VEHICLE VISION SYSTEM UTILIZING CORNER DETECTION

Abstract

A vehicular vision system includes an image sensor operable to capture image data and an image processor operable to process frames of captured image data. The image processor is operable to detect edges or corners in the captured images. The image processor is operable to determine a number of edges detected in individual frames of captured image data. The vision system adjusts a sensitivity of the image processor responsive to the determined number of edges detected in at least one frame of captured image data. The image processor may detect up to a selected maximum number of edges in a frame of captured image data, and the vision system may adjust the sensitivity of the image processor so that the determined number of edges detected in a subsequent frame of captured image data is at or near the selected maximum number of edges.

Description

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to vehicles with cameras mounted thereon and in particular to vehicles with exterior-facing cameras, such as forward facing cameras and/or sideward facing cameras and/or rearward facing cameras.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Use of imaging sensors in vehicle imaging systems is common and known. Examples of such known systems are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,949,331; 5,670,935; and/or 5,550,677, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a camera for a vision system that utilizes one or more cameras or image sensors to capture image data of a scene exterior (such as forwardly) of a vehicle and provides a display of images indicative of or representative of the captured image data. The imager or camera includes a circuit board at which one or more components and/or circuitry is/are established. The imager may include or be associated with an image processor that processes captured image data to detect corners or edges of objects in the captured images. The image processor or control may select an appropriate or desired number of corners or edges of objects to detect in the captured images, and may adjust the amount of corners or edges being processed to optimize the object detection function. The system may utilize a back loop or hysteresis from the corner or edge number to an adjustable sensitivity level.

In a given frame, a current number of detected corners per frame may be determined and used, and if that current number is greater than a number of corners that can be processed by the processor or control, then the sensitivity of the system may be reduced for the next frame or frames. The system of the present invention thus provides a control system that is operable to process an appropriate number of corners or edges in any given frame of captured image data and may adjust the processed number based on the number of corners present in a prior frame of captured image data.

These and other objects, advantages, purposes and features of the present invention will become apparent upon review of the following specification in conjunction with the drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a plan view of a vehicle with a vision system that incorporates cameras in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a schematic of a camera system with object detection in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 3 is a schematic of a Bresenham circle with radius 3; and

FIG. 4 is a schematic of a regulation scheme of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Referring now to the drawings and the illustrative embodiments depicted therein, a vehicle 10 includes an imaging system or vision system 12 that includes one or more imaging sensors or cameras (such as a rearward facing imaging sensor or camera 14a and/or a forwardly facing camera 14b at the front (or at the windshield) of the vehicle, and/or a sidewardly/rearwardly facing camera 14c, 14b at the sides of the vehicle), which capture images exterior of the vehicle, with the cameras having a lens for focusing images at or onto an imaging array or imaging plane of the camera (FIG. 1). The vision system 12 is operable to process image data captured by the cameras and may provide displayed images at a display device 16 for viewing by the driver of the vehicle. Optionally, the vision system may process image data to detect objects, such as objects to the rear of the subject or equipped vehicle during a reversing maneuver, or such as approaching or following vehicles or vehicles at a side lane adjacent to the subject or equipped vehicle or the like.

Modern video camera systems are including more and more object detection features, whether they are used in or at vehicles or used for other industrial applications. The basis of such object detection normally is a feature extractor which is either an edge detector or a corner detector. In video applications with a certain frame rate, the computing time for feature extraction is usually limited to the time of one frame. Therefore, computing efficiency is important and it is important that the computing times are fitting into a frame-time based raster.

A camera system with object detection is shown in FIG. 2. The raw data from the video sensor is communicated (such as via a wireless or wired link or via a bus network of the vehicle) to an image signal processor for image data processing before the captured images are shown on a display. Some intermediate data is used for object detection (such as via an object detection algorithm of the image processor) and its result may be used to generate overlays on the output image. Another option is to do some extra object analysis or handling or processing, such as, for example, for generating warning signals (such as audible or acoustic warning signals) or for controlling a vehicle function, such as the brakes or brake system of the vehicle, or the like.

To fulfill the given execution time requirements, the input of the object detection algorithms has to be limited to a maximum number of features they can process. In the example of a corner detector this will be a maximum number of corners that the system can process and detect in one image frame. The number of detected corners is dependent first on the number of examined pixels and second on the corner detector's sensitivity. In the first case, the system may define certain regions of interest on the source image. The second case may be handled in accordance with the following.

