The present invention relates in general to silicon (Si) crystallization using laser radiation pulses. The invention relates in particular to temporal shaping of the laser radiation pulses for optimizing the silicon crystallization.
Silicon crystallization is a step that is often used in the manufacture of thin-film transistor (TFT) active-matrix LCDs, and organic LED (AMOLED) displays. The crystalline silicon forms a semiconductor base, in which electronic circuits of the display are formed by conventional lithographic processes. Commonly, crystallization is performed using a pulsed laser beam shaped in a long line. In this process, a thin layer of amorphous silicon on a glass substrate is repeatedly melted by pulses of laser radiation while the substrate (and the silicon layer thereon) is translated relative to a delivery source of the laser-radiation pulses. Melting and re-solidification (re-crystallization) through the repeated pulses take place until a desired crystalline microstructure is obtained in the film.
Optical elements are used to form the laser pulses into a line of radiation, and crystallization occurs in a strip having the width of the line of radiation. Every attempt is made to keep the intensity of the radiation pulses highly uniform along the line. This is necessary to keep crystalline microstructure uniform along the strip. A favored source of the optical pulses is an excimer laser, which delivers pulses having a wavelength in the ultraviolet region of the electromagnetic spectrum. The above described crystallization process, using excimer-laser pulses, is usually referred to as excimer-laser annealing (ELA).
The ELA process is usually performed at a radiation energy density at which near complete melting of the silicon layer takes place. In most locations, the film is molten throughout the thickness of the layer. However, small solid portions remain that subsequently seed laterally growing crystal grains. During the repetitive radiation at this energy density, a microstructure evolves having a surface topology dictated by the wavelength of the light. This topology results from optical interference effects and this phenomenon has been described as laser-induced periodic surface structures (LIPSS). During the process, a grain-structure evolves that matches the surface topology, i.e., grains having a dimension similar to the wavelength of the pulse-radiation. The process energy density at which the desired grain structure is obtained is often referred to as the optimum energy density (OED).
The process is a delicate one. By way of example, high energy pulses may result in so-called shot marks (shot mura) in the film structure that may also be visible in the display. In an extreme case, a high energy pulse may result in radiation above the complete melting threshold (CMT) of the film, as a result of which nucleation and growth of small defective grains takes place. Generally, any energy-density variation along the length of the line may result in lines parallel to the scan (scan-mura). A very schematic illustration of various melting regimes is presented in
In
In
In
It has been found that the temporal intensity profile (“pulse shape”) of irradiating pulses influences the occurrence of mura. Pulse shape is often optimized to reduce shot mura. However, this optimization is usually performed empirically, and can lead to different outcomes. Nevertheless, some simple guidelines in optimizing pulse-shape have been developed by practitioners of the art.
Based on simple thermal considerations, it can be argued that a short pulse-duration is preferred. Longer pulse-durations make it more difficult to effect the preferred incomplete or near complete melting of the film with a single pulse, as the heat diffusion length becomes very large. The typical temporal pulse-profile of a xenon chloride (XeCl) excimer-laser, which is a super-atmosphere gas-discharge laser, consists of two peaks (often referred to as “humps”). The FWHM duration of the first peak (hump) is typically less than 30 ns. The peak intensity of the second peak is typically about equal to or less than 50% of the first peak, and depends, inter alia, on lasing-gas mixture, repetition rate, gas aging, and discharge-pulse voltage.
It can be seen that when the intensity of the second peak is low, deepest melting occurs on the first peak. However, when the intensity of the second peak is high, deepest melting occurs on the second peak, even though melting may have already started on the first peak. Such a shift in the details of the melting and solidification is expected to lead to different outcomes of the cumulative crystallization process. By way of example, the cumulative microstructure evolution may progress at a different rate depending on intensity of the second peak. Thus, shifts in the ratio between the two peaks, as, for example, could occur as a result of gas aging, might bring about shifts in the optimum process condition such as the OED. Further, the stability of the process, or in other words the process window, may be affected by such shifts.
ELA technology is currently being considered for larger displays such as large-screen AMOLED TV displays. In order for this to be commercially effective, longer lines of radiation will be required than are currently the norm. A problem, however, is that this will require more power per pulse than can be delivered by a single excimer laser. One means of overcoming this problem would be to combine pulses from two or more excimer lasers. Simultaneous triggering of the lasers could be used to create a combined pulse having essentially the same pulse shape as a single pulse, i.e., a pulse with first and second peaks, as described above. A potential advantage may be that the pulse-to-pulse fluctuation of the combined pulse becomes less than that of the individual pulses, resulting in fewer high-energy pulses which lead to shot mura.
