Ultrasound lithotripsy and histotripsy for using controlled bubble cloud cavitation in fractionating urinary stones

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9901753
  • Patent Number
    9,901,753
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, August 26, 2010
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 27, 2018
    6 years ago
Abstract
A medical imaging and therapy device is provided that may include any of a number of features. One feature of the device is that it can deliver Lithotripsy therapy to a patient, so as to fractionate urinary stones. Another feature of the device is that it can deliver Histotripsy therapy to a patient, so as to erode urinary stones. In some embodiments, the medical imaging and therapy device is configured to target and track urinary stones in the patient during therapy. Methods associated with use of the medical imaging and therapy device are also covered.
Description
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

All publications, including patents and patent applications, mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety to the same extent as if each individual publication was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.


FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to ultrasound treatment of urinary stones. More specifically, the present invention relates to using a combination of Lithotripsy and Histotripsy to fractionate and erode urinary stones.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Histotripsy and Lithotripsy are non-invasive tissue ablation modalities that focus pulsed ultrasound from outside the body to a target tissue inside the body. Histotripsy mechanically damages tissue through cavitation of microbubbles, and Lithotripsy is typically used to fragment urinary stones with acoustic shockwaves.


Histotripsy is the mechanical disruption via acoustic cavitation of a target tissue volume or tissue embedded inclusion as part of a surgical or other therapeutic procedure. Histotripsy works best when a whole set of acoustic and transducer scan parameters controlling the spatial extent of periodic cavitation events are within a rather narrow range. Small changes in any of the parameters can result in discontinuation of the ongoing process.


Histotripsy requires high peak intensity acoustic pulses which in turn require large surface area focused transducers. These transducers are often very similar to the transducers used for Lithotripsy and often operate in the same frequency range. The primary difference is in how the devices are driven electrically.


As shown by FIGS. 1A-1B, Histotripsy pulses comprise (usually) small number of cycles of a sinusoidal driving voltage whereas Lithotripsy is (most usually) driven by a single high voltage pulse with the transducer responding at its natural frequencies. Even though the Lithotripsy pulse is only one cycle, its negative pressure phase length is equal to or greater than the entire length of the Histotripsy pulse, lasting tens of microseconds. This negative pressure phase allows generation and continual growth of the bubbles, resulting in bubbles of sizes up to 1 mm. The Lithotripsy pulses use the mechanical stress produced by a shockwave and these 1 mm bubbles to fracture the stones into smaller pieces.


In comparison, each negative and positive cycle of a Histotripsy pulse grows and collapses the bubbles, and the next cycle repeats the same process. The maximal sizes of bubbles reach approximately tens to hundreds of microns. These micron size bubbles interact with a tissue surface to mechanically damage tissue.


In addition, Histotripsy delivers hundreds to thousands of pulses per second, i.e., 100-1 kHz pulse repetition frequency. Lithotripsy only works well within a narrow range of pulse repetition frequency (usually 0.5-2 Hz, which is the current limit in the United States and in Europe, however higher limits up to 4-5 Hz are contemplated). Studies show that the efficacy and efficiency of Lithotripsy decreases significantly when the pulse repetition frequency is increased to 10-100 Hz. The reduced efficiency is likely due to the increased number of mm size bubbles blocking the shock waves and other energy from reaching the stone.


Prior art treatment of nephrolithiasis (urinary stones) included early generation hydroelectric spark gap Lithotripters, such as the Donier HM3, which targeted a large treatment area, covering a sizeable portion of the kidney. For this reason, treatment success rates were high without the need for precise image guidance, yet substantial damage to the kidney tissue within the large focal volume also occurred. Subsequent Lithotripter development was focused on reducing renal injury by decreasing the focal volume. Some of the current third generation Lithotripters use piezoelectric (PZT) transducers, such as the Richard Wolf Piezolith 3000. The PZT transducer focused ultrasound in a small treatment region. Fluoroscope and ultrasound imaging can be utilized to target the urinary stones prior to and during treatment. By virtue of the smaller focus, the newer generation Lithotripters have reduced collateral tissue damage, but at the expense of success rates. Inaccuracies of targeting and respiratory motion of the kidneys decrease the fraction of pulses that directly impact the targeted stone.


Histotripsy also uses focused PZT transducers but has a different driving system. It uses ultrasound imaging to target the focused ultrasound to the stone and monitor the treatment in real time. The bubble clouds generated by Histotripsy show as a temporally changing hyperechoic zone on ultrasound images. The real-time guidance makes it possible to track the stone movement and adjust the focus position, thus further reducing possible collateral tissue damage. As described earlier, stone fragments produced by lithotripter vary from small granules less than 1.0 mm diameter to macroscopic fragments with diameters significantly greater than 1 mm (as shown in FIG. 2A), while Histotripsy erodes stones into fine particles smaller than 100 μm (as shown in FIG. 2B). Table 1 lists the Histotripsy and Lithotripsy parameters for comparison.









TABLE 1







Histotripsy and Lithotripsy Parameters









Parameters
Histotripsy
Lithotripsy





Energy Source
Short ultrasound
Short ultrasound



pulses
pulses


Image Guidance
Ultrasound
Fluoroscopy,




Ultrasound











Peak negative pressure
~8-40
MPa
~10-25
MPa


Peak positive pressure
~30-200
MPa
~50-200
MPa


Pulse Length
3-20
cycles
1
cycle









Duty Cycle
≦5%
<0.1%











Pulse Repetition Frequency
≦5
kHz
≦2
Hz









Shockwave Lithotripsy is favorable in that it is a short (˜30 minute) outpatient procedure that requires only IV sedation in the vast majority of patients. Post-operative pain generally resolves within 1-2 days. Ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy generally require general anesthesia. Although ureteroscopy is an outpatient procedure, patients often suffer with pain and discomfort from a ureteral stent for 4-7 days after treatment. Disadvantages of Lithotripsy include a stone free rate of ˜65% percent 4 weeks after treatment (compared with 90-95% stone free rate in patients having percutaneous and ureteroscopic procedures) and the necessity and occasionally discomfort of passing stone fragments following treatment. Furthermore, urinary stones fragmented using shockwave Lithotripsy can remain up to several mm in size and include sharp or jagged edges that make them difficult and painful to pass through the urinary tract.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In some embodiments, a Lithotripsy-Histotripsy system is provided comprising a first therapy transducer configured to deliver Lithotripsy therapy to a target, a second therapy transducer configured to deliver Histotripsy therapy to the target, and a control system configured to switch between delivering Lithotripsy therapy from the first therapy transducer to delivering Histotripsy therapy from the second therapy transducer.


In some embodiments, the first therapy transducer is configured to apply acoustic pulses that operate at a frequency between approximately 50 KHz and 5 MHz, having a pulse intensity with a peak negative pressure of approximately 10-25 MPa, a peak positive pressure of more than 10 MPa, a pulse length of 1 cycle, a duty cycle less than 0.1%, and a pulse repetition frequency of less than 2 Hz.


In other embodiments, the second therapy transducer is configured to apply acoustic pulses that operate at a frequency between approximately 50 KHz and 5 MHz, having a pulse intensity with a peak negative pressure of approximately 8-40 MPa, a peak positive pressure of more than 10 MPa, a pulse length shorter than 50 cycles, a duty cycle of less than 5%, and a pulse repetition frequency of less than 5 KHz.


In some embodiments, the Lithotripsy-Histotripsy system further comprises an imaging system. In some embodiments, the imaging system comprises a fluoroscopic imaging system. In other embodiments, the imaging system comprises an ultrasound imaging system. In additional embodiments, the imaging system comprises a combination fluoroscopic and ultrasound imaging system. The imaging system can be configured to target and track a urinary stone in a patient.


