All publications, including patents and patent applications, mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety to the same extent as if each individual publication was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
The present invention generally relates to ultrasound treatment of urinary stones. More specifically, the present invention relates to using a combination of Lithotripsy and Histotripsy to fractionate and erode urinary stones.
Histotripsy and Lithotripsy are non-invasive tissue ablation modalities that focus pulsed ultrasound from outside the body to a target tissue inside the body. Histotripsy mechanically damages tissue through cavitation of microbubbles, and Lithotripsy is typically used to fragment urinary stones with acoustic shockwaves.
Histotripsy is the mechanical disruption via acoustic cavitation of a target tissue volume or tissue embedded inclusion as part of a surgical or other therapeutic procedure. Histotripsy works best when a whole set of acoustic and transducer scan parameters controlling the spatial extent of periodic cavitation events are within a rather narrow range. Small changes in any of the parameters can result in discontinuation of the ongoing process.
Histotripsy requires high peak intensity acoustic pulses which in turn require large surface area focused transducers. These transducers are often very similar to the transducers used for Lithotripsy and often operate in the same frequency range. The primary difference is in how the devices are driven electrically.
As shown by
In comparison, each negative and positive cycle of a Histotripsy pulse grows and collapses the bubbles, and the next cycle repeats the same process. The maximal sizes of bubbles reach approximately tens to hundreds of microns. These micron size bubbles interact with a tissue surface to mechanically damage tissue.
In addition, Histotripsy delivers hundreds to thousands of pulses per second, i.e., 100-1 kHz pulse repetition frequency. Lithotripsy only works well within a narrow range of pulse repetition frequency (usually 0.5-2 Hz, which is the current limit in the United States and in Europe, however higher limits up to 4-5 Hz are contemplated). Studies show that the efficacy and efficiency of Lithotripsy decreases significantly when the pulse repetition frequency is increased to 10-100 Hz. The reduced efficiency is likely due to the increased number of mm size bubbles blocking the shock waves and other energy from reaching the stone.
Prior art treatment of nephrolithiasis (urinary stones) included early generation hydroelectric spark gap Lithotripters, such as the Donier HM3, which targeted a large treatment area, covering a sizeable portion of the kidney. For this reason, treatment success rates were high without the need for precise image guidance, yet substantial damage to the kidney tissue within the large focal volume also occurred. Subsequent Lithotripter development was focused on reducing renal injury by decreasing the focal volume. Some of the current third generation Lithotripters use piezoelectric (PZT) transducers, such as the Richard Wolf Piezolith 3000. The PZT transducer focused ultrasound in a small treatment region. Fluoroscope and ultrasound imaging can be utilized to target the urinary stones prior to and during treatment. By virtue of the smaller focus, the newer generation Lithotripters have reduced collateral tissue damage, but at the expense of success rates. Inaccuracies of targeting and respiratory motion of the kidneys decrease the fraction of pulses that directly impact the targeted stone.
Histotripsy also uses focused PZT transducers but has a different driving system. It uses ultrasound imaging to target the focused ultrasound to the stone and monitor the treatment in real time. The bubble clouds generated by Histotripsy show as a temporally changing hyperechoic zone on ultrasound images. The real-time guidance makes it possible to track the stone movement and adjust the focus position, thus further reducing possible collateral tissue damage. As described earlier, stone fragments produced by lithotripter vary from small granules less than 1.0 mm diameter to macroscopic fragments with diameters significantly greater than 1 mm (as shown in
Shockwave Lithotripsy is favorable in that it is a short (˜30 minute) outpatient procedure that requires only IV sedation in the vast majority of patients. Post-operative pain generally resolves within 1-2 days. Ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy generally require general anesthesia. Although ureteroscopy is an outpatient procedure, patients often suffer with pain and discomfort from a ureteral stent for 4-7 days after treatment. Disadvantages of Lithotripsy include a stone free rate of ˜65% percent 4 weeks after treatment (compared with 90-95% stone free rate in patients having percutaneous and ureteroscopic procedures) and the necessity and occasionally discomfort of passing stone fragments following treatment. Furthermore, urinary stones fragmented using shockwave Lithotripsy can remain up to several mm in size and include sharp or jagged edges that make them difficult and painful to pass through the urinary tract.
In some embodiments, a Lithotripsy-Histotripsy system is provided comprising a first therapy transducer configured to deliver Lithotripsy therapy to a target, a second therapy transducer configured to deliver Histotripsy therapy to the target, and a control system configured to switch between delivering Lithotripsy therapy from the first therapy transducer to delivering Histotripsy therapy from the second therapy transducer.
In some embodiments, the first therapy transducer is configured to apply acoustic pulses that operate at a frequency between approximately 50 KHz and 5 MHz, having a pulse intensity with a peak negative pressure of approximately 10-25 MPa, a peak positive pressure of more than 10 MPa, a pulse length of 1 cycle, a duty cycle less than 0.1%, and a pulse repetition frequency of less than 2 Hz.
In other embodiments, the second therapy transducer is configured to apply acoustic pulses that operate at a frequency between approximately 50 KHz and 5 MHz, having a pulse intensity with a peak negative pressure of approximately 8-40 MPa, a peak positive pressure of more than 10 MPa, a pulse length shorter than 50 cycles, a duty cycle of less than 5%, and a pulse repetition frequency of less than 5 KHz.
In some embodiments, the Lithotripsy-Histotripsy system further comprises an imaging system. In some embodiments, the imaging system comprises a fluoroscopic imaging system. In other embodiments, the imaging system comprises an ultrasound imaging system. In additional embodiments, the imaging system comprises a combination fluoroscopic and ultrasound imaging system. The imaging system can be configured to target and track a urinary stone in a patient.
In another embodiment of a Lithotripsy-Histotripsy system, the system comprises a multi-mode therapy transducer configured to deliver Lithotripsy therapy and Histotripsy therapy to a target, and a control system configured to switch between delivering Lithotripsy therapy from the multi-mode therapy transducer to delivering Histotripsy therapy from the multi-mode therapy transducer.
