The present invention generally relates to an adhesive dispensing system and more particularly, adhesive dispensing systems and methods using a piston pump to move adhesive toward an outlet.
A conventional dispensing system for supplying heated adhesive (i.e., a hot-melt adhesive dispensing system) generally includes an inlet for receiving adhesive materials in solid or semi-solid form, a melter in communication with the inlet for heating and/or melting the adhesive materials, an outlet in communication with the melter for receiving the heated adhesive from the melter, and a pump in communication with the melter and the outlet for driving and controlling the dispensation of the heated adhesive through the outlet. One or more hoses or manifolds may also be connected to the outlet to direct the dispensation of heated adhesive to adhesive dispensing guns or modules located downstream from the pump. Furthermore, conventional dispensing systems generally include a controller (e.g., a processor and a memory) and input controls electrically connected to the controller to provide a user interface with the dispensing system. The controller is in communication with the pump, melter, and/or other components of the dispensing system, such that the controller controls the dispensation of the heated adhesive.
One conventional type of hot-melt adhesive dispensing system may include a piston pump that operates by reciprocating a pump rod through forward and backward strokes in a hydraulic passage. For example, the pump rod may cause drawing of adhesive from a pump inlet into the hydraulic passage during a backward stroke and then force that adhesive from the hydraulic passage through a pump outlet during a forward stroke of the pump rod. The pump rod may also operate to push adhesive through the hydraulic passage during both the forward and backward strokes in some embodiments. The pump rod is connected to a piston in a piston chamber separated from the hydraulic passage, and the piston is driven in opposing directions by pressurized air delivered by solenoids into the piston chamber. As a result of the pump being driven at various speeds as well as continuously and intermittently, the pump must also include a shifter that reverses the movement direction of the piston and the pump rod when the pump rod reaches an end condition.
One particular type of shifter is a mechanical shifter that includes a magnet that moves with a portion of the pump rod. Corresponding switch magnets can be positioned adjacent the end conditions such that when the piston and pump rod arrive at an end condition, the magnet on the pump rod attracts or repels the switch magnet at that end condition to mechanically switch the solenoids to an opposite operating state. To this end, if a first solenoid supplying pressurized air to an upper side of the piston were active and a second solenoid supplying pressurized air to a lower side of the piston were inactive, the resulting movement of the switch magnet at the end condition would cause the first solenoid to be inactive and the second solenoid to be active. Consequently, the piston and pump rod would begin to move in the opposite direction towards the other end condition (at which point, the other switch magnet would mechanically switch the solenoids back to the original operating state). In similar embodiments, the solenoids may be replaced by an air shifting valve supplied with pressurized air, the air shifting valve being moved by the switch magnet to different positions to supply the pressurized air selectively to the upper and lower sides of the piston. The mechanical shifter is highly reliable in operation, but the various components and magnets must be carefully aligned within the pump to ensure proper operation of the pump.
Furthermore, pumps can develop various conditions such as leaking seals or inoperative valves that interfere with the pumping operation. Conventional piston pumps typically do not include sensors or monitoring devices that can detect these conditions, and therefore, the pumps must usually be damaged or significantly degraded before there is any indication that something is wrong with the pumps. To this end, the pumps are generally operated blindly with respect to these various conditions. Although diagnostics are conducted at the end of a manufacturing line for these pumps, the conventional pumps are inoperable to perform similar diagnostics when operating in the field. As a result, repairs of the pump can be time-consuming and costly (specifically, in lost production time or downtime caused by the repairs) when one of these various conditions occurs and interferes with the pumping operation.
For reasons such as these, an improved adhesive dispensing system and method, including the use of a pump with integrated diagnostics for use during regular operation, would be desirable.
According to one embodiment of the invention, a method of operating an adhesive dispensing system having a pump is provided. The method includes operating the pump by moving a pump component to move liquid adhesive from a source of liquid adhesive to device pump outlet. Movements of the pump component are monitored with at least one sensor, and the at least one sensor produces signals based on the monitored movements of the pump component. The controller collects information regarding operational cycles of the pump based on the signals. As a result, the adhesive dispensing system automatically collects information about pump operation that may be used to enable one or more diagnostic processes during dispensing operation.
