Patent Grant
11624416
The subject matter described herein relates to braking systems, for example to brake rotors and brake pads for use as part of braking systems for slowing or stopping a vehicle.
A vehicle braking system for use on a wheeled vehicle generally includes a rotating device that rotates with a wheel while the vehicle is in motion and a second device that is mounted to an apparatus on the vehicle body itself and that does not rotate with the wheel while the vehicle is in motion. When the brakes are applied, the apparatus moves the second device into contact with a surface or surfaces on the rotating device to create friction between the rotating device and the friction device. The resulting friction causes the speed of the vehicle to decrease. In a vehicle with a disk braking system, the rotating device is commonly referred to as a brake disk or a brake rotor while the second device is commonly referred to as a brake pad. In a vehicle with drum brakes, the rotating device is commonly referred to as a drum while the second device is commonly referred to as a brake shoe. The terms “brake rotor” and “brake pad” are used throughout this disclosure to refer generically and respectively to a rotating device of a braking system and a second device of a braking system.
A braking system can include one or more components operable to move a friction material or other surface on the brake pad to forcibly contact with a friction surface of the brake rotor. The braking system can be controlled by a user operable mechanism, such as a foot-operated brake pedal or a hand-operated grip device and can be mechanical, electrical, hydraulic, or the like. For braking systems featuring a brake rotor, the mechanism can be a set of calipers and a mechanical, electrical, hydraulic, etc. system for applying pressure to one or more brake pads mounted to each caliper to urge it/them against the friction surfaces of the brake rotor. The brake rotor typically has two opposing friction surfaces on opposite annular faces of a disk-like structure, which can optionally include vanes or other internal structures for providing ventilation, reducing weight, or otherwise supporting some amount of non-solid volume disposed between the two opposing friction surfaces, etc. In brake drum systems, the friction surface of the drum is typically on the inner rotation surface. The brake shoes are urged against the friction surface by calipers, levers, pistons, or other devices that are controlled by the user.
Brake rotors are generally made of a durable material while brake pads are made of a material that wears away under the friction resulting from stopping or slowing a vehicle. However, brake rotors typically also experience wear and eventually require replacement or re-machining, which can be expensive. Additionally, particulate debris from brake pads generated during braking are typically released to the environment. Because of the chemical compositions typically employed in brake pads, this particulate debris can include constituents, including but not limited to copper, cadmium, lead, mercury, and the like, that are known or suspected to have harmful effects when found in significant quantities in the environment. In addition, the heat generated during the braking process can promote reactions between chemical components of the brake pad, which can cause the formation of toxic materials and/or gases.
Currently available brake rotors are most frequently manufactured out of cast iron for a number of reasons. For example, one or more physical properties of cast iron, such as for example the ability to handle large amounts of heat generated during braking and the relative ease with which it can be cast and formed into a necessary shape, can be desirable. In addition, cast iron is generally quite inexpensive as a bulk material (in particular in comparison to other materials such as stainless steel, titanium, carbon fiber, and the like that are used in some braking applications). Production processes for cast iron brake rotors are also relatively established and well-known. Furthermore cast iron is generally accepted as a standard brake rotor material.
However, cast iron is relatively soft. It works well as a brake rotor due to its interactions with a brake pad, which can generate significant friction. Cast iron tends to wear due to this friction interaction, and as it does so it introduces particulate matter to the environment. Particulate materials are strongly suspected of causing health issues and other environmental problems. Furthermore, rotor wear requires regular and costly maintenance of a braking system of a vehicle, typically including re-machining or even replacing the brake rotors on a regular basis.
In one aspect, a brake rotor includes a supporting layer applied to a friction surface of a brake rotor substrate and one or more coatings applied over the supporting layer. The supporting layer includes a preparatory metal and the coating(s) imparts wear and corrosion resistant properties to the friction surface.
In an interrelated aspect, a method includes applying a supporting layer to a friction surface of a brake rotor substrate and applying a coating applied over the supporting layer. The supporting layer includes a preparatory metal, and the coating imparts wear and corrosion resistant properties to the friction surface.
In another interrelated aspect, a method includes transferring an amount of a friction material from a brake pad to a friction surface of a brake rotor having persistent surface roughness features. The transferring creating a transfer film layer on the friction surface, and that transfer film layer is retained on the friction surface at least in part due to the persistent surface roughness features. The method further includes stopping a vehicle by actuating a braking system that includes the brake pad and the brake rotor. The actuating causes the friction material of the brake pad to be urged into contact with the transfer film layer on the friction surface of the brake rotor such that an adherent friction interaction between the friction material and the transfer film layer enhances a braking power of the braking system.
