Treatment methods using a particulate cadaveric allogenic juvenile cartilage particles

Abstract
The present invention is directed to compositions having at least one neocartilage particle, juvenile cartilage particle or a combination thereof and a matrix, and methods and devices that include the compositions.
Description
STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

Not Applicable.


REFERENCE TO A SEQUENCE LISTING

Not Applicable.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Injuries and damage to articular cartilage result in lesions in the cartilage that often lead to disability, pain and reduced or disturbed functionality. Historically there has been limited success in the repair of these injuries and lesions, (i.e., characterized by a repair that re-establishes a structurally and functionally competent articular cartilage tissue of a lasting nature). Many injuries and defects to articular cartilage penetrate the bone and bone-marrow spaces as well (i.e., an osteochandral defect).


Articular cartilage tissue has a tough and elastic character; it covers the ends of bones in joints and enables the bones to move smoothly over one another. Numerous diseases, including osteoarthritis, and traumatic injuries from activities and accidents cause damage to articular cartilage.


Articular cartilage lacks a direct blood supply, is aneural, alymphatic, and contains a single cell type, the chondrocyte. Its lack of vascularization, high matrix-to-cell ratio and lack of a local source of undifferentiated cell reserves results in a limited capacity to regenerate following injury or degenerative loss. Repair of damaged or diseased mature articular cartilage historically has been difficult because of its very limited ability to self-repair. Adult human articular cartilage usually does not self-repair or only partially heals under normal biological conditions.


In the past, repair interventions based on the use of adult human tissue or isolated chondrocyte autografts or allografts have not provided completely satisfactory results, from the standpoint of a restoration of the architecture of the articulating surface.


Grafting of pure articular cartilage alone has shown little or no success, nor has the implantation of isolated cartilage flakes after traumatic dissociation or ablation without a bony support, as cartilage does not adhere to bony surfaces nor is bone able to facilitate cartilage fixation.


In vitro culture of chondrocytes under controlled conditions can give rise to normal articular cartilage tissue growth. Adkisson, U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,235,316 and 6,645,764. However, normal adult chondrocytes generally have lost their potential to reproduce and generate new cartilage in vivo, although they are responsible for maintaining tissue homeostasis. Accordingly, there exists a need for improved compositions and methods for repairing articular cartilage.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

One aspect of the present invention is directed to compositions including a cartilage or a neocartilage construct of juvenile cartilage particles and biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix. Some embodiments may further include an osteo-conductive matrix. The cartilage may be distributed throughout substantially all of the biocompatible chondro-conductive matrix or just a portion of the matrix, the portion may range from 90 to 10%. In some embodiments the surface-to-volume ratio of the cartilage particles is greater than 1. In any embodiment the biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix may be fibrinogen, fibrinogen/thrombin, albumin, in-situ forming poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) hydrogel, fibrin/hyaluronate, fibrin/collagen/hyaluronate, PEG/hyaluronate, PEG/collagen, other plasma and protein-based adhesives and sealants, other natural adhesives and sealants and any combination thereof. In any embodiment the composition may further comprise an osteo-conductive matrix. The osteo-conductive matrix may be fibrinogen, fibrinogen/thrombin, fibrin/tri-calcium phosphate, fibrin/collagen/tri-calcium phosphate, fibrin/hyaluronate/tri-calcium phosphate, in-situ forming PEG hydrogel sealants, PEG/tri-calcium phosphate, PEG/collagen, demineralized bone matrix, and any combination thereof. In any embodiment the composition may include an associated matrix containing collagen, polylactic acid (PLA) and polyglycolic acid (PGA).


In any embodiment the composition may include other cartilage tissues, such as costal cartilage, nasal cartilage, trachea cartilage, sternum cartilage and any other cartilage tissue that contains Collagen II and not Collagen I and III.


Another aspect of the invention may include a composition containing neocartilage or juvenile cartilage particles from a non-autologous source.


Another aspect of the invention is directed toward or includes methods of using the inventive compositions for inducing articular cartilage (i.e., a chondral defect) formation, repairing articular cartilage or repairing articular cartilage together with filling a bone defect in vertebrates (i.e., an osteochondral defect). The methods include disposing the inventive compositions in a site where regeneration, augmentation, the induction of articular cartilage formation, the repairing of articular cartilage or the repairing of articular cartilage and also filling a bone defect, is desired.


Another aspect of the invention includes a device including any of the compositions of the invention and the device may also be used in a method of articular cartilage repair by disposing the device in a defect in need of repair.


Yet another aspect of the invention includes a method of preparing any of the compositions of the invention, scoring a surface of juvenile cartilage or neocartilage; separating at least a portion of the scored cartilage from underlying bone; and adding a preservative to the separated cartilage.


Another aspect of the invention includes a kit for repairing cartilage including any of the compositions of the invention, a pouch having a hollow interior; a sterile container positioned in the hollow interior having a receptacle therein; and one or more particles of juvenile cartilage and/or neocartilage positioned in the receptacle of the container.


These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with regard to the following description, appended claims and accompanying figures where:





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS AND FIGURES


FIG. 1 shows an embodiment of the invention wherein cartilage particles are distributed throughout substantially all of the biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix.



FIG. 2 shows an embodiment of the invention wherein cartilage particles are distributed throughout approximately 75% or less of the biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix.



FIG. 3 shows an embodiment of the invention wherein cartilage particles are distributed throughout substantially all of the biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix and further comprises a particulate osteo-conductive matrix.



FIG. 4 shows juvenile cartilage particles encapsulated within a hyaluronate hydrogel.



FIG. 5 shows the morphologic appearance of human juvenile cartilage particles, pre-cast in a fibrin matrix, after 60 days of laboratory culture.



FIG. 6 shows a repaired medial femoral condyle (right side of photograph) of a Spanish goat, 6 weeks after implantation of human juvenile cartilage particles with a fibrin matrix and live periosteal flap.



FIG. 7 shows a 1 mm thick section through the defect site represented in FIG. 6



FIG. 8 shows viable human juvenile cartilage implanted into a goat femoral condyle 6 weeks after surgery.



FIG. 9 shows the morphologic appearance of human juvenile cartilage particles implanted into a goat femoral condyle 6 weeks after surgery.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The term “juvenile cartilage” refers to a chondrocyte cell, cells, cartilage tissue, or progeny or derivatives thereof, that are committed to become cartilage, or progenitor cells which are capable of undergoing proliferation growth, differentiation and maturation into chondrocytes and formation of cartilaginous tissue. In general, such chondrocytes are most readily found in tissue from individuals who encompass allograft, autograft and xenograft sources. In humans, preferably chondrocytes are from those less than fifteen years of age, and more preferably, less than two years of age. Typically, immature or juvenile chondrocytes express an enhanced ability to synthesize and organize a hyaline cartilage extra-cellular matrix. This activity usually is highest in cells freshly isolated from donor tissue and decays during subsequent manipulation such as passage and expansion.


The term “neocartilage” refers to cartilage characterized by one or more of the following attributes: containing membrane phospholipids enriched in Mead acid, containing membrane phospholipids depleted in linoleic or arachidonic acid, being substantially free of endothelial, bone and/or synovial cells, having a sulfated glycosaminoglycan S-GAG content of at least 400 mg/mg, positive for type II collagen expression, being substantially free of type I, III and X collagen, containing a matrix substantially free of biglycan, having multiple layers of cells randomly arranged, rather than separated into distinct zones of chondrocyte maturation, being enriched in high molecular weight aggrecan, being produced in vitro and essentially free of non-cartilage material, or being characterized by having multiple layers of cells surrounded by a substantially continuous insoluble glycosaminoglycan and collagen-enriched hyaline extracellular matrix.


The term “biocompatible” refers to materials which, when incorporated into the invention, have acceptable toxicity, acceptable foreign body reactions in the living body, and acceptable affinity with living tissues.


The term “chondro-inductive” refers to the ability of a material to induce the proliferation, growth differentiation and/or other maturation of chondrocytes or chondroprogenitor cells and/or proliferation, growth differentiation and/or maturation of chondrocytes or chondroprogenitor cells or production of articular cartilage from neocartilage progenitor cells, chondrocytes or cartilage. A chondro-inductive material may act directly as a growth factor which interacts with precursor cells to induce chondrocyte proliferation, growth differentiation and/or maturation, or the material may act indirectly by inducing the production of other chondro-inductive factors, such as growth factors. This induction may optionally include without limitation signaling, modulating, and transforming molecules.


The term “chondro-conductive” refers to materials which provide an environment for proliferation, differentiation, growth, ingrowth and/or orientation of cartilage tissue, chondrocyte cells or chondroprogenitor cells from surrounding tissues.


The term “chondro-inductive/conductive” refers to the characteristic of being both chondro-inductive and chondro-conductive.


The term “matrix” refers to substance(s) which adhered to or partially embedded within which something is contained.


The term “osteo-conductive” refers to materials which provide an environment for proliferation, differentiation, growth, ingrowth and/or orientation of osteogenic cells.


The term “flap” refers to an autologous or allogenic membrane of live cells, natural or synthetic material that can be vital or devitalized. The flap contains the matrix with cartilage particles that can be attached to natural cartilage or underlying bone in vivo by sutures or sutureless attachment such as chemical tissue welding or gluing, or by physical attachment devices such as tacks or staples.


The compositions and methods as described herein comprise useful repair of damaged or diseased articular cartilage. The compositions and methods include a cartilage matrix or particles and a biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix.


In another aspect of the invention a device as described herein may be disposed into a site of cartilage repair, regeneration or augmentation.


In another aspect of the invention, the compositions further comprise a particulate osteo-conductive matrix.


In other embodiments the cartilage matrix comprises a cartilage growth-enhancing material selected from the group consisting of at least one juvenile cartilage particle, at least one neocartilage particle, a combination thereof, and any of the above together with an associated matrix.


The compositions may be used according to the methods of the invention, for implanting or transplanting or otherwise disposing a reparative construct into a site in need of articular cartilage repair, regeneration or growth.


In another aspect of the invention a device may be formed from the inventive compositions and the device may be disposed in a site in need of articular cartilage repair.


In some embodiments the compositions further comprise a particulate osteo-conductive matrix.


The biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix of the invention comprises any appropriate compound or combination of compounds that is inductive or conductive for the formation or repair of articular cartilage in the inventive compositions and methods.


The chondro-conductive/inductive matrix may comprise fibrinogen. The fibrinogen may be from any suitable source. For example, one skilled in the art will recognize that fibrinogen may be derived from blood bank products—either heterologous (pooled or single-donor) or autologous cryoprecipitate or fresh frozen plasma. Fibrinogen can also be derived from autologous fresh or platelet-rich plasma, obtained using cell-saver or other techniques. U.S. Pat. No. 5,834,420 also discloses a method for obtaining fibrinogen.


In other embodiments the biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix comprises thrombin. The thrombin may be from any suitable source. One skilled in the art will recognize that thrombin can be isolated by well known means or purchased commercially. See U.S. Pat. No. 4,965,203, and Berliner, J L, Thrombin: Structure and Function (Ed) Plenum Pub Corp; (1992) for exemplary methods of isolation and/or purification.


In any embodiment the biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix may comprise a combination of fibrinogen and thrombin. The chondro-conductive/inductive matrix may contain equal proportions of fibrinogen and thrombin or more of either fibrinogen than thrombin or more thrombin than fibrinogen. When used in combination the two may be in any proportion, ranging from one part of either compared to the amount of the other up to equal proportions of each of the two.


Regardless of whether the fibrinogen or the thrombin are mixed with the neocartilage, juvenile cartilage or are separate components of the biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix, when practicing certain embodiments of the invention the fibrinogen and thrombin components preferably are kept separate from each other prior to the time of use. The fibrinogen and the thrombin are then brought into contact with each other at the time of use. A common type of applicator that may be used for this purpose consists of a double syringe, joined by a Y-connector where the components mix as they emerge. This type of applicator, used with a blunt cannula, is useful for combining the thrombin and the fibrinogen and also useful in the methods of the invention for disposing or transplanting the inventive compositions to a site wherein articular cartilage repair is desired. In cases where the articular cartilage repair site is open for repair, the fibrinogen and/or thrombin can also be used with a spray attachment to cover surfaces; or the fibrinogen and/or thrombin may be applied to an absorbable carrier or dressing, such as a cellulose sponge, collagen fleece, vital or devitalized periosteum or any other suitable means.


In various embodiments the chondro-conductive/inductive matrix may comprise one or more of fibrinogen, thrombin, fibrinogen/thrombin (Tisseel or Crosseal), albumin, in-situ forming poly (ethylene glycol) (PEG) hydrogel, fibrin, hyaluronate, fibrin/hyaluronate, collagen hyaluronate, fibrin/collagen/hyaluronate, PEG/hyaluronate, PEG/collagen, PEG base sealants (CoSeal), or other plasma and protein-based adhesives and/or sealants, other natural adhesives and/or sealants and combinations thereof, that are biocompatible with regard to the articular cartilage repair or replacement and are inductive or conductive for the cartilage matrix or cartilage growth-enhancing material in the repair or replacement of articular cartilage.


The biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix, may in some embodiments optionally function to facilitate anchoring and/or fixation of the composition in the methods of the invention to repair the desired articular cartilage.


The invented compositions may also include materials which are not yet known, but which provide characteristics relating to these components which are similar to the materials described herein.


The cartilage tissue in certain embodiment of the inventive composition also may comprise neocartilage or juvenile cartilage or a combination of neocartilage or juvenile cartilage. The neocartilage and juvenile cartilage may be in any proportion to each other, ranging from one cell or part of either compared to the other up to equal proportions of each of the two. For example, the cartilage matrix or cartilage growth-enhancing material may contain equal proportions of neocartilage and juvenile cartilage or more of either neocartilage than juvenile cartilage or more juvenile cartilage than neocartilage. In some embodiments the compositions of the invention further comprise a particulate osteo-conductive matrix. The neocartilage or juvenile cartilage is in the form of particles in the cartilage matrix or cartilage growth-enhancing material. The particles increase the surface to volume ratio in the cartilage matrix or cartilage growth-enhancing material, which allows for improved integration and metabolite and growth factor exchange, which advantageously results in enhanced viability and shelf life for the compositions. The neocartilage and juvenile cartilage particles may vary in size ranges from 1 to 27 mm 3. Thus, the neocartilage and juvenile cartilage particles placed in cartilage matrix or cartilage growth-enhancing material also may vary in size from single cells with associated matrix to 100 mm 3 in size depending on application or defect type. For a somewhat typical defect of 2 cm, at least 1×10 6 to 2×10 6 cells would be disposed, preferably 2×10 6 to 4×10 6, and most preferably 10×10 6 to 20×10 6. The amount of cells used may vary depending on the specific circumstances of a defect in need of repair and the goals of the patient. For example, one skilled in the art would recognize that on average, adult tissue has about a 5 to 10% cell mass per gram of tissue. This equates to about a 7% fill. However, some cell death will likely occur during maturation so a higher initial cell count is typically preferable.


In terms of providing economic ratios of tissue to percentage fill of defects, to maximize tissue use, approximately 300 mg of tissue would provide for about a 50% defect fill, although less, approximately 200 mg, for a 30% defect fill, and most preferably, for a 10% defect fill, 60 mg would be utilized.


The matrix portion of the cartilage matrix or cartilage growth-enhancing material may comprise thrombin, fibrinogen, media or fibrinogen in combination with media or thrombin in combination with media. Any suitable media may be used for the media component. Examples of suitable media include, but are not limited to a conditioned growth medium adapted for use in growing cartilage cell cultures which contains heparin-binding growth factors, at least one of which is a cartilage-derived morphogenetic protein (Chang et al., J. Biol Chem 269: 28227-28234), other pre-conditioned medias, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM), Minimum Essential Medium and RPMI (Roswell Park Memorial Institute) medium. The culture medium may also comprise ascorbate, and/or exogenous autocrine growth factors.


The juvenile cartilage in the invention may be from any suitable source. The juvenile cartilage or chondrocytes used in the composition may be harvested from donor tissue and prepared by dividing or mincing the donor cartilage into small pieces or particles. The juvenile cartilage particles may comprise juvenile cells or tissue, which may be intact, minced or disrupted, such as by homogenizing the tissue. Examples of sources of donor cartilage include autologous, allogenic or xenogenic sources. In the case of autologous grafts, cartilage is harvested from cartilaginous tissue of the patient's own body. Typical sources for autologous donor cartilage include the articular joint surfaces, intercostals cartilage, and cartilage from the ear or nasal septum. In the case of allografts, the cartilage may be taken from any appropriate non-identical donor, for example from a cadaveric source, other individuals or a transgenic source or similar appropriate source.


In any embodiment of the invention the cartilage matrix or cartilage growth-enhancing material may comprise juvenile cartilage (without neocartilage) in any suitable tissue culture media. The juvenile cartilage may also comprise juvenile cartilage tissue in a matrix of thrombin or juvenile cartilage in a matrix of fibrinogen.


In any embodiment that includes neocartilage, the cartilage matrix or cartilage growth-enhancing material may comprise neocartilage cells in any suitable tissue culture media. The neocartilage matrix or cartilage growth-enhancing material may also comprise neocartilage in a thrombin matrix or neocartilage in a fibrinogen matrix.


In embodiments having neocartilage, the neocartilage may be from any suitable source. The neocartilage particles may comprise neocartilage cells or tissue, which may be intact, minced or disrupted, such as by homogenizing the tissue. The neocartilage may be either autologous or allogenic. Examples of suitable sources include commercially available sources, such as Carticel® (Genzyme Biosurgery, Cambridge, Mass.), embryonic sources, tissue culture sources or any other suitable source. For example a cell culture may be produced to grow neocartilage by isolating immature chondrocytes, e.g., fetal, neonatal, and pre-adolescent chondrocytes from donor articular cartilage. The neocartilage of the inventive cartilage matrix or cartilage growth-enhancing material may be obtained by culturing chondrocytes under suitable culture conditions known in the art, such as growing the cell culture at 37 degrees C. in a humidified atmosphere with the addition of 2-10% carbon dioxide, preferably 5%. Chondrocytes may be isolated by methods known in the art such as by sequential enzyme digestion techniques. The isolated chondrocytes may then be seeded directly on a tissue culture vessel in any suitable media. Also see, for examples of other sources, U.S. Pat. No. 5,326,357 which describes methods to produce a continuous cartilaginous tissue and U.S. Pat. No. 6,235,316 which discloses neocartilage compositions and uses, which are incorporated by reference, herein in their entirety.


The juvenile or neo cartilage tissue for the cartilage matrix or cartilage growth-enhancing material can be mammalian or avian replacement tissue, most preferably from the same species as the recipient, for example human donor tissue for human replacement and equine tissue for equine use. Furthermore, mammalian replacement tissue can be produced using chondrocytes from transgenic animals which may have been genetically engineered to prevent immune-mediated xenograft rejection.


In embodiments where the matrix portion of the cartilage matrix or cartilage growth-enhancing material comprises tissue culture media, without fibrinogen or thrombin, then the biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix preferably comprises fibrinogen and thrombin.


In embodiments where the matrix portion of the cartilage matrix or cartilage growth-enhancing material comprises media and fibrinogen, then the biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix preferably comprises thrombin.


In embodiments where the matrix portion of the cartilage matrix or cartilage growth-enhancing material comprises media and thrombin, then the biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix preferably comprises fibrinogen.


In different embodiments various combinations of the cartilage matrix or cartilage growth-enhancing material and the biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix are possible. By way of non-limiting example, an embodied composition may comprise juvenile cartilage and thrombin in the cartilage matrix with the biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix comprising media and fibrinogen.


In another embodiment the cartilage matrix or cartilage growth-enhancing material may comprise neocartilage and thrombin with the biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix comprising media and fibrinogen.


In another embodiment the cartilage matrix or cartilage growth-enhancing material may comprise a combination of juvenile and neocartilage in thrombin with the biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix comprising media and fibrinogen.


In any embodiment the compositions may further comprise an osteo-conductive matrix. The osteo-conductive matrix comprises bone particles. The bone particles may be from any suitable source. The osteo-conductive matrix may include but not be limited to fibrinogen/thrombin (Tisseel, Crosseal), fibrin/tri-calcium phosphate, fibrin/collagen/tri-calcium phosphate, fibrin/hyaluronate/tri-calcium phosphate PEG base sealants (CoSeal), PEG/tri-calcium phosphate, PEG/collagen (FibroGen) and any of the above components mixed with demineralized bone matrix. The osteo-conductive matrix may be purchased from commercial sources, such as the demineralized bone matrix compositions Grafton® (Osteotech, Eatontown, N.J.). Examples of other sources suitable for the osteo-conductive matrix include those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,356,629, 6,437,018 and 6,327,257. Suitable compositions may comprise demineralized bone, demineralized bone matrix, nondecalcified bone, cancellous bone or combinations of the same and a gel material. The osteo-conductive matrix may also comprise a porous solid, semisolid, paste or gel material including materials such as gelatin, hyaluronic acid, collagen, amylopectin, demineralized bone matrix, and/or calcium carbonate fibrinogen/thrombin, fibrin/tri-calcium phosphate, fibrin/collagen/tri-calcium phosphate, fibrin/hyaluronate/tri-calcium phosphate, in-situ forming PEG hydrogel sealants in-situ forming PEG hydrogel sealants, PEG/tri-calcium phosphate, PEG/collagen, demineralized bone matrix, and any combination thereof.


Osteoconductive materials are generally porous materials and are able to provide latticework structures such as the structure of cancellous bone or similar to cancellous bone. Such materials may generally facilitate blood-vessel incursion and new bone formation into a defined passive trellis-like support structure, as well as potentially supporting the attachment of new osteoblasts and osteoprogenitor cells. Osteoconductive materials may provide an interconnected structure through which new cells can migrate and new vessels can form.


