The present Application for Patent is related to the co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/141,934 entitled “WIRELESS SUBSCRIBER APPLICATION AND CONTENT DISTRIBUTION AND DIFFERENTIATED PRICING” by Mitchell Oliver, Jerry Horel, and Brian Minear, filed concurrently herewith, assigned to the assignee hereof, and expressly incorporated by reference herein.
1. Field
The present invention generally relates to communications between remote computing devices and servers. More particularly, the invention relates to the creation and sending of billing events between a server and a remote client device.
2. Background
Advances in technology have resulted in smaller and more powerful personal computing devices. For example, there currently exist a variety of portable personal computing devices, including wireless computing devices, such as portable wireless telephones, personal digital assistants (PDAs) and paging devices that are each small, lightweight, and can be easily carried by users. More specifically, the portable wireless telephones, for example, further include cellular telephones that communicate voice and data packets over wireless networks. Further, many such cellular telephones are being manufactured with relatively large increases in computing capabilities, and as such, are becoming tantamount to small personal computers and hand-held PDAs. However, these smaller and more powerful personal computing devices are typically severely resource constrained. For example, the screen size, amount of available memory and file system space, amount of input and output capabilities and processing capability may each be limited by the small size of the device, and in particular, the small size of the user input unit, e.g., the keyboard. Because of such severe resource constraints, it is often typically desirable, for example, to maintain a limited size and quantity of software applications and other information residing on such remote personal computing devices (client devices).
Some of the personal computing devices utilize application programming interfaces (APIs), sometimes referred to as runtime environments and software platforms, that are installed onto their local computer platform and which are used, for example, to simplify operations of such devices, such as by providing generalized calls for device specific resources. Further, some such APIs are also known to provide software developers the ability to create software applications that are fully executable on such devices. In addition, some of such APIs are known to be operationally located between the computing device system software and the software applications such that the computing device computing functionality is made available to the software applications without requiring the software developer to have the specific computing device system source code. Further, some APIs are known to provide mechanisms for secure communications between such personal devices (i.e., clients) and remote devices (i.e., servers) using secure cryptographic information.
Examples of such APIs, some of which are discussed in more detail below, include versions of the Binary Runtime Environment for Wireless software (BREW®) developed by QUALCOMM, Inc., of San Diego, Calif,. BREW® can cooperate with a computing device's (e.g., a wireless cellular phone) operating system, and can, among other features, provide interfaces to hardware features particularly found on personal computing devices. BREW® can also provide these interfaces on such personal computing devices at a relatively low cost with respect to demands on device resources and with respect to the price paid by consumers for devices containing BREW®. Additional features of BREW® include its end-to-end software distribution platform that provides a variety of benefits for wireless service operators, software developers and computing device consumers. At least one such currently available end-to-end software distribution platform includes logic distributed over a server-client architecture, where the server performs, for example, billing, security and application distribution functionality, and the client performs, for example, application execution, security and user interface functionality.
The foregoing description of the related art is merely intended to provide an overview of some of the known uses of APIs and as an introduction to the BREW® platform, which can be used in embodiments of the invention. However, the invention is not to be construed as being limited to a specific implementation, operating platform or environment.
Exemplary embodiments of the present invention are directed to a system and method for generating and processing billing requests in a wireless network.
Accordingly, an embodiment of the invention can include a method comprising: generating a billing request at a trusted service; communicating the billing request including billing information to a wireless subscriber billing system; generating a validation response to the billing request in the wireless subscriber billing system; and communicating the validation response to the trusted service.
Another embodiment of the invention can include an apparatus comprising: a service value billing (SVB) module in a wireless subscriber billing system configured to receive a billing request from a trusted service and to authenticate the trusted service; and validation logic configured to generate a validation response in response to the billing request.
Another embodiment of the invention can include a system comprising: means for receiving a billing request including billing information from a trusted service at a wireless subscriber billing system; means for generating a validation response to the billing request in the wireless subscriber billing system; and means for communicating the validation response to the trusted service.
Another embodiment of the invention can include a computer-readable medium on which is stored a computer program for processing billing requests in a wireless subscriber billing system, the computer program comprising instructions which, upon being executed, causes the computing device to perform a process of: receiving a billing request from a trusted service, wherein the billing request billing information to the wireless subscriber billing system; generating a validation response to the billing request in the wireless subscriber billing system; and communicating the validation response to the trusted service.
Another embodiment of the invention can include a method of processing multi-party billing events, in a wireless subscriber billing system, the method comprising: generating a billing event including a provider fee and payee, and at least one source fee and payee associated with a transaction; and processing the transaction to distribute payment to the provider payee and the at least one source payee.
A more complete appreciation of embodiments of the invention and many of the attendant advantages thereof will be readily obtained as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings which are presented solely for illustration and not limitation of the invention, and in which:
Aspects of the invention are disclosed in the following description and related drawings directed to specific embodiments of the invention. Alternate embodiments may be devised without departing from the scope of the invention. Additionally, well-known elements of the invention will not be described in detail or will be omitted so as not to obscure the relevant details of the invention.
The word “exemplary” is used herein to mean “serving as an example, instance, or illustration.” Any embodiment described herein as “exemplary” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other embodiments. Likewise, the term “embodiments of the invention” does not require that all embodiments of the invention include the discussed feature, advantage or mode of operation.
Further, many embodiments are described in terms of sequences of actions to be performed by, for example, elements of a computing device. It will be recognized that various actions described herein can be performed by specific circuits (e.g., application specific integrated circuits (ASICs)), by program instructions being executed by one or more processors, or by a combination of both. Additionally, these sequence of actions described herein can be considered to be embodied entirely within any form of computer readable storage medium having stored therein a corresponding set of computer instructions that upon execution would cause an associated processor to perform the functionality described herein. Thus, the various aspects of the invention may be embodied in a number of different forms, all of which have been contemplated to be within the scope of the claimed subject matter. In addition, for each of the embodiments described herein, the corresponding form of any such embodiments may be described herein as, for example, “logic configured to” perform the described action.
One or more embodiments of the invention can be used in conjunction with a runtime environment (e.g., API) executing on the computing device. One such runtime environment is Binary Runtime Environment for Wireless software (BREW®) previously discussed. However, one or more embodiments of the invention can be used with other types of runtime environments or platforms that, for example, operate to control the execution of applications on wireless client computing devices.
Additionally, it will be recognized to those skilled in the art that an application file type being distributed and executed may be described herein for simplicity of description. However, an “application” may also include files having executable content, such as: object code, scripts, java file, a bookmark file (or PQA file), WML scripts, byte code, and perl scripts. In addition, an “application” referred to herein, may also include files that are not executable in nature, such as documents that may need to be opened or other data files that need to be accessed.
The application download server (ADS) 106 is shown here on a network 116 with other computer elements in communication with the wireless network 104. There can be a stand-alone server 122, and each server can provide separate services and processes to the client devices 102, 108, 110, 112 across the wireless network 104. There is preferably also at least one stored application database 118 that holds the software applications and content that is downloadable by the wireless devices 102, 108, 110, 112. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the configuration illustrated in
In
The carrier network 200 controls messages (typically sent as data packets) sent to a messaging service controller (“MSC”) 202. The carrier network 200 communicates with the MSC 202 by a network, the Internet and/or a public switched telephone network (PSTN). Typically, the network or Internet connection between the carrier network 200 and the MSC 202 transfers data, and the PSTN transfers voice information. The MSC 202 can be connected to multiple base stations (“BTS”) 204. In a similar manner to the carrier network, the MSC 202 is typically connected to the BTS 204 by a network, the Internet and/or PSTN for data transfer and/or voice information. The BTS 204 can broadcast data messages wirelessly to the client devices, such as cellular telephone 102, by short messaging service (“SMS”), or other over-the-air (OTA) methods known in the art.
