USE OF AMINO ACIDS AS STABILIZING COMPOUNDS IN PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING HIGH CONCENTRATIONS OF PROTEIN-BASED THERAPEUTIC AGENTS

Abstract
The present invention relates to improved pharmaceutical compositions that contain high concentrations of one or more protein biomolecule(s). In particular, the invention relates to such pharmaceutical compositions that include one or more amino acid molecules, particularly arginine, alanine, glycine, lysine or proline, or derivatives and salts thereof, or mixtures thereof, as stabilizing compounds. The inclusion of such stabilizing compounds decreases reconstitution time whilst improving and/or maintaining the long-term stability of the protein biomolecule, so as to facilitate the treatment, management, amelioration and/or prevention of a disease or condition by the pharmaceutical composition. The invention particularly pertains to such pharmaceutical compositions that lack, or substantially lack, a sugar stabilizing agent.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to improved pharmaceutical compositions that contain high concentrations of one or more protein biomolecule(s). In particular, the invention relates to such pharmaceutical compositions that include one or more amino acid molecules, particularly arginine, alanine, glycine, lysine or proline, or derivatives and salts thereof, or mixtures thereof, as stabilizing compounds. The inclusion of such stabilizing compounds decreases reconstitution time whilst improving and/or maintaining the long-term stability of the protein biomolecule, so as to facilitate the treatment, management, amelioration and/or prevention of a disease or condition by the pharmaceutical composition. The invention particularly pertains to such pharmaceutical compositions that lack, or substantially lack, a sugar stabilizing agent.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Protein-based therapeutic agents (e.g., hormones, enzymes, cytokines, vaccines, immunotherapeutics, etc.) are becoming increasingly important to the management and treatment of human disease. As of 2014, more than 60 such therapeutics had been approved for marketing, with approximately 140 additional drugs in clinical trial and more than 500 therapeutic peptides in various stages of preclinical development (Fosgerau, K. et al. (2014) “Peptide Therapeutics: Current Status And Future Directions,” Drug Discov. Today 20(1): 122-128; Kaspar, A. A. et al. (2013) “Future Directions For Peptide Therapeutics Development,” Drug Discov. Today 18:807-817).


One impediment to the use of such therapeutics is the physical instability that is often encountered upon their storage (U.S. Pat. No. 8,617,576; PCT Publications No. WO 2014/100143 and 2015/061584; Balcão, V. M. et al. (2014) “Structural And Functional Stabilization Of Protein Entities: State-Of-The-Art,” Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. (Epub.): doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2014.10.005; pp. 1-17; Maddux, N. R. et al. (2011) “Multidimensional Methods For The Formulation Of Biopharmaceuticals And Vaccines,” J. Pharm. Sci. 100:4171-4197; Wang, W. (1999) “Instability, Stabilization, And Formulation Of Liquid Protein Pharmaceuticals,” Int. J. Pharm. 185:129-188; Kristensen, D. et al. (2011) “Vaccine Stabilization: Research, Commercialization, And Potential Impact,” Vaccine 29:7122-7124; Kumru, O. S. et al. (2014) “Vaccine Instability In The Cold Chain: Mechanisms, Analysis And Formulation Strategies,” Biologicals 42:237-259). Such instability may comprise multiple aspects. A protein-based therapeutic agent may, for example experience operational instability, such as an impaired ability to survive processing operations (e.g., sterilization, lyophilization, cryopreservation, etc.). Additionally or alternatively, proteins may experience thermodynamic instability such that a desired secondary or tertiary conformation is lost or altered upon storage. A further, and especially complex problem, lies in the stabilization of therapeutic agents that comprise multimeric protein subunits, with dissociation of the subunits resulting in the inactivation of the product. Kinetic instability is a measure of the capacity of a protein to resist irreversible changes of structure in in vitro non-native conditions. Protein aggregation and the formation of inclusion bodies is considered to be the most common manifestation of instability, and is potentially encountered in multiple phases of product development (Wang, W. (2005) “Protein Aggregation And Its Inhibition In Biopharmaceutics,” Int. J. Pharm. 289:1-30; Wang, W. (1999) “Instability, Stabilization, And Formulation Of Liquid Protein Pharmaceuticals,” Int. J. Pharm. 185:129-188; Arakawa, T. et al. (1993) “Factors Affecting Short-Term And Long-Term Stabilities Of Proteins,” Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 10:1-28; Arakawa, T. et al. (2001) “Factors Affecting Short-Term And Long-Term Stabilities Of Proteins,” Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 46:307-326). Such issues of instability can affect not only the efficacy of the therapeutic but its immunogenicity to the recipient patient. Protein instability is thus one of the major drawbacks that hinders the use of protein-based therapeutic agent (Balcão, V. M. et al. (2014) “Structural And Functional Stabilization Of Protein Entities: State-Of-The-Art,” Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. (Epub.): doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2014.10.005; pp. 1-17).


Stabilization of protein-based therapeutic agents entails preserving the structure and functionality of such agents, and has been accomplished by establishing a thermodynamic equilibrium between such agents and their (micro)environment (Balcão, V. M. et al. (2014) “Structural And Functional Stabilization Of Protein Entities: State-Of-The-Art,” Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. (Epub.): doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2014.10.005; pp. 1-17). One approach to stabilizing protein-based therapeutic agents involves altering the protein to contain additional covalent (e.g., disulfide) bonds so as to increase the enthalpy associated with a desired conformation. Alternatively, the protein may be modified to contain additional polar groups so as to increase its hydrogen bonding with solvating water molecules (Mozhacv, V. V. et al. (1990) “Structure-Stability Relationships In Proteins: A Guide To Approaches To Stabilizing Enzymes,” Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 4:387-419; Iyer, P. V. et al. (2008) “Enzyme Stability And Stabilization—Aqueous And Non-Aqueous Environment,” Process Biochem. 43:1019-1032).


A second approach to stabilizing protein-based therapeutic agents involves reducing the chemical activity of the water present in the protein's microenvironment, for example by freezing the water, adding specific solutes, or lyophilizing the pharmaceutical composition (see, e.g., Castronuovo, G. (1991) “Proteins In Aqueous Solutions. Calorimetric Studies And Thermodynamic Characterization,” Thermochim. Acta 193:363-390).


Employed solutes range from small molecular weight ions (e.g., salts, buffering agents) to intermediate sized solutes (e.g., amino acids, sugars) to larger molecular weight compounds (e.g., polymers, proteins) (Kamerzell, T. J. et al. (2011) “Protein Excipient Interactions: Mechanisms And Biophysical Characterization Applied To Protein Formulation Development,” Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 63:1118-1159).


For example, such solutes have included budesonide, dextran DMSO glycerol, glucose, inulin, lactose, maltose, mannitol, PEG, piroxicam, PLGA, PVA sorbitol, sucrose, trehalose and urea (Ohtake, S. et al. (2011) “Trehalose: Current Use and Future Applications,” J. Pharm. Sci. 100(6):2020-2053; Willart, J. F. et al. (2008) “Solid State Amorphization of Pharmaceuticals,” Molec. Pharmaceut. 5(6):905-920; Kumru, O. S. et al. (2014) “Vaccine Instability In The Cold Chain: Mechanisms, Analysis And Formulation Strategies,” Biologicals 42:237-259; Somero, G. N. (1995) “Proteins And Temperature,” Annu. Rev. Physiol. 57: 43-68; Sasahara, K. et al. (2003) “Effect Of Dextran On Protein Stability And Conformation Attributed To Macromolecular Crowding,” J. Mol. Biol. 326:1227-1237; Jain, N. K. et al. (2014) “Formulation And Stabilization Of Recombinant Protein Based Virus-Like Particle Vaccines,” Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. (Epub.) doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2014.10.023; pp. 1-14; Kissmann, J. et al. (2011) “H1N1 Influenza Virus-Like Particles: Physical Degradation Pathways And Identification Of Stabilizers,” J. Pharm. Sci. 100:634-645; Kamerzell, T. J. et al. (2011) “Protein Excipient Interactions: Mechanisms And Biophysical Characterization Applied To Protein Formulation Development,” Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 63:1118-1159).


Sugars such as sucrose and trehalose dihydrate are typically used as lyoprotectants and cryoprotectants in lyophilized therapeutic protein formulations to improve drug product stability, e.g., for storage at 2-8° C. (U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,617,576 and 8,754,195). Trehalose, in particular, has been widely used as a stabilizing agent; it is used in a variety of research applications and is contained in several commercially available therapeutic products, including HERCEPTIN®, AVASTIN®, LUCENTIS®, and ADVATER (Ohtake, S. et al. (2011) “Trehalose: Current Use and Future Applications,” J. Pharm. Sci. 100(6):2020-2053).


The amino acids histidine, arginine, glutamate, glycine, proline, lysine and methionine have been mentioned as natural compounds that stabilize proteins. Human serum albumin (HSA) and gelatin have been mentioned as being protein stabilizers (U.S. Pat. No. 8,617,576; US Patent Publication No. 2015/0118249; Kamerzell, T. J. et al. (2011) “Protein-Excipient Interactions: Mechanisms And Biophysical Characterization Applied To Protein Formulation Development,” Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 63:1118-1159; Kumru, O. S. et al. (2014) “Vaccine Instability In The Cold Chain: Mechanisms, Analysis And Formulation Strategies,” Biologicals 42:237-259; Arakawa, T. et al. (2007) “Suppression Of Protein Interactions By Arginine: A Proposed Mechanism Of The Arginine Effects,” Biophys. Chem. 127:1-8; Arakawa, T. et al. (2007) “Biotechnology Applications Of Amino Acids In Protein Purification And Formulations,” Amino Acids 33:587-605; Chen, B. (2003) “Influence Of Histidine On The Stability And Physical Properties Of A Fully Human Antibody In Aqueous And Solid Forms,” Pharm. Res. 20:1952-1960; Tian, F. et al. (2007) “Spectroscopic Evaluation Of The Stabilization Of Humanized Monoclonal Antibodies In Amino Acid Formulations,” Int. J. Pharm. 335:20-31; Wade, A. M. et al. (1998) “Antioxidant Characteristics Of L-Histidine,” J. Nutr. Biochem. 9:308-315; Yates, Z. et al. (2010) “Histidine Residue Mediates Radical-Induced Hinge Cleavage Of Human IggI,” J. Biol. Chem. 285:18662-18671; Lange, C. et al. (2009) “Suppression Of Protein Aggregation By L-Arginine,” Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 10:408-414; Nakakido, M. et al. (2009) “To Be Excluded Or To Bind, That Is The Question: Arginine Effects On Proteins,” Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 10:415-420; Shukla, D. et al. (2010) “Interaction Of Arginine With Proteins And The Mechanism By Which It Inhibits Aggregation,” J. Phys. Chem. B 114:13426-13438; Pyne, A. et al. (2001) “Phase Transitions Of Glycine In Frozen Aqueous Solutions And During Freeze-Drying,” Pharm. Res. 18:1448-1454; Lam, X. M. et al. (1997) “Antioxidants For Prevention Of Methionine Oxidation In Recombinant Monoclonal Antibody HER2,” J. Pharm. Sci. 86:1250-1255; Maeder, W. et al. (2011) “Local Tolerance And Stability Up To 24 Months Of A New 20% Proline-Stabilized Polyclonal Immunoglobulin For Subcutaneous Administration,” Biologicals 39:43-49; Kadoya, S. et al. (2010) “Freeze-Drying Of Proteins With Glass-Forming Oligosaccharide-Derived Sugar Alcohols,” Int. J. Pharm. 389: 107-113; Golovanov, A. P. et al. (2004) “A Simple Method For Improving Protein Solubility And Long-Term Stability, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126:8933-8939).


