User path determining system and method therefor

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9491574
  • Patent Number
    9,491,574
  • Date Filed
    Friday, February 8, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 8, 2016
    7 years ago
Abstract
A system for determining a user's path is described. The system comprises a location server arranged to receive location data of a communication device associated with the user, the location data defining the detected position of the communication device at a number of different points in time, the location server further arranged to receive sequence data associated with the location data indicative of the order in which the location data was determined; path determining means for determining the user's path passing through points defined by the received location data and the associated sequence data; and a comparator for comparing the determined path of the user with one or more predetermined user paths; wherein the location server processes the received location data depending upon the result of the comparison and corrects the determined user path with the processed location data.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to a method and system for determining a user's path. Further, this invention also relates to a method and system for determining the location of a user. More specifically, this invention relates to a method and system for tracking a user within an indoor or outdoor area, such as a hospital, a college campus, a sports arena or an airport This invention also relates to a method and system for determining a user's path for operational and planning purposes, and in particular to a method and system for determining the residence time of a user in a zone.


The invention also has application in providing real time information to passengers, as well as to the scheduling of services so that airport authorities can react to any build up of passengers in critical areas such as security screening, immigration checks, baggage and so on.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In the past, airports have had difficulty getting historical and real-time information regarding the behaviour of passengers within and around an airport.


One solution to this problem is to use Bluetooth (Bluetooth is a registered trade mark of Bluetooth SIG, Inc, Washington, United States of America) or Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) tags. However these solutions have the following limitations:

    • RFID tags are not typically carried by passengers and therefore cannot be used without specifically issuing them to passengers.
    • Bluetooth is a short range protocol limited to small areas of the airport.
    • Bluetooth is not commonly active in passenger smart telephone devices, thereby limiting the accuracy of any measurements.
    • Bluetooth relies on Bluetooth Access Points in fixed locations. It is relatively complex and time consuming to relocate them if necessary.


Another solution is to use a WiFi triangulation method to track passenger smart telephones. WiFi uses a wireless connection between a user device and an access point to transfer data between the user device and access point. WiFi is a registered trade mark of Wi-Fi Alliance, San Jose, United States of America. Usually, the access point has a wired connection to a local area network (LAN). However, a problem with this approach is that WiFi devices do not emit a continuous stream of data. This is because a device will only be detected when a user is actually using the airport WiFi infrastructure.


This means that for any given device, it may be detected only sporadically throughout the airport. For example, a device may be detected while a passenger is using their telephone in a café, or at a gate area, but not while walking from check in to security zones. This is of course problematic for live dwell time measurements because this sporadic data is not representative of what is actually happening in the airport.


Embodiments of the invention seek to address the above problems by using WiFi signals emitted through passenger smart telephones, and other devices, to provide location data which can be used to locate, track and measure the activities of passengers throughout the airport campus. The location data is processed to remove poor quality data and the remaining data is used to determine a passenger's path and associated dwell time information. This data can then be used to provide real time measurements for any section of the airport.


Embodiments of the invention, which may be referred to as and Indoor Anonymous Dwell Time Tracking system, are a multi component service that:


1. Allows airport staff to define arbitrary zones in the airport.


2. Locates devices using triangulation of WiFi signal strength.


3. Associates these devices to a zone in an airport.


4. Charts the path of devices in these spaces.


5. Maintains a live set of continuous device detections for devices detected in the airport


6. Uses this zone and device path data to determine the dwell time in any zones across the airport.


Embodiments of the invention improve on existing RFID systems because the passengers/consumers being tracked do not need to be given a RFID token to carry, and do not necessarily need to be informed that their movements are being tracked, which can subconsciously change behaviour.


Embodiments of the invention improve on Bluetooth systems because WiFi covers the entire airport campus, not just small specific areas. Therefore it is possible to provide sophisticated measurements such as “show current wait time for passengers in immigration who started in international arrivals”. It also improves on Bluetooth systems because the zones being measured are arbitrary and are not tied directly to the location of access points. In this regard, in a Bluetooth system, if an airport wants to modify the zone being measured, it is necessary to physically move the Bluetooth sensors. In the present invention, the airport staff just need to configure the new zone using a Google Map application.


Embodiments of the invention improve on basic WiFi triangulation because it can maintain a live device path, storing all the previous zones a device passed through, and use this data to determine if the data is suitable or not for live dwell time measurements.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a system for determining the path taken by a user through one or more zones. The system may comprise: a location server arranged to receive location data indicative of the location of a communication device associated with the user, the location data defining the position of the communication device at a plurality of different points in time, the location server further arranged to receive sequence data associated with the location data indicative of the order in which the location data was determined; and a path determining means for determining the path of the user through the zone, the user's path being defined by at least a portion of the received location data; and a comparator for comparing the determined path of the user with on or more predetermined user paths. The location server processes the received location data depending upon the result of the comparison. Preferably, the location server corrects the determined user path with the process location data.


According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a system for processing user location data comprising: a location server arranged to receive location data of a communication device associated with the user, the location data defining the position of the communication device at a plurality of different points in time, the location server further arranged to receive sequence data associated with the location data indicative of the order in which the location data was determined; path determining means for determining the user's path defined by the received location data and the associated sequence data; and a comparator for comparing the determined path of the user with one or more predetermined user paths. Each predetermined path is preferably defined by further location data and associated sequence data indicative of the order of the further location data. The location server is configured to process the received location data depending upon the result of the comparison. Usually, the location data is determined based on signal strength data which is usually received by an access point from a mobile device.


In yet a further aspect of the present invention, a method for processing user location data is provided. The method comprises receiving, with a receiver, location data of a communication device associated with the user, the location data defining the detected position of the communication device at a number of different points in time, and receiving, with the receiver, sequence data associated with the location data indicative of the order in which the location data was determined; determining, using a processor, the user's path passing through points defined by the received location data and the associated sequence data; and comparing, using the processor, the determined path of the user with one or more predetermined user paths; and processing, using the processor, the received location data depending upon the result of the comparison. Preferably, the determined user path is corrected or updated with the processed location data.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, and with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:



FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of the main functional components embodying the invention;



FIG. 2 is a screen shot of a zone editor embodying the invention which may be used to select, create, edit or delete different zones in the airport to track a user's device;



FIG. 3 is a screen shot of an editor embodying the invention in which a high quality device path in the airport is visualised in a particular zone;



FIG. 4 is a screen shot of an editor embodying the invention in which a lower quality device path in the airport is visualised in a particular zone;



FIG. 5 is a histogram showing live dwell time data obtained by embodiments of the invention; and



FIG. 6 is a flow diagram showing the main steps performed by an embodiment of the invention.





