Jun 1998 A
5771320 Stone Jun 1998 A
5790288 Jager et al. Aug 1998 A
5790314 Duck et al. Aug 1998 A
5798641 Spagna et al. Aug 1998 A
5804609 Ohnishi et al. Sep 1998 A
5808804 Moskovich Sep 1998 A
5812608 Valimaki et al. Sep 1998 A
5822089 Phillips et al. Oct 1998 A
5822127 Chen et al. Oct 1998 A
5825448 Bos et al. Oct 1998 A
5831700 Li et al. Nov 1998 A
5835661 Tai et al. Nov 1998 A
5841507 Barnes Nov 1998 A
5841587 Moskovich et al. Nov 1998 A
5847787 Fredley et al. Dec 1998 A
5856842 Tedesco Jan 1999 A
5857043 Cook et al. Jan 1999 A
5867238 Miller et al. Feb 1999 A
5867618 Ito et al. Feb 1999 A
5868951 Schuck, III et al. Feb 1999 A
5870228 Kreitzer et al. Feb 1999 A
5875012 Crawford et al. Feb 1999 A
5877826 Yang et al. Mar 1999 A
5886822 Spitzer Mar 1999 A
5892598 Asakawa et al. Apr 1999 A
5892599 Bahuguna Apr 1999 A
5898511 Mizutani et al. Apr 1999 A
5900987 Kreitzer et al. May 1999 A
5900989 Kreitzer May 1999 A
5903395 Rallison et al. May 1999 A
5903396 Rallison May 1999 A
5907416 Hegg et al. May 1999 A
5907436 Perry et al. May 1999 A
5917459 Son et al. Jun 1999 A
5926147 Sehm et al. Jul 1999 A
5929946 Sharp et al. Jul 1999 A
5929960 West et al. Jul 1999 A
5930433 Williamson et al. Jul 1999 A
5936776 Kreitzer Aug 1999 A
5937115 Domash Aug 1999 A
5942157 Sutherland et al. Aug 1999 A
5945893 Plessky et al. Aug 1999 A
5949302 Sarkka Sep 1999 A
5949508 Kumar et al. Sep 1999 A
5956113 Crawford Sep 1999 A
5962147 Shalhub et al. Oct 1999 A
5963375 Kreitzer Oct 1999 A
5966223 Friesem et al. Oct 1999 A
5969874 Moskovich Oct 1999 A
5969876 Kreitzer et al. Oct 1999 A
5973727 McGrew et al. Oct 1999 A
5974162 Metz et al. Oct 1999 A
5985422 Krauter Nov 1999 A
5986746 Metz et al. Nov 1999 A
5991087 Rallison Nov 1999 A
5999089 Carlson et al. Dec 1999 A
5999282 Suzuki et al. Dec 1999 A
5999314 Asakura et al. Dec 1999 A
6014187 Taketomi et al. Jan 2000 A
6023375 Kreitzer Feb 2000 A
6042947 Asakura et al. Mar 2000 A
6043585 Plessky et al. Mar 2000 A
6046585 Simmonds Apr 2000 A
6052540 Koyama Apr 2000 A
6061107 Yang May 2000 A
6061463 Metz et al. May 2000 A
6069728 Huignard et al. May 2000 A
6075626 Mizutani et al. Jun 2000 A
6078427 Fontaine et al. Jun 2000 A
6084998 Straayer Jul 2000 A
6094311 Moskovich Jul 2000 A
6097551 Kreitzer Aug 2000 A
6104448 Doane et al. Aug 2000 A
6107943 Schroeder Aug 2000 A
6115152 Popovich et al. Sep 2000 A
6118908 Bischel et al. Sep 2000 A
6121899 Theriault Sep 2000 A
6127066 Ueda et al. Oct 2000 A
6128058 Walton Oct 2000 A
6133971 Silverstein et al. Oct 2000 A
6133975 Li et al. Oct 2000 A
6137630 Tsou et al. Oct 2000 A
6141074 Bos et al. Oct 2000 A
6141154 Kreitzer et al. Oct 2000 A
6151142 Phillips et al. Nov 2000 A
6154190 Yang et al. Nov 2000 A
6156243 Kosuga et al. Dec 2000 A
6167169 Brinkman et al. Dec 2000 A
6169594 Aye et al. Jan 2001 B1
6169613 Amitai et al. Jan 2001 B1
6169636 Kreitzer et al. Jan 2001 B1
6172792 Jepsen et al. Jan 2001 B1
6176837 Foxlin Jan 2001 B1
6185015 Reinhorn et al. Feb 2001 B1
6185016 Popovich Feb 2001 B1
6188462 Lavrentovich et al. Feb 2001 B1
6191887 Michaloski et al. Feb 2001 B1
6195206 Yona et al. Feb 2001 B1
6195209 Kreitzer et al. Feb 2001 B1
6204835 Yang et al. Mar 2001 B1
6211976 Popovich et al. Apr 2001 B1
6222297 Perdue Apr 2001 B1
6222675 Mall et al. Apr 2001 B1
6222971 Veligdan et al. Apr 2001 B1
6249386 Yona et al. Jun 2001 B1
6259423 Tokito et al. Jul 2001 B1
6259559 Kobayashi et al. Jul 2001 B1
6266166 Katsumata et al. Jul 2001 B1
6268839 Yang et al. Jul 2001 B1
6269203 Davies et al. Jul 2001 B1
6275031 Simmonds et al. Aug 2001 B1
6278429 Ruth et al. Aug 2001 B1
6285813 Schultz et al. Sep 2001 B1
6297860 Moskovich et al. Oct 2001 B1
6301056 Kreitzer et al. Oct 2001 B1
6301057 Kreitzer et al. Oct 2001 B1
6317083 Johnson et al. Nov 2001 B1
6317227 Mizutani et al. Nov 2001 B1
6317228 Popovich et al. Nov 2001 B2
6317528 Gadkaree et al. Nov 2001 B1
6320563 Yang et al. Nov 2001 B1
6321069 Piirainen Nov 2001 B1
6323970 Popovich Nov 2001 B1
6323989 Jacobson et al. Nov 2001 B1
6324014 Moskovich et al. Nov 2001 B1
6327089 Hosaki et al. Dec 2001 B1
6330109 Ishii et al. Dec 2001 B1
6333819 Svedenkrans Dec 2001 B1
6339486 Popovich Jan 2002 B1
6340540 Ueda et al. Jan 2002 B1
6351273 Lemelson et al. Feb 2002 B1
6351333 Araki et al. Feb 2002 B2
6356172 Koivisto et al. Mar 2002 B1
6356674 Davis et al. Mar 2002 B1
6359730 Tervonen Mar 2002 B2
6359737 Stringfellow Mar 2002 B1
6366281 Lipton et al. Apr 2002 B1
6366369 Ichikawa et al. Apr 2002 B2
6366378 Tervonen et al. Apr 2002 B1
6377238 McPheters Apr 2002 B1
6377321 Khan et al. Apr 2002 B1
6388797 Lipton et al. May 2002 B1
6392812 Howard May 2002 B1
6407724 Waldern et al. Jun 2002 B2
6409687 Foxlin Jun 2002 B1
6411444 Moskovich et al. Jun 2002 B1
6414760 Lopez et al. Jul 2002 B1
6417971 Moskovich et al. Jul 2002 B1
6437563 Simmonds et al. Aug 2002 B1
6445512 Moskovich et al. Sep 2002 B1
6449095 Ohtaki et al. Sep 2002 B1
6456584 Nagata et al. Sep 2002 B1
6470132 Nousiainen et al. Oct 2002 B1
6473209 Popovich Oct 2002 B1
6476974 Kreitzer et al. Nov 2002 B1
6483303 Simmonds et al. Nov 2002 B2
6486997 Bruzzone et al. Nov 2002 B1
6504518 Kuwayama et al. Jan 2003 B1
6504629 Popovich et al. Jan 2003 B1
6509937 Moskovich et al. Jan 2003 B1
6510263 Maisenhoelder et al. Jan 2003 B1
6518747 Sager et al. Feb 2003 B2
6519088 Lipton Feb 2003 B1
6522794 Bischel et al. Feb 2003 B1
6522795 Jordan et al. Feb 2003 B1
6524771 Maeda et al. Feb 2003 B2
6529336 Kreitzer et al. Mar 2003 B1
6534977 Duncan et al. Mar 2003 B1
6545778 Ono et al. Apr 2003 B2
6550949 Bauer et al. Apr 2003 B1
6552789 Modro Apr 2003 B1
6557413 Nieminen et al. May 2003 B2
6559813 DeLuca et al. May 2003 B1
6560019 Nakai May 2003 B2
6563648 Gleckman et al. May 2003 B2
6563650 Moskovich et al. May 2003 B2
6567014 Hansen et al. May 2003 B1
6567573 Domash et al. May 2003 B1
6577411 David et al. Jun 2003 B1
6577429 Kurtz et al. Jun 2003 B1
6580529 Amitai et al. Jun 2003 B1
6583838 Hoke et al. Jun 2003 B1
6583873 Goncharov et al. Jun 2003 B1
6587619 Kinoshita Jul 2003 B1
6594090 Kruschwitz et al. Jul 2003 B2
6596193 Coates et al. Jul 2003 B2
6597176 Simmonds et al. Jul 2003 B2
6597475 Shirakura et al. Jul 2003 B1
6598987 Parikka Jul 2003 B1
6600590 Roddy et al. Jul 2003 B2
6608720 Freeman Aug 2003 B1
6611253 Cohen Aug 2003 B1
6618104 Date et al. Sep 2003 B1
6624943 Nakai et al. Sep 2003 B2
6625381 Roddy et al. Sep 2003 B2
6646772 Popovich et al. Nov 2003 B1
6646810 Harter, Jr. et al. Nov 2003 B2
6661578 Hedrick Dec 2003 B2
6667134 Sutherland et al. Dec 2003 B1
6674578 Sugiyama et al. Jan 2004 B2
6677086 Sutehrland et al. Jan 2004 B1
6686815 Mirshekarl-Syahkal et al. Feb 2004 B1
6690516 Aritake et al. Feb 2004 B2
6692666 Sutherland et al. Feb 2004 B2
6699407 Sutehrland et al. Mar 2004 B1
6706086 Emig et al. Mar 2004 B2
6706451 Sutherland et al. Mar 2004 B1
6721096 Bruzzone et al. Apr 2004 B2
6730442 Sutherland et al. May 2004 B1
6731434 Hua et al. May 2004 B1
6738105 Hannah et al. May 2004 B1
6741189 Gibbons, II et al. May 2004 B1
6744478 Asakura et al. Jun 2004 B1
6747781 Trisnadi et al. Jun 2004 B2
6748342 Dickhaus Jun 2004 B1
6750941 Satoh et al. Jun 2004 B2
6750995 Dickson Jun 2004 B2
6750996 Jagt et al. Jun 2004 B2
6757105 Niv et al. Jun 2004 B2
6771403 Endo et al. Aug 2004 B1
6776339 Piikivi Aug 2004 B2
6781701 Sweetser et al. Aug 2004 B1
6791629 Moskovich et al. Sep 2004 B2
6791739 Ramanujan et al. Sep 2004 B2
6804066 Ha et al. Oct 2004 B1
6805490 Levola Oct 2004 B2
6821457 Natarajan et al. Nov 2004 B1
6822713 Yaroshchuk et al. Nov 2004 B1
6825987 Repetto et al. Nov 2004 B2
6829095 Amitai Dec 2004 B2
6830789 Doane et al. Dec 2004 B2
6833955 Niv Dec 2004 B2
6836369 Fujikawa et al. Dec 2004 B2
6842563 Zhang et al. Jan 2005 B2
6844212 Bond et al. Jan 2005 B2
6844980 He et al. Jan 2005 B2
6844989 Jo et al. Jan 2005 B1
6847274 Salmela et al. Jan 2005 B2
6847488 Travis Jan 2005 B2
6850210 Lipton et al. Feb 2005 B1
6853491 Ruhle et al. Feb 2005 B1
6853493 Kreitzer et al. Feb 2005 B2
6861107 Klasen-Memmer et al. Mar 2005 B2
6864861 Schehrer et al. Mar 2005 B2
6864927 Cathey Mar 2005 B1
6864931 Kumar et al. Mar 2005 B1
6867888 Sutherland et al. Mar 2005 B2
6873443 Joubert et al. Mar 2005 B1
6876791 Murashima et al. Apr 2005 B2
6878494 Sutehrland et al. Apr 2005 B2
6885483 Takada Apr 2005 B2
6903872 Schrader Jun 2005 B2
6909345 Salmela et al. Jun 2005 B1
6917375 Akada et al. Jul 2005 B2
6919003 Ikeda et al. Jul 2005 B2
6922267 Endo et al. Jul 2005 B2
6926429 Barlow et al. Aug 2005 B2
6927570 Simmonds et al. Aug 2005 B2
6927694 Smith et al. Aug 2005 B1
6940361 Jokio et al. Sep 2005 B1
6943788 Tomono Sep 2005 B2
6950173 Sutherland et al. Sep 2005 B1
6950227 Schrader Sep 2005 B2
6951393 Koide Oct 2005 B2
6952312 Weber et al. Oct 2005 B2
6952435 Lai et al. Oct 2005 B2
6958662 Salmela et al. Oct 2005 B1
6958868 Pender Oct 2005 B1
6963454 Martins et al. Nov 2005 B1
6972788 Robertson et al. Dec 2005 B1
6975345 Lipton et al. Dec 2005 B1
6980365 Moskovich Dec 2005 B2
6985296 Lipton et al. Jan 2006 B2
6987908 Bond et al. Jan 2006 B2
6999239 Martins et al. Feb 2006 B1
7002618 Lipton et al. Feb 2006 B2
7002753 Moskovich et al. Feb 2006 B2
7003075 Miyake et al. Feb 2006 B2
7003187 Frick et al. Feb 2006 B2
7006732 Gunn, III et al. Feb 2006 B2
7009773 Chaoulov et al. Mar 2006 B2
7018563 Sutherland et al. Mar 2006 B1
7018686 Sutehrland et al. Mar 2006 B2
7018744 Otaki et al. Mar 2006 B2
7019793 Moskovich et al. Mar 2006 B2
7021777 Amitai Apr 2006 B2
7026892 Kajiya Apr 2006 B2
7027671 Huck et al. Apr 2006 B2
7034748 Kajiya Apr 2006 B2
7046439 Kaminsky et al. May 2006 B2
7050674 Lee et al. May 2006 B2
7053735 Salmela et al. May 2006 B2
7053991 Sandusky May 2006 B2
7054045 McPheters et al. May 2006 B2
7058434 Wang et al. Jun 2006 B2
7068405 Sutherland et al. Jun 2006 B2
7068898 Buretea et al. Jun 2006 B2
7072020 Sutherland et al. Jul 2006 B1
7075273 O'Gorman et al. Jul 2006 B2
7077984 Natarajan et al. Jul 2006 B1
7081215 Natarajan et al. Jul 2006 B2
7088457 Zou et al. Aug 2006 B1
7088515 Lipton Aug 2006 B2
7095562 Peng et al. Aug 2006 B1
7099080 Lipton et al. Aug 2006 B2
7101048 Travis Sep 2006 B2
7108383 Mitchell et al. Sep 2006 B1
7110184 Yona et al. Sep 2006 B1
7119965 Rolland et al. Oct 2006 B1
7123418 Weber et al. Oct 2006 B2
7123421 Moskovich et al. Oct 2006 B1
7126418 Hunton et al. Oct 2006 B2
7126583 Breed Oct 2006 B1
7132200 Ueda et al. Nov 2006 B1
7133084 Moskovich et al. Nov 2006 B2
7139109 Mukawa Nov 2006 B2
RE39424 Moskovich Dec 2006 E
7145729 Kreitzer et al. Dec 2006 B2
7149385 Parikka et al. Dec 2006 B2
7151246 Fein et al. Dec 2006 B2
7158095 Jenson et al. Jan 2007 B2
7167286 Anderson et al. Jan 2007 B2
7167616 Ling et al. Jan 2007 B2
7175780 Sutherland et al. Feb 2007 B1
7181105 Teramura et al. Feb 2007 B2
7181108 Levola Feb 2007 B2
7184002 Lipton et al. Feb 2007 B2
7184615 Levola Feb 2007 B2
7186567 Sutherland et al. Mar 2007 B1
7190849 Katase Mar 2007 B2
7198737 Natarajan et al. Apr 2007 B2
7199934 Yamasaki Apr 2007 B2
7205960 David Apr 2007 B2
7205964 Yokoyama et al. Apr 2007 B1
7206107 Levola Apr 2007 B2
7212175 Magee et al. May 2007 B1
7218817 Magnusson et al. May 2007 B2
7230767 Walck et al. Jun 2007 B2
7230770 Kreitzer et al. Jun 2007 B2
7242527 Spitzer et al. Jul 2007 B2
7248128 Mattila et al. Jul 2007 B2
7248765 Lee et al. Jul 2007 B2
7256915 Sutherland et al. Aug 2007 B2
7259906 Islam Aug 2007 B1
7265882 Sutherland et al. Sep 2007 B2
7265903 Sutherland et al. Sep 2007 B2
7268946 Wang Sep 2007 B2
7285903 Cull et al. Oct 2007 B2
7286272 Mukawa Oct 2007 B2
7289069 Ranta Oct 2007 B2
RE39911 Moskovich Nov 2007 E
7299983 Piikivi Nov 2007 B2
7301601 Lin et al. Nov 2007 B2
7312906 Sutherland et al. Dec 2007 B2
7313291 Okhotnikov et al. Dec 2007 B2
D559250 Pombo Jan 2008 S
7319573 Nishiyama Jan 2008 B2
7320534 Sugikawa et al. Jan 2008 B2
7323275 Otaki et al. Jan 2008 B2
7333685 Stone et al. Feb 2008 B2
7336271 Ozeki et al. Feb 2008 B2
7339737 Urey et al. Mar 2008 B2
7339742 Amitai et al. Mar 2008 B2
7349612 Nishii et al. Mar 2008 B2
7356218 Kato et al. Apr 2008 B2
7356224 Levner et al. Apr 2008 B2
7369911 Volant et al. May 2008 B1
7375870 Schorpp May 2008 B2
7375886 Lipton et al. May 2008 B2
7376068 Khoury May 2008 B1
7376307 Singh et al. May 2008 B2
7391573 Amitai Jun 2008 B2
7394865 Borran et al. Jul 2008 B2
7394961 Kornilovich et al. Jul 2008 B2
7395181 Foxlin Jul 2008 B2
7397606 Peng et al. Jul 2008 B1
7401920 Kranz et al. Jul 2008 B1
7404644 Evans et al. Jul 2008 B2
7410286 Travis Aug 2008 B2
7411637 Weiss Aug 2008 B2
7413678 Natarajan et al. Aug 2008 B1
7413679 Sutherland et al. Aug 2008 B1
7415173 Kassamakov et al. Aug 2008 B2
7416818 Sutherland et al. Aug 2008 B2
7418170 Mukawa et al. Aug 2008 B2
7420733 Natarajan et al. Sep 2008 B1
7433116 Islam Oct 2008 B1
7436568 Kuykendall, Jr. Oct 2008 B1
D581447 Yee Nov 2008 S
7447967 Onggosanusi et al. Nov 2008 B2
7453612 Mukawa Nov 2008 B2
7454103 Parriaux Nov 2008 B2
7457040 Amitai Nov 2008 B2
7466994 Pihlaja et al. Dec 2008 B2
7477206 Cowan et al. Jan 2009 B2
7479354 Ueda et al. Jan 2009 B2
7480215 Makela et al. Jan 2009 B2
7482996 Larson et al. Jan 2009 B2
7483604 Levola Jan 2009 B2
7492512 Niv et al. Feb 2009 B2
7496293 Shamir et al. Feb 2009 B2
7499217 Cakmakci et al. Mar 2009 B2
7500104 Goland Mar 2009 B2
7511891 Messerschmidt Mar 2009 B2
7513668 Peng et al. Apr 2009 B1
7522344 Curatu et al. Apr 2009 B1
7525448 Wilson et al. Apr 2009 B1
7528385 Volodin et al. May 2009 B2
7542210 Chirieleison Jun 2009 B2
7545429 Travis Jun 2009 B2
7550234 Otaki et al. Jun 2009 B2
7558446 Wimberger-Friedl et al. Jul 2009 B2
7567372 Schorpp Jul 2009 B2
7570322 Sutherland et al. Aug 2009 B1
7570405 Sutherland et al. Aug 2009 B1
7570429 Maliah et al. Aug 2009 B2
7572555 Takizawa et al. Aug 2009 B2
7573640 Nivon et al. Aug 2009 B2
7576916 Amitai Aug 2009 B2
7577326 Amitai Aug 2009 B2
7579119 Ueda et al. Aug 2009 B2
7583423 Sutherland et al. Sep 2009 B2
7587110 Singh et al. Sep 2009 B2
7588863 Takizawa et al. Sep 2009 B2
7589900 Powell Sep 2009 B1
7589901 DeJong et al. Sep 2009 B2
7592988 Katase Sep 2009 B2
7593575 Houle et al. Sep 2009 B2
7597447 Larson et al. Oct 2009 B2
7599012 Nakamura et al. Oct 2009 B2
7600893 Laino et al. Oct 2009 B2
7602552 Blumenfeld Oct 2009 B1
7605719 Wenger et al. Oct 2009 B1
7605774 Brandt et al. Oct 2009 B1
7605882 Sutherland et al. Oct 2009 B1
7616270 Hirabayashi et al. Nov 2009 B2
7617022 Wood et al. Nov 2009 B1
7618750 Ueda et al. Nov 2009 B2
7619739 Sutherland et al. Nov 2009 B1
7619825 Peng et al. Nov 2009 B1
7629086 Otaki et al. Dec 2009 B2
7639208 Ha et al. Dec 2009 B1
7639911 Lee et al. Dec 2009 B2
7643214 Amitai Jan 2010 B2
7643225 Tsai Jan 2010 B1
7656585 Powell et al. Feb 2010 B1
7660047 Travis et al. Feb 2010 B1
7672055 Amitai Mar 2010 B2
7672549 Ghosh et al. Mar 2010 B2
7675684 Weissman et al. Mar 2010 B1
7691248 Ikeda et al. Apr 2010 B2
7710622 Takabayashi et al. May 2010 B2
7710654 Ashkenazi et al. May 2010 B2
7711228 Noda et al. May 2010 B2
7724441 Amitai May 2010 B2
7724442 Amitai May 2010 B2
7724443 Amitai May 2010 B2
7733571 Li Jun 2010 B1
7733572 Brown et al. Jun 2010 B1
7740387 Schultz et al. Jun 2010 B2
7747113 Mukawa et al. Jun 2010 B2
7751122 Amitai Jul 2010 B2
7751662 Kleemann et al. Jul 2010 B2
7764413 Levola Jul 2010 B2
7777819 Simmonds Aug 2010 B2
7778305 Parriaux et al. Aug 2010 B2
7778508 Hirayama Aug 2010 B2
7843642 Shaoulov et al. Nov 2010 B2
7847235 Krupkin et al. Dec 2010 B2
7864427 Korenaga et al. Jan 2011 B2
7865080 Hecker et al. Jan 2011 B2
7866869 Karakawa Jan 2011 B2
7872707 Sutherland et al. Jan 2011 B1
7872804 Moon et al. Jan 2011 B2
7884593 Simmonds et al. Feb 2011 B2
7884985 Amitai et al. Feb 2011 B2
7887186 Watanabe Feb 2011 B2
7903921 Ostergard Mar 2011 B2
7907342 Simmonds et al. Mar 2011 B2
7920787 Gentner et al. Apr 2011 B2
7928862 Matthews Apr 2011 B1
7936513 Wu et al. May 2011 B2
7936519 Mukawa et al. May 2011 B2
7944428 Travis May 2011 B2
7944616 Mukawa May 2011 B2
7949214 DeJong et al. May 2011 B2
D640310 Suzuki et al. Jun 2011 S
7961117 Zimmerman et al. Jun 2011 B1
7969644 Tilleman et al. Jun 2011 B2
7969657 Cakmakci et al. Jun 2011 B2
7970246 Travis et al. Jun 2011 B2
7976208 Travis Jul 2011 B2
7984884 Iliev et al. Jul 2011 B1
7999982 Endo et al. Aug 2011 B2
8000020 Amitai et al. Aug 2011 B2
8000491 Brodkin et al. Aug 2011 B2
8004765 Amitai Aug 2011 B2
8014050 McGrew Sep 2011 B2
8016475 Travis Sep 2011 B2
8018579 Krah Sep 2011 B1
8022942 Bathiche et al. Sep 2011 B2
8023783 Mukawa et al. Sep 2011 B2
RE42992 David Dec 2011 E
8073296 Mukawa et al. Dec 2011 B2
8077274 Sutherland et al. Dec 2011 B2
8079713 Ashkenazi Dec 2011 B2
8082222 Rangarajan et al. Dec 2011 B2
8086030 Gordon et al. Dec 2011 B2
8089568 Brown et al. Jan 2012 B1
8093451 Spangenberg et al. Jan 2012 B2
8098439 Amitai et al. Jan 2012 B2
8107023 Simmonds et al. Jan 2012 B2
8107780 Simmonds Jan 2012 B2
8120548 Barber Feb 2012 B1
8120848 Isano Feb 2012 B2
8132948 Owen et al. Mar 2012 B2
8132976 Odell et al. Mar 2012 B2
8134434 Diederichs et al. Mar 2012 B2
8136690 Fang et al. Mar 2012 B2
8137981 Andrew et al. Mar 2012 B2
8142016 Legerton et al. Mar 2012 B2
8149086 Klein et al. Apr 2012 B2
8152315 Travis et al. Apr 2012 B2
8152353 Yang et al. Apr 2012 B2
8155489 Saarikko et al. Apr 2012 B2
8159752 Wertheim et al. Apr 2012 B2
8160409 Large Apr 2012 B2
8160411 Levola et al. Apr 2012 B2
D659137 Matsumoto May 2012 S
8167173 Simmonds et al. May 2012 B1
8186874 Sinbar et al. May 2012 B2
8188925 DeJean May 2012 B2
8189263 Wang et al. May 2012 B1
8189973 Travis et al. May 2012 B2
D661334 Cho et al. Jun 2012 S
D661335 Jeon Jun 2012 S
8194325 Levola et al. Jun 2012 B2
8199803 Hauske et al. Jun 2012 B2
8213065 Mukawa Jul 2012 B2
8213755 Mukawa et al. Jul 2012 B2
8220966 Mukawa Jul 2012 B2
8224133 Popovich et al. Jul 2012 B2
8233204 Robbins et al. Jul 2012 B1
8253914 Iya et al. Aug 2012 B2
8254031 Levola Aug 2012 B2
8264498 Vanderkamp et al. Sep 2012 B1
8294749 Cable Oct 2012 B2
8295710 Marcus Oct 2012 B2
8301031 Gentner et al. Oct 2012 B2
8305577 Kivioja et al. Nov 2012 B2
8306423 Gottwald et al. Nov 2012 B2
8310327 Willers et al. Nov 2012 B2
8314819 Kimmel et al. Nov 2012 B2
8314993 Levola Nov 2012 B2
8320032 Levola Nov 2012 B2
8321810 Heintze Nov 2012 B2
8325166 Akutsu et al. Dec 2012 B2
8329773 Fäcke et al. Dec 2012 B2
8335040 Mukawa et al. Dec 2012 B2
8335414 Zinoviev et al. Dec 2012 B2
D673996 Kim et al. Jan 2013 S
8351744 Travis et al. Jan 2013 B2
8354640 Hamre et al. Jan 2013 B2
8354806 Travis et al. Jan 2013 B2
8355610 Simmonds Jan 2013 B2
8369019 Baker et al. Feb 2013 B2
8376548 Schultz Feb 2013 B2
8382293 Phillips, III et al. Feb 2013 B2
8384504 Diederichs et al. Feb 2013 B2
8384694 Powell et al. Feb 2013 B2
8384730 Vanderkamp et al. Feb 2013 B1
8396339 Mukawa et al. Mar 2013 B2
8396341 Lee et al. Mar 2013 B2
8398242 Yamamoto et al. Mar 2013 B2
8403490 Sugiyama et al. Mar 2013 B2
8422840 Large Apr 2013 B2
8427439 Larsen et al. Apr 2013 B2
8432363 Saarikko et al. Apr 2013 B2
8432372 Butler et al. Apr 2013 B2
8432614 Amitai Apr 2013 B2
8441731 Sprague May 2013 B2
8447365 Imanuel May 2013 B1
8466953 Levola Jun 2013 B2
8472119 Kelly Jun 2013 B1
8472120 Border et al. Jun 2013 B2
8477261 Travis et al. Jul 2013 B2
8481130 Harding et al. Jul 2013 B2
8482858 Sprague Jul 2013 B2
8488246 Border et al. Jul 2013 B2
8491121 Tilleman et al. Jul 2013 B2
8491136 Travis et al. Jul 2013 B2
8493366 Bathiche et al. Jul 2013 B2
8493562 Kopp et al. Jul 2013 B2
8493662 Noui Jul 2013 B2
