Patent Grant
11498964
This application is related to a U.S. provisional application entitled “Antibodies targeting CDH19 for melanoma”, filed on Mar. 15, 2013, the same day as the present application is filed. This related application is incorporated in its entirety by reference.
The present invention relates to an antibody construct comprising a first human binding domain capable of binding to human CDH19 on the surface of a target cell and a second domain capable of binding to human CD3 on the surface of a T cell. Moreover, the invention provides a nucleic acid sequence encoding the antibody construct, a vector comprising said nucleic acid sequence and a host cell transformed or transfected with said vector. Furthermore, the invention provides a process for the production of the antibody construct of the invention, a medical use of said antibody construct and a kit comprising said antibody construct.
Melanoma is a skin cancer that is caused by the oncogenic transformation of melanocytes, which are pigment producing skin cells. As of 2009, Melanoma had a prevalence of more than 870,000 cases in the US alone (US National Institutes of Health). Each year, over 75,000 new cases of melanoma are diagnosed in the US, and approximately 25% of patients have advanced disease at the time of diagnosis. Despite the fact that cases of primary melanoma can be cured by surgery if they are detected early enough, melanoma is the leading cause of death from skin disease in the US, responsible for about 10,000 deaths per year in the US. Once the disease has spread and became metastatic, the prognosis is poor, with a 5 year relative survival of 15%.
There are four basic types of melanomas. Three types are found in the top layers of the skin and the fourth one is invasive and has penetrated deeper into the skin and may have spread to other areas of the body.
Superficial spreading melanoma is the most common type of melanoma which accounts for about 70% of all cases. It grows along the top layer of the skin for a fairly long time before penetrating more deeply. It first appears as a flat or slightly raised discolored patch that has irregular borders and may be somewhat asymmetrical in form. The color varies, and you may see areas of tan, brown, black, red, blue or white. This type of melanoma can occur in a previously benign mole and is found most often in young people.
Lentigo maligna is similar to the superficial spreading type, as it also remains close to the skin surface for quite a while, and usually appears as a flat or mildly elevated mottled tan, brown or dark brown discoloration. It is found most often in the elderly. When this cancer becomes invasive, it is referred to as lentigo maligna melanoma.
Acral lentiginous melanoma also spreads superficially before penetrating more deeply. It is quite different from the others, though, as it usually appears as a black or brown discoloration under the nails or on the soles of the feet or palms of the hands. This type of melanoma is sometimes found on dark-skinned people, and can often advance more quickly than superficial spreading melanoma and lentigo maligna.
Nodular melanoma is usually invasive at the time it is first diagnosed. The malignancy is recognized when it becomes a bump. It is usually black, but occasionally is blue, gray, white, brown, tan, red or skin tone. This is the most aggressive of the melanomas, and is found in 10 to 15 percent of cases.
Common treatments for metastatic melanoma include chemotherapy, targeted therapies for eligible patients (e.g. BRAF inhibitor treatment for patients with BRAF mutations) and immunotherapy. Metastatic melanoma is a tumor type where immunotherapy has been demonstrated to not only slow disease progression, but to lead to cures in late stage patients. Interleukin-2 was approved for the use in metastatic melanoma in 1998, and in 2011 an antibody targeting CTLA4, a member of a new generation of immune checkpoint inhibitors, gained approval by the FDA.
CDH19 is a type II cadherin transmembrane protein of unknown function. The human gene was cloned in 2000 based on its sequence similarity to CDH7 (Kools, P. et al. Genomics. 2000). Expressed Sequence Tags (ESTs) for CDH19 were isolated from melanocyte cDNA libraries, indicating that expression of CDH19 may be limited to cells of neural crest origin (Kools, P. et al. Genomics. 2000). In support of this notion, rat CDH19 was found to be expressed primarily in nerve ganglia and in Schwann cells during rat embryonic development (Takahashi, M. and Osumi, O. Devl Dynamics. 2005.). Diagnostic antibodies detecting CDH19 in Western Blot, immunohistochemitstry or flow cytometry are known in the art and commercially available. Those antibodies comprise poly- and monoclonal antibodies generated in animal hosts.
The present invention provides an isolated multispecific antibody construct comprising a first human binding domain capable of binding to human CDH19 on the surface of a target cell and a second domain capable of binding to human CD3 on the surface of a T cell.
In one embodiment the antibody construct of the invention the first binding domain comprises a VH region comprising CDR-H1, CDR-H2 and CDR-H3 and a VL region comprising CDR-L1, CDR-L2 and CDR-L3 selected from the group consisting of:
In a further embodiment of the antibody construct of the invention the first binding domain comprises a VH region selected from the group consisting of VH regions
In another embodiment of the antibody construct of the invention the first binding domain comprises a VL region selected from the group consisting of VL regions
The invention further provides an embodiment of the antibody construct of the invention, wherein the first binding domain comprises a VH region and a VL region selected from the group consisting of:
In a further embodiment of the invention the antibody construct is in a format selected from the group consisting of (scFv)2, (single domain mAb)2, scFv-single domain mAb, diabodies and oligomers thereof.
In a preferred embodiment the first binding domain comprises an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of
In another embodiment of the antibody construct of the invention the second binding domain is capable of binding to human and Callithrix jacchus, Saguinus Oedipus or Saimiri sciureus CD3 epsilon.
In a preferred embodiment the antibody construct of the invention has an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of
The invention further provides a nucleic acid sequence encoding an antibody construct of the invention.
Furthermore, the invention provides a vector comprising a nucleic acid sequence of the invention. Moreover, the invention provides a host cell transformed or transfected with the nucleic acid sequence of the invention.
In a further embodiment the invention provides a process for the production of a antibody construct of the invention, said process comprising culturing a host cell of the invention under conditions allowing the expression of the antibody construct of the invention and recovering the produced antibody construct from the culture.
Moreover, the invention provides a pharmaceutical composition comprising an antibody construct of the invention or produced according to the process of the invention
In one embodiment the invention provides the antibody construct of the invention or produced according to the process of the invention for use in the prevention, treatment or amelioration of a melanoma disease or metastatic melanoma disease.
The invention also provides a method for the treatment or amelioration of a melanoma disease or metastatic melanoma disease, comprising the step of administering to a subject in need thereof the antibody construct of the invention or produced according to the process of the invention.
In a preferred embodiment method of use of the invention the melanoma disease or metastatic melanoma disease is selected from the group consisting of superficial spreading melanoma, lentigo maligna, lentigo maligna melanoma, acral lentiginous melanoma and nodular melanoma.
In a further embodiment, the invention provides a kit comprising an antibody construct of the invention, or produced according to the process of the invention, a vector of the invention, and/or a host cell of the invention.
FACS analysis of CDH19/CD3 bispecific antibodies on indicated cell lines:
1) untransfected L1.2. 2) L1.2 cells stably transfected with human CDH19, 3) melanoma cell line CHL-1, 4) melanoma cell line A2058, 5) human CD3 positive human T cell line HBP-ALL, 6) macaque T cell line 4119 LnPx. Negative controls [1) to 6)]: detection antibodies without prior CDH19/CD3 bispecific antibody.
Cytotoxic activity of CDH19/CD3 bispecific antibodies as measured in a 48-hour FACS-based cytotoxicity assay. Effector cells: unstimulated human PBMC. Target cells: as indicated. Effector to target cell (E:T)-ratio: 10:1.
Tumor growth in vivo inhibition of Colo699 cells by administration of CDH19 BITE 2G6. The bispecific antibody construct inhibits growth of tumors at 0.5 mg/kg dose.
Tumor growth in vivo inhibition of CHL-1 cells by administration of CDH19 BITE 2G6. The bispecific antibody construct inhibits growth of tumors at 0.5 mg/kg dose.
Cytotoxic activity of CDH19/CD3 bispecific antibodies as measured in a 48-hour imaging-based cytotoxicity assay. Effector cells: unstimulated human T cells. Target cells: as indicated. Effector to target cell (E:T)-ratio: 10:1.
Chromatogram IMAC capture and elution CH19 2G6 302×12C SA21 Typical IMAC elution profile obtained during purification of an CDH19 BiTE antibody. The red line indicates absorption at 254 nm, the blue line indicates absorption at 280 nm. Brown line indicates conductivity. 1—Capture. 2—Pre-Elution 50 mM Imidazole. 3. BiTE Elution 500 mM Imidazole
Chromatogram Protein_A capture and elution CH19 2G6 302×F12Q
Typical Protein_A elution profile obtained during purification of an CDH19 BiTE antibody. The red line indicates absorption at 254 nm, the blue line indicates absorption at 280 nm. Brown line indicates conductivity. Green line indicates the applied gradient percentage. 1—Capture. 2—BiTE Elution
SEC elution profile of CDH19 BITE antibody 2G6 302×12C SA21
Typical SEC elution profile obtained during purification of an CDH19 BITE antibody. Protein peaks corresponding to the monomeric and dimeric BiTE antibody isoforms are indicated. LMW=low molecular weight. The red line indicates absorption at 254 nm, the blue line indicates absorption at 280 nm. Brown line indicates conductivity. 1—non BITE aggregates in SEC exclusion volume. 2. BiTE dimer. 3. BiTE monomer. 4. Low molecular weight contaminants and salts
Reduced SDS PAGE analytics of CDH19 BiTE Monomer CH19 2G6 302×12C SA21 (left) and molecular weight marker Novex Sharp Protein Standard (Life Technologies).
HP-SEC chromatogram showing the elution of CDH19 BITE CH19 2G6 302×12C SA21 after seven day of storage at 37° C. Pink line indicating optical absorption at 210 nm wavelength. Brown line indicating conductivity.
1 BiTE Dimer. 2. BiTE Monomer
HP-SEC chromatogram showing the elution of CDH19 BITE CH19 2G6 302×12C SA21 after three freeze/thaw cycles. Pink line indicating optical absorption at 210 nm wavelength. Brown line indicating conductivity. 1. BiTE Monomer
CatIEX chromatogram of elution of CDH19 BiTE CH19 2G6 302×12C SA21. Blue line indicating optical absorption at 280 nm. Red line indicating optical absorption at 254 nm.
HIC elution profile of CDH19 BiTE CH19 2G6 302×12C SA21. Blue line indicating optical absorption at 280 nm. Red line indicating optical absorption at 254 nm. Brown line indicating conductivity.
FACS analysis of CDH19/CD3 bispecific antibodies on indicated cell lines: 1) HEK293 cells stably transfected with human CDH19, 2) human CD3 positive human T cell line HBP-ALL; Negative controls [1) and 2)]: detection antibodies without prior CDH19/CD3 bispecific antibody cell culture supernatant.
Cytotoxic activity of CDH19/CD3 bispecific antibodies as measured in an 18-hour Chromium release-based cytotoxicity assay. Effector cells: stimulated human CD8+ T-cells. Target cells: HEK293 transfected with human CDH19. Effector to target cell (E:T)-ratio: 10:1.
It must be noted that as used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the”, include plural references unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “a reagent” includes one or more of such different reagents and reference to “the method” includes reference to equivalent steps and methods known to those of ordinary skill in the art that could be modified or substituted for the methods described herein.
Unless otherwise indicated, the term “at least” preceding a series of elements is to be understood to refer to every element in the series. Those skilled in the art will recognize, or be able to ascertain using no more than routine experimentation, many equivalents to the specific embodiments of the invention described herein. Such equivalents are intended to be encompassed by the present invention.
The term “and/or” wherever used herein includes the meaning of “and”, “or” and “all or any other combination of the elements connected by said term”.
The term “about” or “approximately” as used herein means within ±20%, preferably within ±15%, more preferably within ±10%, and most preferably within ±5% of a given value or range.
Throughout this specification and the claims which follow, unless the context requires otherwise, the word “comprise”, and variations such as “comprises” and “comprising”, will be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated integer or step or group of integers or steps but not the exclusion of any other integer or step or group of integer or step. When used herein the term “comprising” can be substituted with the term “containing” or “including” or sometimes when used herein with the term “having”.
When used herein “consisting of” excludes any element, step, or ingredient not specified in the claim element. When used herein, “consisting essentially of” does not exclude materials or steps that do not materially affect the basic and novel characteristics of the claim.
In each instance herein any of the terms “comprising”, “consisting essentially of” and “consisting of” may be replaced with either of the other two terms.
The definition of the term “antibody” includes embodiments such as monoclonal, chimeric, single chain, humanized and human antibodies, as well as antibody fragments, like, inter alia, Fab fragments. Antibody fragments or derivatives further comprise F(ab′)2, Fv, scFv fragments or single domain antibodies such as domain antibodies or nanobodies, single variable domain antibodies or immunoglobulin single variable domain comprising merely one variable domain, which might be VHH, VH or VL, that specifically bind an antigen or epitope independently of other V regions or domains; see, for example, Harlow and Lane (1988) and (1999), loc. cit.; Kontermann and Dübel, Antibody Engineering, Springer, 2nd ed. 2010 and Little, Recombinant Antibodies for Immunotherapy, Cambridge University Press 2009. Such immunoglobulin single variable domain encompasses not only an isolated antibody single variable domain polypeptide, but also larger polypeptides that comprise one or more monomers of an antibody single variable domain polypeptide sequence.
In line with this definition all above described embodiments of the term antibody can be subsumed under the term “antibody construct”. Said term also includes diabodies or Dual-Affinity Re-Targeting (DART) antibodies. Further envisaged are (bispecific) single chain diabodies, tandem diabodies (Tandab's), “minibodies” exemplified by a structure which is as follows: (VH-VL-CH3)2, (scFv-CH3)2 or (scFv-CH3-scFv)2, “Fc DART” antibodies and “IgG DART” antibodies, and multibodies such as triabodies. Immunoglobulin single variable domains encompass not only an isolated antibody single variable domain polypeptide, but also larger polypeptides that comprise one or more monomers of an antibody single variable domain polypeptide sequence.
Various procedures are known in the art and may be used for the production of such antibody constructs (antibodies and/or fragments). Thus, (antibody) derivatives can be produced by peptidomimetics. Further, techniques described for the production of single chain antibodies (see, inter alia, U.S. Pat. No. 4,946,778, Kontermann and Dübel (2010), loc. cit. and Little (2009), loc. cit.) can be adapted to produce single chain antibodies specific for elected polypeptide(s). Also, transgenic animals may be used to express humanized antibodies specific for polypeptides and fusion proteins of this invention. For the preparation of monoclonal antibodies, any technique, providing antibodies produced by continuous cell line cultures can be used. Examples for such techniques include the hybridoma technique (Köhler and Milstein Nature 256 (1975), 495-497), the trioma technique, the human B-cell hybridoma technique (Kozbor, Immunology Today 4 (1983), 72) and the EBV-hybridoma technique to produce human monoclonal antibodies (Cole et al., Monoclonal Antibodies and Cancer Therapy, Alan R. Liss, Inc. (1985), 77-96). Surface plasmon resonance as employed in the BIAcore system can be used to increase the efficiency of phage antibodies which bind to an epitope of a target polypeptide, such as CD3 epsilon (Schier, Human Antibodies Hybridomas 7 (1996), 97-105; Malmborg, J. Immunol. Methods 183 (1995), 7-13). It is also envisaged in the context of this invention that the term “antibody” comprises antibody constructs, which may be expressed in a host as described herein below, e.g. antibody constructs which may be transfected and/or transduced via, inter alia, viruses or plasmid vectors.
Furthermore, the term “antibody” as employed in the invention also relates to derivatives or variants of the antibodies described herein which display the same specificity as the described antibodies.
The terms “antigen-binding domain”, “antigen-binding fragment” and “antibody binding region” when used herein refer to a part of an antibody molecule that comprises amino acids responsible for the specific binding between antibody and antigen. The part of the antigen that is specifically recognized and bound by the antibody is referred to as the “epitope” as described herein above. As mentioned above, an antigen-binding domain may typically comprise an antibody light chain variable region (VL) and an antibody heavy chain variable region (VH); however, it does not have to comprise both. Fd fragments, for example, have two VH regions and often retain some antigen-binding function of the intact antigen-binding domain. Examples of antigen-binding fragments of an antibody include (1) a Fab fragment, a monovalent fragment having the VL, VH, CL and CH1 domains; (2) a F(ab′)2 fragment, a bivalent fragment having two Fab fragments linked by a disulfide bridge at the hinge region; (3) a Fd fragment having the two VH and CH1 domains; (4) a Fv fragment having the VL and VH domains of a single arm of an antibody, (5) a dAb fragment (Ward et al., (1989) Nature 341:544-546), which has a VH domain; (6) an isolated complementarity determining region (CDR), and (7) a single chain Fv (scFv). Although the two domains of the Fv fragment, VL and VH are coded for by separate genes, they can be joined, using recombinant methods, by a synthetic linker that enables them to be made as a single protein chain in which the VL and VH regions pair to form monovalent molecules (known as single chain Fv (scFv); see e.g., Huston et al. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA 85:5879-5883). These antibody fragments are obtained using conventional techniques known to those with skill in the art, and the fragments are evaluated for function in the same manner as are intact antibodies.
