The present invention relates generally to hydrokinetic electrical power generating turbines and methods of use and deployment. More specifically, a ducted rim type generator, bi-directional turbine for generating power from tidal currents in various deployments is disclosed.
Tidal power has been harnessed for many centuries. Tidal grain mills have been located on coastal inlets where seawater could be trapped by sluice gates in low dams at high tide, to be released through a mill wheel at low tide. Such mill wheels are examples of rudimentary hydraulic turbines.
Energy shortages have spurred research activity, including the construction of significant pilot projects in the area of tidal power generation using more modern turbine designs, in Normandy, France and Nova Scotia, Canada. The Normandy and Nova Scotia projects required significant infrastructure and damming of tidal estuaries. The effect of all
While the pilot projects in Normandy and Nova Scotia are still in operation, they have not proven to be economical, and with the global rise in environmental consciousness, this approach has fallen into disfavor. More recent work has been focused on ‘free-stream’ machines that are less costly and far less disruptive to tidal dynamics and the affected marine ecosystems. ‘Arrays’ of such units would consist of single or multiple rows of free-stream machines deployed transversely and/or linearly in an ocean inlet or passage in the manner of a wind-farm. Indeed the term ‘turbine-farm’ has been used to describe such deployment.
In the 1920s, U.S. Pat. No. 1,493,154 to Harza disclosed a substantially horizontal axis water turbine for use in the draft tube of a low head dam, wherein the stator coils surrounded the runner or rim housing the turbine blades. Harza proposed water seals between the runner and stator. It is very difficult to maintain the integrity of water seal in a hydraulic turbine, as underwater turbines are subject to high levels of vibration, erosion and torsion due to the density and velocity of the water.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,986,787 to Mouton disclosed a uni-directional hydraulic turbine with angled blades also including a longitudinal twist. The Mouton patent teaches a deployment method of mounting the turbines under a barge in a river, with a generator on top of the barge. The Mouton patent also discloses a trash screen in front of the turbine consisting of a conical array of cables. The Mouton patent, as with most conventional hydraulic turbines, uses a hub based generator system with impact type blades which are angled with respect to the direction of the water flow. The trash screen of the Mouton patent protected only one end of the turbine and was not self-cleaning, requiring constant regular maintenance.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,163,904 to Skendrovic disclosed an understream turbine plant requiring substantial infrastructure and sealing about the single unidirectional turbine with hub generator.
Investigation into harnessing wave motion resulted in U.S. Pat. No. 4,221,538 to Wells, disclosing a uni-directional aero-foil turbine powered by the air forced through the turbine by the oscillating water column created by wave action enclosed in a floating chamber. The Wells patent disclosed a single rotor with a hub-based generator.
In the 1980's Heuss and Miller disclosed a tidal power plant in U.S. Pat. No. 4,421,990 with a fixed concrete barrage of uni-directional impact turbines with angled blades and a rim-based generator. The Heuss patent required substantial infrastructure, including a dam, draft tube and generator housing. The stator was housed in the dam or foundation at the outer rim of the runner wheel housing the turbine blades and required watertight seals.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,313,711 to Lee disclosed fixed stator blades or vanes that deflected the flow of air or water onto multiple Wells type aerofoil cross-section blades to cause efficient rotation. The Lee patent uses wave motion or wave driven air to generate power. The guide vanes are fixed and the rotors rotate at the same speed and in the same direction.
In the 1990's, Curran, and Gato ran trials on a series of different Wells type air turbines and published their results in the article: “The energy conversion performance of several types of Wells turbine designs”, Proc. Inst. Mech. Engrs. Vol 211 Part A (1997). The trials included single rotor devices with and without guide vanes, and dual rotor devices with the rotors rotating in the same direction and counter-rotating. Although Curran and Gato did not investigate the effect of dual counter rotating rotors with guide vanes, they concluded that two rotors are more efficient than one, that counter-rotating rotors provided a higher damping ratio and improved post-stall performance than uni-directional pairs, and that inlet and outlet guide vanes provided reduced tangential kinetic energy losses compared to those units without vanes.