Typically, a protein-to-stabilizer compound ratio of 1:1 or 1:2 (w/w) has been used to achieve optimal stability for lower protein concentrations (<50 mg/mL). However, for higher protein concentrations (≥50 mg/mL), protein-to-stabilizer compound ratios in the 1:1 or 1:2 (w/w) range are less desirable. For example, such high sugar concentrations can result in high viscosity, which impose challenges during fill-finish operations and in drug-delivery and can require increased reconstitution times for lyophilized formulations. Moreover, the reconstituted formulations can exhibit high osmolality, far outside the desired isotonic range, especially if partial reconstitution is desired in order to achieve a higher protein concentration. Finally, high concentration protein formulations with protein-to-stabilizer compound ratios in the 1:1 or 1:2 (w/w) range can exhibit thermal characteristics that require unacceptably long lyophilization process times at much lower temperatures.


The need to reconstitute such protein-based therapeutic agents imposes a second impediment to their use. Factors that govern reconstitution time remain poorly understood (Beech, K. E. et al. (2015) “Insights Into The Influence Of The Cooling Profile On The Reconstitution Times Of Amorphous Lyophilized Protein Formulations,” Eur. J. Pharmaceut. Biopharmaceut. 96:247-254). The time needed to achieve full reconstitution of conventional compositions may be significant (e.g., 20-40 minutes or more), and products that have not been fully reconstituted may be detrimental to recipient patients. Additionally, the reconstitution procedure can differ depending on the product, which can add further complexity to the administration process. For example, after the addition of a diluent, a product may require swirling at set intervals, or may require being left undisturbed, in order to achieve complete reconstitution (Becch, K. E. et al. (2015) “Insights Into The Influence Of The Cooling Profile On The Reconstitution Times Of Amorphous Lyophilized Protein Formulations,” Eur. J. Pharmaceut. Biopharmaceut. 96:247-254).


Thus, despite all of such advances, a need remains for formulations suitable for stabilizing protein-based pharmaceutical compositions, particularly without a sugar stabilizing agent, such that the pharmaceutical compositions would exhibit improved viscosity and reconstitution times and enhanced stability, both in lyophilized/cryopreserved form and following reconstitution. The present invention is directed to this and other goals.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to improved pharmaceutical compositions that contain high concentrations of one or more protein biomolecule(s). In particular, the invention relates to such pharmaceutical compositions that include one or more amino acid molecules, particularly arginine, alanine, glycine, lysine or proline, or derivatives and salts thereof, or mixtures thereof, as stabilizing compounds. The inclusion of such stabilizing compounds decreases reconstitution time whilst improving and/or maintaining the long-term stability of the protein biomolecule, so as to facilitate the treatment, management, amelioration and/or prevention of a disease or condition by the pharmaceutical composition. The invention particularly pertains to such pharmaceutical compositions that lack, or substantially lack, a sugar stabilizing agent.


In detail, the invention concerns a pharmaceutical composition comprising a protein biomolecule as an active agent or component thereof, wherein the composition comprises:

    • (A) (1) an aqueous carrier;
    • (2) a protein biomolecule;
    • (3) a buffer;
    • (4) a stabilizing compound selected from the group consisting of arginine, alanine, glycine, lysine or proline, or a derivative or salt thereof, or mixtures thereof, in a total concentration of from about 1% (w/v) to about 6% (w/v);


      or
    • (B) a lyophilisate of (A).


The invention further concerns the embodiment of the above-indicated pharmaceutical composition wherein the composition substantially lacks a sugar stabilizing compound.


The invention further concerns the embodiment of either of the above-indicated pharmaceutical compositions wherein the composition comprises from about 10 mg/mL to about 200 mg/mL of a protein biomolecule, and wherein the composition comprises 50 mg/mL, 75 mg/mL, 100 mg/mL, 150 mg/mL or 200 mg/mL of a protein biomolecule.


The invention further concerns the embodiment of all of the above-indicated pharmaceutical compositions wherein the protein biomolecule is an antibody or an antibody-based immunotherapeutic, enzyme, or a hormone/factor.


The invention further concerns the embodiment of the above-indicated pharmaceutical compositions wherein the protein biomolecule is an antibody or an antibody-based immunotherapeutic, and the antibody is selected from the antibodies of Table 1.


The invention further concerns the embodiment of the above-indicated pharmaceutical compositions wherein the protein biomolecule is a hormone/factor, and the hormone/factor is selected from the hormone/factors of Table 2.


The invention further concerns the embodiment of any of the above-indicated pharmaceutical compositions wherein the composition comprises at least two protein biomolecules.


The invention further concerns the embodiments of any of the above-indicated pharmaceutical compositions wherein the stabilizing compound is arginine or a derivative or salt thereof, and wherein the arginine is present at a concentration from about 2.0% (w/v) to about 5.0% (w/v), preferably at a concentration of 2.0% (w/v), a concentration of 3.5% (w/v) or a concentration of 5.5% (w/v).


The invention further concerns the embodiments of any of the above-indicated pharmaceutical compositions wherein the stabilizing compound is alanine or a derivative or salt thereof, and wherein the alanine is present at a concentration from about 2.5% (w/v) to about 5.5% (w/v), preferably at a concentration of about 2.5% (w/v), about 3.5% (w/v), about 4.0% (w/v), or about 5.5% (w/v). The invention further concerns the embodiment of such pharmaceutical compositions wherein arginine is additionally present at a concentration of about 1.25% (w/v), about 1.75% (w/v), about 2.0% (w/v) or about 2.75% (w/v).


The invention further concerns the embodiments of any of the above-indicated pharmaceutical compositions wherein the stabilizing compound is glycine or a derivative or salt thereof, and wherein the glycine is present at a concentration from about 2.5% (w/v) to about 5.5% (w/v), preferably at a concentration of about 2.5% (w/v), about 3.5% (w/v), about 4.0% (w/v) or about 5.5% (w/v). The invention further concerns the embodiment of such pharmaceutical compositions wherein arginine is additionally present at a concentration of about 1.25% (w/v), about 1.75% (w/v), about 2.0% (w/v) or about 2.75% (w/v).


The invention further concerns the embodiment of any of the above-indicated pharmaceutical compositions wherein the composition comprises at least two stabilizing compounds.


The invention further concerns the embodiment of any of the above-indicated pharmaceutical compositions wherein the pH of the pharmaceutical composition is from about 3 to about 11, from about 4 to about 9, from about 5 to about 8, from about 5 to about 7.5, preferably 6.0 or 7.4.


The invention further concerns the embodiment of any of the above-indicated pharmaceutical compositions wherein the buffer is present in a range from about 5 mM to about 50 mM, about 20 mM to about 30 mM, or about 23 mM to about 27 mM, preferably wherein the buffer is present at 25 mM.


The invention further concerns the embodiments of any of the above-indicated pharmaceutical compositions wherein the buffer comprises histidine, phosphate, acetate, citrate, succinate, Tris, or a combination thereof, and wherein the buffer is histidine/histidine-HCl.


The invention further concerns the embodiment of any of the above-indicated pharmaceutical compositions wherein the pharmaceutical composition additionally comprises a non-ionic detergent, and especially wherein the non-ionic detergent is polysorbate-80 (PS-80). The invention further concerns the embodiment of such pharmaceutical compositions wherein such polysorbate-80 (PS-80) is present at a concentration of between 0.005 and 0.1% (w/v), preferably at a concentration of 0.02% (w/v).


The invention further concerns the embodiment of any of the above-indicated pharmaceutical compositions wherein the pharmaceutical composition is the lyophilisate.


The invention further concerns the embodiment of any of the above-indicated pharmaceutical compositions wherein the presence of the stabilizing compound(s) causes the reconstitution time of a lyophilisate of the pharmaceutical composition to be less than 20 minutes, less than 15 minutes, less than 10 minutes, less than 8 minutes, less than 5 minutes, or less than 2 minutes.


The invention further concerns the embodiment of any of the above-indicated pharmaceutical compositions wherein the presence of the stabilizing compound(s) enhances a stability characteristic of the pharmaceutical composition by more than 400%, by more than 200%, by more than 100%, by more than 50%, or by more than 10%, relative to such stability characteristic as observed in the complete absence of the amino acid stabilizing compound(s).


The invention further concerns the embodiment of any of the above-indicated pharmaceutical compositions wherein the presence of the stabilizing compound(s) enhances a stability characteristic of the pharmaceutical composition by more than 50%, by more than 20%, by more than 10%, by more than 5%, or by more than 1%, relative to such stability characteristic as observed in the complete absence of a sugar stabilizing compound.


The invention further concerns an ampoule, vial, cartridge, syringe or sachette that contains any of the above-indicated pharmaceutical compositions.


The invention further concerns a method of treating a disease or disorder by administering any of the above-indicated pharmaceutical compositions.


The invention further concerns of the above-indicated pharmaceutical compositions for use in medicine.