As an example of a suitable corner detection process or algorithm, the FAST algorithm by Dr. Edward Rosten (see Dr. Edward Rosten, FAST, University of Cambridge, England, http://www.edwardrosten.com/work/fast.html) may be used. A good solution for hardware-implementation or HW-implementation in a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) can be found in {hacek over (S)}oberl et al., Hardware Implementation of FAST Algorithm for Mobile Applications, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia (http://vicos.fri.uni-lj.si/data/interact/hwfast.pdf). The advantage of a FPGA realization is that the algorithm can execute in real-time and is independent of the image content and the number of found corners.

The basic idea for the FAST algorithm (and with reference to FIG. 3) is to compare the center pixel (P) with the 16 surrounding pixels on a Bresenham circle with radius 3. A corner is detected if at least a selected value (n) of contiguous pixels on the circle are all brighter or all darker than the central pixel. The various versions of FAST differ in that the selected number n, which has to be fixed, may be different between versions of FAST. The term FAST-9 means a processing version where n is selected and fixed at 9.

If I(x) is the intensity of pixel x, a pixel is:

• • brighter, if I(x)>I(P)+I_th
  • similar, if I(P)−I_th≦I(x)≦I(P)+I_th
  • darker, if I(x)<I(P)−I_th

Within this context, I_th can be defined as the sensitivity of the corner detector. The smaller the value I_th, the higher the sensitivity and vice versa. With higher sensitivities, more corners will be detected in the image as compared with lower sensitivities. So the sensitivity has a direct impact on the number of corners that will be found during processing of the captured image data.

Regulated FAST Corner Detector:

The number of corners that can be handed over to the following algorithmic shall be limited by c_max_corners. The current number of corners may be much below this value. This may lead to undetected objects because of unnecessarily left-out corners. On the other hand, if the current number of corners is much greater than c_max_corners, it is difficult to find the most valuable corners out of the result. In some cases, the calculation of corners may have to be stopped somewhere in the image, which results in unexamined regions of the captured image, which is undesirable.

To overcome these disadvantages, the present invention provides or introduces a type of regulation. In a live video system, the differences from one image to the following image are relative small. Therefore, it can be assumed that the current image is a good prediction for the next one. As a measurement value, the current number of detected corners per frame may be used. If the number is higher than c_max_corners, the sensitivity is reduced (I_th is increased) for the next frame or frames of captured image data. If the value is below c_max_corners minus a hysteresis threshold, the sensitivity is increased (I_th is decreased). The hysteresis threshold and increasing or decreasing steps are dependent on the application and the used regulation algorithm, which may not be fixed. FIG. 4 gives an overview of the regulation scheme.

As shown in FIG. 4, the system or process 110 starts at 112 and processes captured image data, such as via a FAST-9 algorithm (or other suitable algorithm or processing means), at 114. The number of corners determined in the frame of captured image data is counted at 116 until the end of frame (EOF) is reached. Then the counter is reset and the determined number of corners (ncorners) is forwarded to the Sensitivity Regulator at 118. The regulator adjusts or corrects the current value of I_th, which is dependent on ncorners and c_max_corners, before the start of frame (SOF). I_th may be adjusted or updated every frame or may be periodically or episodically adjusted or updated. The regulator is adjusted such that the determined number of corners does not exceed the limit or threshold level of the processor. The additional corners can then be ignored without disadvantages. The system repeats the process for subsequent captured frames of image data and the process ends at 120.

Thus, the present invention provides a vision system corner detection algorithm utilizing a FAST-9 algorithm (but could use other similar or suitable algorithms to detect edges or corners in the captured image data). The vision system may be equipped with a conventional imager or preferably a HDR (High Dynamic Range) imager. As known in the art, HDR imagers possess the ability to control the light sensitivity of pixel areas on the imager independently in a way that these are neither underexposed nor overexposed. Typically, the dynamic range of an HDR imager is wider than the range of the output signal or the receiving device. Leaving potential corners undetected in a frame due to overexposure or underexposure may be limited or substantially precluded by using an HDR imager instead of a non-HDR imager. The image processing device employs a corner detection algorithm, which may be embedded into the signal processing module or the object detection module or may comprise a standalone module therebetween. Physically the process may be put into the camera, a processing unit or central cluster having a display or any other display device. Typically, the detected corners serve a feature detector which is an input for object detection and classification for automotive DAS, used for human and machine vision.

