The present invention relates to articles with optically transparent substrates having anti-fingerprinting characteristics.
There are abundant uses for superhydrophobic materials, including self-cleaning surfaces, anti-fouling surfaces and anti-corrosion surfaces. Approaches for producing surfaces exhibiting these properties include producing microtextured superhydrophobic surfaces or chemically active antimicrobial surfaces. Despite the impressive properties achieved by such known surfaces, the properties are not durable and the surfaces need to be replaced or otherwise maintained frequently. Thus, research to identify alternative approaches has continued.
Additionally, especially in the age of touchscreen devices, a need exists for optically transparent surfaces that resist smudging and fingerprinting so as to remain optically transparent despite frequent interaction with human hands.
Various embodiments relate to an article having a nanostructured surface. The article can include a substrate and a nanostructured layer bonded to the substrate. The nanostructured layer can be directly bonded to the substrate, i.e., without any adhesive or intermediary layers. The nanostructured layer can be atomically bonded to the substrate. The nanostructured layer can include a plurality of spaced apart nanostructured features comprising a contiguous, protrusive material. The nanostructured layer can include an oil pinned in a plurality of nanopores formed by a plurality of nanostructured features.
The nanostructured features can be sufficiently small so that the nanostructured layer is optically transparent. The width, length and height of each of said plurality of spaced apart nanostructured features ranges from 1 to 500 nm.
A continuous hydrophobic coating can be disposed on the plurality of spaced apart nanostructured features. The continuous hydrophobic coating can include a self-assembled monolayer.
The plurality of spaced apart nanostructured features provide an anti-reflective surface. The plurality of spaced apart nanostructures features can provide an effective refractive index gradient such that the effective refractive index increases monotonically towards the substrate.
A method of forming the article with a nanostructured surface layer is also described. The method can include providing a substrate; depositing a film on the substrate; decomposing the film to form a decomposed film; and etching the decomposed film to form the nanostructured layer.
The decomposition step can be performed under a non-oxidizing atmosphere. The decomposing step can include heating the film to a sufficient temperature for a sufficient time to produce a nanoscale spinodal decomposition.
The method can also include applying a continuous hydrophobic coating to the plurality of spaced apart nanostrucutured features, pinning an oil within nanopores formed by the plurality of nanostructured features, or both.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with reference to the following description and appended claims, and accompanying drawings where:
It should be understood that the various embodiments are not limited to the arrangements and instrumentality shown in the drawings.
The present invention may be understood more readily by reference to the following detailed description of preferred embodiments of the invention as well as to the examples included therein. In the following detailed description and in the claims which follow, reference will be made to a number of terms which shall be defined to have the following meanings:
A substrate including a superhydrophobic transparent glass thin film and method of making the same are described. The glass thin film is applied in such a manner that it is possible to deposit thin films on a variety of substrates. The glass thin film can be superhydrophobic, self-cleaning, anti-reflective across the visible light spectrum, the IR spectrum, or both, while blocking, i.e., reflecting or scattering, UV radiation.
As shown in the Figures, the articles 10 with nanostructures surfaces described herein can include a substrate 12 and a nanostructured layer 14 attached to the substrate 12. The nanostructured layer 14 can include a plurality of spaced apart nanostructured features 16 comprising a contiguous, protrusive material 18 and the nanostructured features 16 can be sufficiently small that the nanostructured layer 14 is optically transparent. The nanostructured layer 14 can include a plurality of nanopores 20 defined by the contiguous, protrusive material 18, e.g., the nanostructured features 16.
As used herein, “optically transparent” refers to a material or layer that transmits rays of visible light in such a way that the human eye may see through the glass distinctly. One definition of optically transparent is a maximum of 50% attenuation at a wavelength of 550 nm (green light) for a material or layer, e.g., a layer 1 μm thick. Another definition can be based on the Strehl Ratio, which ranges from 0 to 1, with 1 being a perfectly transparent material. Exemplary optically transparent materials can have a Strehl Ratio≥0.5, or a Strehl Ratio≥0.6, or a Strehl Ratio≥0.7, or a Strehl Ratio≥0.8, or a Strehl Ratio≥0.9, or a Strehl Ratio≥0.95, or a Strehl Ratio≥0.975, or a Strehl Ratio≥0.99.
As used herein, the term “nanopores” refers to pores with a major diameter ranging from 1 to 750 nm. Nanopores can also refer to pores having a major diameter ranging from 5 to 500 nm, or 10 to 400 nm, or any combination thereof, e.g., 400 to 750 nm. The nanostructured layer described herein can have a nanopore size ranging from 10 nm to about 10 μm, or 100 nm to 8 μm, or 500 nm to 6 μm, or 1 to 5 μm, or any combination thereof, e.g., 500 nm to 5 μm.
The nanostructures features formed from a contiguous, protrusive material described herein can be formed by differentially etching of spinodally decomposed materials as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,258,731, “Composite, Nanostructured, Super-Hydrophobic Material”, issued to D'Urso et al., on Aug. 21, 2007; U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2008/0286556, “Super-Hydrophobic Water Repellant Powder,” published Nov. 20, 2008; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/901,072, “Superoleophilic Particles and Coatings and Methods of Making the Same,” (hereinafter “Differential Etching References”) filed Oct. 8, 2010, the entireties of which are incorporated by reference herein.
As used herein, nanostructured feature has its literal meaning and includes, but is not limited to, nanoscale protrusions and nanoscale branched networks. As used herein, “nanoscale branched network” refers to a branched network where the individual branches are less than 1 μm. In some examples, the branches of the nanoscale branched networks described herein can be 750 nm or less in length, or 600 nm or less in length, or 500 nm or less in length. A branch can be defined by the space (i) between adjacent junctions 22, (ii) between a junction 22 and a terminal end 24 of the network, i.e., a nanoscale protrusion, or (iii) both. As shown in
The width, length and height of each of the plurality of spaced apart nanostructured features 16 can independently range from 1 to 500 nm, or from 2 to 400, or from 3 to 300 nm, or from 4 to 250 nm, or from 5 to 200 nm, or any combination of these ranges, e.g., 1 to 200 nm. The width, length and height of each of the plurality of spaced apart nanostructures features can be at least 5 nm, at least 7 nm, at least 10 nm, or at least 20 nm.
The nanostructured layer 14 can also include an etching residue disposed on the contiguous, protrusive material. As will be understood, the etching residue can result from the differential etching process utilized to remove the boron-rich phase of a spinodally decomposed borosilicate layer 26, which is an intermediate product of the spinodal decomposition described in the Differential Etching References referenced above. Thus, the etching residue can include remnants of the recessive contiguous material that was interpenetrating with the protruding material in the spinodally decomposed film 26 intermediary. The etching residue can be contiguous or non-contiguous.
The formation of the nanostructured layer 14 can include an intermediate spinodally decomposed glass film 26 formed from a film 28 selected from the group that includes, but is not limited to, a sodium borosilicate glass and a soda lime glass. An exemplary sodium borosilicate glass can include 65.9 wt-% SiO2, 26.3 wt-% B2O3 and 7.8 wt-% Na2O. The soda lime glass can be any soda lime glass that can be spinodally decomposed and etched to form the nanostructured layer described herein. The protrusive material (e.g., silica-rich phase), the recessive material (e.g., alkali and/or borate-rich phase) or both can be glass.
The contiguous, protrusive material can be directly bonded to the substrate 12. In some exemplary articles, the contiguous, protrusive material can be atomically, i.e., covalently, bonded to the substrate 12. For example, where the substrate 12 is a silica-rich glass and the nanostructured layer 14 is formed from differential etching of a spinodally decomposed sodium borosilicate glass 26, the silica-rich contiguous, protrusive phase of the nanostructured layer 14 can be covalently bonded to the substrate 12. In fact, in some cases, the composition of the substrate 12 and the contiguous, protrusive phase of the nanostructured layer 14 can be the same. This can result in a structure where there is no clear interfacial delineation between the nanostructured layer 14 and the substrate 12.
