A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
An existing system provides an electrical feedback to compensate for aging by the drive transistors and by the organic light emitting devices (OLEDs) in the pixels of a display panel. The display panel can broken into several blocks. In each frame, the electrical aging of a very small number of pixels can be measured by each block. Thus, a full-panel scan is a very lengthy process, causing problems in the presence of fast-aging phenomena and thermal effects.
For example, assuming a panel size of 600×800 pixels or 1200×1600 sub-pixels, if a control circuit controls 210 columns, eight of such circuits are needed. Suppose the frame rate is 60 Hz, and 10 sub-pixels in each of the eight circuits are measured in each frame simultaneously, a full-panel scan period is: 1200*210/10/60/60 or 7 minutes. As a result, the compensation of an aged/relaxed area with an absolute value difference of 100 from the initial estimation, takes at least 100*7=700 minutes or over 11 hours, an unacceptably excessive amount of time. A more efficient compensation scheme is needed.
An algorithm is disclosed that increases the efficiency of the process by which variations or fast changes in the pixels is compensated (such as caused by a phenomenon that adversely affects the pixels such as aging, relaxation, color shift, temperature changes, or process non-uniformities), by adaptively directing measurements toward areas with high a probability of a change (such as aging/relaxation) from a previously measured value (due to aging, relaxation, temperature change, process non-uniformities, etc.) or a deviation from a reference value (due to a mismatch in the drive current, VOLED, brightness, color intensity, and the like), increasing the estimation speed in such areas, and providing a process to update the estimated changing (e.g., aging) of pixels that are not being measured using other pixels' measurements.
According to an aspect of the present disclosure, a method of discriminating areas that are deviating from a previous state or from a previously measured reference value is disclosed. The areas are areas of a display panel of pixels organized into clusters of pixels. The method includes scanning each of at least one of the pixels in a first cluster until a first criterion is satisfied. The scanning includes: measuring a characteristic of a target one of the pixels in the first cluster; comparing the measured characteristic with a reference characteristic to determine a state of the target pixel; and if the state of the target pixel has changed relative to a prior measurement of the target pixel, determining that the first criterion is satisfied. The method further includes, responsive to the first criterion being satisfied, automatically compensating for deviations of the measured characteristic of the display panel based at least on the state of the scanned pixels to shift the measured characteristic toward the reference characteristic.
The pixels of the display can be further organized into a plurality of regions. Each of at least some of the regions can have a plurality of clusters of pixels. The scanning can be carried out in at least one cluster in each of the regions, The first criterion can be satisfied responsive to the state of at least one of the pixels in each of the regions changing relative to a prior measurement of the at least one pixel. The state can indicate at least whether the target pixel is in an aging state indicating that the target pixel is aging. The automatically compensating can compensate for an aging or an overcompensation of at least one of the pixels in the first cluster.
The measured characteristic can be a current used to drive a light emitting device in the target pixel. The scanning can be carried out according to a scan order starting at a top-right pixel and ending at a bottom-left pixel in the first cluster. The measuring can be carried out on only some of the pixels in the first cluster prior to carrying out the automatically compensating.
The method can further include prioritizing the first cluster as a function of the respective states of each of the measured pixels in the first cluster to produce a priority value. The state can further indicate whether the target pixel is in an overcompensated state. The function can include determining an absolute difference of the number of measured pixels in the first cluster that are in the overcompensated state versus the number of measured pixels in the first cluster that are in an aging state.
The method can further include determining a number of additional pixels to be measured in the first cluster based on the priority value such that a higher priority value indicates more additional pixels to be measured in the first cluster; and measuring a characteristic of each of the additional pixels to determine the state of each of the additional pixels. The state can further indicate whether the target pixel is in an overcompensated state. The function can include determining an absolute difference of the number of measured pixels in the first cluster that are in the overcompensated state versus the number of measured pixels in the first cluster that are in an aging state. The number of additional pixels can be zero responsive to the absolute difference not exceeding a minimum threshold indicative of whether additional pixels are to be measured in the first cluster.
Responsive to the priority value exceeding a threshold, the method can further include adjusting a corresponding absolute aging value associated with those of neighboring pixels to the measured pixel that share the same state as the measured pixel. The absolute aging value can be indicative of an extent to which the measured pixel is aged or overcompensated.
The method can further include reducing, for each of the neighboring pixels whose absolute aging value has been adjusted, a coefficient of an average filter associated with each of the neighboring pixels whose absolute aging value has been adjusted. The adjusting can include incrementing by one the absolute aging value responsive to the state of the measured pixel being in the aging state and decrementing by one the absolute aging value responsive to the state of the measured pixel being in the overcompensated state.
The absolute aging value can be adjusted by a constant value or as a function of the priority value such that the absolute aging value is adjusted by a larger amount for higher priority values relative to lower priority values. The method can further include prioritizing the at least one cluster in each of the regions as a function of the respective states of each of the measured pixels in the corresponding ones of the measured clusters to produce for each of the regions a corresponding priority value. The state can include whether the target pixel is in an overcompensated state. The function can include determining an absolute difference of the number of measured pixels in each of the at least one cluster in each of the regions that are in the overcompensated state versus the number of measured pixels in each of the at least one cluster in each of the regions that are in an aging state. The absolute difference can correspond to the priority value. For each of the regions, the method can further determine a number of additional pixels to be measured in the corresponding at least one cluster based on the priority value such that a higher priority value indicates more additional pixels to be measured in the corresponding at least one cluster.
The target pixel in the first cluster can be on a first row in the first cluster. The scanning can further include, during a frame, measuring a characteristic of a second target one of the pixels in the first cluster. The second target pixel can be present on a second row distinct from the first row in the first cluster. Each of the additional pixels can be on different consecutive or non-consecutive rows within the first cluster. The measuring the characteristic of each of the additional pixels can be carried out on at least two of the additional pixels on the different rows during a frame.
The state can further indicate whether the target pixel is in an aging or overcompensated state. The measured characteristic can be a current drawn by a light emitting device in the target pixel and the reference characteristic is a reference current. The reference current can be a current drawn by a reference pixel in the display panel.
According to another aspect of the present disclosure, a method of prioritizing areas of high probability of deviations from a previously measured value or a reference value of a characteristic of areas of pixels of a display panel of pixels, includes: measuring a characteristic of at least some of the pixels of the display panel; comparing the measured characteristic for each of the measured pixels with a corresponding reference characteristic to determine a corresponding state of each of the measured pixels; prioritizing the areas of the display panel as a function of the state of the measured pixels in each of the areas to produce a priority order; and automatically compensating for a deviation by the measured characteristic from the reference characteristic in the areas according to the priority order.
The method can further include scanning each of the at least some of the pixels in a first cluster until a first criterion is satisfied. The scanning can further include: comparing the measured characteristic with a reference characteristic to determine a state of a target pixel in the first cluster, the state indicating at least whether the target pixel is in an aging state indicating that the target pixel is aging; and if the state of the target pixel has changed relative to a prior measurement of the target pixel, determining that the first criterion is satisfied. The automatically compensating can be based at least on the state of the scanned pixels and compensates for an aging or an overcompensation of the areas.
The pixels of the display can be further organized into a plurality of regions. Each of at least some of the regions can have a plurality of clusters of pixels. The scanning can be carried out in at least one cluster in each of the regions. The first criterion can be satisfied responsive to the state of at least one of the pixels in each of the regions changing relative to a prior measurement of the at least one pixel.
The measured characteristic can be a current used to drive a light emitting device in the target pixel and the reference characteristic is a reference current. The scanning can be carried out according to a scan order starting at a top-right pixel and ending at a bottom-left pixel in the first cluster.
The state can indicate whether the target pixel is in an aging or an overcompensated state. The function can include determining an absolute difference of the number of measured pixels in the first cluster that are in the overcompensated state versus the number of measured pixels in the first cluster that are in the aging state.
The prioritizing can include prioritizing the first cluster as a function of the respective states of each of the measured pixels in the first cluster to produce a priority value. The method can further include: determining a number of additional pixels to be measured in the first cluster based on the priority value such that a higher priority value indicates more additional pixels to be measured in the first cluster; and measuring a characteristic of each of the additional pixels to determine the state of each of the additional pixels.
The state can indicate whether the target pixel is in an aging or an overcompensated state. The function can include determining an absolute difference of the number of measured pixels in the first cluster that are in the overcompensated state versus the number of measured pixels in the first cluster that are in the aging state. The number of additional pixels can be zero responsive to the absolute difference not exceeding a minimum threshold indicative of whether additional pixels are to be measured in the first cluster.
The state can indicate whether the target pixel is in an aging or an overcompensated state. The method can further include: responsive to the priority value exceeding a threshold, adjusting a corresponding absolute aging value associated with those of neighboring pixels to the measured pixel that share the same state as the measured pixel, the absolute aging value corresponding to a value indicating an extent to which a pixel is aging or overcompensated. The method can further include reducing, for each of the neighboring pixels whose absolute aging value has been adjusted, a coefficient of an average filter associated with each of the neighboring pixels whose absolute aging value has been adjusted.
The adjusting can include incrementing by one the absolute aging value responsive to the state of the measured pixel being in the aging state and decrementing by one the absolute aging value responsive to the state of the measured pixel being in the overcompensated state. The absolute aging value can be adjusted by a constant value or as a function of the priority value such that the absolute aging value is adjusted by a larger amount for higher priority values relative to lower priority values.