The client device, (here a wireless client computing device), such as cellular telephone 102, has a computer platform 206 that can receive and execute software applications or content and/or commands transmitted from the application download server 106, billing server 130 and/or server 120. The computer platform 206 can include an application specific integrated circuit (“ASIC” 208), or other processor, microprocessor, logic circuit, or other data processing device. The ASIC 208 or other processor executes the application programming interface (“API”) 210 layer that interfaces with any resident programs in the memory 212 of the wireless device. The memory 212 can be comprised of read-only or random-access memory (RAM and ROM), EEPROM, flash cards, or any memory common to computer platforms. The API 210 also includes an application-based value billing extension (AVB) 310 containing logic configured to process special billing requests from the client device to the carrier network 200. The computer platform 206 also includes a local database 214 that can hold applications not actively used in memory 212. The local database 214 is typically a flash memory cell, but can be any secondary storage device as known in the art, such as magnetic media, EEPROM, optical media, tape, soft or hard disk, or the like.
The wireless client computing device, such as cellular telephone 102, has installed on it, or otherwise downloads, one or more software applications, such as games, news, stock monitors, and the like. For example, the cellular telephone 102 may receive one or more software applications and content downloaded from the download server 106. The software applications and content may be stored on the local database 214 when not in use. The cellular telephone 102 or other wireless computing device may upload resident applications stored on the local database 214 to memory 212 for execution on the API 210 when so desired by the user or invoked by another API.
As used herein “client device”, “wireless device” or “client computing device” includes, for example, one or more processing circuits executing resident configured logic, where such computing devices include, for example, microprocessors, digital signal processors (DSPs), microcontrollers, portable wireless telephones, personal digital assistants (PDAs), and paging devices, or any suitable combination of hardware, software and/or firmware containing processors and logic configured to at least perform the operations described herein directed to billing information communicated between a client device and a server. The client computing device can be serviced by at least one remote server with respect to processing the billing requests generated at the client device. Some examples of client devices which may be used in accordance with embodiments of the present invention include cellular telephones or other wireless communication units, PDAs, paging devices, handheld navigation devices, handheld gaming devices, music or video content download units, and other like wireless communication devices.
The wireless communication between the client device 102 and the BTS 204 can be based on different technologies, such as code division multiple access (CDMA), time division multiple access (TDMA), frequency division multiple access (FDMA), the global system for mobile communications (GSM), or other protocols that may be used in a wireless communications network or a data communications network. The data communication is typically between the client device 102, BTS 204, and MSC 202. The MSC 202 can be connected to multiple data networks such as the carrier network 200, PSTN, the Internet, a virtual private network, and the like, thus allowing the client device access to a broader communication network. As discussed in the foregoing, in addition to voice transmission, data can be transmitted to the client device via SMS or other OTA methods known in the art.
Referring the
In contrast, to achieve a similar functionality using conventional systems the application developer would have to generate different applications for each feature and/or pricing level and make them available for download. Conventional systems would treat each download as a one-time purchase and record the billing information and process the settlements for each application downloaded. This process is controlled by the carrier and to purchase each application the client device would have to connect to the carrier network to browse the application catalog and purchase the desired application with the desired features.
In embodiments of the invention, as stated above, the shopping experience is conducted at the client device 300. Accordingly, after a purchase option is presented and accepted at the client device 300, a billing request is generated within the client device 300. The billing request and other information used to process the billing transaction (e.g., subscriber identification information (SID), content provider(s), retail price, and the like) can be transmitted to a remote billing system 301. The billing request is received at the remote billing system 301 and processed. A validation response is generated in response to the billing request at the remote billing system 301. The validation response is transmitted to the client device 300.
The validation response can be an approval of the billing request or a denial of the billing request. Once the client device receives the response, it can process the validation accordingly. For example, the feature (e.g., an additional level in an arcade game) linked to the billing request can be activated, if the validation response is positive. Likewise, if the billing request is denied, an indication of the denial of the billing request can be displayed on the client device. Optionally, additional information can be included in the denial, such as the reason why the request was denied (e.g., insufficient funds).
In at least one embodiment, the billing system can leverage existing billing components to facilitate implementation of the system. For example, in
The ADS 106 can generate the additional billing information based on the item ID. Additionally, the ADS 106 can perform additional checks once the validation logic 330 approves the billing request. For example, if the client pricing plan is a prepay plan, the prepay balance can be checked to see if there is sufficient funds to purchase the item. If there are sufficient funds, then the approval is transmitted to the client device. However, if there are not sufficient funds, then the billing request is denied, even though the billing request is valid. Once the billing request is ultimately approved by the billing system 301, the approval is transmitted to the client device 300 for processing by the AVB 310 and application 320 that generated the billing request.
In addition to transmitting the approval, the ADS 106 communicates transaction data to transaction manager (TXN) 340. The TXN 340 is configured to receive the transaction data from the ADS 106. The TXN 340 can associate any further billing information not included with the transaction data. For example, the transaction data can contain the SID, the item ID, and a price ID. The TXN 340 can associate additional data to complete the billing process (e.g., supplier IDs and related supplier pricing, description of the item, full pricing plan, and the like). The TXN 340 then communicates this information as a billing event to a client billing module 350 and a settlement module 360. The client billing module 350 is configured to receive the billing event from the TXN 340 and to generate a bill to a subscriber associated with the client device 300. The settlement module 360 is also configured to receive the billing event from the TXN 340, to invoice the billing entity (e.g., carrier/operator), and to pay a supplier (e.g., developer, publisher and the like).
Typically, the billing event is created and processed in a conventional manner after the transaction data has been generated. For example, metadata associated with an item can be stored in the TXN 340 and/or related database. When the client device 300 receives approval for the billing request, transaction data can be sent to and stored in the database. The type of transaction can also be stored so that reports generated to the carrier and/or developers can identify the transaction as an AVB generated billing event. The transaction data may also include a subset of the metadata and additional information included by other devices and/or systems. Billing events are created in the TXN 340 by correlating the metadata and the raw transaction data. A more detailed description of this process is found in commonly owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/222,706, entitled “Transaction Processing”, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The conventional process for purchasing and obtaining applications for a client device includes the client device accessing a catalog of available applications, selecting a desired application and downloading the application to the client device. This process generates a billing event related to the application download that ultimately results in the billing of the subscriber and payment of the application developer, as discussed in the background. However, the marketing and purchasing of applications and utilization of the wireless subscriber billing system has been limited to this client-server connection.
An authentication feature can be included in the SVB module 410 that can verify the identity of the trusted service 490 that is accessing the SVB module 410. For example, a digital certificate can be issued to the trusted service. The certificate will be associated with the carrier/operator and the trusted service (e.g., content payee) for validation. The trusted service 490 can digitally sign each transaction to the SVB module 410 using the issued certificate. The digital signature and the digital certificate can be included in each request. The SVB module then authenticates the signature on each billing request. The SVB 410 can be a web-based interface and the connection to the SVB 410 can be via the internet using an HTTPS protocol in the trusted service 490 authentication, for example. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the invention is not limited to an internet connection and an HTTPS protocol and any combination of wired and/or wireless connection and suitable security/authentication system can be used to communicate the billing requests from the trusted service.