In some variations of these aspects, one or more of the following features can optionally be included in any feasible combination. The brake rotor substrate can include at least one of cast iron and an alloy of cast iron, among other possible materials, which are advantageously low cost and have acceptable structural strength and/or heat transfer properties. The friction surface of the brake rotor substrate can include an activated layer or surface that result from back-sputtering of the friction surface prior to the supporting layer having been applied. The back-sputtering of the friction surface can include accelerating ions of the preparatory metal at the friction surface under a voltage in a range of approximately 400 V to 1200 V. The preparatory metal can include chrome or other metals.
In some variations one or more of the following features can optionally be included in any feasible combination. The coating can include graphene. The coating can alternatively or in addition include a first layer comprising a first material and a second layer comprising a second material. The first material can include a metal. The metal can include at least one of titanium, chromium, zirconium, aluminum, and hafnium. The first layer can include a plurality of layers of the first material merged to form a single layer. The second material can include at least one of a nitride, a boride, a carbide, or an oxide of the first material. The coating can include multiple iterations of the first layer and/or the second layer. These multiple iterations of the first and/or second layer can be either homogenous layers or inhomogeneous layers. Use of multiple layers as described herein can improve the structural integrity of the overall coating structure and allow it to resist greater mechanical forces common to a braking event. The multiple iterations of the first layer can be deposited sequentially prior to deposition of the multiple iterations of the second layer, or the multiple iterations of the first layer can be deposited alternatively with intervening deposition of one or more of the multiple iterations of the second layer. Each of the multiple iterations of the first layer and each of the multiple iterations of the second layer can have a thickness in a range of one atom to three or four thousand Angstroms. The friction surface of the brake rotor can include a first scale of surface topography that can include a plurality of island formations separated by channels. The friction surface of the brake rotor can include a second scale of surface topography that can include a plurality peaks and valleys of regular or irregular shape.
Some of a friction material of a brake pad can be transferred to the friction surface of the brake rotor during braking such that a transfer film layer including the transferred friction material is created and mechanically held in place on the friction surface of the brake rotor by persistent surface roughness features of the first and/or second scale of surface topography. The friction material of the brake pad and the friction material of the transfer film layer can participate in an adherent friction interaction that enhances a first braking power of the first combination of braking components relative to a second braking power of the second combination of braking components. A friction material of the first brake pad can consist essentially of components other than copper. A friction material of the first brake pad can include an environmentally beneficial component.
The details of one or more variations of the subject matter described herein are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features and advantages of the subject matter described herein will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims. This summary is not intended to be limiting. Rather the claims that eventually issue in this application are to define the scope of the protected subject matter.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, show certain aspects of the subject matter disclosed herein and, together with the description, help explain some of the principles associated with the disclosed implementations. In the drawings,
When practical, similar reference numbers denote similar structures, features, or elements. It will be understood that any dimensions (either absolute or relative to other features) shown in the drawings may or may not be representative of actual absolute or relative dimensions occurring in one or more implementations of the current subject matter.
Because of the relatively inexpensive cost of cast iron and its advantageous heat handling capabilities as well as its common usage in the manufacture of brake rotors, overcoming the wear and potential health issues (which are rapidly becoming a focal point of legislation in several U.S. states) associated with the use of cast-iron in braking system would be desirable. Additionally, wear of brake pad materials as well as rotors made of both cast iron and other materials can be problematic from the standpoint of vehicle maintenance costs and environmental impacts, among other concerns. To address these and potentially other challenges with existing technologies, one or more implementations of the current subject matter provide methods, systems, articles or manufacture, and the like that can, among other possible advantages, relate to brake systems including brake pads and brake rotors, methods of making brake pads and brake rotors, and other technological developments relating to improvements in braking technology.
A braking system that results in slower or even zero wear of either or both of a brake rotor and the brake pads is also desirable. Consistent with implementations of the current subject matter, a brake pad formed of a particular composition can be made with organic or otherwise less environmentally detrimental materials to eliminate the harmful or toxic materials of conventional brake pads. Brake pad materials consistent with implementations of the current subject matter can be also be formulated specifically to optimize operation with a brake rotor having a wear and corrosion resistant coating as discussed elsewhere herein.
As discussed in more detail below, a brake rotor can have surface roughness and hardness characteristics that maximize a useful lifetime of the brake rotor while also minimizing abrasive consumption of the friction material of a brake pad used in conjunction with the brake rotor. Implementations of the current subject matter further provide methods, systems, articles or manufacture, and the like, of a brake pad composition to optimize performance and minimize wear and release of harmful or toxic substances or matter.
