This U.S. patent application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a) through (d) of Russian Federation utility application RU 2009141540 filed on Nov. 11, 2009, hereby entirely incorporated by reference.
The swimming apparatus pertains to swimming with special equipment for swimmers and divers and can be used for increasing speed, comfortable maneuvering, and making swimming more economical. The swimming apparatus comprises a tail fin, a hand-held fin and a dual snorkel.
The disadvantage of ordinary fins or monofins is low swimming efficiency because of imperfect hydrodynamics caused by the elongated form and the flatness of the fin blade.
When water flows over the fin while stroking, there is a stalling (turbulence) on the fin/monofin surface which causes a low ratio between the momentum and the general stroke effort. This is the reason for the lower swimming speed and faster fatigue while kicking intensively with the fins/monofin.
The engineering solution suggested employs a special fin—a tail fin which has better hydrodynamics than the monofin. The tail fin parameters are made to reach the best ratio between the momentum and the general stroke effort. The tail fin is used together with the hand-held fin. The hand-held fin is intended for stabilizing the upper part of body, maneuvering and increasing speed when swimming with the tail fin.
For breathing while swimming along the surface the swimming apparatus provides the dual snorkel that avoids rebreathing exhaled carbon dioxide.
The invention utilizes the fact that a fin in the shape of a wing provides a better ratio between the momentum and the general stroke effort than a fin with a flat blade. The tail fin is the part of the swimming apparatus that utilizes this advantage.
The solution is reached by the following:
The tail fin length (transverse direction towards the movement) is several times larger than its width (lengthwise direction towards the movement). The tail fin cross-section has a shape which provides optimal ratio of the lift on the surface to the resistance. The fin ends are pointed or have a rectangular shape with flank limiters.
The tail fin is connected to the shoes by a hinge or some flexible connection.
The tail fin is made with the possibility to swing towards the shoes meanwhile the angle of swinging is limited by the regulated stoppers placed on the shoes' keels.
The shoes are joined together by bars; the shoe sole is rigid or semi-rigid.
The tail fin is rigid or has a certain degree of flexibility by means of a supple material with a rigid frame.
The hand-held fin is an essential part of the swimming apparatus (written hereafter as “apparatus”) as a stabilizer of the upper part of body when swimming with the tail fin. At the same time, it can naturally serve for maneuvering. As a result, it enhances speed, comfort and the entertaining aspect of swimming with the apparatus.
The solution is reached by implementing the hand-held fin in variants as follows:
a wing-shaped horizontal fin held with hands on the front edge and additionally fixed by holders at the wrists;
a horizontal fin consisting of two halves connected by an axis; additionally, vertical upper and lower fins may be attached to the horizontal fin either to one of the halves or each one to each of the halves;
a compound fin placed nearer to the elbows and consisting of the horizontal and vertical upper and lower fins held with the hands on the handles connected with the fin combination by a bar, and fixed at the arms by the holders placed under the horizontal fin. The horizontal fin consists of the immovable middle part placed above arms, the right and left parts connected with the middle one by axes. The compound fin may be configured with the two vertical upper fins or with single one.
A means of breathing should be provided so that one can swim with the apparatus along the surface. The point is that the depth is greater, when swimming with the apparatus, than that with ordinary fins and, consequently, a longer snorkel is required. An ordinary snorkel has a zone of exhaled carbon dioxide inside the tube and, therefore, the reasonable length of it is limited. The suggested engineering solution, the dual snorkel, serves the purpose of facilitation of swimmers' respiration by avoiding the breathing “dead zone” (exhaled carbon dioxide) for snorkels of any length, providing the possibility of making a longer tube than an ordinary one.
The solution is achieved by providing the snorkel tube with channels for the inhale and the exhale separated over the whole length, the valves for each channels placed near the mouth-piece. The valves may be done in the manner of flexible petals placed on the different sides of the frame with the holes for the air flow.
The hand-held compound fin may be provided with a built in dual snorkel.
The swimming apparatus pertains to swimming with special equipment and can be used for increasing speed, comfortable maneuvering, and making swimming more economical. It is intended for entertainment and sports.