According to still another aspect of the present disclosure, a method is disclosed of updating an estimated aging of neighboring pixels of a display panel using a known measurement of a pixel. The display panel is organized into clusters of pixels. The method includes: measuring a characteristic of each pixel in a first cluster of the clusters of the display panel; for each pixel in the cluster, comparing the measured characteristic of the pixel with a reference characteristic to determine a state of the pixel, the state indicating whether the pixel is in an aging state, an overcompensated state, or neither; if the state of a selected pixel in the cluster is unchanged relative to a prior measurement of the selected pixel and the state of the selected pixel is the same as the state of the majority of other pixels in the cluster, adjusting corresponding aging values associated with neighboring pixels to the selected pixel, each of the aging values representing an aging or a relaxation state of a pixel and stored in a memory coupled to the display panel; and automatically compensating for an aging or relaxation of the display panel based at least in part on the aging values of the neighboring pixels.
The method can further include reducing, for each of the neighboring pixels whose aging value has been adjusted, a coefficient of an average filter associated with each of the neighboring pixels whose aging value has been adjusted. The neighboring pixels can be immediately adjacent to the selected pixel.
According to yet another aspect of the present disclosure, a method of selectively scanning areas of a display panel having pixels and divided into a plurality of clusters of pixels, includes scanning at least some of the clusters in a first phase until a first criterion is satisfied. The scanning includes: measuring a characteristic of a target pixel in the cluster being scanned according to a pixel scanning order; comparing the measured characteristic with a reference characteristic to produce a state of the target pixel, the state indicating whether the target pixel is in an aging state, a relaxation state, or neither; responsive to the state for the target pixel differing from a previous state for the target pixel, determining that the first criterion is satisfied; and responsive to a predetermined number of target pixels in the cluster being scanned, determining that the first criterion is satisfied. Responsive to the first criterion being satisfied, the method further scans at least one of the clusters. The further scanning includes: determining a priority for scanning additional pixels as a function of the extent of aging or relaxation of the cluster being scanned; measuring the characteristic of a number of additional target pixels in the cluster being scanned, wherein the number of additional target pixels is a function of the priority; and adjusting corresponding aging values associated with neighboring pixels to the target pixel, each of the aging values representing an aging or a relaxation state of a pixel and stored in a memory, responsive to the state of the target pixel being the same as the state of a majority of the other pixels in the cluster being scanned.
The foregoing and additional aspects and embodiments of the present disclosure will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art in view of the detailed description of various embodiments and/or aspects, which is made with reference to the drawings, a brief description of which is provided next.
The foregoing and other advantages of the invention will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description and upon reference to the drawings.
While the present disclosure is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments and implementations have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail herein. It should be understood, however, that the present disclosure is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the present disclosure is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
It should be noted that the present disclosure is directed to identifying areas of a pixel array for compensation for changes in a characteristic of the pixels, such as caused by a phenomenon such as aging or relaxation, temperature change, or process non-uniformities. Changes in the characteristic due to the adverse phenomenon can be measured by an appropriate measurement circuit or algorithm and tracked by any reference value, such as reference values indicating that a pixel (specifically, a drive transistor of the pixel) is aging or relaxing, or reference values indicative of the brightness performance or color shift of the pixel or a current deviation from an expected drive current value required to achieve a desired brightness. How those areas of pixels, once identified, are compensated (such as for aging or relaxation) is not the focus of the present disclosure. Exemplary disclosures for compensating for aging or relaxation of the pixels in a display are known. Examples can be found in commonly assigned, co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/956,842, entitled “System and Methods For Aging Compensation in AMOLED Displays,” filed on Nov. 30, 2010, and in commonly assigned, co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/020,252, entitled “System and Methods For Extracting Correlation Curves For an Organic Light Emitting Device,” filed Feb. 3, 2011. The present disclosure pertains to both compensating for the phenomena of aging and relaxation of pixels (either the light emitting device or the drive TFT transistor that drives current to the light emitting device) in a display (but not both simultaneously, as a pixel is either in a state of aging, relaxation, or neither aging nor relaxation—i.e., in a normal “healthy” state), temperature variation, non-uniformity caused by process variation, as those terms are understood by those of ordinary skill in the art to which the present disclosure pertains, and generally to compensating for any change in a measurable characteristic of the pixel circuits caused by any such phenomena, such as a drive current applied to a light emitting device of the pixels, brightness of the light emitting device (e.g., brightness output can be conventionally measured by a photosensor or other sensor circuit), color shift of the light emitting device, or a shift in the voltage associated with an electronic device in the pixel circuit, such as VOLED, which corresponds to the voltage across a light emitting device in the pixel. In this disclosure, while occasionally the conjunctive “aging/relaxation” or “aged/relaxed” or the like phrases will be used, it should be understood that any discussion relating to aging pertains equally to relaxation, and vice versa, and other phenomena that causes divergence from a reference state of a measurable characteristic of a pixel or a pixel circuit. Instead of relaxation, the terms “recovering,” recovering,” “relaxing,” or “overcompensated” may be used, and these terms are interchangeable and mutually synonymous as used herein. To avoid the awkward recitation of “aging/relaxation” throughout the present disclosure, this disclosure may occasionally refer to aging or relaxation only, but it should be understood that the concepts and aspects disclosed herein apply with equal force to both phenomena. The various grammatical variants of the verbs age or relax, such as aging, aged, relaxed, relaxing, or relaxation, are used interchangeably herein. The examples herein assume that the phenomena being compensated for is aging or relaxation of a drive transistor of a pixel, but it should be emphasized that the present disclosure is not limited to fast compensating for the phenomena of aging or relaxation only, but rather is equally applicable to compensating for any changing phenomena of the pixels or their associated pixel circuits by measuring a characteristic of the pixel/pixel circuit and comparing the measured characteristic against a previously measured value or a reference value to determine whether the pixel/pixel circuit is being afflicted by the phenomenon (e.g., aging, overcompensation, color shift, temperature or process variation, or deviation in the drive current or VOLED relative to a reference current or voltage).
For convenience, the systems and methods for identifying areas of change (such as aging or relaxation) will be referred to merely as an estimation algorithm. The estimation algorithm adaptively directs the measurements of pixels in those areas that have a high probability of change (e.g., aging/relaxation), resulting in a fast estimation speed for compensation, as discussed below in connection with the drawings. Newly changed (e.g., aged or relaxed) areas of a display panel can be discriminated quickly by the estimation algorithm without requiring a full panel scan of all the pixels. By change, it is meant a change of a characteristic of the pixel or its associated pixel circuit. The characteristic, as explained above, can be a drive TFT current, VOLED, a pixel brightness, or a color intensity, for example. These changes can occur as a result of one or more phenomena including aging or over-compensation of a pixel, environmental temperature variations, or due to non-uniformities in the materials inherent in the semiconductor manufacturing process that cause performance variations among the pixels or clusters of pixels on a substrate.
The display system 100 can also include a current source circuit, which supplies a fixed current on current bias lines. In some configurations, a reference current can be supplied to the current source circuit. In such configurations, a current source control controls the timing of the application of a bias current on the current bias lines. In configurations in which the reference current is not supplied to the current source circuit, a current source address driver controls the timing of the application of a bias current on the current bias lines.
As is known, each pixel 104a-d in the display system 100 needs to be programmed with information indicating the brightness of the light emitting device in the pixel 104a-d. A frame defines the time period that includes a programming cycle or phase during which each and every pixel in the display system 100 is programmed with a programming voltage indicative of a brightness and a driving or emission cycle or phase during which each light emitting device in each pixel is turned on to emit light at a brightness commensurate with the programming voltage stored in a storage element. A frame is thus one of many still images that compose a complete moving picture displayed on the display system 100. There are at least two schemes for programming and driving the pixels: row-by-row, or frame-by-frame. In row-by-row programming, a row of pixels is programmed and then driven before the next row of pixels is programmed and driven. In frame-by-frame programming, all rows of pixels in the display system 100 are programmed first, and all of the frames are driven row-by-row. Either scheme can employ a brief vertical blanking time at the beginning or end of each frame during which the pixels are neither programmed nor driven.
The components located outside of the pixel array 102 can be disposed in a peripheral area 106 around the pixel array 102 on the same physical substrate on which the pixel array 102 is disposed. These components include the gate driver 108, the source driver 110 and the optional supply voltage control 114. Alternately, some of the components in the peripheral area can be disposed on the same substrate as the pixel array 102 while other components are disposed on a different substrate, or all of the components in the peripheral area can be disposed on a substrate different from the substrate on which the pixel array 102 is disposed. Together, the gate driver 108, the source driver 110, and the supply voltage control 114 make up a display driver circuit. The display driver circuit in some configurations may include the gate driver 108 and the source driver 110 but not the supply voltage control 114.