A wear and corrosion resistant coating can be applied to at least part of the friction surfaces on the two opposing annular surfaces 108 and 110 as described below as well as in one or more of co-pending and co-owned U.S. patent application publications 2008-0196985 A1, 2008/0196986A1, 2009/0050423A1, and 2009/0288921A1 and co-pending and co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/848,429, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
As shown in the cross-sectional diagram 200 of a brake rotor 102 in
The peaks 202 can have sharp, angular cross-sectional shapes as illustrated in
Peaks 202 of desired shapes and dimensions can be formed in any suitable manner, for example by appropriate machining or other forming processes. After forming peaks 202, valleys 204, and/or other surface roughness features on one or both annular surfaces 108, 110 of the brake rotor 102, the annular surface 108, 110 of the brake rotor 102 can be coated with a wear and corrosion resistant coating that eliminates or greatly reduces the rate at which the peaks 202 are worn down by contact with the friction material 114 of a brake pad. The wear and corrosion resistant coating can be deposited on the surfaces of the peaks 202 and also optionally in the valleys 204. The wear and corrosion resistant coating can improve the overall look or aesthetics of the brake rotor 102 while also substantially increasing its hardness relative to an uncoated brake rotor friction surface. Also, as discussed in more detail below, the peaks and valleys can also help establish and maintain or retain a uniform (e.g. even, consistent, thickness, etc.) transfer film layer on the friction surface of the brake rotor 102 which in turn supports adherent frictional properties that can improve braking performance of a baking system 100.
During braking action, some amount of the friction material 114 of a brake pad 116 is transferred to the friction surfaces of the brake rotor 102, thereby forming a transfer film. This transfer generally occurs during a “seating” or “break-in” process persisting for some period of time and/or miles driven after new brake pads 116 are installed on a vehicle. With a conventional brake rotor, even one initially manufactured with surface roughness features, the friction forces and stresses placed on the friction surfaces during normal braking operations typically rapidly lead to a flattening of the friction surface. Thus, any advantages that might have been gained from the surface roughness features (e.g. better cooling air flow, decorative patterns, retention of a transfer film of brake pad material, etc.) are highly transient and unlikely to be relevant for the majority of the useful lifetime of the brake rotor.
In further implementations of the current subject matter, surface topography on a brake rotor surface 108, 110 can exist at two different scales as illustrated in the expanded diagram 300 of part of a brake rotor 102 shown in of
In some examples, at least part of the base surfaces 306 of the inter-island channels 304 can have a surface roughness sufficient to create turbulence to air masses flowing in a direction parallel to a plane defined by the annular surface (e.g. a surface orthogonal to an axis about which the brake rotor 102 rotates) for example as the brake rotor 102 rotates with a wheel of a motor vehicle. It will be understood that cross-sectional shapes of the island formations 302 can be substantially rectangular (e.g. as shown in
A second, smaller scale of surface topography on a brake rotor surface 108, 110 can include peaks 202 and valleys 204 similar to those described above in reference to
Consistent with some implementations of the current subject matter, the first scale of surface topography can be advantageous in reducing an overall weight of a brake rotor 102 and can also provide cooling benefits by permitting an optionally turbulent flow of air along the base surfaces 306 of the channels 304 formed or defined between the island formations 302.
The second scale of surface topography can advantageously assist in retaining a transferred film or layer of brake pad material to surfaces of the brake rotor 102. In the example of
The transfer film layer can provide significant benefits in both durability and braking effectiveness of the braking system 100. For example, the retained transfer film layer of the friction material can protect the underlying material of the brake rotor 102 from abrasive friction interactions with the brake pad 116 and its friction material 114. Instead, the friction material 114 of the brake pad 116 can interact with similar material present in the transfer film layer retained on the brake rotor 102. The presence of similar materials on either side of the brake pad-brake rotor interaction during actuation of a braking system 100 can also provide improvements in braking power. In an example, the friction material 114 of the brake pad 116 and the transfer film layer on the brake rotor can experience a form of adherent friction, in which friction material dynamically transfers in either direction (e.g. back and forth between the brake pad 116 and the transfer film layer on the brake rotor 102), with a breaking and reforming of molecular bonds occurring as part of the process.
While adherent friction may occur to some small extent in previously available brake rotors, the absence of surface topography features (e.g. either or both of the peaks 202 and valleys 204 of the second scale of surface topography and optionally also the island formation 302 and channels 304 of the first scale of surface topography described herein) on the surfaces of conventional rotors can render this effect relatively insignificant. For example, the amount of transferred friction material present per unit area in a transfer film layer occurring on a conventional rotor can be orders of magnitude smaller than that present in a brake rotor 102 having features described herein. Additionally, without a surface topography structure capable of retaining a transfer film layer, the impact of adherent friction can be diminished as the transfer film layer would not be laterally anchored to the friction surface of the brake rotor 102 or otherwise resistant to rotational motion about the friction surface of the brake rotor 102 during actuation of the braking system except by relatively weak van der Waals or electrostatic forces. The first scale of surface topography (e.g. island formations 302 and channels 304) and/or the second scale of surface topography (e.g. peaks 202 and valleys 204) described herein, or functional or structural equivalents thereof, can provide a mechanical anchoring mechanism by which a transfer film layer has increased resistance to rotational forces and/or other forces or effects that might act to dislodge the transfer film layer from the friction surface when the braking system 100 is actuated.