Accordingly, the wireless subscriber billing system 400 can receive a billing request from a trusted service external to the billing system 400. The billing request can include billing information that is communicated to the billing system 400 and used to validate the request at the billing system 400. Further, the billing system 400 can generate a validation response to the billing request and communicate the validation response to the trusted service 490. The billing information can include information used to validate the billing request including a subscriber ID, provider/content payee, a content (item) ID, list price, billing description, and the like. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that other data can be included in the billing request.
For example, in the configuration illustrated in
Since the SVB-based billing events from the trusted service are not directly generated within the carrier network or from the subscriber's client device, an SID map database 420 can be used by SVB to uniquely identify the subscriber. For example, a subscriber could use their Mobile Directory (dialable) Number (MDN) or other assigned unique number known by the carrier at the trusted service 490. The MDN (or other unique number) can be transmitted with the billing request as the SID to the SVB 410. The SVB 410 can then access the SID map database 420 and replace the MDN or associate the MDN with the unique SID used in the billing system for processing the billing requests and transactions.
Additionally, the item purchased/billed for item may not be an application or content distributed through the ADS and/or carrier network. Accordingly, the billing request can include additional information regarding the item description, retail price, purchase time/date, and the like. However, at least a portion of this additional information may also be pre-loaded into a database and accessed based on the item ID and/or provider/payee ID (e.g., trusted source).
The information included in the billing request can include a variety of data used for billing and tracking transactions. For example, the information included in the billing request can include Item ID which can be specified by the trusted service to represent a unique identifier for item (e.g., application, content, article, and/or service) purchased at the trusted service. It can be considered a billing part number for the item. However, since there is no guarantee that the Item ID is unique across trusted services, it can be referenced with the Provider/Payee ID (which can be the Trusted Service) to maintain uniqueness. A Customer ID can be an operator's Subscriber ID (SID) or other unique ID that can be related to the operator/carrier's SID. A Customer ID Type can be included (e.g., SID, MDN) in the billing information. A Signature can be a concatenated string of all of the data digitally signed by the trusted service, using the private key of the issued digital certificate. The Digital Certificate from the trusted service key pair can be used for the SVB to authenticate the request. A Payee ID can represent the provider/content payee to be paid the content portion of the standard revenue share split (e.g., revenue split between carrier, settlement entity, and content provider) and can equate to a publisher/developer/manufacturer for the item. In many situations, the payee ID is the trusted service.
A Greenwich Mean Time (GMT) stamp for the purchase can be included. A GMT Offset can be included that represents the offset to compute the local time. A Client Trans ID can represent a unique identifier for the billing/transaction request. It can be used to check that this transaction has not already been received (duplicate check to prevent double billing). Carrier ID represents a sub-operator ID in the system (e.g., it can equate to a BREW® Carrier ID and Primary Carrier). A Pre-pay Flag can indicate if the end user is a pre-pay customer for the operator. A Retail Price can represent the consumer charge of the content bill event. A Content Fee can represent the value used to determine the content payee payment according to pricing terms. In most cases it is the same as Retail Price. Currency code can represent the currency of the list price, content fee and source fee amounts specified in the transaction. A Billing Description can represent a short description of the content item which can be included in the report sent to carriers (e.g. a billing XML feed) and the report available to developers (e.g., a developer XML feed) and appear on the consumer billing statement. It equates to the billing part name for this item. A Long Description can represent a longer name of the value bill content which can be used to further describe the transaction (e.g. for customer service), but is typically not included in the Billing Extract XML or the Developer Extract XML (i.e., report to developers). Vendor data can represent additional data to be used by the trusted service as passed with the billing transaction. Vendor data can be included in the billing and developer reports. Information for a start recurring billing interface can include Start Bill Date which can indicate the day (e.g., in MM/DD/YYYY format) to trigger subscription billing. If the Start Bill Date is in the future, then the first value billing (IB) event to trigger billing is not created until the start bill date. An End Bill Date can indicate the end date, (e.g., in MM/DD/YYYY format) of the subscription. No IB events are created after the end bill date.
The foregoing description of optional billing information that can be included in the billing request and/or associated with the billing event was provided solely for illustration. Billing requests can be processed without all the information described above and likewise additional information not listed could be added for the purposes of tracking and reporting billing events. Accordingly, those skilled in the art will appreciate the billing request and associated information to generate a billing event can be varied as desired by the carriers and providers of the purchased items.
Using the SVB 410, the billing system 400 is essentially functioning as a “pass-through” billing service from the trusted service 490 (i.e., an authorized source for billing generation). The trusted service 490 can be responsible for service value billing transaction management which can include: creating the transaction (e.g., SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol) interface), providing security, setting valid transaction attributes (e.g., billing information describe above), submitting the transaction to the billing system 400, processing the response from the billing system 400 and re-submitting the transaction, as required. The trusted service 490 can provide authentication for each transaction (e.g., digitally sign each transaction) to the SVB 410 using the digital certificate issued by the operator or other secured transaction processing. The SVB 410 can then authenticate the requests from the trusted service 490, validate the requests, support value billing operator interfaces and communicate valid requests (e.g., transaction data) to the TXN 440. The SVB 410 can return an error code to identify invalid requests. The TXN 440 can support a duplicate event check, the conversion processing of the billing transactions, the mapping and processing of recurring content value billing and can communicate the value billing events to billing module 450 and settlement module 460.
The SVB 410 can support multiple operator interfaces. For example, a user authorization interface can be used to verify the SID is authorized for the SVB service. A transaction validation interface (e.g., validation logic 430) can be used for the operator to implement additional verification of billing information (i.e., content fee not to exceed X, Customer ID valid, etc.). A pre-pay interface can used to initiate pre-pay authorization (e.g., check pre-pay balance) and debit services for value billing services. These interfaces may be realized as separate modules or may all be included in a common logic module (e.g., validation logic 430).
Application purchasing in conventional wireless systems is controlled by the carrier/operator and is typically based on a client device browsing for applications (e.g., as presented by the ADS), selecting and downloading the application from the carrier network, as discussed above. The transaction can be recorded, billed and settled as discussed in the background and foregoing disclosure.
However, the addition of the SVB service in the billing system allows for alternate buy (Alt Buy) sources in addition to the direct purchase from the carrier network. Referring to
For example, a main catalog 510 can contain a plurality of items (e.g., applications, content, services and the like) available for purchase from the carrier/operator. A SID-directed group 540 that contains only one SID (e.g., a My Apps group) can be formed that contains items that are specifically directed to that SID (client device). Accordingly, a shopping catalog 550 can be generated for a client device 300 from a main catalog 510 based on platform ID, runtime API, and language, in a conventional manner (e.g., using folders/items from main catalog 510). However, the shopping catalog 550 can be augmented by the SID-directed group 540 and items (e.g., My Apps) associated with a SID in the shopping catalog 550 based on the SID associated with the client device 300. Therefore, the shopping catalog 550 can be customizable for each SID and the SID-directed group 540 can be used to deliver items purchased via Alt Buy.
In addition to presenting items in separate groups, differentiated pricing can be used for the same item. For example, item 5 (e.g., an application) in the main catalog 510 may be offered for a full commercial price of $10.00. However, the same item 5 can be contained in a SID-directed group 540 (e.g., My Apps) which may be offered for free. For example, item 5 may have been purchased via Alt Buy or be a gift from another subscriber. Accordingly, the purchase/billing/settlement process can be separated from the delivery of the item purchased unlike the conventional download initiated billing event.
