Vehicular control system using cameras and radar sensor

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10351135
  • Patent Number
    10,351,135
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, November 1, 2018
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 16, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
A vehicular control system includes a plurality of cameras, at least one radar sensor, and a control having at least one processor. Captured image data and sensed radar data are provided to and processed at the control to detect objects present exteriorly of the vehicle. The control receives data relevant to a geographic location of the vehicle. The vehicular control system wirelessly communicates information that is relevant to the geographic location of the vehicle to a remote receiver. The information wirelessly communicated to the remote receiver is derived, at least in part, from image data captured by at least a forward-viewing camera. The vehicular control system, based at least in part on processing at the control of at least one selected from the group consisting of (i) captured image data and (ii) captured radar data, detects another vehicle that is present exterior of the equipped vehicle.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to vision or imaging systems for vehicles and is related to object detection systems and, more particularly, to imaging systems which are operable to determine if a vehicle or object of interest is adjacent to, forward of or rearward of the subject vehicle to assist the driver in changing lanes or parking the vehicle. The present invention also relates generally to a lane departure warning system for a vehicle.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Many lane change aid/side object detection/lane departure warning devices or systems and the like have been proposed which are operable to detect a vehicle or other object that is present next to, ahead of or rearward of the equipped vehicle or in an adjacent lane with respect to the equipped vehicle. Such systems typically utilize statistical methodologies to statistically analyze the images captured by a camera or sensor at the vehicle to estimate whether a vehicle or other object is adjacent to the equipped vehicle. Because such systems typically use statistical methodologies to determine a likelihood or probability that a detected object is a vehicle, and for other reasons, the systems may generate false positive detections, where the system indicates that a vehicle is adjacent to, forward of or rearward of the subject vehicle when there is no vehicle adjacent to, forward of or rearward of the subject vehicle, or false negative detections, where the system, for example, indicates that there is no vehicle adjacent to the subject vehicle when there actually is a vehicle in the adjacent lane.


Such known and proposed systems are operable to statistically analyze substantially all of the pixels in a pixelated image as captured by a pixelated image capture device or camera. Also, such systems may utilize algorithmic means, such as flow algorithms or the like, to track substantially each pixel or most portions of the image to determine how substantially each pixel or most portions of the image has changed from one frame to the next. Such frame by frame flow algorithms and systems may not be able to track a vehicle which is moving at generally the same speed as the equipped vehicle, because there may be little or no relative movement between the vehicles and, consequently, little or no change from one frame to the next. Because the systems may thus substantially continuously analyze substantially every pixel for substantially every frame captured and track such pixels and frames from one frame to the next, such systems may require expensive processing controls and computationally expensive software to continuously handle and process substantially all of the data from substantially all of the pixels in substantially each captured image or frame.


Many automotive lane departure warning (LDW) systems (also known as run off road warning systems) are being developed and implemented on vehicles today. These systems warn a driver of a vehicle when their vehicle crosses the road's land markings or when there is a clear trajectory indicating they will imminently do so. The warnings are typically not activated if the corresponding turn signal is on, as this implies the driver intends to make a lane change maneuver. Additionally, the warning systems may be deactivated below a certain vehicle speed. The driver interface for these systems may be in the form of a visual warning (such as an indicator light) and/or an audible warning (typically a rumble strip sound). One application warns a driver with an indicator light if the vehicle tire is crossing the lane marker and no other vehicle is detected in the driver's corresponding blind spot; and/or further warns the driver with an audible warning if the vehicle is crossing into the adjacent lane and there is a vehicle detected in the driver's blind spot.


There is concern that the current systems will be more of a driver annoyance or distraction than will be acceptable by the consumer market. Using the turn signal as the principle means of establishing to the warning system that the maneuver is intentional does not reflect typical driving patterns and, thus, many intended maneuvers will cause a warning. As a driver gets annoyed by warnings during intended maneuvers, the driver will likely begin to ignore the warnings, which may result in an accident when the warning is appropriate.


Therefore, there is a need in the art for an object detection system, such as a blind spot detection system or lane change assist system or lane departure warning system or the like, which overcomes the short comings of the prior art.


SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTION

The present invention is intended to provide an object detection system, such as a blind spot detection system, a lane change assist or aid system or device, a lane departure warning system, a side object detection system, a reverse park aid system, a forward park aid system, a forward, sideward or rearward collision avoidance system, an adaptive cruise control system, a passive steering system or the like, which is operable to detect and/or identify a vehicle or other object of interest at the side, front or rear of the vehicle equipped with the object detection system. The object detection system of the present invention, such as a lane change assist system, utilizes an edge detection algorithm to detect edges of objects in the captured images and determines if a vehicle is present in a lane adjacent to the equipped or subject vehicle in response to various characteristics of the detected edges, such as the size, location, distance, intensity, relative speed and/or the like. The system processes a subset of the image data captured which is representative of a target zone or area of interest of the scene within the field of view of the imaging system where a vehicle or object of interest is likely to be present. The system processes the detected edges within the image data subset to determine if they correspond with physical characteristics of vehicles and other objects to determine whether the detected edge or edges is/are part of a vehicle or a significant edge or object at or toward the subject vehicle. The system utilizes various filtering mechanisms, such as algorithms executed in software by a system microprocessor, to substantially eliminate or substantially ignore edges or pixels that are not or cannot be indicative of a vehicle or significant object to reduce the processing requirements and to reduce the possibility of false positive signals.


In accordance with the present invention, portions or subsets of the image data of the captured image which are representative of areas of interest of the exterior scene where a vehicle or object of interest is likely to be present are weighted and utilized more than other portions or other subsets of the image data of the captured image representative of other areas of the exterior scene where such a vehicle or object of interest is unlikely to be present. Thus, in accordance with the present invention, a reduced set or subset of captured image data is processed based on where geographically vehicles of interest are realistically expected to be in the field of view of the image capture device. More specifically, for example, the control may process and weight the portion of the captured image data set that is associated with a lower portion of the image capture device field of view that is typically directed generally toward the road surface. Preferably, less than approximately 75% of the image data captured by the multi-pixel camera arrangement is utilized for object detection, more preferably, less than approximately 66% of the image data captured by the multi-pixel camera arrangement is utilized for object detection, and most preferably, less than approximately 50% of the image data captured by the multi-pixel camera arrangement is utilized for object detection.


It is further envisioned that the control may process or weight image data within the reduced set or subset which is indicative of physical characteristics of a vehicle or object of interest more than other image data within the reduced set which is not likely indicative of or cannot be indicative of such a vehicle or object of interest. The control thus may further reduce the processing requirements within the reduced set or sets of image data of the captured image.


Preferably, a multi-pixel array is utilized, such as a CMOS sensor or a CCD sensor or the like, such as disclosed in commonly assigned U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,550,677; 5,670,935; 5,796,094 and 6,097,023, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/441,341, filed Nov. 16, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,339,149, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference, or such as an extended dynamic range camera, such as the types disclosed in U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/426,239, filed Nov. 14, 2002, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference. Because a multi-pixel array is utilized, the image or portion of the image captured by a particular pixel or set of pixels may be associated with a particular area of the exterior scene and the image data captured by the particular pixel or set of pixels may be processed accordingly.


According to an aspect of the present invention, an object detection system for a vehicle comprises a pixelated imaging array sensor and a control. The imaging array sensor is directed generally exteriorly from the vehicle to capture an image of a scene occurring exteriorly, such as toward the side, front or rear, of the vehicle. The control comprises an edge detection algorithm and is responsive to an output of the imaging array sensor in order to detect edges of objects present exteriorly of the vehicle. The control is operable to process and weight and utilize a reduced image data set or subset representative of a target area of the exterior scene more than other image data representative of other areas of the exterior scene. The target area or zone comprises a subset or portion of the image captured by the imaging array sensor and is representative of a subset or portion of the exterior scene within the field of view of the imaging array sensor. The control thus processes a reduced amount of image data and reduces processing of image data that is unlikely to indicate a vehicle or other object of interest. The imaging array sensor may be directed partially downwardly such that an upper portion of the captured image is generally at or along the horizon.


The control may be operable to process portions of the captured image representative of a target area of the scene and may reduce processing or reduce utilization of other portions of the captured image representative of areas outside of the target area and, thus, reduce the processing of edges or pixels which detect areas where detected edges are likely indicative of insignificant objects or which are not or cannot be indicative of a vehicle or significant object. The control is thus operable to process and weight and utilize image data from certain targeted portions of the captured image more than image data from other portions which are outside of the targeted portions or the target zone or area of interest.


The control may determine whether the detected edges within the target area are part of a vehicle in an adjacent lane in response to various characteristics of the detected edges which may be indicative of a vehicle or a significant object. For example, the control may be operable to process certain areas or portions or subsets of the captured image data or may be operable to process horizontal detected edges and filter out or substantially ignore vertical detected edges. The control may also or otherwise be operable to process detected edges which have a concentration of the edge or edges in a particular area or zone within the captured image. The control thus may determine that one or more detected edges are part of a vehicle in the adjacent lane in response to the edges meeting one or more threshold levels. Also, the control may adjust the minimum or maximum threshold levels in response to various characteristics or driving conditions or road conditions. For example, the control may be operable to process or substantially ignore detected edges in response to at least one of a size, location, intensity, distance, and/or speed of the detected edges relative to the vehicle, and may adjust the minimum or maximum threshold levels or criteria in response to a distance between the detected edges and the subject vehicle, a road curvature, lighting conditions and/or the like.


According to another aspect of the present invention, an imaging system for a vehicle comprises an imaging array sensor having a plurality of photo-sensing or accumulating or light sensing pixels, and a control responsive to the imaging array sensor. The imaging array sensor is positioned at the vehicle and operable to capture an image of a scene occurring exteriorly of the vehicle. The control is operable to process the captured image, which comprises an image data set representative of the exterior scene. The control is operable to apply an edge detection algorithm to the image captured by the imaging array sensor to detect edges or objects present exteriorly of the vehicle. The control may be operable to determine whether the detected edges or objects are indicative of a significant object or object of interest. The control is operable to process a reduced data set or subset of the image data set, which is representative of a target zone or area of the exterior scene, more than other image data representative of areas of the exterior scene which are outside of the target zone. The control thus may process image data of the reduced data set or subset, such as by applying an edge detection algorithm to the reduced data set, and substantially discount or limit processing of the other image data which is outside of the reduced data set or subset of the image or of the target zone of the exterior scene.


The control may be operable to adjust the reduced data set or subset and the corresponding target zone in response to various threshold criterion. The control may be operable to adjust the reduced data set or target zone in response to a distance to a detected edge or object. The control may approximate a distance to a portion of a detected edge or object in response to a location of the pixel or pixels capturing the portion in the captured image. The pixel location may be determined relative to a target pixel which may be directed generally at the horizon and along the direction of travel of the vehicle. For example, the control may be operable to approximate the distance using spherical trigonometry in response to a pixel size, pixel resolution and field of view of the imaging array sensor. The control may access an information array which provides a calculated distance for each pixel within the reduced data set or target zone to approximate the distance to the portion of the detected edge or object.


In order to determine if a detected edge or detected edges is/are part of or indicative of a vehicle, the control may be operable to determine if the detected edge or edges is/are associated with an ellipse or partial ellipse, since the ellipse or partial ellipse may be indicative of a tire of a vehicle near the equipped vehicle, such as a vehicle in a lane adjacent to the equipped vehicle. The control may also be operable to track one or more of the detected edges between subsequent frames captured by the imaging array sensor to classify and/or identify the object or objects associated with the detected edge or edges.


The object detection system or imaging system may comprise a lane change assist system operable to detect vehicles or objects of interest sidewardly of the vehicle. Optionally, the control may be in communication with a forward facing imaging system. The forward facing imaging system may communicate at least one of oncoming traffic information, leading traffic information and lane marking information to the control of the lane change assist system to assist the lane change assist system in readily identifying vehicles at the side of the subject vehicle or adjusting a reduced data set or an area or zone of interest within the captured image. The control may be operable to adjust the reduced data set or target zone in response to the forward facing imaging system.


Optionally, the object detection system or imaging system may comprise a forward facing imaging system, such as a lane departure warning system. The lane departure warning system may provide a warning or alert signal to the driver of the vehicle in response to a detection of the vehicle drifting or leaving its occupied lane.


Optionally, the forward facing imaging system may include or may be in communication with a passive steering system which is operable to adjust a steering direction of the vehicle in response to a detection by the imaging system of the vehicle drifting or leaving its occupied lane. Optionally, the forward facing imaging system may include or may be in communication with an adaptive speed control which is operable to adjust a cruise control or speed setting of the vehicle in response to road conditions or traffic conditions detected by the imaging system. Optionally, the imaging system may be in communication with a remote receiving device to provide image data to a display system remote from the vehicle such that a person remote from the vehicle may receive and view the image data with the remote receiving device to determine the location and/or condition of the vehicle or its occupants.


According to another aspect of the present invention, a lane change assist system for a vehicle comprises an imaging sensor and a control. The imaging sensor is positioned at the vehicle and directed generally sidewardly from the vehicle to capture an image of a scene occurring toward the side of the vehicle. The control is operable to process the image captured by the imaging array sensor to detect objects sidewardly of the vehicle. The captured image comprises an image data set representative of the exterior scene. The control is operable to process a reduced image data set of the image data set more than other image data of the image data set. The reduced image data set is representative of a target zone of the captured image.


The control may be operable to adjust the reduced data set or subset or target zone in response to an adjustment input. In one form, the adjustment input comprises an output from an ambient light sensor, a headlamp control and/or a manual control. The control may be operable to adjust the reduced data set or subset or target zone between a daytime zone and a nighttime zone in response to the output. The control may be operable to adjust a height input for the imaging array sensor such that the daytime zone is generally along the road surface and the nighttime zone is generally at a height of headlamps of vehicles.


In another form, the control may be operable to adjust the reduced data set or subset or target zone in response to a detection of the vehicle traveling through or along a curved section of road. The adjustment input may comprise an output from a forward facing imaging system or a detection by the imaging sensor and control that the vehicle is traveling through a curved section of road, such as by the imaging sensor and control detecting and identifying curved lane markers or the like along the road surface.


It is further envisioned that many aspects of the present invention are suitable for use in other vehicle vision or imaging systems, such as other side object detection systems, forward facing vision systems, such as lane departure warning systems, forward park aid systems or the like, rearward facing vision systems, such as back up aid systems or rearward park aid systems or the like, or panoramic vision systems and/or the like.


The present invention may also or otherwise provide a lane departure warning system that reduces and may substantially eliminate the provision of an unwarranted and/or unwanted visual or audible warning signals to a driver of a vehicle when the driver intends to perform the driving maneuver.


According to another aspect of the present invention, a lane departure warning system includes an imaging sensor mounted at a forward portion of a vehicle and operable to capture an image of a scene generally forwardly of the vehicle, and a control for providing a warning signal to a driver of the vehicle in response to an image captured by the imaging sensor. The control is operable to process the image captured to detect at least one of a lane marking, a road edge, a shoulder edge and another vehicle or object. The lane departure warning system provides the warning signal in response to a detected object or marking and further in response to the vehicle speed or other parameters which provide additional information concerning the likelihood that a warning signal is necessary.


Therefore, the present invention provides an object detection system or imaging system, such as a lane change assist system or other type of object detection or imaging system, which is operable to detect and identify vehicles or other objects of interest exteriorly, such as sidewardly, rearwardly, and/or forwardly of the subject vehicle. The imaging system may primarily process image data within a reduced data set or subset of the captured image data, where the reduced data set is representative of a target zone or area of interest within the field of view of the imaging system, and may adjust the reduced data set or zone or area in response to various inputs or characteristics, such as road conditions, lighting or driving conditions and/or characteristics of the detected edges or objects. The imaging system of the present invention is operable to detect edges of objects, and particularly horizontal edges of objects, to provide improved recognition or identification of the detected objects. The imaging system of the present invention may be operable to limit processing of or to filter or substantially eliminate or reduce the effect of edges or characteristics which are indicative of insignificant objects, thereby reducing the level of processing required on the captured images.


The edge detection process or algorithm of the lane change assist system of the present invention thus may provide for a low cost processing system or algorithm, which does not require the statistical methodologies and computationally expensive flow algorithms of the prior art systems. Also, the edge detection process may detect edges and objects even when there is little or no relative movement between the subject vehicle and the detected edge or object. The present invention thus may provide a faster processing of the captured images, which may be performed by a processor having lower processing capabilities then processors required for the prior art systems. The lane change assist system may also provide a low cost and fast approximation of a longitudinal and/or lateral and/or total distance between the subject vehicle and a detected edge or object exteriorly of the vehicle and may adjust a threshold detection level in response to the approximated distance.


These and other objects, advantages, purposes and features of the present invention will become apparent upon review of the following specification in conjunction with the drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a top plan view of a vehicle equipped with a lane change assist system in accordance with the present invention, as the vehicle travels along a section of road;



FIG. 2 is a side elevation of the vehicle of FIG. 1;



FIG. 3 is a schematic of a vehicle equipped with the lane change assist system of the present invention as the vehicle travels along a section of road;



FIG. 4 is another schematic of the vehicle and depicts how the lane change assist system of the present invention adapts between daytime and nighttime driving conditions;



FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a vehicle as it may be viewed by a camera or image sensor of the lane change assist system of the present invention;



FIG. 6 is a top plan view of a vehicle equipped with the lane change assist system of the present invention, as the vehicle travels around a sharp curve in a section of road;



FIG. 7 is a schematic of a pixelated image as may be captured by a camera or image sensor of a lane change assist system in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 8 is a schematic of another pixelated image similar to FIG. 7;



FIG. 9 is a block diagram of a top plan view of a vehicle equipped with the lane change assist system of the present invention and another vehicle as they travel along a section of road in adjacent lanes to one another;



FIG. 10 is a block diagram of a lane change assist system in accordance with the present invention;



FIGS. 11A-F are diagrams of a virtual camera and characteristics thereof useful in calculating a distance from the camera of the lane change assist system to an object detected in the field of view of the camera;



FIG. 12 is a top plan view of a vehicle driving along a road and incorporating a lane departure warning system of the present invention; and



FIG. 13 is another top plan view of the vehicle driving along a road, with another vehicle in an adjacent lane.





DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Referring now to the drawings and the illustrative embodiments depicted therein, an object detection system or imaging system, such as a lane change assist or aid system 10, is positioned at a vehicle 12 and is operable to capture an image of a scene occurring sidewardly and rearwardly at or along one or both sides of vehicle 12 (FIGS. 1-4 and 6). Lane change assist system 10 comprises an image capture device or sensor or camera 14 and a control 16 (FIGS. 3, 9 and 10). Camera 14 captures an image of the scene occurring toward a respective side of the vehicle 12, and control 16 processes the captured image to determine whether another vehicle 18 is present at the side of vehicle 12, as discussed below. Control 16 may be further operable to activate a warning indicator or display or signal device 17 (FIG. 10) to alert the driver of vehicle 12 that another vehicle is present at the side of vehicle 12. The warning or alert signal may be provided to the driver of vehicle 12 in response to another vehicle being detected at the blind spot area (as shown in FIG. 1) and may only be provided when the driver of vehicle 12 actuates a turn signal toward that side or begins turning the subject vehicle 12 toward that side to change lanes into the lane occupied by the other detected vehicle 18.


Camera or imaging sensor 14 of object detection system or lane change assist system 10 is operable to capture an image of the exterior scene within the field of view of the camera. The captured image comprises an image data set, which is representative of the exterior scene, and which is received by control 16. Control 16 is operable to process image data within a reduced data set or subset of the image data set more than other image data of the image data set to reduce the processing requirements of the control. The reduced data set or subset or subsets is/are representative of a target zone or area or areas in the exterior scene where a vehicle or other object of interest may realistically be expected to be present within the exterior scene. The control is thus operable to primarily process the significant or relevant area or areas of the scene more than less relevant areas, and may limit or reduce processing of or substantially ignore the image data representative of some areas of the exterior scene where it is not likely that a vehicle or other object of interest would be present or where a vehicle cannot be present.


Camera or imaging sensor 14 may comprise an imaging array sensor, such as a CMOS sensor or a CCD sensor or the like, such as disclosed in commonly assigned U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,550,677; 5,670,935; 5,796,094 and 6,097,023, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/441,341, filed Nov. 16, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,339,149, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference, or an extended dynamic range camera, such as the types disclosed in U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/426,239, filed Nov. 14, 2002, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference. The imaging sensor 14 may be implemented and operated in connection with other vehicular systems as well, or may be operable utilizing the principles of such other vehicular systems, such as a vehicle headlamp control system, such as the type disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,796,094, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference, a rain sensor, such as the types disclosed in commonly assigned U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,353,392; 6,313,454 and/or 6,320,176, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference, a vehicle vision system, such as a forwardly or sidewardly or rearwardly directed vehicle vision system utilizing the principles disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,550,677; 5,670,935 and 6,201,642, and/or in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/199,907, filed Nov. 25, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,717,610, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference, a traffic sign recognition system, a system for determining a distance to a leading vehicle or object, such as utilizing the principles disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,396,397, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference, and/or the like.


Camera 14 preferably comprises a pixelated imaging array sensor which has a plurality of photon accumulating light sensors or pixels 14a. The camera includes circuitry which is operable to individually access each photosensor pixel or element of the array of photosensor pixels and to provide an output or image data set associated with the individual signals to the control 16, such as via an analog to digital converter (not shown). As camera 14 receives light from objects and/or light sources in the target scene, the control 16 may then be operable to process the signal from at least some of the pixels to analyze the image data of the captured image, as discussed below.


Camera 14 may be positioned along one or both sides of vehicle 12, such as at or within the exterior rearview mirror 12a at either or both sides of vehicle 12. However, camera 14 may be positioned elsewhere along either or both sides and/or at the rear of the vehicle and directed sidewardly and rearwardly from the vehicle to capture an image at either side of the vehicle, without affecting the scope of the present invention. Camera 14 may be positioned at vehicle 12 and oriented or angled downwardly so as to capture an image which has an upper edge or region generally at the horizon 15, as can be seen with reference to FIGS. 2, 3 and 11C. Positioning or orienting the camera 14 in such a manner provides for an increased horizontal pixel count across the captured image at the important areas along the side of vehicle 12, since any vehicle or significant object positioned at or along a side of the subject vehicle will be substantially below the horizon and thus substantially within the captured image. The lane change assist system of the present invention thus may provide an increased portion of the captured image or increased pixel count at important or significant or relevant areas of the exterior scene, since the area well above the road or horizon is not as significant to the detection of a vehicle at or along a side of the subject vehicle. Additionally, positioning the camera to be angled generally downwardly also reduces the adverse effects that the sun and/or headlamps of other vehicles may have on the captured images. Camera 14 thus may be operable to capture substantially an entire image of the sideward scene below the horizon.


Control 16 is responsive to camera 14 and processes the signals received from at least some of the pixels of camera 14 to determine what is in the captured image. The present invention utilizes physical characteristics of vehicles and roads to reduce or filter out or substantially eliminate the signals from some of the pixels and to reduce or eliminate signals or detected images indicative of certain insignificant or unimportant objects detected within the captured image, as discussed below. For example, control 16 may primarily process the image data from pixels of camera 14 that are within a reduced data set or subset of the image data of the captured image. The reduced data set of the captured image may be representative of a targeted area or zone of interest of the exterior scene being captured by the camera. The targeted zone may be selected because it encompasses a geographic area of the exterior scene where a vehicle or other object of interest is likely to be present, while the other image data or areas or portions of the captured image may be representative of areas in the exterior scene where a vehicle or other object of interest is unlikely to be present or cannot be present, as discussed below. The present invention thus may provide for a quicker response time by control 16, since the control 16 does not continually process the signals from substantially all of the pixels 14a of camera 14. Preferably, less than approximately 75% of the image data captured by the camera is utilized for object detection, more preferably, less than approximately 66% of the captured image data is utilized for object detection, and most preferably, less than approximately 50% of the captured image data is utilized for object detection.


Control 16 may include a microprocessor having an edge detection algorithm or function 16a (FIG. 10) which is operable to process or is applied to the image data received from the individual pixels to determine whether the image captured by the pixels defines an edge or edges of a significant object, such as an edge or edges associated with or indicative of a bumper 18a of a vehicle 18 or the like. The edge detection function or algorithm 16a of control 16 allows lane change assist system 10 to interrogate complex patterns in the captured image and separate out particular patterns or edges which may be indicative of a vehicle in the adjacent lane, and to substantially ignore or limit processing of other edges or patterns which are not or cannot be indicative of a vehicle and thus are insignificant to lane change assist system 10. Other information or image data in the captured image or frame which is not associated with edges or which is not associated with significant edges (e.g. edges indicative of a portion of a vehicle), may then be substantially ignored or filtered out by control 16 via various filtering processes or mechanisms discussed below to reduce the information or image data being processed by control 16 and to reduce the possibility of a false positive detection by control 16. The edge detection function or algorithm 16a may comprise a Sobel gradient edge detection algorithm or other edge detection algorithms commercially available, and such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,353,392 and 6,313,454, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.


Control 16 may be operable to determine which edges detected are horizontal or generally horizontal edges and to limit processing of or to partially filter out or substantially ignore vertical edges. This may be preferred, since many edges in a vehicle in an adjacent lane will be horizontal or parallel to the road surface, such as edges associated with bumper lines, grills, fenders, and/or the like. Control 16 may thus reject or substantially ignore edges which are non-horizontal, thereby reducing the data to be processed. The edge detection algorithm 16a may also provide digital polarization of the captured images to determine horizontal gradients and to substantially ignore the effects of vertical gradients of the detected edges. For example, the edge detection algorithm may use a convolution matrix (such as a one by three matrix or other small matrix or array) which may be processed or applied to the image data in a single pass across the data received from the pixels 14a of the camera 14 to provide horizontally polarized edge detection through the captured image or a portion thereof. Such horizontal polarization greatly reduces the possibility that road signs and/or guardrails and/or the like will be processed and analyzed by the control of the lane change assist system of the present invention, thereby reducing the processing requirements and reducing the possibility of a false positive signal by the control.


Additionally, the edge detection algorithm 16a of control 16 may function to detect and determine if there is more than one vehicle present at the side of the subject vehicle 12. For example, control 16 may distinguish between edges constituting the fronts of different vehicles and edges constituting the front and side of the same vehicle, since the vehicle fronts typically will have more horizontal edges than the vehicle sides.


In order to further reduce the processing requirements and the possibility of a false positive indication, and thus enhance the response time and system performance, control 16 may process signals or image data from pixels that are oriented or targeted or arranged or selected to capture images of objects or items that are at least partially positioned within a predetermined or targeted area or zone of interest. The zone of interest may be defined by an area or region at the side of the subject vehicle where another vehicle or significant object may be positioned, such as in the blind spot region of that side of the vehicle, which would be significant or important to lane change assist system 10. For example, the zone of interest or “polygon of interest” may be directed rearward from the camera and toward or around the center of the adjacent lane. By substantially isolating the zone of interest, or substantially filtering out or substantially ignoring or reducing utilization of edges or signals or image data of the captured image which are representative of areas outside of the zone or area of interest, the system of the present invention may reduce the image data or information to be processed by control 16 and may substantially reduce the possibility that a false positive signal will occur. For example, if an object is detected substantially to one side or the other or substantially at the bottom of the captured image, such an object is not likely to be a vehicle positioned within the blind spot area of the subject vehicle 12, whereby control 16 may reduce processing of or may not process image data from the pixels capturing that area of the scene or may substantially ignore such a detected edge or object in subsequent processing of the image data captured by the pixels 14a of camera 14.


It is further envisioned that control 16 may process the image data of pixels capturing images representative of an area within the zone of interest and may not indicate a positive signal of a vehicle or other significant object in the adjacent lane unless a detected edge within the reduced image data set or subset or zone of interest is greater than a minimum size threshold, or spans a threshold number of pixels. Optionally, control 16 may require that a detected edge span or include a threshold number of pixels that are within a predetermined “hot zone” or specific targeted area within the zone of interest before the edge will be considered significant for further processing. The targeted zone or hot zone may be defined as a reduced zone or area near the center of the zone of interest or targeted road space or adjacent lane. The control 16 thus may require a substantial portion of the detected edge or edges to be within the smaller hot zone before the control may consider the edges to constitute a portion of a vehicle in the adjacent lane or other significant object. This also may substantially reduce the processing requirements and may substantially reduce the possibility of a false positive signal being generated by control 16.


The reduced image data set of the captured image which is representative of the zone of interest of the exterior scene may be adjusted by control 16 in response to various road or driving conditions, lighting conditions, and/or characteristics of the detected edges or objects. The reduced data set or zone of interest thus may be adaptable to various conditions encountered by the vehicle, such that the control may further reduce the processing requirements and enhance the efficiency of the system by primarily processing image data from some pixels and ignoring image data from other pixels depending on the present conditions surrounding the vehicle.


For example, as shown in FIG. 4, control 16 may be operable to adjust or adapt the image data subset or zone or area of interest between daytime and nighttime driving conditions. During daytime driving conditions, detecting the edge of the front horizontal shadow 18b (FIG. 4) of a vehicle 18 or the bumper 18b of a vehicle 18 may be the method for significant object or vehicle detection by the lane change assist system of the present invention. However, during nighttime driving conditions, where such vehicle characteristics may not be visible to the camera 14, the primary detection characteristic may be the headlights 18c of a vehicle 18 approaching from the rear of the subject vehicle. Control 16 may thus adjust or adapt the reduced data set or target zone in response to an output or signal from an ambient light sensor (which detects the ambient light intensity present at or around the subject vehicle), a headlamp control, a headlamp switch, a manual control or input and/or the like (shown generally at 20 in FIG. 10). More particularly, the reduced data set or zone of interest may be raised to correspond to the typical height or range of height of a headlight of a typical vehicle, so that control 16 may primarily process image data from pixels which receive light from headlamps of vehicles in the adjacent lane.


As shown in FIG. 4, the adjustment of the reduced data set or zone may be adjusted mathematically by changing the height (γ, γ′) of the camera as input to the control (such as between a daytime camera height shown generally at γ and a nighttime camera height shown generally at γ′), such that all of the geometry of the zone of interest is adjusted upward. Because headlights of vehicles are generally within a certain distance or range above the road surface, the control may be operable to adjust the reduced data set or zone of interest to adapt to this geometric change in the detection characteristic. A daytime perspective triangle associated with the camera is shown generally at D in FIG. 4, while a nighttime perspective triangle associated with the camera is shown generally at N in FIG. 4.


