The invention belongs to the field of anti-tumor, and specifically relates to the use of mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome, such as the use in preparation of a drug for treating urothelial carcinoma, breast cancer, bone and soft tissue sarcoma.
Urothelial carcinoma is a multi-origin malignant tumor originating from the urothelium, including renal pelvis cancer, ureteral cancer, bladder cancer and urethral cancer, etc., which is the most common urinary system tumor. Globally, the incidence of bladder-derived tumors ranked 12th among all solid tumors in 2018, accounting for 2.1% of total tumor deaths (Freddie, Bray, Jacques, Ferlay, Isabelle, & Soerjomataram, et al. (2018). Global cancer statistics 2018: globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.). In China, bladder-derived tumors ranked out of 10th in all tumors in 2015; ranked 7th in male, 6.2/100,000 people; ranked out of 10th in female; the standardized mortality rate ranked 14th among all tumors, 1.96/100,000 people (Zheng Rongshou, Sun Kexin, Zhang Siwei, et al. Analysis of the prevalence of malignant tumors in China in 2015. Chinese Journal of Oncology, January 2019, Volume 41, Issue 1). The ratio of male to female incidence in bladder cancer is approximately 3:1 (Freddie, Bray, Jacques, Ferlay, Isabelle, & Soerjomataram, et al. (2018). Global Cancer statistics 2018: globocan estimates of incidence and morality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: a cancerjournal for clinicians.).
For the first-line treatment of unresectable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, for the patients who are tolerant to cisplatin, cisplatin-containing chemotherapy regimens, such as GC (gemcitabine+cisplatin), MVAC (methotrexate+vinblastine+adriamycin+cisplatin) is the primely recommended program. Patients who cannot tolerate cisplatin can consider carboplatin-containing regimens, such as gemcitabine+carboplatin regimen. For other patients, PD-1 inhibitors such as pembrolizumab or atezolizumab, and chemotherapy drugs such as gemcitabine+paclitaxel or gemcitabine alone, can be used. PD-1 inhibitors are primely recommended in patients with PD-L1 expression. For the second-line treatment of patients, the current treatment methods include immunotherapy, targeted therapy, ADC drug therapy and chemotherapy. There is currently no standard treatment for the third-line and above, and corresponding chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and biological therapy should be selected according to the use of front-line drugs.
In conclusion, patients who have failed in treatment with platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens and PD-1 inhibitors lack effective follow-up treatments, and new drugs are urgently needed to be explored.
Among female malignant tumors in China, the incidence of breast cancer ranks first and the mortality rate ranks fifth, which is a serious threat to the health of Chinese women (Zheng Rongshou, Sun Kexin, Zhang Siwei et al. Analysis of the prevalence of malignant tumors in China in 2015 [J]. Chinese Journal of Oncology, 2019, 41(1):19-28.). In 2015, there were about 304,000 new female breast cancer cases in China, with an incidence rate of 45.29/100,000 and more than 70,000 deaths. About 3% to 10% of new breast cancer cases have distant metastasis at the time of diagnosis, while 30% of early-stage cases developed advanced breast cancer. The 5-year survival rate of advanced breast cancer is only 20% (National Cancer Center Breast Cancer Expert Committee. Guidelines for Standardized Diagnosis and Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer in China (2020 Edition).
In inoperable locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic breast cancer, for the patients who are hormone receptor-negative, are HER-2-positive, have shorter postoperative disease-free survival (<2 years), have faster tumor development, have obvious symptoms, have extensive visceral metastasis, are hormone receptor-positive, are subjected to endocrine therapy failure, the chemotherapy is an indispensable treatment. For those who have never been subjected to the treatment with chemotherapy (including adjuvant chemotherapy), the anthracycline and (or) taxane-based regimens are the first choice for the first-line chemotherapy. In the case of metastatic breast cancer wherein anthracycline therapy is failed or close to the cumulative dose, and taxanes have never been used previously, the taxane-based regimens or taxane monotherapy regimens are preferred for first-line chemotherapy. For those who have been subjected to the adjuvant therapy with taxanes and have the relapse time of >1 year, taxanes can be used again. In the selection of other drugs, drugs that have not been used in adjuvant therapy and treatment stages are preferred. For the recurrent and metastatic breast cancer wherein the patient suffering therefrom is subjected to preoperative/adjuvant treatment-failure via anthracyclines and taxanes, there is currently no standard chemotherapy regimen. Drugs that can be considered include capecitabine, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, platinum-based drugs, Eribulin, Utidelone, another kind of taxanes (such as nab-paclitaxel) and doxorubicin liposomes, which can be considered as single or combined regimens, so it is still necessary to research and develop the new drugs for later-line treatment.
Classical osteosarcoma is the most common primary bone malignant tumor, with an annual incidence of about 2-3/1,000,000, accounting for only 0.2% of human malignant tumors. Osteosarcoma can occur in any age group, but it is more common in adolescents. About 75% of patients are 15-25 years old. The median age of onset is 20 years old. The patients who are less than 6 years old or more than 60 years old are relatively rare. For this disease, there are more males than females, and the ratio is about 1.4:1, and the difference is especially obvious before the age of 20. About 20% of patients have definite lung metastases at the time of initial diagnosis, and about 30% of patients have lung metastases within 1 year after the diagnosis of osteosarcoma.