Examples of materials suitable for the osteoconductive matrix include those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,356,629 which discloses a composition of polymethylacrylate biocompatible particles dispersed in a matrix of cellulose ether, collagen or hyaluronic acid and U.S. Pat. No. 6,437,018 which includes a composition of demineralized bone matrix (DBM) in an aqueous carrier that is sodium hyaluronate in a phosphate buffered aqueous solution. U.S. Pat. No. 6,327,257 discloses compositions with demineralized bone, nondecalcified bone, cancellous bone and a gel material. There are also compositions that are available commercially, including demineralized bone matrix compositions such as Grafton® (Osteotech, Eatontown, N.J.). These compositions typically comprise a porous solid, semisolid, paste or gel material including materials such as gelatin, hyaluronic acid, collagen, amylopectin, demineralized bone matrix, and/or calcium carbonate, to create an osteoconductive environment.


In some embodiments the composition optionally further comprises other components or compounds to address the needs of a particular articular cartilage injury or circumstance or a specific patient's individual needs. By way of non-limiting example the biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix may in some instances comprise albumin, in-situ forming PEG hydrogel, fibrin/hyaluronate, fibrin/collagen/hyaluronate, PEG/hyaluronate, PEG/collagen, other plasma and protein-based adhesives and sealants, other natural adhesives and sealants and any combination of these.


In any embodiment the cartilage matrix may be distributed throughout substantially all of the biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix, as shown in FIG. 1. Alternatively the cartilage matrix may be distributed throughout a portion of the biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix, as shown in FIG. 2. The cartilage matrix may be distributed throughout 90% or less of the biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix. The cartilage matrix may also be distributed throughout 80% or less of the biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix. The cartilage matrix may also be distributed throughout 70% or less of the biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix. The cartilage matrix may also be distributed throughout 60% or less of the biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix. The cartilage matrix may also be distributed throughout 50% or less of the biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix. The cartilage matrix may also be distributed throughout 40% or less of the biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix. The cartilage matrix may also be distributed throughout 30% or less of the biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix. The cartilage matrix may also be distributed throughout 20% or less of the biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix. The cartilage matrix may also be distributed throughout 10% or less of the biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix.


Similarly, in embodiments where the compositions and methods further comprise an osteo-conductive matrix, the osteo-conductive matrix may be distributed throughout substantially all of the composition. Alternatively the osteo-conductive matrix may be distributed throughout a portion of the composition. It may be desirable in some embodiments to have the osteo-conductive matrix disposed to contact bone in a defect that has involvement of both bone and articular cartilage, as shown in FIG. 3. The osteo-conductive matrix may be distributed throughout 90% or less of the composition. The osteo-conductive matrix may also be distributed throughout 80% or less of the composition. The osteo-conductive matrix may also be distributed throughout 70% or less of the composition. The osteo-conductive matrix may also be distributed throughout 60% or less of the composition. The osteo-conductive matrix may also be distributed throughout 50% or less of the composition. The osteo-conductive matrix may also be distributed throughout 40% or less of the composition. The osteo-conductive matrix may also be distributed throughout 30% or less of the composition. The osteo-conductive matrix may also be distributed throughout 20% or less of the composition. The osteo-conductive matrix may also be distributed throughout 10% or less of the composition.


In one embodiment a method of use comprises disposing a cartilage matrix of neocartilage or juvenile cartilage, or a combination thereof and a biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix in any location where repair or replacement of articular cartilage is desired.


In one embodiment a method of use comprises disposing a cartilage matrix of neocartilage or juvenile cartilage, or a combination thereof and a biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix and an osteo conductive matrix in any location where repair or replacement of articular cartilage is desired. Compositions and methods of the invention comprising the osteo conductive matrix are useful for repair of replacement of articular cartilage at a site that also includes a bone defect.


In other embodiments a method of use comprises disposing any embodiment of the compositions of the invention into a defect and overlaying the composition with a retainer. The retainer may be of any suitable size and material that functions to maintain the particle in the site where the particle(s) is disposed. The retainer may be for example a flap, plug, disc, sheet or patch. In one embodiment the retainer comprises a flap. The flap is made up of either live cells, such as periosteum cells, other natural tissue membrane or synthetic membrane. The periosteal flap may be vital or devitalized and may be an autologous or an allograft.


Any of the embodiments of the inventive compositions may be used in any of the embodiments of the methods of the invention. The compositions may be extruded or otherwise disposed into the targeted site or configured into a device for transplanting into a desired site (FIG. 1). Typically a multi-unit dispensing device such as a double or triple syringe, joined by a Y-connector, or similar converging connector from the dispensing unit may be used where the components mix as they emerge from a blunt cannula or catheter or other similar device. Any embodiment of the compositions may be delivered to the defect site through an arthroscopic portal from a mixing mechanism that automatically meters the components in the correct ratio, into the desired site for articular cartilage repair or replacement.


Delivery of the compositions may be in a variety of forms and combinations; by way of non-limiting example the cartilage matrix may be in media and mixed with biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix comprising fibrinogen and thrombin just prior to use as a 3 part mixture. Alternatively, the cartilage matrix may include thrombin and be combined with a fibrinogen biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix at the time of use, as a 2 part mixture. In another alternative, the cartilage matrix may include fibrinogen and be combined with a biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix comprising thrombin at the time of use, as a 2 part mixture.) By changing the particles included in the matrix, for example the juvenile cartilage pieces, in vitro-grown neocartilage and the components that comprise the chondro-inductive matrix and/or the osteo-conductive matrix, the nature of the repair graft can be varied from partial thickness through full thickness into osteochondral defects, as desired and/or in response the to the specific site where repair or replacement is desired. Another alternative for delivery is that various combinations of the cartilage matrix and the biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix may be preformed and implanted as a single construct. By way of non-limiting example, an embodied composition may comprise juvenile cartilage pre-cast in a biocompatible chondro-conductive/inductive matrix comprising fibrin.


The juvenile neocartilage replacement tissue or pre-cast construct made up of the juvenile cartilage, a chondro conductive/inductive matrix and/or an osteoconductive matrix can also be attached to natural cartilage or underlying bone in vivo by sutures or sutureless attachment such as chemical tissue welding or gluing, or by physical attachment devices such as tacks or staples. The neocartilage may be grown to various size specifications to facilitate implantation.


Any of the compositions may be configured to form a device of the present invention and the device may then be implanted, inserted or otherwise suitably disposed in a site where repair or replacement of articular cartilage is desired. For example any embodiment of the compositions may be extruded or delivered into a form or mold to produce a specific shape or configuration of device and the produced device may then be appropriately implanted or otherwise disposed in the site where replacement or repair of articular cartilage is desired.


In all cases, the compositions and devices of the invention will have a period of plasticity during which they can be implanted and/or molded to the defect being repaired. These methods of delivery advantageously make implantation of the repair articular cartilage possible in a single arthroscopic procedure, if desired. Once implanted, the cartilage fragments coalesce and replace the matrix with hyaline cartilage tissue. This method can also be extended to neocartilage grown in vitro with the advantage that some expansion of chondrocytes/neocartilage can be done, generating more repair tissue from a single donation of juvenile cartilage. Juvenile chondrocytes and/or juvenile cartilage/neocartilage can be combined with the biocompatible matrix using a uniform distribution as illustrated in FIG. 1 or a non-uniform distribution to increase the cartilage/chondrocyte density as illustrated in FIG. 2 and FIG. 8, where the cartilage is at a higher density near the bottom of the defect.


Similarly, different components can be mixed with the biocompatible matrix to fill chondral and osteochondral defects. FIG. 3 illustrates a potential usage wherein the bone defect is filled with an osteo-conductive matrix up to the tide mark, above which the chondral defect is filled with juvenile chondrocytes and/or juvenile cartilage/neocartilage matrix combined with the biocompatible matrix.


The cartilage may be harvested from cartilage donors such as juvenile animals. For example, the donors may be prepubescent humans aged between about 20 weeks and about 13 years. The cartilage may be harvested from a variety of cartilage sites, including facing surfaces of bones positioned at articulating joints. Among particularly desirable harvest sites are femoral condyles, tibial plateaus and interior surfaces of patella. To harvest the cartilage, the harvest sites are exposed. The surface of a harvest site is scored with a blade such as a #10 scalpel having a ceramic coated edge (e.g., an IonFusion scalpel blade available from IonFusion Surgical, a division of Molecular Metallurgy, Inc. of El Cajon, Calif.) Although the site may be scored in other patterns without departing from the scope of the present invention, in one embodiment the site is scored in a square grid pattern having sides measuring about one millimeter. Further, although the site may be scored to other depths without departing from the scope of the present invention, in one embodiment the site is scored to a depth of between about one millimeter and about three millimeters or more. Once the site is scored, at least a portion of the scored cartilage is separated from underlying bone, such as by shaving the scored surface with the aforementioned scalpel. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, separating the cartilage in this fashion results in small generally cube-shaped particles of cartilage having sides of about one millimeter. Tissue other than cartilage, such as vascularized bone and tendons, generally should be avoided when separating the cartilage from the bone.


The separated particles are collected in a container such as a conical tube. The particles may be stored in or rinsed with a saline solution such as a 0.9% saline solution. After rinsing or storage, the saline solution may be removed from the particles by aspiration and another preservative may be added to the particles. For example, a storage solution comprising hydroxyethyl starch (50 g/L)m lactobionic acid (35.8 g/L), adenosine (1.34 gL), NaOH (5M) (5 mL/L), KH2PO4 (3.4 g/L), MgSO4 (0.6 g/L), glutathione (0.92 g/L), raffinose (17.8 g/L), and KOH (5M) (pH to 7.4) may be added to the particles.


A kit for repairing cartilage may be formed using the particles. Generally, the kit includes an outer bag or pouch having a hollow interior, a sterile container positioned in the hollow interior, and cartilage particles positioned in a receptacle of the container. Although the outer pouch may have other configurations without departing from the scope of the present invention, in one embodiment the pouch is formed from two sheets, each of which has a central portion surrounded by a margin. The sheets are separably joined to one another at their margins. One such pouch is available from Amcor Flexibles Healthcare of Ann Arbor, Mich., and is identified as an RLP-041 HS pouch made from a 48 ga PET/10 lb LDPE/2 mil peelable film (LFM-101). The pouch is about 4×6 inches and has 15 degree chevron configuration with thumb notch. In one embodiment, the container includes a tray having a teardrop-shaped central cup or receptacle and a lip or flange surrounding the receptacle. One such container is available from Prent Corporation of Janesville, Wis., and is formed from a laminate comprising a Glidex sheet sandwiched between PETG sheets having an overall thickness of about 0.020 inch. A removable cover is attached to the lip of the tray for sealing the receptacle to retain the particles in the receptacle. One such cover is available from Tolas Health Care Packaging of Feasterville, Pa., and is known as a TPC-0777A peelable lamination for sterile device packaging. Although the cover may have other dimensions without departing from the scope of the present invention, in one embodiment the cover has a thickness of about 3.95 mils and is about 1.57×3.15 inches.


In one embodiment, excess liquid is removed from the particles by aspiration and a 50 mg scoop is used to measure a desired quantity of particles into a sterile tray, a desired measure of preservative solution (e.g., 2.5 mL) is added to the tray and the cover is sealed against the rim of the tray to close the container. The container is loaded into a pouch and the pouch is sealed for storage and transport. Once ready for use, the pouch is pealed open and the container is deposited in a sterile environment. The non-sterile pouch is disposed and the container is opened by peeling back the cover to expose the particles of cartilage.


EXAMPLES

Without further elaboration, it is believed that one skilled in the art can, using the preceding description, utilize the present invention to its fullest extent. The following specific examples are offered by way of illustration only and not by way of limiting the remaining disclosure.


Example 1

Juvenile Human Articular Cartilage (JHAC) in a Hyaluronate Matrix


In certain embodiments of the composition as described herein particulate JHAC was embedded within a hyaluronate hydrogel and evaluated for their viscosity and their ability to adhere within a defect. Hyaluronate forms a viscous gel that can hold the cartilage particles within a defect during implantation. Concentrations of hyaluronate ranging from 5 mg/ml to 100 mg/ml were tested in this example. In the mixture illustrated by FIG. 4, JHAC was embedded in a gel containing 50 mg of hyaluronate dissolved in 1 ml of phosphate buffered saline. Although suitable for a matrix, hyaluronate alone lacked cross-linking within the gel. Therefore, in one preferred composition, a component such as fibrin is included to retard or prevent dissolution of the chondro-conductive matrix.


Example 2

In Vitro JHAC Re-Integration


When juvenile tissue is maintained in the laboratory embedded within a fibrin matrix, the tissue has the ability to re-integrate. In this experiment, JHAC was minced and cast in human fibrinogen within a cylindrical mold and then cultured for 60 days in a standard cell culture using a proprietary serum-free medium, developed at Isto Technologies, Inc. The tissue composite was then fixed and histological slides were prepared and stained with Safranin-O which stains red in the presence of sulfated glycosaminoglycan (S-GAG). Safranin-O staining is unique to the hyaline cartilage that lines the articular surfaces of the joints. As shown in FIG. 5, the two pieces of tissue have begun to integrate with each other in the fibrin-filled space between the original tissue pieces. The dark red stain (original proof) indicates that the tissue has remained viable and is maintaining a normal hyaline-cartilage phenotype with regard to S-GAG composition.


Example 3

Minced JHAC Implantation


Minced JHAC was implanted into Spanish goats using the methods of the invention, further demonstrating the usefulness of the invention. A six (6) mm circular defect was created in the weight-bearing region of the right, medial femoral condyle. Minced juvenile human articular cartilage was placed into the defect which was subsequently filled with human fibrin and covered with a live periosteal flap sutured into the surrounding cartilage. The limb was then set in a modified Thomas splint for a period of six weeks during which the animal was able to ambulate without exposing the repaired site to full weight-bearing forces.



FIG. 6 shows the repaired medial femoral condyle (right side of photograph) six weeks after implantation. The surface of the repair site appears relatively smooth and the tissue has been retained within the original defect. A 1 mm thick section through the defect site is shown in FIG. 7. The section shows that the defect is filled with a white, translucent material including the original tissue pieces. Fluorescent probes stain the nuclear DNA red and identify dead cells while green probes stain living cells within the cartilage matrix. The juvenile cartilage is embedded into a chondro-conductive matrix composed of fibrin that is less cellular. Microscopic examination of the section using a viability-indicating stain indicates that both the original tissue and cells that have migrated into the fibrin matrix stain green (original proof) and are therefore viable (FIG. 8).


Safranin-O stained histological sections indicate that the defect site is populated not only by the original implanted tissue, but also by cells that have migrated into the defect site as illustrated by FIG. 9. The original tissue retains the red stain (original proof) indicating S-GAG in the extracellular matrix while the cell-populated matrix surrounding the transplanted tissue has not yet been replaced with a hyaline-like extracellular matrix. The juvenile cartilage is embedded into a chondro-conductive matrix composed of fibrin.


These data demonstrate the successful repair of a chondral defect with a viable tissue construct containing juvenile hyaline cartilage according to one embodiment of the present invention.


Other Embodiments


It is to be understood that the present invention has been described in detail by way of illustration and example in order to acquaint others skilled in the art with the invention, its principles, and its practical application. Particular formulations and processes of the present invention are not limited to the descriptions of the specific embodiments presented, but rather the descriptions and examples should be viewed in terms of the claims that follow and their equivalents. While some of the examples and descriptions above include some conclusions about the way the invention may function, the inventors do not intend to be bound by those conclusions and functions, but puts them forth only as possible explanations.


It is to be further understood that the specific embodiments of the present invention as set forth are not intended as being exhaustive or limiting of the invention, and that many alternatives, modifications, and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art in light of the foregoing examples and detailed description. Accordingly, this invention is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications, and variations that fall within the spirit and scope of the following claims.


REFERENCES CITED

All publications, patents, patent applications and other references cited in this application are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety as if each individual publication, patent, patent application or other reference were specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.