In some other examples, the contiguous, protrusive material of the nanostructured layer 14 can be directly bonded to the surface 30 of the substrate 12 by a means other than covalent bonding. In other words, the bond between the substrate 12 and the contiguous, protrusive material 18 can be formed directly without reliance on an adhesive or interfacial material to join the contiguous, protrusive material 18 to the surface 30 of the substrate 12. Such a process could involve interfacial atomic or molecular interdiffusion due to high impact velocities or temperature of deposited species. For example, during physical vapor deposition, target source species arrive at the substrate with high kinetic energy and with various angles of incidence. Because of this, highly dense films with exceptional adherence and coverage can be obtained, even on irregular surfaces. This direct bonding can result from the method of deposition of the precursor to the nanostructured layer, e.g., a physical or chemical vapor deposition technique.
The plurality of spaced apart nanostructured features 16 can cause the nanostructured layer 14 to exhibit anti-reflective properties. In some examples, the plurality of spaced apart nanostructures features can produce an effective refractive index gradient, wherein the effective refractive index gradient increases monotonically towards the surface of the substrate.
Optical glass ordinarily reflects about 4% of incident visible light. The nanostructured layers 14 described herein can provide anti-reflective properties in addition to hydrophobic and transparent properties. As used herein, anti-reflective refers to <1% reflection, and preferably <0.1% for normally incident visible light (e.g., wavelengths from approximately 380-750 nm).
The nanostructured layer 14 described herein in general will have two “interfaces,” i.e., an air-layer interface 32 and a layer-substrate interface 34, and a thickness (t). If the nanostructured layer has optically small features (<200 nm features) that are homogeneously distributed throughout the layer, then interfaces 32, 34 will reflect a certain amount of light. If the air-layer reflection 32 returns to the surface 30 such that it is of equal amplitude and out of phase with the layer-substrate interface reflection 34, the two reflections completely cancel (destructive interference) and the nanostructured layer 14 will be antireflective for that wavelength. The thickness (t) of the nanostructured layer 14 determines the reflected phase relationships while the optical indexes of refraction determine the reflective amplitudes.
In order to exhibit anti-reflective properties, the length (L) of the nanostructured features 16 is preferably about ¼ of the wavelength (λ/4) of the relevant light, such as about 140 nm for green light, which has a wavelength range of approximately 495-570 nm. The nanostructured layer 14 can have an effective optical index of refraction and its thickness (t) can be adjusted by the etch duration to obtain the correct thickness to produce an antireflective surface. For example, for a nanostructured layer 14 formed from sodium borosilicate glass, the refractive index to provide anti-reflectivity should be on the order of [(nfair+nfglass)/(nfglass−nfair)]1/2=about 1.22 for a nfglass=1.5.
Alternately, the use of diffusion limited differential etching of the spinodally decomposed nanostructured layer can be used to produce a variable porosity graded index of refraction layer 14. Finally, an anti-reflective surface can be created by applying a coating that provides a graded index of refraction. The nanostructured layer 14 will generally have an effective reflective index gradient.
In some examples, with increasing duration of etching there will be little or no etching of the decomposed layer 26 at the layer-substrate interface 34, while preferably, the porosity of the nanostructures layer 14 increases greatly approaching the layer-air interface 32. In fact, the porosity and resulting layer index of refraction would approach that of air (˜1.01) near the layer-air interface 32. This reflective index gradient can provide broad spectrum anti-reflective properties. As used herein, “broad-spectrum antireflective properties” refers to anti-reflectivity across a wavelength range of at least 150 nm of the visible and/or infrared light spectrum, at least 200 nm of the visible and/or infrared light spectrum, at least 250 nm of the visible and/or infrared light spectrum, at least 300 nm of the visible and/or infrared light spectrum, or at least 350 nm of the visible and/or infrared light spectrum. Based on the range described above, it will be understood that the visible and infrared light spectrum includes a range of 1120 nm, i.e., from 380 to 1500 nm.
Relying on the same principles, the nanostructured layer 14 can be tailored to exhibit UV blocking properties. As used herein, “UV radiation” refers to radiation with a wavelength ranging from 10-400 nm. For example, the nanostructured layer can block or reflect at least 80% of UV radiation, at least 85% of UV radiation, at least 90% of UV radiation, at least 95% of UV radiation, at least 97.5% of UV radiation, at least 99% of UV radiation, or at least 99.5% of UV radiation.
The nanostructured layer 14 can have a thickness (t) of 2000 nm or less, 1000 nm or less, or 500 nm or less. The nanostructured layer can have a thickness of at least 1 nm, at least 5 nm, at least 10 nm, at least 15 nm, or at least 20 nm.
The nanostructured layer 14 itself can be superhydrophobic when the surface 38 of the nanostructured features 16 are hydrophobic or are made hydrophobic, e.g., through application of a hydrophobic coating. This can be achieved by applying a fluorinated silane solution to the nanostructured layer 14 in order to create a hydrophobic monolayer on the surface 38 of the nanostructured layer 14. Accordingly, one method of making the nanostructured layer 14 superhydrophobic would be to apply a continuous hydrophobic coating 36 on a surface 38 of the plurality of spaced apart nanostructured features 16. As used herein, “superhydrophobic” refers to materials that exhibit contact angle with water of greater than 140°, greater than 150°, greater than 160°, or even greater than 170°.
The continuous hydrophobic coating 36 can be a self-assembled monolayer (SAM). As described in the referenced patent applications, the nanostructured layer 14 will be superhydrophobic only after a hydrophobic coating layer 36 is applied thereto. Prior to application of the hydrophobic coating 36, the uncoated nanostructured layer will generally be hydrophilic. The hydrophobic coating layer 36 can be a perfluorinated organic material, a self-assembled monolayer, or both. Methods and materials for applying the hydrophobic coating, whether as a self-assembled monolayer or not, are fully described in the U.S. patent applications referenced hereinabove.
As shown schematically in
Although SAM methods are described, it will be understood that alternate surface treatment techniques can be used. Additional exemplary surface treatment techniques include, but are not limited to, SAM; physical vapor deposition, e.g., sputtering, pulsed laser deposition, e-beam co-evaporation, and molecular beam epitaxy; chemical vapor deposition; and alternate chemical solution techniques.
SAMs useful in the instant invention can be prepared by adding a melt or solution of the desired SAM precursor onto the nanostructured layer 14 where a sufficient concentration of SAM precursor is present to produce a continuous conformal monolayer coating 36. After the hydrophobic SAM is formed and fixed to the surface 38 of the nanostructured layer 14, any excess precursor can be removed as a volatile or by washing. In this manner the SAM-air interface can be primarily or exclusively dominated by the hydrophobic moiety.
One example of a SAM precursor that can be useful for the compositions and methods described herein is tridecafluoro-1,1,2,2-tetrahydroctyltriclorosilane. In some instances, this molecule undergoes condensation with the silanol groups of the nanostructured layer, which releases HCl and covalently bonds the tridecafluoro-1,1,2,2-tetrahydroctylsilyls group to the silanols at the surface of the porous particle. The tridecafluorohexyl moiety of the tridecafluoro-1,1,2,2-tetrahydroctylsilyl groups attached to the surface of the nanostructured layer provides a monomolecular layer that has a hydrophobicity similar to polytetrafluoroethylene. Thus, such SAMs make it possible to produce a nanostructured layer 14 having hydrophobic surfaces while retaining the desired nanostructured morphology that produces the desired superhydrophobic properties.