8494229 Jarvenpaa et al. Jul 2013 B2
8508848 Saarikko Aug 2013 B2
8520309 Sprague Aug 2013 B2
D691192 Stanley et al. Oct 2013 S
8547638 Levola Oct 2013 B2
8548290 Travers et al. Oct 2013 B2
8565560 Popovich et al. Oct 2013 B2
D694310 Cho et al. Nov 2013 S
D694311 Cho et al. Nov 2013 S
8578038 Kaikuranta et al. Nov 2013 B2
8581831 Travis Nov 2013 B2
8582206 Travis Nov 2013 B2
8593734 Laakkonen Nov 2013 B2
8611014 Valera et al. Dec 2013 B2
8619062 Powell et al. Dec 2013 B2
D697130 Ldvgren Jan 2014 S
8633786 Ermolov et al. Jan 2014 B2
8634120 Popovich et al. Jan 2014 B2
8634139 Brown et al. Jan 2014 B1
8639072 Popovich et al. Jan 2014 B2
8643691 Rosenfeld et al. Feb 2014 B2
8643948 Amitai et al. Feb 2014 B2
8649099 Schultz et al. Feb 2014 B2
8654420 Simmonds Feb 2014 B2
8659826 Brown et al. Feb 2014 B1
D701206 Luckey et al. Mar 2014 S
8670029 McEldowney Mar 2014 B2
8693087 Nowatzyk et al. Apr 2014 B2
8698705 Burke Apr 2014 B2
8731350 Lin et al. May 2014 B1
8736802 Kajiya et al. May 2014 B2
8736963 Robbins et al. May 2014 B2
8742952 Bold Jun 2014 B1
8746008 Mauritsen et al. Jun 2014 B1
8749886 Gupta Jun 2014 B2
8749890 Wood et al. Jun 2014 B1
8767294 Chen et al. Jul 2014 B2
8786923 Chuang et al. Jul 2014 B2
8810600 Bohn et al. Aug 2014 B2
8810913 Simmonds et al. Aug 2014 B2
8810914 Amitai Aug 2014 B2
8814691 Haddick et al. Aug 2014 B2
8816578 Peng et al. Aug 2014 B1
8817350 Robbins et al. Aug 2014 B1
8824836 Sugiyama Sep 2014 B2
8830143 Pitchford et al. Sep 2014 B1
8830584 Saarikko et al. Sep 2014 B2
8830588 Brown et al. Sep 2014 B1
8842368 Simmonds et al. Sep 2014 B2
8859412 Jain Oct 2014 B2
8872435 Kreitzer et al. Oct 2014 B2
8873149 Bohn et al. Oct 2014 B2
8873150 Amitai Oct 2014 B2
D718304 Heinrich Nov 2014 S
D718366 Mehin et al. Nov 2014 S
8885112 Popovich et al. Nov 2014 B2
8885997 Nguyen et al. Nov 2014 B2
8903207 Brown et al. Dec 2014 B1
8906088 Pugh et al. Dec 2014 B2
8913324 Schrader Dec 2014 B2
8913865 Bennett Dec 2014 B1
8917453 Bohn Dec 2014 B2
8929589 Publicover et al. Jan 2015 B2
8933144 Enomoto et al. Jan 2015 B2
8934743 Nishiwaki et al. Jan 2015 B2
8937771 Robbins et al. Jan 2015 B2
8937772 Burns et al. Jan 2015 B1
8938141 Magnusson Jan 2015 B2
8950867 Macnamara Feb 2015 B2
8964298 Haddick et al. Feb 2015 B2
8965152 Simmonds Feb 2015 B2
D725102 Lee et al. Mar 2015 S
8985803 Bohn Mar 2015 B2
8989535 Robbins Mar 2015 B2
D726180 Roat et al. Apr 2015 S
9019595 Jain Apr 2015 B2
9025253 Hadad et al. May 2015 B2
9035344 Jain May 2015 B2
D733709 Kawai Jul 2015 S
9075184 Popovich et al. Jul 2015 B2
9081178 Simmonds et al. Jul 2015 B2
9097890 Miller et al. Aug 2015 B2
9103978 Nishiwaki et al. Aug 2015 B2
9122015 Shimizu Sep 2015 B2
9128226 Fattal et al. Sep 2015 B2
9129295 Border et al. Sep 2015 B2
9164290 Robbins et al. Oct 2015 B2
9176324 Scherer et al. Nov 2015 B1
9188717 Nishiwaki Nov 2015 B2
9201270 Fattal et al. Dec 2015 B2
9215293 Miller Dec 2015 B2
D746896 Markovitz et al. Jan 2016 S
9239507 Chen et al. Jan 2016 B2
9244275 Li Jan 2016 B1
9244280 Tiana et al. Jan 2016 B1
9244281 Zimmerman et al. Jan 2016 B1
D749074 Cazalet et al. Feb 2016 S
9253359 Takahashi Feb 2016 B2
9269854 Jain Feb 2016 B2
D751551 Ho et al. Mar 2016 S
D752129 Lee et al. Mar 2016 S
9274338 Robbins et al. Mar 2016 B2
9274339 Brown et al. Mar 2016 B1
9274349 Popovich et al. Mar 2016 B2
D754782 Kokinakis et al. Apr 2016 S
9310566 Valera et al. Apr 2016 B2
9316786 Nishiwaki et al. Apr 2016 B2
9329325 Simmonds et al. May 2016 B2
9335548 Cakmakci et al. May 2016 B1
9335604 Popovich et al. May 2016 B2
9341846 Popovich et al. May 2016 B2
9354366 Jain May 2016 B2
9366862 Haddick et al. Jun 2016 B2
9366864 Brown et al. Jun 2016 B1
9372347 Levola et al. Jun 2016 B1
9377623 Robbins et al. Jun 2016 B2
9377852 Shapiro et al. Jun 2016 B1
9389415 Fattal et al. Jul 2016 B2
9400395 Travers et al. Jul 2016 B2
9423360 Kostamo et al. Aug 2016 B1
9429692 Saarikko et al. Aug 2016 B1
9431794 Jain Aug 2016 B2
9435961 Jiang Sep 2016 B2
9456744 Popovich et al. Oct 2016 B2
9459451 Saarikko et al. Oct 2016 B2
9464779 Popovich et al. Oct 2016 B2
9465213 Simmonds Oct 2016 B2
9465227 Popovich et al. Oct 2016 B2
9484482 Hsu et al. Nov 2016 B2
9494799 Robbins et al. Nov 2016 B2
9507150 Stratton et al. Nov 2016 B1
9513480 Saarikko et al. Dec 2016 B2
9516193 Aramaki Dec 2016 B2
9519089 Brown et al. Dec 2016 B1
9519115 Yashiki et al. Dec 2016 B2
9523852 Brown et al. Dec 2016 B1
9535253 Levola et al. Jan 2017 B2
9541383 Abovitz et al. Jan 2017 B2
9541763 Heberlein et al. Jan 2017 B1
9547174 Gao et al. Jan 2017 B2
9551468 Jones Jan 2017 B2
9551874 Amitai Jan 2017 B2
9551880 Amitai Jan 2017 B2
9599813 Stratton et al. Mar 2017 B1
9612403 Abovitz et al. Apr 2017 B2
9632226 Waldern et al. Apr 2017 B2
9635352 Henry et al. Apr 2017 B1
9648313 Henry et al. May 2017 B1
9651368 Abovitz et al. May 2017 B2
9664824 Simmonds et al. May 2017 B2
9664910 Mansharof et al. May 2017 B2
9671612 Kress et al. Jun 2017 B2
9674413 Tiana et al. Jun 2017 B1
9678345 Melzer et al. Jun 2017 B1
9679367 Wald Jun 2017 B1
9715067 Brown et al. Jul 2017 B1
9715110 Brown et al. Jul 2017 B1
D793468 Yu et al. Aug 2017 S
D795865 Porter et al. Aug 2017 S
D795866 Porter et al. Aug 2017 S
9726540 Popovich et al. Aug 2017 B2
9727772 Popovich et al. Aug 2017 B2
9733475 Brown et al. Aug 2017 B1
9739950 Sqalli et al. Aug 2017 B2
9746688 Popovich et al. Aug 2017 B2
9754507 Wenger et al. Sep 2017 B1
9762895 Henry et al. Sep 2017 B1
9766465 Tiana et al. Sep 2017 B1
9785231 Zimmerman Oct 2017 B1
9791694 Haverkamp et al. Oct 2017 B1
9791696 Woltman et al. Oct 2017 B2
9804316 Drolet et al. Oct 2017 B2
9804389 Popovich et al. Oct 2017 B2
9823423 Waldern et al. Nov 2017 B2
9857605 Popovich et al. Jan 2018 B2
9874931 Koenck et al. Jan 2018 B1
9899800 Ferrotti et al. Feb 2018 B2
9915825 Robbins et al. Mar 2018 B2
9933684 Brown et al. Apr 2018 B2
9939577 Inoue et al. Apr 2018 B2
9939628 Basset et al. Apr 2018 B2
9977247 Brown et al. May 2018 B1
D827641 Morisawa Sep 2018 S
10088686 Robbins et al. Oct 2018 B2
10089516 Popovich et al. Oct 2018 B2
10107966 Horibe et al. Oct 2018 B1
10114220 Grey et al. Oct 2018 B2
10156681 Waldern et al. Dec 2018 B2
10162181 Webster et al. Dec 2018 B2
10185154 Popovich et al. Jan 2019 B2
D840454 Han et al. Feb 2019 S
10197804 Stenberg et al. Feb 2019 B2
10209517 Popovich et al. Feb 2019 B2
10216061 Popovich et al. Feb 2019 B2
10234696 Popovich et al. Mar 2019 B2
10241330 Popovich et al. Mar 2019 B2
10241332 Vallius Mar 2019 B2
10281725 Yokoyama May 2019 B2
10330777 Popovich et al. Jun 2019 B2
10345519 Miller et al. Jul 2019 B1
10359736 Popovich et al. Jul 2019 B2
D855687 Villalpando Aug 2019 S
D859510 Harmon et al. Sep 2019 S
10409144 Popovich et al. Sep 2019 B2
10423222 Popovich et al. Sep 2019 B2
10423813 Popovich et al. Sep 2019 B2
10437051 Popovich et al. Oct 2019 B2
10437064 Popovich et al. Oct 2019 B2
10444510 Lee et al. Oct 2019 B1
10459311 Popovich et al. Oct 2019 B2
D871494 Yamada et al. Dec 2019 S
D872170 Evans et al. Jan 2020 S
D872794 Wilkins Jan 2020 S
10527797 Waldern et al. Jan 2020 B2
10532594 Akahane et al. Jan 2020 B2
10545346 Waldern et al. Jan 2020 B2
D880575 Thixton Apr 2020 S
10642058 Popovich et al. May 2020 B2
10670876 Popovich et al. Jun 2020 B2
10678053 Waldern et al. Jun 2020 B2
10690915 Popovich et al. Jun 2020 B2
10690916 Popovich et al. Jun 2020 B2
10705281 Fattal et al. Jul 2020 B2
10725312 Popovich et al. Jul 2020 B2
10732569 Waldern et al. Aug 2020 B2
10859768 Popovich et al. Dec 2020 B2
10890707 Waldern et al. Jan 2021 B2
10942430 Waldern et al. Mar 2021 B2
11106048 Popovich et al. Aug 2021 B2
11175512 Waldern et al. Nov 2021 B2
11194098 Waldern et al. Dec 2021 B2
11194162 Waldern et al. Dec 2021 B2
11204540 Popovich et al. Dec 2021 B2
11231544 Lin et al. Jan 2022 B2
11281013 Popovich et al. Mar 2022 B2
20010024177 Popovich Sep 2001 A1
20010033400 Sutherland et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010036012 Nakai et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010043163 Waldern et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010046142 Van Santen et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010050756 Lipton et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020003509 Lipton et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020009299 Lipton Jan 2002 A1
20020011969 Lipton et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020012064 Yamaguchi Jan 2002 A1
20020018040 Aye et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020021407 Elliott Feb 2002 A1
20020021461 Ono et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020036825 Lipton et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020047837 Suyama et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020075240 Lieberman et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020093701 Zhang et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020110077 Drobot et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020126332 Popovich Sep 2002 A1
20020127497 Brown et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020131175 Yagi et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020150032 Nishiuchi et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020150337 Fujimaki Oct 2002 A1
20020167462 Lewis et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020196332 Lipton et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030007070 Lipton et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030025881 Hwang Feb 2003 A1
20030030912 Gleckman et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030038912 Broer et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030039442 Bond et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030063042 Friesem et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030063884 Smith et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030067685 Niv Apr 2003 A1
20030076590 Kramer Apr 2003 A1
20030086670 Moridaira et al. May 2003 A1
20030107809 Chen et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030149346 Arnone et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030175004 Garito et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030197154 Manabe et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030197157 Sutherland et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030202247 Niv et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030206329 Ikeda et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030228019 Eichler et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040004767 Song Jan 2004 A1
20040012833 Newswanger et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040047938 Kosuga et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040057138 Tanijiri et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040075830 Miyake et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040089842 Sutehrland et al. May 2004 A1
20040108971 Waldern et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040109234 Levola Jun 2004 A1
20040112862 Willson et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040125454 Kawasaki et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040130797 Leigh Jul 2004 A1
20040141217 Endo et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040156008 Reznikov et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040174348 David Sep 2004 A1
20040175627 Sutherland et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040179764 Melikechi et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040184156 Gunn, III et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040188617 Devitt et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040208446 Bond et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040208466 Mossberg et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040225025 Sullivan et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040263969 Lipton et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040263971 Lipton et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050018304 Lipton et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050047705 Domash et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050079663 Masutani et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050083564 Mallya et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050105909 Stone May 2005 A1
20050122395 Lipton et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050134404 Kajiya et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050135747 Greiner et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050136260 Garcia Jun 2005 A1
20050141066 Ouchi Jun 2005 A1
20050141811 Yang et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050174321 Ikeda et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050180687 Amitai Aug 2005 A1
20050195276 Lipton et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050218377 Lawandy Oct 2005 A1
20050231774 Hayashi et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050232530 Kekas Oct 2005 A1
20050254752 Domash et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050259217 Lin et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050259302 Metz et al. Nov 2005 A9
20050259944 Anderson et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050265585 Rowe Dec 2005 A1
20050269481 David et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050271258 Rowe Dec 2005 A1
20050286133 Lipton Dec 2005 A1
20060002274 Kihara et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060012878 Lipton et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060013977 Duke et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060043938 O'Gorman et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060055993 Kobayashi et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060093012 Singh et al. May 2006 A1
20060093793 Miyakawa et al. May 2006 A1
20060114564 Sutherland et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060119837 Raguin et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060119916 Sutherland et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060126179 Levola Jun 2006 A1
20060132914 Weiss et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060142455 Agarwal et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060146422 Koike Jul 2006 A1
20060159864 Natarajan et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060164593 Peyghambarian et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060171647 Ye et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060177180 Tazawa et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060181683 Bhowmik et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060191293 Kuczma Aug 2006 A1
20060215244 Yosha et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060215976 Singh et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060221063 Ishihara Oct 2006 A1
20060221448 Nivon et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060228073 Mukawa et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060268104 Cowan et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060268412 Downing et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060279662 Kapellner et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060284974 Lipton et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060285205 Lipton et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060291021 Mukawa Dec 2006 A1
20060291052 Lipton et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060292493 Shinotsuka et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070012777 Tsikos et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070019152 Caputo et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070019297 Stewart et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070041684 Popovich et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070045596 King et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070052929 Allman et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070053032 Popovich Mar 2007 A1
20070070476 Yamada et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070070504 Akutsu et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070070859 Hirayama Mar 2007 A1
20070089625 Grinberg et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070097502 Lipton et al. May 2007 A1
20070109400 Woodgate et al. May 2007 A1
20070109401 Lipton et al. May 2007 A1
20070115553 Chang-Hasnain et al. May 2007 A1
20070116409 Bryan et al. May 2007 A1
20070127348 Ooi et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070133089 Lipton et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070133920 Lee et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070133983 Traff Jun 2007 A1
20070146624 Duston et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070146625 Ooi et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070154153 Fomitchov et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070160325 Son et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070177007 Lipton et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070182915 Osawa et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070183650 Lipton et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070188602 Cowan et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070188837 Shimizu et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070195409 Yun et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070206155 Lipton Sep 2007 A1
20070211164 Olsen et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070236560 Lipton et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070237456 Blauvelt et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070247687 Handschy et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070258138 Cowan et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070263169 Lipton Nov 2007 A1
20080001909 Lim Jan 2008 A1
20080018851 Lipton et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080024598 Perlin et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080043334 Itzkovitch et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080049100 Lipton et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080062259 Lipton et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080089073 Hikmet Apr 2008 A1
20080106775 Amitai et al. May 2008 A1
20080106779 Peterson et al. May 2008 A1
20080117289 Schowengerdt et al. May 2008 A1
20080136916 Wolff Jun 2008 A1
20080136923 Inbar et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080138013 Parriaux Jun 2008 A1
20080143964 Cowan et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080143965 Cowan et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080149517 Lipton et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080151370 Cook et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080151379 Amitai Jun 2008 A1
20080186573 Lipton Aug 2008 A1
20080186574 Robinson et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080186604 Amitai Aug 2008 A1
20080193085 Singh et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080198471 Amitai Aug 2008 A1
20080225187 Yamanaka Sep 2008 A1
20080226281 Lipton Sep 2008 A1
20080239067 Lipton Oct 2008 A1
20080239068 Upton Oct 2008 A1
20080273081 Lipton Nov 2008 A1
20080278812 Amitai Nov 2008 A1
20080285137 Simmonds et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080285140 Amitai Nov 2008 A1