The invention further concerns a use of one or more amino acids, such as arginine, alanine, glycine, lysine or proline, as a replacement of one or more sugars in a pharmaceutical formulation to decrease reconstitution time.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows the observed reconstitution times and degree of aggregation (assessed by high performance size-exclusion chromatography (HPSEC)) of a lyophilized formulation of a pharmaceutical composition containing a high concentration (100 mg/mL) of an exemplary protein biomolecule (a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody) with various amino acid-sugar combinations. Percent aggregate increase post-lyophilization (left axis) is shown as bars, reconstitution times (right axis) are shown as diamonds.



FIG. 2 shows the effects of protein concentration and amino acid excipients on reconstitution times for the indicated lyophilized formulations of pharmaceutical compositions containing a high concentration (50 mg/mL, 75 mg/mL or 100 mg/mL) of a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody. The human IgG1 monoclonal antibody was employed as an exemplary protein biomolecule.



FIGS. 3A-3B show the percent monomer purity over time, as determined by HPSEC for formulations of pharmaceutical compositions containing 75 mg/mL or 100 mg/ml of a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody with various added excipients as shown, at 40° C., 60% relative humidity (FIG. 3A) and at 25° C., 75% relative humidity (FIG. 3B). The human IgG1 monoclonal antibody was employed as an exemplary protein biomolecule.



FIG. 4 shows the reconstitution times for lyophilized formulations, as shown, of pharmaceutical compositions containing a high concentration (75 mg/mL or 100 mg/mL) of a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody, which was employed as an exemplary protein biomolecule. The results are the averages of 10 replicate experiments.



FIGS. 5A-5C show reconstitution times of lyophilized formulations prepared with 75 mg/mL or 100 mg/mL of one of three different exemplary proteins with various amino acid excipients. FIG. 5A shows reconstitution times for a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody.



FIG. 5B shows reconstitution times for a Tn3-HSA fusion protein. FIG. 5C shows reconstitution times for a humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to improved pharmaceutical compositions that contain high concentrations of one or more protein biomolecule(s). In particular, the invention relates to such pharmaceutical compositions that include one or more amino acid molecules, particularly arginine, alanine, glycine, lysine or proline, or derivatives and salts thereof, or mixtures thereof, as stabilizing compounds. The inclusion of such stabilizing compounds decreases reconstitution time whilst improving and/or maintaining the long-term stability of the protein biomolecule, so as to facilitate the treatment, management, amelioration and/or prevention of a disease or condition by the pharmaceutical composition. The invention particularly pertains to such pharmaceutical compositions that lack, or substantially lack, a sugar stabilizing agent.


I. The Pharmaceutical Compositions of the Present Invention

As used herein, the term “pharmaceutical composition” is intended to refer to a “therapeutic” medicament (i.e., a medicament formulated to treat an existing disease or condition of a recipient subject) or a “prophylactic” medicament (i.e., a medicament formulated to prevent or ameliorate the symptoms of a potential or threatened disease or condition of a recipient subject) containing one or more protein biomolecules as its active therapeutic or prophylactic agent or component. The pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention comprise one or more protein biomolecule(s) that serve(s) as an active agent or component of the composition. For therapeutic use, the pharmaceutical composition will contain and provide a “therapeutically effective” amount of the protein biomolecule(s), which is an amount that reduces or ameliorates the progression, severity, and/or duration of a disease or condition, and/or ameliorates one or more symptoms associated with such disease or condition. For prophylactic use, the pharmaceutical composition will contain and provide a “prophylactically effective” amount of the protein biomolecule(s), which is an amount that is sufficient to result in the prevention of the development, recurrence, onset or progression of a disease or condition. The recipient subject is an animal, preferably a mammal including a non-primate (e.g., a cow, pig, horse, cat, dog, rat, or mouse), or a primate (e.g., a chimpanzee, a monkey such as a cynomolgus monkey, and a human), and is more preferably a human.


II. The Stabilizing Compounds of the Pharmaceutical Compositions of the Present Invention

The stabilizing compounds of the present invention are “lyoprotectants” (and as such serve to protect the protein biomolecule of the pharmaceutical composition from denaturation during freeze-drying and subsequent storage) and/or “cryoprotectants” (and as such serve to protect the protein biomolecule of the pharmaceutical composition from denaturation caused by freezing). A “stabilizing” compound is said to “stabilize” or “protect” a protein biomolecule of a pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention, if it serves to preserve the structure and functionality of the protein biomolecule that is the active agent or component of the composition, relative to changes in such structure and functionality observed in the absence of such formulation. A stabilizing compound is one that serves to prevent or decrease the extent of freezing or melting of a composition at that composition's normal melt temperature (Tm).


The “protection” provided to the protein biomolecule may be assessed using high performance size-exclusion chromatography (“HPSEC”), which is an industry standard technique for the detection and quantification of pharmaceutical protein aggregates (US Patent Publication No. 2015/0005475; Gabrielson, J. P. et al. (2006) “Quantitation Of Aggregate Levels In A Recombinant Humanized Monoclonal Antibody Formulation By Size-Exclusion Chromatography, Asymmetrical Flow Field Flow Fractionation, And Sedimentation Velocity,” J. Pharm. Sci. 96(2):268-279; Liu, H. et al. (2009) “Analysis Of Reduced Monoclonal Antibodies Using Size Exclusion Chromatography Coupled With Mass Spectrometry,” J. Amer. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 20:2258-2264; Mahler, H. C. et al. (2008) “Protein Aggregation: Pathways, Induction Factors And Analysis,” J. Pharm. Sci. 98(9):2909-2934). Such protection permits the protein biomolecule to exhibit “low to undetectable levels” of fragmentation (i.e., such that, in a sample of the pharmaceutical composition, more than 80%, 85%, 90% 95%, 98%, or 99% of the protein biomolecule migrates in a single peak as determined by HPSEC and/or “low to undetectable levels” of loss of the biological activity/ies associated (i.e., such that, in a sample of the pharmaceutical composition, more than 80%, 85%, 90% 95%, 98%, or 99% of the protein biomolecule present exhibits its initial biological activity/ies as measured by HPSEC, and/or low to undetectable levels” of aggregation (i.e., such that, in a sample of the pharmaceutical composition, no more than 5%, no more than 4%, no more than 3%, no more than 2%, no more than 1%, and most preferably no more than 0.5%, aggregation by weight protein as measured by HPSEC. The “long-term” stability provided by the pharmaceutical compositions of the present permit such compositions to be stored for more than 3 months, more than 6 months, more than 9 months, more than 1 year, more than 18 months, more than 2 years, or more than 30 months.


The preferred “stabilizing compounds” of the present invention achieve shorter reconstitution times for lyophilized pharmaceutical compositions that contain high concentrations of one or more protein biomolecule(s). Most preferably, such stabilizing compounds are amino acid molecules, and more preferably, the amino acids: alanine, arginine, glycine, lysine and/or proline, or derivatives and salts thereof, or mixtures thereof, and even more preferably, the amino acids: alanine, arginine, and/or glycine, or derivatives and salts thereof, or mixtures thereof. Such amino acid molecules will preferably be L-amino acid molecules, but may be D-amino acid molecules or any combination of D- and L-amino acid molecules, including a racemic mixture thereof. Preferably, the presence of such stabilizing compound(s) of the present invention will be sufficient to cause the reconstitution time of a lyophilisate of the pharmaceutical composition to be less than 20 mins, less than 15 mins, less than 10 mins, less than 8 mins, less than 5 mins, or less than 2 mins, and to enhance a stability characteristic (e.g., a lyoprotective or cryoprotective property, such as single dosage reconstitution time, mean shelf life, percent activity remaining at a designated time interval at a set temperature (e.g., a subzero temperature, room temperature or an elevated temperature), etc.) of the pharmaceutical composition by more than 400%, by more than 200%, by more than 100%, by more than 50%, or by more than 10%, relative to such stability characteristic as observed in the complete absence of amino acid stabilizing compound(s).


With respect to such amino acids molecules, the term “derivatives and salts thereof” denotes any pharmaceutically acceptable salt or amino acid derivative, such as those disclosed in REMINGTON: THE SCIENCE AND PRACTICE OF PHARMACY, 21th Edition, Gennaro, Ed., Mack Publishing Co., Easton, P A, 2005. Such derivatives include substituted amines, amino alcohols, aldehydes, lactones, esters, hydrates, etc. Exemplary derivatives of alanine include: 2-allyl-glycine, 2-aminobutyric acid, cis-amiclenomycin, adamanthane, etc. Exemplary derivatives of arginine include: 2-amino-3-guanidinopropionic acid, 2-amino-4-guanidinobutryric acid, 5-methyl-arginine, arginine methyl ester, arginine-O-tBu, canavanine, citrulline, c-γ-hydroxy arginine, homoarginine, N-tosyl-arginine, Nω-nitro-arginine, thio-citrulline, etc. Exemplary derivatives of lysine include: diaminobutyric acid, 2,3-diaminopropanoic acid, (2s)-2,8-diaminoactanoic acid, ornithine, thialysine, etc. Exemplary derivatives of proline include: trans-1-acetyl-4-hydroxyproline, 3,4-dehydroproline, cis-3-hydroxyproline, cis-4-hydroxyproline, trans-3-hydroxyproline, trans-4-hydroxyproline, α-methylproline, pipecolic acid, etc.


Salts of such amino acids molecules and their derivatives include addition salts of such molecules such as those derived from an appropriate acid, e.g., hydrochloric, sulphuric, phosphoric, maleic, fumaric, citric, tartaric, lactic, acetic or p-toluenesulphonic acid. Particularly preferred are hydrochloride salts.


Such stabilizing compounds can be used individually or in combination in the pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention (e.g., any two stabilizing compounds, any three stabilizing compounds, any four stabilizing compounds, any five stabilizing compounds, or any combination of more than five of such stabilizing compounds.


