Welding simulator

Description

FIELD

The present invention pertains to systems for simulating a welding environment, and more particularly to simulated welding environments that emulate the welding of a weld joint in real time and the setup thereof.

BACKGROUND

For decades companies have been teaching welding skills. Traditionally, welding has been taught in a real-world setting, that is to say that welding has been taught by actually striking an arc with an electrode on a piece of metal. Instructors, skilled in the art, oversee the training process making corrections in some cases as the trainee performs a weld. By instruction and repetition, a new trainee learns how to weld using one or more processes. However, costs are incurred with every weld performed, which varies depending on the welding process being taught.

In more recent times, cost saving systems for training welders have been employed. Some systems incorporate a motion analyzer. The analyzer includes a physical model of a weldment, a mock electrode, and sensing means that track movement of the mock electrode. A report is generated that indicates to what extent the electrode tip traveled outside an acceptable range of motion. More advanced systems incorporate the use of virtual reality, which simulates manipulation of a mock electrode in a virtual setting. Similarly, these systems track position and orientation. Such systems teach only muscle memory, but cannot teach the more advanced welding skills required of a skilled welder.

SUMMARY

The general inventive concepts encompass systems for simulating welding activity within a simulated welding environment.

In one exemplary embodiment, a welding simulator comprises: a logic processor based subsystem operable to execute coded instructions for generating an interactive welding environment in which a welding activity is simulated, the welding activity occurring at an interface of a first simulated work piece and a second simulated work piece defining a simulated weld joint; a display operatively connected to the logic processor based subsystem for visually depicting the interactive welding environment; a first hand-held input device for performing a first simulated welding activity on the simulated weld joint in real time; and a second hand-held input device for performing a second simulated welding activity on the simulated weld joint in real time, wherein at least a portion of the first simulated welding activity and at least a portion of the second simulated welding activity are performed simultaneously.

In one exemplary embodiment, the first simulated work piece is at least one of a flat plate and a cylindrical body. In one exemplary embodiment, the cylindrical body is a pipe.

In one exemplary embodiment, the second simulated work piece is at least one of a flat plate and a cylindrical body. In one exemplary embodiment, the cylindrical body is a pipe.

In one exemplary embodiment, at least one of the first simulated welding activity and the second simulated welding activity includes a tie-in operation.

In one exemplary embodiment, the display depicts at least a portion of the simulated weld joint.

In one exemplary embodiment, the interactive welding environment is a virtual reality environment.

In one exemplary embodiment, the display is integrated in a welding helmet.

In one exemplary embodiment, a method of simulating a welding activity is provided. The method comprises: generating an interactive welding environment in which the welding activity is simulated, the welding activity occurring at an interface of a first simulated work piece and a second simulated work piece defining a simulated weld joint; displaying the interactive welding environment including at least a portion of the simulated weld joint; displaying and/or tracking movement of a first hand-held input device performing a first simulated welding activity on the simulated weld joint in real time; and displaying and/or tracking movement of a second hand-held input device performing a second simulated welding activity on the simulated weld joint in real time, wherein at least a portion of the first simulated welding activity and at least a portion of the second simulated welding activity are performed simultaneously.

In one exemplary embodiment, the first simulated work piece is at least one of a flat plate and a cylindrical body. In one exemplary embodiment, the cylindrical body is a pipe.

In one exemplary embodiment, the second simulated work piece is at least one of a flat plate and a cylindrical body. In one exemplary embodiment, the cylindrical body is a pipe.

In one exemplary embodiment, at least one of the first simulated welding activity and the second simulated welding activity includes a tie-in operation.

In one exemplary embodiment, the interactive welding environment is a virtual reality environment.

In one exemplary embodiment, the display is integrated in a welding helmet.

In one exemplary embodiment, a welding simulator comprises: a logic processor based subsystem operable to execute coded instructions for generating an interactive welding environment in which a welding activity is simulated, the welding activity occurring at an interface of a first simulated work piece and a second simulated work piece defining a simulated weld joint; a display operatively connected to the logic processor based subsystem for visually depicting the interactive welding environment; and a hand-held input device for performing a simulated welding activity on the simulated weld joint in real time, wherein the welding simulator is operable to simulate removal of material from at least one of the first simulated work piece and the second simulated work piece.

In one exemplary embodiment, the simulated removal of material occurs during the welding activity. In one exemplary embodiment, the simulated removal of material results from simulating burning through at least one of the first simulated work piece and the second simulated work piece.

In one exemplary embodiment, the simulated removal of material results from simulating grinding of the simulated weld joint.

In one exemplary embodiment, a welding simulator comprises: a logic processor based subsystem operable to execute coded instructions for generating an interactive welding environment in which a welding activity is simulated, the welding activity occurring at an interface of a first simulated work piece and a second simulated work piece defining a simulated weld joint; a display operatively connected to the logic processor based subsystem for visually depicting the interactive welding environment; and a hand-held input device for performing a simulated welding activity on the simulated weld joint in real time, wherein the welding simulator is operable to simulate generation of smoke during the welding activity.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an end user operator engaging in virtual welding activity with a simulator, according to an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 2 is a front view of a simulator, according to an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 3A is a chart showing pipe welding positions;

FIG. 3B is a chart showing plate welding positions;

FIG. 4 is a schematic block diagram of a representation of a simulator, according to an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 5 is a side perspective view of a mock welding tool, according to an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 6 is a close-up view of a welding user interface, according to an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 7 is a close-up view of an observer display device, according to an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 8A is a perspective view of a personalized display device, according to an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 8B is a perspective view of the personalized display device of FIG. 8A worn by an end user;

FIG. 8C is a perspective view of a personalized display device mounted in a welding helmet, according to an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 9 is a perspective view of a spatial tracker, according to an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 10 is a perspective view of a stand for holding welding coupons, according to an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 11 is a perspective view of an exemplary pipe welding coupon;

FIG. 12 is a perspective view of a pipe welding coupon mounted into the stand, according to an exemplary embodiment;

FIGS. 13A-13C illustrate an exemplary embodiment of a boss weld joint;

FIG. 13D illustrates another exemplary embodiment of a boss weld joint;

FIG. 14 depicts a simulated welding operation on the boss weld joint of FIGS. 13A-13B in a virtual environment, according to an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 15 illustrates an exemplary pipe welding coupon;

FIGS. 16A-16E illustrate an exemplary embodiment of a tie-in operation;

FIG. 17 is a subsystem block diagram of a logic processor-based subsystem, according to an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 18 is a block diagram of a graphics processing unit (GPU) of the logic processor-based subsystem, according to an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 19 is a functional block diagram of a welding simulator, according to an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 20 is a flow chart of an exemplary method of training using a virtual reality training system;

FIGS. 21A-21B illustrate the concept of a welding pixel (wexel) displacement map;

FIG. 22 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a coupon space and a weld space of a flat welding coupon simulated in the simulator;

FIG. 23 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a coupon space and a weld space of a corner welding coupon simulated in the simulator;

FIG. 24 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a coupon space and a weld space of a pipe welding coupon simulated in the simulator;

FIG. 25 illustrates another exemplary pipe welding coupon;

FIGS. 26A-26C illustrate the concept of a dual-displacement puddle model of the simulator, according to an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 27 illustrates an exemplary orbital welding system as used in an orbital welding environment;

FIG. 28 illustrates an exemplary welding tractor for use with the orbital welding system of FIG. 27;

FIG. 29 illustrates an exemplary power source and controller of the orbital welding system of FIG. 27; and

FIG. 30 illustrates an exemplary pendant for use with the orbital welding system of FIG. 27.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Referring now to the drawings wherein the showings are for purposes of illustrating embodiments of the invention only and not for purposes of limiting the same, FIGS. 1 and 2 show a system for simulating welding depicted generally at 10, termed herein as simulator 10 or system 10. Simulator 10 is capable of generating a simulated environment 15, which may depict a welding setting similar to that in the real world. In some exemplary embodiments, the simulated environment 15 may be a virtual reality environment. By way of example only, various embodiments of the simulator 10 will be described herein with respect to a virtual reality environment, such that the simulator 10 implements virtual reality arc welding (VRAW). Within the virtual environment 15, simulator 10 facilitates interaction with one or more end user(s) 12. An input device 155 is included that allows an end user 12 to engage in real-world activity, which is tracked by the simulator 10 and translated into virtual activity. The virtual environment 15 thus comprises an interactive virtual welding environment 15. A display 200 is included that provides visual access into the virtual environment 15 and the end user's 12 activity. In one embodiment, simulator 10 may include a display 150 viewable by a plurality of end users 12 or other observers. Additionally, simulator 10 may include a personalized display 140 adapted for use by a single end user 12, which may be a trainee user 12a or an instructor user 12b. It is expressly noted here that the end user's 12 activity in the real world is translated into virtual welding activity and viewed on one or more displays 140, 150 in real time. As used herein, the term “real time” means perceiving and experiencing, in time, a virtual environment in the same way that an end user 12 would perceive and experience, in time, a real-world setting.

In generating the simulated welding environment 15 (e.g., an interactive virtual welding environment), simulator 10 emulates one or more welding processes for a plurality of weld joints in different welding positions, and additionally emulates the effects of different kinds of electrodes for the plurality of joint configurations. In one particular embodiment, simulator 10 generates an interactive virtual welding environment 15 that emulates welding of a boss weld joint such as typically encountered during pipe welding and/or welding of open root joints.

As used herein, “boss weld joint” generally refers to the welding interface between a first work piece and a second work piece, wherein at least one of the work pieces will typically have a round, contoured, or angled portion. As a result, at least a portion of the welding interface will typically be non-linear. In some embodiments, one of the work pieces will have a tab, flange, protrusion, or the like (i.e., a “boss”) that forms part of the welding interface. For example, a weld nut may include a boss portion that facilitates welding the weld nut to another work piece or surface. Such a boss, however, is not required to fall within the definition of “boss weld joint” as used herein. For example, the interface between a round pipe abutting a flat plate or the interface between two sections of pipe are also examples of a boss weld joint. For purposes of further describing the general inventive concepts, the boss joint welding process will generally be described herein in the context of welding a pipe to a flat plate.

The system is capable of simulating a weld puddle having real-time molten metal fluidity and heat dissipation characteristics. The simulator 10 is also capable of modeling how virtual welding activity affects the weld joint, e.g., the underlying base material. Illustratively, simulator 10 may emulate welding a root pass and a hot pass, as well as subsequent filler and cap passes, each with characteristics paralleling real-world scenarios. Each subsequent pass may weld significantly different from that of the previous pass as a result of changes in the base material made during the previous pass and/or as a result of a differently selected electrode. Real-time feedback of the puddle modeling allows the end user 12 to observe the virtual welding process on the display 200 and adjust or maintain his/her technique as the virtual weld is being performed. Examples of the kinds of virtual indicators observed may include: flow of the weld puddle, shimmer of molten puddle, changes in color during puddle solidification, freeze rate of the puddle, color gradients of heat dissipation, sound, bead formation, weave pattern, formation of slag, undercut, porosity, spatter, slag entrapment, overfill, blowthrough, and occlusions to name a few. It is to be realized that the puddle characteristics are dependent upon, that is to say responsive to, the end user's 12 movement of the input device 155. In this manner, the displayed weld puddle is representative of a real-world weld puddle formed in real time based on the selected welding process and on the end user's 12 welding technique. Furthermore, “wagon tracks” is the visual trail of weld defects and slag left behind in the toes of the root pass made during boss joint (e.g., pipe) welding using the SMAW process. The second pass in the boss joint welding, called the hot pass, must be hot enough to remelt the wagon tracks so they are eliminated in the final weldment. Also, wagon tracks may be removed by a grinding process. Such wagon tracks and elimination of the wagon tracks are properly simulated in the simulator 10 described herein, in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention.

With continued reference to FIGS. 1 and 2 and now also to FIGS. 3A and 3B, simulator 10 may emulate welding processes in various welding positions and model how the weld puddle reacts in each position. More specifically, simulator 10 may emulate boss joint (e.g., pipe) welding in vertical, horizontal, and/or inclined positions referred to in the art respectively as the 5 G, 2 G, and 6 G positions. Additionally, simulator 10 may emulate welding in a 1 G position which relates to the rotating horizontal position of the pipe, or in a 4 G position which relates to welding overhead as may be associated with a groove weld in abutting plates. Other welding positions may relate to the welding of open root joints for various configurations of flat plate. It is to be understood that the simulator 10, including a modeling and analysis engine to be described in detail in subsequent paragraphs, takes into account the effects of gravity on the weld puddle. Accordingly, the weld puddle reacts differently, for example, for a welding pipe in a 5 G position from that of a 6 G position. The examples above are not to be construed as limiting, but are included for illustrative purposes. Those skilled in the art will readily understand its application to any weld joint, welding position, or type of weldment including different kinds of base material.

With reference now to FIGS. 2 and 4, simulator 10 includes a logic processor-based subsystem 110, which may be programmable and operable to execute coded instructions for generating the interactive virtual welding environment 15. Simulator 10 further includes sensors and/or sensor systems, which may be comprised of a spatial tracker 120, operatively connected to the logic processor-based subsystem 110. Simulator 10 also includes a welding user interface 130 in communication with the logic processor-based subsystem 110 for set up and control of the simulator 10. As referenced above, display device(s) 200 are included, which may comprise a face-mounted display device 140 and an observer display device 150 each connected to the logic processor-based subsystem 110 providing visual access to the interactive virtual welding environment 15 and simulated activity therein. One or more of the display devices 200 may be connected to the spatial tracker 120 for changing the images viewed on the device in response to its position and/or movement thereof, as described below.

Input Device

With reference now to FIG. 5, as mentioned above, simulator 10 includes an input device 155 that facilitates interaction with the end-user 12. In one embodiment, input device 155 comprises a mock welding tool 160. The mock welding tool 160 may be, but does not have to be, fashioned to resemble a real-world welding tool such as, for example, a manual welding electrode holder or a weld gun delivering a continuous feed to electrode (e.g., MIG, FCAW, GTAW welding tools). Still, other configurations of the mock welding tool 160 may be implemented without departing from the intended scope of coverage of the embodiments of the subject invention. For discussion purposes, the embodiments of the subject invention will be described in the context of using a mock welding tool 160 that resembles a manual welding electrode holder 156. The mock welding tool 160 may closely resemble a real-world welding tool. In one particular embodiment, mock welding tool 160 may have the same shape, weight, and feel as a real-world welding tool. In fact, a real welding tool could be used as the mock welding tool 160 to provide the actual feel of the tool in the user's hands, even though, in the simulator 10, the real welding tool would not be used to actually create a real arc. In this manner, end-user 12, which maybe a trainee user 12a, becomes accustomed to handling a real-world welding tool thereby enhancing the virtual welding experience. However, the mock welding tool 160 may be constructed in any manner and configuration chosen with sound judgment.

Illustratively, mock welding tool 160 simulates a stick welding tool for pipe welding and includes a holder 161 and a simulated stick electrode 162 extending therefrom. The simulated stick electrode 162 may include a tactilely resistive tip 163 to simulate resistive feedback that occurs during welding in a real-world setting. If the end user 12 moves the simulated stick electrode 162 too far back out of the root (described in detail below), the end user 12 will be able to feel or sense the reduced resistance thereby deriving feedback for use in adjusting or maintaining the current welding process. It is contemplated that the stick welding tool may incorporate an actuator, not shown, that withdraws the simulated stick electrode 162 during the virtual welding process. That is to say that as end user 12 engages in virtual welding activity, the distance between holder 161 and the tip of the simulated stick electrode 162 is reduced to simulate consumption of the electrode. The consumption rate, i.e., withdrawal of the stick electrode 162, may be controlled by the logic processor-based subsystem 110 and more specifically by coded instructions executed by the logic processor-based subsystem 110. The simulated consumption rate may also depend on the end user's 12 technique. It is noteworthy to mention here that as simulator 10 facilitates virtual welding with different types of electrodes, the consumption rate or reduction of the stick electrode 162 may change with the welding procedure used and/or setup of the simulator 10.

The actuator of the mock welding tool 160 may be electrically driven. Power for engaging the actuator may come from the simulator 10, from an external power source, or from internal battery power. In one embodiment, the actuator may be an electromotive device, such as an electric motor. Still, any type of actuator or form of motive force may be used including, but not limited to, electromagnetic actuators, pneumatic actuators, mechanical actuators, or spring-loaded actuators, in any combination thereof.

As indicated above, the mock welding tool 160 may work in conjunction with the spatial tracker for interacting with the simulator 10. In particular, the position and/or orientation of mock welding tool 160 may be monitored and tracked by the spatial tracker 120 in real time. Data representing the position and orientation may therefore be communicated to the logic processor-based subsystem 110 and modified or converted for use as required for interacting with the virtual welding environment 15.

Spatial Tracker

Referencing FIG. 9, an example of a spatial tracker 120 is illustrated. Spatial tracker 120 may interface with the logic processor-based subsystem 110. In one embodiment, the spatial tracker 120 may track the mock welding tool 160 magnetically. That is to say that the spatial tracker generates a magnetic envelope, which is used to determine position and orientation, as well as speed and/or changes in speed. Accordingly, in some exemplary embodiments, the spatial tracker 120 includes a magnetic source 121 and source cable, one or more sensors 122, host software on disk 123, a power source 124, USB and RS-232 cables 125, a processor tracking unit 126, and other associated cables. The magnetic source 121 is capable of being operatively connected to the processor tracking unit 126 via cables, as are the one or more sensors 122. The power source 124 is also capable of being operatively connected to the processor tracking unit 126 via a cable. The processor tracking unit 126 is capable of being operatively connected to the logic processor-based subsystem 110 via a USB or RS-232 cable 125. The host software on disk 123 may be loaded onto the logic processor-based subsystem 110 and allows functional communication between the spatial tracker 120 and the logic processor-based subsystem 110.

The magnetic source 121 creates a magnetic field, or envelope, surrounding the source 121 defining a three-dimensional space within which the end user's 12 activity may be tracked for interacting with the simulator 10. The envelope establishes a spatial frame of reference. Objects used within the envelope, e.g., mock welding tool 160 and coupon stand (described below), may be comprised of non-metallic, i.e., non-ferric and non-conductive, material so as not to distort the magnetic field created by the magnetic source 121. Each sensor 122 may include multiple induction coils aligned in crossing spatial directions, which may be substantially orthogonally aligned. The induction coils measure the strength of the magnetic field in each of the three directions providing information to the processor tracking unit 126. In one embodiment at least one sensor 122 is attached to the mock welding tool 160 allowing the mock welding tool 160 to be tracked with respect to the spatial frame of reference in both position and orientation. More specifically, the induction coils may be mounted in the tip of the electrode 162. In this way, simulator 10 is able to determine where within the three-dimensional envelope the mock welding tool 160 is positioned. Additional sensors 122 may be provided and operatively attached to the one or more display devices 200. Accordingly, simulator 10 may use sensor data to change the view seen by the end user 12 responsive to the end user's 12 movements. As such, the simulator 10 captures and tracks the end user's 12 activity in the real world for translation into the simulated welding environment 15.