The following papers are also of interest regarding a vertical axis turbine and a feasibility study on sub-sea power generation from tidal currents:
Vauthier, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,168,373B1, 6,406,251, and 2002/0088222A1 disclosed a floating, uni-directional and bi-directional lightweight dual ducted turbine hub-generator unit suitable for either tidal or river deployment. The dual, side by side rotationally uni-directional, turbine swings freely with the water current. The turbine therefore must swing to the direction of the current as it accepts only uni-directional water flow. The bi-directional unit is moored at both ends and thereby kept in the line of current regardless of the direction of water flow. Additional features include stabilizer fins on the housing, and an augmentor ring at the downstream end of the housing to deflect external water flow thereby creating a venturi effect at the outfall of the housing and presumably accelerating the flow of water through the turbine. The turbine blades are of the angled, conventional type and guide vanes are not used.
Mouton et al, in the U.S. Pat. No. 4,219,303 (D1) disclosed a unidirectional hydrokinetic electrical power generating turbine with a nozzle. Fischer, in Germany patent 1028 948 (D2) disclosed a forced-flow hydro turbine in a tube with two rotors where the upstream rotor is employed as a set of guide vanes, and a sealed generator in the tube. In the fall of 2001 Vortec Energy Limited of New Zealand published an “Information Memorandum” disclosing a wind turbine using a diffuser ring to create a low-pressure region downstream of the turbine rotor. The preferred embodiment of the Vortec unit is a huge 50 m diameter and greater wind turbine deployed either on or offshore. Barge, pole and block mounted sub-sea units were contemplated, but not developed. The Vortec Memorandum also suggests the possibility of rim generation to eliminate the need for large center body structures and hub mechanisms. In PCT Publication WO 01/06122 A1 to Fox et. al, owned by Vortec, advantages of a slotted, aerofoil cross section blade in a turbine are disclosed.
The current technology for hydro turbines is unsatisfactory due to the large number of moving parts and complexity of manufacturing, installing and maintaining turbines in the corrosive salt water environment.
There is a need therefore for an efficient hydraulic turbine generator unit, which can harness tidal energy with a minimal environmental impact. A turbine with a minimum number of moving parts which optimizes energy conservation by minimizing friction and flow losses, and can be manufactured, installed and maintained without substantial infrastructure costs is required, and a simple generator free of moving parts such that maintenance requirements are minimized. The present invention provides a ducted, flooded rim generator, bi-directional turbine having two or more coaxial counter rotating rotors with augmenter skirt that overcomes the disadvantages of the prior art.
It is an object of the present invention to implement an apparatus for a hydro turbine generator that overcomes some of the disadvantages of the prior art.
Other objects include providing an apparatus with a hub parallel to the water flow, a plurality of blades, a cylindrical housing and a plurality of guide vanes which are curved and rectangular and redirect the water flow to strike the blades at an optimal angle. The blades may be symmetrical hydrofoils in cross section.
The vanes may be fixed or they may flip between a first and second position, the first position being appropriate for redirecting an inflow and the second position appropriate for redirecting an outflow to minimize downstream efficiency losses.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a bi-directional turbine with dual counter-rotating rotor disks to create a stable, efficient turbine generator unit minimizing swirl losses.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a screen to prevent the ingress of marine life and debris into the turbine unit.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a longitudinal hole in the hub that water can flow through.
A further object of the present invention is to provide an augmentor skirt which minimizes the Betz effect, and is adapted to rotate the guide vanes when the water flow changes direction due to the tide change.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a rim generating hydro turbine where the generator is flooded with ambient fluid.
Yet a further object of the present invention is to provide a turbine generator with a modular removable unit including the rotor disk to facilitate ease of maintenance.
Yet a further object of the present invention is to provide a hydro turbine generator which may be deployed individually or in any number of units, and be deployed on pylons, under a raft, tethered to the marine floor and floating due to an integral buoyant structure, in a dam, by a river, or in a tidal array crossing a submarine dip, depression or valley.
Further advantages of the invention will become apparent when considering the drawings in conjunction with the detailed description.