An external billing channel (e.g., SVB 410) to the wireless subscriber billing system allows for external purchase transactions to be processed via the wireless subscriber billing system. Some purchases can be processed without any associated download or enhancement to the client device, such as purchasing tickets to a movie. However, other types of external transactions can be processed that include purchasing items from a carrier catalog (e.g., downloading or enhancing features of an application, application purchase, ringtone purchase, and the like) directed to a client device on the wireless system. In general this type transaction that is directed to a client device but is not generated within the conventional client device to server transaction in the carrier network by the client device is referred to as an “alternate buy” or “Alt Buy”, in the following description.
An Alt Buy zone 610 can include various channels, such as Retail 612 (e.g., operator/third-party retail cards, kiosk), PC/Web based 614 (e.g., operator/third-party web site or directly from within a PC application, such as game in which a purchase can be made for a related game for the wireless client 300), Mass media 616 (e.g., Advertising Links, and the like). The Alt Buy can leverage the SVB 410 for billing and SID based group functions (e.g., My Apps 540) for delivery of the content/application to the client device 300 associated with the SID.
For example, retail cards can be a card sold in either an operator's or third-party's retail outlet that provides a subscriber with one or more applications. The purchaser may use the card himself or gift the card to another subscriber. The purchase of multiple applications on a single card can contain a discount in the purchase price of the applications. After purchase or receipt of the gift, the subscriber can register the card, at which point the applications (e.g., BREW® applications) are loaded into their SID-directed group (e.g., My Apps directory) for download or auto-installation. Further, the transaction processing is completed to bill subscriber (optional if not prepaid) and settles with all application and service providers.
Operator/third-party web offerings can be presented that mimic the catalog offerings and possibly incorporate some discount pricing for purchase of multiple applications or for purchase of certain offerings during limited time offerings. Web site Alt Buys can offer applications and content individually, or offer bundles of product and service items. For example, the subscriber (or gift giver) can provide information regarding the destination subscriber's device (e.g., MDN) and the operator/third-party (i.e., trusted service) provides information for subscriber billing and content provider payment via the SVB 410 interface.
Operator or third-party kiosks can have application purchasing capability that mimics the main catalog offerings and possibly incorporates some discount pricing for purchase of multiple applications or for purchase of certain applications during limited time offerings. The subscriber provides information on the destination subscriber's device (e.g., client device 300) and the operator or third-party directs distribution (e.g., via My Apps) of the purchased applications to that device and provides information for subscriber billing and content and service provider payments.
Advertising Links can offer applications to an operator's subscribers. For example, these can be non-billable to the subscriber. The subscriber provides information on the destination subscriber's device and the operator or third-party directs distribution of the applications to that device (e.g., via My Apps) for user download.
As discussed in the foregoing, the Alt Buy offers a variety of different channels to purchase and deliver applications/content to subscribers. In each of these configurations, the billing and delivery information is communicated to the SVB 410 and group manager 515 to allow for proper delivery and billing. Accordingly, billing and delivery metadata can be transmitted as part of the billing request communicated to the SVB 410.
For example, an application can be purchased outside the carrier network/billing system (e.g., cash, credit card at an operator kiosk). A billing and distribution request is communicated from the trusted service (e.g., Alt Buy zone 610) to the SVB 410. A special price handle can be included with the billing request that indicates the transaction is alternate buy and has a special pricing base (e.g., CLP=0 so that the subscriber is not billed). The SID is used to target delivery (e.g., My Apps). Generally, the Alt Buy service formats and submits billing and distribution requests, processes return event information, and processes error instances. The billing/distribution request can be a SVB transaction and the distribution request can be a group manager directed (SID-directed) application request. The metadata (information) included with the request includes, for example, Distribution SID, Item ID, Price Handle, Price Method, Price Basis, Price Value, Vendor Data, and Source Type for each application associated with the Alt Buy.
An Alt Buy delivery table 620 can be populated with data from the metadata passed from the Alt Buy source (e.g., 610). For example, the table can include SID (e.g., the distribution SID), Item ID, Usage, Price Handler, CLP fields. In the scenario described above, where the application was paid for at the Alt Buy zone 610 and the CLP=0, this information can be associated with the SID and the item ID and associated with the SID-directed group 540 (e.g., My Apps). When a client device 300 associated with the SID, accesses the SID-directed (“My Apps”) group from shopping catalog 550 generated by the ADS 106, one of the items (e.g., an application) presented can be an item, which was purchased via an Alt Buy.
The ADS 106 can access the Alt Buy table 620 for and determine if there is an Alt Buy price handle associated with the SID and Item ID. The ADS can then replace the provided price handle associated with the Item ID with the local price handle from the Alt Buy table 620. Assuming the price is zero, the presentation of $0.00 or “Free” (or other language specific indication) can be displayed at the client device 300. If there is a local price handle, ADS 106 can identify the transaction as an Alt Buy transaction to ensure operator and developer minimums do not apply, consumer billing is not applied and developer/content provider settlement is not processed or processed at zero value. The ADS 106 can process the download request and generate transaction data at a zero value and pass the transaction data to the transaction processing, billing and settlement modules, as discussed above. However, both the billing and settlement will be zero (CLP=0, DAP=0, where the DAP is the payment to the developer/content provider), as the billing and settlement was performed at the Alt Buy zone via SVB. However, the other information related to the transaction can be maintained on this download event, in order to populate the operator and/or developer reports. For example, the information can be useful in tracking of the actual applications downloaded, download dates, and the like and can be associated with a SID and client device for marketing and/customer service.
In another exemplary embodiment, an Alt Buy purchase can be made from an operator kiosk for a one time or limited number of downloads for a special price (e.g., a low cost or zero cost promotion). As discussed above, an Alt Buy delivery table 620 can be initially set to allow the client device associated with the SID to download the application at the special pricing (e.g., CLP=0). The special pricing handle and price level is propagated through the billing system as discussed in the foregoing. However, in addition to the pricing, item ID and other data in the Alt Buy delivery table 620, a download indicator can be stored. Accordingly, once the item is downloaded (e.g., via ADS 106), the item ID licensing is delivered to the SID and the status of that license is set to a state of delivered. A record is kept for each downloadable license available for the item ID. When the item ID licensing is delivered to the SID the status of that license is set to a state of delivered. Accordingly, the download indicator/delivery status indicates that the item has been delivered and can be removed from the Alt Buy delivery table 620 (or functionally removed via a logic check to the download indicator field). Likewise, the item may not be visible from the SID-directed (My Apps) group 540. Accordingly, in either case if the item is downloaded again, it may be offered at the standard price level defined in the main catalog 510. Therefore, standard commercial item pricing can be intermingled with Alt Buy pricing, in the wireless billing system to allow for additional flexibility in promoting and marketing applications, content and/or services.
In the Alt Buy scenario, billing and distribution information can be generated in the Alt Buy zone 610 (e.g., at an operator kiosk). The billing and distribution information is communicated to the SVB 410 and the group manager 515. At least a portion of the information (metadata) can be passed along and stored through the billing and download transactions to allow the system to relate the transactions to a single Alt Buy transaction ID. For example, transaction metadata can be generated and carried with the SVB transaction. This metadata can be associated and stored with the item ID added to the SID-directed group 540, using, for example, group manager 515, ADS 106 or other server or logic. The metadata can be passed to the client device on a download request. Further, the metadata can be included in a mediated usage record by the transaction manager TXN.