Before the 1970s, surgery was the only treatment for osteosarcoma, mainly amputation, and the average 5-year survival rate was only 19.7%. In the late 1970s, a treatment regimen of neoadjuvant chemotherapy+surgery+adjuvant chemotherapy was found, and the 5-year survival rate was significantly improved to 60-80% (Niu Xiaohui. Current Situation and Prospects of Comprehensive Treatment of Osteosarcoma in China [J]. Chinese Journal of Anatomy and Clinical Medicine, 2019(01):1-5.), which is still in use today. In contrast, the survival rate of patients suffering from metastatic or recurrent osteosarcoma has barely changed over the past 30 years, with an overall 5-year survival rate of approximately 20% (Meyers P A, Healey J H, Chou A J, et al. Addition of pamidronate to chemotherapy for the treatment of osteosarcoma [J]. Cancer, 2011, 117(8):1736-1744.).
There are many chemotherapy regimens for osteosarcoma in the world, but there is no specific and unified regimen. However, due to the similar types and doses of drugs used, their efficacy is similar. Doxorubicin, cisplatin, ifosfamide, and high-dose methotrexate are listed as first-line chemotherapy drugs for osteosarcoma, and in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy the same drugs are used. More than two drugs should be selected for each patient, and sufficient dose intensity should be ensured. Comparing the three-drug combination regimen with the two-drug combination regimen, the 5-year EFS (time-free survival) rates were 58% and 48%, respectively, and the 5-year OS rates were 70% and 62%, respectively. After the failure of first-line chemotherapy for the patients having osteosarcoma, since there is no second-line treatment regimen with overall survival benefit, participating in clinical trials is an opportunity to obtain better efficacy or the latest treatment.
To sum up, at present, in addition to surgery, chemotherapy is an important regimen of clinical treatment. The patients who suffer from advanced or unresectable osteosarcoma and are subjected to first-line chemotherapy failure have poor prognosis, and the medical evidence for targeted and immunotherapy of osteosarcoma is not yet enough. Seeking or adopting new cytotoxic or targeted drug therapy brings opportunities for second-line treatment.
Soft-tissue sarcoma refers to a group of malignant tumors derived from non-epithelial extraosseous tissues, accounting for about 0.8% of all malignant tumors in humans, with an annual incidence of about 3.4/100,000 in the United States, and 4-5/100,000 in Europe, about 2.38/100,000 in China (Siegel R L, Miller K D, Fuchs H E, et al. Cancer Statistics, 2021 [J]. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2021, 71(1).).) Patients of any age can develop the disease. The ratio of males to females in China is close to 1:1. With the increase of age, the incidence rate increases significantly. According to the age-adjusted incidence rate, the incidence rate at the age of 80 is about 8 times that at the age of 30. (Bumingham Z, Hashibe M, Spector L, et al. The epidemiology of sarcoma[J]. Clin Sarcoma Res, 2012, 2(1):14). Soft-tissue sarcomas are mainly derived from mesoderm and partly from neuroectoderm, including muscle, fat, fibrous tissue, blood vessels, and peripheral nerves etc. The most common site of occurrence was the extremities (about 53%), followed by the retroperitoneum (19%), the trunk (12%), and the head and neck (11%). According to the tissue source, it can be divided into 12 categories, and then according to different morphology and biological behavior, it can be divided into more than 50 subtypes. Common subtypes are: undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, and synovial sarcoma. The most common soft-tissue sarcoma in adolescents and children is rhabdomyosarcoma.
Soft tissue sarcoma is mainly manifested as a gradually growing painless mass, which is highly insidious and can last for several months to years. When the tumor gradually enlarges and compresses nerves or blood vessels, pain, numbness and even limb edema may occur. In some cases, the mass may grow rapidly in a short period of time, the skin temperature may increase, and the regional lymph nodes may be enlarged. It should pay attention to the possibility of increased tumor grade. Soft tissue sarcomas have a high degree of malignancy, and are characterized by a short course of disease, early hematogenous metastasis, and easy recurrence after treatment. The most common metastatic site for extremity sarcomas is the lung, whereas retroperitoneal and gastrointestinal sarcomas most frequently metastasize to the liver. The overall five-year survival rate for soft tissue sarcomas is about 60 to 80%.
A comprehensive treatment strategy based on surgery is adopted for the soft tissue sarcoma. Radiation, chemotherapy, or concurrent chemoradiation is considered as one of the most effective treatment modalities. With the development of tumor combination therapy mode, preoperative treatment+surgery+chemotherapy has been gradually carried out. Its advantages are that it can reduce tumor volume, increase the chance of limb salvage, improve the local control rate, reduce the risk of distant metastasis and recurrence, and improve the patient's survival rate.
Chemotherapy sensitivity is an important basis for choosing chemotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma. Anthracycline-based regimens are the first choice in neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies. However, in patients having soft tissue sarcoma with high pathological grade, 40%-50% of them still have local recurrence after surgery, and >50% of them will develop distant metastasis. Chemotherapy for patients with metastatic or recurring tumors that cannot be completely removed is palliative chemotherapy, which aims to shrink and stabilize the tumor, relieve symptoms, prolong survival period, and improve quality of life.