A problem in realizing a consistent pulse-combination is that there is a limit to the accuracy with which the two or more lasers can be triggered. This triggering inaccuracy is usually referred to by practitioners of the art as jitter. An exemplary state-of-the-art value of the jitter is about 5 nanoseconds (ns) for high pulse repetition rate (PRF) operation of an excimer laser, for example, about 500 kilohertz (kHz) or more. The jitter can be less for lower-PRF operation.
In experiments at low PRF, wherein the delay between two pulses being combined was systematically varied to smooth the intensity profiles of the combined pulse, the OED was observed to shift upwards by more than 2% for a delay of 5ns and more than 4% for a delay of 10 ns. These values indicate that a variation of the intensity profile of the combined pulse as a function of jitter exists that could be unacceptable for manufacturing. If the delay time was selected such that the first peak of the delayed pulse began to overlap with the second peak of the first pulse (between about 40 ns and 50 ns delay), a pulse-profile in which most energy is combined into a single intense peak was again created. In this condition, the OED shift may actually be very limited. However, at this condition, the pulse profile was still very sensitive to jitter, and, furthermore, also became sensitive to differences between the first pulse-profile and the second pulse-profile, for example, having a different energy or different peak-ratio.
In other words, whereas simultaneous triggering of pulses reduces the pulse-to-pulse fluctuation, delayed triggering to smooth the shape of a combined pulse profile may actually result in worse pulse-to-pulse fluctuation in the combined pulse than that of the individual pulses being combined. There is a need for a method of forming a combined pulse which can minimize OED shift while avoiding sensitivity of the combined pulse to pulse-to-pulse variation and jitter.
In one aspect of the present invention a method of crystallizing a silicon layer, comprises delivering a first laser radiation pulse having a first pulse duration and a first peak intensity from a first laser and a second laser radiation pulse having a second duration and a second peak intensity from a second laser. The duration of the first laser pulse is extended in a pulse-duration extender to a third duration significantly longer than the second duration, thereby reducing the first peak intensity to a third peak intensity. The second-duration and third-duration pulses are combined, temporally overlapping. Combination of the second duration pulse is delayed such that the temporal overlap occurs at a predetermined time following initiation of the third-duration pulse. The temporally overlapping second-duration and third-duration pulses are projected onto the silicon layer. The second and third peak intensities are selected such that when the temporally overlapping second-duration and third-duration pulses are projected onto the silicon layer, the silicon layer is preheated by the third-duration pulse before being melted during the temporal overlap. In a preferred embodiment of the method, the lasers are excimer lasers. The synchronization of the pulse delivery and delivery delay is controlled by a trigger mechanism common to the two lasers.
Continuing with reference to the drawings,
Pulse-1 is intercepted by a pulse-duration expander (PEX) 20, including a plane beam-splitting mirror (beamsplitter) 22 (which is partially reflective and partially transmissive at the wavelength of the pulses) combined with a plane mirror 24 and concave mirrors 26, 28, and 30. A portion of pulse-1 is transmitted by mirror 22 and the remaining portion is reflected from the other mirrors (in sequential numeric order) back to mirror 22, where the remaining portion is divided into reflected and transmitted portions. Mirrors 24, 26, 28, and 30 are configured and arranged such that the beam size of the pulse is the same at each incidence thereof on mirror 22.
The reflected portion of the pulse from mirror 30 exits the PEX on the same path as the originally-transmitted portion. The new transmitted portion makes a second sequence of reflections back to mirror 20 where pulse division into reflected and transmitted portions again takes place. This sequence is repeated until there no significant pulse energy remaining in the PEX. By selecting a particular value for the reflection and transmission of mirror 22 and the path length (optical delay time) around the PEX, the originally-transmitted and subsequently-reflected pulse portions can be temporally overlapped to form a new pulse (stretched pulse-1) which has a smoother temporal profile and lower peak intensity than the original pulse. The stretched pulse will have nominally the same energy as the original pulse, less that which is lost to scatter and absorption in the PEX.
Only sufficient description of PEX 20 is provided to illustrate the function of the PEX in the inventive apparatus. A more detailed description of such a PEX is not necessary to understand principles of the present invention and, accordingly, is not presented herein. A detailed description of a PEX such as PEX 20, and a description of more complex PEX forms, with different pulse-shaping possibilities, is provided in U.S. Pre-Grant Publication No. 2006/0216037, and U.S. Pat. No. 7,035,012, each of which is assigned to the assignee of the present invention, and the complete disclosure of each of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Continuing with reference to
Pulse-2 is delayed such that the leading edge thereof occurs later than the leading edge of stretched pulse-1. The temporally-overlapping (combined) pulses are directed by a mirror 38 into line-projection optics 40 which project the combined pulses onto a silicon layer 42 being crystallized, the layer, of course being supported on a substrate 44.
