The present invention relates to articles of footwear, and in particular to articles of footwear having a sole with improved cushioning characteristics.
One of the primary focuses in the recent design of athletic footwear has been underfoot cushioning. This is primarily because, while the human foot has existing natural cushioning characteristics, such natural characteristics are alone incapable of effectively overcoming the stresses encountered during everyday activity. For example, an athlete may partake in an activity in which substantial loads are placed on the foot, joint, and muscular structures of the leg including the ankle, knee, and hip joints. Such activities include road running, track running, hiking or trail running. Trail running in particular can subject the foot and lower extremities to extreme conditions and therefore extreme loads. As one example, in trail running, as distinguished from track and road running, one might encounter rough terrain such as rocks, fallen trees, gravel or steep hills. Traversing this terrain necessarily involves large stresses to be borne by the foot. Even in less demanding environments, such as in ordinary walking or road running, the human foot still experiences significant stresses. Cushioning systems have therefore developed to mitigate and overcome these stresses.
Existing cushioning systems for footwear have tended to focus on mitigating vertical ground reaction forces in order to offset the impact associated with heel strike during gait. This is not altogether unreasonable, considering that, in some activities, the body experiences peak forces nearing 2000 N in the vertical direction. Yet, during running, walking, trail running or the like, a heel strike typically involves both vertical and horizontal forces. In fact, due to the angle of the foot and leg upon contact with the ground, up to thirty (30) percent of the forces generated are in the horizontal plane.
Many traditional cushioning systems also suffer from the problem of preloading, due in part to the nature of such cushioning systems' design. Specifically, a significant amount of existing cushioning systems utilize a continuous midsole in which each section of the midsole is susceptible to compression upon contact with the ground. In other words, traditional midsoles are continuous such that, when one portion of the midsole is compressed, an adjacent portion is also compressed. This results in large areas of the midsole being compressed at the time of ground contact, thus reducing cushioning potential and forcing the midsole to act as a monolithic structure.
Yet another concern with existing cushioning systems is that, while different cushioning systems must satisfy similar objectives, such systems often need to be tailored to a particular activity or use being undertaken. For example, the demands and needs of a trail runner in terms of cushioning may be vastly different than the demands of a casual walker. The trail runner, for instance, may have specific needs that require more substantial cushioning than the ordinary walker. In fact, in trail running protection from bruising, which may be caused by repeated impacts with rocks, roots and other irregularities, is a major concern. Quite differently, during walking and/or road running, a premium is placed on vertical compression and a stable platform.
A first embodiment of the present invention includes a shoe sole comprising a sole member having a first layer of material overlying a second layer of material. The first and second layers of material may include first and second surfaces, respectively, where the second surface of the first layer of material may be attached to the first surface of the second layer of material along substantially the entire length thereof. The first layer of material may have a first hardness and the second layer of material may have a second hardness, with the first layer being harder than the second layer. A pattern of lugs may also be formed on the second layer of material, the lugs being arranged in a repetitive wave pattern extending along the second surface of the second layer of material.
Further aspects of the first embodiment may include first and second layers of material, which, in combination, form a solid body. In yet other aspects of the first embodiment, the first hardness of the first layer of material may be from about sixty (60) to sixty three (63) on the Asker C scale, while the second hardness of the second layer of material may be from about forty eight (48) to fifty (50) on the Asker C scale. The second surface of the second layer of material may also be partially covered by an outsole, which may conform to the second surface of the second layer of material, such that the outsole may be contiguous with the second surface of the second layer of material. Still further aspects of the first embodiment may include an outsole attached non-contiguously to the second surface of the second layer of material in the form of a plurality of strips of rubber material, as opposed to an all encompassing outsole.
Additionally, according to the first embodiment, the repetitive wave pattern may be one of: (1) a low frequency, high amplitude wave; (2) a mid frequency, mid amplitude wave; and (3) a high frequency, low amplitude wave. Selected ones of the aforementioned lugs may also, according to additional aspects of the first embodiment, extend continuously from a lateral side of the sole to a medial side of the sole. The amplitude of such selected lugs may also remain constant between the medial and lateral sides of the sole.