For metastatic or recurrent unresectable tumors, palliative chemotherapy needs to be tailored based on the individual conditions. For patients with metastatic non-pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma, the chemotherapy regimen should be alternated between VAC/VI/VCD/IE according to the high-risk group. For unspecified soft tissue sarcomas, doxorubicin and ifosfamide are the cornerstone drugs. There is currently no acceptable second-line chemotherapy regimen for unspecified soft tissue sarcoma.
In conclusion, soft tissue sarcoma has a high degree of malignancy. For patients with soft tissue sarcoma who are subjected to first-line treatment failure, there are only few types of second-line treatment options with limited efficacy. Participating in clinical trials is one of the recommended options. It is an urgent clinical need to improve the treatment to patients with soft tissue sarcoma and explore new drugs.
Mitoxantrone hydrochloride is an anthraquinone chemotherapy drug. The FDA-approved indications for mitoxantrone hydrochloride ordinary injection are multiple sclerosis, prostate cancer and acute myeloid leukemia; it has been approved in China for patients suffering from lymphoma, leukemia and breast cancer with a recommended dose of 12-14 mg/m2 for adults as a single drug, once every 3-4 weeks; or 4-8 mg/m2, once a day for 3-5 days, with an interval of 2-3 weeks. The combined dose is 5-10 mg/m2 once. Mitoxantrone is an anthracycline drug, and the main adverse reactions are mainly cardiotoxicity, myelosuppression and gastrointestinal reactions etc. Among them, the myelosuppression and gastrointestinal reactions can be solved by giving appropriate drugs, but cardiotoxicity often brings serious consequences and is the most serious adverse reaction of anthracyclines. Clinical studies and practical observations have shown that the cardiotoxicity resulting from the anthracyclines is mostly progressive and irreversible, especially the first use of anthracyclines can easily cause cardiac damage. Chronic Dose Accumulation Limiting Toxicity—cardiotoxicity is a common concern for clinicians. Therefore, although the indication for breast cancer is approved, mitoxantrone is not recommended as a treatment for breast cancer by authoritative clinical medication guidelines. For urothelial carcinoma, bone and soft tissue sarcoma, mitoxantrone has never been approved for these two indications.
Different tumors have different drug sensitivities. Existing studies have shown that when the same drug is used to treat different indications, its dosage regimen may be different. For example, Doxil (doxorubicin hydrochloride liposome) has been approved by the FDA for three indications, namely: (1) ovarian cancer, the recommended dose is 50 mg/m2, administered intravenously once every 4 weeks; (2) Kaposi's sarcoma, the recommended dose is 20 mg/m2, administered intravenously once every 3 weeks; (3) Multiple myeloma, the recommended dose is 30 mg/m2, intravenously administered on the fourth day after bortezomib administration.
Another example is Abraxane (paclitaxel for injection [albumin-bound]) which is also approved by the FDA for three indications, (1) metastatic breast cancer: the recommended dose is 260 mg/m2, intravenous infusion for 30 minutes, once every 3 weeks; (2) Non-small cell lung cancer: the recommended dose is 100 mg/m2, intravenous infusion for 30 minutes, a course of treatment every 21 days, administered on the 1st day, the 8th day and the 15th day respectively; for the injection on the 1st day Carboplatin is administered immediately after administration of paclitaxel (albumin-bound), once every 21 days; (3) Pancreatic cancer: the recommended dose is 125 mg/m2, intravenous infusion over 30-40 minutes, with a cycle of 28 days, once administered on the 1st, 8th and 15th day respectively, and gemcitabine was administered immediately after each administration of paclitaxel for injection (albumin-bound). For another example, the starting dose of AmBisome (Amphotericin B liposome for injection) for the treatment of the following indications is: (1) empirical treatment: the recommended dose is 3 mg/kg/day; (2) systemic fungal infections (Aspergillus, Candida, Cryptococcus): the recommended dose is 3-5 mg/kg/day; (3) Cryptococcal meningitis in HIV-infected patients: the recommended dose is 6 mg/kg/day (day 1-day 5), 3 mg/kg/day (day 4, day 21); (4) Immunocompromised patients with visceral leishmaniasis: 4 mg/kg/day (day 1-day 5), 4 mg/kg/day (day 10, day 17, day 24, day 31, day 38); dosage and administration data are customized according to the actual situation of the patient to achieve maximum efficacy and minimum toxicity or adverse reactions. It can be seen that there are differences in the safe and effective doses of the same drug for different indications. Dosage and administration data should be customized according to the specific disease and the actual situation of the patient, so as to achieve the maximum efficacy and minimum toxicity or adverse reactions, and achieve the effect of safe and effective treatment of the disease. For the special dosage form of mitoxantrone liposome, which is different from ordinary injections, its absorption, distribution and metabolism after entering the body are very complicated. For the treatment of different indications, especially in the treatment of different tumors, it is difficult to simply deduce from one indication to another.