In some embodiments, the multi-mode therapy transducer is configured to apply acoustic pulses that operate at a frequency between approximately 50 KHz and 5 MHz, having a pulse intensity with a peak negative pressure of approximately 10-25 MPa, a peak positive pressure of more than 10 MPa, a pulse length of 1 cycle, a duty cycle less than 0.1%, and a pulse repetition frequency of less than 2 Hz, so as to deliver Lithotripsy therapy to the target.
In other embodiments, the multi-mode therapy transducer is configured to apply acoustic pulses that operate at a frequency between approximately 50 KHz and 5 MHz, having a pulse intensity with a peak negative pressure of approximately 8-40 MPa, a peak positive pressure of more than 10 MPa, a pulse length shorter than 50 cycles, a duty cycle of less than 5%, and a pulse repetition frequency of less than 5 KHz, so as to deliver Histotripsy therapy to the target.
In some embodiments, the Lithotripsy-Histotripsy system further comprises an imaging system. In some embodiments, the imaging system comprises a fluoroscopic imaging system. In other embodiments, the imaging system comprises an ultrasound imaging system. In additional embodiments, the imaging system comprises a combination fluoroscopic and ultrasound imaging system. The imaging system can be configured to target and track a urinary stone in a patient.
A method of treating urinary stones is also provided, comprising applying Histotripsy therapy to generate a bubble cloud, positioning the bubble cloud on a urinary stone, applying Lithotripsy therapy to generate a shock wave to fractionate the urinary stone into macroscopic urinary stone particles, and applying Histotripsy therapy to the macroscopic urinary stone particles to erode the macroscopic urinary stone particles.
In some embodiments, the positioning step further comprises positioning the bubble cloud on a urinary stone under imaging guidance. In other embodiments, the positioning step further comprises positioning the bubble cloud on a urinary stone under ultrasound imaging guidance. In additional steps, the positioning step further comprises positioning the bubble cloud on a urinary stone under fluoroscopic and ultrasound imaging guidance.
In some embodiments, the applying Histotripsy therapy steps comprise applying Histotripsy therapy with a multi-mode transducer. In other embodiments, the applying Lithotripsy therapy step comprises applying Lithotripsy therapy with the multi-mode transducer.
In one embodiment, the applying Histotripsy therapy steps comprise applying Histotripsy therapy at a first pulse repetition frequency, wherein the applying Lithotripsy therapy step comprises applying Lithotripsy therapy at a second pulse repetition frequency, the method further comprising interleaving Histotripsy therapy and Lithotripsy therapy with virtually no change in the first and second pulse repetition rates.
Another method of treating a target tissue is provided, comprising delivering a first Lithotripsy pulse to the target tissue, delivering a sequence of Histotripsy pulses to the target tissue after the first Lithotripsy pulse, and delivering a second Lithotripsy pulse to the target tissue after the sequence of Histotripsy pulses, wherein the first and second Lithotripsy pulses are separated in time by a pulse repetition frequency. In some embodiments, the target tissue is a urinary stone.
In some embodiments, the method further comprises delivering a sequence of Histotripsy pulses immediately prior to delivering the first Lithotripsy pulse to the target tissue to suppress cavitation. In additional embodiments, the method further comprises delivering a sequence of Histotripsy pulses immediately prior to delivering the second Lithotripsy pulse to the target tissue to suppress cavitation.
In some embodiments, the method further comprises delivering a spatially-varying cavitation suppressing Histotripsy field to allow cavitation to occur within the target tissue while suppressing cavitation outside the target tissue.
In addition to imaging tissue, ultrasound technology is increasingly being used to treat and destroy tissue. In medical applications such as Histotripsy, ultrasound pulses are used to form cavitational microbubbles in tissue to mechanically break down and destroy tissue. In Lithotripsy procedures, ultrasound pulses are used to form acoustic shockwaves that break up urinary stones into smaller fragments. Particular challenges arise in using Lithotripsy to break up urinary stones, including failing to break stones down into sizes small and smooth enough to pass comfortably, as well as visualizing and tracking the stones within the patient. The present invention describes several embodiments of devices and methods for treating urinary stones or other calculi including, but not limited to biliary calculi such as gall stones, particularly through the combination of Histotripsy and Lithotripsy therapy in a single procedure.
Despite the difference between Lithotripsy and Histotripsy, the aperture size, focal characteristics, and piezoelectric materials of the relative transducers are similar in both types of therapy. Thus, a single transducer can be driven in both Histotripsy and Lithotripsy modes. This dual-mode Histotripsy and Lithotripsy system can be configured to treat, fractionate, and dissolve urinary stones in patients suffering from urinary stones.
In some embodiments, a multi-mode Lithotripsy-Histotripsy device is configured to shift virtually instantaneously (electronic speeds) from a Lithotripsy shock wave mode (L-mode) to the Histotripsy “soft” erosion mode (H-mode). The primary advantages of a dual mode Lithotripsy-Histotripsy system are: (1) ability to rapidly fractionate urinary stones into smaller gravel like fragments in L-mode, which can be reduced in size more quickly by H-mode erosion (erosion is effectively a surface phenomena) because of the greatly increased surface area of the Lithotripsy fragments; (2) easy image guidance and initial focal targeting by utilizing the Histotripsy bubble cloud.
Despite the differences between Lithotripsy and Histotripsy, the aperture size, focal characteristics, and piezoelectric materials of the transducers needed for each system are similar. The circuitry and generators required to drive these transducers can be configured to drive a single transducer in both H and L-modes, or alternatively, can be configured to drive separate H-mode and L-mode transducers.
