This invention relates to a synthetic penetrating lubricant capable of dissolving rust and corrosion caused by oxidation and harsh chemicals while offering extreme pressure lubrication capacities with a high dielectric protection.
Over the years many penetrating compounds have been developed to penetrate rust and corrosion, but they exhibit few if any lubrication qualities. Further many topical lubricants have been developed for lubrication, but again exhibit little if any penetrating capacity. Of the many products developed, few have demonstrated extreme pressure capability. Further, there are several industrial products offering the benefit of dielectric strength. Those tested found to be far short of their claims. Further there are a number of products developed to clean electrical contacts to reduce resistance and associated heat. Again these products sorely lack the ability to lubricate or penetrate rust and oxidation.
Disclosed herein is a penetrating lubricant with the capacity to penetrate rust and corrosion caused by oxidation or harsh chemicals, into the crystalline surface of the metal, leaving a non-migrating lasting lubricant with extreme pressure capabilities. Further the product offers the ability to clean electrical contacts for improved conductivity while offering insulation and isolation by way of an extremely high dielectric strength. Further the product when applied to ferrous and non-ferrous material, is resistant the environment including salt waters. This penetrating lubricant comprises alpha-olefins; low-odor aromatic solvents; and at least one a base oil selected from the base oil group consisting of hydroisomerized high base oils and HT Severe Hydro-cracked Base Oils; as well as other ingredients. Also disclosed is a method for producing this penetrating lubricant.
Specifically, disclosed is universal synthetic penetrating lubricant for penetrating and dissolving rust and corrosion and cleaning metal and removing oxidation, while providing lubrication including extreme pressure lubrication, high dielectric protection, and corrosion resistance, comprising: alpha-olefins; low-odor aromatic solvents; at least one base oil selected from the base oil group consisting of hydroisomerized high-base oils and HT severe hydro-cracked base oils; and high flash mineral spirits.
The invention relates to the use of a multi-functional penetrating lubricant with applications as a general penetrating liquid for dissolving and loosening of corrosion and rust caused by oxidation or harsh chemicals. The invention further has the ability to penetrate into the crystalline surface of metal, leaving a lubricating film that is resistant to future corrosion. Further the invention leaves a barrier film that has extreme pressure capacity. Further the invention acts as a solvent to remove oxidation between electrical contacts to allow maximum flow of electricity while reducing resistance and heat associated with resistance. Although the invention cleans contacts for reduced resistance, it also isolates and insulates electrical contacts to protect them from moisture and other such elements which can cause electrical shorts and failure. The invention demonstrates high dielectric strength while exhibiting the characteristics of a penetrant, lubricant, extreme pressure lubricant, and contact cleaner.
Primary Ingredients
The preferred embodiment of the invention is a combination of:
The preferred blending ratios for each component are shown as below. It is important to maintain a blend of components that fall within the following percentages. Note that in the event one or more of the ingredients shown below is omitted from the penetrating lubricant, the percentages by weight of the remaining ingredients are proportionately increased:
Alpha-Olefins: 2 to 30% by weight and preferably 7.0 to 25% by weight and more preferably 9.0 to 22% by weight. Most preferable is 17.0% by weight.
Low-odor Aromatic Solvents: 2 to 25% by weight and preferably 4.5 to 18% by weight and more preferably 7 to 14% by weight. Most preferable is 9.4% by weight.
Hydroisomerized High-Base Oils and HT Severe Hydro-cracked Base Oils: 7 to 55% by weight and preferably 10 to 42% by weight and more preferably 15 to 35% by weight. Most preferable is 31.5% by weight.
High Flash Mineral Spirits: 15 to 60% by weight and preferably 20 to 55% by weight and more preferably 25 to 49% by weight. Most preferable is 34.6% by weight.
Synthetic Calcium Sulfonates: 0.05 to 1.05% by weight, preferably 0.25 to 0.95% by weight and more preferably 0.56 to 0.87% by weight. Most preferable is 0.833% by weight.
Methyl-Isobutyl Ketones: 2.0 to 25% by weight and preferably 4 to 16% by weight and more preferably 5 to 11% by weight. Most preferable is 7.2%.
Solvent Activated Dyes: 0.002 to 0.005% by weight and preferably 0.0025 to 0.004% by weight and more preferably 0.027 to 0.035% by weight. Most preferable is 0.003% by weight.
Solvent Activated Fragrances: 0.001 to 0.005% by weight and preferably 0.0015 to 0.004 and more preferably 0.00175 to 0.003% by weight. Most preferable is 0.002% by weight.
Polytetrafluoroethylene (fluoroadditive): 0.012 to 0.097% by weight and preferably 0.022 to 0.0925% and more preferably 0.042 to 0.085% by weight. Most preferable is 0.0835% by weight.
Preferred Sequence of Blending Components
The initial blend (primary blend) will require the alpha olefins, the low-odor aromatic solvent and the base oils being blended until the liquid is a consistent amalgamation without any appearance of separation. Blending is based on speed of the agitator and temperature will dictate the amount of time for the blend to complete. The blending time range may vary from 4 to 6 hours. The ideal temperature for each component is between 22 to 30 degrees centigrade for ideal blending.
While this is blending, a secondary blend for the methyl isobutyl ketones, solvent activated dyes and solvent activated fragrance is prepared in a much smaller high-speed enclosed blender, and then added to the main blend.
The synthetic calcium sulfonates will be blended with the mineral spirits in an approximate 0.25/75 ratio in the initial stage of the blend to produce a tertiary blend. (The mineral spirits used will be from the preferred percentage set forth earlier.) This tertiary blend, or the mineral spirits alone absent the synthetic calcium sulfonates, together with the balance of the ingredients, can be then added to the main blend and the agitator is run until the components appear to have thoroughly blended into a consistent liquid.