A non-exclusive list of exemplary SAM precursors that can be used for various embodiments of the invention is:
Xy(CH3)(3-y)SiLR
where y=1 to 3; X is Cl, Br, I, H, HO, R′HN, R′2N, imidizolo, R′C(O)N(H), R′C(O)N(R″), R′O, F3CC(O)N(H), F3CC(O)N(CH3), or F3S(O)2O, where R′ is a straight or branched chain hydrocarbon of 1 to 4 carbons and R″ is methyl or ethyl; L, a linking group, is CH2CH2, CH2CH2CH2, CH2CH2O, CH2CH2CH2O, CH2CH2C(O), CH2CH2CH2C(O), CH2CH2OCH2, CH2CH2CH2OCH2; and R is (CF2)nCF3 or (CF(CF3)OCF2)nCF2CF3, where n is 0 to 24. Preferred SAM precursors have y=3 and are commonly referred to as silane coupling agents. These SAM precursors can attach to multiple OH groups on the surface and can link together with the consumption of water, either residual on the surface, formed by condensation with the surface, or added before, during or after the deposition of the SAM precursor. All SAM precursors yield a most thermodynamically stable structure where the hydrophobic moiety of the molecule is extended from the surface and establish normal conformational populations which permit the hydrophobic moiety of the SAM to dominate the air interface. In general, the hydrophobicity of the SAM surface increases with the value of n for the hydrophobic moiety, although in most cases sufficiently high hydrophobic properties are achieved when n is about 4 or greater where the SAM air interface is dominated by the hydrophobic moiety. The precursor can be a single molecule or a mixture of molecules with different values of n for the perfluorinated moiety. When the precursor is a mixture of molecules it is preferable that the molecular weight distribution is narrow, typically a Poisson distribution or a more narrow distribution.
The SAM precursor can have a non-fluorinated hydrophobic moiety as long as the SAM precursor readily conforms to the nanostructured features 16 of the nanostructured layer 14 and exhibits a sufficiently low surface energy to exhibit the desired hydrophobic properties. Although fluorinated SAM precursors may be preferred, in some embodiments of the invention silicones and hydrocarbon equivalents for the R groups of the fluorinated SAM precursors above can be used. Additional details regarding SAM precursors and methodologies can be found in the patent applications that have been incorporated herein by reference.
That article 10 can also, optionally, include an oil 40 pinned in the plurality of nanopores 20 formed by the plurality of nanostructured features 16. The oil 40 pinned by and/or within the nanopores 20 can be a non-nutritional oil. As used herein, the term “non-nutritional” is used to refer to oils that are not consumed as a nutrient source by microbes, e.g., bacteria, fungus, etc., or other living organisms. Exemplary non-nutritional oils include, but are not limited to polysiloxanes.
As used herein, “pinned” refers to being held in place by surface tension forces, van der Waal forces (e.g., suction), or combinations of both. For example, the interactions that prevent a liquid from being dispensed from a laboratory pipette until the plunger is depressed could be referred to as pinning.
As used herein, “oil” is intended to refer to a non-polar fluid that is a stable, non-volatile, liquid at room temperature, e.g., 23-28° C. The oils used herein should be incompressible and have no solubility or only trace solubility in water, e.g., a solubility of 0.01 g/l or 0.001 g/l or less. Exemplary oils include non-volatile linear and branched alkanes, alkenes and alkynes, esters of linear and branched alkanes, alkenes and alkynes; polysiloxanes, and combinations thereof.
The oil 40 can be pinned in all or substantially all of the nanopores and/or surface nanopores of the nanostructured layer 14. For example, oil 40 can be pinned in at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 97.5%, or at least 99% of the nanopores and/or surface nanopores of the nanostructured layer 14 described herein. The oil 40 pinned within the nanostructured layer 14 can be a contiguous oil phase. Alternately, the superoleophilic layer 14 described herein can include an inner air phase with an oil phase at the air-nanostructured layer interface 32.
In order to maintain the superoleophilic properties for an extended duration, it can be desirable that the oil 40 pinned in the nanostructured layer 14 does not evaporate when the article 10 is exposed to the use environment. For example, the oil 40 can be an oil 40 that does not evaporate at ambient environmental conditions. An exemplary oil 40 can have a boiling point of at least 120° C., or at least 135° C., or at least 150° C. or at least 175° C.
As used herein, “ambient environmental conditions” refer generally to naturally occurring terrestrial or aquatic conditions to which superoleophilic materials may be exposed. For example, submerged in lakes, rivers and oceans around the world, and adhered to manmade structures around the world. Exemplary ambient environmental conditions include (i) a temperature range from −40° C. to 45° C. at a pressure of one atmosphere, and (ii) standard temperature and pressure.
As described above, the nanostructured layer 14 can be covalently or otherwise strongly bonded to the substrate 12. Such bonds, especially, covalent bonds, are very strong and eliminate cracks that can act to concentrate stresses. In particular, this is a significant improvement over conventional adhesive bonding and allows the flexibility to bond a nanostructured layer to a compositionally different substrate without the use of an adhesive. This is yet another manner in which the durability of the nanostructured layer described herein is enhanced.
A method of forming an article 10 with a nanostructured surface 14 is also described. As shown in
In the depositing step, the film 28 can be deposited on the substrate 12 using an in-situ thin film deposition process selected from the group that includes, but is not limited to, pulsed laser ablation, chemical vapor deposition (CVD), metallorganic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD), sputtering and e-beam co-evaporation. Alternately, the film 28 can be deposited on the substrate 12 using an ex-situ thin film deposition process selected from the group that includes, but is not limited to chemical solution processes, and deposition of a halogen compound for an ex situ film process, followed by a heat treatment. The depositing step can occur at a temperature between 15 and 800° C.
In some exemplary methods, the decomposing step can be part of the depositing step, i.e., the film 28 may be deposited in decomposed state 26. For example, by depositing the film 28 at a temperature sufficient to induce decomposition, e.g., spinodal decomposition, during the depositing step. In other exemplary methods, the decomposing step can be a separate step, such as a heating step. The decomposing step can include heating the deposited film 28 to a sufficient temperature for a sufficient time to produce a nanoscale spinodal decomposition. As used herein, “nanoscale spinodal decomposition” refers to spinodal decomposition where the protrusive and recessive interpenetrating networks are of dimensions that, upon differential etching, can result in the nanostructured layers described herein.
The decomposition step can be performed under a non-oxidizing or inert atmosphere. Exemplary inert or non-oxidizing atmospheres include Ar, H2, N2, and combinations thereof (e.g., Ar & H2).
Exemplary decomposed films 26 include a contiguous, protrusive phase and a contiguous, recessive phase that are differentially etchable (i.e. have different etch rates), when subjected to one or more etchants and have an interconnected structure, such as a spinodal structure. The as-deposited film 28 may need to be heat treated in order to phase separate properly. The decomposed film 26 can then be differentially etched to remove most or all of the recessive phase (such as borate-rich phase in the case of borosilicate glass), and to sharpen and thin the protrusive phase to form the plurality of nanostructured features 16.
Although etching is generally described herein as being solution based, etching can also be carried out by vapor etchants. The remaining surface features 16 after etching are characterized by general nanosize dimensions (width, length, and spacing) in a range of about 4 nm to no more than 500 nm, preferably <200 nm, such as in a range of about 50 nm to no more than about 100 nm.
Nanostructured feature 16 dimensions may vary as a function of feature length if a wet etch process is used to form the nanostructured features 16. In this case, the feature dimensions at the air-layer interface 32 of the nanostructured layer 14 tends to be smallest, with the feature size increasing monotonically towards the layer-substrate interface 34, which is inherently exposed to the etchant for a shorter period of time. An exemplary etchant is hydrogen fluoride, such as a 0.05 to 1 mol-% aqueous hydrogen fluoride solution or a 0.1 to 0.5 mol-% aqueous hydrogen fluoride solution.