In accordance with another exemplary embodiment of the invention, the sensor(s) 122 may wirelessly interface to the processor tracking unit 126, and the processor tracking unit 126 may wirelessly interface to the logic processor-based subsystem 110. In accordance with yet another exemplary embodiments of the invention, other types of spatial trackers 120 may be used in the simulator 10 including, for example, an accelerometer/gyroscope-based tracker, an optical tracker, an infrared tracker, an acoustic tracker, a laser tracker, a radio frequency tracker, an inertial tracker, an active or passive optical tracker, and augmented reality based tracking. Still, other types of trackers may be used without departing from the intended scope of coverage of the general inventive concepts.

Display Device

With reference now to FIG. 8A, an example of the face-mounted display device 140 will now be described. The face-mounted display device 140 may be integrated into a welding helmet 900, as shown in FIG. 8C or alternatively may be separately mounted as shown in FIG. 8B. The face-mounted display device 140 may include two high-contrast SVGA 3D OLED micro-displays capable of delivering fluid full-motion video in the 2D and frame sequential video modes. Virtual images (e.g., video) from the virtual welding environment 15 are provided and displayed on the face-mounted display device 140. In one embodiment of the subject invention, the logic processor-based subsystem 110 provides stereoscopic video to the face-mounted display device 140, enhancing the depth perception of the user. Stereoscopic images may be produced by a logic processing unit, which may be a graphics processing unit described in detail below. A zoom (e.g., 2×) mode may also be provided, allowing a user to simulate a cheater plate.

The face-mounted display device 140 operatively connects to the logic processor-based subsystem 110 and the spatial tracker 120 via wired or wireless means. A sensor 122 of the spatial tracker 120 may be attached to the face-mounted display device 140 or to the welding helmet 900 thereby allowing the face-mounted display device 140 to be tracked with respect to the 3D spatial frame of reference created by the spatial tracker 120. In this way, movement of the welding helmet 900 responsively alters the image seen by the end user 12 in the simulated welding environment 15 (e.g., a three-dimensional virtual reality setting). The face-mounted display device 140 may also function to call up and display menu items similar to that of observer display device 150, as subsequently described. In this manner, an end user is therefore able to use a control on the mock welding tool 160 (e.g., a button or switch) to activate and select options from the menu. This may allow the user to easily reset a weld if the user makes a mistake, change certain parameters, or back up to re-do a portion of a weld bead trajectory, for example.

The face-mounted display device 140 may further include speakers 910, allowing the user to hear simulated welding-related and environmental sounds produced by the simulator 10. Sound content functionality and welding sounds provide particular types of welding sounds that change depending on if certain welding parameters are within tolerance or out of tolerance. Sounds are tailored to the various welding processes and parameters. For example, in a MIG spray arc welding process, a crackling sound is provided when the user does not have the mock welding tool 160 positioned correctly, and a hissing sound is provided when the mock welding tool 160 is positioned correctly. In a short arc welding process, a hissing sound is provided when undercutting is occurring. These sounds mimic real-world sounds corresponding to correct and incorrect welding techniques.

High fidelity sound content may be taken from real-world recordings of actual welding using a variety of electronic and mechanical means. The perceived volume and direction of the sound is modified depending on the position, orientation, and distance of the end user's head, i.e., the face-mounted display device 140, with respect to the simulated arc between the mock welding tool 160 and the welding coupon 175. Sound may be provided to the user via speakers 910, which may be earbud speakers or any other type of speakers or sound generating device, mounted in the face-mounted display device 140 or alternatively mounted in the console 135 and/or stand 170. Still, any manner of presenting sound to the end user 12 while engaging in virtual welding activity may be chosen. It is also noted here that other types of sound information may be communicated through the speakers 910. Examples include verbal instructions from the instructor user 12b, in either real time or via prerecorded messages. Prerecorded messages may be automatically triggered by particular virtual welding activity. Real time instructions may be generated on site or from a remote location. Still, any type of message or instruction may be conveyed to end user 12.

Console

With reference now to FIGS. 2, 6, and 7, the simulator 10 may include a console 135 housing one or more components of the simulator 10. In one embodiment, the console 135 may be constructed to resemble a welding power source. That is to say that the shape and size of the console 135 may match that of a real-world device. Operation of the simulator 10 may be facilitated by a welding unit interface 130, which may be fashioned to resemble welding power source knobs, dials, and/or switches 133, 134. Simulator 10 may further include a display, which may be display device 200. Coded instructions, i.e., software, installed onto the simulator 10 may direct the end user's 12 interaction with the simulator 10 by displaying instructions and/or menu options on the display 200. Interaction with the simulator 10 may include functions relating to administrative activity, simulation set up and activation, and the like. This may further include selection of a particular welding process and electrode type, as well as part set up including welding position. Selections made by way of welding unit interface 130 are reflected on the display 200.

FIG. 6 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of the console 135 and welding user interface 130. The welding unit interface 130 may include a set of buttons 131 corresponding to the user selections 153 used during set up and operation of the simulator 10. The buttons 131 may be colored to correspond to colors of the user selections 153 displayed on display 200. When one of the buttons 131 is pressed, a signal is sent to the logic processor-based subsystem 110 to activate the corresponding function. The welding unit interface 130 may also include a joystick 132 capable of being used by a user to select various parameters and selections displayed on the display 200. The welding unit interface 130 further includes a dial or knob 133, which in an exemplary manner, may be used for adjusting wire feed speed/amps, and another dial or knob 134 for adjusting volts/trim. The welding unit interface 130 also includes a dial or knob 136 for selecting an arc welding process. In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention, three arc welding processes are selectable including flux cored arc welding (FCAW), gas metal arc welding (GMAW), and shielded metal arc welding (SMAW). The welding unit interface 130 further includes a dial or knob 137 for selecting a welding polarity. In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention, three arc welding polarities are selectable including alternating current (AC), positive direct current (DC+), and negative direct current (DC−). Still, other welding processes and set up features may be incorporated in the simulator 10 without departing from the intended scope of coverage of the general inventive concepts, including but not limited to TIG welding embodiments. From the aforementioned, it will be readily seen that setup of the simulator 10 parallels set up of a real-world device.

The graphical user interface functionality 1213 (see FIG. 19) allows a user, viewable via the observer display device 150 and using the joystick 132 of the physical user interface 130, to set up a welding scenario. The set up of a welding scenario may include selecting a language, entering an end user name, selecting a practice plate (e.g., a welding coupon, T-plate, flat plate), selecting a welding process (e.g., FCAW, GMAW, SMAW, TIG) and associated axial spray, pulse, or short arc mode of transfer, selecting a gas type and flow rate, selecting a type of stick electrode (e.g., E6010 or E7018), and selecting a type of flux cored wire (e.g., self-shielded, gas-shielded). The set up of a welding scenario may also include setting up a coupon stand 170 to be discussed in detail below. The set up of a welding scenario further includes selecting an environment (e.g., a background environment in virtual reality space), setting a wire feed speed, setting a voltage level, selecting a polarity, and turning particular visual cues on or off. In some embodiments, the setup of a welding scenario may include inputting parameters associated with preheating a work piece (e.g., a thick rod or plate) prior to welding. It is noted here that in one embodiment, limitations may be incorporated into the simulator 10, which may be software limitations, that prevent operation of a given welding scenario until the appropriate settings for a selected process have been properly entered. In this way, trainee users 12a are taught or learn the proper range of real-world welding settings by setting up virtual welding scenarios.

Accordingly, display 200 reflects activity corresponding to the end user selections 153 including menu, actions, visual cues, new coupon set up, and scoring. These user selections may be tied to user buttons on the console 135. As a user makes various selections via display 200, the displayed characteristics can change to provide selected information and other options to the user. However, the display 200, which may be an observer display device 150, may have another function, which is to display virtual images seen by the end user 12 during operation of the simulator 10, i.e., while engaging in virtual welding activity. Display 200 may be set up to view the same image as seen by the end user 12. Alternatively, display 200 may also be used to display a different view, or different perspective, of the virtual welding activity.

In one embodiment, display devices 150, 200 may be used to playback virtual welding activity stored electronically on data storage devices 300, shown in FIG. 17. Data representing the end user's 12 virtual welding activity may be, for example, stored for playback and review, downloaded for archiving purposes, and/or transmitted to remote locations for viewing and critiquing in real time. In replaying the virtual welding activity, details such as weld puddle fluidity and travel speed, as well as discontinuity states 152 including, for example, improper fillet size, poor bead placement, poor tie-in, concave bead, excessive convexity, undercut, porosity, incomplete fusion, slag entrapment, excess spatter, and burn-through, may be represented. Undercut may also be displayed, which is the result of an out of tolerance angle. Moreover, porosity may be displayed caused by moving the arc too far away from the weldment. In this manner, the simulator 10 is capable of replaying part or all of particular virtual welding activity and modeling all aspects of the virtual welding scenario including occlusions and defects related directly to the end user's activity.

Referencing FIG. 7, simulator 10 is also capable of analyzing and displaying the results of virtual welding activity. By analyzing the results, it is meant that simulator 10 is capable of determining when during the welding pass (including any tie-ins) and where along the weld joints the end user 12 deviated from the acceptable limits of the welding process. A score may be attributed to the end user's 12 performance. In one embodiment, the score may be a function of deviation in position, orientation, and speed of the mock welding tool 160 through ranges of tolerances, which may extend from an ideal welding pass to marginal or unacceptable welding activity. Any gradient of ranges may be incorporated into the simulator 10 as chosen for scoring the end user's 12 performance. Scoring may be displayed numerically or alpha-numerically. Additionally, the end user's 12 performance may be displayed graphically showing, in time and/or position along the weld joint, how closely the mock welding tool traversed the weld joint. Parameters such as travel angle, work angle, speed, and distance from the weld joint are examples of what may be measured, although any parameters may be analyzed for scoring purposes. For example, performance of a tie-in procedure, as described herein, can be analyzed and scored. The tolerance ranges of the parameters are taken from real-world welding data, thereby providing accurate feedback as to how the end user will perform in the real world. In another embodiment, analysis of the defects corresponding to the end user's 12 performance may also be incorporated and displayed on the display devices 150, 200. In this embodiment, a graph may be depicted indicating what type of discontinuity resulted from measuring the various parameters monitored during the virtual welding activity. While occlusions may not be visible on the display 200, defects may still have occurred as a result of the end user's 12 performance, the results of which may still be correspondingly displayed, e.g., graphed.

Display 200 may also be used to display tutorial information used to train an end user 12. Examples of tutorial information may include instructions, which may be displayed graphically as depicted by video or pictures. Additionally, instructions may be written or presented in audio format, as mentioned above. Such information may be stored and maintained on the data storage devices 300. In one embodiment, simulator 10 is capable of displaying virtual welding scenes showing various welding parameters 151 including position, tip to work, weld angle, travel angle, and travel speed, termed herein as visual cues.

In one embodiment, remote communications may be used to provide virtual instruction by offsite personnel, i.e., remote users, working from similarly or dissimilarly constructed devices, i.e., simulators. Portraying a virtual welding process may be accomplished via a network connection including but not limited to the internet, LANs, and other means of data transmission. Data representing a particular weld (including performance variables) may be sent to another system capable of displaying the virtual image and/or weld data. It should be noted that the transmitted data is sufficiently detailed for allowing remote user(s) to analyze the welder's performance. Data sent to a remote system may be used to generate a virtual welding environment thereby recreating a particular welding process. Still, any way of communicating performance data or virtual welding activity to another device may be implemented without departing from the intended scope of coverage of the embodiments of the subject invention.

Welding Coupon

With reference now to FIGS. 1, 11, and 12, simulator 10 may include a welding coupon 175 that resembles pipe sections juxtaposed to form a welding joint 176. The welding coupon 175 may work in conjunction with the simulator 10, serving as a guide for the end user 12 while engaging in virtual welding activity (e.g., welding of a boss weld joint). A plurality of welding coupons 175 may be used, that is to say interchanged for use in a given cycle of virtual welding activity. The types of welding coupons may include cylindrical pipe sections, arcuate pipe segments, flat plate, T-plate, and solid rods, just to name a few. In one embodiment, each of the welding coupons may incorporate open root joints or grooves. However, any configurations of weld joints may be incorporated into a welding coupon without departing from the intended scope of coverage of the embodiments of the subject invention.

The dimensions of welding coupons 175 may vary. For cylindrical pipe, the range of inside diameters may extend, for example, from 1½ inches (inside diameter) to 18 inches (inside diameter). In one particular embodiment, the range of inside diameters may exceed 18 inches. In another embodiment, arcuate pipe segments may have a characteristic radius in the range extending, for example, from 1½ inches (inside diameter) up to and exceeding 18 inches (inside diameter). Furthermore, it is to be construed that any inside diameter of welding coupon 175 may be utilized, both those smaller than 1½ inches and those exceeding 18 inches. In a practical sense, any size of welding coupon 175 can be used as long as the welding coupon 175, or a portion of the welding coupon 175, fits within the envelope generated by the spatial tracker 120. Flat plate may extend up to and exceed 18 inches in length as well. Still, it is to be understood that the upper dimensional limits of a welding coupon 175 are constrained only by the size and strength of the sensing field generated by the spatial tracker 120 and its ability to be positioned respective of the welding coupon 175. All such variations are to be construed as falling within the scope of coverage of the embodiments of the subject invention.

In one embodiment, the welding coupon 175 includes a pipe 2000 or pipe section interfaced with a plate 2002 that is flat, planar, or the like. In this manner, the welding coupon 175 can emulate a pipe-on-plate weld, as a type of boss weld (see FIGS. 13A-13B and 15). An outer circumference of where the pipe 2000 interfaces with or otherwise contacts the plate 2002 forms a weld path 2004. A shape of the weld path 2004 will typically correspond to a shape of the pipe 2000. The weld path 2004 is a path that a mock welding tool 2010 (e.g., the mock welding tool 160) is expected to traverse when welding the pipe 2000 and plate 2002 to one another.

In one exemplary embodiment, the pipe 2000 and the plate 2002 interface to form a fillet joint (see FIGS. 13A-13B). FIG. 13A is a side elevational view of the pipe 2000 and the plate 2002. FIG. 13B is a perspective view of the pipe 2000 and the plate 2002. FIG. 13C is a perspective view, according to an alternative exemplary embodiment, of a solid rod 2001 and the plate 2002 with the mock welding tool 2010 in position to weld along the weld path 2004.

In another exemplary embodiment, the solid rod 2001 and the plate 2002 interface to form a fillet joint, wherein a first mock welding tool 2012 and a second mock welding tool 2014 are welding along the weld path 2004 at the same time (see FIG. 13D). Thus, the simulator 10 is capable of simulating simultaneous welding activity on a single weld joint in real time.

FIG. 14 is an image 2100 showing how the simulated operation of welding the fillet joint at the interface of the pipe 2000 and the plate 2002 might look to a user (e.g., the user 12). For example, the image 2100 could be displayed on any suitable display device (e.g., the display 200). In this manner, the image 2100 could be displayed on the observer display device 150. Furthermore, the image 2100 shows what the user might see in his/her face-mounted display device 140.

In one embodiment, a lower section 2020 of the pipe 2000 includes a beveled or grooved section to form a groove joint (see FIG. 15). Thus, the pipe 2000 and the plate 2002 interface to form the grooved joint. FIG. 15 is a perspective view of the pipe 2000 and the plate 2002.

When welding certain weld joints, such as the fillet joint of FIGS. 13A-13C, the groove joint of FIG. 15, a corner joint, or the like, including straight/linear weld joints, an experienced welder may be able to traverse the entire weld path (e.g., the weld path 2004) in a single pass. However environmental obstacles or other constraints (e.g., fatigue, distraction) may require that a user only traverse a portion of the weld path, stop momentarily (e.g., to reposition his/her body relative to the weld), and then resume traversing the weld path. Likewise, an inexperienced welder (e.g., the trainee welder 12a) may feel more comfortable or otherwise benefit from breaking up a long weld pass (e.g., a 360 degree weld pass) into two or more smaller weld passes (e.g., a first 180 degrees weld pass and a second 180 degree weld pass). The joining or connecting of two different weld passes is called a tie-in.

In one embodiment, a tie-in operation 2300 (e.g., as shown in FIGS. 16A-16E) is emulated in the simulator 10. In this manner, the tie-in operation can be performed and practiced/taught, scored, etc. As shown in FIG. 16A, the weld path 2004 for the fillet joint at the interface of the pipe 2000 and the plate 2002 (see FIG. 13B) is circular. In welding the fillet joint, the user positions the mock welding tool 2010 to begin welding at a first point 2302 on the weld path 2004 (see FIG. 16B). The user then moves the mock welding tool 2010 along the weld path 2004 in the direction of the arrow 2304. The user moves the mock welding tool 2010 along the weld path 2004 until a second point 2306 is reached, at which time welding is temporarily suspended, thereby completing a first weld pass 2308 (see FIG. 16C). Typically, the first weld pass will substantially solidify during this period of non-welding.

As the user prepares to begin a second weld pass 2326, it is important that the second weld pass 2326 is tied-in to the first weld pass 2308. Accordingly, the user positions the mock welding tool 2010 to begin welding at a third point 2320 on the weld path 2004 that at least partially overlaps the second point 2306 on the weld path 2004 where the first weld pass 2308 ended (see FIG. 16D). By beginning the second weld pass 2326 at a point that at least partially overlaps or is otherwise merged with the first weld pass 2308, the second weld pass 2326 will be tied-in with the first weld pass 2308. The user then moves the mock welding tool 2010 along the weld path 2004 in the direction of the arrow 2322. The user moves the mock welding tool 2010 along the weld path 2004 until a fourth point 2324 is reached, at which time welding is halted, thereby completing the second weld pass 2326 (see FIG. 16E). Again, given the circular nature of this particular weld path 2004, the fourth point 2324 on the weld path 2004 at least partially overlaps with the first point 2302 on the weld path 2004.

The first weld pass 2308 and the second weld pass 2326, which are tied-in to one another, form the fillet joint weld between the pipe 2000 and the plate 2002.

As mentioned above, the welding coupon 175 may be constructed from a material that does not interfere with the spatial tracker 120. For spatial trackers generating a magnetic field, the welding coupon 175 may be constructed from non-ferrous and non-conductive material (e.g., plastic). However, any type of material may be chosen that is suitable for use with the type of spatial tracker 120 or other sensors selected.

