Patent Grant
8487278
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to treatment of solid cancers. More particularly, the invention relates to an X-ray method and apparatus used in conjunction with radiation treatment of cancerous tumors.
2. Discussion of the Prior Art
Cancer
A tumor is an abnormal mass of tissue. Tumors are either benign or malignant. A benign tumor grows locally, but does not spread to other parts of the body. Benign tumors cause problems because of their spread, as they press and displace normal tissues. Benign tumors are dangerous in confined places such as the skull. A malignant tumor is capable of invading other regions of the body. Metastasis is cancer spreading by invading normal tissue and spreading to distant tissues.
Cancer Treatment
Several distinct forms of radiation therapy exist for cancer treatment including: brachytherapy, traditional electromagnetic X-ray therapy, and proton therapy. Proton therapy systems typically include: a beam generator, an accelerator, and a beam transport system to move the resulting accelerated protons to a plurality of treatment rooms where the protons are delivered to a tumor in a patient's body.
Proton therapy works by aiming energetic ionizing particles, such as protons accelerated with a particle accelerator, onto a target tumor. These particles damage the DNA of cells, ultimately causing their death. Cancerous cells, because of their high rate of division and their reduced ability to repair damaged DNA, are particularly vulnerable to attack on their DNA.
Charged Particle Cancer Therapy
Patents related to the current invention are summarized here.
Proton Beam Therapy System
F. Cole, et. al. of Loma Linda University Medical Center “Multi-Station Proton Beam Therapy System”, U.S. Pat. No. 4,870,287 (Sep. 26, 1989) describe a proton beam therapy system for selectively generating and transporting proton beams from a single proton source and accelerator to a selected treatment room of a plurality of patient treatment rooms.
Accelerator/Synchrotron
S. Peggs, et. al. “Rapid Cycling Medical Synchrotron and Beam Delivery System”, U.S. Pat. No. 7,432,516 (Oct. 7, 2008) describe a synchrotron having combined function magnets and a radio frequency (RF) cavity accelerator. The combined function magnets function to first bend the particle beam along an orbital path and second focus the particle beam. The RF cavity accelerator is a ferrite loaded cavity adapted for high speed frequency swings for rapid cycling particle acceleration.
H. Tanaka, et. al. “Charged Particle Accelerator”, U.S. Pat. No. 7,259,529 (Aug. 21, 2007) describe a charged particle accelerator having a two period acceleration process with a fixed magnetic field applied in the first period and a timed second acceleration period to provide compact and high power acceleration of the charged particles.
T. Haberer, et. al. “Ion Beam Therapy System and a Method for Operating the System”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,683,318 (Jan. 27, 2004) describe an ion beam therapy system and method for operating the system. The ion beam system uses a gantry that has a vertical deflection system and a horizontal deflection system positioned before a last bending magnet that result in a parallel scanning mode resulting from an edge focusing effect.
V. Kulish, et. al. “Inductional Undulative EH-Accelerator”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,433,494 (Aug. 13, 2002) describe an inductive undulative EH-accelerator for acceleration of beams of charged particles. The device consists of an electromagnet undulation system, whose driving system for electromagnets is made in the form of a radio-frequency (RF) oscillator operating in the frequency range from about 100 KHz to 10 GHz.
K. Saito, et. al. “Radio-Frequency Accelerating System and Ring Type Accelerator Provided with the Same”, U.S. Pat. No. 5,917,293 (Jun. 29, 1999) describe a radio-frequency accelerating system having a loop antenna coupled to a magnetic core group and impedance adjusting means connected to the loop antenna. A relatively low voltage is applied to the impedance adjusting means allowing small construction of the adjusting means.
J. Hirota, et. al. “Ion Beam Accelerating Device Having Separately Excited Magnetic Cores”, U.S. Pat. No. 5,661,366 (Aug. 26, 1997) describe an ion beam accelerating device having a plurality of high frequency magnetic field inducing units and magnetic cores.
J. Hirota, et. al. “Acceleration Device for Charged Particles”, U.S. Pat. No. 5,168,241 (Dec. 1, 1992) describe an acceleration cavity having a high frequency power source and a looped conductor operating under a control that combine to control a coupling constant and/or de-tuning allowing transmission of power more efficiently to the particles.
Extraction
T. Nakanishi, et. al. “Method of Operating the Particle Beam Radiation Therapy System”, U.S. Pat. No. 7,122,978 (Oct. 17, 2006) describe a charged particle beam accelerator having an RF-KO unit for increasing amplitude of betatron oscillation of a charged particle beam within a stable region of resonance and an extraction quadrupole electromagnet unit for varying a stable region of resonance. The RF-KO unit is operated within a frequency range in which the circulating beam does not go beyond a boundary of stable region of resonance and the extraction quadrupole electromagnet is operated with timing required for beam extraction.
T. Haberer, et. al. “Method and Device for Controlling a Beam Extraction Raster Scan Irradiation Device for Heavy Ions or Protons”, U.S. Pat. No. 7,091,478 (Aug. 15, 2006) describe a method for controlling beam extraction in terms of beam energy, beam focusing, and beam intensity for every accelerator cycle.
K. Hiramoto, et. al. “Accelerator and Medical System and Operating Method of the Same”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,472,834 (Oct. 29, 2002) describe a cyclic type accelerator having a deflection electromagnet and four-pole electromagnets for making a charged particle beam circulate, a multi-pole electromagnet for generating a stability limit of resonance of betatron oscillation, and a high frequency source for applying a high frequency electromagnetic field to the beam to move the beam to the outside of the stability limit. The high frequency source generates a sum signal of a plurality of alternating current (AC) signals of which the instantaneous frequencies change with respect to time, and of which the average values of the instantaneous frequencies with respect to time are different. The system applies the sum signal via electrodes to the beam.
K. Hiramoto, et. al. “Synchrotron Type Accelerator and Medical Treatment System Employing the Same”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,087,670 (Jul. 11, 2000) and K. Hiramoto, et. al. “Synchrotron Type Accelerator and Medical Treatment System Employing the Same”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,008,499 (Dec. 28, 1999) describe a synchrotron accelerator having a high frequency applying unit arranged on a circulating orbit for applying a high frequency electromagnetic field to a charged particle beam circulating and for increasing amplitude of betatron oscillation of the particle beam to a level above a stability limit of resonance. Additionally, for beam ejection, four-pole divergence electromagnets are arranged: (1) downstream with respect to a first deflector; (2) upstream with respect to a deflecting electromagnet; (3) downstream with respect to the deflecting electromagnet; and (4) and upstream with respect to a second deflector.
K. Hiramoto, et. al. “Circular Accelerator and Method and Apparatus for Extracting Charged-Particle Beam in Circular Accelerator”, U.S. Pat. No. 5,363,008 (Nov. 8, 1994) describe a circular accelerator for extracting a charged-particle beam that is arranged to: (1) increase displacement of a beam by the effect of betatron oscillation resonance; (2) to increase the betatron oscillation amplitude of the particles, which have an initial betatron oscillation within a stability limit for resonance; and (3) to exceed the resonance stability limit thereby extracting the particles exceeding the stability limit of the resonance.
K. Hiramoto, et. al. “Method of Extracting Charged Particles from Accelerator, and Accelerator Capable Carrying Out the Method, by Shifting Particle Orbit”, U.S. Pat. No. 5,285,166 (Feb. 8, 1994) describe a method of extracting a charged particle beam. An equilibrium orbit of charged particles maintained by a bending magnet and magnets having multipole components greater than sextuple components is shifted by a constituent element of the accelerator other than these magnets to change the tune of the charged particles.
Transport/Scanning Control
K. Matsuda, et. al. “Particle Beam Irradiation Apparatus, Treatment Planning Unit, and Particle Beam Irradiation Method”, U.S. Pat. No. 7,227,161 (Jun. 5, 2007); K. Matsuda, et. al. “Particle Beam Irradiation Treatment Planning Unit, and Particle Beam Irradiation Method”, U.S. Pat. No. 7,122,811 (Oct. 17, 2006); and K. Matsuda, et. al. “Particle Beam Irradiation Apparatus, Treatment Planning Unit, and Particle Beam Irradiation Method” (Sep. 5, 2006) each describe a particle beam irradiation apparatus have a scanning controller that stops output of an ion beam, changes irradiation position via control of scanning electromagnets, and reinitiates treatment based on treatment planning information.
T. Norimine, et. al. “Particle Therapy System Apparatus”, U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,060,997 (Jun. 13, 2006); T. Norimine, et. al. “Particle Therapy System Apparatus”, 6,936,832 (Aug. 30, 2005); and T. Norimine, et. al. “Particle Therapy System Apparatus”, 6,774,383 (Aug. 10, 2004) each describe a particle therapy system having a first steering magnet and a second steering magnet disposed in a charged particle beam path after a synchrotron that are controlled by first and second beam position monitors.
K. Moriyama, et. al. “Particle Beam Therapy System”, U.S. Pat. No. 7,012,267 (Mar. 14, 2006) describe a manual input to a ready signal indicating preparations are completed for transport of the ion beam to a patient.
H. Harada, et. al. “Irradiation Apparatus and Irradiation Method”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,984,835 (Jan. 10, 2006) describe an irradiation method having a large irradiation field capable of uniform dose distribution, without strengthening performance of an irradiation field device, using a position controller having overlapping area formed by a plurality of irradiations via use of a multileaf collimator. The system provides flat and uniform dose distribution over an entire surface of a target.
H. Akiyama, et. al. “Charged Particle Beam Irradiation Equipment Having Scanning Electromagnet Power Supplies”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,903,351 (Jun. 7, 2005); H. Akiyama, et. al. “Charged Particle Beam Irradiation Equipment Having Scanning Electromagnet Power Supplies”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,900,436 (May 31, 2005); and H. Akiyama, et. al. “Charged Particle Beam Irradiation Equipment Having Scanning Electromagnet Power Supplies”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,881,970 (Apr. 19, 2005) all describe a power supply for applying a voltage to a scanning electromagnet for deflecting a charged particle beam and a second power supply without a pulsating component to control the scanning electromagnet more precisely allowing for uniform irradiation of the irradiation object.
K. Amemiya, et. al. “Accelerator System and Medical Accelerator Facility”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,800,866 (Oct. 5, 2004) describe an accelerator system having a wide ion beam control current range capable of operating with low power consumption and having a long maintenance interval.
A. Dolinskii, et. al. “Gantry with an Ion-Optical System”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,476,403 (Nov. 5, 2002) describe a gantry for an ion-optical system comprising an ion source and three bending magnets for deflecting an ion beam about an axis of rotation. A plurality of quadrupoles are provided along the beam path to create a fully achromatic beam transport and an ion beam with different emittances in the horizontal and vertical planes. Further, two scanning magnets are provided between the second and third bending magnets to direct the beam.
H. Akiyama, et. al. “Charged Particle Beam Irradiation Apparatus”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,218,675 (Apr. 17, 2001) describe a charged particle beam irradiation apparatus for irradiating a target with a charged particle beam that includes a plurality of scanning electromagnets and a quadrupole electromagnet between two of the plurality of scanning electromagnets.
K. Matsuda, et. al. “Charged Particle Beam Irradiation System and Method Thereof”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,087,672 (Jul. 11, 2000) describe a charged particle beam irradiation system having a ridge filter with shielding elements to shield a part of the charged particle beam in an area corresponding to a thin region in the target.
P. Young, et. al. “Raster Scan Control System for a Charged-Particle Beam”, U.S. Pat. No. 5,017,789 (May 21, 1991) describe a raster scan control system for use with a charged-particle beam delivery system that includes a nozzle through which a charged particle beam passes. The nozzle includes a programmable raster generator and both fast and slow sweep scan electromagnets that cooperate to generate a sweeping magnetic field that steers the beam along a desired raster scan pattern at a target.
Beam Energy/Intensity
M. Yanagisawa, et. al. “Charged Particle Therapy System, Range Modulation Wheel Device, and Method of Installing Range Modulation Wheel Device”, U.S. Pat. No. 7,355,189 (Apr. 8, 2008) and Yanagisawa, et. al. “Charged Particle Therapy System, Range Modulation Wheel Device, and Method of Installing Range Modulation Wheel Device”, U.S. Pat. No. 7,053,389 (May 30, 2008) both describe a particle therapy system having a range modulation wheel. The ion beam passes through the range modulation wheel resulting in a plurality of energy levels corresponding to a plurality of stepped thicknesses of the range modulation wheel.
M. Yanagisawa, et. al. “Particle Beam Irradiation System and Method of Adjusting Irradiation Apparatus”, U.S. Pat. No. 7,297,967 (Nov. 20, 2007); M. Yanagisawa, et. al. “Particle Beam Irradiation System and Method of Adjusting Irradiation Apparatus”, U.S. Pat. No. 7,071,479 (Jul. 4, 2006); M. Yanagisawa, et. al. “Particle Beam Irradiation System and Method of Adjusting Irradiation Apparatus”, U.S. Pat. No. 7,026,636 (Apr. 11, 2006); and M. Yanagisawa, et. al. “Particle Beam Irradiation System and Method of Adjusting Irradiation Apparatus”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,777,700 (Aug. 17, 2004) all describe a scattering device, a range adjustment device, and a peak spreading device. The scattering device and range adjustment device are combined together and are moved along a beam axis. The spreading device is independently moved along the axis to adjust the degree of ion beam scattering. The combined device increases the degree of uniformity of radiation dose distribution to diseased tissue.