In one aspect of the invention, the method also includes performing at least one diagnostic process with the controller pertaining to the pump or to the adhesive dispensing system as a whole based on the collected information. To this end, performing the diagnostic process may include monitoring a total number of operational cycles performed by the pump and providing an indication that the pump will require maintenance or replacement after the pump has reached the total number of operational cycles corresponding to a predetermined percentage of predicted total life. The flow rate of liquid adhesive being dispensed from the dispenser device may be approximated by monitoring the speed of the operational cycles performed by the pump. In another example, performing the diagnostic process may include determining if the speed of operational cycles performed by the pump exceeds a predetermined threshold indicating an overspeed condition, which may be caused by a number of error states or fault conditions, including running out of adhesive or a burst hose. When an overspeed condition is detected, the method includes reducing the speed of movements of the pump component in response to the detected overspeed condition to avoid added damage caused by operation at overspeed.
In yet another example, performing the diagnostic process may include a leak rate test, which is performed by closing device valve downstream from the pump outlet, continuing to operate the pump, and measuring the speed of operational cycles of the pump to provide an indication of an approximate leak rate at the pump based on the speed of operational cycles. This diagnostic may be run periodically during operation, such as at the beginning of each working day, to continually monitor the reliability of seals used with the adhesive dispensing system. In one particular example, the adhesive dispensing system may also include a dispenser device such as a module with a dispensing valve controlling flow from the pump. In such embodiments, the leak rate test is run by closing all dispensing valves and then operating the pump, which should result in no movement of the pump if no leaks are present at the pump.
Generally speaking, the diagnostic processes are configured to identify error states or fault conditions based on the collected information, and then provide an indication to an operator of the error state or fault condition. For example, providing the indication may include producing a message on a display screen or illuminating an indicator light or tone that indicates an error state or fault condition has been identified. These error states and fault conditions may be detected without directly measuring pressure within the pump with a pressure transducer, so the additional diagnostic capabilities are provided with minimal additional expense and maintenance requirements.
In another aspect, the pump is a piston pump with a piston coupled to a pump rod. Operating the pump is performed by actuating at least one solenoid to supply pressurized air to one side of the piston, thereby moving the piston and the pump rod from a first end condition to a second end condition. The operating state of the solenoid(s) is switched so that the pressurized air is supplied to the other side of the piston to move the piston and pump rod back to the first end condition. It will be understood that the solenoid(s) could be replaced by a spool valve or some other air valve in other embodiments. The pump rod moves liquid adhesive during the movement between the first and second end conditions, thereby pumping liquid adhesive to the dispenser device. In this embodiment, the movements of the pump component may be monitored by detecting when the piston and the pump rod approach the first and second end conditions with the at least one sensor. For example, the sensor may include a Hall Effect sensor that detects the passing of at least one magnet mounted on either the piston or the pump rod and proximate to the sensor. In another example, the sensor may include an LVDT sensor in the form of a coil that detects the current location of the piston and the pump rod by sensing the location of a magnetic piece moving with the piston or the pump rod along the LVDT sensor. The sensor may include other alternative types of sensors as well, including but not limited to: capacitive sensors, contact sensors such as those with microswitches, and intermediate sensors such as a rack-like element that provides indications of partial stroke movements of the pump rod. In this regard, the sensor may include any kind of point sensor that detects when the piston and pump rod reach a certain location during movement or continuous/incremental movement sensor that detects movement over a range of the piston and pump rod movement. The switching of operating states for the solenoid(s) and the sensing of pump movements to enable diagnostics can all be performed by the same sensor, which simplifies the components needed for this invention.
According to another embodiment of the invention, an adhesive dispensing system includes a dispenser device for dispensing liquid adhesive and a pump coupled to the dispenser device. The pump is configured to move a pump component to move liquid adhesive from a source of liquid adhesive to the dispenser device. The adhesive dispensing system also includes at least one sensor positioned to sense movements of the pump component and to produce signals based on the sensed movements of the pump component. The dispensing system further includes a controller communicating with the at least one sensor. The controller operates the pump and collects information regarding operational cycles of the pump based on the signals. Therefore, the controller is enabled to perform one or more diagnostic processes pertaining to the pump and to the adhesive dispensing system as a whole based on the collected information. The diagnostic processes may pertain to expected life of the pump, overspeed conditions at the pump, and leak rates in the adhesive dispensing system. The pump may be a piston pump with solenoids for delivering pressurized air to move a piston and a pump rod, and the switching device used to switch the operating state of the solenoids may provide the sensors needed to monitor pump component movements and enable the diagnostic processes.
