Embodiments of the present invention relate to the fields of design and manufacturing semiconductors, and more particularly to systems and methods for forming ultra-low drain-source resistance power metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFETs).
Power metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFETs) have wide application in the electronic arts, for example in switching power supplies, motor driving circuits and the like. In many applications, a decreased ON resistance, or drain to source resistance, RDS, of a power MOSFET is desirable.
Therefore, there is a need for systems and methods for ultra-low drain-source resistance power MOSFETs. In addition to the aforementioned need, there is a need for ultra-low drain-source resistance power MOSFETs with improved breakdown voltage characteristics. Further, there is a need for providing for the aforementioned needs in a manner that is compatible and complimentary with existing semiconductor processing systems and manufacturing processes.
Accordingly, an ultra-low drain-source resistance power metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor is disclosed. In accordance with a first embodiment of the present invention, a semiconductor device comprises a substrate doped with red Phosphorus.
In accordance with another embodiment of the preset invention, a semiconductor device comprises a plurality of trench power MOSFETs. The plurality of trench power MOSFETs is formed in a second epitaxial layer. The second epitaxial layer is formed adjacent and contiguous to a first epitaxial layer. The first epitaxial layer is formed adjacent and contiguous to a substrate highly doped with red Phosphorus.
Reference will now be made in detail to the various embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the invention will be described in conjunction with these embodiments, it will be understood that they are not intended to limit the invention to these embodiments. On the contrary, the invention is intended to cover alternatives, modifications and equivalents, which may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Furthermore, in the following detailed description of the present invention, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be recognized by one of ordinary skill in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, components, and circuits have not been described in detail as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the present invention.
Although embodiments of in accordance with the present invention are herein described in terms of power MOSFETs, it is to be appreciated that embodiments of in accordance with the present invention are well suited to other types of semiconductors, e.g., semiconductors in which a low substrate resistance is desirable, and that such embodiments are within the scope of the present invention.
Conventional semiconductor designs and processing techniques are generally unable to produce a power metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor characterized as having a drain to source resistance, RDS, of less than about two milliohms percentimeter. For example, a conventional n-channel MOSFET is generally fabricated utilizing an Arsenic-doped substrate. The figure of two milliohms percentimeter is approximately a physical limit of such an Arsenic-doped substrate. Further, the substrate typically contributes about 40% of the ON resistance in conventional power MOSFETs.
In one embodiment of the present invention, substrate 110 is doped to a level of about 1.0×1020 dopant atoms per cubic centimeter. At this doping level, substrate 110 achieves an advantageously low resistant of better than about 1.0 to 1.5 milliohms per square centimeter. It is to be appreciated that other doping levels are well suited to embodiments in accordance with the present invention.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, substrate 110 is doped to a level of about 7.5×1019 to 1.1×1020 dopant atoms per cubic centimeter. At this doping level, substrate 110 achieves an advantageously low resistant of less than about 1.0 milliohms per square centimeter.
A conventional approach to reducing ON resistance of a power MOSFET is to reduce a thickness of an epitaxial layer and/or to create shallow drains. Deleteriously, semiconductor manufacturing techniques impose limits as to minimum size of such features. An additional drawback of such thin epitaxial layers is an undesirable reduction in breakdown voltage.
Red Phosphorus is generally characterized as having a high diffusion behavior. Such diffusion can lead to deleterious lowered breakdown voltages due to the Early effect.
Power MOSFET 100 further comprises a first epitaxial layer 120, deposed adjacent to substrate 110. In one embodiment of the present invention, first epitaxial layer 120 is doped to a level of about 1.0×1018±about 5% dopant atoms per cubic centimeter. It is to be appreciated that other doping levels are well suited to embodiments in accordance with the present invention. One function of first epitaxial layer 120 is to limit the diffusion of red Phosphorus from substrate 110.
Power MOSFET 100 further comprises a second epitaxial layer 130, deposed adjacent to first epitaxial layer 120. In one embodiment of the present invention, second epitaxial layer 130 is doped to a level of about 1.0×1016 dopant atoms per cubic centimeter with, for example, Arsenic and/or Phosphorus. It is to be appreciated that other doping levels as well as different dopants are well suited to embodiments in accordance with the present invention.
Trench devices 140 of well-known design are constructed in second epitaxial layer 130.
In accordance with embodiments of the present invention, the thickness, relative thickness, doping levels and dopant species of the first and second epitaxial layers can be designed to achieve a desirable high breakdown voltage in conjunction with an advantageous low ON resistance. For example, as the diffusion coefficient of Arsenic is smaller than that of Phosphorus, a first epitaxial layer comprising Arsenic dopants can be made thinner than a first epitaxial layer comprising Phosphorus dopants, beneficially decreasing ON resistance.
MOSFET 200 comprises an implant layer 250 adjacent to a boundary between the substrate 210 and the first epitaxial layer 220. Implant layer 250 may be formed at a depth considered to be within substrate 210, at a depth considered to be within first epitaxial layer 220 or at a depth that crosses a boundary between substrate 210 and first epitaxial layer 220, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. Implant layer 250 may comprise implanted atoms of Arsenic or Antimony, for example.
One function of implant layer 250 is to limit the diffusion of red Phosphorus from substrate 210. In this novel manner, first epitaxial layer 220 can be made thinner in comparison to a corresponding epitaxial layer in a semiconductor without an implant layer, e.g., first epitaxial layer 120 (
Region 310 of doping profile 300 represents a doping level of a substrate, e.g., substrate 110 of
Region 330 represents a doping level of a second epitaxial layer adjacent to the first epitaxial layer, e.g., second epitaxial layer 130 of
In accordance with alternative embodiments of the present invention, a novel Antimony-doped substrate may be utilized. Antimony is characterized as having a very low diffusion coefficient, e.g., lower than that of Phosphorus.