It is further envisioned that the reduced data set or area or zone of interest may be changed or adapted to accommodate sharp curves in the road that the subject vehicle 12 is traveling through or has traveled through. In situations where a vehicle travels along a sharp curve in the road, a lane change assist system may consider a guardrail or vehicle 18′ in another lane to be a vehicle or object of interest in the adjacent lane, since the other vehicle or object may be positioned generally at or near the zone of interest of the lane change assist system, as can be seen in FIG. 6. Control 16 may be operable to process the image data or signals from the pixels 14a of camera 14 to determine lane markers along the road, or a shoulder of the road or the like, in order to determine the road curvature as the vehicle 12 travels along the section of road. In situations where a sharp curve in the road is detected, control 16 may be operable to alter or reshape the reduced data set or area or zone of interest and/or to adjust the distance thresholds (discussed below) or to adjust other filtering characteristics or criteria or thresholds to accommodate such a curve in the road. The lane change assist system of the present invention thus may use road curvature information to adjust how far back and/or where the camera and/or control may look for significant objects or vehicles. The lane change assist system thus substantially avoids providing a false positive signal upon detection of another vehicle 18′ or guardrail or the like which is not in the adjacent lane, since such a vehicle or object may not be within the adjusted zone of interest of the lane change assist system.


Optionally, control 16 may be further operable to substantially eliminate or substantially ignore image data representative of objects or edges which are too large or too small to be considered part of a vehicle in the adjacent lane. If a detected edge is too small, such as if the horizontal pixel span or vertical pixel span is very small, the control may reduce processing of the edge or the edge may be removed from further processing, since it does not represent a significant edge to the lane change assist system 10. Likewise, if an edge is too large, the control may reduce processing of the edge or it may also be removed from further processing since it does not represent a vehicle in the adjacent lane. The threshold size of the detected edge or object may also vary in response to the distance to the edge or object, as discussed below.


Additionally, lane change assist system 10 may be operable to determine whether a detected edge or object is a vehicle in an adjacent lane in response to one or more other detection thresholds or criteria. Further, control 16 may be operable to vary one or more detection thresholds or criteria at which a detected edge or object is considered a vehicle or significant object. The threshold values may thus be variable and may be adjusted in response to driving conditions, road curvature, location of the detected edges and/or the distance between the camera and the detected object and/or the like. For example, the threshold value or values may be adjusted in response to the distance so that control 16 more readily accepts and processes detected edges as the object they are representative of gets closer to or approaches the subject vehicle.


For example, control 16 may have a minimum gradient threshold at which control 16 determines whether or not a detected edge is to be included in further processing of the captured image. Control 16 thus may be operable to determine the vertical and/or horizontal gradient of the detected edges and may substantially eliminate or filter out edges with a gradient below a threshold gradient level, since such edges cannot be representative of a vehicle or object which is significant to the lane change assist system. The control thus may further substantially preclude false positive signals and reduce further processing of the pixel signals.


However, as an object or other vehicle approaches the subject vehicle 12, the detected edge or edges representative of the object tends to resolve or reduces and spreads out the gradient across multiple pixels, thereby reducing the gradient at a particular pixel. Control 16 thus may be further operable to adjust the minimum gradient threshold in response to the distance to the detected object. By using a calculated or estimated or approximated distance to the detected object or a table of perspective calculations or distance approximations, discussed below, the minimum gradient threshold may be reduced proportionally in response to the estimated or tabulated distance data to provide enhanced edge detection at closer ranges.


By detecting edges of objects within the reduced data set or zone or area of interest (and adjusting the zone of interest for particular driving conditions or situations), and by focusing on or concentrating on or primarily processing the horizontal edges detected or other edges which may be indicative of a vehicle or significant object, while substantially filtering out or substantially ignoring other image data or edges or information, the present invention substantially reduces the possibility of false positive signals. In order to further reduce the possibility of such false positive signals, control 16 may be operable to determine a distance between a detected object and the subject vehicle to further filter out or substantially eliminate objects that are not within a predetermined range or threshold distance from the subject vehicle and which, thus, may be insignificant to the lane change assist system of the present invention.


In a preferred embodiment, camera 14 and control 16 may be operable to approximate the distance to an object or vehicle in response to a pixel count of the number of pixels between the pixels capturing the object (or an edge of the object) and the pixels along an edge of the camera or directed toward and along the horizon of the captured image. More particularly, with the camera 14 oriented with the video frame horizontal scan lines or pixels being generally parallel to the horizon, perspective calculations may be made to provide a table of entries of particular distances which correspond to particular horizontal lines or pixels in the video frame which may detect or sense a forward edge of an adjacent vehicle at the ground level, such as an edge corresponding to a shadow of the front of the vehicle 18 or an edge corresponding to the intersection of the tire 18d of the vehicle 18 on the road surface or the like. The distance to an object captured by an edge detected in the captured image may then be approximated by determining a vertical pixel count and retrieving the appropriate distance entry corresponding to that particular horizontal line or pixel count or position. The present invention thus provides for a quick and inexpensive means for determining or estimating or approximating the distance between the subject vehicle and an object or edge detected in the area or zone of interest by determining a horizontal line count from the horizon down to the pixels capturing the detected edge.


As can be seen with reference to FIGS. 3 and 7-9 and as discussed below, the location and distance of a closest point φ on a detected edge or object relative to camera 14 or subject vehicle 12 may be calculated based on known or assigned parameters of the location of camera 14 and a horizontal and vertical pixel count between a target or alignment point 14b (FIGS. 7 and 8) and the closest point φ. This may be accomplished because the lowest detected edge of a vehicle may be considered to be indicative of a forward shadow of the front bumper of the vehicle on the road surface or may be indicative of the intersection of the tire and the road surface. Because such edges are generally at or near the road surface, the distance to the detected object may be calculated using known geometrical equations given the height of the camera on the subject vehicle (as input to the control). Control 16 thus may quickly determine the distance to a detected object and may be easily calibrated for different applications of the lane change assist system. The calculated distances corresponding to at least some of the pixels 14a of camera 14 may be entered into a table or database, such that control 16 may be operable to quickly obtain an estimated distance between the camera and the closest point of a detected edge or object once at least the vertical pixel count between the closest point φ and the horizon or target or alignment point 14b is determined.


More particularly, in order to determine the total distance between camera 14 and the closest point of a detected edge or object, the lateral distance ψ and longitudinal distance δ may be calculated and used to obtain the total distance τ. Because the lateral distance ψ should be approximately constant for an edge or vehicle detected in the zone or area corresponding to the adjacent lane, the lane change assist system 10 may only calculate or tabulate and access the longitudinal distance δ for the detected edges, whereby the distances may be calculated and tabulated for each horizontal line count down from the horizon or target point. More particularly, the longitudinal distance δ may be calculated or approximated by determining a pixel count (Pixelsβ) downward from the horizon 15 to the detected edge or point φ. The pixel count may be used to obtain a value for the downward angle β (FIG. 3) between camera 14 and the detected object, which is derived from the following equation (1):

β=Pixelsβ*v;  (1)

where v is the vertical view angle per pixel of the camera and is obtained via the following equation (2):

v=(Optical Field Height Degrees)/(Vertical Pixel Resolution);  (2)

where the Optical Field Height Degrees is the vertical angle of view of the camera and the Vertical Pixel Resolution is the number of horizontal rows of pixels of the camera. The downward angle β is then calculated to determine the angle between the horizon and the forward edge of the detected object at the ground. The longitudinal distance δ between the vehicles may then be determined or approximated by the following equation (3):

δ=γ*tan(90°−β);  (3)

where γ is the height of the camera 14 above the ground as input to the control 16, and as best shown with reference to FIG. 3. As discussed above, the height input to control 16 may be adjusted between γ and γ′ (FIG. 4) to adjust the zone of interest for daytime versus nighttime driving conditions. Such an adjustment also adjusts the distance calculations to determine the distance to the detected headlamps, which are above the ground or road surface.


Likewise, if desired, the lateral or sideward location or distance ψ to the closest point φ on the detected edge or object may be calculated by obtaining a horizontal pixel count Pixelβmin, such as by counting or determining the pixels or pixel columns from the alignment point 14b horizontally across the captured image to the pixel column corresponding to the closest point φ. This pixel count value may be used to calculate the lateral distance to the detected edge or object, which may in turn be used to calculate or estimate the total distance to the detected object. More particularly, the lateral angle ω (FIG. 9) between camera 14 at the side of vehicle 12 and the detected object may be determined by the following equation (4):

ω=Pixelβmin*λ;  (4)

where λ is the horizontal view angle per pixel of the camera and is obtained via the following equation (5):

λ=Optical Field Width Degrees/Horizontal Pixel Resolution;  (5)

where the Optical Field Width Degrees of camera 14 is the angle of view of the camera and the Horizontal Pixel Resolution is the number of columns of pixels of camera 14.


Optionally, the lateral angle ω (FIG. 9) between camera 14 at the side of vehicle 12 and the detected object may be determined using spherical trigonometry, which may provide a more accurate lateral angle ω determination than equations 4 and 5 above. Using spherical trigonometry, discussed below, or the equations set forth above, a table (image space) of horizontal angles may be produced at initialization or startup of the lane change assist system 10 to determine the horizontal angle for each pixel position on the captured image. Because the horizontal angle is not independent of the vertical angle, an image space may be created and the horizontal view angle of every pixel may be stored therein. An example of such an image space or array is depicted in FIG. 11F.


In determining the perspective geometry, the parameters of a virtual camera 14′ are determined or assigned and implemented (see FIGS. 11A-11E). The virtual camera 14′ does not actually exist, but calculations may be made to determine an effective focal length (in pixels) of the virtual camera. To work with the perspective geometry, spherical trigonometry may be employed to determine where each pixel on the camera is directed toward. In spherical trigonometry, lateral angles may be calculated based on both horizontal and vertical pixel positions of the detected edge grouping or point. The relationship between horizontal angles and vertical angles may be used to calculate or generate a table of horizontal angles and/or distances to an edge or object detected by each pixel.


The virtual camera geometry may be calculated and used to determine the relationship between each pixel of the captured image and the location on the road surface that the pixel corresponds to. These calculations may be based on an assumption that lines perpendicular to the direction of travel of the subject vehicle may be on a plane which is generally parallel to the horizon and, thus, parallel to the image or pixel lines or rows, since the camera is positioned or oriented such that the horizontal rows of pixels are generally parallel to the horizon. This allows the control to determine the distance along the vehicle forward direction in response to the row of pixels on which the object has been detected, assuming that the camera is detecting an edge of the detected object or other vehicle (such as the front shadow edges, tires or the like) along the pavement or road surface.


An array of pixels 14a′ and a focal length (in pixels) vfl of the virtual camera 14′ is shown in FIGS. 11A, 11B and 11E. The virtual focal length vfl at the frame center of the virtual camera 14′ may be determined by the following equation (6):

vfl=(Pixel Resolution/2)/(tan(Frame Angular Size/2));  (6)

where the Frame Angular Size is the angular field of view of the camera 14. This equation may be used to calculate the virtual focal length of an imaginary pinhole camera with an infinitely small pinhole lens in vertical pixels vvfl and the virtual focal length in horizontal pixels hvfl using the pixel resolutions and frame angular sizes in the vertical and horizontal directions, respectively. The virtual focal length is calculated in both vertical pixel units and horizontal pixel units because the vertical and horizontal sizes of the pixels may be different and the camera may have a different pixel resolution and frame angular size or field of view between the vertical and horizontal directions.


The vertical or downward view angle β to the object may be determined by the following equation (7):

β=arctan(Vertical Pixels)/(vvfl);  (7)

where Vertical Pixels is the number of pixels or rows of pixels down from the target row or horizon. The view angle thus may be calculated for any line of pixels according to equation (7). An array for each of the view angle values may be calculated and stored for rapid distance calculations. The downward angle β may then be used to calculate the longitudinal distance δ in a similar manner as discussed above. As discussed above, the longitudinal distance calculations assume that for a detected edge or object along a row of pixels, the longitudinal distance to the edge or object is the same for any pixel along the row, since the camera is oriented with the rows of pixels being generally parallel to the horizon and generally perpendicular to the direction of travel of the vehicle.


In order to determine the location and angle and distance to a detected object or edge (which may be represented by a point along an object, such as at coordinate x, y of the pixel array (FIG. 11A)), the effective focal length of the virtual camera for the point on the detected object may be calculated. As shown in FIG. 11E, the effective focal length in vertical pixels (vefl) may be calculated by the following equation (8):

vefl=(vvfl2+(y−height/2)2)1/2;  (8)

where height/2 is one-half of the vertical image height (in pixels) of the camera. The effective focal length in horizontal pixels (hefl) may then be calculated by converting the effective focal length in vertical pixel units to horizontal pixel units via the following equation (9):

hefl=hvfl*vefl/vvfl.  (9)


The horizontal angle ω to the detected point in the image may be calculated via the following equation (10):

ω=arctan(Horizontal Pixels/hefl);  (10)

where Horizontal Pixels is the number of columns of pixels (or horizontal distance in pixels) that the point x, y is from the target or alignment or aft point or pixel. The Horizontal Pixels value may be counted or calculated by the control. The calculations for the Horizontal Pixels value may be different for the opposite sides of the vehicle in applications where the zero coordinate of the pixel array may be on the vehicle side of the array for a camera on one side of the vehicle, such as on the passenger side of the vehicle, and may be on the outside of the array for a camera on the other side of the vehicle, such as on the driver side of the vehicle. In the illustrated embodiment of FIG. 11A, the Horizontal Pixels may be calculated by subtracting the x-coordinate for the aft pixel or alignment point 14b′ from the x-coordinate of the detected point x, y.


Such calculations may provide a more precise and true value for the lateral angle ω between the camera 14 and the detected object. The lateral distance ψ to the detected object may thus be calculated by the following equation (11):

ψ=δ*tan(ω).  (11)


Accordingly, the actual distance T between camera 14 and the closest point on the detected object may be obtained by the following equation (12):

τ=(δ22)1/2.  (12)


Because the lateral, longitudinal and total distances are calculated using certain known or obtainable characteristics and geometrical relationships, such as the input height of camera 14 above the ground, the pixel resolution of camera 14, the field of view of the camera, and a pixel count in the horizontal and vertical direction with respect to a target point or alignment target and/or the horizon, the calculated distance and/or angle values for each pixel count or location may be entered into a table to provide a rapid response time for determining the distance to the detected edge or object once the pixel count or location of the detected edge is known.


As discussed above, the lane change assist system may only be concerned with the longitudinal distance δ to the detected edge. Control 16 may thus determine a vertical pixel count and approximate the longitudinal distance to the detected object or edge via equations (1), (2) and (3) or via the data table, thereby significantly reducing the processing requirements of control 16 to estimate or calculate the distance to the detected edges or objects.


Additionally, control 16 may be operable to substantially eliminate or substantially ignore other forms or types of detected edges which are not likely or cannot be part of a vehicle in the adjacent lane. For example, as can be seen in FIG. 5, the tires and wheels 18d of an adjacent or approaching vehicle 18 are viewed as ellipses from a forward and sideward angle with respect to the adjacent vehicle. Because all vehicles on the road have tires, control 16 of lane change assist system 10 may be operable to process the signals from the pixels (such as the pixels directed toward the zone of interest) to detect the presence of one or more ellipses at or near the detected edges. If an ellipse or wheel is not detected, then the detected edges and associated object may be eliminated from processing by control 16, since it cannot be a vehicle in the adjacent lane. Detecting the presence of ellipses and wheels or portions thereof can thus assist in providing information regarding the existence of a vehicle and may assist in determining the position and/or velocity or relative position and/or relative velocity of the detected vehicle with respect to vehicle 12.


In order to further reduce the possibility of control 16 generating a false positive signal, control 16 of lane change assist system 10 may be operable to determine an intensity or brightness level associated with the detected edges and to substantially eliminate edges which do not significantly change in brightness level or intensity level from one side of the detected edge to the other. This is preferred, since lines in the road, thin branches on the road and/or many other small articles or objects may not resolve, and thus may result in single edges that do not significantly change in brightness or intensity (or color if a color system is used) across their detected edges. However, a significant change in brightness or intensity would be expected along a detected edge of an automotive body panel or bumper or other component or structure of a vehicle or the like. Accordingly, control 16 may substantially eliminate or substantially ignore edges or objects which do not have a significant brightness or intensity change thereacross, since an edge with an insignificant change in brightness or color signifies an insignificant edge which can be substantially eliminated. By substantially eliminating such insignificant edges, control 16 may further significantly reduce the computational requirements or processing requirements, while also significantly reducing the possibility of a false positive indication.


Control 16 may also be operable to compare image data from consecutive frames or images captured by camera 14 to confirm that a detected edge or object is representative of a vehicle in an adjacent lane and/or to determine the relative speed between the detected object or vehicle and the equipped or subject vehicle 12. By extracting collections of edges or points of interest, such as ellipses, bend maximums in edges and/or the like, from consecutive frames, and correlating such points of interest from one frame to the next, the lane change assist system of the present invention can more effectively verify the pairing of such characteristics or objects. The control may track or correlate the points of interest based on the placement or location of the edges within the captured images, the general direction of travel of the detected edges or groups of edges between consecutive frames, the dimensions, size and/or aspect ratio of the detected edges or objects and/or the like. Confirming such characteristics of edges and groups of edges and objects allows the lane change assist system to track the objects from one captured frame or image to the next. If the relative speed or movement of the detected edge or object is not indicative of the relative speed or movement of a vehicle in the adjacent lane, control 16 may filter out or substantially ignore such detected edges in further processing so as to reduce subsequent processing requirements and to avoid generation of a false positive signal. Lane change assist system 10 may also be operable to connect collections of such objects or edges based on relative motion between the subject vehicle and the detected object or edges. Such connected collections may provide information about the size and shape of the detected object for object classification and identification by control 16.


It is further envisioned that lane change assist system 10 may be operable in conjunction with a lane departure warning system or other forward facing imaging system 22 of vehicle 12, such as a lane departure warning system of the type discussed below or as disclosed in U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/377,524, filed May 3, 2002, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference, or any other lane departure warning system or the like, or a headlamp control system, such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,796,094, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference, or any forwardly directed vehicle vision system, such as a vision system utilizing principles disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,550,677; 5,670,935; 6,201,642 and 6,396,397, and/or in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/199,907, filed Nov. 25, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,717,610, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference. The forward facing imaging system may provide an input to lane change assist system 10 to further reduce any likelihood of a false positive signal from the lane change assist system.


For example, the forward facing imaging system may detect lane markers at the road surface to detect a curvature in the road that the subject vehicle is approaching and/or traveling along. Such information may be communicated to lane change assist system 10, so that control 16 may adapt or shape the reduced image data set or zone of interest as the subject vehicle 12 enters and proceeds along the detected road curvature, as discussed above. Also, the forward facing imaging system may detect headlamps of oncoming or approaching vehicles. If the lane forward and to the left of vehicle 12 has oncoming traffic, control 16 may substantially ignore the left side of the vehicle, since the lane change assist system would not be concerned with a lane change into oncoming traffic. Also, the forward facing imaging system may detect the tail lights or rear portion of a leading vehicle in another lane, and may track the leading vehicle relative to the subject vehicle. As the subject vehicle overtakes the leading vehicle, the lane change assist system may then be alerted as to the presence of the overtaken vehicle, such that edges detected in that lane a short period of time after the overtaken vehicle leaves the range of the forward facing imaging system (the period of time may be calculated based on the relative velocity between the subject vehicle and the overtaken vehicle) may be readily identified as the now overtaken and passed vehicle. By utilizing the vehicle information of a vehicle detected by a forward facing imaging system, the lane change assist system of the present invention (or other side object detection systems or the like) may reduce the amount of processing of the captured images or detected edges, since such a vehicle may be readily identified as the vehicle that was previously detected by the forward facing imaging system. This avoids a duplication of efforts by the forward facing imaging system and lane change assist system of the vehicle.


By primarily processing image data and detected edges in certain areas and/or processing image data and detected edges that meet certain thresholds or criteria, and substantially rejecting or substantially ignoring other information or image data or edges, such as detected edges that are substantially non-horizontal, or other edges that cannot be part of a vehicle, or image data that are not representative of a zone of interest of the exterior scene, the lane change assist system of the present invention substantially reduces the image data to be processed by control 16. It is envisioned that such a reduction in the amount of image data to be processed may allow the lane change assist system to have a control which comprises a micro-processor positioned at the camera. Accordingly, the lane change assist system may be provided as a module which may be positioned at either or both sides of the vehicle, and which may be connected to an appropriate power source or control or accessory of the vehicle.


Therefore, the present invention provides a lane change assist system which is operable to detect and identify vehicles or other objects of interest sidewardly and/or rearwardly of the subject vehicle. The lane change assist system of the present invention is operable to detect edges of objects, and particularly horizontal edges of objects, to provide improved recognition or identification of the detected objects and reduced false positive signals from the lane change assist system. The lane change assist system may primarily process information or image data from a reduced set or subset of image data which is representative of a target zone or area of interest within the exterior scene and may adjust the reduced data set or target zone in response to driving or road conditions or the like. The edge detection process or algorithm of the lane change assist system of the present invention provides for a low cost processing system or algorithm, which does not require the statistical methodologies and computationally expensive flow algorithms of the prior art systems. Also, the edge detection process may detect edges and objects even when there is little or no relative movement between the subject vehicle and the detected edge or object.


The lane change assist system of the present invention thus may be operable to substantially ignore or substantially eliminate or reduce the effect of edges or characteristics which are indicative of insignificant objects, thereby reducing the level of processing required on the captured images and reducing the possibility of false positive detections. The lane change assist system may also provide a low cost and fast approximation of a longitudinal and/or lateral and/or total distance between the subject vehicle and a detected edge or object at a side of the vehicle and may adjust a threshold detection level in response to the approximated distance. The lane change assist system of the present invention may be operable to substantially ignore certain detected edges or provide a positive identification signal depending on the characteristics of the detected object or edge or edges, the driving or road conditions, and/or the distance from the subject vehicle. The present invention thus may provide a faster processing of the captured images, which may be performed by a processor having lower processing capabilities then processors required for the prior art systems.


Although the present invention is described above as a lane change assist or aid system or side object detection system, it is envisioned that many aspects of the imaging system of the present invention are suitable for use in other vehicle vision or imaging systems, such as other side object detection systems, forward facing vision systems, such as lane departure warning systems, forward park aids, passive steering systems, adaptive cruise control systems or the like, rearward facing vision systems, such as back up aids or park aids or the like, panoramic vision systems and/or the like.


For example, an object detection system or imaging system of the present invention may comprise a forward facing lane departure warning system 110 (FIG. 1), which may include an image sensor or camera 114 and a control 116 positioned on or at vehicle 12. Lane departure warning system 110 is generally shown at the front of the vehicle 12 with camera 114 positioned and oriented to capture an image of the region generally forwardly of the vehicle. However, the camera may optionally be positioned elsewhere at the vehicle, such as within the vehicle cabin, such as at an interior rearview mirror assembly of the vehicle or at an accessory module or the like, and directed forwardly through the windshield of the vehicle, without affecting the scope of the present invention. Camera 114 is operable to capture an image of a scene occurring forwardly of the vehicle and control 116 is operable to process image data of the captured images or frames to detect and monitor or track lane markers or road edges or the like or oncoming or approaching vehicles or objects, and to provide a warning or alert signal to a driver of the vehicle in response to the detected images, such as in the manner disclosed in U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/377,524, filed May 3, 2002, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.


Similar to camera 14 of lane change assist system 10, discussed above, camera 114 may be positioned at vehicle 12 and oriented generally downwardly toward the ground to increase the horizontal pixel count across the captured image at the important areas in front of vehicle 12, since any significant lane marking or road edge or the like, or other vehicle approaching or being approached by the subject vehicle, positioned in front of or toward a side of the subject vehicle will be substantially below the horizon and thus substantially within the captured image. The lane departure warning system of the present invention thus may provide an increased portion of the captured image or increased pixel count at important areas of the exterior scene, since the area well above the road or horizon is not as significant to the detection of lane markers and the like and/or other vehicles. Additionally, positioning the camera to be angled generally downwardly also reduces the adverse effects that the sun and/or headlamps of other vehicles may have on the captured images.


Control 116 of lane departure warning system 110 may include an edge detection algorithm or function, such as described above, which is operable to process or may be applied to the individual pixels to determine whether the image captured by the pixels defines an edge or edges of a lane marker or the like. The edge detection function or algorithm of control 116 allows lane departure warning system 110 to interrogate complex patterns in the captured image and separate out particular patterns or edges which may be indicative of a lane marker or the like, and to substantially ignore other edges or patterns which are not or cannot be indicative of a lane marker or the like and thus are insignificant to lane departure warning system 110. Other information in the captured image or frame, which is not associated with significant edges, may then be substantially ignored or filtered out by control 116 via various filtering mechanisms or processing limitations to reduce the information being processed by control 116.


Control 116 may be operable to determine which detected edges are angled or diagonal across and along the captured image and to partially filter out or substantially ignore or limit processing of vertical and/or horizontal edges. This may be preferred, since edges indicative of a lane marker may be angled within the captured image, as can be seen with reference to FIGS. 7 and 8. The control may thus process edges which are angled and which move diagonally through the scene from one frame to the next. Control 116 may be operable to skew or bias the rows of pixels in the pixelated array to simulate horizontal edges with the angled edges, such that control may detect and track such edges while substantially ignoring other edges. Control 116 may thus reject or substantially ignore edges which are not indicative of lane markers or the like (and which are not indicative of another vehicle forward of and approaching the subject vehicle), thereby reducing the data to be processed.


In order to further reduce the processing requirements and the possibility of a false detection or indication of a lane marker, and to enhance the response time and system performance, control 116 may primarily process signals or image data from pixels that are oriented or targeted or arranged or selected to capture images of objects or markers that are at least partially positioned within a predetermined or targeted area or zone of interest of the exterior scene. The zone of interest may be defined by an area or region forwardly and toward one or both sides of the subject vehicle where a lane marker or road side or edge may be positioned, which would be significant or important to lane departure warning system 110. By substantially isolating the reduced data set representative of the zone of interest, or substantially filtering out or substantially ignoring edges or signals or image data which are representative of areas outside of the zone or area of interest, the present invention may reduce the image data or information to be processed by control 116 and may substantially reduce the possibility that a false detection of a lane marker or the like will occur. Lane departure warning system 110 may also process edges or image data within a further reduced image data set representative of a targeted portion or hot zone of the zone of interest to further identify and confirm that the detected edge or edges are indicative of a lane marker or the like or a vehicle or object that is significant to the lane departure warning system, such as discussed above with respect to lane change assist system 10.


By detecting edges of objects (such as lane markers, road edges, vehicles and the like) within the zone or area of interest (and optionally adjusting the zone of interest for particular driving conditions or situations), and by focusing on or concentrating on or primarily processing the detected edges or image data which may be indicative of a lane marker or vehicle or significant object, while substantially filtering out or substantially ignoring other edges or information or image data, the present invention substantially reduces the possibility of falsely detecting lane markers or other significant vehicles or objects. Control 116 may be further operable to determine a distance between a detected object and the subject vehicle to further filter out or substantially eliminate objects that are not within a predetermined range or threshold distance from the subject vehicle and which, thus, may be insignificant to the lane departure warning system of the present invention, such as described above with respect to lane change assist system 10.


Control 116 may also be operable to determine or estimate the distance to the detected edge or object in response to the location of the pixel or pixels on the pixelated array which capture the detected edge or object, such as in the manner also discussed above. The distance may thus be determined by determining the pixel location and accessing a table or data list or array to determine the distance associated with the particular pixel.


Control 116 of lane departure warning system 110 may also be operable to determine an intensity or brightness level associated with the detected edges and to substantially eliminate edges which do not significantly change in brightness level or intensity level from one side of the detected edge to the other. This is preferred, since thin branches on the road and/or many other small articles or objects may not resolve, and thus may result in single edges that do not significantly change in brightness or intensity (or color if a color system is used) across their detected edges. However, a sharp or significant change in brightness or intensity would be expected at a detected edge of a lane marker (since a lane marker is typically a white or yellow line segment along a dark or black or gray road surface) or an automotive body panel or bumper or other component or structure of a vehicle or the like. Accordingly, control 16 may substantially eliminate or substantially ignore edges or objects which do not have a significant brightness or intensity change thereacross. By substantially eliminating such insignificant edges, control 16 may further significantly reduce the computational requirements or processing requirements, while also significantly reducing the possibility of a false detection of a lane marker or vehicle. It is further envisioned that lane departure warning system 110 may be capable of detecting lane markings and road edges and other vehicles and modifying the alert signal or process in response to the type of marking, surrounding vehicles or the like and/or the vehicle movement, such as disclosed in U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/377,524, filed May 3, 2002, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.


With reference to FIGS. 12 and 13, lane departure warning system 110 may provide a warning signal to a driver of vehicle 12 when the vehicle is about to depart from its lane or road 113. The lane departure warning system 110 is operable in response to imaging sensor or camera 114 positioned at a forward portion of the vehicle 12 (and may be positioned at a vehicle bumper area or at a windshield area, such as at an interior rearview mirror or attachment thereto, without affecting the scope of the present invention) and having a field of view directed generally forwardly with respect to the direction of travel of vehicle 12. The imaging sensor 114 is operable to capture an image of a scene generally forwardly (and preferably at least partially sidewardly) of the vehicle. The lane departure warning system includes image processing controls or devices which may process the images captured to detect and identify various objects within the image.


The imaging sensor useful with the present invention is preferably an imaging array sensor, such as a CMOS sensor or a CCD sensor or the like, such as disclosed in commonly assigned U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,550,677; 5,670,935; 5,796,094 and 6,097,023, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/441,341, filed Nov. 16, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,339,149, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference. The imaging sensor may be implemented and operated in connection with other vehicular systems as well, or may be operable utilizing the principles of such other vehicular systems, such as a vehicle headlamp control system, such as the type disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,796,094, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference, a rain sensor, such as the types disclosed in commonly assigned U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,353,392; 6,313,454 and/or 6,320,176, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference, a vehicle vision system, such as a forwardly directed vehicle vision system utilizing the principles disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,550,677; 5,670,935 and 6,201,642, and/or in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/199,907, filed Nov. 25, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,717,610, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference, a traffic sign recognition system, a system for determining a distance to a leading vehicle or object, such as using the principles disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/372,915, filed Aug. 12, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,396,397, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference, and/or the like.


The lane departure warning system of the present invention is operable to provide a warning signal to a driver of the vehicle under at least one of at least the following three conditions:


1) the vehicle is moving toward the edge of the road at a rapid speed indicating that the vehicle will actually depart from the pavement or shoulder;


2) the vehicle is moving into a lane with oncoming traffic present in that lane; and/or


3) the vehicle is moving into a lane with traffic flowing in the same direction and there is an adjacent vehicle in that lane (regardless of turn signal use).