Referencing FIGS. 11-12, 13A-13C, and 15, the welding coupon 175 may be constructed so that it fits into a table or stand 170, which functions (at least in part) to hold the welding coupon 175 constant with respect to the spatial tracker 120. Accordingly, the welding coupon 175 may include a connecting portion 177 or connector 177, as shown in FIGS. 11-12. The connecting portion 177 may extend from one side of the welding coupon 175, which as illustrated may be the bottom side (e.g., a bottom surface of the plate 2002), and may be received into a mechanical interlocking device included with the stand 170. It will be appreciated that the orientation at which the welding coupon 175 is inserted into the stand 170 may need to be constant, i.e., repeatable, for closely matching the virtual weldment, e.g., pipe, created within the virtual welding environment 15. In this manner, as long as the simulator 10 is aware of how the position of the welding coupon 175 has changed, adjustments to the virtual counterpart may be made accordingly. For example, during set up, the end user 12 may select the size of the part (e.g., pipe) to be welded on. The end user 12 may then insert the appropriate welding coupon 175 into the stand 170, locking it into position. Subsequently, the end user 12 may choose a desired welding position making the selection via the welding user interface 130. As will be described below, the stand 170 may then be tilted or adjusted to position the welding coupon 175 in any of the welding positions recognized by the simulator 10. Of course, it will be appreciated that adjusting the position of the welding coupon 175 also adjusts the position of the spatial tracker 120 thereby preserving the relative position of the welding coupon 175 within the sensory tracking field.

FIG. 10 depicts one embodiment of the stand 170. The stand 170 may include an adjustable table 171, a stand base 172, an adjustable arm 173, and a vertical post 174. The table 171 and the arm 173 are respectively attached to the vertical post 174. The table 171 and the arm 173 are each capable of being adjusted along the height of the vertical post 174, which may include upward, downward, and/or rotational movement with respect to the vertical post 174. The arm 173 is used to hold the welding coupon 175, in a manner consistent with that discussed herein. The table 171 may assist the end user 12 by allowing his/her arms to rest on the table 171 during use. In one particular embodiment, the vertical post 174 is indexed with position information such that a user may know exactly where the arm 173 and the table 171 are positioned. This information may also be entered into the simulator 10 by way of the welding user interface 130 and the display device 150 during set up.

An alternative embodiment of the subject invention is contemplated wherein the positions of the table 171 and the arm 173 are automatically adjusted responsive to selections made during set up of the simulator 10. In this embodiment, selections made via the welding user interface 130 may be communicated to the logic processor-based subsystem 110. Actuators and feedback sensors employed by the stand 170 may be controlled by the logic processor-based subsystem 110 for positioning the welding coupon 175 without physically moving the arm 173 or the table 171. In one embodiment, the actuators and feedback sensors may comprise electrically driven servomotors. However, any locomotive device may be used to automatically adjust the position of the stand 170 as chosen with sound engineering judgment. In this manner, the process of setting up the welding coupon 175 is automated and does not require manual adjustment by the end user 12.

Another embodiment of the subject invention includes the use of intelligence devices used in conjunction with the welding coupon 175, termed herein as “smart” coupons 175. In this embodiment, the welding coupon 175 includes a device having information about that particular welding coupon 175 that may be sensed by the stand 170. In particular, the arm 173 may include detectors that read data stored on or within the device located on the welding coupon 175. Examples may include the use of digital data encoded on a sensor, e.g., micro-electronic device, that may be read wirelessly when brought into proximity of the detectors. Other examples may include the use of passive devices like bar coding. Still any manner of intelligently communicating information about the welding coupon 175 to the logic processor-based subsystem 110 may be chosen with sound engineering judgment.

The data stored on the welding coupon 175 may automatically indicate, to the simulator 10, the kind of welding coupon 175 that has been inserted in the stand 170. For example, a 2-inch pipe coupon may include information related to its diameter. Alternatively, a flat plate coupon may include information that indicates the kind of weld joint included on the coupon, e.g., a groove weld joint or a butt weld joint, as well as its physical dimensions. In this manner, information about the welding coupon 175 may be used to automate that portion of the setup of the simulator 10 related to selecting and installing a welding coupon 175.

Calibration functionality 1208 (see FIG. 19) provides the capability to match up physical components in real-world space (3D frame of reference) with visual components in the virtual welding environment 15. Each different type of welding coupon 175 is calibrated in the factory by mounting the welding coupon 175 to the arm 173 of the stand 170 and touching the welding coupon 175 at predefined points 179 (indicated by, for example, three dimples 179 on the welding coupon 175) with a calibration stylus operatively connected to the stand 170. The simulator 10 reads the magnetic field intensities at the predefined points 179, provides position information to the logic processor-based subsystem 110, and the logic processor-based subsystem 110 uses the position information to perform the calibration (i.e., the translation from real-world space to virtual reality space).

Any part of the same type of welding coupon 175, accordingly, fits into the arm 173 of the stand 170 in the same repeatable way to within very tight tolerances. Therefore, once a particular type of welding coupon 175 is calibrated, repeated calibration of similar coupons is not necessary, i.e., calibration of a particular type of welding coupon 175 is a one-time event. Stated differently, welding coupons 175 of the same type are interchangeable. Calibration ensures that physical feedback perceived by the user during a welding process matches up with what is displayed to the user in virtual reality space, making the simulation seem more real. For example, if the user slides the tip of a mock welding tool 160 around the corner of an actual welding coupon 175, the user will see the tip sliding around the corner of the virtual welding coupon on the display 200 as the user feels the tip sliding around the actual corner. In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the mock welding tool 160 may also be placed in a pre-positioned jig and calibrated in a similar manner, based on the known jig position.

In accordance with another embodiment of the subject invention, “smart” coupons may include sensors that allow the simulator 10 to track the pre-defined calibration point, or corners of the “smart” coupon. The sensors may be mounted on the welding coupon 175 at the precise location of the predefined calibration points. However, any manner of communicating calibration data to the simulator 10 may be chosen. Accordingly, the simulator 10 continuously knows where the “smart” coupon is in real-world 3D space. Furthermore, licensing keys may be provided to “unlock” welding coupons 175. When a particular welding coupon 175 is purchased, a licensing key may be provided that allows the end user 12a, 12b to enter the licensing key into the simulator 10, unlocking the software associated with that particular welding coupon 175. In an alternative embodiment, special nonstandard welding coupons may be made or otherwise provided based on real-world CAD drawings of parts.

With reference now to FIGS. 2, 4, and 10, as mentioned above, simulator 10 includes a logic processor-based subsystem 110, which may comprise programmable electronic circuitry 202 for executing coded instructions used to generate the simulated welding environment 15. The programmable electronic circuitry 202 may include one or more logic processors 203 or logic processor-based systems 203, which may be comprised of one or more microprocessors 204. In one particular embodiment, the programmable electronic circuitry 202 may be comprised of central processing unit(s) (CPU) and graphics processing unit(s) (GPU), to be discussed further below. Additional circuitry may be included, like for example electronic memory, i.e., RAM, ROM, as well as other peripheral support circuitry. It is noted that electronic memory may be included for both the CPU and the GPU, each of which may be separately programmable for use in rendering aspects of the simulated welding environment 15 as described herein. Moreover, the programmable electronic circuitry 202 may include and utilize data storage devices 300 such as hard disk drives, optical storage devices, flash memory, and the like. Still other types of electronic circuitry may be included that facilitate the transfer of data between devices within the simulator 10 or between different simulators 10. This may include, for example, receiving data from one or more input devices 155, e.g., spatial tracker or sensor, or transferring data over one or more networks which may be a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), and/or the Internet. It is to be understood that the aforementioned devices and processes are exemplary in nature and should not be construed as limiting. In fact, any form of programmable circuitry, support circuitry, communication circuitry, and/or data storage may be incorporated into the embodiments of the subject invention as chosen with sound engineering judgment.

FIG. 17 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a subsystem block diagram of the logic processor-based subsystem 110 of the simulator 10. The logic processor-based subsystem 110 may include a central processing unit (CPU) 111 and two graphics processing units (GPU) 115. The two GPUs 115 may be programmed to provide virtual reality simulation of a weld puddle having real-time molten metal fluidity as well as heat absorption and dissipation characteristics.

With reference to FIG. 18, a block diagram of the graphics processing unit (GPU) 115 is shown. Each GPU 115 supports the implementation of data parallel algorithms. In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention, each GPU 115 provides two video outputs 118 and 119 capable of providing two virtual reality views. Two of the video outputs may be routed to the face-mounted display device 140, rendering the welder's point of view, and a third video output may be routed to the observer display device 150, for example, rendering either the welder's point of view or some other point of view. The remaining fourth video output may be routed to a projector, for example, or used for any other purpose suitable for simulating a virtual welding environment 15. Both GPUs 115 may perform the same welding physics computations but may render the virtual welding environment 15 from the same or different points of view. The GPU 115 includes a computed unified device architecture (CUDA) 116 and a shader 117. The CUDA 116 is the computing engine of the GPU 115 which is accessible to software developers through industry standard programming languages. The CUDA 116 includes parallel cores and is used to run the physics model of the weld puddle simulation described herein. The CPU 111 provides real-time welding input data to the CUDA 116 on the GPU 115. In one particular embodiment, the shader 117 is responsible for drawing and applying all of the visuals of the simulation. Bead and puddle visuals are driven by the state of a wexel displacement map which is described later herein. In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the physics model runs and updates at a rate of about 30 times per second.

FIG. 19 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a functional block diagram of the simulator 10. The various functional blocks of the simulator 10 may be implemented largely via software instructions and modules running on the logic processor-based subsystem 110. The various functional blocks of the simulator 10 include a physical interface 1201, torch and clamp models 1202, environment models 1203, sound content functionality 1204, welding sounds 1205, stand/table model 1206, internal architecture functionality 1207, calibration functionality 1208, coupon models 1210, welding physics 1211, internal physics adjustment tool (tweaker) 1212, graphical user interface functionality 1213, graphing functionality 1214, student reports functionality 1215, renderer 1216, bead rendering 1217, 3D textures 1218, visual cues functionality 1219, scoring and tolerance functionality 1220, tolerance editor 1221, and special effects 1222.

The internal architecture functionality 1207 provides the higher level software logistics of the processes of the simulator 10 including, for example, loading files, holding information, managing threads, turning the physics model on, and triggering menus. The internal architecture functionality 1207 runs on the CPU 111, in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention. Certain real-time inputs to the logic processor-based subsystem 110 include arc location, gun position, face-mounted display device or helmet position, gun on/off state, and contact made state (yes/no).

During a simulated welding scenario, the graphing functionality 1214 gathers user performance parameters and provides the user performance parameters to the graphical user interface functionality 1213 for display in a graphical format (e.g., on the observer display device 150). Tracking information from the spatial tracker 120 feeds into the graphing functionality 1214. The graphing functionality 1214 includes a simple analysis module (SAM) and a whip/weave analysis module (WWAM). The SAM analyzes user welding parameters including welding travel angle, travel speed, weld angle, position, and tip to work by comparing the welding parameters to data stored in bead tables. The WWAM analyzes user whipping parameters including dime spacing, whip time, and puddle time. The WWAM also analyzes user weaving parameters including width of weave, weave spacing, and weave timing. The SAM and WWAM interpret raw input data (e.g., position and orientation data) into functionally usable data for graphing. In one exemplary embodiment, the SAM, the WWAM, and/or some other module is used to track, graph, or otherwise account for tie-in operations, as described herein. For each parameter analyzed by the SAM, the WWAM, and/or other related module, a tolerance window is defined by parameter limits around an optimum or ideal set point input into bead tables using the tolerance editor 1221, and scoring and tolerance functionality 1220 is performed.

The tolerance editor 1221 includes a weldometer which approximates material usage, electrical usage, and welding time. Furthermore, when certain parameters are out of tolerance, welding discontinuities (i.e., welding defects) may occur. The state of any simulated welding discontinuities are processed by the graphing functionality 1214 and presented via the graphical user interface functionality 1213 in a graphical format. Such welding discontinuities include fillet size, poor bead placement, improper tie-in, concave bead, excessive convexity, undercut, porosity, incomplete fusion, slag entrapment, and excess spatter. In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the level or amount of a discontinuity is dependent on how far away a particular user parameter is from the optimum or ideal set point.

Different parameter limits may be pre-defined for different types of users such as, for example, welding novices, welding experts, and persons at a trade show. The scoring and tolerance functionality 1220 provide number scores depending on how close to optimum (ideal) a user is for a particular parameter and depending on the level of discontinuities or defects present in the weld. Information from the scoring and tolerance functionality 1220 and from the graphics functionality 1214 may be used by the student reports functionality 1215 to create a performance report for an instructor and/or a student.

Visual cues functionality 1219 provide immediate feedback to the user by displaying overlaid colors and indicators on the face-mounted display device 140 and/or the observer display device 150. Visual cues are provided for each of the welding parameters 151 including position, tip to work, weld angle, travel angle, and travel speed and visually indicate to the user if some aspect of the user's welding technique should be adjusted based on the predefined limits or tolerances. Visual cues may also be provided for whip/weave technique, weld bead “dime” spacing, and proper tie-in technique, for example.

In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention, simulation of a weld puddle or pool in virtual reality space is accomplished where the simulated weld puddle has real-time molten metal fluidity and heat dissipation characteristics. At the heart of the weld puddle simulation is the welding physics functionality 1211 (a.k.a., the physics model) which may be executed on the GPUs 115, in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention. The welding physics functionality employs a double displacement layer technique to accurately model dynamic fluidity/viscosity, solidity, heat gradient (heat absorption and dissipation), puddle wake, and bead shape, and is described in more detail herein with respect to FIGS. 21A-21B.

The welding physics functionality 1211 communicates with the bead rendering functionality 1217 to render a weld bead in all states from the heated molten state to the cooled solidified state. The bead rendering functionality 1217 uses information from the welding physics functionality 1211 (e.g., heat, fluidity, displacement, dime spacing) to accurately and realistically render a weld bead in virtual reality space in real time. The 3D textures functionality 1218 provides texture maps to the bead rendering functionality 1217 to overlay additional textures (e. g., scorching, slag, grain) onto the simulated weld bead. The renderer functionality 1216 is used to render various non-puddle specific characteristics using information from the special effects module 1222 including sparks, spatter, smoke, arc glow, fumes, and certain discontinuities such as, for example, undercut and porosity.

The internal physics adjustment tool 1212 is a tweaking tool that allows various welding physics parameters to be defined, updated, and modified for the various welding processes. In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the internal physics adjustment tool 1212 runs on the CPU 111, and the adjusted or updated parameters are downloaded to the GPUs 115. The types of parameters that may be adjusted via the internal physics adjustment tool 1212 include parameters related to welding coupons, process parameters that allow a process to be changed without having to reset a welding coupon (allows for doing a second pass), various global parameters that can be changed without resetting the entire simulation, and other various parameters.

FIG. 20 is a flow chart of an exemplary embodiment of a method 1300 of training using the simulator 10. In step 1310, a mock welding tool is moved with respect to a welding coupon in accordance with a welding technique. In step 1320, the position and orientation of the mock welding tool is tracked in three-dimensional space using a virtual reality system. In step 1330, a real-time virtual reality simulation of the mock welding tool and the welding coupon in a virtual reality space is displayed as the simulated mock welding tool deposits a simulated weld bead material onto at least one simulated surface of the simulated welding coupon by forming a simulated weld puddle in the vicinity of a simulated arc emitting from said simulated mock welding tool. In step 1340, real-time molten metal fluidity and heat dissipation characteristics of the simulated weld puddle are displayed. In step 1350, at least one aspect of the welding technique is modified in real time in response to viewing the real-time molten metal fluidity and heat dissipation characteristics of the simulated weld puddle. In one exemplary embodiment, the welding technique includes a tie-in operation, as described herein.

The method 1300 illustrates how a user is able to view a weld puddle in virtual reality space and modify his/her welding technique in response to viewing various characteristics of the simulated weld puddle, including real-time molten metal fluidity (e.g., viscosity) and heat dissipation. The user may also view and respond to other characteristics including real-time puddle wake and dime spacing. Viewing and responding to characteristics of the weld puddle is how many welding operations are actually performed in the real world. The double displacement layer modeling of the welding physics functionality 1211 running on the GPUs 115 allows for such real-time molten metal fluidity and heat dissipation characteristics to be accurately modeled and represented to the user. For example, heat dissipation determines solidification time (i.e., how much time it takes for a wexel to completely solidify).

Furthermore, a user may make a second pass over the weld bead material using the same or a different (e.g., a second) mock welding tool, welding electrode, and/or welding process. In such a second pass scenario, the simulation shows the simulated mock welding tool, the welding coupon, and the original simulated weld bead material in virtual reality space as the simulated mock welding tool deposits a second simulated weld bead material merging with the first simulated weld bead material by forming a second simulated weld puddle in the vicinity of a simulated arc emitting from the simulated mock welding tool. Additional subsequent passes using the same or different welding tools or processes may be made in a similar manner. In any second or subsequent pass, the previous weld bead material is merged (as a form of tie-in) with the new weld bead material being deposited as a new weld puddle is formed in virtual reality space from the combination of any of the previous weld bead material, the new weld bead material, and possibly the underlying coupon material in accordance with certain embodiments of the invention. Such subsequent passes may be performed to repair a weld bead formed by a previous pass, for example, or may include a heat pass and one or more gap closing passes after a root pass as is done in pipe welding. In accordance with various exemplary embodiments of the invention, base and weld bead material may be simulated to include mild steel, stainless steel, and aluminum.

As noted above, the merging of multiple weld passes is termed a “tie-in.” The second or subsequent weld pass may be performed parallel to and at least partially on top of a first or prior weld pass. Another type of tie-in is when a weld pass is interrupted or otherwise halted prior to traversing the complete weld path. Thereafter, the user starts a new weld pass on the weld path, wherein the new weld pass overlaps or is otherwise interfaced with the pre-existing weld pass. Thus, a proper tie-in involves correctly merging the two or more weld passes making up the weld along the weld path.

In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention, welding with stainless steel materials is simulated in a real-time virtual environment. The base metal appearance is simulated to provide a realistic representation of a stainless steel weldment. Simulation of the visual effect is provided to change the visual spectrum of light to accommodate the coloration of the arc. Realistic sound is also simulated based on proper work distance, ignition, and speed. The arc puddle appearance and deposition appearance are simulated based on the heat affected zone and the torch movement. Simulation of dross or broken particles of aluminum oxide or aluminum nitride films, which can be scattered throughout the weld bead, is provided. Calculations related to the heating and cooling affected zones are tailored for stainless steel welding. Discontinuity operations related to spatter are provided to more closely and accurately simulate the appearance of stainless steel GMAW welding.