There is a limited number of corners that the image processor and system can handle. If there are too few corners (such as below a selected threshold amount) being processed and detected, the system capacity is not being fully used or optimized, and if there are too many corners being processed and detected, some corners may get dumped or ignored or not detected so there may be lost object information. The number of corners being detected depends on the sensitivity of the system, but depending on the content of the image the same sensitivity may deliver or detect the same number of corners.

The sensitivity of the corner detector may be controlled in a loop control. A higher sensitivity delivers less corners, while a lower sensitivity delivers an increasing number of corners. The control may adjust the sensitivity in a way that the delivered corners are at least some or most of the time approximately the number of corners that the system can handle and/or process.

The typical amount of maximum corners (c_max_corners) which can be handled or processed is about 2,000 (such as 2048) to about 4,000 (such as 4096), but on limited area(s) of interest, such as for trailer angle detection or the like, there may be just about 40 to 100 corners processed. Typically, the amount is selected in typical chip address bus sizes or memory sizes, such as fractions of 2^X (such as 128, 256, 512, 1024, 2048 or 4096). The feature detector may be capable to discriminate poles from stones, balls, traffic signs, persons, moving vehicles. The sensitivity may be selected to be between about 4 and 16 for an 8 bit sensor resolution, with an initial value at about 8. A stepping range of +1/−1 is preferred (but optionally fractions are possible depending on the bit depth and contrast level of the sensor). A three point control may be utilized (such as a P, PD, PI, PID type of control or the like).

Such a three point control or controller may comprise one or two or three such controller types (either alone or in parallel), and such loop controller types may be combined by three essential types: P, I and D, where:

P is for proportional behavior: P_out=K_pe(t)

D is for derivative behavior

$D_{\mathrm{out}}=K_d\frac{}{t}e\left(t\right)$

and I is for integral behavior

$I_{\mathrm{out}}=K_i{\int }_0^te\left(\tau \right)\tau .$

Such a three point controller has two thresholds: Both show a hysteresis which is often beneficial to suppress since the output is changing rapidly when the input is just at one threshold's borderline.

In a more sophisticated solution, the hysteresis may be dynamic, such as depending on historical data, or optionally coming from a statistical value, such as a value generated from the standard deviation. The systems may be tuned to always function to have a corner value of about 10 percent to about 20 percent less than the maximum value of corners that the system may be able to process or compute (30 percent less may be too low, and five times more corners than computable would be too high). At a borderline of a maximal of about 4096 computable edges, the system may operate to have about 3800 to about 4000 corners. This means about a 200 hysteresis. At this hysteresis the system does not swing any more. The present invention thus provides a back loop from the corner number to the adjustable sensitivity level.

The vehicle may include any type of sensor or sensors, such as imaging sensors or radar sensors or lidar sensors or ladar sensors or ultrasonic sensors or the like. The imaging sensor or camera may capture image data for image processing and may comprise any suitable camera or sensing device, such as, for example, an array of a plurality of photosensor elements arranged in at least 640 columns and 480 rows (preferably a megapixel imaging array or the like), with a respective lens focusing images onto respective portions of the array. The photosensor array may comprise a plurality of photosensor elements arranged in a photosensor array having rows and columns. The logic and control circuit of the imaging sensor may function in any known manner, and the image processing and algorithmic processing may comprise any suitable means for processing the images and/or image data.