As discussed above, sugars such as dextran, sucrose, trehalose dihydrate are typically used as stabilizing compounds in lyophilized therapeutic protein formulations. In a highly preferred embodiment of the present invention, the pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention will substantially lack (i.e., be substantially free of) a sugar stabilizing compound, and in a more highly preferred embodiment of the present invention, the pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention will completely lack (i.e., be completely free of) a sugar stabilizing compound. As used herein, a pharmaceutical composition of the present invention is said to “substantially lack sugar stabilizing compound(s)” if the presence of such compounds does not enhance a stability characteristic (e.g., a lyoprotective or cryoprotective property) of the pharmaceutical composition by more than 50%, by more than 20%, by more than 10%, by more than 5%, or by more than 1%, relative to such stability characteristic as observed in the complete absence of such sugar stabilizing compound(s). As used herein, a pharmaceutical composition of the present invention is said to “completely lack sugar stabilizing compound(s)” if the presence of such compound(s) is not detectable. It is preferred that the pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention will completely lack any sugar stabilizing compound.


Sugars such as sucrose and trehalose dihydrate are typically used as excipients in lyophilized therapeutic protein formulations to improve drug product stability, e.g., for storage at 2-8° C. (U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,617,576 and 8,754,195). Trehalose, in particular, has been widely used as a stabilizing agent; it is used in a variety of research applications and is contained in several commercially available therapeutic products, including HERCEPTIN®, AVASTIN®, LUCENTIS®, and ADVATE® (Ohtake, S. et al. (2011) “Trehalose: Current Use and Future Applications,” J. Pharm. Sci. 100(6):2020-2053).


III. The Protein Biomolecules Of The Pharmaceutical Compositions Of The Present Invention

The stabilizing compounds of the present invention are particularly suitable for use in pharmaceutical compositions that contain high concentrations of one or more protein biomolecule(s) as their active agents or components. As used herein, the term “high concentration” denotes a concentration of the protein biomolecule(s) that is greater than 10 mg/mL, greater than 20 mg/mL, greater than 30 mg/mL, greater than 40 mg/mL, greater than 50 mg/mL, greater than 60 mg/mL, greater than 70 mg/mL, greater than 80 mg/mL, greater than 90 mg/mL, greater than 100 mg/mL, greater than 120 mg/mL, greater than 150 mg/mL, greater than 200 mg/mL, greater than 250 mg/mL, greater than 300 mg/mL, greater than 350 mg/mL, greater than 400 mg/mL, greater than 450 mg/mL, or greater than 500 mg/mL.


Without limitation, the “protein biomolecules” contained in such pharmaceutical compositions may be any kind of protein molecule, including single polypeptide chain proteins or multiple polypeptide chain proteins. As used herein the term protein biomolecule does not connote that the molecule is of any particular size and is intended to include protein biomolecules that comprise fewer than 5, fewer than 10, fewer than 20 fewer than 30, fewer than 40 or fewer than 50 amino acid residues, as well as protein biomolecules that comprise more than 50, more than 100, more than 200 more than 300, more than 400, or more than 500 amino acid residues.


Examples of protein biomolecules that may be present in the pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention are provided in Tables 1 and 2, and include antibody or antibody-based immunotherapeutics (for example, palivizumab which is directed to an epitope in the A antigenic site of the F protein of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) (SYNAGIS®; U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,460,663 and 8,986,686), antibody directed against angiopoietin-2 (U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,507,656 and 8,834,880); antibody directed against Delta-like Protein Precursor 4 (DLL4) (U.S. Pat. No. 8,663,636; US Patent Publication No. 2015/0005475; PCT Publication No. WO 2013/113898); antibody directed against Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-α (PDGRF-α) (U.S. Pat. No. 8,697,664); antibody directed against alpha-V-beta-6 integrin (αVβ6) (U.S. Pat. No. 8,894,998; antibody directed against Growth and Differentiation Factor (GDF-8) (U.S. Pat. No. 8,697,664), enzymes, hormones and factors, and antigenic proteins for use in vaccines (for example, insulin, erythropoietin, growth hormone, etc.).









TABLE 1







Antibody and Immunotherapeutic Molecules










Disease-Associated



Antibody Name
Antigen
Therapeutic Target Application





3F8
Gd2
Neuroblastoma


8H9
B7-H3
Neuroblastoma, Sarcoma, Metastatic Brain




Cancers


Abagovomab
CA-125
Ovarian Cancer


Abciximab
CD41
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitor


Actoxumab

Clostridium


Clostridium Difficile Infection





Difficile




Adalimumab
TNF-A
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Crohn's Disease,




Plaque Psoriasis, Psoriatic Arthritis,




Ankylosing Spondylitis, Juvenile Idiopathic




Arthritis, Hemolytic Disease Of The




Newborn


Adecatumumab
Epcam
Prostate And Breast Cancer


Aducanumab
Beta-Amyloid
Alzheimer's Disease


Afelimomab
TNF-A
Sepsis


Afutuzumab
CD20
Lymphoma


Alacizumab
VEGFR2
Cancer


Ald518
Il-6
Rheumatoid Arthritis


Alemtuzumab
CD52
Multiple Sclerosis


Alirocumab
NARP-1
Hypercholesterolemia


Altumomab
CEA
Colorectal Cancer


Amatuximab
Mesothelin
Cancer


Anatumomab
TAG-72
Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma


Mafenatox




Anifrolumab
Interferon A/B
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus



Receptor



Anrukinzumab
IL-13
Cancer


Apolizumab
HLA-DR
Hematological Cancers


Arcitumomab
CEA
Gastrointestinal Cancer


Aselizumab
L-Selectin (CD62L)
Severely Injured Patients


Atinumab
RTN4
Cancer


Atlizumab
IL-6 Receptor
Rheumatoid Arthritis


Atorolimumab
Rhesus Factor
Hemolytic Disease Of The Newborn


Bapineuzumab
Beta-Amyloid
Alzheimer's Disease


Basiliximab
CD25
Prevention Of Organ Transplant Rejections


Bavituximab
Phosphatidylserine
Cancer, Viral Infections


Bectumomab
CD22
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (Detection)


Belimumab
BAFF
Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma


Benralizumab
CD125
Asthma


Bertilimumab
CCL11 (Eotaxin-1)
Severe Allergic Disorders


Besilesomab
CEA-Related
Inflammatory Lesions And Metastases



Antigen
(Detection)


Bevacizumab
VEGF-A
Metastatic Cancer, Retinopathy Of




Prematurity


Bezlotoxumab

Clostridium difficile


Clostridium difficile Infection



Biciromab
Fibrin II, Beta
Thromboembolism (Diagnosis)



Chain



Bimagrumab
ACVR2B
Myostatin Inhibitor


Bivatuzumab
CD44 V6
Squamous Cell Carcinoma


Blinatumomab
CD19
Cancer


Blosozumab
SOST
Osteoporosis


Brentuximab
CD30 (TNFRSF8)
Hematologic Cancers


Briakinumab
IL-12, IL-23
Psoriasis, Rheumatoid Arthritis,




Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Multiple




Sclerosis


Brodalumab
IL-17
Inflammatory Diseases


Canakinumab
IL-1
Rheumatoid Arthritis


Cantuzumab
MUC1
Cancers


Cantuzumab
Mucin Canag
Colorectal Cancer


Mertansine




Caplacizumab
VWF
Cancers


Capromab
Prostatic Carcinoma
Prostate Cancer (Detection)



Cells



Carlumab
MCP-1
Oncology/Immune Indications


Catumaxomab
Epcam, CD3
Ovarian Cancer, Malignant Ascites, Gastric




Cancer


Cc49
Tag-72
Tumor Detection


Certolizumab
TNF-A
Crohn's Disease


Cetuximab
EGFR
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer And Head And




Neck Cancer


Ch.14.18
Undetermined
Neuroblastoma


Citatuzumab
Epcam
Ovarian Cancer And Other Solid Tumors


Cixutumumab
IGF-1 Receptor
Solid Tumors


Clazakizumab

Oryctolagus

Rheumatoid Arthritis




Cuniculus




Clivatuzumab
MUC1
Pancreatic Cancer


Conatumumab
TRAIL-R2
Cancer


Concizumab
TFPI
Bleeding


Cr6261
Influenza A
Infectious Disease/Influenza A



Hemagglutinin



Crenezumab
1-40-B-Amyloid
Alzheimer's Disease


Dacetuzumab
CD40
Hematologic Cancers


Daclizumab
CD25
Prevention Of Organ Transplant Rejections


Dalotuzumab
Insulin-Like
Cancer



Growth Factor I




Receptor



Daratumumab
CD38
Cancer


Demcizumab
DLL4
Cancer


Denosumab
RANKL
Osteoporosis, Bone Metastases


Detumomab
B-Lymphoma Cell
Lymphoma


Dorlimomab
Undetermined
Cancer


Aritox




Drozitumab
DR5
Cancer


Duligotumab
HER3
Cancer


Dupilumab
IL4
Atopic Diseases


Dusigitumab
ILGF2
Cancer


Ecromeximab
GD3 Ganglioside
Malignant Melanoma


Eculizumab
C5
Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria


Edobacomab
Endotoxin
Sepsis Caused By Gram-Negative Bacteria


Edrecolomab
Epcam
Colorectal Carcinoma


Efalizumab
LFA-1 (CD11a)
Psoriasis (Blocks T Cell Migration)


Efungumab
Hsp90
Invasive Candida Infection


Eldelumab
Interferon-Gamma-
Crohn's Disease, Ulcerative Colitis



Induced Protein



Elotuzumab
SLAMF7
Multiple Myeloma


Elsilimomab
IL-6
Cancer


Enavatuzumab
TWEAK Receptor
Cancer


Enlimomab
ICAM-1 (CD54)
Cancer


Enokizumab
IL9
Asthma


Enoticumab
DLL4
Cancer


Ensituximab
5AC
Cancer


Epitumomab
Episialin
Cancer


Cituxetan




Epratuzumab
CD22
Cancer, SLE


Erlizumab
ITGB2 (CD18)
Heart Attack, Stroke, Traumatic Shock


Ertumaxomab
HER2/Neu, CD3
Breast Cancer


Etaracizumab
Integrin Avβ3
Melanoma, Prostate Cancer, Ovarian Cancer


Etrolizumab
Integrin A7 B7
Inflammatory Bowel Disease


Evolocumab
PCSK9
Hypocholesterolemia


Exbivirumab
Hepatitis B Surface
Hepatitis B



Antigen



Fanolesomab
CD15
Appendicitis (Diagnosis)