In some embodiments, Histotripsy transducers can apply acoustic pulses that operate at a frequency between approximately 50 KHz and 5 MHz, having a pulse intensity with a peak negative pressure of approximately 8-40 MPa, a peak positive pressure of more than 10 MPa, a pulse length shorter than 50 cycles, a duty cycle between approximately 0.1% and 5% and in some embodiments less than 5%, and a pulse repetition frequency of less than 5 KHz. In other embodiments, Lithotripsy transducers can apply acoustic pulses that operate at a frequency between approximately 50 KHz and 5 MHz, having a pulse intensity with a peak negative pressure of approximately 10-25 MPa, a peak positive pressure of more than 10 MPa, a pulse length of 1 cycle, a duty cycle less than 0.1%, and a pulse repetition frequency of less than 2 Hz.
Imaging system 306 can provide real-time imaging guidance of the patient while during L-mode and H-mode therapy. In the embodiment of
Control system 308 can include all the necessary drive electronics and signal generators necessary to drive therapy transducers 302 and 304 in both L-mode and H-mode. For example, the drive electronics and signal generators of control system 308 should be configured to drive therapy transducers 302 and/or 304 according to the parameters set forth in Table 1 above for both H-mode and L-mode transducers. The control system 308 can including a switching mechanism configured to instantaneously switch operation of the system between an L-mode and an H-mode, or to allow for simultaneous operation in H and L-modes. Control system 308 can further include a CPU or computer configured to set treatment parameters, receive and process imaging information, and direct L-mode and H-mode therapy according to a surgical plan. The therapy transducer drive electronics may be configured to generate both types of pulses as a pulse sequence in addition to Histotripsy pulses that optimize Lithotripsy pulses by suppressing and enhancing cavitation. One therapy transducer may have the capability of focusing outside of the target are to suppress cavitation and thereby provide active protection of tissues outside of the target area. This technique is more fully described in U.S. patent Ser. No. 12/121,001, filed May 15, 2008, titled “Pulsed Cavitational Ultrasound Therapy.”
Methods of using a Lithotripsy-Histotripsy system, such as the system described herein, will now be discussed. The choice of modality for treating patients with nephrolithiasis depends upon stone size, stone location, anatomic factors, patient factors, and patient preference. In general, for stones in the ureter or kidney having a size less than 2 cm in greatest dimension, shockwave Lithotripsy and ureteroscopy are first-line treatment options. For stones in the kidney (particularly those that reside in the lower pole of the kidney), percutaneous nephrolithotomy, albeit much more invasive of a procedure, can also be an appropriate option. Shockwave lithotripsy was the primary modality for managing these stones; however, advances in ureteroscopic instrumentation and technology have placed ureteroscopy on equal footing with shockwave lithotripsy, such that this has become the preferred first-line therapy at many academic medical centers.
The primary advantage of Histotripsy therapy over Lithotripsy therapy is the uniformly microscopic size of the reduced stone particles compared to Lithotripsy. For some stones which do not break down via L-mode therapy into sufficiently small fragments to be passed through the urinary tract, this may be critical. Some situations might be best approached primarily in the L-mode (harder stones in places where fragments are easily passed) and some situations might be best approached primarily in the H-mode (softer more easily eroded stones). Some may require a combination of each system with optimal application to be determined by clinical and laboratory experience with such a system. Additionally, visualization of Lithotripsy procedures is typically challenging and requires large and expensive imaging equipment, such as a fluoroscopic C-Arm. However, cavitational bubble clouds formed with a Histotripsy H-mode pulse can be easily viewed in real time under ultrasound imaging. Thus, it can be possible to visualize and target a urinary stone or by placing an H-mode bubble cloud on the stone, then focusing an L-mode shockwave towards the position of the bubble cloud to fragment the stone.
Thus, referring back to
Next, the Lithotripsy-Histotripsy system can be switched to an L-mode with a switching mechanism (e.g., switching mechanism 418 of
Thus, L-mode and H-modes of operation can be alternated so as to break down urinary stones into macroscopic particles (with L-mode pulses) and subsequently erode the macroscopic particles into a fine powder (with H-mode pulses). Histotripsy and Lithotripsy are naturally complementary as Lithotripsy shockwaves are efficient at causing initial coarse subdivision of targeted stones which greatly increases surface area and rate for subsequent Histotripsy erosion. Since the actual position of the original urinary stone can be tracked by image analysis (e.g., visual tracking of the stone itself or speckle tracking), the Lithotripsy-Histotripsy system can allow for movement of the kidney and can continually reposition the focus onto the tracked target volume. Visualization of the Histotripsy bubble cloud at the target position can confirm proper targeting.
In some method embodiments, urinary stones can be treated solely with Histotripsy H-mode pulses. Thus, Histotripsy acoustic sequences can be applied directly to the stones to cause erosion of the stones, producing extremely fine debris particles less than 100 μm in diameter which can be passed painlessly by the patient and eliminate the risk of steinstrasse (multiple obstructing fragments within the ureter). Still referring to
Alternative embodiments of methods of treating urinary stones can include multi-frequency systems for additional optimization, e.g., L-mode at higher frequencies (probably about 1 MHz) to fragment the stone and H-mode at lower frequencies (about 500 Khz) to cover the whole stone area and to make sure the increased stone surface area is usable for enhanced surface-based erosion. Referring now to
This L-mode and H-mode interleaving technique can be used to treat urinary stones. Thus, referring back to
Next, the Lithotripsy-Histotripsy system can generate an L-mode pulse to deliver a shock wave to the urinary stone to macroscopically fractionate the stone. Since L-mode pulses typically have a PRF≦2 Hz (but possibly ≦5 Hz), the time between subsequent L-mode pulses can be used to apply H-mode pulses, which typically have a PRF≦5 kHz. Thus, the method of treatment can comprise delivering an L-mode pulse to a urinary stone to fractionate the stone, instantaneously switching to an H-mode of operation to deliver a series of H-mode pulses to the urinary stone, and instantaneously switching back to an L-mode to deliver another Lithotripsy shockwave to the stone(s). As described above, verification of the stone position can be achieved by switching to H-mode and visualizing the H-mode bubble cloud under imaging guidance.