The lane departure warning system may be operable in response to one or more of the detected conditions and may be further operable in response to various vehicle characteristics or parameters, such as vehicle speed, a distance to the lane marker, shoulder, other vehicle, or any other relevant distance, road conditions, driving conditions, and/or the like.


With respect to the first condition (shown in FIG. 12), the lane departure warning system may be operable in response to a single forward facing imaging sensor or camera, to establish and track the road edge as defined by two thresholds:


1) threshold 1: the edge 113a of the road or pavement 113 (the intersection of the pavement 113 and the shoulder 113b); and/or


2) threshold 2: the edge 113c of the shoulder 113b (the intersection of the shoulder 113b and the grass 113d).


The lane departure warning system of the present invention may then be operable to provide an audible warning, such as a rumble strip sound, when the vehicle is approaching threshold 1 and the vehicle is moving above an established speed. The lane departure warning system may then be operable to provide a more urgent audible warning, such as an alarm, when the vehicle is approaching threshold 2 and is moving above the established speed. If the road does not have a shoulder, such as on some rural roads, there is only one threshold and this may correspond to a threshold 2 warning. The lane departure warning system may be operable to provide the warning signal or signals in response to the vehicle being a particular distance from the detected lane or road or shoulder. The distances to the threshold markings at which the lane departure warning system initiates the warning signal or signals may vary depending on the speed of the vehicle, or other conditions surrounding the vehicle, such as road conditions, driving conditions, or the like.


With respect to the second condition, the lane departure warning system may be operable in response to a single forward facing camera to monitor the lane markings 113e along the road surface and monitor the potential presence of oncoming traffic in an adjacent lane or lanes. Once the presence of oncoming traffic has been established, the lane departure warning system may issue an urgent audible warning if the vehicle begins to cross the lane marking 113e. Furthermore, if the vehicle has already begun to cross into the oncoming traffic lane before oncoming traffic is detected, the lane departure warning system may issue the urgent warning when oncoming traffic is detected.


Similar to the first condition, the lane departure warning system may be operable in response to the second condition to initiate the warning signal in response to different distances between the subject vehicle and the approaching vehicle, depending on the speed of one or both vehicles, the driving conditions, the road conditions and/or the like.


With respect to the third condition (shown in FIG. 13), the lane departure warning system of the present invention may be operable in response to a single forward facing camera and at least one, and optionally two, rearward and/or sideward facing cameras, to monitor the lane markings and the potential presence of adjacent traffic or vehicle or vehicles 112 in an adjacent lane 113f, which may be traveling in the same direction as the subject vehicle 12. Once the presence of adjacent traffic has been established, the lane departure warning system may issue an urgent audible warning to the driver of the vehicle if the subject vehicle begins to cross the lane marking 113e. Furthermore, if the subject vehicle has already begun to cross into the adjacent lane and then subsequently an adjacent vehicle is detected, the lane departure warning system may issue the urgent warning signal to the driver of the vehicle.


Again, the lane departure warning system may be operable to initiate the warning signal or signals in response to varying threshold parameters, which may vary depending on the speed of the subject vehicle, the speed of the other detected vehicle, the relative speed of the vehicles, the driving conditions, the road conditions and/or the like. The lane departure warning system of the present invention may be operable to differentiate between the different types of lane markings along roads, such as between solid and dashed lines and double lines.


Optionally, the lane departure warning system may be further operable to detect and recognize stop lights and/or stop signs and/or other road or street signs or markings, and to provide a warning signal to the driver of the vehicle in response to such detection. It is further envisioned that the lane departure warning system of the present invention may be operable to provide an alarm or broadcast an alarm or warning signal on a safety warning band when the forward facing camera detects a stop light or stop sign and the system determines that the vehicle is not going to stop based on the vehicle's current speed and deceleration. This provides a signal or alarm to crossing drivers to warn them of an unsafe condition.


Optionally, the lane departure warning system of the present invention may be operable to determine the road conditions of the road on which the vehicle is traveling and/or the driving conditions surrounding the vehicle. The system may then provide the warning signal or signals in response to variable threshold values, such as different vehicle speeds or distances or the like. For example, wet or snowy roads would change the distance and/or speed thresholds at which the lane departure warning system would provide the warning signal or signals. Also, because darkened or raining conditions may affect visibility of lane markers, road edges and other vehicles, the lane departure warning system of the present invention may be operable to provide a warning signal sooner or at a greater distance from the marker, edge or vehicle in such low visibility conditions. This provides the driver of the subject vehicle a greater amount of time to respond to the warning in such conditions.


The lane departure warning system of the present invention may be integrated with a side object detection system (SOD). For example, the vehicle may be equipped with a camera or image-based side object detection system or a Doppler radar-based side object detection system or other such systems (such as mounted on the side rearview mirrors or at the side of the vehicle) for detecting objects and/or vehicles at one or both sides of the subject vehicle. The lane departure warning threshold level or sensitivity at which the lane departure warning system generates a warning signal may then be adjustable in response to detection of a vehicle or object at a side of the subject vehicle and determination of the location and speed of the detected vehicle. Optionally, the signal generated may increase or decrease in intensity or volume in response to the position or speed of an object or vehicle detected by the side object detection system. For example, the threshold level may take into account the approach speed of the other vehicle to the subject vehicle, and may provide a louder or brighter warning to the driver of the subject vehicle if the approach speed is above a particular threshold level or threshold levels.


The lane departure warning system may be provided with a multi-feature or multi-function forward facing imaging system. The imaging system may combine two or more functions, such as an intelligent headlamp controller (such as the type disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,796,094 and 6,097,023, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/441,341, filed Nov. 16, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,339,149, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference), an image-based smart wiper controller, a rain sensor (such as the types disclosed in commonly assigned U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,353,392; 6,313,454 and/or 6,320,176, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference), an image-based climate control blower controller, an image-based or image-derived or partially derived adaptive cruise-control system (where the imaging may be primary or secondary to a forward facing Doppler radar), and/or other vision systems (such as a forwardly directed vehicle vision system utilizing the principles disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,550,677; 5,670,935 and 6,201,642, and/or in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/199,907, filed Nov. 25, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,717,610, which are all hereby incorporated herein by reference), a traffic sign recognition system, a system for determining a distance to a leading vehicle or object (such as using the principles disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/372,915, filed Aug. 12, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,396,397, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference), and/or the like.


For example, an embodiment of the lane departure warning system of the present invention may be incorporated with or integrated with an intelligent headlamp control system (such as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,796,094 and 6,097,023, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/441,341, filed Nov. 16, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,339,149, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference) having an imaging array sensor feeding a signal or image to a microcontroller (which may comprise a microprocessor or microcomputer), which is operable to adjust a state of the headlamps in response to a captured image of the scene forwardly of the vehicle. The image captured by the imaging sensor may be analyzed for light sources of interest for the headlamp control, and also for lane markings, road edges, and other objects of interest (such as road signs, stop signs, stop lights and/or the like) for the lane departure warning system. Optionally, the lane departure warning system may be integrated with or tied to an existing headlamp control of the vehicle.


The lane departure warning system of the present invention thus may be implemented as part of one or more other imaging-based systems, and thus may share components, hardware and/or software with the other systems to reduce the incremental costs associated with the lane departure warning system and with the other systems as well. Accordingly, multiple systems may be provided by an automotive supplier as part of a common platform or module for each vehicle of a particular vehicle line or model. The vehicle manufacturer may then choose to activate or enable one or more of the systems of the module, depending on which options are selected on a particular vehicle. Therefore, the addition or selection of the lane departure warning system, or of one or more other imaging-based systems, is associated with an incremental addition of hardware and/or software, and thus of associated costs, in order to install and enable the system on a particular vehicle. The imaging array sensor or sensors of the module may then be interrogated by an appropriate processor or software to extract the light sources or objects of interest or pixels of interest for each respective system of the common or unitary module. For example, an image captured by the imaging array sensor or camera may be processed or analyzed one way for a headlamp control system, and then processed or analyzed another way for the lane departure warning system or for any other enabled functions or systems of the common module. The software may further include common blocks or functions or macros to further enhance the sharing of software between the systems.


Accordingly, a unitary module may be provided to a vehicle assembly plant and may include multiple features, systems or functions, such that the desired features, systems or functions may be enabled for a particular vehicle, with minimal additional software or components or hardware being associated with the features, systems or functions that are enabled. The anchor system of the common or unitary module or platform may be an intelligent headlamp controller, with the additional systems, such as the lane departure warning system of the present invention, being added to or integrated with the anchor system.


The lane departure warning system and any other associated imaging-based systems may be included as part of an interior rearview mirror assembly or as part of an electronic windshield module and/or accessory module assembly, such as disclosed in commonly assigned U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,243,003; 6,278,377 and 6,433,676; U.S. application Ser. No. 10/054,633, filed Jan. 22, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,195,381; and Ser. No. 09/792,002, filed Feb. 26, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,690,268; Ser. No. 09/585,379, filed Jun. 1, 2000; Ser. No. 09/466,010, filed Dec. 17, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,420,975; and Ser. No. 10/355,454, filed Jan. 31, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,824,281, which are all hereby incorporated herein by reference.


Therefore, the lane departure warning system of the present invention provides a warning signal or signals to a driver of a vehicle based on the detection of various objects, vehicles and conditions surrounding the vehicle. The lane departure warning system of the present invention is thus less likely to provide a warning signal to a driver of the vehicle when the driver intends to maneuver the vehicle in that manner, and thus where such a warning signal is not needed or wanted. The lane departure warning system of the present invention thus avoids annoying, unnecessary warnings, and thus provides improved responses by the driver of the vehicle, since the driver is less likely to ignore the signal provided by the lane departure warning system. The lane departure warning system of the present invention may be implemented with or integrated with one or more other imaging-based systems to reduce the incremental components, hardware, software and costs associated with the implementation of the lane departure warning system.


Optionally, the object detection system or imaging system of the present invention may be operable in conjunction with a passive steering system 210 (FIG. 1), which is operable to adjust or bias the steering direction of the vehicle toward a center region of a lane in response to detection of the lane markers or road edges or the like by the imaging system. Passive steering system 210 may be in communication with or connected to a steering system of the vehicle and may adjust or bias the steering direction of the vehicle slightly if the lane departure warning system detects a slow drifting of the vehicle out of its lane and may be further operable in response to a detected road curvature ahead of the vehicle. The passive steering system 210 may steer the vehicle back into its lane or keep the vehicle in its lane when such a drifting condition is detected. The passive steering system may function to bias the steering of the vehicle toward the center of the occupied lane, but may be easily overcome by manual steering of the vehicle by the driver, such that the driver at all times maintains ultimate control over the steering of the vehicle. The passive steering system thus may function as a lane detent which maintains the vehicle in its lane, but may be easily overcome or disabled if the steering wheel is manually turned or if a turn signal is activated or the like.


The passive steering assist system of the present invention thus may reduce driver fatigue from driving a vehicle under conditions which require constant driver steering input or adjustment, such as in windy conditions and the like. The passive steering assist system thus may reduce lane drift from side to side within a lane. Also, overall safety may be improved by the reduction in undesired lane maneuvers. Although described as being responsive to the imaging system of the present invention, the passive steering system of the present invention may be responsive to other types of lane departure warning systems or other types of vision or imaging systems, without affecting the scope of the present invention.


Optionally, the object detection system or imaging system of the present invention may be operable in connection with an adaptive speed control system 310 (FIG. 1), which may adjust the cruise control setting or speed of the vehicle in response to road or traffic conditions detected by the imaging system. For example, adaptive speed control system 310 may reduce the set speed of the vehicle in response to the imaging system (or other forward facing vision system) detecting a curve in the road ahead of the vehicle. The vehicle speed may be reduced to an appropriate speed for traveling around the curve without the driver having to manually deactivate the cruise control. The adaptive speed control may then resume the initial speed setting after the vehicle is through the turn or curve and is again traveling along a generally straight section of road. Adaptive speed control 310 may also reduce the speed of the vehicle or even deactivate the cruise control setting in response to a detection by the lane departure warning system or other vision system of taillights or headlamps of another vehicle detected in front of the subject vehicle and within a threshold distance of the subject vehicle or approaching the subject vehicle at a speed greater than a threshold approach speed, or in response to detection of other objects or conditions which may indicate that the speed of the vehicle should be reduced.


Additionally, because the imaging system, such as a forward facing lane departure warning system, may track the lane curvature, the system may also be able to determine if a vehicle which appears in front of the subject vehicle is actually in the same lane as the subject vehicle or if it is in an adjacent lane which is curving with the section of road. The imaging system and adaptive speed control system may then establish if the vehicle speed should be reduced in response to the road curvature and the presence of another vehicle at the curve. Although described as being responsive to the imaging system or lane departure warning system of the present invention, the adaptive speed control system of the present invention may be responsive to other types of lane departure warning systems or other types of vision or imaging systems, particularly other types of forward facing imaging systems, without affecting the scope of the present invention.


It is further envisioned that the imaging system, which may comprise an object detection system, a lane change assist system, a side object detection system, a lane departure warning system or other forward facing vision system, a rear vision system or park aid or panoramic view system, a passive steering system, an adaptive cruise control system or the like, may be in communication with a security monitoring system. The vision or image data from the imaging system may be transmitted to a remote device, such as the vehicle owner's computer monitor or other personal display system remote from the vehicle, so that the owner of the vehicle or other person may view the status of the area surrounding the vehicle when the owner or other person is not in the vehicle. Also, the vision or image data may be provided to or made available to the local police authorities or the like in the event of a theft of the vehicle or of an accident involving the vehicle or of the vehicle being otherwise inoperable (such as when the motorist is stranded). The police or emergency services or the like may use the vision or image data to determine the vehicle location and possibly the condition of the vehicle and/or the driver and/or the passengers. It is further envisioned that the vision or image data may be used in conjunction with the global positioning system (GPS) of the vehicle to precisely locate or pinpoint the vehicle location. The vision or image data may be transmitted to the remote device or to the emergency services or the like via various transmission devices or systems, such as utilizing Bluetooth technology or the like, without affecting the scope of the present invention.


Therefore, the present invention provides a vision or imaging system or object detection system which is operable to detect and process edges within a captured image or images to determine if the edges are indicative of a significant vehicle or object or the like at or near or approaching the subject vehicle. The imaging system may primarily process a reduced image data set representative of a zone of interest of the exterior scene and may process edges that are detected which are representative of an object within the zone of interest of the captured image. The imaging system may adjust the reduced data set or zone of interest in response to various conditions or characteristics or criteria. The imaging system may comprise an object detection system or a lane change assist system operable to detect objects or other vehicles at one or both sides of the subject vehicle. The object detection system may determine the distance to the detected object or edge and may adjust threshold criterion in response to the determined or estimated or calculated distance.


Optionally, the imaging system may comprise a forward facing lane departure warning system which may be operable to detect lane markers or the like and/or vehicles in front of the subject vehicle and to provide an alert signal to the driver of the vehicle that the vehicle is leaving its lane. The lane departure warning system may primarily process edges detected within a zone of interest within the captured image. The lane departure warning system may determine a distance to the detected edge or object and may vary or adjust threshold criterion in response to the determined or estimated or calculated distance.


The forward facing imaging system may be in communication with the lane change assist system of the vehicle and/or may be in communication with other systems of the vehicle, such as a side object detection system, a passive steering system or an adaptive speed control system or the like. The imaging system may communicate to the lane change assist system that the vehicle is approaching a curve in the road or that another vehicle is being approached and passed by the subject vehicle to assist in processing the image data captured by the sensor or camera of the lane change assist system. Optionally, a passive steering system may adjust a steering direction of the vehicle in response to the imaging system, or an adaptive speed control system may adjust a cruise control setting of the vehicle in response to the imaging system. Optionally, an output of the imaging system may be provided to or communicated to a remote receiving and display system to provide image data for viewing at a location remote from the subject vehicle.


Changes and modifications in the specifically described embodiments may be carried our without departing from the principles of the present invention, which is intended to limited only by the scope of the appended claims, as interpreted according to the principles of patent law.

Claims
  • 1. A vehicular control system, said vehicular control system comprising: a plurality of cameras disposed at a vehicle equipped with said vehicular control system;said plurality of cameras at least comprising (i) a forward-viewing camera mounted at a front portion of the equipped vehicle and having a field of view at least forward of the equipped vehicle, said forward-viewing camera operable to capture image data, (ii) a driver side-viewing camera mounted at a driver side portion of the equipped vehicle and having a field of view at least sideward and rearward of the equipped vehicle at a driver side of the equipped vehicle, said driver side-viewing camera operable to capture image data, and (iii) a passenger side-viewing camera mounted at a passenger side portion of the equipped vehicle and having a field of view at least sideward and rearward of the equipped vehicle at a passenger side of the equipped vehicle, said passenger side-viewing camera operable to capture image data;wherein said forward-viewing camera is attached at an in-cabin side of a windshield of the equipped vehicle and views forward through the windshield exteriorly of the equipped vehicle;at least one radar sensor having a field of sensing exterior of the equipped vehicle and operable to capture radar data;a control comprising at least one processor;wherein image data captured by said forward-viewing camera, said driver side-viewing camera and said passenger side-viewing camera is provided to said control;wherein radar data captured by said at least one radar sensor is provided to said control;wherein captured image data provided to said control is processed at said control to detect objects present exteriorly of the equipped vehicle;wherein captured radar data provided to said control is processed at said control to detect objects present exteriorly of the equipped vehicle;wherein said control receives data relevant to a geographic location of the equipped vehicle;wherein said vehicular control system wirelessly communicates information to a remote receiver that is remote from the equipped vehicle;wherein information wirelessly communicated to said remote receiver is derived, at least in part, from image data captured by at least said forward-viewing camera;wherein information wirelessly communicated to said remote receiver is relevant to the geographic location of the equipped vehicle; andwherein said vehicular control system, based at least in part on processing at said control of at least one selected from the group consisting of (i) captured image data and (ii) captured radar data, detects another vehicle that is present exterior of the equipped vehicle.
  • 2. The vehicular control system of claim 1, wherein said vehicular control system, based at least in part on processing at said control of captured image data, determines curvature of a road being traveled by the equipped vehicle.
  • 3. The vehicular control system of claim 1, wherein information wirelessly communicated to said remote receiver comprises information relevant to a condition of the equipped vehicle.
  • 4. The vehicular control system of claim 1, wherein information is wirelessly communicated to said remote receiver in response to an input from a transmitter associated with said remote receiver.
  • 5. The vehicular control system of claim 4, wherein information is wirelessly communicated to said remote receiver via a limited-range wireless communication.
  • 6. The vehicular control system of claim 5, wherein said limited-range wireless communication comprises a Bluetooth limited-range wireless communication.
  • 7. The vehicular control system of claim 1, wherein captured image data provided to said control is processed at said control via an edge detection algorithm to detect objects present exteriorly of the equipped vehicle and within the exterior field of view of at least one selected from the group consisting of (i) said forward-viewing camera, (ii) said driver side-viewing camera and (iii) said passenger side-viewing camera.
  • 8. The vehicular control system of claim 7, wherein said vehicular control system determines whether a detected edge constitutes a portion of the other vehicle that is present exterior the equipped vehicle.
  • 9. The vehicular control system of claim 1, wherein said vehicular control system, responsive to determination based at least in part on processing at said control of captured image data that the equipped vehicle is unintentionally drifting out of a traffic lane that the equipped vehicle is currently travelling in, controls a steering system of the equipped vehicle to adjust steering of the equipped vehicle to mitigate such drift out of the traffic lane that the equipped vehicle is travelling in.
  • 10. The vehicular control system of claim 9, wherein said vehicular control system determines distance from the equipped vehicle to a detected leading vehicle that is present forward of the equipped vehicle and within the forward field of view of said forward-viewing camera, and wherein, when the detected leading vehicle is determined by said vehicular control system to be within a threshold distance from the equipped vehicle, speed of the equipped vehicle is reduced.
  • 11. The vehicular control system of claim 10, wherein said forward-viewing camera is primary to said at least one radar sensor.
  • 12. The vehicular control system of claim 10, wherein the steering system is manually controllable irrespective of said vehicular control system.
  • 13. The vehicular control system of claim 1, wherein, responsive at least in part to processing at said control of captured image data detecting a road condition on a road being traveled by the equipped vehicle, speed of the equipped vehicle is adjusted in accordance with the detected road condition.
  • 14. The vehicular control system of claim 1, wherein, responsive at least in part to processing at said control of captured image data, speed of the equipped vehicle is adjusted in accordance with a traffic condition detected by said vehicular control system.
  • 15. The vehicular control system of claim 1, wherein the geographic location of the equipped vehicle is determined, at least in part, by a global positioning system (GPS).
  • 16. The vehicular control system of claim 15, wherein image data captured by at least said forward-viewing camera is processed at said control one way for a headlamp control system of the equipped vehicle and is processed at said control another way for a lane keeping system of the equipped vehicle.
  • 17. The vehicular control system of claim 15, wherein said vehicular control system, responsive to processing at said control of image data captured by at least said forward-viewing camera, detects headlights of an oncoming vehicle present within the forward field of view of said forward-viewing camera when the equipped vehicle is operated under nighttime conditions.
  • 18. The vehicular control system of claim 15, wherein said vehicular control system, responsive to processing at said control of image data captured by at least said forward-viewing camera, detects taillights of a leading vehicle present within the forward field of view of said forward-viewing camera when the equipped vehicle is operated under nighttime conditions.
  • 19. The vehicular control system of claim 18, wherein said vehicular control system, responsive to determination based at least in part on processing at said control of captured image data that the equipped vehicle is unintentionally drifting out of a traffic lane that the equipped vehicle is currently travelling in, controls a steering system of the equipped vehicle to adjust steering of the equipped vehicle to mitigate such drift out of the traffic lane that the equipped vehicle is travelling in.
  • 20. The vehicular control system of claim 19, wherein the steering system is manually controllable by a driver of the equipped vehicle irrespective of control by said vehicular control system.
  • 21. The vehicular control system of claim 1, wherein said driver side-viewing camera is mounted at a driver-side exterior mirror assembly of the equipped vehicle, and wherein said passenger side-viewing camera is mounted at a passenger-side exterior mirror assembly of the equipped vehicle.
  • 22. The vehicular control system of claim 21, wherein said control receives image data captured by a rear-viewing camera mounted at a rear portion of the equipped vehicle and having a field of view at least rearward of the equipped vehicle.
  • 23. The vehicular control system of claim 22, wherein image data captured by said rear-viewing camera at the rear portion of the equipped vehicle and by one or more of said driver side-viewing camera at the driver-side exterior mirror assembly of the equipped vehicle and said passenger side-viewing camera at the passenger-side exterior mirror assembly of the equipped vehicle is provided to a panoramic vision system of the equipped vehicle.
  • 24. The vehicular control system of claim 1, wherein said vehicular control system, responsive at least in part to processing at said control of captured image data, controls an adaptive cruise control system of the equipped vehicle.
  • 25. The vehicular control system of claim 1, wherein image data captured by at least said forward-viewing camera is processed at said control for stop light recognition.
  • 26. The vehicular control system of claim 1, wherein image data captured by at least said forward-viewing camera is processed at said control for traffic sign recognition.
  • 27. The vehicular control system of claim 1, wherein, responsive at least in part to processing at said control of captured image data detecting a road curve in a road along which the equipped vehicle is traveling and ahead of the equipped vehicle, speed of the equipped vehicle is reduced to an appropriate speed for traveling around the detected road curve, and wherein speed of the equipped vehicle increases after travelling around the detected road curve to a speed appropriate for travelling along a straight section of road that comes after the road curve.
  • 28. The vehicular control system of claim 1, wherein, when the detected other vehicle that is present exterior of the equipped vehicle is determined by said vehicular control system to be within a threshold distance from the equipped vehicle, speed of the equipped vehicle is reduced.
  • 29. The vehicular control system of claim 1, wherein captured image data and captured radar data are processed at said control for an adaptive cruise control system of the equipped vehicle, and wherein, during operation of the adaptive cruise control system, captured image data is primary to captured radar data.
  • 30. The vehicular control system of claim 1, wherein captured image data and captured radar data are processed at said control for an adaptive cruise control system of the equipped vehicle, and wherein, during operation of the adaptive cruise control system, captured image data is secondary to captured radar data.
  • 31. The vehicular control system of claim 1, wherein said at least one radar sensor comprises a driver side-sensing radar sensor mounted the equipped vehicle, said driver side-sensing radar sensor having a field of sensing at least sideward and rearward of the equipped vehicle, and wherein said at least one radar sensor comprises a passenger side-sensing radar sensor mounted at the equipped vehicle, said passenger side-sensing radar sensor having a field of sensing at least sideward and rearward of the equipped vehicle.
  • 32. The vehicular control system of claim 31, wherein said at least one radar sensor comprises a forward-sensing radar sensor mounted at the equipped vehicle, said forward-sensing radar sensor having a field of sensing at least forward of the equipped vehicle.
  • 33. The vehicular control system of claim 32, wherein said vehicular control system, responsive at least in part to processing at said control of radar sensor data sensed by at least said forward-sensing radar sensor, controls an adaptive cruise control system of the equipped vehicle.
  • 34. The vehicular control system of claim 33, wherein said vehicular control system, based at least in part on processing at said control of radar sensor data sensed by at least said forward-sensing radar sensor, detects the other vehicle that is present exterior of and ahead of the equipped vehicle and determines distance from the equipped vehicle to the detected other vehicle that is present exterior of and ahead of the equipped vehicle.
  • 35. The vehicular control system of claim 33, wherein said vehicular control system, based at least in part on processing at said control of captured image data, detects the other vehicle that is present exterior of and ahead of the equipped vehicle.
  • 36. The vehicular control system of claim 1, wherein said vehicular control system, based at least in part on processing at said control of at least one selected from the group consisting of (i) captured image data and (ii) captured radar data, controls speed of the equipped vehicle.
  • 37. The vehicular control system of claim 1, wherein said vehicular control system, based at least in part on processing at said control of at least one selected from the group consisting of (i) captured image data and (ii) captured radar data, determines distance from the equipped vehicle to the detected other vehicle that is present exterior of the equipped vehicle.
  • 38. The vehicular control system of claim 37, wherein said vehicular control system, based at least in part on determination of distance from the equipped vehicle to the detected other vehicle, controls a steering system operable to adjust a steering direction of the equipped vehicle.
  • 39. The vehicular control system of claim 37, wherein said vehicular control system, based at least in part on processing of (i) captured image data and (ii) captured radar data, controls steering of the equipped vehicle.
  • 40. The vehicular control system of claim 1, wherein said vehicular control system, responsive to determination based at least in part on processing at said control of captured image data that the equipped vehicle is unintentionally drifting out of a traffic lane that the equipped vehicle is currently travelling in, controls a steering system of the equipped vehicle to adjust steering of the equipped vehicle to mitigate such drift out of the traffic lane that the equipped vehicle is travelling in.
  • 41. The vehicular control system of claim 40, wherein said vehicular control system, based at least in part on detection of the other vehicle present exterior of the equipped vehicle, determines whether it is safe for the equipped vehicle to execute a lane change maneuver.
  • 42. The vehicular control system of claim 41, wherein said vehicular control system, responsive to processing at said control of image data captured by at least said forward-viewing camera, detects taillights of a leading vehicle present within the forward field of view of said forward-viewing camera when the equipped vehicle is operated under nighttime conditions.
  • 43. The vehicular control system of claim 1, wherein said vehicular control system, based at least in part on processing at said control of captured image data and captured radar data, detects the other vehicle that is present exterior of the equipped vehicle, and wherein said vehicular control system, based at least in part on processing at said control of captured image data and captured radar data, controls speed of the equipped vehicle.
  • 44. The vehicular control system of claim 43, wherein said vehicular control system controls speed of the equipped vehicle for an adaptive cruise control system of the equipped vehicle.
  • 45. The vehicular control system of claim 43, wherein (a) said at least one radar sensor comprises a driver side-sensing radar sensor mounted at the equipped vehicle, said driver side-sensing radar sensor having a field of sensing at least sideward and rearward of the equipped vehicle, and (b) said at least one radar sensor comprises a passenger side-sensing radar sensor mounted at the equipped vehicle, said passenger side-sensing radar sensor having a field of sensing at least sideward and rearward of the equipped vehicle.
  • 46. The vehicular control system of claim 45, wherein said vehicular control system, responsive at least in part to processing at said control of radar data captured by said driver side-sensing radar sensor, detects a vehicle travelling in the same direction as the equipped vehicle that is approaching the equipped vehicle from rearward of the equipped vehicle and that is travelling in a traffic lane that is left of the traffic lane that the equipped vehicle is travelling in.
  • 47. The vehicular control system of claim 45, wherein said vehicular control system, responsive at least in part to processing at said control of radar data captured by said passenger side-sensing radar sensor, detects a vehicle travelling in the same direction as the equipped vehicle that is approaching the equipped vehicle from rearward of the equipped vehicle and that is travelling in a traffic lane that is right of the traffic lane that the equipped vehicle is travelling in.
  • 48. The vehicular control system of claim 47, wherein said at least one radar sensor comprises a forward-sensing radar sensor mounted at the equipped vehicle and having a field of sensing at least forward of the equipped vehicle.
  • 49. A vehicular control system, said vehicular control system comprising: a forward-viewing camera attached at an in-cabin side of a windshield of a vehicle equipped with said vehicular control system;wherein said forward-viewing camera views forward through the windshield exteriorly of the equipped vehicle and has a field of view at least forward of the equipped vehicle;wherein said forward-viewing camera is operable to capture image data;a forward-sensing radar sensor mounted at a front portion of the equipped vehicle;wherein said forward-sensing radar sensor has a field of sensing at least forward of the equipped vehicle and is operable to capture radar data;a control comprising at least one processor;wherein image data captured by said forward-viewing camera is provided to said control;wherein radar data captured by said forward-sensing radar sensor is provided to said control;wherein captured image data provided to said control is processed at said control to detect objects present exteriorly of the equipped vehicle;wherein captured radar data provided to said control is processed at said control to detect objects present exteriorly of the equipped vehicle;wherein said control receives data relevant to a geographic location of the equipped vehicle;wherein the geographic location of the equipped vehicle is determined, at least in part, by a global positioning system (GPS);wherein said vehicular control system wirelessly communicates information to a remote receiver that is remote from the equipped vehicle;wherein information wirelessly communicated to said remote receiver is derived, at least in part, from image data captured by said forward-viewing camera;wherein information wirelessly communicated to said remote receiver is relevant to the geographic location of the equipped vehicle; andwherein said vehicular control system, based at least in part on processing at said control of captured image data and captured radar data, detects another vehicle that is present forward of the equipped vehicle.
  • 50. The vehicular control system of claim 49, wherein said vehicular control system, responsive to processing at said control of image data captured by said forward-viewing camera, one selected from the group consisting of (i) detects headlights of an oncoming vehicle present within the forward field of view of said forward-viewing camera when the equipped vehicle is operated under nighttime conditions, and (ii) detects taillights of a leading vehicle present within the forward field of view of said forward-viewing camera when the equipped vehicle is operated under nighttime conditions.
  • 51. The vehicular control system of claim 50, wherein said vehicular control system, responsive to determination based at least in part on processing at said control of captured image data that the equipped vehicle is unintentionally drifting out of a traffic lane that the equipped vehicle is currently travelling in, controls a steering system of the equipped vehicle to adjust steering of the equipped vehicle to mitigate such drift out of the traffic lane that the equipped vehicle is travelling in.
  • 52. The vehicular control system of claim 51, wherein information wirelessly communicated to said remote receiver comprises information relevant to a condition of the equipped vehicle.
  • 53. The vehicular control system of claim 51, wherein information is wirelessly communicated to said remote receiver in response to an input from a transmitter associated with said remote receiver.
  • 54. The vehicular control system of claim 49, wherein, when the detected other vehicle that is present forward of the equipped vehicle is determined by said control to be within a threshold distance from the equipped vehicle, speed of the equipped vehicle is reduced.
  • 55. The vehicular control system of claim 49, wherein said vehicular control system, based at least in part on processing at said control of captured image data, determines curvature of a road being traveled by the equipped vehicle.
  • 56. The vehicular control system of claim 55, wherein image data captured by said forward-viewing camera is processed at said control for stop light recognition.
  • 57. The vehicular control system of claim 55, wherein image data captured by said forward-viewing camera is processed at said control for traffic sign recognition.
  • 58. The vehicular control system of claim 55, wherein, responsive at least in part to processing at said control of captured image data detecting a road curve in the road being traveled by the equipped vehicle and ahead of the equipped vehicle, speed of the equipped vehicle is reduced to an appropriate speed for traveling around the detected road curve.
  • 59. The vehicular control system of claim 58, wherein speed of the equipped vehicle increases after travelling around the detected road curve to a speed appropriate for travelling along a straight section of road that comes after the road curve.
  • 60. A vehicular control system, said vehicular control system comprising: a plurality of cameras disposed at a vehicle equipped with said vehicular control system;said plurality of cameras at least comprising (i) a forward-viewing camera mounted at a front portion of the equipped vehicle and having a field of view at least forward of the equipped vehicle, said forward-viewing camera operable to capture image data, (ii) a driver side-viewing camera mounted at a driver side portion of the equipped vehicle and having a field of view at least sideward and rearward of the equipped vehicle at a driver side of the equipped vehicle, said driver side-viewing camera operable to capture image data, (iii) a passenger side-viewing camera mounted at a passenger side portion of the equipped vehicle and having a field of view at least sideward and rearward of the equipped vehicle at a passenger side of the equipped vehicle, said passenger side-viewing camera operable to capture image data, and (iv) a rear-viewing camera mounted at a rear portion of the equipped vehicle and having a field of view at least rearward of the equipped vehicle, said rear-viewing camera operable to capture image data;wherein said forward-viewing camera is attached at an in-cabin side of a windshield of the equipped vehicle and views forward through the windshield exteriorly of the equipped vehicle;a plurality of radar sensors disposed at the equipped vehicle;said plurality of radar sensors at least comprising (i) a forward-sensing radar sensor mounted at the equipped vehicle and having a field of sensing at least forward of the equipped vehicle, said forward-sensing radar sensor operable to capture radar data, (ii) a driver side-sensing radar sensor mounted at the equipped vehicle, said driver side-sensing radar sensor having a field of sensing at least sideward and rearward of the equipped vehicle, said driver-side sensing radar sensor operable to capture radar data, and (iii) a passenger side-sensing radar sensor mounted at the equipped vehicle, said passenger side-sensing radar sensor having a field of sensing at least sideward and rearward of the equipped vehicle, said passenger side-sensing radar sensor operable to capture radar data;a control comprising at least one processor;wherein image data captured by said forward-viewing camera, said driver side-viewing camera, said passenger side-viewing camera and said rear-viewing camera is provided to said control;wherein radar data captured by said forward-sensing radar sensor, said driver side-sensing radar sensor and said passenger side-sensing radar sensor is provided to said control;wherein captured image data provided to said control is processed at said control to detect objects present exteriorly of the equipped vehicle;wherein captured radar data provided to said control is processed at said control to detect objects present exteriorly of the equipped vehicle;wherein said control receives data relevant to a geographic location of the equipped vehicle;wherein the geographic location of the equipped vehicle is determined, at least in part, by a global positioning system (GPS);wherein said vehicular control system wirelessly communicates information to a remote receiver that is remote from the equipped vehicle;wherein information wirelessly communicated to said remote receiver is derived, at least in part, from image data captured by at least said forward-viewing camera;wherein information wirelessly communicated to said remote receiver is relevant to the geographic location of the equipped vehicle; andwherein said vehicular control system, based at least in part on processing at said control of at least one selected from the group consisting of (i) captured image data and (ii) captured radar data, detects another vehicle that is present exterior of the equipped vehicle.
  • 61. The vehicular control system of claim 60, wherein said vehicular control system, responsive at least in part to processing at said control of radar data captured by said driver side-sensing radar sensor, detects a vehicle travelling in the same direction as the equipped vehicle that is approaching the equipped vehicle from rearward of the equipped vehicle and that is travelling in a traffic lane that is left of the traffic lane that the equipped vehicle is travelling in.
  • 62. The vehicular control system of claim 60, wherein said vehicular control system, responsive at least in part to processing at said control of radar data captured by said passenger side-sensing radar sensor, detects a vehicle travelling in the same direction as the equipped vehicle that is approaching the equipped vehicle from rearward of the equipped vehicle and that is travelling in a traffic lane that is right of the traffic lane that the equipped vehicle is travelling in.
  • 63. The vehicular control system of claim 60, wherein said vehicular control system, responsive to processing at said control of image data captured by said forward-viewing camera, one selected from the group consisting of (i) detects headlights of an oncoming vehicle present within the forward field of view of said forward-viewing camera when the equipped vehicle is operated under nighttime conditions, and (ii) detects taillights of a leading vehicle present within the forward field of view of said forward-viewing camera when the equipped vehicle is operated under nighttime conditions.
  • 64. The vehicular control system of claim 63, wherein said vehicular control system, responsive to determination based at least in part on processing at said control of captured image data that the equipped vehicle is unintentionally drifting out of a traffic lane that the equipped vehicle is currently travelling in, controls a steering system of the equipped vehicle to adjust steering of the equipped vehicle to mitigate such drift out of the traffic lane that the equipped vehicle is travelling in.
  • 65. The vehicular control system of claim 64, wherein said vehicular control system, based at least in part on processing at said control of captured image data, determines curvature of a road being traveled by the equipped vehicle.
  • 66. The vehicular control system of claim 60, wherein information wirelessly communicated to said remote receiver comprises information relevant to a condition of the equipped vehicle.
  • 67. The vehicular control system of claim 60, wherein information is wirelessly communicated to said remote receiver in response to an input from a transmitter associated with said remote receiver.
  • 68. The vehicular control system of claim 60, wherein image data captured by at least said forward-viewing camera is processed at said control for stop light recognition.
  • 69. The vehicular control system of claim 60, wherein image data captured by at least said forward-viewing camera is processed at said control for traffic sign recognition.
  • 70. The vehicular control system of claim 60, wherein, responsive at least in part to processing at said control of captured image data detecting a road curve in a road along which the equipped vehicle is traveling and ahead of the equipped vehicle, speed of the equipped vehicle is reduced to an appropriate speed for traveling around the detected road curve.
  • 71. The vehicular control system of claim 70, wherein speed of the equipped vehicle increases after travelling around the detected road curve to a speed appropriate for travelling along a straight section of road that comes after the road curve.
  • 72. The vehicular control system of claim 60, wherein, when the detected other vehicle that is present exterior of the equipped vehicle is determined by said vehicular control system to be within a threshold distance from the equipped vehicle, speed of the equipped vehicle is reduced.
  • 73. The vehicular control system of claim 60, wherein said vehicular control system, based at least in part on processing at said control of captured image data and captured radar data, detects the other vehicle that is present exterior of the equipped vehicle, and wherein said vehicular control system, based at least in part on processing at said control of captured image data and captured radar data, controls speed of the equipped vehicle.
  • 74. The vehicular control system of claim 73, wherein said vehicular control system controls speed of the equipped vehicle for an adaptive cruise control system of the equipped vehicle.
  • 75. The vehicular control system of claim 60, wherein said vehicular control system, based at least in part on processing at said control of captured radar data, determines distance from the equipped vehicle to the detected other vehicle that is present exterior of the equipped vehicle.
  • 76. The vehicular control system of claim 75, wherein said vehicular control system, based at least in part on determination of distance from the equipped vehicle to the detected other vehicle, controls a steering system operable to adjust a steering direction of the equipped vehicle.
  • 77. The vehicular control system of claim 60, wherein said vehicular control system, based at least in part on processing at said control of captured image data and captured radar data, controls steering of the equipped vehicle.
  • 78. The vehicular control system of claim 60, wherein said vehicular control system, responsive to determination based at least in part on processing at said control of captured image data that the equipped vehicle is unintentionally drifting out of a traffic lane that the equipped vehicle is currently travelling in, controls a steering system of the equipped vehicle to adjust steering of the equipped vehicle to mitigate such drift out of the traffic lane that the equipped vehicle is travelling in.
  • 79. The vehicular control system of claim 60, wherein said vehicular control system, based at least in part on detection of the other vehicle present exterior of the equipped vehicle, determines whether it is safe for the equipped vehicle to execute a lane change maneuver.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/830,114, filed Dec. 4, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,118,618, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/413,462, filed Jan. 24, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,834,216, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/155,350, filed May 16, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,555,803, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/922,640, filed Oct. 26, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/195,137, filed Mar. 3, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,171,217, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/651,659, filed Oct. 15, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,665,079, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/559,856, filed Sep. 15, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,289,142, which is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/329,029, filed Dec. 5, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,679,498, which is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/408,776, filed Apr. 21, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,463,138, which is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/427,051, filed Apr. 30, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,038,577, which claims priority of U.S. provisional applications, Ser. No. 60/433,700, filed Dec. 16, 2002, and Ser. No. 60/377,524, filed May 3, 2002, which are all hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

