1. Background of Related Art
The present disclosure relates to forceps used for open surgical procedures. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to a forceps that applies electrosurgical current to seal tissue.
2. Technical Field
A hemostat or forceps is a simple plier-like tool which uses mechanical action between its jaws to constrict vessels and is commonly used in open surgical procedures to grasp, dissect and/or clamp tissue. Electrosurgical forceps utilize both mechanical clamping action and electrical energy to effect hemostasis by heating the tissue and blood vessels to coagulate, cauterize and/or seal tissue.
Certain surgical procedures require sealing and cutting blood vessels or vascular tissue. Several journal articles have disclosed methods for sealing small blood vessels using electrosurgery. An article entitled Studies on Coagulation and the Development of an Automatic Computerized Bipolar Coagulator, J. Neurosurg., Volume 75, July 1991, describes a bipolar coagulator which is used to seal small blood vessels. The article states that it is not possible to safely coagulate arteries with a diameter larger than 2 to 2.5 mm. A second article is entitled Automatically Controlled Bipolar Electrocoagulation—“COA-COMP”, Neurosurg. Rev. (1984), pp. 187-190, describes a method for terminating electrosurgical power to the vessel so that charring of the vessel walls can be avoided.
By utilizing an electrosurgical forceps, a surgeon can either cauterize, coagulate/desiccate, reduce or slow bleeding and/or seal vessels by controlling the intensity, frequency and duration of the electrosurgical energy applied to the tissue. Generally, the electrical configuration of electrosurgical forceps can be categorized in two classifications: 1) monopolar electrosurgical forceps; and 2) bipolar electrosurgical forceps.
Monopolar forceps utilize one active electrode associated with the clamping end effector and a remote patient return electrode or pad which is typically attached externally to the patient. When the electrosurgical energy is applied, the energy travels from the active electrode, to the surgical site, through the patient and to the return electrode.
Bipolar electrosurgical forceps utilize two generally opposing electrodes which are disposed on the inner opposing surfaces of the end effectors and which are both electrically coupled to an electrosurgical generator. Each electrode is charged to a different electric potential. Since tissue is a conductor of electrical energy, when the effectors are utilized to grasp tissue therebetween, the electrical energy can be selectively transferred through the tissue.
In order to effect a proper seal with larger vessels, two predominant mechanical parameters must be accurately controlled—the pressure applied to the vessel and the gap between the electrodes both of which affect thickness of the sealed vessel. More particularly, accurate application of the pressure is important to oppose the walls of the vessel, to reduce the tissue impedance to a low enough value that allows enough electrosurgical energy through the tissue, to overcome the forces of expansion during tissue heating and to contribute to the end tissue thickness which is an indication of a good seal. It has been determined that a fused vessel wall is optimum between 0.001 and 0.006 inches. Below this range, the seal may shred or tear and above this range the lumens may not be properly or effectively sealed.
With respect to smaller vessel, the pressure applied to the tissue tends to become less relevant whereas the gap distance between the electrically conductive surfaces becomes more significant for effective sealing. In other words, the chances of the two electrically conductive surfaces touching during activation increases as the vessels become smaller.
Electrosurgical methods may be able to seal larger vessels using an appropriate electrosurgical power curve, coupled with an instrument capable of applying a large closure force to the vessel walls. It is thought that the process of coagulating small vessels is fundamentally different than electrosurgical vessel sealing. For the purposes herein, “coagulation” is defined as a process of desiccating tissue wherein the tissue cells are ruptured and dried and vessel sealing is defined as the process of liquefying the collagen in the tissue so that it reforms into a fused mass. Thus, coagulation of small vessels is sufficient to permanently close them. Larger vessels need to be sealed to assure permanent closure.
Numerous bipolar electrosurgical forceps have been proposed in the past for various open surgical procedures. However, some of these designs may not provide uniformly reproducible pressure to the blood vessel and may result in an ineffective or non-uniform seal. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 2,176,479 to Willis, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,005,714 and 4,031,898 to Hiltebrandt, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,827,274, 5,290,287 and 5,312,433 to Boebel et al., U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,370,980, 4,552,143, 5,026,370 and 5,116,332 to Lottick, U.S. Pat. No. 5,443,463 to Stern et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,484,436 to Eggers et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 5,951,549 to Richardson et al., all relate to electrosurgical instruments for coagulating, cutting and/or sealing vessels or tissue.
Many of these instruments include blade members or shearing members which simply cut tissue in a mechanical and/or electromechanical manner and are relatively ineffective for vessel sealing purposes. Other instruments rely on clamping pressure alone to procure proper sealing thickness and are not designed to take into account gap tolerances and/or parallelism and flatness requirements which are parameters which, if properly controlled, can assure a consistent and effective tissue seal. For example, it is known that it is difficult to adequately control thickness of the resulting sealed tissue by controlling clamping pressure alone for either of two reasons: 1) if too much force is applied, there is a possibility that the two poles will touch and energy will not be transferred through the tissue resulting in an ineffective seal; or 2) if too low a force is applied, a thicker less reliable seal is created.