In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention, welding with aluminum materials is simulated in a real-time virtual environment. The bead wake is simulated to closely match the appearance of the aluminum welding to that seen in the real world. The base metal appearance is simulated to represent a realistic representation of an aluminum weldment. Simulation of the visual effect is provided to change the visual spectrum of light to accommodate the coloration of the arc. A calculation of lighting is provided to create reflectivity. Calculations related to the heating and cooling affected zones are tailored for aluminum welding. Simulation of oxidation is provided to create a realistic “cleaning action.” Realistic sound is also simulated based on proper work distance, ignition, and speed. The arc puddle appearance and deposition appearance are simulated based on the heat affected zone and the torch movement. The appearance of the aluminum wire is simulated in the GMAW torch to provide a realistic and proper appearance.

In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention, GTAW welding is simulated in a real-time virtual environment. Simulation of operational parameters for GTAW welding are provided including, but not limited to, flow rate, pulsing frequency, pulse width, arc voltage control, AC balance, and output frequency control. Visual representation of the puddle “splash” or dipping technique and melt off of the welding consumable are also simulated. Furthermore, representations of autogenous (no filler metal) and GTAW with filler metal welding operations in the welding puddle are rendered visually and audibly. Implementation of additional filler metal variations may be simulated including, but not limited to, carbon steel, stainless steel, aluminum, and Chrome Moly. A selectable implementation of an external foot pedal may be provided for operation while welding.

Engine for Modeling

FIGS. 21A-21B illustrate the concept of a welding element (wexel) displacement map 1420, in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention. FIG. 21A shows a side view of a flat welding coupon 1400 having a flat top surface 1410. The welding coupon 1400 exists in the real world as, for example, a plastic part, and also exists in virtual reality space as a simulated welding coupon. FIG. 21B shows a representation of the top surface 1410 of the simulated welding coupon 1400 broken up into a grid or array of welding elements, termed “wexels” forming a wexel map 1420. Each wexel (e.g., wexel 1421) defines a small portion of the surface 1410 of the welding coupon. The wexel map defines the surface resolution. Changeable channel parameter values are assigned to each wexel, allowing values of each wexel to dynamically change in real time in virtual reality weld space during a simulated welding process. The changeable channel parameter values correspond to the channels Puddle (molten metal fluidity/viscosity displacement), Heat (heat absorption/dissipation), Displacement (solid displacement), and Extra (various extra states, e.g., slag, grain, scorching, virgin metal). These changeable channels are referred to herein as PHED for Puddle, Heat, Extra, and Displacement, respectively.

FIG. 22 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a coupon space and a weld space of the flat welding coupon 1400 of FIG. 21A simulated in the simulator 10 of FIGS. 1 and 2. Points 0, X, Y, and Z define the local 3D coupon space. In general, each coupon type defines the mapping from 3D coupon space to 2D virtual reality weld space. The wexel map 1420 of FIG. 21B is a two-dimensional array of values that map to weld space in virtual reality. A user is to weld from point B to point E as shown in FIG. 22. A trajectory line from point B to point E is shown in both 3D coupon space and 2D weld space in FIG. 22.

Each type of coupon defines the direction of displacement for each location in the wexel map. For the flat welding coupon of FIG. 22, the direction of displacement is the same at all locations in the wexel map (i.e., in the Z-direction). The texture coordinates of the wexel map are shown as S, T (sometimes called U, V) in both 3D coupon space and 2D weld space, in order to clarify the mapping. The wexel map is mapped to and represents the rectangular surface 1410 of the welding coupon 1400.

FIG. 23 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a coupon space and a weld space of a corner welding coupon 1600 simulated in the simulator 10. The corner welding coupon 1600 has two surfaces 1610 and 1620 in 3D coupon space that are mapped to 2D weld space as shown in FIG. 23. Again, points 0, X, Y, and Z define the local 3D coupon space. The texture coordinates of the wexel map are shown as S, T in both 3D coupon space and 2D weld space, in order to clarify the mapping. A user is to weld from point B to point E as shown in FIG. 23. A trajectory line from point B to point E is shown in both 3D coupon space and 2D weld space in FIG. 23. However, the direction of displacement is towards the line X′-0′ as shown in the 3D coupon space, towards the opposite corner.

FIG. 24 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a coupon space and a weld space of a pipe welding coupon 1700 simulated in the simulator 10. The pipe welding coupon 1700 has a curved surface 1710 in 3D coupon space that is mapped to 2D weld space. Points 0, X, Y, and Z once again define the local 3D coupon space. The texture coordinates of the wexel map are shown as S, T in both 3D coupon space and 2D weld space, in order to clarify the mapping. An end user 12 is to weld from point B to point E along a curved trajectory as shown in FIG. 24. A trajectory curve and line from point B to point E is shown in 3D coupon space and 2D weld space, respectively. The direction of displacement is away from the line Y-0 (i.e., away from the center of the pipe). FIG. 25 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of the pipe welding coupon 1700 of FIG. 24. The pipe welding coupon 1700 is made of a non-ferric, non-conductive plastic and simulates two pipe pieces 1701 and 1702 coming together to form a root joint 1703. An attachment piece 1704 for attaching to the arm 173 of the stand 170 is also shown.

In a similar manner that a texture map may be mapped to a rectangular surface area of a geometry, a weldable wexel map may be mapped to a rectangular surface of a welding coupon. Each element of the weldable map is termed a wexel in the same sense that each element of a picture is termed a pixel (a contraction of picture element). A pixel contains channels of information that define a color (e.g., red, green, blue). A wexel contains channels of information (e.g., P, H, E, D) that define a weldable surface in virtual reality space.

In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the format of a wexel is summarized as channels PHED (Puddle, Heat, Extra, Displacement) which contains four floating point numbers. The Extra channel is treated as a set of bits which store logical information about the wexel such as, for example, whether or not there is any slag at the wexel location. The Puddle channel stores a displacement value for any liquefied metal at the wexel location. The Displacement channel stores a displacement value for the solidified metal at the wexel location. The Heat channel stores a value giving the magnitude of heat at the wexel location. In this way, the weldable part of the coupon can show displacement due to a welded bead, a shimmering surface “puddle” due to liquid metal, color due to heat, etc. All of these effects are achieved by the vertex and pixel shaders applied to the weldable surface.

In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention, a displacement map and a particle system are used where the particles can interact with each other and collide with the displacement map. The particles are virtual dynamic fluid particles and provide the liquid behavior of the weld puddle but are not rendered directly (i.e., are not visually seen directly). Instead, only the particle effects on the displacement map are visually seen. Heat input to a wexel affects the movement of nearby particles. There are two types of displacement involved in simulating a welding puddle which include Puddle and Displacement. Puddle displacement is “temporary” and only lasts as long as there are particles and heat present. Displacement is “permanent.” Puddle displacement is the liquid metal of the weld which changes rapidly (e.g., shimmers) and can be thought of as being “on top” of the Displacement. The particles overlay a portion of a virtual surface displacement map (i.e., a wexel map). The Displacement represents the permanent solid metal including both the initial base metal and the weld bead that has solidified.

In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the simulated welding process in virtual reality space works as follows: Particles stream from the emitter (emitter of the simulated mock welding tool 160) in a thin cone. The particles make first contact with the surface of the simulated welding coupon where the surface is defined by a wexel map. The particles interact with each other and the wexel map and build up in real time. More heat is added the nearer a wexel is to the emitter. Heat is modeled in dependence on distance from the arc point and the amount of time that heat is input from the arc. Certain visuals (e.g., color) are driven by the heat. A weld puddle is drawn or rendered in virtual reality space for wexels having enough heat. Wherever it is hot enough, the wexel map liquefies, causing the Puddle displacement to “raise up” for those wexel locations. Puddle displacement is determined by sampling the “highest” particles at each wexel location. As the emitter moves on along the weld trajectory, the wexel locations left behind cool. Heat is removed from a wexel location at a particular rate. When a cooling threshold is reached, the wexel map solidifies. As such, the Puddle displacement is gradually converted to Displacement (i.e., a solidified bead). Displacement added is equivalent to Puddle removed such that the overall height does not change. Particle lifetimes are tweaked or adjusted to persist until solidification is complete. Certain particle properties that are modeled in the simulator 10 include attraction/repulsion, velocity (related to heat), dampening (related to heat dissipation), and direction (related to gravity).

FIGS. 26A-26C illustrate an exemplary embodiment of the concept of a dual-displacement (displacement and particles) puddle model of the simulator 10. Welding coupons are simulated in virtual reality space having at least one surface. The surfaces of the welding coupon are simulated in virtual reality space as a double displacement layer including a solid displacement layer and a puddle displacement layer. The puddle displacement layer is capable of modifying the solid displacement layer.

As described herein, “puddle” is defined by an area of the wexel map where the Puddle value has been raised up by the presence of particles. The sampling process is represented in FIGS. 26A-26C. A section of a wexel map is shown having seven adjacent wexels. The current Displacement values are represented by un-shaded rectangular bars 1910 of a given height (i.e., a given displacement for each wexel). In FIG. 26A, the particles 1920 are shown as round un-shaded dots colliding with the current Displacement levels and are piled up. In FIG. 26B, the “highest” particle heights 1930 are sampled at each wexel location. In FIG. 26C, the shaded rectangles 1940 show how much Puddle has been added on top of the Displacement as a result of the particles. The weld puddle height is not instantly set to the sampled values since Puddle is added at a particular liquification rate based on Heat. Although not shown in FIGS. 26A-26C, it is possible to visualize the solidification process as the Puddle (shaded rectangles) gradually shrinks and the Displacement (unshaded rectangles) gradually grows from below to exactly take the place of the Puddle. In this manner, real-time molten metal fluidity characteristics are accurately simulated. As a user practices a particular welding process, the user is able to observe the molten metal fluidity characteristics and the heat dissipation characteristics of the weld puddle in real time in virtual reality space and use this information to adjust or maintain his/her welding technique.

The number of wexels representing the surface of a welding coupon is fixed. Furthermore, the puddle particles that are generated by the simulation to model fluidity are temporary, as described herein. Therefore, once an initial puddle is generated in virtual reality space during a simulated welding process using the simulator 10, the number of wexels plus puddle particles tends to remain relatively constant. This is because the number of wexels that are being processed is fixed and the number of puddle particles that exist and are being processed during the welding process tend to remain relatively constant because puddle particles are being created and “destroyed” at a similar rate (i.e., the puddle particles are temporary). Therefore, the processing load of the logic processor-based subsystem 110 remains relatively constant during a simulated welding session.

In accordance with another exemplary embodiment of the invention, puddle particles may be generated within or below the surface of the welding coupon. In such an embodiment, displacement may be modeled as being positive or negative with respect to the original surface displacement of a virgin (i.e., un-welded) coupon. In this manner, puddle particles may not only build up on the surface of a welding coupon, but may also penetrate the welding coupon. However, the number of wexels is still fixed and the puddle particles being created and destroyed is still relatively constant.

In accordance with other exemplary embodiments of the invention, instead of modeling particles, a wexel displacement map may be provided having more channels to model the fluidity of the puddle. Or, instead of modeling particles, a dense voxel map may be modeled. Or, instead of a wexel map, only particles may be modeled which are sampled and never go away. Such alternative embodiments may not provide a relatively constant processing load for the system, however.

Furthermore, in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention, blowthrough or a keyhole is simulated by taking material away. For example, if a user keeps an arc in the same location for too long, in the real world, the material would burn away causing a hole. Such real-world burnthrough is simulated in the simulator 10 by wexel decimation techniques. If the amount of heat absorbed by a wexel is determined to be too high by the simulator 10, that wexel may be flagged or designated as being burned away and rendered as such (e.g., rendered as a hole). Subsequently, however, wexel re-constitution may occur for certain welding process (e.g., pipe welding) where material is added back after being initially burned away. In general, the simulator 10 simulates wexel decimation (taking material away) and wexel reconstitution (adding material back).

Furthermore, removing material in root-pass welding is properly simulated in the simulator 10. For example, in the real world, grinding of the root pass may be performed prior to subsequent welding passes. Similarly, simulator 10 may simulate a grinding pass that removes material from the virtual weld joint. It will be appreciated that the material removed is modeled as a negative displacement on the wexel map. That is to say that the grinding pass removes material that is modeled by the simulator 10 resulting in an altered bead contour. Simulation of the grinding pass may be automatic, which is to say that the simulator 10 removes a predetermined thickness of material, which may be respective to the surface of the root pass weld bead. In an alternate embodiment, an actual grinding tool, or grinder, may be simulated that turns on and off by activation of the mock welding tool 160 or another input device. It is noted that the grinding tool may be simulated to resemble a real-world grinder. In this embodiment, the user maneuvers the grinding tool along the root pass to remove material responsive to the movement thereof. It will be understood that the user may be allowed to remove too much material. In a manner similar to that described above, holes or keyholes, or other defects (described above) may result if the user “grinds away” too much material. Still, hard limits or stops may be implemented, i.e. programmed, to prevent the user from removing too much material or indicate when too much material is being removed.

In addition to the non-visible “puddle” particles described herein, the simulator 10 also uses three other types of visible particles to represent Arc, Flame, and Spark effects, in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention. These types of particles do not interact with other particles of any type but interact only with the displacement map. While these particles do collide with the simulated weld surface, they do not interact with each other. Only Puddle particles interact with each other, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. The physics of the Spark particles is setup such that the Spark particles bounce around and are rendered as glowing dots in virtual reality space.

The physics of the Arc particles is setup such that the Arc particles hit the surface of the simulated coupon or weld bead and stay for a while. The Arc particles are rendered as larger dim bluish-white spots in virtual reality space. It takes many such spots superimposed to form any sort of visual image. The end result is a white glowing nimbus with blue edges.

The physics of the Flame particles is modeled to slowly raise upward. The Flame particles are rendered as medium sized dim red-yellow spots. It takes many such spots superimposed to form any sort of visual image. The end result is blobs of orange-red flames with red edges raising upward and fading out. Other types of non-puddle particles may be implemented in the simulator 10, in accordance with other exemplary embodiments of the invention. For example, smoke particles may be modeled and simulated in a similar manner to flame particles.

The final steps in the simulated visualization are handled by the vertex and pixel shaders provided by the shaders 117 of the GPUs 115. The vertex and pixel shaders apply Puddle and Displacement, as well as surface colors and reflectivity altered due to heat, etc. The Extra (E) channel of the PHED wexel format, as discussed earlier herein, contains all of the extra information used per wexel. In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the extra information includes a non virgin bit (true=bead, false=virgin steel), a slag bit, an undercut value (amount of undercut at this wexel where zero equals no undercut), a porosity value (amount of porosity at this wexel where zero equals no porosity), and a bead wake value which encodes the time at which the bead solidifies. There are a set of image maps associated with different coupon visuals including virgin steel, slag, bead, and porosity. These image maps are used both for bump mapping and texture mapping. The amount of blending of these image maps is controlled by the various flags and values described herein.

A bead wake effect is achieved using a 1D image map and a per wexel bead wake value that encodes the time at which a given bit of bead is solidified. Once a hot puddle wexel location is no longer hot enough to be called “puddle,” a time is saved at that location and is called “bead wake.” The end result is that the shader code is able to use the 1D texture map to draw the “ripples” that give a bead its unique appearance which portrays the direction in which the bead was laid down. In accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention, the simulator 10 is capable of simulating, in virtual reality space, and displaying a weld bead having a real-time weld bead wake characteristic resulting from a real-time fluidity-to-solidification transition of the simulated weld puddle, as the simulated weld puddle is moved along a weld trajectory.

In accordance with another exemplary embodiment of the invention, the simulator 10 is capable of teaching a user how to troubleshoot a welding machine. For example, a troubleshooting mode of the system may train a user to make sure the user sets up the system correctly (e.g., correct gas flow rate, correct power cord connected). In accordance with another exemplary embodiment of the invention, the simulator 10 is capable of recording and playing back a welding session (or at least a portion of a welding session, for example, N frames). A track ball may be provided to scroll through frames of video, allowing a user or instructor to critique a welding session. Playback may be provided at selectable speeds as well (e.g., full speed, half speed, quarter speed). In accordance with another exemplary embodiment of the invention, a split-screen playback may be provided, allowing two welding sessions to be viewed side-by-side, for example, on the observer display device 150. For example, a “good” welding session may be viewed next to a “poor” welding session for comparison purposes.

Automated welding is also an aspect of the present invention. One illustrative example of automated welding is orbital welding, which is often used for the joining of tubes or pipes of various types of materials. For example, a TIG (GTAW) welding torch may be used to orbit around the pipes to be welded together by an automated mechanical system. FIG. 27 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of an orbital welding system as used in an orbital welding environment. An orbital welding system includes a welding tractor that travels around the pipes or tubes, a welding power source and controller, and a pendant providing operator control. FIG. 28 shows the welding tractor 2010 of the orbital welding system of FIG. 27, as operably connected to two pipes to be welded. FIG. 29 shows a power source and controller 2020 of the orbital welding system of FIG. 27, and FIG. 30 shows a pendant 2030 of the orbital welding system of FIG. 27.

While the above discussion has focused on the virtual reality simulation of various welding processes, including orbital welding, other embodiments of the invention are not limited to that aspect and include teaching and feedback aspects of the actual setup and performance characteristics associated with welds made in accordance with a user-defined setup. As discussed above, GTAW/GMAW welding requires training to ensure that the operator understands the controls which are available for the practice of a welding process, for example, an orbital welding process. There is a misconception that automation associated with orbital welding systems eliminates the need for training, since the machine is doing the welding. Automated orbital welding requires training to ensure the operator understands welding, and all of the unique setup and implementation skills for controlling TIG beads. This includes error correction, larger diameter pipe welding, the utilization of remote cameras, and proper error assessment and correction.

Training programs offer inconsistent or insufficient coverage of teaching a good weld situation, a bad weld situation, and the mechanisms to perform, react to, or correct each. Instructors for this type of niche solution are hard to find with sufficient background and/or industry knowledge and experience. Only through quality training taught by certified instructors can operators of welding equipment gain the complex skills needed to meet the strict acceptance criteria in today's welding environment. Additionally, on large circumference projects with long weld joints (which may include one or more tie-ins), the difficulty of maintaining attention and focus represents a significant problem.