US Referenced Citations (1144)
Number Name Date Kind
1472509 Bitter Oct 1923 A
2074251 Braun Mar 1937 A
2148119 Grist Feb 1939 A
2240843 Gillespie May 1941 A
2317400 Paulus et al. Apr 1943 A
2331144 Sitter Oct 1943 A
2339291 Paulus et al. Jan 1944 A
2424288 Severy Jul 1947 A
2598420 Onksen, Jr. et al. May 1952 A
2632040 Rabinow Mar 1953 A
2827594 Rabinow Mar 1953 A
2750583 McCullough Jun 1956 A
2762932 Falge Sep 1956 A
2907920 McIlvane Oct 1956 A
2855523 Berger Oct 1958 A
2856146 Lehder Oct 1958 A
2863064 Rabinow Dec 1958 A
2892094 Lehovec Jun 1959 A
2912593 Deuth Nov 1959 A
2934676 Miller Apr 1960 A
2959709 Vanaman et al. Nov 1960 A
3008532 Reed Nov 1961 A
3011580 Reid Dec 1961 A
3069654 Hough Dec 1962 A
3085646 Paufve Apr 1963 A
3158835 Hipkins Nov 1964 A
3172496 Rabinow et al. Mar 1965 A
3179845 Kulwiec Apr 1965 A
3201750 Morin Aug 1965 A
3208070 Boicey Sep 1965 A
3249761 Baumanns May 1966 A
3271577 Miller et al. Sep 1966 A
3325680 Amacher Jun 1967 A
3367616 Bausch et al. Feb 1968 A
3411843 Moller Nov 1968 A
3486066 Jones et al. Dec 1969 A
3515472 Schwitzgebel Jun 1970 A
3572428 Monaco Mar 1971 A
3623671 Hargroves Nov 1971 A
3673560 Barsh et al. Jun 1972 A
3680951 Jordan et al. Aug 1972 A
3689695 Rosenfield et al. Sep 1972 A
3708668 Tilley Jan 1973 A
3751711 Schick Aug 1973 A
3845572 McCanney Nov 1974 A
3876940 Wickord et al. Apr 1975 A
3971065 Bayer Jul 1976 A
3985424 Steinacher Oct 1976 A
3986022 Hyatt Oct 1976 A
4003445 De Bruine Jan 1977 A
4037134 Loper Jul 1977 A
4044853 Melke Aug 1977 A
4049961 Marcy Sep 1977 A
4058796 Oishi et al. Nov 1977 A
4093364 Miller Jun 1978 A
4127778 Leitz Nov 1978 A
4139801 Linares Feb 1979 A
4143264 Gilbert et al. Mar 1979 A
4176728 Otteblad et al. Dec 1979 A
4200361 Malvano et al. Apr 1980 A
4209853 Hyatt Jun 1980 A
4214266 Myers Jul 1980 A
4218698 Bart et al. Aug 1980 A
4236099 Rosenblum Nov 1980 A
4238778 Ohsumi Dec 1980 A
4243196 Toda et al. Jan 1981 A
4247870 Gabel et al. Jan 1981 A
4249160 Chilvers Feb 1981 A
4254931 Aikens Mar 1981 A
4257703 Goodrich Mar 1981 A
4266856 Wainwright May 1981 A
4277804 Robison Jul 1981 A
4278142 Kono Jul 1981 A
4281898 Ochiai Aug 1981 A
4288814 Talley et al. Sep 1981 A
RE30835 Giglia Dec 1981 E
4348652 Barnes et al. Sep 1982 A
4348653 Tsuzuki et al. Sep 1982 A
4355271 Noack Oct 1982 A
4357558 Massoni et al. Nov 1982 A
4357594 Ehrlich et al. Nov 1982 A
4381888 Momiyama May 1983 A
4389537 Tsunoda et al. Jun 1983 A
4389639 Torii et al. Jun 1983 A
4390742 Wideman Jun 1983 A
4390895 Sato et al. Jun 1983 A
4401181 Schwarz Aug 1983 A
4403208 Hodgson et al. Sep 1983 A
4420238 Felix Dec 1983 A
4431896 Lodetti Feb 1984 A
4441125 Parkinson Apr 1984 A
4443057 Bauer et al. Apr 1984 A
4460831 Oettinger et al. Jul 1984 A
4464789 Sternberg Aug 1984 A
4471228 Nishizawa et al. Sep 1984 A
4481450 Watanabe et al. Nov 1984 A
4483011 Brown Nov 1984 A
4485402 Searby Nov 1984 A
4491390 Tong-Shen Jan 1985 A
4495589 Hirzel Jan 1985 A
4512637 Ballmer Apr 1985 A
4521804 Bendell Jun 1985 A
4529275 Ballmer Jul 1985 A
4529873 Ballmer et al. Jul 1985 A
4532550 Bendell et al. Jul 1985 A
4538181 Taylor Aug 1985 A
4546551 Franks Oct 1985 A
4549208 Kamejima et al. Oct 1985 A
4564833 Seko et al. Jan 1986 A
4566032 Hirooka et al. Jan 1986 A
4571082 Downs Feb 1986 A
4572619 Reininger et al. Feb 1986 A
4580875 Bechtel et al. Apr 1986 A
4587522 Warren May 1986 A
4588041 Tsuchuhashi May 1986 A
4599544 Martin Jul 1986 A
4600913 Caine Jul 1986 A
4601053 Grumet Jul 1986 A
4603946 Kato et al. Aug 1986 A
4614415 Hyatt Sep 1986 A
4620141 McCumber Oct 1986 A
4623222 Ito et al. Nov 1986 A
4625329 Ishikawa et al. Nov 1986 A
4626850 Chey Dec 1986 A
4629941 Ellis et al. Dec 1986 A
4630109 Barton Dec 1986 A
4632509 Ohmi et al. Dec 1986 A
4638287 Umebayashi et al. Jan 1987 A
4645320 Muelling et al. Feb 1987 A
4645975 Meitzler et al. Feb 1987 A
4647161 Müller Mar 1987 A
4647975 Alston et al. Mar 1987 A
4653316 Fukuhara Mar 1987 A
4665321 Chang et al. May 1987 A
4669825 Itoh et al. Jun 1987 A
4671614 Catalano Jun 1987 A
4671615 Fukada et al. Jun 1987 A
4672457 Hyatt Jun 1987 A
4676601 Itoh et al. Jun 1987 A
4679077 Yuasa et al. Jul 1987 A
4681431 Sims et al. Jul 1987 A
4688085 Imaide Aug 1987 A
4690508 Jacob Sep 1987 A
4692798 Seko et al. Sep 1987 A
4693788 Berg et al. Sep 1987 A
4697883 Suzuki et al. Oct 1987 A
4699484 Howell et al. Oct 1987 A
4701022 Jacob Oct 1987 A
4701613 Watanbe et al. Oct 1987 A
4713685 Nishimura et al. Dec 1987 A
4717830 Botts Jan 1988 A
4727290 Smith et al. Feb 1988 A
4728804 Norsworthy Mar 1988 A
4731669 Hayashi et al. Mar 1988 A
4731769 Schaefer et al. Mar 1988 A
4741603 Miyagi et al. May 1988 A
4755664 Holmes et al. Jul 1988 A
4758883 Kawahara et al. Jul 1988 A
4768135 Kretschmer et al. Aug 1988 A
4772942 Tuck Sep 1988 A
4779095 Guerreri Oct 1988 A
4785280 Fubini et al. Nov 1988 A
4789904 Peterson Dec 1988 A
4793690 Gahan et al. Dec 1988 A
4799267 Kamejima et al. Jan 1989 A
4805015 Copeland Feb 1989 A
4816828 Feher Mar 1989 A
4817948 Simonelli Apr 1989 A
4820933 Hong Apr 1989 A
4825232 Howdle Apr 1989 A
4833469 David May 1989 A
4833534 Paff et al. May 1989 A
4838650 Stewart et al. Jun 1989 A
4839749 Franklin Jun 1989 A
4841348 Shizukuishi et al. Jun 1989 A
4843463 Michetti Jun 1989 A
4847489 Dietrich Jul 1989 A
4847772 Michalopoulos et al. Jul 1989 A
4849731 Melocik Jul 1989 A
4855822 Narendra et al. Aug 1989 A
4859031 Berman et al. Aug 1989 A
4862037 Farber et al. Aug 1989 A
4863130 Marks, Jr. Sep 1989 A
4867561 Makino et al. Sep 1989 A
4870264 Beha Sep 1989 A
4871917 O'Farrell et al. Oct 1989 A
4872051 Dye Oct 1989 A
4881019 Shiraishi et al. Nov 1989 A
4882466 Friel Nov 1989 A
4882565 Gallmeyer Nov 1989 A
4883349 Mittelhauser Nov 1989 A
4884055 Memmola Nov 1989 A
4886960 Molyneux et al. Dec 1989 A
4891559 Matsumoto et al. Jan 1990 A
4892345 Rachael Jan 1990 A
4895790 Swanson et al. Jan 1990 A
4896030 Miyaji Jan 1990 A
4899296 Khattak Feb 1990 A
4900133 Berman Feb 1990 A
4905151 Weiman et al. Feb 1990 A
4906940 Green et al. Mar 1990 A
4907870 Brucker Mar 1990 A
4910591 Petrossian et al. Mar 1990 A
4916374 Schierbeek et al. Apr 1990 A
4917477 Bechtel et al. Apr 1990 A
4926346 Yokoyama May 1990 A
4930742 Schofield et al. Jun 1990 A
4931937 Kakinami et al. Jun 1990 A
4936533 Adams et al. Jun 1990 A
4937796 Tendler Jun 1990 A
4948246 Shigematsu Aug 1990 A
4949186 Peterson Aug 1990 A
4953305 Van Lente et al. Sep 1990 A
4954962 Evans et al. Sep 1990 A
4956591 Schierbeek et al. Sep 1990 A
4961625 Wood et al. Oct 1990 A
4963788 King et al. Oct 1990 A
4966441 Conner Oct 1990 A
4967319 Seko Oct 1990 A
4970509 Kissinger Nov 1990 A
4970589 Hanson Nov 1990 A
4970653 Kenue Nov 1990 A
4971405 Hwang Nov 1990 A
4971430 Lynas Nov 1990 A
4974078 Tsai Nov 1990 A
4975703 Delisle et al. Dec 1990 A
4985847 Shioya et al. Jan 1991 A
4987357 Masaki Jan 1991 A
4987410 Berman et al. Jan 1991 A
4991054 Walters Feb 1991 A
5001558 Burley et al. Mar 1991 A
5003288 Wilhelm Mar 1991 A
5003339 Kikuchi et al. Mar 1991 A
5008739 D'Luna et al. Apr 1991 A
5008946 Ando Apr 1991 A
5012082 Watanabe Apr 1991 A
5012092 Kobayashi Apr 1991 A
5012335 Cohodar Apr 1991 A
5016977 Baude et al. May 1991 A
5020114 Fujioka et al. May 1991 A
5027001 Torbert Jun 1991 A
5027104 Reid Jun 1991 A
5027200 Petrossian et al. Jun 1991 A
5031101 Kamimura et al. Jul 1991 A
5036437 Macks Jul 1991 A
5044706 Chen Sep 1991 A
5044956 Behensky et al. Sep 1991 A
5050966 Berman Sep 1991 A
5051906 Evans, Jr. et al. Sep 1991 A
5055668 French Oct 1991 A
5059877 Teder Oct 1991 A
5059947 Chen Oct 1991 A
5063603 Burt Nov 1991 A
5064274 Alten Nov 1991 A
5072154 Chen Dec 1991 A
5075768 Wirtz et al. Dec 1991 A
5080207 Horneffer Jan 1992 A
5080309 Ivins Jan 1992 A
5081585 Kurami et al. Jan 1992 A
5086253 Lawler Feb 1992 A
5086510 Guenther et al. Feb 1992 A
5087969 Kamada et al. Feb 1992 A
5096287 Kakinami et al. Mar 1992 A
5097362 Lynas Mar 1992 A
5100093 Rawlinson Mar 1992 A
5101351 Hattori Mar 1992 A
5111289 Lucas et al. May 1992 A
5113721 Polly May 1992 A
5115398 De Jong May 1992 A
5121200 Choi Jun 1992 A
5122957 Hattori Jun 1992 A
5124549 Michaels et al. Jun 1992 A
5128769 Ari Jul 1992 A
5130709 Toyama et al. Jul 1992 A
5133605 Nakamura Jul 1992 A
5137238 Hutten Aug 1992 A
5139327 Tanaka Aug 1992 A
5144685 Nasar et al. Sep 1992 A
5146340 Dickerson Sep 1992 A
5148014 Lynam Sep 1992 A
5153760 Ahmed Oct 1992 A
5155426 Kurami Oct 1992 A
5155775 Brown Oct 1992 A
5159557 Ogawa Oct 1992 A
5160780 Ono et al. Nov 1992 A
5160971 Koshizawa et al. Nov 1992 A
5161632 Asayama et al. Nov 1992 A
5162841 Terashita Nov 1992 A
5162861 Tamburino Nov 1992 A
5163002 Kurami Nov 1992 A
5165108 Asayama Nov 1992 A
5166681 Bottesch et al. Nov 1992 A
5168355 Asayama Dec 1992 A
5168378 Black et al. Dec 1992 A
5170374 Shimohigashi et al. Dec 1992 A
5172235 Wilm et al. Dec 1992 A
5172317 Asanuma et al. Dec 1992 A
5173881 Sindle Dec 1992 A
5177462 Kajiwara Jan 1993 A
5177606 Koshizawa Jan 1993 A
5177685 Davis et al. Jan 1993 A
5182502 Slotkowski et al. Jan 1993 A
5184956 Langlais et al. Feb 1993 A
5185812 Yamashita et al. Feb 1993 A
5187383 Taccetta et al. Feb 1993 A
5189561 Hong Feb 1993 A
5193000 Lipton et al. Mar 1993 A
5193029 Schofield et al. Mar 1993 A
5193894 Lietar et al. Mar 1993 A
5204536 Vardi Apr 1993 A
5204778 Bechtel Apr 1993 A
5208701 Maeda May 1993 A
5208750 Kurami et al. May 1993 A
5212468 Adell May 1993 A
5214408 Asayama May 1993 A
5216408 Shirakawa Jun 1993 A
5218414 Kajiwara et al. Jun 1993 A
5220508 Ninomiya et al. Jun 1993 A
5223814 Suman Jun 1993 A
5223907 Asayama Jun 1993 A
5225827 Persson Jul 1993 A
5229941 Hattori Jul 1993 A
5230400 Kakinami et al. Jul 1993 A
5231379 Wood et al. Jul 1993 A
5233527 Shinnosuke Aug 1993 A
5234070 Noah et al. Aug 1993 A
5235178 Hegyi Aug 1993 A
5237249 Levers Aug 1993 A
5243524 Ishida et al. Sep 1993 A
5245422 Borcherts et al. Sep 1993 A
5246193 Faidley Sep 1993 A
5249126 Hattori Sep 1993 A
5249128 Markandey et al. Sep 1993 A
5249157 Taylor Sep 1993 A
5251680 Miezawa et al. Oct 1993 A
5253050 Karasudani Oct 1993 A
5253109 O'Farrell et al. Oct 1993 A
5265172 Markandey et al. Nov 1993 A
5266873 Arditi et al. Nov 1993 A
5267160 Ito et al. Nov 1993 A
5276389 Levers Jan 1994 A
5285060 Larson et al. Feb 1994 A
5289182 Brillard et al. Feb 1994 A
5289321 Secor Feb 1994 A
5291424 Asayama et al. Mar 1994 A
5293162 Bachalo Mar 1994 A
5298732 Chen Mar 1994 A
5301115 Nouso et al. Apr 1994 A
5302956 Asbury et al. Apr 1994 A
5304980 Maekawa Apr 1994 A
5305012 Faris Apr 1994 A
5307136 Saneyoshi Apr 1994 A
5307419 Tsujino et al. Apr 1994 A
5309137 Kajiwara May 1994 A
5313072 Vachss May 1994 A
5318143 Parker et al. Jun 1994 A
5321556 Joe Jun 1994 A
5325096 Pakett Jun 1994 A
5325386 Jewell et al. Jun 1994 A
5327288 Wellington et al. Jul 1994 A
5329206 Slotkowski et al. Jul 1994 A
5331312 Kudoh Jul 1994 A
5336980 Levers Aug 1994 A
5341437 Nakayama Aug 1994 A
5343206 Ansaldi et al. Aug 1994 A
5345266 Denyer Sep 1994 A
5347456 Zhang et al. Sep 1994 A
5351044 Mathur et al. Sep 1994 A
D351370 Lawlor et al. Oct 1994 S
5355118 Fukuhara Oct 1994 A
5359666 Nakayama et al. Oct 1994 A
5367457 Ishida et al. Nov 1994 A
5369590 Karasudani Nov 1994 A
5371535 Takizawa Dec 1994 A
5373911 Yasui Dec 1994 A
5374852 Parkes Dec 1994 A
5379196 Kobayashi et al. Jan 1995 A
5379353 Hasegawa et al. Jan 1995 A
5381338 Wysocki et al. Jan 1995 A
5386285 Asayama Jan 1995 A
5388048 Yavnayi et al. Feb 1995 A
5394333 Kao Feb 1995 A
5398041 Hyatt Mar 1995 A
5406395 Wilson et al. Apr 1995 A
5406414 O'Farrell et al. Apr 1995 A
5408330 Squicciarini Apr 1995 A
5408346 Trissel et al. Apr 1995 A
5410346 Saneyoshi et al. Apr 1995 A
5414257 Stanton May 1995 A
5414439 Groves et al. May 1995 A
5414461 Kishi et al. May 1995 A
5414625 Hattori May 1995 A
5416313 Larson et al. May 1995 A
5416318 Hegyi May 1995 A
5416478 Morinaga May 1995 A
5416711 Gran et al. May 1995 A
5424952 Asayama Jun 1995 A
5426294 Kobayashi et al. Jun 1995 A
5430431 Nelson Jul 1995 A
5430450 Holmes Jul 1995 A
5434407 Bauer et al. Jul 1995 A
5434927 Brady et al. Jul 1995 A
5436839 Dausch et al. Jul 1995 A
5440428 Hegg et al. Aug 1995 A
5444478 Lelong et al. Aug 1995 A
5448180 Kienzler et al. Sep 1995 A
5450057 Watanabe Sep 1995 A
5451822 Bechtel et al. Sep 1995 A
5457493 Leddy et al. Oct 1995 A
5459660 Berra Oct 1995 A
5461357 Yoshioka et al. Oct 1995 A
5461361 Moore Oct 1995 A
5465079 Bouchard et al. Nov 1995 A
5467284 Yoshioka et al. Nov 1995 A
5469298 Suman et al. Nov 1995 A
5471515 Fossum et al. Nov 1995 A
5473515 Liu Dec 1995 A
5475366 Van Lente et al. Dec 1995 A
5475494 Nishida et al. Dec 1995 A
5481257 Brubaker et al. Jan 1996 A
5482133 Iwata et al. Jan 1996 A
5483060 Sugiura et al. Jan 1996 A
5483168 Reid Jan 1996 A
5483453 Uemura et al. Jan 1996 A
5487116 Nakano et al. Jan 1996 A
5488496 Pine Jan 1996 A
5493269 Durley et al. Feb 1996 A
5493392 Blackmon et al. Feb 1996 A
5498866 Bendicks et al. Mar 1996 A
5500766 Stonecypher Mar 1996 A
5508592 Lapatovich et al. Apr 1996 A
5510983 Iino Apr 1996 A
5515448 Nishitani May 1996 A
5521633 Nakajima et al. May 1996 A
5528698 Kamei et al. Jun 1996 A
5529138 Shaw et al. Jun 1996 A
5530240 Larson et al. Jun 1996 A
5530330 Baiden et al. Jun 1996 A
5530420 Tsuchiya et al. Jun 1996 A
5530771 Maekawa Jun 1996 A
5535144 Kise Jul 1996 A
5535314 Alves et al. Jul 1996 A
5537003 Bechtel et al. Jul 1996 A
5539397 Asanuma et al. Jul 1996 A
5541590 Nishio Jul 1996 A
5545960 Ishikawa Aug 1996 A
5550677 Schofield et al. Aug 1996 A
5555136 Waldmann et al. Sep 1996 A
5555312 Shima et al. Sep 1996 A
5555503 Kyrtsos et al. Sep 1996 A
5555555 Sato et al. Sep 1996 A
5558123 Castel et al. Sep 1996 A
5559695 Daily Sep 1996 A
5562336 Gotou et al. Oct 1996 A
5566224 ul Azam et al. Oct 1996 A
5568027 Teder Oct 1996 A
5568316 Schrenck et al. Oct 1996 A
5572315 Krell Nov 1996 A
5574443 Hsieh Nov 1996 A
5576687 Blank et al. Nov 1996 A
5581464 Woll et al. Dec 1996 A
5582383 Mertens et al. Dec 1996 A
5588123 Loibl Dec 1996 A
5594222 Caldwell Jan 1997 A
5596319 Spry et al. Jan 1997 A
5596382 Bamford Jan 1997 A
5598164 Reppas et al. Jan 1997 A
5602457 Anderson et al. Feb 1997 A
5612686 Takano et al. Mar 1997 A
5612883 Shaffer et al. Mar 1997 A
5614788 Mullins Mar 1997 A
5614885 Van Lente et al. Mar 1997 A
5615857 Hook Apr 1997 A
5619370 Guinosso Apr 1997 A
5627586 Yamasaki May 1997 A
5633944 Guibert et al. May 1997 A
5634709 Iwama Jun 1997 A
5638116 Shimoura et al. Jun 1997 A
5642299 Hardin et al. Jun 1997 A
5646612 Byon Jul 1997 A
5648835 Uzawa Jul 1997 A
5650944 Kise Jul 1997 A
5660454 Mori et al. Aug 1997 A
5661303 Teder Aug 1997 A
5666028 Bechtel et al. Sep 1997 A
5667896 Carter et al. Sep 1997 A
5668663 Varaprasad et al. Sep 1997 A
5670935 Schofield et al. Sep 1997 A
5673019 Dantoni Sep 1997 A
5675489 Pomerleau Oct 1997 A
5676484 Chamberlin et al. Oct 1997 A
5677851 Kingdon et al. Oct 1997 A
5677979 Squicciarini et al. Oct 1997 A
5680263 Zimmermann et al. Oct 1997 A
D388107 Huckins Dec 1997 S
5699044 Van Lente et al. Dec 1997 A
5699057 Ikeda et al. Dec 1997 A
5699149 Kuroda et al. Dec 1997 A
5706355 Raboisson et al. Jan 1998 A
5707129 Kobayashi Jan 1998 A
5708410 Blank et al. Jan 1998 A
5710633 Klappenbach et al. Jan 1998 A
5715093 Schierbeek et al. Feb 1998 A
5719551 Flick Feb 1998 A
5724187 Varaprasad et al. Mar 1998 A
5724316 Brunts Mar 1998 A
5737226 Olson et al. Apr 1998 A
5757949 Kinoshita et al. May 1998 A
5760826 Nayer Jun 1998 A
5760828 Cortes Jun 1998 A
5760931 Saburi et al. Jun 1998 A
5760962 Schofield et al. Jun 1998 A
5761094 Olson et al. Jun 1998 A
5764139 Nojima et al. Jun 1998 A
5765116 Wilson-Jones et al. Jun 1998 A
5765940 Levy et al. Jun 1998 A
5781105 Bitar et al. Jul 1998 A
5781437 Wiemer et al. Jul 1998 A
5786772 Schofield et al. Jul 1998 A
5790403 Nakayama Aug 1998 A
5790973 Blaker et al. Aug 1998 A
5793308 Rosinski et al. Aug 1998 A
5793420 Schmidt Aug 1998 A
5796094 Schofield et al. Aug 1998 A
5798575 O'Farrell et al. Aug 1998 A
5804719 Didelot et al. Sep 1998 A
5808589 Fergason Sep 1998 A
5811888 Hsieh Sep 1998 A
5820097 Spooner Oct 1998 A
5835255 Miles Nov 1998 A
5835613 Breed et al. Nov 1998 A
5835614 Aoyama et al. Nov 1998 A
5837994 Stam et al. Nov 1998 A
5841126 Fossum et al. Nov 1998 A
5844505 Van Ryzin Dec 1998 A
5844682 Kiyomoto et al. Dec 1998 A
5845000 Breed et al. Dec 1998 A
5847755 Wixson et al. Dec 1998 A
5848802 Breed et al. Dec 1998 A
5850176 Kinoshita et al. Dec 1998 A
5850254 Takano et al. Dec 1998 A
5867591 Onda Feb 1999 A
5877707 Kowalick Mar 1999 A
5877897 Schofield et al. Mar 1999 A
5878370 Olson Mar 1999 A
5883193 Karim Mar 1999 A
5883684 Millikan et al. Mar 1999 A
5883739 Ashihara et al. Mar 1999 A
5884212 Lion Mar 1999 A
5890021 Onoda Mar 1999 A
5890083 Franke et al. Mar 1999 A
5896085 Mori et al. Apr 1999 A
5899956 Chan May 1999 A
5904725 Iisaka et al. May 1999 A
5905457 Rashid May 1999 A
5912534 Benedict Jun 1999 A
5914815 Bos Jun 1999 A
5920367 Kajimoto et al. Jul 1999 A
5922036 Yasui Jul 1999 A
5923027 Stam et al. Jul 1999 A
5929784 Kawaziri et al. Jul 1999 A
5929786 Schofield et al. Jul 1999 A
5938320 Crandall Aug 1999 A
5938810 DeVries, Jr. et al. Aug 1999 A
5940120 Frankhouse et al. Aug 1999 A
5942853 Piscart Aug 1999 A
5949331 Schofield et al. Sep 1999 A
5955941 Pruksch et al. Sep 1999 A
5956181 Lin Sep 1999 A
5959367 O'Farrell et al. Sep 1999 A
5959555 Furuta Sep 1999 A
5961571 Gorr Oct 1999 A
5963247 Banitt Oct 1999 A
5964822 Alland et al. Oct 1999 A
5971552 O'Farrell et al. Oct 1999 A
5982288 Sawatari et al. Nov 1999 A
5986796 Miles Nov 1999 A
5990469 Bechtel et al. Nov 1999 A
5990649 Nagao et al. Nov 1999 A
5991427 Kakinami et al. Nov 1999 A
6001486 Varaprasad et al. Dec 1999 A
6009336 Harris et al. Dec 1999 A
6020704 Buschur Feb 2000 A
6028537 Suman et al. Feb 2000 A
6031484 Bullinger Feb 2000 A
6037860 Zander et al. Mar 2000 A
6037975 Aoyama Mar 2000 A
6049171 Stam et al. Apr 2000 A
6052124 Stein et al. Apr 2000 A
6057754 Kinoshita et al. May 2000 A
6066933 Ponziana May 2000 A
6084519 Coulling et al. Jul 2000 A
6087953 DeLine et al. Jul 2000 A
6091833 Yasui et al. Jul 2000 A
6094198 Shashua Jul 2000 A
6097023 Schofield et al. Aug 2000 A
6097024 Stam et al. Aug 2000 A
6100811 Hsu et al. Aug 2000 A
6107939 Sorden Aug 2000 A
6116743 Hoek Sep 2000 A
6122597 Saneyoshi et al. Sep 2000 A
6124647 Marcus et al. Sep 2000 A
6124886 DeLine et al. Sep 2000 A
6139172 Bos et al. Oct 2000 A
6140980 Spitzer et al. Oct 2000 A
6144022 Tenenbaum et al. Nov 2000 A
6144158 Beam Nov 2000 A
6150014 Chu et al. Nov 2000 A
6150930 Cooper Nov 2000 A
6151065 Steed et al. Nov 2000 A
6151539 Bergholz et al. Nov 2000 A
6158655 DeVries, Jr. et al. Dec 2000 A
6166628 Andreas Dec 2000 A
6170955 Campbell et al. Jan 2001 B1
6172613 DeLine et al. Jan 2001 B1
6175164 O'Farrell et al. Jan 2001 B1
6175300 Kendrick Jan 2001 B1
6176590 Prevost et al. Jan 2001 B1
6188939 Morgan et al. Feb 2001 B1
6198409 Schofield et al. Mar 2001 B1
6201642 Bos Mar 2001 B1
6211907 Scaman et al. Apr 2001 B1
6218934 Regan Apr 2001 B1
6219444 Shashua et al. Apr 2001 B1
6222447 Schofield et al. Apr 2001 B1
6222460 DeLine et al. Apr 2001 B1
6226061 Tagusa May 2001 B1
6229319 Johnson May 2001 B1
6243003 DeLine et al. Jun 2001 B1
6247819 Turnbull et al. Jun 2001 B1
6250148 Lynam Jun 2001 B1
6259412 Duroux Jul 2001 B1
6259423 Tokito et al. Jul 2001 B1
6266082 Yonezawa et al. Jul 2001 B1
6266442 Laumeyer et al. Jul 2001 B1
6278377 DeLine et al. Aug 2001 B1
6281804 Haller et al. Aug 2001 B1
6285393 Shimoura et al. Sep 2001 B1
6285778 Nakajima et al. Sep 2001 B1
6291905 Drummond et al. Sep 2001 B1
6291906 Marcus et al. Sep 2001 B1
6292752 Franke et al. Sep 2001 B1
6294989 Schofield et al. Sep 2001 B1
6297781 Turnbull et al. Oct 2001 B1
6302545 Schofield et al. Oct 2001 B1
6310611 Caldwell Oct 2001 B1
6311119 Sawamoto et al. Oct 2001 B2
6313454 Bos et al. Nov 2001 B1
6315421 Apfelbeck et al. Nov 2001 B1
6317057 Lee Nov 2001 B1
6318870 Spooner et al. Nov 2001 B1
6320176 Schofield et al. Nov 2001 B1
6320282 Caldwell Nov 2001 B1
6324450 Iwama Nov 2001 B1
6326613 Heslin et al. Dec 2001 B1
6329925 Skiver et al. Dec 2001 B1
6333759 Mazzilli Dec 2001 B1
6341523 Lynam Jan 2002 B2
6353392 Schofield et al. Mar 2002 B1
6359392 He Mar 2002 B1
6362729 Hellmann et al. Mar 2002 B1
6366213 DeLine et al. Apr 2002 B2
6366236 Farmer et al. Apr 2002 B1
6370329 Teuchert Apr 2002 B1
6388565 Bernhard et al. May 2002 B1
6388580 Graham May 2002 B1
6389340 Rayner May 2002 B1
6392218 Kuehnle May 2002 B1
6396397 Bos et al. May 2002 B1
6396408 Drummond et al. May 2002 B2
6411204 Bloomfield et al. Jun 2002 B1
6411328 Franke et al. Jun 2002 B1
6420975 DeLine et al. Jul 2002 B1
6424273 Gutta et al. Jul 2002 B1
6428172 Hutzel et al. Aug 2002 B1
6429594 Stam et al. Aug 2002 B1
6430303 Naoi et al. Aug 2002 B1
6433676 DeLine et al. Aug 2002 B2
6433817 Guerra Aug 2002 B1
6441748 Takagi et al. Aug 2002 B1
6442465 Breed et al. Aug 2002 B2
6445287 Schofield et al. Sep 2002 B1
6445809 Sasaki et al. Sep 2002 B1
6449540 Raynar Sep 2002 B1
6452148 Bendicks et al. Sep 2002 B1
6466136 DeLine et al. Oct 2002 B2
6466684 Sasaki et al. Oct 2002 B1
6469739 Bechtel et al. Oct 2002 B1
6472977 Poechmueller Oct 2002 B1
6472979 Schofield et al. Oct 2002 B2
6477260 Shimomura Nov 2002 B1
6477464 McCarthy et al. Nov 2002 B2
6483438 DeLine et al. Nov 2002 B2
6485155 Duroux et al. Nov 2002 B1
6497503 Dassanayake et al. Dec 2002 B1
6498620 Schofield et al. Dec 2002 B2
6509832 Bauer et al. Jan 2003 B1
6513252 Schierbeek et al. Feb 2003 B1
6515378 Drummond et al. Feb 2003 B2
6516272 Lin Feb 2003 B2
6516664 Lynam Feb 2003 B2
6523964 Schofield et al. Feb 2003 B2
6534884 Marcus et al. Mar 2003 B2
6535242 Strumolo et al. Mar 2003 B1
6539306 Turnbull Mar 2003 B2
6540193 DeLine Apr 2003 B1
6547133 DeVries, Jr. et al. Apr 2003 B1
6553130 Lemelson et al. Apr 2003 B1
6559435 Schofield et al. May 2003 B2
6570998 Ohtsuka et al. May 2003 B1
6574033 Chui et al. Jun 2003 B1
6577334 Kawai et al. Jun 2003 B1
6578017 Ebersole et al. Jun 2003 B1
6587573 Stam et al. Jul 2003 B1
6587968 Leyva Jul 2003 B1
6589625 Kothari et al. Jul 2003 B1
6593011 Liu et al. Jul 2003 B2
6593565 Heslin et al. Jul 2003 B2
6593698 Stam et al. Jul 2003 B2
6593960 Sugimoto et al. Jul 2003 B1
6594583 Ogura et al. Jul 2003 B2
6611202 Schofield et al. Aug 2003 B2
6611610 Stam et al. Aug 2003 B1
6614579 Roberts et al. Sep 2003 B2
6617564 Ockerse et al. Sep 2003 B2
6627918 Getz et al. Sep 2003 B2
6631316 Stam et al. Oct 2003 B2
6631994 Suzuki et al. Oct 2003 B2
6636258 Strumolo Oct 2003 B2
6648477 Hutzel et al. Nov 2003 B2
6650233 DeLine et al. Nov 2003 B2
6650455 Miles Nov 2003 B2
6653614 Stam et al. Nov 2003 B2
6672731 Schnell et al. Jan 2004 B2
6674562 Miles Jan 2004 B1
6674878 Retterath et al. Jan 2004 B2
6678056 Downs Jan 2004 B2
6678590 Burchfiel Jan 2004 B1
6678614 McCarthy et al. Jan 2004 B2
6680792 Miles Jan 2004 B2
6681163 Stam et al. Jan 2004 B2
6690268 Schofield et al. Feb 2004 B2
6700605 Toyoda et al. Mar 2004 B1
6703925 Steffel Mar 2004 B2
6704621 Stein et al. Mar 2004 B1
6710908 Miles et al. Mar 2004 B2
6711474 Treyz et al. Mar 2004 B1
6714331 Lewis et al. Mar 2004 B2
6717524 DeLine et al. Apr 2004 B2
6717610 Bos et al. Apr 2004 B1
6728393 Stam et al. Apr 2004 B2
6728623 Takenaga et al. Apr 2004 B2
6735506 Breed et al. May 2004 B2
6738088 Uskolovsky et al. May 2004 B1
6741186 Ross May 2004 B2
6741377 Miles May 2004 B2
6744353 Sjönell Jun 2004 B2
6754367 Ito et al. Jun 2004 B1
6757109 Bos Jun 2004 B2
6762867 Lippert et al. Jul 2004 B2
6764210 Akiyama Jul 2004 B2
6765480 Tseng Jul 2004 B2
6774988 Stam et al. Aug 2004 B2
6784828 Delcheccolo et al. Aug 2004 B2
6794119 Miles Sep 2004 B2
6795221 Urey Sep 2004 B1
6801127 Mizusawa Oct 2004 B2
6801244 Takeda et al. Oct 2004 B2
6802617 Schofield et al. Oct 2004 B2
6806452 Bos et al. Oct 2004 B2
6807287 Hermans Oct 2004 B1
6811330 Tozawa Nov 2004 B1
6812463 Okada Nov 2004 B2
6813545 Stromme Nov 2004 B2
6819231 Berberich et al. Nov 2004 B2
6819779 Nichani Nov 2004 B1
6822563 Bos et al. Nov 2004 B2
6823241 Shirato et al. Nov 2004 B2
6823261 Sekiguchi Nov 2004 B2
6824281 Schofield et al. Nov 2004 B2
6831261 Schofield et al. Dec 2004 B2
6838980 Gloger et al. Jan 2005 B2
6842189 Park Jan 2005 B2
6847487 Burgner Jan 2005 B2
6850629 Jeon Feb 2005 B2
6853738 Nishigaki et al. Feb 2005 B1
6859148 Miller et al. Feb 2005 B2
6861809 Stam Mar 2005 B2
6864930 Matsushita et al. Mar 2005 B2
6873253 Veziris Mar 2005 B2
6882287 Schofield Apr 2005 B2
6888447 Hori et al. May 2005 B2
6889161 Winner et al. May 2005 B2
6891563 Schofield et al. May 2005 B2
6898518 Padmanabhan May 2005 B2
6906620 Nakai et al. Jun 2005 B2
6906639 Lemelson et al. Jun 2005 B2
6909753 Meehan et al. Jun 2005 B2
6914521 Rothkop Jul 2005 B2
6928180 Stam et al. Aug 2005 B2
6932669 Lee et al. Aug 2005 B2
6933837 Gunderson et al. Aug 2005 B2
6940423 Takagi et al. Sep 2005 B2
6946978 Schofield Sep 2005 B2
6950035 Tanaka et al. Sep 2005 B2