According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, a bipolar electrosurgical instrument includes first and second shafts each having a jaw member extending from its distal end and a handle disposed at its proximal end for effecting movement of the jaw members relative to one another about a pivot from a first position wherein the jaw members are disposed in spaced relation relative to one another to a second position wherein the jaw members cooperate to grasp tissue. Each jaw member is adapted to connect to a source of electrosurgical energy such that the jaw members are capable of selectively conducting energy through tissue held therebetween to effect a tissue seal. At least one of the jaw members includes a knife channel defined along its length. The knife channel is configured to reciprocate a cutting mechanism therealong to cut tissue grasped between the jaw members. The instrument also includes an actuator for selectively advancing the cutting mechanism from a first position wherein the cutting mechanism is disposed proximal to tissue grasped between the jaw members to at least one subsequent position wherein the cutting mechanism is disposed distal to tissue grasped between the jaw members. The instrument also includes a switch disposed on the first shaft. The switch is configured to be depressed between a first position and at least one subsequent position upon biasing engagement with a mechanical interface disposed on the second shaft upon movement of the jaw members from the first position to the second position. The first position of the switch relays information to the user corresponding to a desired pressure on tissue grasped between the jaw members and the at least one subsequent position is configured to activate the source of electrosurgical energy to supply electrosurgical energy to the jaw members.
According to another embodiment of the present disclosure, a bipolar electrosurgical instrument includes first and second shafts each having a jaw member extending from its distal end and a handle disposed at its proximal end for effecting movement of the jaw members relative to one another about a pivot from a first position wherein the jaw members are disposed in spaced relation relative to one another to a second position wherein the jaw members cooperate to grasp tissue. Each jaw member is adapted to connect to a source of electrosurgical energy such that the jaw members are capable of selectively conducting energy through tissue held therebetween to effect a tissue seal. A knife channel is defined along a length of one or both of the jaw members. The knife channel is configured to reciprocate a cutting mechanism therealong to cut tissue grasped between the jaw members. The instrument also includes an actuator for selectively advancing the cutting mechanism from a first position wherein the cutting mechanism is disposed proximal to tissue grasped between the jaw members to at least one subsequent position wherein the cutting mechanism is disposed distal to tissue grasped between the jaw members. The instrument also includes a switch disposed on the first shaft. The switch is configured to be depressed between at least two positions upon biasing engagement with the second shaft upon movement of the jaw members from the first position to the second position. The switch generates a first tactile response upon movement to the first position of the switch and a subsequent tactile response upon movement to the at least one subsequent position of the switch. The first tactile response relays information to the user corresponding to a predetermined pressure on tissue grasped between the jaw members and the subsequent tactile response is configured to activate the source of electrosurgical energy to supply electrosurgical energy to the jaw members.
According to another embodiment of the present disclosure, a method of performing an electrosurgical procedure includes the step of approximating first and second shafts of a bipolar forceps to grasp tissue between first and second jaw members associated with the first and second shafts. The method also includes the steps of depressing a switch upon approximation of the first and second shafts to a first position to relay information to the user corresponding to a predetermined grasping pressure applied to tissue grasped between the jaw members and depressing the switch to at least one subsequent position to activate a source of electrosurgical energy to supply electrosurgical energy to the jaw members.
Various embodiments of the subject instrument are described herein with reference to the drawings wherein:
Referring initially to
The forceps 10 includes an end effector assembly 100 that attaches to the distal ends 16a and 16b of shafts 12a and 12b, respectively. The end effector assembly 100 includes pair of opposing jaw members 110 and 120 that are pivotably connected and movable relative to one another about a pivot 65 (
Each shaft 12a and 12b includes a handle 15 and 17, respectively, disposed at the proximal end 14a and 14b thereof. Each handle 15 and 17 defines a finger hole 15a and 17a, respectively, therethrough for receiving a finger of the user. Handles 15 and 17 facilitate movement of the shafts 12a and 12b relative to one another which, in turn, pivot the jaw members 110 and 120 from an open position wherein the jaw members 110 and 120 are disposed in spaced relation relative to one another to a clamping or closed position wherein the jaw members 110 and 120 cooperate to grasp tissue therebetween.
As best seen in
The arrangement of shaft 12b is slightly different from shaft 12a. More particularly, shaft 12a is generally hollow to house the knife 85 and an actuating mechanism 40. The actuating mechanism 40 is operatively associated with a trigger 45 having handle members 45a and 45b disposed on opposing sides of shaft 12a to facilitate left-handed and right-handed operation of trigger 45. Trigger 45 is operatively associated with a series of suitable inter-cooperating elements (e.g.,
As shown in
The tissue grasping portions of the jaw members 110 and 120 are generally symmetrical and include similar component features that cooperate to permit facile rotation about pivot 65 to effect the grasping and sealing of tissue. As a result, and unless otherwise noted, jaw member 110 and the operative features associated therewith are initially described herein in detail and the similar component features with respect to jaw member 120 will be briefly summarized thereafter.
With reference to
As best shown by the cross-sectional view of
Likewise, jaw member 120 includes similar elements that correspond to jaw member 110 including: an outer housing 116b, first and second plastic insulators 108b and 114b, and an electrically conductive sealing surface 112b that is pronounced from the jaw housing 116b and second insulator 114b. As described above with respect to jaw member 110, the first insulator 108b electrically insulates the jaw housing 116b from the sealing surface 112b and the second insulator 114b secures the sealing surface 112b to the jaw housing 116b. Insulators 114a and 114b extend along the entire length of jaw members 110 and 120, respectively, to reduce alternate or stray current paths during sealing. In some embodiments, each of sealing surfaces 112a and 112b may include an outer peripheral edge that has a radius such that each insulator 114a and 114b meets the respective sealing surface 112a and 112b along an adjoining edge that is generally tangential to the radius and/or meets along the radius.