The display system 100 further includes a current supply and readout circuit 120, which reads output data from data output lines, VD[k], VD[k+1], and so forth, one for each column of pixels 104a, 104c in the pixel array 102. A set of column reference pixels 130 is fabricated on the edge of the pixel array 102 at the end of each column such as the column of pixels 104a and 104c. The column reference pixels 130 can also receive input signals from the controller 112 and output corresponding current or voltage signals to the current supply and readout circuit 120. Each of the column reference pixels 130 includes a reference drive transistor and a reference light emitting device, such as an OLED, but the reference pixels are not part of the pixel array 102 that displays images. The column reference pixels 130 are not driven for most of the programming cycle because they are not part of the pixel array 102 to display images and therefore do not age from the constant application of programming voltages as compared to the pixels 104a and 104c. Although only one column reference pixel 130 is shown in
A pixel array 102 of the display panel 100 is divided in columns (k . . . k+w) into regions or blocks of columns as shown in
A memory records the absolute aging estimation of all sub-pixels in each clustering scheme (i.e., AbsAge[i, j, color, cs]). If a pixel is in state 1 and Ip<Ir the content of the memory corresponding to that pixel is incremented by 1. The absolute aging value associated with that pixel in the memory is decremented by 1 if that pixel is in state 2 and Ip>Ir. The memory can be conventionally incorporated in or connected to the controller 112. The absolute aging values are examples of reference values that can be used to track whether a pixel has changed relative to a prior measurement of the characteristic of interest (e.g., drive current, VOLED, brightness, color intensity) for compensating for a phenomenon that affects pixel performance, efficiency, or lifetime (e.g., aging/relaxation of the drive TFT or light emitting device, color shift, temperature variation, process non-uniformities).
Referring to
The example described in the Background Section above illustrates the highly inefficient performance of a brute-force approach for compensating for the aging/relaxation of pixels. A conventional full-panel scan of each EIC region is a very slow process. Fortunately, the aging/relaxation of the pixels is not purely random. There is strong tendency toward spatial correlation of the aging/relaxation due to the spatial correlation of the video content displayed on the panel 102. In other words, if a pixel 104 is aging/relaxing, losing its brightness, or experiencing a shift in color, drive current, or VOLED, there is a high probability that the same phenomenon is affecting other pixels 104 close to this pixel (i.e., neighboring pixels) are also changing. The estimation algorithm according to the present disclosure exploits this tendency to achieve a higher estimation speed to focus the compensation on the areas where characteristic changes are the most severe.
The estimation algorithm disclosed herein is a local priority-based scanning scheme that gives higher priority to scanning areas that are under continuous change. Assuming that a region can be identified as an area needing compensation (e.g., for aging or relaxation), therefore, it is also relevant to use a single measurement data from a single pixel in that area as a candidate to determine whether the rest of the region needs further compensation or not. This intelligence is integrated and designed in a way that the estimation algorithm detects the newly changed areas quickly, while the measurements are already focused on the areas that need high attention.
To leverage the locality of the aging profile, each EIC's region 170a is divided into clusters 160a,b,c of 8×8 pixels 104 (16×16 sub-pixels 150, for example). The estimation algorithm is composed of two phases (Phase I and Phase II) that run consequently on each cluster 160a,b,c. The principal role of Phase I is to determine whether a cluster 160a,b,c needs high attention in Phase II or not, as quickly as possible. In this Phase I, a given color (e.g., red, green blue, or white) of the cluster 160a,b,c of 64 pixels 104 is scanned just enough to make sure the cluster 160a,b,c is not important or until the cluster 160a,b,c is fully scanned once. This quick scan ensures that newly emerged changed (e.g., aged/relaxed) areas are detected quickly. However, in Phase II, the notion of priority that is quantified based on previous measurements in the cluster is used to extend the measurements in the cluster 160a,b,c for more pixels, as well as to accelerate the changes of the absolute value of the aging/relaxation or other reference value of interest, to accelerate the noise filtering, and to treat the rest of the neighboring pixels to the measured pixel similarly.
For now, the major blocks will be described. The details as to each of these blocks will be described below in connection with the flowcharts. The Measurement and Update Block 204 determines whether the state of one or more pixels has flipped (or, more generally, whether a reference value has changed relative to a prior measurement of a pixel characteristic) in the same position in all of the EICs 140a,b,c (e.g., pixel A at location i,k in EIC 1 140a, pixel B at location i,k in EIC 2 140b, and pixel C at location i,k in EIC 3 140c), and if so, transfers control of the estimation algorithm to an Extra Pixel Scan Block (Phase II) 208. In Phase II, if the Extra Pixel Scan Block 208 determines that additional pixels need to be measured, the Measurement and Update Block 204 measures the additional pixels and updates the state machine logic corresponding to any of the measured pixels whose state changed relative to a prior measurement. The Extra Pixel Scan Block 208 can interrogate a Priority Lookup Table (LUT) 212 to determine a number of additional pixels to be scanned based on a priority value determined from the number of pixels in a cluster that are in an aging or relaxation state. Thus, the more pixels in a given cluster that are aged/relaxed, the higher priority value can be assigned to that cluster, and therefore more pixels are flagged for further measurement.
The Measurement and Update Block 204 can optionally update neighboring pixels in a like manner that the measured pixel was updated using the optional Neighbor Update Block 206. Thus, if the state of the measured pixel is in the same state as a majority of its neighbors, the absolute aging/relaxation value for those neighboring pixels can be adjusted and updated in an Absolute Aging Table 210, which stores the absolute aging/relaxation values for each of the pixels, as a function of their state as determined in
Now that the primary blocks have been described with reference to
Step 0: Select the first/next clustering scheme. As defined above, a clustering scheme defines how a display panel 100 is divided into clusters. In this example, a rectangular clustering scheme is assumed.
Step 1: Select the first/next color. As explained above, each pixel 104 can be composed of multiple sub-pixels 150, each emitting a different color, such as red, green, or blue.
Step 2: Select the first/next cluster (e.g., start with cluster 160a). The scanning can be performed in any desirable order. For example, each of the clusters can be scanned according to a scan order in a top-right to bottom-left order.
Step 3 (Start of Phase I): In the current cluster (e.g., cluster 160a), select the next pixel to be measured. Run the Measurement and Update Block 204 for the pixel 104a to determine whether its state is aging, relaxed, or neither by comparing in a comparator the measured current for that pixel 104a against a reference current, and using an output of the comparator to determine the state of the pixel according to
Step 4: Go to Step 3 until the comparison result (0 or 1) flips at least once for all EICs 140a,b,c. However, if the loop (Step 3 to Step 4) is repeated sixteen times, break to Step 5. Therefore, if a cluster in one of the EIC regions 170a is already aged/relaxed, the comparator output must remain the same (either > or <) for all sixteen measurements (a full cluster scan), otherwise a flip of the comparator stops the continuation of Phase I.
Step 5 (Start of Phase II): Find the maximum priority, PMAX, of the current cluster being scanned. The maximum priority is equal to the maximum priorities of corresponding clusters in all of the EICs, optionally including neighboring pixels. The priority value of a cluster in an EIC is the absolute difference of the number of pixels in state 2 (see
Step 6: Based on the maximum priority, PMAX, determined in the Step 5, the number of extra pixels needed to be scanned in this cluster (NEx) is set according to the LUT 212, an example of which is shown in Table 1 above.
Step 7: Scan NEx more target pixels in the cluster (typically in all EICs 140a,b,c) starting from the last measured pixel coordinate in Phase I. While scanning, the following tasks based on the priority value of the clusters in each EIC are performed:
Step 7.1 (Neighbor-Update): For each pixel 104 measured in the current frame, if its priority value, P>Thr (e.g., Thr=24 or Thr=30), for its cluster and the state of the pixel 104 remained unchanged after the measurement while it is the same as the state of the majority of the pixels in the cluster, increment/decrement by 1 the absolute aging of the eight pixels neighboring of the measured pixel (in the Absolute Aging Table 210), which have the same color and the same state machine value as the measured pixel. Add 1 if the state of the measured pixel is 1, and subtract 1 if the state of the measured pixel is 2. In this case, optionally divide by 2 the coefficients of the exponential moving average filter of the 8 pixels neighboring the measured pixel, which have the same color and the same state machine value as the measured pixel. This ensures that the averaging (noise filtering) is done with a shorter latency for high-priority clusters. There is a limit beyond which the coefficient of the averaging filter is not divided anymore.
Step 8: Return to Step 1.
Having described the high-level operation of the estimation algorithm, additional considerations will now be described in the following numbered paragraphs.
1. In an exemplary implementation of the aspects of the present disclosure, the absolute value of the estimated aging is added/subtracted by a constant value (e.g. 1 or 2). Alternately, the change in absolute value can be accelerated such that the pixels that are in a high-priority cluster experience a larger change in the absolute aging value relative to pixels that are not in a high-priority cluster.
2. The list of pixels to be scanned can be stored in a Measurement Queue (MQ). To minimize the measurement time of the pixels, the controller 112 can be configured to allow multiple row measurements per frame. Therefore, in Steps 3 and 7 above, extra rows can be measured along with the target pixel. These extra rows are selected such that each row is located in a different cluster, and their corresponding clusters have the top accumulative priorities along EICs. Their local coordinates (row and column) are the same as the target pixel. As used herein, a “target” or a “selected” pixel refers to the particular pixel under measurement or under consideration, as opposed to a neighboring pixel, or a next pixel, which refers to an adjacent pixel to the target or selected pixel under consideration.
3. Whenever the absolute aging value (stored in the Absolute Aging Table 210) is changed by adding/subtracting 1 to its value due to neighbor effects, other related lookup tables such as tables storing the average aging values and delta aging values can also be updated.
4. By way of example, upon initialization of the estimation algorithm, all the cluster priorities can be set to zero, all the state machines of the pixels can be reset to zero, and the last measured pixel position in the cluster can be set randomly or initialized to the top-right pixels in the cluster.