For example, the vision system and/or processing and/or camera and/or circuitry may utilize aspects described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,005,974; 5,760,962; 5,877,897; 5,796,094; 5,949,331; 6,222,447; 6,302,545; 6,396,397; 6,498,620; 6,523,964; 6,611,202; 6,201,642; 6,690,268; 6,717,610; 6,757,109; 6,802,617; 6,806,452; 6,822,563; 6,891,563; 6,946,978; 7,859,565; 5,550,677; 5,670,935; 6,636,258; 7,145,519; 7,161,616; 7,230,640; 7,248,283; 7,295,229; 7,301,466; 7,592,928; 7,881,496; 7,720,580; 7,038,577; 6,882,287; 5,929,786 and/or 5,786,772, and/or International Publication Nos. WO 2011/028686; WO 2010/099416; WO 2012/061567; WO 2012/068331; WO 2012/075250; WO 2012/103193; WO 2012/0116043; WO 2012/0145313; WO 2012/0145501; WO 2012/145818; WO 2012/145822; WO 2012/158167; WO 2012/075250; WO 2012/103193; WO 2012/0116043; WO 2012/0145501; WO 2012/0145343; WO 2012/154919; WO 2013/019707; WO 2013/016409; WO 2012/145822; WO 2013/067083; WO 2013/070539; WO 2013/043661; WO 2013/048994; WO 2013/063014, WO 2013/081984; WO 2013/081985; WO 2013/074604; WO 2013/086249; WO 2013/103548; WO 2013/109869; WO 2013/123161; WO 2013/126715; WO 2013/043661 and/or WO 2013/158592 and/or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/082,573, filed Nov. 18, 2013 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P2183); Ser. No. 14/082,574, filed Nov. 18, 2013 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P2184); Ser. No. 14/082,575, filed Nov. 18, 2013 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P2185); Ser. No. 14/082,577, filed Nov. 18, 2013 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P2203); Ser. No. 14/071,086, filed Nov. 4, 2013 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P2208); Ser. No. 14/076,524, filed Nov. 11, 2013 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P2209); Ser. No. 14/052,945, filed Oct. 14, 2013 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P-2165); Ser. No. 14/046,174, filed Oct. 4, 2013 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P-2158); Ser. No. 14/016,790, filed Oct. 3, 2013 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P-2139); Ser. No. 14/036,723, filed Sep. 25, 2013 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P-2148); Ser. No. 14/016,790, filed Sep. 3, 2013 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P-2139); Ser. No. 14/001,272, filed Aug. 23, 2013 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P-1824); Ser. No. 13/970,868, filed Aug. 20, 2013 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P2131); Ser. No. 13/964,134, filed Aug. 12, 2013 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P-2123); Ser. No. 13/942,758, filed Jul. 16, 2013 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P-2127); Ser. No. 13/942,753, filed Jul. 16, 2013 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P-2112); Ser. No. 13/927,680, filed Jun. 26, 2013 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P-2091); Ser. No. 13/916,051, filed Jun. 12, 2013 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P-2081); Ser. No. 13/894,870, filed May 15, 2013 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P-2062); Ser. No. 13/887,724, filed May 6, 2013 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P-2072); Ser. No. 13/852,190, filed Mar. 28, 2013 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P2046); Ser. No. 13/851,378, filed Mar. 27, 2013 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P-2036); Ser. No. 13/848,796, filed Mar. 22, 2012 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P-2034); Ser. No. 13/847,815, filed Mar. 20, 2013 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P-2030); Ser. No. 13/800,697, filed Mar. 13, 2013 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P-2060); Ser. No. 13/785,099, filed Mar. 5, 2013 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P-2017); Ser. No. 13/779,881, filed Feb. 28, 2013 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P-2028); Ser. No. 13/774,317, filed Feb. 22, 2013 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P-2015); Ser. No. 13/774,315, filed Feb. 22, 2013 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P-2013); Ser. No. 13/681,963, filed Nov. 20, 2012 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P-1983); Ser. No. 13/660,306, filed Oct. 25, 2012 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P-1950); Ser. No. 13/653,577, filed Oct. 17, 2012 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P-1948); and/or Ser. No. 13/534,657, filed Jun. 27, 2012 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P-1892), and/or U.S. provisional applications, Ser. No. 61/901,127, filed Nov. 7, 2013; Ser. No. 61/905,461, filed Nov. 18, 2013; Ser. No. 61/905,462, filed Nov. 18, 2013; Ser. No. 61/895,610, filed Oct. 25, 2013; Ser. No. 61/895,609, filed Oct. 25, 2013; Ser. No. 61/893,489, filed Oct. 21, 2013; Ser. No. 61/886,883, filed Oct. 4, 2013; Ser. No. 61/879,837, filed Sep. 19, 2013; Ser. No. 61/879,835, filed Sep. 19, 2013; Ser. No. 61/878,877, filed Sep. 17, 2013; Ser. No. 61/875,351, filed Sep. 9, 2013; Ser. No. 61/869,195, filed. Aug. 23, 2013; Ser. No. 61/864,835, filed Aug. 12, 2013; Ser. No. 61/864,836, filed Aug. 12, 2013; Ser. No. 61/864,837, filed Aug. 12, 2013; Ser. No. 61/864,838, filed Aug. 12, 2013; Ser. No. 61/856,843, filed Jul. 22, 2013, Ser. No. 61/845,061, filed Jul. 11, 2013; Ser. No. 61/844,630, filed Jul. 10, 2013; Ser. No. 61/844,173, filed Jul. 9, 2013; Ser. No. 61/844,171, filed Jul. 9, 2013; Ser. No. 61/842,644, filed Jul. 3, 2013; Ser. No. 61/840,542, filed Jun. 28, 2013; Ser. No. 61/838,619, filed Jun. 24, 2013; Ser. No. 61/838,621, filed Jun. 24, 2013; Ser. No. 61/837,955, filed Jun. 21, 2013; Ser. No. 61/836,900, filed Jun. 19, 2013; Ser. No. 61/836,380, filed Jun. 18, 2013; Ser. No. 61/834,129, filed Jun. 12, 2013; Ser. No. 61/833,080, filed Jun. 10, 2013; Ser. No. 61/830,375, filed Jun. 3, 2013; Ser. No. 61/830,377, filed Jun. 3, 2013; Ser. No. 61/825,752, filed May 21, 2013; Ser. No. 61/825,753, filed May 21, 2013; Ser. No. 61/823,648, filed May 15, 2013; Ser. No. 61/823,644, filed May 15, 2013; Ser. No. 61/821,922, filed May 10, 2013; Ser. No. 61/819,835, filed May 6, 2013; Ser. No. 61/819,033, filed May 3, 2013; Ser. No. 61/816,956, filed Apr. 29, 2013; Ser. No. 61/815,044, filed Apr. 23, 2013; Ser. No. 61/814,533, filed Apr. 22, 2013; Ser. No. 61/813,361, filed Apr. 18, 2013; Ser. No. 61/810,407, filed Apr. 10, 2013; Ser. No. 61/808,930, filed Apr. 5, 2013; Ser. No. 61/807,050, filed Apr. 1, 2013; Ser. No. 61/806,674, filed Mar. 29, 2013; Ser. No. 61/793,592, filed Mar. 15, 2013; Ser. No. 61/772,015, filed Mar. 4, 2013; Ser. No. 61/772,014, filed Mar. 4, 2013; Ser. No. 61/770,051, filed Feb. 27, 2013; Ser. No. 61/770,048, filed Feb. 27, 2013; Ser. No. 61/766,883, filed Feb. 20, 2013; Ser. No. 61/760,366, filed Feb. 4, 2013; Ser. No. 61/760,364, filed Feb. 4, 2013; Ser. No. 61/756,832, filed Jan. 25, 2013; Ser. No. 61/754,804, filed Jan. 21, 2013; Ser. No. 61/736,104, filed Dec. 12, 2012; Ser. No. 61/736,103, filed Dec. 12, 2012; Ser. No. 61/734,457, filed Dec. 7, 2012; and/or Ser. No. 61/733,598, filed Dec. 5, 2012, which are all hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. The system may communicate with other communication systems via any suitable means, such as by utilizing aspects of the systems described in International Publication Nos. WO/2010/144900; WO 2013/043661 and/or WO 2013/081985, and/or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/202,005, filed Aug. 17, 2011 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P-1595), which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