In another embodiment of a Lithotripsy-Histotripsy system, the system comprises a multi-mode therapy transducer configured to deliver Lithotripsy therapy and Histotripsy therapy to a target, and a control system configured to switch between delivering Lithotripsy therapy from the multi-mode therapy transducer to delivering Histotripsy therapy from the multi-mode therapy transducer.


In some embodiments, the multi-mode therapy transducer is configured to apply acoustic pulses that operate at a frequency between approximately 50 KHz and 5 MHz, having a pulse intensity with a peak negative pressure of approximately 10-25 MPa, a peak positive pressure of more than 10 MPa, a pulse length of 1 cycle, a duty cycle less than 0.1%, and a pulse repetition frequency of less than 2 Hz, so as to deliver Lithotripsy therapy to the target.


In other embodiments, the multi-mode therapy transducer is configured to apply acoustic pulses that operate at a frequency between approximately 50 KHz and 5 MHz, having a pulse intensity with a peak negative pressure of approximately 8-40 MPa, a peak positive pressure of more than 10 MPa, a pulse length shorter than 50 cycles, a duty cycle of less than 5%, and a pulse repetition frequency of less than 5 KHz, so as to deliver Histotripsy therapy to the target.


In some embodiments, the Lithotripsy-Histotripsy system further comprises an imaging system. In some embodiments, the imaging system comprises a fluoroscopic imaging system. In other embodiments, the imaging system comprises an ultrasound imaging system. In additional embodiments, the imaging system comprises a combination fluoroscopic and ultrasound imaging system. The imaging system can be configured to target and track a urinary stone in a patient.


A method of treating urinary stones is also provided, comprising applying Histotripsy therapy to generate a bubble cloud, positioning the bubble cloud on a urinary stone, applying Lithotripsy therapy to generate a shock wave to fractionate the urinary stone into macroscopic urinary stone particles, and applying Histotripsy therapy to the macroscopic urinary stone particles to erode the macroscopic urinary stone particles.


In some embodiments, the positioning step further comprises positioning the bubble cloud on a urinary stone under imaging guidance. In other embodiments, the positioning step further comprises positioning the bubble cloud on a urinary stone under ultrasound imaging guidance. In additional steps, the positioning step further comprises positioning the bubble cloud on a urinary stone under fluoroscopic and ultrasound imaging guidance.


In some embodiments, the applying Histotripsy therapy steps comprise applying Histotripsy therapy with a multi-mode transducer. In other embodiments, the applying Lithotripsy therapy step comprises applying Lithotripsy therapy with the multi-mode transducer.


In one embodiment, the applying Histotripsy therapy steps comprise applying Histotripsy therapy at a first pulse repetition frequency, wherein the applying Lithotripsy therapy step comprises applying Lithotripsy therapy at a second pulse repetition frequency, the method further comprising interleaving Histotripsy therapy and Lithotripsy therapy with virtually no change in the first and second pulse repetition rates.


Another method of treating a target tissue is provided, comprising delivering a first Lithotripsy pulse to the target tissue, delivering a sequence of Histotripsy pulses to the target tissue after the first Lithotripsy pulse, and delivering a second Lithotripsy pulse to the target tissue after the sequence of Histotripsy pulses, wherein the first and second Lithotripsy pulses are separated in time by a pulse repetition frequency. In some embodiments, the target tissue is a urinary stone.


In some embodiments, the method further comprises delivering a sequence of Histotripsy pulses immediately prior to delivering the first Lithotripsy pulse to the target tissue to suppress cavitation. In additional embodiments, the method further comprises delivering a sequence of Histotripsy pulses immediately prior to delivering the second Lithotripsy pulse to the target tissue to suppress cavitation.


In some embodiments, the method further comprises delivering a spatially-varying cavitation suppressing Histotripsy field to allow cavitation to occur within the target tissue while suppressing cavitation outside the target tissue.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIGS. 1A and 1B illustrate a typical Histotripsy pulse and Lithotripsy pulse, respectively.



FIG. 2A illustrates a urinary stone eroded by Histotripsy therapy.



FIG. 2B illustrates a urinary stone fractionated by Lithotripsy therapy.



FIG. 3 illustrates one embodiment of a Lithotripsy-Histotripsy system.



FIG. 4 illustrates a schematic view of a Lithotripsy-Histotripsy system.



FIG. 5 illustrates a pulse sequence of Lithotripsy therapy interleaved with Histotripsy therapy.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

In addition to imaging tissue, ultrasound technology is increasingly being used to treat and destroy tissue. In medical applications such as Histotripsy, ultrasound pulses are used to form cavitational microbubbles in tissue to mechanically break down and destroy tissue. In Lithotripsy procedures, ultrasound pulses are used to form acoustic shockwaves that break up urinary stones into smaller fragments. Particular challenges arise in using Lithotripsy to break up urinary stones, including failing to break stones down into sizes small and smooth enough to pass comfortably, as well as visualizing and tracking the stones within the patient. The present invention describes several embodiments of devices and methods for treating urinary stones or other calculi including, but not limited to biliary calculi such as gall stones, particularly through the combination of Histotripsy and Lithotripsy therapy in a single procedure.


Despite the difference between Lithotripsy and Histotripsy, the aperture size, focal characteristics, and piezoelectric materials of the relative transducers are similar in both types of therapy. Thus, a single transducer can be driven in both Histotripsy and Lithotripsy modes. This dual-mode Histotripsy and Lithotripsy system can be configured to treat, fractionate, and dissolve urinary stones in patients suffering from urinary stones.


In some embodiments, a multi-mode Lithotripsy-Histotripsy device is configured to shift virtually instantaneously (electronic speeds) from a Lithotripsy shock wave mode (L-mode) to the Histotripsy “soft” erosion mode (H-mode). The primary advantages of a dual mode Lithotripsy-Histotripsy system are: (1) ability to rapidly fractionate urinary stones into smaller gravel like fragments in L-mode, which can be reduced in size more quickly by H-mode erosion (erosion is effectively a surface phenomena) because of the greatly increased surface area of the Lithotripsy fragments; (2) easy image guidance and initial focal targeting by utilizing the Histotripsy bubble cloud.


Despite the differences between Lithotripsy and Histotripsy, the aperture size, focal characteristics, and piezoelectric materials of the transducers needed for each system are similar. The circuitry and generators required to drive these transducers can be configured to drive a single transducer in both H and L-modes, or alternatively, can be configured to drive separate H-mode and L-mode transducers.



FIG. 3 illustrates a combination Lithotripsy-Histotripsy system 300, comprising therapy transducer 302, therapy transducer 304, imaging system 306, control system 308, display 310, and patient support 312. In one embodiment, therapy transducer 302 can be a Lithotripsy transducer configured to operate in an L-mode to deliver Lithotripsy therapy to a target, and therapy transducer 304 can be a Histotripsy transducer configured to operate in an H-mode to deliver Histotripsy therapy to a target. In another embodiment, a combination Lithotripsy-Histotripsy system may include only a single transducer, such as therapy transducer 302, the transducer being configured to deliver both Lithotripsy therapy and Histotripsy therapy, without requiring a second therapy transducer 304. Therapy transducers 302 and 304 may have a single focus with mechanical or electromechanical steering of the respective Lithotripsy-Histotripsy focus. Alternatively, the therapy transducers may comprise a phased array to provide electrical steering of the focal point. Histotripsy transducers can be fabricated from piezo-electric ceramic materials that are pulsed with high voltage electric signals at ultrasonic frequencies. Lithotripsy transducers can be fabricated from piezo-electric ceramic materials or they may be magneto-resistive magnetic transducers or spark gap transducers, for example.


