This invention relates to a method for visualizing a surgical trajectory. The method combines 3D imaging information with a digitized anatomic model for segmenting anatomical structures in the 3D imaging information. A planned surgical trajectory is projected onto the combined images for visualizing the surgical trajectory.
This invention further relates to a system and a computer program product for performing said method.
Such a method is, e.g., known from Guo et al., ‘Development and Application of Functional Databases for Planning Deep-Brain Neurosurgical Procedures’. From Guo et al. it is known to fuse pre-operative MR images of individual patients with digitized anatomical atlases. From the MR images alone it is very difficult or even impossible to visually distinguish small different neurological structures such as the subthalamic nucleus (STN) which is often targeted during deep brain stimulation procedures. When using additional information from anatomic atlases and/or probabilistic functional atlases, it is possible to enhance the accuracy and precision for localizing surgical targets from this pre-operative surgical planning. In Guo et al. probabilistic functional atlases based on additional standardized electrophysiological information available prior to surgery are used to assist the surgical target determination and to provide anatomical labeling to the 3D image data. The fused images and the standardized electrophysiological information together serve to enable display of the position of a probe needle along a real or simulated surgical trajectory. The position of the probe needle is displayed in a 3D image volume and in 2D slices of a patient.
However, registration of the atlas to pre-operative MR images has limited precision due to registration errors inherent to any registration method. Image-processing such as segmentation may be utilized to further improve the anatomic labeling. However, also this technique has inherent limited accuracies. Further, during surgery an implanted probe may unintentionally deviate from a planned trajectory (e.g. due to an imperfection such as a slight bending of the probe) or the anatomy may slightly shift due to the surgical procedure itself (e.g. the implantation of the probe in the tissue generates a small force field that pushes aside the tissue; loss of cerebrospinal fluid during the surgery may lead to pressure-changes in the tissue resulting in larger deformations referred to as ‘brain-shift’). Precision implantation of a probe in a small target therefore usually requires intra-operative measurements (e.g. electrophysiological measurements) to exactly pinpoint the target and to correct for errors due to inaccuracies in the pre-operative planning or due to anatomic shifts during surgery or due to (unintended) deviations of the probe from the planned trajectory. Correct interpretation of such intra-operative measurements is crucial to accurate target localization but may be a very difficult analysis to perform due to the complexity of the data and the amount of information needed to be processed by experts when performing this analysis.
It is a problem of the method described in Guo et al. that the resulting data does not provide sufficiently clear and unambiguous information for the surgeon, which information could help the physician with recognizing the types of neurological structures to expect and with localizing a surgical target along the planned and traversed surgical paths.
It is an object of the invention to provide a clearer way of displaying sufficiently clear information for the surgeon in order to know what type of neurological structures to expect along the planned and traversed surgical path.
According to a first aspect of the invention, this object is achieved by providing a method of visualizing a surgical trajectory, the method comprising, receiving 3D imaging information of a region to undergo surgery, combining the received 3D imaging information with data from an anatomic model repository, e.g. a digitized anatomical atlas, to obtain a combined map of the region to undergo surgery, the combined map comprising expected positions of anatomical structures in the region to undergo surgery, receiving the surgical trajectory for the surgery, determining positions of intersections of the surgical trajectory with the anatomical structures and providing the positions of the intersections in a coordinate system aligned with the surgical trajectory.
As a result of this method, the user receives a clear overview of what anatomical structures are to be expected at what position along the surgical trajectory. In fact, the method according to the invention maps the 3D anatomical information onto the surgical path. With the method according to the invention, the user knows what structures are to be expected at what position along a planned or navigated surgical path. Therefore it is easier to evade critical structures, localize the surgical target or, e.g., release a certain drug at a particular anatomical structure.
The method according to the invention combines (i) 3D medical imaging information with (ii) an anatomical model repository for segmenting anatomical structures in the 3D medical imaging information and (iii) local measurements indicative of anatomy or tissue-type from a surgical probe obtained during the surgical intervention. The model repository is combined with the 3D imaging information to provide 3D anatomical labeling of the imaging information (e.g. by registering a digital anatomic atlas to the MRI). At least one planned surgical trajectory towards at least one surgical target is combined with the anatomically labeled 3D images and the cross-section of the trajectory with the anatomically labeled 3D imaging information is projected as anatomical labeling onto the surgical trajectory.