The apparatus and method of the present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawing figures, in which:
Referring to
The turbine generator unit 10 has two ends about a center line which are symmetrical. A hub 20 with an axis substantially parallel to the direction of water flow 100 is disposed along the central axis of the turbine generator 10. The hub 20 has a hub nose 21 at each end which may be advantageously formed in any hydrodynamic shape. The hub nose 21 may be ogive shaped or have ogive shaped caps in order to minimize drag into and out of the duct 40.
A plurality of hydrofoil blades 30 with symmetric cross sections are attached at their root to a central hub 26 and at their periphery or tip to a permanent magnet race also called a rotor rim 54 and together comprise a rotor disk 50. In the preferred embodiment there is a first rotor disk 50 and a second rotor disk 52 mounted coaxially in a front and back configuration. The rotor disks 50 and 52 will only rotate in one direction due to the hydrofoil shape of the blade 30. Thrust bearings 29 rotate freely between and abut against the central hub 26 for each rotor disk 50 and 52 and the hub nose 21. Bearings are preferably water lubricated low friction thrust bearings 29. A central hub or bearing-spacer 28 seats rotatably and coaxially between the central hub 26 of the two rotor disks 50 and 52 and separates the rotor disks 50 and 52 from any contact with each other. The rotor disks 50 and 52 rotate freely about the spacer 28.
The upstream rotor disk 50 when viewed form the direction of the water flow 100 will always rotate one direction (either clockwise or counter-clockwise), and the downstream rotor 52 will always rotate in the opposite direction. When the tide and therefore water flow 100 direction reverses, the second rotor 52 will now be upstream, and will continue to rotate in the same direction as before due to the hydrofoil shape. Thus the turbine generator unit 10 is bi-directional with regard to the water flow 100, and each rotor disk 50 and 52 always rotates in the same direction. When the turbine generator unit 10 has a single rotor disk 50, it also rotates in a single direction.
The blades 30 are symmetrical airfoils or hydrofoils projecting radially at substantially 90 degrees from the hub 26. The blades 30 have a top and bottom surface and a leading edge and trailing edge. The top and bottom surface of the blades 30 is generally perpendicular to the water flow 100. The blades 30 may be disposed at an oblique angle, such as for a swept-back blade configuration. The number of blades 30 is dependent on the size of the turbine. Any airfoil and/or hydrofoil shape known to the art which creates a variation of the speed of the fluid flowing across the respective sides of the blades 30 thereby creating optimal lift and drag may be used.
The duct 40 is a hollow cylinder disposed about the axis of the rotor 50 to form a duct and house the rotor 50. The duct 40 may be a cylinder of constant internal diameter, or the interior walls may converge in order to increase the velocity of water flowing through the duct 40. In the preferred embodiment the interior walls of the duct 40 converge in the central portion thereby producing a venturi effect as the water flow 100 passes through the duct 40. The rotor rim 54 allows for a plurality of hermetically sealed permanent magnets 56 attached to the outer rim of the rotor disks 50 and 52. The rotor disk rim permanent magnet race sits in a recess in the outer duct 40, which houses the hermetically sealed stator coils 60. The second rotor 52 rotates in a direction opposite to the first rotor 50, in order to decrease fluid momentum losses due to swirl and therefore render the turbine generator unit 10 more efficient. Fixed stator coils 60 are mounted in the duct 40 adjacent to the outer edge of the rotor disks 50 housing the magnets 56.
Optionally, to operate concentrically and resist lateral loads, a magnetic bearing system may be used at the rotor rim 54, which is known in the art. The rotor rim 54 seats rotably in a magnet race or rotor rim cavity 55 in the duct 40, water lubricated low friction skid plates (not shown) may be mounted on the exterior sides of the rotor rim 54 to protect the stator coils 60 against excessive deflection by the rotor disk 50 and 52
A plurality of curved, generally rectangular guide vanes 24, acting also as hub supports, extend from the hub 20 to the rotor housing or duct 40 to form a stable shaft on which the rotor disks 50 and 52 rotate. The guide vanes 24 have a generally sharp leading edge, a sharp trailing edge and two sides. The guide vanes 24 provide an initial angle of attack to the upstream rotor disk 50, and exit guide vanes 24 aft of the downstream rotor disk 52, to minimize hydrodynamic swirl momentum losses. In the preferred embodiment the face of the guide vanes is curved in an arc such that water striking the vanes 24 is redirected at a predetermined angle of attack, before striking the blades 30. The blades 30 have zero angle of attack with respect to the rotor disk 50, and have a symmetric cross-section.