A. Sliski, et. al. “Programmable Particle Scatterer for Radiation Therapy Beam Formation”, U.S. Pat. No. 7,208,748 (Apr. 24, 2007) describe a programmable pathlength of a fluid disposed into a particle beam to modulate scattering angle and beam range in a predetermined manner. The charged particle beam scatterer/range modulator comprises a fluid reservoir having opposing walls in a particle beam path and a drive to adjust the distance between the walls of the fluid reservoir under control of a programmable controller to create a predetermined spread out Bragg peak at a predetermined depth in a tissue. The beam scattering and modulation is continuously and dynamically adjusted during treatment of a tumor to deposit a dose in a targeted predetermined three dimensional volume.
M. Tadokoro, et. al. “Particle Therapy System”, U.S. Pat. No. 7,247,869 (Jul. 24, 2007) and U.S. Pat. No. 7,154,108 (Dec. 26, 2006) each describe a particle therapy system capable of measuring energy of a charged particle beam during irradiation of cancerous tissue. The system includes a beam passage between a pair of collimators, an energy detector, and a signal processing unit.
G. Kraft, et. al. “Ion Beam Scanner System and Operating Method”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,891,177 (May 10, 2005) describe an ion beam scanning system having a mechanical alignment system for the target volume to be scanned allowing for depth modulation of the ion beam by means of a linear motor and transverse displacement of energy absorption means resulting in depth-staggered scanning of volume elements of a target volume.
G. Hartmann, et. al. “Method for Operating an Ion Beam Therapy System by Monitoring the Distribution of the Radiation Dose”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,736,831 (May 18, 2004) describe a method for operation of an ion beam therapy system having a grid scanner that irradiates and scans an area surrounding an isocentre. Both the depth dose distribution and the transverse dose distribution of the grid scanner device at various positions in the region of the isocentre are measured and evaluated.
Y. Jongen “Method for Treating a Target Volume with a Particle Beam and Device Implementing Same”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,717,162 (Apr. 6, 2004) describes a method of producing from a particle beam a narrow spot directed toward a target volume, characterized in that the spot sweeping speed and particle beam intensity are simultaneously varied.
G. Kraft, et. al. “Device for Irradiating a Tumor Tissue”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,710,362 (Mar. 23, 2004) describe a method and apparatus of irradiating a tumor tissue, where the apparatus has an electromagnetically driven ion-braking device in the proton beam path for depth-wise adaptation of the proton beam that adjusts both the ion beam direction and ion beam range.
K. Matsuda, et. al. “Charged Particle Beam Irradiation Apparatus”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,617,598 (Sep. 9, 2003) describe a charged particle beam irradiation apparatus that increases the width in a depth direction of a Bragg peak by passing the Bragg peak through an enlarging device containing three ion beam components having different energies produced according to the difference between passed positions of each of the filter elements.
H. Stelzer, et. al. “Ionization Chamber for Ion Beams and Method for Monitoring the Intensity of an Ion Beam”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,437,513 (Aug. 20, 2002) describe an ionization chamber for ion beams and a method of monitoring the intensity of an ion therapy beam. The ionization chamber includes a chamber housing, a beam inlet window, a beam outlet window and a chamber volume filled with counting gas.
H. Akiyama, et. al. “Charged-Particle Beam Irradiation Method and System”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,433,349 (Aug. 13, 2002) and H. Akiyama, et. al. “Charged-Particle Beam Irradiation Method and System”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,265,837 (Jul. 24, 2001) both describe a charged particle beam irradiation system that includes a changer for changing energy of the particle and an intensity controller for controlling an intensity of the charged-particle beam.
Y. Pu “Charged Particle Beam Irradiation Apparatus and Method of Irradiation with Charged Particle Beam”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,034,377 (Mar. 7, 2000) describes a charged particle beam irradiation apparatus having an energy degrader comprising: (1) a cylindrical member having a length; and (2) a distribution of wall thickness in a circumferential direction around an axis of rotation, where thickness of the wall determines energy degradation of the irradiation beam.
Starting/Stopping Irradiation
K. Hiramoto, et. al. “Charged Particle Beam Apparatus and Method for Operating the Same”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,316,776 (Nov. 13, 2001) describe a charged particle beam apparatus where a charged particle beam is positioned, started, stopped, and repositioned repetitively. Residual particles are used in the accelerator without supplying new particles if sufficient charge is available.
K. Matsuda, et. al. “Method and Apparatus for Controlling Circular Accelerator”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,462,490 (Oct. 8, 2002) describe a control method and apparatus for a circular accelerator for adjusting timing of emitted charged particles. The clock pulse is suspended after delivery of a charged particle stream and is resumed on the basis of state of an object to be irradiated.
Gantry
T. Yamashita, et. al. “Rotating Irradiation Apparatus”, U.S. Pat. No. 7,381,979 (Jun. 3, 2008) describe a rotating gantry having a front ring and a rear ring, each ring having radial support devices, where the radial support devices have linear guides. The system has thrust support devices for limiting movement of the rotatable body in the direction of the rotational axis of the rotatable body.
T. Yamashita, et. al. “Rotating Gantry of Particle Beam Therapy System” U.S. Pat. No. 7,372,053 (May 13, 2008) describe a rotating gantry supported by an air braking system allowing quick movement, braking, and stopping of the gantry during irradiation treatment.
M. Yanagisawa, et. al. “Medical Charged Particle Irradiation Apparatus”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,992,312 (Jan. 31, 2006); M. Yanagisawa, et. al. “Medical Charged Particle Irradiation Apparatus”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,979,832 (Dec. 27, 2005); and M. Yanagisawa, et. al. “Medical Charged Particle Irradiation Apparatus”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,953,943 (Oct. 11, 2005) all describe an apparatus capable of irradiation from upward and horizontal directions. The gantry is rotatable about an axis of rotation where the irradiation field forming device is eccentrically arranged, such that an axis of irradiation passes through a different position than the axis of rotation.
H. Kaercher, et. al. “Isokinetic Gantry Arrangement for the Isocentric Guidance of a Particle Beam And a Method for Constructing Same”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,897,451 (May 24, 2005) describe an isokinetic gantry arrangement for isocentric guidance of a particle beam that can be rotated around a horizontal longitudinal axis.
G. Kraft, et. al. “Ion Beam System for Irradiating Tumor Tissues”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,730,921 (May 4, 2004) describe an ion beam system for irradiating tumor tissues at various irradiation angles in relation to a horizontally arranged patient couch, where the patient couch is rotatable about a center axis and has a lifting mechanism. The system has a central ion beam deflection of up to ±15 degrees with respect to a horizontal direction.
M. Pavlovic, et. al. “Gantry System and Method for Operating Same”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,635,882 (Oct. 21, 2003) describe a gantry system for adjusting and aligning an ion beam onto a target from a freely determinable effective treatment angle. The ion beam is aligned on a target at adjustable angles of from 0 to 360 degrees around the gantry rotation axis and at an angle of 45 to 90 degrees off of the gantry rotation axis yielding a cone of irradiation when rotated a full revolution about the gantry rotation axis.
Movable Patient
N. Rigney, et. al. “Patient Alignment System with External Measurement and Object Coordination for Radiation Therapy System”, U.S. Pat. No. 7,199,382 (Apr. 3, 2007) describe a patient alignment system for a radiation therapy system that includes multiple external measurement devices that obtain position measurements of movable components of the radiation therapy system. The alignment system uses the external measurements to provide corrective positioning feedback to more precisely register the patient to the radiation beam.
Y. Muramatsu, et. al. “Medical Particle Irradiation Apparatus”, U.S. Pat. No. 7,030,396 (Apr. 18, 2006); Y. Muramatsu, et. al. “Medical Particle Irradiation Apparatus”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,903,356 (Jun. 7, 2005); and Y. Muramatsu, et. al. “Medical Particle Irradiation Apparatus”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,803,591 (Oct. 12, 2004) all describe a medical particle irradiation apparatus having a rotating gantry, an annular frame located within the gantry such that it can rotate relative to the rotating gantry, an anti-correlation mechanism to keep the frame from rotating with the gantry, and a flexible moving floor engaged with the frame in such a manner to move freely with a substantially level bottom while the gantry rotates.
H. Nonaka, et. al. “Rotating Radiation Chamber for Radiation Therapy”, U.S. Pat. No. 5,993,373 (Nov. 30, 1999) describe a horizontal movable floor composed of a series of multiple plates that are connected in a free and flexible manner, where the movable floor is moved in synchrony with rotation of a radiation beam irradiation section.
Respiration
K. Matsuda “Radioactive Beam Irradiation Method and Apparatus Taking Movement of the Irradiation Area Into Consideration”, U.S. Pat. No. 5,538,494 (Jul. 23, 1996) describes a method and apparatus that enables irradiation even in the case of a diseased part changing position due to physical activity, such as breathing and heart beat. Initially, a position change of a diseased body part and physical activity of the patient are measured concurrently and a relationship therebetween is defined as a function. Radiation therapy is performed in accordance to the function.
Patient Positioning
Y. Nagamine, et. al. “Patient Positioning Device and Patient Positioning Method”, U.S. Pat. No. 7,212,609 (May 1, 2007) and Y. Nagamine, et. al. “Patient Positioning Device and Patient Positioning Method”, U.S. Pat. No. 7,212,608 (May 1, 2007) describe a patient positioning system that compares a comparison area of a reference X-ray image and a current X-ray image of a current patient location using pattern matching.
D. Miller, et. al. “Modular Patient Support System”, U.S. Pat. No. 7,173,265 (Feb. 6, 2007) describe a radiation treatment system having a patient support system that includes a modularly expandable patient pod and at least one immobilization device, such as a moldable foam cradle.
K. Kato, et. al. “Multi-Leaf Collimator and Medical System Including Accelerator”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,931,100 (Aug. 16, 2005); K. Kato, et. al. “Multi-Leaf Collimator and Medical System Including Accelerator”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,823,045 (Nov. 23, 2004); K. Kato, et. al. “Multi-Leaf Collimator and Medical System Including Accelerator”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,819,743 (Nov. 16, 2004); and K. Kato, et. al. “Multi-Leaf Collimator and Medical System Including Accelerator”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,792,078 (Sep. 14, 2004) all describe a system of leaf plates used to shorten positioning time of a patient for irradiation therapy. Motor driving force is transmitted to a plurality of leaf plates at the same time through a pinion gear. The system also uses upper and lower air cylinders and upper and lower guides to position a patient.
Computer Control
A. Beloussov et. al. “Configuration Management and Retrieval System for Proton Beam Therapy System”, U.S. Pat. No. 7,368,740 (May 6, 2008); A. Beloussov et. al. “Configuration Management and Retrieval System for Proton Beam Therapy System”, U.S. Pat. No. 7,084,410 (Aug. 1, 2006); and A. Beloussov et. al. “Configuration Management and Retrieval System for Proton Beam Therapy System”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,822,244 (Nov. 23, 2004) all describe a multi-processor software controlled proton beam system having treatment configurable parameters that are easily modified by an authorized user to prepare the software controlled system for various modes of operation to insure that data and configuration parameters are accessible if single point failures occur in the database.
J. Hirota et. al. “Automatically Operated Accelerator Using Obtained Operating Patterns”, U.S. Pat. No. 5,698,954 (Dec. 16, 1997) describes a main controller for determining the quantity of control and the control timing of every component of an accelerator body with the controls coming from an operating pattern.
Imaging
P. Adamee, et. al. “Charged Particle Beam Apparatus and Method for Operating the Same”, U.S. Pat. No. 7,274,018 (Sep. 25, 2007) and P. Adamee, et. al. “Charged Particle Beam Apparatus and Method for Operating the Same”, U.S. Pat. No. 7,045,781 (May 16, 2006) describe a charged particle beam apparatus configured for serial and/or parallel imaging of an object.
K. Hiramoto, et. al. “Ion Beam Therapy System and its Couch Positioning System”, U.S. Pat. No. 7,193,227 (Mar. 20, 2007) describe an ion beam therapy system having an X-ray imaging system moving in conjunction with a rotating gantry.
C. Maurer, et. al. “Apparatus and Method for Registration of Images to Physical Space Using a Weighted Combination of Points and Surfaces”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,560,354 (May 6, 2003) described a process of X-ray computed tomography registered to physical measurements taken on the patient's body, where different body parts are given different weights. Weights are used in an iterative registration process to determine a rigid body transformation process, where the transformation function is used to assist surgical or stereotactic procedures.
M. Blair, et. al. “Proton Beam Digital Imaging System”, U.S. Pat. No. 5,825,845 (Oct. 20, 1998) describe a proton beam digital imaging system having an X-ray source that is movable into the treatment beam line that can produce an X-ray beam through a region of the body. By comparison of the relative positions of the center of the beam in the patient orientation image and the isocentre in the master prescription image with respect to selected monuments, the amount and direction of movement of the patient to make the best beam center correspond to the target isocentre is determined.