6953253 Schofield et al. Oct 2005 B2
6956469 Hirvonen et al. Oct 2005 B2
6959994 Fujikawa et al. Nov 2005 B2
6961178 Sugino et al. Nov 2005 B2
6961661 Sekiguchi Nov 2005 B2
6963661 Hattori et al. Nov 2005 B1
6967569 Weber et al. Nov 2005 B2
6968736 Lynam Nov 2005 B2
6975775 Rykowski et al. Dec 2005 B2
6980092 Turnbull et al. Dec 2005 B2
6989736 Berberich et al. Jan 2006 B2
6990397 Albou et al. Jan 2006 B2
6995687 Lang et al. Feb 2006 B2
7004593 Weller et al. Feb 2006 B2
7004606 Schofield Feb 2006 B2
7005974 McMahon et al. Feb 2006 B2
7012507 DeLine et al. Mar 2006 B2
7012727 Hutzel et al. Mar 2006 B2
7023331 Kodama Apr 2006 B2
7027387 Reinold et al. Apr 2006 B2
7027615 Chen Apr 2006 B2
7030738 Ishii Apr 2006 B2
7030775 Sekiguchi Apr 2006 B2
7030778 Ra Apr 2006 B2
7038577 Pawlicki et al. May 2006 B2
7046448 Burgner May 2006 B2
7057505 Iwamoto Jun 2006 B2
7057681 Hinata et al. Jun 2006 B2
7062300 Kim Jun 2006 B1
7065432 Moisel et al. Jun 2006 B2
7068289 Satoh et al. Jun 2006 B2
7068844 Javidi et al. Jun 2006 B1
7085633 Nishira et al. Aug 2006 B2
7085637 Breed et al. Aug 2006 B2
7091837 Nakai et al. Aug 2006 B2
7092548 Laumeyer et al. Aug 2006 B2
7095432 Nakayama et al. Aug 2006 B2
7106213 White Sep 2006 B2
7110021 Nobori et al. Sep 2006 B2
7110156 Lawlor et al. Sep 2006 B2
7113867 Stein Sep 2006 B1
7116246 Winter et al. Oct 2006 B2
7121028 Shoen et al. Oct 2006 B2
7123168 Schofield Oct 2006 B2
7133661 Hatae et al. Nov 2006 B2
7149613 Stam et al. Dec 2006 B2
7151996 Stein Dec 2006 B2
7167796 Taylor et al. Jan 2007 B2
7171027 Satoh Jan 2007 B2
7184585 Hamza et al. Feb 2007 B2
7187498 Bengoechea et al. Mar 2007 B2
7188963 Schofield et al. Mar 2007 B2
7195381 Lynam et al. Mar 2007 B2
7202776 Breed Apr 2007 B2
7202987 Varaprasad et al. Apr 2007 B2
7205904 Schofield Apr 2007 B2
7221363 Roberts et al. May 2007 B2
7224324 Quist et al. May 2007 B2
7227459 Bos et al. Jun 2007 B2
7227611 Hull et al. Jun 2007 B2
7235918 McCullough et al. Jun 2007 B2
7248283 Takagi et al. Jul 2007 B2
7248344 Morcom Jul 2007 B2
7249860 Kulas et al. Jul 2007 B2
7253723 Lindahl et al. Aug 2007 B2
7255451 McCabe et al. Aug 2007 B2
7271951 Weber et al. Sep 2007 B2
7304661 Ishikura Dec 2007 B2
7311406 Schofield et al. Dec 2007 B2
7325934 Schofield et al. Feb 2008 B2
7325935 Schofield et al. Feb 2008 B2
7337055 Matsumoto et al. Feb 2008 B2
7338177 Lynam Mar 2008 B2
7339149 Schofield et al. Mar 2008 B1
7344261 Schofield et al. Mar 2008 B2
7355524 Schofield Apr 2008 B2
7360932 Uken et al. Apr 2008 B2
7362883 Otsuka et al. Apr 2008 B2
7370983 DeWind et al. May 2008 B2
7375803 Bamji May 2008 B1
7380948 Schofield et al. Jun 2008 B2
7388182 Schofield et al. Jun 2008 B2
7402786 Schofield et al. Jul 2008 B2
7403659 Das et al. Jul 2008 B2
7420756 Lynam Sep 2008 B2
7423248 Schofield et al. Sep 2008 B2
7423821 Bechtel et al. Sep 2008 B2
7425076 Schofield et al. Sep 2008 B2
7429998 Kawauchi et al. Sep 2008 B2
7432248 Roberts et al. Oct 2008 B2
7432967 Bechtel et al. Oct 2008 B2
7446924 Schofield et al. Nov 2008 B2
7459664 Schofield et al. Dec 2008 B2
7460007 Schofield et al. Dec 2008 B2
7463138 Pawlicki et al. Dec 2008 B2
7468652 DeLine et al. Dec 2008 B2
7474963 Taylor et al. Jan 2009 B2
7480149 DeWard et al. Jan 2009 B2
7489374 Utsumi et al. Feb 2009 B2
7495719 Adachi et al. Feb 2009 B2
7525604 Xue Apr 2009 B2
7526103 Schofield et al. Apr 2009 B2
7533998 Schofield et al. May 2009 B2
7541743 Salmeen et al. Jun 2009 B2
7543946 Ockerse et al. Jun 2009 B2
7545429 Travis Jun 2009 B2
7548291 Lee et al. Jun 2009 B2
7551103 Schofield Jun 2009 B2
7561181 Schofield et al. Jul 2009 B2
7565006 Stam et al. Jul 2009 B2
7566639 Kohda Jul 2009 B2
7566851 Stein et al. Jul 2009 B2
7567291 Bechtel et al. Jul 2009 B2
7605856 Imoto Oct 2009 B2
7613327 Stam et al. Nov 2009 B2
7616781 Schofield et al. Nov 2009 B2
7619508 Lynam et al. Nov 2009 B2
7629996 Rademacher et al. Dec 2009 B2
7633383 Dunsmoir et al. Dec 2009 B2
7639149 Katoh Dec 2009 B2
7650030 Shan et al. Jan 2010 B2
7653215 Stam Jan 2010 B2
7655894 Schofield et al. Feb 2010 B2
7663798 Tonar et al. Feb 2010 B2
7676087 Dhua et al. Mar 2010 B2
7679498 Pawlicki et al. Mar 2010 B2
7683326 Stam et al. Mar 2010 B2
7702133 Muramatsu et al. Apr 2010 B2
7719408 DeWard et al. May 2010 B2
7720580 Higgins-Luthman May 2010 B2
7724434 Cross et al. May 2010 B2
7731403 Lynam et al. Jun 2010 B2
7742864 Sekiguchi Jun 2010 B2
7786898 Stein et al. Aug 2010 B2
7791694 Molsen et al. Sep 2010 B2
7792329 Schofield et al. Sep 2010 B2
7825600 Stam et al. Nov 2010 B2
7842154 Lynam Nov 2010 B2
7843451 Lafon Nov 2010 B2
7854514 Conner et al. Dec 2010 B2
7855755 Weller et al. Dec 2010 B2
7855778 Yung et al. Dec 2010 B2
7859565 Schofield et al. Dec 2010 B2
7873187 Schofield et al. Jan 2011 B2
7877175 Higgins-Luthman Jan 2011 B2
7881496 Camilleri et al. Feb 2011 B2
7903324 Kobayashi et al. Mar 2011 B2
7903335 Nieuwkerk et al. Mar 2011 B2
7914187 Higgins-Luthman et al. Mar 2011 B2
7914188 DeLine et al. Mar 2011 B2
7930160 Hosagrahara et al. Apr 2011 B1
7949152 Schofield et al. May 2011 B2
7965357 Van De Witte et al. Jun 2011 B2
7972045 Schofield Jul 2011 B2
7991522 Higgins-Luthman Aug 2011 B2
7994462 Schofield et al. Aug 2011 B2
7995067 Navon Aug 2011 B2
8004392 DeLine et al. Aug 2011 B2
8017898 Lu et al. Sep 2011 B2
8027691 Bernas et al. Sep 2011 B2
8045760 Stam et al. Oct 2011 B2
8063759 Bos et al. Nov 2011 B2
8064643 Stein et al. Nov 2011 B2
8082101 Stein et al. Dec 2011 B2
8090153 Schofield et al. Jan 2012 B2
8094002 Schofield et al. Jan 2012 B2
8095310 Taylor et al. Jan 2012 B2
8098142 Schofield et al. Jan 2012 B2
8100568 DeLine et al. Jan 2012 B2
8116929 Higgins-Luthman Feb 2012 B2
8120652 Bechtel et al. Feb 2012 B2
8162518 Schofield Apr 2012 B2
8164628 Stein et al. Apr 2012 B2
8179437 Schofield et al. May 2012 B2
8184159 Luo May 2012 B2
8203440 Schofield et al. Jun 2012 B2
8203443 Bos et al. Jun 2012 B2
8222588 Schofield et al. Jul 2012 B2
8224031 Saito Jul 2012 B2
8233045 Luo et al. Jul 2012 B2
8254635 Stein et al. Aug 2012 B2
8288711 Heslin et al. Oct 2012 B2
8289142 Pawlicki et al. Oct 2012 B2
8289430 Bechtel et al. Oct 2012 B2
8300058 Navon et al. Oct 2012 B2
8305471 Bechtel et al. Nov 2012 B2
8308325 Takayanazi et al. Nov 2012 B2
8314689 Schofield et al. Nov 2012 B2
8324552 Schofield et al. Dec 2012 B2
8325028 Schofield et al. Dec 2012 B2
8325986 Schofield et al. Dec 2012 B2
8339526 Minikey, Jr. et al. Dec 2012 B2
8350683 DeLine et al. Jan 2013 B2
8362883 Hale et al. Jan 2013 B2
8378851 Stein et al. Feb 2013 B2
8386114 Higgins-Luthman Feb 2013 B2
8405726 Schofield et al. Mar 2013 B2
8414137 Quinn et al. Apr 2013 B2
8434919 Schofield May 2013 B2
8452055 Stein et al. May 2013 B2
8481910 Schofield et al. Jul 2013 B2
8481916 Heslin et al. Jul 2013 B2
8492698 Schofield et al. Jul 2013 B2
8508593 Schofield et al. Aug 2013 B1
8513590 Heslin et al. Aug 2013 B2
8531278 DeWard et al. Sep 2013 B2
8531279 DeLine et al. Sep 2013 B2
8534887 DeLine et al. Sep 2013 B2
8538205 Sixsou et al. Sep 2013 B2
8543330 Taylor et al. Sep 2013 B2
8553088 Stein et al. Oct 2013 B2
8593521 Schofield et al. Nov 2013 B2
8599001 Schofield et al. Dec 2013 B2
8629768 Bos et al. Jan 2014 B2
8636393 Schofield Jan 2014 B2
8637801 Schofield et al. Jan 2014 B2
8643724 Schofield et al. Feb 2014 B2
8656221 Sixsou et al. Feb 2014 B2
8665079 Pawlicki et al. Mar 2014 B2
8676491 Taylor et al. Mar 2014 B2
8686840 Drummond et al. Apr 2014 B2
8692659 Schofield et al. Apr 2014 B2
8818042 Schofield et al. Aug 2014 B2
9008369 Schofield et al. Apr 2015 B2
9171217 Pawlicki et al. Oct 2015 B2
9191634 Schofield et al. Nov 2015 B2
9428192 Schofield et al. Aug 2016 B2
9555803 Pawlicki et al. Jan 2017 B2
9834216 Pawlicki et al. Dec 2017 B2
1011861 Pawlicki et al. Nov 2018 A1
20010002451 Breed May 2001 A1
20020003571 Schofield et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020005778 Breed Jan 2002 A1
20020011611 Huang et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020029103 Breed et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020060522 Stam et al. May 2002 A1
20020080235 Jeon Jun 2002 A1
20020113873 Williams Aug 2002 A1
20020116106 Breed et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020126002 Patchell Sep 2002 A1
20020126875 Naoi et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020135468 Bos et al. Sep 2002 A1
20030040864 Stein Feb 2003 A1
20030070741 Rosenberg et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030103142 Hitomi et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030122930 Schofield Jul 2003 A1
20030125855 Breed et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030128106 Ross Jul 2003 A1
20030137586 Lewellen Jul 2003 A1
20030191568 Breed Oct 2003 A1
20030202683 Ma et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030209893 Breed et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030222982 Hamdan et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040016870 Pawlicki et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040021947 Schofield Feb 2004 A1
20040022416 Lemelson Feb 2004 A1
20040086153 Tsai et al. May 2004 A1
20040096082 Nakai et al. May 2004 A1
20040146184 Hamza et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040148063 Patchell Jul 2004 A1
20040164228 Fogg et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040200948 Bos et al. Oct 2004 A1
20050036325 Furusawa et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050073853 Stam Apr 2005 A1
20050131607 Breed Jun 2005 A1
20050219852 Stam et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050226490 Phillips et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050237385 Kosaka et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060018511 Stam et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060018512 Stam et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060050018 Hutzel et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060091813 Stam et al. May 2006 A1
20060095175 deWaal et al. May 2006 A1
20060103727 Tseng May 2006 A1
20060250224 Steffel et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060250501 Wildmann et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070024724 Stein et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070104476 Yasutomi et al. May 2007 A1
20070109406 Schofield et al. May 2007 A1
20070115357 Stein et al. May 2007 A1
20070120657 Schofield et al. May 2007 A1
20070154063 Breed Jul 2007 A1
20070154068 Stein et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070193811 Breed et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070221822 Stein et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070229238 Boyles et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070230792 Shashua et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070242339 Bradley Oct 2007 A1
20080036576 Stein et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080043099 Stein et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080137908 Stein Jun 2008 A1
20080147321 Howard et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080231710 Asari et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080234899 Breed et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080239393 Navon Oct 2008 A1
20080266396 Stein Oct 2008 A1
20090052003 Schofield et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090066065 Breed et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090113509 Tseng et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090143986 Stein et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090182690 Stein Jul 2009 A1
20090190015 Bechtel et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090201137 Weller et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090243824 Peterson et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090256938 Bechtel et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090300629 Navon et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100125717 Navon May 2010 A1
20100172547 Akutsu Jul 2010 A1
20110018700 Stein et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110219217 Sixsou et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110280495 Sixsou et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110307684 Krenin et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120002053 Stein et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120045112 Lundblad et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120056735 Stein et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120069185 Stein Mar 2012 A1
20120105639 Stein et al. May 2012 A1
20120140076 Rosenbaum et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120200707 Stein et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120212593 Na'aman et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120233841 Stein Sep 2012 A1
20120314071 Rosenbaum et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130135444 Stein et al. May 2013 A1
20130141580 Stein et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130147957 Stein Jun 2013 A1
20130169536 Wexler et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130271584 Wexler et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130308828 Stein et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140015976 DeLine et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140033203 Dogon et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140049648 Stein et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140082307 Kreinin et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140093132 Stein et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140122551 Dogon et al. May 2014 A1
20140125799 Bos et al. May 2014 A1
20140156140 Stein et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140160244 Berberian et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140161323 Livyatan et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140198184 Stein et al. Jul 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (512)
Number Date Country
519193 Aug 2011 AT
1008142 Jan 1996 BE
1101522 May 1981 CA
2392578 May 2001 CA
2392652 May 2001 CA
644315 Jul 1984 CH
2074262 Apr 1991 CN
2185701 Dec 1994 CN
1104741 Jul 1995 CN
2204254 Aug 1995 CN
1194056 Sep 1998 CN
1235913 Nov 1999 CN
1383032 Dec 2002 CN
102193852 Sep 2011 CN
102542256 Jul 2012 CN
1152627 Aug 1963 DE
1182971 Dec 1964 DE
1190413 Apr 1965 DE
1196598 Jul 1965 DE
1214174 Apr 1966 DE
2064839 Jul 1972 DE
3004247 Aug 1981 DE
3040555 May 1982 DE
3101855 Aug 1982 DE
3240498 May 1984 DE
3248511 Jul 1984 DE
3433671 Mar 1985 DE
3515116 Oct 1986 DE
3528220 Feb 1987 DE
3535588 Apr 1987 DE
3601388 Jul 1987 DE
3637165 May 1988 DE
3636946 Jun 1988 DE
3642196 Jun 1988 DE
3734066 Apr 1989 DE
3737395 May 1989 DE
3838365 Jun 1989 DE
3833022 Apr 1990 DE
3839512 May 1990 DE
3839513 May 1990 DE
3937576 May 1990 DE
3840425 Jun 1990 DE
3844364 Jul 1990 DE
9010196 Oct 1990 DE
4015927 Nov 1990 DE
3932216 Apr 1991 DE
4007646 Sep 1991 DE
4107965 Sep 1991 DE
4111993 Oct 1991 DE
4015959 Nov 1991 DE
4116255 Dec 1991 DE
4023952 Feb 1992 DE
4130010 Mar 1992 DE
4032927 Apr 1992 DE
4133882 Apr 1992 DE
4035956 May 1992 DE
4122531 Jan 1993 DE
4124654 Jan 1993 DE
4137551 Mar 1993 DE
4136427 May 1993 DE
4300941 Jul 1993 DE
4206142 Sep 1993 DE
4214223 Nov 1993 DE
4231137 Feb 1994 DE
4328304 Mar 1994 DE
4328902 Mar 1994 DE
4332612 Apr 1994 DE
4238599 Jun 1994 DE
4337756 Jun 1994 DE
4344485 Jun 1994 DE
4304005 Aug 1994 DE
4332836 Sep 1994 DE
4407082 Sep 1994 DE
4407757 Sep 1994 DE
4411179 Oct 1994 DE
4412669 Oct 1994 DE
4418122 Dec 1994 DE
4423966 Jan 1995 DE
4336288 Mar 1995 DE
4428069 Mar 1995 DE
4434698 Mar 1995 DE
4341409 Jun 1995 DE
4446452 Jun 1995 DE
69107283 Jul 1995 DE
4403937 Aug 1995 DE
19505487 Sep 1995 DE
19518978 Nov 1995 DE
4480341 Mar 1996 DE
069302975 Dec 1996 DE
29703084 Jun 1997 DE
29805142 Jun 1998 DE
19755008 Jul 1999 DE
19829162 Jan 2000 DE
10237554 Mar 2004 DE
000010251949 May 2004 DE
19530617 Feb 2009 DE
0048492 Mar 1982 EP
0049722 Apr 1982 EP
0072406 Feb 1983 EP
0176615 Apr 1986 EP
0202460 Nov 1986 EP
0169734 Oct 1989 EP
0340735 Nov 1989 EP
0341985 Nov 1989 EP
0348691 Jan 1990 EP
0353200 Jan 1990 EP
0354561 Feb 1990 EP
0360880 Apr 1990 EP
0361914 Apr 1990 EP
0387817 Sep 1990 EP
0527665 Feb 1991 EP
0426503 May 1991 EP
0433538 Jun 1991 EP
0450553 Oct 1991 EP
0454516 Oct 1991 EP
0455524 Nov 1991 EP
0459433 Dec 1991 EP
473866 Mar 1992 EP
0477986 Apr 1992 EP
0479271 Apr 1992 EP
0487100 May 1992 EP
0487465 May 1992 EP
0492591 Jul 1992 EP
0495508 Jul 1992 EP
0496411 Jul 1992 EP
0501345 Sep 1992 EP
0505237 Sep 1992 EP
0513476 Nov 1992 EP
0514343 Nov 1992 EP
529346 Mar 1993 EP
0532379 Mar 1993 EP
0533508 Mar 1993 EP
0550397 Jul 1993 EP
0558027 Sep 1993 EP
0564858 Oct 1993 EP
0567059 Oct 1993 EP
0582236 Feb 1994 EP
0586857 Mar 1994 EP
0588815 Mar 1994 EP
0590588 Apr 1994 EP
0591743 Apr 1994 EP
0602962 Jun 1994 EP
0605045 Jul 1994 EP
0606586 Jul 1994 EP
0617296 Sep 1994 EP
0626654 Nov 1994 EP
0640903 Mar 1995 EP
0642950 Mar 1995 EP
0654392 May 1995 EP
0667708 Aug 1995 EP
0677428 Oct 1995 EP
0686865 Dec 1995 EP
0687594 Dec 1995 EP
0697641 Feb 1996 EP
733252 Sep 1996 EP
0756968 Feb 1997 EP
0788947 Aug 1997 EP
0487332 Oct 1997 EP
0874331 Oct 1998 EP
0889801 Jan 1999 EP
0893308 Jan 1999 EP
0899157 Mar 1999 EP
0913751 May 1999 EP
0949818 Oct 1999 EP
1022903 Jul 2000 EP
1257971 Nov 2000 EP
1058220 Dec 2000 EP
1065642 Jan 2001 EP
1074430 Feb 2001 EP
1115250 Jul 2001 EP
0830267 Dec 2001 EP
1170173 Jan 2002 EP
1236126 Sep 2002 EP
0860325 Nov 2002 EP
1359557 Nov 2003 EP
1727089 Nov 2006 EP
1748644 Jan 2007 EP
1754179 Feb 2007 EP
1790541 May 2007 EP
1806595 Jul 2007 EP
1837803 Sep 2007 EP
1887492 Feb 2008 EP
1741079 May 2008 EP
1930863 Jun 2008 EP
1978484 Oct 2008 EP
2068269 Jun 2009 EP
2101258 Sep 2009 EP
2131278 Dec 2009 EP
2150437 Feb 2010 EP
2172873 Apr 2010 EP
2187316 May 2010 EP
2365441 Sep 2011 EP
2377094 Oct 2011 EP
2383679 Nov 2011 EP
2383713 Nov 2011 EP
2395472 Dec 2011 EP
2431917 Mar 2012 EP
2448251 May 2012 EP
2463843 Jun 2012 EP
2602741 Jun 2013 EP
2605185 Jun 2013 EP
2629242 Aug 2013 EP
2674323 Dec 2013 EP
2690548 Jan 2014 EP
2709020 Mar 2014 EP
2728462 May 2014 EP
2250218 Apr 2006 ES
2610401 Aug 1988 FR
2641237 Jul 1990 FR
2646383 Nov 1990 FR
2674201 Sep 1992 FR
2674354 Sep 1992 FR
2687000 Aug 1993 FR
2706211 Dec 1994 FR
2721872 Jan 1996 FR
914827 Jan 1963 GB
1000265 Aug 1965 GB
1008411 Oct 1965 GB
1054064 Jan 1967 GB
1098608 Jan 1968 GB
1098610 Jan 1968 GB
1106339 Mar 1968 GB
1178416 Jan 1970 GB
1197710 Jul 1970 GB
2210835 Jun 1989 GB
2233530 Jan 1991 GB
2255649 Nov 1992 GB
2261339 May 1993 GB
2262829 Jun 1993 GB
9310728 Jul 1993 GB
2267341 Dec 1993 GB
2271139 Apr 1994 GB
2275452 Aug 1994 GB
2280810 Feb 1995 GB
2289332 Nov 1995 GB
970014 Jul 1998 IE
S5539843 Mar 1980 JP
55156901 Dec 1980 JP
S5685110 Jul 1981 JP
S5871230 Apr 1983 JP
58110334 Jun 1983 JP
58122421 Jul 1983 JP
59114139 Jul 1984 JP
59127200 Jul 1984 JP
S6047737 Mar 1985 JP
6079889 May 1985 JP
6080953 May 1985 JP
S6078312 May 1985 JP
S60206746 Oct 1985 JP
60240545 Nov 1985 JP
S60219133 Nov 1985 JP
S60255537 Dec 1985 JP
S6141929 Feb 1986 JP
S6185238 Apr 1986 JP
S61105245 May 1986 JP
S61191937 Aug 1986 JP
61260217 Nov 1986 JP
S61285151 Dec 1986 JP
S61285152 Dec 1986 JP
62001652 Jan 1987 JP
S6221010 Jan 1987 JP
S6226141 Feb 1987 JP
62080143 Apr 1987 JP
S6216073 Apr 1987 JP
6272245 May 1987 JP
S62115600 May 1987 JP
62131837 Jun 1987 JP
S62253543 Nov 1987 JP
S62253546 Nov 1987 JP
S62287164 Dec 1987 JP
63011446 Jan 1988 JP
63258236 Oct 1988 JP
63258237 Oct 1988 JP
63192788 Dec 1988 JP
6414700 Jan 1989 JP
01123587 May 1989 JP
H1168538 Jul 1989 JP
01242917 Sep 1989 JP
H01233129 Sep 1989 JP
H01265400 Oct 1989 JP
H01275237 Nov 1989 JP
H0268237 Mar 1990 JP
02190978 Jul 1990 JP
H236417 Aug 1990 JP
H02212232 Aug 1990 JP
H2117935 Sep 1990 JP
H0314739 Jan 1991 JP
H0374231 Mar 1991 JP
03099952 Apr 1991 JP
03266739 May 1991 JP
H03246413 Nov 1991 JP
H05137144 Nov 1991 JP
03282707 Dec 1991 JP
03282709 Dec 1991 JP
03286399 Dec 1991 JP
H03273953 Dec 1991 JP
H042909 Jan 1992 JP
H0410200 Jan 1992 JP
04114587 Apr 1992 JP
04127280 Apr 1992 JP
04137014 May 1992 JP
H04137112 May 1992 JP
H04194827 Jul 1992 JP
04239400 Aug 1992 JP
04242391 Aug 1992 JP
H04238219 Aug 1992 JP
04250786 Sep 1992 JP
04291405 Oct 1992 JP
H04303047 Oct 1992 JP
H0516722 Jan 1993 JP
H0538977 Feb 1993 JP
H06229759 Feb 1993 JP
0577657 Mar 1993 JP
05050883 Mar 1993 JP
H06332370 May 1993 JP
H05155287 Jun 1993 JP
05189694 Jul 1993 JP
H05172638 Jul 1993 JP
05213113 Aug 1993 JP
H05201298 Aug 1993 JP
05244596 Sep 1993 JP
H05229383 Sep 1993 JP
05298594 Nov 1993 JP
05313736 Nov 1993 JP
H05297141 Nov 1993 JP
06048247 Feb 1994 JP
H0640286 Feb 1994 JP
06076200 Mar 1994 JP
H0672234 Mar 1994 JP
06107035 Apr 1994 JP
06113215 Apr 1994 JP
06117924 Apr 1994 JP
06150198 May 1994 JP
H06162398 Jun 1994 JP
H06174845 Jun 1994 JP
H06191344 Jul 1994 JP
06215291 Aug 1994 JP
6227318 Aug 1994 JP
06230115 Aug 1994 JP
H06229739 Aug 1994 JP
06247246 Sep 1994 JP
6266825 Sep 1994 JP
06267304 Sep 1994 JP
06270733 Sep 1994 JP
06274626 Sep 1994 JP
06276524 Sep 1994 JP
H06262963 Sep 1994 JP
H06267303 Sep 1994 JP
H06275104 Sep 1994 JP
06295601 Oct 1994 JP
H06289138 Oct 1994 JP
H06293236 Oct 1994 JP
05093981 Nov 1994 JP
06310740 Nov 1994 JP
06321007 Nov 1994 JP
H06321010 Nov 1994 JP
H06324144 Nov 1994 JP
06337938 Dec 1994 JP
06341821 Dec 1994 JP
07002021 Jan 1995 JP
07004170 Jan 1995 JP
07025286 Jan 1995 JP
H072022 Jan 1995 JP
732936 Feb 1995 JP
07032935 Feb 1995 JP
07047878 Feb 1995 JP
07052706 Feb 1995 JP
H0737180 Feb 1995 JP
H0740782 Feb 1995 JP
H0746460 Feb 1995 JP
07069125 Mar 1995 JP
07078240 Mar 1995 JP
H0764632 Mar 1995 JP
H0771916 Mar 1995 JP
H07057200 Mar 1995 JP
H07078258 Mar 1995 JP
07105496 Apr 1995 JP
H07101291 Apr 1995 JP
H07105487 Apr 1995 JP
H07108873 Apr 1995 JP
H07108874 Apr 1995 JP
07125571 May 1995 JP
07137574 May 1995 JP
H07125570 May 1995 JP
H730149 Jun 1995 JP
H07141588 Jun 1995 JP
H07144577 Jun 1995 JP
07186818 Jul 1995 JP
07192192 Jul 1995 JP
06000927 Aug 1995 JP
07242147 Sep 1995 JP
H07239714 Sep 1995 JP
H07249128 Sep 1995 JP
H07280563 Oct 1995 JP
H07315122 Dec 1995 JP
H0840138 Feb 1996 JP
H0840140 Feb 1996 JP
H0843082 Feb 1996 JP
H0844999 Feb 1996 JP
H0850697 Feb 1996 JP
H08138036 May 1996 JP
08166221 Jun 1996 JP
08235484 Sep 1996 JP
H08320997 Dec 1996 JP
02630604 Apr 1997 JP
H0991596 Apr 1997 JP
09330415 Dec 1997 JP
10038562 Feb 1998 JP
10063985 Mar 1998 JP
H1090188 Apr 1998 JP
10134183 May 1998 JP
10171966 Jun 1998 JP
H10222792 Aug 1998 JP
10261189 Sep 1998 JP
11069211 Mar 1999 JP
11078737 Mar 1999 JP
H1178693 Mar 1999 JP
H1178717 Mar 1999 JP
H1123305 Jul 1999 JP
11250228 Sep 1999 JP
H11259634 Sep 1999 JP
11345392 Dec 1999 JP
2000016352 Jan 2000 JP
2000085474 Mar 2000 JP
2000113374 Apr 2000 JP
2000127849 May 2000 JP
2000207575 Jul 2000 JP
2000215299 Aug 2000 JP
2000305136 Nov 2000 JP
2000311289 Nov 2000 JP
2001001832 Jan 2001 JP
2001092970 Apr 2001 JP
2001180401 Jul 2001 JP
2001188988 Jul 2001 JP
2001297397 Oct 2001 JP
2001351107 Dec 2001 JP
2002022439 Jan 2002 JP
2002046506 Feb 2002 JP
2002074339 Mar 2002 JP
2002079895 Mar 2002 JP
2002084533 Mar 2002 JP
2002099908 Apr 2002 JP
2002109699 Apr 2002 JP
2002175534 Jun 2002 JP
2002211428 Jul 2002 JP
2002341432 Nov 2002 JP
2003030665 Jan 2003 JP
2003076987 Mar 2003 JP
2003083742 Mar 2003 JP
3395289 Apr 2003 JP
2003123058 Apr 2003 JP
2003150938 May 2003 JP
2003168197 Jun 2003 JP
2003178397 Jun 2003 JP
2003217099 Jul 2003 JP
2003248895 Sep 2003 JP
2003259361 Sep 2003 JP
2003281700 Oct 2003 JP
20041658 Jan 2004 JP
2004032460 Jan 2004 JP
2004146904 May 2004 JP
2004336613 Nov 2004 JP
2004355139 Dec 2004 JP
2005182158 Jul 2005 JP
2000883510000 Mar 1995 KR
1020010018981 Oct 2002 KR
1004124340000 Mar 2004 KR
336535 Jul 1971 SE
WO1986005147 Sep 1986 WO
WO1988009023 Nov 1988 WO
WO1990004528 May 1990 WO
WO1993000647 Jan 1993 WO
WO1993004556 Mar 1993 WO
WO1993010550 May 1993 WO
WO1993011631 Jun 1993 WO
WO1993021596 Oct 1993 WO
WO1994019212 Sep 1994 WO
WO1995018979 Jul 1995 WO
WO1995023082 Aug 1995 WO
WO1996002817 Feb 1996 WO
WO1996015921 May 1996 WO
WO1996018275 Jun 1996 WO
WO1996021581 Jul 1996 WO
WO1996034365 Oct 1996 WO
WO1996038319 Dec 1996 WO
WO1997001246 Jan 1997 WO
WO1997029926 Aug 1997 WO
WO1997035743 Oct 1997 WO
WO1997048134 Dec 1997 WO
WO1998010246 Mar 1998 WO
WO1998014974 Apr 1998 WO
WO1999043242 Feb 1999 WO
WO1999023828 May 1999 WO
WO1999059100 Nov 1999 WO
WO2000015462 Mar 2000 WO
WO2001026332 Apr 2001 WO
WO2001039018 May 2001 WO
WO2001039120 May 2001 WO
WO2001064481 Sep 2001 WO
WO2001070538 Sep 2001 WO
WO2001077763 Oct 2001 WO
WO2001080068 Oct 2001 WO
WO2001080353 Oct 2001 WO
WO2002071487 Sep 2002 WO
WO2003065084 Aug 2003 WO
WO2003093857 Nov 2003 WO
WO2004004320 Jan 2004 WO
WO2004005073 Jan 2004 WO
WO2005098751 Oct 2005 WO
WO2005098782 Oct 2005 WO
WO2008134715 Nov 2008 WO
