The invention generally relates to ribbon crystals and, more particularly, the invention relates to grain boundaries of wafers formed from ribbon crystals.
String ribbon crystals, such as those discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,689,109 (issued in 1987 and naming Emanuel M. Sachs as the sole inventor), can form the basis of a variety of electronic devices. For example, Evergreen Solar, Inc. of Marlborough, Mass. forms solar cells from conventional string ribbon crystals.
As discussed in greater detail in the noted patent, conventional processes form string ribbon crystals by passing two or more strings through molten silicon. Due to the nature of the process, a string ribbon crystal often grows with an irregular width. Consequently, rather than forming a smooth, generally planar shape, the long edges of the crystals often form an irregular shape. Accordingly, when processed into solar cells, their spacing typically is farther from adjacent wafers than if the edges were substantially smooth and planar, thus reducing the total power produced by the cells per unit area. Such a result is contrary to the goal of maximizing the power produced per unit area of a solar cell.
In addition, also as a result of this non-uniform growth, the portions near the edges of the crystals often form a high density of grains and, consequently, a high density of grain boundaries. As known by those in the art, grain boundaries generally reduce the electrical efficiency of the wafer by acting as “electron traps.” Moreover, many in the art consider the small grains and irregular edges to be not aesthetically pleasing.
When used to form solar cells, the wafers often have backside electrodes to transmit electrons. Due to the fluctuating and relatively unknown shape of the edges, however, those in the art typically do not form the backside electrodes on much of the area of the wafer. Instead, those in the art typically form the backside electrode in a smaller area of the wafer; namely, spaced a relatively large distance from the edges of the wafer. Accordingly, this practice further reduces the full electrical efficiency of the wafer.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, a method of processing a ribbon crystal provides a string ribbon crystal, and removes at least one edge of the string ribbon crystal.
The method also can remove the string with the edge, or remove the portion between the string and the edge. In addition, removal of the edge can form a substantially planar edge or non-planar edge on the crystal. The method also can remove two or more edges of the string ribbon crystal.
In addition to removing at least one edge, the method can separate the ribbon crystal into a plurality of individual wafers after removing at least one edge. After forming the wafers, the method can form a back-surface contact on at least one of the wafers. Alternatively, the method can first form a back-surface contact on the string ribbon crystal before removing at least one edge of the string ribbon crystal, and then separate the ribbon crystal into a plurality of individual wafers. In either case, removal of the original edge forms a new edge, and the back-surface contact may substantially extend to the new edge. In other embodiments, however, the back-surface contact is spaced from the new edge.
Among other ways, the ribbon crystal may be provided by growing the ribbon crystal from molten silicon (e.g., polysilicon). When providing the crystal while growing, removal of the edge may involve removing at least one edge as the ribbon crystal grows, or removing the edge after the ribbon crystal finishes growing.
The method preferably removes the edge of the ribbon crystal at a point that improves ultimate device performance. For example, if the ribbon crystal has a grain boundary, then the method may remove at least a portion of the grain boundary.
Various embodiments thus form a string ribbon wafer having a body with larger grains. The body also may be free of string on at least one side and have an edge that is substantially planar or, in some embodiments, has an irregular pattern and no string.
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, a method of processing a ribbon crystal provides a string ribbon crystal, and then separates the crystal into a plurality of wafers. After separating the crystal, the method removes at least one edge of at least one of the plurality of wafers.
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, a string ribbon wafer has a body with a plurality grains, which includes a plurality of large grains and a plurality of small grains. The plurality of large grains have smallest outer dimensions that are greater than about two times the diffusion length of the carriers within the wafer. The majority of the plurality of grains are large grains and the body is substantially free of string.
Those skilled in the art should more fully appreciate advantages of various embodiments of the invention from the following “Description of Illustrative Embodiments,” discussed with reference to the drawings summarized immediately below.
In illustrative embodiments, a wafer fabrication method removes an edge of a string ribbon crystal, or an edge of a wafer cut from the string ribbon crystal, to substantially mitigate the above noted problems. Specifically, among other things, this method may both generally planarize the crystal/wafer edge and remove at least a portion of the smaller grains that act as electron traps. Accordingly, the resultant wafers 1) have improved electrical properties, 2) may be positioned in closer proximity to neighboring wafers, and 3) maximize the area of a back-surface contact. In addition, removal of the smaller grains should improve the aesthetic appearance to some observers. Details of illustrative embodiments are discussed below.