The following description is of a system for use in the aviation industry, but this is exemplary and other applications of the invention will also be discussed. For example, the system may be used in any indoor or outdoor area where a user carries a WiFi enabled device, such as a hospital, a college campus, a sports arena and so on.


Referring now to FIG. 1, this shows a schematic representation of a system 100 according to an embodiment of the invention. Operation of the various components will be explained in further detail below.


The system 100 may be directed towards the tracking of users in an airport 101 having a plurality of WiFi access points 101a-101d providing at least part of a WiFi infrastructure in the airport 101. Each access point 101a-101d may be positioned at a different location in the airport 101.


The WiFi infrastructure may use Real-time Locating System (RTLS) triangulation to locate a passenger's smart telephone or other mobile communication device as will be known to the skilled person.


In the embodiment shown in FIG. 1, a location server 107 is communicatively coupled to the airport WiFi infrastructure 101a-101d. The location server 107 may be coupled to the airport infrastructure via a wireless link or a wired link. The sever 107 may run in an airport data centre or as a cloud service over a number of servers, which are usually positioned in different locations.


The server 107 may communicate with the airport network by means of an Application Programming Interface (“API”) that is provided by a WiFi vendor or provider. The server 107 may use a particular provider's API to obtain the raw location data from the airport.


The location server 107 may comprise a historical data store 103 for storing the determined movement of devices in the airport. The historical data store may be provided as part of the location server as a hard disk or solid state memory or other local storage means. Alternatively the historical data store 103 may be a separate store located in a different position to the location server 107, such as a hard disk or solid state memory or other remote storage means. The historical data store may store both historical reference data and also data identifying devices belonging to airport staff or infrastructure. In either case, the historical data store 103 is communicatively coupled a zone data component 102 which may be part of the location server 107. This may be using a wired or wireless connection. A zone refers to a spatial area in the airport in which dwell time measurements are to be made. Examples of zones are: Security, Baggage, Immigration, Retail, or Check in.


The zone data component 102 may store a definition of the zones of interest in the airport, for example: airside, landside, security, baggage, retail and so on. The data component 102 may store the zone definitions on a hard disk or solid state memory or in other storage means. The airside part of the airport is usually the part of the airport that is accessible only after a passenger has gone through boarding card and x-ray security checks. The landside part of the airport is usually the part before a passenger has gone through boarding card and x-ray security checks. It is also useful to note that arriving passengers emerges from the baggage hall into the Landside area.


In the example shown in FIG. 2, and described in further detail below, there are three terminals, T1, T2, and T3. Each terminal comprises a plurality of zones. For example, terminal T1 may comprise the following zones: Airside—First Floor, Airside—Ground Floor, and Landside zones. Terminal T2 may comprise Duty Free, Food, Retail, Airside, Check in, Landside-First Floor, and Landside—Ground Floor zones. Further, Terminal T3 may comprise Baggage and Check in zones, although the above definitions of which zones are associated with which terminal are exemplary only.


The zones are defined as are virtual spaces. A user may define each zone by dragging a polygon out on a map application, such as an internet browser map application running on an administration interface 106. One example of a suitable internet browser map application is a Google maps application. Defining a zone is similar to creating a polygon shape in Microsoft Powerpoint. Google is a registered trade mark of Google Inc., USA, and Microsoft and PowerPoint are registered trade mark of Microsoft Corporation, USA.


It is only necessary to define zones in a region of the airport where access points exist. However, one or more physical access points may be added to or removed from a particular zone without modifying the virtual zones. Furthermore, virtual zones may be redefined without having to modify any airport infrastructure. This addresses one of the problems with Bluetooth identified above in that embodiments of the invention may allow a change in the area being measured or monitored without physically moving access points.


In FIG. 1, the arrow labelled B pointing from the administration interface towards the zone data component schematically shows how the administration interface sends data defining a particular zone to the zone data component. The data defining each zone may be data defining a polygon and preferably associated data defining the position of each access point in the polygon.


The server may also comprise an in-memory cache 104. The cache 104 stores data indicative of the current active devices that are being tracked in the airport, including their current position and zone. The cache may also store an in-memory representation of a path a device has taken as it moves thorough the airport. A path may be defined by the curve line or shape which links or joins a sequence of data points indicative of the position of the device. The sequence of the positional data is usually ordered in a chronological order.


An example of this representation is shown in FIGS. 3 and 4 of the drawings, described in further detail below. FIG. 3 is an example of a device path that is considered a high quality device path. There are plenty of device detections with good accuracy in the desired measurement zone. FIG. 4 is an example of a device path that is considered low quality compared to the device path shown in FIG. 3. There are more infrequent detections than the higher quality device path shown in FIG. 4. The path shown in FIG. 4 is an example of the type of problematic data quality that the invention seeks to address.


The server 107 may also comprise an Application Programming Interface (API) 105. The API provides a way to access the data stored in the in-memory cache 104.


In the embodiment shown in FIG. 1, the API 105 is communicatively coupled to an administration interface 106 and the in-memory cache 104. The administration interface is described in further detail below. Further, the in-memory cache 104 is communicatively coupled to the zone data component 102 and to the API 105. Further, in the embodiment shown in FIG. 1, the zone data component 102 is communicatively coupled to both the historical data store 103 and the airport WiFi infrastructure 101.


The administration interface 106 uses the API 105 to access the memory cache data 104. The administration interface sends a request via the API 105 to access the memory cache data 104. The arrows E and F shown in FIG. 1 represent the memory cache data 104 being sent to the administration interface 106 in response to that request.


As previously described, the system 100 may comprise an administration interface 106 tool. This tool may be used to define the zones and to display the data returned from the API. The administration interface tool 106 is usually provided on a separate or different server to the location server 107 however, they can in principle be provided on a single server. In either case, the administration interface 106 is communicatively coupled to the zone data component 102 and the API 105 within the location server 107.