The Alt Buy transaction may generate multiple transaction data at the TXN (e.g., first transaction data associated with the SVB billing request and second transaction data associated with the actual delivery (e.g., push/pull) of the content to the client device. Accordingly, a tracking ID can be used throughout the transaction processing so that the end-to-end tracking of the related transactions can be accomplished. Thus, the tracking ID can be included with the Alt Buy billing request and first transaction data can be generated based on the billing request. The transaction data can be processed through the billing system (e.g., TXN, billing and settlement modules) to generate a subscriber bill, distribute payment to a provider of the item, and/or transmit reporting data based on the first transaction data. The first transaction data including the tracking ID can be stored in a database for later retrieval, adjustments, customer service, and the like.
As discussed above, the delivery of the content in an Alt Buy transaction can occur separately from the billing request or not at all (e.g., if no content is delivered). Accordingly, if content is to be delivered, the content can be added from the main catalog to a SID-directed group associated with a client device. The tracking ID can also be associated with the content in the SID-directed group. When the content from the SID-directed group is downloaded to the client device, the tracking ID can also be passed to the client device. Likewise, second transaction data can be generated on the download of the content including the tracking ID and processed through the remaining billing, settlement and/or reporting process, as previously discussed. The second transaction data including the tracking ID can also be stored for later retrieval, adjustments, customer service, and the like. Accordingly, the Alt Buy transaction can be mapped and managed end-to-end (i.e., from the Alt Buy sale to the application download and transaction billing and settlement). Being able to track these transactions end-to-end, allows for increased business intelligence and application distribution penetration for Alt Buy sales channels. For example, with use of the tracking ID the carrier can derive how many Alt Buy downloads were exercised against the applications/content purchased. This is accomplished through the TXN mediationlconversion process for Alt Buy related downloads. TXN can use the local price handle to include conversion of the tracking ID in the mediated usage record. The tracking ID is used to correlate download events with SYB billing events. Because the tracking ID is included in the mediated usage record it can also be included in the billing report which can be integrated into carrier billing and data warehousing solutions.
In another embodiment of the invention, the transaction may include multiple developers/publishers/vendors/sources (752, 754, 756), as illustrated in
Accordingly, for multi-party settlements additional source payee 754, 756 information can be included in the billing request generated in the billing system or by the Alt Buy source. For example, at least one source payee ID can be included. The source payee ID can represent a third-party payee (source payee) that supplied at least part of the content. The third-party payee is paid some portion of the content payee 752 payment. A source description can be included that represents a short description of the content provided by the source payee 754, 756. A source fee can be provided for each Source Payee ID that represents the third-party payee portion of the content payee payment. This additional information can be included with the billing metadata that is passed with the transaction. Therefore, the wireless subscriber billing system can be further leveraged to automatically bill and settled a single transaction including multiple third-party content providers/sources.
For example, in processing multi-party billing events in a wireless subscriber billing system, a billing event is generated (e.g., based on a request from trusted service 490) including a content payee 752, a content fee and at least one source payee 754, 756 and source fee associated with a transaction. The transaction is processed to distribute payment (e.g., via settlement module 460) to the content payee 752 and the at least one source payee 754, 756. The transaction data related to the payment of the content payee 752 and the at least one source payee 754, 756 is stored (e.g., at TXN 440 or other database operably coupled to the billing system) for later processing (e.g., customer service, billing adjustments, sales/marketing data mining, and the like). As discussed above, the content fee is greater than or equal to the sum of the source fees. Further, in addition to storing the transaction data at least a portion of that data can be transmitted (e.g., by settlement module 460) as transaction reporting data to the content payee 752 and/or each source payee 754, 756. For example, a developer may wish to track application sales related to bundling using the transaction reporting data sent from the billing and distribution system. Also, as discussed above, the billing event will typically lead to a subscriber bill (e.g., via billing module 450) being generated based on a retail price (e.g., CLP) for the content delivery or scheduled to be delivered. The retail price is typically greater than or equal to the content fee.
Once the transaction data has been stored, it can be used for a variety of purposes as discussed above. One such use is in customer relationship management (CRM) services. As illustrated in
Accordingly, using the SID, transaction tracking ID and the like, the transaction data associated with the bundle purchase can be accessed. The negative content fee and at least one negative source fee can be based on an adjustment percentage and the stored transaction data related to the payment of the content payee 752 and the at least one source payee 754, 756. For example, the CRM interface 730 can receive an adjustment amount or percentage (e.g., −20%) from CRM 720. The CRM interface 730 can access the original transaction data, then generate a negative payment (e.g., 20% of the content fee and source fee) for the content payee 752 and each source payee 754, 756. The adjustment percentage is not limited, but can for example range from one to one-hundred percent (i.e., a complete refund). Further, a subscriber credit can also be generated based on the adjustment percentage and the list price for the content. Accordingly, a twenty percent refund to the subscriber can result in each payee in the original purchase (e.g., carrier/operator 710, content payee 752, source payee(s) 754, 756) receiving a proportional twenty percent debit. This can be accomplished by CRM interface 730 generating a negative billing event, which will then be passed through the billing system and settled in a similar manner to the billing events discussed in the foregoing description. Thus, the CRM interface 730 of the multiparty settlement system allows for the automatic adjustment of any multiple third-party transactions settled through the wireless subscriber billing system. Once again, the adjustment transaction data can be stored and/or used to generate reporting data to the operator 710, content payee 752 and/or source payee(s) 754, 756.
Although the foregoing example and related
In view of the foregoing disclosure, those skilled in the art will recognize that embodiments of the invention include methods of performing the sequence of actions, operations and/or functions previously discussed. For example, referring to
Additionally, as discussed in the foregoing the billing information in the billing request can include a variety of information used for processing and tracking the transaction such as subscriber ID, provider ID/content payee, a content/item ID, retail price, and/or billing description. However, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, not all of these fields are required nor is this a complete listing of the possible fields to be used. For example, a bill to subscriber ID and a deliver to subscriber ID may be defined in the billing request in a gifting type scenario. Alternatively, a subscriber ID may only represent a bill to or a deliver to ID depending on the type of transaction. For example, SVB can be used to purchase items/services external to the wireless subscriber system, but use the wireless subscriber billing system to bill the wireless subscriber and settle the transaction. Alternatively, in the Alt Buy examples discussed above, an item (e.g., application, content, service, and the like) available in the wireless subscriber system can be purchased external to the wireless subscriber system and the SID can be used for purposes of identifying the delivery to device/subscriber (e.g., an application will be available for download at a zero price level). Accordingly, the information contained in the billing request or later associated with a billing event can vary based upon many factors, such as the type of transaction, and the specific preferences of the parties involved in the transaction (e.g., operator, provider(s), trusted service, and the like).
Referring back to
Referring to
Transaction data can be generated upon the download of the item using the information in delivery table, block 940, and a billing event can be generated based on the transaction data, block 950. If the item was paid for in the Alt Buy scenario, the information in the delivery table can include a zero value retail price for the item and likewise the transaction data and billing event each can include a zero value retail price for the item. Accordingly, the item can be delivered and the delivery tracked and reported through the billing system without generating a bill to the subscriber. Alternatively, the value could be greater than zero, but less than the full retail price in the main catalog and the discounted price can be processed through the billing system and a subscriber billed a discounted amount.
Referring to
Accordingly, a first transaction including a tracking ID based on a SVB generated billing event can cause a billing and settlement of the transaction, such as the external purchase of an application, in an Alt Buy scenario. The transaction and tracking ID metadata can be stored in the billing system. When the application is actually downloaded to a client device, the tracking ID can be passed to the client device, and a second transaction can be generated based on the download. The second transaction can include a special pricing handle from the delivery table so the subscriber is not billed on the download, as discussed above. However, the event can be processed through the billing system, so that delivery of the item can be tracked and reported to the carrier and provider(s) of the item (e.g., application). Once again, the tracking ID will be included with the second transaction data and can be stored in the billing system for later retrieval, reporting and the like. Accordingly, purchases/billing requests generated external to the wireless subscriber billing system can be tracked end to end, from billing request through settlement and delivery of the item.