According to a second embodiment of the present invention, a shoe sole is provided and comprises an outer surface having a pattern of lugs extending lengthwise along a longitudinal axis of the sole. The lugs may define a sinusoidal wave pattern and may be symmetrically arranged such that each lug is configured to: (1) vertically compress in a direction generally normal to the longitudinal axis of the sole; (2) horizontally deflect in a first direction extending generally parallel to the longitudinal axis of the sole; and (3) horizontally deflect in a second direction extending opposite the first direction and generally parallel to the longitudinal axis of the sole.
Other aspects of the second embodiment may include a midsole having a first layer of material overlying a second layer of material. The first layer of material may have a first hardness and the second layer of material may have a second hardness, the hardness of the first layer being greater than the hardness of the second layer. The first and second layers of material may also include first and second surfaces, respectively, where the second surface of the first layer of material is attached to the first surface of the second layer of material along substantially the entire length thereof. Further aspects of the second embodiment may include solid lugs. Each lug in the pattern of lugs may additionally be configured to vertically compress and horizontally deflect independently of adjacent lugs. Selected ones of the lugs may also extend continuously from a lateral side of the sole to a medial side of the sole. Each one of the selected lugs may further have an amplitude, which remains constant between the lateral and medial sides of the sole.
According to a third embodiment of the present invention, a shoe comprising an upper and a midsole attached to the upper is provided. The midsole may have a top layer of material overlying a bottom layer of material. The top layer of material may be connected to the bottom layer of material along substantially the entire length thereof. The top layer of material may also be harder than the bottom layer of material. A pattern of lugs may be formed on an outer surface of the bottom layer of material, the lugs being defined by a sinusoidal wave extending along the outer surface from a toe region to a heel region of the shoe.
Selected ones of the aforementioned lugs may, according to additional aspects of the third embodiment, extend continuously from a lateral side of the midsole to a medial side of the midsole. An amplitude of such lugs may also remain constant between the lateral and medial sides of the midsole. Further, an outsole may be attached and conformed to the outer surface of the bottom layer of material, such that the outsole may be contiguous with the outer surface of the bottom layer. Still further aspects of the third embodiment may include a sinusoidal wave pattern formed on the outer surface of the bottom layer of material in a direction extending from the lateral side to the medial side of the midsole.
A more complete appreciation of the subject matter of the present invention and the various advantages thereof can be realized by reference to the following detailed description in which reference is made to the accompanying drawings:
In describing embodiments of the invention discussed herein, specific terminology will be used for the sake of clarity. However, the invention is not intended to be limited to any specific terms used herein, and it is to be understood that each specific term includes all technical equivalents, which operate in a similar manner to accomplish a similar purpose.
Referring to
The midsole 12 of the sole 10 may include a first layer of material 14 and a second layer of material 16. In a particular embodiment, the first layer of material 14 and the second layer of material 16 may be completely solid. The first and second layers of material 14, 16, respectively, may also have corresponding top surfaces 15, 19 and bottom surfaces 17, 21. The top surface 19 of the second layer of material 16 may abut and be connected to the bottom surface 17 of the first layer of material 14 along substantially or alternatively the entire length thereof. Thus, the first layer of material 14 may overly the second layer of material 16.
The first and second layers of material 14, 16 of the sole 10 may also vary in hardness. In other words, the first layer of material 14 may be harder than the second layer of material 16, or vice versa. As one example, the first layer of material 14 may have a hardness ranging from sixty (60) to sixty three (63) on the Asker C scale and the second layer of material 16 may have a hardness ranging from forty eight (48) to fifty (50) on the Asker C scale, thus making the first layer of material 14 harder than the second layer of material 16. In an alternate embodiment, the first layer of material 14 may have a hardness ranging from about fifty (50) to seventy (70) on the Asker C scale, while the second layer of material 16 may have a hardness ranging from about forty five (45) to sixty (60) on the Asker C scale. Hardness may also vary depending on use. For instance, the second layer of material 16 (i.e., a lower midsole) may be designed to be softer than the first layer of material 14 (i.e., an upper midsole), with the first layer of material 14 supplying support to the foot and the second layer of material 16 working as a spring object to absorb trail irregularities and provide deformation in independent areas.