20080297731 Powell et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080297807 Feldman et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080298649 Ennis et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080298740 Hlousek et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080303895 Akka et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080303896 Lipton et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080304111 Queenan et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080309586 Vitale Dec 2008 A1
20080316303 Chiu et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080316375 Lipton et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090010135 Ushiro et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090017424 Yoeli et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090019222 Verma et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090052017 Sasaki Feb 2009 A1
20090052046 Amitai Feb 2009 A1
20090052047 Amitai Feb 2009 A1
20090067774 Magnusson Mar 2009 A1
20090074356 Sanchez et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090097122 Niv Apr 2009 A1
20090097127 Amitai Apr 2009 A1
20090121301 Chang May 2009 A1
20090122413 Hoffman et al. May 2009 A1
20090122414 Amitai May 2009 A1
20090128495 Kong et al. May 2009 A1
20090128781 Li May 2009 A1
20090128902 Niv et al. May 2009 A1
20090128911 Itzkovitch et al. May 2009 A1
20090136246 Murakami May 2009 A1
20090141324 Mukawa Jun 2009 A1
20090153437 Aharoni Jun 2009 A1
20090169152 Oestergard Jul 2009 A1
20090190222 Simmonds et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090213208 Glatt Aug 2009 A1
20090237804 Amitai et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090242021 Petkie et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090296218 Ryytty Dec 2009 A1
20090303599 Levola Dec 2009 A1
20090316246 Asai et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100014312 Travis et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100039796 Mukawa Feb 2010 A1
20100053565 Mizushima et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100060551 Sugiyama et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100060990 Wertheim et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100065726 Zhong et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100079841 Levola Apr 2010 A1
20100079865 Saarikko et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100084261 Lee et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100086256 Ben Bakir et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100092124 Magnusson et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100096562 Klunder et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100097674 Kasazumi et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100097820 Owen et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100103078 Mukawa et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100134534 Seesselberg et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100135615 Ho et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100136319 Imai et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100141555 Rorberg et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100141905 Burke Jun 2010 A1
20100149073 Chaum et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100165465 Levola Jul 2010 A1
20100165660 Weber et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100171680 Lapidot et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100177388 Cohen et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100202725 Popovich et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100214659 Levola Aug 2010 A1
20100220293 Mizushima et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100225834 Li Sep 2010 A1
20100225876 Escuti et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100231532 Nho et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100231693 Levola Sep 2010 A1
20100231705 Yahav et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100232003 Baldy et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100232016 Landa et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100245756 Sugihara et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100245757 Sugihara et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100246003 Simmonds et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100246004 Simmonds Sep 2010 A1
20100246993 Rieger et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100253987 Leopold et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100265117 Weiss Oct 2010 A1
20100277803 Pockett et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100284085 Laakkonen Nov 2010 A1
20100284090 Simmonds Nov 2010 A1
20100284180 Popovich et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100296163 Saarikko Nov 2010 A1
20100299814 Celona et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100315719 Saarikko et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100321781 Levola et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100322555 Vermeulen et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110001895 Dahl Jan 2011 A1
20110002143 Saarikko et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110013423 Selbrede et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110019250 Aiki et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110019874 Jarvenpaa et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110026128 Baker et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110026774 Flohr et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110032602 Rothenberg et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110032618 Handerek et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110032706 Mukawa Feb 2011 A1
20110038024 Wang et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110050548 Blumenfeld et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110063604 Hamre et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110096401 Levola Apr 2011 A1
20110102711 Sutherland et al. May 2011 A1
20110109880 Nummela May 2011 A1
20110157707 Tilleman et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110164221 Tilleman et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110187293 Travis et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110211239 Mukawa et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110216255 Miyauchi et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110221656 Haddick et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110232211 Farahi Sep 2011 A1
20110235179 Simmonds Sep 2011 A1
20110235365 McCollum et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110236803 Weiser et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110238399 Ophir et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110242349 Izuha et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110242661 Simmonds Oct 2011 A1
20110242670 Simmonds Oct 2011 A1
20110249309 McPheters et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110274435 Fini et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110299075 Meade et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110310356 Vallius Dec 2011 A1
20120007979 Schneider et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120027347 Mathal et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120033306 Valera et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120044572 Simmonds et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120044573 Simmonds et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120062850 Travis Mar 2012 A1
20120062998 Schultz et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120075168 Osterhout et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120081789 Mukawa et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120092632 McLeod et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120099203 Boubis et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120105634 Meidan et al. May 2012 A1
20120105740 Jannard et al. May 2012 A1
20120120493 Simmonds et al. May 2012 A1
20120127577 Desserouer May 2012 A1
20120162549 Gao et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120162764 Shimizu Jun 2012 A1
20120176665 Song et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120183888 Oliveira et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120194420 Osterhout et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120200532 Powell et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120206811 Mukawa et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120206937 Travis et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120207432 Travis et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120207434 Large Aug 2012 A1
20120214089 Hönel et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120214090 Weiser et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120218481 Popovich et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120224062 Lacoste et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120235884 Miller et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120235886 Border et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120235900 Border et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120242661 Takagi et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120280956 Yamamoto et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120281943 Popovich et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120290973 Robertson et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120294037 Holman et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120300311 Simmonds et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120320460 Levola Dec 2012 A1
20120326950 Park et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120328234 Lu et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130016324 Travis Jan 2013 A1
20130016362 Gong et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130021392 Travis Jan 2013 A1
20130021586 Lippey Jan 2013 A1
20130027006 Holloway et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130033485 Kollin et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130039619 Laughlin Feb 2013 A1
20130044376 Valera et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130051730 Travers et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130059233 Askham Mar 2013 A1
20130069850 Mukawa et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130077049 Bohn Mar 2013 A1
20130088637 Duparre Apr 2013 A1
20130093893 Schofield et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130101253 Popovich et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130107186 Ando et al. May 2013 A1
20130117377 Miller May 2013 A1
20130125027 Abovitz et al. May 2013 A1
20130128230 Macnamara May 2013 A1
20130138275 Nauman et al. May 2013 A1
20130141937 Katsuta et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130143336 Jain Jun 2013 A1
20130163089 Bohn Jun 2013 A1
20130163928 Wang et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130170031 Bohn et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130176704 Lanman et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130184904 Gadzinski Jul 2013 A1
20130200710 Robbins Aug 2013 A1
20130207887 Raffle et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130224634 Berneth et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130229717 Amitai Sep 2013 A1
20130249895 Westerinen et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130250207 Bohn Sep 2013 A1
20130250380 Fujikawa et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130250430 Robbins et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130250431 Robbins et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130257848 Westerinen et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130258701 Westerinen et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130267309 Robbins et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130271731 Popovich et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130277890 Bowman et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130286053 Fleck et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130300997 Popovich et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130301014 DeJong et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130305437 Weller et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130308185 Robinson et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130312811 Aspnes et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130314789 Saarikko et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130314793 Robbins et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130322810 Robbins Dec 2013 A1
20130328948 Kunkel et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130342525 Benko et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140002514 Richards Jan 2014 A1
20140003762 Macnamara Jan 2014 A1
20140009809 Pyun et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140022616 Popovich et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140024159 Jain Jan 2014 A1
20140027006 Foley et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140037242 Popovich et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140043672 Clarke et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140043689 Mason Feb 2014 A1
20140055845 Jain Feb 2014 A1
20140063055 Osterhout et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140064655 Nguyen et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140071538 Muller Mar 2014 A1
20140098010 Travis Apr 2014 A1
20140104665 Popovich et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140104685 Bohn et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140118647 Momonoi et al. May 2014 A1
20140126029 Fuetterer May 2014 A1
20140126175 Amitai et al. May 2014 A1
20140130132 Cahill et al. May 2014 A1
20140140653 Brown et al. May 2014 A1
20140140654 Brown et al. May 2014 A1
20140146394 Tout et al. May 2014 A1
20140152778 Ihlenburg et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140154614 Xie et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140160576 Robbins et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140168055 Smith Jun 2014 A1
20140168260 O'Brien et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140168735 Yuan et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140168783 Luebke et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140172296 Shtukater Jun 2014 A1
20140176528 Robbins Jun 2014 A1
20140177023 Gao et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140185286 Popovich et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140198128 Hong et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140198896 Hemmendorff et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140204455 Popovich et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140211322 Bohn et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140218468 Gao et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140218801 Simmonds et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140232759 Simmonds et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140240834 Mason Aug 2014 A1
20140240842 Nguyen et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140255662 Enomoto et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140267420 Schowengerdt et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140268017 Sweis et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140268353 Fujimura et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140300947 Fattal et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140300960 Santori et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140300966 Travers et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140327970 Bohn et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140330159 Costa et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140367719 Jain Dec 2014 A1
20140375542 Robbins et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140375789 Lou et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140375790 Robbins et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150001677 Palumbo et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150003796 Bennett Jan 2015 A1
20150010265 Popovich et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150015946 Muller Jan 2015 A1
20150016777 Abovitz et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150035744 Robbins et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150036068 Fattal et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150058791 Robertson et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150062675 Ayres et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150062707 Simmonds et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150086163 Valera et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150086907 Mizuta et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150107671 Bodan et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150109763 Shinkai et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150125109 Robbins et al. May 2015 A1
20150148728 Sallum et al. May 2015 A1
20150160529 Popovich et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150167868 Boncha Jun 2015 A1
20150177443 Faecke et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150177686 Lee et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150177688 Popovich et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150185475 Saarikko et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150211960 Shimizu Jul 2015 A1
20150219834 Nichol et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150235447 Abovitz et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150235448 Schowengerdt et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150243068 Solomon Aug 2015 A1
20150247975 Abovitz et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150260994 Akutsu et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150262424 Tabaka et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150268399 Futterer Sep 2015 A1
20150268415 Schowengerdt et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150277375 Large et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150285682 Popovich et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150288129 Jain Oct 2015 A1
20150289762 Popovich et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150309264 Abovitz et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150316768 Simmonds Nov 2015 A1
20150338689 Min et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150346490 Tekolste et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150346495 Welch et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150355394 Leighton et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160003847 Ryan et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160004090 Popovich et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160018673 Wang Jan 2016 A1
20160026253 Bradski et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160033705 Fattal Feb 2016 A1
20160033706 Fattal et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160038992 Arthur et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160041387 Valera et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160055822 Bell Feb 2016 A1
20160077338 Robbins et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160085300 Robbins et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160097959 Bruizeman et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160116739 TeKolste et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160124223 Shinbo et al. May 2016 A1