The term “monoclonal antibody” as used herein refers to an antibody obtained from a population of substantially homogeneous antibodies, i.e., the individual antibodies comprising the population are identical except for possible naturally occurring mutations and/or post-translation modifications (e.g., isomerizations, amidations) that may be present in minor amounts. Monoclonal antibodies are highly specific, being directed against a single antigenic site. Furthermore, in contrast to conventional (polyclonal) antibody preparations which typically include different antibodies directed against different determinants (epitopes), each monoclonal antibody is directed against a single determinant on the antigen. In addition to their specificity, the monoclonal antibodies are advantageous in that they are synthesized by the hybridoma culture, uncontaminated by other immunoglobulins. The modifier “monoclonal” indicates the character of the antibody as being obtained from a substantially homogeneous population of antibodies, and is not to be construed as requiring production of the antibody by any particular method. For example, the monoclonal antibodies to be used in accordance with the present invention may be made by the hybridoma method first described by Kohler et al., Nature, 256: 495 (1975), or may be made by recombinant DNA methods (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 4,816,567). The “monoclonal antibodies” may also be isolated from phage antibody libraries using the techniques described in Clackson et al., Nature, 352: 624-628 (1991) and Marks et al., J. Mol. Biol., 222: 581-597 (1991), for example.
The term “human antibody” includes antibodies having variable and constant regions corresponding substantially to human germline immunoglobulin sequences known in the art, including, for example, those described by Kabat et al. (See Kabat et al. (1991) loc. cit.). The human antibodies of the invention may include amino acid residues not encoded by human germline immunoglobulin sequences (e.g., mutations introduced by random or site-specific mutagenesis in vitro or by somatic mutation in vivo), for example in the CDRs, and in particular, CDR3. The human antibody can have at least one, two, three, four, five, or more positions replaced with an amino acid residue that is not encoded by the human germline immunoglobulin sequence. It is emphasized that the definition of human antibodies as used herein also contemplates fully human antibodies, which include only non-artificially and/or genetically altered human sequences of antibodies as those can be derived by using technologies using systems such as the Xenomice.
Examples of “antibody variants” include humanized variants of non-human antibodies, “affinity matured” antibodies (see, e.g. Hawkins et al. J. Mol. Biol. 254, 889-896 (1992) and Lowman et al., Biochemistry 30, 10832-10837 (1991)) and antibody mutants with altered effector function (s) (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,648,260, Kontermann and Dübel (2010), loc. cit. and Little (2009), loc. cit.).
As used herein, “in vitro generated antibody” refers to an antibody where all or part of the variable region (e.g., at least one CDR) is generated in a non-immune cell selection (e.g., an in vitro phage display, protein chip or any other method in which candidate sequences can be tested for their ability to bind to an antigen). This term thus preferably excludes sequences generated by genomic rearrangement in an immune cell.
The pairing of a VH and VL together forms a single antigen-binding site. The CH domain most proximal to VH is designated as CH1. Each L chain is linked to an H chain by one covalent disulfide bond, while the two H chains are linked to each other by one or more disulfide bonds depending on the H chain isotype. The VH and VL domains consist of four regions of relatively conserved sequences called framework regions (FR1, FR2, FR3, and FR4), which form a scaffold for three regions of hypervariable sequences (complementarity determining regions, CDRs). The CDRs contain most of the residues responsible for specific interactions of the antibody with the antigen. CDRs are referred to as CDR 1, CDR2, and CDR3. Accordingly, CDR constituents on the heavy chain are referred to as H1, H2, and H3, while CDR constituents on the light chain are referred to as L1, L2, and L3.
The term “variable” refers to the portions of the immunoglobulin domains that exhibit variability in their sequence and that are involved in determining the specificity and binding affinity of a particular antibody (i.e., the “variable domain(s)”). Variability is not evenly distributed throughout the variable domains of antibodies; it is concentrated in sub-domains of each of the heavy and light chain variable regions. These sub-domains are called “hypervariable” regions or “complementarity determining regions” (CDRs). The more conserved (i.e., non-hypervariable) portions of the variable domains are called the “framework” regions (FRM). The variable domains of naturally occurring heavy and light chains each comprise four FRM regions, largely adopting a β-sheet configuration, connected by three hypervariable regions, which form loops connecting, and in some cases forming part of, the β-sheet structure. The hypervariable regions in each chain are held together in close proximity by the FRM and, with the hypervariable regions from the other chain, contribute to the formation of the antigen-binding site (see Kabat et al., loc. cit.). The constant domains are not directly involved in antigen binding, but exhibit various effector functions, such as, for example, antibody-dependent, cell-mediated cytotoxicity and complement activation.
The terms “CDR”, and its plural “CDRs”, refer to a complementarity determining region (CDR) of which three make up the binding character of a light chain variable region (CDRL1, CDRL2 and CDRL3) and three make up the binding character of a heavy chain variable region (CDRH1, CDRH2 and CDRH3). CDRs contribute to the functional activity of an antibody molecule and are separated by amino acid sequences that comprise scaffolding or framework regions. The exact definitional CDR boundaries and lengths are subject to different classification and numbering systems. CDRs may therefore be referred to by Kabat, Chothia, contact or any other boundary definitions, including the numbering system described herein. Despite differing boundaries, each of these systems has some degree of overlap in what constitutes the so called “hypervariable regions” within the variable sequences. CDR definitions according to these systems may therefore differ in length and boundary areas with respect to the adjacent framework region. See for example Kabat, Chothia, and/or MacCallum (Kabat et al., loc. cit.; Chothia et al., J. Mol. Biol, 1987, 196: 901; and MacCallum et al., J. Mol. Biol, 1996, 262: 732). However, the numbering in accordance with the so-called Kabat system is preferred. The CDR3 of the light chain and, particularly, CDR3 of the heavy chain may constitute the most important determinants in antigen binding within the light and heavy chain variable regions. In some antibody constructs, the heavy chain CDR3 appears to constitute the major area of contact between the antigen and the antibody. In vitro selection schemes in which CDR3 alone is varied can be used to vary the binding properties of an antibody or determine which residues contribute to the binding of an antigen.
“Consisting essentially of” means that the amino acid sequence can vary by about 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, or 15% relative to the recited SEQ ID NO: sequence and still retain biological activity, as described herein.
In some embodiments, the antibody constructs of the invention are isolated proteins or substantially pure proteins. An “isolated” protein is unaccompanied by at least some of the material with which it is normally associated in its natural state, for example constituting at least about 5%, or at least about 50% by weight of the total protein in a given sample. It is understood that the isolated protein may constitute from 5 to 99.9% by weight of the total protein content depending on the circumstances. For example, the protein may be made at a significantly higher concentration through the use of an inducible promoter or high expression promoter, such that the protein is made at increased concentration levels. The definition includes the production of an antigen binding protein in a wide variety of organisms and/or host cells that are known in the art.
For amino acid sequences, sequence identity and/or similarity is determined by using standard techniques known in the art, including, but not limited to, the local sequence identity algorithm of Smith and Waterman, 1981, Adv. Appl. Math. 2:482, the sequence identity alignment algorithm of Needleman and Wunsch, 1970, J. Mol. Biol. 48:443, the search for similarity method of Pearson and Lipman, 1988, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85:2444, computerized implementations of these algorithms (GAP, BESTFIT, FASTA, and TFASTA in the Wisconsin Genetics Software Package, Genetics Computer Group, 575 Science Drive, Madison, Wis.), the Best Fit sequence program described by Devereux et al., 1984, Nucl. Acid Res. 12:387-395, preferably using the default settings, or by inspection. Preferably, percent identity is calculated by FastDB based upon the following parameters: mismatch penalty of 1; gap penalty of 1; gap size penalty of 0.33; and joining penalty of 30, “Current Methods in Sequence Comparison and Analysis,” Macromolecule Sequencing and Synthesis, Selected Methods and Applications, pp 127-149 (1988), Alan R. Liss, Inc.
An example of a useful algorithm is PILEUP. PILEUP creates a multiple sequence alignment from a group of related sequences using progressive, pairwise alignments. It can also plot a tree showing the clustering relationships used to create the alignment. PILEUP uses a simplification of the progressive alignment method of Feng & Doolittle, 1987, J. Mol. Evol. 35:351-360; the method is similar to that described by Higgins and Sharp, 1989, CABIOS 5:151-153. Useful PILEUP parameters including a default gap weight of 3.00, a default gap length weight of 0.10, and weighted end gaps.
Another example of a useful algorithm is the BLAST algorithm, described in: Altschul et al., 1990, J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-410; Altschul et al., 1997, Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-3402; and Karin et al., 1993, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90:5873-5787. A particularly useful BLAST program is the WU-BLAST-2 program which was obtained from Altschul et al., 1996, Methods in Enzymology 266:460-480. WU-BLAST-2 uses several search parameters, most of which are set to the default values. The adjustable parameters are set with the following values: overlap span=1, overlap fraction=0.125, word threshold (T)=II. The HSP S and HSP S2 parameters are dynamic values and are established by the program itself depending upon the composition of the particular sequence and composition of the particular database against which the sequence of interest is being searched; however, the values may be adjusted to increase sensitivity.
An additional useful algorithm is gapped BLAST as reported by Altschul et al., 1993, Nucl. Acids Res. 25:3389-3402. Gapped BLAST uses BLOSUM-62 substitution scores; threshold T parameter set to 9; the two-hit method to trigger ungapped extensions, charges gap lengths of k a cost of 10+k; Xu set to 16, and Xg set to 40 for database search stage and to 67 for the output stage of the algorithms. Gapped alignments are triggered by a score corresponding to about 22 bits.
Generally, the amino acid homology, similarity, or identity between individual variant CDRs are at least 80% to the sequences depicted herein, and more typically with preferably increasing homologies or identities of at least 85%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, and almost 100%. In a similar manner, “percent (%) nucleic acid sequence identity” with respect to the nucleic acid sequence of the binding proteins identified herein is defined as the percentage of nucleotide residues in a candidate sequence that are identical with the nucleotide residues in the coding sequence of the antigen binding protein. A specific method utilizes the BLASTN module of WU-BLAST-2 set to the default parameters, with overlap span and overlap fraction set to 1 and 0.125, respectively.
Generally, the nucleic acid sequence homology, similarity, or identity between the nucleotide sequences encoding individual variant CDRs and the nucleotide sequences depicted herein are at least 80%, and more typically with preferably increasing homologies or identities of at least 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99%, and almost 100%.
Thus, a “variant CDR” is one with the specified homology, similarity, or identity to the parent CDR of the invention, and shares biological function, including, but not limited to, at least 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99% of the specificity and/or activity of the parent CDR.
While the site or region for introducing an amino acid sequence variation is predetermined, the mutation per se need not be predetermined. For example, in order to optimize the performance of a mutation at a given site, random mutagenesis may be conducted at the target codon or region and the expressed antigen binding protein CDR variants screened for the optimal combination of desired activity. Techniques for making substitution mutations at predetermined sites in DNA having a known sequence are well known, for example, M13 primer mutagenesis and PCR mutagenesis. Screening of the mutants is done using assays of antigen binding protein activities, such as CDH19 binding.
The term “amino acid” or “amino acid residue” typically refers to an amino acid having its art recognized definition such as an amino acid selected from the group consisting of: alanine (Ala or A); arginine (Arg or R); asparagine (Asn or N); aspartic acid (Asp or D); cysteine (Cys or C); glutamine (Gln or Q); glutamic acid (Glu or E); glycine (Gly or G); histidine (His or H); isoleucine (He or I): leucine (Leu or L); lysine (Lys or K); methionine (Met or M); phenylalanine (Phe or F); pro line (Pro or P); serine (Ser or S); threonine (Thr or T); tryptophan (Trp or W); tyrosine (Tyr or Y); and valine (Val or V), although modified, synthetic, or rare amino acids may be used as desired. Generally, amino acids can be grouped as having a nonpolar side chain (e.g., Ala, Cys, He, Leu, Met, Phe, Pro, Val); a negatively charged side chain (e.g., Asp, Glu); a positively charged sidechain (e.g., Arg, His, Lys); or an uncharged polar side chain (e.g., Asn, Cys, Gln, Gly, His, Met, Phe, Ser, Thr, Trp, and Tyr).
The term “hypervariable region” (also known as “complementarity determining regions” or CDRs) when used herein refers to the amino acid residues of an antibody which are (usually three or four short regions of extreme sequence variability) within the V-region domain of an immunoglobulin which form the antigen-binding site and are the main determinants of antigen specificity. There are at least two methods for identifying the CDR residues: (1) An approach based on cross-species sequence variability (i. e., Kabat et al., loc. cit.); and (2) An approach based on crystallographic studies of antigen-antibody complexes (Chothia, C. et al., J. Mol. Biol. 196: 901-917 (1987)). However, to the extent that two residue identification techniques define regions of overlapping, but not identical regions, they can be combined to define a hybrid CDR. However, in general, the CDR residues are preferably identified in accordance with the so-called Kabat (numbering) system.
The term “framework region” refers to the art-recognized portions of an antibody variable region that exist between the more divergent (i.e., hypervariable) CDRs. Such framework regions are typically referred to as frameworks 1 through 4 (FR1, FR2, FR3, and FR4) and provide a scaffold for the presentation of the six CDRs (three from the heavy chain and three from the light chain) in three dimensional space, to form an antigen-binding surface.
Typically, CDRs form a loop structure that can be classified as a canonical structure. The term “canonical structure” refers to the main chain conformation that is adopted by the antigen binding (CDR) loops. From comparative structural studies, it has been found that five of the six antigen binding loops have only a limited repertoire of available conformations. Each canonical structure can be characterized by the torsion angles of the polypeptide backbone. Correspondent loops between antibodies may, therefore, have very similar three dimensional structures, despite high amino acid sequence variability in most parts of the loops (Chothia and Lesk, J. Mol. Biol., 1987, 196: 901; Chothia et al., Nature, 1989, 342: 877; Martin and Thornton, J. Mol. Biol, 1996, 263: 800, each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety). Furthermore, there is a relationship between the adopted loop structure and the amino acid sequences surrounding it. The conformation of a particular canonical class is determined by the length of the loop and the amino acid residues residing at key positions within the loop, as well as within the conserved framework (i.e., outside of the loop). Assignment to a particular canonical class can therefore be made based on the presence of these key amino acid residues. The term “canonical structure” may also include considerations as to the linear sequence of the antibody, for example, as catalogued by Kabat (Kabat et al., loc. cit.). The Kabat numbering scheme (system) is a widely adopted standard for numbering the amino acid residues of an antibody variable domain in a consistent manner and is the preferred scheme applied in the present invention as also mentioned elsewhere herein. Additional structural considerations can also be used to determine the canonical structure of an antibody. For example, those differences not fully reflected by Kabat numbering can be described by the numbering system of Chothia et al and/or revealed by other techniques, for example, crystallography and two or three-dimensional computational modeling. Accordingly, a given antibody sequence may be placed into a canonical class which allows for, among other things, identifying appropriate chassis sequences (e.g., based on a desire to include a variety of canonical structures in a library). Kabat numbering of antibody amino acid sequences and structural considerations as described by Chothia et al., loc. cit. and their implications for construing canonical aspects of antibody structure, are described in the literature.