The dimensions of the nanostructured features 16 are dependent on a number of factors, such as composition, heat treating duration and temperature. The nanostructured feature 16 dimensions, including height of the features, are generally determined by the etch rate and etch time selected. Compared to the processing described in the Differential Etching References cited herein, shorter heating and etch times are generally utilized to form features having dimensions <200 nm.
Smaller feature sizes (<200 nm) make the nanostructured layer 14 more optically transparent. The processing parameters are heavily dependent on the specific phase separating material used. For example, some glasses will phase separate and be spinodal from the initial glass deposition (no additional heat treating required). Other glasses require many days of specific heat treating to form a phase separated spinodal structure. This dependence on the processing parameters is applicable for other parameters as well (e.g., etchant type, etchant concentration and etch time). The degree of transparency can often be typically less than optical quality, such as a Strehl ratio <0.5, due to the imposed surface roughness (or porosity) of the features that make the surface superhydrophobic.
The method can also include applying a continuous hydrophobic coating 36 to a surface 38 of the plurality of spaced apart nanostructured features 16. The continuous hydrophobic coating 36 can be a self-assembled monolayer as described above.
The etching step can be continued until a width, length and height of each of the plurality of spaced apart nanostructured features 16 ranges from 1 to 500 nm, or can be continued until the nanostructured features 16 are any other size described herein.
The decomposed film 26 can include a first material and a second material different from the first material. The first material can be contiguous and the second material can be contiguous, and the first and second materials can form an interpenetrating structure. The first material and the second material can have differential susceptibility to an etchant, e.g., 0.5 molar HF. For example, the first material can be a protrusive phase, i.e., less susceptible to the etchant, and the second material can be a recessive phase, i.e., more susceptible to the etchant.
The first and second materials can be independently selected from the group consisting of glass, metal, ceramic, polymer, resin, and combinations thereof. The first material can be a first glass and the second material can be a second glass different from the first glass.
In some exemplary methods, the recessive phase is completely etched, while in others exemplary methods portions of the recessive phase remain. Accordingly, the nanostructured layer 14 can include an etching residue disposed on the contiguous, protrusive material, where the etching residue is from a recessive contiguous material that was interpenetrating with the protruding material in the decomposed film 26.
The method can include pinning an oil 40 within nanopores 20 formed (or defined) by the plurality of spaced apart nanostructured features 16. The pinning step can include contacting an oil pinning solution with the nanopores 20 of the nanostructured layer 14. The oil pinning solution can include the oil 40, a surfactant, or both. Exemplary surfactants include volatile alcohols, e.g., methanol, ethanol, etc.; acetone; volatile linear and branched alkanes, alkenes and alkynes, e.g., hexane, heptanes and octane; and combinations thereof.
The oil 40 being pinned should be miscible in the surfactant and the surfactant should have a viscosity that is lower than that of the oil. Because high viscosity fluids, such as some of the relevant non-volatile oils, cannot penetrate into nanopores 20, a critical feature of the surfactants is reduction of the effective viscosity of the oil pinning solution to a range that can penetrate the nanopores 20. Once the oil pinning solution penetrates the nanopores 20, the surfactant can volatize leaving the oil 40 pined within the nanopores 20.
In general, the ratio of oil-to-surfactant should be such that the viscosity of the oil pinning solution is sufficiently low to penetrate into the nanopores of the nanostructured layer 14. The oil can be 0.01 to 100 wt-% of the oil pinning solution, 0.01 to 20 wt-% of the oil pinning solution, 0.05 to 10 wt-% of the oil pinning solution or 0.1-5 wt-% of the oil pinning solution. Where the surfactant is present, the surfactant can be 99.99 to 80 wt-% of the oil pinning solution, or 99.95 to 90 wt-% of the oil pinning solution, or 99.99 to 95 wt-% of the oil pinning solution. Additional features of the exemplary materials with oil 40 pinned in the nanopores 20 of nanostructured layer 14 are provided in U.S. application Ser. No. 12/901,072, “Superoleophilic Particles and Coatings and Methods of Making the Same,” filed Oct. 8, 2010, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention can be used to make a variety of articles. For example, articles can include cover plates for optical systems, windows, labware and optical detectors.
For purposes of the present disclosure a surface is “oleophobic” with respect to a composition comprising one or more oils if it has a contact angle with a drop of that composition in a range of from 70 to 90 degrees. For example, a surface can be “oleophobic with respect to ethylene glycol” if it has a contact angle with a drop of ethylene glycol in a range of from 70 to 90 degrees. For purposes of the present disclosure ethylene glycol is the default composition. If no particular composition is specified, then an “oleophobic surface” means a surface that is oleophobic with respect to ethylene glycol.
For purposes of the present disclosure a surface is “superoleophobic” with respect to a composition comprising one or more oils if it has a contact angle with a drop of that composition of greater than 90 degrees. For example, a surface can be “superoleophobic with respect to ethylene glycol” if it has a contact angle with a drop of ethylene glycol of greater than 90 degrees. If no particular composition is specified, then an “superoleophobic surface” means a surface that is superoleophobic with respect to ethylene glycol.
Two types of naturally secreted oils are typically found in fingerprints: secretions of eccrine sweat glands and secretions from sebaceous glands. Eccrine secretions include 98.5 to 99.5% water and 0.5 to 1.5% solids. The solids can include inorganic salts and organic substances. The inorganic salts can include chloride, bromide, iodide, and fluoride. The organic substances can include amino acids, fatty acids, ammonia, and urea. Sebaceous secretions include mainly saturated fats, waxes, and squalene. For purposes of the present disclosure, the term “fingerprint oil” comprises at least one of eccrine secretions and sebaceous secretions.
According to various embodiments, a surface that is “oleophobic with respect to fingerprint oil” has a contact angle with a drop of a composition comprising eccrine secretions and/or sebaceous secretions within a range having a lower limit and/or an upper limit. The range can include or exclude the lower limit and/or the upper limit. The lower limit and/or upper limit can be selected from 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, and 90 degrees. For example, according to certain preferred embodiments, a surface that is “oleophobic with respect to fingerprint oil” has a contact angle with a fingerprint oil in a range of from 70 to 90 degrees.
According to various embodiments, a surface that is “superoleophobic with respect to fingerprint oil” has a contact angle with a drop of a composition comprising eccrine secretions and/or sebaceous secretions within a range having a lower limit and/or an upper limit. The range can include or exclude the lower limit and/or the upper limit. The lower limit and/or upper limit can be selected from 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, and 180 degrees. For example, according to certain preferred embodiments, a surface that is “oleophobic with respect to fingerprint oil” has a contact angle with a fingerprint oil in a range of from 70 to 90 degrees.
Various embodiments relate to coating a nanostructured layer 14, which can be optically transparent, with a layer having a surface that is hydrophobic and oleophobic to form an anti-fingerprinting substrate. In particular, the layer can have a surface that is hydrophobic and oleophobic with respect to fingerprint oil. Using an optical quality superhydrophobic spinodal thin film, with a submicron porous and spiky textured topography can result in an optically clear coating that does not show fingerprints. The anti-fingerprinting properties are achieved by applying a layer having both hydrophobic and oleophobic properties to the surface of a submicron spinodal structure.
Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that when fingerprint skin oil does touch the outer portion of the anti-fingerprinting substrate, very little of the fingerprint oil adheres and any fingerprint oil that adheres does not disperse across the surface of the anti-fingerprinting substrate. Fingerprint oil adheres and disperses to a limited degree, because the surface chemistry of the anti-fingerprinting substrate is hydrophobic/oleophobic due to the application of a layer having a surface that is hydrophobic and oleophobic. It has been demonstrated that various embodiments of the present invention virtually eliminates visible fingerprinting of the surface of the anti-fingerprinting substrate. Therefore, various embodiments are particularly useful for touch screen applications, allowing the touch screens to be handled without showing any fingerprints or skin oil smearing. Other applications include, but are not limited to laser optical windows, and photography cover slips.