Histotripsy can be used to enhance shockwave (Lithotripsy) fragmentation of stones through control of the cavitation environment. Histotripsy can be used to control the cavitation environment to enhance and suppress cavitation at appropriate times. For example, Histotripsy can be used to suppress cavitation to improve efficacy at higher Lithotripsy shockwave rates. Additionally, Histotripsy can be used to suppress cavitation in healthy tissue to facilitate a higher Lithotripsy shockwave rate. High repetition rate Lithotripsy (>2 Hz) is currently limited by the persistence of microbubbles created during the process (cavitation) which interfere with subsequent shockwaves. Simple suppression of cavitation does not improve overall comminution because some cavitation is necessary for complete fragmentation. Time-varying Histotripsy sequences applied immediately before the arrival of a Lithotripsy shockwave to suppress cavitation, followed by enhancement sequences during the tensile portion of the Lithotripter wave (acting as a pump) can maximize both methods of comminution. This technique can greatly increase the efficiency of shockwaves as well as the rate which can be used allowing more complete comminution of even difficult urinary stones.
Cavitation suppressing Histotripsy acoustic sequences can be used to reduce collateral tissue injury during high dose and high rate shockwave application. Studies have shown increased risk of injury when high shockwave rates or high shockwave doses are attempted limiting the thoroughness and effectiveness of a treatment. A spatially-varying cavitation suppressing Histotripsy field can allow cavitation to occur within a target zone while suppressing cavitation outside the target zone. This technique can be used to eliminate collateral injury from shockwaves while permitting necessary cavitation on the stone surface when large shockwave doses and higher rates are used for more complete comminution. Thus, a method of treating tissue can comprise delivering Lithotripsy therapy to a target tissue to treat the target tissue, and delivering spatially-varying Histotripsy therapy to allow cavitation to occur within the target tissue while suppressing cavitation outside the target tissue.
As for additional details pertinent to the present invention, materials and manufacturing techniques may be employed as within the level of those with skill in the relevant art. The same may hold true with respect to method-based aspects of the invention in terms of additional acts commonly or logically employed. Also, it is contemplated that any optional feature of the inventive variations described may be set forth and claimed independently, or in combination with any one or more of the features described herein. Likewise, reference to a singular item, includes the possibility that there are plural of the same items present. More specifically, as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “and,” “said,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. It is further noted that the claims may be drafted to exclude any optional element. As such, this statement is intended to serve as antecedent basis for use of such exclusive terminology as “solely,” “only” and the like in connection with the recitation of claim elements, or use of a “negative” limitation. Unless defined otherwise herein, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. The breadth of the present invention is not to be limited by the subject specification, but rather only by the plain meaning of the claim terms employed.
This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119 of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/237,011, filed Aug. 26, 2009, titled “Devices and Methods for Using Controlled Bubble Cloud Cavitation in Fractionating Kidney Stones”. This application is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3243497 | Kendall et al. | Mar 1966 | A |
3679021 | Goldberg et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
4016749 | Wachter | Apr 1977 | A |
4024501 | Herring et al. | May 1977 | A |
4051394 | Tieden | Sep 1977 | A |
4117446 | Alais | Sep 1978 | A |
4269174 | Adair | May 1981 | A |
4277367 | Madsen et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4351038 | Alais | Sep 1982 | A |
4406153 | Ophir et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4440025 | Hayakawa et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4453408 | Clayman | Jun 1984 | A |
4483345 | Miwa | Nov 1984 | A |
4549533 | Cain et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4550606 | Drost | Nov 1985 | A |
4575330 | Hull | Mar 1986 | A |
4622972 | Giebeler, Jr. | Nov 1986 | A |
4625731 | Quedens et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4641378 | McConnell et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4669483 | Hepp et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4689986 | Carson et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4757820 | Itoh | Jul 1988 | A |
4791915 | Barsotti et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4819621 | Ueberle et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4829491 | Saugeon et al. | May 1989 | A |
4856107 | Dory | Aug 1989 | A |
4865042 | Umemura et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4888746 | Wurster et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4890267 | Rudolph | Dec 1989 | A |
4922917 | Dory | May 1990 | A |
4938217 | Lele | Jul 1990 | A |
4957099 | Hassler | Sep 1990 | A |
4973980 | Howkins et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4984575 | Uchiyama et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4991151 | Dory | Feb 1991 | A |
4995012 | Dory | Feb 1991 | A |
RE33590 | Dory | May 1991 | E |
5014686 | Schafer | May 1991 | A |
5065751 | Wolf | Nov 1991 | A |
5080101 | Dory | Jan 1992 | A |
5080102 | Dory | Jan 1992 | A |
5091893 | Smith et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5092336 | Fink | Mar 1992 | A |
5097709 | Masuzawa et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5111822 | Dory | May 1992 | A |
5143073 | Dory | Sep 1992 | A |
5143074 | Dory | Sep 1992 | A |
5150711 | Dory | Sep 1992 | A |
5158070 | Dory | Oct 1992 | A |
5158071 | Umemura et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5163421 | Bernstein et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5165412 | Okazaki | Nov 1992 | A |
5174294 | Saito | Dec 1992 | A |
5209221 | Riedlinger | May 1993 | A |
5215680 | D'Arrigo | Jun 1993 | A |
5219401 | Cathignol et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5230340 | Rhyne | Jul 1993 | A |
5295484 | Marcus et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5316000 | Chapelon et al. | May 1994 | A |
5354258 | Dory | Oct 1994 | A |
5380411 | Schlief | Jan 1995 | A |
5409002 | Pell | Apr 1995 | A |
5431621 | Dory | Jul 1995 | A |
5435311 | Umemura et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5443069 | Schaetzle | Aug 1995 | A |
5469852 | Nakamura et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5474071 | Chapelon et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5474531 | Carter | Dec 1995 | A |
5501655 | Rolt et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5520188 | Hennige et al. | May 1996 | A |
5523058 | Umemura et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5524620 | Rosenschein | Jun 1996 | A |
5540909 | Schutt | Jul 1996 | A |
5542935 | Unger et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5558092 | Unger et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5563346 | Bartelt et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5566675 | Li et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5573497 | Chapelon | Nov 1996 | A |