20160124241 Popovich et al. May 2016 A1
20160132025 Taff et al. May 2016 A1
20160170226 Popovich et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160178901 Ishikawa Jun 2016 A1
20160195664 Fattal et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160209648 Haddick et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160209657 Popovich et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160231568 Saarikko et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160231570 Levola et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160238772 Waldern et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160266398 Poon et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160274356 Mason Sep 2016 A1
20160274362 Tinch et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160283773 Popovich et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160291328 Popovich et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160299344 Dobschal et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160320536 Simmonds et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160327705 Simmonds et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160336033 Tanaka Nov 2016 A1
20160341964 Amitai Nov 2016 A1
20160363840 Mizoguchi et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160377879 Popovich et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170003505 Vallius et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170010466 Klug et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170010488 Klug et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170030550 Popovich et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170031160 Popovich et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170031171 Vallius et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170032166 Raguin et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170034435 Vallius Feb 2017 A1
20170038579 Yeoh et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170052374 Waldern et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170052376 Amitai et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170059759 Ayres et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170059775 Coles et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170102543 Vallius Apr 2017 A1
20170115487 Travis et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170123208 Vallius May 2017 A1
20170131460 Lin et al. May 2017 A1
20170131545 Wall et al. May 2017 A1
20170131546 Woltman et al. May 2017 A1
20170131551 Robbins et al. May 2017 A1
20170138789 Ivanov May 2017 A1
20170160546 Bull et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170180404 Bersch et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170180408 Yu et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170192246 Popovich et al. Jul 2017 A9
20170199333 Waldern et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170212295 Vasylyev Jul 2017 A1
20170219841 Popovich et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170236463 Chi et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170255257 Tiana et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170270637 Perreault et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170276940 Popovich et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170299793 Fattal Oct 2017 A1
20170299794 Fattal Oct 2017 A1
20170299860 Wall et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170307800 Fattal Oct 2017 A1
20170322426 Tervo Nov 2017 A1
20170356801 Popovich et al. Dec 2017 A1
20170357841 Popovich et al. Dec 2017 A1
20180011324 Popovich et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180052277 Schowengerdt et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180059305 Popovich et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180067251 Baldwin et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180074265 Waldern et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180074352 Popovich et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180081190 Lee et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180107011 Lu et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180113303 Popovich et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180120669 Popovich et al. May 2018 A1
20180129060 Lee et al. May 2018 A1
20180143438 Oh May 2018 A1
20180143449 Popovich et al. May 2018 A1
20180172995 Lee et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180188542 Waldern et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180188691 Fattal Jul 2018 A1
20180210198 Brown et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180210396 Popovich et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180232048 Popovich et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180246354 Popovich et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180252869 Ayres et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180275350 Oh et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180275402 Popovich et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180275410 Yeoh et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180284440 Popovich et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180348524 Blum et al. Dec 2018 A1
20180373115 Brown et al. Dec 2018 A1
20190041634 Popovich et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190042827 Popovich et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190064526 Connor Feb 2019 A1
20190064735 Waldern et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190072723 Waldern et al. Mar 2019 A1
20190094548 Nicholson et al. Mar 2019 A1
20190113751 Waldern et al. Apr 2019 A9
20190113829 Waldern et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190114484 Keech et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190121027 Popovich et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190129085 Waldern et al. May 2019 A1
20190162962 Leighton et al. May 2019 A1
20190162963 Leighton et al. May 2019 A1
20190171031 Popovich et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190179153 Popovich et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190187538 Popovich et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190188471 Osterhout et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190212195 Popovich et al. Jul 2019 A9
20190212557 Waldern et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190212573 Popovich et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190212588 Waldern et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190212589 Waldern et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190212596 Waldern et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190212597 Waldern et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190212698 Waldern et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190212699 Waldern et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190219822 Popovich et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190243142 Tekolste et al. Aug 2019 A1
20190265486 Hansotte et al. Aug 2019 A1
20190278224 Schlottau et al. Sep 2019 A1
20190285796 Waldern et al. Sep 2019 A1
20190293880 Nishiwaki et al. Sep 2019 A1
20190319426 Lu et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190339558 Waldern et al. Nov 2019 A1
20200026074 Waldern et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200033190 Popovich et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200033801 Waldern et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200033802 Popovich et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200057353 Popovich et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200064637 Popovich et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200081317 Popovich et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200103661 Kamakura Apr 2020 A1
20200142131 Waldern et al. May 2020 A1
20200159023 Bhargava et al. May 2020 A1
20200159026 Waldern et al. May 2020 A1
20200183163 Waldern et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200201042 Wang et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200201051 Popovich et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200225471 Waldern et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200241304 Popovich et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200249484 Waldern et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200249491 Popovich et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200264378 Grant et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200271973 Waldern et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200292745 Waldern et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200292840 Popovich et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200341194 Waldern et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200348519 Waldern et al. Nov 2020 A1
20200348531 Popovich et al. Nov 2020 A1
20200363771 Waldern et al. Nov 2020 A1
20200386947 Waldern et al. Dec 2020 A1
20210026297 Waldern et al. Jan 2021 A1
20210033857 Waldern et al. Feb 2021 A1
20210055551 Chi et al. Feb 2021 A1
20210063634 Waldern et al. Mar 2021 A1
20210216040 Waldern et al. Jul 2021 A1
20210223585 Waldern et al. Jul 2021 A1
20210231874 Popovich et al. Jul 2021 A1
20210231955 Waldern et al. Jul 2021 A1
20210239984 Popovich et al. Aug 2021 A1
20210247560 Waldern et al. Aug 2021 A1
20210247620 Popovich et al. Aug 2021 A1
20210247719 Waldern et al. Aug 2021 A1
20210349328 Popovich et al. Nov 2021 A1
20210405299 Grant et al. Dec 2021 A1
20210405514 Waldern et al. Dec 2021 A1
20220075196 Waldern et al. Mar 2022 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (423)
Number Date Country
PI0720469 Jan 2014 BR
2889727 Jun 2014 CA
1320217 Oct 2001 CN
1886680 Dec 2006 CN
200944140 Sep 2007 CN
101103297 Jan 2008 CN
101151562 Mar 2008 CN
101263412 Sep 2008 CN
100492099 May 2009 CN
101589326 Nov 2009 CN
101688977 Mar 2010 CN
101726857 Jun 2010 CN
101793555 Aug 2010 CN
101881936 Nov 2010 CN
101910900 Dec 2010 CN
101945612 Jan 2011 CN
102314092 Jan 2012 CN
102498425 Jun 2012 CN
102608762 Jul 2012 CN
102782563 Nov 2012 CN
102928981 Feb 2013 CN
103000188 Mar 2013 CN
103562802 Feb 2014 CN
103777282 May 2014 CN
103823267 May 2014 CN
103959133 Jul 2014 CN
104040308 Sep 2014 CN
104040410 Sep 2014 CN
104204901 Dec 2014 CN
104246626 Dec 2014 CN
303019849 Dec 2014 CN
104520751 Apr 2015 CN
303217936 May 2015 CN
104956252 Sep 2015 CN
105074537 Nov 2015 CN
105074539 Nov 2015 CN
105190407 Dec 2015 CN
105229514 Jan 2016 CN
105393159 Mar 2016 CN
105408801 Mar 2016 CN
105408802 Mar 2016 CN
105408803 Mar 2016 CN
105531716 Apr 2016 CN
105705981 Jun 2016 CN
105940451 Sep 2016 CN
106125308 Nov 2016 CN
106716223 May 2017 CN
106842397 Jun 2017 CN
106950744 Jul 2017 CN
107466372 Dec 2017 CN
107873086 Apr 2018 CN
108107506 Jun 2018 CN
108474945 Aug 2018 CN
108780224 Nov 2018 CN
109073889 Dec 2018 CN
109154717 Jan 2019 CN
208621784 Mar 2019 CN
103823267 May 2019 CN
110383117 Oct 2019 CN
107873086 Mar 2020 CN
111025657 Apr 2020 CN
111323867 Jun 2020 CN
111386495 Jul 2020 CN
111566571 Aug 2020 CN
305973971 Aug 2020 CN
111615655 Sep 2020 CN
111684362 Sep 2020 CN
111902768 Nov 2020 CN
107466372 Jan 2021 CN
108780224 Aug 2021 CN
113424095 Sep 2021 CN
108474945 Oct 2021 CN
113692544 Nov 2021 CN
113759555 Dec 2021 CN
111684362 Mar 2022 CN
19751190 May 1999 DE
10221837 Dec 2003 DE
102006003785 Jul 2007 DE
102006036831 Feb 2008 DE
102012108424 Mar 2014 DE
102013209436 Nov 2014 DE
001747551-0002 Aug 2012 EM
007234190- 0001 Nov 2019 EM
0795775 Sep 1997 EP
0822441 Feb 1998 EP
1347641 Sep 2003 EP
1413972 Apr 2004 EP
1526709 Apr 2005 EP
1748305 Jan 2007 EP
1938152 Jul 2008 EP
1413972 Oct 2008 EP
2110701 Oct 2009 EP
2196729 Jun 2010 EP
2225592 Sep 2010 EP
2244114 Oct 2010 EP
2326983 Jun 2011 EP
2381290 Oct 2011 EP
1828832 May 2013 EP
2733517 May 2014 EP
1573369 Jul 2014 EP
2748670 Jul 2014 EP
2634605 Oct 2015 EP
2929378 Oct 2015 EP
2748670 Nov 2015 EP
2995986 Mar 2016 EP
1402298 Sep 2016 EP
2995986 Apr 2017 EP
3198192 Aug 2017 EP
3245444 Nov 2017 EP
3245551 Nov 2017 EP
3256888 Dec 2017 EP
3359999 Aug 2018 EP
2494388 Nov 2018 EP
3398007 Nov 2018 EP
3433658 Jan 2019 EP
3433659 Jan 2019 EP
2842003 Feb 2019 EP
3245551 Sep 2019 EP
3548939 Oct 2019 EP
3698214 Aug 2020 EP
3710876 Sep 2020 EP
3710887 Sep 2020 EP
3710893 Sep 2020 EP
3710894 Sep 2020 EP
3894938 Oct 2021 EP
3924759 Dec 2021 EP
20176157 Jun 2019 FI
20176161 Jun 2019 FI
2677463 Dec 1992 FR
2975506 Nov 2012 FR
2115178 Sep 1983 GB
2140935 Dec 1984 GB
2508661 Jun 2014 GB
2509536 Jul 2014 GB
2512077 Sep 2014 GB
2514658 Dec 2014 GB
1204684 Nov 2015 HK
1205563 Dec 2015 HK
1205793 Dec 2015 HK
1206101 Dec 2015 HK
57089722 Jun 1982 JP
02186319 Jul 1990 JP
03239384 Oct 1991 JP
06294952 Oct 1994 JP
07098439 Apr 1995 JP
0990312 Apr 1997 JP
10096903 Apr 1998 JP
11109320 Apr 1999 JP
11142806 May 1999 JP
2953444 Sep 1999 JP
2000056259 Feb 2000 JP
2000511306 Aug 2000 JP
2000261706 Sep 2000 JP
2000267042 Sep 2000 JP
2001027739 Jan 2001 JP
2001296503 Oct 2001 JP
2002090858 Mar 2002 JP
2002122906 Apr 2002 JP
2002156617 May 2002 JP
2002162598 Jun 2002 JP
2002523802 Jul 2002 JP
2002529790 Sep 2002 JP
2002311379 Oct 2002 JP
2003066428 Mar 2003 JP
2003270419 Sep 2003 JP
2004157245 Jun 2004 JP
2006350129 Dec 2006 JP
2007011057 Jan 2007 JP
2007094175 Apr 2007 JP
2007219106 Aug 2007 JP
2008112187 May 2008 JP
2009036955 Feb 2009 JP
2009515225 Apr 2009 JP
2009132221 Jun 2009 JP
2009133999 Jun 2009 JP
2009211091 Sep 2009 JP
4367775 Nov 2009 JP
2010044326 Feb 2010 JP
2010256631 Nov 2010 JP
2012137616 Jul 2012 JP
2012533089 Dec 2012 JP
2013061480 Apr 2013 JP
5303928 Oct 2013 JP
2013235256 Nov 2013 JP
2014132328 Jul 2014 JP
5588794 Sep 2014 JP
5646748 Nov 2014 JP
2015053163 Mar 2015 JP
2015523586 Aug 2015 JP
2015172713 Oct 2015 JP
2016030503 Mar 2016 JP
2018508037 Mar 2018 JP
2018533069 Nov 2018 JP
2019512745 May 2019 JP
2019520595 Jul 2019 JP
6598269 Oct 2019 JP
6680793 Mar 2020 JP
2020514783 May 2020 JP
1664536 Jul 2020 JP
6734933 Jul 2020 JP
2020-537187 Dec 2020 JP
2021509488 Mar 2021 JP
2021509736 Apr 2021 JP
2021509737 Apr 2021 JP
2021509739 Apr 2021 JP
6895451 Jun 2021 JP
2022-520472 Mar 2022 JP
20060132474 Dec 2006 KR
100803288 Feb 2008 KR
20100092059 Aug 2010 KR
20140140063 Dec 2014 KR
20140142337 Dec 2014 KR
20170031357 Mar 2017 KR
30-1061010 May 2020 KR
10-2020-0106932 Sep 2020 KR
10-2020-0108030 Sep 2020 KR
2020-0106170 Sep 2020 KR
20200104402 Sep 2020 KR
20210100174 Aug 2021 KR
1020210127237 Oct 2021 KR
20210134763 Nov 2021 KR
1020210138609 Nov 2021 KR
200535633 Nov 2005 TW
200801583 Jan 2008 TW
201314263 Apr 2013 TW
201600943 Jan 2016 TW
201604601 Feb 2016 TW
1997001133 Jan 1997 WO
1997027519 Jul 1997 WO
1998004650 Feb 1998 WO
1999009440 Feb 1999 WO
9931658 Jun 1999 WO
1999052002 Oct 1999 WO
2000016136 Mar 2000 WO
0023832 Apr 2000 WO
2000023830 Apr 2000 WO
2000023832 Apr 2000 WO
2000023847 Apr 2000 WO
2000028369 May 2000 WO
2000028369 Oct 2000 WO
2001050200 Jul 2001 WO
2001090822 Nov 2001 WO
2002082168 Oct 2002 WO
2003081320 Oct 2003 WO
2004023174 Mar 2004 WO
2004053531 Nov 2004 WO
2004102226 Nov 2004 WO
2004109349 Dec 2004 WO
2005001753 Jan 2005 WO
2005006065 Jan 2005 WO
2005006065 Feb 2005 WO
2005073798 Aug 2005 WO
2006002870 Jan 2006 WO
2006064301 Jun 2006 WO
2006064325 Jun 2006 WO
2006064334 Jun 2006 WO
2006102073 Sep 2006 WO
2006132614 Dec 2006 WO
2006102073 Jan 2007 WO
2007015141 Feb 2007 WO
2007029032 Mar 2007 WO
2007085682 Aug 2007 WO
2007130130 Nov 2007 WO
2007141587 Dec 2007 WO
2007141589 Dec 2007 WO
2008011066 Jan 2008 WO
2008011066 May 2008 WO
2008081070 Jul 2008 WO
2008100545 Aug 2008 WO
2008011066 Dec 2008 WO
2009013597 Jan 2009 WO
2009013597 Jan 2009 WO
2009077802 Jun 2009 WO
2009077803 Jun 2009 WO
2009101238 Aug 2009 WO
2007130130 Sep 2009 WO
2009155437 Dec 2009 WO
2009155437 Mar 2010 WO
2010023444 Mar 2010 WO
2010057219 May 2010 WO
2010067114 Jun 2010 WO
2010067117 Jun 2010 WO
2010078856 Jul 2010 WO
2010104692 Sep 2010 WO
2010122330 Oct 2010 WO
2010125337 Nov 2010 WO
2010125337 Nov 2010 WO
2010131046 Nov 2010 WO
2011012825 Feb 2011 WO
2011032005 Mar 2011 WO
2011042711 Apr 2011 WO
2011051660 May 2011 WO
2011055109 May 2011 WO
2011042711 Jun 2011 WO
2011073673 Jun 2011 WO
2011107831 Sep 2011 WO
2011110821 Sep 2011 WO
2011131978 Oct 2011 WO
2012052352 Apr 2012 WO
2012062658 May 2012 WO
2012136970 Oct 2012 WO
2012158950 Nov 2012 WO
2012172295 Dec 2012 WO
2013027004 Feb 2013 WO
2013027006 Feb 2013 WO
2013033274 Mar 2013 WO
2013034879 Mar 2013 WO
2013049012 Apr 2013 WO
2013054972 Apr 2013 WO
2013102759 Jul 2013 WO
2013163347 Oct 2013 WO
2013167864 Nov 2013 WO
2013190257 Dec 2013 WO
2014064427 May 2014 WO
2014080155 May 2014 WO
2014085734 Jun 2014 WO
2014090379 Jun 2014 WO
2014091200 Jun 2014 WO
2014093601 Jun 2014 WO
2014100182 Jun 2014 WO
2014113506 Jul 2014 WO
2014116615 Jul 2014 WO
2014130383 Aug 2014 WO
2014144526 Sep 2014 WO
2014159621 Oct 2014 WO
2014164901 Oct 2014 WO
2014176695 Nov 2014 WO
2014179632 Nov 2014 WO
2014188149 Nov 2014 WO
2014209733 Dec 2014 WO
2014209819 Dec 2014 WO
2014209820 Dec 2014 WO
2014209821 Dec 2014 WO
2014210349 Dec 2014 WO
2015006784 Jan 2015 WO
2015015138 Feb 2015 WO
2015017291 Feb 2015 WO
2015069553 May 2015 WO
2015081313 Jun 2015 WO
2015117039 Aug 2015 WO
2015145119 Oct 2015 WO
2016010289 Jan 2016 WO
2016020630 Feb 2016 WO
2016020643 Feb 2016 WO
2016025350 Feb 2016 WO
2016020630 Mar 2016 WO
2016042283 Mar 2016 WO
2016044193 Mar 2016 WO
2016046514 Mar 2016 WO
2016048729 Mar 2016 WO
2016054092 Apr 2016 WO
2016069606 May 2016 WO
2016087442 Jun 2016 WO
2016103263 Jun 2016 WO
2016111706 Jul 2016 WO
2016111707 Jul 2016 WO
2016111708 Jul 2016 WO
2016111709 Jul 2016 WO
2016113533 Jul 2016 WO
2016113534 Jul 2016 WO
2016116733 Jul 2016 WO
2016118107 Jul 2016 WO
2016122679 Aug 2016 WO
2016130509 Aug 2016 WO
2016135434 Sep 2016 WO
2016113533 Oct 2016 WO
2016156776 Oct 2016 WO
2016181108 Nov 2016 WO
2016046514 Apr 2017 WO
2017060665 Apr 2017 WO
2017094129 Jun 2017 WO
2017120320 Jul 2017 WO
2017134412 Aug 2017 WO
2017160367 Sep 2017 WO
2017162999 Sep 2017 WO
2017162999 Sep 2017 WO
2017178781 Oct 2017 WO
2017180403 Oct 2017 WO
2017182771 Oct 2017 WO
2017203200 Nov 2017 WO
2017203201 Nov 2017 WO
2017207987 Dec 2017 WO
2018102834 Jun 2018 WO
2018102834 Jun 2018 WO
2018096359 Jul 2018 WO
2018129398 Jul 2018 WO
2018150163 Aug 2018 WO
2018206487 Nov 2018 WO
2019046649 Mar 2019 WO
2019077307 Apr 2019 WO
2019079350 Apr 2019 WO
2019079350 Apr 2019 WO
2019046649 May 2019 WO
2019122806 Jun 2019 WO
2019135784 Jul 2019 WO
2019135796 Jul 2019 WO
2019135837 Jul 2019 WO
2019136470 Jul 2019 WO
2019136471 Jul 2019 WO
2019136473 Jul 2019 WO
2019171038 Sep 2019 WO
2019185973 Oct 2019 WO
2019185975 Oct 2019 WO
2019185976 Oct 2019 WO
2019185977 Oct 2019 WO
2019217453 Nov 2019 WO
2020023779 Jan 2020 WO
2020123506 Jun 2020 WO
2020149956 Jul 2020 WO
2020168348 Aug 2020 WO
2020172681 Aug 2020 WO
2020186113 Sep 2020 WO
2020212682 Oct 2020 WO
2020219092 Oct 2020 WO
2020227236 Nov 2020 WO
2020247930 Dec 2020 WO
2021016371 Jan 2021 WO
2021021926 Feb 2021 WO
2021032982 Feb 2021 WO
2021032983 Feb 2021 WO
2021041949 Mar 2021 WO
2021044121 Mar 2021 WO
2021138607 Jul 2021 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (477)
Entry
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2014/000197, Search completed Jul. 31, 2014, dated Aug. 7, 2014, 6 Pgs.