In another embodiment, a pump includes a pump component that moves in a repeatable manner and is configured to actuate movement of liquid adhesive within an adhesive dispensing system. The pump includes a controller that controls operation of the pump component. At least one sensor is positioned to sense movements of the pump component and produce signals based on the sensed movements. This sensor communicates with the controller such that the controller collect information regarding operational cycles of the pump based on the signals. As a result, the controller of the pump is operable to perform multiple diagnostic processes related to the pump.
In yet another embodiment according to the current invention, an adhesive dispensing system includes a pump having a pump component that moves to move a liquid adhesive. At least one sensor is positioned to sense movements of the pump component and then produce signals based on the sensed movements. The system further includes a diagnostic device with a controller communicating with the sensor. The controller of the diagnostic device collects information regarding operational cycles of the pump based on the signals. The controller is configured to perform at least one diagnostic process based on the collected information. For example, the diagnostic process may include an overspeed detection process.
These and other objects and advantages of the invention will become more readily apparent during the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the drawings herein.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with a general description of the invention given above, and the detailed description of the embodiments given below, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
Referring to
With continued reference to
Each of these components is shown connected with a hose 22 in
The controller 16 includes a processor and memory (not shown in
In order to better describe how the diagnostic processes are automatically enabled by the adhesive dispensing system 10, a more detailed description of the first embodiment of the dispensing system 10 and its components is provided below. As described in further detail below, the pump 14 of this embodiment may include a piston pump 14 similar to the SP Pump commercially available from Nordson Corporation of Westlake, Ohio. As well understood in the dispensing field, the piston pump 14 moves liquid adhesive with reciprocating movement of a piston and a pump rod (components not shown in
With reference to
The pneumatic section 40 of the piston pump 14 includes a housing 54 defining a piston chamber 56 that is sealed from the external environment, as shown in
With continued reference to
The control section 44 also includes the shifter 28, which is an electric shifter 28 in the illustrated embodiment and is best shown in
The movement of the guide pin 88 within the guide slot 90 ensures that the magnets 84a, 84b stay in a known position and orientation proximate to the circuit board 72 during movements of the pump rod 60. The Hall Effect sensors 80, 82 are positioned on the circuit board 72 so that the first magnet 84a will approach or pass by the first Hall Effect sensor 80 at the first end condition defined by the upper limit of the stroke of the piston 58 and the pump rod 60, and so that the second magnet 84b will approach or pass by the second Hall Effect sensor 82 at the second end condition defined by the lower limit of the stroke of the piston 58 and the pump rod 60. Of course, it will be understood that the Hall Effect sensors 80, 82 may be repositioned in other embodiments such as along the piston chamber 56 to detect movements of the piston 58 in other embodiments. To this end, in such an embodiment, the Hall Effect sensors 80, 82 would alternatively be mounted on the housing 54 of the pneumatic section 40 and a magnet would be positioned on the piston 58 so that movement of the piston 58 could be detected through the housing 54. As a result, the Hall Effect sensors 80, 82 detect when the piston 58 and the pump rod 60 approach the first and second end conditions so that the processor 74 can send a signal to switch the operating state of the solenoids 48, 50 and continue the reciprocating movement of the piston 58 and the pump rod 60. This shifting of the pump 14 is therefore performed without mechanical actuation of magnetic switches, as is the case in so-called mechanical shifters. Moreover, the information collected from the sensed pump movements may be used by the controller 16 to perform the diagnostics described in further detail below.
With reference to
With reference to
With particular reference to
A first diagnostic process that may be performed by the controller is a life cycle monitoring diagnostic. As shown by
It will be understood that the controller 16 may be pre-loaded with a predicted total life cycle for the pump 14, which is an average number of cycles before the pump 14 is likely to fail. This predicted total life cycle is primarily based on historical data for similar batches of components and also based on test data collected by the manufacturer of the components. Several factors may also be programmed in to adjust the predicted total life cycle to fit the particular circumstances in which the pump 14 is placed in operation. In a pump 14, for example, the rate of use, duty cycles, the particular materials dispensed, the operating temperature, and the viscosity of the liquid adhesive being moved all could be known factors that adjust the predicted total life cycle. These factors may be adjusted by the manufacturer or the end user, both before and during use of the component. It will also be understood that in addition or alternatively to the list 116 generated on the display screen 24, the controller 16 may be configured to illuminate one or more of the indicator lights 26 to provide warnings indicating that replacement or repair of the pump 14 is predicted to be necessary soon. Regardless of the method used to provide the indication of remaining life to the end user, the pump 14 advantageously enables such a life cycle monitoring diagnostic based solely on the pump movements that are already sensed for the purpose of shifting the pump 14, at least in embodiments including the electric shifter 28 discussed above.