The imaging device and control and image processor and any associated illumination source, if applicable, may comprise any suitable components, and may utilize aspects of the cameras and vision systems described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,550,677; 5,877,897; 6,498,620; 5,670,935; 5,796,094; 6,396,397; 6,806,452; 6,690,268; 7,005,974; 7,123,168; 7,004,606; 6,946,978; 7,038,577; 6,353,392; 6,320,176; 6,313,454; and 6,824,281, and/or International Publication No. WO 2010/099416, published Sep. 2, 2010, and/or PCT Application No. PCT/US10/47256, filed Aug. 31, 2010 and published Mar. 10, 2011 as International Publication No. WO 2011/028686, and/or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/508,840, filed Jul. 24, 2009, and published Jan. 28, 2010 as U.S. Pat. Publication No. US 2010-0020170, and/or PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/048110, filed Jul. 25, 2012 (Attorney Docket MAG04 FP-1907(PCT)), and/or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/534,657, filed Jun. 27, 2012 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P-1892), which are all hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. The camera or cameras may comprise any suitable cameras or imaging sensors or camera modules, and may utilize aspects of the cameras or sensors described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/091,359, filed Apr. 24, 2008 and published Oct. 1, 2009 as U.S. Publication No. US-2009-0244361, and/or Ser. No. 13/260,400, filed Sep. 26, 2011 (Attorney Docket MAG04 P-1757), and/or U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,965,336 and/or 7,480,149, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. The imaging array sensor may comprise any suitable sensor, and may utilize various imaging sensors or imaging array sensors or cameras or the like, such as a CMOS imaging array sensor, a CCD sensor or other sensors or the like, such as the types described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,550,677; 5,670,935; 5,760,962; 5,715,093; 5,877,897; 6,922,292; 6,757,109; 6,717,610; 6,590,719; 6,201,642; 6,498,620; 5,796,094; 6,097,023; 6,320,176; 6,559,435; 6,831,261; 6,806,452; 6,396,397; 6,822,563; 6,946,978; 7,339,149; 7,038,577; 7,004,606; and/or 7,720,580, and/or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/534,632, filed May 11, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,965,336; and/or PCT Application No. PCT/US2008/076022, filed Sep. 11, 2008 and published Mar. 19, 2009 as International Publication No. WO/2009/036176, and/or PCT Application No. PCT/US2008/078700, filed Oct. 3, 2008 and published Apr. 9, 2009 as International Publication No. WO/2009/046268, which are all hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