Stretching of pulse-1 and the delay of pulse-2 is arranged such that the temporally combined pulse has a broad base-level of intensity which, when initially projected onto silicon layer 42, has insufficient energy to initiate melting the silicon layer. Superimposed on the base level of intensity is an intensity-peak resulting from the contribution of pulse-2 to the pulse-combination. This intensity peak has sufficient energy to cause the desired incomplete or near complete melting of the silicon layer. An example of the pulse-combination is described below with reference to
Here, it is assumed that each of the lasers 12 and 14 delivers an above-discussed two-peak pulse having a peak-ratio of about 20%, wherein melting would typically occur primarily through the first peak, with the second peak merely protracting re-crystallization, as depicted in
It can be seen that these PEX parameters stretch and smooth pulse-1 such that there is no prominent peak-intensity in the stretched pulse, with intensity falling gradually over a period of about 175 ns. Pulse-2 pulse is a delayed by a period tD, in this case, by about 60.0 ns. The delay can be created entirely by suitable triggering if the optical path of the pulses to the point of combination is the same. Alternatively, the delay can be created by some combination of pulse-triggering delay and optical path difference, or entirely by the optical path difference. An optical-path difference of about 30.0 centimeters (cm) is equal to a delay of 1.0 ns.
In
The combined pulse is characterized by a very prominent peak-intensity region over a background region, with the peak region having a duration of about 30 ns, which is about one-fifth of the total period of radiation delivery. In practice, it is arranged such that the prominent peak region is the only region in which intensity is sufficient to initiate significant melting, with the remaining background radiation predominantly used for preheating the layer before melting is initiated, or, less preferably, for protracting the re-crystallization after the melting.
In an experiment, a pulse similar to the combined pulse of
It is emphasized that melting with the above-described inventive pulse-intensity profile is dictated by the short intense peak from the unstretched pulse. Pre-heating occurs as a result of the smoothed pulse from the first laser, and, as a result, a lower intensity-peak is sufficient to induce the required near-complete melting for a single pulse. A trace of the second peak of the un-stretched pulse is still present in the background, but has a sufficiently low energy that deepest melting is ensured to occur as a result of the first-peak intensity.
Nevertheless, it may be beneficial to further reduce the intensity of the second peak or eliminate a second peak altogether. Reducing the second-peak intensity of the un-stretched pulse may be accomplished by including in laser 14 (laser-2) a gas-mixture that gives a lower second peak. Alternatively, hardware may be used to divert away the energy from the pulsing electronics at the time the second peak would otherwise be created.
Further, laser 12 (laser-1), delivering the pulse to be stretched, may be optimized such that the pulse to be stretched has a smoother profile than that of the 20% peak-ratio pulse discussed above. For example, a higher second peak may be desirable in the pulse to be stretched so that a PEX with smaller reflectivity and/or delay may be sufficient to create a smooth pulse profile. In addition, two PEX's in series, or a double-pass PEX as described in the above referenced '6037 publication may be used. It is also possible to combine outputs of more than two lasers with pulses optimized and shaped in different ways to further optimize the intensity-profile of the combined pulses. Those skilled in the art may use these and any other means to achieve the inventive pulse profile, without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Whatever means are used to achieve the inventive pulse profile, the intensity profile should still be such, that, when the pulse is projected on the silicon layer, melting still predominantly occurs on the short high-intensity peak, with the initial pre-heating stage not leading to melting. The energy-ratio between the pre-heating and the melting stages accordingly should thus not exceed a certain value. Heat-flow simulations as well as transient reflectivity data indicate that for regular pulse profiles, deepest melting can easily occur on the second hump when the intensity thereof is even less than 50% of that of the first hump. To avoid melting on the first hump altogether, a larger ratio should be used, for example 75% intensity of the second hump or even a 1:1 ratio.
While heat-flow simulations and transient reflectance measurements can be instrumental in understanding the exact onset of melting for smooth homogeneous films, these methods become less meaningful for polycrystalline films having surface roughness and high degree of heterogeneity. In other words, the maximum ratio between the pre-heating and the melting pulse should be established experimentally by evaluating the material.
In summary, the present invention has been described in terms of a preferred and other embodiments. The invention is not limited, however, to the embodiments described and depicted. Rather, the invention is defined by the claims appended hereto.
This application claims priority of U.S. Provisional Application No 61/474,600 filed Apr. 12, 2011, assigned to the assignee of the present invention, and the complete disclosure of each of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61474600 | Apr 2011 | US |