S. Nishihara, et. al. “Therapeutic Apparatus”, U.S. Pat. No. 5,039,867 (Aug. 13, 1991) describe a method and apparatus for positioning a therapeutic beam in which a first distance is determined on the basis of a first image, a second distance is determined on the basis of a second image, and the patient is moved to a therapy beam irradiation position on the basis of the first and second distances.
Problem
There exists in the art of particle beam therapy of cancerous tumors a need for positioning and verification of proper positioning of a patient immediately prior to and/or concurrently with particle beam therapy irradiation to ensure targeted and controlled delivery of energy to the cancerous tumor with minimization of damage to surrounding healthy tissue. There further exists in the art of particle beam treatment a need for an X-ray source that has a robust lifetime to minimize or eliminate downtime of the particle beam irradiation system due to a burned out X-ray source.
The invention comprises an X-ray method and apparatus used in conjunction with charged particle beam radiation therapy of cancerous tumors.
The invention comprises an X-ray method and apparatus used in conjunction with charged particle beam radiation therapy of cancerous tumors.
In one embodiment, the invention comprises an X-ray method and apparatus used in conjunction with charged particle or proton beam radiation therapy of cancerous tumors. Accurate and precise delivery of protons to a tumor in body tissue is critical in charged particle beam therapy. Complicating accurate and precise deliver is natural movement of the body. Movement of the body occurs on multiple levels, including: (1) general movement; (2) standing, sitting, or lying position variation; and (3) relative movement of internal body parts, such as organs. All of these movements change with time. Hence, a method of determining position of elements of the body at or in close proximity in time to the charged particle therapy is needed, such as after the body is positioned relative to a charged particle beam. Herein, an X-ray positioning and/or verification method and apparatus used in conjunction with charged particle therapy is described. In this embodiment, the system uses an X-ray beam that lies in substantially the same path as a proton beam path of a particle beam cancer therapy system. The system creates an electron beam that strikes an X-ray generation source where the X-ray generation source is located proximate to the proton beam path. By generating the X-rays near the proton beam path, an X-ray path that is essentially the proton beam path is created. Using the generated X-rays, the system collects X-ray images of a localized body tissue region about a cancerous tumor. The generated image is usable for: fine tuning body alignment relative to the proton beam path, to control the proton beam path to accurately and precisely target the tumor, and/or in system verification and validation.
In another embodiment, the system uses an X-ray imaging system having an elongated lifetime, which reduces required maintenance.
In yet another embodiment, the system uses an X-ray system that is orientated to provide X-ray images of a patient in the same orientation as viewed by a proton therapy beam, is synchronized with patient breathing, is operable on a patient positioned for proton therapy, and does not interfere with a proton beam treatment path. Preferably, the synchronized system is used in conjunction with a negative ion beam source, synchrotron, and/or targeting method apparatus to provide an X-ray timed with patient breathing and performed immediately prior to and/or concurrently with particle beam therapy irradiation to ensure targeted and controlled delivery of energy relative to a patient position resulting in efficient, precise, and/or accurate noninvasive, in-vivo treatment of a solid cancerous tumor with minimization of damage to surrounding healthy tissue in a patient using the proton beam position verification system.
In still yet another embodiment, the system times X-ray imaging and proton therapy with patient respiration by monitoring and/or controlling the patient's respiration. The breath monitoring system uses thermal and/or force sensors to determine where a patient is in a breathing cycle in combination with a feedback signal control delivered to the patient to inform the patient when breath control is required. The resulting breath control is timed with X-ray imaging and/or charged particle delivery to the tumor to enhance accuracy, precision, and/or efficiency of tumor treatment.
Used in combination with the invention, novel design features of a charged particle beam cancer therapy system are described. Particularly, a negative ion beam source with novel features in the negative ion source, ion source vacuum system, ion beam focusing lens, and tandem accelerator is described. Additionally, turning magnets, edge focusing magnets, magnetic field concentration magnets, winding and correction coils, flat magnetic field incident surfaces, and extraction elements are described that minimize the overall size of the synchrotron, provide a tightly controlled proton beam, directly reduce the size of required magnetic fields, directly reduce required operating power, and allow continual acceleration of protons in a synchrotron even during a process of extracting protons from the synchrotron. The ion beam source system and synchrotron are preferably computer integrated with a patient imaging system and a patient interface including respiration monitoring sensors and patient positioning elements. Further, intensity control of a charged particle beam acceleration, extraction, and/or targeting method and apparatus used in conjunction with charged particle beam radiation therapy of cancerous tumors is described. More particularly, intensity, energy, and timing control of a charged particle stream of a synchrotron is described. The synchrotron control elements allow tight control of the charged particle beam, which compliments the tight control of patient positioning to yield efficient treatment of a solid tumor with reduced tissue damage to surrounding healthy tissue. In addition, the system reduces the overall size of the synchrotron, provides a tightly controlled proton beam, directly reduces the size of required magnetic fields, directly reduces required operating power, and allows continual acceleration of protons in a synchrotron even during a process of extracting protons from the synchrotron. All of these systems are preferably used in conjunction with an X-ray system capable of collecting X-rays of a patient in (1) a positioning system for proton treatment and (2) at a specified moment of the patient's respiration cycle. Combined, the systems provide for efficient, accurate, and precise noninvasive tumor treatment with minimal damage to surrounding healthy tissue.
Cyclotron/Synchrotron
A cyclotron uses a constant magnetic field and a constant-frequency applied electric field. One of the two fields is varied in a synchrocyclotron. Both of these fields are varied in a synchrotron. Thus, a synchrotron is a particular type of cyclic particle accelerator in which a magnetic field is used to turn the particles so they circulate and an electric field is used to accelerate the particles. The synchroton carefully synchronizes the applied fields with the travelling particle beam.
By increasing the fields appropriately as the particles gain energy, the charged particles path can be held constant as they are accelerated. This allows the vacuum container for the particles to be a large thin torus. In reality it is easier to use some straight sections between the bending magnets and some turning sections giving the torus the shape of a round-cornered polygon. A path of large effective radius is thus constructed using simple straight and curved pipe segments, unlike the disc-shaped chamber of the cyclotron type devices. The shape also allows and requires the use of multiple magnets to bend the particle beam.
The maximum energy that a cyclic accelerator can impart is typically limited by the strength of the magnetic fields and the minimum radius/maximum curvature, of the particle path. In a cyclotron the maximum radius is quite limited as the particles start at the center and spiral outward, thus this entire path must be a self-supporting disc-shaped evacuated chamber. Since the radius is limited, the power of the machine becomes limited by the strength of the magnetic field. In the case of an ordinary electromagnet, the field strength is limited by the saturation of the core because when all magnetic domains are aligned the field may not be further increased to any practical extent. The arrangement of the single pair of magnets also limits the economic size of the device.
Synchrotrons overcome these limitations, using a narrow beam pipe surrounded by much smaller and more tightly focusing magnets. The ability of this device to accelerate particles is limited by the fact that the particles must be charged to be accelerated at all, but charged particles under acceleration emit photons, thereby losing energy. The limiting beam energy is reached when the energy lost to the lateral acceleration required to maintain the beam path in a circle equals the energy added each cycle. More powerful accelerators are built by using large radius paths and by using more numerous and more powerful microwave cavities to accelerate the particle beam between corners. Lighter particles, such as electrons, lose a larger fraction of their energy when turning. Practically speaking, the energy of electron/positron accelerators is limited by this radiation loss, while it does not play a significant role in the dynamics of proton or ion accelerators. The energy of those is limited strictly by the strength of magnets and by the cost.
Charged Particle Beam Therapy
Throughout this document, a charged particle beam therapy system, such as a proton beam, hydrogen ion beam, or carbon ion beam, is described. Herein, the charged particle beam therapy system is described using a proton beam. However, the aspects taught and described in terms of a proton beam are not intended to be limiting to that of a proton beam and are illustrative of a charged particle beam system. Any charged particle beam system is equally applicable to the techniques described herein.
Referring now to
In one embodiment, one or more of the subsystems are stored on a client. The client is a computing platform configured to act as a client device, e.g. a personal computer, a digital media player, a personal digital assistant, etc. The client comprises a processor that is coupled to a number of external or internal inputting devices, e.g. a mouse, a keyboard, a display device, etc. The processor is also coupled to an output device, e.g. a computer monitor to display information. In one embodiment, the main controller 110 is the processor. In another embodiment, the main controller 110 is a set of instructions stored in memory that is carried out by the processor.
The client includes a computer-readable storage medium, i.e. memory. The memory includes, but is not limited to, an electronic, optical, magnetic, or another storage or transmission device capable of coupling to a processor, e.g. such as a processor in communication with a touch-sensitive input device, with computer-readable instructions. Other examples of suitable media include, for example, flash drive, CD-ROM, read only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), DVD, magnetic disk, memory chip, etc. The processor executes a set of computer-executable program code instructions stored in the memory. The instructions may comprise code from any computer-programming language, including, for example, C, C++, C#, Visual Basic, Java, and JavaScript.
An exemplary method of use of the charged particle beam system 100 is provided. The main controller 110 controls one or more of the subsystems to accurately and precisely deliver protons to a tumor of a patient. For example, the main controller 110 obtains an image, such as a portion of a body and/or of a tumor, from the imaging system 170. The main controller 110 also obtains position and/or timing information from the patient interface module 150. The main controller 110 then optionally controls the injection system 120 to inject a proton into a synchrotron 130. The synchrotron typically contains at least an accelerator system 132 and an extraction system 134. The main controller preferably controls the proton beam within the accelerator system, such as by controlling speed, trajectory, and timing of the proton beam. The main controller then controls extraction of a proton beam from the accelerator through the extraction system 134. For example, the controller controls timing, energy, and/or intensity of the extracted beam. The controller 110 also preferably controls targeting of the proton beam through the scanning/targeting/delivery system 140 to the patient interface module 150. One or more components of the patient interface module 150 are preferably controlled by the main controller 110. Further, display elements of the display system 160 are preferably controlled via the main controller 110. Displays, such as display screens, are typically provided to one or more operators and/or to one or more patients. In one embodiment, the main controller 110 times the delivery of the proton beam from all systems, such that protons are delivered in an optimal therapeutic manner to the patient.
Herein, the main controller 110 refers to a single system controlling the charged particle beam system 100, to a single controller controlling a plurality of subsystems controlling the charged particle beam system 100, or to a plurality of individual controllers controlling one or more sub-systems of the charged particle beam system 100.
Synchrotron
Herein, the term synchrotron is used to refer to a system maintaining the charged particle beam in a circulating path; however, cyclotrons are alternatively used, albeit with their inherent limitations of energy, intensity, and extraction control. Further, the charged particle beam is referred to herein as circulating along a circulating path about a central point of the synchrotron. The circulating path is alternatively referred to as an orbiting path; however, the orbiting path does not refer a perfect circle or ellipse, rather it refers to cycling of the protons around a central point or region.
Referring now to
Ion Beam Generation System
An ion beam generation system generates a negative ion beam, such as a hydrogen anion or H− beam; preferably focuses the negative ion beam; converts the negative ion beam to a positive ion beam, such as a proton or H+ beam; and injects the positive ion beam into the synchrotron 130. Portions of the ion beam path are preferably under partial vacuum. Each of these systems are further described, infra.
Referring now to
Still referring to
Still referring to
Still referring to
Further, by isolating the inlet gas from the synchrotron vacuum system, the synchrotron vacuum pumps, such as turbo molecular pumps can operate over a longer lifetime as the synchrotron vacuum pumps have fewer gas molecules to deal with. For example, the inlet gas is primarily hydrogen gas but may contain impurities, such as nitrogen and carbon dioxide. By isolating the inlet gases in the negative ion source system 310, first partial vacuum system 330, ion beam focusing system 350 and negative ion beam side of the tandem accelerator 390, the synchrotron vacuum pumps can operate at lower pressures with longer lifetimes, which increases the efficiency of the synchrotron 130.
Still referring to
Still referring to
Referring again to
Circulating System
A synchrotron 130 preferably comprises a combination of straight sections 410 and ion beam turning sections 420. Hence, the circulating path of the protons is not circular in a synchrotron, but is rather a polygon with rounded corners.
In one illustrative embodiment, the synchrotron 130, which as also referred to as an accelerator system, has four straight elements and four turning sections. Examples of straight sections 410 include the: inflector 240, accelerator 270, extraction system 290, and deflector 292. Along with the four straight sections are four ion beam turning sections 420, which are also referred to as magnet sections or turning sections. Turning sections are further described, infra.
Referring now to
Referring now to
In physics, the Lorentz force is the force on a point charge due to electromagnetic fields. The Lorentz force is given by equation 1 in terms of magnetic fields with the election field terms not included.
F=q(v×B) eq. 1
In equation 1, F is the force in newtons; B is the magnetic field in Teslas; and v is the instantaneous velocity of the particles in meters per second.