As shown in
As shown in
In some embodiments, the sealing surfaces 112a and 112b are relatively flat to avoid current concentrations at sharp edges and to avoid arcing between high points. In addition, and due to the reaction force of the tissue when engaged, each of jaw members 110 and 120 may be manufactured to resist bending, e.g., tapered along its length to provide a constant pressure for a constant tissue thickness at parallel and the thicker proximal portion of the jaw members 110 and 120 will resist bending due to the reaction force of the tissue.
As shown in
As best shown in
With reference to
With reference to
With reference to
In one embodiment, the first tactile response indicates to the user that the maximum grasping pressure has been reached before end effector 100 is energized where the user is free to approximate, manipulate, and grasp tissue as needed. In this scenario, the second tactile response indicates to the user the electrosurgical activation of the end effector 100. The switch 50 may include a plurality of other tactile responses between the above discussed first and second tactile responses and/or subsequent to the second tactile response that correspond to particular functions of the forceps 10 such as, for example, operation of the knife 85 and/or the actuation assembly 40, operation of a safety lockout mechanism associated with the actuation assembly 40, as discussed in detail below.
As shown in
Hall effect sensors may be incorporated to determine the gap between jaw members 110 and 120 based on a detected relationship between the magnetic field strength between jaw members 110 and 120 and the distance between jaw members 110 and 120.
In some embodiments, one or more reed switches 81a, 81b may be incorporated within shafts 12a and 12b to determine the proximity thereof relative to one another, as shown in
Any of the above discussed sensors, switches, and/or strain gauge(s) may be incorporated within an electrical circuit such that the strain detected by the strain gauge changes the electrical signal through the circuit. With this purpose in mind, an electrical circuit between the strain gauge and the switch 50 and/or an electrosurgical generator (not shown) allows communication of information such as desired tissue pressure thereto. This information may be tied to the activation of switch 50 such that the switch is not activated until a desired and/or predetermined pressure on tissue grasped between jaw members 110 and 120 is achieved as detected by the strain gauge. Accordingly, the strain gauge may be disposed strategically on the forceps 10, e.g., on one or more of jaw members 110, 120, such that pressure applied to tissue grasped between jaw members 110 and 120 affects the strain gauge.
In use, forceps 10 may be calibrated such that particular tactile responses (e.g., the first tactile response) of switch 50 corresponds to a predetermined grasping pressure on tissue as determined through use of one or more of the above discussed sensors, switches, and/or strain gauge(s). The predetermined grasping pressure about tissue is within the range of about 3 kg/cm2 to about 16 kg/cm2 in one embodiment and, in another embodiment, about 7 kg/cm2 to about 13 kg/cm2. In some embodiments, switch 50 may generate multiple tactile responses, each of which corresponds to different predetermined grasping force. For a more detailed discussion of force sensing and/or measuring devices such as load cells, strain gauges, etc., reference is made to commonly-owned U.S. application Ser. No. 11/409,154, filed on Apr. 21, 2006.
As shown in
In some embodiments, actuation of the knife 85 is associated with activation of the switch 50. For example, sensor 87 may be embodied as a position sensor configured to detect the position of knife 85 relative to jaw members 110 and 120 and/or relative to tissue held therebetween. Additionally or alternatively, sensor 87 may be configured to detect either of the first and second tactile responses of switch 50 and allow or prevent actuation of the knife 85 accordingly. For example, based on feedback from the sensor 87, any one or more inter-cooperating elements or lockout mechanisms associated with the actuating mechanism 40 may be energized or de-energized to allow or prevent actuation of the knife 85, as described in more detail below.
As shown in
In some embodiments, the forceps 10 may include a safety lockout mechanism having a series of suitable inter-cooperating elements (e.g., anti-deployment link 47, trigger link 47) that work together to prevent unintentional firing of the knife 85 when the jaw members 110 and 120 are disposed in the open position. Generally, the anti-deployment link 47 mechanically cooperates with the trigger link 43 to prevent advancement of the knife 85 until the jaw members 110 and 120 are closed about tissue. One such safety lockout mechanism for use with forceps 10 is described in commonly-owned U.S. application Ser. No. 12/896,100 entitled “Blade Deployment Mechanisms for Surgical Forceps”, filed on Oct. 1, 2010.
In some embodiments, any one or more of the inter-cooperating elements of the safety lockout mechanism (e.g., anti-deployment link 47) may be electrically interconnected to the switch 50 and include suitable electro-mechanical components (e.g., springs, rods, solenoids, etc.) configured to be energized via activation of the switch 50 (e.g., via any one of leads 71a, 71b, 71c, 71d, 71e) to mechanically manipulate the safety lockout mechanism. For example, upon electrical conduction through leads 71d and 71e to energize the end effector 100, the anti-deployment link 47 is energized to cause actuation thereof such that the safety lockout mechanism disengages to allow selective actuation of the knife 85. In this scenario, by way of example, selective actuation of the knife 85 may be prevented until switch 50 has been depressed to generate at least the first tactile response.