In some embodiments, Histotripsy transducers can apply acoustic pulses that operate at a frequency between approximately 50 KHz and 5 MHz, having a pulse intensity with a peak negative pressure of approximately 8-40 MPa, a peak positive pressure of more than 10 MPa, a pulse length shorter than 50 cycles, a duty cycle between approximately 0.1% and 5% and in some embodiments less than 5%, and a pulse repetition frequency of less than 5 KHz. In other embodiments, Lithotripsy transducers can apply acoustic pulses that operate at a frequency between approximately 50 KHz and 5 MHz, having a pulse intensity with a peak negative pressure of approximately 10-25 MPa, a peak positive pressure of more than 10 MPa, a pulse length of 1 cycle, a duty cycle less than 0.1%, and a pulse repetition frequency of less than 2 Hz.


Imaging system 306 can provide real-time imaging guidance of the patient while during L-mode and H-mode therapy. In the embodiment of FIG. 3, imaging system 306 comprises an ultrasound and fluoroscopic C-Arm imaging system. However, due to the size and cost of C-arm imaging solutions, in other embodiments the imaging system can comprise a high-resolution ultrasound imaging system. If an ultrasound imaging system is used, it can be separate from therapy transducers 302 and 304. Alternatively in some embodiments, the ultrasound imaging system can be disposed on or within the therapy transducers 302 and 304. Real-time imaging from imaging system 306 can be displayed on display 310, which can comprise and electronic display or a graphical user interface (GUI). In some embodiments, the display can visualize treatment from both the therapy transducers 302 and 304 at the same time, thus having the capability to overlap or fuse the fluoroscopic and ultrasonic images to optimize image planning and therapy tracking. Therapy transducers 302 and 304 and imaging system 306 can be packaged together as a single unit, as shown in FIG. 3, to facilitate imaging and treatment of a patient lying on patient support 312.


Control system 308 can include all the necessary drive electronics and signal generators necessary to drive therapy transducers 302 and 304 in both L-mode and H-mode. For example, the drive electronics and signal generators of control system 308 should be configured to drive therapy transducers 302 and/or 304 according to the parameters set forth in Table 1 above for both H-mode and L-mode transducers. The control system 308 can including a switching mechanism configured to instantaneously switch operation of the system between an L-mode and an H-mode, or to allow for simultaneous operation in H and L-modes. Control system 308 can further include a CPU or computer configured to set treatment parameters, receive and process imaging information, and direct L-mode and H-mode therapy according to a surgical plan. The therapy transducer drive electronics may be configured to generate both types of pulses as a pulse sequence in addition to Histotripsy pulses that optimize Lithotripsy pulses by suppressing and enhancing cavitation. One therapy transducer may have the capability of focusing outside of the target are to suppress cavitation and thereby provide active protection of tissues outside of the target area. This technique is more fully described in U.S. patent Ser. No. 12/121,001, filed May 15, 2008, titled “Pulsed Cavitational Ultrasound Therapy.”



FIG. 4 is a schematic drawing showing additional details of the system of FIG. 3. Lithotripsy-Histotripsy system 400 of FIG. 4 can include therapy transducer 402, imaging system 406, optional ultrasound imaging probe 407, H-mode driving system 414, L-mode driving system 416, and switching mechanism 418, which can be a physical or electronic control switch. In FIG. 4, therapy transducer 402 can represent either therapy transducers 302 and 304 of FIG. 3, or alternatively, can represent a single therapy transducer capable of both H and L-mode pulses. The Lithotripsy-Histotripsy system 400 of FIG. 4 allows virtually instantaneous switching between H-mode driving system 414 and the L-mode driving system 416 with electronic control switch 418 to allow an infinite range of possibilities for time division multiplexing of the H-mode and L-mode pulses.


Methods of using a Lithotripsy-Histotripsy system, such as the system described herein, will now be discussed. The choice of modality for treating patients with nephrolithiasis depends upon stone size, stone location, anatomic factors, patient factors, and patient preference. In general, for stones in the ureter or kidney having a size less than 2 cm in greatest dimension, shockwave Lithotripsy and ureteroscopy are first-line treatment options. For stones in the kidney (particularly those that reside in the lower pole of the kidney), percutaneous nephrolithotomy, albeit much more invasive of a procedure, can also be an appropriate option. Shockwave lithotripsy was the primary modality for managing these stones; however, advances in ureteroscopic instrumentation and technology have placed ureteroscopy on equal footing with shockwave lithotripsy, such that this has become the preferred first-line therapy at many academic medical centers.


The primary advantage of Histotripsy therapy over Lithotripsy therapy is the uniformly microscopic size of the reduced stone particles compared to Lithotripsy. For some stones which do not break down via L-mode therapy into sufficiently small fragments to be passed through the urinary tract, this may be critical. Some situations might be best approached primarily in the L-mode (harder stones in places where fragments are easily passed) and some situations might be best approached primarily in the H-mode (softer more easily eroded stones). Some may require a combination of each system with optimal application to be determined by clinical and laboratory experience with such a system. Additionally, visualization of Lithotripsy procedures is typically challenging and requires large and expensive imaging equipment, such as a fluoroscopic C-Arm. However, cavitational bubble clouds formed with a Histotripsy H-mode pulse can be easily viewed in real time under ultrasound imaging. Thus, it can be possible to visualize and target a urinary stone or by placing an H-mode bubble cloud on the stone, then focusing an L-mode shockwave towards the position of the bubble cloud to fragment the stone.


Thus, referring back to FIGS. 3-4, one method of treating urinary stones with a Lithotripsy-Histotripsy system (e.g., Lithotripsy-Histotripsy system 300/400 of FIG. 3/4) may include positioning a patient on a patient support (e.g., patient support 312 of FIG. 3) and imaging the patient with an imaging system (e.g., imaging system 306 of FIG. 3). The imaging system can be, for example, an ultrasound imaging system or a fluoroscopic imaging system. The method can include targeting a urinary stone or urinary stones within the patient with the imaging system. Next, the method can include focusing an H-mode therapy transducer (e.g., therapy transducer 304 of FIG. 3) on the urinary stone and generating a bubble cloud onto the stone under the ultrasound image guidance. The Histotripsy bubble cloud can be visualized as a greatly enhanced backscatter region on a visual display (e.g., display 310 of FIG. 3).


Next, the Lithotripsy-Histotripsy system can be switched to an L-mode with a switching mechanism (e.g., switching mechanism 418 of FIG. 4) to deliver a shock wave or shock waves to the urinary stone to macroscopically fractionate the stone. Verification of the focal position and its relationship to the urinary stone can be achieved by switching back to H-mode and visualizing the H-mode bubble cloud under imaging guidance. Furthermore, the H-mode bubble cloud can continue to erode the macroscopic urinary stone particles due to the increased surface area of multiple fractionated stone particles compared to the original urinary stone. The Histotripsy therapy can function to smooth (by erosion) the Lithotripsy fragments so as to facilitate passage of these fragments by removing sharp corners, edges, or elongated dimensions which can hinder passage of fragments through the ureter.


Thus, L-mode and H-modes of operation can be alternated so as to break down urinary stones into macroscopic particles (with L-mode pulses) and subsequently erode the macroscopic particles into a fine powder (with H-mode pulses). Histotripsy and Lithotripsy are naturally complementary as Lithotripsy shockwaves are efficient at causing initial coarse subdivision of targeted stones which greatly increases surface area and rate for subsequent Histotripsy erosion. Since the actual position of the original urinary stone can be tracked by image analysis (e.g., visual tracking of the stone itself or speckle tracking), the Lithotripsy-Histotripsy system can allow for movement of the kidney and can continually reposition the focus onto the tracked target volume. Visualization of the Histotripsy bubble cloud at the target position can confirm proper targeting.