Another diagnostic process enabled by the adhesive dispensing system 10 is a rough estimation of dispensing flow rate through the dispenser module 12. In this regard, the monitoring of pump movements at the first and second Hall Effect sensors 80, 82 provides an indication of the speed with which the pump 14 is operating. Assuming that the pump 14 moves a set amount of liquid adhesive to the dispenser module 12 for each operational cycle or stroke of the piston 58 and pump rod 60, a rough estimation of a flow rate or a volume provided to the dispenser module 12 can be determined from the speed of operation of the pump 14. This flow rate or volume provided to the dispenser module 12 should be about equivalent to the flow rate or volume output of liquid adhesive being dispensed from the dispenser module 12, so the diagnostic process is capable of providing some information relative to the flow rate of liquid adhesive being dispensed from the dispensing system 10. This information can be compared to the intended flow rates that are supposed to be delivered by the dispenser module 12 to determine if a large inconsistency is present, which may indicate an error condition, such as a high rate of leakage in the adhesive dispensing system 10.
The adhesive dispensing system 10 may also enable another diagnostic process to test for an overspeed condition at the pump 14. Overspeed is defined as operating the pump 14 with a cycle speed or stroke speed that exceeds a predetermined threshold that the components of the pump 14 are designed to withstand. The overspeed condition may be caused by a number of error states or fault conditions, including running out of adhesive at the hydraulic section 42, a burst hose causing no pressure at the pump 14, or a problem with the PDV 30. In each of these circumstances, the pump 14 is unencumbered by the flow of liquid adhesive and therefore tends to operate faster and faster until the pump 14 reaches overspeed. The overspeed condition can rapidly and significantly damage multiple components of the pump 14, including the piston 58 and the pump rod 60.
The diagnostic process that tests for the overspeed condition simply monitors the speed of operational cycles of the pump 14 during all times when the pump 14 is operating and continuously checks the current pump speed against the predetermined threshold. If the controller 16 determines that the current speed of the pump 14 exceeds the predetermined threshold, the controller 16 may generate an indication to the operator that an overspeed condition is occurring, and may also modify the actuation of the solenoids 48, 50 to slow down or completely stop the pump movements, thereby eliminating the overspeed condition. Moreover, this responsive reduction of speed at the pump 14 prevents the pump 14 from staying in the overspeed condition for more than a couple operational cycles, which thereby reduces the likelihood of damage to pump components by a significant amount. The indication of the overspeed condition can be provided to the end user, such as by a message at the display screen 24 or the illumination of one or more indicator lights 26, and the end user can check various items to determine why the pump 14 lost hydraulic pressure. The indication may be provided locally at the pump 14 itself or transmitted via a programmable logic controller or other devices to remote monitoring locations with an operator. In this regard, the pump 14 can be stopped so that the end user can determine if the PDV 30 is not operational or if a hose has burst in the adhesive dispensing system 10, for example. Advantageously, this test for overspeed may be performed without adding additional equipment to the pump 14 of the exemplary embodiment. More particularly, the test for overspeed is accomplished without the use of expensive pressure transducers in the hydraulic section 42 of the pump 14.
With reference to
As described generally in the previous two diagnostic processes (overspeed detection test and leak rate test), the diagnostic processes can be used to identify any of a number of error states or fault conditions that may be determined, at least in part, on the basis of how quickly the pump 14 is moving through operational cycles or strokes. The indicator lights 26 or display screen 24 may be illuminated to provide an indication to the end user whenever one of these error states or fault conditions is identified, and corrective action may also be taken automatically in certain circumstances, like when the overspeed condition is detected. These diagnostic processes therefore increase the amount of information available to an end user and decrease the amount of unplanned downtime caused by unexpected failures of the pump 14 or other components of the adhesive dispensing system 10. In this regard, any maintenance and replacement can be planned out in advance of regularly-scheduled downtimes for the adhesive dispensing system 10, and replacement parts or components can be delivered in advance of the need. Moreover, the diagnostic processes can be performed using information already sensed by the Hall Effect sensors 80, 82, when an electric shifter 28 is used with the controller 16 as described in the exemplary embodiment. In this regard, no additional equipment or sensors, such as pressure transducers in the hydraulic section 42, are required to obtain the relevant information about the pump 14 and the adhesive dispensing system 10. Consequently, the adhesive dispensing system 10 and methods of the current invention provide significant amounts of information via integrated diagnostic processes that do not require additional equipment or components. More specifically, the pump 14 is controlled and provides information for diagnostics with added simplicity in manufacturing and added economy by not requiring additional components to perform the diagnostics.