Written Opinion for International Application PCT/GB2013/000210, completed Aug. 12, 2013, dated Aug. 20, 2013, 5 pgs.
Written Opinion for International Application PCT/GB2016/000005, search completed May 27, 2016, dated Jun. 6, 2016, 6 pgs.
Google search: “digilens waveguide” [site visited Sep. 14, 2020], https://www.google.com/search?q-digilens+waveguide&sxsrf=ALeKk02RFwZAZ0vrlxVH0M_2fiXFkhW1 FA: 1604777621684&source=Inms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ah U KEwjjyNXAIvHsAh U Rh HI EHTufCvsQ_AUoAnoECBwQBA&biw= 1200&bih= 1777.
Google search: “eyewear display devices” [site visited Sep. 14, 2020], https://www.google.com/search?q=eyewear+display+devices&sxsrf=ALeKkO 1 WWfnOAgsQR_bhydJaYK3e37r J Lg: 1604779001617 &source=Inms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ah U KEwi99txSm_HsAhVaoH I EHawtD8QQ_AUoAnoECC8QBA&biw= 1200&bih= 1777.
Google search: “smart glasses” [site visited Sep. 14, 2020], https://www.google.com/search?q=smart+glasses&sxsrf=ALeKk01 KN 1wj23-NqP -KCnrcsUpCgxyKA: 1604779046920&source=Inms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ah U KEwipkq Pom_HsAhVKhXI EHQGFBp8Q_AUoBHoECCgQBg&biw= 1200&bih= 1777.
Bhuvaneshwaran et al., “Spectral response of Bragg gratings in multimode polymer waveguides”, Applied Optics, Dec. 1, 2017, vol. 56. No. 34, pp. 9573-9582, doi: 10.1364/AO.56.009573.
Caputo et al., “POLICRYPS: a liquid crystal composed nano/microstructure with a wide range of optical and electro-optical applications”, Journal of Optics A: Pure and Applied Optics, Jan. 15, 2009, vol. 11, No. 2, 13 pgs., doi: 10.1088/1464-4258/11/2/024017.
Carothers, “Polymers and polyfunctionality”, Transactions of the Faraday Society, 1936, vol. 32, pp. 39-49.
De Sarkar et al., “Effect of Monomer Functionality on the Morphology and Performance of Holographic Transmission Gratings Recorded on Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystals”, Macromolecules, 2003, vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 630-638.
Doolittle, “Studies in Newtonian Flow. II. The Dependence of the Viscosity of Liquids on Free-Space”, Journal of Applied Physics, 1951, vol. 22, Issue 12, pp. 1471-1475, published online Apr. 29, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699894.
Escuti et al., “Holographic photonic crystals”, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, Sep. 2004, vol. 43, No. 9, pp. 1973-1987, DOI: 10.1117/1.1773773.
Flory, “Molecular size distribution in three-dimensional polymers. I. Gelation”, J. Am. Chem. Soc., Nov. 1941, vol. 63, pp. 3083-3090.
Fries et al., “Real-time beam shaping without additional optical elements”, Light Science & Applications, Jun. 20, 2018, vol. 7, No. 18, doi: 10.1038/S41377-018-0014-0.
Gerritsen et al., “Application of Kogelnik's two-wave theory to deep, slanted, highly efficient, relief transmission gratings”, Applied Optics, Mar. 1, 1991, vol. 30; No. 7, pp. 807-814.
Golub et al., “Bragg properties of efficient surface relief gratings in the Yesonance domain”, Optics Communications, Feb. 24, 2004, vol. 235, pp. 261-267, doi: 10.1016/j.optcom.2004.02.069.
Goodman, “Introduction to Fourier Optics”, Second Edition, Jan. 1996, 457 Pages.
Guo et al., “Analysis of the effects of viscosity, volume and temperature in photopolymer material for holographic applications”, Proc. SPIE, May 2013, vol. 8776, pp. 87760J-1-87760-J15, DOI:10.1117/12.2018330.
He et al., “Transmission Holographic Gratings Using Siloxane Containing Liquid Crystalline Compounds, Importance of Chemical Structure of Polymer Matrix Components”, Polymer Journal, Jun. 9, 2006, vol. 38, No. 7, pp. 678-685.
Jang et al., “Low Driving Voltage Holographic Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystals with Chemically Incorporated Graphene Oxide”, Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2011, vol. 21, pp. 19226-19232, doi.10.1039/1jm13827h.
Kakiuchida et al., “Multiple Bragg Diffractions with Different Wavelengths and Polarizations Composed of Liquid Crystal/Polymer Periodic Phases”, ACS Omega, Sep. 22, 2017, pp. 6081-6090, doi: 10.1021/acsomega.7b01149.
Kwon et al., “Polymer waveguide notch filter using two stacked thermooptic Tong-period gratings”, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Apr. 4, 2005, vol. 17, Issue 4, pp. 792-794, DOI: 10.1109/LPT.2005.844008.
Levin et al., “A Closed Form Solution to Natural Image Matting”, Illumination & Displays 3D Visualization and Imaging Systems Laboratory (3DVIS) College of Optical Sciences University of Arizona Tucson, 2014, 8 pgs.
Li et al., “A low cost, label-free biosensor based on a novel double-sided grating waveguide coupler with sub-surface cavities”, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, Jan. 2015, vol. 206, pp. 371-380, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2014.09.065.
Liu et al., “Effect of Surfactant on the Electro-Optical Properties of Holographic Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystal Bragg Gratings”, Optical Materials, 2005, vol. 27, pp. 1451-1455, available online Dec. 25, 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.optmat.2004.10.010.
Lougnot et al., “Polymers for holographic recording: VI. Some basic ideas for modelling the kinetics of the recording process”, Pure and Applied Optics: Journal of the European Optical Society Part A, 1997, vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 225-245, https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-9659/6/2/007.
Missinne et al., “Flexible thin polymer waveguide Bragg grating sensor foils for strain sensing”, Proc. SPIE, 10101, Organic Photonic Materials and Devices, Feb. 16, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2250823.
Moharam et al., “Diffraction characteristics of photoresist surface-relief gratings”, Applied Optics, Sep. 15, 1984, vol. 23, pp. 3214-3220.
Nielsen et al., “Grating Couplers for Fiber-to-Fiber Characterizations of Stand-Alone Dielectric Loaded Surface Plasmon Waveguide Components”, Journal of Lightwave Technology, Oct. 1, 2012, vol. 30, No. 19, pp. 3118-3125, DOI: 10.1109/JLT.2012.2212418.
Ogiwara et al., “Temperature Dependence of Anisotropic Diffraction in Holographic Polymer-Dispersed Liquid Crystal Memory”, Applied Optics, Sep. 10, 2013, vol. 52, No. 26, pp. 6529-6536.
Ogiwara et al., “Thermo-Driven Light Controller by Using Thermal Modulation of Diffraction Wavelength in Holographic Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystal Grating”, Proc SPIE, Feb. 19, 2014, 9004,.Article 90040Q, 8 pgs., doi: 10.1117/12.2039104.
Peng et al., “Low Voltage Driven and Highly Diffractive Holographic Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystals with Spherical Morphology”, RSC Advances, 2017, vol. 7, pp. 51847-51857, doi: 10.1039/c7ra08949.
Pierantoni et al., “Efficient modeling of 3-D photonic crystals for integrated optical devices”, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Feb. 2006, vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 319-321, DOI: 10.1109/LPT.2005.861991.
Pogue et al., “Electrically Switchable Bragg Gratings from Liquid Crystal/Polymer Composites”, Applied Spectroscopy, 2000, vol. 54, Issue 1, pp. 12A-28A.
Prokop et al., “Air-Suspended SU-8 Polymer Waveguide Grating Couplers”, Journal of Lightwave Technology, Sep. 1, 2016, vol. 34, No. 17, pp. 3966-3971, DOI: 10.1109/JLT.2016.2593025.
Roussel et al., “Photopolymerization Kinetics and Phase Behavior of Acrylate Based Polymers Dispersed Liquid Crystals”, Liquid Crystals, 1998, vol. 24, Issue 4, pp. 555-561.
Sabel et al., “Simultaneous formation of holographic surface relief gratings and volume phase gratings in photosensitive polymer”, Materials Research Letters, May 30, 2019, vol. 7, No. 10, pp. 405-411, doi: 10.1080/21663831.2019.1621956.
Sakhno et al., “Deep surface relief grating in azobenzene-containing materials using a low-intensity 532 nm laser”, Optical Materials: X, Jan. 23, 2019, 100006, pp. 3-7, doi: 10.1016/j.omx.2019.100006.
Sutherland et al., “Phenomenological model of anisotropic volume hologram formation in liquid-crystal-photopolymer mixtures”, Journal of Applied Physics, Jun. 30, 2004, vol. 96, No. 2, pp. 951-965, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1762713.
Tahata et al., “Effects of Polymer Matrix on Electro-Optic Properties of Liquid Crystal Mixed with Polymer”, Proc SPIE, Mar. 11, 1996, vol. 2651, pp. 101-106, doi: 10.1117/12.235342.
Tondiglia et al., “Holographic Formation of Electro-Optical Polymer-Liquid Crystal Photonic Crystals”, Advanced Materials, 2002, Published Online Novembers, 2001, vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 187-191.
Waldern et al., “Waveguide Optics for All Day Wearable Displays”, Jun. 20, 2017, 35 pgs.
Yokomori, “Dielectric surface-re lief gratings with high diffraction efficiency”, Applied Optics, Jul. 15, 1984, vol. 23; No. 14, pp. 2303-2310.
Youcef et al., “Phase Behavior of Poly(N-Butyl Acrylate) and Poly(2-Ethylhexyl Acrylate) in Nematic Liquid Crystal E7”, Macromol. Symp. 2011, vol. 303, pp. 10-16, doi: 10.1002/masy.201150502.
Zeller et al., “Laminated Air Structured and Fluid Infiltrated Polymer Waveguides”, in IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Nov. 2, 2011, vol. 23, Issue: 21, pp. 1564-1566, first published Aug. 12, 2011, DOI: 10.1109/LPT.2011.2164396.
Zhao et al., “Diffusion Model of Hologram Formation in Dry Photopolymer Materials”, Journal of Modern Optics, 1994. Vol. 41, No. 10, pp. 1929-1939, https: //doi.org/10.1080/09500349414551831.
Zhao et al., “Extension of a diffusion model for holographic photopolymers”, Journal of Modern Optics, 1995, vol. 42, No. 12, pp. 2571-2573, https://doi.org/10.1080/713824349.
Zheng et al., “Holographic Polymer-Dispersed Liquid Crystal Grating with Low Scattering Losses”, Liquid Crystals, Mar. 2012, vol. 39, Issue 3, pp. 387-391.
Digi Lens: Waveguides, announced unknown, [online], [site visited Nov. 6, 2020], Available from Internet, <URL: https://www.digilens.com/technology/waveguides/> (Year: 2020).
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 19736108.2, Search completed Sep. 15, 2021, dated Sep. 27, 2021, 8 Pgs.
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 18727645.6, Search completed Oct. 14, 2020, dated Oct. 23, 2020, 13 Pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/GB2016/000005, Report issued Jul. 18, 2017, dated Jul. 27, 2017, 7 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/GB2016/000051, Report issued Sep. 19, 2017, dated Sep. 28, 2017, 7 Pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/IB2008/001909, Report issued Jan. 26, 2010, dated Jan. 26, 2010, 5 Pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2018/037410, Report issued Jul. 14, 2020, dated Jul. 23, 2020, 7 Pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2018/048636, Report issued Jul. 14, 2020, dated Jul. 23, 2020, 9 Pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2018/062835, Report issued Jul. 14, 2020, dated Jul. 23, 2020, 7 Pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/GB2013/000210, issued Nov. 11, 2014, dated Nov. 20, 2014, 6 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/GB2014/000197, issued Nov. 24, 2015, dated Dec. 3, 2015, 7 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/GB2016/000003, issued Jul. 18, 2017, dated Jul. 27, 2017, 11 Pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/GB2017/000015, Report Completed Aug. 7, 2018, dated Aug. 16, 2018, 7 Pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2018/048960, Report issued on Mar. 3, 2020, dated Mar. 12, 2020, 7 Pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2018/056150, Report Issued on Apr. 21, 2020, dated Apr. 30, 2020, 6 Pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2019/031163, Report issued Nov. 10, 2020, dated Nov. 19, 2020, 6 Pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2020/018686, Report issued Aug. 10, 2021, dated Aug. 26, 2021, 6 Pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2019/064765, Report issued Oct. 19, 2020, dated Oct. 28, 2020, 27 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2020/048590, Search completed Dec. 7, 2020, dated Jan. 11, 2021, 19 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2017/000015, Search completed Apr. 25, 2017, dated May 8, 2017, 10 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/IB2008/001909, Search completed Feb. 4, 2009, dated Feb. 17, 2009, 6 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/043496, Search completed Sep. 28, 2019, dated Nov. 14, 2019, 12 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/064765, Search completed Feb. 3, 2020, dated Mar. 18, 2020, 11 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2020/019549, Search completed Apr. 14, 2020, dated May 22, 2020, 12 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2020/022482, Search completed May 12, 2020, dated Jun. 9, 2020, 11 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2020/036654, Search completed Aug. 21, 2020, dated Sep. 4, 2020, 14 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2020/043107, Search completed Sep. 28, 2020, dated Oct. 15, 2020, 12 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/065478, Search completed Jan. 29, 2020, dated Feb. 11, 2020, 14 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2015/047097, completed Nov. 22, 2015, dated Dec. 16, 2019, 10 pgs.
International Search Report for PCT/GB2013/000210, completed by the European Patent Office on Aug. 12, 2013, 3 pgs.
International Search Report for PCT/GB2014/000197, Completed by the European Patent Office on Jul. 31, 2014, 3 Pages.
International Search Report for PCT/GB2016/000003, Completed by the European Patent Office May 31, 2016, 6 pgs.
International Search Report for PCT/GB2016/000005, completed by the European Patent Office on May 27, 2016, 4 pgs.
International Search Report for PCT/GB2016/000051, Completed Aug. 11, 2016, 3 Pgs.
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 18867522.7, Search completed Sep. 15, 2021, dated Sep. 24, 2021, 9 Pgs.
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 18898154.2, Search completed Aug. 13, 2021, dated Aug. 23, 2021, 7 pgs.
Extended Search Report for European Application No. 18898841.4, Search completed Mar. 18, 2021, dated Mar. 26, 2021, 10 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2019/043496 Report issued Jan. 26, 2021, dated Feb. 4, 2021, 5 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2019/047097 issued Sep. 28, 2021, dated Nov. 4, 2021, 7 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2019/065478, Report issued Jun. 8, 2021, dated Jun. 24, 2021, 9 Pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2020/019549, Report issued Aug. 10, 2021, dated Sep. 2, 2021, 7 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2020/022482, issued Aug. 25, 2021, dated Sep. 23, 2021, 7 Pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2020/031363, issued Nov. 2, 2021, dated Nov. 18, 2021, 7 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2020/067737, Search completed Mar. 3, 2021, dated Mar. 25, 2021, 12 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2021/072287, Search completed Jan. 10, 2022, dated Feb. 17, 2022, 11 Pgs.
Liu et al., “Realization and Optimization of Holographic Waveguide Display System”, Acta Optica Sinica, vol. 37, Issue. 5, Issuing date—May 10, 2017, pp. 310-317.
Extended European Search Report for EP Application No. 13192383.1, dated Apr. 2, 2014, 7 pgs.
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 13765610.4 dated Feb. 16, 2016, 6 pgs.
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 15187491.4, search completed Jan. 15, 2016, dated Jan. 28, 2016, 5 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/GB2010/000835, issued Nov. 1, 2011, dated Nov. 10, 2011, 9 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/GB2010/001920, issued Apr. 11, 2012, dated Apr. 19, 2012, 10 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/GB2010/001982, report issued May 1, 2012, dated May 10, 2012, 7 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/GB2013/000273, issued Dec. 23, 2014, dated Dec. 31, 2014, 8 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/GB2015/000203, issued Mar. 21, 2017, dated Mar. 30, 2017, 8 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/GB2016/000036, issued Aug. 29, 2017, dated Sep. 8, 2017, 8 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/GB2016/000065, issued Oct. 3, 2017, dated Oct. 12, 2017, 8 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. CT/US201 8/012227, Report issued Jul. 30, 2019, dated Aug. 8, 2019, 7 Pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US201 9/012758, Report issued Jul. 14, 2020, dated Jul. 23, 2020, 4 Pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. CT/US201 9/012759, Report issued Jul. 14, 2020, dated Jul. 23, 2020, 6 Pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT US2018/015553, Report issued Jun. 4, 2019, dated Jun. 13, 2019, 6 Pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application CT/GB2009/051676, issued Jun. 14, 2 011, dated Jun. 23, 2011, 6 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application CT/GB2011/000349, issued Sep. 18, 2012, dated Sep. 27, 2012, 10 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application CT/GB201 2/000331, issued Oct. 8, 2013, dated Oct. 17, 2013, 8 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application CT/GB2012/000677, issued Feb. 25, 2014, dated Mar. 6, 2014, 5 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application CT/GB201 3/000005, issued Jul. 8, 2014, dated Jul. 17, 2014, 12 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application >CT/GB201 4/000295, issued Feb. 2, 2016, dated Feb. 11, 2016, 4 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application CT/GB201 5/000225, issued Feb. 14, 2017, dated Feb. 23, 2017, 8 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application DCT/GB2015/000228, issued Feb. 14, 2017, dated Feb. 23, 2017, 11 ogs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/GB2015/000274, Issued Mar. 28, 2017, dated Apr. 6, 2017, 8 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/GB2016/000014, issued Jul. 25, 2017, dated Aug. 3, 2017, 7 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/GB2017/000055, issued Oct. 16, 2018, dated Oct. 25, 2018, 9 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/011736, issued Jul. 21, 2015, dated Jul. 30, 2015, 9 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2016/017091, issued Aug. 15, 2017, dated Aug. 24, 2017, 5 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2018/012691, issued Jul. 9, 2019, dated Jul. 18, 2019, 10 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2019/012764, Report issued Jul. 14, 2020, dated Jul. 23, 2020, 5 Pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/GB2017/000040, Report issued Sep. 25, 2018 , dated Oct. 4, 2018, 7 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/038070, dated Oct. 28, 2014, 6 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/031163, Search completed Jul. 9, 2019, dated Jul. 29, 2019, 11 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2010/000835, completed Oct. 26, 2010, dated Nov. 8, 2010, 12 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2010/001920, completed Mar. 29, 2011, dated Apr. 6, 2011, 15 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2015/000228, Search completed May 4, 2011, dated Jul. 15, 2011, 15 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2016/000036, completed Jul. 4, 2016, dated Jul. 13, 2016, 10 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2016/000065, completed Jul. 14, 2016, dated Jul. 27, 2016, 10 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2017/000055, Search completed Jul. 19, 2017, dated Jul. 26, 2017, 12 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/038070, completed Aug. 12, 2013, dated Aug. 14, 2013, 12 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/011736, completed Apr. 18, 2014, dated May 8, 2014, 10 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/012227, Search completed Feb. 28, 2018, dated Mar. 14, 2018, 8 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/012691, completed Mar. 10, 2018, dated Mar. 28, 2018, 16 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/015553, completed Aug. 6, 2018, dated Sep. 19, 2018, 12 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/037410, Search completed Aug. 16, 2018, dated Aug. 30, 2018, 11 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/048636, Search completed Nov. 1, 2018, dated Nov. 15, 2018, 16 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/056150, Search completed Dec. 4, 2018, dated Dec. 26, 2018, 10 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/062835, Search completed Jan. 14, 2019, dated Jan. 31, 2019, 14 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/012758, completed Mar. 12, 2019, dated Mar. 27, 2019, 9 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/012764, completed Mar. 1, 2019, dated Mar. 18, 2019, 9 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2020/018686, Search completed Apr. 25, 2020, dated May 22, 2020, 1 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2020/031363, completed May 28, 2020, dated Jun. 10, 2020, 8 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/048960, Search completed Dec. 14, 2018, dated Jan. 8, 2019, 14 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/GB2009/051676, completed May 10, 2010, dated May 18, 2010, 7 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/GB2016/000181, completed Dec. 21, 2016, dated Feb. 27, 2017, 21 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2016/017091, completed by the European Patent Office on Apr. 20, 2016, 7 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2019/012759, completed Mar. 14, 2019, dated Apr. 15, 2019, 12 pgs.