Referring now to
As described, supra, a larger gap size requires a larger power supply. For instance, if the gap 610 size doubles in vertical size, then the power supply requirements increase by about a factor of 4. The flatness of the gap 610 is also important. For example, the flat nature of the gap 610 allows for an increase in energy of the extracted protons from about 250 to about 330 MeV. More particularly, if the gap 610 has an extremely flat surface, then the limits of a magnetic field of an iron magnet are reachable. An exemplary precision of the flat surface of the gap 610 is a polish of less than about 5 microns and preferably with a polish of about 1 to 3 microns. Unevenness in the surface results in imperfections in the applied magnetic field. The polished flat surface spreads unevenness of the applied magnetic field.
Still referring to
Still referring to
Referring now to
Still again to
Multiple turning magnets provide multiple magnet edges that each have edge focusing effects in the synchrotron 130. If only one turning magnet is used, then the beam is only focused once for angle alpha or twice for angle alpha and angle beta. However, by using smaller turning magnets, more turning magnets fit into the turning sections 420 of the synchrotron 130. For example, if four magnets are used in a turning section 420 of the synchrotron, then for a single turning section there are eight possible edge focusing effect surfaces, two edges per magnet. The eight focusing surfaces yield a smaller cross-sectional beam size. This allows the use of a smaller gap 610.
The use of multiple edge focusing effects in the turning magnets results in not only a smaller gap 610, but also the use of smaller magnets and smaller power supplies. For a synchrotron 130 having four turning sections 420 where each turning sections has four turning magnets and each turning magnet has two focusing edges, a total of thirty-two focusing edges exist for each orbit of the protons in the circulating path of the synchrotron 130. Similarly, if 2, 6, or 8 magnets are used in a given turning section, or if 2, 3, 5, or 6 turning sections are used, then the number of edge focusing surfaces expands or contracts according to equation 2.
where TFE is the number of total focusing edges, NTS is the number of turning sections, M is the number of magnets, and FE is the number of focusing edges. Naturally, not all magnets are necessarily beveled and some magnets are optionally beveled on only one edge.
The inventors have determined that multiple smaller magnets have benefits over fewer larger magnets. For example, the use of 16 small magnets yields 32 focusing edges whereas the use of 4 larger magnets yields only 8 focusing edges. The use of a synchrotron having more focusing edges results in a circulating path of the synchrotron built without the use of focusing quadrupoles magnets. All prior art synchrotrons use quadrupoles in the circulating path of the synchrotron. Further, the use of quadrupoles in the circulating path necessitates additional straight sections in the circulating path of the synchrotron. Thus, the use of quadrupoles in the circulating path of a synchrotron results in synchrotrons having larger diameters, circulating beam pathlengths, and/or larger circumferences.
In various embodiments of the system described herein, the synchrotron has any combination of:
Referring again to
Referring still to
In one example, the initial cross-section distance 890 is about fifteen centimeters and the final cross-section distance 892 is about ten centimeters. Using the provided numbers, the concentration of the magnetic field is about 15/10 or 1.5 times at the incident surface 870 of the gap 610, though the relationship is not linear. The taper 842 has a slope, such as about 20, 40, or 60 degrees. The concentration of the magnetic field, such as by 1.5 times, leads to a corresponding decrease in power consumption requirements to the magnets.
Referring still to
Still referring to
Referring now to
The winding and/or correction coils correct 1, 2, 3, or 4 turning magnets, and preferably correct a magnetic field generated by two turning magnets. A winding or correction coil covering multiple magnets reduces space between magnets as fewer winding or correction coil ends are required, which occupy space.
Referring now to
As a further clarifying example, the RF synthesizer 1040 sends an RF-signal, with a period equal to a period of circulation of a proton about the synchrotron 130, to a set of ten microcircuit/loop/coil combinations, which results in about 100 volts for acceleration of the protons in the proton beam path 264. The 100 volts is generated at a range of frequencies, such as at about 1 MHz for a low energy proton beam to about 15 MHz for a high energy proton beam. The RF-signal is optionally set at an integer multiple of a period of circulation of the proton about the synchrotron circulating path. Each of the microcircuit/loop/coil combinations are optionally independently controlled in terms of acceleration voltage and frequency.
Integration of the RF-amplifier microcircuit and accelerating coil, in each microcircuit/loop/coil combination, results in three considerable advantages. First, for synchrotrons, the prior art does not use microcircuits integrated with the accelerating coils but rather uses a set of long cables to provide power to a corresponding set of coils. The long cables have an impedance/resistance, which is problematic for high frequency RF control. As a result, the prior art system is not operable at high frequencies, such as above about 10 MHz. The integrated RF-amplifier microcircuit/accelerating coil system is operable at above about 10 MHz and even 15 MHz where the impedance and/or resistance of the long cables in the prior art systems results in poor control or failure in proton acceleration. Second, the long cable system, operating at lower frequencies, costs about $50,000 and the integrated microcircuit system costs about $1000, which is 50 times less expensive. Third, the microcircuit/loop/coil combinations in conjunction with the RF-amplifier system results in a compact low power consumption design allowing production and use of a proton cancer therapy system is a small space, as described supra, and in a cost effective manner.
Referring now to
Traditional extraction systems do not allow this control as magnets have memories in terms of both magnitude and amplitude of a sine wave. Hence, in a traditional system, in order to change frequency, slow changes in current must be used. However, with the use of the feedback loop using the magnetic field sensors, the frequency and energy level of the synchrotron are rapidly adjustable. Further aiding this process is the use of a novel extraction system that allows for acceleration of the protons during the extraction process, described infra.
Referring again to
Flat Gap Surface
While the gap surface is described in terms of the first turning magnet 510, the discussion applies to each of the turning magnets in the synchrotron. Similarly, while the gap 610 surface is described in terms of the magnetic field incident surface 670, the discussion additionally optionally applies to the magnetic field exiting surface 680.
The magnetic field incident surface 870 of the first magnet 810 is preferably about flat, such as to within about a zero to three micron finish polish or less preferably to about a ten micron finish polish. By being very flat, the polished surface spreads the unevenness of the applied magnetic field across the gap 610. The very flat surface, such as about 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 15, or 20 micron finish, allows for a smaller gap size, a smaller applied magnetic field, smaller power supplies, and tighter control of the proton beam cross-sectional area. The magnetic field exiting surface 880 is also preferably flat.
Proton Beam Extraction
Referring now to
In the proton extraction process, an RF voltage is applied across the first pair of blades, where the first blade 1212 of the first pair of blades is on one side of the circulating proton beam path 264 and the second blade 1214 of the first pair of blades is on an opposite side of the circulating proton beam path 264. The applied RF field applies energy to the circulating charged-particle beam. The applied RF field alters the orbiting or circulating beam path slightly of the protons from the original central beamline 264 to an altered circulating beam path 265. Upon a second pass of the protons through the RF cavity system, the RF field further moves the protons off of the original proton beamline 264. For example, if the original beamline is considered as a circular path, then the altered beamline is slightly elliptical. The applied RF field is timed to apply outward or inward movement to a given band of protons circulating in the synchrotron accelerator. Each orbit of the protons is slightly more off axis compared to the original circulating beam path 264. Successive passes of the protons through the RF cavity system are forced further and further from the original central beamline 264 by altering the direction and/or intensity of the RF field with each successive pass of the proton beam through the RF field.
The RF voltage is frequency modulated at a frequency about equal to the period of one proton cycling around the synchrotron for one revolution or at a frequency than is an integral multiplier of the period of one proton cycling about the synchrotron. The applied RF frequency modulated voltage excites a betatron oscillation. For example, the oscillation is a sine wave motion of the protons. The process of timing the RF field to a given proton beam within the RF cavity system is repeated thousands of times with each successive pass of the protons being moved approximately one micrometer further off of the original central beamline 264. For clarity, the approximately 1000 changing beam paths with each successive path of a given band of protons through the RF field are illustrated as the altered beam path 265.
With a sufficient sine wave betatron amplitude, the altered circulating beam path 265 touches a material 1230, such as a foil or a sheet of foil. The foil is preferably a lightweight material, such as beryllium, a lithium hydride, a carbon sheet, or a material of low nuclear charge. A material of low nuclear charge is a material composed of atoms consisting essentially of atoms having six or fewer protons. The foil is preferably about 10 to 150 microns thick, is more preferably 30 to 100 microns thick, and is still more preferably 40-60 microns thick. In one example, the foil is beryllium with a thickness of about 50 microns. When the protons traverse through the foil, energy of the protons is lost and the speed of the protons is reduced. Typically, a current is also generated, described infra. Protons moving at a slower speed travel in the synchrotron with a reduced radius of curvature 266 compared to either the original central beamline 264 or the altered circulating path 265. The reduced radius of curvature 266 path is also referred to herein as a path having a smaller diameter of trajectory or a path having protons with reduced energy. The reduced radius of curvature 266 is typically about two millimeters less than a radius of curvature of the last pass of the protons along the altered proton beam path 265.
The thickness of the material 1230 is optionally adjusted to create a change in the radius of curvature, such as about ½, 1, 2, 3, or 4 mm less than the last pass of the protons 265 or original radius of curvature 264. Protons moving with the smaller radius of curvature travel between a second pair of blades. In one case, the second pair of blades is physically distinct and/or are separated from the first pair of blades. In a second case, one of the first pair of blades is also a member of the second pair of blades. For example, the second pair of blades is the second blade 1214 and a third blade 1216 in the RF cavity system 1210. A high voltage DC signal, such as about 1 to 5 kV, is then applied across the second pair of blades, which directs the protons out of the synchrotron through an extraction magnet 292, such as a Lambertson extraction magnet, into a transport path 268.
Control of acceleration of the charged particle beam path in the synchrotron with the accelerator and/or applied fields of the turning magnets in combination with the above described extraction system allows for control of the intensity of the extracted proton beam, where intensity is a proton flux per unit time or the number of protons extracted as a function of time. For example, when a current is measured beyond a threshold, the RF field modulation in the RF cavity system is terminated or reinitiated to establish a subsequent cycle of proton beam extraction. This process is repeated to yield many cycles of proton beam extraction from the synchrotron accelerator.
Because the extraction system does not depend on any change in magnetic field properties, it allows the synchrotron to continue to operate in acceleration or deceleration mode during the extraction process. Stated differently, the extraction process does not interfere with synchrotron acceleration. In stark contrast, traditional extraction systems introduce a new magnetic field, such as via a hexapole, during the extraction process. More particularly, traditional synchrotrons have a magnet, such as a hexapole magnet, that is off during an acceleration stage. During the extraction phase, the hexapole magnetic field is introduced to the circulating path of the synchrotron. The introduction of the magnetic field necessitates two distinct modes, an acceleration mode and an extraction mode, which are mutually exclusive in time.
Charged Particle Beam Intensity Control
Control of applied field, such as a radio-frequency (RF) field, frequency and magnitude in the RF cavity system 1210 allows for intensity control of the extracted proton beam, where intensity is extracted proton flux per unit time or the number of protons extracted as a function of time.
Referring still to
The amplified signal or measured intensity signal resulting from the protons passing through the material 1230 is preferably used in controlling the intensity of the extracted protons. For example, the measured intensity signal is compared to a goal signal, which is predetermined in an irradiation of the tumor plan 1260. In one example, the tumor plan 1260 contains the goal or targeted energy and intensity of the delivered proton beam as a function of x-position, y-position, time, and/or rotational position of the patient. The difference between the measured intensity signal and the planned for goal signal is calculated. The difference is used as a control to the RF generator. Hence, the measured flow of current resulting from the protons passing through the material 1230 is used as a control in the RE generator to increase or decrease the number of protons undergoing betatron oscillation and striking the material 1230. Hence, the voltage determined off of the material 1230 is used as a measure of the orbital path and is used as a feedback control to control the RF cavity system. Alternatively, the measured intensity signal is not used in the feedback control and is just used as a monitor of the intensity of the extracted protons.
As described, supra, the photons striking the material 1230 is a step in the extraction of the protons from the synchrotron 130. Hence, the measured intensity signal is used to change the number of protons per unit time being extracted, which is referred to as intensity of the proton beam. The intensity of the proton beam is thus under algorithm control. Further, the intensity of the proton beam is controlled separately from the velocity of the protons in the synchrotron 130. Hence, intensity of the protons extracted and the energy of the protons extracted are independently variable.
For example, protons initially move at an equilibrium trajectory in the synchrotron 130. An RF field is used to excite the protons into a betatron oscillation. In one case, the frequency of the protons orbit is about 10 MHz. In one example, in about one millisecond or after about 10,000 orbits, the first protons hit an outer edge of the target material 130. The specific frequency is dependent upon the period of the orbit. Upon hitting the material 130, the protons push electrons through the foil to produce a current. The current is converted to voltage and amplified to yield a measured intensity signal. The measured intensity signal is used as a feedback input to control the applied RF magnitude, RF frequency, or RF field. Preferably, the measured intensity signal is compared to a target signal and a measure of the difference between the measured intensity signal and target signal is used to adjust the applied RF field in the RF cavity system 1210 in the extraction system to control the intensity of the protons in the extraction step. Stated again, the signal resulting from the protons striking and/or passing through the material 130 is used as an input in RF field modulation. An increase in the magnitude of the RF modulation results in protons hitting the foil or material 130 sooner. By increasing the RF, more protons are pushed into the foil, which results in an increased intensity, or more protons per unit time, of protons extracted from the synchrotron 130.