CDR3 is typically the greatest source of molecular diversity within the antibody-binding site. H3, for example, can be as short as two amino acid residues or greater than 26 amino acids. The subunit structures and three-dimensional configurations of different classes of immunoglobulins are well known in the art. For a review of the antibody structure, see Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, eds. Harlow et al., 1988. One of skill in the art will recognize that each subunit structure, e.g., a CH, VH, CL, VL, CDR, FR structure, comprises active fragments, e.g., the portion of the VH, VL, or CDR subunit the binds to the antigen, i.e., the antigen-binding fragment, or, e.g., the portion of the CH subunit that binds to and/or activates, e.g., an Fc receptor and/or complement. The CDRs typically refer to the Kabat CDRs, as described in Sequences of Proteins of immunological Interest, US Department of Health and Human Services (1991), eds. Kabat et al. Another standard for characterizing the antigen binding site is to refer to the hypervariable loops as described by Chothia. See, e.g., Chothia, et al. (1987; J. Mol. Biol. 227:799-817); and Tomlinson et al. (1995) EMBO J. 14: 4628-4638. Still another standard is the AbM definition used by Oxford Molecular's AbM antibody modeling software. See, generally, e.g., Protein Sequence and Structure Analysis of Antibody Variable Domains. In: Antibody Engineering Lab Manual (Ed.: Duebel, S. and Kontermann, R., Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg). Embodiments described with respect to Kabat CDRs can alternatively be implemented using similar described relationships with respect to Chothia hypervariable loops or to the AbM-defined loops.
The sequence of antibody genes after assembly and somatic mutation is highly varied, and these varied genes are estimated to encode 1010 different antibody molecules (Immunoglobulin Genes, 2nd ed., eds. Jonio et al., Academic Press, San Diego, Calif., 1995). Accordingly, the immune system provides a repertoire of immunoglobulins. The term “repertoire” refers to at least one nucleotide sequence derived wholly or partially from at least one sequence encoding at least one immunoglobulin. The sequence(s) may be generated by rearrangement in vivo of the V, D, and J segments of heavy chains, and the V and J segments of light chains. Alternatively, the sequence(s) can be generated from a cell in response to which rearrangement occurs, e.g., in vitro stimulation. Alternatively, part or all of the sequence(s) may be obtained by DNA splicing, nucleotide synthesis, mutagenesis, and other methods, see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,565,332. A repertoire may include only one sequence or may include a plurality of sequences, including ones in a genetically diverse collection.
The term “binding molecule” or “antibody construct” in the sense of the present disclosure indicates any molecule capable of (specifically) binding to, interacting with or recognizing the target molecules CDH19 and CD3. Such molecules or constructs may include proteinaceous parts and non-proteinaceous parts (e.g. chemical linkers or chemical cross-linking agents such as glutaraldehyde).
In the event that a linker is used, this linker is preferably of a length and sequence sufficient to ensure that each of the first and second domains can, independently from one another, retain their differential binding specificities. Most preferably and as documented in the appended examples, the antibody construct of the invention is a “bispecific single chain antibody construct”, more preferably a bispecific single chain Fv (scFv). Bispecific single chain molecules are known in the art and are described in WO 99/54440, Mack, J. Immunol. (1997), 158, 3965-3970, Mack, PNAS, (1995), 92, 7021-7025, Kufer, Cancer Immunol. Immunother., (1997), 45, 193-197, Löffler, Blood, (2000), 95, 6, 2098-2103, Brühl, Immunol., (2001), 166, 2420-2426, Kipriyanov, J. Mol. Biol., (1999), 293, 41-56.
The said variable domains comprised in the herein described antibody constructs may be connected by additional linker sequences. The term “peptide linker” defines in accordance with the present invention an amino acid sequence by which the amino acid sequences of the first domain and the second domain of the antibody construct of the invention are linked with each other. An essential technical feature of such peptide linker is that said peptide linker does not comprise any polymerization activity. Among the suitable peptide linkers are those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,751,180 and 4,935,233 or WO 88/09344. A preferred embodiment of a peptide linker is characterized by the amino acid sequence Gly-Gly-Gly-Gly-Ser, i.e. Gly4Ser, or polymers thereof, i.e. (Gly4Ser)x, where x is an integer 1 or greater. The characteristics of said peptide linker, which comprise the absence of the promotion of secondary structures are known in the art and described e.g. in Dall'Acqua et al. (Biochem. (1998) 37, 9266-9273), Cheadle et al. (Mol Immunol (1992) 29, 21-30) and Raag and Whitlow (FASEB (1995) 9(1), 73-80). Peptide linkers which also do not promote any secondary structures are preferred. The linkage of said domains to each other can be provided by, e.g. genetic engineering, as described in the examples. Methods for preparing fused and operatively linked bispecific single chain constructs and expressing them in mammalian cells or bacteria are well-known in the art (e.g. WO 99/54440 or Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, 2001).
For peptide linkers, which connect the at least two binding domains in the antibody construct of the invention peptide linkers are preferred which comprise only a few number of amino acid residues, e.g. 12 amino acid residues or less. Thus, peptide linker of 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6 or 5 amino acid residues are preferred. An envisaged peptide linker with less than 5 amino acids comprises 4, 3, 2 or one amino acid(s) wherein Gly-rich linkers are preferred. A particularly preferred “single” amino acid in context of said “peptide linker” is Gly. Accordingly, said peptide linker may consist of the single amino acid Gly.
The term “multispecific” as used herein refers to a binding molecule which is an antibody construct and comprises at least a first and a second binding domain, wherein the first binding domain is capable of binding to one antigen or target, and the second binding domain is capable of binding to another antigen or target. Accordingly, antibody constructs according to the invention comprise at least specificities for two different antigens or targets and are at least bispecific. The “antibody construct” of the invention also comprises multispecific binding molecules such as e.g. trispecific binding molecules, the latter ones including three binding domains.
It is also envisaged that the antibody construct of the invention has, in addition to its function to bind to the target molecules CDH19 and CD3, a further function. In this format, the antibody construct is a tri- or multifunctional antibody construct by targeting plasma cells through binding to CDH19, mediating cytotoxic T cell activity through CD3 binding and providing a further function such as a fully functional Fc constant domain mediating antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity through recruitment of effector cells like NK cells, a label (fluorescent etc.), a therapeutic agent such as, e.g. a toxin or radionuclide, and/or means to enhance serum half-life, etc.
The term “binding domain” characterizes in connection with the present invention a domain which is capable of specifically binding to/interacting with a given target epitope or a given target site on the target molecules CDH19 and CD3.
Binding domains can be derived from a binding domain donor such as for example an antibody. It is envisaged that a binding domain of the present invention comprises at least said part of any of the aforementioned binding domains that is required for binding to/interacting with a given target epitope or a given target site on the target molecules CDH19 and CD3.
It is envisaged that the binding domain of the aforementioned binding domain donors is characterized by that part of these donors that is responsible for binding the respective target, i.e. when that part is removed from the binding domain donor, said donor loses its binding capability. “Loses” means a reduction of at least 50% of the binding capability when compared with the binding donor. Methods to map these binding sites are well known in the art—it is therefore within the standard knowledge of the skilled person to locate/map the binding site of a binding domain donor and, thereby, to “derive” said binding domain from the respective binding domain donors.
The term “epitope” refers to a site on an antigen to which a binding domain, such as an antibody or immunoglobulin or derivative or fragment of an antibody or of an immunoglobulin, specifically binds. An “epitope” is antigenic and thus the term epitope is sometimes also referred to herein as “antigenic structure” or “antigenic determinant”. Thus, the binding domain is an “antigen-interaction-site”. Said binding/interaction is also understood to define a “specific recognition”. In one example, said binding domain which (specifically) binds to/interacts with a given target epitope or a given target site on the target molecules CDH19 and CD3 is an antibody or immunoglobulin, and said binding domain is a VH and/or VL region of an antibody or of an immunoglobulin.
“Epitopes” can be formed both by contiguous amino acids or non-contiguous amino acids juxtaposed by tertiary folding of a protein. A “linear epitope” is an epitope where an amino acid primary sequence comprises the recognized epitope. A linear epitope typically includes at least 3 or at least 4, and more usually, at least 5 or at least 6 or at least 7, for example, about 8 to about 10 amino acids in a unique sequence.
A “conformational epitope”, in contrast to a linear epitope, is an epitope wherein the primary sequence of the amino acids comprising the epitope is not the sole defining component of the epitope recognized (e.g., an epitope wherein the primary sequence of amino acids is not necessarily recognized by the binding domain). Typically a conformational epitope comprises an increased number of amino acids relative to a linear epitope. With regard to recognition of conformational epitopes, the binding domain recognizes a three-dimensional structure of the antigen, preferably a peptide or protein or fragment thereof (in the context of the present invention, the antigen for one of the binding domains is comprised within the CDH19 protein). For example, when a protein molecule folds to form a three-dimensional structure, certain amino acids and/or the polypeptide backbone forming the conformational epitope become juxtaposed enabling the antibody to recognize the epitope. Methods of determining the conformation of epitopes include, but are not limited to, x-ray crystallography, two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance (2D-NMR) spectroscopy and site-directed spin labelling and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy. Moreover, the provided examples describe a further method to characterize a given binding domain by way of binning, which includes a test whether the given binding domain binds to one or more epitope cluster(s) of a given protein, in particular CDH19.
As used herein, the term “epitope cluster” denotes the entirety of epitopes lying in a defined contiguous stretch of an antigen. An epitope cluster can comprise one, two or more epitopes. The concept of epitope cluster is also used in the characterization of the features of the antibody constructs of the invention.
The terms “(capable of) binding to”, “specifically recognizing”, “directed to” and “reacting with” mean in accordance with this invention that a binding domain is capable of specifically interacting with one or more, preferably at least two, more preferably at least three and most preferably at least four amino acids of an epitope.
As used herein, the terms “specifically interacting”, “specifically binding” or “specifically bind(s)” mean that a binding domain exhibits appreciable affinity for a particular protein or antigen and, generally, does not exhibit significant reactivity with proteins or antigens other than CDH19 or CD3. “Appreciable affinity” includes binding with an affinity of about 10−8M (KD) or stronger. Preferably, binding is considered specific when binding affinity is about 10−12 to 10−8 M, 10−12 to 10−8 M, 10−12 to 10−10 M, 10−11 to 10−8 M, preferably of about 10−11 to 10−9 M. Whether a binding domain specifically reacts with or binds to a target can be tested readily by, inter alia, comparing the reaction of said binding domain with a target protein or antigen with the reaction of said binding domain with proteins or antigens other than CDH19 or CD3. Preferably, a binding domain of the invention does not essentially bind or is not capable of binding to proteins or antigens other than CDH19 or CD3 (i.e. the first binding domain is not capable of binding to proteins other than CDH19 and the second binding domain is not capable of binding to proteins other than CD3).
The term “does not essentially bind”, or “is not capable of binding” means that a binding domain of the present invention does not bind another protein or antigen other than CDH19 or CD3, i.e., does not show reactivity of more than 30%, preferably not more than 20%, more preferably not more than 10%, particularly preferably not more than 9%, 8%, 7%, 6% or 5% with proteins or antigens other than CDH19 or CD3, whereby binding to CDH19 or CD3, respectively, is set to be 100%.
Specific binding is believed to be effected by specific motifs in the amino acid sequence of the binding domain and the antigen. Thus, binding is achieved as a result of their primary, secondary and/or tertiary structure as well as the result of secondary modifications of said structures. The specific interaction of the antigen-interaction-site with its specific antigen may result in a simple binding of said site to the antigen. Moreover, the specific interaction of the antigen-interaction-site with its specific antigen may alternatively or additionally result in the initiation of a signal, e.g. due to the induction of a change of the conformation of the antigen, an oligomerization of the antigen, etc.
Proteins (including fragments thereof, preferably biologically active fragments, and peptides, usually having less than 30 amino acids) comprise one or more amino acids coupled to each other via a covalent peptide bond (resulting in a chain of amino acids). The term “polypeptide” as used herein describes a group of molecules, which consist of more than 30 amino acids. Polypeptides may further form multimers such as dimers, trimers and higher oligomers, i.e. consisting of more than one polypeptide molecule. Polypeptide molecules forming such dimers, trimers etc. may be identical or non-identical. The corresponding higher order structures of such multimers are, consequently, termed homo- or heterodimers, homo- or heterotrimers etc. An example for a hereteromultimer is an antibody molecule, which, in its naturally occurring form, consists of two identical light polypeptide chains and two identical heavy polypeptide chains. The terms “polypeptide” and “protein” also refer to naturally modified polypeptides/proteins wherein the modification is effected e.g. by post-translational modifications like glycosylation, acetylation, phosphorylation and the like. A “polypeptide” when referred to herein may also be chemically modified such as pegylated. Such modifications are well known in the art.
“Isolated” when used to describe the antibody construct disclosed herein, means a antibody construct that has been identified, separated and/or recovered from a component of its production environment. Preferably, the isolated antibody construct is free of association with all other components from its production environment. Contaminant components of its production environment, such as that resulting from recombinant transfected cells, are materials that would typically interfere with diagnostic or therapeutic uses for the polypeptide, and may include enzymes, hormones, and other proteinaceous or non-proteinaceous solutes. In preferred embodiments, the antibody construct will be purified (1) to a degree sufficient to obtain at least 15 residues of N-terminal or internal amino acid sequence by use of a spinning cup sequenator, or (2) to homogeneity by SDS-PAGE under non-reducing or reducing conditions using Coomassie blue or, preferably, silver stain. Ordinarily, however, an isolated antibody will be prepared by at least one purification step.
Amino acid sequence modifications of the antibody constructs described herein are contemplated. For example, it may be desirable to improve the binding affinity and/or other biological properties of the antibody. Amino acid sequence variants of the antibody constructs are prepared by introducing appropriate nucleotide changes into the antibody constructs nucleic acid, or by peptide synthesis.
Such modifications include, for example, deletions from, and/or insertions into, and/or substitutions of, residues within the amino acid sequences of the antibody constructs. Any combination of deletion, insertion, and substitution is made to arrive at the final construct, provided that the final construct possesses the desired characteristics. The amino acid changes also may alter post-translational processes of the antibody constructs, such as changing the number or position of glycosylation sites. Preferably, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 amino acids may be substituted in a CDR, while 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, or 25 amino acids may be substituted in the framework regions (FRs). The substitutions are preferably conservative substitutions as described herein. Additionally or alternatively, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 amino acids may be inserted or deleted in each of the CDRs (of course, dependent on their length), while 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, or 25 amino acids may be inserted or deleted in each of the FRs.
A useful method for identification of certain residues or regions of the antibody constructs that are preferred locations for mutagenesis is called “alanine scanning mutagenesis” as described by Cunningham and Wells in Science, 244: 1081-1085 (1989). Here, a residue or group of target residues within the antibody construct is/are identified (e.g. charged residues such as arg, asp, his, lys, and glu) and replaced by a neutral or negatively charged amino acid (most preferably alanine or polyalanine) to affect the interaction of the amino acids with the epitope.
Those amino acid locations demonstrating functional sensitivity to the substitutions then are refined by introducing further or other variants at, or for, the sites of substitution. Thus, while the site for introducing an amino acid sequence variation is predetermined, the nature of the mutation per se needs not to be predetermined. For example, to analyze the performance of a mutation at a given site, ala scanning or random mutagenesis is conducted at a target codon or region and the expressed antibody construct variants are screened for the desired activity.
Preferably, amino acid sequence insertions include amino- and/or carboxyl-terminal fusions ranging in length from 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10 residues to polypeptides containing a hundred or more residues, as well as intrasequence insertions of single or multiple amino acid residues. An insertional variant of the antibody construct includes the fusion to the N- or C-terminus of the antibody to an enzyme or a fusion to a polypeptide which increases the serum half-life of the antibody.
Another type of variant is an amino acid substitution variant. These variants have preferably at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10 amino acid residues in the antibody construct replaced by a different residue. The sites of greatest interest for substitutional mutagenesis include the CDRs of the heavy and/or light chain, in particular the hypervariable regions, but FR alterations in the heavy and/or light chain are also contemplated.
For example, if a CDR sequence encompasses 6 amino acids, it is envisaged that one, two or three of these amino acids are substituted. Similarly, if a CDR sequence encompasses 15 amino acids it is envisaged that one, two, three, four, five or six of these amino acids are substituted.
Generally, if amino acids are substituted in one or more or all of the CDRs of the heavy and/or light chain, it is preferred that the then-obtained “substituted” sequence is at least 60%, more preferably 65%, even more preferably 70%, particularly preferably 75%, more particularly preferably 80% identical to the “original” CDR sequence. This means that it is dependent of the length of the CDR to which degree it is identical to the “substituted” sequence. For example, a CDR having 5 amino acids is preferably 80% identical to its substituted sequence in order to have at least one amino acid substituted. Accordingly, the CDRs of the antibody construct may have different degrees of identity to their substituted sequences, e.g., CDRL1 may have 80%, while CDRL3 may have 90%.