Claims
  • 1. A method of treating a cartilage defect, comprising: implanting cadaveric, allogenic human juvenile cartilage tissue particles including viable chondrocytes into the defect; anddepositing a chondro-conductive matrix into the defect.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the cartilage particles are implanted and the chondro-conductive matrix is deposited simultaneously.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the cartilage particles are implanted and the chondro-conductive matrix is deposited sequentially.
  • 4. The method of claim 2 or 3, wherein the cartilage particles are implanted and the chondro-conductive matrix is deposited through a cannulated device.
  • 5. The method of claim 2 or 3, wherein the cartilage particles are implanted and the chondro-conductive matrix is molded to the defect during a period of plasticity of the chondro-conductive matrix.
  • 6. The method of claim 2, wherein the cartilage particles and the chondro-conductive matrix comprise a single construct.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein a preformed single construct is produced by delivering the cartilage particles and the chondro-conductive matrix to a mold.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the preformed single construct is attached to cartilage or bone adjacent the defect by gluing.
  • 9. The method of claim 4, wherein the cartilage particles and the chondro-conductive matrix are mixed during deposition.
  • 10. The method of claim 3, wherein chondro-conductive matrix is deposited after cartilage particles are implanted into the defect.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, further comprising applying a retainer to the defect.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the retainer is selected from the group consisting of a flap, plug, disc, sheet or patch overlaying the cartilage particles and the chondro-conductive matrix.
  • 13. The method of claim 11, wherein the retainer comprises a glue.
  • 14. The method of claim 11, wherein the retainer is selected from the group consisting of a suture, tack or staple.
  • 15. The method of claim 1, further comprising treating a bone defect adjacent the cartilage defect with an osteo-conductive matrix.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, wherein the osteo-conductive matrix is deposited up to the tide mark adjacent the cartilage defect.
  • 17. The method of claim 15, wherein the osteo-conductive matrix is selected from the group consisting of a porous solid, semisolid, paste or gel.
  • 18. The method of claim 15, wherein the osteo-conductive matrix is selected from the group consisting of bone or a calcium phosphate containing composition.
  • 19. The method of claim 18, wherein the bone is demineralized.
  • 20. The method of claim 1, further comprising removing the cartilage particles from a container including a biocompatible storage solution.
  • 21. The method of claims 20, wherein the storage solution comprises at least one preservative.
  • 22. The method of claim 1, wherein the cartilage particles have a dimension from about one to about three millimeters.
  • 23. The method of any one of claim 1, 2, 3, 11, 15 or 20, wherein the cartilage particles range in size from about 1 to about 27 mm3.
  • 24. The method of claim 1, wherein the cartilage particles comprise at least 1×106 chondrocytes.
  • 25. The method of claim 1, 2, 3, 11, 15 or 20, wherein the cartilage particles are distributed throughout 90% or less of the chondro-conductive matrix.
  • 26. The method of claim 25, wherein the cartilage particles are distributed throughout 60% or less of the chondro-conductive matrix.
  • 27. The method of claim 26, wherein the cartilage particles are distributed throughout 30% or less of the chondro-conductive matrix.
  • 28. The method of claim 1, wherein the cartilage particles are homogeneously distributed within the chondro-conductive matrix.
  • 29. The method of claim 1, wherein the cartilage particles are heterogeneously distributed within the chondro-conductive matrix.
  • 30. The method of claim 29, wherein the cartilage particles are at a higher concentration in the chondro-conductive matrix near the bottom of the defect.
  • 31. The method of claim 1, 2, 3, 11, 15 or 20, wherein the defect is an articular cartilage defect.
  • 32. The method of claim 1, wherein the cartilage particles comprise articular cartilage.
  • 33. The method of claim 32, wherein the cartilage particles comprise cartilage from a femoral condyle, a tibial plateau or an interior surface of a patella.
  • 34. The method of claim 1, wherein the chondro-conductive matrix is selected from the group consisting of plasma-based adhesives or sealants, and protein-based adhesives or sealants, natural adhesives or sealants and any combination thereof.
  • 35. The method of claim 34, wherein the chondro-conductive matrix is fibrin.
  • 36. The method of claim 1, 2, 3, 11, 15 or 20, wherein the cartilage particles are from cadaveric juvenile donors less than fifteen years of age.
  • 37. The method of claim 36, wherein the cartilage particles are from cadaveric juvenile donors less than two years of age.
  • 38. The method of claim 36, wherein the cartilage particles are from cadaveric juvenile donors from about 20 weeks to about 13 years of age.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/861,404 filed Aug. 23, 2010, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/010, 779 filed Dec. 13, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,824,711, which claims priority to Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/528,865 filed on Dec. 11, 2003, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (600)
Number Name Date Kind
1347622 Deininger Jul 1920 A
2533004 Ferry et al. Dec 1950 A
2621145 Sano Dec 1952 A
3400199 Balassa Sep 1968 A
3474146 Balassa Oct 1969 A
3476855 Balassa Nov 1969 A
3772432 Balassal Nov 1973 A
RE28093 Balassa Jul 1974 E
3966908 Balassa Jun 1976 A
4440680 Cioca Apr 1984 A
4453939 Zimmerman et al. Jun 1984 A
4479271 Bolesky et al. Oct 1984 A
4522096 Niven, Jr. Jun 1985 A
4566138 Lewis et al. Jan 1986 A
4587766 Miyatake et al. May 1986 A
4609551 Caplan et al. Sep 1986 A
4627879 Rose et al. Dec 1986 A
4640834 Eibl et al. Feb 1987 A
4641651 Card Feb 1987 A
4642120 Nevo et al. Feb 1987 A
4656137 Balassa Apr 1987 A
4660755 Farling Apr 1987 A
4714457 Alterbaum Dec 1987 A
4773418 Hettich Sep 1988 A
4818633 Dinwoodie et al. Apr 1989 A
4846835 Grande Jul 1989 A
4851354 Winston et al. Jul 1989 A
4863474 Brown et al. Sep 1989 A
4863475 Andersen et al. Sep 1989 A
4904259 Itay Feb 1990 A
4911720 Collier Mar 1990 A
4928603 Rose et al. May 1990 A
4952403 Vallee et al. Aug 1990 A
4963489 Naughton et al. Oct 1990 A
4997444 Farling Mar 1991 A
4997445 Hodorek Mar 1991 A
5002071 Harrell Mar 1991 A
5002582 Guire et al. Mar 1991 A
5013324 Zolman et al. May 1991 A
5018285 Zolman et al. May 1991 A
5030215 Morse et al. Jul 1991 A
5032508 Naughton et al. Jul 1991 A
5041138 Vacanti et al. Aug 1991 A
5053050 Itay Oct 1991 A
5067963 Khouri et al. Nov 1991 A
5067964 Richmond et al. Nov 1991 A
5069881 Clarkin Dec 1991 A
5080674 Jacobs et al. Jan 1992 A
5092887 Gendler Mar 1992 A
5130418 Thompson Jul 1992 A
5139527 Redl et al. Aug 1992 A
5189148 Akiyama et al. Feb 1993 A
5198308 Shetty et al. Mar 1993 A
5206023 Hunziker Apr 1993 A
5217954 Foster et al. Jun 1993 A
5219363 Crowninshield et al. Jun 1993 A
5226914 Caplan et al. Jul 1993 A
5236457 Devanathan Aug 1993 A
5254471 Mori et al. Oct 1993 A
5269785 Bonutti Dec 1993 A
5270300 Hunziker Dec 1993 A
5281422 Badylak et al. Jan 1994 A
5282861 Kaplan Feb 1994 A
5290552 Sierra et al. Mar 1994 A
5290558 O'Leary et al. Mar 1994 A
5312417 Wilk May 1994 A
5323954 Shetty et al. Jun 1994 A
5326357 Kandel Jul 1994 A
5345927 Bonutti Sep 1994 A
5356629 Sander et al. Oct 1994 A
5368858 Hunziker Nov 1994 A
5372821 Badylak et al. Dec 1994 A
5387243 Devanathan Feb 1995 A
5403317 Bonutti Apr 1995 A
5405607 Epstein Apr 1995 A
5410016 Hubbell et al. Apr 1995 A
5443454 Tanabe et al. Aug 1995 A
5443510 Shetty Aug 1995 A
5443512 Parr et al. Aug 1995 A
5445833 Badylak et al. Aug 1995 A
5456723 Steinemann Oct 1995 A
5456828 Tersi et al. Oct 1995 A
5461953 Mccormick Oct 1995 A
5475052 Rhee et al. Dec 1995 A
5482929 Fukunaga et al. Jan 1996 A
5496375 Sisk et al. Mar 1996 A
5504300 Devanathan et al. Apr 1996 A
5510396 Prewett et al. Apr 1996 A
5514536 Taylor May 1996 A
5516532 Atala et al. May 1996 A
5516533 Badylak et al. May 1996 A
5535810 Compton et al. Jul 1996 A
5545222 Bonutti Aug 1996 A
5549704 Sutter Aug 1996 A
5549904 Juergensen et al. Aug 1996 A
5554389 Badylak et al. Sep 1996 A
5556429 Felt Sep 1996 A
5565519 Rhee et al. Oct 1996 A
5571187 Devanathan Nov 1996 A
5577517 Bonutti Nov 1996 A
5578492 Fedun Nov 1996 A
5585007 Antanavich et al. Dec 1996 A
5605887 Pines et al. Feb 1997 A
5612028 Sackier et al. Mar 1997 A
5618925 Dupont et al. Apr 1997 A
5624463 Stone et al. Apr 1997 A
5639280 Warner et al. Jun 1997 A
5643192 Hirsh et al. Jul 1997 A
5650494 Cerletti et al. Jul 1997 A
5654166 Kurth Aug 1997 A
5655546 Halpern Aug 1997 A
5656587 Sporn et al. Aug 1997 A
5662710 Bonutti Sep 1997 A
5669544 Schulze et al. Sep 1997 A
5672284 Devanathan et al. Sep 1997 A
5673840 Schulze et al. Oct 1997 A
5673841 Schulze et al. Oct 1997 A
5680982 Schulze et al. Oct 1997 A
5681353 Li et al. Oct 1997 A
5692668 Schulze et al. Dec 1997 A
5694951 Bonutti Dec 1997 A
5695998 Badylak et al. Dec 1997 A
5709854 Griffith-Cima et al. Jan 1998 A
5713374 Pachence et al. Feb 1998 A
5714371 Ramanathan et al. Feb 1998 A
5723010 Yui et al. Mar 1998 A
5723011 Devanathan et al. Mar 1998 A
5723331 Tubo et al. Mar 1998 A
5734959 Krebs et al. Mar 1998 A
5735875 Bonutti et al. Apr 1998 A
5736132 Juergensen et al. Apr 1998 A
5736396 Bruder et al. Apr 1998 A
5749968 Melanson et al. May 1998 A
5753485 Dwulet May 1998 A
5755791 Whitson et al. May 1998 A
5769899 Schwartz et al. Jun 1998 A
5770194 Edwardson et al. Jun 1998 A
5782835 Hart et al. Jul 1998 A
5782915 Stone Jul 1998 A
5786217 Tubo et al. Jul 1998 A
5788662 Antanavich et al. Aug 1998 A
5795571 Cederholm-Williams et al. Aug 1998 A
5795780 Cederholm-Williams et al. Aug 1998 A
5811094 Caplan et al. Sep 1998 A
5824093 Ray et al. Oct 1998 A
5826776 Schulze et al. Oct 1998 A
5827217 Silver et al. Oct 1998 A
5830741 Dwulet et al. Nov 1998 A
5842477 Naughton et al. Dec 1998 A
5853746 Hunziker Dec 1998 A
5853976 Hesse et al. Dec 1998 A
5864016 Eibl et al. Jan 1999 A
5866415 Villeneuve Feb 1999 A
5866630 Mitra et al. Feb 1999 A
5876208 Mitra et al. Mar 1999 A
5876451 Yui et al. Mar 1999 A
5876452 Athanasiou et al. Mar 1999 A
5879398 Swarts et al. Mar 1999 A
5888219 Bonutti Mar 1999 A
5888491 Mitra et al. Mar 1999 A
5890898 Wada et al. Apr 1999 A
5891455 Sittinger et al. Apr 1999 A
5899936 Goldstein May 1999 A
5902741 Purchio et al. May 1999 A
5919702 Purchio et al. Jul 1999 A
5921987 Stone Jul 1999 A
5922027 Stone Jul 1999 A
5922846 Cerletti et al. Jul 1999 A
5926685 Krebs et al. Jul 1999 A
5928945 Seliktar et al. Jul 1999 A
5935131 Bonutti Aug 1999 A
5944754 Vacanti Aug 1999 A
5944755 Stone Aug 1999 A
5948384 Filler Sep 1999 A
5952215 Dwulet et al. Sep 1999 A
5962405 Seelich Oct 1999 A
5964752 Stone Oct 1999 A
5964805 Stone Oct 1999 A
5968556 Atala et al. Oct 1999 A
5985315 Patat et al. Nov 1999 A
5989269 Vibe-hansen et al. Nov 1999 A
5989888 Dwulet et al. Nov 1999 A
6022361 Epstein et al. Feb 2000 A
6025334 Dupont et al. Feb 2000 A
6045990 Baust et al. Apr 2000 A
6048966 Edwardson et al. Apr 2000 A
6051249 Samuelsen Apr 2000 A
6060053 Atala May 2000 A
6077989 Kandel et al. Jun 2000 A
6080194 Pachence et al. Jun 2000 A
6080579 Hanley, Jr. et al. Jun 2000 A
6083383 Huang et al. Jul 2000 A
6087553 Cohen et al. Jul 2000 A
6107085 Coughlin et al. Aug 2000 A
6110209 Stone Aug 2000 A
6110210 Norton et al. Aug 2000 A
6110212 Gregory Aug 2000 A
6110482 Khouri et al. Aug 2000 A
6120514 Vibe-Hansen et al. Sep 2000 A
6129761 Hubbell Oct 2000 A
6132465 Ray et al. Oct 2000 A
6132472 Bonutti Oct 2000 A
6140123 Demetriou et al. Oct 2000 A
6140452 Felt et al. Oct 2000 A
6143214 Barlow Nov 2000 A
6150163 McPherson et al. Nov 2000 A
6152142 Tseng Nov 2000 A
6162241 Coury et al. Dec 2000 A
6171610 Vacanti et al. Jan 2001 B1
6174313 Bonutti Jan 2001 B1
6179871 Halpern Jan 2001 B1
6183737 Zaleske et al. Feb 2001 B1
6187329 Agrawal et al. Feb 2001 B1
6197575 Griffith et al. Mar 2001 B1
6200330 Benderev et al. Mar 2001 B1
6203526 McBeth et al. Mar 2001 B1
6224893 Langer et al. May 2001 B1
6235316 Adkisson May 2001 B1
6242247 Rieser et al. Jun 2001 B1
6248114 Ysebaert Jun 2001 B1
6264659 Ross et al. Jul 2001 B1
6271320 Keller et al. Aug 2001 B1
6274090 Coelho et al. Aug 2001 B1
6280993 Yamato et al. Aug 2001 B1
6294656 Mittl et al. Sep 2001 B1
6306169 Lee et al. Oct 2001 B1
6306177 Felt et al. Oct 2001 B1
6312668 Mitra et al. Nov 2001 B2
6322563 Cummings et al. Nov 2001 B1
6327257 Khalifa Dec 2001 B1
6336930 Stalcup et al. Jan 2002 B1
6338878 Overton et al. Jan 2002 B1
6358266 Bonutti Mar 2002 B1
6361565 Bonutti Mar 2002 B1
6368298 Beretta et al. Apr 2002 B1
6368784 Murray Apr 2002 B1
6370920 Overton et al. Apr 2002 B1
6378527 Hungerford et al. Apr 2002 B1
6395327 Shetty May 2002 B1
6417320 Otto et al. Jul 2002 B1
6423063 Bonutti Jul 2002 B1
6425704 Voiers et al. Jul 2002 B2
6436143 Ross et al. Aug 2002 B1
6437018 Gertzman et al. Aug 2002 B1
6443988 Felt et al. Sep 2002 B2
6444228 Baugh et al. Sep 2002 B1
6447514 Stalpcup et al. Sep 2002 B1
6464713 Bonutti Oct 2002 B2
6468289 Bonutti Oct 2002 B1
6468527 Austin et al. Oct 2002 B2
6472162 Coelho et al. Oct 2002 B1
6475764 Burtscher et al. Nov 2002 B1
6482235 Lambrecht et al. Nov 2002 B1
6485723 Badylak et al. Nov 2002 B1
6492163 Yoo et al. Dec 2002 B1
6497903 Hennink et al. Dec 2002 B1
6503267 Bonutti et al. Jan 2003 B2
6503277 Bonutti Jan 2003 B2
6504079 Tucker et al. Jan 2003 B2
6511958 Atkinson et al. Jan 2003 B1
6514514 Atkinson et al. Feb 2003 B1
6514522 Domb Feb 2003 B2
6528052 Smith et al. Mar 2003 B1
6533817 Norton et al. Mar 2003 B1
6534084 Vyakarnam et al. Mar 2003 B1
6534591 Rhee et al. Mar 2003 B2
6543455 Bonutti Apr 2003 B2
6544472 Compton et al. Apr 2003 B1
6551355 Lewandrowski et al. Apr 2003 B1
6559119 Burgess et al. May 2003 B1
6575982 Bonutti Jun 2003 B1
6576265 Spievack Jun 2003 B1
6579538 Spievack Jun 2003 B1
6582960 Martin et al. Jun 2003 B1
6592531 Bonutti Jul 2003 B2
6596180 Baugh et al. Jul 2003 B2
6599515 Delmotte Jul 2003 B1
6607534 Bonutti Aug 2003 B2
6610033 Melanson et al. Aug 2003 B1
6620169 Peterson et al. Sep 2003 B1
6626859 Von Segesser Sep 2003 B2
6626945 Simon et al. Sep 2003 B2
6626950 Brown et al. Sep 2003 B2
6630000 Bonutti Oct 2003 B1
6632246 Simon et al. Oct 2003 B1
6632648 Kampinga et al. Oct 2003 B1
6637437 Hungerford et al. Oct 2003 B1
6638309 Bonutti Oct 2003 B2
6645316 Brouwer et al. Nov 2003 B1
6645764 Adkisson Nov 2003 B1
6649168 Arvinte et al. Nov 2003 B2
6652532 Bonutti Nov 2003 B2
6652872 Nevo et al. Nov 2003 B2
6652883 Goupil et al. Nov 2003 B2
6653062 DePablo et al. Nov 2003 B1
6662805 Frondoza et al. Dec 2003 B2
6663616 Roth et al. Dec 2003 B1
6676971 Goupil et al. Jan 2004 B2
6685987 Shetty Feb 2004 B2
6697143 Freeman Feb 2004 B2
6705790 Quintero et al. Mar 2004 B2
6713772 Goodman et al. Mar 2004 B2
6719803 Bonutti Apr 2004 B2
6719901 Dolecek et al. Apr 2004 B2
6730299 Tayot et al. May 2004 B1
6733515 Edwards et al. May 2004 B1
6736853 Bonutti May 2004 B2
6737072 Angele et al. May 2004 B1
6740186 Hawkins et al. May 2004 B2
6743232 Overaker et al. Jun 2004 B2
6773458 Brauker et al. Aug 2004 B1
6773713 Bonassar et al. Aug 2004 B2
6776938 Bonutti Aug 2004 B2
6797006 Hodorek Sep 2004 B2
6800663 Asgarzadeh et al. Oct 2004 B2
6818008 Cates et al. Nov 2004 B1
6830762 Baugh et al. Dec 2004 B2
6833408 Sehl et al. Dec 2004 B2
6835198 Bonutti Dec 2004 B2
6835277 Park Dec 2004 B2
6840960 Bubb Jan 2005 B2
6852330 Bowman et al. Feb 2005 B2
6860904 Bonutti Mar 2005 B2
6884428 Binette et al. Apr 2005 B2
6886568 Frondoza et al. May 2005 B2
6893466 Trieu May 2005 B2
6905517 Bonutti Jun 2005 B2
6919067 Filler et al. Jul 2005 B2
6919172 DePablo et al. Jul 2005 B2
6921633 Baust et al. Jul 2005 B2
6942880 Dolecek Sep 2005 B1
6949252 Mizuno et al. Sep 2005 B2
6965014 Delmotte et al. Nov 2005 B1
6979307 Beretta et al. Dec 2005 B2
6990982 Bonutti Jan 2006 B1
6991652 Burg Jan 2006 B2
7009039 Yayon et al. Mar 2006 B2
7045601 Metzner et al. May 2006 B2
7067123 Gomes et al. Jun 2006 B2
7081125 Edwards et al. Jul 2006 B2
7083964 Kurfurst et al. Aug 2006 B2
7087227 Adkisson Aug 2006 B2
RE39321 MacPhee et al. Oct 2006 E
7134437 Bonutti Nov 2006 B2
7147471 Frey et al. Dec 2006 B2
7217294 Kusanagi et al. May 2007 B2
7235255 Austin et al. Jun 2007 B2
7273756 Adkisson et al. Sep 2007 B2
7276235 Metzner et al. Oct 2007 B2
7276481 Golembo et al. Oct 2007 B2
7299805 Bonutti Nov 2007 B2
7316822 Binette et al. Jan 2008 B2
7375077 Mao May 2008 B2
7468192 Mizuno et al. Dec 2008 B2
7488348 Truncale et al. Feb 2009 B2
7537780 Mizuno et al. May 2009 B2
7720533 Behravesh May 2010 B2
7824711 Kizer et al. Nov 2010 B2
7838040 Malinin Nov 2010 B2
7875296 Binette et al. Jan 2011 B2
7879604 Seyedin et al. Feb 2011 B2
RE42208 Truncale et al. Mar 2011 E
7897384 Binette et al. Mar 2011 B2
7901457 Truncale et al. Mar 2011 B2
7901461 Harmon et al. Mar 2011 B2
8017394 Adkisson, IV et al. Sep 2011 B2
8025901 Kao et al. Sep 2011 B2
8137702 Binette et al. Mar 2012 B2
8163549 Yao et al. Apr 2012 B2
8480757 Gage et al. Jul 2013 B2
8497121 Yao et al. Jul 2013 B2
8518433 Kizer et al. Aug 2013 B2
8524268 Kizer et al. Sep 2013 B2
8652507 Kizer et al. Feb 2014 B2
20010004710 Felt et al. Jun 2001 A1
20010006634 Zaleske et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010014473 Rieser et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010014475 Frondoza et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010051834 Frondoza et al. Dec 2001 A1
20010055621 Baugh et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020004038 Baugh et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020009805 Nevo et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020012705 Domb Jan 2002 A1
20020028192 Dimitrijevich et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020029055 Bonutti Mar 2002 A1
20020045940 Giannetti et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020055755 Bonutti May 2002 A1
20020062151 Altman et al. May 2002 A1
20020064512 Petersen et al. May 2002 A1
20020082623 Osther et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020095160 Bonutti Jul 2002 A1
20020099401 Bonutti Jul 2002 A1
20020099448 Hiles et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020106625 Hung et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020123142 Hungerford et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020128683 Epstein Sep 2002 A1
20020133235 Hungerford et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020150550 Petersen Oct 2002 A1
20020151974 Bonassar et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020159982 Bonassar et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020159985 Baugh et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020183850 Felt et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020198490 Wirt et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020198599 Haldimann Dec 2002 A1
20030009147 Bonutti Jan 2003 A1
20030009235 Manrique et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030039695 Geistlich et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030040113 Mizuno et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030065389 Petersen Apr 2003 A1
20030069605 Bonutti et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030077244 Petersen Apr 2003 A1
20030099620 Zaleske et al. May 2003 A1
20030114936 Sherwood et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030134032 Chaouk et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030151974 Kutty et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030153078 Libera et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030176602 Schmidt et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030181939 Bonutti Sep 2003 A1
20030187387 Wirt et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030195628 Bao et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030199979 Mcguckin, Jr. Oct 2003 A1
20030211073 Goupil et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030223956 Goupil et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040030404 Noll et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040030406 Ochi et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040033212 Thomson et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040042960 Frey et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040044408 Hungerford et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040048796 Hariri et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040059416 Murray et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040064192 Bubb Apr 2004 A1
20040064193 Evans et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040073308 Kuslich et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040078073 Bonutti Apr 2004 A1
20040078077 Binette et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040078090 Binette et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040092946 Bagga et al. May 2004 A1
20040097714 Maubois et al. May 2004 A1
20040097829 McRury et al. May 2004 A1
20040117033 Frondoza et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040127987 Evans et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040134502 Mizuno et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040138522 Haarstad et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040151705 Mizuno et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040172045 Eriksson et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040175690 Mishra et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040176787 Mishra et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040181240 Tseng et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040191900 Mizuno et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040193181 Bonutti Sep 2004 A1
20040219182 Gomes et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040228901 Trieu et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040230303 Gomes et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040230309 DiMauro et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050026133 Nakatsuji et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050038520 Binette et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050043805 Chudik Feb 2005 A1
20050043814 Kusanagi et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050054595 Binette et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050064042 Vunjak-Novakovic et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050079159 Shastri et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050095235 Austin et al. May 2005 A1
20050095666 Jhavar et al. May 2005 A1
20050113736 Orr et al. May 2005 A1
20050113937 Binette et al. May 2005 A1
20050119754 Trieu et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050123520 Eavey et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050124038 Aguiar et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050125077 Harmon et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050136046 Pines et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050137600 Jacobs et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050139656 Arnouse Jun 2005 A1