The turbine generator unit 10 remains fixed in place, and as the tide and therefore water flow 100 reverses, the rotors begin to rotate in their respective directions. The arrangement of the counter-rotating rotor disks 50 and 52 and the guide vanes 24 provides high-efficiency power output with the flow 100 coming into the duct(s) 40 from either direction of the rotor-disk axis and minimized the number of moving mechanical parts, thereby reducing costly maintenance in the marine environment.
Referring now to
Rotor disk torque is created by the flow of water 100 into the duct 40, given an initial angle of attack by the guide vanes 24 which creates lift across the blades 30 thereby commencing rotation of the first rotor 50. The water flow 100 is swirling with a beneficial angle of attack as it departs the first rotor 50 and strikes the second rotor 52, thereby rotating the second rotor 52 (see
Referring again to
Referring again to
The turbine generator unit is constructed of durable corrosion resistant materials. In the preferred embodiment marine grade concrete containing lightweight internally stiffened aggregate in sufficient proportion that the whole structure is positively buoyant is used for the duct 40 and a corrosion resistant high strength material is used for the rotors 50, and shaft 19 which comprise the turbine 10 and other principal components. Materials such as advanced composites, concrete and steel may be used. The turbine generator unit 10 is coated with a silicon glass product as is known in the art to reduce hydraulic losses and to minimize fouling by attachment of marine creatures.
The duct 40 is coated with a new silicon glass product and is preferably formed from lightweight buoyant concrete enabling the turbine generator unit 10 to be towed to the site for deployment, then moored such that the turbine generator unit 10 floats at a predetermined depth below the surface of the water 16. The turbine generator unit 10 is lowered into a river or sub-sea location as desired. In the preferred embodiment the turbine generator unit uses tidal forces to generate power.
The turbine generator unit 10 may be deployed individually or in groups of two or more turbine generator units 10.
There are at least five possible methods of deployment anticipated for the turbine generator unit 10. These would be:
mounted on one or more telescopic pylons 80 as shown in
floating beneath and attached to a barge 120
alongside a collapsible rubber dam 130 at the side of a river
floating tethered beneath the surface as shown in
in a tidal fence across an ocean inlet or passage as shown in
The preferred embodiments herein described are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the scope of the invention to the precise forms disclosed. They are chosen and described to best explain the principles of the invention and its application and practical use to allow others skilled in the art to comprehend its teachings.
As will be apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the foregoing disclosure, many alterations and modifications are possible in the practice of this invention without departing from the spirit or scope thereof. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is to be construed in accordance with the substance defined by the following claims.