Faralimomab
Interferon Receptor
Cancer


Farletuzumab
Folate Receptor 1
Ovarian Cancer


Fasinumab[51]
HNGF
Cancer


Fbta05
CD20
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia


Felvizumab
Respiratory
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection



Syncytial Virus



Fezakinumab
IL-22
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriasis


Ficlatuzumab
HGF
Cancer


Figitumumab
IGF-1 Receptor
Adrenocortical Carcinoma, Non-Small Cell




Lung Carcinoma


Flanvotumab
TYRP1
Melanoma



(Glycoprotein 75)



Fontolizumab
IFN-γ
Crohn's Disease


Foravirumab
Rabies Virus
Rabies (Prophylaxis)



Glycoprotein



Fresolimumab
TGF-B
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, Focal




Segmental Glomerulosclerosis, Cancer


Fulranumab
NGF
Pain


Futuximab
EGFR
Cancer


Galiximab
CD80
B Cell Lymphoma


Ganitumab
IGF-I
Cancer


Gantenerumab
Beta-Amyloid
Alzheimer's Disease


Gavilimomab
CD147 (Basigin)
Graft-Versus-Host Disease


Gemtuzumab
CD33
Acute Myelogenous Leukemia


Ozogamicin




Gevokizumab
IL-1β
Diabetes


Girentuximab
Carbonic
Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma



Anhydrase 9 (CA-




IX)



Glembatumumab
GPNMB
Melanoma, Breast Cancer


Vedotin




Golimumab
TNF-A
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis,




Ankylosing Spondylitis


Gomiliximab
CD23 (Ige
Allergic Asthma



Receptor)



Guselkumab
IL13
Psoriasis


Ibritumomab
CD20
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma


Tiuxetan




Icrucumab
VEGFR-1
Cancer


Igovomab
CA-125
Ovarian Cancer (Diagnosis)


Imab362
Cldn18.2
Gastrointestinal Adenocarcinomas And




Pancreatic Tumor


Imgatuzumab
EGFR
Cancer


Inclacumab
Selectin P
Cancer


Indatuximab
SDC1
Cancer


Ravtansine




Infliximab
TNF-A
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Ankylosing




Spondylitis, Psoriatic Arthritis, Psoriasis,




Crohn's Disease, Ulcerative Colitis


Inolimomab
CD25 (A Chain Of
Graft-Versus-Host Disease



IL-2 Receptor)



Inotuzumab
CD22
Cancer


Ozogamicin




Intetumumab
CD51
Solid Tumors (Prostate Cancer, Melanoma)


Ipilimumab
CD152
Melanoma


Iratumumab
CD30 (TNFRSF8)
Hodgkin's Lymphoma


Itolizumab
CD6
Cancer


Ixekizumab
IL-17A
Autoimmune Diseases


Keliximab
CD4
Chronic Asthma


Labetuzumab
CEA
Colorectal Cancer


Lambrolizumab
PDCD1
Antineoplastic Agent


Lampalizumab
CFD
Cancer


Lebrikizumab
IL-13
Asthma


Lemalesomab
NCA-90
Diagnostic Agent



(Granulocyte




Antigen)



Lerdelimumab
TGF Beta 2
Reduction Of Scarring After Glaucoma




Surgery


Lexatumumab
TRAIL-R2
Cancer


Libivirumab
Hepatitis B Surface
Hepatitis B



Antigen



Ligelizumab
IGHE
Cancer


Lintuzumab
CD33
Cancer


Lirilumab
KIR2D
Cancer


Lodelcizumab
PCSK9
Hypercholesterolemia


Lorvotuzumab
CD56
Cancer


Lucatumumab
CD40
Multiple Myeloma, Non-Hodgkin's




Lymphoma, Hodgkin's Lymphoma


Lumiliximab
CD23
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia


Mapatumumab
TRAIL-R1
Cancer


Margetuximab
Ch4d5
Cancer


Matuzumab
EGFR
Colorectal, Lung And Stomach Cancer


Mavrilimumab
GMCSF Receptor
Rheumatoid Arthritis



A-Chain



Mepolizumab
IL-5
Asthma And White Blood Cell Diseases


Metelimumab
TGF Beta 1
Systemic Scleroderma


Milatuzumab
CD74
Multiple Myeloma And Other Hematological




Malignancies


Minretumomab
TAG-72
Cancer


Mitumomab
GD3 Ganglioside
Small Cell Lung Carcinoma


Mogamulizumab
CCR4
Cancer


Morolimumab
Rhesus Factor
Cancer


Motavizumab
Respiratory
Respiratory Syncytial Virus (Prevention)



Syncytial Virus



Moxetumomab
CD22
Cancer


Pasudotox




Muromonab-CD3
CD3
Prevention Of Organ Transplant Rejections


Nacolomab
C242 Antigen
Colorectal Cancer


Tafenatox




Namilumab
CSF2
Cancer


Naptumomab
5T4
Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma, Renal Cell


Estafenatox

Carcinoma


Narnatumab
RON
Cancer


Natalizumab
Integrin A4
Multiple Sclerosis, Crohn's Disease


Nebacumab
Endotoxin
Sepsis


Necitumumab
EGFR
Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma


Nerelimomab
TNF-A
Cancer


Nesvacumab
Angiopoietin 2
Cancer


Nimotuzumab
EGFR
Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Head And Neck




Cancer, Nasopharyngeal Cancer, Glioma


Nivolumab
PD-1
Cancer


Nofetumomab
Undetermined
Cancer


Merpentan




Ocaratuzumab
CD20
Cancer


Ocrelizumab
CD20
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Lupus Erythematosus


Odulimomab
LFA-1 (CD11a)
Prevention Of Organ Transplant Rejections,




Immunological Diseases


Ofatumumab
CD20
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia


Olaratumab
PDGF-R A
Cancer


Olokizumab
IL6
Cancer


Onartuzumab
Human Scatter
Cancer



Factor Receptor




Kinase



Ontuxizumab
TEM1
Cancer


Oportuzumab
Epcam
Cancer


Monatox




Oregovomab
CA-125
Ovarian Cancer


Orticumab
Oxldl
Cancer


Otlertuzumab
CD37
Cancer


Oxelumab
OX-40
Asthma


Ozanezumab
NOGO-A
ALS And Multiple Sclerosis


Ozoralizumab
TNF-A
Inflammation


Pagibaximab
Lipoteichoic Acid
Sepsis (Staphylococcus)


Palivizumab
F Protein Of
Respiratory Syncytial Virus (Prevention)



Respiratory




Syncytial Virus



Panitumumab
EGFR
Colorectal Cancer


Pankomab
Tumor Specific
Ovarian Cancer



Glycosylation Of




MUC1



Panobacumab

Pseudomonas


Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Infection





Aeruginosa




Parsatuzumab
EGFL7
Cancer


Pascolizumab
IL-4
Asthma


Pateclizumab
LTA
TNF


Patritumab
HER3
Cancer


Pembrolizumab
PD-1
Cancer


Pemtumomab
MUC1
Cancer


Perakizumab
IL17A
Arthritis


Pertuzumab
HER2/Neu
Cancer


Pexelizumab
C5
Reduction Of Side-Effects Of Cardiac




Surgery


Pidilizumab
PD-1
Cancer And Infectious Diseases


Pinatuzumab
CD22
Cancer


Vedotin




Pintumomab
Adenocarcinoma
Adenocarcinoma



Antigen



Placulumab
Human TNF
Cancer


Polatuzumab
CD79B
Cancer


Vedotin




Ponezumab
Human Beta-
Alzheimer's Disease



Amyloid



Pritoxaximab

E. Coli Shiga Toxin

Cancer



Type-1



Pritumumab
Vimentin
Brain Cancer


Pro 140
Ccr5
HIV Infection


Quilizumab
IGHE
Cancer


Racotumomab
N-
Cancer



Glycolylneuraminic




Acid



Radretumab
Fibronectin Extra
Cancer



Domain-B



Rafivirumab
Rabies Virus
Rabies (Prophylaxis)



Glycoprotein



Ramucirumab
VEGFR2
Solid Tumors


Ranibizumab
VEGF-A
Macular Degeneration (Wet Form)


Raxibacumab
Anthrax Toxin,
Anthrax (Prophylaxis And Treatment)



Protective Antigen



Regavirumab
Cytomegalovirus
Cytomegalovirus Infection



Glycoprotein B



Reslizumab
IL-5
Inflammations Of The Airways, Skin And




Gastrointestinal Tract


Rilotumumab
HGF
Solid Tumors


Rituximab
CD20
Lymphomas, Leukemias, Some Autoimmune




Disorders


Robatumumab
IGF-1 Receptor
Cancer


Roledumab
RHD
Cancer


Romosozumab
Sclerostin
Osteoporosis


Rontalizumab
IFN-α
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus


Rovelizumab
CD11, CD18
Haemorrhagic Shock


Ruplizumab
CD154 (CD40L)
Rheumatic Diseases


Samalizumab
CD200
Cancer


Sarilumab
IL6
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Ankylosing




Spondylitis


Satumomab
TAG-72
Cancer


Pendetide




Secukinumab
IL-17A
Uveitis, Rheumatoid Arthritis Psoriasis


Seribantumab
ERBB3
Cancer


Setoxaximab

E. Coli Shiga Toxin

Cancer



Type-1



Sevirumab
Cytomegalovirus
Cytomegalovirus Infection


Sgn-CD19a
CD19
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia And B Cell




Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma


Sgn-CD33a
CD33
Acute Myeloid Leukemia


Sibrotuzumab
FAP
Cancer


Sifalimumab
IFN-A
SLE, Dermatomyositis, Polymyositis


Siltuximab
IL-6
Cancer


Simtuzumab
LOXL2
Fibrosis


Siplizumab
CD2
Psoriasis, Graft-Versus-Host Disease




(Prevention)


Sirukumab
IL-6
Rheumatoid Arthritis


Solanezumab
Beta-Amyloid
Alzheimer's Disease


Solitomab
Epcam
Cancer


Sonepcizumab
Sphingosine-1-
Choroidal And Retinal Neovascularization



Phosphate



Sontuzumab
Episialin
Cancer


Stamulumab
Myostatin
Muscular Dystrophy


Sulesomab
NCA-90
Osteomyelitis



(Granulocyte




Antigen)