Preferred substitutions (or replacements) are conservative substitutions. However, any substitution (including non-conservative substitution or one or more from the “exemplary substitutions” listed in Table 1, below) is envisaged as long as the antibody construct retains its capability to bind to CDH19 via the first binding domain and to CD3 epsilon via the second binding domain and/or its CDRs have an identity to the then substituted sequence (at least 60%, more preferably 65%, even more preferably 70%, particularly preferably 75%, more particularly preferably 80% identical to the “original” CDR sequence).
Conservative substitutions are shown in Table 1 under the heading of “preferred substitutions”. If such substitutions result in a change in biological activity, then more substantial changes, denominated “exemplary substitutions” in Table 1, or as further described below in reference to amino acid classes, may be introduced and the products screened for a desired characteristic.
Substantial modifications in the biological properties of the antibody construct of the present invention are accomplished by selecting substitutions that differ significantly in their effect on maintaining (a) the structure of the polypeptide backbone in the area of the substitution, for example, as a sheet or helical conformation, (b) the charge or hydrophobicity of the molecule at the target site, or (c) the bulk of the side chain. Naturally occurring residues are divided into groups based on common side-chain properties: (1) hydrophobic: norleucine, met, ala, val, leu, ile; (2) neutral hydrophilic: cys, ser, thr; (3) acidic: asp, glu; (4) basic: asn, gin, his, lys, arg; (5) residues that influence chain orientation: gly, pro; and (6) aromatic: trp, tyr, phe.
Non-conservative substitutions will entail exchanging a member of one of these classes for another class. Any cysteine residue not involved in maintaining the proper conformation of the antibody construct may be substituted, generally with serine, to improve the oxidative stability of the molecule and prevent aberrant crosslinking. Conversely, cysteine bond(s) may be added to the antibody to improve its stability (particularly where the antibody is an antibody fragment such as an Fv fragment).
A particularly preferred type of substitutional variant involves substituting one or more hypervariable region residues of a parent antibody (e. g. a humanized or human antibody). Generally, the resulting variant(s) selected for further development will have improved biological properties relative to the parent antibody from which they are generated. A convenient way for generating such substitutional variants involves affinity maturation using phage display. Briefly, several hypervariable region sites (e. g. 6-7 sites) are mutated to generate all possible amino acid substitutions at each site. The antibody variants thus generated are displayed in a monovalent fashion from filamentous phage particles as fusions to the gene III product of M13 packaged within each particle. The phage-displayed variants are then screened for their biological activity (e. g. binding affinity) as herein disclosed. In order to identify candidate hypervariable region sites for modification, alanine scanning mutagenesis can be performed to identify hypervariable region residues contributing significantly to antigen binding. Alternatively, or additionally, it may be beneficial to analyze a crystal structure of the antigen-antibody complex to identify contact points between the binding domain and, e.g., human CDH19. Such contact residues and neighbouring residues are candidates for substitution according to the techniques elaborated herein. Once such variants are generated, the panel of variants is subjected to screening as described herein and antibodies with superior properties in one or more relevant assays may be selected for further development.
Other modifications of the antibody construct are contemplated herein. For example, the antibody construct may be linked to one of a variety of non-proteinaceous polymers, e.g., polyethylene glycol, polypropylene glycol, polyoxyalkylenes, or copolymers of polyethylene glycol and polypropylene glycol. The antibody construct may also be entrapped in microcapsules prepared, for example, by coacervation techniques or by interfacial polymerization (for example, hydroxymethylcellulose or gelatine-microcapsules and poly (methylmethacylate) microcapsules, respectively), in colloidal drug delivery systems (for example, liposomes, albumin microspheres, microemulsions, nanoparticles and nanocapsules), or in macroemulsions. Such techniques are disclosed in Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, 16th edition, Oslo, A., Ed., (1980).
The antibody constructs disclosed herein may also be formulated as immuno-liposomes. A “liposome” is a small vesicle composed of various types of lipids, phospholipids and/or surfactant which is useful for delivery of a drug to a mammal. The components of the liposome are commonly arranged in a bilayer formation, similar to the lipid arrangement of biological membranes. Liposomes containing the antibody are prepared by methods known in the art, such as described in Epstein et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 82: 3688 (1985); Hwang et al., Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 77: 4030 (1980); U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,485,045 and 4,544,545; and WO 97/38731 published Oct. 23, 1997. Liposomes with enhanced circulation time are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,013,556. Particularly useful liposomes can be generated by the reverse phase evaporation method with a lipid composition comprising phosphatidylcholine, cholesterol and PEG-derivatized phosphatidylethanolamine (PEG-PE). Liposomes are extruded through filters of defined pore size to yield liposomes with the desired diameter. Fab′ fragments of the antibody of the present invention can be conjugated to the liposomes as described in Martin et al. J. Biol. Chem. 257: 286-288 (1982) via a disulfide interchange reaction. A chemotherapeutic agent is optionally contained within the liposome. See Gabizon et al. J. National Cancer Inst. 81 (19) 1484 (1989).
When using recombinant techniques, the antibody construct can be produced intracellularly, in the periplasmic space, or directly secreted into the medium. If the antibody construct is produced intracellularly, as a first step, the particulate debris, either host cells or lysed fragments, are removed, for example, by centrifugation or ultrafiltration. Carter et al., Bio/Technology 10: 163-167 (1992) describe a procedure for isolating antibodies which are secreted to the periplasmic space of E. coli.
The antibody construct composition prepared from the cells can be purified using, for example, hydroxylapatite chromatography, gel electrophoresis, dialysis, and affinity chromatography, with affinity chromatography being the preferred purification technique.
The term “nucleic acid” is well known to the skilled person and encompasses DNA (such as cDNA) and RNA (such as mRNA). The nucleic acid can be double stranded and single stranded, linear and circular. Said nucleic acid molecule is preferably comprised in a vector which is preferably comprised in a host cell. Said host cell is, e.g. after transformation or transfection with the nucleic acid sequence of the invention, capable of expressing the antibody construct. For that purpose the nucleic acid molecule is operatively linked with control sequences.
A vector is a nucleic acid molecule used as a vehicle to transfer (foreign) genetic material into a cell. The term “vector” encompasses—but is not restricted to—plasmids, viruses, cosmids and artificial chromosomes. In general, engineered vectors comprise an origin of replication, a multicloning site and a selectable marker. The vector itself is generally a nucleotide sequence, commonly a DNA sequence, that comprises an insert (transgene) and a larger sequence that serves as the “backbone” of the vector. Modern vectors may encompass additional features besides the transgene insert and a backbone: promoter, genetic marker, antibiotic resistance, reporter gene, targeting sequence, protein purification tag. Vectors called expression vectors (expression constructs) specifically are for the expression of the transgene in the target cell, and generally have control sequences such as a promoter sequence that drives expression of the transgene. Insertion of a vector into the target cell is usually called “transformation” for bacteria, “transfection” for eukaryotic cells, although insertion of a viral vector is also called “transduction”.
As used herein, the term “host cell” is intended to refer to a cell into which a nucleic acid encoding the antibody construct of the invention is introduced by way of transformation, transfection and the like. It should be understood that such terms refer not only to the particular subject cell but to the progeny or potential progeny of such a cell. Because certain modifications may occur in succeeding generations due to either mutation or environmental influences, such progeny may not, in fact, be identical to the parent cell, but are still included within the scope of the term as used herein.
As used herein, the term “expression” includes any step involved in the production of a antibody construct of the invention including, but not limited to, transcription, post-transcriptional modification, translation, post-translational modification, and secretion.
The term “control sequences” refers to DNA sequences necessary for the expression of an operably linked coding sequence in a particular host organism. The control sequences that are suitable for prokaryotes, for example, include a promoter, optionally an operator sequence, and a ribosome binding site. Eukaryotic cells are known to utilize promoters, polyadenylation signals, and enhancers.
A nucleic acid is “operably linked” when it is placed into a functional relationship with another nucleic acid sequence. For example, DNA for a presequence or secretory leader is operably linked to DNA for a polypeptide if it is expressed as a preprotein that participates in the secretion of the polypeptide; a promoter or enhancer is operably linked to a coding sequence if it affects the transcription of the sequence; or a ribosome binding site is operably linked to a coding sequence if it is positioned so as to facilitate translation. Generally, “operably linked” means that the DNA sequences being linked are contiguous, and, in the case of a secretory leader, contiguous and in reading phase. However, enhancers do not have to be contiguous. Linking is accomplished by ligation at convenient restriction sites. If such sites do not exist, the synthetic oligonucleotide adaptors or linkers are used in accordance with conventional practice.
The terms “host cell,” “target cell” or “recipient cell” are intended to include any individual cell or cell culture that can be or has/have been recipients for vectors or the incorporation of exogenous nucleic acid molecules, polynucleotides and/or proteins. It also is intended to include progeny of a single cell, and the progeny may not necessarily be completely identical (in morphology or in genomic or total DNA complement) to the original parent cell due to natural, accidental, or deliberate mutation. The cells may be prokaryotic or eukaryotic, and include but are not limited to bacteria, yeast cells, animal cells, and mammalian cells, e.g., murine, rat, macaque or human.
Suitable host cells include prokaryotes and eukaryotic host cells including yeasts, fungi, insect cells and mammalian cells.
The antibody construct of the invention can be produced in bacteria. After expression, the antibody construct of the invention, preferably the antibody construct is isolated from the E. coli cell paste in a soluble fraction and can be purified through, e.g., affinity chromatography and/or size exclusion. Final purification can be carried out similar to the process for purifying antibody expressed e. g, in CHO cells.
In addition to prokaryotes, eukaryotic microbes such as filamentous fungi or yeast are suitable cloning or expression hosts for the antibody construct of the invention. Saccharomyces cerevisiae, or common baker's yeast, is the most commonly used among lower eukaryotic host microorganisms. However, a number of other genera, species, and strains are commonly available and useful herein, such as Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Kluyveromyces hosts such as, e.g., K. lactis, K. fragilis (ATCC 12424), K. bulgaricus (ATCC 16045), K. wickeramii (ATCC 24178), K. waltii (ATCC 56500), K. drosophilarum (ATCC 36906), K. thermotolerans, and K. marxianus; yarrowia (EP 402 226); Pichia pastoris (EP 183 070); Candida; Trichoderma reesia (EP 244 234); Neurospora crassa; Schwanniomyces such as Schwanniomyces occidentalis; and filamentous fungi such as, e.g., Neurospora, Penicillium, Tolypocladium, and Aspergillus hosts such as A. nidulans and A. niger.
Suitable host cells for the expression of glycosylated antibody construct of the invention, preferably antibody derived antibody constructs are derived from multicellular organisms. Examples of invertebrate cells include plant and insect cells. Numerous baculoviral strains and variants and corresponding permissive insect host cells from hosts such as Spodoptera frugiperda (caterpillar), Aedes aegypti (mosquito), Aedes albopictus (mosquito), Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly), and Bombyx mori have been identified. A variety of viral strains for transfection are publicly available, e. g., the L-1 variant of Autographa californica NPV and the Bm-5 strain of Bombyx mori NPV, and such viruses may be used as the virus herein according to the present invention, particularly for transfection of Spodoptera frugiperda cells.
Plant cell cultures of cotton, corn, potato, soybean, petunia, tomato, Arabidopsis and tobacco can also be utilized as hosts. Cloning and expression vectors useful in the production of proteins in plant cell culture are known to those of skill in the art. See e.g. Hiatt et al., Nature (1989) 342: 76-78, Owen et al. (1992) Bio/Technology 10: 790-794, Artsaenko et al. (1995) The Plant J 8: 745-750, and Fecker et al. (1996) Plant Mol Biol 32: 979-986.
However, interest has been greatest in vertebrate cells, and propagation of vertebrate cells in culture (tissue culture) has become a routine procedure. Examples of useful mammalian host cell lines are monkey kidney CV1 line transformed by SV40 (COS-7, ATCC CRL 1651); human embryonic kidney line (293 or 293 cells subcloned for growth in suspension culture, Graham et al., J. Gen Virol. 36:59 (1977)); baby hamster kidney cells (BHK, ATCC CCL 10); Chinese hamster ovary cells/-DHFR (CHO, Urlaub et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77: 4216 (1980)); mouse sertoli cells (TM4, Mather, Biol. Reprod. 23: 243-251 (1980)); monkey kidney cells (CVI ATCC CCL 70); African green monkey kidney cells (VERO-76, ATCC CRL1587); human cervical carcinoma cells (HELA, ATCC CCL 2); canine kidney cells (MDCK, ATCC CCL 34); buffalo rat liver cells (BRL 3A, ATCC CRL 1442); human lung cells (W138, ATCC CCL 75); human liver cells (Hep G2,1413 8065); mouse mammary tumor (MMT 060562, ATCC CCL5 1); TRI cells (Mather et al., Annals N. Y Acad. Sci. 383: 44-68 (1982)); MRC 5 cells; FS4 cells; and a human hepatoma line (Hep G2).
When using recombinant techniques, the antibody construct of the invention can be produced intracellularly, in the periplasmic space, or directly secreted into the medium. If the antibody construct is produced intracellularly, as a first step, the particulate debris, either host cells or lysed fragments, are removed, for example, by centrifugation or ultrafiltration. Carter et al., Bio/Technology 10: 163-167 (1992) describe a procedure for isolating antibodies which are secreted to the periplasmic space of E. coli. Briefly, cell paste is thawed in the presence of sodium acetate (pH 3.5), EDTA, and phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride (PMSF) over about 30 min. Cell debris can be removed by centrifugation. Where the antibody is secreted into the medium, supernatants from such expression systems are generally first concentrated using a commercially available protein concentration filter, for example, an Amicon or Millipore Pellicon ultrafiltration unit. A protease inhibitor such as PMSF may be included in any of the foregoing steps to inhibit proteolysis and antibiotics may be included to prevent the growth of adventitious contaminants.
The antibody construct of the invention prepared from the host cells can be purified using, for example, hydroxylapatite chromatography, gel electrophoresis, dialysis, and affinity chromatography, with affinity chromatography being the preferred purification technique.
The matrix to which the affinity ligand is attached is most often agarose, but other matrices are available. Mechanically stable matrices such as controlled pore glass or poly (styrenedivinyl) benzene allow for faster flow rates and shorter processing times than can be achieved with agarose. Where the antibody construct of the invention comprises a CH3 domain, the Bakerbond ABXMresin (J. T. Baker, Phillipsburg, N.J.) is useful for purification. Other techniques for protein purification such as fractionation on an ion-exchange column, ethanol precipitation, Reverse Phase HPLC, chromatography on silica, chromatography on heparin SEPHAROSE™ chromatography on an anion or cation exchange resin (such as a polyaspartic acid column), chromato-focusing, SDS-PAGE, and ammonium sulfate precipitation are also available depending on the antibody to be recovered.
The term “culturing” refers to the in vitro maintenance, differentiation, growth, proliferation and/or propagation of cells under suitable conditions in a medium.
As used herein, the term “pharmaceutical composition” relates to a composition for administration to a patient, preferably a human patient. The particular preferred pharmaceutical composition of this invention comprises the antibody construct of the invention. Preferably, the pharmaceutical composition comprises suitable formulations of carriers, stabilizers and/or excipients. In a preferred embodiment, the pharmaceutical composition comprises a composition for parenteral, transdermal, intraluminal, intraarterial, intrathecal and/or intranasal administration or by direct injection into tissue. It is in particular envisaged that said composition is administered to a patient via infusion or injection. Administration of the suitable compositions may be effected by different ways, e.g., by intravenous, intraperitoneal, subcutaneous, intramuscular, topical or intradermal administration. In particular, the present invention provides for an uninterrupted administration of the suitable composition. As a non-limiting example, uninterrupted, i.e. continuous administration may be realized by a small pump system worn by the patient for metering the influx of therapeutic agent into the body of the patient. The pharmaceutical composition comprising the antibody construct of the invention can be administered by using said pump systems. Such pump systems are generally known in the art, and commonly rely on periodic exchange of cartridges containing the therapeutic agent to be infused. When exchanging the cartridge in such a pump system, a temporary interruption of the otherwise uninterrupted flow of therapeutic agent into the body of the patient may ensue. In such a case, the phase of administration prior to cartridge replacement and the phase of administration following cartridge replacement would still be considered within the meaning of the pharmaceutical means and methods of the invention together make up one “uninterrupted administration” of such therapeutic agent.