Other potential advantages can result for a brake rotor 102 having one or more scales of surface topography as described herein that are sufficient to generate and retain a transfer film layer that includes friction material from a brake pad 116 acting on the brake rotor 102. For example, the transfer film layer can act as a protective layer that reduces abrasive friction on the friction surface of the brake rotor 102. This protective feature can be beneficial in extending the useful lifetime of a brake rotor 102 as overall wear of the friction surface can be reduced. Adherent friction and/or one or more other mechanisms that improve braking effectiveness of a braking system the includes such a brake rotor 102 and a brake pad 116 with creation of a transfer film layer can also reduce wear of the friction material from the brake pad 116. This effect may also result from the increased importance of adherent friction relative to abrasive friction as well as the possibility that a “stickier” brake rotor 102 to brake pad friction material interaction can require less overall force to be applied during actuation of the braking system. Decreased wear of the friction material of a brake pad 116 can reduce an amount of friction material debris created during actuation of the braking system 100 and released into the environment. As one or more chemical components of brake pad friction material can be damaging to the environment, human health, etc., this effect can has significant advantages, particularly in view of increasing governmental regulation of emission from braking systems.
Each of a first scale of surface topography and a second scale of surface topography on a friction surface of a brake rotor 102 can be created, formed, etc. through one or more processes. For example, a surface finishing process for creating the island formations 302 and channels 304 of a first scale of surface topography can include one or more machining or forming techniques, including but not limited to bead blasting, grinding, acid etching, laser etching, roll forming, embossing, stamping, honing, lapped, polished, blanched, milled, profiled or any other machined surface treatment or surface geometry modification and any combination(s) thereof. A surface finishing process for creating peaks 202 and valleys 204 of a second scale of surface topography can include one or more machining or forming techniques, including but not limited to bead blasting, sanding, grinding, acid etching, photo-resist etching, roll forming, embossing, stamping, honing, lapping, polishing, blanching, milling, profiling, or any other machined surface treatment or surface geometry modification and any combination(s) thereof.
Consistent with implementations of the current subject matter, durability can be imparted to some or all of the area of the annular surfaces 108, 110 of a brake rotor by the addition of a wear and corrosion resistant coating. In general, one or more surface finishing processes for creating either or both of a first scale of surface topography and a second scale of surface topography can advantageously occur prior to the processes discussed herein for applying or otherwise creating the wear and corrosion resistant coating
A wear and corrosion resistant coating, either one that is consistent with the examples described herein or one formed using other approaches, can cause surface topography features of a friction surface of a brake rotor 102 to be persistent and durable, even after prolonged use of the brake rotor 102 (e.g. in operation of a motor vehicle or the like). Spacing of the peaks 202 and valleys that are formed in such a surface configuration can be regular or irregular. The peak and valley configuration can operate during braking to transfer some of the material of a brake pad to the brake rotor such that subsequent braking can be enhanced due to adherent friction between the similar brake pad material on the pad itself and on the rotor surface, as discussed in more detail below.
In implementations of the current subject matter, a brake rotor substrate formed of cast iron or some other bulk material having desirable bulk characteristics (e.g. sufficient rigidity, desirable weight properties, cost, etc.) can be prepared with a wear and corrosion resistant coating. Such a rotor can be cleaned, for example to remove impurities such as oil, grease, dirt, oxides, and the like.
The cleaned brake rotor substrate can then be pre-treated using a back-sputtering process performed under a controlled atmosphere (e.g. a vacuum, a partial vacuum, an inert atmosphere such as nitrogen or argon or the like, etc.). A back-sputtering process can include generating ions, which are accelerated toward a surface of the brake rotor substrate by a biasing voltage. In some examples, the biasing voltage can be in a range of approximately 400 to 1200 V or alternatively in a range of about 600 to 1000 V, and the back-sputtering process can be applied for a duration of about 3 to 20 minutes or for other durations depending on one or more of physical properties of the rotor, desired surface characteristics, chemical properties of the rotor substrate material, etc. The pre-treatment process can further clean the surface of the brake rotor substrate in addition to activating the surface to enhance its receptivity to subsequent physical vapor deposition processes.