WO2013121357 Aug 2013 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (500)
Entry
“All-seeing screens for tomorrow's cars”, Southend Evening Echo, Oct. 4, 1991.
“Final Report of the Working Group on Advanced Vehicle Control Systems (AVCS)” Mobility 2000, Mar. 1990.
“Magic Eye on safety”, Western Daily Press, Oct. 10, 1991.
“On-screen technology aims at safer driving”, Kent Evening Post Oct. 4, 1991.
“Versatile LEDs Drive Machine vision in Automated Manufacture,” http://www.digikey.ca/en/articles/techzone/2012/jan/versatileleds-drive-machine-vision-in-automated-manufacture.
3M, “Automotive Rear View Mirror Button Repair System”, Automotive Engineered Systems Division, Jun. 1996.
Abshire et al., “Confession Session: Learning from Others Mistakes,” 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), 2011.
Achler et al., “Vehicle Wheel Detector using 2D Filter Banks,” IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium of Jun. 2004.
Ackland et al., “Camera on a chip”, Digest of Technical Papers of the 42nd Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC), Paper TA 1.2, 1996.
Alley, “Algorithms for automatic guided vehicle navigation and guidance based on Linear Image Array sensor data”, Masters or PhD. Thesis, Dec. 31, 1988.
Altan, “LaneTrak: a vision-based automatic vehicle steering system”, Applications in Optical Science and Engineering. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 1993, Abstract.
Amidi, “Integrated Mobile Robot Control”, M.S. Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, May 1990.
An et al., “Aspects of Neural Networks in Intelligent Collision Avoidance Systems for Prometheus”, JFIT 93, pp. 129-135, Mar. 1993.
Arain et al., “Action planning for the collision avoidance system using neural networks”, Intelligent Vehicle Symposium, Tokyo, Japan, Jul. 1993.
Arain et al., “Application of Neural Networks for Traffic Scenario Identification”, 4th Prometheus Workshop, University of Compiegne, Paris, France, pp. 102-111, Sep. 1990.
Ashley, “Smart Cars and Automated Highways”, Mechanical Engineering 120.5 (1998): 58, Abstract.
Aufrere et al., “A model-driven approach for real-time road recognition”, Machine Vision and Applications 13, 2001, pp. 95-107.
Auty et al., “Image acquisition system for traffic monitoring applications” IS&T/SPIE's Symposium on Electronic Imaging: Science & Technology. International Society for Optics and Photonics, Mar. 14, 1995.
Aw et al., “A 128×128 Pixel Standard-CMOS Image Sensor with Electronic Shutter,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 31, No. 12, Dec. 1996.
Ballard et al., “Computer Vision”, 1982, p. 88-89, sect. 3.4.1.
Barron et al., “The role of electronic controls for future automotive mechatronic systems”, IEEE/ASME Transactions on mechatronics 1.1, Mar. 1996, pp. 80-88.
Batavia et al., “Overtaking vehicle detection using implicit optical flow”, Proceedings of the IEEE Transportation Systems Conference, Nov. 1997, pp. 729-734.
Batavia, “Driver-Adaptive Lane Departure Warning Systems”, The Robotics Institute Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, Sep. 20, 1999.
Bederson, “A miniature Space-Variant Active Vision System: Cortex-I”, Masters or Ph.D. Thesis, Jun. 10, 1992.
Begault, “Head-Up Auditory Displays for Traffic Collision Avoidance System Advisories: A Preliminary Investigation”, Human Factors, 35(4), Dec. 1993, pp. 707-717.
Behringer et al., “Simultaneous Estimation of Pitch Angle and Lane Width from the Video Image of a Marked Road,” pp. 966-973, Sep. 12-16, 1994.
Behringer, “Road recognition from multifocal vision”, Intelligent Vehicles' 94 Symposium, Proceedings of the. IEEE, 1994, Abstract.
Belt et al., “See-Through Turret Visualization Program”, No. NATICK/TR-02/005. Honeywell Inc., Minn, MN Sensors and Guidance Products, 2002.
Bensrhair et al., “A cooperative approach to vision-based vehicle detection” Intelligent Transportation Systems, IEEE, 2001.
Bertozzi et al., “Obstacle and lane detection on ARGO”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 7(1):62-81, Jan. 1998, pp. 62-81.
Bertozzi et al., “Performance analysis of a low-cost solution to vision-based obstacle detection”, Intelligent Transportation Systems, 1999. Proc., Oct. 5-8, 1999, pp. 350-355.
Bertozzi et al., “Vision-based intelligent vehicles: State of the art and perspectives” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 32, 2000 pp. 1-16.
Bertozzi et al., “GOLD: a parallel real-time stereo vision system for generic obstacle and lane detection”, IEEE transactions on image processing 7.1 (1998): 62-81.
Betke et al., “Real-time multiple vehicle detection and tracking from a moving vehicle”, Machine Vision and Applications, 2000.
Beucher et al., “Road Segmentation and Obstacle Detection by a Fast Watershed Transformation”, Intelligent Vehicles' 94 Symposium, Proceedings of the. IEEE, 1994.
Blomberg et al., “NightRider Thermal Imaging Camera and HUD Development Program for Collision Avoidance Applications”, Raytheon Commercial Infrared and ELCAN-Texas Optical Technologies, 2000, Abstract.
Borenstein et al., “Where am I? Sensors and Method for Mobile Robot Positioning”, University of Michigan, Apr. 1996, pp. 2, 125-128.
Bosch, “CAN Specification”, Version 2.0, Sep. 1991.
Bow, “Pattern Recognition and Image Preprocessing (Signal Processing and Communications)”, CRC Press, Jan. 15, 2002, pp. 557-559.
Brackstone et al., “Dynamic Behavioral Data Collection Using an Instrumented Vehicle”, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 1689, Paper 99-2535, 1999.
Brandt, “A CRT Display System for a Concept Vehicle”, SAE Paper No. 890283, published Feb. 1, 1989.
Brauckmann et al., “Towards all around automatic visual obstacle sensing for cars”, Intelligent Vehicles' 94 Symposium, Proceedings of the. IEEE, 1994.
Britell et al., “Collision avoidance through improved communication between tractor and trailer” Proceedings: International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles. vol. 1998. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1998.
Broggi et al., “ARGO and the MilleMiglia in Automatico Tour”, IEEE Intelligent Systems, Jan.-Feb. 1999, pp. 55-64.
Broggi et al., “Architectural Issues on Vision-based automatic vehicle guidance: The experience of the ARGO Project”, Academic Press, 2000.
Broggi et al., “Automatic Vehicle Guidance: The Experience of the ARGO Vehicle”, World Scientific Publishing Co., 1999.
Broggi et al., “Multi-Resolution Vehicle Detection using Artificial Vision,” IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium of Jun. 14-17, 2004.
Broggi et al., “Vision-based Road Detection in Automotive Systems: A real-time expectation-driven approach”, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 1995.
Broggi, “Robust Real-time Lane and Road Detection in Critical Shadow Conditions”, International Symposium on Computer Vision, IEEE, 1995, pp. 21-23.
Brown, “A Survey of Image Registration Techniques”, vol. 24, ACM Computing Surveys, pp. 325-376, Dec. 4, 1992.
Brown, “Scene Segmentation and Definition for Autonomous Robotic Navigation Using Structured Light Processing”, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Delaware, Army Science Conference Proceedings, Jun. 22-25, 1992, vol. 1, Dec. 31, 1988, pp. 189-203, Abstract.
Brunelli et al., “Template Matching: Matched Spatial Filters and Beyond,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 30, No. 5, 1997.
Bucher et al., “Image processing and behavior planning for intelligent vehicles”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial electronics 50.1 (2003): 62-75.
Burger et al., “Estimating 3-D Egomotion from Perspective Image Sequences”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 12, No. 11, pp. 1040-1058, Nov. 1990.
Burt et al., “A Multiresolution Spline with Application to Image Mosaics”, ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 2. No. 4, pp. 217-236, Oct. 1983.
Cardiles, “Implementation de la commande d'un vehicule electrique autonome grace a un capteur de distance et d'angle base sur une camera lineaire” IUP de Mathematiques Appliquees et Industrielles, May 8, 1998.
Carley et al., “Synthesis Tools for Mixed-Signal ICs: Progress on Frontend and Backend Strategies,” Proceedings of the 33rd Design Automation Conference, 1996.
Cartledge, “Jaguar gives cat more lives”, Birmingham Post, Oct. 10, 1991.
Cassiano et al., “Review of filtering methods in mobile vision from ground vehicles in low light conditions”, Proc. SPIE 1613, Mobile Robots VI, 322, Feb. 14, 1992.
Chapuis et al., “Road Detection and Vehicles Tracking by Vision for an On-Board ACC System in the VELAC Vehicle”, 2000.
Charkari et al., “A new approach for real time moving vehicle detection”, Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Yokohama, JP, Jul. 26-30, 1993.
Chern et al., “The lane recognition and vehicle detection at night for a camera-assisted car on highway”, Robotics and Automation, 2003. Proceedings. ICRA'03. IEEE.
International Conference on. vol. 2. IEEE, 2003, Abstract.
Chien et al., “Efficient moving object segmentation algorithm using background registration technique”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 12., No. 7, Jul. 2002.
Clune et al., “Implementation and performance of a complex vision system on a systolic array machine”, Carnegie Mellon University, Jun. 15, 1987.
CMOS sensor page of University of Edinburgh, 2015.
Coghill, “Digital Imaging Technology 101”, Albert Theuwissen, Dalsa Corp, 2003.
Coifman et al., “A real-time computer vision system for vehicle tracking and traffic surveillance”, Transportation Research Part C 6, pp. 271-288, 1998.
Corsi, “Reconfigurable Displays Used as Primary Automotive Instrumentation”, SAE Paper No. 890282, published Feb. 1, 1989.
Crisman et al., “Color Vision for Road Following”, Robotics Institute at Carnegie Mellon University, Proceedings of SPIE Conference on Mobile Robots Nov. 11, 1988, pp. 1-10, Oct. 12, 1988.
Crisman et al., “UNSCARF, A Color Vision System for the Detection of Unstructured Roads” IEEE Paper 1991.
Crisman et al., “Vision and Navigation—The Carnegie Mellon Navlab” Carnegie Mellon University, edited by Charles E. Thorpe, 1990.
Crisman, “SCARF: Color vision system that tracks roads and intersections”, IEEE, 1993.
Crossland, “Beyond Enforcement: In-Car Video Keeps Officers on the Streets”, Traffic technology international. Annual review, 1998, Abstract.
Cucchiara et al., “Vehicle Detection under Day and Night Illumination”, Proceedings of 3rd International ICSC Symposium on Intelligent Industrial Automation (IIA 99), 1999.
Cucchiara et al., “Detecting moving objects, ghosts, and shadows in video streams”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 25, No. 10, 2003.
Cucchiara et al., “Improving Shadow Suppression in Moving Object Detection with HSV Color Information”, Proceeding of IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2001.
Curry et al., “The Lancashire telemedicine ambulance”, Journal of Telemedicine and telecare 4.4 (1998): 231-238, Dec. 1, 1998, Abstract.
Dagan et al., “Forward collision warning with a single camera”, IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2004.
Dally et al., “Digital Systems Engineering”, The University of Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1998.
Davis et al., “Road Boundary Detection for Autonomous Vehicle Navigation”, Optical Engineering, vol. 25, No. 3, Mar. 1986, pp. 409-414.
Davis, “Vision-Based Navigation for Autonomous Ground Vehicles” Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Jul. 18, 1988.
De la Escalera et al., “Neural traffic sign recognition for autonomous vehicles” IEEE, 1994.
De la Escalera et al., “Traffic sign recognition and analysis for intelligent vehicles”, Division of Systems Engineering and Automation, Madrid, Spain, 2003.
Decision—Motions—Bd. R. 125(a), issued Aug. 29, 2006 in connection with Interference No. 105,325, which involved U.S. Appl. No. 09/441,341, filed Nov. 16, 1999 by Schofield et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 5,837,994, issued to Stam et al.
DeFauw, “A System for Small Target Detection, Tracking, and Classification, Intelligent Transportation System”, Intelligent Transportation Systems, 1999. Proceedings. 1999 IEEE/IEEJ/JSAI International Conference on. IEEE, 1999, Abstract.
Denes et al., “Assessment of driver vision enhancement technologies,” Proceedings of SPIE: Collusion Avoidance and Automated Traffic Management Sensors, vol. 2592, Oct. 1995.
DeNuto et al., “LIN Bus and its Potential for use in Distributed Multiplex Applications”, SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-0072, Mar. 5-8, 2001.
Denyer et al., “On-Chip CMOS Sensors for VLSI Imaging Systems”, Dept. of Elect. Engineering, University of Edinburgh, pp. 4b1.1-4b1.5, 1991.
Dérutin et al., “Real-time collision avoidance at road-crossings on board the Prometheus-ProLab 2 vehicle”, Intelligent Vehicles' 94 Symposium, Proceedings of the. IEEE, 1994, Abstract.
Devlin, “The Eyellipse and Considerations in the Driver's Forward Field of View,” Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., Detroit, MI, Jan. 8-12, 1968.
Dickinson et al., “CMOS Digital Camera with Parallel Analog-to-Digital Conversion Architecture”, Apr. 1995.
Dickmanns et al., “A Curvature-based Scheme for Improving Road Vehicle Guidance by Computer Vision,” University of Bundeswehr München, 1986.
Dickmanns et al., “Recursive 3-D road and relative ego-state recognition,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 14, No. 2, Feb. 1992.
Dickmanns et al., “An integrated spatio-temporal approach to automatic visual guidance of autonomous vehicles,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 20, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 1990.
Dickmanns, “Vehicles Capable of Dynamic Vision”, Aug. 23, 1997.
Dickmanns, “4-D dynamic vision for intelligent motion control”, Universitat der Bundeswehr Munich, 1991.
Dickmanns et al., “The seeing passenger car ‘VaMoRs-P’ ”, Oct. 24, 1994.
Dingus et al., “TRAVTEK Evaluation Task C3—Camera Car Study” Final Report/ Sep. 1992 to May 1994. Jun. 1995.
Donnelly Panoramic Vision™ on Renault Talisman Concept Car at Frankfort Motor Show, PR Newswire, Frankfort, Germany Sep. 10, 2001.
Doudoumopoulos et al., “CMOS Active Pixel Sensor Technology for High Performance Machine Vision Applications,” SME Applied Machine Vision '96—Emerging Smart Vision Sensors, Jun. 1996.
Draves, “A Video Graphics Controller for Reconfigurable Automotive Displays”, No. 970193. SAE Technical Paper Feb. 24, 1997, Abstract.
Dubrovin et al., “Application of real-time lighting simulation for intelligent front-lighting studies”, 2000 pp. 333-343.
Dubuisson-Jolly, “Vehicle segmentation and classification using deformable templates”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Mar. 1996.
Easton, “Jaguar Adapts Pilot's Night Sights for safer driving”, The Times, Sep. 28, 1991.
Eaton, “Video Incident Capture System”, Technical Memorandum, OIC General Enforcement Branch, Sep. 1991.
Eaton, “An RS-170 Camera for the Military Environment”, Proc. SPIE 0979, Airborne Reconnaissance XII, Feb. 23, 1989, Abstract.
Eid et al., “A 256×256 CMOS Active Pixel Image Sensor,” Proceedings of SPIE: Charge-Coupled Devices and Solid State Optical Sensors V, vol. 2415, 1995.
Elwell et al., “Near Infrared Spectroscopy,” accessed at http://www.ucl.ac.uk/medphys/research/borl/intro/nirs, Jan. 6, 1999.
Ernst et al., “Camera calibration for lane and obstacle detection” Intelligent Transportation Systems, 1999 pp. 356-361.
Fancher et al. “Intelligent Cruise Control Field Operational Test (Final Report)”, Final Report, vol. I: Technical Report, May 1998.
Fancher et al., “Fostering Development, Evaluation, and Deployment of Forward Crash Avoidance Systems (FOCAS)” Annual Research Report DOT HS 808 437, May 1995.
Ferryman et al., “Visual Surveillance for Moving Vehicles”, SECURE Project, 2000.
Fletcher, “CMOS light-sensor process makes possible low-cost smart machine-vision systems” Penton Media, Inc. et al., 1993.
Forsyth, “A System for Finding Changes in Colour”, Oxford University, Jul. 23, 1987.
Fossum, “Active Pixel Sensors: Are CCD's dinosaurs?” Proceedings of SPIE, Charge-Coupled Devices and Solid-State Optical Sensors III, vol. 1900, 1993.
Fossum, “CMOS Active Pixel Sensor (APS) Technology for Multimedia Image Capture,” 1997 Multimedia Technology & Applications Conference (MTAC97), 1997.
Fossum, “Low power camera-on-a-chip using CMOS active pixel sensor technology”, 1995 Symposium on Low Power Electronics, San Jose, CA, Oct. 9-10, 1995.
Fowler et al., “A CMOS Area Image Sensor With Pixel-Level A/D Conversion,” Digest of Technical Papers of the 41st Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC), 2001.
Franke et al., “Autonomous driving approaches downtown”, IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 13, Nr. 6, 1999.
French et al., “A comparison of IVHS progress in the United States, Europe, and Japan”, IVHA America, Dec. 31, 1993.
Fujimori, “CMOS Passive Pixel Imager Design Techniques”, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Ph.D. Dissertation for Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Feb. 2002.
Fung et al., “Effective moving cast shadow detection for monocular color image sequences”, The 11th International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing Proceedings, Palermo, Italy, Sep. 26-28, 2001,p. 404-409.
Gat et al., “A Monocular Vision Advance Warning System for the Automotive Aftemarket”, Aftermarket SAE World Congress & Exhibition, No. 2005-01-1470. SAE Technical Paper, Jan. 1, 2005.
Gavrila et al., “Real-Time Vision for Intelligent Vehicles” IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine, Jun. 2001, pp. 22-27.
Gavrila, et al., “Real-time object detection for “smart” vehicles”, 1999.
Geary et al., “Passive Optical Lane Position Monitor” Idea Project Final Report Contract ITS-24, Jan. 15, 1996.
Gehrig, “Design, simulation, and implementation of a vision-based vehicle-following system” Doctoral Dissertation, Jul. 31, 2000.
GEM Muon Review Meeting—SSCL Abstract; GEM TN-03-433, Jun. 30, 1993.
Goesch et al., “The First Head Up Display Introduced by General Motors”, SAE Paper No. 890288, published Feb. 1, 1989.
Goldbeck et al., “Lane detection and tracking by video sensors” Intelligent Transportation Systems, 1999. Proc., Oct. 5-8, 1999.
Graefe et al., “Dynamic Vision for Precise Depth Measurement and Robot Control”, Computer Vision for Industry, Jun. 1993.
Graefe, “Vision for Intelligent Road Vehicles”, Universitat de Bundeswehr Müchen, 1993, pp. 135-140.
Greene et al., “Creating Raster Omnimax Images from Multiple Perspective Views Using the Elliptical Weighted Average Filter”, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 6, No. 6, pp. 21-27, Jun. 1986.
Gruss et al., “Integrated sensor and range-finding analog signal processor”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 26, No. 3, Mar. 1991.
Gumkowski et al., “Reconfigurable Automotive Display System”, SAE Paper No. 930456 to Gumkowski, published Mar. 1, 1993.
Hall, “Why I Dislike auto-Dimming Rearview Mirrors,” accessed at http://blog.consumerguide.com/why-i-dislike-autodimming-rearview-mirrors/, Dec. 21, 2012.
Hamit, “360-Degree Interactivity: New Video and Still Cameras Provide a Global Roaming Viewpoint”, Advanced Imaging, Mar. 1997, p. 50.
Haritaoglu et al., “W4: Real-Time Surveillance of People and Their Activities”, IEEE Transactions Patter Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 22, No. 8, Aug. 2000.
Hebert et al., “3-D Vision Techniques for Autonomous Vehicles”, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Carnegie Mellon University, Feb. 1, 1988.
Hebert et al., “Local Perception for Mobile Robot Navigation in Natural Terrain: Two Approaches”, The Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Abstract; Workshop on Computer Vision for Space Applications, Antibes, Sep. 22,24, 1993, pp. 24-31.
Hebert, “Intelligent unmanned ground vehicles: autonomous navigation research”, Carnegie Mellon (Kluwer Academic Publishers), Boston, 1997, Excerpt.
Herbert et al., “3-D Vision Techniques for Autonomous Vehicles”, Technical Report, Carnegie Mellon University, Aug. 1988.
Hess et al., “A Control Theoretic Model of Driver Steering Behavior,” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 10, No. 5, Aug. 1990, pp. 3-8.
Hessburg et al., “An Experimental Study on Lateral Control of a Vehicle,” California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways (PATH), Jan. 1, 1991.
Hillebrand et al., “High speed camera system using a CMOS image sensor”, IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium., Oct. 3-5, 1999, pp. 656-661, Abstract.
Ho et al., “Automatic spacecraft docking using computer vision-based guidance and control techniques”, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 16, No. 2 Mar.-Apr. 1993.
Hock et al., “Intelligent Navigation for Autonomous Robots Using Dynamic Vision”, XVIIth ISPRS Congress, pp. 900-915, Aug. 14, 1992.
Holst, “CCD Arrays, Cameras, and Displays”, Second Edition, Bellingham, WA: SPIE Optical Engineering Press, 1998; pp. v-xxiii, 7-12, 45-101, and 176-179, excerpts.
Honda Worldwide, “Honda Announces a Full Model Change for the Inspire.” Jun. 18, 2003.
Horprasert et al., “A Statistical Approach for Real-Time Robust Background Subtraction and Shadow Detection”, Proceeding of IEEE International Conference on Computer vision FRAME-RATE Workshop, 1999.
Hsieh et al., “Shadow elimination for effective moving object detection by Gaussian shadow modeling”, Image and Vision Computing, vol. 21, No. 6, 505-516, 2003.
Hsieh et al., “A shadow elimination method for vehicle analysis”, Proceeding of IEEE International Conference on Pattern Recognition, vol. 4, 2004.
Hu et al., “Action-based Road Horizontal Shape Recognition”, SBA Controle & Automacao, vol. 10, No. 2, May 1999.
Huertgen et al., “Vehicle Environment Sensing by Video Sensors”, No. 1999-01-0932. SAE Technical Paper, 1999, Abstract.
Huijsing, “Integrated smart sensors”, Sensors and Actuators A, vol. 30, Issues 1-2, pp. 167-174, Jan. 1992.
Hutber et al., “Multi-sensor multi-target tracking strategies for events that become invisible” BMVC '95 Proc. of the 6th British conference on Machine vision, V2, 1995, pp. 463-472.
IEEE 100—The Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standards Terms, 7th Ed. (2000).
Ientilucci, “Synthetic Simulation and Modeling of Image Intensified CCDs (IICCD)”, Master Thesis for Rochester Inst. of Tech., Mar. 31, 2000.
Ishida et al., “Development of a Driver Assistance System”, No. 2003-01-0279. SAE Technical Paper, 2002, Abstract.
Ishihara et al., “Interline CCD Image Sensor with an Anti Blooming Structure,” IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, Session XIII: Optoelectronic Circuits, THPM 13.6, Feb. 11, 1982.
Ishikawa et al., “Visual Navigation of an Autonomous Vehicle Using White Line Recognition”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1988, Abst.
Jaguar Press Releases Autumn 1991 “Jaguar Displays 21st Century Car Technologies”, Jaguar Communications & Public Affairs Dept.
Janssen et al., “Hybrid Approach for Traffic Sign Recognition”, Program for a European Traffic with Highest Efficiency and Unprecendented Safety, Nov. 28, 1993.
Japanese Article “Television Image Engineering Handbook, The Institute of Television Engineers of Japan”, Jan. 17, 1981.
Jochem et al., “PANS: a portable navigation platform”, 1995 IEEE Symposium on Intelligent Vehicles, Detroit, MI, Sep. 25-26, 1995.
Jochem et al., “Life in the Fast Lane”, AI Magazine, vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 11-50, Summer 1996.
Johannes, “A New Microchip Ushers in Cheaper Digital Cameras”, The Wall Street Journal, Aug. 21, 1998, p. B1.
Johnson, “Georgia State Patrol's In-Car Video System”, Council of State Governments, 1992, Abstract.
Juberts et al., “Development and Test Results for a Vision-Based Approach to AVCS.” in Proceedings of the 26th International Symposium on Automotive Technology and Automation, Aachen, Germany, Sep. 1993, pp. 1-9.
Kakinami et al., “Autonomous Vehicle Control System Using an Image Processing Sensor”, No. 950470. SAE Technical Paper, Feb. 1, 1995, Abstract.
Kan et al., “Model-based vehicle tracking from image sequences with an application to road surveillance,” Purdue University, XP000630885, vol. 35, No. 6, Jun. 1996.
Kang et al., “High Dynamic Range Video”, ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 22, No. 3, 2003.
Kassel, “Lunokhod-1 Soviet Lunar Surface Vehicle”, Advanced Research Projects Agency, ARPA Order No. 189-1, Dec. 9, 1971.
Kastrinaki et al., “A survey of video processing techniques for traffic applications”, Image and Computing 21, 2003.