The continuous or uninterrupted administration of these antibody constructs of the invention may be intravenous or subcutaneous by way of a fluid delivery device or small pump system including a fluid driving mechanism for driving fluid out of a reservoir and an actuating mechanism for actuating the driving mechanism. Pump systems for subcutaneous administration may include a needle or a cannula for penetrating the skin of a patient and delivering the suitable composition into the patient's body. Said pump systems may be directly fixed or attached to the skin of the patient independently of a vein, artery or blood vessel, thereby allowing a direct contact between the pump system and the skin of the patient. The pump system can be attached to the skin of the patient for 24 hours up to several days. The pump system may be of small size with a reservoir for small volumes. As a non-limiting example, the volume of the reservoir for the suitable pharmaceutical composition to be administered can be between 0.1 and 50 ml.
The continuous administration may be transdermal by way of a patch worn on the skin and replaced at intervals. One of skill in the art is aware of patch systems for drug delivery suitable for this purpose. It is of note that transdermal administration is especially amenable to uninterrupted administration, as exchange of a first exhausted patch can advantageously be accomplished simultaneously with the placement of a new, second patch, for example on the surface of the skin immediately adjacent to the first exhausted patch and immediately prior to removal of the first exhausted patch. Issues of flow interruption or power cell failure do not arise.
The inventive compositions may further comprise a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. Examples of suitable pharmaceutical carriers are well known in the art and include solutions, e.g. phosphate buffered saline solutions, water, emulsions, such as oil/water emulsions, various types of wetting agents, sterile solutions, liposomes, etc. Compositions comprising such carriers can be formulated by well known conventional methods. Formulations can comprise carbohydrates, buffer solutions, amino acids and/or surfactants. Carbohydrates may be non-reducing sugars, preferably trehalose, sucrose, octasulfate, sorbitol or xylitol. In general, as used herein, “pharmaceutically acceptable carrier” means any and all solvents, dispersion media, coatings, antibacterial and antifungal agents, isotonic and absorption delaying agents, compatible with pharmaceutical administration. The use of such media and agents for pharmaceutically active substances is well known in the art. Acceptable carriers, excipients, or stabilizers are nontoxic to recipients at the dosages and concentrations employed and include: additional buffering agents; preservatives; co-solvents; antioxidants, including ascorbic acid and methionine; chelating agents such as EDTA; metal complexes (e.g., Zn-protein complexes); biodegradable polymers, such as polyesters; salt-forming counter-ions, such as sodium, polyhydric sugar alcohols; amino acids, such as alanine, glycine, asparagine, 2-phenylalanine, and threonine; sugars or sugar alcohols, such as trehalose, sucrose, octasulfate, sorbitol or xylitol stachyose, mannose, sorbose, xylose, ribose, myoinisitose, galactose, lactitol, ribitol, myoinisitol, galactitol, glycerol, cyclitols (e.g., inositol), polyethylene glycol; sulfur containing reducing agents, such as glutathione, thioctic acid, sodium thioglycolate, thioglycerol, [alpha]-monothioglycerol, and sodium thio sulfate; low molecular weight proteins, such as human serum albumin, bovine serum albumin, gelatin, or other immunoglobulins; and hydrophilic polymers, such as polyvinylpyrrolidone. Such formulations may be used for continuous administrations which may be intravenuous or subcutaneous with and/or without pump systems. Amino acids may be charged amino acids, preferably lysine, lysine acetate, arginine, glutamate and/or histidine. Surfactants may be detergents, preferably with a molecular weight of >1.2 KD and/or a polyether, preferably with a molecular weight of >3 KD. Non-limiting examples for preferred detergents are Tween 20, Tween 40, Tween 60, Tween 80 or Tween 85. Non-limiting examples for preferred polyethers are PEG 3000, PEG 3350, PEG 4000 or PEG 5000. Buffer systems used in the present invention can have a preferred pH of 5-9 and may comprise citrate, succinate, phosphate, histidine and acetate.
The compositions of the present invention can be administered to the subject at a suitable dose which can be determined e.g. by dose escalating studies by administration of increasing doses of the polypeptide of the invention exhibiting cross-species specificity described herein to non-chimpanzee primates, for instance macaques. As set forth above, the antibody construct of the invention exhibiting cross-species specificity described herein can be advantageously used in identical form in preclinical testing in non-chimpanzee primates and as drug in humans. These compositions can also be administered in combination with other proteinaceous and non-proteinaceous drugs. These drugs may be administered simultaneously with the composition comprising the polypeptide of the invention as defined herein or separately before or after administration of said polypeptide in timely defined intervals and doses. The dosage regimen will be determined by the attending physician and clinical factors. As is well known in the medical arts, dosages for any one patient depend upon many factors, including the patient's size, body surface area, age, the particular compound to be administered, sex, time and route of administration, general health, and other drugs being administered concurrently.
Preparations for parenteral administration include sterile aqueous or non-aqueous solutions, suspensions, and emulsions. Examples of non-aqueous solvents are propylene glycol, polyethylene glycol, vegetable oils such as olive oil, and injectable organic esters such as ethyl oleate. Aqueous carriers include water, alcoholic/aqueous solutions, emulsions or suspensions, including saline and buffered media. Parenteral vehicles include sodium chloride solution, Ringer's dextrose, dextrose and sodium chloride, lactated Ringer's, or fixed oils. Intravenous vehicles include fluid and nutrient replenishers, electrolyte replenishers (such as those based on Ringer's dextrose), and the like. Preservatives and other additives may also be present such as, for example, antimicrobials, anti-oxidants, chelating agents, inert gases and the like. In addition, the composition of the present invention might comprise proteinaceous carriers, like, e.g., serum albumin or immunoglobulin, preferably of human origin. It is envisaged that the composition of the invention might comprise, in addition to the polypeptide of the invention defined herein, further biologically active agents, depending on the intended use of the composition. Such agents might be drugs acting on the gastro-intestinal system, drugs acting as cytostatica, drugs preventing hyperurikemia, drugs inhibiting immunoreactions (e.g. corticosteroids), drugs modulating the inflammatory response, drugs acting on the circulatory system and/or agents such as cytokines known in the art. It is also envisaged that the antibody construct of the present invention is applied in a co-therapy, i.e., in combination with another anti-cancer medicament.
The biological activity of the pharmaceutical composition defined herein can be determined for instance by cytotoxicity assays, as described in the following examples, in WO 99/54440 or by Schlereth et al. (Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 20 (2005), 1-12). “Efficacy” or “in vivo efficacy” as used herein refers to the response to therapy by the pharmaceutical composition of the invention, using e.g. standardized NCI response criteria. The success or in vivo efficacy of the therapy using a pharmaceutical composition of the invention refers to the effectiveness of the composition for its intended purpose, i.e. the ability of the composition to cause its desired effect, i.e. depletion of pathologic cells, e.g. tumor cells. The in vivo efficacy may be monitored by established standard methods for the respective disease entities including, but not limited to white blood cell counts, differentials, Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorting, bone marrow aspiration. In addition, various disease specific clinical chemistry parameters and other established standard methods may be used. Furthermore, computer-aided tomography, X-ray, nuclear magnetic resonance tomography (e.g. for National Cancer Institute-criteria based response assessment [Cheson B D, Horning S J, Coiffier B, Shipp M A, Fisher R I, Connors J M, Lister T A, Vose J, Grillo-Lopez A, Hagenbeek A, Cabanillas F, Klippensten D, Hiddemann W, Castellino R, Harris N L, Armitage J O, Carter W, Hoppe R, Canellos G P. Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. NCI Sponsored International Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 1999 April; 17(4):1244]), positron-emission tomography scanning, white blood cell counts, differentials, Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorting, bone marrow aspiration, lymph node biopsies/histologies, and various lymphoma specific clinical chemistry parameters (e.g. lactate dehydrogenase) and other established standard methods may be used.
Another major challenge in the development of drugs such as the pharmaceutical composition of the invention is the predictable modulation of pharmacokinetic properties. To this end, a pharmacokinetic profile of the drug candidate, i.e. a profile of the pharmacokinetic parameters that affect the ability of a particular drug to treat a given condition, can be established. Pharmacokinetic parameters of the drug influencing the ability of a drug for treating a certain disease entity include, but are not limited to: half-life, volume of distribution, hepatic first-pass metabolism and the degree of blood serum binding. The efficacy of a given drug agent can be influenced by each of the parameters mentioned above.
“Half-life” means the time where 50% of an administered drug are eliminated through biological processes, e.g. metabolism, excretion, etc.
By “hepatic first-pass metabolism” is meant the propensity of a drug to be metabolized upon first contact with the liver, i.e. during its first pass through the liver.
“Volume of distribution” means the degree of retention of a drug throughout the various compartments of the body, like e.g. intracellular and extracellular spaces, tissues and organs, etc. and the distribution of the drug within these compartments.
“Degree of blood serum binding” means the propensity of a drug to interact with and bind to blood serum proteins, such as albumin, leading to a reduction or loss of biological activity of the drug.
Pharmacokinetic parameters also include bioavailability, lag time (Tlag), Tmax, absorption rates, more onset and/or Cmax for a given amount of drug administered. “Bioavailability” means the amount of a drug in the blood compartment. “Lag time” means the time delay between the administration of the drug and its detection and measurability in blood or plasma.
“Tmax” is the time after which maximal blood concentration of the drug is reached, and “Cmax” is the blood concentration maximally obtained with a given drug. The time to reach a blood or tissue concentration of the drug which is required for its biological effect is influenced by all parameters. Pharmacokinetic parameters of bispecific single chain antibodies exhibiting cross-species specificity, which may be determined in preclinical animal testing in non-chimpanzee primates as outlined above, are also set forth e.g. in the publication by Schlereth et al. (Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 20 (2005), 1-12).
The term “toxicity” as used herein refers to the toxic effects of a drug manifested in adverse events or severe adverse events. These side events might refer to a lack of tolerability of the drug in general and/or a lack of local tolerance after administration. Toxicity could also include teratogenic or carcinogenic effects caused by the drug.
The term “safety”, “in vivo safety” or “tolerability” as used herein defines the administration of a drug without inducing severe adverse events directly after administration (local tolerance) and during a longer period of application of the drug. “Safety”, “in vivo safety” or “tolerability” can be evaluated e.g. at regular intervals during the treatment and follow-up period. Measurements include clinical evaluation, e.g. organ manifestations, and screening of laboratory abnormalities. Clinical evaluation may be carried out and deviations to normal findings recorded/coded according to NCI-CTC and/or MedDRA standards. Organ manifestations may include criteria such as allergy/immunology, blood/bone marrow, cardiac arrhythmia, coagulation and the like, as set forth e.g. in the Common Terminology Criteria for adverse events v3.0 (CTCAE). Laboratory parameters which may be tested include for instance hematology, clinical chemistry, coagulation profile and urine analysis and examination of other body fluids such as serum, plasma, lymphoid or spinal fluid, liquor and the like. Safety can thus be assessed e.g. by physical examination, imaging techniques (i.e. ultrasound, x-ray, CT scans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), other measures with technical devices (i.e. electrocardiogram), vital signs, by measuring laboratory parameters and recording adverse events. For example, adverse events in non-chimpanzee primates in the uses and methods according to the invention may be examined by histopathological and/or histochemical methods.
The term “effective dose” or “effective dosage” is defined as an amount sufficient to achieve or at least partially achieve the desired effect. The term “therapeutically effective dose” is defined as an amount sufficient to cure or at least partially arrest the disease and its complications in a patient already suffering from the disease. Amounts effective for this use will depend upon the severity of the infection and the general state of the subject's own immune system. The term “patient” includes human and other mammalian subjects that receive either prophylactic or therapeutic treatment.
The term “effective and non-toxic dose” as used herein refers to a tolerable dose of an inventive antibody construct which is high enough to cause depletion of pathologic cells, tumor elimination, tumor shrinkage or stabilization of disease without or essentially without major toxic effects. Such effective and non-toxic doses may be determined e.g. by dose escalation studies described in the art and should be below the dose inducing severe adverse side events (dose limiting toxicity, DLT).
The above terms are also referred to e.g. in the Preclinical safety evaluation of biotechnology-derived pharmaceuticals S6; ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline; ICH Steering Committee meeting on Jul. 16, 1997.
The appropriate dosage, or therapeutically effective amount, of the antibody construct of the invention will depend on the condition to be treated, the severity of the condition, prior therapy, and the patient's clinical history and response to the therapeutic agent. The proper dose can be adjusted according to the judgment of the attending physician such that it can be administered to the patient one time or over a series of administrations. The pharmaceutical composition can be administered as a sole therapeutic or in combination with additional therapies such as anti-cancer therapies as needed.
The pharmaceutical compositions of this invention are particularly useful for parenteral administration, i.e., subcutaneously, intramuscularly, intravenously, intra-articular and/or intra-synovial. Parenteral administration can be by bolus injection or continuous infusion.
If the pharmaceutical composition has been lyophilized, the lyophilized material is first reconstituted in an appropriate liquid prior to administration. The lyophilized material may be reconstituted in, e.g., bacteriostatic water for injection (BWFI), physiological saline, phosphate buffered saline (PBS), or the same formulation the protein had been in prior to lyophilization.
In an internal analysis of proprietary mRNA expression data it has been surprisingly found that CDH19 expression is elevated in both primary and metastatic melanoma tumors compared to normal, untransformed tissues. Internal analysis also confirmed that expression of CDH19 in normal tissues is limited to neural crest derived peripheral nerve ganglia and nerve fibers. The differential CDH19 expression in normal and tumor tissues makes this protein attractive for cell-surface targeting therapeutics. Although CDH 19 was discussed as one marker as part of long lists of markers associated with some cancer types (see e.g. WO2009/055937) or Parkinson's disease (see e.g. WO2005/067391) CDH19 was never discussed as a prognostic marker or a drug target in connection with melanoma tumors.
As stated above, the present invention provides an isolated multispecific antibody construct comprising a first human binding domain capable of binding to human CDH19 on the surface of a target cell and a second domain capable of binding to human CD3 on the surface of a T cell.
The “CDH19 extracellular domain” or “CDH19 ECD” refers to a form of CDH19 which is essentially free of transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of CDH19. It will be understood by the skilled artisan that the transmembrane domain identified for the CDH19 polypeptide of the present invention is identified pursuant to criteria routinely employed in the art for identifying that type of hydrophobic domain. The exact boundaries of a transmembrane domain may vary but most likely by no more than about 5 amino acids at either end of the domain specifically mentioned herein. A preferred human CDH19 ECD is shown in SEQ ID NO: 948. In this context it is understood that the CDH19 ECD represents the part of CDH19 on the surface of a target cell.
The T cell CD3 receptor complex is a protein complex and is composed of four distinct chains. In mammals, the complex contains a CD3γ chain, a CDR, chain, and two CD3ε (epsilon) chains. These chains associate with a molecule known as the T cell receptor (TCR) and the ζ chain to generate an activation signal in T lymphocytes.
The redirected lysis of target cells via the recruitment of T cells by a multispecific, at least bispecific, antibody construct involves cytolytic synapse formation and delivery of perforin and granzymes. The engaged T cells are capable of serial target cell lysis, and are not affected by immune escape mechanisms interfering with peptide antigen processing and presentation, or clonal T cell differentiation; see, for example, WO 2007/042261.
The affinity of the first binding domain for human CDH19 is preferably ≤15 nM, more preferably ≤0 nM, even more preferably ≤5 nM, even more preferably ≤1 nM, even more preferably ≤0.5 nM, even more preferably ≤0.1 nM, and most preferably ≤0.05 nM. The affinity of the first binding domain for macaque CDH19 is preferably nM, more preferably ≤10 nM, even more preferably ≤5 nM, even more preferably nM, even more preferably ≤0.5 nM, even more preferably ≤0.1 nM, and most preferably ≤0.05 nM or even ≤0.01 nM. The affinity can be measured for example in a Biacore assay or in a Scatchard assay, e.g. as described in the Examples. The affinity gap for binding to macaque CDH19 versus human CDH19 is preferably [1:10-1:5] or [5:1-10:1], more preferably [1:5-5:1], and most preferably [1:2-3:1] or even [1:1-3:1]. Other methods of determining the affinity are well-known to the skilled person.
Human antibodies, respectively human antibody constructs, avoid some of the problems associated with antibodies/antibody constructs that possess murine or rat variable and/or constant regions. The presence of such murine or rat derived proteins can lead to the rapid clearance of the antibodies/antibody constructs or can lead to the generation of an immune response against the antibody/antibody construct by a patient. In order to avoid the utilization of murine or rat derived antibodies/antibody constructs, human or fully human antibodies can be generated through the introduction of human antibody function into a rodent so that the rodent produces fully human antibodies.