While several embodiments of the disclosure have been shown in the drawings, it is not intended that the disclosure be limited thereto, as it is intended that the disclosure be as broad in scope as the art will allow and that the specification be read likewise. Therefore, the above description should not be construed as limiting, but merely as exemplifications of particular embodiments. Those skilled in the art will envision other modifications within the scope and spirit of the claims appended hereto.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/897,346 filed Oct. 4, 2010, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3100489 | Bagley | Aug 1963 | A |
D249549 | Pike | Sep 1978 | S |
D263020 | Rau, III | Feb 1982 | S |
D295893 | Sharkany et al. | May 1988 | S |
D295894 | Sharkany et al. | May 1988 | S |
D298353 | Manno | Nov 1988 | S |
D299413 | DeCarolis | Jan 1989 | S |
5122139 | Sutter | Jun 1992 | A |
5215101 | Jacobs et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
D343453 | Noda | Jan 1994 | S |
5324289 | Eggers | Jun 1994 | A |
D348930 | Olson | Jul 1994 | S |
D349341 | Lichtman et al. | Aug 1994 | S |
D354564 | Medema | Jan 1995 | S |
D358887 | Feinberg | May 1995 | S |
5443480 | Jacobs et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5472443 | Cordis et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5542945 | Fritzsch | Aug 1996 | A |
D384413 | Zlock et al. | Sep 1997 | S |
5797938 | Paraschac et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5833690 | Yates et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
D402028 | Grimm et al. | Dec 1998 | S |
5849022 | Sakashita et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5891140 | Ginn et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5891142 | Eggers et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5891976 | Costa et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5911719 | Eggers | Jun 1999 | A |
5925043 | Kumar et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5957923 | Hahnen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
D416089 | Barton et al. | Nov 1999 | S |
6010516 | Hulka | Jan 2000 | A |
6029782 | Chojecki et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
D424694 | Tetzlaff et al. | May 2000 | S |
D425201 | Tetzlaff et al. | May 2000 | S |
6056735 | Okada et al. | May 2000 | A |
6123701 | Nezhat | Sep 2000 | A |
6206877 | Kese et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6235027 | Herzon | May 2001 | B1 |
6270497 | Sekino et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
D449886 | Tetzlaff et al. | Oct 2001 | S |
D454951 | Bon | Mar 2002 | S |
D457958 | Dycus et al. | May 2002 | S |
D457959 | Tetzlaff et al. | May 2002 | S |
6443952 | Mulier et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
D465281 | Lang | Nov 2002 | S |
D466209 | Bon | Nov 2002 | S |
6533778 | Herzon | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6682527 | Strul | Jan 2004 | B2 |
D493888 | Reschke | Aug 2004 | S |
6776780 | Mulier et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
D496997 | Dycus et al. | Oct 2004 | S |
6802843 | Truckai et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
D499181 | Dycus et al. | Nov 2004 | S |
D502994 | Blake, III | Mar 2005 | S |
D509297 | Wells | Sep 2005 | S |
6964662 | Kidooka | Nov 2005 | B2 |
D525361 | Hushka | Jul 2006 | S |
7083613 | Treat | Aug 2006 | B2 |
D531311 | Guerra et al. | Oct 2006 | S |
7131970 | Moses et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
D533274 | Visconti et al. | Dec 2006 | S |
D533942 | Kerr et al. | Dec 2006 | S |
D535027 | James et al. | Jan 2007 | S |
D538932 | Malik | Mar 2007 | S |
D541418 | Schechter et al. | Apr 2007 | S |
D541611 | Aglassinger | May 2007 | S |
D541938 | Kerr et al | May 2007 | S |
7211079 | Treat | May 2007 | B2 |
D545432 | Watanabe | Jun 2007 | S |
D547154 | Lee | Jul 2007 | S |
7252667 | Moses et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7267677 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7329256 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
D564662 | Moses et al. | Mar 2008 | S |
D567943 | Moses et al. | Apr 2008 | S |
D575395 | Hushka | Aug 2008 | S |
D575401 | Hixson et al. | Aug 2008 | S |
D582038 | Swoyer et al. | Dec 2008 | S |
7470272 | Mulier et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7500975 | Cunningham et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7513898 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
D617900 | Kingsley et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
D617901 | Unger et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
D617902 | Twomey et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
D617903 | Unger et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
D618798 | Olson et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
7744615 | Couture | Jun 2010 | B2 |
D621503 | Otten et al. | Aug 2010 | S |
7811283 | Moses et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
D627462 | Kingsley | Nov 2010 | S |
D628289 | Romero | Nov 2010 | S |
D628290 | Romero | Nov 2010 | S |
D630324 | Reschke | Jan 2011 | S |