Suvizumab
HIV-1
Viral Infections


Tabalumab
BAFF
B Cell Cancers


Tacatuzumab
Alpha-Fetoprotein
Cancer


Tetraxetan




Tadocizumab
Integrin AIIBβ3
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention


Tanezumab
NGF
Pain


Taplitumomab
CD19
Cancer


Paptox




Tefibazumab
Clumping Factor A

Staphylococcus Aureus Infection



Telimomab
Undetermined
Cancer


Tenatumomab
Tenascin C
Cancer


Teneliximab
CD40
Cancer


Teprotumumab
CD221
Hematologic Tumors


Ticilimumab
CTLA-4
Cancer


Tigatuzumab
TRAIL-R2
Cancer


Tildrakizumab
IL23
Immunologically Mediated Inflammatory




Disorders


Tnx-650
Il-13
Hodgkin's Lymphoma


Tocilizumab
IL-6 Receptor
Rheumatoid Arthritis


Toralizumab
CD154 (CD40L)
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Lupus Nephritis


Tositumomab
CD20
Follicular Lymphoma


Tovetumab
CD140a
Cancer


Tralokinumab
IL-13
Asthma


Trastuzumab
HER2/Neu
Breast Cancer


Trbs07
Gd2
Melanoma


Tremelimumab
CTLA-4
Cancer


Tucotuzumab
Epcam
Cancer


Celmoleukin




Tuvirumab
Hepatitis B Virus
Chronic Hepatitis B


Ublituximab
MS4A1
Cancer


Urelumab
4-1BB
Cancer


Urtoxazumab

Escherichia Coli

Diarrhoea Caused By E. Coli


Ustekinumab
IL-12, IL-23
Multiple Sclerosis, Psoriasis, Psoriatic




Arthritis


Vantictumab
Frizzled Receptor
Cancer


Vapaliximab
AOC3 (VAP-1)
Cancer


Vatelizumab
ITGA2
Cancer


Vedolizumab
Integrin A4β7
Crohn's Disease, Ulcerative Colitis


Veltuzumab
CD20
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma


Vepalimomab
AOC3 (VAP-1)
Inflammation


Vesencumab
NRP1
Cancer


Volociximab
Integrin A5β1
Solid Tumors


Vorsetuzumab
CD70
Cancer


Votumumab
Tumor Antigen
Colorectal Tumors



CTAA16.88



Zalutumumab
EGFR
Squamous Cell Carcinoma Of The Head




And Neck


Zatuximab
HER1
Cancer


Ziralimumab
CD147
Cancer


Zolimomab Aritox
CD5
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Graft-




Versus-Host Disease
















TABLE 2





Hormones/Factors

















Alpha-Glactosidase A



Alpha-L-Iduronidase



Dornase Alfa



Erythropoietin



Factor VIII



Follicle-Stimulating Hormone



Glucocerebrosidase



Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF)



Growth Hormone



Insulin



Insulin-Like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1)



Interferon-B-1α



Interferon-B-1β



N-Acetylgalactosamine-4-Sulfatase



Tissue Plasminogen Activator (TPA)









IV. Formulation of the Pharmaceutical Compositions of the Present Invention

The pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention will typically be formulated, at least initially, as an aqueous liquid, but are most preferably then suitable for lyophilization. The pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention subsequent to such lyophilization is referred to herein as a “lyophilisate.”


The liquid formulations of the pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention preferably comprise a suitable sterile aqueous carrier, a high concentration (as defined above) of the protein biomolecule, a buffer, and a stabilizing compound of the present invention. Optionally, such liquid formulations of the pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention may contain additional components, for example, a pharmaceutically acceptable, non-toxic excipient, buffer or detergent. The pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention lack sugar, or are substantially free of sugar.


Examples of suitable sterile aqueous carriers which may be employed in the pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention include water, saline, phosphate buffered saline, ethanol, dextrose solutions, and water/polyol solutions (such as glycerol, propylene glycol, polyethylene glycol, and the like).


Any suitable buffer may be employed in accordance with the present invention. It is preferred to employ a buffer capable of buffering the liquid within a pH range of from about 3 to about 11, more preferably from about 4 to about 9, more preferably from about 5 to about 8, more preferably from about 5 to about 7.5, and more preferably at a pH of 5.0; 5.1; 5.2; 5.3; 5.4; 5.5; 5.6; 5.7; 5.8; 5.9; 6.0; 6.1; 6.2; 6.3; 6.4; 6.5; 6.6; 6.7; 6.8; 6.9; 7.0; 7.1; 7.2; 7.3; 7.4; 7.5; 7.6; 7.7; 7.8; 7.9; or 8.0.


Suitable buffers include potassium phosphate, sodium phosphate, sodium acetate, histidine, imidazole, sodium citrate, sodium succinate, ammonium bicarbonate and carbonate.


Generally, buffers are used at molarities from about 1 mM to about 2 M, from about 2 mM to about 1 M, from about 1 mM to about 100 mM, about 10 mM to about 50 mM, about 20 mM to about 30 mM, or about 23 mM to about 27 mM, and is most preferably about 5 mM, 10 mM, 15 mM, 20 mM or 25 mM. In one embodiment, the buffer can be histidine/histidine HCl. Histidine can be in the form of L-histidine, D-histidine, or a mixture thereof, but L-histidine is the most preferable. Histidine can be also in the form of a hydrate, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, such as hydrochloride (e.g., a monohydrochloride or a dihydrochloride), hydrobromide, sulfate, acetate, etc. The purity of the histidine should be at least 98%, preferably at least 99%, and most preferably at least 99.5%.


The concentration of the stabilizing compound(s) that is/are included in the composition of the present invention preferably ranges from about 1% (weight/volume (w/v)) to about 6% (w/v), more preferably from about 2% (w/v) to about 5% (w/v) or from about 2% (w/v) to about 4% (w/v)). Particularly preferred are stabilizing compositions containing 2-5% (w/v) arginine, 2-5.5% (w/v) alanine, and 2-5.5% (w/v) glycine, or mixtures thereof.


Polysorbate-80 (“PS-80”) is a preferred non-ionic surfactant and emulsifier of the present invention, however, other suitable non-ionic surfactants and emulsifiers (e.g., Tween-20®, Tween-80®, Polaxamers, sodium dodecyl sulfate, etc.) may be alternatively or additionally employed.


Particularly preferred are liquid formulations that comprise:

    • (1) about 75 mg/mL, about 25 mM histidine/histidine-HCl, about 3.5% arginine (w/v), and about 0.02% PS-80 (w/v), pH 6;
    • (2) about 75 mg/mL, about 25 mM histidine/histidine-HCl, about 5% arginine (w/v), and about 0.02% PS-80 (w/v), pH 6;
    • (3) about 100 mg/mL, about 25 mM histidine/histidine-HCl, about 4% alanine (w/v), about 2% arginine (w/v), and about 0.02% PS-80 (w/v), pH 6;
    • (4) about 100 mg/mL, about 25 mM histidine/histidine-HCl, about 4% glycine (w/v), about 2% arginine (w/v), and about 0.02% PS-80 (w/v), pH 6;


The liquid formulation can be lyophilized to further stabilize the protein biomolecule. Any suitable lyophilization apparatus and regimen may be employed, however, it is preferred to accomplish such lyophilization as shown in Table 3, Table 5 or Table 11.


Particularly subsequent to reconstitution after such lyophilization, liquid formulations of the pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention may additionally contain non-aqueous carriers, such as mineral oil or vegetable oil (e.g., olive oil, corn oil, peanut oil, cottonseed oil, and sesame oil), carboxymethyl cellulose colloidal solutions, tragacanth gum and injectable organic esters, such as ethyl oleate.


The invention provides methods of treatment, prophylaxis, and amelioration of a disease or condition or one or more symptoms thereof by administrating to a subject of an effective amount of liquid formulations of the invention, either as initially formulated or subsequent to reconstitution of a lyophilisate.


Various delivery systems are known and can be used to administer such liquid compositions, including, but not limited to, parenteral administration (e.g., intradermal, intramuscular, intraperitoneal, intravenous and subcutaneous), epidural administration, topical administration, pulmonary administration, and mucosal administration (e.g., intranasal and oral mutes). In a specific embodiment, liquid formulations of the present invention are administered intramuscularly, intravenously, or subcutaneously. The formulations may be administered by any convenient mute, for example by infusion or bolus injection, by absorption through epithelial or mucocutaneous linings (e.g., oral mucosa, rectal and intestinal mucosa, etc.) and may be administered together with other biologically active agents. Administration can be systemic or local. In addition, pulmonary administration can be employed, e.g., by use of an inhaler or nebulizer.


The invention also provides that the initially formulated liquid pharmaceutical composition may be packaged in a hermetically sealed container such as an ampoule, vial, cartridge, syringe or sachette indicating the quantity of the protein biomolecule contained therein. Preferably, such initially formulated liquid pharmaceutical compositions are lyophilized while within such ampoules or sachettes, and the ampoule or sachette indicates the amount of carrier to be added in order to reconstitute the lyophilisate to contain the desired high concentration of the protein biomolecule.


The amount of the liquid formulations of the present invention which will be effective for therapeutic or prophylactic use.


The precise dose to be employed in the formulation will also depend on the route of administration, the disease or condition to be treated, the particular protein biomolecule of the pharmaceutical composition, and should be decided according to the judgment of the practitioner and each subject's circumstances. Exemplary doses include 30 mg/kg or less, 15 mg/kg or less, 5 mg/kg or less, 3 mg/kg or less, 1 mg/kg or less or 0.5 mg/kg or less.


EXAMPLES

The following examples illustrate the compositions of the present invention and their properties. The examples are intended to illustrate, but in no way limit, the scope of the invention.


Example 1
Materials & Methods

Lyophilization—1.1 mL aliquots of a pharmaceutical composition were introduced into 3 cc glass vials. The vials were stoppered with 13 mm single vent lyophilization stoppers. The vials were then lyophilized using a lyophilization cycle, as described in Table 3.









TABLE 3





Lyophilization Parameters


















Loading
20° C.



Freezing
−5° C. at 0.3° C./min



Annealing
−16° C. at 0.5° C./min



Freezing
−40° C. at 0.5° C./min



Primary Drying
−35° C. at 0.1° C./min



Secondary Drying
40° C. at 0.3° C./min



Unloading
 5° C.