Optionally, the medical imaging data and associated anatomical labeling may be updated intra-operatively by perioperative imaging e.g. using flat-panel 3D x-ray system, interventional MRI or 3D ultrasound. Local measurements using at least one surgical probe may be made along the planned surgical trajectory to intra-operatively support the identification of the anatomy type at the probe's measurement location(s). Data extracted from the local measurements are co-visualized with the labeled surgical trajectory to aid their interpretation and to support the intra-operative accurate localization of the surgical target. Data extracted from the local measurements may further be combined with the labeled surgical trajectory for computer processing (e.g. using feature clustering analysis algorithms) to extract characteristic features indicative of certain anatomy that may be presented to the users in order to support target localization.
In a preferred embodiment, the combined map comprises a statistical map of the region to undergo surgery, the statistical map comprising probabilities of a presence of the anatomical structures at positions in the region. In such a statistical map, transitions from one anatomical structure to another are not sharp, but come gradually. The intersections thus do not represent single points where one structure lies adjacent to another one. Instead, the intersections are sections of the surgical path wherein a probability of a first structure gradually decreases while the probability of at least one other structure gradually increases. For example, at a certain position along the surgical path there may be a 30% probability of being at a first structure and a 70% probability of being at a second structure. At some positions even more than two different anatomical structures may have a significant probability. It is to be noted that a method using sharp intersections only uses probabilities of 0% and 100%.
For a clear indication of what structures are to be expected at what position in the surgical trajectory, the positions of the intersections may be provided as a distance between the intersections and a target of the surgical trajectory. This makes it possible for the user to see how close to the target area a specific anatomical structure may be expected. The surgical trajectory may be a planned or a navigated trajectory. While planning a trajectory, the method assists in finding a relatively safe and easily accessible route to the target. When navigating a trajectory using a surgical tool, the method according to the invention may help the user to see at what type of anatomical structure he is currently working and, possibly, what types of structures may be expected when following the path further towards a target structure.
In a practical embodiment of the method according to the invention, the surgical tool is an electrophysiological probe and the method further comprises a step of receiving electrophysiological signals from the probe, a step of extracting features from the received electrophysiological signals, a step of relating the extracted features to positions in the coordinate system, and a step of visualizing the extracted features in combination with the related positions in the coordinate system.
In an embodiment, CT or CT-like 3D image data of a region around the spine is used. Using segmentation and anatomic modeling the 3D image is anatomically labeled and a surgical trajectory is planned. A surgical probe with integrated fiber for optical reflectance measurement is used for local anatomic mapping at probe's tip (‘photonic needle’). The 3D image information and associated anatomic labeling is updated by perioperative 3D x-ray using a flat panel rotational x-ray system. Optical spectra are acquired at different probe positions. Optical spectra are visualized together with a map that visualizes proximity and directionality of certain anatomic labeling with respect to the surgical probe's tip based on the navigated trajectory of the surgical probe's tip in the 3D (anatomically labeled) image.
These and other aspects of the invention are apparent from and will be elucidated with reference to the embodiments described hereinafter.
In the drawings:
a and 8b show further visualizations of neuro-EP parameter values combined with anatomical information about a surgical path,
In the following, the invention will be described by an exemplary embodiment related to neurosurgery using electrophysiological probes. The invention is however not limited to use with a neuro-EP system. Other surgical interventions where knowledge about anatomic information along a surgical trajectory (planned and/or navigated) is useful for clinical and/or diagnostic purposes may benefit as well from this invention. The invention may, e.g., be suitable for optical-needle guided interventions.
The image 100 of
The combined map comprises expected positions of anatomical structures in the region to undergo surgery. The combined map is created using image recognition techniques for finding transitions between structures in the 3D image information and by comparing the 3D images to information from the anatomical atlas. The combined map may, e.g., be an image or a list of data points describing expected positions of important anatomical structures. The map may look like the image 100 shown in
The positions of these intersections are provided in a coordinate system aligned with the surgical trajectory. Such a coordinate system helps in providing an intuitive overview of the anatomical structures which are to be expected along the trajectory. For example, the positions of the intersections may be provided as a distance from the start or target point of the trajectory. The distance is preferably measured along the trajectory. When the positions of the intersections are known, the information may be visualized by, e.g., displaying the trajectory or a graphical representation of the trajectory on a display 15. With the use of, e.g., text labels, color coding or highlighting the positions of important structures relative to the surgical trajectory is displayed.