Therefore, it is necessary to systematically study whether mitoxantrone liposome is suitable for the treatment of urothelial carcinoma, breast cancer, bone and soft tissue sarcoma, and to clarify its safe and effective dose, so as to provide reference for clinical treatment.
The present invention provides a use of mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome in the preparation of a drug for treating urothelial carcinoma, breast cancer, bone and soft tissue sarcoma.
Preferably, the urothelial carcinoma is locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, more preferably, the urothelial carcinoma is locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma wherein the patient suffering therefrom is subjected to treatment-failure via platinum-containing chemotherapy regimen and/or PD-1 inhibitor therapy; or, locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma wherein the patient suffering therefrom is subjected to treatment-failure via platinum-containing chemotherapy regimen and refuses PD-1 inhibitor therapy; or, locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma wherein the patient suffering therefrom is intolerant to cisplatin.
Preferably, the breast cancer is HER-2-negative breast cancer, more preferably, the breast cancer is locally advanced or recurrent/metastatic HER-2-negative breast cancer; or, hormone receptor-negative HER-2-negative breast cancer, or, hormone receptor-positive HER-2-negative breast cancer that is not suitable for endocrine therapy or resistant to endocrine therapy; or, HER-2-negative breast cancer wherein the patient suffering therefrom is subjected to treatment-failure via anthracycline and/or taxane therapy; preferably, the HER-2 negative breast cancer includes immunohistochemical HER-2 0 or 1+, and immunohistochemical HER-2 2+negative breast cancers that need to be confirmed by in situ hybridization.
Preferably, the bone and soft tissue sarcoma is an advanced bone and soft tissue sarcoma, further preferably a metastatic or locally advanced bone and soft tissue sarcoma wherein the patient suffering therefrom has failed at least one prior line of therapy.
Preferably, mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome is used as the only active ingredient for preparing a drug for treating urothelial carcinoma, breast cancer, bone and soft tissue sarcoma.
Preferably, the drug is in the form of injection, including liquid injection, powder for injection, tablet for injection, and the like.
Preferably, the drug is a liquid injection.
According to an embodiment of the present invention, when the drug is a liquid injection, based on mitoxantrone, the medicine contains mitoxantrone in amount of 0.5-5 mg/ml, preferably 1-2 mg/ml, more preferably 1 mg/ml.
The present invention also provides a method for treating urothelial carcinoma, breast cancer, bone and soft tissue sarcoma, and the method is to administer a therapeutically effective amount of mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome to a patient in need of treatment.
The invention also provides a use of mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma, breast cancer, bone and soft tissue sarcoma.
Preferably, the urothelial carcinoma is locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma; more preferably, the urothelial carcinoma is locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma wherein the patient suffering therefrom is subjected to treatment-failure via platinum-containing chemotherapy regimen and/or PD-1 inhibitor therapy, or locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma wherein the patient suffering therefrom is subjected to treatment-failure via platinum-containing chemotherapy and refuses PD-1 inhibitor therapy, or, locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma wherein the patient suffering therefrom is intolerant to cisplatin.
Preferably, the breast cancer is HER-2-negative breast cancer, more preferably, the breast cancer is locally advanced or recurrent/metastatic HER-2-negative breast cancer; or, hormone receptor-negative HER-2-negative breast cancer, or, hormone receptor-positive HER-2-negative breast cancer that is not suitable for endocrine therapy or resistant to endocrine therapy; or, HER-2-negative breast cancer wherein the patient suffering therefrom is subjected to treatment-failure via anthracycline and/or taxane therapy; preferably, the HER-2 negative breast cancer includes immunohistochemical HER-2 0 or 1+, and immunohistochemical HER-2 2+negative breast cancers that need to be confirmed by in situ hybridization; Preferably, the bone and soft tissue sarcoma is an advanced bone and soft tissue sarcoma, further preferably a metastatic or locally advanced bone and soft tissue sarcoma wherein the patient suffering therefrom has failed at least one prior line of therapy.
Preferably, based on mitoxantrone, the therapeutically effective amount means that the dose of mitoxantrone is 8-30 mg/m2, more preferably 12-20 mg/m2 or 16-30 mg/m2. Specific examples are 12 mg/m2, 14 mg/m2, 16 mg/m2, 18 mg/m2, and 20 mg/m2.
Preferably, the mode of administration of the present invention is intravenous administration. Preferably, the administration cycle is once per 3 weeks. Preferably, the treatment given to the patient is 6-8 cycles. Preferably, for each intravenous administration, the infusion administration time of the liposome pharmaceutical preparation is 30 min-120 min, preferably 60 min-120 min, further preferably 60±15 min.
The present invention also provides a mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome for treating urothelial carcinoma, breast cancer, bone and soft tissue sarcoma in a patient.
In some embodiments, the liposome is in the form of injection, including liquid injection, powder for injection, tablet for injection, and the like. When the drug is a liquid injection, based on mitoxantrone, the liposome contains mitoxantrone in amount of 0.5-5 mg/ml, preferably 1-2 mg/ml, more preferably 1 mg/ml.
In some embodiments, the liposome is used alone to treat urothelial carcinoma, breast cancer, bone and soft tissue sarcoma in a patient.