20050152882 Kizer et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050152886 Baugh et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050152961 Austin et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050171470 Kucklick et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050175657 Hunter et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050175704 Petersen Aug 2005 A1
20050175711 Kralovec et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050177249 Kladakis et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050186247 Hunter Aug 2005 A1
20050186283 Geistlich et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050186673 Geistlich et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050192532 Kucklick et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050196387 Seyedin et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050196460 Malinin Sep 2005 A1
20050203342 Kucklick et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050209601 Bowman et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050209602 Bowman et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050222687 Vunjak-Novakovic et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050226856 Ahlfors Oct 2005 A1
20050234298 Kucklick et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050234485 Seegert et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050244454 Elson et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050250697 Maubois et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050250698 Maubois et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050251268 Truncale Nov 2005 A1
20050265980 Chen et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050267584 Burdulis, Jr. et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050273129 Michels et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050287218 Chaouk et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050288796 Awad et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060008530 Seyedin et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060009779 Collins et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060019389 Yayon et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060024373 Shahar et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060024826 Bonassar et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060029679 Dolecek Feb 2006 A1
20060041270 Lenker et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060073588 Adkisson et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060078872 Taguchi et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060099706 Massey et al. May 2006 A1
20060111738 Wenchell May 2006 A1
20060111778 Michalow May 2006 A1
20060128016 Tokushima et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060134093 Ronfard Jun 2006 A1
20060134094 Delmotte et al. Jun 2006 A2
20060147547 Yayon Jul 2006 A1
20060153815 Seyda et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060183224 Aerts et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195188 O'Driscoll et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060210643 Truncale et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060216822 Mizuno et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060228391 Seyedin et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060240064 Hunter et al. Oct 2006 A9
20060240555 Ronfard Oct 2006 A1
20060251631 Adkisson, IV et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060264966 Armstrong Nov 2006 A1
20060275273 Seyedin et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060281173 Fukuda et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060292131 Binette et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070014867 Kusanagi et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070031471 Peyman Feb 2007 A1
20070038299 Stone et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070041952 Guilak et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070077236 Osther Apr 2007 A1
20070087032 Chang et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070098759 Malinin May 2007 A1
20070106394 Chen May 2007 A1
20070128155 Seyedin et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070191781 Richards et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070212389 Weiss et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070213660 Richards et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070250164 Troxel Oct 2007 A1
20070292945 Lin et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070299517 Davisson et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080009942 Mizuno et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080031934 MacPhee et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080033331 MacPhee et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080033332 MacPhee et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080033333 MacPhee et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080039940 Hashimoto et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080039954 Long et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080051624 Bonutti Feb 2008 A1
20080065210 McKay Mar 2008 A1
20080071385 Binette et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080081369 Adkisson, IV et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080103564 Burkinshaw et al. May 2008 A1
20080113007 Kurihara et al. May 2008 A1
20080153157 Yao et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080154370 Mathies Jun 2008 A1
20080199429 Hollander et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080274157 Vunjak-Novakovic et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080299214 Seyedin et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090012629 Yao et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090069901 Truncale et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090143867 Gage et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090149893 Semler et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090155229 Yayon Jun 2009 A1
20090181092 Thorne et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090181093 Thorne et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090181892 Thorne et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090214614 Everland et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090291112 Truncale et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090319045 Truncale et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100015202 Semler et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100086594 Amit et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100121311 Seegert et al. May 2010 A1
20100168856 Long et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100209397 Maor Aug 2010 A1
20100209408 Stephen A. et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100274362 Yayon et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100303765 Athanasiou et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100322994 Kizer et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110009963 Binnette et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110052705 Malinin Mar 2011 A1
20110070271 Truncale et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110091517 Binette et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110097381 Binette et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110166669 Truncale et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110177134 Harmon et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110196508 Truncale et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110256095 Seyedin et al. Oct 2011 A1
20120009224 Kizer et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120009270 Kizer et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120107384 Yao et al. May 2012 A1
20120156265 Binette et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120183586 Yao et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120239146 Kizer et al. Sep 2012 A1
20130330415 Yao et al. Dec 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (195)
Number Date Country
199871003 Oct 1998 AU
2006282754 Mar 2007 AU
2008240191 Jan 2014 AU
2261292 Jul 1997 CA
2261292 Jul 1997 CA
2441994 Mar 2002 CA
2445356 Oct 2003 CA
2445356 Oct 2003 CA
2445558 Oct 2003 CA
2445558 Oct 2003 CA
2449227 Nov 2003 CA
2449227 Nov 2003 CA
2522133 Apr 2004 CA
2522133 Apr 2004 CA
2475905 Jul 2004 CA
2475905 Jul 2004 CA
2480712 Sep 2004 CA
2487029 Nov 2004 CA
2487042 Nov 2004 CA
2496184 Feb 2005 CA
2563082 Mar 2005 CA
2570521 Mar 2006 CA
2631520 Jun 2007 CA
2708147 Dec 2008 CA
2717725 Mar 2009 CA
0006216 Jan 1980 EP
0133934 Mar 1985 EP
0341007 Apr 1989 EP
1142581 Nov 1991 EP
0610423 Oct 1992 EP
0654078 Jun 1993 EP
0493387 Oct 1993 EP
0641007 Jan 1994 EP
0592242 Apr 1994 EP
0669138 Feb 1995 EP
0669138 Aug 1995 EP
0906069 Nov 1996 EP
0877632 Sep 1997 EP
0867193 Sep 1998 EP
01010356 Jun 2000 EP
1132061 Sep 2001 EP
867193 Dec 2002 EP
1264607 Dec 2002 EP
1003568 Apr 2003 EP
0592242 Jul 2003 EP
1538196 Aug 2003 EP
1410810 Oct 2003 EP
1410810 Oct 2003 EP
1410811 Oct 2003 EP
1410811 Oct 2003 EP
1433423 Oct 2003 EP
1433423 Oct 2003 EP
1599126 Mar 2004 EP
1410810 Apr 2004 EP
1410811 Apr 2004 EP
1618178 Apr 2004 EP
1506790 Aug 2004 EP
1512739 Sep 2004 EP
1471140 Oct 2004 EP
1537883 Dec 2004 EP
1537883 Dec 2004 EP
1537883 Dec 2004 EP
1691727 Dec 2004 EP
1958651 Dec 2004 EP
2335650 Dec 2004 EP
2338441 Dec 2004 EP
2338442 Dec 2004 EP
2338533 Dec 2004 EP
1561481 Feb 2005 EP
1561481 Feb 2005 EP
1561481 Feb 2005 EP
1753860 Feb 2005 EP
1535578 Jun 2005 EP
1535633 Jun 2005 EP
1537883 Jun 2005 EP
1561481 Aug 2005 EP
1512739 Sep 2005 EP
1387703 Jul 2006 EP
1303184 Sep 2006 EP
1788077 May 2007 EP
0920490 Feb 2008 EP
1537883 Apr 2008 EP
1618178 Jul 2008 EP
2101681 Aug 2011 EP
2335650 Oct 2012 EP
2338441 Jan 2013 EP
2338442 Jan 2013 EP
2105198 Mar 1983 GB
2175507 May 1985 GB
2404607 Sep 2005 GB
59135054 Aug 1984 JP
10036534 Feb 1998 JP
2004136096 May 2004 JP
2006230749 Sep 2006 JP
8002501 Nov 1980 WO
8505274 Dec 1985 WO
9000060 Jan 1990 WO
WO-9101711 Feb 1991 WO
WO-9209697 Jun 1992 WO
9603160 Feb 1996 WO
WO-9603112 Feb 1996 WO
WO-9639170 Dec 1996 WO
9711090 Mar 1997 WO
WO-9726847 Jul 1997 WO
9804681 Feb 1998 WO
9804681 Feb 1998 WO
WO-9844874 Oct 1998 WO
WO-9907417 Feb 1999 WO
9951164 Oct 1999 WO
WO-0006216 Feb 2000 WO
0029484 May 2000 WO
WO-0048837 Aug 2000 WO
0056251 Sep 2000 WO
WO-0056251 Sep 2000 WO
WO-0062832 Oct 2000 WO
WO-0102030 Jan 2001 WO
WO-0105443 Jan 2001 WO
WO-0110356 Feb 2001 WO
WO-0123014 Apr 2001 WO
WO-0167961 Sep 2001 WO
WO-0168811 Sep 2001 WO
WO-0168811 Sep 2001 WO
WO-0185225 Nov 2001 WO
WO-0197872 Dec 2001 WO
0224244 Mar 2002 WO
WO-0185225 Mar 2002 WO
02067856 Sep 2002 WO
02076285 Oct 2002 WO
02080991 Oct 2002 WO
WO-02089868 Nov 2002 WO
03077794 Sep 2003 WO
WO-03093433 Nov 2003 WO
WO-03100417 Dec 2003 WO
2004028584 Apr 2004 WO
WO-2004028547 Apr 2004 WO
WO-03093433 Jul 2004 WO
2004078032 Sep 2004 WO
WO-2004078035 Sep 2004 WO
WO-2004078955 Sep 2004 WO
2004096983 Nov 2004 WO
2004105576 Dec 2004 WO
WO-2004110308 Dec 2004 WO
WO-2004110512 Dec 2004 WO
2005018491 Mar 2005 WO
WO-2004110512 May 2005 WO
WO-2005044326 May 2005 WO
2005058207 Jun 2005 WO
2005060987 Jul 2005 WO
2005061018 Jul 2005 WO
WO-2005061019 Jul 2005 WO
WO-2005065079 Jul 2005 WO
2004078032 Sep 2005 WO
2005081870 Sep 2005 WO
2005092208 Oct 2005 WO
2005092405 Oct 2005 WO
2005110278 Nov 2005 WO
2005110278 Nov 2005 WO
WO-2005113751 Dec 2005 WO
2006002253 Jan 2006 WO
WO-2006002253 Jan 2006 WO
WO-2006017176 Feb 2006 WO
2006033698 Mar 2006 WO
WO-2006039484 Apr 2006 WO
WO-2006041723 Apr 2006 WO
2006068972 Jun 2006 WO
WO-2006059198 Jun 2006 WO
WO-2006033698 Jul 2006 WO
2006090372 Aug 2006 WO
2006113642 Oct 2006 WO
WO-2006121612 Nov 2006 WO
WO-2005081870 Dec 2006 WO
WO-2006039484 Jan 2007 WO
2007025290 Mar 2007 WO
2006090372 May 2007 WO
2007054939 May 2007 WO
2007067637 Jun 2007 WO
WO-2007089942 Aug 2007 WO
WO-2007089948 Aug 2007 WO
2007102149 Sep 2007 WO
2007115336 Oct 2007 WO
WO-2007025290 Oct 2007 WO
2007143726 Dec 2007 WO
WO-2007089948 Jan 2008 WO
2008021127 Feb 2008 WO
WO-2008019127 Feb 2008 WO
WO-2008019128 Feb 2008 WO
WO-2008019129 Feb 2008 WO
2008079194 Jul 2008 WO
WO-2008079613 Jul 2008 WO
2008106254 Sep 2008 WO
2008128075 Oct 2008 WO
2009039469 Mar 2009 WO
2009076164 Jun 2009 WO
2009111069 Sep 2009 WO
2010078040 Jul 2010 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (661)
Entry
Bentley, G. G and Greer, III R.B., Homotransplantation of Isolated Epiphyseal and Articular Cartilage Chondrocytes into Joint Surfaces of Rabbits, Nature, 1971, pp. 385-388, vol. 230.
Langer, F. and Gross, A.E., Immunogenicity of Allograft Articular Cartilage, JBJS, 1974, pp. 297-304, vol. 56-A, No. 2.
Langer, F. et al, The Immunogenicity of Fresh and Frozen Allogeneic Bone, JBJS, 1975, pp. 216-220, vol. 57-A, No. 2.
Lavrishcheva, G.I., Filling Bone Cavities with Minced Cartilage, Ortopediia travmatologiia I protezirovanie, 1955, pp. 80, vol. 1.
Lee, J.W., Preplanned correction of enophthalmos using diced cartilage grafts, British J. Plastic Surg, 2000, pp. 17-23, vol. 53.
Lemperg, R., et al, Transplantation of diced rib cartilage to the hip joint. Experimental study on adult dogs, Acta Soc Med Ups, 1965, pp. 197-212, vol. 70, No. 3.
Lennert, K.H. and Haas, H.G., Fibrin Adhesive in the Surgical Treatment of the Pseudoarthrosis of the Scaphoid Bone—Methods and Results, Unfallchirurgie, 1988, pp. 158-160, vol. 14, No. 3.
Leopold, G., XIV. Experimental Studies into the Etiology of Tumors, Archiv f. path. Anat., 1881, pp. 283-324, vol. LXXXV, No. 2.
Limberg, A.A., Supporting and Contour Plastic Repair by Needle Administration of Minced Carthage, Vestnik khirurgii imeni I.I. Grekova, 1957, pp. 68-73, vol. 78, No. 4.
Limberg, A.A., The use of diced cartilage by injection with a needle. Part 1. Clinical investigations, Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull., 1961, pp. 523-536, vol. 28.
Limberg, A.A., The use of diced cartilage by injection with a needle. Part 2. Morphologic Changes in the Diced Human Cartilage After Auto- and Homoplasty, Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull., 1961, pp. 649-655, vol. 28.
Loeb, L, Autotransplantation and Homoiotransplantation of Cartilage in the Guinea-Pig, Am. J. Pathology, 1926, pp. 111-122, vol. II.
Lu, Y. et al, Minced Cartilage without Cell Culture Serves as an Effective Intraoperative Cell Source for Cartilage Repair, J Orthop Res., 2006, pp. 1261-1270, vol. 24, No. 6.
Lucht, U. et al, Fibrin sealant in bone transplantation. No effects on blood flow and bone formation in dogs, Acta Orthop Scand., 1986, pp. 19-24, vol. 57, No. 1.
Mahomed, M.N. et al, The long-term success of fresh, small fragment osteochondral allografts used for intraarticular post-traumatic defects in the knee joint, Orthopedics, 1992, pp. 1191-1199, vol. 15, No. 10.
Maletius, W. and Lundberg, M., Refixation of large chondral fragments on the weight-bearing area of the knee joint: a report of two cases, Arthroscopy., 1994, pp. 630-633, vol. 10, No. 6.
Mankin, H.J., Localization of Tritiated Thymidine in Articular Cartilage of Rabbits: II. Repair in Immature Cartilage, JBJS, 1962, pp. 688-698, vol. 44.
Mankin, H.J., Localization of Tritiated Thymidine in Articular Cartilage of Rabbits: III. Mature Articular Cartilage, JBJS, 1963, pp. 529-540, vol. 45.
Mankin, H.J., Current Concepts Review, The Response of Articular Cartilage to Mechanical Injury, JBJS, 1982, pp. 460-466, vol. 64, No. 3.
Marcacci, M. et al, Articular cartilage engineering with Hyalograft C: 3-year clinical results, Clin Orthop Relat Res., 2005, pp. 96-105, No. 435.
Marcacci, M. et al, Use of autologous grafts for reconstruction of osteochondral defects of the knee, Orthopedics, 1999, pp. 595-600, vol. 22, No. 6.
Marchac, D. and Sandor, G., Face lifts and sprayed fibrin glue: an outcome analysis of 200 patients, Br J Plast Surg., 1994, pp. 306-309, vol. 47, No. 5.
Marchac, D. et al, Fibrin glue fixation in forehead endoscopy: evaluation of our experience with 206 cases, Plast Reconstr Surg., 1997, pp. 713-714, vol. 100, No. 3.
Matras, H., Fibrin Seal: The State of the Art, J. Oral Maxilofac Surg, 1985, pp. 605-611, vol. 43.
Matsusue, Y. et al, Biodegradable Pin Fixation of Osteochondral Fragments of the Knee, Clin Ortho Rel Res, 1996, pp. 166-173, No. 322.
McDermott, A.G.P. et al, Fresh Small-Fragment Osteochondral Allografts, Clin Orthop Relat Res., 1985, pp. 96-102, No. 197.
McKibbin, B, Immature Joint Cartilage and the Homograft Reaction, JBJS, 1971, pp. 123-135, vol. 53B, No. 1.
Meachim, G. and Roberts, C., Repair of the joint surface from subarticular tissue in the rabbit knee, J Anat., 1971, pp. 317-327, vol. 109, Part 2.
Meyers, M.H. and Herron, M., A Fibrin Adhesive Seal for the Repair of Osteochondral Fracture Fragments, Clin Ortho Rel Res, 1984, pp. 258-263, No. 182.
Mitchell, N. and Shepard, N., The resurfacing of adult rabbit articular cartilage by multiple perforations through the subchondral bone, JBJS, 1976, pp. 230-233, vol. 58, No. 2.
Mithofer, K. et al, Functional outcome of knee articular cartilage repair in adolescent athletes, Am J Sports Med., 2005, pp. 1147-1153, vol. 33, No. 8.
Miura, Y et al, Brief exposure to high-dose transforming growth factor-beta1 enhances periosteal chondrogenesis in vitro: a preliminary report, JBJS, 2002, pp. 793-799, vol. 84-A, No. 5.
Murray, M.M. and Spector, M, The migration of cells from the ruptured human anterior cruciate ligament into collagen-glycosaminoglycan regeneration templates in vitro, Biomaterials, 2001, pp. 2393-2402, vol. 22.
Nageotte, J., The Organization of Matter in its Connections with Life. Studies of General Anatomy and Experimental Morphology on teh Connective Tissue and the Nerve, L'Organisation De La Matiere, 1922, pp. 95-98.
Niekisch, V.R., English Summary only of Possible methods of using fibrin-glue protection in maxillo facial surgery, Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl, 1980, pp. 555-561, vol. 68, No. 6.
Nixon, A.J., et al, Isolation, propagation, and cryopreservation of equine articular chondrocytes, Am J Vet Res, 1992, pp. 2364-2370, vol. 53, No. 12.
Nixon, A.J., and Fortier, L.A, New Horizons in Articular Cartilage Repair, AAEP Proceedings, 2001, pp. 217-226, vol. 47.
O'Driscoll, S.W. et al, The chondrogenic potential of free autogenous periosteal grafts for biological resurfacing of major full-thickness defects in joint surfaces under the influence of continuous passive motion. An experimental investigation in the rabbit, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1986, pp. 1017-1035, vol. 68, No. 7.
O'Driscoll, S.W. and Salter, R.B., The Repair of Major Osteochondral Defects in Joint Surfaces by Neochondrogenesis with Autogenous Osteoperiosteal Grafts Stimulated by Continuous Passive Motion, Clin Ortho Rel Res, 1986, pp. 131-140, No. 208.
Oegema, T.R. and Thompson, R.C. Jr, Characterization of a hyaluronic acid-dermatan sulfate proteoglycan complex from dedifferentiated human chondrocyte cultures, J Biol Chem., 1981, pp. 1015-1022, vol. 256, No. 2.
Ohlsen, L. and Widenfalk, B., The Early Development of Articular Cartilage After Perichondrial Grafting, Scand J. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1983, pp. 163-177, vol. 17.
Outerbridge, H.K. et al, The Use of a Lateral Patellar Autologous Graft for the Repair of a Large Osteochondral Defect in the Knee, J Bone Joint Surg Am., 1995, pp. 65-72, vol. 77, No. 1.
Paar, O. et al,Cartilage Adhesion at the Knee Joint, Clinical Follow up Examination, Akt. Traumatol, 1984, pp. 15-19, vol. 14.
Paccola, C.A. et al, Fresh Immature Articular Cartilage Allografts—A Study on the Integration of Chondral and Osteochondral Grafts Both in Normal and in Papain-Treated Knee Joints of Rabbits, Arch Orthop Traumat Surg., 1979, pp. 253-259, vol. 93.
Park, J.J. et al, Comparison of the Bonding Power of Various Autologous Fibrin Tissue Adhesives, Am J Otology, 1997, pp. 655-659, vol. 18, No. 5.
Park, M.S., Tympanoplasty using autologous crushed cartilage, Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol, 1995, pp. 365-368, vol. 116, No. 5.
Pascone, M. and Dioguardi, D., Fibrin Sealant in Plastic Surgery of the Head, Plastic Surgery Nerve Repair Burns, Fibring Sealing in Surgical and Nonsurgical Fields, 1995, pp. 11-15, vol. 3, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
Passl, R. et al, Problems of Pure Homologous Articular Cartilage Transplantation, Verh Anat Ges, 1976, pp. 675-678, vol. 70.
Punzet, G. et al, Morphological and Therapeutic Aspects of Osteochondrosis dissecans and Aseptic Bone Necroses, Acta Medica Austriaca, 1978, pp. 17-18, Suppl. No. 11.
Passl, R. et al, Fibrin Gluing of Cartilage Surfaces—Experimental Studies and Clinical Results, Med. u. Sport, 1979, pp. 23-28, vol. 19 (1/2).
Passl, R. et al, Homologous Cartilage Transplants in Animal Experiments, 4th Orthopedics Symposium, Heidelberg, 1981, pp. 102-105, Horst Cotta and Arnim Braun (eds), Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart, New York.
Dupertuis, S.M., Growth of Young Human Autogenous Cartilage Grafts, Plast Reconstr Surg, 1946, pp. 486-493, vol. 5, No. 6.
Albrecht, F. et al, Closure of Osteochondral Lesions Using Chondral Fragments and Fibrin Adhesive, Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 1983, pp. 213-217, vol. 101.
Albrecht, F., English Abstract of German article Closure of joint cartilage defects using cartilage fragments and fibrin glue, Fortschr Med., 1983, pp. 1650-1652, vol. 101, No. 37.
Dupertuis, S. M., Actual Growth of Young Cartilage Transplants in Rabbits, Archives of Surgery, 1941, pp. 32-63, vol. 43.
Eberlin, J.L. et al, Osteocartilagenous Reconstruction, Plastic Surgery Nerve Repair Burns, Fibrin Sealing in Surgical and Nonsurgical Fields, 1995, pp. 20-24, vol. 3 Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
De Kleine, E.H., The Chondrojet, A Simplified Method for Handling of Diced Cartilage, Plast Reconstr Surg, 1946, pp. 95-102, vol. 3, No. 1.
Aston, J.E. and Bentley G., Repair of Articular Surfaces by Allografts of Articular and Growth-Plate Cartilage, J Bone Joint Surg Br.,1986, pp. 29-35, vol. 68, No. 1.
Bacsich, P. and Wyburn, G.M., XXXVIII. The Significance of the Mucoprotein Content on the Survival of Homografts of Cartilage and Cornea, 1947, P.R.S.E., pp. 321-327, vol. LXII, B, Part III.
Bayliss, M.T. and Roughley, P.J., The properties of proteoglycan prepared from human articular cartilage by using associative caesium chloride gradients of high and low starting densities, Biochem. J., 1985, pp. 111-117, vol. 232.
Bently, G. and Greer, R.B. III, Homotransplantation of Isolated Epiphyseal and Articular Cartilage Chondrocytes into Joint Surfaces of Rabbits, Nature, 1971, pp. 385-388, vol. 230.
Berlet, G.C. et al, Treatment of Unstable Osteochondritis Dissecans Lesions of the Knee Using Autogenous Osteochondral Grafts (Mosaicplasty), J. Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, 1999, pp. 312-316, vol. 15, No. 3.
Decher, H., Reduction of Radical Cavities by Means of Homologous Cartilage Chips, Larying. Rhinol. Otol., 1985, pp. 423-426, vol. 64.
Bodo, G. et al, Arthroscopic Autologous Osteochondral Mosaicplasty for the Treatment of Subchondral Cystic Lesion in the Medial Femoral Condyle in a Horse, Acta Veterinaria Hungarica, 2000, pp. 343-354, vol. 48, Vo. 3.
Craigmyle, M.B.L., Cellular Survival in Long-Term Cartilage Grafts in the Rabbit, Transplantation Bulletin, 1958, pp. 123, vol. 5, No. 1.