5. The order of the pixel measurements in a cluster can be set as desired. As an example, Table 2 below shows a top-right to bottom-left order for a 64-pixel cluster. The coordinates of last pixel measured in the cluster is stored; therefore, the next visit by the estimation algorithm to that cluster can start measurement from the pixel following to last measured pixel. The next measured pixel after the pixel 64 is pixel 1.
6. The priority value of a cluster is equal to the absolute difference between the number of pixels in State 1 and those in State 2 (see
Example Pseudo Code is provided below:
The flowcharts in
The estimation algorithm 300 determines whether it is in Phase I or Phase II (314). If the phase is Phase I, the flip register, flip_reg, is updated to reflect whether a state of the measured pixel s changed relative to a prior measurement (316). The estimation algorithm 300 determines whether a state of a pixel, at the same coordinate position as the pixel s in the current EIC being scanned, in each of the other EICs has flipped (e.g., the state of the pixel has changed from aged to relaxed). If not, the estimation algorithm 300 determines whether the last pixel in the cluster has been measured (320). If not, the estimation algorithm 300 continues to measure that pixel's current draw and update the Absolute Aging Table 210 until either the state of the pixels in the same coordinate position in all of the EICs has flipped (318) or all of the pixels in the current cluster have been scanned (320).
If all of the pixels in the cluster have been scanned, the estimation algorithm 300 determines whether additional clusters need to be scanned (322). If additional clusters remain to be scanned, the cluster variable, c, is associated with the next cluster (e.g., the cluster immediately adjacent to the cluster that was just scanned) (306) and that next cluster's pixels are scanned to determine their respective states and whether those states have changed relative to a prior measurement.
If all of the clusters have been scanned, the estimation algorithm 300 determines whether the last color have been scanned (e.g., if red was selected first, blue and green remain to be scanned) (324). If more colors remain to be scanned, the next color is selected (304), and the clusters for that next color are scanned (308), (310), (312), (314), (316), (318), (320), (322). If all colors have been scanned (e.g., red, blue, and green), the estimation algorithm 300 determines whether the last clustering scheme has been selected (326). If not, the algorithm 300 selects the next clustering scheme 302, and repeats the scanning for all colors and clusters according to the next clustering scheme. If so, the algorithm 300 repeats from the beginning.
Returning to block 318, if the pixel at the same coordinate location in all of the EICs has changed its state (e.g., flipped from aged to relaxed), the algorithm 300 enters Phase II (336), and calls a module or function called Find-NEx (334), which corresponds to the Extra Pixel Scan Block 208 shown in
The first time through the Phase II loop, an extra count variable, CntEx, is initialized to zero (332) and incremented each pass through the loop (330). The Find-NEx algorithm 334 returns a value, NEx, corresponding to the number of additional pixels that need to be scanned, for example, based on Table 1 above. A temporary counter, CntP2, keeps track of the number of times through the Phase II loop. The algorithm 300 iterates through the Phase II loop (320, 310, 312, 314, 330, 328) until all of the additional pixels corresponding to the number of extra pixels (NEx) have been scanned by the Measurement and Update Block 204 (312), each time incrementing the CntEx and CntP2 variables with each pass through the Phase II loop.
The Measurement and Update Block 204 (312) is shown as a flowchart diagram in
The measurement block (406) measures the current drawn by the target pixel s and compares it against a reference current in a comparator. For each pixel q in the Measurement Queue, the Measurement and Update algorithm 312 determines the comparator's output (408). If the output has not flipped, the algorithm 312 determines the state of the pixel (410), according to
If the output of the comparator has flipped (408) and indicates a 1, the state of the pixel q is updated as follows (412). If the previous state of the pixel q was 2 (overcompensated), the absolute aging value for that pixel q is incremented by 1 in the Absolute Aging Table 210 and optionally updates the step size for that pixel (420). If the previous state of the pixel q was 0, the state of the pixel q is changed to state 2 (422). If the previous state of the pixel q was 1, the state of the pixel q is changed to state 0 (424).
The algorithm 312 continues to
Optionally, for each pixel q in the Measurement Queue, the average aging value associated with the pixel q can be updated (444). Optionally, for each pixel q in the Measurement Queue, the neighboring pixels can also be updated in the Neighbor-Update algorithm 446 shown in
Returning to block 506, if the calculated priority value for the target cluster c in the target EIC does not exceed the maximum priority PM, the algorithm 334 determines whether additional EICs need to be scanned (518). Returning to block 508, if the maximum priority PM is not equal to the calculated priority value for the target cluster in the target EIC (508), the algorithm 334 determines whether additional EICs need to be scanned (518). If all EICs have been scanned to assess their clusters' priorities, the algorithm 334 determines whether the last neighboring cluster in the target EIC has been scanned (520). If not, the next neighboring cluster (e.g., the immediately adjacent cluster to the target cluster c) is scanned to determine its associated priority value (510, 512, 514). Returning to blocks 512 and 514, if the priority value of the neighboring cluster cn does not exceed the maximum priority PM (512) or if the maximum priority PM does not equal the calculated priority value for the neighboring cluster cn (514), the algorithm 334 determines whether more neighboring clusters need to be scanned (520). Once all clusters have been scanned (520) in the target EIC, the NEx value is retrieved from the Priority Lookup Table 212 and returned to the algorithm 300.
Returning to block 608, if the state of the neighboring pixel, nbr, is identical to the state of the target pixel s, the algorithm 446 determines the state of the pixel s (610). If the state of the pixel s is state 1 (aged), the absolute aging value for the neighboring pixel, nbr, is decremented by one and the average filter coefficient for the neighboring pixel nbr is updated as explained above in Step 7.1 (616). If the state of the pixel s is state 2 (overcompensated), the absolute aging value for the neighboring pixel nbr is incremented by one and the average filter coefficient for nbr is updated (612). The algorithm 446 determines whether there are further neighboring pixels to be analyzed (618) and if not, returns control to the algorithm 300. The absolute aging values and the average filter coefficients can be adjusted based on an Edge Detection block (614).
Any of the methods described herein can include machine or computer-readable instructions for execution by: (a) a processor, (b) a controller, such as the controller 112, and/or (c) any other suitable processing device. Any algorithm, such as those represented in
It should be noted that the algorithms illustrated and discussed herein as having various modules or blocks that perform particular functions and interact with one another. It should be understood that these modules are merely segregated based on their function for the sake of description and represent computer hardware and/or executable software code which is stored on a computer-readable medium for execution on appropriate computing hardware. The various functions of the different modules and units can be combined or segregated as hardware and/or software stored on a non-transitory computer-readable medium as above as modules in any manner, and can be used separately or in combination.
While particular implementations and aspects of the present disclosure have been illustrated and described, it is to be understood that the present disclosure is not limited to the precise construction and compositions disclosed herein and that various modifications, changes, and variations can be apparent from the foregoing descriptions without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/466,468, filed Mar. 22, 2017, now allowed, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/262,266, filed Sep. 12, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,640,112, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/291,486, filed Nov. 8, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,466,240, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/490,309, filed May 26, 2011, entitled “Adaptive Feedback System For Compensating For Aging Pixel Areas With Enhanced Estimation Speed,” the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3506851 | Polkinghorn | Apr 1970 | A |
| 3774055 | Bapat | Nov 1973 | A |
| 4090096 | Nagami | May 1978 | A |
| 4160934 | Kirsch | Jul 1979 | A |
| 4295091 | Ponkala | Oct 1981 | A |
| 4354162 | Wright | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4943956 | Noro | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4996523 | Bell | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5153420 | Hack | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5198803 | Shie | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5204661 | Hack | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5266515 | Robb | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5489918 | Mosier | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5498880 | Lee | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5557342 | Eto | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5561381 | Jenkins | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5572444 | Lentz | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5589847 | Lewis | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5619033 | Weisfield | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5648276 | Hara | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5670973 | Bassetti | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5684365 | Tang | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5691783 | Numao | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5714968 | Ikeda | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5723950 | Wei | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5744824 | Kousai | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5745660 | Kolpatzik | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5748160 | Shieh | May 1998 | A |
| 5815303 | Berlin | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5870071 | Kawahata | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5874803 | Garbuzov | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5880582 | Sawada | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5903248 | Irwin | May 1999 | A |
| 5917280 | Burrows | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5923794 | McGrath | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5945972 | Okumura | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5949398 | Kim | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5952789 | Stewart | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5952991 | Akiyama | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5982104 | Sasaki | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5990629 | Yamada | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6023259 | Howard | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6069365 | Chow | May 2000 | A |
| 6081073 | Salam | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6091203 | Kawashima | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6097360 | Holloman | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6144222 | Ho | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6177915 | Beeteson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6229506 | Dawson | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6229508 | Kane | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6246180 | Nishigaki | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6252248 | Sano | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6259424 | Kurogane | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6262589 | Tamukai | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6271825 | Greene | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6288696 | Holloman | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6304039 | Appelberg | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6307322 | Dawson | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6310962 | Chung | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6320325 | Cok | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6323631 | Juang | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6329971 | McKnight | Dec 2001 | B2 |