5580575 | Unger et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5582578 | Zhong et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5590657 | Cain et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5601526 | Chapelon et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5617862 | Cole et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5648098 | Porter | Jul 1997 | A |
5666954 | Chapelon et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5676452 | Scholz | Oct 1997 | A |
5676692 | Sanghvi et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5678554 | Hossack et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5694936 | Fujimoto et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5695460 | Siegel et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5717657 | Ruffa | Feb 1998 | A |
5724972 | Petrofsky | Mar 1998 | A |
5743863 | Chapelon | Apr 1998 | A |
5753929 | Bliss | May 1998 | A |
5759162 | Oppelt et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5766138 | Rattner | Jun 1998 | A |
5769790 | Watkins et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5797848 | Marian et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5823962 | Schaetzle et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5827204 | Grandia et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5836896 | Rosenschein | Nov 1998 | A |
5849727 | Porter et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5873902 | Sanghvi et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879314 | Peterson et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5932807 | Mallart | Aug 1999 | A |
5947904 | Hossack et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6001069 | Tachibana et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6022309 | Celliers et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6036667 | Manna et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6088613 | Unger | Jul 2000 | A |
6093883 | Sanghvi et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6113558 | Rosenschein et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126607 | Whitmore, III et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6128958 | Cain | Oct 2000 | A |
6143018 | Beuthan et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6165144 | Talish et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6176842 | Tachibana et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6308585 | Nilsson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308710 | Silva | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309355 | Cain et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6318146 | Madsen et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321109 | Ben-Haim et al. | Nov 2001 | B2 |
6338566 | Verdier | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6344489 | Spears | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6391020 | Kurtz et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6413216 | Cain et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6419648 | Vitek et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6470204 | Uzgiris et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6488639 | Ribault et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6490469 | Candy | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6500141 | Irion et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6506154 | Ezion et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6506171 | Vitek et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6508774 | Acker et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6511428 | Azuma et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6511444 | Hynynen et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6522142 | Freundlich | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6524251 | Rabiner et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6536553 | Scanlon | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6543272 | Vitek | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556750 | Constantino et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6559644 | Froundlich et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6576220 | Unger | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6599288 | Maguire et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6607498 | Eshel | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6612988 | Maor et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6613004 | Vitek et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6613005 | Friedman et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6626854 | Friedman et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626855 | Weng et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6645162 | Friedman et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6648839 | Manna et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6666833 | Friedman et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6685640 | Fry et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6685657 | Jones | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6705994 | Vortman et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6719449 | Laugharn, Jr. et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6719694 | Weng et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6735461 | Vitek et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6736814 | Manna et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6750463 | Riley | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6770031 | Hynynen et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6775438 | Gaedke et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6788977 | Fenn et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6790180 | Vitek | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6820160 | Allman | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6852082 | Strickberger et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6869439 | White et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6890332 | Truckai et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6929609 | Asafusa | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7004282 | Manna et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7059168 | Hibi et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7128711 | Medan et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7128719 | Rosenberg | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7175596 | Vitek et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7196313 | Quinones | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7223239 | Schulze et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7258674 | Cribbs et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7273458 | Prausnitz et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7273459 | Desilets et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7300414 | Holland et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7311679 | Desilets et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7331951 | Eshel et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7341569 | Soltani et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7347855 | Eshel et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7358226 | Dayton et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7359640 | Onde et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7367948 | O'Donnell et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7374551 | Liang et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7377900 | Vitek et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7442168 | Novak et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7462488 | Madsen et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7559905 | Kagosaki et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7656638 | Laakso et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
8333115 | Garvey et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