It should be noted that discussion of silicon ribbon crystals 16 is illustrative and not intended to limit all embodiments of the invention. For example, the crystals 16 may be formed from a material other than silicon, or a combination of silicon and some other material.
An interior platform 20 within the housing 20 supports the crucible 14. This embodiment of the crucible 14 has an elongated shape with a region for growing silicon ribbon crystals 16 in a side-by-side arrangement along its length. In illustrative embodiments, the crucible 14 is formed from graphite and resistively heated to a temperature capable of maintaining silicon above its melting point. To improve results, the crucible 14 has a length that is much greater than its width. For example, the length of the crucible 14 may be three or more times greater than its width. Of course, in some embodiments, the crucible 14 is not elongated in this manner. For example, the crucible 14 may have a somewhat square shape, or a nonrectangular shape. String holes (not shown) through the crucible 14 enable strings to pass through molten silicon and thus, form the crystals 16.
The inventor discovered that the edges 24 of prior art ribbon crystals reduced the mobility for carriers within wafers 28 ultimately formed from the ribbon crystal 16. As a consequence, when used in various applications requiring carrier mobility, such as solar cells, a prior art ribbon crystal would be less electrically efficient than it would be if it did not have such edges 24. To overcome this and other problems, the inventor took an approach that is contrary to what they understood to be the conventional wisdom—they removed at least a portion of the edge 24. As a result, the inventor removed many of the smaller grains, which produce a high concentration of grain boundaries. During subsequent tests, the inventor discovered that removal of the edges 24 improved the electrical efficiency in solar cells (e.g., carrier mobility), which is critical in the viability of photovoltaics.
Those in the art recognize significant disincentives associated with removing the edges. Among other things, removal of either edge 24 removes a significant amount of the polysilicon, which currently is in low supply and has a corresponding high cost. The inventor nevertheless was surprised to discover that resultant efficiency improvements more than offset the costs associated with material loss caused by edge removal.
In addition, removal of either edge 24 requires an additional process step or a plurality of additional steps, further increasing production costs. In fact, the additional steps/cuts required to perform this process increase the likelihood of crystal breakage, thus reducing yield. Moreover, the inventor believes that reducing the width of the ribbon crystal 16, and/or removing the string 26, can lead to additional breakage/yield problems. Despite these and other obstacles teaching away from their solution, the inventor removed the edges 24 to discover the improved benefits.
After removing the edge 24 (and string 26, in some cases), the remaining ribbon crystal 16 was left with mostly large grains. In particular, a grain is considered to be “large” when it has a smallest outer dimension that is greater than about two times the diffusion length of carriers (e.g., holes and electrons) within the crystal 16. For example, grains having a smallest outer dimension of between about 2-5 times the diffusion length of the carriers should suffice. Grains having smallest outer dimensions of greater than three times should provide even better results. In fact, it is anticipated that larger grain sizes, even five or more times the carrier diffusion length, should provide even better results.
Accordingly, in illustrative embodiments, the substantial majority of all grains remaining in the crystal 16 are large grains—leaving only trace amounts of small grains. Other embodiments, however, may have more than trace amounts of small grains. In either case, the removal step preferably removes a majority of the small grains, which generally concentrate around the string 26.
To that end,
The ribbon crystals 16 in
For simplicity, this description omits a number of steps involving details of crystal growth from a molten material. However, those skilled in the art can refer to conventional string ribbon techniques as an adjunct to those discussed in
It also should be noted that discussion of this method of
The method begins while a ribbon crystal growth furnace 10 draws a ribbon crystal 16 from a molten material. Specifically, at step 400, the method determines if the back-surface contact 30 is to be added to the ribbon crystal 16 before or after removing one or both of the edges 24 (for simplicity, this method refers to one or both edges 24 in the singular; as an “edge 24”). In some instances, if it is formed after removing the edge 24, the back-surface contact 30 undesirably may extend around the new edge 32, which could cause a short circuit. Consideration of this possibility therefore should be used in making this determination.
If step 400 determines that the back-surface contact 30 is to be formed first, then the method continues to step 402, which adds the back-surface contact 30 to the ribbon crystal 16. Among other ways, conventional processes may screen print the back-surface contact 30 on one side of the ribbon crystal 16. For example, the back-surface contact 30 may be screen printed onto the ribbon crystal 16 as a plurality of separate blocks, as shown in
After completing step 402, or, if at step 400 the back-surface contact 30 is not to be formed on the ribbon crystal 16 before the edge 24 is removed, then the method determines at step 404 if the edge(s) 24 should be removed while in the form of a ribbon crystal. In other words, the method may remove the edge(s) 24 either before or after the ribbon crystal 16 is separated into individual wafers 28.