7887536 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7896878 | Johnson | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7909823 | Moses et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7922718 | Moses et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8292886 | Kerr et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8298232 | Unger | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8298233 | Mueller | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8343151 | Siebrecht et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8388647 | Nau, Jr. et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8409246 | Kerr et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8409247 | Garrison et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8425511 | Olson | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8430877 | Kerr et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8439913 | Horner et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8469991 | Kerr | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8469992 | Roy et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8480671 | Mueller | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8491624 | Kerr et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8491625 | Horner | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8491626 | Roy et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8497436 | Palmer et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8512336 | Couture | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8512371 | Kerr et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8540749 | Garrison et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8556929 | Harper et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8568397 | Horner et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8585736 | Horner et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8597295 | Kerr | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8623018 | Horner et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8641712 | Couture | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8647343 | Chojin et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8652135 | Nau, Jr. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8663222 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8672939 | Garrison | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8685021 | Chernov et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8734445 | Johnson et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8740898 | Chojin et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8784418 | Romero | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8795269 | Garrison | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8808288 | Reschke | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8814864 | Gilbert | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8840639 | Gerhardt, Jr. et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8858553 | Chojin | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8888775 | Nau, Jr. et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8906018 | Rooks et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8920421 | Rupp | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8932293 | Chernov et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8936614 | Allen, IV | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8961504 | Hoarau et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8968357 | Mueller | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8968359 | Kerr et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9005200 | Roy et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9017372 | Artale | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9028484 | Craig | May 2015 | B2 |
9028495 | Mueller et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9060798 | Harper et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
20040092927 | Podhajsky et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20050107784 | Moses | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119655 | Moses et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154387 | Moses et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060074417 | Cunningham et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060167452 | Moses et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070088356 | Moses et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070106297 | Dumbauld et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080021450 | Couture | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080114356 | Johnson et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080215048 | Hafner | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080319442 | Unger et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090012520 | Hixson et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090138003 | Deville et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090149854 | Cunningham et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171353 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090240246 | Deville et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090306660 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100023009 | Moses et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100130977 | Garrison et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100204697 | Dumbauld et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110009859 | Livneh | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110034918 | Reschke | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110054472 | Romero | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110077648 | Lee et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110193608 | Krapohl | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110270245 | Horner et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110270251 | Horner et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110276049 | Gerhardt | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110295313 | Kerr | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120059372 | Johnson | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120059375 | Couture et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120059409 | Reschke et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120083786 | Artale | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120123404 | Craig | May 2012 | A1 |