Craigmyle, M.B.L., An Autoradiographic and Histochemical Study of Long-Term Cartilage Grafts in the Rabbit, J. of Anatomy, 1954, pp. 467-473, vol. 92, Part 3.
Coster, D.J. and Galbraith, J.E.K., Diced cartilage grafts to correct enophthalmos, British J. Ophthalmology, 1980, pp. 135-136, vol. 64.
Chesterman, P.J. et al, Homotransplantation of Articular Cartilage and Isolated Chondrocytes, An Experimental Study in Rabbits, JBJS, 1968, pp. 184-197.
Breadon, G.E., et al, Autografts of Uncrushed and Crushed Bone and Cartilage, Bone and Cartilage Autografts, 1979, pp. 75-80, vol. 105.
Brighton, C.T., et al, Articular Cartilage Preservation and Storage I. Application of Tissue Culture Techniques to the Storage of Viable Articular Cartilage, Arthritis Rheum., 1979, pp. 1093-1101, vol. 22, No. 10.
Brittberg, M. et al, Treatment of Deep Cartilage Defects in the Knee With Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation, The New England Journal of Medicine, 1994, pp. 889-895, vol. 331, No. 14.
Brittberg, M. Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1999, pp. S147-S155, No. 367S.
Brittberg, M. et al, Treatment of Deep Cartilage Defects in the Knee with Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation, N Engl J Med., 1994, pp. 889-895, vol. 331, No. 14.
Brodkin, H.A. and Peer, L.A., Diced Cartilage for Chest Wall Defects, 1954, pp. 97-102, vol. 28, No. 1.
Brown, B.L. et al, Transplantation of Fresh Allografts (Homografts) of Crushed and Uncrushed Cartilage and Bone: A 1-Year Analysis in Rabbits, The Laryngoscope, 1980, pp. 1521-1532, vol. 90.
Bruns, J. et al, Long-Term Follow up Results after Gluing Osteochondral Fragments in Patients with Osteochondrosis Dissecans Langenbecks Arch Chir, 1993, pp. 160-166, vol. 378.
Bruns, J. et al, Autologous rib perichondrial grafts in experimentally induced osteochondral lesions in the sheep-knee joint: morphological results, Virchows Archiv A. Pathol Anat, 1992, pp. 1-8, vol. 421.
Bruns, J. and Henne-Bruns, D., Autologous Perichondrial Transplantation for the Repair of Experimentally Induced Cartilage Defects in the Sheep Knee—Two Glueing Techniques, Orthopedic Surgery Maxillofacial Surgery, Fibrin Sealing in Surgical and Nonsurgical fields, Oct. 27, 1994, pp. 50-60, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Buckwalter, J.A., Articular Cartilage Injuries, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2002, pp. 21-37, vol. 402.
Bujia, J. et al, Culture and Cryopreservation of Chondrocytes from Human Cartilage Relevance for Cartilage Allografting in Otolaryngology, ORL, 1992, pp. 80-84, vol. 54.
Bujia, J., Determination of the Viability of Crushed Cartilage Grafts: Clinical Implications for Wound Healing in Nasal Surgery, Ann Plast Surg, 1994, pp. 261-265, vol. 32.
Cherubino, P. et al, Autologous chondrocyte implantation using a bilayer collagen membrane: A preliminary report, J. Ortho Surg, 2003, pp. 10-15, vol. 11, No. 1.
Calandruccio, R. A. and Gilmer, W.S., Proliferation, Regeneration, and Repair of Articular Cartilage of Immature Animals, JBJS, 1962, pp. 431-455, vol. 44A, No. 3.
Chen, F.S. et al, Repair of Articular Cartilage Defects: Part II. Treatment Options, Am. J. Ortho, 1999, pp. 88-96.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,404, Final Office Action mailed Dec. 6, 2013”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,404, Response filed Jan. 10, 2014 to Final Office Action dated Dec. 6, 2013”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,404, Response filed Apr. 1, 2013 to Non Final Office Action mailed May 16, 2012”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,704, Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 12, 2013”, 10 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,704, Response filed Dec. 10, 2013 to Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 12, 2013”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,711, Examiner Interview Summary mailed Apr. 8, 2013”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,711, Examiner Interview Summary mailed Jul. 25, 2013”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,711, Final Office Action mailed Apr. 17, 2013”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,711, Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 1, 2013”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,711, Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 23, 2013”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,711, Response filed Apr. 2, 2013 to Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 12, 2012”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,711, Response filed Jul. 22, 2013 to Final Office Action mailed Apr. 17, 2013”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,711, Response filed Aug. 9, 2013 to Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 1, 2013”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,711, Supplemental Notice of Allowability mailed Nov. 21, 2013”, 2 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,711, Supplemental Notice of Allowability mailed Dec. 20, 2013”, 2 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,238, Notice of Allowance mailed Apr. 30, 2013”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,238, Response filed Apr. 2, 2013 to Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 2, 2013”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,265, Response filed May 21, 2013 to Final Office Action mailed Jan. 31, 2013”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,286, Notice of Allowance mailed Apr. 24, 2013”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,286, Response filed Apr. 2, 2013 to Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 7, 2013”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,286, Supplemental Notice of Allowability mailed May 15, 2013”, 2 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,286, Supplemental Notice of Allowability mailed May 28, 2013”, 4 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/799,452, Response filed Jan. 28, 2014 to Restriction Requirement mailed Dec. 24, 2013”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/799,452, Restriction Requirement mailed Dec. 24, 2013”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/951,762, Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 20, 2013”, 10 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/951,762, Preliminary Amendment filed Jul. 26, 2013”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/951,762, Response filed Jan. 21, 2014 to Non-Final office Action dated Sep. 20, 2013”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/951,762, Supplemental Preliminary Amendment filed Aug. 22, 2013”, 4 pgs.
“Australian Application Serial No. 2006282754, Response filed May 7, 2013 to First AU Examiner Report mailed Nov. 8, 2011”, 13 pgs.
“Australian Application Serial No. 2006282754, Subsequent Examiners Report mailed Jun. 14, 2013”, 3 pgs.
“Australian Application Serial No. 2008240191, Response filed Aug. 22, 2013 to First Examination Report mailed Sep. 21, 2012”, 12 pgs.
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,684,040, Office Action mailed May 13, 2013”, 4 pgs.
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,684,040, Response filed Oct. 29, 2013 to Office Action mailed May 13, 2013”, 20 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 08745639.8, Extended European Search Report mailed Apr. 3, 2013”, 7 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 08745639.8, Response filed Oct. 18, 2013 to Extended European Search Report mailed Apr. 3, 2013”, 9 pgs.
“NPL text search results cited by USPTO in U.S. Appl. No. 13/951,762”, (Sep. 17, 2013), 1 pg.
Wagner, P.D. and Westen, E., et al, Improved blood buffering in high-altitude natives?, J Appl Physiol, 2002, pp. 2214-2215, vol. 93.
Wakitani, S., et al, Repair of Rabbit Articular Surfaces With Allograft Chondrocytes Embedded in Collagen Gel, JSJS, 1989, pp. 74-80, vol. 71-B.
Wei, X., et al, The Effect of Sodium Selenite on Chondrocytes in Monolayer Culture, Arthritis and Rheumatism, 1986, pp. 660-664, vol. 29, No. 5.
Welsh, F., The alar cartilage morseler: a new instrument, Br. J. Plastic Surgery, 1983, pp. 483-484, vol. 36.
Wilfilingseder, P., Cranioplasties by means of diced cartilage and split rib grafts, Min Chir, 1983, pp. 837-843, vol. 38, No. 12.
Wischhofer, E., et al, English abstract only of The Behaviour of Autologous Spongiosa Transplants from the Dial Crest With and Without Fibrinadhesive in the Canine Femoral Epiphysis, Unfallheilkunde, 1982, ppl. 250-252, vol. 85.
Xu, J.W. et al, Injectable Tissue-Engineered Cartilage with Different Chondrocyte Sources, Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 2004, pp. 1361-1371, vol. 113.
Yamamoto, E. et al, Use of Micro-Sliced Homograft Cartilage Plates in Tympanoplasty, Acta Otolaryngol, 1985, pp. 123-129, vol. 419.
Yamashita, F. et al, The Transplantation of an Autogeneic Osteochondral Fragment for Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee, Clin Ortho Rel Res, 1985, pp. 43-50, vol. 201.
Yilmaz, S. et al, Viability of Diced, Crushed Cartilage Grafts and the Effects of Surgicel (Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose) on Cartilage Grafts, Plast. Reconstru. Surg. 2001, pp. 1054-1060, vol. 108.
Young, F., Autogenous Cartilage Grafts, An Experimental Study, Surgery, 1941, pp. 7-20, vol. 10.
Young, F., The use of autogenous rib cartilage grafts to repair surface defects in dog joints, Surgery, 1940, pp. 254-263, vol. 7.
Zahn, F., On the Fate of Tissues Implanted in the Organism, Int. Med. Congr. in Geneva, Biology Section—Meeting of Sep. 11, 1877, pp. 1-4.
Zalzal, G.H. et al, Cartilage Grafts—Present Status, Head and Neck Surgery, 1986, pp. 363-374, vol. 8.
Zilch, V.H. and Talke, M., Gluing Small Osteochondral Fragments with Fibrin Glue in Hand Surgery. Clinical Experiences, Handchirurgie, 1980, pp. 77-81, vol. 12.
Zilch, V.H., Animal Experiments Investigating the Fixation of Small Osteochondral Fragments by Means of Fibrin Glue, Handchirurgie, 1980, pp. 71-75, vol. 12.
Zilch, H. and Friedebold, G., English summary only of Fixing of Osteochondral Fragments with Fibrinogen Clue. Clinical Experiences, Akt. Traumatol., 1981, pp. 136, vol. 11.
Zilch, H. and Talke, M., English summary only of Fibrin sealant in cases of little osteochondral fragments of the upper limb, Ann. Chir. Main, 1987, pp. 173-176, vol. 6, No. 2.
Zilch, H. and Talke, M., English summary only of Fixation of Small Osteochondral Fragments with the Fibrinogen Adhesive, Clinical Report, Ann. Chir. Main, 1980, pp. 77-81, vol. 12.
Adkisson, H.D., IV et al, In Vitro Generation of Scaffold Independent Neocartilage, Clin Ortho Rel Res, 2001, pp. S280-S294, No. 391S.
Caruso, E. et al, Repopulation of Laser-Perforated Chondroepiphyseal Matrix with Xenogeneic Chondrocytes: An Experimental Model, JBJS, 1996, pp. 102-107, vol. 14.
Cheng, N.C. et al, Chondogenic Differentiation of Adipose-Derived Adult Stem Cells by a Porous Scaffold Derived from Native Articular Cartilage Extracellular Matrix, Tissue Engineering, Part A, 2009, pp. 231-241, vol. 15, No. 2.
Davis, J.S., Some of the Problems of Plastic Surgery, Ann Surg., 1917, pp. 88-94, vol. 66, No. 1.
Davis, W.B. and Gibson, T., Absorption of Autogenous Cartilage Grafts in Man, British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 1957, pp. 177-185, vol. 9.
Gelse, K. et al, Paracrine Effect of Transplanted Rib Chondrocyte Spheroids Supports Formation of Secondary Cartilage Repair Tissue, J. Ortho Res, 2009, pp. 1216-1225, vol. 27.
Hendrickson, D.A. et al, Chondrocyte-Fibrin Matrix Transplants for Resurfacing Extensive Articular Cartilage Defects, J. Ortho Res, 1994, pp. 485-497, vol. 12 No. 4.
Homminga, G.N. et al, Chondrocyte behavior in fibrin glue in vitro, Acta Orthop Scand, 1993, pp. 441-445, vol. 64, No. 4.
Howard, R.D., et al, Long-term fate and effects of exercise on sternal cartilage autografts used for repair of large osteochondral defects in horses, Am J Vet Res, 1994, pp. 1158-1167, vol. 55, No. 8.
Hutchinson, J., Observations on bone transplants in the anterior chamber of the eye, Glasgow Med J., 1949, pp. 357-363, vol. 30, No. 10.
Jeffries, D.J.R., and Evans, P.H.R., Cartilage regeneration following septal surgery in young rabbits, J. Laryngology and Otology, 1984, pp. 577-583, vol. 98.
Gu, J.D., et al, True Denisity of Normal and Enzymatically Treated Bovine Articular Cartilage, Trans Orthop Res Soc., 1999, pp. 642, vol. 24.
Kim, M.K. et al, Autologous chondrocyte implantation in the knee using fibrin, Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc., 2010, pp. 528-534, vol. 18.
Libera, J., et al, Cartilage Engineering, Fundamentals of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, 2009, pp. 233-242, Chapter 18, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
Liu, X., et al, In vivo ectopic chondrogenesis of BMSCs directed by mature chondrocytes, Biomaterials, 2010, pp. 9406-9414, vol. 31.
Longacre, J.J. et al, Further observations of the behavior of autogenous split-rib grafts in reconstruction of extensive defects of the cranium and face, Plas Reconstr Surg, 1957, pp. 281-296, vol. 20, No. 4.
Marmotti, A., et al, One-Step osteochondral repair with cartilage fragments in a composite scaffold, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc., Feb. 21, 2012, [Epub ahead of print], 12 pages.
McKibbin B. and Holdsworth, F.W., The dual nature of epiphysial cartilage, J Bone Joint Surg Br., 1967, pp. 351-361, vol. 49, No. 2.
Medawar, P.B., Immunity to homologous grafted skin; the fate of skin homografts transplanted to the brain, to subcutaneous tissue, and to the anterior chamber of the eye, Br J Exp Pathol., 1948, pp. 58-69, vol. 29, No. 1.
Munirah, S. et al, Articular cartilage restoration in load-bearing osteochondral defects by implantation of autologous chondrocyte-fibrin constructs: an experimental study in sheep, J Bone Joint Surg Br., 2007, pp. 1099-1109, vol. 89, No. 8.
Nehrer, S. et al, Three-year clinical outcome after chondrocyte transplantation using a hyaluronan matrix for cartilage repair, Eur J Radiol., 2006, pp. 3-8, vol. 57, No. 1.
Obradovic, B., et al, Integration of engineered cartilage, J Orthop Res., 2001, pp. 1089-1097, vol. 19, No. 6.
Verwoerd, C.D.A. et al, Stress and woundhealing of the cartilaginous nasal septum, Acta Otolaryngol., 1989, pp. 441-445, vol. 107, Nos. 5-6.
Pierce, A. et al, Surgicel: macrophage processing of the fibrous component, Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg., 1987, pp. 338-345, vol. 16, No. 3.
Roemhildt, M.L. et al, Material properties of articular cartilage in the rabbit tibial plateau, J. Biomech, 2006, pp. 2331-2337, vol. 39, No. 12.
Schubert, T. et al, Long-term effects of chondrospheres on cartilage lesions in an autologous chondrocyte implantation model as investigated in the SCID mouse model, International Journal of Molecular Medicine, 2009, pp. 455-460, vol. 23.
Selktar, D., Lecture Bulletin Nature's Healing Matrix, Technion Focus, May 2006, 1 page.
Silverman, R.P., et al, Adhesion of Tissue-Engineered Cartilage to Native Cartilage, Plast. Reconstr Surg, 2000, pp. 1393-1398, vol. 105.
Sin, Y.M. et al, Studies on the mechanism of cartilage degradation, J Pathol., 1984, pp. 23-30, vol. 142, No. 1.
Van Susante, J.L.C. et al, Resurfacing potential of heterologous chondrocytes suspended in fibrin glue in large full-thickness defects of femoral articular cartilage: an experimental study in the goat, Biomaterials, 1999, pp. 1167-1175, vol. 20, No. 13.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/374,772, 1.132 Declaration of Julia Hwang filed Jan. 5, 2009”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/374,772, Response filed Jan. 6, 2009 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Sep. 2, 2008”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/874,402, Final Office Action mailed Feb. 22, 2011”, 10 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/874,402, Final Office Action mailed Apr. 17, 2009”, 17 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/874,402, Final Office Action mailed Apr. 19, 2010”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/874,402, Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 10, 2008”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/874,402, Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 22, 2010”, 11 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/874,402, Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 27, 2009”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/010,779, Examiner Interview Summary mailed Apr. 5, 2010”, 4 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/010,779, Examiner Interview Summary mailed Dec. 7, 2009”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/010,779, Notice of Allowance mailed Jul. 8, 2010”, 4 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/010,779, Response filed Feb. 12, 2009 to Restriction Requirement mailed Jan. 12, 2009”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/010,779, Response filed Apr. 19, 2010 to Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 17, 2010”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/010,779, Response filed Jul. 15, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 15, 2009”, 16 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/010,779, Response filed Dec. 3, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 15, 2009”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/010,779, Restriction Requirement mailed Jan. 12, 2009”, 16 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/413,419, Final Office Action mailed Aug. 25, 2009”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/413,419, Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 26, 2008”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,250, Advisory Action mailed Jul. 9, 2008”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,250, Final Office Action mailed Apr. 15, 2008”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,250, Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 28, 2011”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,250, Non Final Office Action mailed May 28, 2009”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,250, Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 20, 2007”, 17 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,250, Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 21, 2010”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,250, Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 16, 2008”, 11 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,250, Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 23, 2009”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,250, Notice of Allowance mailed Dec. 23, 2011”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,250, Response filed Jan. 16, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 16, 2008”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,250, Response filed Jan. 19, 2011 to Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 21, 2010”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,250, Response filed Mar. 23, 2010 to Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 23, 2009”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,250, Response filed Jun. 16, 2008 to Final Office Action mailed Apr. 15, 2008”, 19 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,250, Response filed Aug. 28, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed May 28, 2009”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,250, Response filed Sep. 28, 2011 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 28, 2011”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,250, Response filed Dec. 20, 2007 to Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 20, 2007”, 19 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,319, Advisory Action mailed Jan. 19, 2010”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,319, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 18, 2012”, 11 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,319, Final Office Action mailed Oct. 26, 2009”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,319, Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 13, 2009”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,319, Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 29, 2011”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,319, Response filed Jan. 26, 2009 to Restriction Requirement mailed Dec. 26, 2008”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,319, Response filed Jan. 26, 2009 to Advisory Action mailed Jan. 19, 2010”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,319, Response filed Mar. 29, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 29, 2011”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,319, Response filed Jun. 11, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 13, 2009”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,319, Response filed Sep. 17, 2012 to Final Office Action mailed Jun. 18, 2012”, 19 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,319, Response filed Dec. 7, 2009 to Final Office Action mailed Oct. 26, 2009”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,319, Restriction Requirement mailed Dec. 26, 2008”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,456, Advisory Action mailed Aug. 11, 2009”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,456, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 4, 2009”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,456, Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 23, 2009”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,456, Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 11, 2009”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,456, Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 19, 2010”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,456, Response filed Apr. 3, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 23, 2009”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,456, Response filed Aug. 4, 2009 to Final Office Action mailed Jun. 4, 2009”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,456, Response filed Nov. 6, 2008 to Restriction Requirement mailed Oct. 7, 2008”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,456, Response filed Dec. 7, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 11, 2009”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,456, Restriction Requirement mailed Oct. 7, 2008”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/063,291, Final Office Action mailed Mar. 15, 2012”, 10 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/063,291, Final Office Action mailed Mar. 22, 2011”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/063,291, Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 15, 2010”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/063,291, Notice of Allowance mailed Mar. 4, 2013”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/063,291, Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 8, 2012”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/063,291, Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 11, 2012”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/063,291, Preliminary Amendment filed Feb. 8, 2008”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/063,291, Response filed Jan. 21, 2011 to Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 15, 