In some method embodiments, urinary stones can be treated solely with Histotripsy H-mode pulses. Thus, Histotripsy acoustic sequences can be applied directly to the stones to cause erosion of the stones, producing extremely fine debris particles less than 100 μm in diameter which can be passed painlessly by the patient and eliminate the risk of steinstrasse (multiple obstructing fragments within the ureter). Still referring to FIGS. 3-4, another method of treating urinary stones with a Lithotripsy-Histotripsy system (e.g., Lithotripsy-Histotripsy system 300/400 of FIG. 3/4) may include positioning a patient on a patient support (e.g., patient support 312 of FIG. 3) and imaging the patient with an imaging system (e.g., imaging system 306 of FIG. 3). The method can further comprise targeting a urinary stone or urinary stones within the patient with the imaging system. Next, the method can include focusing an H-mode therapy transducer (e.g., therapy transducer 304 of FIG. 3) on the urinary stone and generating a bubble cloud onto the stone under the ultrasound image guidance. The Histotripsy bubble cloud can be visualized as a greatly enhanced backscatter region on a visual display (e.g., display 310 of FIG. 3). The method can further comprise applying Histotripsy therapy to the urinary stone to erode the stone into fine particles having a size less than 100 μm in diameter.


Alternative embodiments of methods of treating urinary stones can include multi-frequency systems for additional optimization, e.g., L-mode at higher frequencies (probably about 1 MHz) to fragment the stone and H-mode at lower frequencies (about 500 Khz) to cover the whole stone area and to make sure the increased stone surface area is usable for enhanced surface-based erosion. Referring now to FIG. 5, since L-mode pulses 520 typically have a maximum pulse repetition frequency (PRF) about 2 Hz (2 pulses per second), and L-mode pulses are generally less than 100 micro-seconds long, most of the time during L-mode therapy is available for H-mode pulses 522. In some embodiments, L-mode pulses can have a maximum PRF of about 5 Hz. Since the H-mode PRF can be 1 kHz or larger, the H-mode pulses 522 and L-mode pulses 520 can progress together appropriately interleaved in time with little decrease in PRF for either, as shown in FIG. 5. Thus during urinary stone treatment, L-mode pulses can fracture a large urinary stone into fragments to increase the stone surface area for the H-mode, which can then progress virtually undiminished in PRF by temporal sharing with the L-mode. It should be noted that the H-mode can trap fragments within its focal field. This may allow trapping of L-mode fragments until the H-mode pulses erode all fragments to very small particles that then escape the trapping field.


This L-mode and H-mode interleaving technique can be used to treat urinary stones. Thus, referring back to FIGS. 3-5, one method of treating urinary stones with a Lithotripsy-Histotripsy system (e.g., Lithotripsy-Histotripsy system 300/400 of FIG. 3/4) may include positioning a patient on a patient support (e.g., patient support 312 of FIG. 3) and imaging the patient with an imaging system (e.g., imaging system 306 of FIG. 3). The imaging system can be, for example, an ultrasound imaging system or a fluoroscopic imaging system. The method can include targeting a urinary stone or urinary stones within the patient with the imaging system. Next, the method can include focusing an H-mode therapy transducer (e.g., therapy transducer 304 of FIG. 3) on the urinary stone and generating a bubble cloud onto the stone under the ultrasound image guidance. The Histotripsy bubble cloud can be visualized under ultrasound image guidance as a greatly enhanced backscatter region on a visual display (e.g., display 310 of FIG. 3). Since the bubble cloud cannot be imaged under solely fluoroscopic imaging, if no ultrasound imaging is used then the stones can be targeted by positioning the geometric focus of the therapy transducer (e.g., the expected location of the bubble cloud) on the targeted urinary stone.


Next, the Lithotripsy-Histotripsy system can generate an L-mode pulse to deliver a shock wave to the urinary stone to macroscopically fractionate the stone. Since L-mode pulses typically have a PRF≦2 Hz (but possibly ≦5 Hz), the time between subsequent L-mode pulses can be used to apply H-mode pulses, which typically have a PRF≦5 kHz. Thus, the method of treatment can comprise delivering an L-mode pulse to a urinary stone to fractionate the stone, instantaneously switching to an H-mode of operation to deliver a series of H-mode pulses to the urinary stone, and instantaneously switching back to an L-mode to deliver another Lithotripsy shockwave to the stone(s). As described above, verification of the stone position can be achieved by switching to H-mode and visualizing the H-mode bubble cloud under imaging guidance.


Histotripsy can be used to enhance shockwave (Lithotripsy) fragmentation of stones through control of the cavitation environment. Histotripsy can be used to control the cavitation environment to enhance and suppress cavitation at appropriate times. For example, Histotripsy can be used to suppress cavitation to improve efficacy at higher Lithotripsy shockwave rates. Additionally, Histotripsy can be used to suppress cavitation in healthy tissue to facilitate a higher Lithotripsy shockwave rate. High repetition rate Lithotripsy (>2 Hz) is currently limited by the persistence of microbubbles created during the process (cavitation) which interfere with subsequent shockwaves. Simple suppression of cavitation does not improve overall comminution because some cavitation is necessary for complete fragmentation. Time-varying Histotripsy sequences applied immediately before the arrival of a Lithotripsy shockwave to suppress cavitation, followed by enhancement sequences during the tensile portion of the Lithotripter wave (acting as a pump) can maximize both methods of comminution. This technique can greatly increase the efficiency of shockwaves as well as the rate which can be used allowing more complete comminution of even difficult urinary stones.


Cavitation suppressing Histotripsy acoustic sequences can be used to reduce collateral tissue injury during high dose and high rate shockwave application. Studies have shown increased risk of injury when high shockwave rates or high shockwave doses are attempted limiting the thoroughness and effectiveness of a treatment. A spatially-varying cavitation suppressing Histotripsy field can allow cavitation to occur within a target zone while suppressing cavitation outside the target zone. This technique can be used to eliminate collateral injury from shockwaves while permitting necessary cavitation on the stone surface when large shockwave doses and higher rates are used for more complete comminution. Thus, a method of treating tissue can comprise delivering Lithotripsy therapy to a target tissue to treat the target tissue, and delivering spatially-varying Histotripsy therapy to allow cavitation to occur within the target tissue while suppressing cavitation outside the target tissue.


As for additional details pertinent to the present invention, materials and manufacturing techniques may be employed as within the level of those with skill in the relevant art. The same may hold true with respect to method-based aspects of the invention in terms of additional acts commonly or logically employed. Also, it is contemplated that any optional feature of the inventive variations described may be set forth and claimed independently, or in combination with any one or more of the features described herein. Likewise, reference to a singular item, includes the possibility that there are plural of the same items present. More specifically, as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “and,” “said,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. It is further noted that the claims may be drafted to exclude any optional element. As such, this statement is intended to serve as antecedent basis for use of such exclusive terminology as “solely,” “only” and the like in connection with the recitation of claim elements, or use of a “negative” limitation. Unless defined otherwise herein, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. The breadth of the present invention is not to be limited by the subject specification, but rather only by the plain meaning of the claim terms employed.