The ability to clone and reconstruct megabase-sized human loci in YACs and to introduce them into the mouse germline provides a powerful approach to elucidating the functional components of very large or crudely mapped loci as well as generating useful models of human disease. Furthermore, the utilization of such technology for substitution of mouse loci with their human equivalents could provide unique insights into the expression and regulation of human gene products during development, their communication with other systems, and their involvement in disease induction and progression.
An important practical application of such a strategy is the “humanization” of the mouse humoral immune system. Introduction of human immunoglobulin (Ig) loci into mice in which the endogenous Ig genes have been inactivated offers the opportunity to study the mechanisms underlying programmed expression and assembly of antibodies as well as their role in B-cell development. Furthermore, such a strategy could provide an ideal source for production of fully human monoclonal antibodies (mAbs)—an important milestone towards fulfilling the promise of antibody therapy in human disease. Fully human antibodies/antibody constructs are expected to minimize the immunogenic and allergic responses intrinsic to mouse or mouse-derivatized mAbs and thus to increase the efficacy and safety of the administered antibodies/antibody constructs. The use of fully human antibodies/antibody constructs can be expected to provide a substantial advantage in the treatment of chronic and recurring human diseases, such as inflammation, autoimmunity, and cancer, which require repeated compound administrations.
One approach towards this goal was to engineer mouse strains deficient in mouse antibody production with large fragments of the human Ig loci in anticipation that such mice would produce a large repertoire of human antibodies in the absence of mouse antibodies. Large human Ig fragments would preserve the large variable gene diversity as well as the proper regulation of antibody production and expression. By exploiting the mouse machinery for antibody diversification and selection and the lack of immunological tolerance to human proteins, the reproduced human antibody repertoire in these mouse strains should yield high affinity antibodies against any antigen of interest, including human antigens. Using the hybridoma technology, antigen-specific human mAbs with the desired specificity could be readily produced and selected. This general strategy was demonstrated in connection with our generation of the first XenoMouse mouse strains, as published in 1994. (See Green et al. Nature Genetics 7:13-21 (1994)) The XenoMouse strains were engineered with yeast artificial chromosomes (YACs) containing 245 kb and 190 kb-sized germline configuration fragments of the human heavy chain locus and kappa light chain locus, respectively, which contained core variable and constant region sequences. Id. The human Ig containing YACs proved to be compatible with the mouse system for both rearrangement and expression of antibodies and were capable of substituting for the inactivated mouse Ig genes. This was demonstrated by their ability to induce B-cell development, to produce an adult-like human repertoire of fully human antibodies, and to generate antigen-specific human mAbs. These results also suggested that introduction of larger portions of the human Ig loci containing greater numbers of V genes, additional regulatory elements, and human Ig constant regions might recapitulate substantially the full repertoire that is characteristic of the human humoral response to infection and immunization. The work of Green et al. was recently extended to the introduction of greater than approximately 80% of the human antibody repertoire through introduction of megabase sized, germline configuration YAC fragments of the human heavy chain loci and kappa light chain loci, respectively. See Mendez et al. Nature Genetics 15:146-156 (1997) and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/759,620, filed Dec. 3, 1996, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
The production of the XenoMouse mice is further discussed and delineated in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/466,008, filed Jan. 12, 1990, Ser. No. 07/610,515, filed Nov. 8, 1990, Ser. No. 07/919,297, filed Jul. 24, 1992, Ser. No. 07/922,649, filed Jul. 30, 1992, filed Ser. No. 08/031,801, filed Mar. 15, 1993, Ser. No. 08/112,848, filed Aug. 27, 1993, Ser. No. 08/234,145, filed Apr. 28, 1994, Ser. No. 08/376,279, filed Jan. 20, 1995, Ser. No. 08/430,938, Apr. 27, 1995, Ser. No. 08/464,584, filed Jun. 5, 1995, Ser. No. 08/464,582, filed Jun. 5, 1995, Ser. No. 08/463,191, filed Jun. 5, 1995, Ser. No. 08/462,837, filed Jun. 5, 1995, Ser. No. 08/486,853, filed Jun. 5, 1995, Ser. No. 08/486,857, filed Jun. 5, 1995, Ser. No. 08/486,859, filed Jun. 5, 1995, Ser. No. 08/462,513, filed Jun. 5, 1995, Ser. No. 08/724,752, filed Oct. 2, 1996, and Ser. No. 08/759,620, filed Dec. 3, 1996 and U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,162,963, 6,150,584, 6,114,598, 6,075,181, and 5,939,598 and Japanese Patent Nos. 3 068 180 B2, 3 068 506 B2, and 3 068 507 B2. See also Mendez et al. Nature Genetics 15:146-156 (1997) and Green and Jakobovits J. Exp. Med. 188:483-495 (1998). See also European Patent No., EP 0 463151 B1, grant published Jun. 12, 1996, International Patent Application No., WO 94/02602, published Feb. 3, 1994, International Patent Application No., WO 96/34096, published Oct. 31, 1996, WO 98/24893, published Jun. 11, 1998, WO 00/76310, published Dec. 21, 2000, WO 03/47336. The disclosures of each of the above-cited patents, applications, and references are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
In an alternative approach, others, including GenPharm International, Inc., have utilized a “minilocus” approach. In the minilocus approach, an exogenous Ig locus is mimicked through the inclusion of pieces (individual genes) from the Ig locus. Thus, one or more V.sub.H genes, one or more D.sub.H genes, one or more J.sub.H genes, a mu constant region, and a second constant region (preferably a gamma constant region) are formed into a construct for insertion into an animal. This approach is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,545,807 to Surani et al. and U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,545,806, 5,625,825, 5,625,126, 5,633,425, 5,661,016, 5,770,429, 5,789,650, 5,814,318, 5,877,397, 5,874,299, and 6,255,458 each to Lonberg and Kay, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,591,669 and 6,023,010 to Krimpenfort and Berns, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,612,205, 5,721,367, and 5,789,215 to Berns et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 5,643,763 to Choi and Dunn, and GenPharm International U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/574,748, filed Aug. 29, 1990, Ser. No. 07/575,962, filed Aug. 31, 1990, Ser. No. 07/810,279, filed Dec. 17, 1991, Ser. No. 07/853,408, filed Mar. 18, 1992, Ser. No. 07/904,068, filed Jun. 23, 1992, Ser. No. 07/990,860, filed Dec. 16, 1992, Ser. No. 08/053,131, filed Apr. 26, 1993, Ser. No. 08/096,762, filed Jul. 22, 1993, Ser. No. 08/155,301, filed Nov. 18, 1993, Ser. No. 08/161,739, filed Dec. 3, 1993, Ser. No. 08/165,699, filed Dec. 10, 1993, Ser. No. 08/209,741, filed Mar. 9, 1994, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference. See also European Patent No. 0 546 073 B 1, International Patent Application Nos. WO 92/03918, WO 92/22645, WO 92/22647, WO 92/22670, WO 93/12227, WO 94/00569, WO 94/25585, WO 96/14436, WO 97/13852, and WO 98/24884 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,981,175, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. See further Taylor et al., 1992, Chen et al., 1993, Tuaillon et al., 1993, Choi et al., 1993, Lonberg et al., (1994), Taylor et al., (1994), and Tuaillon et al., (1995), Fishwild et al., (1996), the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Kirin has also demonstrated the generation of human antibodies from mice in which, through microcell fusion, large pieces of chromosomes, or entire chromosomes, have been introduced. See European Patent Application Nos. 773 288 and 843 961, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference.Xenerex Biosciences is developing a technology for the potential generation of human antibodies. In this technology, SCID mice are reconstituted with human lymphatic cells, e.g., B and/or T cells. Mice are then immunized with an antigen and can generate an immune response against the antigen. See U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,476,996, 5,698,767, and 5,958,765.
Human anti-mouse antibody (HAMA) responses have led the industry to prepare chimeric or otherwise humanized antibodies. While chimeric antibodies have a human constant region and a murine variable region, it is expected that certain human anti-chimeric antibody (HACA) responses will be observed, particularly in chronic or multi-dose utilizations of the antibody. Thus, it would be desirable to provide fully human antibodies against EGFRvIII in order to vitiate concerns and/or effects of HAMA or HACA response.
Cytotoxicity mediated by CDH19/CD3 bispecific antibody constructs can be measured in various ways. Effector cells can be e.g. stimulated enriched (human) CD8 positive T cells or unstimulated (human) peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). If the target cells are of macaque origin or express or are transfected with macaque CDH19, the effector cells should also be of macaque origin such as a macaque T cell line, e.g. 4119LnPx. The target cells should express (at least the extracellular domain of) CDH19, e.g. human or macaque CDH19. Target cells can be a cell line (such as CHO) which is stably or transiently transfected with CDH19, e.g. human or macaque CDH19. Alternatively, the target cells can be a CDH19 positive natural expresser cell line, such as the human myeloma cell line CHL-1 or Colo-699. Usually EC50-values are expected to be lower with target cell lines expressing higher levels of CDH19 on the cell surface. The effector to target cell (E:T) ratio is usually about 10:1, but can also vary. Cytotoxic activity of CDH19/CD3 bispecific antibody constructs can be measured in an 51-chromium release assay (incubation time of about 18 hours) or in a in a FACS-based cytotoxicity assay (incubation time of about 48 hours). Modifications of the assay incubation time (cytotoxic reaction) are also possible. Other methods of measuring cytotoxicity are well-known to the skilled person and comprise MTT or MTS assays, ATP-based assays including bioluminescent assays, the sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay, WST assay, clonogenic assay and the ECIS technology.
The cytotoxic activity mediated by CDH19/CD3 bispecific antibody constructs of the present invention is preferably measured in a cell-based cytotoxicity assay. It is represented by the EC50 value, which corresponds to the half maximal effective concentration (concentration of the antibody construct which induces a cytotoxic response halfway between the baseline and maximum). Preferably, the EC50 value of the CDH19/CD3 bispecific antibody constructs is ≤20.000 pg/ml, more preferably ≤5000 pg/ml, even more preferably ≤1000 pg/ml, even more preferably ≤500 pg/ml, even more preferably ≤350 pg/ml, even more preferably ≤320 pg/ml, even more preferably ≤250 pg/ml, even more preferably ≤100 pg/ml, even more preferably ≤50 pg/ml, even more preferably ≤10 pg/ml, and most preferably ≤5 pg/ml.
Any of the above given EC50 values can be combined with any one of the indicated scenarios of a cell-based cytotoxicity assay. For example, when (human) CD8 positive T cells or a macaque T cell line are used as effector cells, the EC50 value of the CDH19/CD3 bispecific antibody construct is preferably ≤1000 pg/ml, more preferably ≤500 pg/ml, even more preferably ≤250 pg/ml, even more preferably ≤100 pg/ml, even more preferably ≤50 pg/ml, even more preferably ≤10 pg/ml, and most preferably ≤5 pg/ml. If in this assay the target cells are (human or macaque) CDH19 transfected cells such as CHO cells, the EC50 value of the CDH19/CD3 bispecific antibody construct is preferably ≤150 pg/ml, more preferably ≤100 pg/ml, even more preferably ≤50 pg/ml, even more preferably ≤30 pg/ml, even more preferably ≤10 pg/ml, and most preferably ≤5 pg/ml.
If the target cells are a CDH19 positive natural expresser cell line, then the EC50 value is preferably ≤350 pg/ml, more preferably ≤320 pg/ml, even more preferably ≤250 pg/ml, even more preferably ≤200 pg/ml, even more preferably ≤100 pg/ml, even more preferably ≤150 pg/ml, even more preferably ≤100 pg/ml, and most preferably ≤50 pg/ml, or lower. When (human) PBMCs are used as effector cells, the EC50 value of the CDH19/CD3 bispecific antibody construct is preferably ≤1000 pg/ml, more preferably ≤750 pg/ml, more preferably ≤500 pg/ml, even more preferably ≤350 pg/ml, even more preferably ≤320 pg/ml, even more preferably ≤250 pg/ml, even more preferably ≤100 pg/ml, and most preferably ≤50 pg/ml, or lower.
The difference in cytotoxic activity between the monomeric and the dimeric isoform of individual CDH19/CD3 bispecific antibody constructs is referred to as “potency gap”. This potency gap can e.g. be calculated as ratio between EC50 values of the molecule's monomeric and dimeric form. Potency gaps of the CDH19/CD3 bispecific antibody constructs of the present invention are preferably ≤5, more preferably ≤4, even more preferably ≤3, even more preferably ≤2 and most preferably ≤1.
The antibody construct of the invention is a fusion protein comprising at least two binding domains, with or without peptide linkers (spacer peptides). Among the suitable peptide linkers are those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,751,180 and 4,935,233 or WO 88/09344.
Another method for preparing oligomeric antibody construct derivatives involves use of a leucine zipper. Leucine zipper domains are peptides that promote oligomerization of the proteins in which they are found. Leucine zippers were originally identified in several DNA-binding proteins (Landschulz et al., 1988, Science 240:1759), and have since been found in a variety of different proteins. Among the known leucine zippers are naturally occurring peptides and derivatives thereof that dimerize or trimerize. Examples of leucine zipper domains suitable for producing soluble oligomeric proteins are described in PCT application WO 94/10308, and the leucine zipper derived from lung surfactant protein D (SPD) described in Hoppe et al., 1994, FEBS Letters 344:191, hereby incorporated by reference. The use of a modified leucine zipper that allows for stable trimerization of a heterologous protein fused thereto is described in Fanslow et al., 1994, Semin. Immunol. 6:267-78. In one approach, recombinant fusion proteins comprising CDH19 antibody fragment or derivative fused to a leucine zipper peptide are expressed in suitable host cells, and the soluble oligomeric CDH19 antibody fragments or derivatives that form are recovered from the culture supernatant.
Covalent modifications of antigen binding proteins are included within the scope of this invention, and are generally, but not always, done post-translationally. For example, several types of covalent modifications of the antigen binding protein are introduced into the molecule by reacting specific amino acid residues of the antigen binding protein with an organic derivatizing agent that is capable of reacting with selected side chains or the N- or C-terminal residues.
Cysteinyl residues most commonly are reacted with α-haloacetates (and corresponding amines), such as chloroacetic acid or chloroacetamide, to give carboxymethyl or carboxyamidomethyl derivatives. Cysteinyl residues also are derivatized by reaction with bromotrifluoroacetone, α-bromo-β-(5-imidozoyl)propionic acid, chloroacetyl phosphate, N-alkylmaleimides, 3-nitro-2-pyridyl disulfide, methyl 2-pyridyl disulfide, p-chloromercuribenzoate, 2-chloromercuri-4-nitrophenol, or chloro-7-nitrobenzo-2-oxa-1,3-diazole.
Histidyl residues are derivatized by reaction with diethylpyrocarbonate at pH 5.5-7.0 because this agent is relatively specific for the histidyl side chain. Para-bromophenacyl bromide also is useful; the reaction is preferably performed in 0.1M sodium cacodylate at pH 6.0. Lysinyl and amino terminal residues are reacted with succinic or other carboxylic acid anhydrides. Derivatization with these agents has the effect of reversing the charge of the lysinyl residues. Other suitable reagents for derivatizing alpha-amino-containing residues include imidoesters such as methyl picolinimidate; pyridoxal phosphate; pyridoxal; chloroborohydride; trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid; O-methylisourea; 2,4-pentanedione; and transaminase-catalyzed reaction with glyoxylate.
Arginyl residues are modified by reaction with one or several conventional reagents, among them phenylglyoxal, 2,3-butanedione, 1,2-cyclohexanedione, and ninhydrin. Derivatization of arginine residues requires that the reaction be performed in alkaline conditions because of the high pKa of the guanidine functional group. Furthermore, these reagents may react with the groups of lysine as well as the arginine epsilon-amino group.
The specific modification of tyrosyl residues may be made, with particular interest in introducing spectral labels into tyrosyl residues by reaction with aromatic diazonium compounds or tetranitromethane. Most commonly, N-acetylimidizole and tetranitromethane are used to form O-acetyl tyrosyl species and 3-nitro derivatives, respectively. Tyrosyl residues are iodinated using 125I or 131I to prepare labeled proteins for use in radioimmunoassay, the chloramine T method described above being suitable.