One or more supporting layers of a preparatory metal can be deposited onto surfaces of the pre-treated brake rotor substrate. The one or more supporting layers can act as a support for a wear and corrosion resistant outer coating applied to the brake rotor substrate consistent with the current subject matter. As used herein, a preparatory metal can include one or more of chrome, nickel, or other similar materials. The preparatory layer can be formed to meet a variety of functional or decorative purposes, such as for example enhanced environmental corrosion protection, galvanic corrosion protection (or perhaps to accelerate corrosion of a sacrificial material or the like), regenerative braking, electro-magnetic braking, sensing, radio frequency identification (RFID), serving as decorative base layer for photo-chemical etching, or the like. In optional variations, the material of a supporting layer can be applied using a wet plating process, plasma spraying, or any other methods capable of applying one or more metallic coatings with a thickness in a range between a fraction of a micron to several thousand microns thick. In an advantageous implementation, the one or more supporting layers of the preparatory metal can be applied using one or more of a physical vapor deposition process, a sputtering process, an evaporative or cathodic arc process, or the like.
A combination of the cleaning and pre-treating of the brake rotor substrate, in addition to application of a supporting layer 104, can provide a suitable substrate for subsequent deposition of one or more iterations of the first layer 106 and second layer 110 of the wear and corrosion resistant coating as discussed elsewhere herein.
The first layer 106 can include an amorphous (non-crystalline) structure or a crystalline structure. The first layer 106 can include multiple layers or multiple layers that can be merged to form a single layer. The thickness of each layer of the first layer 106 can vary from one or a few atoms in depth to thousands of Angstroms. The surface irregularity or defect can be variations in the height of the parallel surfaces and angled surfaces between the variations in height illustrated in
The wear and corrosion resistant coating can also include a second layer 110 that overlays and contacts the first layer 106. Though the first and second layers 106, 110 and the supporting layer are depicted as distinct, in some implementations of the current subject matter, the layers intermingle or merge such that no distinct boundary exists between the layers. The second layer material can include one or more binary metals, for example, one or more metal nitrides, metal borides, metal carbides and metal oxides. The second layer material can include one or more nitrides, borides, carbides or oxides of the metal used in the first layer. In some examples, amorphous titanium can form some or all of the first layer 106 and a titanium nitride (TiN, Ti2N, etc.) can form all or some of the second layer 110. The multiple layers, for example the first and second layers 106, 110, optionally repeated one or more times, can be configured to form a lattice structure or a super lattice structure, which can include thin films formed by alternately depositing two different components to form layered structures. Multilayers become super-lattices when the period of the different layers is less than 100 angstroms. With this cooperation of structure, a coating having a service life to exceed approximately 100,000 vehicle miles or more can be obtained. It should be noted that chemical abbreviations (e.g. TiN, Ti2N, etc.) are used herein as a shorthand rather than an exact chemical label, and do not suggest that the stoichiometry of the indicated compound must be exactly as stated in the abbreviation.
The wear and corrosion resistant coating can cause surface roughness features on the annular surfaces 108, 110 of the brake rotor 102 to be significantly more durable to wear from normal braking activities. As such, the peak 202 and valley 204 topography that is originally present on the friction surfaces of the brake rotor 102 can persist for a large percentage of the useful life of the brake rotor 102, which can in some implementations be many multiples of a typical useful lifetime for a conventional brake rotor without a wear and corrosion resistant coating as described herein.
Surface roughness features on the friction surface of a brake rotor 102 can interact during application of the friction material 114 of the brake pad 116 to the friction surface during braking system operation to cause the surface roughness features of the friction surface to accumulate a layer of transferred friction material 114 from the brake pad 116 to the friction surface. This accumulated layer of friction material on the brake rotor 102 friction surface can experience enhanced friction properties via an adherent friction interaction with the friction material 114 remaining on the brake pad 116. For example, adhesion between the friction material 114 remaining on the brake pad 116 and that transferred to the brake rotor 102 can be more pronounced than adhesion between the friction material 114 on the brake pad 116 and a clean surface of the brake rotor 102. The accumulated layer of friction material transferred to the friction surface of the brake rotor 102 can be successively refreshed by transfer of additional amounts of friction material 114 from the brake pad 116 to the brake rotor 102. The accumulated layer can also serve to protect the underlying surface roughness features on the friction surface of the brake rotor 102 from excessive wear. The adherent friction interaction between friction material 114 remaining on the brake pad 116 and friction material transferred to the friction surface(s) of the brake rotor 102 can enhance the normal abrasive fiction interaction between the friction material 114 of the brake pad and the uncoated friction surface of the brake rotor 102.