The shaded bar graph sections in
In
In an embodiment, CT or CT-like 3D image data of a region around the spine is used. Using segmentation and anatomic modeling the 3D image is anatomically labeled and a surgical trajectory is planned. A surgical probe with integrated fiber for optical reflectance measurement is used for local anatomic mapping at probe's tip (photonic needle'). The 3D image information and associated anatomic labeling is updated by perioperative 3D x-ray using a flat panel rotational x-ray system. Optical spectra are acquired at different probe positions. Optical spectra are visualized together with a map that visualizes proximity and directionality of certain anatomic labeling with respect to the surgical probe's tip based on the navigated trajectory of the surgical probe's tip in the 3D (anatomically labeled) image.
a and 8b show further visualizations of neuro-EP parameter values combined with anatomical information about a surgical path.
b shows firing rates (y-axis) versus a depth along the surgical trajectory (x-axis). The entrance to STN is marked with very high firing rates (indicated by triangles 91). Firing Rate decreases within STN (indicated by circles 92) and upon entering SN (indicated by triangles 93) increases again. Therefore, Firing Rate alone is also not sufficient in distinguishing STN from SN. Also, measures such as Firing Rate show high variability due to sensitivity of the measure to proximity of neural units. At some depths along the surgical trajectory and within STN, the firing rate drops below the baseline 94. These positions are indicated by circles 92a. Judging from the firing rate alone, a surgeon may make wrong decisions. When combining anatomical knowledge and 3D images with neuroEP signals in a way according to the invention, different anatomical structures can be distinguished more easily and reliably.
In
In intersection calculating step 74, positions of intersections of the at least one surgical trajectory with surfaces of anatomical structures are calculated. These positions are provided as output in output step 75. For easy understanding of the positional data, the positions of the intersections are provided in a coordinate system aligned with the surgical trajectory, such that it is easy to understand what anatomical structures are to be expected at different positions along the surgical trajectory. The provided positions may then be used for visualizing the surgical trajectory, e.g. like shown in one of the
It will be appreciated that the invention also extends to computer programs, particularly computer programs on or in a carrier, adapted for putting the invention into practice. The program may be in the form of source code, object code, a code intermediate source and object code such as partially compiled form, or in any other form suitable for use in the implementation of the method according to the invention. It will also be appreciated that such a program may have many different architectural designs. For example, a program code implementing the functionality of the method or system according to the invention may be subdivided into one or more subroutines. Many different ways to distribute the functionality among these subroutines will be apparent to the skilled person. The subroutines may be stored together in one executable file to form a self-contained program. Such an executable file may comprise computer executable instructions, for example processor instructions and/or interpreter instructions (e.g. Java interpreter instructions). Alternatively, one or more or all of the subroutines may be stored in at least one external library file and linked with a main program either statically or dynamically, e.g. at run-time. The main program contains at least one call to at least one of the subroutines. Also, the subroutines may comprise function calls to each other. An embodiment relating to a computer program product comprises computer executable instructions corresponding to each of the processing steps of at least one of the methods set forth. These instructions may be subdivided into subroutines and/or be stored in one or more files that may be linked statically or dynamically. Another embodiment relating to a computer program product comprises computer executable instructions corresponding to each of the means of at least one of the systems and/or products set forth. These instructions may be subdivided into subroutines and/or be stored in one or more files that may be linked statically or dynamically.
The carrier of a computer program may be any entity or device capable of carrying the program. For example, the carrier may include a storage medium, such as a ROM, for example a CD ROM or a semiconductor ROM, or a magnetic recording medium, for example a floppy disc or hard disk. Further the carrier may be a transmissible carrier such as an electrical or optical signal, which may be conveyed via electrical or optical cable or by radio or other means. When the program is embodied in such a signal, the carrier may be constituted by such cable or other device or means. Alternatively, the carrier may be an integrated circuit in which the program is embedded, the integrated circuit being adapted for performing, or for use in the performance of, the relevant method.
It should be noted that the above-mentioned embodiments illustrate rather than limit the invention, and that those skilled in the art will be able to design many alternative embodiments without departing from the scope of the appended claims. In the claims, any reference signs placed between parentheses shall not be construed as limiting the claim. Use of the verb “comprise” and its conjugations does not exclude the presence of elements or steps other than those stated in a claim. The article “a” or “an” preceding an element does not exclude the presence of a plurality of such elements. The invention may be implemented by means of hardware comprising several distinct elements, and by means of a suitably programmed computer. In the device claim enumerating several means, several of these means may be embodied by one and the same item of hardware. The mere fact that certain measures are recited in mutually different dependent claims does not indicate that a combination of these measures cannot be used to advantage.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
09163970.8 | Jun 2009 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB10/52785 | 6/21/2010 | WO | 00 | 12/14/2011 |