In the GTAW process, an electric arc is maintained between the non-consumable tungsten electrode and the work piece. The electrode supports the heat of the arc and the metal of the work piece melts and forms the weld puddle. The molten metal of the work piece and the electrode must be protected against oxygen in the atmosphere, thereby typically employing an inert gas such as argon as the shielding gas. If the addition of a filler metal is used, the filler wire can be fed to the weld puddle, where it melts due to the energy delivered by the electric arc. In accordance with one exemplary embodiment of the invention, a virtual reality welding system is provided that incorporates technology related to viewing a GTAW/GMAW automated welding operation, using a pendant (actual or virtual) or remote control as it relates to automated welding, identifying welding discontinuities based upon chosen welding parameter combinations, and correcting operator selections and combinations of parameters through the use of user screens to understand the interaction of various parameters and their impact on weld quality with proper terminology and visual elements related to automated welding.

By implementing welding (e.g., orbital GTAW) training in a simulated environment, a number of issues may be addressed. For example, industry and experience in the welding process may be based on the knowledge of the development company and therefore is consistent and updated to the latest technology and standards available, which is easily done by software upgrade in a virtual environment. The instructor becomes a facilitator to the program and does not need to be an expert in the welding process. Additional training aids, such as path following cues or visual overlays, improve transfer of training in a virtual environment. Welding equipment, that can become outdated, does not need to be purchased. The virtual reality welding system can be used in a one-on-one training environment or a classroom type of setting.

The use of a virtual framework allows multiple pendants to be simulated with one training device. In implementing a welding (e.g., orbital GTAW) process in virtual reality, a pendant can be made as a physical device or as a virtual pendant. With the physical device, the student is able to interact with the controls and get the “feel” for the control. With a virtual pendant, where the controls are available and interacted with on a touch screen, the user can easily choose a variety of pendants for control, whether they are customized or company dependent. A virtual pendant also allows for different types of controls or levels to be enabled for use by the student depending on learning levels or controls available based on their industry level (mirroring field work experience). Unlike traditional training, randomized faults (e.g., wire nesting) can be implemented that provide the user a more detailed and complete experience without damage to the equipment or time-consuming setup.

Part of the learning interaction is the understanding of proper welding parameters based on the joint, preparation, material type, etc. In accordance with an exemplary embodiment, in virtual reality, theory enabled screens can be enabled to prompt a user with knowledge as to the proper choice to make. Additional screens or tables can be enabled to prompt a user with knowledge of what to input, but can also be enabled when a wrong choice is selected to highlight what was chosen and why it was incorrect, with the proper selections identified. This type of intelligent agent can ensure that the student does not perform incorrectly and become frustrated by the end result, positive reinforcement and learning being the key. An exemplary embodiment of the invention will also allow for the system or instructor to quiz the user's knowledge and adapt the training curriculum and testing to the individual user's blind spots. An exemplary embodiment of the invention employs artificial intelligence (AI) and a learning management system (LMS) to help with instruction in needed areas, reinforce knowledge, and provide learning assistance.

Setup parameters may include, but are not limited to: inert gas (e.g., Argon, Helium); arc ignition; welding current (e.g., pulsed vs. unpulsed); downslope functionality to avoid crate ring at the end of the weld; torch rotation travel speed; wire feed characteristics (e.g., pulsed waveforms); wire diameter selection; arc voltage; distance between electrode and work piece; welding oscillation control; remote control; cooling characteristics of the generally integrated closed-loop water cooling circuit; and weld cycle programming (often with four axes), etc.

Inspection and review of the weld is another aspect to the learning process. The student can view the weld and identify what is correct or wrong and, based on these choices, receive a score to identify whether they were right and further receive input on what is right or wrong based on industry standards. This can be enhanced further to identify how to correct these situations. For instance, with the correct amperage and speed (identified), the weld may be a good weld based on a particular industry standard.

As described above, a physical teach pendant or a hand-held control device for input selection in virtual reality welding may be provided. Alternatively, a virtual teach pendant device for control input selection for simulated welding may be provided. Interactions with the handheld or virtual device that are student learning level or industry role dependent can be enabled on the device. Restricting controls or interactions based on the user may be provided to enhance learning objectives or reinforce industry role interactions, in accordance with an exemplary embodiment.

Teaching interaction or reactions based on visual, audible, or physical changes may be provided to ensure the user knows the proper set-up or error recovery. Also, teaching interaction or reactions based on visual, audible, or physical changes may be provided to ensure the user knows the proper changes in controls needed based on environmental or weld specific changes being made. Virtual calculators or tables may be enabled that allow input and provide an output based on values entered. Intelligent agent enabled results based on incorrect set-up parameters or choices may be provided to reinforce correct industry standards. Furthermore, intelligent agent enabled input to identify what the proper controls input should have been may be provided, based on the current visual, audio, or physical indicators. In accordance with an exemplary embodiment, the simulation of camera based systems may be provided along with the creation of path following and path determinative systems based upon a fuzzy logic controller based system. For example, multiple renderings may be provided by simulating two camera views such that the camera views may be moved during the simulation. In accordance with an exemplary embodiment, an alarm may sound when the desired path is deviated from, based on the fuzzy logic, for example. Visualization of a simulated TIG weld puddle may be provided via pixel sizes that are small enough to provide proper visualization of the TIG weld puddle. Simulation of the magnification of the simulated TIG weld puddle may also be provided, for better visualization by the user.

Multiple levels of experience for the user that adapt to the skill level, learning pace, and learning style of the user (LMS compatible) may be provided. Artificial intelligence (AI) based fault induction may also be provided in order to test the user's ability to detect, correct, and recover from problems. The simulation of unsafe conditions, machine setup, and materials defects may be provided. Also, a multi-language capable system may be provided, allowing for harmonization of training for a global marketplace, in accordance with an exemplary embodiment. An exemplary embodiment of the invention may provide a virtual reality environment allowing two or more users (multi-man) to create a virtual weld at the same time. In some exemplary embodiments of the invention, the welds of the separate users may be joined by one or more tie-in operations.

In summary, disclosed is a real-time welding simulator including a programmable processor-based subsystem, a spatial tracker operatively connected to the programmable processor-based subsystem, at least one mock welding tool capable of being spatially tracked by the spatial tracker, and at least one display device operatively connected to the programmable processor-based subsystem. The simulator is capable of simulating, in virtual reality space, a weld puddle having real-time molten metal fluidity and heat dissipation characteristics. The simulator is further capable of displaying the simulated weld puddle on the display device in real time.

The invention has been described herein with reference to various disclosed exemplary embodiments. Obviously, modifications and alterations will occur to others upon a reading and understanding of this specification. It is, therefore, intended to include all such modifications and alterations insofar as they come within the scope of the appended claims or the equivalence thereof.

Claims

1. A welding simulator comprising: a logic processor based subsystem operable to execute coded instructions for generating an interactive welding environment in which a welding activity is simulated, the welding activity occurring at an interface of a first simulated work piece and a second simulated work piece defining a simulated weld joint;a display operatively connected to the logic processor based subsystem for visually depicting the interactive welding environment;a first hand-held input device for performing a first simulated welding activity on the simulated weld joint in real time; anda second hand-held input device for performing a second simulated welding activity on the simulated weld joint in real time,wherein at least a portion of the first simulated welding activity and at least a portion of the second simulated welding activity are performed simultaneously.
2. The welding simulator of claim 1, wherein the first simulated work piece is at least one of a flat plate, a cylindrical body, and a pipe.
3. The welding simulator of claim 1, wherein the second simulated work piece is at least one of a flat plate, a cylindrical body, and a pipe.
4. The welding simulator of claim 1, wherein at least one of the first simulated welding activity and the second simulated welding activity includes a tie-in operation.
5. The welding simulator of claim 1, wherein the display depicts at least a portion of the simulated weld joint.
6. The welding simulator of claim 1, wherein the interactive welding environment is a virtual reality environment.
7. The welding simulator of claim 1, wherein the display is integrated in a welding helmet.
8. A method of simulating a welding activity, the method comprising: generating an interactive welding environment in which the welding activity is simulated, the welding activity occurring at an interface of a first simulated work piece and a second simulated work piece defining a simulated weld joint;displaying the interactive welding environment including at least a portion of the simulated weld joint;displaying movement of a first hand-held input device performing a first simulated welding activity on the simulated weld joint; anddisplaying movement of a second hand-held input device performing a second simulated welding activity on the simulated weld joint,wherein at least a portion of the first simulated welding activity and at least a portion of the second simulated welding activity are performed simultaneously.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein the first simulated work piece is at least one of a flat plate, a cylindrical body, and a pipe.
10. The method of claim 8, wherein the second simulated work piece is at least one of a flat plate, a cylindrical body, and a pipe.
11. The method of claim 8, wherein at least one of the first simulated welding activity and the second simulated welding activity includes a tie-in operation.
12. The method of claim 8, wherein the interactive welding environment is a virtual reality environment.
13. The method of claim 8, wherein the display is integrated in a welding helmet.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/615,637 filed on Feb. 6, 2015 and titled Virtual Reality Pipe Welding Simulator And Setup, which claims priority to and any benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/940,221 filed on Feb. 14, 2014, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. Each of the following commonly-assigned U.S. patents is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety: (1) U.S. Pat. No. 8,747,116, which issued on Jun. 10, 2014 and is titled System And Method Providing Arc Welding Training In A Real-Time Simulated Virtual Reality Environment Using Real-Time Weld Puddle Feedback; (2) U.S. Pat. No. 8,915,740, which issued on Dec. 23, 2014 and is titled Virtual Reality Pipe Welding Simulator; (3) U.S. Pat. No. 9,483,959, which issued on Nov. 1, 2016 and is titled Welding Simulator; (4) U.S. Pat. No. 8,657,605, which issued on Feb. 25, 2014 and is titled Virtual Testing And Inspection Of A Virtual Weldment; (5) U.S. Pat. No. 9,011,154, which issued on Apr. 21, 2015 and is titled Virtual Welding System; and (6) U.S. Pat. No. 8,911,237, which issued on Dec. 16, 2014 and is titled Virtual Reality Pipe Welding Simulator And Setup.

US Referenced Citations (462)