The hardness of the coating on the friction surfaces of a brake rotor can dictate how persistent the surface roughness condition of the friction surfaces is over repeated braking events. A typical, uncoated brake rotor constructed of cast iron, stainless steel, light weight metal alloys, ceramic materials, ceramic composite materials, titanium, etc. and/or combinations thereof generally has a hardness as measured on the Rockwell “C” scale of about 35±4. The surface roughness features of the friction surfaces of a brake rotor 102 according to implementations of the current subject matter can be characterized by an average amplitude between the peaks 202 and valleys 204 of the second scale of surface topography, which can in some implementations be in a range of approximately 0.6 μm to 0.85 μm (approximately 26-32 micro-inches). In addition to improved durability resulting from increased hardness of the friction surface of a brake rotor, in some implementations of the current subject matter, a coating imparting wear and corrosion resistance consistent the descriptions herein can also provide a type of solid lubrication. For example, inclusion of chromium and/or possibly other metals can cause the friction surface to be have increased hardness as well as increased “slipperiness,” which can counteract the wear effects of abrasive friction occurring between a friction material of a brake pad 116 and the friction surface of the brake rotor 102.
According to implementations of the current subject matter, an optimized relationship between the surface roughness and the surface hardness can be obtained to maximize persistence of the peak 202 and valley 204 surface roughness features over a useful lifetime of a brake rotor 102. The optimal relationship between the surface roughness and surface hardness is one at which the peak and valley topography is maintained to allow continued transfer and retention of friction material from a brake pad 116 to a friction surface of the brake rotor 102 such that adherent friction between the transferred friction material and the friction material 114 remaining on the brake pad 116 adds to abrasive friction forces between the brake rotor itself and the friction material 114 of the brake pad to improve the stopping power of a braking system 100.
Excessive hardness may lead to brittleness, while too little hardness may lead to premature wear of the surface roughness features. Also, excessive surface roughness may lead to too rapid a consumption of the friction material 114 on a brake pad 116 as too much of the friction material is transferred to and potentially scaled away from the friction surface of the brake rotor. Too little surface roughness on the brake rotor 102 may lead to too little transfer of friction material and/or too little retention of the transferred friction material on the friction surfaces of the brake rotor 102, thereby weakening the braking power and potentially requiring greater reliance on abrasive friction, which can lead to increased wear.
In further implementations, and with reference to
The formulations in Table 1 represent an approximate percentage, either by weight, mass, or volume, or a combination thereof. Further, the approximate value for each component material in each formula can vary in some implementations by +/−5%, or +/−10% or more. For example, the percentage of the formula for each component can vary in alternative formulas by +/−50% or more. In some implementations of the current subject matter, a brake pad friction material can advantageously include primarily environmentally inert components. For example, and/or one or more other toxic or otherwise undesirable friction material components can be excluded from the friction material. In other implementations of the current subject matter, one or more beneficial components can be included in the composition of a brake pad friction material, such as for example a material that acts as a fertilizer when deposited on the land surface.
An additional variable in the analysis of an optimal surface roughness and surface hardness regime can be the composition and other physical properties of the friction material of a brake pad. For example, a brake pad with a friction material that is readily transferrable and/or adherable to a friction surface of a brake rotor may require a less pronounced surface roughness to create the advantages disclosed herein for the inventive subject matter. In such an example, a relatively lower surface roughness may be used in conjunction with an increased surface hardness as the lower amplitude between the peaks 202 and valleys 204 of the surface topography of the brake rotor 102 can be less prone to damage due to the increased brittleness that can accompany increased surface hardness.
At 504, a supporting layer is applied to the pretreated surface. The supporting layer can include a metal such as nickel or chromium, and can be applied through one or more techniques, such as for example wet plating, plasma spraying, physical vapor deposition, sputtering, evaporative arc or cathodic arc in a controlled atmosphere, etc. At 506, a wear and corrosion resistant coating can be applied subsequent to application to the rotor surface. The wear and corrosion resistant coating can advantageously include at least a first layer and a second layer, which can respectively include a metal (e.g titanium or other metals) in an amorphous or crystalline form and a binary metal as discussed above.
In alternative implementations of the current subject matter, the coating can include graphene, which is a 2-dimensional, crystalline allotrope of carbon in which carbon atoms are densely packed in a regular sp2-bonded atomic scale “chicken wire” (e.g. hexagonal) structure. Graphene can be described as a one-atom thick layer of graphite. It is the basic structural element of other allotropes, including graphite, charcoal, carbon nanotubes, and fullerenes. It can also be considered as an indefinitely large aromatic molecule, the limiting case of the family of flat polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. High-quality graphene is strong, light, nearly transparent and an excellent conductor of heat and electricity. Its interactions with other materials and with light and its inherently two-dimensional nature produce unique properties, such as the bipolar transistor effect, ballistic transport of charges, and large quantum oscillations. Addition of graphene to a brake rotor 102 consistent with implementations of the current subject matter can provide one or more potential advantages, potentially including but not limited to improved durability, cooling, corrosion resistance, or the like.