Various embodiments relate to a method for producing an anti-fingerprinting substrate, particularly an anti-fingerprinting glass substrate that is optically clear. The method for producing an anti-fingerprinting substrate can include preparing a nanostructured layer 14, as described according to various other embodiments of the present disclosure. The method can further include preparing a deposition solution to be applied to the nanostructured layer 14. The deposition solution can include one or more polyphobic compounds dissolved in a solvent. The one or more polyphobic compounds can be present in an amount within a range having a lower limit and/or an upper limit. The range can include or exclude the lower limit and/or the upper limit. The lower limit and/or upper limit can be selected from 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5, 9, 9.5, 10, 10.5, 11, 11.5, 12, 12.5, 13, 13.5, 14, 14.5, 15, 15.5, 16, 16.5, 17, 17.5, 18, 18.5, 19, 19.5, and 20% by weight based on the total weight of the deposition solution. For example, according to certain preferred embodiments, the one or more polyphobic compounds can be present in an amount of from 1 to 10% by weight based on the total weight of the deposition solution.
The one or more polyphobic compounds can themselves be hydrophobic, superhydrophobic, oleophobic, and/or superoleophobic. The one or more polyphobic compounds can render a surface onto which they are applied hydrophobic, superhydrophobic, oleophobic, and/or superoleophobic. In particular, the one or more polyphobic compounds can render a surface onto which they are applied oleophobic or superoleophobic with respect to fingerprint oil. According to various embodiments, the one or more polyphobic compounds can be polytetrafluoroethylenes, including but not limited to compounds comprising poly[2,2-bistrifluoromethyl-4,5-difluoro-1,3-dioxole-co-tetrafluoroethylene], which is sold under the trademark TEFLON® AF, and/or compounds comprising poly[2,2,4-trifluoro-5-trifluoromethoxy-1,3-dioxole-co-tetrafluoroethylene], which is sold under the trademark HYFLON®.
The solvent can be any solvent capable of at least partially dissolving the particular polyphobic compounds used, such as a mixture of perfluoro(methyl-di-n-butyl)-amine and perfluoro(tri-n-butylamine), which is sold under the trademark FLUOROINERT® FC-40.
Referring to
In order to create the continuous layer 80, the deposition solution comprising the one or more polyphobic compounds and a solvent can be applied to the surface 38 of the nanostructured features 16. Any suitable deposition method can be employed, including but not limited to spin coating. Once the deposition solution comprising the one or more polyphobic compounds is applied to the surface 38 of the nanostructured features 16, the solvent can be allowed to evaporate. Once the solvent evaporates the continuous layer 80 remains. The continuous layer 80 can have a thickness 81 within a range having a lower limit and/or an upper limit. The range can include or exclude the lower limit and/or the upper limit. The lower limit and/or upper limit can be selected from 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, and 75 nm. For example, according to certain preferred embodiments, the continuous layer 80 can have a thickness 81 in a range of from 1 to 60 nm.
The process by which the surface 38 of nanostructured features 16 are coated, for example a spin coating process, can include a plurality of application passes, where each application pass applies a single coating of the deposition solution to the surface 38 of the nanostructured features 16. The number of application passes can be limited to ensure that the thickness 81 of the continuous layer 80 falls within the above-identified ranges. For a spin coating process operating at 1000 RPMs a single application pass is sufficient. If the thickness 81 of the continuous layer 80 exceeds the above-identified ranges, then the nanostructured topology of the nanostructured layer 14 can be ruined, in that the nanopores 20 can be excessively filled with the continuous layer 80 that is deposited.
The resulting substrate comprising the nanostructured layer 14 and the continuous layer 80 can be optically transparent and can exhibit an anti-fingerprinting characteristic, whereby any fingerprint oils deposited onto the substrate are not readily visible.
As in other embodiments, an oil 40 can be pinned in the plurality of nanopores 20 formed by the plurality of nanostructured features 16. The oil 40 pinned by and/or within the nanopores 20 can be a non-nutritional oil.
All numeric values are herein assumed to be modified by the term “about,” whether or not explicitly indicated. The term “about” generally refers to a range of numbers that one of skill in the art would consider equivalent to the recited value (i.e., having the same function or result). In many instances, the term “about” may include numbers that are rounded to the nearest significant figure.
The invention is further described in the following illustrative examples in which all parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise indicated.
A sodium borosilicate material was sputtered onto a silicon substrate in an inert atmosphere (Ar—H2). The composition of the sodium borosilibate material was 65.9 wt-% SiO2, 26.3 wt-% B2O3, and 7.8 wt-% Na2O. The sputtering conditions were as follows:
The sodium borosilicate-silicon composite was heat treated from 30 minutes at a temperature of ˜700° C. in order to spinodally decompose the sodium borosilicate layer. The surface was then etched for 1 minute using 0.5 mol-% hydrogen fluoride. The resulting material was optically clear and had a layer thickness of approximately 300 nm, feature sizes of ˜75 nm, and good superhydrophobicity (contact angle >170 degrees). The surface showed antireflective behavior.
The method of applying fingerprint oil to a glass surface 700 is shown in
Although the present invention has been described in considerable detail with reference to certain preferred versions thereof, other versions are possible. Therefore, the spirit and scope of the appended claims should not be limited to the description of the preferred versions contained herein.
The reader's attention is directed to all papers and documents which are filed concurrently with this specification and which are open to public inspection with this specification, and the contents of all such papers and documents are incorporated herein by reference.
All the features disclosed in this specification (including any accompanying claims, abstract, and drawings) may be replaced by alternative features serving the same, equivalent or similar purpose, unless expressly stated otherwise. Thus, unless expressly stated otherwise, each feature disclosed is one example only of a generic series of equivalent or similar features.
Any element in a claim that does not explicitly state “means for” performing a specified function, or “step for” performing a specific function, is not to be interpreted as a “means” or “step” clause as specified in 35 U.S.C § 112, sixth paragraph. In particular, the use of “step of” in the claims herein is not intended to invoke the provisions of 35 U.S.C § 112, sixth paragraph.