In another example, a detector 1250 external to the synchrotron 130 is used to determine the flux of protons extracted from the synchrotron and a signal from the external detector is used to alter the RF field or RF modulation in the RF cavity system 1210. Here the external detector generates an external signal, which is used in a manner similar to the measured intensity signal, described in the preceding paragraphs. Particularly, the measured intensity signal is compared to a desired signal from the irradiation plan 1260 in a feedback intensity controller 1240, which adjusts the RF field between the first plate 1212 and the second plate 1214 in the extraction process, described supra.
In yet another example, when a current from material 130 resulting from protons passing through or hitting material is measured beyond a threshold, the RF field modulation in the RF cavity system is terminated or reinitiated to establish a subsequent cycle of proton beam extraction. This process is repeated to yield many cycles of proton beam extraction from the synchrotron accelerator.
In still yet another embodiment, intensity modulation of the extracted proton beam is controlled by the main controller 110. The main controller 110 optionally and/or additionally controls timing of extraction of the charged particle beam and energy of the extracted proton beam.
The benefits of the system include a multi-dimensional scanning system. Particularly, the system allows independence in: (1) energy of the protons extracted and (2) intensity of the protons extracted. That is, energy of the protons extracted is controlled by an energy control system and an intensity control system controls the intensity of the extracted protons. The energy control system and intensity control system are optionally independently controlled. Preferably, the main controller 110 controls the energy control system and the main controller simultaneously controls the intensity control system to yield an extracted proton beam with controlled energy and controlled intensity where the controlled energy and controlled intensity are independently variable. Thus the irradiation spot hitting the tumor is under independent control of:
In addition, the patient is optionally independently rotated relative to a translational axis of the proton beam at the same time. The system is capable of pulse-to-pulse energy variability. Additionally, the system is capable of dynamic energy modulation during a pulse, enabling true three-dimensional proton beam scanning with energy and/or intensity modulation.
Referring now to
Still referring to
Still referring to
Still referring to
Patient Positioning
Referring now to
Referring still to
Any of the semi-vertical, sitting, or laying patient positioning embodiments described, infra, are optionally vertically translatable along the y-axis or rotatable about the rotation or y-axis.
Preferably, the top and bottom units 1412, 1414 move together, such that they rotate at the same rates and translate in position at the same rates. Optionally, the top and bottom units 1412, 1414 are independently adjustable along the y-axis to allow a difference in distance between the top and bottom units 1412, 1414. Motors, power supplies, and mechanical assemblies for moving the top and bottom units 1412, 1414 are preferably located out of the proton beam path 269, such as below the bottom unit 1412 and/or above the top unit 1414. This is preferable as the patient positioning unit 1410 is preferably rotatable about 360 degrees and the motors, power supplies, and mechanical assemblies interfere with the protons if positioned in the proton beam path 269
Proton Delivery Efficiency
Referring now to
The Bragg peak energy profile shows that protons deliver their energy across the entire length of the body penetrated by the proton up to a maximum penetration depth. As a result, energy is being delivered, in the distal portion of the Bragg peak energy profile, to healthy tissue, bone, and other body constituents before the proton beam hits the tumor. It follows that the shorter the pathlength in the body prior to the tumor, the higher the efficiency of proton delivery efficiency, where proton delivery efficiency is a measure of how much energy is delivered to the tumor relative to healthy portions of the patient. Examples of proton delivery efficiency include: (1) a ratio of proton energy delivered to the tumor over proton energy delivered to non-tumor tissue; (2) pathlength of protons in the tumor versus pathlength in the non-tumor tissue; and (3) damage to a tumor compared to damage to healthy body parts. Any of these measures are optionally weighted by damage to sensitive tissue, such as a nervous system element, heart, brain, or other organ. To illustrate, for a patient in a laying position where the patient is rotated about the y-axis during treatment, a tumor near the heart would at times be treated with protons running through the head-to-heart path, leg-to-heart path, or hip-to-heart path, which are all inefficient compared to a patient in a sitting or semi-vertical position where the protons are all delivered through a shorter chest-to-heart; side-of-body-to-heart, or back-to-heart path. Particularly, compared to a laying position, using a sitting or semi-vertical position of the patient, a shorter pathlength through the body to a tumor is provided to a tumor located in the torso or head, which results in a higher or better proton delivery efficiency.
Herein proton delivery efficiency is separately described from the time efficiency or synchrotron use efficiency, which is a fraction of time that the charged particle beam apparatus is in operation.
Depth Targeting
Referring now to
Multi-field Irradiation
It is desirable to maximize efficiency of deposition of protons to the tumor 1420, as defined by maximizing the ratio of the proton irradiation energy delivered to the tumor 1420 relative to the proton irradiation energy delivered to the healthy tissue. Irradiation from one, two, or three directions into the body, such as by rotating the body about 90 degrees between irradiation sub-sessions results in proton irradiation from the distal portion of the Bragg peak concentrating into one, two, or three healthy tissue volumes, respectively. It is desirable to further distribute the distal portion of the Bragg peak energy evenly through the healthy volume tissue surrounding the tumor 1420.
Multi-field irradiation is proton beam irradiation from a plurality of entry points into the body. For example, the patient 1430 is rotated and the radiation source point is held constant. For example, as the patient 1430 is rotated through 360 degrees and proton therapy is applied from a multitude of angles resulting in the distal radiation being circumferentially spread about the tumor yielding enhanced proton irradiation efficiency. In one case, the body is rotated into greater than 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, or 35 positions and proton irradiation occurs with each rotation position. Rotation of the patient for proton therapy or for X-ray imaging is preferably about 45, 90, 135, 180, 270, or 360 degrees. Rotation of the patient is preferably performed using the patient positioning system 1410 and/or the bottom unit 1412 or disc, described supra. Rotation of the patient 1430 while keeping the delivery proton beam 268 in a relatively fixed orientation allows irradiation of the tumor 1420 from multiple directions without use of a new collimator for each direction. Further, as no new setup is required for each rotation position of the patient 1430, the system allows the tumor 1420 to be treated from multiple directions without reseating or positioning the patient, thereby minimizing tumor 1420 regeneration time and increasing patient 1430 cancer therapy throughput.
The patient is optionally centered on the bottom unit 1412 or the tumor 1420 is optionally centered on the bottom unit 1412. If the patient is centered on the bottom unit 1412, then the first axis control element 142 and second axis control element 144 are programmed to compensate for the off central axis of rotation position variation of the tumor 1420.
Referring now to
For a given rotation position, all or part of the tumor is irradiated. For example, in one embodiment only a distal section or distal slice of the tumor 1420 is irradiated with each rotation position, where the distal section is a section furthest from the entry point of the proton beam into the patient 1430. For example, the distal section is the dorsal side of the tumor when the patient 1430 is facing the proton beam and the distal section is the ventral side of the tumor when the patient 1430 is facing away from the proton beam.
Referring now to
In one multi-field irradiation example, the particle therapy system with a synchrotron ring diameter of less than six meters includes ability to:
Referring now to
The 3-dimensional scanning system of the proton spot focal point, described herein, is preferably combined with a rotation/raster method. The method includes layer wise tumor irradiation from many directions. During a given irradiation slice, the proton beam energy is continuously changed according to the tissue's density in front of the tumor to result in the beam stopping point, defined by the Bragg peak, to always be inside the tumor and inside the irradiated slice. The novel method allows for irradiation from many directions, referred to herein as multi-field irradiation, to achieve the maximal effective dose at the tumor level while simultaneously significantly reducing possible side-effects on the surrounding healthy tissues in comparison with existing methods. Essentially, the multi-field irradiation system distributes dose-distribution at tissue depths not yet reaching the tumor.
Proton Beam Position Control
Referring now to
For example, in the illustrated system in
The focused beam spot volume dimension is preferably tightly controlled to a diameter of about 0.5, 1, or 2 millimeters, but is alternatively several centimeters in diameter. Preferred design controls allow scanning in two directions with: (1) a vertical amplitude of about 100 mm amplitude and frequency up to about 200 Hz; and (2) a horizontal amplitude of about 700 mm amplitude and frequency up to about 1 Hz.
In
Combined, the system allows for multi-axes control of the charged particle beam system in a small space with low power supply. For example, the system uses multiple magnets where each magnet has at least one edge focusing effect in each turning section of the synchrotron and/or multiple magnets having concentrating magnetic field geometry, as described supra. The multiple edge focusing effects in the circulating beam path of the synchrotron combined with the concentration geometry of the magnets and described extraction system yields a synchrotron having:
The result is a 3-dimensional scanning system, x-, y-, and z-axes control, where the z-axes control resides in the synchrotron and where the z-axes energy is variably controlled during the extraction process inside the synchrotron.
Referring now to
Imaging/X-Ray System
Herein, an X-ray system is used to illustrate an imaging system.
Timing
An X-ray is preferably collected either (1) just before or (2) concurrently with treating a subject with proton therapy for a couple of reasons. First, movement of the body, described supra, changes the local position of the tumor in the body relative to other body constituents. If the subject has an X-ray taken and is then bodily moved to a proton treatment room, accurate alignment of the proton beam to the tumor is problematic. Alignment of the proton beam to the tumor using one or more X-rays is best performed at the time of proton delivery or in the seconds or minutes immediately prior to proton delivery and after the patient is placed into a therapeutic body position, which is typically a fixed position or partially immobilized position. Second, the X-ray taken after positioning the patient is used for verification of proton beam alignment to a targeted position, such as a tumor and/or internal organ position.
Positioning
An X-ray is preferably taken just before treating the subject to aid in patient positioning. For positioning purposes, an X-ray of a large body area is not needed. In one embodiment, an X-ray of only a local area is collected. When collecting an X-ray, the X-ray has an X-ray path. The proton beam has a proton beam path. Overlaying the X-ray path with the proton beam path is one method of aligning the proton beam to the tumor. However, this method involves putting the X-ray equipment into the proton beam path, taking the X-ray, and then moving the X-ray equipment out of the beam path. This process takes time. The elapsed time while the X-ray equipment moves has a couple of detrimental effects. First, during the time required to move the X-ray equipment, the body moves. The resulting movement decreases precision and/or accuracy of subsequent proton beam alignment to the tumor. Second, the time required to move the X-ray equipment is time that the proton beam therapy system is not in use, which decreases the total efficiency of the proton beam therapy system.
X-Ray Source Lifetime
Preferably, components in the particle beam therapy system require minimal or no maintenance over the lifetime of the particle beam therapy system. For example, it is desirable to equip the proton beam therapy system with an X-ray system having a long lifetime source, such as a lifetime of about 20 years.
In one system, described infra, electrons are used to create X-rays. The electrons are generated at a cathode where the lifetime of the cathode is temperature dependent. Analogous to a light bulb, where the filament is kept in equilibrium, the cathode temperature is held in equilibrium at temperatures at about 200, 500, or 1000 degrees Celsius. Reduction of the cathode temperature results in increased lifetime of the cathode. Hence, the cathode used in generating the electrons is preferably held at as low of a temperature as possible. However, if the temperature of the cathode is reduced, then electron emissions also decrease. To overcome the need for more electrons at lower temperatures, a large cathode is used and the generated electrons are concentrated. The process is analogous to compressing electrons in an electron gun; however, here the compression techniques are adapted to apply to enhancing an X-ray tube lifetime.
Referring now to
Still referring to
More generally, the X-ray generation device 2100 produces electrons having initial vectors. One or more of the control electrode 2112, accelerating electrodes 2140, magnetic lens 2160, and quadrupole magnets 2170 combine to alter the initial electron vectors into parallel vectors with a decreased cross-sectional area having a substantially parallel path, referred to as the accelerated electrons 2150. The process allows the X-ray generation device 2100 to operate at a lower temperature. Particularly, instead of using a cathode that is the size of the electron beam needed, a larger electrode is used and the resulting electrons 2120 are focused and/or concentrated into the required electron beam needed. As lifetime is roughly an inverse of current density, the concentration of the current density results in a larger lifetime of the X-ray generation device. A specific example is provided for clarity. If the cathode has a fifteen mm radius or d1 is about 30 mm, then the area (π r2) is about 225 mm2 times pi. If the concentration of the electrons achieves a radius of five mm or d2 is about 10 mm, then the area (π r2) is about 25 mm2 times pi. The ratio of the two areas is about nine (225π/25π). Thus, there is about nine times less density of current at the larger cathode compared to the traditional cathode having an area of the desired electron beam. Hence, the lifetime of the larger cathode approximates nine times the lifetime of the traditional cathode, though the actual current through the larger cathode and traditional cathode is about the same. Preferably, the area of the cathode 2110 is about 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 15, 20, or 25 times that of the cross-sectional area of the substantially parallel electron beam 2150.