The end point of lyophilization was determined using a Pirani vacuum gauge (see, e.g., Patel, S. M. et al. (2009) “Determination of End Point of Primary Drying in Freeze-Drying Process Control,” AAPS Pharm. Sci. Tech. 11(1):73-84). Such a gauge works on the principle of measuring the thermal conductivity of the gas in the drying chamber (Nail, S. L. et al. (1992) “Methodology For In-Process Determination Of Residual Water In Freeze-Dried Products,” Dev. Biol. Stand. 74:137-151; Biol. Prod. Freeze-Drying Formulation). After completion of the lyophilization cycles, vials were vacuum stoppered and removed from the lyophilizer. The vials were then capped with West 13 mm aluminum Flip-Off overseals.


High Performance Size-Exclusion Chromatography (HPSEC)—HPSEC samples were diluted in 10 mg/mL phosphate buffered saline prior to HPSEC. The samples were injected onto a TSKgel G3000SWXL column, eluted isocratically with phosphate buffer containing sodium sulfate and sodium azide. The eluted protein is detected using UV absorbance at 280 nm and the results are reported as the area percent of the product monomer peak. Peaks eluting earlier than the monomer are recorded as percent aggregate and peaks eluting after the monomer are recorded as percent fragment/other.


Reconstitution Procedure—Prior to use, and generally within 6 hours prior to use, sterile water is injected into the lyophilization vial, which is then gently swirled to effect reconstitution with minimal foaming. Two reconstitution procedures were used for reconstitution: Procedure A—a 1 minute swirl followed by a 5 minute hold method until all the cake is completely dissolved in solution and Procedure B—a 1 minute hold followed by a 1 minute swirl until all the cake is completely dissolved in solution.


Example 2
Impact of Variation of Amino Acid to Sugar Ratio on Reconstitution Time and Protein Aggregation of Pharmaceutical Compositions

In order to investigate the effect of varying the ratio of amino acid to sugar concentrations in pharmaceutical compositions on the preparation, stability and storage of such compositions, a pharmaceutical composition containing an exemplary protein biomolecule (a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody) was incubated in formulations containing different amino acids and at differing amino acid to sugar ratios. More specifically, the pharmaceutical composition was formulated at 100 mg/mL in 25 mM histidine/histidine-HCl, 0.02% (w/v) polysorbate-80 (PS-80), pH 6 buffer with arginine-HCl, lysine-HCl, proline, alanine or glycine at amino acid to sugar ratios as shown in Table 4 and the preparations were evaluated for their effect on reconstitution times of the lyophilized formulations.









TABLE 4







Composition of Amino Acid Formulations















Amino



Protein
Amino Acid
Sucrose
Acid:Sucrose


Description
(mg/mL)
(mg/mL)
(mg/mL)
Ratio














Amino Acid
100
50
0
5:0


Formulation

40
10 (1% (w/v))
4:1




25
50 (5% (w/v))
2:1


Control
100
0
100 (10% (w/v))
N/A









The formulations were lyophilized according to the process in Table 5.









TABLE 5





Lyophilization Process


















Loading
20° C.



Freezing
−5° C. at 0.3° C./min



Annealing
No Annealing



Freezing
−40° C. at 0.1° C./min



Primary Drying
−35° C. at 0.1° C./min



Secondary Drying
40° C. at 0.3° C./min



Unloading
 5° C.










FIG. 1 summarizes the aggregation and reconstitution time results. All formulations of the above-described pharmaceutical composition containing the exemplary protein biomolecule that contained lysine-HCl had high, and in some cases, unacceptably high reconstitution times. Formulations of the pharmaceutical composition that contained arginine, lysine-HCl or proline did not show an in-process increase in aggregation. In contrast, formulations of the pharmaceutical composition that contained alanine and glycine showed an increase in in-process aggregate level, but the addition of amorphous content (sucrose) minimized or prevented this increase, depending on the ratio employed. The results show that arginine, lysine and proline could substitute for sucrose without affecting aggregation.


The lyophilized formulations were also subjected to X-ray Powder Diffraction (XRPD) in order to determine the crystallinity of the lyophilisate. The results, as well as reconstitution times are shown in Table 6 (Reconstitution Time (RC) in minutes; n=2; XRPD, n=1; A, Amorphous; M, Mixture of Amorphous and Crystalline).









TABLE 6







Impact of Amino Acid to Sucrose Ratio on Reconstitution Time and XRPD








Amino



Acid to













Sugar
Arginine-HCl
Lysine-HCl
Alanine
Proline
Glycine

















Ratio
RC
XRPD
RC
XRPD
RC
XRPD
RC
XRPD
RC
XRPD




















5:0
<9
(A)
<50
(A)
<5
(A)
<30
(A)
<5
M


4:1
<29
(A)
<50
(A)
<5
(A)
<30
(A)
<5
M


1:2
<29
(A)
<50
(A)
<24
(A)
<30
(A)
<24
(A)








Control
<27 (A)









In summary, formulations of the pharmaceutical composition containing the exemplary protein biomolecule that contained arginine alone showed a significantly lower reconstitution time compared to the sucrose only formulation. The addition of even 1% (w/v) of sucrose to the arginine formulations increased the reconstitution time. All formulations with arginine were amorphous as measured by XRPD. Formulations of the pharmaceutical composition that contained alanine or glycine showed rapid reconstitution in the absence of sucrose, or in the presence of 1% (w/v) sucrose, but the addition of 5% (w/v) and higher sucrose concentrations increased reconstitution times. Formulations of the pharmaceutical composition that contained alanine or glycine and 0-1% (w/v) sucrose showed a mixture of amorphous and crystalline product by XRPD, while addition of high sucrose to these formulations resulted in an amorphous matrix as determined by XRPD. Formulations of the pharmaceutical composition that contained lysine or proline were difficult to reconstitute and hence had longer reconstitution time. All the lysine- and proline-containing formulations were, however, amorphous as determined by XRPD. The results show that the presence of arginine, alanine or glycine could significantly reduce reconstitution time.


Example 3
Optimizing Sugar to Amino Acid Ratios in High Concentration Protein Formulations

The data presented in Example 2 indicates that both alanine and glycine have a tendency to crystallize when lyophilized alone or in the presence of low amounts of sugar. The following study was carried out to optimize ratios of sugar to amino acid (using alanine or glycine) to obtain amorphous lyophilized cakes with acceptable stability and short reconstitution times. Amino acid/sucrose formulations with various amino acid to sugar ratios were prepared for both alanine and glycine as shown in Table 7. The formulations were lyophilized according to the process shown in Table 5 with addition of annealing at −16° C. for 300 minutes. The lyophilisates were subjected to XRPD, and were then reconstituted. Reconstitution times, percent aggregate increase over pre lyophilization solutions, and osmolality were measured.











TABLE 7





Amino Acid
Sugar
Amino Acid to


(mg/mL)
(mg/mL)
Sugar Ratio

















50
0
5:0


40
10
4:1


40
20
2:1


40
30
4:3


40
40
1:1


25
50
1:2









Table 8 summarizes the effect of amino acid to sugar ratios on reconstitution time, and increase in aggregate post-lyophilization. Results indicate that increasing sugar in the formulations prevents aggregate formation during the lyophilization process but increases reconstitution time. The results provide a guide to determine an acceptable balance between aggregation and reconstitution time, by adjusting the amino acid to sugar ratio.









TABLE 8







Study Results











Amino Acid
% Aggregate
Reconstitution



to Sucrose
Increase (Post-
Time (n = 2)


Amino Acid
Ratio
Lyophilization)
in min













Alanine
5:0
0.8
4



4:1
0.4
4



2:1
0.1
18



4:3
0.2
14



1:1
0.2
18



1:2
0.1
17


Glycine
5:0
1.5
5



4:1
0.6
5



2:1
0.1
13



4:3
0.2
22



1:1
0
24



1:2
0.6
24









Example 4
Evaluation of High Concentration Protein/Amino Acid Formulations

As observed in Example 2, high concentration protein formulations with arginine-HCl remained amorphous during lyophilization, indicating that arginine-HCl can act as a cryoprotectant and as a lyoprotectant. Additionally, the arginine alone protein formulation exhibited a reduced reconstitution time. Because of these characteristics, arginine was evaluated in combination with alanine and/or glycine in a series of high concentration formulations of the above-described pharmaceutical composition containing the exemplary protein biomolecule. In this study, the impact of protein concentration and amino acid ratio on reconstitution time was evaluated. The formulations evaluated are shown with a check mark in Table 9 (N/A, not applicable). The formulations were lyophilized according to the process shown in Table 3. The lyophilisates were subjected to XRPD, and were then reconstituted. Reconstitution times were measured.









TABLE 9







Study Design








Amino Acid (% (w/v))
Protein Concentration (mg/mL)













Alanine
Glycine
Arginine
50
75
90
100













N/A
2
N/A




3














3.5

N/A














5

















2
N/A
2






4

2






N/A
2
2







4
2













The reconstitution times of the various formulations are shown in FIG. 2. These data show that protein concentration had an effect on the reconstitution time. As the protein concentration increased, reconstitution time increased. Also, the extent of increase in reconstitution time was affected by the type and quantity of the amino acid(s) present in the formulations. Both 3.5% (w/v) arginine and 5% (w/v) arginine had a similar impact on reconstitution time.


Formulations containing combinations of 4% glycine (w/v) or 4% alanine (w/v) with 2% arginine (w/v) exhibited reconstitution times reduced to about 10 minutes for the 100 mg lyophilized formulations (i.e., approximately ⅓ to ½ the reconstitution time observed using other combinations of solutes). Also, the extent of reduction in reconstitution time was dependent on amino acid ratio. For example, 2:1 glycine:arginine or alanine:arginine was more effective in reducing reconstitution time than 1:1 glycine:arginine or alanine:arginine.


The XRPD results demonstrated that all of the formulations except for 2:1 glycine:arginine were amorphous (Table 10; A, Amorphous; M, Mixture of Amorphous and Crystalline; N/A, not applicable).