Claims
  • 1. A method of treating urinary stones, comprising: applying Histotripsy therapy by transmitting Histotripsy ultrasound pulses having a pulse repetition frequency between 100 Hz and 1,000 Hz to generate a bubble cloud;positioning the bubble cloud on a urinary stone;applying Lithotripsy therapy by transmitting a Lithotripsy ultrasound pulse having a pulse repetition frequency less than or equal to 2 Hz to generate a shock wave to fractionate the urinary stone into macroscopic urinary stone particles;applying the Histotripsy therapy to the macroscopic urinary stone particles to erode the macroscopic urinary stone particles; anddisplaying real-time imaging of treatment from the Histotripsy therapy and the Lithotripsy therapy on a display.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the positioning step further comprises positioning the bubble cloud on the urinary stone under imaging guidance.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the positioning step further comprises positioning the bubble cloud on the urinary stone under ultrasound imaging guidance.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 wherein the positioning step further comprises positioning the bubble cloud on the urinary stone under fluoroscopic and ultrasound imaging guidance.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the applying Histotripsy therapy steps comprise applying Histotripsy therapy with a multi-mode transducer.
  • 6. The method of claim 5 wherein the applying Lithotripsy therapy step comprises applying Lithotripsy therapy with the multi-mode transducer.
  • 7. The method of claim 1 wherein the applying Histotripsy therapy steps comprise applying Histotripsy therapy at a first pulse repetition frequency, wherein the applying Lithotripsy therapy step comprises applying Lithotripsy therapy at a second pulse repetition frequency, the method further comprising interleaving Histotripsy therapy and Lithotripsy therapy with virtually no change in the first and second pulse repetition rates.
  • 8. A method of treating a target tissue, comprising: delivering a first Lithotripsy pulse to the target tissue;delivering a sequence of Histotripsy pulses having a pulse repetition frequency between 100 Hz and 1,000 Hz to the target tissue after the first Lithotripsy pulse;delivering a second Lithotripsy pulse to the target tissue after the sequence of Histotripsy pulses, wherein the first and second Lithotripsy pulses are separated in time by a pulse repetition frequency less than or equal to 2 Hz; anddisplaying real-time imaging of treatment from the Histotripsy pulses and the first and second Lithotripsy pulses on a display.
  • 9. The method of claim 8 wherein the target tissue is a urinary stone.
  • 10. The method of claim 8 further comprising, prior to delivering the first Lithotripsy pulse to the target tissue, delivering a sequence of Histotripsy pulses to suppress cavitation.
  • 11. The method of claim 10 further comprising, prior to delivering the second Lithotripsy pulse to the target tissue, delivering a sequence of Histotripsy pulses to suppress cavitation.
  • 12. The method of claim 8 further comprising delivering a cavitation suppressing Histotripsy field to allow cavitation to occur within the target tissue while suppressing cavitation outside the target tissue.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119 of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/237,011, filed Aug. 26, 2009, titled “Devices and Methods for Using Controlled Bubble Cloud Cavitation in Fractionating Kidney Stones”. This application is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (288)
Number Name Date Kind
3243497 Kendall et al. Mar 1966 A
3679021 Goldberg et al. Jul 1972 A
4016749 Wachter Apr 1977 A
4024501 Herring et al. May 1977 A
4051394 Tieden Sep 1977 A
4117446 Alais Sep 1978 A
4269174 Adair May 1981 A
4277367 Madsen et al. Jul 1981 A
4351038 Alais Sep 1982 A
4406153 Ophir et al. Sep 1983 A
4440025 Hayakawa et al. Apr 1984 A
4453408 Clayman Jun 1984 A
4483345 Miwa Nov 1984 A
4549533 Cain et al. Oct 1985 A
4550606 Drost Nov 1985 A
4575330 Hull Mar 1986 A
4622972 Giebeler, Jr. Nov 1986 A
4625731 Quedens et al. Dec 1986 A
4641378 McConnell et al. Feb 1987 A
4669483 Hepp et al. Jun 1987 A
4689986 Carson et al. Sep 1987 A
4757820 Itoh Jul 1988 A
4791915 Barsotti et al. Dec 1988 A
4819621 Ueberle et al. Apr 1989 A
4829491 Saugeon et al. May 1989 A
4856107 Dory Aug 1989 A
4865042 Umemura et al. Sep 1989 A
4888746 Wurster et al. Dec 1989 A
4890267 Rudolph Dec 1989 A
4922917 Dory May 1990 A
4938217 Lele Jul 1990 A
4957099 Hassler Sep 1990 A
4973980 Howkins et al. Nov 1990 A
4984575 Uchiyama et al. Jan 1991 A
4991151 Dory Feb 1991 A
4995012 Dory Feb 1991 A
RE33590 Dory May 1991 E
5014686 Schafer May 1991 A
5065751 Wolf Nov 1991 A
5080101 Dory Jan 1992 A
5080102 Dory Jan 1992 A
5091893 Smith et al. Feb 1992 A
5092336 Fink Mar 1992 A
5097709 Masuzawa et al. Mar 1992 A
5111822 Dory May 1992 A
5143073 Dory Sep 1992 A
5143074 Dory Sep 1992 A
5150711 Dory Sep 1992 A
5158070 Dory Oct 1992 A
5158071 Umemura et al. Oct 1992 A
5163421 Bernstein et al. Nov 1992 A
5165412 Okazaki Nov 1992 A
5174294 Saito Dec 1992 A
5209221 Riedlinger May 1993 A
5215680 D'Arrigo Jun 1993 A
5219401 Cathignol et al. Jun 1993 A
5230340 Rhyne Jul 1993 A
5295484 Marcus et al. Mar 1994 A
5316000 Chapelon et al. May 1994 A
5354258 Dory Oct 1994 A
5380411 Schlief Jan 1995 A
5409002 Pell Apr 1995 A
5431621 Dory Jul 1995 A
5435311 Umemura et al. Jul 1995 A
5443069 Schaetzle Aug 1995 A
5469852 Nakamura et al. Nov 1995 A
5474071 Chapelon et al. Dec 1995 A
5474531 Carter Dec 1995 A
5501655 Rolt et al. Mar 1996 A
5520188 Hennige et al. May 1996 A
5523058 Umemura et al. Jun 1996 A
5524620 Rosenschein Jun 1996 A
5540909 Schutt Jul 1996 A
5542935 Unger et al. Aug 1996 A
5558092 Unger et al. Sep 1996 A
5563346 Bartelt et al. Oct 1996 A
5566675 Li et al. Oct 1996 A
5573497 Chapelon Nov 1996 A
5580575 Unger et al. Dec 1996 A
5582578 Zhong et al. Dec 1996 A
5590657 Cain et al. Jan 1997 A
5601526 Chapelon et al. Feb 1997 A
5617862 Cole et al. Apr 1997 A
5648098 Porter Jul 1997 A
5666954 Chapelon et al. Sep 1997 A
5676452 Scholz Oct 1997 A
5676692 Sanghvi et al. Oct 1997 A
5678554 Hossack et al. Oct 1997 A
5694936 Fujimoto et al. Dec 1997 A
5695460 Siegel et al. Dec 1997 A
5717657 Ruffa Feb 1998 A
5724972 Petrofsky Mar 1998 A
5743863 Chapelon Apr 1998 A
5753929 Bliss May 1998 A
5759162 Oppelt et al. Jun 1998 A
5766138 Rattner Jun 1998 A
5769790 Watkins et al. Jun 1998 A
5797848 Marian et al. Aug 1998 A
5823962 Schaetzle et al. Oct 1998 A
5827204 Grandia et al. Oct 1998 A
5836896 Rosenschein Nov 1998 A
5849727 Porter et al. Dec 1998 A
5873902 Sanghvi et al. Feb 1999 A
5879314 Peterson et al. Mar 1999 A
5932807 Mallart Aug 1999 A
5947904 Hossack et al. Sep 1999 A
6001069 Tachibana et al. Dec 1999 A
6022309 Celliers et al. Feb 2000 A
6036667 Manna et al. Mar 2000 A
6088613 Unger Jul 2000 A
6093883 Sanghvi et al. Jul 2000 A
6113558 Rosenschein et al. Sep 2000 A
6126607 Whitmore, III et al. Oct 2000 A
6128958 Cain Oct 2000 A
6143018 Beuthan et al. Nov 2000 A
6165144 Talish et al. Dec 2000 A
6176842 Tachibana et al. Jan 2001 B1
6308585 Nilsson et al. Oct 2001 B1
6308710 Silva Oct 2001 B1
6309355 Cain et al. Oct 2001 B1
6318146 Madsen et al. Nov 2001 B1
6321109 Ben-Haim et al. Nov 2001 B2
6338566 Verdier Jan 2002 B1
6344489 Spears Feb 2002 B1
6391020 Kurtz et al. May 2002 B1
6413216 Cain et al. Jul 2002 B1
6419648 Vitek et al. Jul 2002 B1
6470204 Uzgiris et al. Oct 2002 B1
6488639 Ribault et al. Dec 2002 B1
6490469 Candy Dec 2002 B2
6500141 Irion et al. Dec 2002 B1
6506154 Ezion et al. Jan 2003 B1
6506171 Vitek et al. Jan 2003 B1
6508774 Acker et al. Jan 2003 B1
6511428 Azuma et al. Jan 2003 B1
6511444 Hynynen et al. Jan 2003 B2
6522142 Freundlich Feb 2003 B1
6524251 Rabiner et al. Feb 2003 B2