In another embodiment of the invention, the quadrupole magnets 2170 result in an oblong cross-sectional shape of the electron beam 2150. A projection of the oblong cross-sectional shape of the electron beam 2150 onto the X-ray generation source 2148 results in an X-ray beam that has a small spot in cross-sectional view, which is preferably substantially circular in cross-sectional shape, that is then passed through the patient 2130. The small spot is used to yield an X-ray having enhanced resolution at the patient.
Referring now to
As a whole, the system generates an X-ray beam that lies in substantially the same path as the proton therapy beam. The X-ray beam is generated by striking a tungsten or equivalent material with an electron beam. The X-ray generation source is located proximate to the proton beam path. Geometry of the incident electrons, geometry of the X-ray generation material, and geometry of the X-ray beam blocker 262 yield an X-ray beam that runs either in substantially in parallel with the proton beam or results in an X-ray beam path that starts proximate the proton beam path an expands to cover and transmit through a tumor cross-sectional area to strike an X-ray detector array or film allowing imaging of the tumor from a direction and alignment of the proton therapy beam. The X-ray image is then used to control the charged particle beam path to accurately and precisely target the tumor, and/or is used in system verification and validation.
Having an X-ray generation source 2148 that is proximate the proton beam path 268 allows for an X-ray of the patient 1430 to be collected close in time to use of the proton beam for tumor 1420 therapy as the X-ray generation source 2148 need not be mechanically moved prior to proton therapy. For instance, proton irradiation of the tumor 1420 occurs within about 1, 5, 10, 20, 30, or 60 seconds of when the X-ray is collected.
Referring now to
Referring now to
In a first step of the X-ray tomography system 2400, the patient 1430 is positioned relative to the X-ray beam path 2270 and proton beam path 268 using a patient semi-immobilization/placement system, described infra. After patient 1430 positioning, a series of reference 2-D X-ray images are collected, on a detector array 2290 or film, of the patient 1430 and tumor 1420 as the subject is rotated about a y-axis 1417. For example, a series of about 50, 100, 200, or 400 X-ray images of the patient are collected as the patient is rotated. In a second example, an X-ray image is collected with each n degrees of rotation of the patient 1430, where n is about ½, 1, 2, 3, or 5 degrees of rotation. Preferably, about 200 images are collected during one full rotation of the patient through 360 degrees. Subsequently, using the reference 2-D X-ray images, an algorithm produces a reference 3-D picture of the tumor 1420 relative to the patient's constituent body parts. A tumor 1420 irradiation plan is made using the 3-D picture of the tumor 1420 and the patient's constituent body parts. Creation of the proton irradiation plan is optionally performed after the patient has moved from the X-ray imaging area.
In a second step, the patient 1430 is repositioned relative to the X-ray beam path 2270 and proton beam path 268 using the patient semi-immobilization/placement system. Just prior to implementation of the proton irradiation plan, a few comparative X-ray images of the patient 1430 and tumor 1420 are collected at a limited number of positions using the X-ray tomography system 2400 setup. For example, a single X-ray image is collected with the patient positioned straight on, at angles of plus/minus forty-five degrees, and/or at angles of plus/minus ninety degrees relative to the proton beam path 268. The actual orientation of the patient 1430 relative to the proton beam path 268 is optionally any orientation. The actual number of comparative X-ray images is also optionally any number of images, though the preferable number of comparative X-ray images is about 2 to 5 comparative images. The comparative X-ray images are compared to the reference X-ray images and differences are detected. A medical expert or an algorithm determines if the difference between the reference images and the comparative images is significant. Based upon the differences, the medical expert or algorithm determines if: proton treatment should commence, be halted, or adapted in real-time. For example, if significant differences in the X-ray images are observed, then the treatment is preferably halted and the process of collecting a reference 3-D picture of the patient's tumor is reinitiated. In a second example, if the differences in the X-ray images are observed to be small, then the proton irradiation plan commences. In a third example, the algorithm or medical expert can adapt the proton irradiation plan in real-time to adjust for differences in tumor location resulting from changes in position of the tumor 1420 in the patient 1430 or from differences in the patient 1430 placement. In the third example, the adaptive proton therapy increases patient throughput and enhances precision and accuracy of proton irradiation of the tumor 1420 relative to the healthy tissue of the patient 1430.
Patient Immobilization
Accurate and precise delivery of a proton beam to a tumor of a patient requires: (1) positioning control of the proton beam and (2) positioning control of the patient. As described, supra, the proton beam is controlled using algorithms and magnetic fields to a diameter of about 0.5, 1, or 2 millimeters. This section addresses partial immobilization, restraint, and/or alignment of the patient to insure the tightly controlled proton beam efficiently hits a target tumor and not surrounding healthy tissue as a result of patient movement.
In this section an x-, y-, and z-axes coordinate system and rotation axis is used to describe the orientation of the patient relative to the proton beam. The z-axis represent travel of the proton beam, such as the depth of the proton beam into the patient. When looking at the patient down the z-axis of travel of the proton beam, the x-axis refers to moving left or right across the patient and the y-axis refers to movement up or down the patient. A first rotation axis is rotation of the patient about the y-axis and is referred to herein as a rotation axis, bottom unit 1412 rotation axis, or y-axis of rotation. In addition, tilt is rotation about the x-axis, yaw is rotation about the y-axis, and roll is rotation about the z-axis. In this coordinate system, the proton beam path 269 optionally runs in any direction. As an illustrative matter, the proton beam path running through a treatment room is described as running horizontally through the treatment room.
In this section, a semi-vertical partial immobilization system 2500 is described, which is also illustrative of a sitting partial immobilization system or a laying positioning system.
Vertical Patient Positioning/Immobilization
Referring now to
Patient positioning constraints 2515 are used to maintain the patient in a treatment position, including one or more of: a seat support 2520, a back support 2530, a head support 2540, an arm support 2550, a knee support 2560, and a foot support 2570. The constraints are optionally and independently rigid or semi-rigid. Examples of a semi-rigid material include a high or low density foam or a visco-elastic foam. For example the foot support is preferably rigid and the back support is preferably semi-rigid, such as a high density foam material. One or more of the positioning constraints 2515 are movable and/or under computer control for rapid positioning and/or immobilization of the patient. For example, the seat support 2520 is adjustable along a seat adjustment axis 2522, which is preferably the y-axis; the back support 2530 is adjustable along a back support axis 2532, which is preferably dominated by z-axis movement with a y-axis element; the head support 2540 is adjustable along a head support axis 2542, which is preferably dominated by z-axis movement with a y-axis element; the arm support 2550 is adjustable along an arm support axis 2552, which is preferably dominated by z-axis movement with a y-axis element; the knee support 2560 is adjustable along a knee support axis 2562, which is preferably dominated by y-axis movement with a z-axis element; and the foot support 2570 is adjustable along a foot support axis 2572, which is preferably dominated by y-axis movement with a z-axis element.
If the patient is not facing the incoming proton beam, then the description of movements of support elements along the axes change, but the immobilization elements are the same.
An optional camera 2580 is used with the patient immobilization system. The camera views the patient/subject creating an video image. The image is provided to one or more operators of the charged particle beam system and allows the operators a safety mechanism for determining if the subject has moved or desires to terminate the proton therapy treatment procedure. Based on the video image, the operators may suspend or terminate the proton therapy procedure. For example, if the operator observes via the video image that the subject is moving, then the operator has the option to terminate or suspend the proton therapy procedure.
An optional video display 2590 is provided to the patient. The video display optionally presents to the patient any of: operator instructions, system instructions, status of treatment, or entertainment.
Motors for positioning the constraints 2515, the camera 2580, and video display 2590 are preferably mounted above or below the proton path.
Respiration control is optionally performed by using the video display. As the patient breathes, internal and external structures of the body move in both absolute terms and in relative terms. For example, the outside of the chest cavity and internal organs both have absolute moves with a breath. In addition, the relative position of an internal organ relative to another body component, such as an outer region of the body, a bone, support structure, or another organ, moves with each breath. Hence, for more accurate and precise tumor targeting, the proton beam is preferably delivered at point a in time where the position of the internal structure or tumor is well defined, such as at the bottom of each breath. The video display is used to help coordinate the proton beam delivery with the patient's breathing cycle. For example, the video display optionally displays to the patient a command, such as a hold breath statement, a breath statement, a countdown indicating when a breadth will next need to be held, or a countdown until breathing may resume.
The semi-vertical patient positioning system 2500 and sitting patient positioning system are preferentially used to treatment of tumors in the head or torso due to efficiency. The semi-vertical patient positioning system 2500, sitting patient positioning system, and laying patient positioning system are all usable for treatment of tumors in the patient's limbs.
Support System Elements
Positioning constraints 2515 include all elements used to position the patient, such as those described in the semi-vertical positioning system 2500, sitting positioning system, and laying positioning system. Preferably, positioning constraints or support system elements are aligned in positions that do not impede or overlap the proton beam path 269. However, in some instances the positioning constraints are in the proton beam path 269 during at least part of the time of treatment of the patient. For instance, a positioning constraint element may reside in the proton beam path 269 during part of a time period where the patient is rotated about the y-axis during treatment. In cases or time periods that the positioning constraints or support system elements are in the proton beam path, then an upward adjustment of proton beam energy is preferably applied that increases the proton beam energy to offset the positioning constraint element impedance of the proton beam. In one case, the proton beam energy is increased by a separate measure of the positioning constraint element impedance determined during a reference scan of the positioning constraint system element or set of reference scans of the positioning constraint element as a function of rotation about the y-axis.
For clarity, the positioning constraints 2515 or support system elements are herein described relative to the semi-vertical positioning system 2500; however, the positioning elements and descriptive x-, y-, and z-axes are adjustable to fit any coordinate system, to the sitting positioning system, or the laying positioning system.
An example of a head support system is described to support, align, and/or restrict movement of a human head. The head support system preferably has several head support elements including any of: a back of head support, a right of head alignment element, and a left of head alignment element. The back of head support element is preferably curved to fit the head and is optionally adjustable along a head support axis, such as along the z-axis. Further, the head supports, like the other patient positioning constraints, is preferably made of a semi-rigid material, such as a low or high density foam, and has an optional covering, such as a plastic or leather. The right of head alignment element and left of head alignment elements or head alignment elements, are primarily used to semi-constrain movement of the head. The head alignment elements are preferably padded and flat, but optionally have a radius of curvature to fit the side of the head. The right and left head alignment elements are preferably respectively movable along translation axes to make contact with the sides of the head. Restricted movement of the head during proton therapy is important when targeting and treating tumors in the head or neck. The head alignment elements and the back of head support element combine to restrict tilt, rotation or yaw, roll and/or position of the head in the x-, y-, z-axes coordinate system.
Positioning System Computer Control
One or more of the patient positioning unit components and/or one of more of the patient positioning constraints are preferably under computer control, where the computer control positioning devices, such as via a series of motors and drives, to reproducibly position the patient. For example, the patient is initially positioned and constrained by the patient positioning constraints. The position of each of the patient positioning constraints is recorded and saved by the main controller 110, by a sub-controller or the main controller 110, or by a separate computer controller. Then, medical devices are used to locate the tumor 1420 in the patient 1430 while the patient is in the orientation of final treatment. The imaging system 170 includes one or more of: MRI's, X-rays, CT's, proton beam tomography, and the like. Time optionally passes at this point where images from the imaging system 170 are analyzed and a proton therapy treatment plan is devised. The patient may exit the constraint system during this time period, which may be minutes, hours, or days. Upon return of the patient to the patient positioning unit, the computer can return the patient positioning constraints to the recorded positions. This system allows for rapid repositioning of the patient to the position used during imaging and development of the treatment plan, which minimizes setup time of patient positioning and maximizes time that the charged particle beam system 100 is used for cancer treatment.
Patient Placement
Preferably, the patient 1430 is aligned in the proton beam path 269 in a precise and accurate manner. Several placement systems are described. The patient placement systems are described using the laying positioning system, but are equally applicable to the semi-vertical and sitting positioning systems.
In a first placement system, the patient is positioned in a known location relative to the platform. For example, one or more of the positioning constraints position the patient in a precise and/or accurate location on the platform. Optionally, a placement constraint element connected or replaceably connected to the platform is used to position the patient on the platform. The placement constraint element(s) is used to position any position of the patient, such as a hand, limb, head, or torso element.
In a second placement system, one or more positioning constraints or support element, such as the platform, is aligned versus an element in the patient treatment room. Essentially a lock and key system is optionally used, where a lock fits a key. The lock and key elements combine to locate the patient relative to the proton beam path 269 in terms of any of the x-, y-, and z-position, tilt, yaw, and roll. Essentially the lock is a first registration element and the key is a second registration element fitting into, adjacent to, or with the first registration element to fix the patient location and/or a support element location relative to the proton beam path 269. Examples of a registration element include any of a mechanical element, such as a mechanical stop, and an electrical connection indicating relative position or contact.
In a third placement system, the imaging system, described supra, is used to determine where the patient is relative to the proton beam path 269 or relative to an imaging marker placed in an support element or structure holding the patient, such as in the platform. When using the imaging system, such as an X-ray imaging system, then the first placement system or positioning constraints minimize patient movement once the imaging system determines location of the subject. Similarly, when using the imaging system, such as an X-ray imaging system, then the first placement system and/or second positioning system provide a crude position of the patient relative to the proton beam path 269 and the imaging system subsequently determines a fine position of the patient relative to the proton beam path 269.