In some implementations of the current subject matter, the method illustrated in the process flow chart 500 of
In related implementations of the current subject matter, a method as illustrated in the process flow chart 600 of
At 604, the transfer film layer is retained on the friction surface at least in part due to the persistent surface roughness features. For example, as discussed above, the surface roughness features of the first scale of surface topography and/or the second scale of surface topography on the friction surface can provide a mechanical anchoring effect that holds the transfer film layer in place. The surface roughness features of the first scale of surface topography and/or the second scale of surface topography can be considered persistent if they are not appreciably worn down due to use of the brake rotor in braking. In some examples, the surface roughness features can be made persistent due to application of one or more coatings that impart wear and corrosion resistance to the friction surface of the brake rotor.
At 606, the method includes stopping a vehicle, for example by actuating a braking system that includes the brake pad and the brake rotor. The actuating causes the friction material of the brake pad to be urged into contact with the transfer film layer on the friction surface of the brake rotor such that an adherent friction interaction between the friction material and the transfer film layer enhances a braking power of the braking system. As used herein, the term enhanced can reflect an improvement over braking performance of a comparably sized brake rotor and similar brake pad material. This improvement can result in a stopping distance improvement of at least 5%, and in some cases of more than 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, or 35% or more relative to a comparably sized brake rotor operating in a same braking system on a same vehicle. References to a stopping distance refer to any type of braking test, for example those that involve applying a braking system of a vehicle traveling at a first speed to determine a minimum distance the vehicle would travel under full braking force while slowing from the first speed to a second speed. In some cases, the second speed is a complete stop. A stopping distance improvement can be measured as a relative reduction in this stopping distance using a braking system that includes one or more of the features discussed herein relative to a conventional braking system. For a relevant comparison, a conventional rotor (e.g. one lacking persistent surface roughness features that can assist in retaining a transfer film layer of the brake pad friction material on the friction surface of the brake rotor) would have the same size as a brake rotor consistent with the current subject matter.
The implementations set forth in the foregoing description do not represent all implementations consistent with the subject matter described herein. Instead, they are merely some examples consistent with aspects related to the described subject matter. Although a few variations have been described in detail herein, other modifications or additions are possible. In particular, further features and/or variations can be provided in addition to those set forth herein. For example, the implementations described above can be directed to various combinations and sub-combinations of the disclosed features and/or combinations and sub-combinations of one or more features further to those disclosed herein. In addition, the logic flows depicted in the accompanying figures and/or described herein do not necessarily require the particular order shown, or sequential order, to achieve desirable results.
In the descriptions above and in the claims, phrases such as “at least one of” or “one or more of” may occur followed by a conjunctive list of elements or features. The term “and/or” may also occur in a list of two or more elements or features. Unless otherwise implicitly or explicitly contradicted by the context in which it used, such a phrase is intended to mean any of the listed elements or features individually or any of the recited elements or features in combination with any of the other recited elements or features. For example, the phrases “at least one of A and B;” “one or more of A and B;” and “A and/or B” are each intended to mean “A alone, B alone, or A and B together.” A similar interpretation is also intended for lists including three or more items. For example, the phrases “at least one of A, B, and C;” “one or more of A, B, and C;” and “A, B, and/or C” are each intended to mean “A alone, B alone, C alone, A and B together, A and C together, B and C together, or A and B and C together.”
Use of the term “based on,” above and in the claims is intended to mean, “based at least in part on,” such that an unrecited feature or element is also permissible.
Other implementations may be within the scope of the following claims.