20120130367 | Garrison | May 2012 | A1 |
20120172868 | Twomey et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120172873 | Artale et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
86105764 | Jan 1987 | CN |
101507635 | Aug 2009 | CN |
2415263 | Oct 1975 | DE |
02514501 | Oct 1976 | DE |
2627679 | Jan 1977 | DE |
03423356 | Jun 1986 | DE |
03612646 | Apr 1987 | DE |
8712328 | Feb 1988 | DE |
04303882 | Feb 1995 | DE |
04403252 | Aug 1995 | DE |
19515914 | Jul 1996 | DE |
19506363 | Aug 1996 | DE |
29616210 | Nov 1996 | DE |
19608716 | Apr 1997 | DE |
19751106 | May 1998 | DE |
19751108 | May 1999 | DE |
10045375 | Oct 2002 | DE |
20 2007 009317 | Aug 2007 | DE |
202007009165 | Aug 2007 | DE |
19738457 | Jan 2009 | DE |
102004026179 | Jan 2009 | DE |
1159926 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1532932 | May 2005 | EP |
1595509 | Nov 2005 | EP |
1609430 | Dec 2005 | EP |
1645240 | Apr 2006 | EP |
2436327 | Apr 2012 | EP |
61-501068 | Sep 1984 | JP |
10-24051 | Jan 1989 | JP |
65-502328 | Mar 1992 | JP |
5-5106 | Jan 1993 | JP |
05-40112 | Feb 1993 | JP |
06343644 | Dec 1994 | JP |
07265328 | Oct 1995 | JP |
8-56955 | May 1996 | JP |
08252263 | Oct 1996 | JP |
09010223 | Jan 1997 | JP |
11-070124 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11-169381 | Jun 1999 | JP |
11244298 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2000-102545 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000342599 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2000350732 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2001008944 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001029356 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001128990 | May 2001 | JP |
401367 | Oct 1973 | SU |
0036986 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0115614 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0154604 | Aug 2001 | WO |
2005110264 | Apr 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Int'l Search Report EP 07 021647.8 dated May 2, 2008. |
Int'l Search Report EP 08 002692.5 dated Dec. 12, 2008. |
Int'l Search Report EP 08 004655.0 dated Jun. 24, 2008. |
Int'l Search Report EP 08 006732.5 dated Jul. 29, 2008. |
Int'l Search Report EP 08 006917.2 dated Jul. 3, 2008. |
Int'l Search Report EP 08 016539.2 dated Jan. 8, 2009. |
Int'l Search Report EP 08 020807.7 dated Apr. 24, 2009. |
Int'l Search Report EP 09 003677.3 dated May 4, 2009. |
Int'l Search Report EP 09 003813.4 dated Aug. 3, 2009. |
Int'l Search Report EP 09 004491.8 dated Sep. 9, 2009. |
Int'l Search Report EP 09 005051.9 dated Jul. 6, 2009. |
Int'l Search Report EP 09 005575.7 dated Sep. 9, 2009. |
Int'l Search Report EP 09 010521.4 dated Dec. 16, 2009. |
Int'l Search Report EP 09 011745.8 dated Jan. 5, 2010. |
Int'l Search Report EP 09 012629.3 dated Dec. 8, 2009. |
Int'l Search Report EP 09 012687.1 dated Dec. 23, 2009. |
Int'l Search Report EP 09 012688.9 dated Dec. 28, 2009. |
Int'l Search Report EP 09 152267.2 dated Jun. 15, 2009. |
Int'l Search Report EP 09 152898.4 dated Jun. 10, 2009. |
Int'l Search Report EP 09 154850.3 dated Jul. 20, 2009. |
Int'l Search Report EP 09 160476.9 dated Aug. 4, 2009. |
Int'l Search Report EP 09 164903.8 dated Aug. 21, 2009. |
Int'l Search Report EP 09 165753.6 dated Nov. 11, 2009. |
Int'l Search Report EP 09 168153.6 dated Jan. 14, 2010. |
Int'l Search Report EP 09 168810.1 dated Feb. 2, 2010. |
Int'l Search Report EP 09 172749.5 dated Dec. 4, 2009. |
Int'l Search Report EP 10 000259.1 dated Jun. 30, 2010. |
Int'l Search Report EP 10 157500.9 dated Jul. 30, 2010. |
Int'l Search Report EP 10 159205.3 dated Jul. 7, 2010. |
Int'l Search Report EP 10 160870,1 dated Aug. 9, 2010. |
Int'l Search Report EP 10 161596.1 dated Jul. 28, 2010. |
Int'l Search Report EP 10 168705.1 dated Oct. 4, 2010. |
Int'l Search Report EP 10 169647.4 dated Oct. 29, 2010. |
Int'l Search Report EP 10 172005.0 dated Sep. 30, 2010. |
Int'l Search Report EP 10 175956.1 dated Nov. 12, 2010. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US98/18640 dated Jan. 29, 1999. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US98/23950 dated Jan. 14, 1999. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US98/24281 dated Feb. 22, 1999. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US99/24869 dated Feb. 3, 2000. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US01/11218 dated Aug. 14, 2001. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US01/11224 dated Nov. 13, 2001. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US01/11340 dated Aug. 16, 2001. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US01/11420 dated Oct. 16, 2001. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US02/01890 dated Jul. 25, 2002. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US02/11100 dated Jul. 16, 2002. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US03/08146 dated Aug. 8, 2003. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US03/18674 dated Sep. 18, 2003. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US03/18676 dated Sep. 19, 2003. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US03/28534 dated Dec. 19, 2003. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US04/03436 dated Mar. 3, 2005. |
Australian Examination Report dated Mar. 2, 2016 in corresponding AU Application No. 2014227486. |
Int'l Search Report EP 04027314.6 dated Mar. 10, 2005. |
Int'l Search Report EP 04027479.7 dated Mar. 8, 2005. |
Int'l Search Report EP 04027705.5 dated Feb. 3, 2005. |
Int'l Search Report EP 04709033.7 dated Dec. 8, 2010. |
Int'l Search Report EP 04752343.6 dated Jul. 20, 2007. |
Int'l Search Report EP 05002671.5 dated Dec. 22, 2008. |
Int'l Search Report EP 05002674.9 dated Jan. 16, 2009. |
Int'l Search Report EP 05013463.4 dated Oct. 7, 2005. |
Int'l Search Report EP 05013894 dated Feb. 3, 2006. |