Another embodiment as illustrated in
The transaction data can be stored for further processing, data mining and CRM services, block 1130. For CRM adjustment purposes, the stored transaction data can be accessed, block 1140. An adjustment transaction can be generated that contains a negative provider fee and at least one negative source fee based on the stored transaction data, block 1150. The adjustment transaction can be processed to debit the provider payee and the at least one source payee based on the negative provider fee and the at least one negative source fee, block 1160. The adjustment transaction can be proportional for each of the parties that derived revenue from the initial multi-party transaction. Likewise, a subscriber credit can be generated based on the adjustment proportion and the retail price for the item, block 1170. For example, assume an item is purchased at a given retail price. The operator, provider and source each may derive revenue off of the retail price at a pre-established ratio (e.g., as defined by respective fees associated with the item). The wireless subscriber billing system can automatically bill the subscriber and pay the respective parties based upon the fees associated with the item and this information can be stored for later access, as previously discussed. Upon a determination by a CRM representative that a subscriber should be credited or refunded a portion of the purchase, the adjustment transaction can be processed as a negative billing event. Thus, the wireless subscriber billing system can access the stored transaction data and debit each party (e.g., operator, provider, and source) in proportion to the respective fees paid from the original transaction. Accordingly, the adjustments can automatically propagate through the billing system and be apportioned to all parties, which can significantly reduce the manual effort with settling and CRM services.
In further embodiments, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the foregoing methods can be implemented by the execution of a program embodied on a computer readable medium, such as the memory of a computer platform. The instructions can reside in various types of signal-bearing or data storage primary, secondary, or tertiary media. The media may comprise, for example, RAM accessible by, or residing within, the client device and/or server. Whether contained in RAM, a diskette, or other secondary storage media, the instructions may be stored on a variety of machine-readable data storage media, such as DASD storage (e.g., a conventional “hard drive” or a RAID array), magnetic tape, electronic read-only memory (e.g., ROM, or EEPROM), flash memory cards, an optical storage device (e.g. CD-ROM, WORM, DVD, digital optical tape), paper “punch” cards, or other suitable data storage media.
While the foregoing disclosure shows illustrative embodiments of the invention, it should be noted that various changes and modifications could be made herein without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. The functions, steps and/or actions of the method claims in accordance with the embodiments of the invention described herein need not be performed in any particular order. Furthermore, although elements of the invention may be described or claimed in the singular, the plural is contemplated unless limitation to the singular is explicitly stated.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
628294 | Alderman | Jul 1899 | A |
4156903 | Barton et al. | May 1979 | A |
4528589 | Block et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4975942 | Zebryk | Dec 1990 | A |
5005122 | Griffin et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5013897 | Harman et al. | May 1991 | A |
5329619 | Page et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5564070 | Want et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5608781 | Seiderman | Mar 1997 | A |
5619247 | Russo | Apr 1997 | A |
5634012 | Stefik et al. | May 1997 | A |
5666293 | Metz et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5666397 | Lamons et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5761485 | Munyan | Jun 1998 | A |
5812533 | Cox et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812988 | Sandretto | Sep 1998 | A |
5845267 | Ronen | Dec 1998 | A |
5852812 | Reeder | Dec 1998 | A |
5857201 | Wright, Jr. et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5907837 | Ferrel et al. | May 1999 | A |
5940752 | Henrick | Aug 1999 | A |
5956034 | Sachs et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5970490 | Morgenstern | Oct 1999 | A |
5986690 | Hendricks | Nov 1999 | A |
6014641 | Loeb et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6035281 | Crosskey et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047051 | Ginzboorg et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6088717 | Reed et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6141404 | Westerlage et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6151606 | Mendez | Nov 2000 | A |
6181704 | Drottar et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185198 | LaDue | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6185683 | Ginter et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6202051 | Woolston | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6226618 | Downs et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230168 | Unger et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230269 | Spies et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6253189 | Feezell et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253239 | Shklar et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253326 | Lincke et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6263362 | Donoho et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266401 | Marchbanks et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269157 | Coyle | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6282294 | Deo et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6311223 | Bodin et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6321078 | Menelli et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324565 | Holt, III | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327574 | Kramer et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334114 | Jacobs et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334116 | Ganesan et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6336137 | Lee et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6343318 | Hawkins et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6366893 | Hannula et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6381325 | Hanson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389464 | Krishnamurthy et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6427076 | Skog | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6434535 | Kupka et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6453160 | Thomas et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6460076 | Srinivasan et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463534 | Geiger et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6493722 | Daleen et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6535726 | Johnson | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6549770 | Marran | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6597903 | Dahm et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6598026 | Ojha et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606744 | Mikurak | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6622017 | Hoffman et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6628934 | Rosenberg et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6665711 | Boyle et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6683941 | Brown et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6704716 | Force | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6721716 | Gross | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6741980 | Langseth et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6742043 | Moussa et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6754320 | Daase et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6757710 | Reed | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6792271 | Sherman et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6792280 | Hori et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6816721 | Rudisill | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6820121 | Callis et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6857067 | Edelman | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6873936 | Reed et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6880750 | Pentel | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6883142 | Shimamoto et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6928441 | Haegele | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6937996 | Forsythe et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6941139 | Shupe et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6941270 | Hannula | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6954793 | Ramaswamy et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6957793 | Gautier et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6965883 | Xu et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6978273 | Bonneau et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6985882 | Del Sesto | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6996537 | Minear et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7010303 | Lewis et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7010500 | Aarnio | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7013289 | Horn et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7020688 | Sykes, Jr. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7039389 | Johnson, Jr. | May 2006 | B2 |
7043447 | Hughes et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7047405 | Mauro et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7068680 | Kaltenmark et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7099891 | Harris et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7113766 | Horel et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7117504 | Smith et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7155205 | Cerami et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7177837 | Pegaz-Paquet et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7184747 | Bogat | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7200566 | Moore et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7206842 | Nainani et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7218917 | Pradhan et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7228333 | Smith | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7233790 | Kjellberg et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7260194 | Meyers et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7269654 | Srinivas | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7278164 | Raiz et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7286655 | Voorman et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7293099 | Kalajan | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7334025 | Kuriya et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7362745 | Cope et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7370120 | Kirsch et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7404148 | Lincke et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7415439 | Kontio et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7436816 | Mehta et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7444411 | Sung | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7467198 | Goodman et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7490045 | Flores et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7526450 | Hughes et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7574377 | Carapelli | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7577616 | Zhu | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7583953 | Choi et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7660755 | Amato et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7711680 | Barnes-Leon et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7752217 | Sawashima et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7894803 | Kamada | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7904528 | Zilliacus et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7907937 | Engelhart | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8028056 | Krishna et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8150736 | Horn et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8489470 | Kahlon et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