This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/225,486 (now U.S. patent Ser. No. 10/895,295) filed on Dec. 19, 2018, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/359,293, (now U.S. patent Ser. No. 10/197,121) filed on May 19, 2014, which is a national stage entry of PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/029950, filed on Mar. 15, 2014, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/802,051, filed on Mar. 15, 2013 and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/802,064, filed on Mar. 15, 2013, the entirety of each of which is incorporated by reference herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2753808 | Kluge | Jul 1956 | A |
| 3171527 | Josef | Mar 1965 | A |
| 3314509 | Pelikan | Apr 1967 | A |
| 3403759 | Holcomb | Oct 1968 | A |
| 3443454 | Hall | May 1969 | A |
| 3613851 | Ely | Oct 1971 | A |
| 3708042 | Krause | Jan 1973 | A |
| 3899054 | Huntress | Aug 1975 | A |
| 3907076 | Crossman | Sep 1975 | A |
| 3993415 | Hauser | Nov 1976 | A |
| 4180622 | Burkhard | Dec 1979 | A |
| 4290510 | Warren | Sep 1981 | A |
| 4350231 | Crossman | Sep 1982 | A |
| 4555239 | Miranti, Jr. | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4565274 | Cameron | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4613021 | Lacombe | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4808275 | Ohzora | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4837250 | Headrick | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4848553 | Cameron | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4860872 | Flotow | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4869356 | Cameron | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4933300 | Koinuma et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 5116691 | Darolia | May 1992 | A |
| 5158165 | Flotow | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5306407 | Hauzer | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5407035 | Cole et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5482742 | Takamiya | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5501306 | Martino | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5535857 | Barlow | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5558186 | Hyde | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5612110 | Watremez | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5709288 | Riebe | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5725913 | Wong et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5769185 | Main | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5838522 | Komvopoulos et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5861203 | Yuan et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5884388 | Patrick et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5901818 | Martino | May 1999 | A |
| 5922452 | Takahashi | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5928771 | DeWald, Jr. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 6119828 | Parsons | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6155397 | Killian | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6196936 | Meckel | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6302246 | Naumann | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6457566 | Toby | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6514592 | Hubbard | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6527092 | Gruber et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6536564 | Garfinkel | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6585089 | Parker | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6612415 | Yamane | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6797388 | Szanyi | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6857509 | Braiato | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6935470 | Smith, Jr. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 7097922 | Shen et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7246586 | Hosenfeldt | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7246859 | Hosenfeldt | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7261192 | Khambekar | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7513342 | Waninger | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7799420 | Beck | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 8084089 | Meckel | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8408369 | Chowski | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8449943 | Meckel | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8893863 | Meckel | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 9255618 | Beer et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9394955 | Huschenhoefer | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9581211 | Holly | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 9618066 | Schoepf | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9638276 | Schluck | May 2017 | B2 |
| 9653978 | Zemikow | May 2017 | B2 |
| 10197121 | Filip | Feb 2019 | B2 |
| 10895295 | Filip | Jan 2021 | B2 |
| 20020117360 | Toby | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020153213 | Gruber | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020179382 | Fryska | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030136614 | Feldmann | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030145447 | Moseley | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030183306 | Hehmann | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040129314 | Welty | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040178029 | Hoyte | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20050056495 | Greppi | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050087406 | Meckel | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050183909 | Rau et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050252739 | Callahan | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060079749 | Grau | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060175160 | Weiss | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060272909 | Fuller | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070234929 | Reinsch et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070286961 | Pahle | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080041675 | Baumgartner | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080196985 | Meckel | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080196986 | Meckel | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080213610 | Idei et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20090026025 | Hampton | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090026026 | Martino | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090050423 | Meckel | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090288921 | Meckel | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20110056777 | Woychowski | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110133132 | Zhamu | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110135948 | Pyzik | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20120037465 | Abe | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120118686 | Meckel | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20130008748 | Lembach | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130112514 | Hanna | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130161136 | Huschenhoefer | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130161137 | Huschenhoefer | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130220745 | Meckel | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20140332330 | Orr | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20150041262 | Meckel | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150369314 | Filip | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150369315 | Wall | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20170184164 | Bean | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20190063525 | Wall | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 538507 | Nov 1931 | DE |
| 102004016092 | Oct 2005 | DE |
| 102011122308 | Jun 2012 | DE |
| 1256739 | Nov 2002 | EP |
| 1258647 | Feb 2012 | EP |
| 2707621 | Jul 2016 | EP |
| 788671 | Oct 1935 | FR |
| 2807484 | Oct 2001 | FR |
| 2154614 | Sep 1985 | GB |
| 63026210 | Feb 1988 | JP |
| 02175859 | Jul 1990 | JP |
| 04312220 | Nov 1992 | JP |
| 04337126 | Nov 1992 | JP |
| 04337127 | Nov 1992 | JP |
| 07208520 | Aug 1995 | JP |
| 07224390 | Aug 1995 | JP |
| 09118755 | May 1997 | JP |
| 2003049252 | Feb 2003 | JP |
| 2004316850 | Nov 2004 | JP |
| 101998049479 | Sep 1998 | KR |
| 1019990036405 | May 1999 | KR |
| 1020060051087 | May 2006 | KR |
| 20100098817 | Sep 2010 | KR |
| 9738235 | Oct 1997 | WO |
| 9850837 | Nov 1998 | WO |
| 2006092270 | Sep 2006 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Yu, et al. “Vapor deposition of platinum alloyed nickel aluminide coatings.” Surface & Coatings Technology 201, (Jun. 2006) pp. 2326-2334. |
| Terry Tritt, “Thermal Conductivity: Theory, Properties, and Applications.” (2004):100. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20210381563 A1 | Dec 2021 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61802051 | Mar 2013 | US | |
| 61802064 | Mar 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16225486 | Dec 2018 | US |
| Child | 17123470 | US | |
| Parent | 14359293 | US | |
| Child | 16225486 | US |