In some embodiments, the therapeutically effective amount of the liposome (based on mitoxantrone) is 8-30 mg/m2, more preferably 12-20 mg/m2 or 16-30 mg/m2. Specific examples are 12 mg/m2, 14 mg/m2, 16 mg/m2, 18 mg/m2, and 20 mg/m2.
In some embodiments, the liposome is administered intravenously. Preferably, the administration cycle is once per 3 weeks. Preferably, the treatment given to the patient is 6-8 cycles. Preferably, for each intravenous administration, the infusion administration time of the liposome is 30 min-120 min, preferably 60 min-120 min, further preferably 60±15 min.
In the context of the present invention, the doses are based on mitoxantrone unless otherwise specified.
In the context of the present invention, the mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome can be prepared by using methods known in the art, and can be mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome prepared by any method disclosed in the prior art, for example, the method disclosed in WO2008/080367A1.
In some embodiments, the drug or mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome has one or more of the following properties:
In the context of the present invention, the mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome has a particle size of about 30-80 nm and contains: 1) the active ingredient mitoxantrone, which can forms an insoluble precipitate with multivalent counter ions in the liposome, and 2) the phospholipid bilayer contains phospholipid with a phase transition temperature (Tm) higher than body temperature, so that the phase transition temperature of liposome is higher than body temperature. The phospholipid with a Tm higher than body temperature is phosphatidylcholine, hydrogenated soy lecithin, hydrogenated ovolecithin, lecithin bis palmitate, lecithin bis stearate, or any combination thereof, and the particle size is about 35-75 nm, preferably 40-70 nm, further preferably 40-60 nm, particularly preferably 60 nm. Preferably, the phospholipid bilayer contains hydrogenated soy lecithin, cholesterol and distearoylphosphatidylethanolamine modified with polyethylene glycol 2000 in a mass ratio of 3:1:1, the particle size is about 60 nm. The counter ion is the sulfate ion. Preferably, the phospholipid bilayer of the liposome contains hydrogenated soy lecithin, cholesterol and distearoylphosphatidylethanolamine modified with polyethylene glycol 2000 in a mass ratio of 3:1:1, and the particle size is about 40-60 nm, the counter ion is sulfate ion. The weight ratio of HSPC:Chol DSPE-PEG2000:mitoxantrone in the liposome is 9.58:3.19:3.19:1.
In the context of the present invention, the mitoxantrone liposome is prepared as follows: HSPC (hydrogenated soy lecithin), Chol (cholesterol) and DSPE-PEG2000 (distearoylphosphatidylethanolamine modified with polyethylene glycol 2000) are weighed in a mass ratio of (3:1:1) and dissolved in 95% ethanol to obtain a clear solution. The ethanol solution of phospholipid is mixed with 300 mM ammonium sulfate solution, and hydrated by oscillating at 60-65° C. for 1 h to obtain heterogeneous multilamellar liposome. The particle size of the liposome is then reduced using a microfluidic device. The obtained sample is diluted 200 times with 0.9% NaCl solution and detected by NanoZS. The average particle size of the particles was about 60 nm, and the main peak was concentrated between 40 and 60 nm. The ammonium sulfate in the outer phase of the blank liposome is then removed by using an ultrafiltration device, and the outer phase is replaced with 290 mM sucrose and 10 mM glycine to form a transmembrane ammonium sulfate gradient. According to the ratio of lipid-drug ratio of 16:1, mitoxantrone hydrochloride solution (10 mg/mL) is added to blank liposome, and the drug is loaded at 60-65° C. After incubation for about 1 h, the encapsulation efficiency is demonstrated to be about 100% by using gel exclusion chromatography. The weight ratio of HSPC:Chol:DSPE-PEG2000: mitoxantrone is 9.58:3.19:3.19:1, and the osmotic pressure of the sucrose-glycine solution is close to the physiological value.
It should be understood that various technical details and parameters in the above-mentioned exemplary preparation methods can be adjusted and determined within a reasonable range by those skilled in the art. For example, the amino acid species that can substitute glycine in the outer phase to form the transmembrane ammonium sulfate gradient include, but are not limited to, histidine, asparagine, glutamic acid, leucine, proline, alanine. For another example, the mass ratio of HSPC, Chol and DSPE-PEG2000 can be adjusted appropriately. For another example, the lipid-drug ratio parameter for preparing the specific liposome pharmaceutical preparation, those skilled in the art can design, test and finally obtain a suitable lipid-drug ratio, so as to improve the drug load as much as possible and reduce the amount of drug leakage. For the mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome formulation according to the application, a wide range of lipid-drug ratios can be used, for example, as low as 2:1 or as high as 30:1, 40:1 or 50:1, and more suitable ratio of lipid to drug may be about (15-20):1, such as about 15:1, 16:1, 17:1, 18:1, 19:1 or 20:1. Therefore, several advantageous properties of the liposomal formulations of mitoxantrone hydrochloride described above are more important, and the methods to achieve these properties are diverse.
The first-line, second-line or more than second-line drugs for treating urothelial carcinoma, breast cancer, bone and soft tissue sarcoma described in the present invention refer to drugs approved by drug administrations in China or abroad (such as the United States, the European Union, Japan, South Korea, etc.) for use in the first-line, second-line or more than second-line drugs for treating urothelial carcinoma, breast cancer, bone and soft tissue sarcoma, including but not limited to: taxanes, PD-1 inhibitors, ifosfamide, etc. approved by FDA.