The adhesive dispensing system 10 may be modified in other embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention. As mentioned above, one modification in some embodiments is to use a different type of pump, such as a gear pump. In those embodiments, a different type of operational cycle sensing may be required, but the diagnostic processes operate in much the same fashion regardless of how the operational cycles of a pump are detected. In other embodiments, the sensors 80, 82 could be added to a pump that uses a mechanical shifter rather than the electric shifter 28 of the previously described embodiment. As well understood, the mechanical shifter still requires a magnet to be carried along the stroke length by the pump rod 60, and this magnet could still be detected by the sensors 80, 82 if they are added to the housing of those systems. Therefore, the methods of operating an adhesive dispensing system 10 to collect information regarding operational cycles of the pump 14 and to perform diagnostic processes based on sensed pump movements are still possible regardless of the type of pump 14 or shifter 28 used with the adhesive dispensing system 10.
With reference to
It will be appreciated that the LVDT sensor 280 may be incorporated at different locations relative to the pump rod 60 in other embodiments, such as above the piston chamber 56 when the pump rod 60 is extended to project outside and above the piston chamber 56. It will also be understood that other types of sensors beyond those disclosed in these embodiments may be used with the adhesive dispensing system 10 without departing from the invention. For example, the sensor may include other alternative types of sensors, including but not limited to: capacitive sensors, contact sensors such as those with microswitches, and intermediate sensors such as a rack-like element that provides indications of partial stroke movements of the pump rod. In this regard, the sensor may include any kind of point sensor that detects when the piston and pump rod reach a certain location during movement, or any type of proximity sensor, position sensor, or linear continuous/incremental movement sensor that detects movement over a range of the piston and pump rod movement.
In yet another alternative embodiment of an adhesive dispensing system according to the invention, the diagnostic processes described above may be performed by a separate diagnostic device having a controller that receives signals from the one of the sensors described above. For example, the schematic system shown in
While the present invention has been illustrated by a description of several embodiments, and while those embodiments have been described in considerable detail, there is no intention to restrict, or in any way limit, the scope of the appended claims to such detail. Additional advantages and modifications will readily appear to those skilled in the art. Therefore, the invention in its broadest aspects is not limited to the specific details shown and described. The various features disclosed herein may be used in any combination necessary or desired for a particular application. Consequently, departures may be made from the details described herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the claims which follow.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/799,656, filed Mar. 13, 2013, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/727,924, filed Nov. 19, 2012, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2672215 | Otto et al. | Mar 1954 | A |
2744792 | Finn et al. | May 1956 | A |
2824335 | Moffat et al. | Feb 1958 | A |
2868015 | Haropulos et al. | Jan 1959 | A |
3030153 | Krenke et al. | Apr 1962 | A |
3219394 | Moss et al. | Nov 1965 | A |
3377861 | Sherwood et al. | Apr 1968 | A |
3580644 | Ballard et al. | May 1971 | A |
3756456 | Georgi | Sep 1973 | A |
3773069 | Rebentisch | Nov 1973 | A |
3981416 | Scholl | Sep 1976 | A |
4084628 | Schmid | Apr 1978 | A |
4086466 | Scharlack | Apr 1978 | A |
4277773 | Blatnik | Jul 1981 | A |
4417675 | Abt et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4418569 | Kuhnel | Dec 1983 | A |
4437581 | Coker | Mar 1984 | A |
4441450 | Dettelbach et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4474311 | Petrecca | Oct 1984 | A |
4479600 | Albright | Oct 1984 | A |
4482367 | Howeth | Nov 1984 | A |
4583885 | Thiele | Apr 1986 | A |
4613059 | Merkel | Sep 1986 | A |
4688432 | Marsh | Aug 1987 | A |
4821922 | Miller et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4850425 | Anderson | Jul 1989 | A |
4898527 | Claassen | Feb 1990 | A |
4994984 | Massimo | Feb 1991 | A |
5006018 | Depew | Apr 1991 | A |
5174472 | Raque | Dec 1992 | A |
5287086 | Gibb | Feb 1994 | A |
5294218 | Fiorentini et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5332366 | Anderson | Jul 1994 | A |
5347867 | Pangerl | Sep 1994 | A |
5589203 | Sato | Dec 1996 | A |
5680961 | Boccagno et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5715972 | Siddiqui | Feb 1998 | A |
5747689 | Hampo et al. | May 1998 | A |
5791830 | Fort et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5909829 | Wegman et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6039513 | Law | Mar 2000 | A |
6073488 | Byatt et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6095803 | Slater | Aug 2000 | A |
6175101 | Miller et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6230936 | Lasko | May 2001 | B1 |
6318599 | Estelle et al. | Nov 2001 | B2 |
6352173 | Duckworth | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6380861 | Estelle et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6471751 | Semanderes et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6616721 | Oh | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6712587 | Gerhardt et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
7263781 | Sielemann | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7626143 | Miller | Dec 2009 | B2 |
