This application is a national stage of PCT/EP2004/000349 filed Jan. 19, 2004 and based upon DE 103 03 013.1 filed Jan. 27, 2003 under the International Convention.
1. Field of the invention
The present invention relates to a vehicle with at least one catadioptric camera fitted on the vehicle. The camera is one in which at least one curved mirror arranged on the optical axis of the camera is used as an imaging element. The camera allows panoramic viewing in directions transverse to the optical axis, with an azimuth angle of up to 360° with respect to the latter. According to the invention, the catadioptric camera is preferably used to monitor the space at the back and front of the vehicle.
2. Related Art of the Invention
Along the optical axis, the field of view of a catadioptric camera is bounded in both directions by conical blind regions. The field of view boundary of such a cone, or its semivertex angle, is dictated by the configuration of the camera itself, for instance the spatial extend and arrangement of the imaging elements.
EP 1 197 937 A1 relates to a spatial monitoring system for a vehicle, which comprises a catadioptric camera with an optical axis oriented vertically. EP 1 158 473 A2 also relates to such a spatial monitoring system.
Since the blind regions of a catadioptric camera cannot be made arbitrarily small, there are regions in the immediate vicinity of the vehicle which cannot be seen by these known spatial monitoring systems.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a vehicle which has at least one catadioptric camera fitted on the vehicle, and which ensures improved spatial monitoring.
Accordingly, the invention relates to a vehicle with at least one catadioptric camera fitted on the vehicle, which has an optical axis and at least a first mirror arranged on the optical axis. The optical axis is inclined with respect to a vertical. This has the advantage that the camera can also observe spatial regions in the immediate vicinity of the vehicle, in particular road surfaces, which would lie in the blind regions of the camera if its optical axis was arranged vertically. The oblique setting is preferably selected so that the vehicle completely fills up one of the blind regions.
If the optical axis of the catadioptric camera is inclined by an angle α with respect to a vertical, and the cone forming an upper blind region has a semivertex angle β, and then it is preferable for the angles α and β to satisfy the following inequality: β<90°−α. This ensures that the field of view of the camera always comprises a horizontal, so that even distant objects can be detected in the direction of this horizontal.
The semivertex angle of the cone forming the second blind region, or lower blind region, is denoted by χ. This blind region is generally filled at least partially by the vehicle itself. According to the invention, this semivertex angle χ is preferably greater than the angle α. This prevents the camera from detecting unnecessarily large areas of the vehicle which are generally not of interest to be observed.
Preferably, the angles χ and α satisfy the following inequality: χ<α+30°. This ensures on the one hand that the field of view of the camera is directed far downward so that, for example, the fenders of the vehicle lie in the field of view of the camera, but on the other hand, as already mentioned above, unnecessarily large areas of the vehicle such as front or rear surfaces are not also detected.
A catadioptric camera is preferably mounted on the nose and/or the rear of the vehicle. This makes it possible to monitor the space at the back and front of the vehicle. This is important especially when parking the vehicle. The catadioptric camera may in this case be mounted on the engine hood, on the trunk door, on the fenders or on the bodywork above the fenders.
If the angles α, β and χ are selected as indicated, then both the fender of the vehicle and a horizontal lie in the field of view of the catadioptric camera, which is mounted on the nose or rear of the vehicle. This allows optimal monitoring of the environment of a vehicle, especially when the space in front of or behind the vehicle needs to be monitored for parking.
Nevertheless, if a lateral environment of the vehicle is intended to be monitored, it is also possible to fit the catadioptric camera on the side bodywork of the vehicle or, for example, to integrate it in the exterior rear view mirrors.
The vehicle preferably has a device for retracting and deploying the catadioptric camera.
In the vehicle according to the invention, the catadioptric camera preferably has a second mirror, which is arranged opposite the first mirror on the optical axis. Such a catadioptric camera with two mirror surfaces is described, for example, in WO 00/41024.
The present invention will now be explained in more detail by way of example with reference to the following figures, in which:
The vehicle 1 furthermore has devices (not shown) for retracting and deploying the camera 2. When the cameras 2 are not needed, they can be fully retracted so that they no longer protrude from the surfaces of the engine hood 3 and the trunk door 4. By using a cover (not shown), the cameras 2 in the retracted state are protected from the effects of dirt and weather. Retractability of the cameras 2 also has the advantage that they are protected from the airflow when the vehicle 1 is driving at a substantial speed. In the retracted state, they furthermore do not impair the esthetic appearance of the vehicle 1. When the cameras 2 are needed, for example as an aid to parking, they can be deployed with the aid of the aforementioned device.
In the azimuth direction, the field of view of the camera 2 extends over an angle δ of 360°, although it may also be interrupted on the side facing the vehicle, the left-hand side in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
103 03 013 | Jan 2003 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2004/000349 | 1/19/2004 | WO | 00 | 7/27/2005 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2004/068440 | 8/12/2004 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4968124 | Deckert et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5027200 | Petrossian et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5646614 | Abersfelder et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
6421081 | Markus | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6449103 | Charles | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6538827 | Bos | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6575643 | Takahashi | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6611202 | Schofield et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6611282 | Trubko et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
20020005896 | Kumata et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020080017 | Kumata et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020181803 | Kawakami et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020186298 | Ikeda | Dec 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
9 400 821 | Jan 1996 | NL |
WO 03042743 | May 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060078328 A1 | Apr 2006 | US |