Number	Name	Date	Kind
317063	Wittenstrom	May 1885	A
428459	Coffin	May 1890	A
483428	Goppin	Sep 1892	A
1159119	Springer	Nov 1915	A
1286529	Cave	Dec 1918	A
2326944	Roland	Aug 1943	A
2333192	Mobert	Nov 1943	A
D140630	Garibay	Mar 1945	S
D142377	Dunn	Sep 1945	S
D152049	Welch	Dec 1948	S
2681969	Burke	Jun 1954	A
D174208	Abidgaard	Mar 1955	S
2728838	Barnes	Dec 1955	A
D176942	Cross	Feb 1956	S
2894086	Rizer	Jul 1959	A
3035155	Hawk	May 1962	A
3059519	Stanton	Oct 1962	A
3356823	Waters	Dec 1967	A
3555239	Kerth	Jan 1971	A
3562927	Moskowitz	Feb 1971	A
3562928	Schmitt	Feb 1971	A
3621177	McPherson	Nov 1971	A
3654421	Streetman	Apr 1972	A
3690020	McBratnie	Sep 1972	A
3739140	Rotilio	Jun 1973	A
3852917	McKown	Dec 1974	A
3866011	Cole	Feb 1975	A
3867769	Schow	Feb 1975	A
3904845	Minkiewicz	Sep 1975	A
3988913	Metcalfe	Nov 1976	A
D243459	Bliss	Feb 1977	S
4024371	Drake	May 1977	A
4041615	Whitehill	Aug 1977	A
D247421	Driscoll	Mar 1978	S
4124944	Blair	Nov 1978	A
4132014	Schow	Jan 1979	A
4237365	Lambros	Dec 1980	A
4280041	Kiessling	Jul 1981	A
4280137	Ashida	Jul 1981	A
4314125	Nakamura	Feb 1982	A
4354087	Osterlitz	Oct 1982	A
4359622	Dostoomian	Nov 1982	A
4375026	Kearney	Feb 1983	A
4410787	Kremers	Oct 1983	A
4429266	Traadt	Jan 1984	A
4452589	Denison	Jun 1984	A
D275292	Bouman	Aug 1984	S
D277761	Korovin	Feb 1985	S
4525619	Ide	Jun 1985	A
D280329	Bouman	Aug 1985	S
4555614	Morris et al.	Nov 1985	A
4611111	Baheti	Sep 1986	A
4616326	Meier	Oct 1986	A
4629860	Lindborn	Dec 1986	A
4677277	Cook	Jun 1987	A
4680014	Paton	Jul 1987	A
4689021	Vasiliev	Aug 1987	A
4707582	Beyer	Nov 1987	A
4716273	Paton	Dec 1987	A
D297704	Bulow	Sep 1988	S
4812614	Wang	Mar 1989	A
4867685	Brush	Sep 1989	A
4877940	Bangs	Oct 1989	A
4897521	Burr	Jan 1990	A
4907973	Hon	Mar 1990	A
4931018	Herbst	Jun 1990	A
4973814	Kojima	Nov 1990	A
4998050	Nishiyama	Mar 1991	A
5034593	Rice	Jul 1991	A
5061841	Richardson	Oct 1991	A
5089914	Prescott	Feb 1992	A
5192845	Kirmsse	Mar 1993	A
5206472	Myking	Apr 1993	A
5266930	Ichikawa	Nov 1993	A
5283418	Bellows	Feb 1994	A
5285916	Ross	Feb 1994	A
5288968	Cecil	Feb 1994	A
5305183	Teynor	Apr 1994	A
5320538	Baum	Jun 1994	A
5337611	Fleming	Aug 1994	A
5360156	Ishizaka	Nov 1994	A
5360960	Shirk	Nov 1994	A
5362962	Barborak et al.	Nov 1994	A
5370071	Ackermann	Dec 1994	A
D359296	Witherspoon	Jun 1995	S
5424634	Goldfarb	Jun 1995	A
5436638	Bolas	Jul 1995	A
5464957	Kidwell	Nov 1995	A
5465037	Huissoon	Nov 1995	A
D365583	Viken	Dec 1995	S
5493093	Cecil	Feb 1996	A
5547052	Latshaw	Aug 1996	A
5562843	Yasumoto	Oct 1996	A
5662822	Tada	Sep 1997	A
5670071	Tomoyuki	Sep 1997	A
5676503	Lang	Oct 1997	A
5676867	Van Allen	Oct 1997	A
5708253	Bloch	Jan 1998	A
5710405	Solomon	Jan 1998	A
5719369	White	Feb 1998	A
D392534	Degen	Mar 1998	S
5728991	Takada	Mar 1998	A
5751258	Fergason	May 1998	A
D395296	Kaya	Jun 1998	S
5774110	Edelson	Jun 1998	A
D396238	Schmitt	Jul 1998	S
5781258	Debral	Jul 1998	A
5823785	Matherne	Oct 1998	A
5835077	Dao	Nov 1998	A
5835277	Hegg	Nov 1998	A
5845053	Watanabe	Dec 1998	A
5877777	Colwell	Mar 1999	A
5963891	Walker	Oct 1999	A
6008470	Zhang	Dec 1999	A
6037948	Liepa	Mar 2000	A
6049059	Kim	Apr 2000	A
6051805	Vaidya	Apr 2000	A
6114645	Burgess	Sep 2000	A
6155475	Ekelof	Dec 2000	A
6155928	Burdick	Dec 2000	A
6230327	Briand	May 2001	B1
6236013	Delzenne	May 2001	B1
6236017	Smartt	May 2001	B1
6242711	Cooper	Jun 2001	B1
6271500	Hirayam	Aug 2001	B1
6301763	Pryor	Oct 2001	B1
6330938	Herve	Dec 2001	B1
6330966	Eissfeller	Dec 2001	B1
6331848	Stove	Dec 2001	B1
D456428	Aronson	Apr 2002	S
6373465	Jolly	Apr 2002	B2
6377011	Ben-Ur	Apr 2002	B1
D456828	Aronson	May 2002	S
6396232	Haanpaa	May 2002	B2
D461383	Blackburn	Aug 2002	S
6427352	Pfeiffer	Aug 2002	B1
6441342	Hsu	Aug 2002	B1
6445964	White	Sep 2002	B1
6492618	Flood	Dec 2002	B1
6506997	Matsuyama	Jan 2003	B2
6552303	Blankenship	Apr 2003	B1
6560029	Dobbie	May 2003	B1
6563489	Latypov	May 2003	B1
6568846	Cote	May 2003	B1
D475726	Suga	Jun 2003	S
6572379	Sears	Jun 2003	B1
6583386	Ivkovich	Jun 2003	B1
6593540	Baker	Jul 2003	B1
6621049	Suzuki	Sep 2003	B2
6624388	Blankenship	Sep 2003	B1
D482171	Vui	Nov 2003	S
6647288	Madill	Nov 2003	B2
6649858	Wakeman	Nov 2003	B2
6655645	Lu	Dec 2003	B1
6660965	Simpson	Dec 2003	B2
6679702	Rau	Jan 2004	B1
6697701	Hillen	Feb 2004	B2
6697770	Nagetgaal	Feb 2004	B1
6703585	Suzuki	Mar 2004	B2
6708385	Lemelson	Mar 2004	B1
6710298	Eriksson	Mar 2004	B2
6710299	Blankenship	Mar 2004	B2
6715502	Rome	Apr 2004	B1
D490347	Meyers	May 2004	S
6730875	Hsu	May 2004	B2
6734393	Friedl	May 2004	B1
6744011	Hu	Jun 2004	B1
6750428	Okamoto	Jun 2004	B2
6765584	Matthias	Jul 2004	B1
6772802	Few	Aug 2004	B2
6788442	Potin	Sep 2004	B1
6795778	Dodge	Sep 2004	B2
6798974	Nakano	Sep 2004	B1
6857553	Hartman	Feb 2005	B1
6858817	Blankenship	Feb 2005	B2
6865926	O'Brien	Mar 2005	B2
D504449	Butchko	Apr 2005	S
6920371	Hillen	Jul 2005	B2
6940039	Blankenship	Sep 2005	B2
6982700	Rosenberg	Jan 2006	B2
7021937	Simpson	Apr 2006	B2
7024342	Waite	Apr 2006	B1
7110859	Shibata	Sep 2006	B2
7126078	Demers	Oct 2006	B2
7132617	Lee	Nov 2006	B2
7170032	Flood	Jan 2007	B2
7194447	Harvey	Mar 2007	B2
7233837	Swain	Jun 2007	B2
7247814	Ott	Jul 2007	B2
D555446	Picaza Ibarrondo	Nov 2007	S
7298535	Kuutti	Nov 2007	B2
7315241	Daily	Jan 2008	B1
D561973	Kinsley	Feb 2008	S
7353715	Myers	Apr 2008	B2
7363137	Brant	Apr 2008	B2
7375304	Kainec	May 2008	B2
7381923	Gordon	Jun 2008	B2
7414595	Muffler	Aug 2008	B1
7465230	Lemay	Dec 2008	B2
7474760	Hertzman	Jan 2009	B2
7478108	Townsend	Jan 2009	B2
D587975	Aronson	Mar 2009	S
7487018	Lee	Apr 2009	B2
7516022	Lee	Apr 2009	B2
7580821	Schirm	Aug 2009	B2
D602057	Osicki	Oct 2009	S
7621171	O'Brien	Nov 2009	B2
D606102	Bender	Dec 2009	S
7643890	Hillen	Jan 2010	B1
7687741	Kainec	Mar 2010	B2
D614217	Peters	Apr 2010	S
D615573	Peters	May 2010	S
7817162	Bolick	Oct 2010	B2
7853645	Brown	Dec 2010	B2
D631074	Peters	Jan 2011	S
7874921	Baszucki	Jan 2011	B2
7970172	Hendrickson	Jun 2011	B1
7972129	O'Donoghue	Jul 2011	B2
7991587	Ihn	Aug 2011	B2
8069017	Hallquist	Nov 2011	B2
8224881	Spear	Jul 2012	B1
8248324	Nangle	Aug 2012	B2
8265886	Bisiaux	Sep 2012	B2
8274013	Wallace	Sep 2012	B2
8287522	Moses	Oct 2012	B2
8292723	DeWaal	Oct 2012	B2
8301286	Babu	Oct 2012	B2
8316462	Becker	Nov 2012	B2
8363048	Gering	Jan 2013	B2
8365603	Lesage	Feb 2013	B2
8512043	Choquet	Aug 2013	B2
8569646	Daniel	Oct 2013	B2
8657605	Wallace	Feb 2014	B2
8680434	Stoger	Mar 2014	B2
8692157	Daniel	Apr 2014	B2
8747116	Zboray	Jun 2014	B2
8777629	Kreindl	Jul 2014	B2
8787051	Chang	Jul 2014	B2
8834168	Peters	Sep 2014	B2
8851896	Wallace	Oct 2014	B2
8911237	Postlewaite	Dec 2014	B2
8915740	Zboray	Dec 2014	B2
RE45398	Wallace	Mar 2015	E
8992226	Leach	Mar 2015	B1
9011154	Kindig	Apr 2015	B2
9293056	Zboray	Mar 2016	B2
9293057	Zboray	Mar 2016	B2
9779635	Zboray	Oct 2017	B2
9836987	Postlewaite	Dec 2017	B2
20010045808	Hietmann	Nov 2001	A1
20010052893	Jolly	Dec 2001	A1
20020032553	Simpson	Mar 2002	A1
20020039138	Edelson	Apr 2002	A1
20020046999	Veikkolainen	Apr 2002	A1
20020005421	Edelson	May 2002	A1
20020050984	Roberts	May 2002	A1
20020085843	Mann	Jul 2002	A1
20020094026	Edelson	Jul 2002	A1
20020098468	Barrett	Jul 2002	A1
20020111557	Madill	Aug 2002	A1
20020132213	Grant	Sep 2002	A1
20020135695	Edelson	Sep 2002	A1
20020175897	Pelosi	Nov 2002	A1
20020178038	Grybas	Nov 2002	A1
20020180761	Edelson	Dec 2002	A1
20030000931	Ueda	Jan 2003	A1
20030002740	Melikian	Jan 2003	A1
20030023592	Modica	Jan 2003	A1
20030025884	Hamana	Feb 2003	A1
20030062354	Ward	Apr 2003	A1
20030075534	Okamoto	Apr 2003	A1
20030106787	Santilli	Jun 2003	A1
20030111451	Blankenship	Jun 2003	A1
20030172032	Choquet	Sep 2003	A1
20030186199	McCool	Oct 2003	A1
20030228560	Seat	Dec 2003	A1
20030234885	Pilu	Dec 2003	A1
20040009462	McElwrath	Jan 2004	A1
20040020907	Zauner	Feb 2004	A1
20040035990	Ackeret	Feb 2004	A1
20040050824	Samler	Mar 2004	A1
20040088071	Kouno	May 2004	A1
20040140301	Blankenship	Jul 2004	A1
20040167788	Birimisa	Aug 2004	A1
20040181382	Hu	Sep 2004	A1
20050007504	Fergason	Jan 2005	A1
20050017152	Fergason	Jan 2005	A1
20050029326	Henrikson	Feb 2005	A1
20050046584	Breed	Mar 2005	A1
20050050168	Wen	Mar 2005	A1
20050101767	Clapham	May 2005	A1
20050103766	Iizuka	May 2005	A1
20050103767	Kainec	May 2005	A1
20050103768	Ward	May 2005	A1
20050109735	Flood	May 2005	A1
20050128186	Shahoian	Jun 2005	A1
20050133488	Blankenship	Jun 2005	A1
20050159840	Lin	Jul 2005	A1
20050163364	Beck	Jul 2005	A1
20050189336	Ku	Sep 2005	A1
20050199602	Kaddani	Sep 2005	A1
20050230573	Ligertwood	Oct 2005	A1
20050233295	Chiszar	Oct 2005	A1
20050252897	Hsu	Nov 2005	A1
20050275913	Vesely	Dec 2005	A1
20050275914	Vesely	Dec 2005	A1
20060014130	Weinstein	Jan 2006	A1
20060076321	Maev	Apr 2006	A1
20060136183	Choquet	Jun 2006	A1
20060140502	Tseng	Jun 2006	A1
20060154226	Maxfield	Jul 2006	A1
20060163227	Hillen	Jul 2006	A1
20060163228	Daniel	Jul 2006	A1
20060166174	Rowe	Jul 2006	A1
20060169682	Kainec	Aug 2006	A1
20060173619	Brant	Aug 2006	A1
20060183083	Moran et al.	Aug 2006	A1
20060189260	Sung	Aug 2006	A1
20060207980	Jacovetty	Sep 2006	A1
20060213892	Ott	Sep 2006	A1
20060214924	Kawamoto	Sep 2006	A1
20060226137	Huismann	Oct 2006	A1
20060241432	Herline	Oct 2006	A1
20060252543	Van Noland	Nov 2006	A1
20060258447	Baszucki	Nov 2006	A1
20070034611	Drius	Feb 2007	A1
20070038400	Lee	Feb 2007	A1
20070045488	Shin	Mar 2007	A1
20070088536	Ishikawa	Apr 2007	A1
20070112889	Cook	May 2007	A1
20070164007	Peters et al.	Jul 2007	A1
20070188606	Atkinson	Aug 2007	A1
20070198117	Wajihuddin	Aug 2007	A1
20070211026	Ohta	Sep 2007	A1
20070221797	Thompson	Sep 2007	A1
20070256503	Wong	Nov 2007	A1
20070264620	Maddix	Nov 2007	A1
20070277611	Portzgen	Dec 2007	A1
20070291035	Vesely	Dec 2007	A1
20080021311	Goldbach	Jan 2008	A1
20080027594	Jump	Jan 2008	A1
20080031774	Magnant	Feb 2008	A1
20080038702	Choquet	Feb 2008	A1
20080061049	Albrecht	Mar 2008	A1
20080078811	Hillen	Apr 2008	A1
20080078812	Peters	Apr 2008	A1
20080107345	Melikian	May 2008	A1
20080117203	Gering	May 2008	A1
20080120075	Wloka	May 2008	A1
20080128398	Schneider	Jun 2008	A1
20080135533	Ertmer	Jun 2008	A1
20080140815	Brant	Jun 2008	A1
20080149686	Daniel	Jun 2008	A1
20080203075	Feldhausen	Aug 2008	A1
20080233550	Solomon	Sep 2008	A1
20080249998	Dettinger	Oct 2008	A1
20080303197	Paquette	Dec 2008	A1
20080314887	Stoger	Dec 2008	A1
20090015585	Klusza	Jan 2009	A1
20090021514	Klusza	Jan 2009	A1
20090045183	Artelsmair	Feb 2009	A1
20090050612	Serruys	Feb 2009	A1
20090057286	Ihara	Mar 2009	A1
20090109128	Mangle	Apr 2009	A1
20090152251	Dantinne	Jun 2009	A1
20090173726	Davidson	Jul 2009	A1
20090184098	Daniel	Jul 2009	A1
20090197228	Afshar	Aug 2009	A1
20090200281	Hampton	Aug 2009	A1
20090200282	Hampton	Aug 2009	A1
20090231423	Becker	Sep 2009	A1
20090257655	Melikian	Oct 2009	A1
20090259444	Dolansky	Oct 2009	A1
20090298024	Batzler	Dec 2009	A1
20090312958	Dai	Dec 2009	A1
20090325699	Delgiannidis	Dec 2009	A1
20100012017	Miller	Jan 2010	A1
20100012637	Jaeger	Jan 2010	A1
20100021051	Melikian	Jan 2010	A1
20100048273	Wallace	Feb 2010	A1
20100062405	Zboray	Mar 2010	A1
20100062406	Zboray	Mar 2010	A1
20100096373	Hillen	Apr 2010	A1
20100121472	Babu	May 2010	A1
20100133247	Mazumder	Jun 2010	A1
20100133250	Sardy	Jun 2010	A1
20100176107	Bong	Jul 2010	A1
20100201803	Melikian	Aug 2010	A1
20100224610	Wallace	Sep 2010	A1
20100276396	Cooper	Nov 2010	A1
20100299101	Shimada	Nov 2010	A1
20100307249	Lesage	Dec 2010	A1
20100314362	Albrecht	Dec 2010	A1
20100326962	Calla et al.	Dec 2010	A1
20110006047	Penrod	Jan 2011	A1
20110048273	Colon	Mar 2011	A1
20110052046	Melikian	Mar 2011	A1
20110060568	Goldfine	Mar 2011	A1
20110082728	Melikian	Apr 2011	A1
20110091846	Kreindl	Apr 2011	A1
20110114615	Daniel	May 2011	A1
20110116076	Chantry	May 2011	A1
20110117527	Conrardy	May 2011	A1
20110122495	Togashi	May 2011	A1
20110183304	Wallace	Jul 2011	A1
20110187746	Suto	Aug 2011	A1
20110187859	Edelson	Aug 2011	A1
20110229864	Short	Sep 2011	A1
20110248864	Becker	Oct 2011	A1
20110316516	Schiefermuller	Dec 2011	A1
20120122062	Yang et al.	May 2012	A1
20120189993	Kindig	Jul 2012	A1
20120291172	Wills	Nov 2012	A1
20120298640	Conrardy	Nov 2012	A1
20130026150	Chantry	Jan 2013	A1
20130040270	Albrecht	Feb 2013	A1
20130049976	Maggiore	Feb 2013	A1
20130075380	Albrech	Mar 2013	A1
20130119040	Suraba	May 2013	A1
20130170259	Chang	Jul 2013	A1
20130182070	Peters	Jul 2013	A1
20130183645	Wallace	Jul 2013	A1
20130189657	Wallace	Jul 2013	A1
20130189658	Peters	Jul 2013	A1
20130203029	Choquet	Aug 2013	A1
20130206740	Pfeifer	Aug 2013	A1
20130209976	Postlethwaite	Aug 2013	A1
20130230832	Peters	Sep 2013	A1
20130231980	Choquet	Sep 2013	A1
20130252214	Eigart	Sep 2013	A1
20130288211	Patterson	Oct 2013	A1
20130327747	Dantinne	Dec 2013	A1
20130342678	McAninch	Dec 2013	A1
20140017642	Postlethwaite et al.	Jan 2014	A1
20140038143	Daniel	Feb 2014	A1
20140042136	Daniel	Feb 2014	A1
20140065584	Wallace et al.	Mar 2014	A1
20140134580	Becker	May 2014	A1
20140263224	Becker	Sep 2014	A1
20140272835	Becker	Sep 2014	A1
20140272836	Becker	Sep 2014	A1
20140272837	Becker	Sep 2014	A1
20140272838	Becker	Sep 2014	A1
20140312020	Daniel	Oct 2014	A1
20140346158	Matthews	Nov 2014	A1
20150056584	Boulware	Feb 2015	A1
20150056585	Boulware	Feb 2015	A1
20150056586	Penrod	Feb 2015	A1
20150072323	Postlethwaite	Mar 2015	A1
20150125836	Daniel	May 2015	A1
20150194072	Becker et al.	Jul 2015	A1
20150194073	Becker	Jul 2015	A1
20150235565	Postlethwaite	Aug 2015	A1
20150248846	Postlethwaite	Sep 2015	A1
20160093233	Boulware	Mar 2016	A1
20160125763	Becker	May 2016	A1
20160203734	Boulware	Jul 2016	A1
20160203735	Boulware	Jul 2016	A1
20160260261	Hsu	Sep 2016	A1
20160331592	Stewart	Nov 2016	A1
20160343268	Postlethwaite	Nov 2016	A1
20170053557	Daniel	Feb 2017	A1

Foreign Referenced Citations (122)

Number	Date	Country
2698078	Sep 2011	CA
1665633	Sep 2005	CN
201083660	Jul 2008	CN
201149744	Nov 2008	CN
101406978	Apr 2009	CN
101419755	Apr 2009	CN
201229711	Apr 2009	CN
101571887	Nov 2009	CN
101587659	Nov 2009	CN
101661589	Mar 2010	CN
102053563	May 2011	CN
102202836	Sep 2011	CN
202053009	Nov 2011	CN
202684308	Jan 2013	CN
203503228	Mar 2014	CN
103871279	Jun 2014	CN
28 33 638	Feb 1980	DE
30 46 634	Jan 1984	DE
32 44 307	May 1984	DE
35 22 581	Jan 1987	DE
4037879	Jun 1991	DE
196 15 069	Oct 1997	DE
197 39 720	Oct 1998	DE
19834205	Feb 2000	DE
200 09 543	Aug 2001	DE
10 2005 047 204	Apr 2007	DE
102006048165	Jan 2008	DE
10 2010 038 902	Feb 2012	DE
202012013151	Feb 2015	DE
0008527	Jan 1982	EP
0 108 599	May 1984	EP
0 127 299	Dec 1984	EP
0 145 891	Jun 1985	EP
319623	Oct 1990	EP
0852986	Jul 1998	EP
1 527 852	May 2005	EP
1905533	Apr 2008	EP
2 274 736	May 2007	ES
1456780	Mar 1965	FR
2 827 066	Jan 2003	FR
2 926 660	Jul 2009	FR
1 455 972	Nov 1976	GB
1 511 608	May 1978	GB
2 254 172	Sep 1992	GB
2435838	Sep 2007	GB
2 454 232	May 2009	GB
2-224877	Sep 1990	JP
05-329645	Dec 1993	JP
07-047471	Feb 1995	JP
07-232270	Sep 1995	JP
08-505091	Apr 1996	JP
08-150476	Jun 1996	JP
H08221107	Aug 1996	JP
08-132274	May 1998	JP
2000-167666	Jun 2000	JP
2000-237872	Sep 2000	JP
2001-071140	Mar 2001	JP
2002278670	Sep 2002	JP
2003-200372	Jul 2003	JP
2003-326362	Nov 2003	JP
2004025270	Jan 2004	JP
2006-006604	Jan 2006	JP
2006175205	Jul 2006	JP
2006-281270	Oct 2006	JP
2007-290025	Nov 2007	JP
2009-500178	Jan 2009	JP
2009160636	Jul 2009	JP
2010-225129	Oct 2010	JP
2010231792	Oct 2010	JP
2012024867	Feb 2012	JP
2012218058	Nov 2012	JP
100876425	Dec 2008	KR
20090010693	Jan 2009	KR
1020090111556	Oct 2009	KR
20110068544	Jun 2011	KR
527045	Jul 1995	RU
2317183	Feb 2008	RU
2008 108 601	Nov 2009	RU
1038963	Aug 1983	SU
9845078	Oct 1998	WO
0112376	Feb 2001	WO
0143910	Jun 2001	WO
0158400	Aug 2001	WO
2004029549	Apr 2004	WO
2005102230	Nov 2005	WO
2005110658	Nov 2005	WO
2006034571	Apr 2006	WO
2007009131	Jan 2007	WO
2007039278	Apr 2007	WO
2009120921	Jan 2009	WO
2009060231	May 2009	WO
2010020867	Aug 2009	WO
2009149740	Dec 2009	WO
2010000003	Jan 2010	WO
2010020870	Feb 2010	WO
2010044982	Apr 2010	WO
2010091493	Aug 2010	WO
2011017608	Feb 2011	WO
2011041037	Apr 2011	WO
2011045654	Apr 2011	WO
2011058433	May 2011	WO
2011059502	May 2011	WO
2011060350	May 2011	WO
2011067447	Jun 2011	WO
2011097035	Aug 2011	WO
2012016851	Feb 2012	WO
2012082105	Jun 2012	WO
2012137060	Oct 2012	WO
2012143327	Oct 2012	WO
2013014202	Jan 2013	WO
2013-625672	Feb 2013	WO
2013061518	May 2013	WO
2013114189	Aug 2013	WO
2013119749	Aug 2013	WO
2013175079	Nov 2013	WO
2013186413	Dec 2013	WO
2014007830	Jan 2014	WO
2014019045	Feb 2014	WO
2014020386	Feb 2014	WO
2014140720	Sep 2014	WO
2014184710	Nov 2014	WO
2016137578	Sep 2016	WO

Non-Patent Literature Citations (273)