In another embodiment, with the varying hardness of the first and second layers 14, 16, as described, the lugs 22 of the outsole 20 may compress into the first layer of material 14 during use, which may dissipate the forces felt by a user of the sole 10. Specifically, a particular lug 22 formed on the second layer of material 16 may compress upon contacting the ground and may be forced into a harder first layer of material 14, which, due to its rigidity, may absorb and dissipate the forces generated by such compression. Stated differently, in one embodiment, a softer second layer of material 16 may be compressed into a harder first layer of material 14, which may absorb and dissipate such compression via the relative rigidity of the first layer 14.
Still referring to
The outsole 20, if included with sole 10, further may have an inner surface 23 that is flush with the wave pattern 18 formed on the bottom surface 21 of the second layer of material 16. Thus, the inner surface 23 of the outsole 20 may be contiguous with a portion of the bottom surface 21 to which it is attached. As such, the wave pattern 18 formed on the outsole 20 may approximate or mirror the wave pattern 18 formed on the bottom surface 21 of the second layer of material 16. The outsole 20 may thusly provide a ground contacting surface 25, which mirrors the wave pattern 18 on bottom surface 21. In an alternate embodiment, the ground contacting surface 25 of the outsole 20 may roughly approximate the shape of the wave pattern 18 and may slightly deviate therefrom.
Referring to
The top surface 15 of the first layer of material 14 may further be attached to an upper of a shoe, as shown in
Referring to
Several embodiments of the wave pattern 18 may also have different frequencies. Moreover, the frequency of a particular wave pattern 18 may vary along the length of the sole or may remain constant along such length. For instance, a particular segment of lugs 22 on the second layer of material 16 (and thus the outsole 20) may have a high frequency relative to other such segments, meaning that the number of lugs 22 in a given distance is increased relative to other sections of the sole 10. Alternatively, a particular segment of lugs 22 on the second layer of material 16 (and thus the outsole 20) may have a low frequency relative to other such segments, meaning that the number of lugs 22 in a given distance is decreased relative to other sections of the sole 10. Wave patterns 18 of medium frequency are also contemplated. Moreover, in one embodiment, the wave pattern 18 may have a constant frequency extending from the toe end 42 to the heel end 44 of the sole 10, meaning that the number of lugs 22 in a given distance remains constant over the length of the sole 10. In a particular embodiment, a general purpose training shoe may have a frequency of one lug 22 per every two and a half (2.5) centimeters. Yet, in an alternate embodiment, one segment of sole 10 may have a frequency of a single lug 22 per every two and a half (2.5) centimeters, while other segments of sole 10 may have a higher or lower frequency of lugs 22.
Such variations in the amplitude and frequency of the wave pattern 18, as described, provide a sole 10 having different cushioning characteristics so as to satisfy varying conditions of use. For example, as shown in the cutaway view of sole 10 in
Referring again to
Still referring to
Referring now to
The outsole 20 may also, in a particular embodiment, have a lateral-to-medial wave pattern 52. In other words, a wave pattern 52 may be formed in the bottom surface 21 of the second layer of material 16, and thus the outsole 20 covering the bottom surface 21, in a direction extending from the lateral side 46 to the medial side 48 of the sole 10. The wave pattern 52 may also approximate or alternatively mirror a sinusoidal wave, similar to wave pattern 18. Thus, the sole 10 may comprise an outsole 20 in which a wave pattern is formed in both a direction extending from toe end 42 to heel end 44 and from lateral side 46 to medial side 48.
Still referring to
Referring now to
In contrast, referring now to
Referring now to
In the devices depicted in the figures, particular structures are shown that are adapted to provide improved cushioning for a sole of a shoe. The invention also contemplates the use of any alternative structures for such purposes, including structures having different lengths, shapes, and configurations. For example, while the top surface 19 of the second layer of material 16 has been described as being connected along substantially its entire length to the bottom surface 17 of the first layer of material 14, the second layer of material 16 may be connected to the first layer of material 14 along only portions of bottom surface 17.