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/GB2014/000295, completed Nov. 18, 2014, dated Jan. 5, 2015, 4 pgs.
International Search Report for International Application PCT/GB2017/000040, dated Jul. 18, 2017, completed Jul. 10, 2017, 3 pgs.
International Search Report for PCT/GB2010/001982, completed by the European Patent Office on Feb. 24, 2011, 4 pgs.
International Search Report for PCT/GB2011/000349, completed by the European Patent Office on Aug. 17, 2011, 4 pgs.
International Search Report for PCT/GB2012/000331, completed by the European Patent Office on Aug. 29, 2012, 4 pgs.
International Search Report for PCT/GB2012/000677, completed by the European Patent Office on Dec. 10, 2012, 4 pgs.
International Search Report for PCT/GB2013/000005, completed by the European Patent Office on Jul. 16, 2013, 3 pgs.
International Search Report for PCT/GB2013/000273, completed by the European Patent Office on Aug. 30, 2013, 4 pgs.
International Search Report for PCT/GB2015/000203, completed by the European Patent Office on Oct. 9, 2015, 4 pgs.
International Search Report for PCT/GB2015/000225, completed by the European Patent Office on Nov. 10, 2015, dated Dec. 2, 2016, 5 pgs.
International Search Report for PCT/GB2015/000274, completed by the European Patent Office on Jan. 7, 2016, 4 pgs.
International Search Report for PCT/GB2016/000014, completed by the European Patent Office on Jun. 27, 2016, 4 pgs.
Supplementary Partial European Search Report for European Application No. 18727645.6, Search completed Jul. 2, 2020, dated Jul. 13, 2020, 13 Pgs.
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2010/001982, search completed Feb. 24, 2011, dated Mar. 8, 2011, 6 pgs.
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2011/000349, completer Aug. 17, 2011, dated Aug. 25, 2011, 9 pgs.
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2012/000331, completer Aug. 29, 2012, dated Sep. 6, 2012, 7 pgs.
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2012/000677, completer Dec. 10, 2012, dated Dec. 17, 2012, 4 pgs.
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2013/000005, search completed Jul. 16, 2013, dated Jul. 24, 2013, 11 pgs.
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2013/000273, completer Aug. 30, 2013, dated Sep. 9, 2013, 7 pgs.
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2014/000295, search completed Nov. 18, 2014, dated Jan. 5, 2015, 3 pgs.
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2015/000203, completer Oct. 29, 2015, dated Nov. 16, 2015, 7 pgs.
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2015/000225, search completed Nov. 10, 2015, dated Feb. 4, 2016, 7 pgs.
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2015/000274, search completed Jan. 7, 2016, dated Jan. 19, 2016, 7 pgs.
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2016/000014, search completed Jun. 27, 2016, dated Jul. 7, 2016, 6 pgs.
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2016/000051, Search completed Aug. 11, 2016, Mailed Aug. 22, 2016, 6 Pgs.
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2017/000040, search completed Jul. 10, 2017, dated Jul. 18, 2017, 6 pgs.
Written Opinion for International Application PCT/GB2016/000003, completed May 31, 2016, dated Aug. 12, 2016, 10 pgs.
“Agilent ADNS-2051 Optical Mouse Sensor: Data Sheet”, Agilent Technologies, Jan. 9, 2002, 40 pgs.
“Application Note—MOXTEK ProFlux Polarizer use with LCOS displays”, CRL Opto Limited, http://www.crlopto.com, 2003, 6 pgs.
“Application Note AN 16: Optical Considerations for Bridgelux LED Arrays”, BridgeLux, Jul. 31, 2010, 23 pgs.
“Application Note: Variable Attenuator for Lasers”, Technology and Applications Center, Newport Corporation, www.newport.com, 2006, DS-08067, 6 pgs.
“Bae Systems to Unveil Q-Sight Family of Helmet-Mounted Display at AUSA Symposium”, Released on Tuesday, Oct. 9, 2007, 1 pg.
“Beam Steering Using Liquid Crystals”, Boulder Nonlinear Systems, Inc., info@bnonlinear.com, May 8, 2001, 4 pgs.
“BragGrate—Deflector: Transmitting Volume Bragg Grating for angular selection and magnification”, 2015, www.OptiGrate.com.
“Cree XLamp XP-E LEDs”, Cree, Inc., Retrieved from www.cree.com/Xlamp, CLD-DS18 Rev 17, 2013, 17 pgs.
“Desmodur N 3900”, Bayer Materialscience AG, Mar. 18, 2013, www.bayercoatings.com, 4 pgs.
“Digilens—Innovative Augmented Reality Display and Sensor Solutions for OEMs”, Jun. 6, 2017, 31 pgs.
“Exotic Optical Components”, Building Electro-Optical Systems, Making It All Work, Chapter 7, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 233-261.
“FHS Lenses Series”, Fraen Corporation, www.fraen.com, Jun. 16, 2003, 10 pgs.
“FLP Lens Series for LUXEONTM Rebel and Rebel ES LEDs”, Fraen Corporation, www.fraensrl.com, Aug. 7, 2015, 8 pgs.
“Head-up Displays, See-through display for military aviation”, BAE Systems, 2016, 3 pgs.
“Holder for LUXEON Rebel—Part No. 180”, Polymer Optics Ltd., 2008, 12 pgs.
“LED 7-Segment Displays”, Lumex, uk.digikey.com, 2003, UK031, 36 pgs.
“LED325W UVTOP UV LED with Window”, Thorlabs, Specifications and Documentation, 21978-S01 Rev. A, Apr. 8, 2011, 5 pgs.
“Liquid Crystal Phases”, Phases of Liquid Crystals, http://plc.cwru.edu/tutorial/enhanced/files/lc/phase, Retrieved on Sep. 21, 2004, 6 pgs.
“LiteHUD Head-up display”, BAE Systems, 2016, 2 pgs.
“LiteHUD Head-up display infographic”, BAE Systems, 2017, 2 pgs.
“Luxeon C: Power Light Source”, Philips Lumileds, www.philipslumileds.com, 2012, 18 pgs.
“Luxeon Rebel ES: Leading efficacy and light output, maximum design flexibility”, LUXEON Rebel ES Datasheet DS61 20130221, www.philipslumileds.com, 2013, 33 pgs.
“Mobile Display Report”, Insight Media, LLC, Apr. 2012, vol. 7, No. 4, 72 pgs.
“Molecular Imprints Imprio 55”, Engineering at Illinois, Micro + Nanotechnology Lab, Retrieved from https://mntl.illinois.edu/facilities/cleanrooms/equipment/Nano-Imprint.asp, Dec. 28, 2015, 2 pgs.
“Navy awards SGB Labs a contract for HMDs for simulation and training”, Press releases, DigiLens, Oct. 2012, pp. 1-2.
“Optical measurements of retinal flow”, Industrial Research Limited, Feb. 2012, 18 pgs.
“Osterhout Design Group Develops Next-Generation, Fully-integrated Smart Glasses Using Qualcomm Technologies”, ODG, www.osterhoutgroup.com, Sep. 18, 2014, 2 pgs.
“Plastic has replaced glass in photochromic lens”, www.plastemart.com, 2003, 1 page.
“Range Finding Using Pulse Lasers”, OSRAM, Opto Semiconductors, Sep. 10, 2004, 7 pgs.
“Response time in Liquid-Crystal Variable Retarders”, Meadowlark Optics, Inc., 2005, 4 pgs.
“Secondary Optics Design Considerations for SuperFlux LEDs”, Lumileds, application brief AB20-5, Sep. 2002, 23 pgs.
“Solid-State Optical Mouse Sensor with Quadrature Outputs”, IC Datasheet, UniqueICs, Jul. 15, 2004, 11 pgs.
“SVGA TransparentVLSITM Microdisplay Evaluation Kit”, Radiant Images, Inc., Product Data Sheet, 2003, 3 pgs.
“Technical Data Sheet LPR1”, Luminus Devices, Inc., Luminus Projection Chipset, Release 1, Preliminary, Revision B, Sep. 21, 2004, 9 pgs.
“The Next Generation of TV”, SID Information Display, Nov./Dec. 2014, vol. 30, No. 6, 56 pgs.
“Thermal Management Considerations for SuperFlux LEDs”, Lumileds, application brief AB20-4, Sep. 2002, 14 pgs.
“USAF Awards SBG Labs an SBIR Contract for Wide Field of View HUD”, Press Release, SBG Labs DigiLens, Apr. 2014, 2 pgs.
“UVTOP240”, Roithner LaserTechnik GmbH, v 2.0, Jun. 24, 2013, 6 pgs.
“UVTOP310”, Roithner LaserTechnik GmbH, v 2.0, Jun. 24, 2013, 6 pgs.
“Velodyne's HDL-64E: A High Definition Lidar Sensor for 3-D Applications”, High Definition Lidar, white paper, Oct. 2007, 7 pgs.
“VerLASE Gets Patent for Breakthrough Color Conversion Technology That Enables Full Color MicroLED Arrays for Near Eye Displays”, Cision PRweb, Apr. 28, 2015, Retrieved from the Internet http://www.prweb.com/releases/2015/04/prweb12681038.htm, 3 pgs.
“Webster's Third New International Dictionary 433”, (1986), 3 pages.
“X-Cubes—Revisited for LCOS”, BASID, RAF Electronics Corp. Rawson Optics, Inc., Oct. 24, 2002, 16 pgs.
Aachen, “Design of plastic optics for LED applications”, Optics Colloquium 2009, Mar. 19, 2009, 30 pgs.
Abbate et al., “Characterization of LC-polymer composites for opto-electronic application”, Proceedings of OPTOEL'03, Leganes-Madrid, Spain, Jul. 14-16, 2003, 4 pgs.
Al-Kalbani et al., “Ocular Microtremor laser speckle metrology”, Proc, of SPIE, 2009, vol. 7176 717606-1, 12 pgs.
Almanza-Workman et al., “Planarization coating for polyimide substrates used in roll-to-roll fabrication of active matrix backplanes for flexible displays”, HP Laboratories, HPL-2012-23, Feb. 6, 2012, 12 pgs.
Amitai et al., “Visor-display design based on planar holographic optics”, Applied Optics, vol. 34, No. 8, Mar. 10, 1995, pp. 1352-1356.
Amundson et al., “Morphology and electro-optic properties of polymer-dispersed liquid-crystal films”, Physical Review E, Feb. 1997, vol. 55. No. 2, pp. 1646-1654.
An et al., “Speckle suppression in laser display using several partially coherent beams”, Optics Express, Jan. 5, 2009, vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 92-103.
Apter et al., “Electrooptical Wide-Angle Beam Deflector Based on Fringing-Field-Induced Refractive Inhomogeneity in a Liquid Crystal Layer”, 23rd IEEE Convention of Electrical and Electronics Engineers in Israel, Sep. 6-7, 2004, pp. 240-243.
Arnold et al., “52.3: An Improved Polarizing Beamsplitter LCOS Projection Display Based on Wire-Grid Polarizers”, Society for Information Display, Jun. 2001, pp. 1282-1285.
Ayras et al., “Exit pupil expander with a large field of view based on diffractive optics”, Journal of the SID, May 18, 2009, 17/8, pp. 659-664.
Baets et al., “Resonant-Cavity Light-Emitting Diodes: a review”, Proceedings of SPIE, 2003, vol. 4996, pp. 74-86.
Bayer et al., “Introduction to Helmet-Mounted Displays”, 2016, pp. 47-108.
Beckel et al., “Electro-optic properties of thiol-ene polymer stabilized ferroelectric liquid crystals”, Liquid Crystals, vol. 30, No. 11, Nov. 2003, pp. 1343-1350, DOI: 10.1080/02678290310001605910.
Bergkvist, “Biospeckle-based Study of the Line Profile of Light Scattered in Strawberries”, Master Thesis, Lund Reports on Atomic Physics, LRAP-220, Lund 1997, pp. 1-62.
Bernards et al., “Nanoscale porosity in polymer films: fabrication and therapeutic applications”, Soft Matter, Jan. 1, 2010, vol. 6, No. 8, pp. 1621-1631, doi:10.1039/B922303G.
Bleha et al., “Binocular Holographic Waveguide Visor Display”, SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, Holoeye Systems Inc, Jun. 2014, San Diego, CA, 4 pgs.
Bleha et al., “D-ILA Technology for High Resolution Projection Displays”, Sep. 10, 2003, Proceedings, vol. 5080, doi:10.1117/12.497532, 11 pgs.
Bone, “Design Obstacles for LCOS Displays in Projection Applications “Optics architectures for LCOS are still evolving””, Aurora Systems Inc., Bay Area SID Seminar, Mar. 27, 2001, 22 pgs.
Born et al., “Optics of Crystals”, Principles of Optics 5th Edition 1975, pp. 705-707.
Bourzac, “Magic Leap Needs to Engineer a Miracle”, Intelligent Machines, Jun. 11, 2015, 7 pgs.
Bowen et al., “Optimisation of interdigitated electrodes for piezoelectric actuators and active fibre composites”, J Electroceram, Jul. 2006, vol. 16, pp. 263-269, DOI 10.1007/s10832-006-9862-8.
Bowley et al., “Variable-wavelength switchable Bragg gratings formed in polymer-dispersed liquid crystals”, Applied Physics Letters, Jul. 2, 2001, vol. 79, No. 1, pp. 9-11.
Bronnikov et al., “Polymer-Dispersed Liquid Crystals: Progress in Preparation, Investigation and Application”, Journal of Macromolecular Science Part B, published online Sep. 30, 2013, vol. 52, pp. 1718-1738.
Brown, “Waveguide Displays”, Rockwell Collins, 2015, 11 pgs.
Bruzzone et al., “Compact, high-brightness LED illumination for projection systems”, Journal of the SID 17/12, Dec. 2009, pp. 1043-1049.
Buckley, “Colour holographic laser projection technology for heads-up and instrument cluster displays”, Conference: Proc. SID Conference 14th Annual Symposium on Vehicle Displays, Jan. 2007, 5 pgs.
Buckley, “Pixtronix DMS technology for head-up displays”, Pixtronix, Inc., Jan. 2011, 4 pgs.
Buckley et al., “Full colour holographic laser projector HUD”, Light Blue Optics Ltd., Aug. 10, 2015, 5 pgs.
Buckley et al., “Rear-view virtual image displays”, in Proc. SID Conference 16th Annual Symposium on Vehicle Displays, Jan. 2009, 5 pgs.
Bunning et al., “Effect of gel-point versus conversion on the real-time dynamics of holographic polymer-dispersed liquid crystal (HPDLC) formation”, Proceedings of SPIE—vol. 5213, Liquid Crystals VII, Iam-Choon Khoo, Editor, Dec. 2003, pp. 123-129.
Bunning et al., “Electro-optical photonic crystals formed in H-PDLCs by thiol-ene photopolymerization”, American Physical Society, Annual APS, Mar. 3-7, 2003, abstract #R 1.135.
Bunning et al., “Holographic Polymer-Dispersed Liquid Crystals (H-PDLCs) 1” Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci., 2000, vol. 30, pp. 83-115.
Bunning et al., “Morphology of Anisotropic Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystals and the Effect of Monomer Functionality”, Polymer Science: Part B: Polymer Physics, Jul. 30, 1997, vol. 35, pp. 2825-2833.
Busbee et al., “SiO2 Nanoparticle Sequestration via Reactive Functionalization in Holographic Polymer-Dispersed Liquid Crystals”, Advanced Materials, Sep. 2009, vol. 21, pp. 3659-3662.
Butler et al., “Diffractive Properties of Highly Birefringent vol. Gratings Investigation”, Journal of Optical Society of America, Feb. 2002, vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 183-189.
Cai et al., “Recent advances in anti reflective surfaces based on nanostructure arrays”, Mater. Horiz., 2015, vol. 2, pp. 37-53.
Cameron, “Optical Waveguide Technology & Its Application In Head Mounted Displays”, Proc. of SPIE, May 22, 2012, vol. 8383, pp. 83830E-1-83830E-11.
Cameron, “The Application of Holographic Optical Waveguide Technology to Q-Sight™ Family of Helmet Mounted Displays”, Proc. of SPIE, 2009, vol. 7326, 11 pages, doi:10.1117/12.818581.
Caputo et al., “POLICRYPS Composite Materials: Features and Applications”, Advances in Composite Materials—Analysis of Natural and Man-Made Materials, www.intechopen.com, Sep. 2011, pp. 93-118.
Caputo et al., “POLICRYPS Switchable Holographic Grating: A Promising Grating Electro-Optical Pixel for High Resolution Display Application”, Journal of Display Technology, Mar. 2006, vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 38-51.
Carclo Optics, “Guide to choosing secondary optics”, Carclo Optics, Dec. 15, 2014, www.carclo-optics.com, 48 pgs.
Chen et al., “Polarization rotators fabricated by thermally-switched liquid crystal alignments based on rubbed poly(N-vinyl carbazole) films”, Optics Express, Apr. 11, 2011, vol. 19, No. 8, pp. 7553-7558.