TABLE 10







XRPD Results










Nominal Protein



Amino Acid (% (w/v))
Concentration (mg/mL)












Alanine
Glycine
Arginine
50
100













N/A
2
N/A
A



3.5
A
N/A



5
A
N/A











2
N/A
2
A
A


4

2
A
A


N/A
2
2
A
A



4
2
M
M









Based on the results in Table 10 and in FIG. 2, the following lyophilized formulations of the pharmaceutical composition were evaluated for stability at 5° C., 25° C. 60% relative humidity and 40° C.75% relative humidity:

    • (1) 75 mg/mL, 25 mM histidine/histidine-HCl, 3.5% arginine (w/v), and 0.02% PS-80 (w/v), pH 6;
    • (2) 75 mg/mL, 25 mM histidine/histidine-HCl, 5% arginine (w/v), and 0.02% PS-80 (w/v), pH 6;
    • (3) 100 mg/mL, 25 mM histidine/histidine-HCl, 4% alanine (w/v), 2% arginine (w/v), and 0.02% PS-80 (w/v), pH 6;
    • (4) 100 mg/mL, 25 mM histidine/histidine-HCl, 4% glycine (w/v), 2% arginine (w/v), and 0.02% PS-80 (w/v), pH 6;


Prior to lyophilization, 1.1 mL of the above-described four formulations were subjected to uncontrolled 1×freeze/thaw (F/T) in 3 cc vials (freezing at −80° C. and thawing at room temperature). HPSEC was monitored pre- and post-thaw to study the impact of the freeze/thaw cycle. No significant change in purity was observed in the freeze/thaw cycle.



FIGS. 3A and 3B show the stability of the lyophilisates at 40° C. and 25° C., respectively. The stability was monitored for 6 months at 25° C. and for 3 months at 40° C. The rates of purity loss at both 25° C. and 40° C. were similar to sucrose containing formulations. Post 3 months at 40° C., samples of the lyophilized pharmaceutical composition formulations were submitted to XRPD analysis. Based on XRPD analysis, all of the formulations except those containing glycine were amorphous. Glycine-containing formulations showed a mixture of amorphous and crystalline component, which is consistent with initial (T-0) observations. The stability was also evaluated at 5° C. for 22 months and showed no change in purity.


Ten vials of each formulation (post-lyophilization) were reconstituted and the reconstitution times were measured. The results are shown in FIG. 4. The average reconstitution times of all formulations were less than 15 minutes. The 100 mg/mL formulation of the pharmaceutical composition containing the exemplary protein biomolecule containing a combination of glycine and arginine was the most effective in reducing the reconstitution time followed by the combination of alanine and arginine. For the 75 mg/mL formulation of the pharmaceutical composition containing the exemplary protein biomolecule, both the 3.5% and 5% arginine (w/v) formulations provided acceptable reconstitution times.


Example 5
Evaluation of the Impact of Molecule Type on Reconstitution Time

In order to understand the impact of molecule type on reconstitution time and to demonstrate the generality of the present invention with respect to any protein biomolecule, pharmaceutical compositions were prepared using alternative protein biomolecules. Specifically, pharmaceutical compositions were prepared employing a Tenascin-3-Human Serum Albumin (Tn3-HSA) fusion protein (see, e.g., PCT Publication No. WO 2013/055745) or a humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody in lieu of the human IgG1 monoclonal antibody of the above-described pharmaceutical compositions. The employed formulations were the four lead formulations noted in Example 4 (reiterated below):

    • (1) 75 mg/mL, 25 mM histidine/histidine-HCl, 3.5% arginine, 0.02% PS-80, pH 6;
    • (2) 75 mg/mL, 25 mM histidine/histidine-HCl, 5% arginine, 0.02% PS-80, pH 6;
    • (3) 100 mg/mL, 25 mM histidine/histidine-HCl, 4% alanine, 2% arginine, 0.02% PS-80, pH 6;
    • (4) 100 mg/mL, 25 mM histidine/histidine-HCl, 4% glycine, 2% arginine, 0.02% PS-80, pH 6;


The additional pharmaceutical compositions were formulated as indicated, and lyophilized according to the process in Table 11.









TABLE 11





Lyophilization Process


















Loading
20° C.



Freezing
−5° C. at 0.3° C./min



Annealing
−16° C. at 0.5° C./min



Freezing
−40° C. at 0.5° C./min



Primary Drying
−35° C. at 0.1° C./min



Secondary Drying
40° C. at 0.3° C./min



Unloading
 5° C.









Lyophilisates samples are submitted for stability evaluations at various temperatures. Percent aggregation of the samples is evaluated by HPSEC. Following lyophilization, samples were reconstituted. Formulations were reconstituted using one of two alternative procedures (Procedure A was employed with the human IgG1 monoclonal antibody, and Procedure B was employed with the Tn3-HSA fusion protein and the humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody). The reconstitution times for the IgG1 antibody are shown in FIG. 5A. The reconstitution times for the Tn3-HSA fusion protein are shown in FIG. 5B. The reconstitution time for the IgG4 antibody are shown in FIG. 5C. The reconstitution times for the three molecules were significantly lower, compared to sucrose only formulations and were all 15 minutes or less.


All publications and patents mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference in its entirety. While the invention has been described in connection with specific embodiments thereof, it will be understood that it is capable of further modifications and this application is intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the invention following, in general, the principles of the invention and including such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice within the art to which the invention pertains and as may be applied to the essential features hereinbefore set forth.

Claims
  • 1. A pharmaceutical composition comprising a protein biomolecule as an active agent or component thereof, wherein said composition comprises: (A) (1) an aqueous carrier;(2) a protein biomolecule;(3) a buffer;(4) a stabilizing compound selected from the group consisting of arginine, alanine, glycine, lysine or proline, or a derivative or salt thereof, or mixtures thereof, in a total concentration of from about 1% (w/v) to about 6% (w/v);
  • 2. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein the composition substantially lacks a sugar stabilizing compound.
  • 3. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein the composition comprises from about 10 mg/mL to about 200 mg/mL of a protein biomolecule and wherein said protein biomolecule is an antibody or an antibody-based immunotherapeutic, enzyme, or a hormone/factor.
  • 4-5. (canceled)
  • 6. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 3, wherein said protein biomolecule is an antibody or an antibody-based immunotherapeutic, and said antibody is selected from the antibodies of Table 1.
  • 7. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 3, wherein said protein biomolecule is a hormone/factor, and said hormone/factor is selected from the hormone/factors of Table 2.
  • 8-9. (canceled)
  • 10. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein said stabilizing compound is arginine and said arginine is present at a concentration from about 2.0% (w/v) to about 5.0% (w/v), preferably at a concentration of 2.0% (w/v), a concentration of 3.5% (w/v) or a concentration of 5.5% (w/v).
  • 11. (canceled)
  • 12. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein said stabilizing compound is alanine and said alanine is present at a concentration from about 2.5% (w/v) to about 5.5% (w/v), preferably at a concentration of about 2.5% (w/v), about 3.5% (w/v), about 4.0% (w/v), or about 5.5% (w/v).
  • 13. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 12, wherein arginine is additionally present at a concentration of about 1.25% (w/v), about 1.75% (w/v), about 2.0% (w/v) or about 2.75% (w/v).
  • 14. (canceled)
  • 15. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein said stabilizing compound is glycine and said glycine is present at a concentration from about 2.5% (w/v) to about 5.5% (w/v), preferably at a concentration of about 2.5% (w/v), about 3.5% (w/v), about 4.0% (w/v) or about 5.5% (w/v).
  • 16. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 15, wherein arginine is additionally present at a concentration of about 1.25% (w/v), about 1.75% (w/v), about 2.0% (w/v) or about 2.75% (w/v).
  • 17. (canceled)
  • 18. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein the pH of said pharmaceutical composition is from about 3 to about 11, from about 4 to about 9, from about 5 to about 8, from about 5 to about 7.5, preferably 6.0 or 7.4.
  • 19. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein said buffer is present in a range from about 5 mM to about 50 mM, about 20 mM to about 30 mM, or about 23 mM to about 27 mM, preferably wherein the buffer is present at 25 mM.
  • 20. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein said buffer comprises histidine, phosphate, acetate, citrate, succinate, Tris, or a combination thereof.
  • 21. (canceled)
  • 22. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein said pharmaceutical composition additionally comprises a non-ionic detergent, and wherein said non-ionic detergent is polysorbate-80 (PS-80).
  • 23. (canceled)
  • 24. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 22, wherein said polysorbate-80 (PS-80) is present at a concentration of between 0.005 and 0.1% (w/v), preferably at a concentration of 0.02% (w/v).
  • 25. (canceled)
  • 26. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein said pharmaceutical composition is said lyophilizate and wherein the presence of said stabilizing compound(s) causes the reconstitution time of said lyophilisate of to be less than 20 minutes, less than 15 minutes, less than 10 minutes, less than 8 minutes, less than 5 minutes, or less than 2 minutes.
  • 27. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein the presence of said stabilizing compound(s) enhances a stability characteristic of the pharmaceutical composition by more than 400%, by more than 200%, by more than 100%, by more than 50%, or by more than 10%, relative to such stability characteristic as observed in the complete absence of said amino acid stabilizing compound(s).
  • 28. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein the presence of said stabilizing compound(s) enhances a stability characteristic of the pharmaceutical composition by more than 50%, by more than 20%, by more than 10%, by more than 5%, or by more than 1%, relative to such stability characteristic as observed in the complete absence of a sugar stabilizing compound.
  • 29. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein the formulation comprises; a) 75 mg/mL of a protein biomolecule, 25 mM histidine/histidine-HCl, 3.5% arginine, 0.02% PS-80 at a pH of 6.0,b) 75 mg/mL of a protein biomolecule, 25 mM histidine/histidine-HCl, 5% arginine, 0.02% PS-80 at a pH of 6.0,c) 100 mg/mL of a protein biomolecule, 25 mM histidine/histidine-HCl, 4% alanine, 2% arginine, 0.02% PS-80 at a pH of 6.0, ord) 100 mg/mL of a protein biomolecule, 25 mM histidine/histidine-HCl, 4% glycine, 2% arginine, 0.02% PS-80 at a pH of 6.0.
  • 30-33. (canceled)
  • 34. A method of treating a disease or disorder by administering the pharmaceutical composition of claim 1.
  • 35-36. (canceled)
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62321895 Apr 2016 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 17457456 Dec 2021 US
Child 18616429 US
Parent 16093343 Oct 2018 US
Child 17457456 US