This application is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/767,244 filed Feb. 14, 2013, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/915,183, “Superhydrophobic Transparent Glass (STG) Thin Film Articles,” filed on Oct. 29, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,741,158, issued on Jun. 3, 2014, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/901,072, “Superoleophilic Particles and Coatings and Methods of Making the Same,” filed on Oct. 8, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,497,021, issued on Jul. 30, 2013, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
This invention was made with government support under contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725 awarded by the U.S. Department of Energy. The government has certain rights in this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2221709 | Hood | Nov 1940 | A |
2286275 | Hood | Jun 1942 | A |
2315328 | Hood et al. | Mar 1943 | A |
3790475 | Eaton | Feb 1974 | A |
3931428 | Reick | Jan 1976 | A |
4214919 | Young | Jul 1980 | A |
4326509 | Usukura | Apr 1982 | A |
4377608 | Daudt et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4428810 | Webb et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4521236 | Yamamoto et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4829093 | Matsukawa et al. | May 1989 | A |
5086764 | Gilman | Feb 1992 | A |
5096882 | Kato et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5154928 | Andrews | Oct 1992 | A |
5164363 | Eguchi et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5180845 | Higley | Jan 1993 | A |
5215635 | Stein et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5258221 | Meirowitz et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5264722 | Tonucci et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5266558 | Lichtenberg et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5432151 | Russo et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5437894 | Ogawa et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5482768 | Kawasato et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5510323 | Kamo et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5543630 | Bliss et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5650378 | Tijima et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5736249 | Smith et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5739086 | Goyal et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5741377 | Goyal et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5753735 | Okoroafor et al. | May 1998 | A |
5801105 | Yano et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5846912 | Selvamanickam et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5872080 | Arendt et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5898020 | Goyal et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5958599 | Goyal et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5964966 | Goyal et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5968877 | Budai et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6040251 | Caldwell | Mar 2000 | A |
6074990 | Pique et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077344 | Shoup et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6106615 | Goyal et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6114287 | Lee et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6147033 | Youm et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6150034 | Paranthaman et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6151610 | Senn et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154599 | Rey | Nov 2000 | A |
6156376 | Paranthaman et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159610 | Paranthaman et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6174352 | Semerdjian et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6180570 | Goyal | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6190752 | Do et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6214772 | Iijima et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6231779 | Chiang et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6235383 | Hong et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6235402 | Shoup et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6261704 | Paranthaman et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6265353 | Kinder et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270908 | Williams et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6319868 | Gani et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6331199 | Goyal et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331329 | McCarthy et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6361598 | Balachandran et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6375768 | Goyal | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6384293 | Marcussen | May 2002 | B1 |
6399154 | Williams et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6440211 | Beach et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6447714 | Goyal et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6451450 | Goyal et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6468591 | Paranthaman et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6486100 | Lee et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6515066 | Allen et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6537689 | Schoop et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6555256 | Christen et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6562715 | Chen et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6599346 | Goyal et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6602313 | Goyal et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6607313 | Farries et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6607838 | Goyal et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6607839 | Goyal et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6610413 | Goyal et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6610414 | Goyal et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6632539 | Iijima et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6635097 | Goyal et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6645313 | Goyal et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6657229 | Eguchi et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6657792 | Eguchi et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6663976 | Beach et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6670308 | Goyal | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6673646 | Droopad | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6675229 | Bruno et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6716795 | Norton et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6740421 | Goyal | May 2004 | B1 |
6756139 | Jia et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6764770 | Paranthaman et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6782988 | Cantacuzene et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6784139 | Sankar et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6790253 | Goyal et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6797030 | Goyal et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6800354 | Baumann et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6833186 | Perrine et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6846344 | Goyal et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6867447 | Summerfelt | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6872441 | Baumann et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6872988 | Goyal | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6884527 | Groves et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6890369 | Goyal et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6899928 | Groves et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6902600 | Goval et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6916301 | Clare | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6921741 | Arendt et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6956012 | Paranthaman et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6983093 | Fraval et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6984857 | Udayakumar et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7020899 | Carlopio | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7087113 | Goyal | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7090785 | Chiang et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7193015 | Mabry et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7208044 | Zurbuchen | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7258731 | D'Urso et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7265256 | Artenstein | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7267881 | Weberg et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7323581 | Gardiner et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7338907 | Li et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7341978 | Gu et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7485383 | Aoyagi et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7524531 | Axtell, III et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7553514 | Fan et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7553799 | Paranthaman et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7642309 | Tarng et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7754279 | Simpson et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7754289 | Nagase et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7758928 | Bunce et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7879161 | Goyal | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7892606 | Thies et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7906177 | O'Rear et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7914158 | Schulz et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7923075 | Yeung et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7998919 | Rong et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8017234 | Jin et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8119314 | Heuft et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8119315 | Heuft et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8153233 | Sheng et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8216674 | Simpson et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8497021 | Simpson et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8741158 | Aytug et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
20020142150 | Baumann et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020149584 | Simpson et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020150723 | Oles et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020150725 | Nun et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020150726 | Nun et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020151245 | Hofmann et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030013795 | Nun et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030122269 | Weber et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030185741 | Matyjaszewski et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030230112 | Ikeda et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003768 | Goyal | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040095658 | Buretea et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040163758 | Kagan et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040202872 | Fang | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050129962 | Amidaiji et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050176331 | Martin et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050239658 | Paranthaman et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050239659 | Xiong et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060019114 | Thies et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060024478 | D'Urso et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060024508 | D'Urso et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060029808 | Zhai et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060099397 | Thierauf et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060110537 | Huang | May 2006 | A1 |