Beneficial Technical Effects
The applicant of the present invention unexpectedly found that mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome has better therapeutic effect on urothelial carcinoma, breast cancer, bone and soft tissue sarcoma, and can be used for preparing related medicines.
The technical solutions of the present invention will be described in further detail below with reference to specific embodiments. It should be understood that the following examples are only for illustrating and explaining the present invention, and should not be construed as limiting the protection scope of the present invention. All technologies implemented based on the above content of the present invention are covered within the intended protection scope of the present invention.
Unless otherwise stated, the starting materials and reagents used in the following examples are commercially available or can be prepared by known methods.
The following abbreviations are used in the present invention:
CR: Complete response, the specific definition is based on the “Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST1.1)” commonly used in international research.
PR: Partial response, the specific definition is based on the “Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST1.1)” commonly used in international research.
SD: stable disease, the specific definition is based on the “Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST1.1)” commonly used in international research.
PD: progressive disease, the specific definition is based on the “Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1)” commonly used in international research.
Objective response rate (ORR)=(CR+PR)/total number of evaluable cases*100%.
Disease control rate (DCR)=(CR+PR+SD)/total number of evaluable cases*100%.
In order to investigate the effect of mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma, breast cancer, bone and soft tissue sarcoma, the inventors carried out clinical research. Mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome can effectively treat urothelial carcinoma, breast cancer, bone and soft tissue sarcoma. Compared with ordinary mitoxantrone hydrochloride injection, it has better treating effect and fewer adverse reactions. The mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome injection used in the following examples was provided by CSPC Pharmaceutical Group Co. Ltd. Zhongnuo Pharmaceutical (Shijiazhuang) Co., Ltd. (national medicine approval number H20220001).
Example 1 Phase II Clinical Trial for Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Mitoxantrone Hydrochloride Liposome Injection in the Treatment of Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
This is an open, multicenter Phase II study in which subjects included will receive mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome injection to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome injection for unresectable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.
I. Design of experiments
1. Test Process
Forty subjects with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma were planed to enroll. The study population was mainly subjects who were subjected to treatment-failure via platinum-containing chemotherapy regimen and PD-1 inhibitor therapy (including those who did not receive PD-1 inhibitor therapy); those who were intolerant to cisplatin and required systemic therapy. The study included a screening period, a treatment period, and a follow-up period. The screening period was 28 days, and qualified subjects were screened to enter the treatment period. During the treatment period, mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome injection of 20 mg/m2 monotherapy was given, every 3 weeks as a cycle (q3w), and was administered at the first day of each cycle for 6 cycles. The follow-up period was started after treatment. During the follow-up period, safety follow-up after the last administration (day 28 after the last administration) and survival follow-up (once every 6 weeks after the last administration) were conducted. Safety evaluation was carried out from the first dose to day 28 after the last administration, and safety evaluation was required before each cycle of administration to decide whether to administer the drug in the next cycle. Tumor evaluation was performed once every two cycles according to RECIST 1.1 criteria throughout the study period until disease progression, death or adopting new antitumor therapy.
2. Study Duration
The study included a screening period of 4 weeks (28 days), a treatment period of 6 cycles (18 weeks), a last administration safety follow-up visit, 4 weeks (28 days) after the end of dosing, followed by a survival follow-up visit once every 6 weeks. The duration for each patient was about 12 months.
40 subjects were planed to enroll in this study, and the whole cycle of this study was 18 to 24 months.
II. Test Population:
Subjects who met all the following inclusion criteria and did not have any one of the exclusion criteria were eligible for inclusion in this clinical study.
(1) Selection Criteria
(2) Exclusion Criteria
(3) Criteria for Withdrawal from Treatment and Withdrawal from Research
The Subject must stop receiving the investigational drug treatment if any of the following conditions occurs during the study:
All subjects who withdraw from treatment are required to continue follow-up in accordance with the study plan, except for subjects who discontinue treatment due to death or who meet any one of the following criteria for withdrawal from the study.
Subjects have the right to withdraw from the study at any time for any reason. Subjects will be withdrawn from the study process if any one of the following occurs:
3. Research Results
For the subjects who were subjected to treatment-failure via platinum-containing chemotherapy regimen and PD-1 inhibitor therapy (including those who did not receive PD-1 inhibitor therapy), and subjects who were intolerant to cisplatin and had undergone systemic therapy, there were not subsequently relatively effective therapies, it was urgently needed to explore new drugs. The inventors of the present invention used mitoxantrone liposome. After the drug entered the human body through intravenous infusion, it had the effects of sustained release, targeting, detoxification, and synergism. Compared with ordinary mitoxantrone injection, liposome preparation could be used in a higher dose, which could not only improve the effectiveness, but also reduce the incidence of adverse reactions, and the ideal therapeutic effect could be obtained only with a single drug treatment.