This application is a continuation of pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/489,642, filed Aug. 24, 2005. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/489,642 is a 37 USC §371 National Stage Application of expired International PCT Application No. PCT/CA02/01413, filed Sep. 16, 2002. International PCT Application No. PCT/CA02/01413 claims priority of expired U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/322,443, filed Sep. 17, 2001.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
654654 | Lawrence | Jul 1900 | A |
1123491 | Corbin | Jan 1915 | A |
1326730 | Helguera | Dec 1919 | A |
1486186 | Gulbransen | Mar 1924 | A |
1493154 | Harza | May 1924 | A |
1835018 | Darrieus | Dec 1931 | A |
2471892 | Price | May 1949 | A |
2501696 | Souczek | Mar 1950 | A |
2509442 | Matheisel | May 1950 | A |
2652505 | Matheisel | Sep 1953 | A |
2782321 | Fischer | Feb 1957 | A |
3323592 | Brandon | Jun 1967 | A |
3353028 | Braikevitch et al. | Nov 1967 | A |
3504990 | Sugden | Apr 1970 | A |
3740565 | Wesley | Jun 1973 | A |
3922574 | Whiteley | Nov 1975 | A |
3980894 | Vary et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
3986787 | Mouton et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4025220 | Thompson et al. | May 1977 | A |
4095918 | Mouton, Jr. et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4123666 | Miller | Oct 1978 | A |
4140433 | Eckel | Feb 1979 | A |
4159188 | Atencio | Jun 1979 | A |
4163904 | Skendrovic | Aug 1979 | A |
4166596 | Mouton, Jr. et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
4219303 | Mouton | Aug 1980 | A |
4221538 | Wells | Sep 1980 | A |
4313711 | Lee | Feb 1982 | A |
4324985 | Oman | Apr 1982 | A |
4367413 | Nair | Jan 1983 | A |
4368392 | Drees | Jan 1983 | A |
4385492 | Lee | May 1983 | A |
4417446 | Nakamoto et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4421990 | Heuss et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4464580 | Miller et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4468153 | Atencio | Aug 1984 | A |
4476396 | Calvert, Jr. | Oct 1984 | A |
4524285 | Rauch | Jun 1985 | A |
4593527 | Nakamoto et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4648788 | Jochum | Mar 1987 | A |
4720640 | Anderson et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4740711 | Sato et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4755690 | Obermeyer | Jul 1988 | A |
4781522 | Wolfram | Nov 1988 | A |
4804855 | Obermeyer | Feb 1989 | A |
4868408 | Hesh | Sep 1989 | A |
5228800 | Akai | Jul 1993 | A |
5440176 | Haining | Aug 1995 | A |
5477091 | Fiorina et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5592816 | Williams | Jan 1997 | A |
5825094 | Hess | Oct 1998 | A |
5880550 | Fukao et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5982070 | Caamano | Nov 1999 | A |
6049188 | Smith | Apr 2000 | A |
6109863 | Milliken | Aug 2000 | A |
6146096 | Winkler | Nov 2000 | A |
6168373 | Vauthier | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6281597 | Obermeyer | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285090 | Brutsaert et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6406251 | Vauthier | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6476513 | Gueorguiev | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6648589 | Williams | Nov 2003 | B2 |
RE38336 | Williams | Dec 2003 | E |
6836028 | Northrup et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6982498 | Tharp | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7042109 | Gabrys | May 2006 | B2 |
7154193 | Jansen et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7378750 | Williams | May 2008 | B2 |
7385303 | Roos | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7600963 | Miller | Oct 2009 | B2 |
20020088222 | Vauthier | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20050179264 | Ganev | Aug 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
684430 | Sep 1994 | CH |
85201823 | Mar 1986 | CN |
1028948 | Apr 1958 | DE |
0045202 | Feb 1982 | EP |
026223 | Sep 1923 | FR |
866053 | Jun 1941 | FR |
891697 | Mar 1944 | FR |
56102 | Sep 1952 | FR |
2527803 | Dec 1983 | FR |
2660701 | Oct 1991 | FR |
2348250 | Sep 2000 | GB |
S50-094339 | Jul 1975 | JP |
S55-5402 | Jan 1980 | JP |
55072665 | May 1980 | JP |
56077565 | Jun 1981 | JP |
S61-192859 | Aug 1986 | JP |
S62-38876 | Feb 1987 | JP |
S62-71381 | May 1987 | JP |
H03-222869 | Oct 1991 | JP |
H06-87671 | Dec 1994 | JP |
H08-338354 | Dec 1996 | JP |
H10-115278 | May 1998 | JP |
2000-213446 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2000-240552 | Sep 2000 | JP |
9400050 | Aug 1995 | NL |
1012489 | Nov 2000 | NL |
0028210 | May 2000 | WO |
0050769 | Aug 2000 | WO |
0055440 | Sep 2000 | WO |
0106122 | Jan 2001 | WO |
0125627 | Apr 2001 | WO |
2008014584 | Feb 2008 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090243300 A1 | Oct 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60322443 | Sep 2001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10489642 | US | |
Child | 12328548 | US |