The various steps performed by an embodiment of the invention will now be described in further detail below, referring to the flow diagram shown in FIG. 6. In some embodiments, not all of the steps shown in FIG. 6 will be performed, and the steps do not necessarily have to be performed in the order shown in FIG. 6.


At step 201, an airport operator uses the Administration Interface 106 to define the zones in the airport. A zone may be defined as a polygon having a plurality of lines joined by a number of vertices. Usually, the polygon is a closed shape so that a user has to cross one of the lines or zone boundary when leaving a zone.


The zone data may be stored in the Zone Data component 102. In addition, the zone data may also be stored offline in the Historical Data Store 103, but it is sufficient for the zone to be stored in a single storage means. An example of a baggage zone is shown in FIG. 2 as a filled black polygon area.


At step 203, the Location Server 107 polls the Airport WiFi infrastructure via a third party server. Usually, the airport WiFi infrastructure is provided by a third party, and therefore the location server 107 polls a third party server which in turn requests data, such as location data associated with all devices which may have moved since the last poll request. Usually, the third party server polls the Airport WiFi infrastructure in a periodic or regular manner. The server may poll the WiFi infrastructure approximately every 15 seconds. However, although the polling may be periodic, the received location data of each device is usually irregular in nature. This is because the airport WiFi infrastructure does not have control as to whether it receives a signal from a device. For example, if a device is temporarily switched off, then no location data of that device will be received by the location server when the device is switched off.


The third party server performs triangulation of the devices as the devices use the WiFi network. The third party server does this by well known triangulation methods familiar to the skilled person. The third party server sends to the location server location data of each mobile device which has been detected by the third party server. This allows the location server 107 to receive data associated with all devices that have moved since the last poll request. The arrow labelled A, shown in FIG. 1 represents this data being sent from the third party location server to the location server 105.


The quality of the data received from the third party server may be determined based on an accuracy value provided by the third party provider. Data quality may be determined based on the signal strength or, the number of access points which can see each device, or both.


In addition, the location data may be time-stamped. This provides additional data indicative of when the location data of a particular device was determined. The system may determine the frequency of detections by comparing the time stamp of sequential location data messages received by the location sever 107.


The third party server then sends raw, or in other words, unprocessed location data to the location server 107. The unprocessed location data may include absolute positional data of each device i.e. longitude and latitude of each device in an airport or in other words, the x and y coordinates of the devices. Usually, the received location data of each device does not depend upon the location of the access point which each device is communicating with. Accordingly, the received location data of each device may be independent of the position of each access point.


At step 205, the location server 105 receives from the third party triangulation server data determining the location of all mobile devices which are active within the airport. This may be performed every 15 seconds, but can be performed more frequently or less frequently than this. After the server has received the location data at step 205, the location server may determine the user's path defined by the received location data and the associated sequence data defining a plurality of points on the path, at step 207. At step 209, the location server compares the determined path of the user with one or more predetermined user paths. At step 211, the location server processes the received location data depending upon the result of the comparison. At step 213, the location server corrects or updates the determined user path based on the comparison.


In some embodiments, the raw data received by the location server 107 may be combined or associated with the Zone Data to give it context. This is done by determining whether or not each device is within the boundary defining a particular zone. If it is determined that a particular device is located in a particular zone, then the location data associated with that device is also associated with the zone in which the device is located.


For example, the location server 107 may compare the location data, i.e., the coordinates of a device with the coordinates defining a zone. If a device is determined to be inside the boundary of a polygon defining the zone under consideration, then the location server 107 associates that zone with the data structure for each device.


The combined or associated data may be referred to as contextual data. The data is combined by the server 107 and then stored in an in-memory (and preferably database) data structure. There is a data structure for each device detected. This data structure contains the coordinates, for example the abscissa (e.g. x coordinate) and ordinate (e.g. y coordinate) of the device.


In other words, each device is associated with a zone at each detected location. Usually, a plurality of devices are associated with each zone. In the example shown in FIG. 3, there are 5522 device paths are found, ready for an operator to review.


For example, there may be many people waiting in security or baggage zones at peak time. If there are 100 people waiting, and the server receives data detecting around 10% of them, then there would be 10 devices active in security or baggage.


Although not essential to all embodiments, the contextual location data may be stored in the Historical Data Store 103.


The contextual location data may also be updated in the In Memory Cache 104, storing a real time representation of the movements of all devices in the airport, as shown in FIG. 3.


The contextual data may be stored in both store 103 and memory cache 104 so that a) any airport staff may be automatically identified during nightly processing because they are in the airport longer than is typical for passengers, and b) so that the airport can use the data for historical comparison.


Each time the data is polled, the live dwell time may be determined for each device within each zones. This is described in further detail with reference to a particular Live Dwell Time Algorithm below.


For each communication device, the dwell time may be determined by determining the time when a user was first detected within a zone, and the time when the user was last detected within a zone (before the user moved do a different zone). The dwell time may be computed as the difference in time between the last detection time within a zone and the first detection time within a zone. In the histogram shown in FIG. 5, the number of devices within security is determined as function of wait or dwell time: 5 devices have a dwell time of less than one minute; 6 devices have a dwell time of 1 minute; a further 6 devices have a dwell time of 2 minutes; a further 6 devices have a dwell time of 3 minutes; 2 devices have a dwell time of 4 minutes; 2 further devices have a dwell time of 5 minutes; while finally, 2 devices have been determined to have a dwell time of 6 minutes in security. Steps 203, 205, 207, 209, 211, and 213 may be repeated as updated location data is received by the location server 107.


The dwell time is the amount of time that passengers spend in a particular area (i.e., a Zone) of the airport. This term is interchangeable with Wait Time. Dwell Time is used in areas of an airport that a passenger wants to be in for example retail, food hall. Wait Time is used in areas of an airport that a passenger doesn't want to be in, for example check in, security, baggage collection.


The data may be made accessible to 3rd parties via the API. In other words, 3rd parties may access the data stored in the historical data store 103 (and the in memory cache 104). This live data is in stored in memory 104, while the historic data is stored in historical data store 103. The data (both real time or historical or both) may be viewed using the Administration Interface 106, as shown in FIG. 4, although this step is in fact optional.


The processing, using an algorithm, of the raw WiFi positional data of each mobile device within the airport will now be described in further detail. The algorithm uses the received positional data to determine live dwell time of each mobile device within the airport. This algorithm may be performed every time the location server 107 refreshes the location of devices in the Airport.