The research of the present invention showed that in at least 4 subjects (2 subjects subjected to 2 cycles of treatment, 2 subjects subjected to 1 cycle of treatment), for SD there were 2 cases (1 subject subjected to 1 cycle of treatment, 1 subject subjected to 2 cycles of treatment), DCR was 50% (2/4). Mitoxantrone liposome had good efficacy in patients with urothelial carcinoma, especially those who were subjected to treatment-failure via platinum-containing chemotherapy regimen and PD-1 inhibitor therapy. The 2 subjects who were evaluated as SD continued the treatment and obtained better curative effect.
This regime would improve the treatment regime for urothelial carcinoma, lay the foundation for the combination of drugs to impact first-line and second-line treatment, change the traditional treatment mode of urothelial carcinoma, and look forward to the application of similar high-efficiency and low-toxic chemotherapy drugs in the field of advanced solid tumors.
Example 2 Phase II clinical trial of mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome injection in the treatment of HER-2 negative advanced breast cancer This is an open-lable, multicenter Phase II study in which subjects included will receive mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome injection to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome injection for HER-2 negative advanced breast cancer.
I. Design of Experiments
1. Test Process
This study was divided into screening period, treatment period, and follow-up period. The screening period was 28 days, and eligible patients were screened to enter the treatment period. During the treatment period, the subjects received mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome injection in 20 mg/m2, 3 weeks as a cycle, 6 cycles. After the completion of 6 cycles of treatment, the investigator and the sponsor would determine whether to continue administration according to the benefits and the risks of the patients. Follow-up included end-of-treatment visit (day 28 after last administration) and survival visit (once every 6 weeks after end-of-treatment visit), and all subjects were followed up by telephone or visit until death.
Tumor evaluation: According to RECIST 1.1 criteria, tumor evaluation was performed every 2 cycles during the treatment period and every 6 weeks during the follow-up period until disease progression or new antitumor therapy.
Safety evaluation: Vital signs, physical examination, body weight, ECOG performance score, 12-lead electrocardiogram, echocardiography, and laboratory tests were completed before each cycle of treatment and at the end of treatment visit.
Routine blood tests were performed on D8 and D15 of each cycle.
2. Study Duration
The study included a screening period of 4 weeks (28 days), a treatment period of 6 cycles (18 weeks), an end-of-treatment visit (day 28 after the last administration), followed by a survival follow-up once every 6 weeks until the patient was lost to follow-up or died. The duration for each patient was about 12 months.
73 subjects were enrolled in this study, and the whole cycle of this study is about 36 months.
II. Test Population:
Subjects who met all the following inclusion criteria and did not have any one of the exclusion criteria were eligible for inclusion in this clinical study.
(1) Selection Criteria:
Subjects must meet all the following criteria:
(2) Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects meeting either of the following criteria will be excluded from this trial:
(3) Criteria for Withdrawal from Treatment and Withdrawal from Research
The Subject must stop receiving the investigational drug treatment if any of the following conditions occurs during the study:
All subjects who withdraw from treatment are required to continue follow-up in accordance with the study plan, except for those who discontinue treatment due to death or who meet any of the following criteria for withdrawal from the study.
Subjects have the right to withdraw from the study at any time for any reason. Subjects will be withdrawn from the study process if any of the following occurs:
3. Research Results
There was an urgent need to explore new treatments for advanced breast cancer wherein the subject suffering therefrom was subjected to treatment-failure or recurrence via anthracyclines and taxanes.
The study of the present invention showed that, among at least the 20 evaluable cases, for PR there were 6 cases (1 case subjected to 7 cycles of treatment, 3 cases subjected to 6 cycles of treatment, 1 case subjected to 5 cycles of treatment, 1 case subjected to 4 cycles of treatment), for SD there were 8 cases (2 cases subjected to 6 cycles of treatment, 2 cases subjected to 5 cycles of treatment, 1 case subjected to 4 cycles of treatment, 1 case subjected to 3 cycles of treatment, and 2 cases subjected to 2 cycles of treatment). ORR was 30% (6/20), DCR was 70% (14/20).
Mitoxantrone liposome had good curative effect on breast cancer patients, especially on patients with advanced breast cancer who had been subjected to treatment-failure or recurrence via anthracycline and taxane therapy in the past. The 14 subjects who were evaluated as PR and SD continued the treatment and obtained better curative effect.
The inventor's previous clinical research included mitoxantrone hydrochloride monotherapy in the treatment of recurrent/metastatic breast cancer. There were 30 cases in the experimental group and the control group respectively. The experimental group was given mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome injection in 20 mg/m2, every 4 weeks as a cycle. The control group was given mitoxantrone hydrochloride injection in 14 mg/m2, every 4 weeks as a cycle. Results: In the experimental group, for PR there were 4 cases, for SD there were 11 cases, ORR was 13.3% (4/30), DCR was 50% (15/30); in the control group, for PR there were 2 cases, for SD there were 7 cases, ORR was 6.7% (2/30), DCR was 30% (9/30).
The inventors of the present invention used mitoxantrone liposomes. After the drug entered the human body through intravenous infusion, it had the effects of sustained release, targeting, detoxification and synergism. Not only is the dosage higher than that of ordinary injections, but it was also a single drug treatment. It could not only improve the effectiveness, but also reduce the incidence of adverse reactions.