As another example, although wave pattern 18 and lateral-to-medial wave pattern 52 have been described as approximating or alternatively mirroring a sinusoidal wave, other wave patterns are contemplated, such as wave patterns having a trapezoidal or triangular shape. Stated differently, while wave pattern 18 and lateral-to-medial wave pattern 52 are preferably sinusoidal in shape, the shape of wave pattern 18 and lateral-to-medial wave pattern 52 may vary from that of a sine wave while still maintaining the cushioning features described.
Still further, while the ground contacting surface 25 of the outsole 20 has been described as approximating the wave pattern 18, deviations resulting in incongruence between the shape of wave pattern 18 and ground contacting surface 25 are contemplated. Thus, the shape of ground contacting surface 25 may, in one embodiment, be similar to that of wave pattern 18, albeit with several slight variations. For instance, while the wave pattern 18 may have a rounded sinusoidal shape at the trough of the wave, a trough of the ground contacting surface 25 of the outsole 20 may be more flattened so as to provide a larger surface area for contacting the ground.
As yet another example, although a lateral-to-medial wave pattern 52 has been described as being formed on the bottom surface 21 of the second layer of material 16 (and thus the outsole 20), it is contemplated that the wave pattern 52 may not be present altogether. In other words, it is contemplated that, in a direction extending from lateral side 46 to medial side 48, no wave pattern may be present.
Moreover, while the first layer of material 14, in one embodiment, is described as having a hardness ranging from sixty (60) to sixty three (63) on the Asker C scale, and the second layer of material 16 is described as having a hardness ranging from forty eight (48) to fifty (50) on the Asker C scale, the first and second layers of material 14, 16 may have any hardness on the Asker C scale.
Even further, while, in one embodiment, a lug 22 adjacent the heel end 44 of the sole 10 may have an amplitude of approximately ten (10) millimeters and a lug 22 adjacent the toe end 42 may have an amplitude of approximately five (5) millimeters (e.g., a “mid amplitude” lug pattern), either of such lugs 22 may be increased or decreased in amplitude by a degree of zero (0) to fifty (50) percent. Stated differently, it is contemplated that the aforementioned lugs 22 in either heel end 44 or toe end 42 may be zero (0) to fifty (50) percent larger or smaller than described, thus providing either a “low amplitude” or “high amplitude” lug pattern. Moreover, although a general purpose training shoe, in one embodiment, has a frequency of one lug 22 per every two and a half (2.5) centimeters (e.g., a “mid frequency” lug pattern), the frequency of the lugs 22 of sole 10 may also be increased or decreased by a degree of zero (0) to fifty (50) percent. As such, similar to amplitude, the frequency of a particular segment of lugs 22 on sole 10 may be zero (0) to fifty (50) percent greater or less than as described, thus providing either a “low frequency” or “high frequency” lug pattern.