20010013020 | Yoshida et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010032254 | Hawkins | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034686 | Eder | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010036271 | Javed | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010037192 | Shimamoto et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010037304 | Paiz | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010056362 | Hanagan et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020002603 | Vange | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020004935 | Huotari et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020019764 | Mascarenhas | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020022472 | Watler et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020022971 | Tanaka et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020029197 | Kailamaki et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020029200 | Dulin et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020029347 | Edelman et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020035688 | Kutaragi et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020035699 | Crosbie | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020038369 | Sung et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020049717 | Routtenberg et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052754 | Joyce et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020052968 | Donefas et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020062290 | Ricci | May 2002 | A1 |
20020069176 | Newman | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020069244 | Blair et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020069263 | Sears | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020071559 | Christensen et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083006 | Headings et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083050 | Liu et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020107706 | Oliver et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107795 | Minear et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107809 | Biddle | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020109706 | Lincke et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111904 | Gruber et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020128908 | Levin et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020128984 | Mehta et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020129108 | Sykes, Jr. et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020129165 | Dingsor et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020131401 | Ehreth | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020131404 | Mehta et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020160752 | Hook et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020162112 | Javed | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020164025 | Raiz et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020165822 | Makipaa | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020176553 | Aschir | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020190120 | Pentel et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194143 | Banerjee et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194357 | Harris et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030005136 | Eun | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023550 | Lee | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028903 | Hofrichter et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030033209 | Minear et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046396 | Richter et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030051047 | Horel et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060188 | Gidron et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030074328 | Schiff et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078844 | Takatori et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078886 | Minear et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078895 | MacKay | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030083973 | Horsfall | May 2003 | A1 |
20030083991 | Kikinis | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093461 | Suzuki et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093565 | Berger et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030096591 | Pohutsky et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030110044 | Nix et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110213 | Munetsugu et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110296 | Kirsch et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030112927 | Brown et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120594 | Shaginaw et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030149958 | Baluja et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030151621 | McEvilly et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030172165 | Xu et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030176182 | Cerami et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030197719 | Lincke et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208444 | Sauer | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030208532 | Kuriya | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030212904 | Randle et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030233329 | Laraki et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236867 | Natsuno et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040002923 | Ramaswamy et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040006517 | Takatori | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015413 | Abu-Hejleh et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015416 | Foster et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015562 | Harper et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040030601 | Pond et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040032936 | Horel et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040043753 | Wake et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040044623 | Wake et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054786 | Kjellberg et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040116119 | Lewis et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040137890 | Kalke | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139012 | Koskinen et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040181591 | Yu et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040267630 | Au et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050027872 | Srinivas et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050086348 | Balassanian | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050090258 | Coppinger et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050113092 | Coppinger et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114155 | Hodges et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050125315 | Munoz et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050132049 | Inoue et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050148319 | Himeno | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050192878 | Minear et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050289047 | Oliver et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060014535 | Walker et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015565 | Nainani et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060080232 | Epps | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060143119 | Krueger et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060173758 | Minear et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060235931 | Ruthe et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060253350 | Falkenhain et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271449 | Oliver et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070003034 | Schultz et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070038703 | Tendjoukian et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070066279 | Silverbrook et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083464 | Cordero Torres et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070123229 | Pousti | May 2007 | A1 |
20070169163 | Morio et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174308 | Rausch | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070197188 | Sprigg et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070197189 | Horel et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20110030042 | Neal-Joslin | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110143709 | Pousti | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120309345 | Wake et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2267549 | Sep 2000 | CA |
2363220 | May 2003 | CA |
1147325 | Apr 1997 | CN |
1459183 | Nov 2003 | CN |
0780802 | Jun 1997 | EP |
0895148 | Feb 1999 | EP |
1026610 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1026853 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1033652 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1047030 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1102191 | May 2001 | EP |
1122967 | Aug 2001 | EP |
1162807 | Dec 2001 | EP |
1204054 | May 2002 | EP |
1403797 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1404100 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1414185 | Apr 2004 | EP |
2775550 | Sep 1999 | FR |
2349548 | Nov 2000 | GB |
07044261 | Feb 1995 | JP |
2007-319691 | Aug 1995 | JP |
07319691 | Dec 1995 | JP |
09319573 | Dec 1997 | JP |
1066050 | Mar 1998 | JP |
10140283 | May 1998 | JP |
10260873 | Sep 1998 | JP |
10262059 | Sep 1998 | JP |
11053185 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11055252 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11069017 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11126188 | May 1999 | JP |
200056967 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000078129 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2000505568 | May 2000 | JP |
2000357196 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2001195451 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2001202434 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2001-250069 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001-312324 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001243382 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001265938 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001268623 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001-320509 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2001312666 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2001319168 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2001325234 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2001352583 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002007839 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002015160 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002-027151 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2002-91850 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002093361 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002094450 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002101315 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002109395 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002-099289 | May 2002 | JP |