8157483 | Volkmann | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8201717 | Varga et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8383991 | Ganzer et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8430230 | Ferguson et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8580006 | LaCroix et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
9243626 | Estelle | Jan 2016 | B2 |
20010023880 | Estelle et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020079325 | Estelle | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030021700 | Serafin | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030080154 | Jeter | May 2003 | A1 |
20030080156 | Jeter et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040055739 | Suckow et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040167738 | Miller | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050274740 | Duckworth et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060055503 | Tanida | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060159565 | Sanwald | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060289560 | Bourget et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070080157 | Mehaffy et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070216424 | Sieh et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080026066 | Roser | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080095637 | Burdi et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080120046 | Tung et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080145248 | Kato et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080156801 | Tung et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080196512 | Miller | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080199323 | Bauck et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080206066 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080282795 | Zabel et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080302477 | Varga et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090229359 | Reimelt et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090229683 | Baek et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090285983 | Baldauf et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100282088 | Deuber et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110000309 | Griffiths et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110002793 | Bauck et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110042408 | Giordano et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110079078 | Ho et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110100120 | Neuburger et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20120051945 | Orndorff et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120223094 | Rickard, Jr. et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120227484 | Chen et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120247665 | Varga et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120273071 | Kai | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130105003 | Quam et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130105004 | Tix et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130105005 | Tix et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130105039 | Tix et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130105517 | Tix et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130105526 | Ross et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130112279 | Ross et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130112280 | Quam et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130112294 | Ross et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130112312 | Ross et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130112709 | Ross et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130112710 | Ross et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130112711 | Lind et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130115016 | Ross et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130205893 | Shearer et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140020463 | Ikeya et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20150300335 | Bauck et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1942171 | Apr 2007 | CN |
101943151 | Jan 2011 | CN |
202116049 | Jan 2012 | CN |
3815089 | Nov 1989 | DE |
19923410 | Nov 1999 | DE |
10156691 | May 2003 | DE |
0029485 | Jun 1981 | EP |
0072679 | Feb 1983 | EP |
1350743 | Oct 2003 | EP |
2119509 | Nov 2009 | EP |
1366936 | Jul 1964 | FR |
2787770 | Jun 2000 | FR |
1562562 | Mar 1980 | GB |
2485041 | May 2012 | GB |
9814314 | Apr 1998 | WO |
2007084891 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2009046545 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2012095838 | Jul 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Crowder, Richard. (2006). Electric Drives and Electromechanical Systems. (pp. 119,120). Elsevier. |
Crowder, Richard, Electric Drives and Electromechanical Systems, Elsevier, 2006, pp. 119, 120. |
European Application No. 13187639.3: Extended European Search report dated Feb. 28, 2014, 5 pages. |
European Application No. 13185893.8: Extended European Search report dated Apr. 1, 2015, 6 pages. |
Fluid-Air Products Inc., InvisiPac, Jan. 5, 2013. |
Meltex Corporation, Product Information Sheet, Hot Melt Applicator MP 400, 1 page. |
Meltex GmbH; Product Information Sheet; Hot Melt Applicator MX 2001; 2 pages. |
Meltex GmbH; Product Information Sheet; Hot Melt Applicator MX 2003; 2 pages. |
European Application No. 13185184: Extended European Search report dated Jun. 6, 2014, 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/799,788: Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 12, 2014, 24 pages. |
European Application No. 13184144.7: Extended European Search report dated Mar. 25, 2014, 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160097385 A1 | Apr 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61727924 | Nov 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13799656 | Mar 2013 | US |
Child | 14968446 | US |