Although the invention herein has been described with reference to particular embodiments, it is to be understood that these embodiments are merely illustrative of the principles and applications of the present invention. It is therefore to be understood that numerous modifications may be made to the illustrative embodiments and that other arrangements may be devised without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
It will also be appreciated that the various dependent claims and the features set forth therein can be combined in different ways than presented in the initial claims. It will also be appreciated that the features described in connection with individual embodiments may be shared with others of the described embodiments. For instance, the dual hardness configuration of layers 14, 16 may be employed with any of the wave lug arrangements described.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/217,935 filed Aug. 25, 2011, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2557946 | Crooker | Jun 1951 | A |
2627676 | Hack | Feb 1953 | A |
2710461 | Hack | Jun 1955 | A |
2833057 | Hack | May 1958 | A |
2930149 | Hack | Mar 1960 | A |
2941317 | Hack | Jun 1960 | A |
3018571 | Doherty | Jan 1962 | A |
3299544 | Hack | Jan 1967 | A |
3444632 | Hack et al. | May 1969 | A |
3936956 | Famolare, Jr. | Feb 1976 | A |
D247935 | Sebestik | May 1978 | S |
D248796 | Famolare, Jr. | Aug 1978 | S |
4130947 | Denu et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
D253500 | Famolare, Jr. | Nov 1979 | S |
D256400 | Famolare, Jr. | Aug 1980 | S |
D257186 | Famolare, Jr. | Oct 1980 | S |
D257701 | Famolare, Jr. | Dec 1980 | S |
4262433 | Hagg et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4348821 | Daswick | Sep 1982 | A |
4364190 | Yonkers | Dec 1982 | A |
4507879 | Dassler | Apr 1985 | A |
4547978 | Radford | Oct 1985 | A |
4593482 | Mayer | Jun 1986 | A |
4607440 | Roberts et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4676010 | Cheskin | Jun 1987 | A |
D292344 | Austin | Oct 1987 | S |
D294537 | Le | Mar 1988 | S |
4833795 | Diaz | May 1989 | A |
D301390 | Brown et al. | Jun 1989 | S |
4845863 | Yung-Mao et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
D306372 | Diaz et al. | Mar 1990 | S |
5077916 | Beneteau | Jan 1992 | A |
D323740 | Mitsui | Feb 1992 | S |
D331489 | Takaoka | Dec 1992 | S |
D331494 | Tonkel et al. | Dec 1992 | S |
D347936 | Takaoka | Jun 1994 | S |
D349393 | Mishan | Aug 1994 | S |
5337492 | Anderie et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
D351054 | Minkin | Oct 1994 | S |
D360065 | Werman | Jul 1995 | S |
D360292 | Murray | Jul 1995 | S |
5469639 | Sessa | Nov 1995 | A |
D368794 | Fabio | Apr 1996 | S |
D375616 | Baker et al. | Nov 1996 | S |
D377109 | Manfredi | Jan 1997 | S |
D380075 | Sell, Jr. et al. | Jun 1997 | S |
D382692 | Carlson | Aug 1997 | S |
D388597 | Gavigan | Jan 1998 | S |
5713140 | Baggenstoss | Feb 1998 | A |
5768806 | Parisotto et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5775005 | McClelland | Jul 1998 | A |
D425690 | Bray et al. | May 2000 | S |
D429410 | Wright | Aug 2000 | S |
6138385 | Jungkind et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6219939 | Kita et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
D441946 | Agnew et al. | May 2001 | S |
6253466 | Harmon-Weiss et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
D446000 | Price | Aug 2001 | S |
D449430 | McClaskie | Oct 2001 | S |
6314664 | Kita et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
D453065 | Roulo | Jan 2002 | S |
D454679 | Del Biondi | Mar 2002 | S |
6389713 | Kita | May 2002 | B1 |
6401365 | Kita et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6516539 | Nishiwaki et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
D470998 | Adreliunas et al. | Mar 2003 | S |
D473041 | Finkelberg | Apr 2003 | S |
D475844 | Reynolds et al. | Jun 2003 | S |
D490225 | McClaskie | May 2004 | S |
6807752 | Nakano et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6810605 | Nakano et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
D506053 | Cook | Jun 2005 | S |
D506055 | Ringholz | Jun 2005 | S |
D514288 | Burg | Feb 2006 | S |
D520721 | White et al. | May 2006 | S |
D530891 | Matis et al. | Oct 2006 | S |
D532190 | Scheurer | Nov 2006 | S |
7140126 | Crane et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
D533708 | Earle | Dec 2006 | S |
7181866 | Braunschweiler | Feb 2007 | B2 |
D537611 | Matis et al. | Mar 2007 | S |
D540516 | Weitzman | Apr 2007 | S |
7204044 | Hoffer et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
D544183 | Hull | Jun 2007 | S |
D544701 | Chen | Jun 2007 | S |
7225564 | Gillespie | Jun 2007 | B1 |
D546531 | Bertholon | Jul 2007 | S |
D552333 | McClaskie | Oct 2007 | S |