6536553 Scanlon Mar 2003 B1
6543272 Vitek Apr 2003 B1
6556750 Constantino et al. Apr 2003 B2
6559644 Froundlich et al. May 2003 B2
6576220 Unger Jun 2003 B2
6599288 Maguire et al. Jul 2003 B2
6607498 Eshel Aug 2003 B2
6612988 Maor et al. Sep 2003 B2
6613004 Vitek et al. Sep 2003 B1
6613005 Friedman et al. Sep 2003 B1
6626854 Friedman et al. Sep 2003 B2
6626855 Weng et al. Sep 2003 B1
6645162 Friedman et al. Nov 2003 B2
6648839 Manna et al. Nov 2003 B2
6666833 Friedman et al. Dec 2003 B1
6685640 Fry et al. Feb 2004 B1
6685657 Jones Feb 2004 B2
6705994 Vortman et al. Mar 2004 B2
6719449 Laugharn, Jr. et al. Apr 2004 B1
6719694 Weng et al. Apr 2004 B2
6735461 Vitek et al. May 2004 B2
6736814 Manna et al. May 2004 B2
6750463 Riley Jun 2004 B1
6770031 Hynynen et al. Aug 2004 B2
6775438 Gaedke et al. Aug 2004 B1
6788977 Fenn et al. Sep 2004 B2
6790180 Vitek Sep 2004 B2
6820160 Allman Nov 2004 B1
6852082 Strickberger et al. Feb 2005 B2
6869439 White et al. Mar 2005 B2
6890332 Truckai et al. May 2005 B2
6929609 Asafusa Aug 2005 B2
7004282 Manna et al. Feb 2006 B2
7059168 Hibi et al. Jun 2006 B2
7128711 Medan et al. Oct 2006 B2
7128719 Rosenberg Oct 2006 B2
7175596 Vitek et al. Feb 2007 B2
7196313 Quinones Mar 2007 B2
7223239 Schulze et al. May 2007 B2
7258674 Cribbs et al. Aug 2007 B2
7273458 Prausnitz et al. Sep 2007 B2
7273459 Desilets et al. Sep 2007 B2
7300414 Holland et al. Nov 2007 B1
7311679 Desilets et al. Dec 2007 B2
7331951 Eshel et al. Feb 2008 B2
7341569 Soltani et al. Mar 2008 B2
7347855 Eshel et al. Mar 2008 B2
7358226 Dayton et al. Apr 2008 B2
7359640 Onde et al. Apr 2008 B2
7367948 O'Donnell et al. May 2008 B2
7374551 Liang et al. May 2008 B2
7377900 Vitek et al. May 2008 B2
7442168 Novak et al. Oct 2008 B2
7462488 Madsen et al. Dec 2008 B2
7559905 Kagosaki et al. Jul 2009 B2
7656638 Laakso et al. Feb 2010 B2
8333115 Garvey et al. Dec 2012 B1
20010039420 Burbank et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010041163 Sugita et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020045890 Celliers et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020078964 Kovac et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020099356 Unger et al. Jul 2002 A1
20030092982 Eppstein May 2003 A1
20030112922 Burdette et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030149352 Liang et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030157025 Unger et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030181833 Faragalla et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030199857 Eizenhofer Oct 2003 A1
20030221561 Milo Dec 2003 A1
20030236539 Rabiner et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040127815 Marchitto et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040138563 Moehring et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040236248 Svedman Nov 2004 A1
20040243021 Murphy et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050038339 Chauhan et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050038361 Zhong et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050152561 Spencer Jul 2005 A1
20050154314 Quistgaard Jul 2005 A1
20050283098 Conston et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060060991 Holsteyns et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060074303 Chornenky et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060173387 Hansmann et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060206028 Lee et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060241466 Ottoboni et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241523 Sinelnikov et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060264760 Liu et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060293630 Manna et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070010805 Fedewa et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070016039 Vortman et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070044562 Sarr Mar 2007 A1
20070065420 Johnson Mar 2007 A1
20070083120 Cain et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070161902 Dan Jul 2007 A1
20070167764 Hynynen Jul 2007 A1
20070205785 Nilsson Sep 2007 A1
20070219448 Seip et al. Sep 2007 A1
20080013593 Kawabata Jan 2008 A1
20080055003 Unnikrishnan et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080082026 Schmidt et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080091125 Owen et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080126665 Burr et al. May 2008 A1
20080177180 Azhari et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080194965 Sliwa et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080214964 Chapelon et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080262345 Fichtinger et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080262486 Zvuloni et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080312561 Chauhan Dec 2008 A1
20080319356 Cain et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080319376 Wilcox et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090030339 Cheng et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090112098 Vaezy et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090177085 Maxwell et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090198094 Fenster et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090211587 Lawrentschuk Aug 2009 A1
20090227874 Suri et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090230822 Kushculey et al. Sep 2009 A1
20100011845 Laugharn et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100059264 Hasegawa et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100069797 Cain et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100125225 Gelbart et al. May 2010 A1
20100152624 Tanis et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100163694 Fadler et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100261994 Davalos et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100274136 Cerofolini Oct 2010 A1
20100286519 Lee et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100305432 Duhay et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100317971 Fan et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110040190 Jahnke et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110112400 Emery et al. May 2011 A1
20110118602 Weng et al. May 2011 A1
20110172529 Gertner Jul 2011 A1
20110178444 Slayton et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110251528 Canney et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110257524 Gertner Oct 2011 A1
20110263967 Bailey et al. Oct 2011 A1
20120010541 Cain et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120029353 Slayton et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120059264 Hope Simpson et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120092724 Pettis Apr 2012 A1
20120130288 Holland et al. May 2012 A1
20120172720 Kawabata Jul 2012 A1
20120189998 Kruecker et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120271223 Khanna Oct 2012 A1
20130053691 Kawabata et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130090579 Cain et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130102932 Cain et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130190623 Bertolina et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130289593 Hall et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130303906 Cain et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140073995 Teofilovic et al. Mar 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (41)
Number Date Country
102481164 May 2012 CN
3220751 Dec 1983 DE
3544628 Jun 1987 DE
3817094 Nov 1989 DE
4012760 May 1992 DE
0017382 Oct 1980 EP
0320303 Jun 1989 EP
0332871 Sep 1989 EP
0384831 Aug 1990 EP
0755653 Jan 1997 EP
1374785 Jan 2004 EP
1504713 Feb 2005 EP
2397188 Dec 2011 EP
2099582 Dec 1982 GB
60-80779 May 1985 JP
HEI 60-80779 May 1985 JP
61-196718 Aug 1986 JP
HEI 2-215451 Aug 1990 JP