| 6356029 | Hunter | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6373454 | Knapp | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6377237 | Sojourner | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6392617 | Gleason | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6404139 | Sasaki | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6414661 | Shen | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6417825 | Stewart | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6433488 | Bu | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6437106 | Stoner | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6445369 | Yang | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6475845 | Kimura | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6501098 | Yamazaki | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6501466 | Yamagishi | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6518962 | Kimura | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6522315 | Ozawa | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6525683 | Gu | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6531827 | Kawashima | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6541921 | Luciano, Jr. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6542138 | Shannon | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6555420 | Yamazaki | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6577302 | Hunter | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6580408 | Bae | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6580657 | Sanford | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6583398 | Harkin | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6583775 | Sekiya | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6594606 | Everitt | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6618030 | Kane | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6639244 | Yamazaki | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6668645 | Gilmour | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6677713 | Sung | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6680580 | Sung | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6687266 | Ma | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6690000 | Muramatsu | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6690344 | Takeuchi | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6693388 | Oomura | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6693610 | Shannon | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6697057 | Koyama | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6720942 | Lee | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6724151 | Yoo | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6734636 | Sanford | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6738034 | Kaneko | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6738035 | Fan | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6753655 | Shih | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6753834 | Mikami | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6756741 | Li | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6756952 | Decaux | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6756958 | Furuhashi | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6765549 | Yamazaki | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6771028 | Winters | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6777712 | Sanford | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6777888 | Kondo | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6781306 | Park | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6781567 | Kimura | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6806497 | Jo | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6806638 | Lih | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6806857 | Sempel | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6809706 | Shimoda | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6815975 | Nara | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6828950 | Koyama | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6853371 | Miyajima | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6859193 | Yumoto | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6873117 | Ishizuka | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6876346 | Anzai | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6885356 | Hashimoto | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6900485 | Lee | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6903734 | Eu | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6909243 | Inukai | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6909419 | Zavracky | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6911960 | Yokoyama | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 6911964 | Lee | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6914448 | Jinno | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6919871 | Kwon | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6924602 | Komiya | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6937215 | Lo | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6937220 | Kitaura | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6940214 | Komiya | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6943500 | LeChevalier | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6947022 | McCartney | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6954194 | Matsumoto | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6956547 | Bae | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6975142 | Azami | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6975332 | Arnold | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6995510 | Murakami | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 6995519 | Arnold | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7023408 | Chen | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7027015 | Booth, Jr. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7027078 | Reihl | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7034793 | Sekiya | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7038392 | Libsch | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7053875 | Chou | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7057359 | Hung | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7061451 | Kimura | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7064733 | Cok | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7071932 | Libsch | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7088051 | Cok | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7088052 | Kimura | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7102378 | Kuo | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7106285 | Naugler | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7112820 | Chang | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7116058 | Lo | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7119493 | Fryer | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7122835 | Ikeda | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7127380 | Iverson | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7129914 | Knapp | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7161566 | Cok | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7164417 | Cok | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7193589 | Yoshida | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7224332 | Cok | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7227519 | Kawase | Jun 2007 | B1 |
| 7245277 | Ishizuka | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7246912 | Burger | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7248236 | Nathan | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7262753 | Tanghe | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7274363 | Ishizuka | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7310092 | Imamura | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7315295 | Kimura | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7321348 | Cok | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7339560 | Sun | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7355574 | Leon | Apr 2008 | B1 |
| 7358941 | Ono | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7368868 | Sakamoto | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7397485 | Miller | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7411571 | Huh | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7414600 | Nathan | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7423617 | Giraldo | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7453054 | Lee | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7474285 | Kimura | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7502000 | Yuki | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7528812 | Tsuge | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7535449 | Miyazawa | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7554512 | Steer | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7569849 | Nathan | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7576718 | Miyazawa | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7580012 | Kim | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7589707 | Chou | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7605792 | Son | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7609239 | Chang | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7619594 | Hu | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7619597 | Nathan | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7633470 | Kane | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7656370 | Schneider | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7675485 | Steer | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7800558 | Routley | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7847764 | Cok | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7859492 | Kohno | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7868859 | Tomida | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7876294 | Sasaki | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7924249 | Nathan | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7932883 | Klompenhouwer | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7969390 | Yoshida | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7978187 | Nathan | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7994712 | Sung | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8026876 | Nathan | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8031180 | Miyamoto | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8049420 | Tamura | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8077123 | Naugler, Jr. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8115707 | Nathan | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8208084 | Lin | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8223177 | Nathan | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8232939 | Nathan | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8259044 | Nathan | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8264431 | Bulovic | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8279143 | Nathan | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8294696 | Min | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8314783 | Sambandan | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8339386 | Leon | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8441206 | Myers | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8493296 | Ogawa | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8581809 | Nathan | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8654114 | Shimizu | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 9125278 | Nathan | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9368063 | Chaji | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9418587 | Chaji | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9430958 | Chaji | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9472139 | Nathan | Oct 2016 | B2 |
| 9489891 | Nathan | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9489897 | Jaffari | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9502653 | Chaji | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9530349 | Chaji | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 9530352 | Nathan | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 9536460 | Chaji | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9536465 | Chaji | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9589490 | Chaji | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| 9633597 | Nathan | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9640112 | Jaffari | May 2017 | B2 |
| 9721512 | Soni | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 9741279 | Chaji | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 9741282 | Giannikouris | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 9761170 | Chaji | Sep 2017 | B2 |
| 9773439 | Chaji | Sep 2017 | B2 |
| 9773441 | Chaji | Sep 2017 | B2 |
| 9786209 | Chaji | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 20010002703 | Koyama | Jun 2001 | A1 |
| 20010009283 | Arao | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20010024181 | Kubota | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010024186 | Kane | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010026257 | Kimura | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010030323 | Ikeda | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010035863 | Kimura | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010038367 | Inukai | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010040541 | Yoneda | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010043173 | Troutman | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010045929 | Prache | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010052606 | Sempel | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20010052940 | Hagihara | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020000576 | Inukai | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020011796 | Koyama | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020011799 | Kimura | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020012057 | Kimura | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020014851 | Tai | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020018034 | Ohki | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020030190 | Ohtani | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020047565 | Nara | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020052086 | Maeda | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020067134 | Kawashima | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020084463 | Sanford | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020101152 | Kimura | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020101172 | Bu | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020105279 | Kimura | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020117722 | Osada | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020122308 | Ikeda | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020158587 | Komiya | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020158666 | Azami | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020158823 | Zavracky | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020167471 | Everitt | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020167474 | Everitt | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020169575 | Everitt | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020180369 | Koyama | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020180721 | Kimura | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020181276 | Yamazaki | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020183945 | Everitt | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020186214 | Siwinski | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020190924 | Asano | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020190971 | Nakamura | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020195967 | Kim | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020195968 | Sanford | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030020413 | Oomura | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030030603 | Shimoda | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030043088 | Booth | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030057895 | Kimura | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030058226 | Bertram | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030062524 | Kimura | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030063081 | Kimura | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030071821 | Sundahl | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030076048 | Rutherford | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030090447 | Kimura | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030090481 | Kimura | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030107560 | Yumoto | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030111966 | Mikami | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030122745 | Miyazawa | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030122749 | Booth, Jr. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030122813 | Ishizuki | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030142088 | LeChevalier | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030146897 | Hunter | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030151569 | Lee | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030156101 | Le Chevalier | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030169241 | LeChevalier | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030174152 | Noguchi | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030179626 | Sanford | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030185438 | Osawa | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030197663 | Lee | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030210256 | Mori | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030230141 | Gilmour | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030230980 | Forrest | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030231148 | Lin | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040032382 | Cok | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040041750 | Abe | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040066357 | Kawasaki | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040070557 | Asano | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040070565 | Nayar | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040090186 | Kanauchi | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040090400 | Yoo | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040095297 | Libsch | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040100427 | Miyazawa | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040108518 | Jo | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040135749 | Kondakov | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040140982 | Pate | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040145547 | Oh | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040150592 | Mizukoshi | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040150594 | Koyama | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040150595 | Kasai | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040155841 | Kasai | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040174347 | Sun | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040174349 | Libsch | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040174354 | Ono | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040178743 | Miller | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040178974 | Miller | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040183759 | Stevenson | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040196275 | Hattori | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040207615 | Yumoto | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040227697 | Mori | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040233125 | Tanghe | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040239596 | Ono | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040246246 | Tobita | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040252089 | Ono | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040257313 | Kawashima | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040257353 | Imamura | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040257355 | Naugler | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040263437 | Hattori | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040263444 | Kimura | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040263445 | Inukai | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040263541 | Takeuchi | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050007355 | Miura | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050007357 | Yamashita | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050007392 | Kasai | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050017650 | Fryer | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050024081 | Kuo | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050024393 | Kondo | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050030267 | Tanghe | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050057484 | Diefenbaugh | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050057580 | Yamano | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050067970 | Libsch | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050067971 | Kane | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050068270 | Awakura | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050068275 | Kane | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050073264 | Matsumoto | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050083323 | Suzuki | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050088103 | Kageyama | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050105031 | Shih | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050110420 | Arnold | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050110807 | Chang | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050122294 | Ben-David | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050140598 | Kim | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050140610 | Smith | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050145891 | Abe | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050156831 | Yamazaki | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050162079 | Sakamoto | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050168416 | Hashimoto | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050179626 | Yuki | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050179628 | Kimura | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050185200 | Tobol | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050200575 | Kim | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050206590 | Sasaki | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050212787 | Noguchi | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050219184 | Zehner | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050225683 | Nozawa | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050248515 | Naugler | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050269959 | Uchino | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050269960 | Ono | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050280615 | Cok | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050280766 | Johnson | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050285822 | Reddy | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050285825 | Eom | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060001613 | Routley | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060007072 | Choi | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060007206 | Reddy | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060007249 | Reddy | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060012310 | Chen | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060012311 | Ogawa | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060015272 | Giraldo | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060022305 | Yamashita | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060022907 | Uchino | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060027807 | Nathan | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060030084 | Young | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060038501 | Koyama | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060038758 | Routley | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060038762 | Chou | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060044227 | Hadcock | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060061248 | Cok | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060066533 | Sato | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060077134 | Hector | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060077135 | Cok | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060077142 | Kwon | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060082523 | Guo | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060092185 | Jo | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060097628 | Suh | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060097631 | Lee | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060103324 | Kim | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060103611 | Choi | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060125740 | Shirasaki | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060149493 | Sambandan | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060170623 | Naugler, Jr. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060176250 | Nathan | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060208961 | Nathan | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060208971 | Deane | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060214888 | Schneider | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060231740 | Kasai | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060232522 | Roy | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060244697 | Lee | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060256048 | Fish | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060261841 | Fish | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060273997 | Nathan | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060279481 | Haruna | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060284801 | Yoon | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060284802 | Kohno | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060284895 | Marcu | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060290614 | Nathan | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060290618 | Goto | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070001937 | Park | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070001939 | Hashimoto | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070008251 | Kohno | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070008268 | Park | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070008297 | Bassetti | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070057873 | Uchino | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070057874 | Le Roy | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070069998 | Naugler | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070075727 | Nakano | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070076226 | Klompenhouwer | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070080905 | Takahara | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070080906 | Tanabe | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070080908 | Nathan | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070097038 | Yamazaki | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070097041 | Park | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070103411 | Cok | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070103419 | Uchino | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070115221 | Buchhauser | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070126672 | Tada | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070164664 | Ludwicki | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070164937 | Jung | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070164938 | Shin | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070182671 | Nathan | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070195020 | Nathan | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070236134 | Ho | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070236440 | Wacyk | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070236517 | Kimpe | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070241999 | Lin | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070273294 | Nagayama | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070285359 | Ono | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070290957 | Cok | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070290958 | Cok | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070296672 | Kim | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080001525 | Chao | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080001544 | Murakami | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080030518 | Higgins | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080036706 | Kitazawa | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080036708 | Shirasaki | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080042942 | Takahashi | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080042948 | Yamashita | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080048951 | Naugler, Jr. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080055209 | Cok | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080055211 | Ogawa | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080074413 | Ogura | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080088549 | Nathan | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080088648 | Nathan | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080111766 | Uchino | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080116787 | Hsu | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080117144 | Nakano et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080136770 | Peker | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080150845 | Ishii | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080150847 | Kim | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080158115 | Cordes | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080158648 | Cummings | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080191976 | Nathan | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080198103 | Toyomura | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080211749 | Weitbruch | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080218451 | Miyamoto | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080231558 | Naugler | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080231562 | Kwon | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080231625 | Minami | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080246713 | Lee | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080252223 | Toyoda | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080252571 | Hente | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080259020 | Fisekovic | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080284768 | Yoshida et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080290805 | Yamada | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080297055 | Miyake | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090033598 | Suh | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090058772 | Lee | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090109142 | Takahara | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090121994 | Miyata | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090146926 | Sung | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090160743 | Tomida | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090174628 | Wang | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090184901 | Kwon | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090195483 | Naugler, Jr. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090201281 | Routley | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090206764 | Schemmann | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090207160 | Shirasaki | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090213046 | Nam | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090244046 | Seto | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090262047 | Yamashita | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20100004891 | Ahlers | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100026725 | Smith | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100039422 | Seto | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100039458 | Nathan | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100045646 | Kishi | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100045650 | Fish | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100060911 | Marcu | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100073335 | Min | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100073357 | Min | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100079419 | Shibusawa | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100085282 | Yu | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100103160 | Jeon | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100134469 | Ogura | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100134475 | Ogura | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100165002 | Ahn | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100194670 | Cok | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100207960 | Kimpe | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100225630 | Levey | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100251295 | Amento | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100277400 | Jeong | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100315319 | Cok | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110032232 | Smith | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110050870 | Hanari | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110063197 | Chung | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110069051 | Nakamura | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110069089 | Kopf | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110069094 | Knapp | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110069096 | Li | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110074750 | Leon | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110074762 | Shirasaki | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110109610 | Yamamoto | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110149166 | Botzas | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110169798 | Lee | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110175895 | Hayakawa | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110181630 | Smith | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110199395 | Nathan | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110227964 | Chaji | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110242074 | Bert | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110273399 | Lee | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110279488 | Nathan | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110292006 | Kim | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110293480 | Mueller | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120056558 | Toshiya | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120062565 | Fuchs | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120262184 | Shen | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120299970 | Bae | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120299973 | Jaffari | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120299978 | Chaji | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130002527 | Kim | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130027381 | Nathan | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130057595 | Nathan | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130112960 | Chaji | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130135272 | Park | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130162617 | Yoon | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130201223 | Li | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130241813 | Tanaka | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130309821 | Yoo | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130321671 | Cote | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140015824 | Chaji | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140022289 | Lee | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140043316 | Chaji | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140055500 | Lai | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140111567 | Nathan | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20160275860 | Wu | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1 294 034 | Jan 1992 | CA |
| 2 109 951 | Nov 1992 | CA |
| 2 249 592 | Jul 1998 | CA |
| 2 368 386 | Sep 1999 | CA |
| 2 242 720 | Jan 2000 | CA |
| 2 354 018 | Jun 2000 | CA |
| 2 432 530 | Jul 2002 | CA |
| 2 436 451 | Aug 2002 | CA |
| 2 438 577 | Aug 2002 | CA |
| 2 463 653 | Jan 2004 | CA |
| 2 498 136 | Mar 2004 | CA |
| 2 522 396 | Nov 2004 | CA |
| 2 443 206 | Mar 2005 | CA |
| 2 472 671 | Dec 2005 | CA |
| 2 567 076 | Jan 2006 | CA |
| 2526436 | Feb 2006 | CA |
| 2 526 782 | Apr 2006 | CA |
| 2 541 531 | Jul 2006 | CA |
| 2 550 102 | Apr 2008 | CA |
| 2 773 699 | Oct 2013 | CA |
| 1381032 | Nov 2002 | CN |
| 1448908 | Oct 2003 | CN |
| 1538377 | Oct 2004 | CN |
| 1623180 | Jun 2005 | CN |
| 1682267 | Oct 2005 | CN |
| 1758309 | Apr 2006 | CN |
| 1760945 | Apr 2006 | CN |
| 1886774 | Dec 2006 | CN |
| 1897093 | Jul 2007 | CN |
| 100375141 | Mar 2008 | CN |
| 101194300 | Jun 2008 | CN |
| 101300618 | Nov 2008 | CN |
| 101449311 | Jun 2009 | CN |
| 101615376 | Dec 2009 | CN |
| 101923828 | Dec 2010 | CN |
| 102414737 | Apr 2012 | CN |
| 102656621 | Sep 2012 | CN |
| 102725786 | Oct 2012 | CN |
| 102741910 | Oct 2012 | CN |
| 103280162 | Sep 2013 | CN |
| 0 158 366 | Oct 1985 | EP |
| 1 028 471 | Aug 2000 | EP |
| 1 111 577 | Jun 2001 | EP |
| 1 130 565 | Sep 2001 | EP |
| 1 194 013 | Apr 2002 | EP |
| 1 335 430 | Aug 2003 | EP |
| 1 372 136 | Dec 2003 | EP |
| 1 381 019 | Jan 2004 | EP |
| 1 418 566 | May 2004 | EP |
| 1 429 312 | Jun 2004 | EP |
| 145 0341 | Aug 2004 | EP |
| 1 465 143 | Oct 2004 | EP |
| 1 469 448 | Oct 2004 | EP |
| 1 521 203 | Apr 2005 | EP |
| 1 594 347 | Nov 2005 | EP |
| 1 784 055 | May 2007 | EP |
| 1854338 | Nov 2007 | EP |
| 1 879 169 | Jan 2008 | EP |
| 1 879 172 | Jan 2008 | EP |
| 2395499 | Dec 2011 | EP |
| 2 389 951 | Dec 2003 | GB |
| 1272298 | Oct 1989 | JP |
| 4-042619 | Feb 1992 | JP |
| 6-314977 | Nov 1994 | JP |
| 8-340243 | Dec 1996 | JP |
| 09-090405 | Apr 1997 | JP |
| 10-254410 | Sep 1998 | JP |
| 11-202295 | Jul 1999 | JP |
| 11-219146 | Aug 1999 | JP |
| 11 231805 | Aug 1999 | JP |
| 11-282419 | Oct 1999 | JP |
| 2000-056847 | Feb 2000 | JP |
| 2000-81607 | Mar 2000 | JP |
| 2001-134217 | May 2001 | JP |
| 2001-195014 | Jul 2001 | JP |
| 2002-055654 | Feb 2002 | JP |
| 2002-91376 | Mar 2002 | JP |
| 2002-514320 | May 2002 | JP |
| 2002-229513 | Aug 2002 | JP |
| 2002-278513 | Sep 2002 | JP |
| 2002-333862 | Nov 2002 | JP |
| 2003-076331 | Mar 2003 | JP |
| 2003-124519 | Apr 2003 | JP |
| 2003-177709 | Jun 2003 | JP |
| 2003-271095 | Sep 2003 | JP |
| 2003-308046 | Oct 2003 | JP |
| 2003-317944 | Nov 2003 | JP |
| 2004-004675 | Jan 2004 | JP |
| 2004-045648 | Feb 2004 | JP |
| 2004-145197 | May 2004 | JP |
| 2004-287345 | Oct 2004 | JP |
| 2005-057217 | Mar 2005 | JP |
| 2006-284970 | Oct 2006 | JP |
| 2007-065015 | Mar 2007 | JP |
| 2007-155754 | Jun 2007 | JP |
| 2007-206590 | Aug 2007 | JP |
| 2008-102335 | May 2008 | JP |
| 4-158570 | Oct 2008 | JP |
| 2003-195813 | Jul 2013 | JP |
| 2004-0100887 | Dec 2004 | KR |
| 342486 | Oct 1998 | TW |
| 473622 | Jan 2002 | TW |
| 485337 | May 2002 | TW |
| 502233 | Sep 2002 | TW |
| 538650 | Jun 2003 | TW |
| 1221268 | Sep 2004 | TW |
| 1223092 | Nov 2004 | TW |
| 200727247 | Jul 2007 | TW |
| WO 199848403 | Oct 1998 | WO |
| WO 199948079 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| WO 200106484 | Jan 2001 | WO |
| WO 200127910 | Apr 2001 | WO |
| WO 200163587 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| WO 2002067327 | Aug 2002 | WO |
| WO 2003001496 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| WO 2003034389 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| WO 2003058594 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| WO 2003063124 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| WO 2003077231 | Sep 2003 | WO |
| WO 2004003877 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004025615 | Mar 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004034364 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004047058 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004066249 | Aug 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004104975 | Dec 2004 | WO |
| WO 2005022498 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005022500 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005029455 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005029456 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| WO2005034072 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005055185 | Jun 2005 | WO |
| WO 2006000101 | Jan 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006053424 | May 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006063448 | Jun 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006084360 | Aug 2006 | WO |
| WO 2007003877 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007079572 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007090287 | Aug 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007120849 | Oct 2007 | WO |
| WO 2009048618 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009055920 | May 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009127065 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| WO 2010023270 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010146707 | Dec 2010 | WO |
| WO 2011041224 | Apr 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011064761 | Jun 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011067729 | Jun 2011 | WO |
| WO 2012160424 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| WO 2012160471 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| WO 2012164474 | Dec 2012 | WO |
| WO 2012164475 | Dec 2012 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Ahnood : “Effect of threshold voltage instability on field effect mobility in thin film transistors deduced from constant current measurements”; dated Aug. 2009. |
| Alexander : “Pixel circuits and drive schemes for glass and elastic AMOLED displays”; dated Jul. 2005 (9 pages). |
| Alexander : “Unique Electrical Measurement Technology for Compensation Inspection and Process Diagnostics of AMOLED HDTV”; dated May 2010 (4 pages). |
| Ashtiani : “AMOLED Pixel Circuit With Electronic Compensation of Luminance Degradation”; dated Mar. 2007 (4 pages). |
| Chaji : “A Current-Mode Comparator for Digital Calibration of Amorphous Silicon AMOLED Displays”; dated Jul. 2008 (5 pages). |
| Chaji : “A fast settling current driver based on the CCII for AMOLED displays”; dated Dec. 2009 (6 pages). |
| Chaji : “A Low-Cost Stable Amorphous Silicon AMOLED Display with Full V˜T-and V˜O˜L˜E˜D Shift Compensation”; dated May 2007 (4 pages). |
| Chaji : “A low-power driving scheme for a-Si:H active-matrix organic light-emitting diode displays”; dated Jun. 2005 (4 pages). |
| Chaji : “A low-power high-performance digital circuit for deep submicron technologies”; dated Jun. 2005 (4 pages). |
| Chaji : “A novel a-Si:H AMOLED pixel circuit based on short-term stress stability of a-Si:H TFTs”; dated Oct. 2005 (3 pages). |
| Chaji : “A Novel Driving Scheme and Pixel Circuit for AMOLED Displays”; dated Jun. 2006 (4 pages). |
| Chaji : “A Novel Driving Scheme for High Resolution Large-area a-Si:H AMOLED displays”; dated Aug. 2005 (3 pages). |
| Chaji : “A Stable Voltage-Programmed Pixel Circuit for a-Si:H AMOLED Displays”; dated Dec. 2006 (12 pages). |