20010039420 | Burbank et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010041163 | Sugita et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020045890 | Celliers et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020078964 | Kovac et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020099356 | Unger et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030092982 | Eppstein | May 2003 | A1 |
20030112922 | Burdette et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030149352 | Liang et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030157025 | Unger et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030181833 | Faragalla et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030199857 | Eizenhofer | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030221561 | Milo | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236539 | Rabiner et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040127815 | Marchitto et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138563 | Moehring et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040236248 | Svedman | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243021 | Murphy et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050038339 | Chauhan et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038361 | Zhong et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050152561 | Spencer | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050154314 | Quistgaard | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050283098 | Conston et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060060991 | Holsteyns et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074303 | Chornenky et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060173387 | Hansmann et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206028 | Lee et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060241466 | Ottoboni et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241523 | Sinelnikov et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060264760 | Liu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060293630 | Manna et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070010805 | Fedewa et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016039 | Vortman et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070044562 | Sarr | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070065420 | Johnson | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083120 | Cain et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070161902 | Dan | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167764 | Hynynen | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070205785 | Nilsson | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070219448 | Seip et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080013593 | Kawabata | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080055003 | Unnikrishnan et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082026 | Schmidt et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080091125 | Owen et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080126665 | Burr et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080177180 | Azhari et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080194965 | Sliwa et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080214964 | Chapelon et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080262345 | Fichtinger et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262486 | Zvuloni et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080312561 | Chauhan | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319356 | Cain et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319376 | Wilcox et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090030339 | Cheng et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090112098 | Vaezy et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090177085 | Maxwell et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198094 | Fenster et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090211587 | Lawrentschuk | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090227874 | Suri et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090230822 | Kushculey et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100011845 | Laugharn et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100059264 | Hasegawa et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100069797 | Cain et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100125225 | Gelbart et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100152624 | Tanis et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100163694 | Fadler et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100261994 | Davalos et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274136 | Cerofolini | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100286519 | Lee et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100305432 | Duhay et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100317971 | Fan et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110040190 | Jahnke et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110112400 | Emery et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110118602 | Weng et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110172529 | Gertner | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110178444 | Slayton et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110251528 | Canney et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110257524 | Gertner | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110263967 | Bailey et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120010541 | Cain et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120029353 | Slayton et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120059264 | Hope Simpson et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120092724 | Pettis | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120130288 | Holland et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120172720 | Kawabata | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120189998 | Kruecker et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120271223 | Khanna | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130053691 | Kawabata et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130090579 | Cain et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130102932 | Cain et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130190623 | Bertolina et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130289593 | Hall et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130303906 | Cain et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140073995 | Teofilovic et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102481164 | May 2012 | CN |
3220751 | Dec 1983 | DE |
3544628 | Jun 1987 | DE |
3817094 | Nov 1989 | DE |
4012760 | May 1992 | DE |
0017382 | Oct 1980 | EP |
0320303 | Jun 1989 | EP |
0332871 | Sep 1989 | EP |
0384831 | Aug 1990 | EP |
0755653 | Jan 1997 | EP |
1374785 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1504713 | Feb 2005 | EP |
2397188 | Dec 2011 | EP |
2099582 | Dec 1982 | GB |
60-80779 | May 1985 | JP |
HEI 60-80779 | May 1985 | JP |
61-196718 | Aug 1986 | JP |
HEI 2-215451 | Aug 1990 | JP |
HEI 7-504339 | May 1995 | JP |
08-84740 | Apr 1996 | JP |
06-304178 | May 1996 | JP |
08-131454 | May 1996 | JP |
09-55571 | Feb 1997 | JP |
HEI 10-512477 | Dec 1998 | JP |
2000300559 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2003-510159 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2004-505660 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2005167058 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2007520307 | Jul 2007 | JP |
2010019554 | Jan 2010 | JP |
2010029650 | Feb 2010 | JP |
2010204068 | Sep 2010 | JP |
2004-512502 | Apr 2014 | JP |
WO9406355 | Mar 1994 | WO |