Kehtarnavaz et al., “Traffic sign recognition in noisy outdoor scenes”, 1995.
Kehtarnavaz, “Visual control of an autonomous vehicle (BART)—the vehicle-following problem”, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Aug. 31, 1991, Abstract.
Kemeny et al., “Multiresolution Image Sensor,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 7, No. 4, Aug. 1997.
Kenue et al., “LaneLok: Robust Line and Curve Fitting of Lane Boundaries”, Applications in Optical Science and Engineering, International Society for Optics and Photonics, 1993, Abstract.
Kenue, “Lanelok: Detection of Lane Boundaries and Vehicle Tracking Using Image-Processing Techniques,” SPIE Conference on Mobile Robots IV, 1989.
Kidd et al., “Speed Over Ground Measurement”, SAE Technical Paper Series, No. 910272, pp. 29-36, Feb.-Mar. 1991.
Kiencke et al., “Automotive Serial controller Area Network,” SAE Technical Paper 860391, 1986, retrieved from http://papers.sae.org/860391/, accessed Mar. 20, 2015.
Klassen et al., “Sensor Development for Agricultural Vehicle Guidance”, No. 932427. SAE Technical Paper, 1993, Abstract.
Kluge et al., “Representation and Recovery of Road Geometry in YARF,” Carnegie Mellon University, Proceedings of the IEEE, pp. 114-119, 1992.
Knipling, “IVHS Technologies Applied to Collision Avoidance: Perspectives on Six Target Crash Types and Countermeasures,” Technical Paper presented at Safety & Human Factors session of 1993 IVHS America Annual Meeting, Apr. 14-17, 1993, pp. 1-22.
Knipling et al., “Vehicle-Based Drowsy Driver Detection: Current Status and Future Prospects,” IVHS America Fourth Annual Meeting, Atlanta, GA, Apr. 17-20, 1994, pp. 1-24.
Koller et al., “Binocular Stereopsis and Lane Marker Flow for Vehicle Navigation: Lateral and Longitudinal Control,” University of California, Mar. 24, 1994.
Kowalick, “Proactive use of highway recorded data via an event data recorder (EDR) to achieve nationwide seat belt usage in the 90th percentile by 2002” “Seat belt event data recorder (SB-EDR)”Transportation Recording: 2000 and Beyond., May 3-5, 1999, pp. 173-198, 369.
Kozlowski et al., “Comparison of Passive and Active Pixel Schemes for CMOS Visible Imagers,” Proceedings of SPIE Conference on Infrared Readout Electronics IV, vol. 3360, Apr. 1998.
Krotkov, “An agile stereo camera system for flexible image acquisition”, IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation, Feb. 18, 1988.
Kuan et al., “Autonomous Robotic Vehicle Road Following”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 10, No. 5, Sep. 1988, pp. 648-658, Abstract.
Kuehnle, “Symmetry-based recognition of vehicle rears”, Pattern Recognition Letters 12, North-Holland, 1991.
Kuhnert, “A vision system for real time road and object recognition for vehicle guidance,” in Proc. SPIE Mobile Robot Conf., Cambridge, MA, Oct. 1986, pp. 267-272.
Kweon et al., “Behavior-Based Intelligent Robot in Dynamic Indoor Environments”, Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Jul. 7-10, 1992.
Lasky et al., “Automated Highway Systems (AHS) Classification by Vehicle and Infrastructure”, AHMT Research Report, Jan. 25, 1994.
Leachtenauer, “Resolution requirements and the Johnson criteria revisited,” Proceedings of SPIE, Infrared Imaging Systems: Design, Analysis, Modeling and Testing XIV, vol. 5076, 2003.
LeBlanc et al., “CAPC: A Road-Departure Prevention System”, IEEE, Dec. 1996, pp. 61-71.
Lee et al., “Automatic recognition of a car license plate using color image processing”, IEEE, Nov. 16, 1994.
Lee, “How to Select a Heat Sink”, Electronics Cooling Magazine, Jun. 1, 1995.
Leen et al., “Digital networks in the automotive vehicle”, Dec. 1999.
Lezin, “Video Gear in Police Cruisers Gets Mixed Reviews Critics Say It Violates Privacy Rights and Inhibits Officers From Doing Their Jobs Well”, Mar. 17, 1997.
Linkwitz, “High Precision Navigation: Integration of Navigational and Geodetic Methods,” Springer-Verlag, Jul. 5, 1989, Excerpt.
Lisowski et al., “Specification of a small electric vehicle: modular and distributed approach,” IEEE 1997, pp. 919-924.
Litkouhi et al., “Estimator and Controller Design for LaneTrak, a Vision-Based Automatic Vehicle Steering System,” Proceedings of the 32nd Conference on Decision and Control, San Antonio, Texas, Dec. 1993, pp. 1868-1873.
Litwiller, “CCD vs. CMOS: Facts and Fiction,” Photonics Spectra, Jan. 2001.
Liu Xianghong, “Development of a vision-based object detection and recognition system for intelligent vehicle”, 2000.
Lockwood, “Design of an obstacle avoidance system for automated guided vehicles”, Doctoral thesis, University of Huddersfield, Oct. 1991.
Lowenau et al., “Adaptive light control a new light concept controlled by vehicle dynamics and navigation”, SAE Technical Paper Series, Feb. 23-26, 1998.
Lu et al., “On-chip Automatic Exposure Control Technique, Solid-State Circuits Conference”, ESSCIRC '91. Proceedings—17th European (vol. 1) Abst. Sep. 11-13, 1991.
Lucas Demonstrates Intelligent Cruise Control, Detroit Feb. 27, 1995 available at http://www.thefreelibrary.com/LUCAS+DEMONSTRATES+INTELLIGENT+CUISE+CONTR OL=a016602459.
Luebbers et al., “Video-image-based neural network guidance system with adaptive view-angles for autonomous vehicles”, Applications of Artificial Neural Networks II. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 1991, Abstract.
Lumia, “Mobile system for measuring retroreflectance of traffic signs”, Optics, Illumination, and Image Sensing for Machine Vision, Mar. 1, 1991, Abstract.
Mackey et al., “Digital Eye-Witness Systems”, Transportation Recording: 2000 and Beyond, May 3-5, 1999, 271-284.
Malik et al., “A Machine Vision Based System for Guiding Lane-change Maneuvers”, California Path Program, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkeley, Sep. 1995.
Manigel et al., “Computer control of an autonomous road vehicle by computer vision”—Industrial Electronics, Control and Instrumentation, Proceedings. IECON '91, 1991 International Conference on, p. 19-24 vol. 1, 1991.
Manigel et al., “Vehicle control by computer vision,” Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 39, Issue 3, 181-188, Jun. 1992.
Martel-Brisson et al., “Moving cast shadow detection from a Gaussian mixture shadow model”, Proceeding of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, vol. 2, 2005.
Masaki, “Vision-based vehicle guidance”, Industrial Electronics, Control, Instrumentation, and Automation, 1992. Power Electronics and Motion Control, Proceedings of the 1992 International Conference on. IEEE, 1992.
Mason et al., “The Golem Group I UCLA Autonomous Ground Vehicle in the DARPA Grand Challenge”, Jun. 12, 2006.
Matthews, “Visual Collision Avoidance,” Oct. 1994, University of Southampton, PhD submission.
Maurer et al., “VaMoRs-P: an advanced platform for visual autonomous road vehicle guidance”, 1995.
Maurer, “Flexible Automatisierung von StraBenfahrzeugen mit Rechnersehen” Universitat der Buneswehr Milnchen Dissertation, Jul. 27, 2000.
MC68331 User's Manual, “Freescale Semiconductor”, Inc., 1994.
McKenna et al., “Tracking Groups of People”, Computer Vision and Image Understanding, vol. 80, p. 42-56, 2000.
McTamaney, “Mobile Robots Real-Time Intelligent Control”, FMC Corporation, Winter 1987.
Mei Chen et al., “AURORA: A Vision-Based Roadway Departure Warning System, The Robotics Institute”, Carnegie Mellon University, published, Aug. 5-9, 1995.
Mendis et al., “A 128×128 CMOS active pixel image sensor for highly integrated imaging systems”, Dec. 8, 1993.
Mendis et al., “CMOS Active Pixel Image Sensor,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 41, No. 3, Mar. 1994.
Metzler, “Computer Vision Applied to Vehicle Operation”, Paper from Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., 1988.
Mikic et al., “Moving shadow and object detection in traffic scenes”, Proceeding of IEEE International Conference on Pattern Recognition, vol. 1, 2000.
Miller, “Evaluation of vision systems for teleoperated land vehicles,” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, Jun. 28, 1988.
Mimuro et al., “Functions and Devices of Mitsubishi Active Safety ASV” Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Sep. 19-20, 1996, Abstract.
Mironer et al., “Examination of Single Vehicle Roadway Departure Crashes and Potential IVHS Countermeasures,” U.S. Department of Transportation, Aug. 1994.
Miura et al., “Towards Vision-Based Intelligent Navigator: Its Concept and Prototype”, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Jun. 2002.
Miura et al., “Towards intelligent navigator that can provide timely advice on safe and efficient driving” Intelligent Transportation Systems Proceedings, Oct. 5-8, 1999, pp. 981-986.
Mobileye N.V. Introduces EyeQ™ Vision System-On-A-Chip High Performance, Low Cost Breakthrough for Driver Assistance Systems, Detroit, Michigan, Mar. 8, 2004.
Moini, “Vision Chips or Seeing Silicon,” Third Revision, Mar. 1997.
Moravec, “Obstacle Avoidance and Navigation in the Real World by a Seeing Robot Rover”, Computer Science Department, Stanford University, Ph.D. Thesis, Sep. 1980.
Morgan et al., “Road edge tracking for robot road following: a real-time implementation,” vol. 8, No. 3, Aug. 1990.
Mori et al., “Shadow and Rhythm as Sign patterns of Obstacle Detection”, Industrial Electronics, 1993. Conference Proceedings, ISIE'93-Budapest, IEEE International Symposium on. IEEE, 1993, Abstract.
Morris, “E-Z-Pass and transmit using electronic toll tags for traffic monitoring” National Traffic Data Acquisition Conference, PDF pp. 54-63, 1996, 289-298, Abstract.
Muirhead, “Developments in CMOS Camera Technology,” The Institution of Electrical Engineers, Dec. 5, 1994.
Nadimi et al., “Physical models for moving shadow and object detection in video”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 26, No. 8, Aug. 2004.
Najm, “Comparison of alternative crash-avoidance sensor technologies”, Jan. 6, 1995, Abstract.
Nashman et al., “Real-time Visual Processing for Autonomous Driving,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles, vol. 93, Jun. 1993, pp. 14-16.
Nathan, “Digital Video Data Handling,” NASA JPL Tech Report 32-877, Pasadena, CA, Jan. 5, 1966.
Navon, “SoC IP Qualification & Emulation Environment”, Dec. 8-9, 2004.
Nguyen et al., “Obstacle detection using bi-spectrum CCD camera and image processing”, Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles '92 Symposium, Jun. 29-Jul. 1, 1992, p. 42-50.
Nixon et al., “128×128 CMOS Photodiode-Type Active Pixel Sensor With On-Chip Timing, Control and Signal Chain Electronics” 1995.
Nixon et al., “256×256 CMOS Active Pixel Sensor Camera-on-a-Chip,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 31, No. 12, Paper FA 11.1, 1996.
Nolan, “Survey of Electronic Displays”, SAE Paper No. 750364, published Feb. 1, 1975.
Oldenburg, “Comments on the Autronic Eye”, 2002.
Ortega et al., “An Interactive, Reconfigurable Display System for Automotive Instrumentation”, SAE Paper No. 860173, published Mar. 1, 1986.
Otsuka, “Flat Dot Matrix Display Module for Vehicle Instrumentation”, SAE Paper No. 871288, published Nov. 8, 1987.
Pacaud et al., “Ground Speed Sensing,” Lucas International Symposium, Paris, France 1989.
Paetzold, “Interpretation of visually sensed urban environment for a self-driving car” Ruhr-Universitat Bochum, Dissertation, Sep. 2000.
Page et al., “Advanced technologies for collision avoidance,” Eureka on Campus (Summer 1992).
Paradiso et al., “Wide-Range Precision Alignment for the Gem Muon System,” Oct. 1993.
Paradiso, “Application of miniature cameras in video straightness monitor systems”, Draper Laboratory, Jun. 1994.
Paradiso, “Electronics for precision alignment of the Gem Muon System”, Proceedings of the 1994 LeCroy Electronics for Future Colliders Conference, May 1994.
Parent, “Automatic Driving for Small Public Urban Vehicles,” Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Tokyo, Jul. 14-16, 1993.
Parker (ed.), McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms Fifth Edition. (1993).
Parnell, “Reconfigurable Vehicle”. No. 2002-01-0144. SAE Technical Paper, 2002. Xilinx WPI 53, Nov. 19, 2001.
Pelco Fixed Focal Length Lenses Product Specification, Apr. 1996.
Peng et al., “Experimental Automatic Lateral Control System for an Automobile,” California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways (PATH), Jan. 1, 1992.
Peng, “Vehicle Lateral Control for Highway Automation,” Ph.D. Thesis—University of California Berkeley, 1992.
Philips Components, PCA82C200, Stand-alone CAN-controller, Jan. 22, 1991.
Philomin et al., “Pedestrain Tracking from a Moving Vehicle”, Proceedings of the IEEE, Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, IV, 2000.
Piccioli et al., “Robust road sign detection and recognition from image sequences”, 1994.
Pollard, “Evaluation of the Vehicle Radar Safety Systems' Rashid Radar Safety Brake Collision Warning System”, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Feb. 29, 1988.
Pomerleau, “Alvinn: An Autonomous Land Vehicle in a Neural Network”, Technical Report AIP-77 Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Mar. 13, 1990.
Pomerleau, “RALPH: Rapidly Adapting Lateral Position Handler”, The Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 506-511., 1995.
Pomerleau et al., “Run-Off-Road Collision Avoidance Countermeasures Using IVHS Countermeasures TASK 3—vol. 1”, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Final Report, Aug. 23, 1995.
Pomerleau et al., “Rapidly Adapting Machine Vision for Automated Vehicle Steering”, pp. 19-27, Apr. 30, 1996.
Pomerleau, “Run-Off-Road Collision Avoidance Using Ivhs Countermeasures”, Robotics Institute, Task 6 Interim Report, Sep. 10, 1996.
Porter et al., “Compositing Digital Images,” Computer Graphics (Proc. Siggraph), vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 253-259, Jul. 1984.
Prasad, “Performance of Selected Event Data Recorders”, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Washington, DC, Sep. 2001.
Prati et al., “Detecting moving shadows: algorithms and evaluation”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 25, Jul. 1, 2003.
Pratt, “Digital Image Processing, Passage—ED.3”, John Wiley & Sons, US, Jan. 1, 2001, pp. 657-659, XP002529771.
Priese et al., “New Results on Traffic Sign Recognition”, IEEE Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles 1994 Symposium.
Priese et al., “Traffic Sign Recognition Based on Color Image”, Universität Koblenz-Landau, 1993, pp. 95-100.
Proceedings of the 1992 International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control, Instrumentation, and Automation, 1992. Power Electronics and Motion Control, Date of Conference Nov. 9-13, 1992.
Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 1992-present.
Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Tokyo, Jul. 14-16, 1993.
Pynn et al., “Automatic identification of cracks in road surfaces” 7th International Conference on Image Processing and its Application, CP465, Jan. 1999, pp. 671-675, Abstract.
Raboisson et al., “Obstacle Detection in Highway Environment by Colour CCD Camera and Image Processing Prototype Installed in a Vehicle”, Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Symposium 1994.
Radatz, “The IEEE Standard Dictionary of Electrical and Electronics Terms,” Sixth Edition, Standards Coordinating Committee 10, Terms and Definitions, 1996.
Raglan Tribe Video—1994; 1994; Raglan Tribe; “Robot Car Raglan Tribe” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AILZhcnpXYI.
Ramesh et al., “Real-Time Video Surveillance and Monitoring for Automotive Applications”, SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-0347, Mar. 6, 2000, Abstract.
Ran et al., “Development of Vision-based Vehicle Detection and Recognition System for Intelligent Vehicles”, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin at Madison, 1999 TRB Annual Meeting, Nov. 16, 1998.
Raphael et al., “Development of a Camera-Based Forward Collision Alert System”, SAE International, Apr. 12, 2011.
Rayner et al., “I-Witness Black Box Recorder” Intelligent Transportation Systems Program, Final Report for ITS-IDEA Project 84, Nov. 2001.
Redmill, “The OSU Autonomous Vehicle”, 1997.
Regensburger et al., “Visual Recognition of Obstacles on Roads”, Intelligent Robots and Systems, Elsevier, 1994.
Reichardt, “Kontinuierliche Verhaltenssteuerung eines autonomen Fahrzeugs in dynamischer Umgebung” Universitat Kaisserslautern Dissertation, Transation: Continuous behavior control of an autonomous vehicle in a dynamic environment, Jan. 1996.
Reid, “Vision-based guidance of an agriculture tractor”, IEEE Control Systems Magazine, Apr. 30, 1987, Abstract.
Reisman et al., “Crowd Detection in Video Sequences”, IEEE, Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Jan. 1, 2004.
Ritter et al., “Traffic sign recognition using colour information”, Math, Computing, Modelling, vol. 22, No. 4-7, pp. 149-161, Oct. 1995.
Ritter, “Traffic Sign Recognition in Color Image Sequences”, Institute for Information Technology, 1992, pp. 12-17.
Roberts, “Attentive Visual Tracking and Trajectory Estimation for Dynamic Scene Segmentation”, University of Southampton, PhD submission, Dec. 1994.
Rombaut et al., “Dynamic data temporal multisensory fusion in the Prometheus ProLab2 demonstrator”, IEEE Paper, 1994.
Ross, “A Practical Stereo Vision System”, The Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Aug. 25, 1993.
Rowell, “Applying Map Databases to Advanced Navigation and Driver Assistance Systems”, The Journal of Navigation 54.03 (2001): 355-363.
Sahli et al., “A Kalman Filter-Based Update Scheme for Road Following,” IAPR Workshop on Machine Vision Applications, pp. 5-9, Nov. 12-14, 1996.
Salvador et al., “Cast shadow segmentation using invariant color features”, Computer Vision and Image Understanding, vol. 95, 2004.
Sanders, “Speed Racers: Study to monitor driver behavior to determine the role of speed in crashes”, Georgia Research Tech News, Aug. 2002.
Sayer et al., “The Effect of Lead-Vehicle Size on Driver Following Behavior”, University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, 2000-15, Jun. 2000.
Schneiderman et al., “Visual Processing for Autonomous Driving,” IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision, Palm Springs, CA, Nov. 30-Dec. 2, 1992.
Schönfeld et al., Compact Hardware Realization for Hough Based Extraction of Line Segments in Image Sequences for Vehicle Guidance, IEEE Paper, 1993, Abstract.
Schumann et al., “An Exploratory Simulator Study on the Use of Active Control Devices in Car Driving,” No. IZF-1992-B-2. Institute for Perception RVO-TNO Soesterber (Netherlands), May 1992.
Schwarzinger et al., “Vision-based car-following: detection, tracking, and identification”, Jul. 1, 1992.
Scott, “Video Image on a Chip”, Popular Science, vol. 237, No. 3, Sep. 1991, pp. 50.
Seelen et al., “Image Processing for Driver Assistance”, 1998.
Seger et al., “Vision Assistance in Scenes with Extreme Contrast,” IEEE Micro, vol. 13, No. 1, Feb. 1993.
Shafer, “Automation and Calibration for Robot Vision Systems”, National Science Foundation, Carnegie Mellon University Research Showcase, May 12, 1988.
Shashua et al., “Two-body Segmentation from Two Perspective Views”, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Hawaii, pp. 263-270, Dec. 2001, Abstract.
Shashua et al., “Direct Estimation of Motion and Extended Scene Structure from a Moving Stereo Rig”, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Jun. 1998, pp. 211-218.
Shashua et al., “Illumination and View Position in 3D Visual Recognition”, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Morgan Kauffman Publishers, CA 1992 (Proc. of NIPS '91), pp. 404-411.
Shashua et al., “Image-Based View Synthesis by Combining Trilinear Tensors and Learning Techniques”, ACM Conference on Virtual Reality and Systems (VRST), Sep. 1997, pp. 140-145.
Shashua et al., “Novel View Synthesis by Cascading Trilinear Tensors”, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. vol. 4, No. 4, Oct.-Dec. 1998.
Shashua et al., “On Degeneracy of Linear Reconstruction from Three Views: Linear Line Complex and Applications”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI), vol. 21 (3), 1999, pp. 244-251.
Shashua et al., “3D Reconstruction from Tangent-of-Sight ”, European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Jun. 2000, Dublin, Ireland, pp. 220-234.
Shashua et al., “A Geometric Invariant for Visual Recognition and 3D Reconstruction From Two Perspective/Orthographic Views”, Proceedings of the IEEE 2nd Qualitative Vision Workshop, Jun. 1993, New York, NY, pp. 107-117.
Shashua et al., “A Parallel Decomposition Solver for SVM: Distributed Dual Ascend using Fenchel Duality”, Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Jun. 2008, Anchorage, Alaska.
Shashua et al., “A Unifying Approach to Hard and Probabilistic Clustering”, International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Beijing, China, Oct. 2005.
Shashua et al., “Affine 3-D Reconstruction from Two Projective Images of Independently Translating Planes”, International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Jul. 2001, Vancouver, Canada, pp. 238-244.
Shashua et al., “Algebraic Functions for Recognition”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI) vol. 17(8), Jan. 1994 pp. 779-789.
Shashua et al., “Ambiguity from Reconstruction From Images of Six Points”, International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Jan. 1998, Bombay India, pp. 703-708.
Shashua et al., “Convergent Message-Passing Algorithms for reference over General Graphs with Convex Free Energies”, Conf. on Uncertainty in AI (UAI), Helsinki, Jul. 2008.
Shashua et al., “Doubly Stochastic Normalization for Spectral Clustering”, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), Vancouver, Canada, Dec. 2006.
Shashua et al., “Duality of multi-point and multi-frame geometry: Fundamental shape matrices and tensors”, European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Apr. 1996, Cambridge United Kingdom, pp. 217-227.
Shashua et al., “Dynamic Pn to Pn Alignment”, In Handbook of Computational Geometry for Pattern Recognition, Computer Vision. Neuro computing and Robotics. Eduardo Bayro-Corrochano (eds.), Springer-Verlag, 2004.
Shashua et al., “Feature Selection for Unsupervised and Supervised Inference: the Emergence of Sparsity in a Weight-based Approach”, Journal of Machine Learning Research (JMLR), 6(11):1885-1887, 2005, pp. 1885-1887.
Shashua et al., “Grouping Contours by Iterated Pairing Network”, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 3, (Proc. of NIPS '90), Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, CA, 1991, pp. 335-341.
Shashua et al., “Nomography Tensors: On Algebraic Entities That Represent Three Views of Static or Moving Planar Points”, European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Jun. 2000, Dublin, Ireland, pp. 163-177.
Shashua et al., “Join Tensors: on 3D-to-3D Alignment of Dynamic Sets”, International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), Jan. 2000, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 99-102.
Shashua et al., “Kernel Feature Selection with Side Data using a Spectral Approach”, Proc. of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), May 2004, Prague, Czech Republic.
Shashua et al., “Kernel Principal Angles for Classification Machines with Applications to Image Sequence Interpretation”, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Jun. 2003, Madison.
Shashua et al., “Latent Model Clustering and Applications to Visual Recognition”, International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Rio, Brazil, Oct. 2007.
Shashua et al., “Learning over Sets using Kernel Principal Angles”, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2003, pp. 913-931.
Shashua et al., “Linear Image Coding for Regression and Classification using the Tensor-rank Principle”, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Dec. 2001, Hawaii, pp. 42-49, Abstract.
Shashua et al., “Manifold Pursuit: A New Approach to Appearance Based Recognition”, International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), Aug. 2002, Quebec, Canada.
Shashua et al., “Multi-frame Infinitesimal Motion Model for the Reconstruction of (Dynamic) Scenes with Multiple Linearly Moving Objects”, International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Jul. 2001,, Vancouver, Canada, pp. 592-599.
Shashua et al., “Multiple View Geometry of Non-planar Algebraic Curves”, International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Vancouver, Canada, Jul. 2001, pp. 181-186.