Cheng et al., “Design of an ultra-thin near-eye display with geometrical waveguide and freeform optics”, Optics Express, Aug. 2014, 16 pgs.
Chi et al., “Ultralow-refractive-index optical thin films through nanoscale etching of ordered mesoporous silica films”, Optic Letters, May 1, 2012, vol. 37, No. 9, pp. 1406-1408.
Chigrinov et al., “Photo-aligning by azo-dyes: Physics and applications”, Liquid Crystals Today, Sep. 6, 2006, http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tlcy20, 15 pgs.
Cho et al., “Electro-optic Properties of CO2 Fixed Polymer/Nematic LC Composite Films”, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Nov. 5, 2000, vol. 81, Issue 11, pp. 2744-2753.
Cho et al., “Optimization of Holographic Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystals for Ternary Monomers”, Polymer International, Nov. 1999, vol. 48, pp. 1085-1090.
Colegrove et al., “P-59: Technology of Stacking HPDLC for Higher Reflectance”, SID 00 Digest, May 2000, pp. 770-773.
Crawford, “Electrically Switchable Bragg Gratings”, Optics & Photonics News Apr. 2003, pp. 54-59.
Cruz-Arreola et al., “Diffraction of beams by infinite or finite amplitudephase gratings”, Investigacio' N Revista Mexicana De Fl'Sica, Feb. 2011, vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 6-16.
Dabrowski, “High Birefringence Liquid Crystals”, Crystals, Sep. 3, 2013, vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 443-482.
Dainty, “Some statistical properties of random speckle patterns in coherent and partially coherent illumination”, Optica Acta, Mar. 12, 1970, vol. 17, No. 10, pp. 761-772.
Date, “Alignment Control in Holographic Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystal”, Journal of Photopolymer Science and Technology, Nov. 2, 2000, vol. 13, pp. 289-284.
Date et al., “52.3: Direct-viewing Display Using Alignment-controlled PDLC and Holographic PDLC”, Society for Information Display Digest, May 2000, pp. 1184-1187, DOI: 10.1889/1.1832877.
Date et al., “Full-color reflective display device using holographically fabricater polymer-dispersed liquid crystal (HPDLC)”, Journal of the SID, 1999, vol. 7, No. 1 pp. 17-22.
De Bitetto, “White light viewing of surface holograms by simple dispersion compensation”, Applied Physics Letters, Dec. 15, 1966, vol. 9, No. 12, pp. 417-418.
Developer World, “Create customized augmented reality solutions”, printed Oct. 19, 2017, LMX-001 holographic waveguide display, Sony Developer World, 3 pgs.
Dhar et al., “Recording media that exhibit high dynamic range for digital holographic data storage”, Optics Letters, Apr. 1, 1999, vol. 24, No. 7, pp. 487-489.
Domash et al., “Applications of switchable Polaroid holograms”, SPIE Proceedings, vol. 2152, Diffractive and Holographic Optics Technology, Jan. 23-29, 1994, Los Angeles, CA, pp. 127-138, ISBN: 0-8194-1447-6.
Drake et al., “Waveguide Hologram Fingerprint Entry Device”, Optical Engineering, Sep. 1996, vol. 35, No. 9, pp. 2499-2505.
Drevensek-Olenik et al., “In-Plane Switching of Holographic Polymer-Dispersed Liquid Crystal Transmission Gratings”, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 2008, vol. 495, p. 177/[529]-185/[537].
Drevensek-Olenik et al., “Optical diffraction gratings from polymer-dispersed liquid crystals switched by interdigitated electrodes”, Journal of Applied Physics, Dec. 1, 2004, vol. 96, No. 11, pp. 6207-6212.
Ducharme, “Microlens diffusers for efficient laser speckle generation”, Optics Express, Oct. 29, 2007, vol. 15, No. 22, pp. 14573-14579.
Duong et al., “Centrifugal Deposition of Iron Oxide Magnetic Nanorods for Hyperthermia Application”, Journal of Thermal Engineering, Yildiz Technical University Press, Istanbul, Turkey, Apr. 2015, vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 99-103.
Fattal et al., “A multi directional backlight for a wide-angle glasses-free three-dimensional display”, Nature, Mar. 21, 2012, vol. 495, pp. 348-351.
Fontecchio et al., “Spatially Pixelated Reflective Arrays from Holographic Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystals”, SID 00 Digest, May 2000, pp. 774-776.
Forman et al., “Materials development for PhotoINhibited SuperResolution (PINSR) lithography”, Proc. of SPIE, 2012, vol. 8249, 824904, doi: 10.1117/12.908512, pp. 824904-1-824904-9.
Forman et al., “Radical diffusion limits to photoinhibited superresolution Tithography”, Phys.Chem. Chem. Phys., May 31, 2013, vol. 15, pp. 14862-14867.
Friedrich-Schiller, “Spatial Noise and Speckle”, Version 1.12.2011, Dec. 2011, Abbe School of Photonics, Jena, Germany, 27 pgs.
Fuh et al., “Thermally and Electrically Switchable Gratings Based Upon the Polymer-Balls Type Polymer-Dispersed Liquid Crystal Films”, Appl. Phys. vol. 41 No. 22, Aug. 1, 2002, pp. 4585-4589.
Fujii et al., “Nanoparticle-polymer-composite vol. gratings incorporating chain-transfer agents for holography and slow-neutron optics”, Optics Letters, Apr. 25, 2014, vol. 39, Issue 12, 5 pgs.
Funayama et al., “Proposal of a new type thin film light-waveguide display device using”, The International Conference on Electrical Engineering, 2008, No. P-044, 5 pgs.
Gabor, “Laser Speckle and its Elimination”, BM Research and Development, Eliminating Speckle Noise, Sep. 1970, vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 509-514.
Gardiner et al., “Bistable liquid-crystals reduce power consumption for high-efficiency smart glazing”, SPIE, 2009, 10.1117/2.1200904.1596, 2 pgs.
Giancola, “Holographic Diffuser, Makes Light Work of Screen Tests”, Photonics Spectra, 1996, vol. 30, No. 8, pp. 121-122.
Goodman, “Some fundamental properties of speckle”, J. Opt. Soc. Am., Nov. 1976, vol. 66, No. 11, pp. 1145-1150.
Goodman, “Statistical Properties of Laser Speckle Patterns”, Applied Physics, 1975, vol. 9, Chapter 2, Laser Speckle and Related Phenomena, pp. 9-75.
Goodman et al., “Speckle Reduction by a Moving Diffuser in Laser Projection Displays”, The Optical Society of America, 2000, 15 pgs.
Guldin et al., “Self-Cleaning Anti reflective Optical Coatings”, Nano Letters, Oct. 14, 2013, vol. 13, pp. 5329-5335.
Guo et al., “Review Article: A Review of the Optimisation of Photopolymer Materials for Holographic Data Storage”, Physics Research International, vol. 2012, Article ID 803439, Academic Editor: Sergi Gallego, 16 pages, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/803439, May 4, 2012.
Han et al., “Study of Holographic Waveguide Display System”, Advanced Photonics for Communications, 2014, 4 pgs.
Harbers et al., “I-15.3: LED Backlighting for LCD-HDTV”, Journal of the Society for Information Display, 2002, vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 347-350.
Harbers et al., “Performance of High Power LED Illuminators in Color Sequential Projection Displays”, Lumileds Lighting, 2007, 4 pgs.
Harbers et al., “Performance of High Power LED Illuminators in Color Sequential Projection Displays”, Lumileds, Aug. 7, 2001, 11 pgs.
Harbers et al., “Performance of High-Power LED illuminators in Projection Displays”, Proc. Int. Disp. Workshops, Japan. Vol. 10, pp. 1585-1588, 2003.
Harding et al., “Reactive Liquid Crystal Materials for Optically Anisotropic Patterned Retarders”, Merck, Iicrivue, 2008, ME-GR-RH-08-010, 20 pgs.
Harding et al., “Reactive Liquid Crystal Materials for Optically Anisotropic Patterned Retarders”, SPIE Lithography Asia—Taiwan, 2008, Proceedings vol. 7140, Lithography Asia 2008; 71402J, doi: 10.1117/12.805378.
Hariharan, “Optical Holography: Principles, techniques and applications”, Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 231-233.
Harris, “Photonic Devices”, EE 216 Principals and Models of Semiconductor Devices, Autumn 2002, 20 pgs.
Harrold et al., “3D Display Systems Hardware Research at Sharp Laboratories of Europe: an update”, Sharp Laboratories of Europe, Ltd., received May 21, 1999, 7 pgs.
Harthong et al., “Speckle phase averaging in high-resolution color holography”, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, Feb. 1997, vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 405-409.
Hasan et al., “Tunable-focus lens for adaptive eyeglasses”, Optics Express, Jan. 23, 2017, vol. 25, No. 2, 1221, 13 pgs.
Hasman et al., “Diffractive Optics: Design, Realization, and Applications”, Fiber and Integrated Optics, vol. 16, pp. 1-25, 1997.
Hata et al., “Holographic nanoparticle-polymer composites based on stepgrowth thiol-ene photopolymerization”, Optical Materials Express, Jun. 1, 2011, vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 207-222.
He et al., “Dynamics of peristrophic multiplexing in holographic polymer-dispersed liquid crystal”, Liquid Crystals, Mar. 26, 2014, vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 673-684.
He et al., “Holographic 3D display based on polymer-dispersed liquid-crystal thin films”, Proceedings of China Display/Asia Display 2011, pp. 158-160.
He et al., “Properties of vol. Holograms Recording in Photopolymer Films with Various Pulse Exposures Repetition Frequencies”, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 5636, Bellingham, WA, 2005, doi: 10.1117/12.580978, pp. 842-848.
Herman et al., “Production and Uses of Diffractionless Beams”, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A., Jun. 1991, vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 932-942.
Hisano, “Alignment layer-free molecular ordering induced by masked photopolymerization with nonpolarized light”, Appl. Phys. Express 9, Jun. 6, 2016, pp. 072601-1-072601-4.
Hoepfner et al., “LED Front Projection Goes Mainstream”, Luminus Devices, Inc., Projection Summit, 2008, 18 pgs.
Holmes et al., “Controlling the Anisotropy of Holographic Polymer-Dispersed Liquid-Crystal Gratings”, Physical Review E, Jun. 11, 2002, vol. 65, 066603-1-066603-4.
Hoyle et al., “Advances in the Polymerization of Thiol-Ene Formulations”, Heraeus Noblelight Fusion UV Inc., 2003 Conference, 6 pgs.
Hua, “Sunglass-like displays become a reality with free-form optical technology”, Illumination & Displays 3D Visualization and Imaging Systems Laboratory (3DVIS) College of Optical Sciences University of Arizona Tucson, AZ. 2014, 3 pgs.
Huang et al., “Diffraction properties of substrate guided-wave holograms”, Optical Engineering, Oct. 1995, vol. 34, No. 10, pp. 2891-2899.
Huang et al., “Theory and characteristics of holographic polymer dispersed Tiquid crystal transmission grating with scaffolding morphology”, Applied Optics, Jun. 20, 2012, vol. 51, No. 18, pp. 4013-4020.
Iannacchione et al., “Deuterium NMR and morphology study of copolymer-dispersed liquid-crystal Bragg gratings”, Europhysics Letters, 1996, vol. 36, No. 6, pp. 425-430.
Irie, “Photochromic diarylethenes for photonic devices”, Pure and Applied Chemistry, 1996, pp. 1367-1371, vol. 68, No. 7, IUPAC.
Jeng et al., “Aligning liquid crystal molecules”, SPIE, 2012, 10.1117/2.1201203.004148, 2 pgs.
Jeong et al., “Memory Effect of Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystal by Hybridization with Nanoclay”, express Polymer Letters, vol. 4, No. 1, 2010, pp. 39-46.
Jo et al., “Control of Liquid Crystal Pretilt Angle using Polymerization of Reactive Mesogen”, IMID 2009 Digest, P1-25, 2009, pp. 604-606.
Juhl, “Interference Lithography for Optical Devices and Coatings”, Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2010.
Juhl et al., “Holographically Directed Assembly of Polymer Nanocomposites”, ACS Nano, Oct. 7, 2010, vol. 4, No. 10, pp. 5953-5961.
Jurbergs et al., “New recording materials for the holographic industry”, Proc. of SPIE, 2009 Vol. 7233, pp. 72330K-1-72330L-10, doi: 10.1117/12.809579.
Kahn et al., “Private Line Reporton Large Area Display”, Kahn International, Jan. 7, 2003, vol. 8, No. 10, 9 pgs.
Karasawa et al., “Effects of Material Systems on the Polarization Behavior of Holographic Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystal Gratings”, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Oct. 1997, vol. 36, No. 10, pp. 6388-6392.
Karp et al., “Planar micro-optic solar concentration using multiple imaging lenses into a common slab waveguide”, Proc. of SPIE vol. 7407, 2009 SPIE, CCC code: 0277-786X/09, doi: 10.1117/12.826531, pp. 74070D-1-74070D-11.
Karp et al., “Planar micro-optic solar concentrator”, Optics Express, Jan. 18, 2010, vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 1122-1133.
Kato et al., “Alignment-Controlled Holographic Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystal (HPDLC) for Reflective Display Devices”, SPIE,1998, vol. 3297, pp. 52-57.
Kessler, “Optics of Near to Eye Displays (NEDs)”, Oasis 2013, Tel Aviv, Feb. 19, 2013, 37 pgs.
Keuper et al., “26.1: RGB LED Illuminator for Pocket-Sized Projectors”, SID 04 Digest, 2004, ISSN/0004-0966X/04/3502, pp. 943-945.
Keuper et al., “P-126: Ultra-Compact LED based Image Projector for Portable Applications”, SID 03 Digest, 2003, ISSN/0003-0966X/03/3401-0713, pp. 713-715.
Kim et al., “Effect of Polymer Structure on the Morphology and Electro optic Properties of UV Curable PNLCs”, Polymer, Feb. 2000, vol. 41, pp. 1325-1335.
Kim et al., “Enhancement of electro-optical properties in holographic polymer-dispersed liquid crystal films by incorporation of multiwalled carbon nanotubes into a polyurethane acrylate matrix”, Polym. Int., Jun. 16, 2010, vol. 59, pp. 1289-1295.
Kim et al., “Fabrication of Reflective Holographic PDLC for Blue”, Molecular Crystals and Liquid Crystals Science, 2001, vol. 368, pp. 3845-3853.
Kim et al., “Optimization of Holographic PDLC for Green”, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., vol. 368, pp. 3855-3864, 2001.
Klein, “Optical Efficiency for Different Liquid Crystal Colour Displays”, Digital Media Department, HPL-2000-83, Jun. 29, 2000, 18 pgs.
Kogelnik, “Coupled Wave Theory for Thick Hologram Gratings”, The Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 48, No. 9, pp. 2909-2945, Nov. 1969.
Kotakonda et al., “Electro-optical Switching of the Holographic Polymer-dispersed Liquid Crystal Diffraction Gratings”, Journal of Optics A: Pure and Applied Optics, Jan. 1, 2009, vol. 11, No. 2, 11 pgs.
Kress et al., “Diffractive and Holographic Optics as Optical Combiners in Head Mounted Displays”, UbiComp '13, Sep. 9-12, 2013, Session Wearable Systems for Industrial Augmented Reality Applications, pp. 1479-1482.
Lauret et al., “Solving the Optics Equation for Effective LED Applications”, Gaggione North America, LLFY System Design Workshop 2010, Oct. 28, 2010, 26 pgs.
Lee, “Patents Shows Widespread Augmented Reality Innovation”, PatentVue, May 26, 2015, 5 pgs.
Levola, “Diffractive optics for virtual reality displays”, Journal of the SID, 2006, 14/5, pp. 467-475.
Levola et al., “Near-to-eye display with diffractive exit pupil expander having chevron design”, Journal of the SID, 2008, 16/8, pp. 857-862.
Levola et al., “Replicated slanted gratings with a high refractive index materia for in and outcoupling of light”, Optics Express, vol. 15, Issue 5, pp. 2067-2074 (2007).
Li et al., “Design and Optimization of Tapered Light Pipes”, Proceedings vol. 5529, Nonimaging Optics and Efficient Illumination Systems, Sep. 29, 2004, doi: 10.1117/12.559844, 10 pgs.
Li et al., “Dual Paraboloid Reflector and Polarization Recycling Systems for Projection Display”, Proceedings vol. 5002, Projection Displays IX, Mar. 28, 2003, doi: 10.1117/12.479585, 12 pgs.
Li et al., “Light Pipe Based Optical Train and its Applications”, Proceedings vol. 5524, Novel Optical Systems Design and Optimization VII, Oct. 24, 2004, doi: 10.1117/12.559833, 10 pgs.
Li et al., “Novel Projection Engine with Dual Paraboloid Reflector and Polarization Recovery Systems”, Wavien Inc., SPIE EI 5289-38, Jan. 21, 2004, 49 pgs.
Li et al., “Polymer crystallization/melting induced thermal switching in a series of holographically patterned Bragg reflectors”, Soft Matter, Jul. 11, 2005, vol. 1, pp. 238-242.
Lin et al., “Ionic Liquids in Photopolymerizable Holographic Materials”, in book Holograms—Recording Materials and Applications, Nov. 9, 2011, 21 pgs.
Liu et al., “Holographic Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystals” Materials, Formation and Applications, Advances in OptoElectronics, Nov. 30, 2008, vol. 2008, Article ID 684349, 52 pgs.
Lorek, “Experts Say Mass Adoption of augmented and Virtual Reality is Many Years Away”, Siliconhills, Sep. 9, 2017, 4 pgs.
Lowenthal et al., “Speckle Removal by a Slowly Moving Diffuser Associated with a Motionless Diffuser”, Journal of the Optical Society of America, Jul. 1971, vol. 61, No. 7, pp. 847-851.
Lu et al., “Polarization switch using thick holographic polymer-dispersed liquid crystal grating”, Journal of Applied Physics, Feb. 1, 2004, vol. 95, No. 3, pp. 810-815.
Lu et al., “The Mechanism of electric-field-induced segregation of additives in a Tiquid-crystal host”, Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys., Nov. 27, 2012, 14 pgs.
Ma et al., “Holographic Reversed-Mode Polymer-Stabilized Liquid Crystal Grating”, Chinese Phys. Lett., 2005, vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 103-106.
Mach et al., “Switchable Bragg diffraction from liquid crystal in colloid-templated structures”, Europhysics Letters, Jun. 1, 2002, vol. 58, No. 5, pp. 679-685.
Magarinos et al., “Wide Angle Color Holographic infinity optics display”, Air Force Systems Command, Brooks Air Force Base, Texas, AFHRL-TR-80-53, Mar. 1981, 100 pgs.
Marino et al., “Dynamical Behaviour of Policryps Gratings”, Electronic-Liquid Crystal Communications, Feb. 5, 2004, 10 pgs.
Massenot et al., “Multiplexed holographic transmission gratings recorded in holographic polymer-dispersed liquid crystals: static and dynamic studies”, Applied Optics, 2005, vol. 44, Issue 25, pp. 5273-5280.
Matay et al., “Planarization of Microelectronic Structures by Using Polyimides”, Journal of Electrical Engineering, 2002, vol. 53, No. 3-4, pp. 86-90.