2010”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/063,291, Response filed Jul. 16, 2012 to Final Office Action mailed Mar. 15, 2012”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/063,291, Response filed Sep. 22, 2011 to Final Office Action mailed Mar. 22, 2011”, 10 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/101,553, Response filed Aug. 15, 2011 to Restriction Requirement mailed Jul. 13, 2011”, 11 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/101,553, Final Office Action mailed Sep. 14, 2012”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/101,553, Final Office Action mailed Dec. 28, 2012”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/101,553, Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 9, 2011”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/101,553, Response filed Mar. 13, 2013 to Final Office Action mailed Dec. 28, 2012”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/101,553, Response filed May 9, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 9, 2011”, 14 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/101,553, Restriction Requirement mailed Jul. 13, 2011”, 17 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/751,230, Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 1, 2010”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/751,230, Preliminary Amendment filed Mar. 31, 2010”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/751,230, Response filed Jul. 30, 2010 to Restriction Requirement mailed Jul. 21, 2010”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/751,230, Restriction Requirement mailed Jul. 21, 2010”, 53 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,404, Non Final Office Action mailed May 16, 2012”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,404, Preliminary Amendment filed Aug. 23, 2010”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,711, Examiner Interview Summary mailed Nov. 15, 2012”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,711, Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 12, 2012”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,711, Response filed Aug. 29, 2012 to Restriction Requirement mailed May 29, 2012”, 4 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,711, Response filed Dec. 3, 2012 to Restriction Requirement mailed Oct. 4, 2012”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,711, Restriction Requirement mailed May 29, 2012”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,711, Restriction Requirement mailed Oct. 4, 2012”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,238, Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 2, 2013”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,238, Preliminary Amendment filed Jun. 1, 2012”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,238, Response filed Dec. 7, 2012 to Restriction Requirement mailed Sep. 7, 2012”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,238, Restriction Requirement mailed Sep. 7, 2012”, 11 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,265, Final Office Action mailed Jan. 31, 2013”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,265, Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 2, 2012”, 10 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,265, Response filed Sep. 4, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 2, 2012”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,286, Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 7, 2013”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,286, Preliminary Amendment filed Jun. 1, 2012”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/428,873, Final Office Action mailed Dec. 12, 2012”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/428,873, Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 18, 2012”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/428,873, Notice of Allowance mailed Mar. 25, 2013”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/428,873, Preliminary Amendment filed Mar. 23, 2012”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/428,873, Response filed Feb. 12, 2013 to Final Office Action mailed Dec. 12, 2012”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/428,873, Response filed Oct. 17, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 18, 2012”, 9 pgs.
“Application Serial No. 2008240191, First Examination Report mailed Sep. 21, 2012”.
“Australian Application Serial No. 2006282754, Office Action mailed Nov. 8, 2011”, 3 pgs.
“Combine”, Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, [Online] Retrieved From Internet: <http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/combine>, (Jul. 13, 2011), 2 pgs.
“English translation of Abstract for CA2285382”, (Oct. 15, 1998), 1 pg.
“English translation of Abstract of AU7100398”, (Oct. 30, 1998), 1 pg.
“English translation of Abstract of JP 2006230749”, (Feb. 25, 2005), 1 pg.
“English translation of Abstract of JP2001519700”, (Oct. 23, 2001), 1 pg.
“European Application Serial No. 04813849.9, Extended European Search Report mailed Apr. 8, 2008”, 3 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 04813849.9, Office Action mailed Feb. 16, 2009”, 5 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 04813849.9, Office Action mailed Jun. 20, 2011”, 3 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 04813849.9, Office Action mailed Jul. 21, 2006”, 2 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 04813849.9, Office Action mailed Dec. 30, 2010”, 4 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 04813849.9, Response filed Aug. 20, 2009 to Office Action mailed Feb. 16, 2009”, 18 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 04813849.9, Response filed Aug. 21, 2006 to Office Action mailed Jul. 21, 2006”, 4 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 07862720.5, Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 25, 2011”, 6 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 07862720.5, Office Action mailed Feb. 26, 2010”, 3 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 07862720.5, Response filed Sep. 1, 2010 to Office Action mailed Feb. 26, 2010”, 10 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 11154746.9, Office Action mailed Jan. 7, 2013”, 3 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 11154746.9, Office Action mailed Mar. 5, 2012”, 33 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 11154746.9, Office Action mailed Nov. 15, 2012”, 1 pg.
“European Application Serial No. 11154746.9, Response filed Jul. 5, 2012 to Office Action mailed Mar. 5, 2012”, 7 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 11154746.9, Response filed Dec. 14, 2012 to Office Action mailed Nov. 15, 2012”, 4 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 11154746.9, Search Report mailed May 23, 2011”, 4 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 11154747.7, Office Action mailed Mar. 5, 2012”, 4 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 11154747.7, Office Action mailed Jul. 23, 2012”, 3 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 11154747.7, Office Action mailed Nov. 21, 2012”, 4 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 11154747.7, Response filed Jun. 25, 2012 to Office Action mailed Mar. 5, 2012”, 8 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 11154747.7, Response filed Sep. 5, 2012 to Office Action mailed Jul. 23, 2012”, 3 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 11154747.7, Response filed Dec. 13, 2011 to Extended European Search Report mailed May 23, 2011”, 3 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 11154747.7, Response filed Dec. 14, 2012 to Office Action mailed Nov. 21, 2012”, 4 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 11154747.7, Search Report mailed May 23, 2011”, 4 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 11154748.5, Office Action mailed Apr. 13, 2012”, 5 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 11154748.5, Search Report mailed May 24, 2011”, 4 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2004/041591, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed May 18, 2005”, 4 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2006/033687, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Feb. 26, 2008”, 7 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2006/033687, Written Opinion mailed Aug. 8, 2007”, 6 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2007/025252, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Jun. 23, 2009”, 8 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2007/025252, International Search Report mailed Apr. 18, 2008”, 3 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2007/025252, Written Opinion mailed Apr. 18, 2008”, 7 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2007/086468, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Jun. 23, 2009”, 10 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2007/086468, International Search Report Jun. 5, 2008”, 4 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2007/086468, Written Opinion mailed Jun. 20, 2009”, 9 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2008/060078, International Search Report mailed Sep. 3, 2008”, 3 pgs.
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2008-528250, Office Action mailed Mar. 5, 2013”, 3 pgs.
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2008-528250, Office Action mailed Jun. 22, 2012”, with English translation, 5 pgs.
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2008-528250, Response filed Nov. 22, 2012 to Office Action mailed Jun. 22, 2012”, with English translation, 9 pgs.
“Morsel”, Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, [Online] Retrieved From Internet: <http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/morsel>, (Jul. 13, 2011), 2 pgs.
“Pulverize”, Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, [Online] Retrieved From Internet: <http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pulverize>, (Jul. 13, 2011), 2 pgs.
Adibi, Siamak A, et al., “Removal of Glycylglutamine from Plasma by Individual Tissues: Mechanism and Impact on Amino Acid Fluxes in Postabsorption and Starvation”, The Journal of Nutrition, Symposium: Nutritional and Hormonal Regulation of Amino Acid Metabolism, (1993), 325-331.
Adkisson, H. Davis, et al., “The Potential of Human Allogeneic Juvenile Chondrocytes for Restoration of Articular Cartilage”, The American Journal of Medicine vol. 38, (Apr. 27, 2010), 1324-1333.
Akens, M K, et al., “In Vitro Studies of a Photo-oxidized Bovine Articular Cartlage”, Journal of Veterinary Medicine, vol. 49, Blackwell Wissenschafts-Verlag, Berlin, (2002), 39-45.
Alfredson, Hakan, et al., “Superior results with continuous passive motion compared to active motion after periosteal transplantation”, vol. 7, Knee Surg sports Trautnatol Arthrosc, Springer-Verlag, Germany, (1999), 232-238.
Alston, et al., “New method to prepare autologous fibrin glue on demand”, Translational Research vol. 149, (2007), 187-195.
Augenstein, D C, et al., “Effect of Shear on the Death of Two Strains of Mammalian Tissue Cells”, vol. XIII, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, USA, (1971), 409-418.
Aulthouse, Amy Lynn, et al., “Expression of the Human Chondrocyte Phenotype in Vitro”, vol. 25, No. 7, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology, USA, (1989), 659-668.
Azizkhan, et al., “Chondrocytes contain a growth factor that is localized in the nucleus and is associated with chomatin”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 77, No. 5, (1980), 2762-2766.
Bartlett, W, et al., “Autologous chondrocyte implantation at the knee using a bilayer collagen membrane with bone graft”, vol. 87-B, The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery [Br], London, (2005), 330-332.
Bartlett, W, et al., “Autologous chondrocyte implantation versus matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects of the knee”, vol. 87-B, No. 5, The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery [Br], London, (2005), 640-645.
Bassleer, C, et al., “Human Chondrocytes in Tridimensional Culture”, vol. 22, No. 3, PI. I, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology, UK, (1986), 113-119.
Behrens, Peter, et al., “Matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte trnasplantationlimplantation (MACTIMACI)—5-year follow-up”, vol. 13, The Knee, Elsevier, UK, (2006), 194-202.
Ben-Zeev, A, et al., “Protein synthesis requires cell-surface contact while nuclear events respond to cell shape in anchorage-dependent fibroblasts”, Cell, vol. 21., (1980), 365-372.
Binette, F, et al., “Tenninally Redifferentiated Human Articular Chondrocytes Express Hyaline Cartilage Markers without Hypertrophy”, Genzyrne Tissue Repair, 43rd Annual Meeting, Orthopaedic Research Society, USA, (1997), 520 pgs.
Black, J., “Biological Performance of Tantalum”, Clinical Materials, vol. 16., (1994), 167-173.
Bobyn, J D, et al., “Effect of pore size on the peel strength of attachment of fibrous tissue to porous-surfaced implants”, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., vol. 16., (1982), 571-584.
Bobyn, JD, et al., “Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial”, J. Bone Joint Surg Br., 81, (1999), 907-914.
Bobyn, JD, et al., “Tissue response to porous tantalum acetabular cups”, a canine model. J. Arthroplasty, 14, (1999), 347-54.
Boumediene, et al., “Modulation of rabbit articular chondrocyte (RAC) proliferation by TFG-B isoforms”, Cell Prolif., vol. 28, (1995), 221-234.
Brighton, Carl T, et al., “In Vitro Rabbit Articular Cartilage Organ Model II. 35S Incorporation in Various Oxygen Tensions”, Arthritis and Rheumatism vol. 17, No. 3, (May 1974), 245-252.
Bujia, et al., “Synthesis of human cartilage using organotypic cell culture”, ORL, vol. 55, (1993), 347-351.
Bujia, J, et al., “Effect of Growth Factors on Cell Proliferation by Human Nasal Septal Chondrocytes Cultured in Monolayer”, Acta Otolaryngol, vol. 114, Scandinavian University Press, Sweden, (1994), 539-543.
Butler, M, et al., “Nutritional aspects of the growth of animal cells in culture”, Journal of Biotechnology 12, (1989), 97-110.
Butler, Michael, et al., “Adaptation of mammalian cells to non-ammoniagenic media”, Cytotechnology 15, (1994), 87-94.
Chang, et al., “Cartilage-Derived Morphogenetic Proteins”, J. Biol. Chem., 269, (1994), 28227-28234.
Chawla, K, et al., “Short-term retention of labeled chondrocyte subpopulations in stratified tissue-engineered cartilaginous constructs implanted in vivo in mini-pigs”, Tissue Engineering vol. 13, No. 7, (2007), 1525-1538.
Cherry, R S, et al., “Hydrodynamic effects on cells in agitated tissue culture reactors”, Bioprocess Engineering, vol. I, Springer-Verlag, USA, (1986), 29-41.
Cherry, Robert S, et al., “Physical Mechanisms of Cell Damage in Microcarrier Cell Culture Bioreactors”, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 32, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., USA, (1988), 1001-1014.
Cherry, Robert S, et al., “Understanding and Controlling Fluid-Mechanical Injury of Animal Cells in Bioreactors”, Animal Cell Biotechnology, vol. 4, Academic Press Limited, USA, (1990), 71-121.
Chesterman, P. J., et al., “Cartilage as a Homograft”, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. Proceedings and reports of councils and associations, (1968), 878.
Choi, Ye Chin, et al., “Effect of Platelet Lysate on Growth and Sulfated Glycosaminoglycan Synthesis in Articular Chondrocyte Cultures”, Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 22, No. 2, USA, (1980), 220-224.
Christel, P, et al., “Osteochondral Grafting using the Mosaicplasty Technique”, [Online] Retrived from the internet Dec. 16, 2008: <www.maitrise-orthop.com/corpusmaitri/orthopaedic/mo76—mosaicplasty/index.shtm>, 20 pgs.
Christie, A, et al., “Glutamine-based dipeptides are unilized in mammalian cell culture by extracellular hydrolysis catalyzed by a specific peptidase”, Journal of Biotechnology 37, (1994), 277-290.
Convery, F.R., et al., “The Repair of Large Osteochondral Defects”, An Experimental Study in Horses, Clin. Orthrop. 82., (1972), 253-262.
Coutts, Richard D, et al., “Section III Basic Science and Pathology Rib Periochondrial Autografts in Full-Thickness Articular Cartilage Defects in Rabbits”, Clinic Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 275, USA, (1989), 263-273.
Croughan, Matthew Shane, et al., “Hydrodynamic Effects on Animal Cells Grown in Microcarrier Cultures”, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. XXIX, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., USA, (1987), 130-141.
Delbruck, Axel, et al., “In-Vitro Culture of Human Chondrocytes from Adult Subjects”, Connective Tissue Research, Gordon and Breach, Science Publishers, Inc., USA, (1986), 155-172.
Dewey, Jr, C F, et al., “The Dynamic Response of Vascular Endothelial Cells to Fluid Shear Stress”, Journal of Biomechnical Engineering, vol. 103, USA, (1981), 177-185.
Didier, R, et al., “The production of cartilage and bone grafts in living and dead rabbits”, Compt. rend. Soc de bioi, vol. 98, (1928), 443-445.
Dogterom, A A, et al., “Matrix depletion of young and old human articular cartilage by cultured autologous synovium fragments; a chondrocyte-independent effect”, Rheumatology International, vol. 5, Springer-Verlag, UK, (1985), 169-173.
Dowthwaite, Gary P, et al., “The surface of articular cartilage contains a progenitor cell population”, Journal of Cell Science vol. 117, The Company of Biologists, 2004 UK, (2004), 889-897.
Drobnic, M. MD, et al., “Comparison of four techniques for the fixation of a collagen scaffold in the human cadaveric knee”, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 14 Elsevier Ltd., UK, (2006), 337-344.
Elima, Kati, et al., “Expression of mRNAs for collagens and other matrix components in dedifferentiating and redifferentiating human chondrocytes in culture”, FEBS Letters, vol. 258 No. 2, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (Biomedical Division), UK, (1989), 195-198.
Evans, Robin C, et al., “Solute diffusivity correlates with mechanical properties and matrix density of compressed articular cartilage”, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 442, Elsevier, UK, (2005), 1-10.
Farmer, S R, et al., “Altered Translatability of Messenger RNA from Suspended Anchorage-Dependent Fibroblasts”, Reversal upon Cell Attachment to a Surface, Cell, vol. 15., (1978), 627-637.
Feder, J, “Tissue Engineering in Musculoskeletal Clinical Practice: The Promise of Chondral Repair Using Neocartilage”, Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg., Chapter 22., (2004), 219-226.
Feder, Joseph, et al., “The Large-Scale Cultivation of Mammalian Cells”, Scientific American, Inc USA, (1983), 36-43.
Folkman, J, et al., “Role of cell shape in growth control”, Nature, vol. 273., (1978), 345-349.
Frangos, John, et al., “Flow Effects on Prostacyclin Production by Cultured Human Endothelial Cells”, Science, vol. 227, Texas, USA, (1985), 1477-1479.
Freed, L E, et al., “Neocartilage formation in virtro and invivo using cells cultured on synthetic biodegradable polymers”, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. vol. 27 (1), (1993), 11-23.
Freed, L. E, et al., “Cartilage Tissue Engineering Based on Cell-Polymer Constructs”, Tissue Engineering of Cartilage, CRC Press, Inc., USA, (1995), 1788-1806.
Freed, L. E, et al., “Composition of Cell-Polymer Cartilage Implants”, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 43, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., USA, (1994), 605-614.
Freed, L. E, et al., “Cultivation of Cell-Polymer Cartilage Implants in Bioreactors”, Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 51, Wiley-Liss, Inc., USA, (1993), 257-264.
Freed, L. E, et al., “Cultivation of Cell-Polymer Tissue Constructs in Simulated Microgravity”, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 46, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., USA, (1995), 306-313.
Freed, Lisa E, et al., “Tissue engineering of cartilage in space”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 94, The National Academy of Sciences, USA, (1997), 13885-13890.
Frisbie, David D, et al., “In Vivo Evaluation of Autologous Cartilage Fragment-Loaded Scaffolds Implanted Into Equine Articular Defects and Compared With Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation”, The American Journal of Sports Medicine 37, (Nov. 24, 2009), 71S-80S.
Fry, Donald, “Acute Vascular Endothelial Changes Associated with Increased Blood Velocity Gradients,”, Journal of the American Heart Association, vol. XXII, American Heart Association, USA, (1968), 165-197.
Fub, M, et al., “Characteristics of human chondrocytes, osteoblasts and fibroblasts seeded onto a type I/II collagen sponge under different culture conditions”, Annals of Anatomy, vol. 182, Urban & Fischer Verlag, Germany, (2000), 303-310.
Galera, et al., “Effect of transforming growth factor-B1 (TGF-B1) on matrix synthesis by monolayer cultures of rabbit chondrocytes during the dedifferentiating process”, Experimental Cell Research, vol. 200, (1992), 379-392.
Gibble, et al., “Fibrin glue: the perfect operative sealant”, Transfusion, 1990, vol. 30, No. 8., 741-747.
Gille, J, et al., “Migration pattern, morphology and viability of cells suspended in or sealed with fibrin glue: A histomorphologic study”, Tissue and Cell, Vo. 37, Elsevier, UK, (2005), 339-348.
Girotto, Davide, et al., “Tissue-specific gene expression in chondrocytes grown on three-dimensional hyaluronic acid scaffolds”, Biomaterials, vol. 24, Elsevier, UK, (2003), 3265-3275.
Glacken, Michael W, “Catabolic Control of Mammalian Cell Culture”, Biotechnology vol. 6, (Sep. 1998), 1041-1050.
Gooch, K J, et al., “Effects of Mixing Intensity on Tissue-Engineered Cartilage”, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 72, No. 4, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., USA, (2001), 402-407.
Guilak, F, et al., “Functional tissue engineering: the role of biomechanics in articular cartilage repair”, Clin Orthop Relat Res, vol. 391S., (2001), 295-305.
Haart, et al., “Optimization of chondrocyte expansion in culture”, Acta Orthop Scand, vol. 70, No. 1, (1999), 55-61.
Hacking, S A, et al., “Fibrous tissue ingrowth and attachment to porous tantalum”, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., vol. 52, No. 4., (2000), 631-638.
Hammarqvist, Folke, et al., “Alanyl-glutamine Counteracts the Depletion of Free Glutamine and the Postoperative Decline in Protein Synthesis in Skeletal Muscle”, Ann. Surg, (Nov. 1990), 637-644.
Han, et al., “Scaffold-free Grafts for Articular Cartilage Defects”, Clin Orthop Relat Res. vol. 466, (2008), 1912-1920.
Harrison, et al., “Osteogenin promotes reexpression of cartilage phenotype by dedifferentiated articular chondrocytes in serum-free medium”, Experimental Cell Research, vol. 192, (1991), 340-345.
Harrison, et al., “Transforming growth factor-beta: Its effect on phenotype reexpression by dedifferentiated chondrocytes in the presence and absence of osteogenin”, In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol., vol. 28A, (1992), 445-448.
Hassell, T, et al., “Growth Inhibition in Animal Cell Culture: The Effect of Lactate and Ammonia”, Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, vol. 30, (1991), 29-41.
Hiraki, et al., “Effect of transforming growth factor B on cell proliferation and glycosaminoglycen synthesis by rabbit growth-plate chondrocytes in culture”, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 969, (1988), 91-99.