Int'l Search Report EP 05013895.7 dated Oct. 21, 2005. |
Int'l Search Report EP 05016399.7 dated Jan. 13, 2006. |
Int'l Search Report EP 05017281.6 dated Nov. 24, 2005. |
Int'l Search Report EP 05019130.3 dated Oct. 27, 2005. |
Int'l Search Report EP 05019429.9 dated May 6, 2008. |
Int'l Search Report EP 05020532 dated Jan. 10, 2006. |
Int'l Search Report EP 05020665.5 dated Feb. 27, 2006. |
Int'l Search Report EP 05020666.3 dated Feb. 27, 2006. |
Int'l Search Report EP 05021197.8 dated Feb. 20, 2006. |
Int'l Search Report EP 05021779.3 dated Feb. 2, 2006. |
Int'l Search Report EP 05021780.1 dated Feb. 23, 2006. |
Int'l Search Report EP 05021937.7 dated Jan. 23, 2006. |
Int'l Search Report—extended—EP 05021937.7 dated Mar. 15, 2006. |
Int'l Search Report EP 05023017.6 dated Feb. 24, 2006. |
Int'l Search Report EP 06002279.5 dated Mar. 30, 2006. |
Int'l Search Report EP 06005185.1 dated May 10, 2006. |
Int'l Search Report EP 06006716.2 dated Aug. 4, 2006. |
Int'l Search Report EP 06008515.6 dated Jan. 8, 2009. |
Int'l Search Report EP 06008779.8 dated Jul. 13, 2006. |
Int'l Search Report EP 06014461.5 dated Oct. 31, 2006. |
Int'l Search Report EP 06020574.7 dated Oct. 2, 2007. |
Int'l Search Report EP 06020583.8 dated Feb. 7, 2007. |
Int'l Search Report EP 06020584.6 dated Feb. 1, 2007. |
Int'l Search Report EP 06020756.0 dated Feb. 16, 2007. |
Int'l Search Report EP 06 024122.1 dated Apr. 16, 2007. |
Int'l Search Report EP 06024123.9 dated Mar. 6, 2007. |
Int'l Search Report EP 07 001480.8 dated Apr. 19, 2007. |
Int'l Search Report EP 07 001488.1 dated Jun. 5, 2007. |
Int'l Search Report EP 07 004429.2 dated Nov. 2, 2010. |
Int'l Search Report EP 07 009026.1 dated Oct. 8, 2007. |
Int'l Search Report Extended—EP 07 009029.5 dated Jul. 20, 2007. |
Int'l Search Report EP 07 009321.6 dated Aug. 28, 2007. |
Int'l Search Report EP 07 010672.9 dated Oct. 16, 2007. |
Int'l Search Report EP 07 013779.9 dated Oct. 26, 2007. |
Int'l Search Report EP 07 014016 dated Jan. 28, 2008. |
Int'l Search Report EP 07 015191.5 dated Jan. 23, 2008. |
Int'l Search Report EP 07 015601.3 dated Jan. 4, 2008. |
Int'l Search Report EP 07 016911 dated May 28, 2010. |
Int'l Search Report EP 07 020283.3 dated Feb. 5, 2008. |
Int'l Search Report EP 07 021646.0 dated Mar. 20, 2008. |
Int'l Search Report EP 07 021646.0 dated Jul. 9, 2008. |
Michael Choti, “Abdominoperineal Resection with the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System and LigaSure ; Atlas 20 cm Open Instrument” ; Innovations That Work, Jun. 2003. |
Chung et al., “Clinical Experience of Sutureless Closed Hemorrhoidectomy with LigaSure”; Diseases of the Colon & Rectum vol. 46, No. 1 Jan. 2003. |
Tinkcler L.F., “Combined Diathermy and Suction Forceps”, Feb. 6, 1967 (Feb. 6, 1965), British Medical Journal Feb. 6, 1976, vol. 1, nr. 5431 p. 361, ISSN: 0007-1447. |
Carbonell et al., “Comparison of theGyrus PlasmaKinetic Sealer and the Valleylab LigaSure Device in the Hemostasis of Small, Medium, and Large-Sized Arteries” Carolinas Laparoscopic and Advanced Surgery Program, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC; Date: Aug. 2003. |
Peterson et al. “Comparison of Healing Process Following Ligation with Sutures and Bipolar Vessel Sealing” Surgical Technology International (2001). |
“Electrosurgery: A Historical Overview” Innovations in Electrosurgery; Sales/Product Literature; Dec. 31, 2000. |
Johnson et al. “Evaluation of a Bipolar Electrothermal Vessel Sealing Device in Hemorrhoidectomy”; Sales/Product Literature; Jan. 2004. |
E. David Crawford “Evaluation of a New Vessel Sealing Device in Urologic Cancer Surgery”; Sales/Product Literature 2000. |
Johnson et al. “Evaluation of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Hemorrhoidectormy”; American College of Surgeons (ACS) Clinicla Congress Poster (2000). |
Muller et al., “Extended Left Hemicolectomy Using the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System”; Innovations That Work, Sep. 1999. |
Kennedy et al. “High-burst-strength, feedback-controlled bipolar vessel sealing”; Surgical Endoscopy (1998) 12:876-878. |
Burdette et al. “In Vivo Probe Measurement Technique for Determining Dielectric Properties at VHF Through Microwave Frequencies”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. MTT-28, No. 4, Apr. 1980 pp. 414-427. |
Carus et al., “Initial Experience With the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Abdominal Surgery”; Innovations That Work, Jun. 2002. |
Heniford et al. “Initial Research and Clinical Results with an Electrothermal Bipolar Vessel Sealer”; Oct. 1999. |
Heniford et al. “Initial Results with an Electrothermal Bipolar Vessel Sealer”; Surgical Endoscopy (2000) 15:799-801. |
Herman et al., “Laparoscopic Intestinal Resection With the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System: A Case Report”; Innovations That Work, Feb. 2002. |
Koyle et al., “Laparoscopic Palomo Varicocele Ligation in Children and Adolescents”; Pediatric Endosurgery & Innovative Techniques, vol. 6, No. 1, 2002. |
W. Scott Helton, “LigaSure Vessel Sealing System: Revolutionary Hemostasis Product for General Surgery”; Sales/Product Literature 1999. |
LigaSure Vessel Sealing System, the Seal of Confidence in General, Gynecologic, Urologic, and Laparaoscopic Surgery; Sales/Product Literature; Apr. 2002. |
Joseph Ortenberg “LigaSure System Used in Laparoscopic 1st and 2nd Stage Orchiopexy”; Innovations That Work, Nov. 2002. |
Sigel et al. “The Mechanism of Blood Vessel Closure by High Frequency Electrocoagulation”; Surgery Gynecology & Obstetrics, Oct. 1965 pp. 823-831. |
Sampayan et al, “Multilayer Ultra-High Gradient Insulator Technology”; Discharges and Electrical Insulation in Vacuum, 1998. Netherlands Aug. 17-21, 1998; vol. 2, pp. 740-743. |