Carboxyl side groups (aspartyl or glutamyl) are selectively modified by reaction with carbodiimides (R′—N═C═N—R′), where R and R′ are optionally different alkyl groups, such as 1-cyclohexyl-3-(2-morpholinyl-4-ethyl) carbodiimide or 1-ethyl-3-(4-azonia-4,4-dimethylpentyl) carbodiimide. Furthermore, aspartyl and glutamyl residues are converted to asparaginyl and glutaminyl residues by reaction with ammonium ions.
Derivatization with bifunctional agents is useful for crosslinking antigen binding proteins to a water-insoluble support matrix or surface for use in a variety of methods. Commonly used crosslinking agents include, e.g., 1,1-bis(diazoacetyl)-2-phenylethane, glutaraldehyde, N-hydroxysuccin imide esters, for example, esters with 4-azidosalicylic acid, homobifunctional imidoesters, including disuccinimidyl esters such as 3,3′-dithiobis(succinimidylpropionate), and bifunctional maleimides such as bis-N-maleimido-1,8-octane. Derivatizing agents such as methyl-3-[(p-azidophenyl)dithio]propioimidate yield photoactivatable intermediates that are capable of forming crosslinks in the presence of light. Alternatively, reactive water-insoluble matrices such as cyanogen bromide-activated carbohydrates and the reactive substrates described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,969,287; 3,691,016; 4,195,128; 4,247,642; 4,229,537; and 4,330,440 are employed for protein immobilization.
Glutaminyl and asparaginyl residues are frequently deamidated to the corresponding glutamyl and aspartyl residues, respectively. Alternatively, these residues are deamidated under mildly acidic conditions. Either form of these residues falls within the scope of this invention.
Other modifications include hydroxylation of proline and lysine, phosphorylation of hydroxyl groups of seryl or threonyl residues, methylation of the α-amino groups of lysine, arginine, and histidine side chains (T. E. Creighton, Proteins: Structure and Molecular Properties, W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco, 1983, pp. 79-86), acetylation of the N-terminal amine, and amidation of any C-terminal carboxyl group.
Another type of covalent modification of the antigen binding protein included within the scope of this invention comprises altering the glycosylation pattern of the protein. As is known in the art, glycosylation patterns can depend on both the sequence of the protein (e.g., the presence or absence of particular glycosylation amino acid residues, discussed below), or the host cell or organism in which the protein is produced. Particular expression systems are discussed below.
Glycosylation of polypeptides is typically either N-linked or O-linked. N-linked refers to the attachment of the carbohydrate moiety to the side chain of an asparagine residue. The tri-peptide sequences asparagine-X-serine and asparagine-X-threonine, where X is any amino acid except proline, are the recognition sequences for enzymatic attachment of the carbohydrate moiety to the asparagine side chain. Thus, the presence of either of these tri-peptide sequences in a polypeptide creates a potential glycosylation site. O-linked glycosylation refers to the attachment of one of the sugars N-acetylgalactosamine, galactose, or xylose, to a hydroxyamino acid, most commonly serine or threonine, although 5-hydroxyproline or 5-hydroxylysine may also be used.
Addition of glycosylation sites to the antigen binding protein is conveniently accomplished by altering the amino acid sequence such that it contains one or more of the above-described tri-peptide sequences (for N-linked glycosylation sites). The alteration may also be made by the addition of, or substitution by, one or more serine or threonine residues to the starting sequence (for O-linked glycosylation sites). For ease, the antigen binding protein amino acid sequence is preferably altered through changes at the DNA level, particularly by mutating the DNA encoding the target polypeptide at preselected bases such that codons are generated that will translate into the desired amino acids.
Another means of increasing the number of carbohydrate moieties on the antigen binding protein is by chemical or enzymatic coupling of glycosides to the protein. These procedures are advantageous in that they do not require production of the protein in a host cell that has glycosylation capabilities for N- and O-linked glycosylation. Depending on the coupling mode used, the sugar(s) may be attached to (a) arginine and histidine, (b) free carboxyl groups, (c) free sulfhydryl groups such as those of cysteine, (d) free hydroxyl groups such as those of serine, threonine, or hydroxyproline, (e) aromatic residues such as those of phenylalanine, tyrosine, or tryptophan, or (f) the amide group of glutamine. These methods are described in WO 87/05330 published Sep. 11, 1987, and in Aplin and Wriston, 1981, CRC Crit. Rev. Biochem., pp. 259-306.
Removal of carbohydrate moieties present on the starting antigen binding protein may be accomplished chemically or enzymatically. Chemical deglycosylation requires exposure of the protein to the compound trifluoromethanesulfonic acid, or an equivalent compound. This treatment results in the cleavage of most or all sugars except the linking sugar (N-acetylglucosamine or N-acetylgalactosamine), while leaving the polypeptide intact. Chemical deglycosylation is described by Hakimuddin et al., 1987, Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 259:52 and by Edge et al., 1981, Anal. Biochem. 118:131. Enzymatic cleavage of carbohydrate moieties on polypeptides can be achieved by the use of a variety of endo- and exo-glycosidases as described by Thotakura et al., 1987, Meth. Enzymol. 138:350. Glycosylation at potential glycosylation sites may be prevented by the use of the compound tunicamycin as described by Duskin et al., 1982, J. Biol. Chem. 257:3105. Tunicamycin blocks the formation of protein-N-glycoside linkages.
Another type of covalent modification of the antigen binding protein comprises linking the antigen binding protein to various non-proteinaceous polymers, including, but not limited to, various polyols such as polyethylene glycol, polypropylene glycol or polyoxyalkylenes, in the manner set forth in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,640,835; 4,496,689; 4,301,144; 4,670,417; 4,791,192 or 4,179,337. In addition, as is known in the art, amino acid substitutions may be made in various positions within the antigen binding protein to facilitate the addition of polymers such as PEG.
In some embodiments, the covalent modification of the antigen binding proteins of the invention comprises the addition of one or more labels.
The term “labelling group” means any detectable label. Examples of suitable labelling groups include, but are not limited to, the following: radioisotopes or radionuclides (e.g., 3H, 14C, 15N, 35S, 89Zr, 90Y, 99Tc, 111In, 125I, 131I), fluorescent groups (e.g., FITC, rhodamine, lanthanide phosphors), enzymatic groups (e.g., horseradish peroxidase, β-galactosidase, luciferase, alkaline phosphatase), chemiluminescent groups, biotinyl groups, or predetermined polypeptide epitopes recognized by a secondary reporter (e.g., leucine zipper pair sequences, binding sites for secondary antibodies, metal binding domains, epitope tags). In some embodiments, the labelling group is coupled to the antigen binding protein via spacer arms of various lengths to reduce potential steric hindrance. Various methods for labelling proteins are known in the art and may be used in performing the present invention.
In general, labels fall into a variety of classes, depending on the assay in which they are to be detected: a) isotopic labels, which may be radioactive or heavy isotopes; b) magnetic labels (e.g., magnetic particles); c) redox active moieties; d) optical dyes; enzymatic groups (e.g. horseradish peroxidase, β-galactosidase, luciferase, alkaline phosphatase); e) biotinylated groups; and f) predetermined polypeptide epitopes recognized by a secondary reporter (e.g., leucine zipper pair sequences, binding sites for secondary antibodies, metal binding domains, epitope tags, etc.). In some embodiments, the labelling group is coupled to the antigen binding protein via spacer arms of various lengths to reduce potential steric hindrance. Various methods for labelling proteins are known in the art and may be used in performing the present invention.
Specific labels include optical dyes, including, but not limited to, chromophores, phosphors and fluorophores, with the latter being specific in many instances. Fluorophores can be either “small molecule” fluores, or proteinaceous fluores.
By “fluorescent label” is meant any molecule that may be detected via its inherent fluorescent properties. Suitable fluorescent labels include, but are not limited to, fluorescein, rhodamine, tetramethylrhodamine, eosin, erythrosin, coumarin, methyl-coumarins, pyrene, Malacite green, stilbene, Lucifer Yellow, Cascade BlueJ, Texas Red, IAEDANS, EDANS, BODIPY FL, LC Red 640, Cy 5, Cy 5.5, LC Red 705, Oregon green, the Alexa-Fluor dyes (Alexa Fluor 350, Alexa Fluor 430, Alexa Fluor 488, Alexa Fluor 546, Alexa Fluor 568, Alexa Fluor 594, Alexa Fluor 633, Alexa Fluor 660, Alexa Fluor 680), Cascade Blue, Cascade Yellow and R-phycoerythrin (PE) (Molecular Probes, Eugene, Oreg.), FITC, Rhodamine, and Texas Red (Pierce, Rockford, Ill.), Cy5, Cy5.5, Cy7 (Amersham Life Science, Pittsburgh, Pa.). Suitable optical dyes, including fluorophores, are described in Molecular Probes Handbook by Richard P. Haugland, hereby expressly incorporated by reference.
Suitable proteinaceous fluorescent labels also include, but are not limited to, green fluorescent protein, including a Renilla, Ptilosarcus, or Aequorea species of GFP (Chalfie et al., 1994, Science 263:802-805), EGFP (Clontech Laboratories, Inc., Genbank Accession Number U55762), blue fluorescent protein (BFP, Quantum Biotechnologies, Inc. 1801 de Maisonneuve Blvd. West, 8th Floor, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3H 1J9; Stauber, 1998, Biotechniques 24:462-471; Heim et al., 1996, Curr. Biol. 6:178-182), enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (EYFP, Clontech Laboratories, Inc.), luciferase (Ichiki et al., 1993, J. Immunol. 150:5408-5417), β galactosidase (Nolan et al., 1988, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85:2603-2607) and Renilla (WO92/15673, WO95/07463, WO98/14605, WO98/26277, WO99/49019, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,292,658, 5,418,155, 5,683,888, 5,741,668, 5,777,079, 5,804,387, 5,874,304, 5,876,995, 5,925,558). All of the above-cited references are expressly incorporated herein by reference.
The antibody construct of the invention may also comprise additional domains, which e.g. are helpful in the isolation of the molecule or relate to an adapted pharmacokinetic profile of the molecule.
Domains helpful for the isolation of an antibody construct may be elected from peptide motives or secondarily introduced moieties, which can be captured in an isolation method, e.g. an isolation column. A non-limiting embodiments of such additional domains comprise peptide motives known as Myc-tag, HAT-tag, HA-tag, TAP-tag, GST-tag, chitin binding domain (CBD-tag), maltose binding protein (MBP-tag), Flag-tag, Strep-tag and variants thereof (e.g. StrepII-tag) and His-tag. All herein disclosed antibody constructs characterized by the identified CDRs are preferred to comprise a His-tag domain, which is generally known as a repeat of consecutive His residues in the amino acid sequence of a molecule, preferably of six His residues.
As described in appended example 2 a broad number of CDH19 specific binder has been characterized with respect to identified binding characteristics and those binders were grouped into five different bins, which refers to five different subgroups of CDH19 specific binding domains. Accordingly, in one embodiment the antibody construct of the invention the first binding domain comprises a VH region comprising CDR-H1, CDR-H2 and CDR-H3 and a VL region comprising CDR-L1, CDR-L2 and CDR-L3 selected from the group consisting of:
which all characterize binding domains for CDH19 grouped into bin 5.
In a further embodiment of the antibody construct of the invention the first binding domain comprises a VH region selected from the group consisting of VH regions
In another embodiment of the antibody construct of the invention the first binding domain comprises a VL region selected from the group consisting of VL regions
The invention further provides an embodiment of the antibody construct of the invention, wherein the first binding domain comprises a VH region and a VL region selected from the group consisting of:
In a further embodiment of the invention the antibody construct is in a format selected from the group consisting of (scFv)2, (single domain mAb)2, scFv-single domain mAb, diabodies and oligomers thereof.
In a preferred embodiment the first binding domain comprises an amino acid selected from the group consisting of
In one aspect of the invention, the second binding domain is capable of binding to human CD3 and to macaque CD3, preferably to human CD3 epsilon and to macaque CD3 epsilon. Additionally or alternatively, the second binding domain is capable of binding to Callithrix jacchus, Saguinus oedipus and/or Saimiri sciureus CD3 epsilon. According to these embodiments, one or both binding domains of the antibody construct of the invention are preferably cross-species specific for members of the mammalian order of primates. Cross-species specific CD3 binding domains are, for example, described in WO 2008/119567.
It is particularly preferred for the antibody construct of the present invention that the second binding domain capable of binding to the T cell CD3 receptor complex comprises a VL region comprising CDR-L1, CDR-L2 and CDR-L3 selected from:
In an alternatively preferred embodiment of the antibody construct of the present invention, the second binding domain capable of binding to the T cell CD3 receptor complex comprises a VH region comprising CDR-H 1, CDR-H2 and CDR-H3 selected from:
It is further preferred for the antibody construct of the present invention that the second binding domain capable of binding to the T cell CD3 receptor complex comprises a VL region selected from the group consisting of a VL region as depicted in SEQ ID NO: 35, 39, 125, 129, 161 or 165 of WO 2008/119567.
It is alternatively preferred that the second binding domain capable of binding to the T cell CD3 receptor complex comprises a VH region selected from the group consisting of a VH region as depicted in SEQ ID NO: 15, 19, 33, 37, 51, 55, 69, 73, 87, 91, 105, 109, 123, 127, 141, 145, 159, 163, 177 or 181 of WO 2008/119567.
More preferably, the antibody construct of the present invention is characterized by the second binding domain capable of binding to the T cell CD3 receptor complex comprising a VL region and a VH region selected from the group consisting of:
According to a preferred embodiment of the antibody construct of the present invention, in particular the second binding domain capable of binding to the T cell CD3 receptor complex, the pairs of VH-regions and VL-regions are in the format of a single chain antibody (scFv). The VH and VL regions are arranged in the order VH-VL or VL-VH. It is preferred that the VH-region is positioned N-terminally to a linker sequence. The VL-region is positioned C-terminally of the linker sequence.
A preferred embodiment of the above described antibody construct of the present invention is characterized by the second binding domain capable of binding to the T cell CD3 receptor complex comprising an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 23, 25, 41, 43, 59, 61, 77, 79, 95, 97, 113, 115, 131, 133, 149, 151, 167, 169, 185 or 187 of WO 2008/119567.
In a preferred embodiment the antibody construct of the invention has an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of
The invention further provides a nucleic acid sequence encoding an antibody construct of the invention.
Furthermore, the invention provides a vector comprising a nucleic acid sequence of the invention. Moreover, the invention provides a host cell transformed or transfected with the nucleic acid sequence of the invention.
In a further embodiment the invention provides a process for the production of a antibody construct of the invention, said process comprising culturing a host cell of the invention under conditions allowing the expression of the antibody construct of the invention and recovering the produced antibody construct from the culture.
Moreover, the invention provides a pharmaceutical composition comprising an antibody construct of the invention or produced according to the process of the invention
The formulations described herein are useful as pharmaceutical compositions in the treatment, amelioration and/or prevention of the pathological medical condition as described herein in a patient in need thereof. The term “treatment” refers to both therapeutic treatment and prophylactic or preventative measures. Treatment includes the application or administration of the formulation to the body, an isolated tissue, or cell from a patient who has a disease/disorder, a symptom of a disease/disorder, or a predisposition toward a disease/disorder, with the purpose to cure, heal, alleviate, relieve, alter, remedy, ameliorate, improve, or affect the disease, the symptom of the disease, or the predisposition toward the disease.
Those “in need of treatment” include those already with the disorder, as well as those in which the disorder is to be prevented. The term “disease” is any condition that would benefit from treatment with the protein formulation described herein. This includes chronic and acute disorders or diseases including those pathological conditions that predispose the mammal to the disease in question. Non-limiting examples of diseases/disorders to be treated herein include proliferative disease, a tumorous disease, or an immunological disorder.
In some embodiments, the invention provides a pharmaceutical composition comprising a therapeutically effective amount of one or a plurality of the antibody construct of the invention together with a pharmaceutically effective diluents, carrier, solubilizer, emulsifier, preservative, and/or adjuvant. Pharmaceutical compositions of the invention include, but are not limited to, liquid, frozen, and lyophilized compositions.
Preferably, formulation materials are nontoxic to recipients at the dosages and concentrations employed. In specific embodiments, pharmaceutical compositions comprising a therapeutically effective amount of an antibody construct of the invention.