Hollander, Anthony P, et al., “Maturation of Tissue Engineered Cartilage Implanted in Injured and Osteoarthritic Human Knees,”, Tissue Engineering, vol. 12, No. 7, Mary Ann Leibert, Inc., UK, (2006), 1787-1798.
Hollinger, Jeffrey O, et al., “Poly(alpha-hydroxy acids): carriers for bon morphogenetic proteins”, Biomaterial, vol. 17, (1996), 187-194.
Horton, et al., “Transforming growth factor-beta and fibroblast growth factor act synergistically to inhibit collagen II synthesis through a mechanism involving regulatory DNA sequences”, Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 141, (1989), 8-15.
Hu, Wei-Shou, “Bioreactors for Animal Cell Cultivation”, Recent Advances in Biotechnology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, (1992), 243-261.
Huang, et al., “Tissue Engineering”, vol. 8, No. 3, (2002), 469-481.
Hunziker, E.B., et al., “Quantitative structural organization of normal adult human articular cartilage”, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 10, (2002), 564-572.
Iwasa, J, et al., “Clinical application of scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering”, Surg Sports Traumalol Arthorsc vol. 13, No. 4, (2008), 561-577.
Jones, C W, et al., “Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation in sheep: objective assessments including confocal arthroscopy”, J. Orthopaedic Research vol. 26, (2008), 292-303.
Jurgensen, K, et al., “A New Biological Glue for Cartilage-Cartilage Interfaces: Tissue Transglutaminase”, JBJS (Am), 1997, vol. 79., (1997), 185-193.
Kandel, et al., “Fetal bovine serum inhibits chondrocyte collagenase production: interleukin 1 reverses this effect”, Biochim. Biophys. Acta.: 1053(2-3), (1990), 130-134.
Kato, Y, et al., “Sulfated Proteoglycan Synthesis by Conftuent Cultures of Rabbit Costal Chondrocytes Grown in the Presence of Fibroblast Growth Factor”, J. Cell Biology, vol. 100., (1985), 477-485.
Kavalkovich, Karl W, et al., “Chondrogenic Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Within an Alginate Layer Culture System”, In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.—Animal, vol. 38, Society for In Vitro Biology, USA, (2002), 457-466.
Kim, et al., “OsteoArthritis and Cartilage”, vol. 11, (2003), 653-664.
Kimura, Tomoatsu, et al., “Chondrocytes Embedded in CoHagen Gels Maintain Cartilage Phenotype During Long-term Cultures”, ?Clinical Orthopaedics and related Research, vol. 186, Japan, (1984), 231-239.
Klagsbrun, et al., “Purification of a cartilage-derived growth factor”, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 255, No. 22, (1980), 10859-10866.
Klagsbrun, et al., “The stimulation of DNA synthesis and cell division in chondrocytes and 3T3 cells by a growth factor isolated from cartilage”, Exp Cell Res, vol. 105, (1977), 99-108.
Klein, T J, et al., “Tailoring secretion of proteoglycan 4 (PRG4) in tissue-engineered cartilage”, Tissue Engineering, vol. 12, No. 6., (2006), 1429-1439.
Klein, T J, et al., “Tissue engineering of stratified articular cartilage from chondrocyte subpopulations”, OsteoArthritis and Cartilage vol. 11, (2003), 595-602.
Kon, E, et al., “Arthroscopic second generation autologous chondrocyte implantation at 48 months follow up”, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage vol. 15, Suppl. B, (2007), B44-45.
Kon, E, et al., “Arthroscopic Second-generation Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Compared with Microfracture of Chondral Lesions of the Knee”, Am J. of Sports Medicine vol. 37, No. 1, (2009), 33-41.
Krueger, John W, et al., “An In Vitro Study of Flow Response by Cells”, Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 4, Pergamon Press, Great Britain, (1971), 31-36.
Kuettner, Klaus E, et al., “Synthesis of Cartilage Matrix by Mammalizn Chondrocytes in Vitro.I. Isolation, Culture Characteristics, and Morphology”, The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 93, The RockefeHer University Press, USA, (1982), 743-750.
Kujawa, et al., “Hyaluronic acid bonded to cell culture surfaces inhibits the program of myogenesis”, Developmental Biology, vol. 113, (1986), 10-16.
Kujawa, Mary J, et al., “Hyaluronic Acid Bonded to Cell-Culture Surfaces Timulates Chondrogenesis inStage 24 Limb Mesenchyme Cell Cultures”, Developmental Biology, vol. 114, Academic Press, Inc., USA, (1986), 504-518.
Kujawa, Mary J, et al., “Substrate-Bonded Hyaluronic Acid Exhibits a Size-Dependent Stimulation of Chondrogenic Differentiation of Stage 24 Limb Mesenchymal Cells in Culture”, Developmental Biology, vol. 114, Academic Press, Inc., USA, (1986), 519-528.
Lee, et al., “Primary cultured chondrocytes of different origins respond differently to bFGF and TGF-B”, Life Sciences, vol. 61, No. 3, (1997), 293-299.
Lin, Z, et al., “Gene Expression Profiles of Human Chondrocytes during Passaged Monolayer Cultivation”, J. Orthopaedic Research, vol. 26, (2008), 1230-1237.
Liu, Lin-Shu, et al., “An osteoconductive collagen/hyaluronate matrix for bone regeneration”, Biomaterials vol. 20, Elsevier, UK, (1999), 1097-1108.
Lucas, Paul A, et al., “Ectopic induction of cartilage and bone by water-soluble proteins from bovine bone using a collagenous delivery vehicle”, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research: Applied Biomaterials, vol. 23, No. AI, (1989), 23-39.
MacKay, et al., “Chondrogenic differentiation of cultured human mesenchymal stem cells from marrow”, Tissue Engineering, vol. 4, No. 4, (1998), 415-430.
Malemud, C J, et al., “The effect of chondrocyte growth factor on membrane transport by articular chondrocytes in monolayer culture”, Connective Tissue Research, vol. 6, (1978), 1-9.
Mandl, E W, et al., “Multiplication of human chondrocytes with low seeding densities accelerates cell yield without losing redifferentiation capacity”, Tissue Engineering, vol. 10, No. 1/2, (2004), 109-120.
Mandl, E W, et al., “Serum-free medium supplemented with high-concentration FGF2 for cell expansion culture of human ear chondrocytes promotes redifferentiation capacity”, Tissue Engineering, vol. 8, No. 4, (2002), 573-582.
Mannheim, A, “Free Autoploastic Cartilage transplantation—Uber freie autoplastische Knorpeltransplantation”, Arch. F klin Chir, (1926), 668-672.
Marcacci, M, et al., “Multiple Osteochondral Arthroscopic Grafting (Mosaicplasty) for Cartilage Defects of the Knee: Prospective Study Results at 2-Year Follow-up”, J. Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, vol. 21, No. 4., (2005), 462-470.
Marlovits, S, et al., “Changes in the ratio of type-I and type-II collagen expression during monolayer culture of human chondrocytes”, JBJS, vol. 86-B, (2004), 286-95.
Marlovits, Stefan, et al., “Early postoperative adherence of matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation for the treatment of full-thickness cartilage defects of the femoral condyle”, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthorosc, vol. 13, Springer-Verlag, Austria, (2005), 451-457.
Marvin, H M, “The Value of the Xanthine Diuretics in Congestive Heart Failure”, The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 87, No. 25, Abstract only, (Dec. 18, 1926), 2131-2132.
Mathiowitz, Edith, et al., “Biologically erodable microspheres as potential oral drug delivery systems”, Nature, vol. 386, (Mar. 1997), 410-414.
McCormick, F., “Minced Articular Cartilage—Basic Science, Surgical Technique, and Clinical Application”, Sports Med. Arthrosc. Rev., vol. 16, No. 4, (Dec. 2008), 217-220.
McIlwraith, C W, et al., “In-Vivo Evaluation of a One-Step Autologous Cartilage Resurfacing Technique (CAIS)—Comparison of Three Different Scaffolds”, 6th Symposium of the International Cartilage Repair Society, (Jan. 2006), p. 3-6.
McNickle, Allison G, et al., “Overview of Existing Cartilage Repair Technology”, Sports Med Arthorosc Rev., vol. 16, No. 4, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, USA, (2008), 196-201.
McQueen, Anne, et al., “Flow Effects on the Viability and Lysis of Suspended Mammalian Cells”, Biotechnology Letters, vol. 9, No. 12, California Institute of Technology, USA, (1987), 831-836.
Merchuk, Jose Celman, “Shear Effects on Suspended Cells”, Advances in Biochemical Engineering Biotechnology, vol. 44, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, (1988).
Merchuk, Jose C, et al., “Why use air-lift bioreactors?”, Tibtech, vol. 8, Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd., UK, (1990), 66-71.
Mienaltowski, M J, et al., “Differential gene expression associated with postnatal equine articular cartilage maturation”, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, vol. 9., (2008), 149-162.
Minamoto, Yoshiki, et al., “Development of a serum-free and heat-sterilizable medium and continuous high-density cell culture”, Cytotechnology, vol. 5, (1991), S35-S51.
Minas, T, et al., “Current Concepts in the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Defects”, Orthopedics, vol. 20., (1997), 525-538.
Mow, V C, et al., “Experimental Studies on Repair of Large Osteochondral Defects at a High Weight Bearing Area of the Knee Joint: A Tissue Engineering Study”, Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 113, USA, (1991), 198-207.
Newland, M, et al., “Hybridoma growth limitations: The roles of energy metabolism and ammonia production”, Cytotechnology, vol. 3, (1990), 215-229.
Nixon, Alan J, et al., “Temporal matrix synthesis and histologic features of a chondrocyte-laden porous collagen cartilage analogue”, American Journal of Veterinary Research, vol. 54, No. 2, USA, (1993), 349-356.
Oldshue, J Y, et al., “Comparison of Mass Transfer Characteristics of Radial and Axial Flow Impellers”, Mixing Proceedings of the 6th European Conference, Pavia, Italy,, (1988), 345-350.
Papoutsakis, Eleftherios T, “Fluid-mechanical damage of animal cells in bioreactors”, TibTech, vol. 9, Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd. (UK), (1991), 427-437.
Pavesio, Allesandra, et al., “Hyaluronan-based scaffolds (Hyalograft C) in the treatment of knee cartilage defects; preliminary clinical findings”, Hyaluronan Scaffolds in Cartilage Repair, UK, (2003), 203-217.
Peer, Lyndon, “Diced Cartilage Grafts—New Method for Repair of Skull Defects, Mastoid Fistula and Other Deformities”, Archives of Otolaryngology, vol. 38, No. 2, (1943), 156-165.
Peretti, G M, et al., “Meniscal repair using engineered tissue”, J. Orthop Res, vol. 19, No. 2., (2001), 278-85.
Polettini, Bruno, “Su neoformazioni carilaginee ed ossee determinate da innesti di frammenti di cartilagine e d'osso fissati”, (1922), 179-192.
Reginato, et al., “Formation of nodular structures resembling mature articular cartilage in long-term primary cultures of human fetal epiphyseal chondrocytes on a hydrogel substrate”, Arthritis & Rheumatism, vol. 37, No. 9, (1994), 1338-1349.
Reitzer, Lawrence J, et al., “Evidence that Glutamine, Not Sugar, is the Major Energy Source for Cultured HeLa Cells”, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 254, No. 8, (Apr. 1979), 2669-2676.
Ronga, Mario, et al., “Arthroscopic Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation for the Treatment of a Chondral Defect in the Tibial Plateau of the Knee”, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 20, No. 1, Italy, (2004), 79-84.
Ronga, Mario, et al., “Tissue Engineering Techniques for the Treatment of a Comples Knee Injury”, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 22 No. 5, Italy, (2006), 576.e1-576.e3.
Rosier, R N, et al., “Transforming growth factor bela: an autocrine regulator of chondrocytes”, Connective Tissue Research vol. 20., (1989), 295-301.
Rosselot, G, et al., “Development of a serum-free system to study the effect of growth hormone and insulinlike growth factor-I on cultured postembryonic growth plate chondrocytes”, In Vitro Cell Dev Biol vol. 28A., (1992), 235-244.
Roth, E, et al., “Influence of Two Glutamine-Containing Dipeptides on Growth of Mammalian Cells”, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology, vol. 24, No. 7, (Jul. 1988), 696-698.
Russlies, M., et al., “A cell-seeded biocomposite for cartilage repair”, Annals of Anatomy vol. 184, Urban & Fischer Verlag, UK, (2002), 317-323.
Saini, Sunil, et al., “Concentric Cylinder Bioreactor for Production of Tissue Engineered Cartilage; Effect of Seeding Density and Hydrodynamic Loading on Construct Development”, Biotechnol Prog., vol. 19, American Chemical Society and American Institute of Chemical Engineers, USA, (2003), 510-521.
Salter, Robert B, et al., “The Biological Concept of Continuous Passive Motion of Synovial Joints: The First 18 Years of Basic Research and Its Clinical Application”, Articular Cartilage and Knee Joint Function : Basic Science and Arthroscopy, Raven Press, Ltd., NY, USA, (1990), 335-353.
Schmidt, Tannin A, et al., “Synthesis of Proteoglycan 4 by Chondrocyte Subpopulations in Cartilage Explants, Monolayer Cultures, and Resurfaced Cartilage Cultures”, Arthritis & Rheumatism, vol. 50, No. 9, American College of Rheumatology, USA, (2004), 2849-2857.
Schwan, B L, “Human Amniotic Membrane Transplantation for the Treatment of Ocular Surface Disease”, Human Amniotic Membrane Transplantation, (2002), 1-7.
Schwarz, Ray P, et al., “Cell Culture for Three-Dimensional Modeling in Rotating-Wall Vessels: An Application of Simulated Microgravity”, Journal of Tissue Culture Meth., Tissue Culture Association, TX, USA, (1992), 51-58.
Shahgaldi, B F, et al., “Repair of Cartilage Lesions Using Biological Implants—A Comparative Histological and Biomechanical Study in Goats”, Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, vol. 73-5, UK, (1991), 57-64.
Shands, A R, “The Regeneration of Hyaline Cartilage in Joints”, Archives of Surgery, vol. 22, (1931), 137-178.
Smith, R. Lane, et al., “Effects of Fluid-Induced Shear on Articular Chondrocyte Morphology and Metabolism In Vitro”, Journal of Orthopaedic Research, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc., vol. 13, USA, (1995), 824-831.
Sokoloff, L, et al., “In vitro culture of articular chondrocytes”, Federation Proc vol. 32., (1973), 1499-1502.
Sokoloff, L., et al., “Sulfate Incorporation by Articular Chondrocytes in Monolayer Culture”, Arthritis and Rheumatism vol. 13, No. 2., (1970), 118-124.
Song, C. X, et al., “Formulation and Characterization of Biodegradable Nanoparticles for Intravascular Local Drug Delivery”, Journal of Controlled Release vol. 43, No. 2/03,, XP00632668, (Jan. 18, 1997), 197-212.
Spangenberg, K M, et al., “Histomorphometric Analysis of a Cell-Based Model of Cartilage Repair”, Tissue Engineering, vol. 8, No. 5., (2002), 839-46.
Stathopoulos, N. A, et al., “Shear Stress Effects on Human Embryonic Kidney Cells in Vitro”, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. XXVII, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., USA, (1985), 1021-1026.
Stewart, Matthew C, et al., “Phenotypic Stability of Articular Chondrocytes In Vitro: The Effects of Culture Models, Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2, and Serum Supplemenation”, Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 15, No. 1, (2000), 166-174.
Stiles, C. D, et al., “Dual control of cell growth by somatomedins and platelet-derived growth factor”, PNAS vol. 76, No. 3., (1979), 1279-1283.
Stockwell, R. A, “The cell density of human articular and costal cartilage”, J. Anal. vol. 101,No. 4., (1967), 753-763.
Thilly, W. G, et al., “Microcarrier Culture: A Homogeneous Environment for Studies of Cellular Biochemistry”, Methods in Enzymology vol. LVIII, ISBN 0-12-181958-2, Academic Press, Inc., New York, New York, United States., (1979), 184-194.
Thilly, W. G, et al., “Microcarriers and the problem of high density cell culture”, From Gene to Protein: Translation in Biotechnology vol. 19, Academic Press, Inc., New York, New York, United States., (1982), 75-103.
Trattnig, S., et al., “Differentiating normal hyaline cartilage from post-surgical repair tissue using fast gradient echo imaging in delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI (dGEMRIC) at 3 Tesla”, Eur Radial vol. 18., (2008), 1251-1259.
Trattnig, S., et al., “Quantitative T2 Mapping of Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation at 3 Tesla an in vivo Cross-Sectional Study”, Investigative Radiology vol. 42, No. 6., (2007), 442-448.
Trattnig, Siegfried, et al., “Matrix-based autologous chondrocyte implantation for cartilage repair: noninvasive monitoring by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging”, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 23, Elsevier, Austria, (2005), 779-787.
Vacanti, C. A, et al., “Synthetic Polymers Seeded with Chondrocytes Provide a Template for New Cartilage Formation”, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 88, No. 5, (1991), 753-759.
Vanderploeg, E. J, et al., “Articular chondrocytes derived from distinct tissue zones differentially respond to in vitro oscillatory tensile loading”, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage vol. 16., (2008), 1228-1236.
Venkat, Raghavan V, et al., “Study of Hydrodynamics in Microcarrier Culture Spinner Vessels: A Particle Tracking Velocimetry Approach”, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 49, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., USA, (1996), 456-466.
Verwoerd, C.D.A., et al., “Wound Healing of Autologous Implants in the Nasal Septal Cartilage”, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Pathology, ORL vol. 53, (1991), 310-314.
Vishwakarma, G. K, et al., “Isolation & cryo-preservation of human foetal articular chondrocytes”, Indian J. Med Res vol. 98., (1993), 309-313.
Von Schroeder, Herbert P, et al., “The use of polylatic acid matrix and periosteal grafts for the reconstruction of rabbit knee articular defects”, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 25, (1991), 329-339.
Willers, Craig, et al., “Articular cartilage repair: procedures versus products”, Expert Rev. Med. Devices, vol. 4., No. 3, Future Drugs Ltd, US, (2007), 373-392.
Xu, et al., “Injectable Tissue-Engineered Cartilage with Different Chondrocyte Sources”, vol. 113, (2004), 1361-1371.
Yoshihashi, Yuji, et al., “Tissue Reconstitution by Isolated Articular Chondrocytes in vitro”, J. Jpn. Orthop. Assoc., vol. 58, (1983), pp. 629-641.
Zheng, M H, et al., “Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI): Biological and Histological Assessment”, Tissue Engineering, vol. 13, No. 4., (2007), 737-746.
Zielke, Ronald H, et al., “Glutamine: a major energy source for mammalian cells”, Federation Proceedings, vol. 43, No. 1, (Jan. 1984), 121-125.
Zimber, M P, et al., “TGF-β Promotes the Growth of Bovine Chondrocytes in Monolayer Culture and the Formation of Cartilage Tissue on Three-Dimensional Scaffolds”, Tissue Engineering, vol. 1, No. 3., (1995), 289-300.
Passl, R. and Plenk, H. Jr, Histological observations after replantation of articular cartilage, Unfallchirurgie, 1986, pp. 194-199, vol. 12, No. 4.
Passl, R. and Plenk, H. Jr, Fibrin Sealing of Cartilage Surfaces, Beitr. Orthop. Traumatol, 1989, pp. 503-507, vol. 36, No. 10.
Pech, A., et al, Tissuecol in Septorhinoplasties, Ann. Oto-Laryng., 1988, pp. 629-634, vol. 105.
Peer, L.A., Extended Use of Diced Cartilage Grafts, Meeting of the American Association of Plastic Surgeons, Apr. 21, 23, 1954, pp. 178-185.
Peer, L.A., The Fate of Living and Dead Cartilage Transplanted in Humans, Surg, Gynec, and Obst., 1939, pp. 603-610, vol. 68.
Peer, L.A., Fate of Autogenous Septal Cartilage After Transplantation in Human Tissues, Archv of Otolaryngology, 1941, pp. 696-709, vol. 34, No. 4.
Peer, L.A., The Neglected Septal Cartilage Graft (With Experimental Observations on the Growth of Human Cartilage Grafts), Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.,1945, pp. 384-396, vol. 42, No. 5.
Peretti, G.M. et al, Bonding of Cartilage Matrices with Cultured Chondrocytes: An Experimental Model, J. Orthopaedic Res, 1998, pp. 89-95, vol. 16.
Peretti, G.M. et al, Biomechanical Analysis of a Chondrocyte-Based Repair Model of Articular Cartilage, Tissue Engineering, 1999, pp. 317-326, vol. 5, No. 4.
Peretti, G.M. et al, Cell-Based Tissue-Engineered Allogeneic Implant for Cartilage Repair, Tissue Engineering, 2000, pp. 567-576, vol. 6, No. 5.
Peretti, G.M. et al, Cell-Based bonding of articular cartilage: An extended Study, J. Biomed Mater Res, 2003, pp. 517-524, vol. 64A.
Peretti, G.M. et al, In vitro bonding of pre-seeded chondrocytes, Sport Sci Health, 2007, pp. 29-33, vol. 2.
Phemister, D.B. and Miller, E.M., The Method of New Joint Formation in Arthroplasty, Surgery, Gynecology and Ostetrics, 1918, pp. 406-447, vol. 26.
Pierce, G.W. and O'Connor, G.B., XXXVI. Reconstruction Surgery of the Nose, Ann. Otol. Rhin. and Laryng., 1938, pp. 437-452, vol. 47.
Piragine, F. et al, Use of Bovine Heterologous Cartilage and Fibrin Sealant in Middle Ear Reconstructive Surgery, Neurosurgery Ophthalmic Surgery ENT, Fibrin Sealing in Surgical and Nonsurgical Fields, 1994, pp. 193-198, vol. 5, Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.
Pitman, M.I. et al, The Use of Adhesives in Chondrocyte Transplantation Surgery: In-Vivo Studies, Bull Hosp Jt Dis Orthop Inst., 1989, pp. 213-220, vol. 49, No. 2.
Plaga, B.R. et al, Fixation of osteochondral fractures in rabbit knees. A comparison of Kirschner wires, fibrin sealant, and polydioxanone pins, J Bone Joint Surg Br., 1992, pp. 292-296, vol. 74, No. 2.
Plenk, H. Jr and Passl, R., Trans- and Replantation of Articular Cartilage Using the Fibrinogen Adhesive System, Gastpar, H. (ed.): Biology of the articular cartilage in health and disease, 1980, pp. 439-447, Schattauer, Stuttgart—New York, USA.
Plenk, H. Jr and Passl, R., Articular Cartilage Transplants in Experiments and Clinical Practice, ACA, Acta Chirurgica Austriaca 21st Seminar of the Austrian Association of Surgical Research, Nov. 13 to 15, 1997, pp. 1-4, vol. 29, Suppl. No. 137.
Pridie, K.H., A method of resurfacing osteoarthritic knee joints, JBJS, 1959, pp. 618-619, vol. 41B, No. 3.
Prin, A. et al, Effect of purified growth factors on rabbit articular chondrocytes in Monolayer Culture, I. DNA Synthesis, Arthritis & Rheumatism, 1982, pp. 1217-1227, vol. 25, No. 10.
Prudden, T., Article IV. Experimental Studies on the Transplantation, American Journal of the Medical Sciences: Oct. 1881, pp. 360-370, vol. 82, No. 164.
Vachon, A., et al, Neochondrogenesis in free intra-articular, periosteal, and perichondrial autografts in horses, Am J Vet Res, 1989, pp. 1787-1794, vol. 50, No. 10.
Redl, H. et al, Methods of Fibrin Seal Application, Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surgeon, 1982, pp. 223-227, vol. 30.
Roberts, S. et al, Autologous chondrocyte implantation for cartilage repair: monitoring its success by magnetic resonance imaging and histology, Arthritis Res and Therapy, 2003, pp. R60-R73, vol. 5.
Robinson, D. et al, Regenerating hyaline cartilage in articular defects of old chickens using implants of embryonal chick chondrocytes embedded in a new natural delivery substance, Calcif Tissue Int., 1990, pp. 246-253, vol. 46, No. 4.
Ruano-Ravina, A. and Diaz, M.J., Autologous chondrocyte implantation: a systematic review, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2006, pp. 47-51, vol. 14.
Rudderman, R.H., et al, The Fate of Fresh and Preserved, Noncrushed and Crushed Autogenous Cartilage in the Rabbit Model, Ann Plast Surg, 1994, pp. 250-254, vol. 32.
Rupp, G. et al, Fibrin Adhesion of Transposed Autologous Cartilage Bone Grafts to Repair Knee-Joint Defects, Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 1978, pp. 676-677, vol. 347, No. 1.