The camera module and circuit chip or board and imaging sensor may be implemented and operated in connection with various vehicular vision-based systems, and/or may be operable utilizing the principles of such other vehicular systems, such as a vehicle headlamp control system, such as the type disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,796,094; 6,097,023; 6,320,176; 6,559,435; 6,831,261; 7,004,606; 7,339,149; and/or 7,526,103, which are all hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties, a rain sensor, such as the types disclosed in commonly assigned U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,353,392; 6,313,454; 6,320,176; and/or 7,480,149, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties, a vehicle vision system, such as a forwardly, sidewardly or rearwardly directed vehicle vision system utilizing principles disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,550,677; 5,670,935; 5,760,962; 5,877,897; 5,949,331; 6,222,447; 6,302,545; 6,396,397; 6,498,620; 6,523,964; 6,611,202; 6,201,642; 6,690,268; 6,717,610; 6,757,109; 6,802,617; 6,806,452; 6,822,563; 6,891,563; 6,946,978; and/or 7,859,565, which are all hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties, a trailer hitching aid or tow check system, such as the type disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,005,974, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, a reverse or sideward imaging system, such as for a lane change assistance system or lane departure warning system or for a blind spot or object detection system, such as imaging or detection systems of the types disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,720,580; 7,038,577; 5,929,786 and/or 5,786,772, and/or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/239,980, filed Sep. 30, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,881,496, and/or U.S. provisional applications, Ser. No. 60/628,709, filed Nov. 17, 2004; Ser. No. 60/614,644, filed Sep. 30, 2004; Ser. No. 60/618,686, filed Oct. 14, 2004; Ser. No. 60/638,687, filed Dec. 23, 2004, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties, a video device for internal cabin surveillance and/or video telephone function, such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,760,962; 5,877,897; 6,690,268; and/or 7,370,983, and/or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/538,724, filed Jun. 13, 2005 and published Mar. 9, 2006 as U.S. Publication No. US-2006-0050018, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties, a traffic sign recognition system, a system for determining a distance to a leading or trailing vehicle or object, such as a system utilizing the principles disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,396,397 and/or 7,123,168, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties, and/or the like.

Optionally, the circuit board or chip may include circuitry for the imaging array sensor and or other electronic accessories or features, such as by utilizing compass-on-a-chip or EC driver-on-a-chip technology and aspects such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,255,451 and/or U.S. Pat. No. 7,480,149; and/or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/226,628, filed Sep. 14, 2005 and published Mar. 23, 2006 as U.S. Publication No. US-2006-0061008, and/or Ser. No. 12/578,732, filed Oct. 14, 2009 (Attorney Docket DON01 P-1564), which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

Optionally, the vision system may include a display for displaying images captured by one or more of the imaging sensors for viewing by the driver of the vehicle while the driver is normally operating the vehicle. Optionally, for example, the vision system may include a video display device disposed at or in the interior rearview mirror assembly of the vehicle, such as by utilizing aspects of the video mirror display systems described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,690,268 and/or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/333,337, filed Dec. 21, 2011 (Attorney Docket DON01 P-1797), which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. The video mirror display may comprise any suitable devices and systems and optionally may utilize aspects of the compass display systems described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,370,983; 7,329,013; 7,308,341; 7,289,037; 7,249,860; 7,004,593; 4,546,551; 5,699,044; 4,953,305; 5,576,687; 5,632,092; 5,677,851; 5,708,410; 5,737,226; 5,802,727; 5,878,370; 6,087,953; 6,173,508; 6,222,460; 6,513,252; and/or 6,642,851, and/or European patent application, published Oct. 11, 2000 under Publication No. EP 0 1043566, and/or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/226,628, filed Sep. 14, 2005 and published Mar. 23, 2006 as U.S. Publication No. US-2006-0061008, which are all hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. Optionally, the video mirror display screen or device may be operable to display images captured by a rearward viewing camera of the vehicle during a reversing maneuver of the vehicle (such as responsive to the vehicle gear actuator being placed in a reverse gear position or the like) to assist the driver in backing up the vehicle, and optionally may be operable to display the compass heading or directional heading character or icon when the vehicle is not undertaking a reversing maneuver, such as when the vehicle is being driven in a forward direction along a road (such as by utilizing aspects of the display system described in PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/056295, filed Oct. 14, 2011 and published Apr. 19, 2012 as International Publication No. WO 2012/051500, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety).