Preferred Blend Equipment
The process sequence involves a series of blending and holding tanks where the product can be weighed and then pumped through control valves to maintain consistent flow and pressure. The blending should be performed in an enclosed tank to reduce product evaporation (loss) and prevent exposure to open spark. Blending equipment can be by a combination of high or low speed blending apparatus. Size or volume of tank is not critical to the blend.
Universal Use of Invention
The product has been industrially tested, on an experimental basis, in extreme and harsh conditions. The invention has been so-tested in various forms of machining, and in electrical applications where elements such as water are a constant source of shorting and electrical safety and failure are a concern. The invention has been tested as an extreme pressure topical lubricant and has exceeded the performance of most lubricants available. Finally the product has been severely tested, experimentally, in applications with extreme rust and corrosion and has demonstrated the ability to penetrate and loosen the same while leaving a protective barrier on the metal. The product has shown its ability to work well with ferrous and non-ferrous material with profound results including the protection of brake rotors.
Testing Procedures
As the product is unique in its field and as such has been tested on the Timken Bench Tester and has demonstrated the capacity to exceed the lubrication capacity of an engine lubricant many time over. When tested the average engine lubricant failed at 5 to 7 foot-pounds. The average penetrant failed at less than 2 foot-pounds while the invention exceeded 30 foot-pounds of destructive weight. Further when tested for dielectric strength, the invention exhibited the capacity of over 8000 volts protection. When the invention was tested in machine, tapping and drilling, the invention allowed the tool to leave a highly refined finish on the points of contact and pressure.
Test Results
As there is no particular ASTM-D test protocol to measure the ability of a multi-purpose penetrating lubricant, the inventor has had to rely on actual results from hands on use of the products in various fields of testing.
This experimental testing has demonstrated the ability of the invention to show dramatic improvement in all the fields of testing, to such a degree that there may be potential to exhibit positive results in application areas yet to be considered.
While only certain preferred features of the invention have been illustrated and described, many modifications, changes and substitutions will occur to those skilled in the art. It is, therefore, to be understood that the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications and changes as fall within the true spirit of the invention.
This application is a 371 of PCT/US08/87449, filed Dec. 18, 2008, and a CIP of Ser. No. 12/060,637, filed Apr. 1, 2008, which is a CIP of PCT/US08/50951 filed Jan. 13, 2008, which is a CIP of PCT/US07/88252 filed Dec. 19, 2007 and said Ser. No. 12/060,637 filed Apr. 1, 2008, which is a CIP of Ser. No. 11/290,596 filed Dec. 1, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,745,382.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2008/087449 | 12/18/2008 | WO | 00 | 6/10/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/085967 | 7/9/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3406419 | Young | Oct 1968 | A |
3984599 | Norton | Oct 1976 | A |
4127491 | Reick | Nov 1978 | A |
4131551 | Thompson et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4218330 | Shubkin | Aug 1980 | A |
4224173 | Reick | Sep 1980 | A |
4228021 | Lenack | Oct 1980 | A |
4375418 | Zoleski et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4443348 | Wright et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4504404 | Schumacher et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4534873 | Clark | Aug 1985 | A |
4844825 | Sloan | Jul 1989 | A |
4859359 | DeMatteo et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4956122 | Watts et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5120358 | Pippett | Jun 1992 | A |
5136118 | Buchanan et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5202040 | Sanderson et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5332516 | Stephens | Jul 1994 | A |
5364994 | Scharf | Nov 1994 | A |
5431841 | Lockhart | Jul 1995 | A |
5631211 | Nakagawa et al. | May 1997 | A |
5672572 | Araik et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5681797 | Lawate | Oct 1997 | A |
5741764 | Patel et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5885942 | Zhang et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5972853 | Boffa et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6008164 | Aldrich et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6046142 | Zilonis et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6074993 | Waddoups et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6143701 | Boffa | Nov 2000 | A |
6413916 | Baumgart et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6761645 | Weber | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6774091 | Dituro et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6858567 | Akao | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6919300 | Dituro | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6962895 | Scharf et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6992049 | Deckman et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7018960 | Negoro et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7022766 | Okada et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7055534 | Goode et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7109152 | Corby et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7124728 | Carey et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7745382 | Sloan | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7931704 | Sloan | Apr 2011 | B2 |
20030040444 | Garmier | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030087769 | Dituro et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040014613 | Dituro et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040060229 | Todd et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040077506 | Arrowsmith et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20060160708 | Sloan | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20080182769 | Sloan | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080190014 | Volkel et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20100261626 | Sloan | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100269404 | Sloan | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100273687 | Sloan | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110009301 | Sloan | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110015103 | Sloan | Jan 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19723460 | Jan 1998 | DE |
0361180 | Apr 1990 | EP |
0837122 | Apr 1998 | EP |
1203803 | May 2002 | EP |
1736529 | Dec 2006 | EP |
2193080 | Jul 1972 | FR |
59204700 | Nov 1984 | JP |
07233001 | Sep 1995 | JP |
2001-271077 | Oct 2001 | JP |
9719153 | May 1997 | WO |
0234867 | May 2002 | WO |
03064571 | Aug 2003 | WO |
2006-015800 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2006100188 | Sep 2006 | WO |
2007004789 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2009078882 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009079020 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009085957 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2009085967 | Jul 2009 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100273688 A1 | Oct 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12060637 | Apr 2008 | US |
Child | 12747236 | US | |
Parent | PCT/US2008/050951 | Jan 2008 | US |
Child | 12060637 | US | |
Parent | PCT/US2007/088252 | Dec 2007 | US |
Child | PCT/US2008/050951 | US | |
Parent | 11290596 | Dec 2005 | US |
Child | PCT/US2007/088252 | US |