When measuring the live dwell time for a given zone such as security, it is necessary to factor in the following data quality problems:


1. Staff and static WiFi devices (e.g., staff personal computers (PCs)) in the security should be filtered out.


2. The sporadic and periodically inaccurate nature of WiFi data means that devices that are passing near to, but not through, the Security zone may be incorrectly reported as being in Security.


3. The number, accuracy and frequency of detections will vary for devices.


Embodiments of the invention address these data quality problems in a number of different ways.


Handling Staff Devices


The Location Server 107 maintains a dynamic list of staff and infrastructure at the airport (Historic Data 103 above). This list is automatically generated by monitoring for devices that are in the airport for a long time which may be typical of a staff member working there, or are frequently in the airport which may be typical of airport staff working 5 days a week.


Devices in the Security zone are then compared with this list and filtered out from the results.


Handling Inaccurate or Partial Paths


Inaccurate WiFi data can be smoothed out or eliminated by using the typical path of a departing passenger through the airport. The following example refers to a departing passenger because it is described in conjunction with a security area, and only departing passengers pass through security. Nevertheless, the processing steps equally apply to other passenger types such as arriving passengers.


The device path can be used to profile the passenger as a Departing, Arriving or Transfer passenger. In addition the device path can be profiled as Airport Staff, or a welcoming agent also known as a Meeter/Greeter.


The typical path of a departing passenger is given by the following sequence of zones:



















LANDSIDE
CHECK
SECURITY
AIRSIDE
RETAIL
GATE



IN



AREA









That is, a passenger arrives at the airport in the LANDSIDE zone, then CHECKS IN, then passes through SECURITY to the AIRSIDE zone. The passenger will typically dwell in the RETAIL area until ready for boarding and then go to the GATE AREA. For the purposes of measuring dwell time in security, any paths that contain LANDSIDE or CHECKIN in the past, and do not contain AIRSIDE/RETAIL/GATEAREA can be considered good representative paths.


Examples of inaccurate paths caused by the sporadic nature of the WiFi data are:




















1.
SECURITY
[SLEEP]
GATE AREA










This would be an example of a path where a device is first detected in the SECURITY area, then enters SLEEP mode where it is no longer detected by the WiFi infrastructure, and after a long period of time detected in GATEAREA. This is a bad path because a) It is not known how long the device was in SECURITY before it was first detected and b) because it entered a SLEEP mode and was undetected, it is not known how long it remained there before going AIRSIDE.



















1.
AIRSIDE
GATE
BAGGAGE
SECURITY
LANDSIDE




AREA









This is an example of an arriving passenger who has arrived at AIRSIDE in the GATEAREA, and walked to BAGGAGE to collect their bags. Before going LANDSIDE, the passenger is briefly (and incorrectly) detected in the SECURITY zone because of poor WiFi quality. This device path will therefore have to be eliminated from the dwell time measurements.


Because the full device path is maintained in memory, it is possible to filter or remove these bad quality paths by specifying filter criteria in the algorithm. The filter criteria vary according to the zone being measured, and therefore must be configurable for the zone in question. The following is an example of the filter criteria for two zones:


1. Security Zone


a. Device must be in Security Zone, or device must have just transitioned out of Security into AIRSIDE


b. Device must never have been AIRSIDE


c. Device must have previously been LANDSIDE


d. Device path must match profile for Departing Passenger


2. Baggage Zone


a. Device must be in Baggage Zone, or device must have just transitioned out of Baggage into LANDSIDE


b. Device must never have been LANDSIDE


c. Device must have previously been AIRSIDE


d. Device path must match profile for Arriving Passenger


Handling Number, Accuracy & Frequency of Detections


The live dwell time algorithm may factor in the number, accuracy & frequency of detections to determine the quality of any given device path for use. These three factors are important because:


1. In general, the more detections that of a particular device path, the better quality of that device path. Closely related to this is the accuracy and frequency of these detections.


2. The accuracy can vary from detection to detection, caused by environmental factors at the airport. The higher the accuracy, the more reliable the data.


3. The frequency of detections varies along the device path (typically due to whether the passenger is using the device or not). Infrequent detections is a problem because if a device has not been detected for, say 2 minutes, it is not possible to tell if the device is still in Security or has moved out of Security. FIGS. 2 and 3 show examples of device paths with high and low frequency.


The algorithm factors in these three parameters when assigning a quality value to the path. Of particular importance are the frequency and accuracy of detections as the device transitions from CHECKIN to SECURITY and from SECURITY to AIRSIDE. If a determination can be made with a high degree of accuracy when a device moves into/out of SECURITY, then embodiments of the invention can determine with a high degree of accuracy how long the device spent in SECURITY.


The device path has to meet a quality threshold to be usable for zone dwell time measurement.


Accordingly, embodiments of the invention combine an arbitrary zone definition, device path profiling, device path filtering by history and device detection quality profiling such that that the variable and sporadic nature of WiFi signals can be processed. This allows live (as well as historic) dwell times of a user in any part of an airport to be determined.