Entry
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 15/077,532 dated Mar. 28, 2018.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/827,657 dated May 26, 2017.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/827,657 dated Jan. 16, 2018.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 15/228,524 dated Feb. 5, 2018.
Office Action from Chinese Application No. 201280075678.5 dated Jul. 5, 2016.
Office Action from Chinese Application No. 201480027306.4 dated Aug. 3, 2016.
Office Action from Chinese Application No. 201380017661.9 dated Aug. 22, 2016.
Office Action from Chinese Application No. 201480025359.2 dated Sep. 26, 2016.
Office Action from Chinese Application No. 201480025614.3 dated Nov. 28, 2016.
Office Action from Chinese Application No. 201480025359.2 dated Feb. 28, 2017.
Office Action from Chinese Application No. 201380076368.X dated Mar. 1, 2017.
Office Action from Chinese Application No. 201480025614.3 dated Jun. 9, 2017.
Office Action in CN Application No. 201480012861.X dated Jul. 18, 2017.
Office Action in CN Application No. 201610179195.X dated Jul. 19, 2017.
Office Action in CN Application No. 201480025985.1 dated Aug. 10, 2017.
Decision on Rejection in CN Application No. 201380047141.2 dated Sep. 7, 2017.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/829,161 dated Jul. 28, 2017.
Notification of Reason for Refusal from KR Application No. 10-2015-7002697 dated Sep. 25, 2017.
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC in EP Application No. 14732357.0 dated Feb. 12, 2018.
Office Action in JP Application No. 2015-562352 dated Feb. 6, 2018.
Office Action in JP Application No. 2015-562353 dated Feb. 6, 2018.
Office Action in JP Application No. 2015-562354 dated Feb. 6, 2018.
Office Action in JP Application No. 2015-562355 dated Feb. 6, 2018.
Office Action in CN Application No. 201710087175A dated Feb. 1, 2018.
Bargteil et al., “A Texture Synthesis Method for Liquid Animations,” Eurographics/ ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Computer Animation, 2006, pp. 345-351.
Aidun, Daryush K “Influence of simulated high-g on the weld size of Al—Li-Alloy” Acta Astronautica, vol. 48, No. 2-3, pp. 153-156, 2001.
Boss (engineering), Wikipedia, 1 page, printed Feb. 6, 2014.
CS Wave, Product Description, 2 pages, printed Jan. 14, 2015.
EnergynTech Inc.; website printout; http://www.energyntech.com./; Advanced Metals Processing Technology & Flexible Automation for Manufacturing; Virtual Welder; Virtual training system for beginning welders; 2 page; 2014.
EnergynTech Inc.; website printout; http://www.energyntech.com/Zipper.html; Zipper Robot Performing a HiDep Weld; 1 page 2014.
Erden, “Skill Assistance with Robot for Manual Welding”, Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship, Project No. 297857, 3 pgs., printed Apr. 27, 2015.
EWM Virtual Welding Trainer, 2 pages, printed Jan. 14, 2015.
Fillet weld, Wikipedia, 3 pgs, printed Feb. 6, 2014.
Fronius, Virtual Welding, 8 pages, printed Jan. 14, 2015.
Fronius, Virtual Welding, The Welder Training of the Future, 8 page brochure, 2011.
The Goodheart-Wilcox Co., Inc., Weld Joints and Weld Types, Chaper 6; pp. 57-68; date unknown.
Kemppi ProTrainer, product data, 3 pages, printed Jan. 14, 2015.
Leap Motion, Inc., product information, copyright 2013, 14 pages.
Learning Labs, Inc., Seabery, Soldamatic Augmented Reality Welding Trainers, 4 pgs., printed Mar. 20, 2014.
Lim et al., “Automatic classification of weld defects using simulated data and MLP neural network”, Insight, vol. 49, No. 3, Mar. 2007.
Narayan et al., “Computer Aided Design and Manufacturing,” pp. 3-4, 14-15, 17-18, 92-95, and 99-100, Dec. 31, 2008.
NSRP—Virtual Welding—A Low Cost Virtual Reality Welder Training System—Phase II—Final Report; Feb. 29, 2012; Kenneth Fast, Jerry Jones, Valerie Rhoades; 53 pages.
Seabury Soluciones, SOLDAMATIC Welding Trainer Simulator, 30 pages, printed Jan. 14, 2015.
Terebes; Institute of Automation; University of Bremen; Project Motivation Problems Using Traditional Welding Masks; 2 page ; 2015.
Weld nut, Wikipedia, 2 pgs, printed Feb. 6, 2014.
Weldplus, Welding Simulator, 2 pages, printed Jan. 14, 2015.
WeldWatch Software/Wisible Welding; website printout; http://visiblewelding.com/weldwatch-software/; 4 pages; 2015.
Aiteanu, Dorin, Hillers, Bernd and Graser, Axel “A Step Forward in Manual Welding: Demonstration of Augmented Reality Helmet” Institute of Automation, University of Bremen, Germany, Proceedings of the Second IEEE and ACMIntemational Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality; 2003; 2 pages.
Exhibit B from Declaration of Morgan Lincoln in Lincoln Electric Co. et al. v. Seabery Soluciones, S.L. et al., Case No. 1:15-cv-01575-DCN, dated Dec. 20, 2016, 5 pages.
Adams et., “Adaptively Sampled Particle Fluids,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 26, No. 3, Article 48, Jul. 2007, pp. 48.1-48.7.
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC from EP Application No. 15732934.3 dated Apr. 24, 2018.
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC from EP Application No. 15731664.7 dated Jul. 13, 2018.
Chuansong Wu: “Microcomputer-based welder training simulator”, Computers in Industry, vol. 20, No. 3, Oct. 1992, 5 pages, pp. 321-325, XP000205597, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, NL.
ViziTech USA, retrieved on Mar. 27, 2014 from http://vizitechusa.com/, 2 pages.
Guu and Rokhlin ,Technique for Simultaneous Real-Time Measurements of Weld Pool Surface Geometry and Arc Force, 10 pages, Dec. 1992.
William T. Reeves, “Particles Systems—A Technique for Modeling a Class of Fuzzy Objects”, Computer Graphics 17:3 pp. 359-376, 1983, 17 pages.
S.B. Chen, L. Wu, Q. L. Wang and Y. C. Liu, Self-Learning Fuzzy Neural Networks and Computer Vision for Control of Pulsed GTAW, 9 pages, dated May 1997.
Patrick Rodjito, Position tracking and motion prediction using Fuzzy Logic, 81 pages, 2006, Colby College.
D'Huart, Deat, and Lium; Virtual Environment for Training, 6th International Conference, ITS 20002, 6 pages, Jun. 2002.
Konstantinos Nasios (Bsc), Improving Chemical Plant Safety Training Using Virtual Reality, Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, 313 pages, Dec. 2001.
ANSI/A WS D 10.11 MID 10. 11 :2007 Guide for Root Pass Welding of Pipe without Backing Edition: 3rd American Welding Society / Oct. 13, 2006/36 pages ISBN: 0871716445, 6 pages.
M. Jonsson, L Karlsson, and L-E Lindgren, Simulation of Tack Welding Procedures in Butt Joint Welding of Plates Welding Research Supplement, Oct. 1985, 7 pages.
Isaac Brana Veiga, Simulation of a Work Cell in the IGRIP Program, dated 2006, 50 pages.
Balijepalli, A. and Kesavadas, Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Haptics 2003, Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, NY.
Johannes Hirche, Alexander Ehlert, Stefan Guthe, Michael Doggett, Hardware Accelerated Per-Pixel Displacement Mapping, 8 pages.
Yao et al., ‘Development of a Robot System for Pipe Welding’. 2010 International Conference on Measuring echnology and Mechatronics Automation. Retrieved from the Internet: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5460347&tag=1; pp. 1109-1112, 4 pages.
Steve Mann, Raymond Chun Bing Lo, Kalin Ovtcharov, Shixiang Gu, David Dai, Calvin Ngan, Tao Al, Realtime HDR (High Dynamic Range) Video for Eyetap Wearable Computers, FPGA-Based Seeing Aids, and Glasseyes (EYETAPS), 2012 25th IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE), pp. 1-6, 6 pages, Apr. 29, 2012.
Kyt Dotson, Augmented Reality Welding Helmet Prototypes How Awsome the Technology Can Get, Sep. 26, 2012, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://siliconangle.com/blog/2012/09/26/augmented-reality-welding-helmet-prototypes-how-awesome-the-technology-can-get/,1 page, retrieved on Sep. 26, 2014.
Terrence O'Brien, “Google's Project Glass gets some more details”,Jun. 27, 2012 (Jun. 27, 2012), Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/27/googles-project-glass-gets-some-more-details/, 1 page, retrieved on Sep. 26, 2014.
T. Borzecki, G. Bruce, YS. Han, et al., Specialist Committee V.3 Fabrication Technology Committee Mandate, Aug. 20-25, 2006, 49 pages, vol. 2, 16th International Ship and Offshore Structures Congress, Southampton, UK.
G. Wang, P.G. Huang, and Y.M. Zhang: “Numerical Analysis of Metal Transfer in Gas Metal Arc Welding”: Departments of Mechanical Engineering; and Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0108, 10 pages, Dec. 10, 2001.
Echtler et al, “17 The Intelligent Welding Gun: Augmented Reality for Experimental Vehicle Construction,” Virtual and Augmented Reality Applications in Manufacturing (2003) pp. 1-27.
Teeravarunyou et al, “Computer Based Welding Training System,” International Journal of Industrial Engineering (2009) 16(2): 116-125.
Antonelli et al, “A Semi-Automated Welding Station Exploiting Human-Robot Interaction,” Advanced Manufacturing Systems and Technology (2011) pp. 249-260.
Praxair Technology Inc, “The RealWeld Trainer System: Real Weld Training Under Real Conditions” Brochure (2013) 2 pages.
Xie et al., “A Real-Time Welding Training System Base on Virtual Reality,” Wuhan Onew Technology Co., Lid, IEEE Virtual Reality Conference Mar. 23-27, 2015, Arles France, pp. 309-310.
Lincoln Global, Inc., “VRTEX 360: Virtual Reality Arc Welding Trainer” Brochure (2015) 4 pages.
Wuhan Onew Technology Co Ltd, “ONEW-360 Welding Training Simulator” http://en.onewtech.com/_d276479751.htm as accessed on Jul. 10, 2015, 14 pages.
The Lincoln Electric Company, “VRTEX Virtual Reality Arc Welding Trainer,” http://www.lincolnelectric.com/en-us/equipment/training-equipment/Pages/vrtex.aspx as accessed on Jul. 10, 2015, 3 pages.
Miller Electric Mfg Co, “LiveArc: Welding Performance Management System” Owner's Manual, (Jul. 2014) 64 pages.
Miller Electric Mfg Co, “LiveArc Welding Performance Management System” Brochure, (Dec. 2014) 4 pages.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/499,687 dated Mar. 6, 2014.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/499,687 dated Nov. 6, 2014.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,570 dated May 8, 2013.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/543,240 dated Nov. 14, 2014.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/444,173 dated Mar. 18, 2015.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/543,240 dated Jun. 3, 2015.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/444,173 dated Jun. 24, 2015.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 15/077,481 dated May 23, 2016.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 15/077,481 dated Aug. 10, 2016.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 15/077,481 dated Feb. 3, 2017.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/190,812 dated Nov. 9, 2016.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/190,812 dated Feb. 23, 2017.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 15/077,532 dated Dec. 29, 2017.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/293,700 dated Dec. 28, 2016.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/293,700 dated May 10, 2017.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/293,826 dated Dec. 30, 2016.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/293,826 dated Jul. 21, 2017.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/526,914 dated Feb. 3, 2017.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/526,914 dated Jun. 6, 2017.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/552,739 dated Feb. 17, 2017.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/615,637 dated Apr. 27, 2017.
Summons to attend oral proceedings pursuant to Rule 115(1) EPC from EP Application No. 15711563.5 dated Sep. 27, 2018.
Russell and Norvig, “Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach”, Prentice-Hall (Copyright 1995).
Mechanisms and Mechanical Devices Source Book, Chironis, Neil Sclater, McGraw Hill; 2nd Addition, 1996.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US12/45776 dated Oct. 1, 2012.
Bender Shipbuilding and Repair Co. Virtual Welding—A Low Cost Virtual Reality Welding Training System. Proposal submitted pursuant to MSRP Advanced Shipbuilding Enterprise Research Announcement, Jan. 23, 2008. 28 pages, See also, http://www.nsrp.org/6-PresentationsM/D/020409 Virtual Welding Wilbur.pdf.
Aiteanu, Dorian; and Graser, Axel. “Generation and Rendering of a Virtual Welding Seam in an Augmented Reality Training Environment.” Proceedings of the Sixth IASTED International Conference on Visualization, Imaging and Image Processing, Aug. 28-30, 2006, 8 pages, allegedly Palma de Mallorca, Spain. Ed. J.J. Villaneuva. ACTA Press.
Tschirner, Petra; Hillers, Bernd; and Graser, Axel “A Concept for the Application of Augmented Reality in Manual Gas Metal Arc Welding.” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality; 2 pages; 2002.
Penrod, Matt. “New Welder Training Tools.” EWI PowerPoint presentation; 16 pages; allegedly 2008.
Fite-Georgel, Pierre. Is there a Reality in Industrial Augmented Reality? 10th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). 10 pages, allegedly 2011.
Hillers, B.; Graser, A. “Real time Arc-Welding Video Observation System.” 62nd International Conference of IIW, Jul. 12-17, 2009, 5 pages, allegedly Singapore 2009.
Advance Program of American Welding Society Programs and Events. Nov. 11-14, 2007. 31 pages. Chicago.
Sandor, Christian; Gudrun Klinker. “PAARTI: Development of an Intelligent Welding Gun for BMW.” PIA2003, 7 pages, Tokyo. 2003.
ARVIKA Forum Vorstellung Projekt PAARI. BMW Group Virtual Reality Center. 4 pages. Nuermberg. 2003.
Sandor, Christian; Klinker, Gudrun. “Lessons Learned in Designing Ubiquitous Augmented Reality User Interfaces.” 21 gages, allegedly from Emerging Technologies of Augmented Reality: Interfaces Eds. Haller, M.; Billinghurst, M.; Thomas, B. Idea Group Inc. 2006.
Impact Welding: examples from current and archived website, trade shows, etc. See, e.g., http://www.impactwelding..com. 53 pages.
http://www.nsrp.org/6-Presentations/WDVirtual_Welder.pdf (Virtual Reality Welder Training, Project No. SI051, Navy ManTech Program, Project Review for ShipTech 2005); 22 pages. Biloxi, MS.
https://app.aws_org/w/r/www/wj/2005/031WJ_2005_03.pdf (AWS Welding Journal, Mar. 2005 (see, e.g., p. 54)).; 114 pages.
https://app.aws.org/conferencesklefense/live index.html (AWS Welding in the Defense Industry conference schedule, 2004); 12 pages.
https://app.aws.org/wj/2004/04/052/njc (AWS Virtual Reality Program to Train Welders for Shipbuilding, workshop Information, 2004); 7 pages.
https://app.aws.org/wj/2007/11WJ200711.pdf (AWS Welding Journal, Nov. 2007); 240 pages.
Energetics, Inc. “Welding Technology Roadmap,” Sep. 2000, 38 pages.
Aiteanu, Dorian; and Graser, Axel. Computer-Aided Manual Welding Using an Augmented Reality Supervisor Sheet Metal Welding Conference XII, Livonia, MI, May 9-12, 2006, 14 pages.
Hillers, Bernd; Aiteanu, Dorin and Graser, Axel “Augmented Reality—Helmet for the Manual Welding Process,” Institute of Automation, University of Bremen, Germany; 21 pages.
Aiteanu, Dorin, Hillers, Bernd and Graser, Axel “A Step Forward in Manual Welding: Demonstration of Augmented Reality Helmet” Institute of Automation, University of Bremen, Germany, Proceedings of the Second IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality; 2003; 2 pages.
ArcSentry Weld Quality Monitoring System; Native American Technologies, allegedly 2002, 5 pages.
P/NA.3 Process Modelling and Optimization; Native American Technologies, allegedly 2002, 5 pages.
B. Hillers, D. Aitenau, P. Tschimer, M. Park, A. Graser, B. Balazs, L. Schmidt, “TEREBES: Welding Helmet with AR Capabilities”, Institute of Automatic University Bremen; Institute of Industrial Engineering and Ergonomics, 10 pages, allegedly 2004.
Sheet Metal Welding Conference Xlr, American Welding Society Detroit Section, May 2006, 11 pages.
Kenneth Fast, Timothy Gifford, Robert Yancey, “Virtual Training for Welding”, Proceedings of the Third IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR 2004); 2 pages.
Amended Answer to Complaint with Exhibit A for Patent Infringement filed by Seabery North America Inc. in Lincoln Electric Co. et al. v. Seabery Soluciones, S.L. et al., Case No. 1:15-cv-01575-DCN, docket No. 44, filed Mar. 1, 2016, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio; 19 pages.
Amended Answer to Complaint with Exhibit A for Patent Infringement filed by Seabery Soluciones SL in Lincoln Electric Co. et al. v. Seabery Soluciones, S.L_ et al., Case No. 1:15-cv-01575-DCN, docket No. 45, filed Mar. 1, 2016, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio; 19 pages.
Reply to Amended Answer to Complaint for Patent Infringement filed by Lincoln Electric Company; Lincoln Global, Inc. in. Lincoln Electric Co. et al. v. Seabery Soluciones, S.L. et al., Case No. 1:15-cv-01575-DCN; docket No. 46, filed Mar. 22, 2016; 5 pages.
Answer for Patent Infringement filed by Lincoln Electric Company, Lincoln Global, Inc. in Lincoln Electric Co. et al. v. Seabery Soluciones, S.L et al., Case No. 1:15-cv-01575-DCN; docket No. 47, filed Mar. 22, 2016; 5 pages.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,747,116; IPR 2016-00749; Apr. 7, 2016; 70 pages.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. Re. 45,398; IPR 2016-00840; Apr. 18, 2016; 71 pages.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,293,056; IPR 2016-00904; May 9, 2016; 91 pages.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,293,057; IPR 2016-00905; May 9, 2016; 87 pages.
http://www.vrsim.net/history, downloaded Feb. 26, 2016.
Complaint for Patent Infringement in Lincoln Electric Co. et al. v. Seabery Soluciones, S.L. et al., Case No. 1:15-av-01575-DCN, filed Aug. 10, 2015, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio; 81 pages.
Kobayashi, Ishigame, and Kato, Simulator of Manual Metal Arc Welding with Haptic Display (“Kobayashi 2001”), Proc. of the 11th International Conf. on Artificial Reality and Telexistence (ICAT), Dec. 5-7, 2001, pp. 175-178, Tokyo, Japan.
Wahi, Maxwell, and Reaugh, “Finite-Difference Simulation of a Multi-Pass Pipe Weld” (“Wahl”), vol. L, paper 3/1, International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, San Francisco, CA, Aug. 15-19, 1977.
Declaration of Dr. Michael Zyda, May 3, 2016, exhibit to IPR 2016-00749.
Declaration of Edward Bohnert, Apr. 27, 2016, exhibit to IPR 2016-00749.