Example 3 Phase Ib Clinical Trial of Mitoxantrone Hydrochloride Liposome Injection in the Treatment of Advanced Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma Wherein the Subject Suffering Therefrom has Failed at Least One Prior Line of Therapy
This is an open-lable, multi-center Phase Ib study in which subjects included will receive mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome injection to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome injection for metastatic or unresectable bone and soft tissue sarcoma wherein the subject suffering therefrom has failed at least one prior line of therapy.
I. Design of Experiments
1. Test Process
The study included a screening period, a treatment period, and a follow-up period.
The screening period was 28 days, and eligible subjects were screened to enter the treatment period. During the treatment period, subjects received mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome injection in 20 mg/m2 on the first day, 3 weeks as a treatment cycle (q3w), in a total of 6 cycles. For subjects who had completed 6 cycles of treatment, according to the risks and benefits of the subjects, the investigator and the sponsor discussed to determine whether to continue the administration. During the follow-up period, safety follow-up after the last administration (day 28±7 after the last administration) and survival follow-up (once every 6 weeks after the last administration) were carried out.
Safety evaluation was carried out from the first administration to day 28 after the last administration. Safety evaluation was required before each cycle of administration to decide whether to administer in the next cycle. During the entire study period, tumor evaluation was performed according to the RESIST1.1 criteria.
The tumor evaluation was performed every two cycles during the treatment period, and the follow-up period was performed every 6 weeks until disease progression, death, or new antitumor therapy.
2. Study Duration
The study included a screening period of 4 weeks (28 days), a treatment period of 6 cycles (18 weeks), a safety follow-up visit after last administration, at 4 weeks (28 days) after the end of dosing, followed by a survival follow-up once every 6 weeks, the duration for each patient was about 12 months.
No less than 50 subjects were enrolled in this study, and the whole cycle of this study was 24 to 36 months.
II. Test Population:
Subjects who met all the following inclusion criteria and did not have any of the exclusion criteria were eligible for inclusion in this clinical study.
(1) Selection Criteria:
Subjects must meet all of the following criteria:
Subjects meeting either of the following criteria will be excluded from this trial:
(3) Criteria for Withdrawal from Treatment and Research
The Subject must stop receiving the investigational drug treatment if any of the following conditions occurs during the study:
All subjects who withdraw from treatment are required to continue follow-up in accordance with the study plan, except for those who discontinue treatment due to death or who meet any of the following withdrawal criteria.
Subjects have the right to withdraw from the study at any time for any reason.
Subjects will be withdrawn from the study process if any of the following occurs:
3. Research Results
For subjects with no chance of radical surgery or metastatic bone and soft tissue sarcoma, after the first-line standard treatment, the second-line treatment drugs were not effective. Therefore, improving the treatment had always been a difficult clinical problem, and new treatments were urgently needed to be explored. In the dose escalation study (HE071-01), mitoxantrone liposome had shown certain curative effect in 12 mg/m2 and 14 mg/m2 groups of advanced soft tissue sarcoma subjects. The inventors of the present invention used mitoxantrone liposomes. After the drug entered the human body through intravenous infusion, it had the effects of sustained release, targeting, detoxification and synergism. Not only was the dosage higher than that of ordinary injections, but it is also a single drug treatment. It could not only improve the effectiveness, but also reduce the incidence of adverse reactions.
The study of the present invention showed that among the evaluable subjects, among 3 subjects with osteosarcoma (2 cases received 2 cycles of treatment, 1 case received 1 cycle of treatment), 1 subject was evaluated as SD (1 cycle of treatment was received), DCR was 33.3% (1/3).
In soft tissue sarcoma, among 12 subjects (1 case subjected to 6 cycles of treatment, 2 cases subjected to 5 cycles of treatment, 2 cases subjected to 4 cycles of treatment, 1 case subjected to 3 cycles of treatment, and 6 cases subjected to 2 cycles of treatment) were evaluated as SD (1 case subjected to 6 cycles of treatment, 2 cases subjected to 5 cycles of treatment, 2 cases subjected to 4 cycles of treatment, 1 case subjected to 3 cycles of treatment, and 2 cases subjected to 2 cycles of treatment; 3 subjects had tumor volume reduction), DCR was 66.7% (8/12).
Mitoxantrone liposome had good curative effect in patients with osteosarcoma and soft tissue sarcoma. 9 subjects who were evaluated as SD continued the treatment and obtained better curative effect.
The embodiments of the technical solutions of the present invention have been exemplarily described above. It should be understood that the protection scope of the present invention is not limited to the above-mentioned embodiments. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement, etc. made by those skilled in the art within the spirit and principle of the present invention shall be included within the protection scope of the claims of the present application.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
202110410490.2 | Apr 2021 | CN | national |
The present invention claims to enjoy the priority of a prior application with the patent application number of 202110410490.2 and the title of “use of mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome”, which was submitted to the China National Intellectual Property Administration on Apr. 16, 2021. The prior application is incorporated herein by reference entirely. The present patent application cites PCT application of WO2008/080367A1 filed on Dec. 29, 2007, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference entirely.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CN2022/086959 | 4/15/2022 | WO |