7281343 | Riha et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7287340 | Talbott | Oct 2007 | B2 |
D556982 | Harper et al. | Dec 2007 | S |
D558964 | Truelsen | Jan 2008 | S |
D566937 | St-Louis et al. | Apr 2008 | S |
D569094 | Morgan et al. | May 2008 | S |
7392604 | Greene et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
D580143 | Schoenborn et al. | Nov 2008 | S |
D581640 | Earle | Dec 2008 | S |
7484317 | Kita et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
D588791 | Nelson | Mar 2009 | S |
7513065 | Kita et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
D593290 | Chen | Jun 2009 | S |
D593742 | Issler | Jun 2009 | S |
7540100 | Pawlus et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
D600895 | Morgan | Sep 2009 | S |
7624515 | Kita et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7665232 | Manz et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7707742 | Ellis, III | May 2010 | B2 |
7707743 | Schindler et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7779558 | Nishiwaki et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
D624294 | Skovgaard | Sep 2010 | S |
7793429 | Ellis, III | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7886461 | Sato | Feb 2011 | B2 |
D634536 | Lee et al. | Mar 2011 | S |
D634537 | Lee et al. | Mar 2011 | S |
D639540 | Raysse | Jun 2011 | S |
D640863 | Raysse | Jul 2011 | S |
D642775 | Raysse | Aug 2011 | S |
D643195 | Yi | Aug 2011 | S |
D643605 | Raysse | Aug 2011 | S |
D650567 | Badegruber | Dec 2011 | S |
8171655 | Morgan | May 2012 | B2 |
D679485 | Raysse | Apr 2013 | S |
D679899 | Taestensen | Apr 2013 | S |
D683529 | Marshall | Jun 2013 | S |
D685167 | Hatfield et al. | Jul 2013 | S |
D688035 | Recchi et al. | Aug 2013 | S |
D746562 | Babcock | Jan 2016 | S |
D754424 | Spring | Apr 2016 | S |
D762958 | Sars | Aug 2016 | S |
20010039745 | Nakano et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20030192199 | Nakano et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040168350 | Mathieu et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050000115 | Kimura et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20060090372 | Kim | May 2006 | A1 |
20060130364 | Greene et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060137227 | Kita et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20080052965 | Sato | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080196271 | Wang | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080263905 | Tai | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080289224 | Sink | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090241377 | Kita et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100236098 | Morgan | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100281714 | Carboy | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110016746 | Callahan et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110016749 | Callahan | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110045028 | Iinuma | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110061268 | Park et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110179669 | Hanebrink et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20150052780 | Smith, III | Feb 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0383489 | Aug 1990 | EP |
1264556 | Dec 2002 | EP |
2269478 | Jan 2011 | EP |
S58051764 | Apr 1983 | JP |
H0284504 | Jun 1990 | JP |
H8280406 | Oct 1996 | JP |
H09248203 | Sep 1997 | JP |
2000106905 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2001321201 | Nov 2001 | JP |
D1258687 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2006334395 | Dec 2006 | JP |
2008054780 | Mar 2008 | JP |
8101234 | May 1981 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report, PCT/US2012/047176, dated Jan. 23, 2013. |
Powell, Bryon, “Sneak Peak at La Sportiva's MorphoDynamic Technology”, <www.irunfar.com/2010/07/sneak-peak-at-la-sportivas-morphodynamic-technology.html>, Jul. 27, 2010. |
Run Junkie: RJ Review: The New La Sportiva Electron. A wave of Change, <runjunkie.blogspot.com/2011/05/rj-review-new-la-sportiva-electron-wave.html>, May 28, 2011. |
Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP12825667.4 dated Jun. 25, 2015. |
Official Journal of the European Communities, Sep. 13, 2011, published by Office of Harmonization in the Internal Market, Sole (Registration No. 001909946-0008), (Well-known material No. HH23207024, Design Division, Patent Office). |
Asahi “Fall & Winter Shoes Catalog 1991”, 3 pages. |
European Search Report for Application No. EP16180864 dated Jan. 19, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150096200 A1 | Apr 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13217935 | Aug 2011 | US |
Child | 14568375 | US |