Shashua et al., “Structural Saliency: the Detection of Globally Salient Structures Using a Locally Connected Network”, International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Tarpon Springs, Florida, pp. 321-327, Jul. 1988.
Shashua et al., “The Study of 3D-from-2D using Elimination”, International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Jun. 1995, Boston, MA, pp. 473-479.
Shashua et al., “Multiple-view Geometry and Photometry, In Recent Progress in Computer Vision”, Springer-Verlag, LNCS series, Invited papers of ACCV'95, Singapore Dec. 1995, 225-240, Abstract.
Shashua et al., “Multiple-view geometry of general algebraic curves”, International Journal of Computer Vision (IJCV), 2004.
Shashua et al., “Multi-way Clustering Using Super-symmetric Non-negative Tensor Factorization”, Proc. of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Graz, Austria, May 2006.
Shashua et al., “Nonnegative Sparse PCA”, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), Vancouver, Canada, Dec. 2006.
Shashua et al., “Non-Negative Tensor Factorization with Applications to Statistics and Computer Vision”, International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), Bonn, Germany, Aug. 2005.
Shashua et al., “Norm-Product Belief Propagation: Primal-Dual Message-Passing for Approximate Inference”, IEEE Trans. on Information Theory, Jun. 28, 2010.
Shashua et al., “Novel View Synthesis in Tensor Space”, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Jun. 1997, pp. 1034-1040.
Shashua et al., “Off-road Path Following using Region Classification and Geometric Projection Constraints”, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Jun. 2006, NY.
Shashua et al., “Omni-Rig Sensors: What Can be Done With a Non-Rigid Vision Platform?”, Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (W ACV), pp. 174-179, Princeton, Oct. 1998, pp. 174-179.
Shashua et al., “Omni-rig: Linear Self-recalibration of a Rig with Varying Internal and External Parameters,” International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Jul. 2001, Vancouver, Canada, pp. 135-141.
Shashua et al., “On calibration and reconstruction from planar curves”, European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), pp. 256-270, Jun. 2000, Dublin, Ireland, pp. 256-270.
Shashua et al., “On Geometric and Algebraic Aspects of 3D Affine and Projective Structures from Perspective 2D Views”, In Applications of Invariance in Computer Vision, Springer-Verlag LNCS No. 825, 1994, 127-143.
Shashua et al., “On Photometric Issues in 3D Visual Recognition from a Single 2D Image”, International Journal of Computer Vision (IJCV), 21(1/2), 1997 pp. 99-122.
Shashua et al., “On Projection Matrices Pk-P2, k=3, 6, and their Applications in Computer Vision”, International Journal of Computer Vision (IJCV), 2002, pp. 53-67.
Shashua et al., “On the Reprojection of 3D and 2D Scenes Without Explicit Model Selection”, European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Jun. 2000, Dublin, Ireland, pp. 468-482.
Shashua et al., “On the Structure and Properties of the Quadrifocal Tensor”, European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Jun. 2000, Dublin, Ireland, pp. 354-368.
Shashua et al., “On the Synthesis of Dynamic Scenes from Reference Views”, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Jun. 2000, pp. 133-139.
Shashua et al., “pLSA for Sparse Arrays With Tsallis Pseudo-Additive, Divergence: Noise Robustness and Algorithm”, International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Rio, Brazil, Oct. 2007.
Shashua et al., “Principal Component Analysis Over Continuous Subspaces and Intersection of Half-spaces”, European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), May 2002, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 133-147.
Shashua et al., “Probabilistic Graph and Hypergraph Matching”, Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Jun. 2008, Anchorage, Alaska.
Shashua et al., “Projective Structure from Uncalibrated Images: Structure from Motion and Recognition”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (P AMI), (vol. 16(8), 1994, pp. 778-790.
Shashua et al., “Q-warping: Direct Computation of Quadratic Reference Surfaces”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (P AMI), vol. 23(8), 2001, pp. 920-925.
Shashua et al., “Relative Affine Structure: Canonical Model for 3D from 2D Geometry and Applications,” IEEE, Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (P AMI) vol. 18(9), pp. 873-883, Jun. 1994.
Shashua et al., “Relative Affine Structure: Theory and Application for 3D Reconstruction From Perspective Views,” IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Seattle, Washington, pp. 483-489, Jun. 1994.
Shashua et al., “Revisiting Single-view Shape Tensors: Theory and Applications,” EP Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Copenhagen, DK, pp. 256-270, May 2002.
Shashua et al., “Robust Recovery of Camera Rotation from Three Frames,” IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), San Francisco, CA, pp. 796-802, Jun. 1996.
Shashua et al., “Shape Tensors for Efficient and Learnable Indexing”, Proceedings of the workshop on Scene Representations, Jun. 1995, Cambridge, MA, pp. 58-65.
Shashua et al., “ShareBoost: Efficient Multiclass Learning with Feature Sharing, Neural Information and Processing Systems (NIPS)”, Dec. 2011.
Shashua et al., “Sparse Image Coding using a 3D Non-negative Tensor Factorization”, International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Beijing, China, Oct. 2005.
Shashua et al., “Taxonomy of Large Margin Principle Algorithms for Ordinal Regression Problems”, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), Vancouver, Canada, Dec. 2002.
Shashua et al., “Tensor Embedding of the Fundamental Matrix”, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, 1998.
Shashua et al., “The Quadric Reference Surface: Applications in Registering Views of Complex 3D Objects”, European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), May 1994, Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 407-416.
Shashua et al., “The Quadric Reference Surface: Theory and Applications”, 1994.
Shashua et al., “The Rank 4 Constraint in Multiple (≥3) View Geometry”, European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Apr. 1996, Cambridge, United Kingdom, pp. 196-206.
Shashua et al., “The Semi-Explicit Shape Model for Multi-object Detection and Classification”, Proc. of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Crete, Greece, pp. 336-349, Sep. 2010.
Shashua et al., “Threading Fundamental Matrices”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI), vol. 23(1), Jan. 2001, pp. 73-77.
Shashua et al., “Threading Kernel functions: on Bridging the Gap between Representations and Algorithms”, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), Vancouver, Canada, Dec. 2004.
Shashua et al., “Time-varying Shape Tensors for Scenes with Multiply Moving Points”, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern, pp. 623-630, Dec. 2001, Hawaii.
Shashua et al., “Trajectory Triangulation over Conic Sections”, International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Greece, 1999, pp. 330-337.
Shashua et al., “Trajectory Triangulation: 3D Reconstruction of Moving Points from a Monocular Image Sequence”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI), vol. 22(4), 2000, pp. 348-357.
Shashua et al., “Trilinear Tensor: The Fundamental Construct of Multiple-view Geometry and its Applications”, International Workshop on Algebraic Frames for the Perception Action Cycle (AFPAC97), Kiel Germany, Sep. 8-9, 1997. Proceedings appeared in Springer-Verlag, LNCS series, 1997, 190-206.
Shashua et al., “Trilinearity in Visual Recognition by Alignment”, European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), May 1994, Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 479-484.
Shashua et al., “Projective Depth: A Geometric Invariant for 3D Reconstruction From Two Perspective/Orthographic Views and for Visual Recognition,” International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), May 1993, Berlin, Germany, pp. 583-590.
Shashua et al., “The Quotient Image: Class Based Recognition and Synthesis Under Varying Illumination Conditions”, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Jun. 1999, pp. 566-573.
Shashua et al., “The Quotient Image: Class Based Re-rendering and Recognition With Varying Illuminations”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI), vol. 23(2), 2001, pp. 129-139.
Shashua et al., “Pedestrian Detection for Driving Assistance, Systems: Single-Frame Classification and System Level, Performance”, IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Jan. 1, 2004.
Shashua, “On the Relationship Between the Support Vector Machine for classification and Sparsified Fishers Linear Discriminant,” Neural Processing Letters, 1999, 9(2): 129-139.
Shimizu et al., “A moving image processing system for personal vehicle system”, Nov. 9, 1992, Abstract.
Shirai, “Robot Vision”, Future Generation Computer Systems, 1985.
Shladover et al., “Automatic Vehicle Control Developments in the PATH Program,” IEEE Transaction on Vehicular Technology, vol. 40, No. 1, Feb. 1991, pp. 114-130.
Shladover, “Research and Development Needs for Advanced Vehicle Control Systems,” Micro, IEEE, vol. 13, No. 1, Feb. 1993, pp. 11-19.
Shladover, “Highway Electrification and Automation,” California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways (PATH), Jan. 1, 1992.
Siala et al., “Moving shadow detection with support vector domain description in the color ratios space”, Proceeding of IEEE International Conference on Pattern Recognition. vol. 4, 2004.
Siegle, “Autonomous Driving on a Road Network,” Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles '92 Symposium Detroit, Michigan, ISBN 0-7803-0747-X; Jun. 29-Jul. 1, 1992.
Smith et al., “An Automotive Instrument Panel Employing Liquid Crystal Displays”, SAE Paper No. 770274, published Feb. 1, 1977.
Smith et al., “Optical sensors for automotive applications”, May 11, 1992.
Smith et al., “Vision sensing for intelligent vehicle and highway systems”, Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems, Las Vegas, NV, Oct. 5, 1994.
Soatto et al., “The Golem Group/University of California at Los Angeles Autonomous Ground Vehicle in the DARPA Grand Challenge”, Journal of Field Robotics 23(8), 2006, pp. 527-553.
Solder et al., “Visual Detection of Distant Objects”, Intelligent Robots and Systems' 93, IROS'93. Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on. vol. 2. IEEE, 1993, Abstract.
Sole et al., “Solid or not solid: vision for radar target validation”, IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2004.
Sony Operating Manual CCD Color Video Camera Model: DXC-151A, 1993.
Sparks et al., “Multi-Sensor Modules with Data Bus Communication Capability” SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-1277, Mar. 1, 1999, doi: 10.4271/1999-01-1277, http://papers.sae.org/1999-01-1277/, Abstract.
Sridhar, “Multirate and event-driven Kalman filters for helicopter flight”, IEEE Control Systems, Aug. 15, 1993.
Standard J2284/3, “High-Speed CAN (HSC) for Vehicle Applications at 500 Kbps,” issued May 30, 2001.
Stauder et al., “Detection of moving cast shadows for object segmentation”, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 1, No. 1, Mar. 1999.
Stein et al., “A Computer Vision System on a Chip: a case study from the automotive domain”, IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2005.
Stein et al., “Challenges and solutions for Bundling Multiple DAS Applications on a Single Hardware Platform”, Procs. VISION 2008.
Stein et al., “Direct Methods for Estimation of Structure and Motion from three views”, A.I. Memo No. 1594, MA Inst. of Tech., Nov. 1996.
Stein et al., “Internal Camera Calibration using Rotation and Geometric Shapes”, Submitted to the Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at MA Inst. of Tech., Masters Thesis, M.I.T., Feb. 1993.
Stein et al., “Model-based brightness constraints: on direct estimation of structure and motion,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 22, Issue 9, Sep. 2000.
Stein et al., “Stereo-assist: Top-down stereo for driver assistance systems”, IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2010.
Stein et al., “Vision-based ACC with a single camera: bounds on range and range rate accuracy”, IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2003.
Stein et al., “A robust method for computing vehicle ego-motion”, Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2000.
Stein, “Accurate Internal Camera Calibration using Rotation, with Analysis of Sources of Error”, Computer Vision, Proceedings Fifth International Conference on. IEEE, 1995.
Stein, “Geometric and photometric constraints: motion and structure from three views”, Mass. Inst. of Tech., Doctoral Dissertation, 1998.
Stein, “Lens Distortion Calibration Using Point Correspondences”, A.I. Memo No. 1595, M.I.T. Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Nov. 1996.
Stein, “Tracking from multiple view points: Self-calibration of space and time”, IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Jun. 1999.
Stein et al., “Monitoring Activities from Multiple Video Streams: Establishing a Common Coordinate Frame,” A.I. Memo No. 1655, M.I.T. Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Apr. 1999.
Steiner et al., “Future applications or microsystem technologies in automotive safety systems” Advanced Microsystems for Automotive Applications '98, 1998, pp. 21-42.
Stengel et al., “Intelligent Guidance for Headway and Lane Control”, Princeton University, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, New Jersey, 1989.
Stickford, “Candid cameras come to Park”, Grosse Pointe News, Mar. 7, 1996.
Stiller et al., “Multisensor obstacle detection and tracking”, Image and Vision Computing 18, Elsevier, 2000, pp. 389-396.
Sukthankar, “RACCOON: A Real-time Autonomous Car Chaser Operating Optimally at Night”, Oct. 1992.
Sun et al., “On-road vehicle detection using optical sensors: a review”, 2004.
Sun et al., “A Real-time Precrash Vehicle Detection System”, 2002.
Szeliski, “Image Mosaicing for Tele-Reality Applications”, DEC Cambridge Research Laboratory, CRL 94/2, May 1994.
Taktak et al., “Vehicle detection at night using image processing and pattern recognition”, Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy, 1994.
Taylor, “CCD and CMOS Imaging Array Technologies: Technology Review,” Xerox Research Centre Europe, Technical Report EPC—1998-106, 1998.
Thomanek et al., “Multiple object recognition and scene interpretation for autonomous road vehicle guidance” Oct. 1994.
Thomas, “Real-time vision guided navigation”, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Jan. 31, 1991, Abstract.
Thongkamwitoon et al., “An adaptive real-time background subtraction and moving shadows detection”, Proceeding of IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo. vol. 2, 2004.
Thorpe et al., “Perception for Outdoor Navigation First Year Report”, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Carnegie Mellong University, Dec. 31, 1990.
Thorpe, “Vision and Navigation for the Carnegie-Mellon Navlab”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 10, No. 3, May 1998.
Thorpe, “1988 Year End Report for Road Following at Carnegie Mellon”, Carnegie Mellon University, May 31, 1989.
Thorpe et al., “Toward autonomous driving: the CMU Navlab. I. Perception”, IEEE Paper, Aug. 1991.
Thorpe et al., “The 1997 Automated Highway Free Agent Demonstration”, 1997 pp. 496-501, 1997.
Tokimaru et al., “CMOS Rear-View TV System with CCD Camera”, National Technical Report vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 329-336, Jun. 1988, Japan.
Toth et al., “Detection of moving shadows using mean shift clustering and a significance test”, Proceeding of IEEE International Conference on Pattern Recognition, vol. 4, 2004.
Toyota Motor Corporation, “Present and future of safety technology development at Toyota.” 2004.
Trainor et al., “Architectural Synthesis of Digital Signal Processing Algorithms Using ‘IRIS’”, Journal of VLSI Signal Processing Systems for Signal, Image and Video Technology, vol. 16, No. 1, 1997.
Tremblay et al., “High resolution smart image sensor with integrated parallel analog processing for multiresolution edge extraction”, Robotics and Autonomous Systems 11, pp. 231-242, with abstract, 1993.
Tribe et al., “Collision Avoidance,” Advances, Issue No. 4, May 1990.
Tribe et al., “Collision Avoidance,” Lucas International Symposium, Paris, France, 1989.
Tribe et al., “Collision Warning,” Autotech '93, Seminar 9, NEC Birmingham, UK, Nov. 1993.
Tribe, “Intelligent Autonomous Systems for Cars, Advanced Robotics and Intelligent Machines,” Peter Peregrinus, Nov. 1994.
Trivdei et al., “Distributed Video Networks for Incident Detection and Management”, Computer Vision and Robotics Research Laboratory, 2000.
Tsugawa et al., “An automobile with artificial intelligence,” in Proc. Sixth IJCAI, 1979.
Tsugawa et al., “Vision-based vehicles in japan; machine vision systems and driving control systems”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 41, No. 4, Aug. 1994.
Tsutsumi et al., “Vehicle Distance Interval Control Technology” Mitsubishi Electric Advance, Technical Reports, vol. 78, pp. 10-12, Mar. 1997.
Turk et al., “VITS-A Vision System for Autonomous Land Vehicle Navigation,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 10, No. 3, May 3, 1988.
Ulmer, “VITA II—active collision avoidance in real traffic” Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles '94 Symposium, Oct. 24-26, 1994, Abstract.
Valeo Infos News, “Valeo's revolutionary Lane Departure Warning System makes debut on Nissan Infiniti vehicles”, 04.08 found at http://www.valeo.com/cwscontent/www.valeo.com/medias/fichiers/journalistes/en/CP/Idws_uk.pdf, Mar. 31, 2004.
Van Leeuwen et al., “Motion Estimation with a Mobile Camera for Traffic Applications”, IEEE, US, vol. 1, pp. 58-63, Oct. 3, 2000.
Van Leeuwen et al., “Motion Interpretation for In-Car Vision Systems”, IEEE, US, vol. 1 p. 135-140, Sep. 30, 2002.
Van Leeuwen et al., “Real-Time Vehicle Tracking in Image Sequences”, IEEE, US, vol. 3, pp. 2049-2054, XP010547308, May 21, 2001.
Van Leeuwen et al., “Requirements for Motion Estimation in Image Sequences for Traffic Applications”, IEEE, pp. 354-359, XP002529773, 2000.
Van Leeuwen et al., “Requirements for Motion Estimation in Image Sequences for Traffic Applications”, IEEE, US, vol. 1, pp. 145-150, XP010340272, May 24, 1999.
Vellacott, “CMOS in Camera,” IEE Review, pp. 111-114, May 1994.
Vlacic et al., “Intelligent Vehicle Technologies, Theory and Applications”, Society of Automotive Engineers Inc., edited by SAE International, 2001.
Vosselman et al., “Road traceing by profile matching and Kalman filtering”, Faculty of Geodetic Engineering, 1995.
Wallace et al., “Progress in Robot Road-Following,” Proceedings of the 1986 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 3, pp. 1615-1621, 1986.
Wan et al., “A New Edge Detector for Obstacle Detection with a Linear Stereo Vision System”, Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles '95 Symposium, Abstract.
Wang et al., “CMOS Video Cameras”, article, 4 pages, University of Edinburgh, UK, 1991.
Wang et al., “A probabilistic method for foreground and shadow segmentation”, Proceeding of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Pattern Recognition, vol. 3, Oct. 2, 2003.
Wang, “Camera Calibration by Vanishing Lines for 3-D Computer Vision”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 13, No. 4, Apr. 15, 1991.
Webpage: http://parts.royaloakschevy.com/showAssembly.aspx?makeName=pontiac&modelYear= 1990&modelName=trans-sport&ukey_assembly=5888560&ukey_category=53643&assembly=921201mu10-009mu10-009.
Weisser et al., “Autonomous driving on vehicle test tracks: Overview, implementation and vehicle diagnosis” Intelligent Transportation Systems, pp. 62-67, Oct. 5-8, 1999, Abstract.
Wierwille et al., “Research on Vehicle-Based Driver Status/Performance Monitoring, Part III” Final Report, Sep. 1996.
Wilson, “Technology: A little camera with big ideas—The latest smart vision system,” Financial Times, Jun. 17, 1993.
Wolberg, “Digital Image Warping”, IEEE Computer Society Press, 1990.
Wolberg, “A Two-Pass Mesh Warping Implementation of Morphing,” Dr. Dobb's Journal, No. 202, Jul. 1993.
Wördenweber, “Driver assistance through lighting.” ESV: 17th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles. Report. No. 476. 2001.
Wright, “Take your hands off that car!”, Edn. vol. 42, No. 26, Dec. 18, 1997, Abstract.
Wüller et al., “The usage of digital cameras as luminance meters”, Proc. SPIE 6502, Digital Photography III, 65020U, Feb. 20, 2007; doi:10.1117/12.703205.
Wyatt et al., “Analog VLSI systems for Image Acquisition and Fast Early Vision Processing”, International Journal of Computer Vision, 8:3, pp. 217-223, 1992.
Xie et al., “Active and Intelligent Sensing of Road Obstacles: Application to the European Eureka-PROMETHEUS Project”, Fourth International Conference on Computer Vision, IEEE, 1993, Abstract.
Xu et al., “3 DOF modular eye for smart car” School of Mechanical & Production Engineering Nanyang Technologies University, Intelligent Transportation Systems, 1999. Proc., Oct. 5-8, 1999, pp. 501-505.
Xu et al., “Cast shadow detection in video segmentation”, Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 26, Nov. 4, 2003.
Yadid-Pecht et al., “Wide Intrascene Dynamic Range CMOS APS Using Dual Sampling,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 44, No. 10, Oct. 1997.
Yamada et al., “Wide Dynamic Range Vision Sensor for Vehicles,” 1994 Vehicle Navigation & Information Systems Conference Proceedings, pp. 405-408, 1994.
Yazigi, “Technology: Promethean Plans for Next Generation of Cars”, The New York Times, Sep. 13, 1992.
Yee, “Portable Camera Mount”, Feb. 1986, Abstract.
Yeh et al., “Image-Based Dynamic Measurement for Vehicle Steering Control”, Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles '94 Symposium, 1994, Abstract.
Yerazunis et al. “An inexpensive, all solid-state video and data recorder for accident reconstruction” Mitsubishi Technical Report TR-99-29 (Presented at the 1999 SAE International Congress and Exposition, Detroit, MI, Mar. 3, 1999.), Apr. 24, 1999.
Yoneyama et al., “Moving cast shadow elimination for robust vehicle extraction based on 2D joint vehicle/shadow models”, Proceeding of IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance, 2003.
Yoneyama et al., “Robust vehicle and traffic information extraction for highway surveillance”, EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing, pp. 2305-2321, 2005.
Young et al., “Cantata: Visual Programming Environment for the Khoros System, ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics-Special focus: modular visualization environments (MVEs)”, vol. 29, issue 2, Mar. 16, 1995.
Young et al., “Improved Obstacle Detection by Sensor Fusion”, IEEE Colloquium on “Prometheus and DRIVE”, Oct. 15, 1992, Abstract.
Yu et al., “Vehicles Recognition by Video Camera” 1995.
Yu, “Road tracking, lane segmentation and obstacle recognition by mathematical morphology,” Intelligent Vehicles '92 Symposium, Proceedings of the IEEE 1992 Conference, p. 166-172.
Yuji et al., “Accidents and Near-Misses Analysis by Using Video Drive-Recorders in a Fleet Test”, Proceedings of the 17th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV) Conference, Jun. 4-7, 2001 Amsterdam, The Netherlands, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC. HS 809 20, Jun. 2001.
Zheng et al., “An Adaptive System for Traffic Sign Recognition,” IEEE Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles '94 Symposium, pp. 165-170, Oct. 1994.
Zidek, “Lane Position Tracking”, Aerospace and Electronics Conference, National Proceedings of the IEEE 1994, Abstract.
Zigman, “Light Filters to Improve Vision”, Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 69, No. 4, pp. 325-328, Apr. 15, 1992.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190061760 A1 Feb 2019 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
60433700 Dec 2002 US
60377524 May 2002 US
Divisions (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 12329029 Dec 2008 US
Child 12559856 US
Parent 11408776 Apr 2006 US
Child 12329029 US
Parent 10427051 Apr 2003 US
Child 11408776 US
Continuations (7)
Number Date Country
Parent 15830114 Dec 2017 US
Child 16177734 US
Parent 15413462 Jan 2017 US
Child 15830114 US
Parent 15155350 May 2016 US
Child 15413462 US
Parent 14922640 Oct 2015 US
Child 15155350 US
Parent 14195137 Mar 2014 US
Child 14922640 US
Parent 13651659 Oct 2012 US
Child 14195137 US
Parent 12559856 Sep 2009 US
Child 13651659 US