Claims
  • 1. A system for determining a user's path comprising: a. a location server arranged to receive location data of a communication device associated with the user, the location data defining the detected position of the communication device at a number of different points in time, the location server further arranged to receive sequence data associated with the location data indicative of the order in which the location data was determined; wherein the location server is further arranged to compare the received location data and zone data defining a plurality of zones and to associate the received location data with one of the plurality of zones;b. path determining means for determining the user's path passing through a sequence of zones defined by the associated location data and the associated sequence data;c. storage means for storing a plurality of pre-generated, predetermined user profiles wherein each pre-generated, predetermined user profile is defined by zone sequence data defining an order in which a given type of user passes through the plurality of zones; andd. a comparator for comparing the determined path of the user passing through the sequence of zones with one or more pre-generated, predetermined user profiles; wherein the location server is further arranged to associate the user with a given pre-generated, predetermined user profile and to process and correct the previously determined path of the user depending upon the result of the comparison by, at least in part, eliminating inaccurate location data.
  • 2. A system according to claim 1 in which the location server is further configured to smoothen the determined path or eliminate one or more points on the determined path or interpolate between points on the path based on the result of the comparison.
  • 3. A system according to claim 1 in which the location server is further configured to determine the accuracy of the associated location data based on the result of the comparison.
  • 4. A system according to claim 1 in which the location server is further arranged to track the location of user at a point in time on the path based on real time or cached location data.
  • 5. A system according to claim 1 in which the location server is configured to receive location data comprising timestamp data indicative of when the location of the device was determined.
  • 6. A system according to claim 1 in which the location server is further configured to determine the user's dwell time at a particular location or within a zone based on the processed associated location data.
  • 7. A system according to claim 6 in which the location server determines that the device is associated with a staff member if the determined dwell time is greater than a predetermined threshold.
  • 8. A system according to claim 1 in which the location server is further configured to determine the number of points on the determined user path, and preferably to compare the determined number of points with a predetermined threshold stored in a storage means.
  • 9. A system according to claim 8 in which the location server is further configured to determine the user dwell time only if the number points on the determined user path is greater than the predetermined threshold.
  • 10. A system according to claim 1 in which the location server is configured to process the associated location data to eliminate location data associated with an inaccurate path.
  • 11. A system according to claim 1 in which the location server is further configured to determine that a path is inaccurate if the determined user path does not correspond to the predetermined user path.
  • 12. A system according to claim 1 in which the location server is further configured to determine whether the communication device is associated with a staff member or infrastructure located within a zone or whether the communication device is stationary for a substantial period of time.
  • 13. A system according to claim 1 in which the location server is further configured to process the location data to eliminate location data associated with a staff member or infrastructure or location data of a device which has been stationary for a substantial period of time.
  • 14. A system according to claim 1 wherein the storage means is configured to store a departing passenger profile or an arriving passenger profile or a transfer passenger profile or an airport staff profile, or welcoming staff profile or non-passenger user profile.
  • 15. A system according to claim 1 further comprising an administration interface for defining a plurality of zones within a region such as an airport.
  • 16. A system according to claim 1 in which the location server is further configured to determine zone data, from the received location data, indicative of which of a plurality of zones the communication device is located in at each point in time.
  • 17. A system according to claim 16 in which the location server is further configured to associate the determined zone data with the determined location data.
  • 18. A system according to claim 1 in which the location server is further configured to profile the user as a departing passenger or an arriving passenger or a transfer passenger or airport staff, or welcoming staff or non-passenger user based on the comparison of the determined user path and the predetermined user path.
  • 19. A system according to claim 1 in which the location server is further configured to rank the determined user path data based on the number of points which the determined user path passes through or based on the accuracy of the processed associated location data or based on the frequency of the processed location data.
  • 20. A system according to claim 1 in which the location server is further configured to determine a boundary of one or more zones.
  • 21. A system according to claim 1 in which the location server is further configured to determine a first frequency of location detections when the user device is within a first predetermined distance from a zone boundary and a second frequency of location detections when the user device is further away from the zone boundary.
  • 22. A system according to claim 21 in which the location server is further configured to rank the path based on the first and second frequency of detections.
  • 23. A system according to claim 1 in which the location server is further configured to receive location data of a plurality of communication devices, to compare the received location data and the received zone data and, if it is determined that the received location data is in a given zone, to produce associated location data associating the received location data with the given zone and to determine the path of each device and to compare the determined path of each user with one or more predetermined user paths and to process the associated location data depending upon the result of the comparison and to correct each determined user path with the processed associated location data depending upon the result of the comparison.
  • 24. A system according to claim 1 in which the location server is further configured to determine a first frequency of location detections of a first path when the user device is within a first predetermined distance of a zone boundary and a second frequency of location detections of a second path when a further user is within a corresponding predetermined distance from the zone boundary.
  • 25. A system according to claim 24 in which the location server ranks a path with more location detections within the predetermined distance of a zone boundary higher than a path with fewer location detections within the predetermined distance of the zone boundary.
  • 26. A system according to claim 1 further comprising storing means for storing the determined user path.
  • 27. A system according to claim 1 in which the location data of the communication device is determined based on signal strength data received by an access point.
  • 28. A system according to claim 1 in which the location data is received from a third party server arranged to determine the location of the communication device based on signal strength data received by the third party server.
  • 29. A system according to claim 1 wherein the received location data comprises location data defining the detected position of the device at three or more points in time, and wherein the location data is received in a non-periodic or irregular or sporadic manner.
  • 30. A system according to claim 1 in which the location data is determined using a wireless communications system, particularly a wireless communications system employing a wireless protocol according to the Institute of Engineering and technology 802.11 standard.
  • 31. A system according to claim 1 wherein each predetermined path is defined by further location data and associated sequence data indicative of the order of the further location data.
  • 32. A system according to claim 1 wherein the location server is further arranged to process and to correct the determined user path depending upon zone filter criteria.
  • 33. A system according to claim 1 wherein the zone data further defines a plurality of zones corresponding to defined spatial locations.
  • 34. A system for processing user location data comprising: a. a location server arranged to receive location data of a communication device associated with the user, the location data defining the detected position of the communication device at a number of different points in time, the location server further arranged to receive sequence data associated with the location data indicative of the order in which the location data was determined and to receive zone data defining a plurality of zones; wherein the location server is further arranged to compare the received location data and the received zone data and, if it is determined that the received location data is in a given zone, to produce associated location data associating the received location data with the given zone;b. path determining means for determining the user's path passing through a sequence of zones defined by the associated location data and the associated sequence data;c. storage means for storing a plurality of pre-generated, predetermined user profiles wherein each pre-generated, predetermined user profile is defined by zone sequence data defining an order in which a given type of user passes through the plurality of zones; andd. a comparator for comparing the determined path of the user passing through the sequence of zones with one or more pre-generated, predetermined user profiles;wherein the location server is further arranged to associate the user with a given pre-generated, predetermined user profile and to process the previously determined user path depending upon the result of the comparison by, at least in part, eliminating inaccurate location data.
  • 35. A method for determining a user's path comprising: a. receiving with a location server location data of a communication device associated with the user, the location data defining the detected position of the communication device at a number of different points in time, receiving, using the location server, sequence data associated with the location data indicative of the order in which the location data was determined and receiving zone data defining a plurality of zones; further comprising comparing, with the location server, the received location data and the received zone data and, if it is determined that the received location data is in a given zone, producing associated location data associating the received location data with the given zone;b. determining with a path determining means, the user's path passing through a sequence of zones defined by the associated location data and the associated sequence data;c. storing, using a store, a plurality of pre-generated, predetermined user profiles wherein each pre-generated, predetermined user profile is defined by zone sequence data defining an order in which a given type of user passes through the plurality of zones; andd. comparing, using a comparator, the determined path of the user passing through the sequence of zones with one or more pre-generated, predetermined user profiles; and associating the user with a given pre-generated, predetermined user profile and processing and correcting with the location server the previously determined user path depending upon the result of the comparison by, at least in part, eliminating inaccurate location data.
  • 36. A method for processing user location data comprising: a. receiving, with a receiver, location data of a communication device associated with the user, the location data defining the detected position of the communication device at a number of different points in time, and receiving, with the receiver, sequence data associated with the location data indicative of the order in which the location data was determined and receiving zone data defining a plurality of zones; further comprising comparing, with the location server, the received location data and the received zone data and, if it is determined that the received location data is in a given zone, producing associated location data associating the received location data with the given zone;b. determining, using a processor, the user's path passing through a sequence of zones defined by the associated location data and the associated sequence data;c. storing, using a store, a plurality of pre-generated, predetermined user profiles wherein each pre-generated, predetermined user profile is defined by zone sequence data defining an order in which a given type of user passes through the plurality of zones; andd. comparing, using the processor, the determined path of the user passing through the sequence of zones with one or more pre-generated, predetermined user profiles; andassociating, using the processor, the user with a given pre-generated, predetermined user profile and processing, using the processor, the previously determined user path depending upon the result of the comparison by, at least in part, eliminating inaccurate location data.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
1220976.3 Nov 2012 GB national
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a non-provisional application and claims the benefit of and priority under 35 U.S.C. §§119, 120 to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/596,980, filed Feb. 9, 2012, entitled “Path Determining System & Method Therefor”, by Kevin O'Sullivan, et al., and to Great Britain Patent Application No. 1220976.3, filed Nov. 21, 2012, entitled “User Path Determining System and Method Therefor”, by Kevin O'Sullivan, et al., the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference as if set forth herein in their entireties.