Saidi, K. et al, Articular Knee Transplant in the Rabbit: Experimental Study and Clinical Projections, Union Medicale du Canada, 1971, pp. 88-99, vol. 100, No. 1.
Salter, R.B., et al, The Biological Effect of Continuous Passive Motion on the Healing of Full-Thickness Defects in ARticular Cartilage, JBJS, 1980, pp. 1232-1251, vol. 62-A, No. 8.
Sampath, T.K., et al, In vitro transformation of mesenchymal cells derived from embryonic muscle into cartilage in response to extracellular matrix components of bone, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1984, pp. 3419-3423, vol. 81, No. 11.
Schlag, G. and Redl, H., Fibrin Sealant in Orthopedic Surgery, Clin Ortho Rel Res, 1988, pp. 269-285, vol. 227.
Schlag, G. and Redl, H., Fibrin adhesive system in bone healing, Acta Orthop Scand., 1983, pp. 655-658, vol. 54, No. 4.
Schobel, H., Compound Prosthesis and Cartilage Layer: Two New Applications of Fibrin Sealing in Reconstructive Middle Ear Surgery, Neurosurgery Ophthalmic Surgery ENT, Fibrin Sealing in Surgical and Nonsurgical Fields, 1994, pp. 186-192, vol. 5, Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.
Schreiber, R.E. et al, A Method for Tissue Engineering of Cartilage by Cell Seeding on Bioresorbable Scaffolds, Ann N Y Acad Sci., 1999, pp. 398-404, vol. 875.
Schwam, B.L., Human Amniotic Membrane Transplantation for the Treatment of Ocular Surface Disease, Northeast Florida Medicine Journal, http://www.dcmsonline.org/jax-medicine/2002journals/augsept2002/amniotic.htm, 2002, print date Mar. 3, 2009, pp. 1-7.
Schwartz, E.R., et al, Sulfate Metabolism in Human Chondrocyte Cultures, J. Clin Investigation, 1974, pp. 1056-1063, vol. 54.
Schwarz, N., et al, The Influence of Fibrin Sealant on Demineralized Bone Matrix-Dependent Osteoinduction, Clin Ortho Rel Re, 1989, pp. 282-287, No. 238.
Shoemaker, S. et al, Effects of fibrin sealant on incorporation of autograft and xenograft tendons within bone tunnels. A preliminary study, JAm J Sports Med., 1989, pp. 318-324, vol. 17, No. 3.
Silverman, R.P., et al, Injectable Tissue-Engineered Cartilage Using a Fibrin Glue Polymer, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, 1999, pp. 1809-1818, vol. 103, No. 7.
Simms, G.F., et al, Diced Homologous Cartilage in Hernioplasty, Jour. Med. Soc. J.J., 1952, pp. 406-407, vol. 49, No. 9.
Sosna, A. and Vavra, J., Use of Fibrin Glue in Orthopedics, Acta Chir. Orthop. Traum., 1984, pp. 8-91, vol. 51, No. 2.
Specchia, N. et al, Fetal chondral homografts in the repair of articular cartilage defects, Blletin Hospital for Joint Diseases, 1996, pp. 230-235, vol. 54, No. 4.
Stoksted, P. and Ladefoged, C., Crushed cartilage in nasal reconstruction, J. Laryngology and Otology, 1986, pp. 897-906, vol. 100.
Tanaka, H. et al, A Study on Experimental Homocartilage Transplantation, Arch Orthop Traumat Surg, 1980, pp. 165-169, vol. 96.
Tanaka, H. and Shinno, N., Histochemical Studies on Regeneration of Articular Cartilage, Tokushima J Exp Med., 1971, pp. 63-73, vol. 18.
Temenoff, J.S. and Mikos, A.G., Review: Tissue engineering for regeneration of articular cartilage, Biomaterials, 2000, pp. 431-440, vol. 21, No. 5.
Tuan, R.S., A second-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation approach to the treatment of focal articular cartilage defects, Arthritis Res Ther., 2007, pp. 109 (1-4), vol. 9, No. 5.
Peretti, G.M. et al, A Biomechanical Analysis of an Engineered Cell-Scaffold Implant for Cartilage Repair, 2001, Ann Plast Surg, pp. 533-537, vol. 46.
Aston, J.E. and Bently, G., Repair of articular surfaces by allografts of articular and growth-plate cartilage, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1986, pp. 29-35, vol. 68-B, No. 1.
Bacsich, P. and Wyburn, G.M., XXXVIII.—The Significance of the Mucoprotein Content on the Survival of Homografts of Cartilage and Cornea, Mucoprotein Content on the Survival of Homografts of Cartilage and Cornea, Dec. 19, 1947, pp. 321-330, vol. LXII.
Bentley, G. and Greer, III R.B., Homotransplantation of Isolated Epiphyseal and Articular Cartilage Chondrocytes into Joint Surfaces of Rabbits, Nature, 1971, pp. 385-388, vol. 230.
Brighton, C.T. et al, Articular Cartilage Preservation and Storage I. Application of Tissue Culture Techniques to the Storage of Viable Articular Cartilage, Arthritis and Rheumatism, 1979, pp. 1093-1101, vol. 22, No. 10.
Buckwalter, J.A., Articular Cartilage Injuries, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2002, pp. 21-37, No. 402.
Bujia, J. et al, Culture and Cryopreservation of Chondrocytes from Human Cartilage: Relevance for Cartilage Allografting in Otolaryngology, ORL, 1992, pp. 80-84, vol. 54.
Chen, F.S. et al, Repair of Articular Cartilage Defects: Part II. Treatment Options, Am. J. Ortho., 1999, pp. 88-96.
Cherubino, P. et al, Autologous chondrocyte implantation using a bilayer collagen membrane: a preliminary report, J. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2003, pp. 10-15, vol. 11, No. 1.
Craigmyle, M.B.L., Studies of Cartilage Autografts and Homografts in the Rabbit, British J. Plastic Surgery, 1955, pp. 93-100.
Dupertuis, S.M., Actual Growth of Young Cartilage Transplants in Rabbits, Achives of Surgery, 1941, pp. 32-63, vol. 43.
Gibson, T. et al, The Long-Term Survival of Cartilage Homografts in Man, British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 1958, pp. 177-187.
He, Q. et al, Repair of flexor tendon defects of rabbit with tissue engineering method, Chinese J. of Traumatology, 2002, pp. 200-208, vol. 5, No. 4.
Hunziker, E.B., Articular cartilage repair: basic science and clinical progress. A review of the current status and prospects, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2001, pp. 432-463, vol. 10.
Jin, C.Z. et al, Human Amniotic Membrane as a Delivery Matrix for Articular Cartilage Repair, Tissue Engineering, 2007, pp. 693-703, vol. 13, No. 4.
Kon, E. et al, Second Generation Issues in Cartilage Repair, Sports Med Arthorosc Rev., 2008, pp. 221-229, vol. 16, No. 4.
Loeb, L., Autotransplantation and homoiotransplantation of cartilage in the guinea-pig, Am. J. Pathology, 1926, pp. 111-122, vol. II.
Mankin, H. J., Localization of Tritiated Thymidine in Articular Cartilage of Rabbits: II. Repair in Immature Cartilage, JBJS, 1962, pp. 688-698, vol. 44.
Mankin, H. J., Localization of Tritiated Thymidine in Articular Cartilage of Rabbits: III. Mature Articular Cartilage, JBJS, 1963, pp. 529-540, vol. 45.
Marcacci, M. et al, Articular Cartilage Engineering with Hyalograft C, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2005, pp. 96-105, vol. 435.
McDermott, A.G.P. et al, Fresh Small-Fragment Osteochondral Allografts, Clin Ortho Rel Res, 1985, pp. 96-102, No. 197.
McKibbin, B., Immature Joint Cartilage and the Homograft Reaction, JBJS, 1971, pp. 123-135, vol. 53-B, No. 1.
Nixon, A.J. et al, Isolation, propagation, and cryopreservation of equine articular chondrocytes, Am J Vet Res, 1992, pp. 2364-2370, vol. 53, No. 12.
Nixon, A.J. and Fortier, L.A., New Horizons in Articular Cartilage Repair, AAEP Proceedings, 2001, pp. 217-226, vol. 47.
Peretti, G.M. et al, Bonding of Cartilage Matrices with Cultured Chondrocytes: An Experimental Model, J. Orthop Res., 1998, pp. 89-95, vol. 16.
Peretti, G.M. et al, Cell-based bonding of articular cartilage: An extended study, Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2003, pp. 517-524.
Robinson, D. et al, Regenerating Hyaline Cartilage in Articular Defects of Old Chickens Using Implants of Embryonal Chick Chondrocytes Embedded in a New Natural Delivery Substance, Calcif Tissue Int., 1990, pp. 246-253, vol. 46.
Schwan, B.L., Human Amniotic Membrane Transplantation for the Treatment of Ocular Surface Disease, http://www.dcmsonline.org/jax-medicine/2002journals/augsept2002/amniotic.htm, 2002, 7 pages.
Silverman, R.P. et al, Injectable Tissue-Engineered Cartilage Using a Fibrin Glue Polymer, American Society of Plastic Surgery, 1999, pp. 1809-1818, vol. 103, No. 7.
Specchia, N. et al, Fetal chondral homografts in the repair of articular cartilage defects, Bulletin Hospital for Joint Diseases, 1996, pp. 230-235, vol. 54, No. 4.
Tuan, R.S., A second-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation approach to the treatment of focal articular cartilage defects, Arthritis Research & Therapy, 2007, pp. 109-112, vol. 9.
Xu, J.W. et al, Injectable Tissue-Engineered Cartilage with Different Chondrocyte Sources, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2004, pp. 1361-1371, vol. 113, No. 5.
Zalzal, G.H. et al, Cartilage Grafts—Present Status, Head & Neck Surgery, 1986, pp. 363-374.
Horton, W.A. et al, Characterization of a type II collagen gene (COL2A1) mutation identified in cultured chondrocytes from human hypochondrogenesis, PNAS, 1992, pp. 4583-4587, vol. 89.
Ishizaki, Y. et al, Autocrine Signals Enable Chondrocytes to Survive in Culture, J. Cell Biol, 1994, pp. 1069-1077, vol. 126, No. 4.
Lu, Y. et al, Minced Cartilage without Cell Culture Serves as an Effective Intraoperative Cell Source for Cartilage Repair, J. Orthop Res, 2006, pp. 1261-1270, vol. 24, No. 6.
Non-Final Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/010,779 issued Apr. 15, 2009, 10 pages.
Non-Final Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/010,779 issued Feb. 17, 2010, 4 pages.
European Search Report regarding European Application No. 11154746 dated May 10, 2001, 2 pages.
European Search Report regarding European Application No. 11154748 dated May 10, 2001, 2 pages.
European Search Report regarding European Application No. 11154747 dated May 22, 2001, 2 pages.
Egkher, E., Indications and Limits of Fibrin Adhesive Applied to Traumatological Patients, Traumatology and Orthopaedics, 1986, pp. 144-151, vol. 7, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
Erikson, U. et al, English abstract only, A roentgenological method for the determination of renal blood flow. A preliminary report, Acta Soc Med Ups, 1965, pp. 213-216, vol. 70, No. 3.
Erol, O.O., The Turkish Delight: A Pliable Graft for Rhinoplasty, Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 2000, pp. 2229-2241, vol. 105.
Evans, C.H., et al, Experimental Arthritis Induced by Intraarticular Injection of Allogenic Cartilageinous Particles into Rabbit Knees, Arthritis and Rheumatism, 1984, pp. 200-207, vol. 27, No. 2.
Farrior, R.T., Implant Materials in Restoration of Facial Contour, Laryngoscope, 1966, pp. 934-954, vol. 76, No. 5.
Feldman, M.D., et al, Compatibility of Autologous Fibrin Adhesive With Implant Materials, Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 1988, pp. 182-185, vol. 114.
Fontana, A., et al, Cartilage Chips Synthesized with Fibrin Glue in Rhinoplasty, Aesth Plast Surg, 1991, pp. 237-240, vol. 15.
Furukawa, T. et al, Biochemical Studies on Repair Cartilage Resurfacing Experimental Defects in the Rabbit Knee, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1980, pp. 79-89, vol. 62, No. 1.
Gaudernak, T., et al, Clinical Experiences Using Fibrin Sealant in the Treatment of Osteochondral Fractures, Fibrin Sealant in Operative Medicine—Traumatology and Orthopaedics, 1986, pp. 91-102, vol. 7, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
Gerngross, H. et al, Experimental Studies on the Influence of Fibrin Adhesive, Factor XIII, and Calcitonin on the Incorporation and Remodeling of Autologous Bone Grafts, Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 1986, pp. 23, 31, vol. 106.
Gersdorff, M.C.H., and Robillard, T.A., “How I Do It”—Otology and Neurotology. A Specific Issue and Its Solution. A New Procedure for Bone Reconstruction in OTO-Microsurgery: A Mixture of Bone Dust and Fibrinogen Adhesive, Laryngoscope, 1985, pp. 1278-1280, vol. 95.
Ghadially, J.A. and Ghadially, F.N., Evidence of Cartilage Flow in Deep Defects in Articular Cartilage, Virchows Arch B. Cell Path, 1975, pp. 193-204, vol. 18.
Ghadially, J.A. et al, Long-Term Results of Deep Defects in Articular Cartilage, Virchows Arch B. Cell Path, 1977, pp. 125-136, vol. 25.
Ghazavi, M.T. et al, Fresh Osteochondral Allografts for Post-Traumatic Osteochondral Defects of the Knee, JBJS, 1997, pp. 1008-1013, vol. 79-B.
Gibson, T. et al, The Long-Term Survival of Cartilage Homografts in Man, British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 1958, pp. 177-187, vol. 11.
Gooding, C.R. et al, Abstract only of a prospective, randomised study comparing two techniques of autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects in the knee: Periosteum covered versus type I/III collagen covered, Knee, 2006, pp. 203-210, vol. 13, No. 3.
Greco, F. et al, Experimental Investigation into Reparative Osteogenesis With Fibrin Adhesive, Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 1988, pp. 99-104, vol. 107.
Hamra, S.T., Crushed Cartilage Grafts over Alar Dome Reduction in Open Rhinoplasty, Plast Reconstr Surg., 1993, pp. 352-356, vol. 92, No. 2.
Hangody, L. et al, English Abstract only, Autogenous Osteochondralf Craft Technique for Replacing Knee Cartilage Defects in Dogs, Autogenous Osteochondral Mosaicplasty, Orthop Int, 1997, pp. 175-181, vol. 5, No. 3.
Hangody, L. and Fules, P., Autologous Osteochondral Mosaicplasty for the Treatment of Full-Thickness Defects of Weght-Bearing Joints: Ten Years of Experimental and clinical Experience, JBJS, 2003, pp. 25-32, vol. 85.
Hangody, L. et al, Mosaicplasty for the Treatment of Articular Defects of the Knee and Ankle, Clin Orthopaedics and Rel Res, 2001, pp. S328-S336, No. 391S.
Harbin, M. and Moritz, A.R., Autogenous Free Cartilage Transplanted into Joints, Archives of Surgery, 1930, pp. 885-896, vol. 20, No. 6.
He, Q. et al, Repair of flexor tendon defects of rabbit with tissue engineering method, Chinese Journal of Traumatology, 2002, pp. 200-208, vol. 5, No. 4.
Helidonis, E. et al, Laser Shaping of Composite Cartilage Grafts, Am. J. Otolaryngology, 1993, pp. 410-412, vol. 14, No. 6.
Homminga, G.N. et al, Perichondral Grafting for Cartilage Lesions of the Knee, British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1990, pp. 1003-1007, vol. 72B.
Homminga, G.N., Repair of Chrondral Lesions of the Knee with a Perichondrial Graft, Fibrin Sealant in Operative Medicine—Orthopedic Surgery Maxillofacial Surgery, 1986, pp. 61-69, vol. 4, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
Hoover, N.W. et al, Skin Arthroplasty of the Hip, An Experimental Study in Dogs, JBJS, 1961, pp. 1155-1166, vol. 43-A, No. 8.
Horas, U. et al, Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation and Osteochondral Cylinder Transplantation in Cartilage Repair of the Knee Joint: A Prospective, Comparative Trial, JBJS, 2003, pp. 185-192, vol. 85.
Hurtig, M.B. et al, Effects of Lesion Size and Location on Equine Articular Cartilage Repair, Can J. Vet Res, 1988, pp. 137-146, vol. 52.
Hurtig, M.B., Use of autogenous cartilage particles to create a model of naturally occurring degenerative joint disease in the horse, Equine Vet J Suppl, 1988, pp. 19-22, No. 6.
Imhoff, A.B., et al, English Abstract only of Autologous Osteochondral transplantation on various joints, Orthopade, 1999, pp. 33-44, vol. 28, No. 1.
Ishida, T., English Abstract only of the Use of a Fibrin Adhesive for a Cartilage Graft Basic and Clinical Studies, Japanese J. of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1990, pp. 215-230, vol. 33, No. 1.
Ishizaki, Y. et al, Autocrine Signals Enable Chondrocytes to Survive in Culture, J. Cell Biol. 1994, pp. 1069-1077, vol. 126, No. 4.
Ito, Y. et al, Localization of chondrocyte precursors in periosteum, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2001, pp. 215-223, vol. 9.
Ittner, G. et al, English Abstract only of Treatment of flake fracture of the talus, Z. Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb, 1989, pp. 183-186, vol. 127, No. 2.
Jakob, R.P. et al, Autologous Osteochondral Grafting in the Knee: Indication, Results and Reflections, Clinical Orthopaedics and Rel Res, 2002, pp. 170.184, No. 401.
Jin, C.Z. et al, Human Amniotic Membrane as a Delivery Matrix for Articular Cartilage Repair, Tissue Engineering, 2007, pp. 693-702, vol. 13, No. 4.
Johnson, L.L., Arthroscopic Abrasion Arthroplasty Historical and Pathologic Perspective: Present Status, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, 1986, pp. 54-69, vol. 2, No. 1.
Kanzaki, J. et al, Use of Fibrin Glue in Intracranial Procedures Following Acoustic Neuroma Surgery: Application in Facial Nerve Reconstruction and Prevention of Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea, Fibrin Sealing in Surgical and Nonsurgical Fields—Neurosurgery Ophthalmic Surgery ENT, 1994, pp. 162-168, vol. 5, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
Kaplonyi, G. et al, The use of fibrin adhesive in the repair of chondral and osteochondral injuries, Injury, 1988, pp. 267-272, vol. 19.
Kawamura, M. and Urist, M.R., Human Fibrin Is a Physiologic Delivery System for Bone Morphogenetic Protein, Clin Ortho Rel Res, 1988, pp. 302-310, No. 235.
Keller, J. et al, Fixation of osteochondral fractures, Acta Orthop Scand, 1985, pp. 323-326, vol. 56.
Kettunen, K.O., Skin Arthroplasty in the Light of Animal Experiments With Special Reference to Functional Metaplasia of Connective Tissue, Acta Ortho Scand, 1958, pp. 9-69, Suppl. XXIX.
Kirilak, Y. et al, Fibrin sealant promotes migration and proliferation of human articular chondrocytes: possible involvement of thrombin and protease-activated receptors, Int. J. Mol. Med, 2006, pp. 551-558, vol. 17, No. 4.
Knutsen, G. et al, Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Compared with Microfracture in the Knee. A Randomized Trial, JBJS, 2004, pp. 455-464, vol. 86.
Kon, E. et al, Second Generation Issues in Cartilage Repair, Sports Med Arthrosc Rev., 2008, pp. 221-229, vol. 16.
Korhonen, R.K. et al, Importance of the superficial tissue layer for the indentation stiffness of articular cartilage, Medical Eng. Phys, 2002, pp. 99-108, vol. 24.
Lane, J.M. et al, Joint Resurfacing in the Rabbit Using an Autologous Osteochondral Graft, JBJS, 1977, pp. 218-222, vol. 59-A, No. 2.
Schaffer, D.J. et al, English abstract only of foreign patent No. WO00/74741 A2, international filed, Jun. 8, 2000, one page.
Schaffer, D.J. et al, English abstract only of foreign patent No. WO00/74741 A3, international filing date Jun. 8, 2000, one page.
Yamamoto, K, et al, English abstract only of Japanese publication No. 2006230749A, publication date Sep. 7, 2006, one page.
Verwerd, C.D.A. et al, Wound Healing of Autologous Implants in the Nasal Septal Cartilage, ORL, 1991, pp. 310-314, vol. 53.
Wilflingseder, P., Cancellous Bone Grafts, S Afr Med J., 1957, pp. 1267-1271, vol. 31, No. 50.
Wilfingseder, P., Treatment of Mandibular Facial Dysostosis, S Afr Med J., 1957, pp. 1296-1298, vol. 31, No. 51.
Pirsig, W., English Abstract only of Regeneration of septal cartilage in children after septoplasty. A histological study, Acta Otolaryngol, 1975, pp. 451-459, vol. 79, No. 5-6.
Passl, R. et al, Homologous articular cartilage transplantation in animal experiments. Preliminary studies on sheep (author's transl), Arch Orthop Unfallchir., 1976, pp. 243-256, vol. 86, No. 2.
Hunter, W., VI. Of the Structure and Difeafes of Articulating Cartilages, Academiae Grypeswaldensis Bibliotheca, 1775, pp. 514-521, vol. 1.
Kallio, K.E., Arthroplastia Cutanea, Discussion by T. Heirtom, ACTA Orhtopaedica Scandinavica, 1957, pp. 327-328, vol. 26.
Peer, L.A., Transplanation of Tissues—Cartilage, Bone, Fascia, Tendon, and Muscle, The Williams & Wilkins Company, 1955, pp. 69-137 and 392-393, vol. 1, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Mannhelm, A., Abstract—Free Autoplastic Cartilage Transplantation, J. Am Med Assoc., 1926, pp. 2132, vol. 87, No. 25.
Nehrer, S. and Minas, T., Treatment of Articular Cartilage Defects, Investigative Radiology, 2000, pp. 639-646, vol. 35, No. 10.
Prudden, T.M., Experimental studies on the transplantation of cartilage, Am. J. M. Sc., 1881, pp. 360-370, vol. 82.
Shands, A.R., Jr., The regeneration of hyaline cartilage in joints. An experimental study, Arch. Surg., 1931, pp. 137-178, vol. 22.
Cheung, H.S. and Haak, M.H., Growth of osteoblasts on porous calcium phosphate ceramic: an in vitro model for biocompatibility study, Biomaterials, 1989, pp. 63-67, vol. 10.
Sittinger, M. et al, Engineering of cartilage tissue using bioresorbable polymer carriers in perfusion culture, Biomaterials, 1994, pp. 451-456, vol. 15, No. 6.
Polettini, B., English abstract only Experimental Grafts of Cartilage and Bone, J.A.M.A., 1923, p. 360, vol. 80.
Rohrbach, JM et al, Abstract only of Biological corneal replacement an alternative to keratoplasty and keratoprosthesis? A pilot study with heterologous hyaline cartilage in the rabbit model, 1995, Klin Monatsbl. Augenheilkd., pp. 191-196, vol. 207, No. 3.
Fontana, A et al, Abstract only of Cartilage chips synthesized with fibrin glue in rhinoplasty, Aestetic Plast Surg, 1991, pp. 237-240, vol. 15, No. 3.
Mainil-Varlet, P et al, Abstract only of Articular cartilage repair using a tissue engineered cartilage like implant: an animal study, Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2001, pp. s:6-s:15, vol. 9.
Erol, OO, The Turkish delight: a pliable graft for rhinoplasty, Plast Reconstro Surg, 2000, pp. 2229-2241, vol. 105, No. 6.
Degroot, J. et al, Age related decrease in Proteoglycan synthesis of human articular chondrocytes, 1999, Arthritis & Rheumatism, pp. 1003-1009, vol. 42, No. 5.
Feder, J. et al, The promise of chondral repair using neocartilage, 2004, Tissue engineering in musculoskeletal clinical practice, 1st Edition, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, pp. 219-226, Chapter 22, Section 3.
Morales, T.I., Review: Chondrocyte moves: clever strategies?, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2007, pp. 861-871, vol. 15.
Namba, R.S. et al, Spontaneous repair of superficial defects in articular cartilage in a fetal lamb model, 1998, JBJS, pp. 4-10, vol. 80, No. 1.
Williamson, A.K., et al, Compressive properties and function composition relationships of developing bovine articular cartilage, J. Orthopaedic Research, 2001, pp. 1113-1121, vol. 19.
Brown, K.R. et al, English Abstract of Japanese publication No. 2003-102755, 1 page.
Cheung, H.S. and Haak, M.H., Growth of osteoblasts on porous calcium phosphate ceramic: an in vitro model for biocompatibility study, Biomaterials, 1989, pp. 63-67., vol. 10.
Lapchinsky, A.G., et al., English abstract only of Apparatus for grinding cartilage in plastic surgery, 1960, primenenija Moskva, pp. 209-213, No. 4.
Imbert, L. et al, English translated Abstract only of Research on cartilage grafts hetero-plastic, 1916, Rev. de chir., pp. 111-128, vol. 52.
Iwamoto, Y. et al, English abstract of WO2005/011765, published Feb. 10, 2005, 1 page.
Ochi, M. et al, English abstract of Japanese publication No. 2002-233567, 1 page.
Sengupta, S. and Lumpur, K., The fate of transplants of articular cartilage in the rabbit, 1974, JBJS, pp. 167-177, vol. 56B, No. 1.
Didier R., English translated Abstract only of the production of cartilage and bone grafts in living and dead rabbits, 1928, Compt. rend. Soc de biol, pp. 443-445, vol. 98.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120009270 A1 Jan 2012 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60528865 Dec 2003 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 12861404 Aug 2010 US
Child 12976689 US
Parent 11010779 Dec 2004 US
Child 12861404 US