Thus, embodiments in accordance with the present invention provide systems and methods ultra-low drain-source resistance power MOSFETs. Additionally, in conjunction with the aforementioned benefit, embodiments of the present invention provide systems and methods for ultra-low drain-source resistance power MOSFETs that enable improved breakdown voltage characteristics. As a further benefit, in conjunction with the aforementioned benefits, systems and methods of ultra-low drain-source resistance power MOSFETs are provided in a manner that is compatible and complimentary with existing semiconductor processing systems and manufacturing processes.
Embodiments in accordance with the present invention, ultra-low drain-source resistance power MOSFET, are thus described. While the present invention has been described in particular embodiments, it should be appreciated that the present invention should not be construed as limited by such embodiments, but rather construed according to the below claims.
This is a Divisional Application of, and claims benefit to, co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/386,927, filed Mar. 21, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,409,954, to Chau et al., which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4131524 | Gieles | Dec 1978 | A |
4478655 | Nagakubo et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4605919 | Wilner | Aug 1986 | A |
4660068 | Sakuma et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4758531 | Beyer et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4799990 | Kerbaugh et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4835585 | Panousis | May 1989 | A |
4843025 | Morita | Jun 1989 | A |
4857986 | Kinugawa | Aug 1989 | A |
4939557 | Pao et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5087585 | Hayashi | Feb 1992 | A |
5087586 | Chan et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5182233 | Inoue | Jan 1993 | A |
5366914 | Takahashi et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5602424 | Tsubouchi et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5814858 | Williams | Sep 1998 | A |
5963822 | Saihara et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5965904 | Ohtani et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6059981 | Nakasuji | May 2000 | A |
6153896 | Omura et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6180966 | Kohno et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6245615 | Noble et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6359308 | Hijzen et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6373100 | Pages | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6436791 | Lin et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6483171 | Forbes et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6495883 | Shibata et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6580154 | Noble et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6605843 | Krivokapic et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6621132 | Onishi et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6630389 | Shibata et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6710403 | Sapp | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6903393 | Ohmi et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6919610 | Saitoh et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6924198 | Williams et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6960821 | Noble et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6967112 | Maa et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6995439 | Hill et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7192495 | Collins | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7217606 | Forbes et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7348244 | Aoki et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7361952 | Miura et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7397083 | Amali et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7605425 | Bhalla et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7663195 | Ohmi et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7667264 | Tai et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7800169 | Bhalla et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7923774 | Bhalla et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7928518 | Ohmi et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8008151 | Tai et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8084327 | Sapp | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8409954 | Chau et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8680611 | Kocon et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
9412833 | Chau et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9425043 | Pattanayak et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9437424 | Pattanayak et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9685524 | Chau et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
20010026006 | Noble et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020104988 | Shibata et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020155685 | Sakakibara | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030008483 | Sato et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030073271 | Bimer et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030082873 | Zambrano | May 2003 | A1 |
20030102564 | Darwish | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040155287 | Omura et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040161886 | Forbes et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040185665 | Kishimoto et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040198003 | Yeo et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050026369 | Noble et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050029585 | He | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050079678 | Verma et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050224890 | Bernstein et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050250276 | Heath et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050253193 | Chen et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050277278 | Maleville et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060046419 | Sandhu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060081919 | Inoue et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060091456 | Montgomery | May 2006 | A1 |
20060108635 | Bhalla et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060128100 | Aoki et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060131655 | Kunnen | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060138538 | Ohmi et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060292825 | Lemer | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070034911 | Kao | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070048966 | Chau et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080099344 | Basol et al. | May 2008 | A9 |
20080157281 | Chau et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090104751 | Chau et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100032857 | Izadnegahdar et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100072519 | Ohmi et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0238749 | Oct 1986 | EP |
0354449 | Feb 1990 | EP |
0628337 | Dec 1994 | EP |
1628337 | Feb 2006 | EP |
S58-100441 | Jun 1983 | JP |
68168258 | Oct 1983 | JP |
S58-168258 | Oct 1983 | JP |
S58-197839 | Nov 1983 | JP |
S61-022630 | Jan 1986 | JP |
S61-256739 | Nov 1986 | JP |
S61256739 | Nov 1986 | JP |
S62-298130 | Dec 1987 | JP |
S63-228710 | Sep 1988 | JP |
S63-284832 | Nov 1988 | JP |
S63291449 | Nov 1988 | JP |
401008672 | Jan 1989 | JP |
S64-076755 | Mar 1989 | JP |
02035736 | Feb 1990 | JP |
02058248 | Feb 1990 | JP |
2002231945 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2004056003 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2004146626 | May 2004 | JP |
2004356114 | Dec 2004 | JP |
1020040036958 | Apr 2004 | KR |
2004012234 | May 2004 | WO |
2004105116 | Dec 2004 | WO |
20060058210 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2006058210 | Jun 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Peter Van Zant, Microchip Fabrication, 2000, McGraw-Hill Publication, Fourth Edition, p. 32. |
Nakamura et al., “Effects of Selecting Channel Direction in Improving Performance of Sub-100nm MOSFETS Fabricated on (110) Surface Si Substrate,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 43, No. 48, Japan, Apr. 27, 2004, pp. 1723-1728. |
Los Alamos National Laboratory Periodic Table, www.periodic.lanl.gov/elements/15.shtml, publicly available Jan. 1992. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080157281 A1 | Jul 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11386927 | Mar 2006 | US |
Child | 12069712 | US |