Mathews, “The LED FAQ Pages”, Jan. 31, 2002, 23 pgs.
Matic, “Blazed phase liquid crystal beam steering”, Proc. of the SPIE, 1994, vol. 2120, pp. 194-205.
McLeod, “Axicons and Their Uses”, Journal of the Optical Society of America, Feb. 1960, vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 166-169.
McManamon et al., “A Review of Phased Array Steering for Narrow-Band Electrooptical Systems”, Proceedings of the IEEE, Jun. 2009, vol. 97, No. 6, pp. 1078-1096.
McManamon et al., “Optical Phased Array Technology”, Proceedings of the IEEE, Feb. 1996, vol. 84, Issue 2, pp. 268-298.
Miller, “Coupled Wave Theory and Waveguide Applications”, The Bell System Technical Journal, Short Hills, NJ, Feb. 2, 1954, 166 pgs.
Moffitt, “Head-Mounted Display Image Configurations”, retrieved from the internet on Dec. 19, 2014, dated May 2008, 25 pgs.
Nair et al., “Enhanced Two-Stage Reactive Polymer Network Forming Systems”, Polymer (Guildf). May 25, 2012, vol. 53, No. 12, pp. 2429-2434, doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2012.04.007.
Nair et al., “Two-Stage Reactive Polymer Network Forming Systems”, Advanced Functional Materials, 2012, pp. 1-9, DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201102742.
Naqvi et al., “Concentration-dependent toxicity of iron oxide nanoparticles mediated by increased oxidative stress”, International Journal of Nanomedicine, Dovepress, Nov. 13, 2010, vol. 5, pp. 983-989.
Natarajan et al., “Electro Optical Switching Characteristics of Volume Holograms in Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystals”, Journal of Nonlinear Optical Physics and Materials, 1997, vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 666-668.
Natarajan et al., “Electro-Optical Switching Characteristics of Volume Holograms in Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystals”, J. of Nonlinear Optical Physics Materials, Jan. 1996, vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 89-98.
Natarajan et al., “Holographic polymer dispersed liquid crystal reflection gratings formed by visible light initiated thiol-ene photopolymerization”, Polymer, vol. 47, May 8, 2006, pp. 4411-4420.
Naydenova et al., “Low-scattering vol. Holographic Material”, DIT PhD Project, http://www.dit.ie/ieo/, Oct. 2017, 2 pgs.
Neipp et al., “Non-local polymerization driven diffusion based model: general dependence of the polymerization rate to the exposure intensity”, Optics Express, Aug. 11, 2003, vol. 11, No. 16, pp. 1876-1886.
Nishikawa et al., “Mechanically and Light Induced Anchoring of Liquid Crysta on Polyimide Film”, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst, Aug. 1999, vol. 329, 8 pgs.
Nishikawa et al., “Mechanism of Unidirectional Liquid-Crystal Alignment on Polyimides with Linearly Polarized Ultraviolet Light Exposure”, Applied Physics Letters, May 11, 1998, vol. 72, No. 19, 4 pgs.
Nordin et al., “Diffraction Properties of Stratified vol. Holographic Optical Elements”, Journal of the Optical Society of America A., vol. 9, No. 12, Dec. 1992, pp. 2206-2217.
Oh et al., “Achromatic diffraction from polarization gratings with high efficiency” Optic Letters, Oct. 15, 2008, vol. 33, No. 20, pp. 2287-2289.
Olson et al., “Templating Nanoporous Polymers with Ordered Block Copolymers”, Chemistry of Materials, Web publication Nov. 27, 2007, vol. 20, pp. 869-890.
Ondax, Inc., “Volume Holographic Gratings (VHG)”, 2005, 7 pgs.
Orcutt, “Coming Soon: Smart Glasses That Look Like Regular Spectacles”, Intelligent Machines, Jan. 9, 2014, 4 pgs.
Osredkar, “A study of the limits of spin-on-glass planarization process”, Informacije MIDEM, 2001, vol. 31, 2, ISSN0352-9045, pp. 102-105.
Osredkar et al., “Planarization methods in IC fabrication technologies”, Informacije MIDEM, 2002, vol. 32, 3, ISSN0352-9045, 5 pgs.
Ou et al., “A Simple LCOS Optical System (Late News)”, Industrial Technology Research Institute/OES Lab. Q100/Q200, SID 2002, Boston, USA, 2 pgs.
Paolini et al., “High-Power LED Illuminators in Projection Displays”, Lumileds, Aug. 7, 2001, 19 pgs.
Park et al., “Aligned Single-Wall Carbon Nanotube Polymer Composites Using an Electric Field”, Journal of Polymer Science: Part B: Polymer Physics, Mar. 24, 2006, DOI 10.1002/polb.20823, pp. 1751-1762.
Park et al., “Fabrication of Reflective Holographic Gratings with Polyurethane Acrylates (PUA)”, Current Applied Physics, Jun. 2002, vol. 2, pp. 249-252.
Plawsky et al., “Engineered nanoporous and nanostructured films”, MaterialsToday, Jun. 2009, vol. 12, No. 6, pp. 36-45.
Potenza, “These smart glasses automatically focus on what you're looking at”, The Verge, Voc Media, Inc., Jan. 29, 2017, https://www.theverge.com/2017/1Z29/14403924/smart-glasses-automatic-focus-presbyopia-ces-2017, 6 pgs.
Presnyakov et al., “Electrically tunable polymer stabilized liquid-crystal Tens”, Journal of Applied Physics, Apr. 29, 2005, vol. 97, pp. 103101-1-103101-6.
Qi et al., “P-111: Reflective Display Based on Total Internal Reflection and Grating-Grating Coupling”, Society for Information Display Digest, May 2003, pp. 648-651, DOI: 10.1889/1.1832359.
Ramón, “Formation of 3D micro- and nanostructures using liquid crystals as a template”, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Apr. 17, 2008, Thesis, DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.6100/IR634422, 117 pgs.
Ramsey, “Holographic Patterning of Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystal Materials for Diffractive Optical Elements”, Thesis, The University of Texas at Arlington, Dec. 2006, 166 pgs.
Ramsey et al., “Holographically recorded reverse-mode transmission gratings in polymer-dispersed liquid crystal cells”, Applied Physics B: Laser and Optics, Sep. 10, 2008, vol. 93, Nos. 2-3, pp. 481-489.
REID, “Thin film silica nanocomposites for anti-reflection coatings”, Oxford Advance Surfaces, www.oxfordsurfaces.com, Oct. 18, 2012, 23 pgs.
Riechert, “Speckle Reduction in Projection Systems”, Dissertation, University Karlsruhe, 2009, 178 pgs.
Rossi et al., “Diffractive Optical Elements for Passive Infrared Detectors”, Submitted to OSA Topical Meeting “Diffractive Optics and Micro-Optics”, Quebec Jun. 18-22, 2000, 3 pgs.
Sagan et al., “Electrically Switchable Bragg Grating Technology for Projection Displays”, Proc. SPIE. vol 4294, Jan. 24, 2001, pp. 75-83.
Saleh et al., “Fourier Optics: 4.1 Propagation of light in free space, 4.2 Optica Fourier Transform, 4.3 Diffraction of Light, 4.4 Image Formation, 4.5 Holography” Fundamentals of Photonics 1991, Chapter 4, pp. 108-143.
Saraswat, “Deposition & Planarization”, EE 311 Notes, Aug. 29, 2017, 28 pgs.
Schechter et al., “Compact beam expander with linear gratings”, Applied Optics, vol. 41, No. 7, Mar. 1, 2002, pp. 1236-1240.
Schreiber et al., “Laser display with single-mirror MEMS scanner”, Journal of the SID 17/7, 2009, pp. 591-595.
Seiberle et al., “Photo-aligned anisotropic optical thin films”, Journal of the SID 12/1, 2004, 6 pgs.
Serebriakov et al., “Correction of the phase retardation caused by intrinsic birefringence in deep UV lithography”, Proc. of SPIE, May 21, 2010, vol. 5754, pp. 1780-1791.
Shi et al., “Design considerations for high efficiency liquid crystal decentered microlens arrays for steering light”, Applied Optics, vol. 49, No. 3, Jan. 20, 2010, pp. 409-421.
Shriyan et al., “Analysis of effects of oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotubes on electro-optic polymer/liquid crystal thin film gratings”, Optics Express, Nov. 12, 2010, vol. 18, No. 24, pp. 24842-24852.
Simonite, “How Magic Leap's Augmented Reality Works”, Intelligent Machines, Oct. 23, 2014, 7 pgs.
Smith et al., “RM-PLUS—Overview”, Licrivue, Nov. 5, 2013, 16 pgs.
Sony Global, “Sony Releases the Transparent Lens Eyewear ‘SmartEyeglass Developer Edition’”, printed Oct. 19, 2017, Sony Global—News Releases, 5 pgs.
Steranka et al., “High-Power LEDs—Technology Status and Market Applications”, Lumileds, Jul. 2002, 23 pgs.
Stumpe et al., “Active and Passive LC Based Polarization Elements”, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 2014, vol. 594: pp. 140-149.
Stumpe et al., “New type of polymer-LC electrically switchable diffractive devices—POLIPHEM”, May 19, 2015, p. 97.
Subbarayappa et al., “Bistable Nematic Liquid Crystal Device”, Jul. 30, 2009, 14 pgs.
Sun et al., “Effects of multiwalled carbon nanotube on holographic polymer dispersed liquid crystal”, Polymers Advanced Technologies, Feb. 19, 2010, DOI: 10.1002/pat.1708, 8 pgs.
Sun et al., “Low-birefringence lens design for polarization sensitive optical systems”, Proceedings of SPIE, 2006, vol. 6289, doi: 10.1117/12.679416, pp. 6289DH-1-6289DH-10.
Sun et al., “Transflective multiplexing of holographic polymer dispersed liquid crystal using Si additives”, eXPRESS Polymer Letters, 2011, vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 73-81.
Sutherland et al., “Bragg Gratings in an Acrylate Polymer Consisting of Periodic Polymer—Dispersed Liquid-Crystal Planes”, Chem. Mater., 1993, vol. 5, pp. 1533-1538.
Sutherland et al., “Electrically switchable vol. gratings in polymer-dispersed liquid crystals”, Applied Physics Letters, Feb. 28, 1994, vol. 64, No. 9, pp. 1074-1076.
Sutherland et al., “Enhancing the electro-optical properties of liquid crystal nanodroplets for switchable Bragg gratings”, Proc. of SPIE, 2008, vol. 7050, pp. 705003-1-705003-9, doi: 10.1117/12.792629.
Sutherland et al., “Liquid crystal bragg gratings: dynamic optical elements for spatial light modulators”, Hardened Materials Branch, Hardened Materials Branch, AFRL-ML-WP-TP-2007-514, Jan. 2007, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH, 18 pgs.
Sutherland et al., “The physics of photopolymer liquid crystal composite holographic gratings”, presented at SPIE: Diffractive and Holographic Optics Technology San Jose, CA, 1996, SPIE, vol. 2689, pp. 158-169.
Sweatt, “Achromatic triplet using holographic optical elements”, Applied Optics May 1977, vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 1390-1391.
Talukdar, “Technology Forecast: Augmented reality”, Changing the economic of Smartglasses, Issue 2, 2016, 5 pgs.
Tao et al., “TiO2 nanocomposites with high refractive index and transparency” J. Mater. Chem., Oct. 4, 2011, vol. 21, pp. 18623-18629.
Titus et al., “Efficient, Accurate Liquid Crystal Digital Light Deflector”, Proc. SPIE 3633, Diffractive and Holographic Technologies, Systems, and Spatial Ligh Modulators VI, 1 Jun. 1, 1999, doi: 10.1117/12.349334, 10 pgs.
Tiziani, “Physical Properties of Speckles”, Speckle Metrology, Chapter 2, Academic Press, Inc., 1978, pp. 5-9.
Tominaga et al., “Fabrication of holographic polymer dispersed liquid crystals doped with gold nanoparticles”, 2010 Japanese Liquid Crystal Society Annual Meeting, 2 pgs.
Tomita, “Holographic assembly of nanoparticles in photopolymers for photonic applications”, The International Society for Optical Engineering, SPIE Newsroom, 2006, 10.1117/2.1200612.0475, 3 pgs.
Trisnadi, “Hadamard Speckle Contrast Reduction”, Optics Letters, Jan. 1, 2004, vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 11-13.
Trisnadi, “Speckle contrast reduction in laser projection displays”, Proc. SPIE 4657, 2002, 7 pgs.
Tzeng et al., “Axially symmetric polarization converters based on photoaligned liquid crystal films”, Optics Express, Mar. 17, 2008, vol. 16, No. 6, pp. 3768-3775.
Upatnieks et al., “Color Holograms for white light reconstruction”, Applied Physics Letters, Jun. 1, 1996, vol. 8, No. 11, pp. 286-287.
Urey, “Diffractive exit pupil expander for display applications”, Applied Optics, vol. 40, Issue 32, pp. 5840-5851 (2001).
Ushenko, “The Vector Structure of Laser Biospeckle Fields and Polarization Diagnostics of Collagen Skin Structures”, Laser Physics, 2000, vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 1143-1149.
Valoriani, “Mixed Reality: Dalle demo a un prodotto”, Disruptive Technologies Conference, Sep. 23, 2016, 67 pgs.
Van Gerwen et al., “Nanoscaled interdigitated electrode arrays for biochemical sensors”, Sensors and Actuators, Mar. 3, 1998, vol. B 49, pp. 73-80.
Vecchi, “Studi ESR DI Sistemi Complessi Basati Su Cristalli Liquidi”, Thesis, University of Bologna, Department of Physical and Inorganic Chemistry, 2004-2006, 110 pgs.
Veltri et al., “Model for the photoinduced formation of diffraction gratings in Tiquid-crystalline composite materials”, Applied Physics Letters, May 3, 2004, vol. 84, No. 18, pp. 3492-3494.
VITA, “Switchable Bragg Gratings”, Thesis, Universita degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Nov. 2005, 103 pgs.
Vuzix, “M3000 Smart Glasses, Advanced Waveguide Optics”, brochure, Jan. 1, 2017, 2 pgs.
Wang et al., “Liquid-crystal blazed-grating beam deflector”, Applied Optics, Dec. 10, 2000, vol. 39, No. 35, pp. 6545-6555.
Wang et al., “Optical Design of Waveguide Holographic Binocular Display for Machine Vision”, Applied Mechanics and Materials, Sep. 27, 2013, vols. 427-429, pp. 763-769.
Wang et al., “Speckle reduction in laser projection systems by diffractive optical elements”, Applied Optics, Apr. 1, 1998, vol. 37, No. 10, pp. 1770-1775.
Weber et al., “Giant Birefringent Optics in Multilayer Polymer Mirrors”, Science, Mar. 31, 2000, vol. 287, pp. 2451-2456.
Wei An, “Industrial Applications of Speckle Techniques”, Doctoral Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Production Engineering, Chair of Industrie Metrology & Optics, Stockholm, Sweden 2002, 76 pgs.
Welde et al., “Investigation of methods for speckle contrast reduction”, Master of Science in Electronics, Jul. 2010, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, 127 pgs.
White, “Influence of thiol-ene polymer evolution on the formation and performance of holographic polymer dispersed liquid crystals”, The 232nd ACS National Meeting, San Francisco, CA, Sep. 10-14, 2006, 1 pg.
Wight et al., “Nanoporous Films with Low Refractive Index for Large-Surface Broad-Band Anti-Reflection Coatings”, Macromol. Mater. Eng., 2010, 295, DOI: 10.1002/mame.201000045, 9 pgs.
Wilderbeek et al., “Photoinitiated Bulk Polymerization of Liquid Crystalline Thiolene Monomers”, Macromolecules, 2002, vol. 35, pp. 8962-8969.
Wilderbeek et al., “Photo-Initiated Polymerization of Liquid Crystalline Thiol-Ene Monomers in Isotropic and Anisotropic Solvents”, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2002, vol. 106, No. 50, pp. 12874-12883.
Wisely, “Head up and head mounted display performance improvements through advanced techniques in the manipulation of light”, Proc. of SPIE, 2009, 10 pages, vol. 7327.
Wofford et al., “Liquid crystal bragg gratings: dynamic optical elements for spatial light modulators”, Hardened Materials Branch, Survivability and Sensor Materials Division, AFRL-ML-WP-TP-2007-551, Air Force Research Laboratory, Jan. 2007, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH, 17 pgs.
Yang et al., “Robust and Accurate Surface Measurement Using Structured Light”, IEEE, Apr. 30, 2008, vol. 57, Issue 6, pp. 1275-1280, DOI:10.1109/TIM.2007.915103.
Yaqoob et al., “High-speed two-dimensional laser scanner based on Bragg grating stored in photothermorefractive glass”, Applied Optics, Sep. 10, 2003, vol. 42, No. 26, pp. 5251-5262.
Yaroshchuk et al., “Stabilization of liquid crystal photoaligning layers by Yeactive mesogens”, Applied Physics Letters, Jul. 14, 2009, vol. 95, pp. 021902-1-021902-3.
Ye, “Three-dimensional Gradient Index Optics Fabricated in Diffusive Photopolymers”, Thesis, Department of Electrical, Computer and Energy Engineering, University of Colorado, 2012, 224 pgs.
Yemtsova et al., “Determination of liquid crystal orientation in holographic polymer dispersed liquid crystals by linear and nonlinear optics”, Journal of Applied Physics, Oct. 13, 2008, vol. 104, pp. 073115-1-073115-4.
Yeralan et al., “Switchable Bragg grating devices for telecommunications applications”, Opt. Eng., Aug. 2012, vol. 41, No. 8, pp. 1774-1779.
Yoshida et al., “Nanoparticle-Dispersed Liquid Crystals Fabricated by Sputter Doping”, Adv. Mater., 2010, vol. 22, pp. 622-626.
Zhang et al., “Dynamic Holographic Gratings Recorded by Photopolymerization of Liquid Crystalline Monomers”, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, vol. 116, pp. 7055-7063.
Zhang et al., “Switchable Liquid Crystalline Photopolymer Media for Holography”, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, vol. 114, pp. 1506-1507.
Zhao et al., “Designing Nanostructures by Glancing Angle Deposition”, Proc. of SPIE, Oct. 27, 2003, vol. 5219, pp. 59-73.
Zlȩbacz, “Dynamics of nano and micro objects in complex liquids”, Ph.D. dissertation, Institute of Physical Chemistry of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw 2011, 133 pgs.
Zou et al., “Functionalized nano interdigitated electrodes arrays on polymer with integrated microfluidics for direct bio-affinity sensing using impedimetric measurement”, Sensors and Actuators A, Jan. 16, 2007, vol. 136, pp. 518-526.
Zyga, “Liquid crystals controlled by magnetic fields may lead to new optical applications”, Nanotechnology, Nanophysics, Retrieved from http://phys.org/news/2014-07-liquid-crystals-magnetic-fields-optical.html, Jul. 9, 2014, 3 pgs.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20210278739 A1 Sep 2021 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
61849853 Feb 2013 US
61796632 Nov 2012 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 15943590 Apr 2018 US
Child 17153588 US
Parent 14044676 Oct 2013 US
Child 15943590 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13844456 Mar 2013 US
Child 14044676 US