WO 0232506 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO2005018469 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2007038160 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2008051484 | May 2008 | WO |
WO2011040054 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO 2011092683 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO2011154654 | Dec 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Pishchalnikov et al. (Cavitation Bubble Cluster Activity in the Breakage of Kidney Stones by Lithotripter Shock Waves, J Endourol. Sep. 2003 ; 17(7): 435-446.). |
Sapozhnikov et al. (Ultrasound-Guided Localized Detection of Cavitation During Lithotripsy in Pig Kidney In Vivo, 2001 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium-1348). |
Cain, Charles A.; Histrotripsy: controlled mechanical sub-division of soft tissues by high intensity pulsed ultrasound (conference presentation); American Institute of Physics (AIP) Therapeutic Ultrasound: 5th International Symposium on Therapeutic Ultrasound; 44 pgs.; Oct. 27-29, 2005. |
Parsons et al.; Pulsed cavitational ultrasound therapy for controlled tissue homogenization; Ultrasound in Med. & Biol.; vol. 32; pp. 115-129; 2006. |
Roberts et al.; Pulsed cavitational ultrasound: a noninvasive technology for controlled tissue ablation (histotripsy) in the rabbit kidney; Journal of Urology; vol. 175; pp. 734-738; 2006. |
Xu et al.; A new strategy to enhance cavitational tissue erosion by using a high intensity initiating sequence; IEEE Trans Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Freq Control; vol. 53; pp. 1412-1424; 2006. |
Xu et al.; Controlled ultrasound tissue erosion: the role of dynamic interaction between insonation and microbubble activity; Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; vol. 117; pp. 424-435; 2005. |
Xu et al.; Controlled ultrasound tissue erosion; IEEE Transaction on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control; vol. 51; pp. 726-736; 2004. |
Xu et al.; Effects of acoustic parameters on bubble cloud dynamics in ultrasound tissue erosion (histotripsy); Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; vol. 122; pp. 229-236; 2007. |
Xu et al.; High Speed Imaging of Bubble Clouds Generated in Pulsed Ultrasound Cavitational Therapy'Histotripsy; IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; ; vol. 54; No. 10; pp. 2091R2101; Oct. 2007. |
Xu et al.; Investigation of intensity threshold for ultrasound tissue erosion; Ultrasound in Med. & Biol.; vol. 31; pp. 1673-1682; 2005. |
Xu et al.; Optical and acoustic monitoring of bubble cloud dynamics at a tissue-fluid interface in ultrasound tissue erosion; Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; vol. 121; pp. 2421-2430; 2007. |
Hall et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/868,768 entitled “Micromanipulator Control Arm for Therapeutic and Imaging Ultrasound Transducers,” filed Aug. 26, 2010. |
Cain et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/887,705 entitled “Gel phantoms for testing cavitational ultrasound (histotripsy) transducers,” filed Sep. 22, 2010. |
Hall et al.; Imaging feedback of tissue liquefaction (histotripsy) in ultrasound surgery; IEEE Ultrasonic Symposium, Sep. 18-25, 2005, pp. 1732-1734. |
Appel et al.; Stereoscopic highspeed recording of bubble filaments; Ultrasonics Sonochemistry; vol. 11(1); pp. 39-42; Jan. 2004. |
Atchley et al.; Thresholds for cavitation produced in water by pulsed ultrasound; Ultrasonics.; vol. 26(5); pp. 280-285; Sep. 1988. |
Bland et al.; Surgical Oncology; McGraw Hill; Chap. 5 (Cavitron Ultrasonic Aspirator); pp. 461-462; Jan. 29, 2001. |
Burdin et al.; Implementation of the laser diffraction technique for cavitation bubble investigations; Particle & Particle Systems Characterization; vol. 19; pp. 73-83; May 2002. |
Holland et al.; Thresholds for transient cavitation produced by pulsed ultrasound in a controlled nuclei environment; J. Acoust. Soc. Am.; vol. 88(5); pp. 2059-2069; Nov. 1990. |
Huber et al.; Influence of shock wave pressure amplitude and pulse repetition frequency on the lifespan, size and number of transient cavities in the field of an electromagnetic lithotripter; Physics in Medicine and Biology; vol. 43 (10); pp. 3113-3128; Oct. 1998. |
Lauterborn et al.; Cavitation bubble dynamics studied by high speed photography and holography: part one; Ultrasonics; vol. 23; pp. 260-268; Nov. 1985. |
Miller et al.; A review of in vitro bioeffects of inertial ultrasonic cavitation from a mechanistic perspective; Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology; vol. 22; pp. 1131-1154; (year of publication is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date and any foreign priority date) 1996. |
Ohl et al.; Bubble dynamics, shock waves and sonoluminescence; Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A; vol. 357; pp. 269-294; (year of publication is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date and any foreign priority date) 1999. |
Porter et al.; Reduction in left ventricular cavitary attenuation and improvement in posterior myocardial contrast . . . ; J Am Soc Echocardiography; pp. 437-441; Jul.-Aug. 1996. |
Roy et al.; A precise technique for the measurement of acoustic cavitation thresholds and some preliminary results; Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; vol. 78(5); pp. 1799-805; Nov. 1985. |
Sokolov et al.; Use of a dual-pulse lithotripter to generate a localized and intensified cavitation field; Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; vol. 110(3); pp. 1685-1695; Sep. 2001. |
Teofilovic, Dejan; U.S. Appl. No. 13/446,783 entitled “Systems and Methods for Obtaining Large Creepage Isolation on Printed Circuit Boards,” filed Apr. 13, 2012. |
Cain, Charles A.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/570,708 entitled “Lesion Generation Through Bone Using Histotripsy Therapy Without Aberration Correction,” filed Aug. 9, 2012. |
Aschoff et al.; How does alteration of hepatic blood flow affect liver perfusion and radiofrequency-induced thermal lesion size in rabbit liver?; J Magn Reson Imaging; 13(1); pp. 57-63; Jan. 2001. |
Cline et al.; Magnetic resonance-guided thermal surgery; Magnetic Resonance in Medicine; 30(1); pp. 98-106; Jul. 1993. |
Curiel et al.; Elastography for the follow-up of high-intensity focused ultrasound prostate cancer treatment: Initial comparison with MRI; Ultrasound Med. Biol; 31(11); pp. 1461-1468; Nov. 2005. |
Emelianov et al.; Triplex ultrasound: Elasticity imaging to age deep venous thrombosis; Ultrasound Med Biol; 28(6); pp. 757-767; Jun. 2002. |
Hynynen et al.; Tissue thermometry during ultrasound exposure; European Urology; 23(Suppl 1); pp. 12-16; 1993 (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date). |
Kallel et al.; The feasibility of elastographic visualization of HIFU-induced thermal lesions in soft tissues: Image-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound; Ultrasound Med. Biol; 25(4); pp. 641-647; May 1999. |
Konofagou; Quo vadis elasticity imaging?; Ultrasonics; 42(1-9); pp. 331-336; Apr. 2004. |
Kruse et al.; Tissue characterization using magnetic resonance elastography: Preliminary results; Phys. Med. Biol; 45(6); pp. 1579-1590; Jun. 2000. |
Liu et al.; Real-time 2-D temperature imaging using ultrasound; IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 57(1); pp. 12-16; Jan. 2010 (author manuscript, 16 pgs.). |
Liu et al.; Viscoelastic property measurement in thin tissue constructs using ultrasound; IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 55(2); pp. 368-383; Feb. 2008 (author manuscript, 37 pgs.). |
Nightingale et al.; Analysis of contrast in images generated with transient acoustic radiation force; Ultrasound Med Biol; 32(1); pp. 61-72; Jan. 2006. |
Okada et al.; A case of hepatocellular carcinoma treated by MR-guided focused ultrasound ablation with respiratory gating; Magn Reson Med Sci; 5(3); pp. 167-171; Oct. 2006. |