Optionally, the vision system (utilizing the forward facing camera and a rearward facing camera and other cameras disposed at the vehicle with exterior fields of view) may be part of or may provide a display of a top-down view or birds-eye view system of the vehicle or a surround view at the vehicle, such as by utilizing aspects of the vision systems described in International Publication Nos. WO 2010/099416; WO 2011/028686; WO2012/075250; WO 2013/019795; WO 2012/075250; WO 2012/145822; WO 2013/081985; WO 2013/086249; and/or WO 2013/109869, and/or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/333,337, filed Dec. 21, 2011 (Attorney Docket DON01 P-1797), which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

Optionally, a video mirror display may be disposed rearward of and behind the reflective element assembly and may comprise a display such as the types disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,530,240; 6,329,925; 7,855,755; 7,626,749; 7,581,859; 7,446,650; 7,370,983; 7,338,177; 7,274,501; 7,255,451; 7,195,381; 7,184,190; 5,668,663; 5,724,187 and/or 6,690,268, and/or in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/091,525, filed Apr. 25, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,855,755; Ser. No. 11/226,628, filed Sep. 14, 2005 and published Mar. 23, 2006 as U.S. Publication No. US-2006-0061008; and/or Ser. No. 10/538,724, filed Jun. 13, 2005 and published Mar. 9, 2006 as U.S. Publication No. US-2006-0050018, which are all hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. The display is viewable through the reflective element when the display is activated to display information. The display element may be any type of display element, such as a vacuum fluorescent (VF) display element, a light emitting diode (LED) display element, such as an organic light emitting diode (OLED) or an inorganic light emitting diode, an electroluminescent (EL) display element, a liquid crystal display (LCD) element, a video screen display element or backlit thin film transistor (TFT) display element or the like, and may be operable to display various information (as discrete characters, icons or the like, or in a multi-pixel manner) to the driver of the vehicle, such as passenger side inflatable restraint (PSIR) information, tire pressure status, and/or the like. The mirror assembly and/or display may utilize aspects described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,184,190; 7,255,451; 7,446,924 and/or 7,338,177, which are all hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. The thicknesses and materials of the coatings on the substrates of the reflective element may be selected to provide a desired color or tint to the mirror reflective element, such as a blue colored reflector, such as is known in the art and such as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,910,854; 6,420,036; and/or 7,274,501, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

Optionally, the display or displays and any associated user inputs may be associated with various accessories or systems, such as, for example, a tire pressure monitoring system or a passenger air bag status or a garage door opening system or a telematics system or any other accessory or system of the mirror assembly or of the vehicle or of an accessory module or console of the vehicle, such as an accessory module or console of the types described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,289,037; 6,877,888; 6,824,281; 6,690,268; 6,672,744; 6,386,742; and 6,124,886, and/or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/538,724, filed Jun. 13, 2005 and published Mar. 9, 2006 as U.S. Publication No. US-2006-0050018, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

While the above description constitutes a plurality of embodiments of the present invention, it will be appreciated that the present invention is susceptible to further modification and change without departing from the fair meaning of the accompanying claims.

Claims

1. A vehicular vision system, said vehicular vision system comprising: an image sensor operable to capture frames of image data;an image processor operable to process captured image data;wherein said image processor is operable to determine edges in captured image data;wherein said image processor is operable to determine a number of edges detected in individual frames of captured image data; andwherein said vision system adjusts a sensitivity of said image processor responsive to the determined number of edges detected in at least one frame of captured image data.

2. The vehicular vision system of claim 1, wherein, when the determined number of edges detected in a frame of captured image data is above an upper threshold level, said vision system reduces the sensitivity of said image processor.

3. The vehicular vision system of claim 2, wherein, when the determined number of edges detected in a frame of captured image data is below a lower threshold level, said vision system increases the sensitivity of said image processor.

4. The vehicular vision system of claim 1, wherein, when the determined number of edges detected in a frame of captured image data is below a lower threshold level, said vision system increases the sensitivity of said image processor.

