The present invention relates to a wire-feeding device for a wire-processing machine, there being provided after a wire supply and before the wire-processing machine a wire buffer which can be fed by a transporting unit, the wire buffer satisfying the requirement for wire of the wire-processing machine.
From German patent application DE 33 43 286 A1 an arrangement for coiling a lightwave conductor has become known. The coiling operation takes place under a constant mechanical tension. The tension is determined by the own weight of the hanging length of conductor and by an additional toroidal weight attached to it. The length of the hanging conductor and the position of the additional weight can be regulated by means of a regulating device and a detecting device. The rotational speed of the coiling reel is controlled in such manner that the length of the hanging conductor remains constant, light barriers arranged one above the other detecting the position of the additional weight.
A disadvantage of the known device is that to avoid hunting elaborate control and mechanical measures are necessary.
It is here that the present invention sets out to provide a remedy avoiding the disadvantages of the known device and creating an inexpensive device for feeding wires to wire-processing machines. To process wires, the wire-processing machine according to the present invention transports the wire to be processed intermittently and at high speed (about 5 m/s) and with high acceleration (about 5 g). The stepwise requirement for wire of the wire-processing machine cannot be readily met out of a drum or off a reel. For this purpose a feeding device is necessary which assures removal of the wire from the drum or off the reel in wire-compatible manner and which makes the necessary amount of wire available to the wire-processing machine. For example, jerky removal of the wire from the drum would result in wire loops and/or wire knots. Jerky removal of the wire from the reel would cause snapping of the wire with very fine wires. For wires with a diameter of about 0.3 mm and more, controllable wire buffers are normally used as buffers between the wire supply and the wire-processing machine. For very fine wires with a diameter of approximately 0.15 mm the tensile forces on the wire arising on account of the mass of the rotating reels and the mass of the movable reel frame are too high. However, reel diameters cannot be made smaller indefinitely since for processing the wire-ends and for storing the wires straight and kink-free wires are essential.
The advantages achieved by the present invention are essentially to be seen in that the feeding device according to the invention fulfills the processing conditions of the subsequent wire-processing machine with little expense. Provided in the feeding device is a wire-path with free-hanging wire-loop, the hanging length of wire serving as a wire buffer between the wire drum or wire reel and the wire-processing machine. With the free-hanging w ire-loop, even very fine wires remain kink-free and straight even when withdrawn jerkily. With control of the hanging wire-loop, the transporting unit which feeds the hanging wire-loop can be operated largely autonomously. Control of the hanging wire-loop can be realized with simple and inexpensive means. If the length of the hanging wire-loop is too small or too large, the wire-processing machine can adjust the parameters of the transporting unit. The stepwise requirement for wire of the wire-processing machine can be met with the free-hanging wire-loop.
The wire-feeder according to the present invention prevents the hanging wire-loop of very fine wires from being able to adhere to machine parts through static charging.
Also advantageous is the space-saving arrangement of the feeding device according to the present invention. The plane occupied by the feeding device stands perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the wire-processing machine. Thus the overall length of the machine is increased only insignificantly.
The above, as well as other advantages of the present invention, will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment when considered in the light of the accompanying drawings in which:
Signals generated by the light-barriers 23, 25, 27 are transmitted to the not-shown control device which controls the transporting unit 2. In the position of the wire apex 15 shown in
Should, for example, the transporting unit 2 be switched to level “2” and should more wire 7 be fed to the wire buffer 3 than the requirement for wire of the wire-processing machine, the wire apex 15 falls and deposits the second runner 20 in the second light-barrier 25. With the signal (presence of wire) of the second light-barrier 25 the transport-unit 2 is switched to level “1”. A similar operation applies for the first runner 19 and the first light-barrier 23.
The individual speed levels of the transporting unit 2 can also be influenced by the control of the wire-processing machine. Depending on the processing program of the wire-processing machine, the wire speed of the transporting unit 2 in the respective level can be adapted.
In accordance with the provisions of the patent statutes, the present invention has been described in what is considered to represent its preferred embodiment. However, it should be noted that the invention can be practiced otherwise than as specifically illustrated and described without departing from its spirit or scope.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03405665 | Sep 2003 | EP | regional |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2314070 | Bogoslowsky | Mar 1943 | A |
| 2681184 | Thomas | Jun 1954 | A |
| 2800326 | Berger | Jul 1957 | A |
| 2825512 | Andren | Mar 1958 | A |
| 2895489 | Foust | Jul 1959 | A |
| 3049308 | Lang | Aug 1962 | A |
| 3684205 | Rogow | Aug 1972 | A |
| 3974949 | Petersen | Aug 1976 | A |
| 4422583 | Maxner et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4500043 | Brown | Feb 1985 | A |
| 5031847 | Tanaka | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5139206 | Butler | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5195690 | Cross et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5413264 | Kotzur et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5597105 | Keller | Jan 1997 | A |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2 036 157 | Jan 1972 | DE |
| 33 43 286 | Jun 1985 | DE |
| 44 43 503 | Jun 1996 | DE |
| 0 255 507 | Feb 1988 | EP |
| 10021764 | Jan 1998 | JP |
| 04156405 | May 1998 | JP |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20050051588 A1 | Mar 2005 | US |