US Referenced Citations (179)
Number Name Date Kind
4821118 Lafreniere Apr 1989 A
5270921 Hornick Dec 1993 A
5918209 Campbell et al. Jun 1999 A
6108636 Yap et al. Aug 2000 A
6112185 Walker et al. Aug 2000 A
6158658 Barclay Dec 2000 A
6192416 Baxter Feb 2001 B1
6367016 Lambert et al. Apr 2002 B1
6661340 Saylor et al. Dec 2003 B1
6695203 Iki et al. Feb 2004 B2
6757712 Bastian et al. Jun 2004 B1
6760778 Nelson et al. Jul 2004 B1
6869023 Hawes et al. Mar 2005 B2
7035828 Ketonen et al. Apr 2006 B2
7212978 Kowal et al. May 2007 B2
7258276 Linton et al. Aug 2007 B2
7327262 Motteram et al. Feb 2008 B2
7421319 Stefani Sep 2008 B2
7440967 Chidlovskii Oct 2008 B2
7454203 Levitan Nov 2008 B2
7483696 Mitchell Jan 2009 B1
7486960 Brady et al. Feb 2009 B2
7539985 Marvin May 2009 B2
7571206 Koning et al. Aug 2009 B2
7607080 Heuer et al. Oct 2009 B2
7664672 Walker et al. Feb 2010 B1
7668873 Davis et al. Feb 2010 B2
7685009 Halavais et al. Mar 2010 B2
7702328 Lemond et al. Apr 2010 B2
7720724 Kurashige May 2010 B2
7739292 Falk et al. Jun 2010 B2
7786899 Baker et al. Aug 2010 B2
7805523 Mitchell et al. Sep 2010 B2
7870101 Hubbard et al. Jan 2011 B2
7882137 Lepman Feb 2011 B2
7907067 Baker et al. Mar 2011 B2
7907545 Ric Mar 2011 B2
7949335 Stefani et al. May 2011 B2
7954712 Babcock et al. Jun 2011 B2
8001519 Conallen et al. Aug 2011 B2
8058972 Mohanty Nov 2011 B2
8087583 Hawes Jan 2012 B2
8090603 Payne et al. Jan 2012 B2
8117051 Sauvage et al. Feb 2012 B2
8160759 Baker et al. Apr 2012 B2
8165809 Baker et al. Apr 2012 B1
8170535 Lopes et al. May 2012 B1
8195151 Cerra, II et al. Jun 2012 B2
8214144 Baker et al. Jul 2012 B2
8229458 Busch Jul 2012 B2
8296281 Baker et al. Oct 2012 B2
8332136 Baker et al. Dec 2012 B2
8606508 Baker et al. Dec 2013 B2
8671009 Coley et al. Mar 2014 B1
8700236 Berman Apr 2014 B1
8713661 Vysogorets et al. Apr 2014 B2
20020138184 Kipersztok et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020138625 Bruner et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020160773 Gresham et al. Oct 2002 A1
20030034390 Linton et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030048471 Lundgren Mar 2003 A1
20030093187 Walker May 2003 A1
20030111530 Iki et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030130769 Farley et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030146871 Karr et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030150922 Hawes Aug 2003 A1
20030220116 Sagefalk et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040030855 Takeuchi et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040039617 Maycotte et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040128193 Brice et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040249836 Reynders et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050004919 Green et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050033666 Kurashige Feb 2005 A1
20050071206 Berge Mar 2005 A1
20050228702 Fairbanks et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050258247 Hawes Nov 2005 A1
20060004781 Burgel et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060075934 Ram Apr 2006 A1
20060085451 Pal et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060095434 McCullough et al. May 2006 A1
20060097046 Baru Fassio et al. May 2006 A1
20060173680 Verhasselt et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060206246 Walker Sep 2006 A1
20060234700 Funderburk et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060238384 Hess et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060259456 Falk et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060277231 Kral et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060288021 Kojima Dec 2006 A1
20070055416 Allen Mar 2007 A1
20070072590 Levitan Mar 2007 A1
20070111725 Kauffman et al. May 2007 A1
20070127460 Wilber et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070133487 Wang et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070149216 Misikangas Jun 2007 A1
20070157078 Anderson Jul 2007 A1
20070198314 Andrew et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070222595 Motteram et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070233617 Gillespie Oct 2007 A1
20070244766 Goel Oct 2007 A1
20070250356 Douglas Oct 2007 A1
20070265881 El Eman et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070273514 Winand et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080010005 Small et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080015926 Marcken Jan 2008 A1
20080027765 Gunn et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080027955 May et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080046298 Ben-Yehuda et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080065480 Baker et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080070517 Brady et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080091445 Mihic Apr 2008 A1
20080099552 Grillion May 2008 A1
20080140226 Ganev Jun 2008 A1
20080140434 O'Brien Jun 2008 A1
20080224823 Lawson et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080229228 Cohen Sep 2008 A1
20090010200 Lauer et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090015398 Bhogal et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090030781 Mehta et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090033491 Saunders Feb 2009 A1
20090063219 Raufaste et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090070841 Buga et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090081947 Margis Mar 2009 A1
20090112473 Lu et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090164500 Mathur et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090182590 Ashby et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090187494 Heath Jul 2009 A1
20090196201 Ric Aug 2009 A1
20090248457 Munter et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090256675 Kerr Oct 2009 A1
20090259549 Winand et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090287513 Anderson et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090288123 Havlovick et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090307020 Viale et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090310530 Cerra, II et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090313601 Baird et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100027461 Bothorel Feb 2010 A1