HEI 7-504339 May 1995 JP
08-84740 Apr 1996 JP
06-304178 May 1996 JP
08-131454 May 1996 JP
09-55571 Feb 1997 JP
HEI 10-512477 Dec 1998 JP
2000300559 Oct 2000 JP
2003-510159 Mar 2003 JP
2004-505660 Feb 2004 JP
2005167058 Jun 2005 JP
2007520307 Jul 2007 JP
2010019554 Jan 2010 JP
2010029650 Feb 2010 JP
2010204068 Sep 2010 JP
2004-512502 Apr 2014 JP
WO9406355 Mar 1994 WO
WO 0232506 Apr 2002 WO
WO2005018469 Mar 2005 WO
WO 2007038160 Apr 2007 WO
WO 2008051484 May 2008 WO
WO2011040054 Jul 2011 WO
WO 2011092683 Aug 2011 WO
WO2011154654 Dec 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (83)
Entry
Pishchalnikov et al. (Cavitation Bubble Cluster Activity in the Breakage of Kidney Stones by Lithotripter Shock Waves, J Endourol. Sep. 2003 ; 17(7): 435-446.).
Sapozhnikov et al. (Ultrasound-Guided Localized Detection of Cavitation During Lithotripsy in Pig Kidney In Vivo, 2001 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium-1348).
Cain, Charles A.; Histrotripsy: controlled mechanical sub-division of soft tissues by high intensity pulsed ultrasound (conference presentation); American Institute of Physics (AIP) Therapeutic Ultrasound: 5th International Symposium on Therapeutic Ultrasound; 44 pgs.; Oct. 27-29, 2005.
Parsons et al.; Pulsed cavitational ultrasound therapy for controlled tissue homogenization; Ultrasound in Med. & Biol.; vol. 32; pp. 115-129; 2006.
Roberts et al.; Pulsed cavitational ultrasound: a noninvasive technology for controlled tissue ablation (histotripsy) in the rabbit kidney; Journal of Urology; vol. 175; pp. 734-738; 2006.
Xu et al.; A new strategy to enhance cavitational tissue erosion by using a high intensity initiating sequence; IEEE Trans Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Freq Control; vol. 53; pp. 1412-1424; 2006.
Xu et al.; Controlled ultrasound tissue erosion: the role of dynamic interaction between insonation and microbubble activity; Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; vol. 117; pp. 424-435; 2005.
Xu et al.; Controlled ultrasound tissue erosion; IEEE Transaction on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control; vol. 51; pp. 726-736; 2004.
Xu et al.; Effects of acoustic parameters on bubble cloud dynamics in ultrasound tissue erosion (histotripsy); Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; vol. 122; pp. 229-236; 2007.
Xu et al.; High Speed Imaging of Bubble Clouds Generated in Pulsed Ultrasound Cavitational Therapy'Histotripsy; IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; ; vol. 54; No. 10; pp. 2091R2101; Oct. 2007.
Xu et al.; Investigation of intensity threshold for ultrasound tissue erosion; Ultrasound in Med. & Biol.; vol. 31; pp. 1673-1682; 2005.
Xu et al.; Optical and acoustic monitoring of bubble cloud dynamics at a tissue-fluid interface in ultrasound tissue erosion; Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; vol. 121; pp. 2421-2430; 2007.
Hall et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/868,768 entitled “Micromanipulator Control Arm for Therapeutic and Imaging Ultrasound Transducers,” filed Aug. 26, 2010.
Cain et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/887,705 entitled “Gel phantoms for testing cavitational ultrasound (histotripsy) transducers,” filed Sep. 22, 2010.
Hall et al.; Imaging feedback of tissue liquefaction (histotripsy) in ultrasound surgery; IEEE Ultrasonic Symposium, Sep. 18-25, 2005, pp. 1732-1734.
Appel et al.; Stereoscopic highspeed recording of bubble filaments; Ultrasonics Sonochemistry; vol. 11(1); pp. 39-42; Jan. 2004.
Atchley et al.; Thresholds for cavitation produced in water by pulsed ultrasound; Ultrasonics.; vol. 26(5); pp. 280-285; Sep. 1988.
Bland et al.; Surgical Oncology; McGraw Hill; Chap. 5 (Cavitron Ultrasonic Aspirator); pp. 461-462; Jan. 29, 2001.
Burdin et al.; Implementation of the laser diffraction technique for cavitation bubble investigations; Particle & Particle Systems Characterization; vol. 19; pp. 73-83; May 2002.
Holland et al.; Thresholds for transient cavitation produced by pulsed ultrasound in a controlled nuclei environment; J. Acoust. Soc. Am.; vol. 88(5); pp. 2059-2069; Nov. 1990.
Huber et al.; Influence of shock wave pressure amplitude and pulse repetition frequency on the lifespan, size and number of transient cavities in the field of an electromagnetic lithotripter; Physics in Medicine and Biology; vol. 43 (10); pp. 3113-3128; Oct. 1998.
Lauterborn et al.; Cavitation bubble dynamics studied by high speed photography and holography: part one; Ultrasonics; vol. 23; pp. 260-268; Nov. 1985.
Miller et al.; A review of in vitro bioeffects of inertial ultrasonic cavitation from a mechanistic perspective; Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology; vol. 22; pp. 1131-1154; (year of publication is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date and any foreign priority date) 1996.
Ohl et al.; Bubble dynamics, shock waves and sonoluminescence; Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A; vol. 357; pp. 269-294; (year of publication is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date and any foreign priority date) 1999.
Porter et al.; Reduction in left ventricular cavitary attenuation and improvement in posterior myocardial contrast . . . ; J Am Soc Echocardiography; pp. 437-441; Jul.-Aug. 1996.
Roy et al.; A precise technique for the measurement of acoustic cavitation thresholds and some preliminary results; Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; vol. 78(5); pp. 1799-805; Nov. 1985.
Sokolov et al.; Use of a dual-pulse lithotripter to generate a localized and intensified cavitation field; Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; vol. 110(3); pp. 1685-1695; Sep. 2001.
Teofilovic, Dejan; U.S. Appl. No. 13/446,783 entitled “Systems and Methods for Obtaining Large Creepage Isolation on Printed Circuit Boards,” filed Apr. 13, 2012.
Cain, Charles A.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/570,708 entitled “Lesion Generation Through Bone Using Histotripsy Therapy Without Aberration Correction,” filed Aug. 9, 2012.
Aschoff et al.; How does alteration of hepatic blood flow affect liver perfusion and radiofrequency-induced thermal lesion size in rabbit liver?; J Magn Reson Imaging; 13(1); pp. 57-63; Jan. 2001.
Cline et al.; Magnetic resonance-guided thermal surgery; Magnetic Resonance in Medicine; 30(1); pp. 98-106; Jul. 1993.
Curiel et al.; Elastography for the follow-up of high-intensity focused ultrasound prostate cancer treatment: Initial comparison with MRI; Ultrasound Med. Biol; 31(11); pp. 1461-1468; Nov. 2005.
Emelianov et al.; Triplex ultrasound: Elasticity imaging to age deep venous thrombosis; Ultrasound Med Biol; 28(6); pp. 757-767; Jun. 2002.
Hynynen et al.; Tissue thermometry during ultrasound exposure; European Urology; 23(Suppl 1); pp. 12-16; 1993 (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date).
Kallel et al.; The feasibility of elastographic visualization of HIFU-induced thermal lesions in soft tissues: Image-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound; Ultrasound Med. Biol; 25(4); pp. 641-647; May 1999.
Konofagou; Quo vadis elasticity imaging?; Ultrasonics; 42(1-9); pp. 331-336; Apr. 2004.
Kruse et al.; Tissue characterization using magnetic resonance elastography: Preliminary results; Phys. Med. Biol; 45(6); pp. 1579-1590; Jun. 2000.
Liu et al.; Real-time 2-D temperature imaging using ultrasound; IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 57(1); pp. 12-16; Jan. 2010 (author manuscript, 16 pgs.).
Liu et al.; Viscoelastic property measurement in thin tissue constructs using ultrasound; IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 55(2); pp. 368-383; Feb. 2008 (author manuscript, 37 pgs.).
Nightingale et al.; Analysis of contrast in images generated with transient acoustic radiation force; Ultrasound Med Biol; 32(1); pp. 61-72; Jan. 2006.