X-Ray Synchronization with Patient Respiration
In one embodiment, X-ray images are collected in synchronization with patient respiration or breathing. The synchronization enhances X-ray image clarity by removing position ambiguity due to the relative movement of body constituents during a patient breathing cycle.
In a second embodiment, an X-ray system is orientated to provide X-ray images of a patient in the same orientation as viewed by a proton therapy beam, is synchronized with patient breathing, is operable on a patient positioned for proton therapy, and does not interfere with a proton beam treatment path. Preferably, the synchronized system is used in conjunction with a negative ion beam source, synchrotron, and/or targeting method apparatus to provide an X-ray timed with patient breathing and performed immediately prior to and/or concurrently with particle beam therapy irradiation to ensure targeted and controlled delivery of energy relative to a patient position resulting in efficient, precise, and/or accurate noninvasive, in-vivo treatment of a solid cancerous tumor with minimization of damage to surrounding healthy tissue in a patient using the proton beam position verification system.
An X-ray delivery control algorithm is used to synchronize delivery of the X-rays to the patient 1430 within a given period of each breath, such as at the top or bottom of a breath when the subject is holding their breath. For clarity of combined X-ray images, the patient is preferably both accurately positioned and precisely aligned relative to the X-ray beam path 2270. The X-ray delivery control algorithm is preferably integrated with the breathing control module. Thus, the X-ray delivery control algorithm knows when the subject is breathing, where in the breath cycle the subject is, and/or when the subject is holding their breath. In this manner, the X-ray delivery control algorithm delivers X-rays at a selected period of the breathing cycle. Accuracy and precision of patient alignment allow for (1) more accurate and precise location of the tumor 1420 relative to other body constituents and (2) more accurate and precise combination of X-rays in generation of a 3-dimensional X-ray image of the patient 1430 and tumor 1420.
Referring now to
Patient Breathing Monitoring
Preferably, the patient's breathing pattern is monitored 2620. When a subject or patient 1430 is breathing many portions of the body move with each breath. For example, when a subject breathes the lungs move as do relative positions of organs within the body, such as the stomach, kidneys, liver, chest muscles, skin, heart, and lungs. Generally, most or all parts of the torso move with each breath. Indeed, the inventors have recognized that in addition to motion of the torso with each breath, various motion also exists in the head and limbs with each breath. Motion is to be considered in delivery of a proton dose to the body as the protons are preferentially delivered to the tumor and not to surrounding tissue. Motion thus results in an ambiguity in where the tumor resides relative to the beam path. To partially overcome this concern, protons are preferentially delivered at the same point in each of a series of breathing cycles.
Initially a rhythmic pattern of breathing of a subject is determined 2620. The cycle is observed or measured. For example, an X-ray beam operator or proton beam operator can observe when a subject is breathing or is between breaths and can time the delivery of the protons to a given period of each breath. Alternatively, the subject is told to inhale, exhale, and/or hold their breath and the protons are delivered during the commanded time period.
Preferably, one or more sensors are used to determine the breathing cycle of the individual. Two examples of a breath monitoring system are provided: (1) a thermal monitoring system and (2) a force monitoring system.
A first example of the thermal breath monitoring system is provided. In the thermal breath monitoring system, a sensor is placed by the nose and/or mouth of the patient. As the jaw of the patient is optionally constrained, as described supra, the thermal breath monitoring system is preferably placed by the patient's nose exhalation path. To avoid steric interference of the thermal sensor system components with proton therapy, the thermal breath monitoring system is preferably used when treating a tumor not located in the head or neck, such as a when treating a tumor in the torso or limbs. In the thermal monitoring system, a first thermal resistor 2595 is used to monitor the patient's breathing cycle and/or location in the patient's breathing cycle. Preferably, the first thermal resistor 2595 is placed by the patient's nose, such that the patient exhaling through their nose onto the first thermal resistor 2595 warms the first thermal resistor 2595 indicating an exhale. Preferably, a second thermal resistor operates as an environmental temperature sensor. The second thermal resistor is preferably placed out of the exhalation path of the patient but in the same local room environment as the first thermal resistor 2595. Generated signal, such as current from the thermal resistors 2595, is preferably converted to voltage and communicated with the main controller 110 or a sub-controller of the main controller. Preferably, the second thermal resistor is used to adjust for the environmental temperature fluctuation that is part of a signal of the first thermal resistor 2595, such as by calculating a difference between values of the thermal resistors 2595 to yield a more accurate reading of the patient's breathing cycle.
A second example of the force/pressure breath monitoring system is provided. In the force breath monitoring system, a sensor is placed by the torso. To avoid steric interference of the force sensor system components with proton therapy, the force breath monitoring system is preferably used when treating a tumor located in the head, neck, or limbs. In the force monitoring system, a belt or strap 2555 is placed around an area of the patient's torso that expands and contracts with each breath cycle of the patient. The belt 2555 is preferably tight about the patient's chest and is flexible. A force meter 2557 is attached to the belt and senses the patients breathing pattern. The forces applied to the force meter 2557 correlate with periods of the breathing cycle. The signals from the force meter 2557 are preferably communicated with the main controller 110 or a sub-controller of the main controller.
Respiration Control
Referring now to
Proton Beam Therapy Synchronization with Respiration
A proton delivery control algorithm is used to synchronize delivery of the protons to the tumor within a given period of each breath, such as at the top or bottom of a breath when the subject is holding their breath. The proton delivery control algorithm is preferably integrated with the respiration control module. Thus, the proton delivery control algorithm knows when the subject is breathing, where in the breath cycle the subject is, and/or when the subject is holding their breath. The proton delivery control algorithm controls when protons are injected and/or inflected into the synchrotron, when an RF signal is applied to induce an oscillation, as described supra, and when a DC voltage is applied to extract protons from the synchrotron, as described supra. Typically, the proton delivery control algorithm initiates proton inflection and subsequent RF induced oscillation before the subject is directed to hold their breath or before the identified period of the breathing cycle selected for a proton delivery time. In this manner, the proton delivery control algorithm can deliver protons at a selected period of the breathing cycle by simultaneously or nearly simultaneously delivering the high DC voltage to the second pair of plates, described supra, which results in extraction of the protons from the synchrotron and subsequent delivery to the subject at the selected time point. Since the period of acceleration of protons in the synchrotron is constant or known for a desired energy level of the proton beam, the proton delivery control algorithm is used to set an AC RF signal that matches the breathing cycle or directed breathing cycle of the subject.
Although the invention has been described herein with reference to certain preferred embodiments, one skilled in the art will readily appreciate that other applications may be substituted for those set forth herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/RU2009/000105 | Mar 2009 | WO | international |
This application is a National Stage Entry and claims priority to PCT Application No. PCT/RU2009/000250, filed May 21, 2009, and claims the benefit of: U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/055,395 filed May 22, 2008;U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/137,574 filed Aug. 1, 2008;U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/192,245 filed Sep. 17, 2008;U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/055,409 filed May 22, 2008;U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/203,308 filed Dec. 22, 2008;U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/188,407 filed Aug. 11, 2008;U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/209,529 filed Mar. 9, 2009;U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/188,406 filed Aug. 11, 2008;U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/189,815 filed Aug. 25, 2008;U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/208,182 filed Feb. 23, 2009;U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/201,731 filed Dec. 15, 2008;U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/208,971 filed Mar. 3, 2009;U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/205,362 filed Jan. 21, 2009;U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/134,717 filed Jul. 14, 2008;U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/134,707 filed Jul. 14, 2008;U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/201,732 filed Dec. 15, 2008;U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/198,509 filed Nov. 7, 2008;U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/134,718 filed Jul. 14, 2008;U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/190,613 filed Sep. 2, 2008;U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/191,043 filed Sep. 8, 2008;U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/192,237 filed Sep. 17, 2008,U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/201,728 filed Dec. 15, 2008;U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/190,546 filed Sep. 2, 2008;U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/189,017 filed Aug. 15, 2008;U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/198,248 filed Nov. 5, 2008;U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/198,508 filed Nov. 7, 2008;U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/197,971 filed Nov. 3, 2008;U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/199,405 filed Nov. 17, 2008;U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/199,403 filed Nov. 17, 2008;U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/199,404 filed Nov. 17, 2008; andclaims priority to PCT patent application no. PCT/RU2009/00105, “Multi-Field Charged Particle Cancer Therapy Method and Apparatus”, filed Mar. 4, 2009;all of which are incorporated herein in their entirety by this reference thereto.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/RU2009/000250 | 5/21/2009 | WO | 00 | 1/31/2011 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2009/142548 | 11/26/2009 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2306875 | Fremlin | Dec 1942 | A |
| 2533688 | Quam | Dec 1950 | A |
| 2790902 | Wright | Apr 1957 | A |
| 2822490 | Scag | Feb 1958 | A |
| 3128405 | Lambertson | Apr 1964 | A |
| 3328708 | Smith et al. | Jun 1967 | A |
| 3412337 | Lothrop | Nov 1968 | A |
| 3461410 | Beth | Aug 1969 | A |
| 3655968 | Moore et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
| 3806749 | Yntema | Apr 1974 | A |
| 3867705 | Hudson | Feb 1975 | A |
| 3882339 | Rate et al. | May 1975 | A |
| 3906280 | Andelfinger | Sep 1975 | A |
| 4344011 | Hayashi et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4607380 | Oliver | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4612660 | Huang et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4622687 | Whitaker et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4705955 | Mileikowsky | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4726046 | Nunan | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4730353 | Ono | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4868844 | Nunan | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4870287 | Cole | Sep 1989 | A |
| H909 | Danby et al. | Apr 1991 | H |
| 5017789 | Young | May 1991 | A |
| 5039867 | Nishihara | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5073913 | Martin | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5117829 | Miller et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5168241 | Hirota | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5177448 | Ikeguchi | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5260581 | Lesyna | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5285166 | Hiramoto | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5349198 | Takanaka | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5363008 | Hiramoto | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5388580 | Sullivan | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5402462 | Nobuta | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5423328 | Gavish | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5440133 | Moyers | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5483129 | Yamamoto | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5511549 | Legg | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5538494 | Matsuda | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5568109 | Takayama | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5576549 | Hell et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5585642 | Britton | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5600213 | Hiramoto | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5626682 | Kobari | May 1997 | A |
| 5633907 | Gravelle | May 1997 | A |
| 5659223 | Goodman | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5661366 | Hirota | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5668371 | Deasy et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5698954 | Hirota | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5760395 | Johnstone | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5789875 | Hiramoto | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5818058 | Nakanishi | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5820320 | Kobari | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5825845 | Blair | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5854531 | Young et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5866912 | Slater | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5895926 | Britton | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5907595 | Sommerer | May 1999 | A |
| 5917293 | Saito | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5949080 | Ueda et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5969367 | Hiramoto | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5986274 | Akiyama | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5993373 | Nonaka | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6008499 | Hiramoto | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6034377 | Pu | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6057655 | Jongen | May 2000 | A |
| 6087670 | Hiramoto | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6087672 | Matsuda | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6148058 | Dobbs | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6207952 | Kan | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6218675 | Akiyama | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6236043 | Tadokoro | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6265837 | Akiyama | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6282263 | Arndt | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6292538 | Hell et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6316776 | Hiramoto | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6322249 | Wofford | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6333966 | Schoen | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6335535 | Miyake et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6339635 | Schardt | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6356617 | Besch | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6365894 | Tadokoro | Apr 2002 | B2 |
| 6421416 | Sliski | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6433336 | Jongen | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6433349 | Akiyama | Aug 2002 | B2 |
| 6433494 | Kulish | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6437513 | Stelzer | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6444990 | Morgan | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6462348 | Gelbart | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6462490 | Matsuda | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6470068 | Cheng | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6472834 | Hiramoto | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6476403 | Dolinskii | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6545436 | Gary | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6560354 | Maurer, Jr. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6580084 | Hiramoto | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6597005 | Badura | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6600164 | Badura | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6614038 | Brand et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6617598 | Matsuda | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6626842 | Oka | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6635882 | Pavlovic et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6639234 | Badura | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6661876 | Turner et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6670618 | Hartmann | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6683318 | Haberer | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6683426 | Kleeven | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6710362 | Kraft | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6717162 | Jongen | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6730921 | Kraft | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6736831 | Hartmann | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6745072 | Badura | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6774383 | Norimine | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6777700 | Yanagisawa | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6785359 | Lemaitre | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6787771 | Bashkirov | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6792078 | Kato | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6799068 | Hartmann | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6800866 | Amemiya | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6803591 | Muramatsu | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6809325 | Dahl | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6819743 | Kato | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6822244 | Beloussov | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6823045 | Kato | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6838676 | Jackson | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6859741 | Haberer | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6873123 | Marchand | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6881970 | Akiyama | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6891177 | Kraft | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6897451 | Kaercher | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6900446 | Akiyama | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6903351 | Akiyama | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 6903356 | Muramatsu | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6931100 | Kato | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6936832 | Norimine | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6937696 | Mostafavi | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6953943 | Yanagisawa | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6979832 | Yanagisawa | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6984835 | Harada | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6992312 | Yanagisawa | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7006594 | Chell et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7012267 | Moriyama | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7026636 | Yanagisawa | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7030396 | Muramatsu | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7045781 | Adamec | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7049613 | Yanagisawa | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7053389 | Yanagisawa | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7054801 | Sakamoto | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7058158 | Sako | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7060997 | Norimine | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7071479 | Yanagisawa | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7081619 | Bashkirov | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7084410 | Beloussov | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7091478 | Haberer | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7102144 | Matsuda | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7109505 | Sliski | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7122811 | Matsuda | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7141810 | Kakiuchi | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7154107 | Yanagisawa | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7154108 | Tadokoro | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7173264 | Moriyama | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7173265 | Miller | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7193227 | Hiramoto | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7199382 | Rigney | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7208748 | Sliski | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7212608 | Nagamine | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7212609 | Nagamine | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7227161 | Matsuda | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7247869 | Tadokoro | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7252745 | Gorokhovsky | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7259529 | Tanaka | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7262424 | Moriyama | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7274018 | Adamec | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7274025 | Berdermann | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7280633 | Cheng | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7297967 | Yanagisawa | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7301162 | Matsuda | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7307264 | Brusasco | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7310404 | Tashiro | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7315606 | Tsujii | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7319231 | Moriyama | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7345291 | Kats | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7345292 | Moriyama | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7349522 | Yan et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7351988 | Naumann | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7355189 | Yanagisawa | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7356112 | Brown | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7368740 | Beloussov | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7372053 | Yamashita | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7381979 | Yamashita | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7385203 | Nakayama | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7394082 | Fujimaki | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7397054 | Natori | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7397901 | Johnsen | Jul 2008 | B1 |
| 7402822 | Guertin | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7402823 | Guertin | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7402824 | Guertin | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7402963 | Sliski | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7425717 | Matsuda | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7432516 | Peggs et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7439528 | Nishiuchi | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7446490 | Jongen | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7449701 | Fujimaki | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7456415 | Yanagisawa | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7456591 | Jongen | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7465944 | Ueno | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7476883 | Nutt | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7531818 | Brahme | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7555103 | Johnsen | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7560717 | Matsuda | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7576342 | Hiramoto | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7586112 | Chiba | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7589334 | Hiramoto | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7626347 | Sliski | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7634057 | Ein-Gal | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7659521 | Pedroni | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7668585 | Green | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7692168 | Moriyama | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7701677 | Schultz | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7709818 | Matsuda | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7718982 | Sliski | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7728311 | Gall | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7729469 | Kobayashi | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7741623 | Sommer | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7755305 | Umezawa | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7772577 | Saito | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7796730 | Marash | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7801277 | Zou | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7807982 | Nishiuchi | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7817778 | Nord | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7825388 | Nihongi | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7826593 | Svensson | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7834336 | Boeh | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7838855 | Fujii | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7848488 | Mansfield | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7860216 | Jongen | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7875868 | Moriyama | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7894574 | Nord | Feb 2011 | B1 |
| 7906769 | Blasche | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7919765 | Timmer | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7940891 | Star-Lack | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7953205 | Balakin | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7961844 | Takeda | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7977656 | Fujimaki | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7982198 | Nishiuchi | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7987053 | Schaffner | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7995813 | Foshee | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8003964 | Stark | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8009804 | Siljamaki | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8045679 | Balakin | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8093564 | Balakin | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8129694 | Balakin | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8129699 | Balakin | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8129701 | Al-Sadah et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8144832 | Balakin | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 20020183667 | Kitadou et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030048080 | Amemiya et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030104207 | Arakida et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030163015 | Yanagisawa | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030164459 | Schardt et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030188757 | Yanof et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040002641 | Sjogren et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040022361 | Lemaitre | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040062354 | Kato et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040155206 | Marchand | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040162457 | Maggiore et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040184583 | Nagamine et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040218725 | Radley et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20050017193 | Jackson | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050161618 | Pedroni | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050211905 | Stark | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050226378 | Cocks et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050238134 | Brusasco | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050269497 | Jongen | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060050848 | Vilsmeier et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060106301 | Kats | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060163495 | Hiramoto et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060171508 | Noda et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060255285 | Jongen | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070018121 | Leyman | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070055124 | Viswanathan et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070093723 | Keall et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070121788 | Mildner et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070131876 | Brahme | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070170994 | Peggs | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070181815 | Ebstein | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070225603 | Jackson | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20080023644 | Pedroni | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080043916 | Lemaitre | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080049896 | Kuduvalli et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080093567 | Gall | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080139955 | Hansmann et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080191142 | Pedroni | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20090086905 | Boyden et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090096179 | Stark | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090122961 | Ohsawa | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090140672 | Gall | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090168960 | Jongen | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090189095 | Flynn et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090190719 | Barschdorf et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090200483 | Gall | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090236545 | Timmer | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090283704 | Nishiuchi | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090289194 | Saito | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090304153 | Amelia | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090309046 | Balakin | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100001212 | Nishiuchi | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100008468 | Balakin | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100008469 | Balakin | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100020937 | Hautmann et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100027745 | Balakin | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100033115 | Cleland | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100045213 | Sliski | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100059688 | Claereboudt | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100060209 | Balakin | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100128846 | Balakin | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100176309 | Mackie et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100230617 | Gall | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100272241 | Amelia | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100308235 | Sliski | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110073778 | Natori | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110089329 | Jongen | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110118530 | Balakin | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110118531 | Balakin | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110127443 | Comer | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110137159 | Jongen | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110168903 | Kyele et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110180720 | Balakin | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110182410 | Balakin | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110186720 | Jongen | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20120143051 | Balakin | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1683545 | Jul 2006 | EP |
| 1270619 | Apr 1972 | GB |
| 62-87171 | Apr 1987 | JP |
| 9129151 | May 1997 | JP |
| 11-057042 | Mar 1999 | JP |
| 2000021597 | Jan 2000 | JP |
| 2004357724 | Dec 2004 | JP |
| 2149045 | May 2000 | RU |
| 2149662 | May 2000 | RU |
| 2006103781 | Sep 2007 | RU |
| WO-9953998 | Oct 1999 | WO |
| WO-2006094533 | Sep 2006 | WO |
| WO-2007014026 | Feb 2007 | WO |
| WO-2008044194 | Apr 2008 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Adams, et al., “Electrostatic cylinder lenses II: Three element einzel lenses”, Journal of Physics E: Sci. Intr., vol. 5, No. 2, Feb. 1972, pp. 150-155. |
| Amaldi, U. et al., “A Hospital-Based Hadrontherapy Complex”, Proceedings of EPAC '94, London, England, Jun. 1994, pp. 49-51. |
| Arimoto, et al., “A Study of the PRISM-FFAG Magnet”, Proc. of Cyclotron 2004 Conference, Tokyo, Japan, Oct. 2004, pp. 243-245. |
| Biophysics Group, et al., “Design, construction and First Experiments of a Magnetic Scanning System for Therapy. Radiobilogical Experiments on the Radiobiological Action of Carbon, Oxygen and Neon”, GSI Report, Gesellschaft Fuer Schwerionenforschung MbH, vol. GSI-91-18, Jun. 1991, pp. 1-31. |
| Blackmore, et al., “Operation of the TRIUMF Proton Therapy Facility”, Proc. of the 1997 Particle Accelerator Conference, vol. 3, Piscataway, NJ, USA, May 1997, pp. 3831-3833. |
| Bryant, P., “Proton-Ion Medical Machine Study (PIMMS) Part II”, Proton-Ion Medical Machine Study: PIMMS, European Organisation for Nuclear Research Cern—PS Division, Geneva, Switzerland, Jul. 2000, pp. 23, 228, 289-290. |
| Craddock, M.K. , “New Concepts in FFAG Design for Secondary Beam Facilities and other Applications”, Proc. of 2005 Particle Accelerator Conference, Knoxville, TN, USA, May 2005, pp. 261-265. |
| Dzhelepov, et al., “Use of USSR proton accelerators for medical purposes”, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science USA, vol. ns-20, No. 3, Jun. 1973, pp. 268-270. |
| Endo, et al., “Medical Synchrotron for Proton Therapy”, Proc. of EPAC 88, Rome, Italy, Jun. 1988, pp. 1459-1461. |
| Franzke, et al., “Commissioning of the heavy ion storage ring ESR”, Proc. of EAPC 90, Nice, France, Jun. 1990, pp. 46-48. |
| Johnstone, et al., “Tune-Stabilized Linear-Field FFAG for Carbon Therapy”, Proc. of EPAC 2006, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, Jun. 2006, Total of 3 Pages. |
| Kalnins, J.G., “The use of electric mutipole lenses for bending and focusing polar molecules with application to the design of a rotational-state separator”, Proc. of PAC 2003, Portland, OR, USA, May 2003, pp. 2951-2953. |
| Kim, et al., “50MEV Proton Beam Test Facility for Low Flux Beam Utilization Studies of PEFP”, Proceedings of APAC 2004, Gyeongju, Korea, Oct. 2005, pp. 441-443. |
| Lapostolle, P. , “Introduction a la theorie des accelerateurs lineaires”, CERN Yellow Books, CERN87-09, Geneva, Switzerland, Jul. 1987, pp. 4-5. |
| Li, Yulin , “A Thin Beryllium Injection Window for CESR-C”, Proc. PAC '03, Portland, Oregon, USA, May 2001, pp. 2264-2266. |
| Noda, et al., “Performance of a respiration-gated beam control system for patient treatment”, Proc. EPAC 96, Barcelona, Spain, Jun. 1996, pp. 2656-2658. |
| Noda, et al., “Slow beam extraction by a transverse RF field with AM and FM”, Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research, Section—A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, vol. A 374, Amsterdam, NL, May 1996, pp. 269-277. |
| Peters, J. , “Negative ion sources for high energy accelerators (invited)”, Review of Scientific Instruments, AIP, vol. 71, No. 2, Melville, NY, US, Feb. 2000, pp. 1069-1074. |
| Pohlit, W. , “Optimization of Cancer Treatment with Accelerator Produced Radiations”, Proc. EPAC '98, Stockholm, Sweden, Jun. 1998, pp. 192-194. |
| Saito, et al., “RF Accelerating System for a Compact Ion Synchrotron”, Proc. of 2001 PAC, Chicago, USA, Jun. 2001, pp. 966-968. |
| Suda, et al., “Medical application of the positron emitter beam at HIMAC”, Proc. of EPAC 2000, Vienna, Austria, Jun. 2000, pp. 2554-2556. |
| Tanigaki, et al., “Construction of FFAG Accelerators in KURRI for ADS Study”, Proc. of 2005, Knoxville, TN, USA, May 2005, pp. 350-352. |
| Trbojevic, et al., “Design of a Non-Scaling FFAG Accelerator for Proton Therapy”, Proc. of 2004 Cyclotron Conf., Tokyo, Japan, Oct. 2004, Total of 3 pages. |
| Winkler, et al., “Charge Exchange Extraction at the Experimental Storage Ring ESR at GSI”, Proc. of EPAC 98, Stockholm Sweden, Jun. 1998, pp. 559-561. |
| “Proton-Ion Medical Machine Study (PIMMS) Part II”, European Organization for Nuclear Research CERN—PS Division, Jul. 27, 2000, pp. 1-352. |
| Arimoto, et al., “A Study of the PRISM-FFAG Magnet”, Proc. of Cyclotron 2004 Conference, Tokyo, Japan, Oct. 2004, 243-245, plus 30 page presentation. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20110150180 A1 | Jun 2011 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61055395 | May 2008 | US | |
| 61055409 | May 2008 | US | |
| 61134717 | Jul 2008 | US | |
| 61134707 | Jul 2008 | US | |
| 61137574 | Aug 2008 | US | |
| 61188406 | Aug 2008 | US | |
| 61188407 | Aug 2008 | US | |
| 61189017 | Aug 2008 | US | |
| 61189815 | Aug 2008 | US | |
| 61190546 | Sep 2008 | US | |
| 61190613 | Sep 2008 | US | |
| 61191043 | Sep 2008 | US | |
| 61192245 | Sep 2008 | US | |
| 61192237 | Sep 2008 | US | |
| 61197971 | Nov 2008 | US | |
| 61198248 | Nov 2008 | US | |
| 61198508 | Nov 2008 | US | |
| 61198509 | Nov 2008 | US | |
| 61199405 | Nov 2008 | US | |
| 61199403 | Nov 2008 | US | |
| 61199404 | Nov 2008 | US | |
| 61201728 | Dec 2008 | US | |
| 61201732 | Dec 2008 | US | |
| 61201731 | Dec 2008 | US | |
| 61203308 | Dec 2008 | US | |
| 61205362 | Jan 2009 | US | |
| 61208182 | Feb 2009 | US | |
| 61209529 | Mar 2009 | US | |
| 61208971 | Mar 2009 | US | |
| 61134718 | Jul 2008 | US |