Rowland et al.; MRI study of hepatic tumours following high intensity focused ultrasound surgery; British Journal of Radiology; 70; pp. 144-153; Feb. 1997. |
Sapareto et al.; Thermal dose determination in cancer therapy; Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 10(6); pp. 787-800; Apr. 1984. |
Souchon et al.; Visualisation of HIFU lesions using elastography of the human prostate in vivo: Preliminary results; Ultrasound Med. Biol; 29(7); pp. 1007-1015; Jul. 2003. |
Xie et al.; Correspondence of ultrasound elasticity imaging to direct mechanical measurement in aging DVT in rats; Ultrasound Med Biol; 31(10); pp. 1351-1359; Oct. 2005 (author manuscript, 20 pgs.). |
Zheng et al.; An acoustic backscatter-based method for localization of lesions induced by high-intensity focused ultrasound; Ultrasound Med Biol; 36(4); pp. 610-622; Apr. 2010. |
Akiyama et al.; Elliptically curved acoustic lens for emitting strongly focused finite-amplitude beams: Application of the spheroidal beam equation model to the theoretical prediction; Acoustical Science and Technology, vol. 26, pp. 279-284, May 2005. |
AVOGO Technologies; ACNV2601 High Insulation Voltage 10 MBd Digital Opotcoupler. Avago Technologies Data Sheet; pp. 1-11; Jul. 29, 2010. |
Bjoerk et al.; Cool/MOS CP—How to make most beneficial use of the generation of super junction technology devices. Infineon Technologies AG. Feb. 2007 [retrieved Feb. 4, 2014] from the internet (http://www.infineon.com/dgdl/Infineon+-+Application+Note+-+PowerMOSFETs+-+600V+CoolMOS%E284%A2+-+CP+Most+beneficial+use+of+superjunction+technologie+devices.pdf?folderId=db3a304412b407950112b408e8c900048&fileId=db3a304412b407950112b40ac9a40688>pp. 1, 4, 14. |
Canney et al.; Shock-Induced Heating and Millisecond Boiling in Gels and Tissue Due to High Intensity Focused Ultrasound; Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 36, pp. 250-267; Feb. 2010 (author manuscript). |
Chan et al.; An image-guided high intensity focused ultrasound device for uterine fibroids treatment; Medical Physics, vol. 29, pp. 2611-2620, Nov. 2002. |
Clement et al.; A hemisphere array for non-invasive ultrasound brain therapy and surgery; Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 45, p. 3707-3719, Dec. 2000. |
Desilets et al.; The Design of Efficient Broad-Band Piezoelectric Transducers; Sonics and Ultrasonics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 25, pp. 115-125, May 1978. |
Giannatsis et al.; Additive fabrication technologies applied to medicine and health care: a review; The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology; 40(1-2); pp. 116-127; Jan. 2009. |
Gudra et al.; Influence of acoustic impedance of multilayer acoustic systems on the transfer function of ultrasonic airborne transducers; Ultrasonics, vol. 40, pp. 457-463, May 2002. |
Hall et al.; A Low Cost Compact 512 Channel Therapeutic Ultrasound System for Transcutaneous Ultrasound Surgery; Aip Conference Proceedings, Boston, MA; vol. 829, pp. 445-449, Oct. 27-29, 2005. |
Hall et al.; Histotripsy of the prostate: dose effects in a chronic canine model; Urology; 74(4); pp. 932-937; Oct. 2009 (author manuscript). |
Hartmann; Ultrasonic properties of poly(4-methyl pentene-1), Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 51, pp. 310-314, Jan. 1980. |
Kim et al.; Dependence of particle volume fraction on sound velocity and attenuation of EPDM composites; Ultrasonics, vol. 46, pp. 177-183, Feb. 2007. |
Krimholtz et al.; New equivalent circuits for elementary piezoelectric transducers; Electronics Letters, vol. 6, pp. 398-399, Jun. 1970. |
Lake et al.; Histotripsy: minimally invasive technology for prostatic tissue ablation in an in vivo canine model; Urology; 72(3); pp. 682-686; Sep. 2008. |
Lensing et al.; Deep-vein thrombosis; The Lancet, vol. 353, pp. 479-485, Feb. 6, 1999. |
Manes et al.; Design of a Simplified Delay System for Ultrasound Phased Array Imaging; Sonics and Ultrasonics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 30, pp. 350-354, Nov. 1983. |
Maréchal et al; Effect of Radial Displacement of Lens on Response of Focused Ultrasonic Transducer; Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 46, p. 3077-3085; May 15, 2007. |
Maréchal et al; Lens-focused transducer modeling using an extended KLM model; Ultrasonics, vol. 46, pp. 155-167, May 2007. |
Martin et al.; Water-cooled, high-intensity ultrasound surgical applicators with frequency tracking; Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 50, pp. 1305-1317, Oct. 2003. |
Maxwell et al.; Noninvasive Thrombolysis Using Pulsed Ultrasound Cavitation Therapy—Histotripsy; Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 35, pp. 1982-1994, Dec. 2009 (author manuscript). |
Parsons et al.; Cost-effective assembly of a basic fiber-optic hydrophone for measurement of high-amplitude therapeutic ultrasound fields; The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 119, pp. 1432-1440, Mar. 2006. |
Rosenschein et al.; Ultrasound Imaging-Guided Noninvasive Ultrasound Thrombolysis: Preclinical Results; Circulation; vol. 102; pp. 238-245, Jul. 11, 2000. |
Sato et al.; Experimental Investigation of Phased Array Using Tapered Matching Layers. 2002 IEEE Ultrasound Symposium. vol. 2; pp. 1235-1238, Oct. 2002. |
Simonin et al.; Characterization of heterogeneous structure in a polymer object manufactured by stereolithography with low-frequency microechography; Journal of Materials Chemistry; vol. 6, pp. 1595-99, Sep. 1996. |
Song et al.; Feasibility of Using Lateral Mode Coupling Method for a Large Scale Ultrasound Phased Array for Noninvasive Transcranial Therapy; Biomedical Engineering; IEEE Transactions on, vol. 57, pp. 124-133; Jan. 2010 (author manuscript). |
Souquet et al.; Design of Low-Loss Wide-Band Ultrasonic Transducers for Noninvasive Medical Application; Sonics and Ultrasonics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 26, pp. 75-80, Mar. 1979. |
Therapeutic Ultrasound Group. Non-invasive Ultrasonic Tissue Fraction for Treatment of Benign Disease and Cancer—“Histotripsy”. University research [online]. Biomedical Engineering Department, University of Michigan. Jul. 2011[retrieved on Jan. 28, 2014] from: (http://web.archive.org/web/20110720091822/http://www.histotripsy.umich.edu/index.html>.entiredocument). |
Toda; Narrowband impedance matching layer for high efficiency thickness mode ultrasonic transducers; Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 49, pp. 299-306, Mar. 2002. |
Van Kervel et al.; A calculation scheme for the optimum design of ultrasonic transducers; Ultrasonics, vol. 21, pp. 134-140, May 1983. |
Wang et al.; Quantitative ultrasound backscatter for pulsed cavitational ultrasound therapy-histotripsy; Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 56, pp. 995-1005, May 2009 (author manuscript). |
Yan et al.; A review of rapid prototyping technologies and systems; Computer-Aided Design, vol. 28, pp. 307-318, Apr. 1996. |
Xu et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/046,024 entitled “Bubble-induced color doppler feedback during histotripsy,” filed Oct. 4, 2013. |
AVTECH; AVR-8 Data sheet; May 23, 2004; 3 pages; retrieved from the internet (http//www.avtechpulse.com). |
Hobarth et al.; Color flow doppler sonography for extracorporal shock wave lithotripsy; Journal of Urology; 150(6); pp. 1768-1770; Dec. 1, 1993. |
Maxwell et al.; In-vivo study of non-invasive thrombolysis by histotripsy in a porcine model; IEEE international Ultrasonics Symposium; IEEE; p. 220-223; Sep. 20, 2009. |
Avago Technologies; Avago's ACNV2601 optocoupler is an optically coupled logic gate; Data Sheet; 2 pages; Jul. 29, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110054363 A1 | Mar 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61237011 | Aug 2009 | US |