20060110541 | Russell et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060110542 | Dietz et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111249 | Shinohara | May 2006 | A1 |
20060175198 | Vermeersch et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060216476 | Ganti et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060229808 | Manabe | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060234066 | Zurbuchen | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060246297 | Sakoske et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060257643 | Birger | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060263516 | Jones et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060275595 | Thies et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060276344 | Paranthaman et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060288774 | Jacob et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070009657 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070027232 | Walsh et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070073381 | Jones | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070088806 | Marriott et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070098806 | Ismail et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070166464 | Acatay et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070170393 | Zhang | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070178227 | Hunt et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070184247 | Simpson et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070196401 | Naruse et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070215004 | Kuroda et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070231542 | Deng et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070237812 | Patel et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070298216 | Jing et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080004691 | Weber et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015298 | Xiong et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080097143 | Californiaa | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080176749 | Goyal | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080185343 | Meyer et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080199657 | Capron et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080213853 | Garcia et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080221009 | Kanagasabapathy et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080221263 | Kanagasabapathy et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080241581 | Zurbuchen | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080248263 | Kobrin | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080248281 | Nakaguma et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080268288 | Jin | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080280104 | Komori et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080280699 | Jarvholm | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080286556 | D'urso et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080299288 | Kobrin et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090011222 | Xiu et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090018249 | Kanagasabapathy et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090025508 | Liao et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090029145 | Thies et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090042469 | Simpson | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090076430 | Simpson et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090081456 | Goyal | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090088325 | Goyal et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090118384 | Nicholas | May 2009 | A1 |
20090118420 | Zou et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090136741 | Zhang et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090253867 | Takahashi et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090264836 | Roe et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090298369 | Koene et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090318717 | Virtanen et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100004373 | Zhu et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100021692 | Bormashenko et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100021745 | Simpson et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100068434 | Steele et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100068509 | Ma et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100090345 | Sun | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100112204 | Marte et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100129258 | Diez Gil et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100130082 | Lee et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100184913 | Ebbrecht et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100200512 | Chase et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100239824 | Weitz et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100266648 | Ranade et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100272987 | Marte et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100286582 | Simpson et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100291723 | Low et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100304086 | Carre et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100326699 | Greyling | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100330278 | Choi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110008401 | Ranade et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110041912 | Ragogna et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110042004 | Schubert et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110070180 | Ranade et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110084421 | Soane et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110095389 | Cui et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110104021 | Curello et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110143094 | Kitada et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110150765 | Boyden et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110160374 | Jin et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110177320 | Mehrabi et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110195181 | Jin et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110217544 | Young et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110223415 | Drescher et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110226738 | Lee | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110229667 | Jin et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110232522 | Das et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110250353 | Caruso et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110263751 | Mayer et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110277393 | Hohmann, Jr. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110311805 | Schier et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120028022 | Brugger et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120028342 | Ismagilov et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120029090 | Brugger et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120041221 | McCarthy et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120058355 | Lee et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120058697 | Strickland et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120088066 | Aytug et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120107581 | Simpson et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20130157008 | Aytug et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130236695 | Aytug et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101225226 | Jul 2008 | CN |
100540153 | Sep 2009 | CN |
19740964 | Mar 1999 | DE |
10138036 | Feb 2003 | DE |
0718897 | Jun 1996 | EP |
0927748 | Jul 1999 | EP |
0985392 | Mar 2000 | EP |
1844863 | Oct 2007 | EP |
2011817 | Jan 2009 | EP |
2019120 | Jan 2009 | EP |
2286991 | Feb 2011 | EP |
2091492 | Sep 2011 | EP |
1065718 | Mar 1989 | JP |
1100816 | Apr 1989 | JP |
1100817 | Apr 1989 | JP |
1220307 | Sep 1989 | JP |
11025772 | Jan 1999 | JP |
2000144116 | May 2000 | JP |
2001207123 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2003286196 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2003296196 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2010510338 | Apr 2010 | JP |
2008136478 | Mar 2010 | RU |
02098562 | Dec 2002 | WO |
2004048450 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2005091235 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2005118501 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2007092746 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2008045022 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2008063134 | May 2008 | WO |
2008108606 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2009029979 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2009118552 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2009125202 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2009158046 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2010000493 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010022107 | Feb 2010 | WO |
2010038046 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010042555 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010059833 | May 2010 | WO |
2010147942 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2011022678 | Feb 2011 | WO |
2011034678 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011070371 | Jun 2011 | WO |
2011084811 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2011109302 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2011156095 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2011163556 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2012011142 | Jan 2012 | WO |
2012012441 | Jan 2012 | WO |
2012024005 | Feb 2012 | WO |
2012044522 | Apr 2012 | WO |
2012054039 | Apr 2012 | WO |
2012100099 | Jul 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Minot et al., Single-layer, gradient refractive index antireflection films, J. Opt. Soc. Am. Jun. 1976, vol. 66, No. 6. |
Ai Lan et al., “Studies on super-hydrophobic films”, Progress in Chemistry (2006) 18(11). (6 pages) (abstract translation). |
“Covalent Bond”, Free Dictionary (Sep. 27, 2013). (1 page). |
Dupont, “Teflon being Oleophobic”, (Nov. 28, 2005). (3 pages). |
Fang et al., “Formation of the superhydrophobic boehmite film on glass substrate by sol-gel method”, Frontiers of Chemical Engineering in China (2009) 3(1): 97-101. |
He et al., “Preparation of porous and nonporous silica nanofilms from aqueous sodium silicate”, Chem Mater (2003) 15(17): 3308-3313. |
Laugel et al., “Nanocomposite silica/polyamine films prepared by a reactive layer-by-layer deposition”, Langmuir (2007) 23(7): 3706-3711. |
Lin et al., “Superhydrophobic/superhydrophilic patterning and superhydrophobic-superhydrophilic gradient on the surface of a transparent silica nanoparticulate thin film”, (Jun. 6, 2009). (abstract only). |
Zhang et al., “Mechanically stable antireflection and antifogging coating fabricated by the layer-by-layer deposition process and postcalcination”, Langmuir (2008) 24(19): 10851-10857. |
Aytug et al., “Deposition studies and coordinated characterization of MOCVD YBCO films on IBAD-MgO templates”, Superconductor Science and Technology (2009) 22: 1-5. |