2002-99441 | May 2002 | JP |
2002132367 | May 2002 | JP |
2002133316 | May 2002 | JP |
2002-175387 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2002163258 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2002163467 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2002197294 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002245350 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002279103 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002329249 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2002335336 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2002345030 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2002353885 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2003016041 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003016093 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003518885 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003187083 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2004004157 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004005044 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004135229 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004185197 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004220546 | Aug 2004 | JP |
3609398 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2005078325 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2005519407 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005198021 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2005537544 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2006505966 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006520173 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2007527570 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2008514743 | May 2008 | JP |
2010178027 | Aug 2010 | JP |
2000-72521 | Dec 2000 | KR |
20010078968 | Aug 2001 | KR |
20010078968 | Aug 2001 | KR |
20020039648 | May 2002 | KR |
20020039648 | May 2002 | KR |
2003-0042660 | Jun 2003 | KR |
102003005056 | Jun 2003 | KR |
20030078446 | Oct 2003 | KR |
20070007954 | Jan 2007 | KR |
2165679 | Apr 2001 | RU |
2191482 | Oct 2002 | RU |
2212057 | Sep 2003 | RU |
161301 | Jun 1991 | TW |
388021 | Apr 2000 | TW |
466858 | Dec 2001 | TW |
499645 | Aug 2002 | TW |
WO9308545 | Apr 1993 | WO |
9703410 | Jan 1997 | WO |
9726739 | Jul 1997 | WO |
9745814 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO9821676 | May 1998 | WO |
9931610 | Jun 1999 | WO |
9941861 | Aug 1999 | WO |
9952077 | Oct 1999 | WO |
0002112 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO0031672 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO-0043962 | Jul 2000 | WO |
0056033 | Sep 2000 | WO |
0079451 | Dec 2000 | WO |
0143390 | Jun 2001 | WO |
0150305 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO-0149048 | Jul 2001 | WO |
0163900 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0163532 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0169891 | Sep 2001 | WO |
0197104 | Dec 2001 | WO |
0203219 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 0231718 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 0244892 | Jun 2002 | WO |
02063537 | Aug 2002 | WO |
02067600 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO02063536 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO-02073934 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO-02093361 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO-02103459 | Dec 2002 | WO |
03017171 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO-03032618 | Apr 2003 | WO |
03050743 | Jun 2003 | WO |
03075584 | Sep 2003 | WO |
03079256 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO-03085943 | Oct 2003 | WO |
2004003708 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO2004021131 | Mar 2004 | WO |
2004084526 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO2004082245 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2005008383 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005004456 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO2005020027 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO-2005069917 | Aug 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report, PCT/US06/020705, International Search Authority European Patent Office, Jan. 17, 2007. |
Arar, Yardena, “Download apps to a phone,” PC World, Jun. 2002, v20i6.p. 64, Proquest #120993020 3 pgs. |
Qualcomm; “Binary Runtime Environment for Wireless, BREW Application note: Developing BREW Applications for Devices with RUIM Units” (Online) Jan. 10, 2005, pp. 1-11, XP002410586 San Diego Retrieved from the internet: URL:http://brew.qualcomm.com/brew—bnry/pdf/. |
Qualcomm; BREW Distribution System (BDS) Overview (online) 2003, pp. 1-17, XP002410587 San Diego Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http.wirelessknowledge.com/brew/images/about/pdf/bds.pdf> [retrieved on Dec. 6, 2006] the whole document. |
Office Action dated Nov. 30, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 11/141,934. |
Request for Reconsideration, dated Mar. 4, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 11/141,934. |
Office Action dated Jun. 12, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 11/141,934. |
Request for Reconsideration, dated Aug. 12, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 11/141,934. |
“SYNCML Representation Protocol, Version 1.0” SYNCML Representation Protocol, (Dec. 7, 2000), pp. 1-104, Chapters 1-4. |
Atsuyuki Morishima, “Efficient Construction of Materialized XML Views With Silkroute”, IPSJ SIG Notes, Japan, Information Processing Society of Japan, Jul. 17, 2001, vol. 2001, No. 70, pp. 421-428. |
Butrico M A et al: “Gold Rush: Mobile Transaction Middleware With Java-Object Replication” Conference on Object-Oriented Technologies, (Jun. 16, 1997), pp. 91-101. |
Goldenberg-Hart, Diane, “A Glossary of Selected Internet and Computing Terms” Yale University Library, Jun. 1996, Retrieved from http://www.library.yale.edu/ref/internet/intgloss.htm. |
International Search Report—PCT/US02/025749, International Search Authority—US, Jan. 22, 2003. |
M2 Presswire. Convergys: Genie Mobile chooses Geneva Billing software, continuing the momentum of the merger between Convergys and Geneva Technology. Coventry: Jun. 1 2001, p. 1. |
No Author. “AvantGo 4.0 Powers Wireless Applications and Services,” Customer Inter@ction Solutions, May 2001, vol. 19, Issue 11, p. 71. |
No Author. “Sony Pictures to Sell Movies via Internet,” Jul. 9, 2001, Source: Japan Computer Industry Scan. |
PR Newswire. China Unicom Selects QUALCOMM's BREW Solution as Its Platform to Launch Wireless Data Applications. New York, Aug. 26, 2002, p. 1. |
Rigdon, Joan E., “CyberSource Begins to Offer Software of Symantec and Others on the Internet,” Wall Street Journal, Jan. 31, 1995. |
SYNCML Consortium: “SYNCML Sync Protocol, Version 1.0” (Dec. 7, 2000), Chapters 1,2,5-8. |
SYNCML Consortium: “SYNCML Sync Protocol, Version 1.0.1” (Jun. 15, 2001). |
Amendment dated Oct. 14, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 11/141,934. |
USA Group Selects Clikc-N-Done for Electronic Bill Presentment and Patment; Software Will Support Online Presentment and Payment for Education Loan Borrowers Business Editors, Internet Writers. Business Wire. New York: Apr 24, 2000. p. 1. |
Written Opinion—PCT/US06/020705, International Search Authority European Patent Office, Jan. 17, 2007. |
Anonymous, “BPM In Action: Universe,” Intelligent Enterprise, San Mateo, May 15, 2004, vol. 7, Issue 8, 2 pages (recovered from ProQuest on Jun. 5, 2009). |
Office Action dated Jan. 7, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/141,934. |
Office Action dated Sep. 12, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 11/141,934. |
Business Wire, Informer Announces Key Customer Wins in Fourth Quarter; Leading Companies and Government Entities in Key Markets Around the World Respond to Informer's Technology Strategy Business/Technology Editors. Business Wire. New York: Jan, 27, 1999, p. 1. |
Amendment dated Aug. 8, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 11/141,807. |
Amendment dated Dec. 23, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 11/141,807. |
Declaration of Non-Establishment of International Search Report—PCT/US05/022837, International Search Authority—European Patent Office, Sep. 22, 2005. |
Diebold Teams with Health System Services to Offer a Complete Distribution Package for Pharmacy Medication and Supplies PR Newswire. New York: May 28, 1998. p. 1. |
Office Action dated Jan. 31, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 11/141,807. |
Office Action dated May 2, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 11/141,807. |
Office Action dated Oct. 22, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 11/141,807. |
Statement in accordance with the Notice from the European Patent Office dated Oct. 1, 2007 concerning business methods, Official Journal of the European Patent Office, Nov. 1, 2007, pp. 592-593, European Patent Office, Munich, Germany, XP007905525. |
European Search Report—EP10172294, Search Authority—Munich Patent Office, Nov. 25, 2010. |
Fujii, H. “BREW application, flexibility in development comparable to PCs, powerful in enterprise system cooperation of cellular phones,” Solution IT, vol. 14, No. 11, Japan, RIC Telecom, Nov. 1, 2002, pp. 22-24. |
Translation of Office Action in Japan application 2004-531867 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 10/231,970, dated Mar. 29, 2011. |
Translation of Office Action in Japan application 2008-514743 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 11/141,807, dated Nov. 9, 2010. |
European Search Report—EP10172296—Search Authority—Munich—Aug. 10, 2011. |
Anonymous: “BREW TM Application Note: Developing BREW Applications for Devices with RUIM Units”, May 14, 2005, pp. 1-11, XP007920607, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://web.archive.org/web/20050514075656/http://brew.qualcomm.com/brew—bnry/pdf/developer/resources/ds/Dev—BREW—Apps.pdf. |
Anonymous: “Internet Archive Wayback Machine”, Internet Citation, May 14, 2005, p. 1, XP007920684, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://wayback.archive.org/web/200506150000007*/http://brew.qualcomm.com/brew—bnry/pdf/developer/resources/ds/Dev—BREW—Apps.pdf [retrieved on Jun. 4, 2012]. |
Telesens: TelesensKSCL and Comptel sign strategic agreement; New alliance expands best of suite billing offering and furthers drive towards comprehensive next generation solution for network service providers M2 Presswire, Coventry, Nov. 28, 2000, p. 1. |
Classified Ad 3—No Title, New York Daily Times (1851-1857); Nov. 15, 1853; ProQuest Historical Newspapers: The New York Times (1851-2008) p. 4. |
Classified Ad 74—No Title. Chicago Daily Tribune (1923-1963); Oct. 11, 1959; ProQuest Historical Newspapers: Chicago Tribune (1849-1989) p. G34. |
“Ellipsus' Mobile Aplication Provisioning System”, Internet Citation, Dec. 2, 2001, XP002266188, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: web.archive.orgfwww.ellipsus.com [retrieved on Jan. 7, 2004]. |
“How can wireless models help my business?”, Computer Weekly, Dec. 2, 2003; p. 1-5, Available from: Business Source Complete, Ipswich, MA. Accessed Jul. 1, 2013. |
Mcauliffe W., “Broadband heading for move to metered billing”, New Media Age, Apr. 29, 2004; p. 1, Available from: Business Source Complete, Ipswich, MA. Accessed Jul. 1, 2013. |
Oommen P., “Over the Air Handset Management,” Emerging Technologies Symposium, Broadband, Wireless Internet Access, 2000, IEEE Apr. 10-11, 2000, Piscataway, NJ, USA, IEEE, Apr. 10, 2000, pp. 1-4, XP010538894, ISBN: 0-7803-6364-7. |
Floyd R, et al., “Mobile Web Access Using Enetwork Web Express”, IEEE Personal Communications, IEEE Communications Society, US, vol. 5, No. 5, Oct. 1, 1998, pp. 47-52, XP000786616. |
Seifert A., et al. “A Multi-Version Cache Replacement and Prefetching Policy for Hybrid Data Delivery Environments,” Proceeding VLDB '02 Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Very Large, Jan. 1, 2002, pp. 850-861, XP055148735. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060270386 A1 | Nov 2006 | US |