| Chaji : “A Sub-μA fast-settling current-programmed pixel circuit for AMOLED displays”; dated Sep. 2007. |
| Chaji : “An Enhanced and Simplified Optical Feedback Pixel Circuit for AMOLED Displays”; dated Oct. 2006. |
| Chaji : “Compensation technique for DC and transient instability of thin film transistor circuits for large-area devices”; dated Aug. 2008. |
| Chaji : “Driving scheme for stable operation of 2-TFT a-Si AMOLED pixel”; dated Apr. 2005 (2 pages). |
| Chaji : “Dynamic-effect compensating technique for stable a-Si:H AMOLED displays”; dated Aug. 2005 (4 pages). |
| Chaji : “Electrical Compensation of OLED Luminance Degradation”; dated Dec. 2007 (3 pages). |
| Chaji : “eUTDSP: a design study of a new VLIW-based DSP architecture”; dated My 2003 (4 pages). |
| Chaji : “Fast and Offset-Leakage Insensitive Current-Mode Line Driver for Active Matrix Displays and Sensors”; dated Feb. 2009 (8 pages). |
| Chaji : “High Speed Low Power Adder Design With a New Logic Style: Pseudo Dynamic Logic (SDL)”; dated Oct. 2001 (4 pages). |
| Chaji : “High-precision fast current source for large-area current-programmed a-Si flat panels”; dated Sep. 2006 (4 pages). |
| Chaji : “Low-Cost AMOLED Television with IGNIS Compensating Technology”; dated May 2008 (4 pages). |
| Chaji : “Low-Cost Stable a-Si:H AMOLED Display for Portable Applications”; dated Jun. 2006 (4 pages). |
| Chaji : “Low-Power Low-Cost Voltage-Programmed a-Si:H AMOLED Display”; dated Jun. 2008 (5 pages). |
| Chaji : “Merged phototransistor pixel with enhanced near infrared response and flicker noise reduction for biomolecular imaging”; dated Nov. 2008 (3 pages). |
| Chaji : “Parallel Addressing Scheme for Voltage-Programmed Active-Matrix OLED Displays”; dated May 2007 (6 pages). |
| Chaji : “Pseudo dynamic logic (SDL): a high-speed and low-power dynamic logic family”; dated 2002 (4 pages). |
| Chaji : “Stable a-Si:H circuits based on short-term stress stability of amorphous silicon thin film transistors”; dated May 2006 (4 pages). |
| Chaji : “Stable Pixel Circuit for Small-Area High-Resolution a-Si:H AMOLED Displays”; dated Oct. 2008 (6 pages). |
| Chaji : “Stable RGBW AMOLED display with OLED degradation compensation using electrical feedback”; dated Feb. 2010 (2 pages). |
| Chaji : “Thin-Film Transistor Integration for Biomedical Imaging and AMOLED Displays”; dated 2008 (177 pages). |
| European Search Report for Application No. EP 04 78 6661 dated Mar. 9, 2009. |
| European Search Report for Application No. EP 05 75 9141 dated Oct. 30, 2009 (2 pages). |
| European Search Report for Application No. EP 05 81 9617 dated Jan. 30, 2009. |
| European Search Report for Application No. EP 06 70 5133 dated Jul. 18, 2008. |
| European Search Report for Application No. EP 06 72 1798 dated Nov. 12, 2009 (2 pages). |
| European Search Report for Application No. EP 07 71 0608.6 dated Mar. 19, 2010 (7 pages). |
| European Search Report for Application No. EP 07 71 9579 dated May 20, 2009. |
| European Search Report for Application No. EP 07 81 5784 dated Jul. 20, 2010 (2 pages). |
| European Search Report for Application No. EP 10 16 6143 dated Sep. 3, 2010 (2 pages). |
| European Search Report for Application No. EP 10 83 4294.0/1903 dated Apr. 8, 2013 (9 pages). |
| European Supplementary Search Report for Application No. EP 04 78 6662 dated Jan. 19, 2007 (2 pages). |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. 11 73 9485.8 dated Aug. 6, 2013 (14 pages). |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 09 73 3076.5 dated Apr. 27, 2011 (13 pages). |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 11 16 8677.0 dated Nov. 29, 2012 (13 page). |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 11 19 1641.7 dated Jul. 11, 2012 (14 pages). |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 10834297 dated Oct. 27, 2014 (6 pages). |
| Fossum Eric R.. “Active Pixel Sensors: Are CCD's Dinosaurs?” SPIE: Symposium on Electronic Imaging. Feb. 1, 1993 (13 pages). |
| Goh “A New a-Si:H Thin-Film Transistor Pixel Circuit for Active-Matrix Organic Light-Emitting Diodes” IEEE Electron Device Letters vol. 24 No. 9 Sep. 2003 pp. 583-585. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/CA2005/001007 dated Oct. 16, 2006 4 pages. |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/CA2004/001741 dated Feb. 21, 2005. |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/CA2004/001742 Canadian Patent Office dated Feb. 21, 2005 (2 pages). |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/CA2005/001007 dated Oct. 18, 2005. |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/CA2005/001897 dated Mar. 21, 2006 (2 pages). |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/CA2007/000652 dated Jul. 25, 2007. |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/CA2009/000501 dated Jul. 30, 2009 (4 pages). |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/CA2009/001769 dated Apr. 8, 2010 (3 pages). |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/IB2010/055481 dated Apr. 7, 2011 3 pages. |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/IB2010/055486 dated Apr. 19, 2011 5 pages. |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/IB2014/060959 dated Aug. 28, 2014 5 pages. |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/IB2010/055541 filed Dec. 1, 2010 dated May 26, 2011; 5 pages. |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/IB2011/050502 dated Jun. 27, 2011 (6 pages). |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/IB2011/051103 dated Jul. 8, 2011 3 pages. |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/IB2011/055135 Canadian Patent Office dated Apr. 16, 2012 (5 pages). |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/IB2012/052372 dated Sep. 12, 2012 (3 pages). |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/IB2013/054251 Canadian Intellectual Property Office dated Sep. 11, 2013; (4 pages). |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/JP02/09668 dated Dec. 3, 2002 (4 pages). |
| International Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/CA2004/001742 Canadian Patent Office dated Feb. 21, 2005 (5 pages). |
| International Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/CA2005/001897 dated Mar. 21, 2006 (4 pages). |
| International Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/CA2009/000501 dated Jul. 30, 2009 (6 pages). |
| International Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2010/055481 dated Apr. 7, 2011 6 pages. |
| International Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2010/055486 dated Apr. 19, 2011 8 pages. |
| International Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2010/055541 dated May 26, 2011; 6 pages. |
| International Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2011/050502 dated Jun. 27, 2011 (7 pages). |
| International Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2011/051103 dated Jul. 8, 2011 6 pages. |
| International Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2011/055135 Canadian Patent Office dated Apr. 16, 2012 (5 pages). |
| International Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2012/052372 dated Sep. 12, 2012 (6 pages). |
| International Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2013/054251 Canadian Intellectual Property Office dated Sep. 11, 2013; (5 pages). |
| Jafarabadiashtiani : “A New Driving Method for a-Si AMOLED Displays Based on Voltage Feedback”; dated 2005 (4 pages). |
| Kanicki J. “Amorphous Silicon Thin-Film Transistors Based Active-Matrix Organic Light-Emitting Displays.” Asia Display: International Display Workshops Sep. 2001 (pp. 315-318). |
| Karim K. S. “Amorphous Silicon Active Pixel Sensor Readout Circuit for Digital Imaging.” IEEE: Transactions on Electron Devices. vol. 50 No. 1 Jan. 2003 (pp. 200-208). |
| Lee : “Ambipolar Thin-Film Transistors Fabricated by PECVD Nanocrystalline Silicon”; dated 2006. |
| Lee Wonbok: “Thermal Management in Microprocessor Chips and Dynamic Backlight Control in Liquid Crystal Displays” Ph.D. Dissertation University of Southern California (124 pages). |
| Liu P. Innovative Voltage Driving Pixel Circuit Using Organic Thin-Film Transistor for AMOLEDs Journal of Display Technology vol. 5 Issue 6 Jun. 2009 (pp. 224-227). |
| Ma E Y: “organic light emitting diode/thin film transistor integration for foldable displays” dated Sep. 15, 1997(4 pages). |
| Matsueda y : “35.1: 2.5-in. AMOLED with Integrated 6-bit Gamma Compensated Digital Data Driver”; dated May 2004. |
| Mendes E. “A High Resolution Switch-Current Memory Base Cell.” IEEE: Circuits and Systems. vol. 2 Aug. 1999 (pp. 718-721). |
| Nathan A. “Thin Film imaging technology on glass and plastic” ICM 2000 proceedings of the 12 international conference on microelectronics dated Oct. 31, 2001 (4 pages). |
| Nathan “Amorphous Silicon Thin Film Transistor Circuit Integration for Organic LED Displays on Glass and Plastic” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits vol. 39 No. 9 Sep. 2004 pp. 1477-1486. |
| Nathan : “Backplane Requirements for active Matrix Organic Light Emitting Diode Displays”; dated 2006 (16 pages). |
| Nathan : “Call for papers second international workshop on compact thin-film transistor (TFT) modeling for circuit simulation”; dated Sep. 2009 (1 page). |
| Nathan : “Driving schemes for a-Si and LTPS AMOLED displays”; dated Dec. 2005 (11 pages). |
| Nathan : “Invited Paper: a-Si for AMOLeD—Meeting the Performance and Cost Demands of Display Applications (Cell Phone to HDTV)”; dated 2006 (4 pages). |
| Office Action in Japanese patent application No. JP2012-541612 dated Jul. 15, 2014. (3 pages). |
| Partial European Search Report for Application No. EP 11 168 677.0 dated Sep. 22, 2011 (5 pages). |
| Partial European Search Report for Application No. EP 11 19 1641.7 dated Mar. 20, 2012 (8 pages). |
| Philipp: “Charge transfer sensing” Sensor Review vol. 19 No. 2 Dec. 31, 1999 (Dec. 31, 1999) 10 pages. |
| Rafati : “Comparison of a 17 b multiplier in Dual-rail domino and in Dual-rail D L (D L) logic styles”; dated 2002 (4 pages). |
| Safavian : “3-TFT active pixel sensor with correlated double sampling readout circuit for real-time medical x-ray imaging”; dated Jun. 2006 (4 pages). |
| Safavian : “A novel current scaling active pixel sensor with correlated double sampling readout circuit for real time medical x-ray imaging”; dated May 2007 (7 pages). |
| Safavian : “A novel hybrid active-passive pixel with correlated double sampling CMOS readout circuit for medical x-ray imaging”; dated May 2008 (4 pages). |
| Safavian : “Self-compensated a-Si:H detector with current-mode readout circuit for digital X-ray fluoroscopy”; dated Aug. 2005 (4 pages). |
| Safavian : “TFT active image sensor with current-mode readout circuit for digital x-ray fluoroscopy [5969D-82]”; dated Sep. 2005 (9 pages). |
| Safavian : “Three-TFT image sensor for real-time digital X-ray imaging”; dated Feb. 2, 2006 (2 pages). |
| Singh “Current Conveyor: Novel Universal Active Block” Samriddhi S-JPSET vol. I Issue 1 2010 pp. 41-48 (12EPPT). |
| Smith Lindsay I. “A tutorial on Principal Components Analysis” dated Feb. 26, 2001 (27 pages). |
| Spindler System Considerations for RGBW OLED Displays Journal of the SID 14/1 2006 pp. 37-48. |
| Snorre AUNET: “switched capacitors circuits” University of Oslo Mar. 7, 2011 (Mar. 7, 2011) XP002729694 Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://www.uio.no/studier/emner/matnat/ifi/INF4420/v11/undervisningsmateriale/INF4420_V11_0308_1.pdf [retrieved on Sep. 9, 2014]. |
| Stewart M. “polysilicon TFT technology for active matrix oled displays” IEEE transactions on electron devices vol. 48 No. 5 dated May 2001 (7 pages). |
| Vygranenko : “Stability of indium-oxide thin-film transistors by reactive ion beam assisted deposition”; dated 2009. |
| Wang : “Indium oxides by reactive ion beam assisted evaporation: From material study to device application”; dated Mar. 2009 (6 pages). |
| Yi He “Current-Source a-Si:H Thin Film Transistor Circuit for Active-Matrix Organic Light-Emitting Displays” IEEE Electron Device Letters vol. 21 No. 12 Dec. 2000 pp. 590-592. |
| Yu Jennifer: “Improve OLED Technology for Display” Ph.D. Dissertation Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sep. 2008 (151 pages). |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/IB2014/058244 Canadian Intellectual Property Office dated Apr. 11, 2014; (6 pages). |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/IB2014/059753 Canadian Intellectual Property Office dated Jun. 23, 2014; (6 pages). |
| Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2014/059753 Canadian Intellectual Property Office dated Jun. 12, 2014 (6 pages). |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/IB2014/060879 Canadian Intellectual Property Office dated Jul. 17, 2014 (3 pages). |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 14158051.4 dated Jul. 29, 2014 (4 pages). |
| Office Action in Chinese Patent Invention No. 201180008188.9 dated Jun. 4, 2014 (17 pages) (w/English translation). |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/IB/2014/066932 dated Mar. 24, 2015. |
| Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB/2014/066932 dated Mar. 24, 2015. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 11866291.5 dated Mar. 9, 2015 (9 pages). |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 14181848.4 dated Mar. 5, 2015 (8 pages). |
| Office Action in Chinese Patent Invention No. 201280022957.5 dated Jun. 26, 2015 (7 pages). |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 13794695.0 dated Dec. 18, 2015 (9 pages). |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 16157746.5 dated Apr. 8, 2016 (11 pages). |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 16192749.6 dated Dec. 15, 2016 (17 pages). |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/IB/2016/054763 dated Nov. 25, 2016 (4 pages). |
| Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB/2016/054763 dated Nov. 25, 2016 (9 pages). |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 17195377.1 dated Feb. 12, 2018 (8 pages). |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 18150300.4 dated Mar. 14, 2018 (11 pages). |
| Office Action in Chinese Patent Invention No. 201610284450.7 dated May 31, 2018 (6 pages). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20180240385 A1 | Aug 2018 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61490309 | May 2011 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15466468 | Mar 2017 | US |
| Child | 15955924 | US | |
| Parent | 15262266 | Sep 2016 | US |
| Child | 15466468 | US | |
| Parent | 13291486 | Nov 2011 | US |
| Child | 15262266 | US |