If the edge 24 is not to be removed while in the ribbon crystal state/form, then the method separates the ribbon crystal 16 along the dashed lines of
The method then continues to step 408, which removes one or both edges 24 of the ribbon crystal 16 (if continuing from step 404) or the wafers 28 (if continuing from step 406). To that end, when removing a given edge 24, conventional sawing/dicing processes may remove the entire string 26 and many other smaller grains inward of the string (if any). Experimental processes may determine how far to remove the edge 24 inward of the string 26.
It is anticipated that in some instances, however, the removal device (e.g., a laser or saw) may cut along a straight line, while the string 26 may not be positioned perfectly straight from top to bottom of the crystal 16. In a corresponding manner, the string may be more straight than the cut. As a result, the removal step may leave a portion of the string 26 behind in the crystal 16. To avoid this, if desired, one skilled in the art can select an appropriate distance to cut the ribbon crystal 16 (or wafer 28, as the case may be) inward from the string.
Alternatively, in a variety of embodiments, one skilled in the art can set the width of the crystal 16 and measure outwardly from a generally longitudinal point of the crystal 16. For example, to yield a crystal 16 with about a 100 millimeter width, one skilled in the art can cut along generally parallel lines about 50 millimeters from a general longitudinal portion of the crystal 16.
If the ribbon crystal 16 is grown to have a significant amount of area outward of the string 26, then some embodiments may remove a portion of the crystal 16 outward of the string 26, thus keeping the string 26 in the crystal 16. It nevertheless is anticipated that removal of the string 26 in such a crystal 16 will yield more efficient wafers. It should be noted that a wafer produced by the discussed techniques and in the described manners is considered to be a string ribbon wafer even if the string 26 is partially or completely removed.
The method may perform step 408 in a number of different manners. Specifically, if removing the edge(s) 24 while in ribbon crystal form, the method may automate the process as the ribbon crystal 16 grows. For example, the furnace 10 may be retrofitted to include a saw or laser (not shown) to remove the edge(s) 24 from the growing ribbon crystal 16 in real time. Alternatively, the ribbon crystal 16 first may be manually scribed to remove it from the furnace 10, and then manually or automatically moved to another machine that cuts the edge(s) 24 in the prescribed manner. Of course, some embodiments remove the edge(s) 24 by means of an operator manually scribing the edge(s) 24 of the ribbon crystal 16. In a similar manner, if already in wafer form, then the method may use either automatic or manual means to remove the edge(s) 24.
Accordingly, removal of one or both edges 24 removes the smaller grains (i.e., the area with high grain density). This should leave relatively larger grains in the resulting wafers 28, which improves electrical efficiency.
The method concludes by adding the back-surface contact 30 to the ribbon crystal 16 or wafers 28, depending on their form, if such feature was not already added (step 410), and separating the ribbon crystal 16 into wafers 28 if not already in that form (step 412).
It should be noted that the back-surface contact 30 may be formed at a number of different points in the overall fabrication of a solar cell. For example, the method could add the back-surface contact 30 before any fabrication steps are executed, or add the back-surface contact 30 after performing a number of solar cell fabrication steps that were not discussed.
Accordingly, illustrative embodiments produce wafers 28 having substantially planar edges 32 with few or no grain boundary regions. These planar edges 32 may form approximately ninety degree angles with their adjacent sides (i.e., the intersection of the top edge and the new side edge 32 of the ultimate wafers 28). Alternatively, or in addition, these planar edges 32 may form acute and/or obtuse angles with their adjacent sides. Moreover, such embodiments may form new edges 32 having a variety of shapes (e.g., irregularly shaped).
Consequently, as noted above, in addition to improving the aesthetic appearance to some observers, many such wafers 28 should 1) have improved electrical properties due to removal of many of the high grain concentrations near the crystal edge, 2) may be positioned in closer proximity to neighboring wafers, and 3) maximize the area of a back-surface contact 30.
Although the above discussion discloses various exemplary embodiments of the invention, it should be apparent that those skilled in the art can make various modifications that will achieve some of the advantages of the invention without departing from the true scope of the invention.
This patent application claims priority from provisional U.S. patent application No. 60/952,435 filed Jul. 27, 2007 entitled, “WAFER/RIBBON CRYSTAL METHOD AND APPARATUS,” and naming Andrew Gabor as inventor, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein, in its entirety, by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60952435 | Jul 2007 | US |