Paul G. Horgan, “A Novel Technique for Parenchymal Division During Hepatectomy”; The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 181, No. 3, Apr. 2001 pp. 236-237. |
Benaron et al., “Optical Time-Of-Flight and Absorbance Imaging of Biologic Media”, Science, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC, vol. 259, Mar. 5, 1993, pp. 1463-1466. |
Olsson et al. “Radical Cystectomy in Females”; Current Surgical Techniques in Urology, vol. 14, Issue 3, 2001. |
Palazzo et al. “Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure versus open haemorrhoidectomy”; British Journal of Surgery 2002, 89, 154-157. |
Levy et al. “Randomized Trial of Suture Versus Electrosurgical Bipolar Vessel Sealing in Vaginal Hysterectomy” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 102, No. 1, Jul. 2003. |
“Reducing Needlestick Injuries in the Operating Room”; Sales/Product Literature 2001. |
Bergdahl et al. “Studies on Coagulation and the Development of an Automatic Computerized Bipolar Coagulator” J. Neurosurg, vol. 75, Jul. 1991, pp. 148-151. |
Strasberg et al. “A Phase I Study of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Hepatic Surgery”; Section of HPB Surger, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis MO, Presented at AHPBA, Feb. 2001. |
Sayfan et al. “Sutureless Closed Hemorrhoidectomy: A New Technique”; Annals of Surgery vol. 234 No. 1 Jul. 2001; pp. 21-24. |
Levy et al., “Update on Hysterectomy—New Technologies and Techniques”; OBG Management, Feb. 2003. |
Dulemba et al. “Use of a Bipolar Electrothermal Vessel Sealer in Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy” Sales/Product Literature; Jan. 2004. |
Strasberg et al., “Use of a Bipolar Vessel-Sealing Device for Parenchymal Transection During Liver Surgery” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 6, No. 4, Jul./Aug. 2002 pp. 569-574. |
Sengupta et al., “Use of a Computer-Controlled Bipolar Diathermy System in Radical Prostatectomies and Other Open Urological Surgery” ANZ Journal of Surgery (2001) 71.9 pp. 538-540. |
Rothenberg et al. “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Minimally Invasive Surgery in Children” Int'l Pediatric Endosurgery Group (IPEG) 2000. |
Crawford et al. “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Urologic Cancer Surgery”; Grand Rounds in Urology 1999 vol. 1 Issue 4 pp. 10-17. |
Craig Johnson, “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Bloodless Hemorrhoidectomy”; Innovations That Work, Mar. 2000. |
Levy et al. “Use of a New Energy-based Vessel Ligation Device During Vaginal Hysterectomy”; Int'l Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) World Congress 1999. |
Barbara Levy, “Use of a New Vessel Ligation Device During Vaginal Hysterectomy”; FIGO 2000, Washington, D.C. |
E. David Crawford “Use of a Novel Vessel Sealing Technology in Management of the Dorsal Veinous Complex” Sales/Product Literature 2000. |
Jarrett et al., “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System for Peri-Hilar Vessels in Laparoscopic Nephrectomy” Sales/Product Literature 2000. |
Crouch et al. “A Velocity-Dependent Model for Needle Insertion in Soft Tissue”; MICCAI 2005; LNCS 3750 pp. 624-632, Dated: 2005. |
McLellan et al. “Vessel Sealing for Hemostasis During Pelvic Surgery”; Int'l Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics FIGO World Congress 2000, Washington, D.C. |
McLellan et al. “Vessel Sealing for Hemostasis During Gynecologic Surgery”; Sales/Product Literature 1999. |
Int'l Search Report EP 98944778.4 dated Oct. 31, 2000. |
Int'l Search Report EP 98957771 dated Aug. 9, 2001. |
Int'l Search Report EP 98957773 dated Aug. 1, 2001. |
Int'l Search Report EP 98958575.7 dated Sep. 20, 2002. |
Int'l Search Report EP 04013772.1 dated Apr. 1, 2005. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US04/13273 dated Dec. 15, 2004. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US04/15311 dated Jan. 12, 2005. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US07/021438 dated Apr. 1, 2008. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US07/021440 dated Apr. 8, 2008. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US08/52460 dated Apr. 24, 2008. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US08/61498 dated Sep. 22, 2008. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US09/032690 dated Jun. 16, 2009. |
European Search Report from Appl. No. EP 11183476.8 dated Jan. 11, 2012. |
International Search Report PCT/US2013/028286 dated Jun. 21, 2013. |
Chinese Office Action dated Jul. 25, 2014 issued in Chinese Appln. No. 2011103096356. |
Official Action from Japanese Application No. 2011-219394 dated Jan. 30, 2015. |
Chinese Office Action, and English translation, issued May 20, 2015 in Application No. CN 201110309635.6. |
Extended European Search Report from Appl. No. 13757413.3 dated Sep. 14, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/387,883, filed Sep. 1, 1999 by Dale F. Schmaltz. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/591,328, filed Jun. 9, 2000 by Thomas P. Ryan. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/336,970, filed Dec. 17, 2008 by Paul R. Sremeich. |
Extended European Search Report from Appl. No. 13182009.4 dated Jun. 16, 2016. |
Extended European Search Report from Appl. No. 16157269.8 dated Jun. 16, 2016. |
Japanese Office Action together with the English translation dated Mar. 4, 2016 in corresponding JP Application No. 201380019229.3. |
Chinese Office Action together with the English translation dated Mar. 4, 2016 in corresponding CN Application No. 201380019229.3. |
Japanese Office Action from Appl. No. 2015-130629 dated May 6, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150320483 A1 | Nov 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12897346 | Oct 2010 | US |
Child | 14795246 | US |