Okada et al.; A case of hepatocellular carcinoma treated by MR-guided focused ultrasound ablation with respiratory gating; Magn Reson Med Sci; 5(3); pp. 167-171; Oct. 2006.
Rowland et al.; MRI study of hepatic tumours following high intensity focused ultrasound surgery; British Journal of Radiology; 70; pp. 144-153; Feb. 1997.
Sapareto et al.; Thermal dose determination in cancer therapy; Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 10(6); pp. 787-800; Apr. 1984.
Souchon et al.; Visualisation of HIFU lesions using elastography of the human prostate in vivo: Preliminary results; Ultrasound Med. Biol; 29(7); pp. 1007-1015; Jul. 2003.
Xie et al.; Correspondence of ultrasound elasticity imaging to direct mechanical measurement in aging DVT in rats; Ultrasound Med Biol; 31(10); pp. 1351-1359; Oct. 2005 (author manuscript, 20 pgs.).
Zheng et al.; An acoustic backscatter-based method for localization of lesions induced by high-intensity focused ultrasound; Ultrasound Med Biol; 36(4); pp. 610-622; Apr. 2010.
Akiyama et al.; Elliptically curved acoustic lens for emitting strongly focused finite-amplitude beams: Application of the spheroidal beam equation model to the theoretical prediction; Acoustical Science and Technology, vol. 26, pp. 279-284, May 2005.
AVOGO Technologies; ACNV2601 High Insulation Voltage 10 MBd Digital Opotcoupler. Avago Technologies Data Sheet; pp. 1-11; Jul. 29, 2010.
Bjoerk et al.; Cool/MOS CP—How to make most beneficial use of the generation of super junction technology devices. Infineon Technologies AG. Feb. 2007 [retrieved Feb. 4, 2014] from the internet (http://www.infineon.com/dgdl/Infineon+-+Application+Note+-+PowerMOSFETs+-+600V+CoolMOS%E284%A2+-+CP+Most+beneficial+use+of+superjunction+technologie+devices.pdf?folderId=db3a304412b407950112b408e8c900048&fileId=db3a304412b407950112b40ac9a40688>pp. 1, 4, 14.
Canney et al.; Shock-Induced Heating and Millisecond Boiling in Gels and Tissue Due to High Intensity Focused Ultrasound; Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 36, pp. 250-267; Feb. 2010 (author manuscript).
Chan et al.; An image-guided high intensity focused ultrasound device for uterine fibroids treatment; Medical Physics, vol. 29, pp. 2611-2620, Nov. 2002.
Clement et al.; A hemisphere array for non-invasive ultrasound brain therapy and surgery; Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 45, p. 3707-3719, Dec. 2000.
Desilets et al.; The Design of Efficient Broad-Band Piezoelectric Transducers; Sonics and Ultrasonics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 25, pp. 115-125, May 1978.
Giannatsis et al.; Additive fabrication technologies applied to medicine and health care: a review; The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology; 40(1-2); pp. 116-127; Jan. 2009.
Gudra et al.; Influence of acoustic impedance of multilayer acoustic systems on the transfer function of ultrasonic airborne transducers; Ultrasonics, vol. 40, pp. 457-463, May 2002.
Hall et al.; A Low Cost Compact 512 Channel Therapeutic Ultrasound System for Transcutaneous Ultrasound Surgery; Aip Conference Proceedings, Boston, MA; vol. 829, pp. 445-449, Oct. 27-29, 2005.
Hall et al.; Histotripsy of the prostate: dose effects in a chronic canine model; Urology; 74(4); pp. 932-937; Oct. 2009 (author manuscript).
Hartmann; Ultrasonic properties of poly(4-methyl pentene-1), Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 51, pp. 310-314, Jan. 1980.
Kim et al.; Dependence of particle volume fraction on sound velocity and attenuation of EPDM composites; Ultrasonics, vol. 46, pp. 177-183, Feb. 2007.
Krimholtz et al.; New equivalent circuits for elementary piezoelectric transducers; Electronics Letters, vol. 6, pp. 398-399, Jun. 1970.
Lake et al.; Histotripsy: minimally invasive technology for prostatic tissue ablation in an in vivo canine model; Urology; 72(3); pp. 682-686; Sep. 2008.
Lensing et al.; Deep-vein thrombosis; The Lancet, vol. 353, pp. 479-485, Feb. 6, 1999.
Manes et al.; Design of a Simplified Delay System for Ultrasound Phased Array Imaging; Sonics and Ultrasonics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 30, pp. 350-354, Nov. 1983.
Maréchal et al; Effect of Radial Displacement of Lens on Response of Focused Ultrasonic Transducer; Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 46, p. 3077-3085; May 15, 2007.
Maréchal et al; Lens-focused transducer modeling using an extended KLM model; Ultrasonics, vol. 46, pp. 155-167, May 2007.
Martin et al.; Water-cooled, high-intensity ultrasound surgical applicators with frequency tracking; Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 50, pp. 1305-1317, Oct. 2003.
Maxwell et al.; Noninvasive Thrombolysis Using Pulsed Ultrasound Cavitation Therapy—Histotripsy; Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 35, pp. 1982-1994, Dec. 2009 (author manuscript).
Parsons et al.; Cost-effective assembly of a basic fiber-optic hydrophone for measurement of high-amplitude therapeutic ultrasound fields; The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 119, pp. 1432-1440, Mar. 2006.
Rosenschein et al.; Ultrasound Imaging-Guided Noninvasive Ultrasound Thrombolysis: Preclinical Results; Circulation; vol. 102; pp. 238-245, Jul. 11, 2000.
Sato et al.; Experimental Investigation of Phased Array Using Tapered Matching Layers. 2002 IEEE Ultrasound Symposium. vol. 2; pp. 1235-1238, Oct. 2002.
Simonin et al.; Characterization of heterogeneous structure in a polymer object manufactured by stereolithography with low-frequency microechography; Journal of Materials Chemistry; vol. 6, pp. 1595-99, Sep. 1996.
Song et al.; Feasibility of Using Lateral Mode Coupling Method for a Large Scale Ultrasound Phased Array for Noninvasive Transcranial Therapy; Biomedical Engineering; IEEE Transactions on, vol. 57, pp. 124-133; Jan. 2010 (author manuscript).
Souquet et al.; Design of Low-Loss Wide-Band Ultrasonic Transducers for Noninvasive Medical Application; Sonics and Ultrasonics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 26, pp. 75-80, Mar. 1979.
Therapeutic Ultrasound Group. Non-invasive Ultrasonic Tissue Fraction for Treatment of Benign Disease and Cancer—“Histotripsy”. University research [online]. Biomedical Engineering Department, University of Michigan. Jul. 2011[retrieved on Jan. 28, 2014] from: (http://web.archive.org/web/20110720091822/http://www.histotripsy.umich.edu/index.html>.entiredocument).
Toda; Narrowband impedance matching layer for high efficiency thickness mode ultrasonic transducers; Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 49, pp. 299-306, Mar. 2002.
Van Kervel et al.; A calculation scheme for the optimum design of ultrasonic transducers; Ultrasonics, vol. 21, pp. 134-140, May 1983.
Wang et al.; Quantitative ultrasound backscatter for pulsed cavitational ultrasound therapy-histotripsy; Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 56, pp. 995-1005, May 2009 (author manuscript).
Yan et al.; A review of rapid prototyping technologies and systems; Computer-Aided Design, vol. 28, pp. 307-318, Apr. 1996.
Xu et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/046,024 entitled “Bubble-induced color doppler feedback during histotripsy,” filed Oct. 4, 2013.
AVTECH; AVR-8 Data sheet; May 23, 2004; 3 pages; retrieved from the internet (http//www.avtechpulse.com).
Hobarth et al.; Color flow doppler sonography for extracorporal shock wave lithotripsy; Journal of Urology; 150(6); pp. 1768-1770; Dec. 1, 1993.
Maxwell et al.; In-vivo study of non-invasive thrombolysis by histotripsy in a porcine model; IEEE international Ultrasonics Symposium; IEEE; p. 220-223; Sep. 20, 2009.
Avago Technologies; Avago's ACNV2601 optocoupler is an optically coupled logic gate; Data Sheet; 2 pages; Jul. 29, 2010.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20110054363 A1 Mar 2011 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61237011 Aug 2009 US