5. The vehicular vision system of claim 1, wherein said image processor is operable to detect up to a selected maximum number of edges in a given frame of captured image data, and wherein said vision system, responsive to the number of edges detected in a frame of captured image data, is operable to adjust the sensitivity of said image processor so that the determined number of edges detected in a subsequent frame of captured image data is at or near the selected maximum number of edges.

6. The vehicular vision system of claim 5, wherein the selected maximum number of edges is adjustable.

7. The vehicular vision system of claim 5, wherein the sensitivity of said image processor is adjusted so that, for any given frame of captured image data, said image processor is operable to detect a number of edges that is close to the capability of said image processor but not greater than the capability of said image processor.

8. The vehicular vision system of claim 7, wherein said image sensor comprises a high dynamic range sensor.

9. The vehicular vision system of claim 1, wherein said image sensor comprises a high dynamic range sensor.

10. The vehicular vision system of claim 1, wherein said image processor is operable to determine a number of corners detected in individual frames of captured image data, and wherein said vision system adjusts the sensitivity of said image processor responsive to the determined number of corners detected in at least one frame of captured image data.

11. The vehicular vision system of claim 10, wherein said image processor is operable to detect up to a selected maximum number of corners in a given frame of captured image data, and wherein said vision system, responsive to the number of corners detected in a frame of captured image data, is operable to adjust the sensitivity of said image processor so that the determined number of corners detected in a subsequent frame of captured image data is at or near the selected maximum number of corners.

12. The vehicular vision system of claim 1, wherein said image processor determines edges in the captured image data via a FAST-9 algorithm.

13. A vehicular vision system, said vehicular vision system comprising: an image sensor operable to capture frames of image data;an image processor operable to process captured image data;wherein said image processor is operable to determine corners in captured image data;wherein said image processor is operable to determine a number of corners detected in individual frames of captured image data;wherein said vision system adjusts a sensitivity of said image processor responsive to the determined number of corners detected in at least one frame of captured image data;wherein, when the determined number of corners detected in a frame of captured image data is above an upper threshold level, said vision system reduces the sensitivity of said image processor; andwherein, when the determined number of corners detected in a frame of captured image data is below a lower threshold level, said vision system increases the sensitivity of said image processor.

14. The vehicular vision system of claim 13, wherein said image processor is operable to detect up to a selected maximum number of corners in a given frame of captured image data, and wherein said vision system, responsive to the number of corners detected in a frame of captured image data, is operable to adjust the sensitivity of said image processor so that the determined number of corners detected in a subsequent frame of captured image data is at or near the selected maximum number of corners.

15. The vehicular vision system of claim 14, wherein the selected maximum number of corners is adjustable.

16. The vehicular vision system of claim 14, wherein the sensitivity of said image processor is adjusted so that, for any given frame of captured image data, said image processor is operable to detect a number of corners that is close to the capability of said image processor but not greater than the capability of said image processor.

17. The vehicular vision system of claim 13, wherein said image sensor comprises a high dynamic range sensor.

18. A vehicular vision system, said vehicular vision system comprising: an image sensor operable to capture frames of image data;an image processor operable to process captured image data;wherein said image processor is operable to determine edges in captured image data;wherein said image processor is operable to determine a number of edges detected in individual frames of captured image data;wherein said vision system adjusts a sensitivity of said image processor responsive to the determined number of edges detected in at least one frame of captured image data;wherein the sensitivity of said image processor is adjusted so that, for any given frame of captured image data, said image processor is operable to detect a number of edges that is close to the capability of said image processor but not greater than the capability of said image processor;wherein, when the determined number of edges detected in a frame of captured image data is above an upper threshold level, said vision system reduces the sensitivity of said image processor; andwherein, when the determined number of edges detected in a frame of captured image data is below a lower threshold level, said vision system increases the sensitivity of said image processor.

19. The vehicular vision system of claim 18, wherein said image processor is operable to detect up to a selected maximum number of edges in a given frame of captured image data, and wherein said vision system, responsive to the number of edges detected in a frame of captured image data, is operable to adjust the sensitivity of said image processor so that the determined number of edges detected in a subsequent frame of captured image data is at or near the selected maximum number of edges.

20. The vehicular vision system of claim 18, wherein said image processor is operable to determine a number of corners detected in individual frames of captured image data, and wherein said vision system adjusts the sensitivity of said image processor responsive to the determined number of corners detected in at least one frame of captured image data.