20100030591 Viard et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100065632 Babcock et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100076795 Steir et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100076826 Bayne Mar 2010 A1
20100078475 Lin et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100102934 Guichard Apr 2010 A1
20100159871 Tester Jun 2010 A1
20100190510 Maranhas et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100191782 Brzozowski Jul 2010 A1
20100197318 Petersen et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100198628 Rayner Aug 2010 A1
20100205448 Tarhan et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100245034 D'Oliveiro et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100268656 Teicher Oct 2010 A1
20100332358 Owens Dec 2010 A1
20110004832 Canal et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110018769 Misikangas et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110028160 Roeding et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110119183 Berman May 2011 A1
20110227737 Kamins Sep 2011 A1
20120035965 Maguire et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120042263 Rapaport et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120075168 Osterhout et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120129546 Yang et al. May 2012 A1
20120200390 Saravanan Aug 2012 A1
20120203578 Baggett et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120284108 Fontana et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130069985 Wong et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130141313 Zhou et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130211864 Sanderson et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130234849 Gupta et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130267255 Liu et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130295966 Dingler et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130297103 Baker et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130314257 Macrae et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130325526 Tyler Dec 2013 A1
20140006070 Stamler Jan 2014 A1
20140039717 Henkel Feb 2014 A1
20140052482 Le Marier et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140067244 Baker et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140075506 Davis et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140123315 Baker et al. May 2014 A1
20140188311 Masson Jul 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (44)
Number Date Country
2002317935 Jan 2003 AU
101436185 May 2009 CN
10357831 Jul 2005 DE
1318463 Jun 2003 EP
1454306 Sep 2004 EP
1 610 094 Dec 2005 EP
1679624 Jul 2006 EP
2088543 Aug 2009 EP
2088569 Aug 2009 EP
2 222 053 Aug 2010 EP
1 874 001 Oct 2010 EP
2290600 Mar 2011 EP
2362354 Aug 2011 EP
2390845 Nov 2011 EP
2474931 Jul 2012 EP
2366945 Mar 2002 GB
2408131 Mar 2006 GB
2418511 Mar 2006 GB
2469026 Oct 2010 GB
2470897 Dec 2010 GB
2005135199 May 2005 JP
2006053724 Feb 2006 JP
2008117340 May 2008 JP
2008171181 Jul 2008 JP
2009093603 Apr 2009 JP
0073954 Dec 2000 WO
0135269 May 2001 WO
0135289 May 2001 WO
0157323 Aug 2001 WO
0215582 Feb 2002 WO
03005237 Jan 2003 WO
2004045106 May 2004 WO
2006010774 Feb 2006 WO
2008055181 May 2008 WO
2009002139 Dec 2008 WO
2009021068 Feb 2009 WO
2009058505 May 2009 WO
2009091553 Jul 2009 WO
2009151925 Dec 2009 WO
2011057323 May 2011 WO
2011088233 Jul 2011 WO
2012106075 Aug 2012 WO
2012105829 Sep 2012 WO
2013079512 Jun 2013 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (53)
Entry
International Civil Aviation Organization, Machine Readable Travel Documents, Part 1, Machine Readable Passports—vol. 1, Specifications for Electronically Enabled Passports with Biometric Identification Capability, Sixth Edition, 99 pages, 2006.
International Civil Aviation Organization, Machine Readable Travel Documents, Part 1, Machine Readable Passports—vol. 2, Passports with Machine Readable Data Stored in Optical Character Recognition Format, Sixth Edition, 131 pages, 2006.
International Civil Aviation Organization, Machine Readable Travel Documents, Part 3, Machine Readable Official Travel Documents—vol. 1, MRtds with Machine Readable Data Stored in Optical Character Recognition Text International Civil Aviation Organization, Third Edition, 122 pages, 2008.
International Civil Aviation Organization, Machine Readable Travel Documents, Part 3, Machine Readable Official Travel Documents—vol. 2, Specifications for Electronically Enabled MRtds with Biometric Identification Capability, Third Edition, 149 pages, 2008.
Dunkel, Jürgen, et al., Model-Driven Architecture for Mobile Applications, pp. 464-477, 2007, Hannover University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Department of Computer Sciences, Hannover Germany.
Glushko, Robert J., et al., Bridging the “Front Stage” and “Back Stage” in Service System Design, pp. 1-10, 2008, University of California, Berkely, School of Information, Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).
Johnston, Michael, et al., Multimodal Applications from Mobile to Kiosk, 4 pages, AT&T Research, Florham Park, New Jersey, USA, 1975.
Kindervater, Gerard, Revenue Management in the Airline Passenger Industry, 24 pages, AirFrance KLM, 2007.
Li, Quanzhong, et al., XVM: A Bridge Between XML Data and Its Behavior, 9 pages, May 17-22, 2004, 13th International Conference on World Wide Web, New York, New York, USA.
Madria, Sanjay, An XML Schema Integration and Query Mechanism System, pp. 266-303, 2007, Elsevier B.V., Science Direct, Data & Knowledge Engineering 65 (2008).
McGuire, Kelly A., et al., The Future of Revenue Management, 5 pages, 2009, SAS Global Forum 2009, SAS Institute, Inc.
Smith, Barry C., et al., Yield Management at American Airlines, pp. 8-31, 1992, American Airlines Decision Technologies, Dallas/Fort Worth Airport, Texas, USA.