Swantec corporate web page downloaded Apr. 19, 2016. httpl/www.swantec.com/technology/numerical-simulation/.
Catalina, Stefanescu, Sen, and Kaukler, Interaction of Porosity with a Planar Solid/Liquid Interface (Catalina),), Metallurgical and Materials Transactions, vol. 35A, May 2004, pp. 1525-1538.
Fletcher Yoder Opinion re U.S. Pat. No. Re. 45,398 and U.S. Appl. No. 14/589,317; including appendices; Sep. 9, 2015; 1700 pages.
Kobayashi, Ishigame, and Kato, “Skill Training System of Manual Arc Welding by Means of Face-Shield-Like HMD and Virtual Electrode” (“Kobayashi 2003”), Entertainment Computing, vol. 112 of the International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP), Springer Science + Business Media, New York, copyright 2003, pp. 389-396.
G.E. Moore, No exponential is forever: but Forever can be delayed!: IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, 2003. 19 pages.
“High Performance Computer Architectures_ A Historical Perspective,” downloaded May 5, 2016. http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/cgi/mi/comparch. pl?Paru/perf.html,Paru/perf-f.html,Paru/menu-76.html; 3 pages.
SIMFOR / CESOL, “RV-SOLD” Welding Simulator, Technical and Functional Features, 20 pages, date unknown.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/IB2009/006605 dated Feb. 12, 2010.
Robert Schoder, “Design and Implementation of a Video Sensor for Closed Loop Control of Back Bead Weld Puddle Width,” Massachusetts, Institute of Technology, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, May 27, 1983, 64 pages.
Hills and Steele, Jr.; “Data Parallel Algorithms”, Communications of the ACM, Dec. 1986, vol. 29, No. 12, p. 1170.
Nancy C. Porter, J. Allan Cote, Timothy D. Gifford, and Wim Lam, Virtual Reality Welder Training, 29 pages, dated Jul. 14, 2006.
J.Y. (Yosh) Mantinband, Hillel Goldenberg, Llan Kleinberger, Paul Kleinberger, Autosteroscopic, field-sequential display with full freedom of movement OR Let the display were the shutter-glasses, 3ality (Israel) Ltd., 8 pages, 2002.
Fronius, ARS Electronica Linz GMBH, High-speed video technology is applied to research on welding equipment, and the results are visualized in the CAVE, 2 pages, May 18, 1997.
D.K. Aidun and S.A. Martin, “Penetration in Spot GTA Welds during Centrifugation, ”Journal of Material Engineering and Performance vol. 7(5), 4 pages, Oct. 1998—597.
Arc+ simulator; httl://www.123arc.com/en/depliant_ang.pdf; 2 pages, 2000.
Glen Wade, “Human uses of ultrasound: ancient and modern”, Ulrasonics vol. 38, 5 pages, dated 2000.
ASME Definitions, Consumables, Welding Positions, 4 pages, dated Mar. 19, 2001. See http://www.gowelding.com/asme4.htm.
M. Abbas, F. Waeckel, Code Aster (Software) EDF (France), 14 pages, Oct. 2001.
Achim Mahrle, Jurgen Schmidt, “The influence of fluid flow phenomena on the laser beam welding process”; International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 23, 10 pages, dated 2002.
The Lincoln Electric Company; CheckPoint Production Monitoring brochure; four (4) pages; http://www.lincolnelectric.com/assets/en_US/products/literature/s232.pdf; Publication S2.32; 4 pages, Issue Date Feb. 2012.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US10/60129 dated Feb. 10, 2011.
Desroches, X.; Code-Aster, Note of use for aclculations of welding; Instruction manual U2.03 booklet: Thermomechincal; Document: U2.03.05; 13 pages, Oct. 1, 2003.
Fast, K. et al., “Virtual Training for Welding”, Mixed and Augmented Reality, 2004, ISMAR 2004, Third IEEE and SM International Symposium on Arlington, VA, 2 pages, Nov. 2-5, 2004.
Cooperative Research Program, Virtual Reality Welder Training, Summary Report SR 0512, 4 pages, Jul. 2005.
Porter, et al., Virtual Reality Training, Paper No. 2005-P19, 14 pages, 2005.
Eduwelding+, Weld Into the Future; Online Welding Seminar—A virtual training environment; 123arc.com; 4 pages, 2005.
Miller Electric Mfg Co.; MIG Welding System features weld monitoring software; NewsRoom 2010 (Dialog® File 992); © 2011 Dialog. 2010; http://www.dialogweb.com/cgi/dwclient?reg=133233430487; three (3) pages; printed Mar. 8, 2012.
M. Abida and M. Siddique, Numerical simulation to study the effect of tack welds and root gap on welding deformations and residual stresses of a pipe-flange joint, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, GIK Institute of Engineering Sciences and Technology, Topi, NWFP, Pakistan, 12 pages, Available on-line Aug. 25, 2005.
Abbas, M. et al..; Code_Aster; Introduction to Code_Aster; User Manual; Booklet U1.0-: Introduction to Code_Aster; Document: U1.02.00; Version 7.4; 14 pages, Jul. 22, 2005.
Mavrikios D et al, A prototype virtual reality-based demonstrator for immersive and interactive simulation of welding processes, International Journal of Computer Integrated manufacturing, Taylor and Francis, Basingstoke, GB, vol. 19, No. 3, 8 pages, Apr. 1, 2006, pp. 294-300.
Nancy C. Porter, Edison Welding Institute; J. Allan Cote, General Dynamics Electric Boat; Timothy D. Gifford, VRSim; and WIM LAM, FCS Controls; Virtual Reality Welder Trainer, Session 5: Joining Technologies for Naval Applications, 16 pages, earliest date Jul. 14, 2006.
T Borzecki, G. Bruce, Y.S. Han, M. Heinemann, A. Imakita, L Josefson, W. Nie, D. Olson, F. Roland, and Y. Takeda, 16th International Shop and Offshore Structures Congress: Aug. 20-25, 2006: Southhampton, UK, 49 pages, vol. 2 Specialist Committee V.3 Fabrication Technology Committee Mandate.
Ratnam and Khalid: “Automatic classification of weld defects using simulated data and an MLP neutral network.” Insight vol. 49, No. 3; 6 pages, Mar. 2007.
Wang et al., Study on welder training by means of haptic guidance and virtual reality for arc welding, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, ROBIO 2006 ISBN-10: 1424405718, 5 pages, p. 954-958.
CS Wave, The Virtual Welding Trainer, 6 pages, 2007.
asciencetutor.com, A division of Advanced Science and Automation Corp., VWL (Virtual Welding Lab), 2 pages, 2007.
Eric Linholm, John Nickolls, Stuart Oberman, and John Montrym, “NVIDIA Testla: A Unifired Graphics and Computing Architecture”, IEEE Computer Society, 17 pages, 2008.
NSRP ASE, Low-Cost Virtual Realtiy Welder Training System, 1 Page, 2008.
Edison Welding Institute, E-Weld Predictor, 3 pages, 2008.
CS Wave, A Virtual learning tool for welding motion, 10 pages, Mar. 14, 2008.
The Fabricator, Virtually Welding, Training in a virtual environment gives welding students a leg up, 4 pages, Mar. 2008.
N. A. Tech., P/NA.3 Process Modeling and Optimization, 11 pages, Jun. 4, 2008.
FH Joanneum, Fronius—virtual welding, 2 pages, May 12, 2008.
Eduwelding+, Training Activities with arc+ simulator; Weld Into the Future, Online Welding Simulator—A virtual training environment; 123arc.com; 6 pages, May 2008.
ChemWeb.com, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance (v.7, #5), 3 pgs., printed Sep. 26, 2012.
Choquet, Claude; “ARC+: Today's Virtual Reality Solution for Welders” Internet Page, 6 pages, Jan. 1, 2008.
Juan Vicenete Rosell Gonzales, “RV-Sold: simulator virtual para la formacion de soldadores”; Deformacion Metalica, Es. vol. 34, No. 301, 14 pages, Jan. 1, 2008.
White et al., Virtual welder training, 2009 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, 1 page, p. 303, 2009.
Training in a virtual environment gives welding students a leg up, retrieved on Apr. 12, 2010 from: http://www.thefabricator.com/article/arcwelding/virtually-welding, 4 pages.
Sim Welder, Train better welders faster, retrieved on Apr. 12, 2010 from: http://www.simwelder.com.
P. Beatriz Garcia-Allende, Jesus Mirapeix, Olga M. Conde, Adolfo Cobo and Jose M. Lopez-Higuera; Defect Detection in Arc-Welding Processes by Means of the Line-to-Continuum Method and Feature Selection; www.mdpi.com/journal/sensors; 2009; 18 pages; Sensors 2009, 9, 7753-7770; doi; 10.3390/s91007753.
Production Monitoring 2 brochure, four (4) pages, The Lincoln Electric Company, May 2009.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/IB10/02913 dated Apr. 19, 2011.
Bjorn G. Agren; Sensor Integration for Robotic Arc Welding; 1995; vol. 5604C of Dissertations Abstracts International p. 1123; Dissertation Abs Online (Dialog® File 35): © 2012 ProQuest Info& Learning: http://dialogweb.com/cgi/dwclient?req=1331233317524; one (1) page; printed Mar. 8, 2012.
J. Hu and Hi Tsai, Heat and mass transfer in gas metal arc welding. Part 1: the arc, found in ScienceDirect, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 50 (2007), 14 pages, 833-846, available online on Oct. 24, 2006 http://www.web.mst.edu/˜tsai/publications/HU-IJHMT-2007-1-60.pdf.
M. Ian Graham, Texture Mapping, Carnegie Mellon University Class 15-462 Computer Graphics, Lecture 10, 53 pages, dated Feb. 13, 2003.
Andreas Grahn, “Interactive Simulation of Contrast Fluid using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics,” Jan. 1, 2008, Masters Thesis in Computing Science, Umea University, Department of Computing Science, Umea Sweden; 69 pages.
Marcus Vesterlund, Simulation and Rendering of a Viscous Fluid using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics, Dec. 3, 2004, Master's Thesis in Computing Science, Umea University, Department of Computing Science, Umea Sweden; 46 pages.
M. Muller,, et al., Point Based Animation of Elastic, Plastic and Melting Objects, Eurographics/ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Computer Animation (2004); 11 pages.
Andrew Nealen, “Point-Based Animation of Elastic, Plastic, and Melting Objects,” CG topics, Feb. 2005; 2 pages.
D. Tonnesen, Modeling Liquids and Solids using Thermal Particles, Proceedings of Graphics Interface'91, pp. 255-262, Calgary, Alberta, 1991.
CUDA Programming Guide Version 1.1, Nov. 29, 2007, 143 pages.
Websters II new college dictionary, 3rd ed., Houghton Mifflin Co., copyright 2005, Boston, MA, p. 1271, definition of Wake, 3 pages.
Da Dalto L, et al. “CS Wave: Learning welding motion in a virtual environment” Published in Proceedings of the IIW International Conference, Jul. 10-11, 2008; 19 pages.
CS Wave—Manual, “Virtual Welding Workbench User Manual 3.0” 2007; 25 pages.
Choquet, Claude. ARC+®: Today's Virtual Reality Solution for Welders, Published in Proceedings of the IIW International Conference; Jul. 10-11, 2008; 19 pages.
Welding Handbook, Welding Science & Technology, American Welding Society, Ninth Ed., Copyright 2001. Appendix A Terms and Definitions 54 pages.
Virtual Welding: A Low Cost Virtual Reality Welder Training System, NSRP RA 07-01—BRP Oral Review Meeting in Charleston, SC at ATI, Mar. 2008; 6 pages.
Dorin Aiteanu, “Virtual and Augmented Reality Supervisor for a New Welding Helmet Dissertation,” Nov. 15, 2005; 154 pages.
Screen Shot of CS Wave Exercise 135.FWPG Root Pass Level 1 https://web.archive.org/web/20081128081858/http:/wave.c-s.fr/images/english/snap_evolution2.Jpg; 1 page.
Screen Shot of CS Wave Control Centre V3.0.0 https://web.archive.org/web/20081128081915/http:/wave.c-s.fr/images/english/snap_evolution4.jpg; 1 page.
Screen Shot of CS Wave Control Centre V3.0.0 https://web.archive.org/web/20081128081817/http:/wave.c-s.fr/images/english/snap_evolution6.jpg; 1 page.
Da Dalto L, et al. “CS Wave a Virtual learning tool for the welding motion,” Mar. 14, 2008; 10 pages.
Nordruch, Stefan, et al. “Visual Online Monitoring of PGMAW Without a Lighting Unit”, Jan. 2005; 14 pages.
The Evolution of Computer Graphics; Tony Tamasi, NVIDIA, 2008; 36 pages.
VRSim Powering Virtual Reality, www.lincolnelectric.com/en-us/eguipment/Iraining-eguipment/Pages/powered-by-'rsim.aspx, 2016, 1 page.
Hillers, B.; Graser, A. “Direct welding arc observation without harsh flicker,” 8 pages, allegedly FABTECH International and AWS welding show, 2007.
Declaration of Dr. Michael Zyda, May 3, 2016, exhibit to IPR 2016-00905; 72 pages.
Declaration of Edward Bohnart, Apr. 27, 2016, exhibit to IPR 2016-00905; 23 pages.
Declaration of Dr. Michael Zyda, May 3, 2016, exhibit to IPR 2016-00904; 76 pages.
Declaration of Edward Bohnart, Apr. 27, 2016, exhibit to IPR 2016-00904; 22 pages.
Declaration of Axel Graeser, Apr. 17, 2016, exhibit to IPR 2016-00840; 88 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/IB2014/002346 dated Feb. 24, 2015.
Arc+—Archived Press Release from WayBack Machine from Jan. 31, 2008-Apr. 22, 2013, Page, https://web.3rchive.org/web/20121006041803/http://www.123certification.com/en/article_press/index.htm, Jan. 21, 2016, 3 pages.
P. Tschirner et al., “Virtual and Augmented Reality for Quality Improvement of Manual Welds” National Institute of Standards and Technology, Jan. 2002, Publication 973, 24 pages.
Y. Wang et al., “Impingement of Filler Droplets and Weld Pool During Gas Metal Arc Welding Process” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Sep. 1999, 14 pages.
Larry Jeffus, “Welding Principles and Applications,” Sixth Edition, 2008, 10 pages.
R.J. Renwick et al., “Experimental Investigation of GTA Weld Pool Oscillations,” Welding Research—Supplement to the Welding Journal, Feb. 1983, 7 pages.
Matt Phar, “GPU Gems 2 Programming Techniques for High-Performance Graphics and General-Purpose Computation,” 2005, 12 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/IB2015/000161 dated Jun. 8, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/IB2015/000257 dated Jul. 3, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/IB2015/000777 dated Sep. 21, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/IB2015/000814 dated Nov. 5, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/IB2015/001711 dated Jan. 4, 2016.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability from PCT/IB2014/001796 dated Mar. 15, 2016.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability from PCT/IB2015/000161 dated Aug. 25, 2016.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability from PCT/IB2015/000257 dated Sep. 15, 2016.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/IB2015/000777 dated Dec. 15, 2016.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/IB2015/000814 dated Dec. 15, 2016.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability from PCT/IB2015/001084 dated Jan. 26, 2017.
Extended European Search Report from EP Application No. 10860823.3 dated Jun. 6, 2017.
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC in EP Application No. 13753204.0 dated Mar. 9, 2017.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/499,687 dated Oct. 16, 2012.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/499,687 dated Jun. 26, 2013.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,570 dated Apr. 29, 2014.
Corrected Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,570 dated Feb. 23, 2015.
Bargteil et al., “A Semi-Lagrangian Contouring Method for Fluid Simulation,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 25, No. 1, Jan. 2006, pp. 19-38.
Chentanez et al., “Liquid Simulation on Lattice-Based Tetrahedral Meshes,” Eurographics/ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Computer Animation (2007), 10 pages.
Chentanez et al., “Simultaneous Coupling of Fluids and Deformable Bodies,” Eurographics/ ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Computer Animation, 2006, pp. 83-89.
Clausen et al., “Simulating Liquids and Solid-Liquid Interactions with Lagrangian Meshes,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 32, No. 2, Article 17, Apr. 2013, pp. 17.1-17.15.
Feldman et al., “Animating Suspended Particle Explosions,” Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, Jul. 27-31, 2003, pp. 1-8.
Feldman et al., “Fluids in Deforming Meshes,” Eurographics/ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Computer Animation (2005), pp. 255-259.
Foster et al., “Practical Animation of Liquids,” ACM SIGGRAPH, Aug. 12-17, 2001, Los Angeles, CA, pp. 23-30.
Foster et al., “Realistic Animation of Liquids,” Graphical Models and Image Processing, vol. 58, No. 5, Sep. 1996, pp. 471-483.
Goktekin et al., “A Method for Animating Viscoelastic Fluids,” Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, Aug. 8-12, 2004, pp. 1-6.
Holmberg et al., “Efficient Modeling and Rendering of Turbulent Water over Natural Terrain,” Proceedings of the 2nd International conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques in Australasia and South East Asia, Singapore, Jun. 15-18, 2004, pp. 15-22.
Irving et al., “Efficient Simulation of Large Bodies of Water by Coupling Two and ThreeDimensional Techniques,” ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), vol. 25, Issue 3, Jul. 2006,pp. 805-811.
Kass et al., “Rapid, Stable Fluid Dynamics for Computer Graphics,” Computer Graphics, vol. 24, No. 4, Aug. 1990, pp. 49-57.
Klinger et al., “Fluid Animation with Dynamic Meshes,” Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, Jul. 30-Aug. 3, 2006, 820-825.
Muller et al., “Particle-Based Fluid Simulation for Interactive Applications,” Eurographics/SIGGRAPH Symposium on Computer Animation (2003), pp. 154-159 and 372.
O'Brien et al., “Dynamic Simulation of Splashing Fluids,” Proceedings of Computer Animation '95, Apr. 19-21, 1995, in Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 198-205.
Premoze et al., “Particle-Based Simulation of Fluids,” EUROGRAPHICS, vol. 22, No. 3 (2003), 10 pages.
Rasmussen et al., “Directable Photorealistic Liquids,” Eurographics/ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Computer Animation (2004), pp. 193-202.
Stam, “Stable Fluids,” SIGGRAPH 99 Conference Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, Aug. 1999, 121-128.
Thurey et al., “Real-time Breaking Waves for Shallow Water Simulations,” Proceedings of the Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications, Maui, Hawaii, Oct. 29-Nov. 2, 2007, 8 pages.
Yaoming, “Applications of Microcomputer in Robot Technology,” Scientific and Technical Documentation Press, Sep. 1987, pp. 360-365.
Collins (Lecture 4:Smoothing) (downloaded from: https://web.archive.org/web/20150616212349/http://www.cse.psu.edu/- rtc12/CSE486/lecture04.pdf) (Year: 2015).
IT Media, “Tokyo Game Show 2008: Games aren't just about entertainment,” published Oct. 9, 2008.

Related Publications (1)

	Number	Date	Country
	20180068580 A1	Mar 2018	US

Provisional Applications (1)

	Number	Date	Country
	61940221	Feb 2014	US

Continuations (1)

	Number	Date	Country
Parent	14615637	Feb 2015	US
Child	15795312		US

Welding simulator

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

Field of Search

CPC

International Classifications

Disclaimer

Term Extension

Abstract