The objective of the invention is to provide a quicker means of swimming than ordinary fins and monofins. The tail fin serves the purpose of optimizing the kick more than ordinary fins. The tail fin characteristics are fulfilled to achieve the optimal ratio of momentum to the general stroke effort. The tail fin length (transverse direction towards the movement) is several times larger than its width (lengthwise direction towards the movement). The tail fin cross-section has a shape which provides the optimal ratio of lift (which appears on the fin surface while water flows over the fin) to resistance. The tail fin construction allows one to achieve a maximum effect for both a downstroke and an upstroke because it sets an optimal attack angle of the tail fin towards the incoming flow for either direction of the kick. The tail fin is supposed to be exercised in a dolphin-like style of swimming. It can be used for both comfortable and intensive, sport-like manners of kicking.
Although it is preferable when a tail fin has a better ratio between lift and resistance and other characteristics that enhance the efficiency of the tail fin—it is a matter of hydrodynamics—the apparatus proves its sufficient efficiency when used with less optimal characteristics too.
The methods of implementation of the tail fin are various. The tail fin may be produced as the rigid variant or have a certain degree of flexibility. In case of a flexible variant, the tail fin is made of flexible material, for example, rubber, in combination with a rigid frame. The frame parts have the ability to turn around an axis. Under the pressure of the incoming water flow, the tail fin changes shape in a way that is best for the smooth water flowing over the fin and the ratio between the lift and the resistance.
Despite the evident advantage of the said tail fin, a problem prevents the use of it alone—the swinging of the upper part of body while kicking with the tail fin. The movement appears to be significant, however, the forward progress remains unaffected, if not inhibited. The lift created on the fin surface has an angle towards the actual direction of swimming. The cross vector of the lift causes such an effect that when a swimmer makes a downstroke his upper part of body bends downwardly and when an upstroke it bends upwardly. The more effort of stroke, the more swinging of the upper part of body. As a result, the effect of the tail fin use is destroyed.
The problem is solved by use of the hand-held fin held with the hands stretched forward in front of the head. Its starting version is implemented as a horizontal fin. Preferably, it also has the shape of a wing because lift created on its surface is one that suppresses swinging of the upper part of body. A better ratio of lift to resistance is important for the had-held fin too. The horizontally stabilizing function of the hand-held fin is the main one. At the same time, naturally, it can serve for directional steering and banking while swimming. The full advantage of it is taken when the hand-held fin is provided with vertical fins attached to the horizontal one and different parts of the hand-held fin are made with the ability to move/turn towards each other.
For a logical completion of the apparatus, a means of breathing should be provided so that one can swim with the apparatus along the surface. An ordinary snorkel can hardly be useful for this case since the depth of swimming with the apparatus is greater than that with ordinary fins. The swimmer's body and the fins should be completely covered by water while kicking. Besides, the swimmer's head may swing in a certain degree. Also, the head is positioned lower for smoother water flow over the body. A snorkel that is longer than an ordinary one by at least 30-35 centimetres is required. Such an additional length is unattainable for an ordinary snorkel since it is single-channeled and has the zone of exhaled carbon dioxide inside the tube and reasonable length of it is limited. The suggested engineering solution, the dual snorkel, serves the purpose of avoiding the breathing “dead zone” (exhaled carbon dioxide) regardless of the snorkel length and, consequently, providing the possibility of making a longer tube than an ordinary one.
The solution is achieved by providing the snorkel tube with channels for the inhale and the exhale separated over the whole length, the valves for each channels placed near the mouth-piece. The valves ensure the inhaled and the exhaled air move strictly along the relative channels. The valves may be done in the manner of flexible petals placed on the different sides of the frame with the holes for the air flow.
Materials for producing the fin and the shoes: plastic, rubber, carbon, steel for strengthening the shoes and the hinges.
Materials for producing the fin: plastic, rubber, carbon, steel.
A dual snorkel may be built in a hand-held compound fin or may be implemented as a separate component of the apparatus as well.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2009141540 | Nov 2009 | RU | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3529313 | Girden | Sep 1970 | A |
4781637 | Caires | Nov 1988 | A |
5348503 | Fechtner | Sep 1994 | A |
5429536 | Evans | Jul 1995 | A |
5649845 | Fechtner | Jul 1997 | A |
5664558 | Wagner | Sep 1997 | A |
6086440 | Fechtner | Jul 2000 | A |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110111655 A1 | May 2011 | US |