Xu, Liping, et al., A Model of Capacity Control with Overbooking for a Two-leg Airlines Network, 5 pages, 2008, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).
Marmesse, M., et al., Location-aware Information Delivery with comMotion, MIT Media Laboratory, Cambridge, MA, HUC 2000 Proceedings, pp. 157-171, Springer-Verlag.
Chen, G., et al., A Survey of Context-Aware Mobile Computing Research, Dartmouth College, Department of Computer Science, Hanover, New Hampshire, 2000.
Munoz, M., et al., Context-Aware Mobile Communication in Hospitals, IEEE Computer Society, Sep. 2003.
Schwinger, W., et al., Context-Aware in Mobile Tourism Guides—A Comprehensive Survey, Austrian Federal Ministry for Education, Science, and Culture, and the European Social Fund, 2002.
Kinneging, T., Machine Readable Travel Documents—Technical Report: PKI for Machine Readable Travel Documents Offering ICC Read-Only Access, PKI Task Force, International Civil Aviation Organization, Version 1.1, Oct. 1, 2004.
International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Search Authority (EPO) for PCT/EP2013/057497 dated Jun. 27, 2013.
Singapore Search Report of Application No. 201306353-2, mailed on Apr. 11, 2014, by the Danish Patent and Trademark Office.
Singapore Written Opinion of Application No. 201306353-2, mailed on Apr. 11, 2014, by the Danish Patent and Trademark Office.
Search Report of Singapore Application No. 201306353-2, received from the Danish Patent and Trademark Office on Jun. 16, 2014.
Written Opinion of Singapore Application No. 201306353-2, received from the Danish Patent and Trademark Office on Jun. 16, 2014.
International Search Report of Application No. PCT/EP2013/052590, received from the European Patent Office on Jun. 14, 2013.
International Civil Aviation Organization, Machine Readable Travel Documents, Part 1, Machine Readable Passports—vol. 2, Specifications for Electronically Enabled Passports with Biometric Identification Capability, Sixth Edition, 99 pages, 2006.
International Civil Aviation Organization, Machine Readable Travel Documents, Part 3, Machine Readable Official Travel Documents—vol. 1, MRtds with Machine Readable Data Stored in Optical Character Recognition Format, Third Edition, 122 pages, 2008.
Danish Patent and Trademark Office, Written Opinion of Singapore Application No. 201301978-1, dated Oct. 15, 2013.
Hungarian Intellectual Property Office, Search Report of Singapore Application No. 201301980-7, dated Sep. 3, 2013.
Hungarian Intellectual Property Office, Written Opinion of Singapore Application No. 201301980-7, dated Sep. 3, 2013.
Belobaba, Fundamentals of Pricing and Revenue Management, The Global Airline Industry, 2009.
Glaser-Opitz, et al., Evaluation of CPDLC and Voice Communication During Approach Phase, Digital Avionics conference, Sep. 13-17, 2015.
Hull, et al., Technology-Enabled Airborne Spacing and Merging, Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 2004.
International Examination Report mailed in Australian Application No. 2011347893 dated Sep. 11, 2015.
Kenney, et al., Secure ATC Surveillance for Military Applications, Military Communications Conference, 2008.
Lee, et al., Effectiveness of the Ground-Based Transceiver (GBT) Parrot System for Monitoring GPS Integrity for Alaska ATC “Radar-Like Services” Using ADS-B, Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 2004.
AIRCOM Server Administrator Guide, SITA Airline Telecommunications and Information Services, Feb. 19, 2013, pp. 1-280.
AIRCOM Server User Guide, SITA Airline Telecommunications and Information Services, Jan. 24, 2013, pp. 1-153.
Caliendo, et al., Social Networks, Job Search Methods and Reservation Wages: Evidence for Germany, IZA, Sep. 2010, Germany.
Examination Report mailed Apr. 28, 2014 in Malaysian Application No. PI 2013000936.
Examination Report of Malaysian Application No. 2013001405, received from the Intellectual Property Corporation of Malaysia on Oct. 28, 2014.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed in International Application No. PCT/EP2011/070551 filed Nov. 21, 2011.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed in International Application No. PCT/EP2014/055037 filed Mar. 13, 2014.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed in International Application No. PCT/EP2014/062464 filed Jun. 13, 2014.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed in International Application No. PCT/EP2015/053319 filed Feb. 17, 2015.
Stellin, “Automation is Considered for Checking IDs in Airports”, Business Day, The New York Times, Mar. 19, 2012, 3 pages, retrieved Sep. 4, 2014, http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/20/business/tsa-is-considering-automating-id-checks.html.
International Search Report mailed in International Application No. PCT/EP2011/072286 filed on Sep. 12, 2011.
Kirby, Personal Services—In-flight connectivity poised to change the passenger experience for ever, http://www. flightglobal.com/news/articles/personal-services-in-flight-connectivity-poised-to-change-the-passenger-experience-for-332765/, Article dated Sep. 28, 2009.
Kitson, The Future of In-flight: Part Two—The Concierge Concept, http://ustwo.com/blog/the-future-of-in-flight-part-two-the-concierge-concept/, Article dated Apr. 2012.
Robert Longley, “TSA's New ID, Boarding Pass Scanning System Draws Criticism”, US Government, About.com, Aug. 2, 2012, 2 pages, retrieved online on Jul. 30, 2014, http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/defenseandsecurity/a/Tsa-Boarding-Pass-Scanning-System-Draws-Criticism.
Russian Search Report for 2013133853/08(050668) mailed Feb. 20, 2015.
Schechner, Airlines Entertain Tablet Ideas—Rather Than Wiring Planes for In-Flight Movies, Some Hand Out iPads, http://online.wsj.com/articles/SB10000872396390443916104578020601759253578, Article dated Sep. 2012.
Search Report and Examination Opinion mailed May 19, 2015 in International Application No. GB1421313.6.
Search Report mailed on Aug. 6, 2015 in European patent application No. 15176140.0.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130210454 A1 Aug 2013 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61596980 Feb 2012 US