Aytug et al., “Enhancement of flux pinning in YBA2Cu307_6films via nano-scale modifications of substrate surfaces”, Nova Science Publishers, Inc. (2007) ISBN: 978-1-60021-692-3, pp. 237-262. |
Aytug et al., “ORNL-Superpower CRADA: Development of MOCVD-based IBAD-2G wires”, Retrieved on Oct. 21, 2010, from <http://111.htspeereview.com> /2008/pdfs/presentations /wednesday/2G/5_2g_ornl_superpower.pdf. |
Chen et al., “Metal organic chemical vapor deposition for the fabrication of YBCO superconducting tapes”, Nova Science Publishers, Inc (2007): ISBN: 978-1-60021-692-1, pp. 205-216. |
Comini, “Quasi-one dimensional metal oxide semiconductors: Preparation, characterization and application as chemical sensors”, Progress in Materials Science (2009) 54(1): 1-67. |
Duan et al., “Indium phosphide nanowires as building blocks for nanoscale electronic and optoelectronic devices”, Nature (2001) 409: 66-69. |
Feng et al., “A super-hydrophobic and super-oleophilic coating mesh film for the separation of oil and water”, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. (2004) 43: 2012-2014. |
Gao et al., “Single and binary rare earth REBa2CU307_delta films prepared by chemical solution deposition”, J. Phys Conf. Series (2008) 97: 1-5. |
Goyal et al., “Self-assembled, ferromagnetic CoNSZ nanocomposite films for ultrahigh density storage media”, American Physical Society (2010): abstract #S1.119. (abstract only). |
Goyal et al., “Irradiation-free, columnar defects comprised of self-assembled nanodots and nanorods resulting in strongly enhanced flux-pinning in YBA2CU307-6 films”, Superconductor Science and Technology (2005): 18(11): 1533-1538. |
Han et al., “Transition metal oxide core-shell nanowires: Generic synthesis and transport studies”, Nano Letters (2004) 4(7): 1241-1246. |
Haugan et al., “In situ approach to introduce flux pinning in YBCO”, Nova Science Publishers, Inc (2007) ISBN: 978-1-60021-692-3, pp. 59-77. |
Huang et al., “Room-temperature ultraviolet nanowire nanolasers”, Science (2001) 292: 1897-1899. |
Javey et al., “Layer-by-layer assembly of nanowires for three-dimensional, multifunctional electronics”, Nano Letters (2007) 7(3): 773-777. |
Kang et al. “High-performance high-Tc superconducting wires”, Science (2006) 311: 1911-1914. |
Kang et al., “Supporting material: High-performance high-Tc superconducting wires”, Science (2006) 311: 1911. |
Kuchibhatla et al., “One dimensional nanostructured materials”, Progress in Materials Science (2007) 52: 699-913. |
Le et al., “Systematic studies of the epitaxial growth of single-crystal ZnO nanorods on GaN using hydrothermal synthesis”, Journal of Crystal Growth (2006) 293: 36-42. |
Lei et al., “Highly ordered nanostructures with tunable size, shape and properties: A new way to surface nano-pattering using ultra-thin alumina masks”, Progress in Materials Science (2007) 52: 465-539. |
Wee et al., “Enhanced flux pinning and critical current density via incorporation of self-assembled rare-Earth barium tantalate nanocolumns within YBa2Cu3 07-6 films”, Phys Rev B (2010) 81(14): 140503. (4 pages). |
Wee et al., “Formation of self-assembled, double-perovskite, BAZYNbO6 nanocolumns and their contribution to flux-pinning and .. /c in Nb-doped YBa2Cu3 07_6 films”, Applied Physics Express 3 (2010): 023101. (3 pages). |
Yamada et al., “Reel-to-reel pulsed laser deposition of YBCO thick films”, Nova Science Publishers, Inc. (2007) ISBN: 978-1-60021-692-3, pp. 95-119. |
Yamada et al., “Towards the practical PLD-IBAD coated conductor fabrication-Long wire, high production rate, and ./, enhancement in magnetic field”, Physica (2006) 445-448: 504-508. |
Yoo et al., “Electrocatalytic application of a vertical Au nanorod array using ultrathin Pt/Ru/Pt layer-by-layer coatings”, Electrochimica Acta (2008) 53: 3656-3662. |
Li et al., “A facile layer-by-layer deposition process for the fabrication of highly transparent superhydrophobic coatings”, Chem Commun (2009): 2730-2732. |
Ahn et al., “Heterogeneous Three-Dimensional Electronics by Use of Printed Semiconductor Nanomaterials,” Science vol. 314, (2006) pp. 1754-1757. |
Aytug et al., “Enhanced flux pinning in MOCVD-YBCO films through Zr additions: systematic feasibility studies,” Superconductor Science and Technology, vol. 23, (2010), pp. 1-7. |
Aytug, “Deposition studies and coordinated characterization of MOCVD YBCO films on IBAD-Mg0 templates,” Superconductor Science and Technology, vol. 22, (2009) p. 1. |
Harrington et al., “Self-assembled, rare earth tantalite pyrochlore nanoparticles for superior flux pinning in YBa2Cu3O7_8 films,” Superconductor Science and Technology, Issue 2 (2009), pp. 1-5. |
Hikichi et al., “Property and Structure of YBa2Cu307,-Nb205 Composite,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 31, (1992) 1234, col. 2 Paragraph 1. |
Kar et al., “Synthesis and Characterization of One-dimensional MgO Nanostructures,” J. Nanosci. Nanotech, vol. 314, (2006) pp. 1447-1452. |
Kita et al., “Effect of Ta205 addition on the superconducting properties of REBa2CU30,,” Physica C: vol. 445-448, (2006) pp. 391-394. |
Levkin et al., “Porous polymer coatings: A versatile approach to Superhydrophobic surfaces,” Adv. Funct. Mater. (2009) 19: 1993-1998. |
Li and Zhu, “Preparation and structure characterization of organic-inorganic nanocomposites,” J Xi'an Shiyou Univ. (Natural Sci. Ed.) (2003). (abstract only). |
Li et al., “Joining of pressureless sintered SiC using polysiloxane SR355 with active additive Ni nanopowder,” Acta Materiae Composite Sinica, (2008). Abstract only. |
Liang et al., “Preparation of Free-Standing Nanowire Arrays on Conductive Substrates,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. vol. 126 (2004) pp. 16338-16339. |
Lu et al., “Quasi-one-dimensional metal oxide materials-Synthesis, properties and applications,” Materials Science and Engineering R: Reports, Elsevier Sequoia S.A., Lausanne, CH LNKD-DOI: 10.1016/J.Mser.2006.04.002, vol. 52, No. 103, (2006) pp. 49-91. |
Ma et al., “Growth and properties of YBCO-coated conductors fabricated by inclined-substrate deposition,” IEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 15, No. 2 (2005) pp. 2970-2973. |
McIntyre et al., “Metalorganic deposition of high-J,Ba2YCu307, thin films from trifluoroacetate precursors onto (100) SrTiO3,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 68, No. 8 (1990) pp. 4183-4187. |
Morales et al. “A laser Ablation Method for the Synthesis of Crystalline Semiconductor Nanowires,” Science, vol. 279 (1998) pp. 208-211. |
Nagashima et al., “Epitaxial Growth of MgO Nanowires by Pulsed Laser Deposition,” J. Appl.; Phys., vol. 101 (2007) pp. 124304-1 to 124304-4. |
Pan et al., “Nanobelts of Semiconducting Oxides,” Science, vol. 291, (2001) pp. 1947-1949. |
Paranthaman et al., “Flux Pinning and AC Loss in Second Generation High Temperature; Superconductor Wires,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37832, ISBN: 978-1- ; 60021-692-3, pp. 3-10. |
Pomar et al., “Enhanced vortex pinning in YBCO; coated conductors with BZO nanoparticles; from chemical solution deposition,” IEEE Transactions No. 3, (2009) pp. 3258-3261; on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 19. |
Saylor et al., “Experimental Method for Determining; surface Energy Anisotropy; and its; Application to Magnesia,” Journal of the American; Ceramic Society, vol. 83, No. 5, (2004) pp. 1226-1232. |
Selvamanickam et al., “High-current Y—Ba—Cu—O coated conductor using metal organic; chemical-vapor Deposition, and ion-beam-assisted deposition,” IEEE Transactions on Applied; Superconductivity, vol. 11, No. 1 (2001) pp. 3379-3381. |
Su et al., “Fabrication of thin films of multi-oxides (YBa2Cu307_8) starting from nanoparticles of; mixed ions,” Superconductor Science and Technology, vol. 19, No. 11, (2006) pp. L51-L54. |
Tu et al., “Fabrication of Superhydrophobic and Superoleophilic polystyrene surfaces by a facile; one step method,” Macromol. Rapid Commun. (2007) 28: 2262-2266. |
Wang et al., “Growth of Nanowires,” Mater. Sci. & Eng., vol. 60, No. 1-6 (2008) pp. 1-51. |
Wee et al., “High Performance Superconducting Wire in High Applied Magnetic Fields via; Nanoscale Defect Engineering,” Superconductor Science and Technology, (2008) pp. 1-4. |
Wei et al., “Preparation and characterization of periodic mesoporous organosilica ermially functionalized with fluorocarbon groups by a direct synthesis,” J Sol-Gel Sci Technol (2007) 44: 105-110. |
Dupont, “Dupont Krytox Performance Lubricants Product Overview”, 2002, p. 1-12. Accessed at http://www.vacsysspec.com/files/121193149.pdf. |
3M, “3M Fluorinert Electronic Liquid FC-70”, 2000, p. 1-4. Accessed at http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/648910/fluorinert-electronic-liquid-fc-70.pdf. |
Wang, S.; Shu, y.; “Superhydrophobic antireflective coating with high transmittance”, Journal of Coatings Technology and Research, 2013, vol. 4, p. 527-535. |
Nilsson, M.; Daniello, R.; Rothstein, J.; “A novel and inexpensive technique for creating superhydrophobic surfaces using Teflon and sandpaper”; Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2010, vol. 43, p. 1-5. |
Daniel et al., “Lubricant-infused micro/nano-structured surfaces with tunable dynamic omniphobicity at high temperatures”, Appl Phys Lett. (2013) 102: 231603. (5 pages). |
Tuteja et al., “Robust omniphobic surfaces”, Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences—PNAS (2008) 47: 18200-18205. |
Vogel et al., “Transparency and damage tolerance of patternable omniphobic lubricated surfaces based on inverse colloidal monolayers”, Nature (2013) 4: 1. |
Wong et al., “Bioinspired self-repairing slippery surfaces with pressure-stable omniphobicity”, Nature (2011) 447: 443-447. |
Arkles, “Hydrophobocity, hydrophilicity and silane surface modification”, Gelest, Inc. (2006): 1-19. |
Barabash, “Spatially resolved distribution of dislocations and crystallographic tilts in GaN layers grown on Si(111) substrates by maskless cantilever epitaxy”, J Appl Phys (2006) 100(5): 053103. (12 pages). |
Kim et al., “Critical thickness of GaN thin films on sapphire (0001)”, Appl Phys Lett (1996) 69(16): 2358-2360. |
Ai et al., “Recent progress on the superhydrophobic surfaces with special adhesion: From natural to biomimetic to functional”, Journal of Nanoengineering and Nanomanufacturing (2011) 1: 18-34. |
Poco et al., “Synthesis of high porosity, monolithic alumina aerogels”, J Non-Crystalline Solids (2001) 285: 57-63. |
Roach et al., “Progress in superhydrophobic surface development”, Soft Matter (2008) 4: 224-240. |
Smirnova, “Synthesis of silica aerogels and their application as a drug delivery system”, Dissertation, Technischen Universitat Berlin (2002): 43-44. |
Zhang et al., “Comparison of X-ray diffraction methods for determination of the critical layer thickness for dislocation multiplication”, Journal of Electronic Materials (1999) 28(5): 553-558. |
Das et al., Novel nonlithographic quantum wire array fabrication: Physica E—Low-Dimensional Systems and Nanostructures, Elsevier Science BV, NL LNKD—DOI: 10.1016/J.Physe.2005.10.015, vol. 36, No. 2, 3 (2007), pp. 133-139. |
Kim et al: “A perspective on conducting oxide buffers for Cu-based YBCO-coated conductors”, Institute of Physics Jublishing, Superconductor Science and Technology, Published Feb. 7, 2006, Online at stacks.iop.org/SUST/19/R23. |
FOCtek, “Fused Silica”, 2007, p. 1. |
Sheen et al.: “New approach to fabricate an extremely super-amphiphobic surface based on fluorinated silica nanoparticles”, Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics, vol. 46, Issue 18, pp. 1984-1990, Aug. 11, 2008. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220298361 A1 | Sep 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13767244 | Feb 2013 | US |
Child | 17712939 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12915183 | Oct 2010 | US |
Child | 13767244 | US | |
Parent | 12901072 | Oct 2010 | US |
Child | 12915183 | US |