In certain embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition may contain formulation materials for modifying, maintaining or preserving, for example, the pH, osmolarity, viscosity, clarity, color, isotonicity, odor, sterility, stability, rate of dissolution or release, adsorption or penetration of the composition. In such embodiments, suitable formulation materials include, but are not limited to, amino acids (such as glycine, glutamine, asparagine, arginine, proline, or lysine); antimicrobials; antioxidants (such as ascorbic acid, sodium sulfite or sodium hydrogen-sulfite); buffers (such as borate, bicarbonate, Tris-HCl, citrates, phosphates or other organic acids); bulking agents (such as mannitol or glycine); chelating agents (such as ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA)); complexing agents (such as caffeine, polyvinylpyrrolidone, beta-cyclodextrin or hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin); fillers; monosaccharides; disaccharides; and other carbohydrates (such as glucose, mannose or dextrins); proteins (such as serum albumin, gelatin or immunoglobulins); coloring, flavoring and diluting agents; emulsifying agents; hydrophilic polymers (such as polyvinylpyrrolidone); low molecular weight polypeptides; salt-forming counterions (such as sodium); preservatives (such as benzalkonium chloride, benzoic acid, salicylic acid, thimerosal, phenethyl alcohol, methylparaben, propylparaben, chlorhexidine, sorbic acid or hydrogen peroxide); solvents (such as glycerin, propylene glycol or polyethylene glycol); sugar alcohols (such as mannitol or sorbitol); suspending agents; surfactants or wetting agents (such as pluronics, PEG, sorbitan esters, polysorbates such as polysorbate 20, polysorbate, triton, tromethamine, lecithin, cholesterol, tyloxapal); stability enhancing agents (such as sucrose or sorbitol); tonicity enhancing agents (such as alkali metal halides, preferably sodium or potassium chloride, mannitol sorbitol); delivery vehicles; diluents; excipients and/or pharmaceutical adjuvants. See, REMINGTON'S PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 18″ Edition, (A. R. Genrmo, ed.), 1990, Mack Publishing Company.
In certain embodiments, the optimal pharmaceutical composition will be determined by one skilled in the art depending upon, for example, the intended route of administration, delivery format and desired dosage. See, for example, REMINGTON'S PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, supra. In certain embodiments, such compositions may influence the physical state, stability, rate of in vivo release and rate of in vivo clearance of the antigen binding proteins of the invention. In certain embodiments, the primary vehicle or carrier in a pharmaceutical composition may be either aqueous or non-aqueous in nature. For example, a suitable vehicle or carrier may be water for injection, physiological saline solution or artificial cerebrospinal fluid, possibly supplemented with other materials common in compositions for parenteral administration. Neutral buffered saline or saline mixed with serum albumin are further exemplary vehicles. In specific embodiments, pharmaceutical compositions comprise Tris buffer of about pH 7.0-8.5, or acetate buffer of about pH 4.0-5.5, and may further include sorbitol or a suitable substitute therefore. In certain embodiments of the invention, human antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof of the invention or the antibody construct of the invention compositions may be prepared for storage by mixing the selected composition having the desired degree of purity with optional formulation agents (REMINGTON'S PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, supra) in the form of a lyophilized cake or an aqueous solution. Further, in certain embodiments, the human antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof of the invention or the antibody construct of the invention may be formulated as a lyophilizate using appropriate excipients such as sucrose.
The pharmaceutical compositions of the invention can be selected for parenteral delivery. Alternatively, the compositions may be selected for inhalation or for delivery through the digestive tract, such as orally. Preparation of such pharmaceutically acceptable compositions is within the skill of the art. The formulation components are present preferably in concentrations that are acceptable to the site of administration. In certain embodiments, buffers are used to maintain the composition at physiological pH or at a slightly lower pH, typically within a pH range of from about 5 to about 8.
When parenteral administration is contemplated, the therapeutic compositions for use in this invention may be provided in the form of a pyrogen-free, parenterally acceptable aqueous solution comprising the desired human antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof of the invention or the antibody construct of the invention in a pharmaceutically acceptable vehicle. A particularly suitable vehicle for parenteral injection is sterile distilled water in which the antibody construct of the invention is formulated as a sterile, isotonic solution, properly preserved. In certain embodiments, the preparation can involve the formulation of the desired molecule with an agent, such as injectable microspheres, bio-erodible particles, polymeric compounds (such as polylactic acid or polyglycolic acid), beads or liposomes, that may provide controlled or sustained release of the product which can be delivered via depot injection. In certain embodiments, hyaluronic acid may also be used, having the effect of promoting sustained duration in the circulation. In certain embodiments, implantable drug delivery devices may be used to introduce the desired antigen binding protein.
Additional pharmaceutical compositions will be evident to those skilled in the art, including formulations involving h the antibody construct of the invention in sustained- or controlled-delivery formulations. Techniques for formulating a variety of other sustained- or controlled-delivery means, such as liposome carriers, bio-erodible microparticles or porous beads and depot injections, are also known to those skilled in the art. See, for example, International Patent Application No. PCT/US93/00829, which is incorporated by reference and describes controlled release of porous polymeric microparticles for delivery of pharmaceutical compositions. Sustained-release preparations may include semipermeable polymer matrices in the form of shaped articles, e.g., films, or microcapsules. Sustained release matrices may include polyesters, hydrogels, polylactides (as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,773,919 and European Patent Application Publication No. EP 058481, each of which is incorporated by reference), copolymers of L-glutamic acid and gamma ethyl-L-glutamate (Sidman et al., 1983, Biopolymers 2:547-556), poly (2-hydroxyethyl-methacrylate) (Langer et al., 1981, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 15:167-277 and Langer, 1982, Chem. Tech. 12:98-105), ethylene vinyl acetate (Langer et al., 1981, supra) or poly-D(−)-3-hydroxybutyric acid (European Patent Application Publication No. EP 133,988). Sustained release compositions may also include liposomes that can be prepared by any of several methods known in the art. See, e.g., Eppstein et al., 1985, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82:3688-3692; European Patent Application Publication Nos. EP 036,676; EP 088,046 and EP 143,949, incorporated by reference.
Pharmaceutical compositions used for in vivo administration are typically provided as sterile preparations. Sterilization can be accomplished by filtration through sterile filtration membranes. When the composition is lyophilized, sterilization using this method may be conducted either prior to or following lyophilization and reconstitution. Compositions for parenteral administration can be stored in lyophilized form or in a solution. Parenteral compositions generally are placed into a container having a sterile access port, for example, an intravenous solution bag or vial having a stopper pierceable by a hypodermic injection needle.
Aspects of the invention includes self-buffering antibody construct of the invention formulations, which can be used as pharmaceutical compositions, as described in international patent application WO 06138181A2 (PCT/US2006/022599), which is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein.
As discussed above, certain embodiments provide antibody construct of the invention protein compositions, particularly pharmaceutical compositions of the invention, that comprise, in addition to the antibody construct of the invention, one or more excipients such as those illustratively described in this section and elsewhere herein. Excipients can be used in the invention in this regard for a wide variety of purposes, such as adjusting physical, chemical, or biological properties of formulations, such as adjustment of viscosity, and or processes of the invention to improve effectiveness and or to stabilize such formulations and processes against degradation and spoilage due to, for instance, stresses that occur during manufacturing, shipping, storage, pre-use preparation, administration, and thereafter.
A variety of expositions are available on protein stabilization and formulation materials and methods useful in this regard, such as Arakawa et al., “Solvent interactions in pharmaceutical formulations,” Pharm Res. 8(3): 285-91 (1991); Kendrick et al., “Physical stabilization of proteins in aqueous solution,” in: RATIONAL DESIGN OF STABLE PROTEIN FORMULATIONS: THEORY AND PRACTICE, Carpenter and Manning, eds. Pharmaceutical Biotechnology. 13: 61-84 (2002), and Randolph et al., “Surfactant-protein interactions,” Pharm Biotechnol. 13: 159-75 (2002), each of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety, particularly in parts pertinent to excipients and processes of the same for self-buffering protein formulations in accordance with the current invention, especially as to protein pharmaceutical products and processes for veterinary and/or human medical uses.
Salts may be used in accordance with certain embodiments of the invention to, for example, adjust the ionic strength and/or the isotonicity of a formulation and/or to improve the solubility and/or physical stability of a protein or other ingredient of a composition in accordance with the invention.
As is well known, ions can stabilize the native state of proteins by binding to charged residues on the protein's surface and by shielding charged and polar groups in the protein and reducing the strength of their electrostatic interactions, attractive, and repulsive interactions. Ions also can stabilize the denatured state of a protein by binding to, in particular, the denatured peptide linkages (—CONN) of the protein. Furthermore, ionic interaction with charged and polar groups in a protein also can reduce intermolecular electrostatic interactions and, thereby, prevent or reduce protein aggregation and insolubility.
Ionic species differ significantly in their effects on proteins. A number of categorical rankings of ions and their effects on proteins have been developed that can be used in formulating pharmaceutical compositions in accordance with the invention. One example is the Hofmeister series, which ranks ionic and polar non-ionic solutes by their effect on the conformational stability of proteins in solution. Stabilizing solutes are referred to as “kosmotropic.” Destabilizing solutes are referred to as “chaotropic.” Kosmotropes commonly are used at high concentrations (e.g., >1 molar ammonium sulfate) to precipitate proteins from solution (“salting-out”). Chaotropes commonly are used to denture and/or to solubilize proteins (“salting-in”). The relative effectiveness of ions to “salt-in” and “salt-out” defines their position in the Hofmeister series.
Free amino acids can be used in the antibody construct of the invention formulations in accordance with various embodiments of the invention as bulking agents, stabilizers, and antioxidants, as well as other standard uses. Lysine, proline, serine, and alanine can be used for stabilizing proteins in a formulation. Glycine is useful in lyophilization to ensure correct cake structure and properties. Arginine may be useful to inhibit protein aggregation, in both liquid and lyophilized formulations. Methionine is useful as an antioxidant.
Polyols include sugars, e.g., mannitol, sucrose, and sorbitol and polyhydric alcohols such as, for instance, glycerol and propylene glycol, and, for purposes of discussion herein, polyethylene glycol (PEG) and related substances. Polyols are kosmotropic. They are useful stabilizing agents in both liquid and lyophilized formulations to protect proteins from physical and chemical degradation processes. Polyols also are useful for adjusting the tonicity of formulations.
Among polyols useful in select embodiments of the invention is mannitol, commonly used to ensure structural stability of the cake in lyophilized formulations. It ensures structural stability to the cake. It is generally used with a lyoprotectant, e.g., sucrose. Sorbitol and sucrose are among preferred agents for adjusting tonicity and as stabilizers to protect against freeze-thaw stresses during transport or the preparation of bulks during the manufacturing process. Reducing sugars (which contain free aldehyde or ketone groups), such as glucose and lactose, can glycate surface lysine and arginine residues. Therefore, they generally are not among preferred polyols for use in accordance with the invention. In addition, sugars that form such reactive species, such as sucrose, which is hydrolyzed to fructose and glucose under acidic conditions, and consequently engenders glycation, also is not among preferred polyols of the invention in this regard. PEG is useful to stabilize proteins and as a cryoprotectant and can be used in the invention in this regard.
Embodiments of the antibody construct of the invention formulations further comprise surfactants. Protein molecules may be susceptible to adsorption on surfaces and to denaturation and consequent aggregation at air-liquid, solid-liquid, and liquid-liquid interfaces. These effects generally scale inversely with protein concentration. These deleterious interactions generally scale inversely with protein concentration and typically are exacerbated by physical agitation, such as that generated during the shipping and handling of a product.
Surfactants routinely are used to prevent, minimize, or reduce surface adsorption. Useful surfactants in the invention in this regard include polysorbate 20, polysorbate 80, other fatty acid esters of sorbitan polyethoxylates, and poloxamer 188.
Surfactants also are commonly used to control protein conformational stability. The use of surfactants in this regard is protein-specific since, any given surfactant typically will stabilize some proteins and destabilize others.
Polysorbates are susceptible to oxidative degradation and often, as supplied, contain sufficient quantities of peroxides to cause oxidation of protein residue side-chains, especially methionine. Consequently, polysorbates should be used carefully, and when used, should be employed at their lowest effective concentration. In this regard, polysorbates exemplify the general rule that excipients should be used in their lowest effective concentrations.
Embodiments of the antibody construct of the invention formulations further comprise one or more antioxidants. To some extent deleterious oxidation of proteins can be prevented in pharmaceutical formulations by maintaining proper levels of ambient oxygen and temperature and by avoiding exposure to light. Antioxidant excipients can be used as well to prevent oxidative degradation of proteins. Among useful antioxidants in this regard are reducing agents, oxygen/free-radical scavengers, and chelating agents. Antioxidants for use in therapeutic protein formulations in accordance with the invention preferably are water-soluble and maintain their activity throughout the shelf life of a product. EDTA is a preferred antioxidant in accordance with the invention in this regard.
Antioxidants can damage proteins. For instance, reducing agents, such as glutathione in particular, can disrupt intramolecular disulfide linkages. Thus, antioxidants for use in the invention are selected to, among other things, eliminate or sufficiently reduce the possibility of themselves damaging proteins in the formulation.
Formulations in accordance with the invention may include metal ions that are protein co-factors and that are necessary to form protein coordination complexes, such as zinc necessary to form certain insulin suspensions. Metal ions also can inhibit some processes that degrade proteins. However, metal ions also catalyze physical and chemical processes that degrade proteins.
Magnesium ions (10-120 mM) can be used to inhibit isomerization of aspartic acid to isoaspartic acid. Ca+2 ions (up to 100 mM) can increase the stability of human deoxyribonuclease. Mg+2, Mn+2, and Zn+2, however, can destabilize rhDNase. Similarly, Ca+2 and Sr+2 can stabilize Factor VIII, it can be destabilized by Mg+2, Mn+2 and Zn+2, Cu+2 and Fe+2, and its aggregation can be increased by Al+3 ions.
Embodiments of the antibody construct of the invention formulations further comprise one or more preservatives. Preservatives are necessary when developing multi-dose parenteral formulations that involve more than one extraction from the same container. Their primary function is to inhibit microbial growth and ensure product sterility throughout the shelf-life or term of use of the drug product. Commonly used preservatives include benzyl alcohol, phenol and m-cresol. Although preservatives have a long history of use with small-molecule parenterals, the development of protein formulations that includes preservatives can be challenging. Preservatives almost always have a destabilizing effect (aggregation) on proteins, and this has become a major factor in limiting their use in multi-dose protein formulations. To date, most protein drugs have been formulated for single-use only. However, when multi-dose formulations are possible, they have the added advantage of enabling patient convenience, and increased marketability. A good example is that of human growth hormone (hGH) where the development of preserved formulations has led to commercialization of more convenient, multi-use injection pen presentations. At least four such pen devices containing preserved formulations of hGH are currently available on the market. Norditropin (liquid, Novo Nordisk), Nutropin AQ (liquid, Genentech) & Genotropin (lyophilized—dual chamber cartridge, Pharmacia & Upjohn) contain phenol while Somatrope (Eli Lilly) is formulated with m-cresol. Several aspects need to be considered during the formulation and development of preserved dosage forms. The effective preservative concentration in the drug product must be optimized. This requires testing a given preservative in the dosage form with concentration ranges that confer anti-microbial effectiveness without compromising protein stability.
As might be expected, development of liquid formulations containing preservatives are more challenging than lyophilized formulations. Freeze-dried products can be lyophilized without the preservative and reconstituted with a preservative containing diluent at the time of use. This shortens the time for which a preservative is in contact with the protein, significantly minimizing the associated stability risks. With liquid formulations, preservative effectiveness and stability should be maintained over the entire product shelf-life (about 18 to 24 months). An important point to note is that preservative effectiveness should be demonstrated in the final formulation containing the active drug and all excipient components.
The antibody construct of the invention generally will be designed for specific routes and methods of administration, for specific administration dosages and frequencies of administration, for specific treatments of specific diseases, with ranges of bio-availability and persistence, among other things. Formulations thus may be designed in accordance with the invention for delivery by any suitable route, including but not limited to orally, aurally, opthalmically, rectally, and vaginally, and by parenteral routes, including intravenous and intraarterial injection, intramuscular injection, and subcutaneous injection.
Once the pharmaceutical composition has been formulated, it may be stored in sterile vials as a solution, suspension, gel, emulsion, solid, crystal, or as a dehydrated or lyophilized powder. Such formulations may be stored either in a ready-to-use form or in a form (e.g., lyophilized) that is reconstituted prior to administration. The invention also provides kits for producing a single-dose administration unit. The kits of the invention may each contain both a first container having a dried protein and a second container having an aqueous formulation. In certain embodiments of this invention, kits containing single and multi-chambered pre-filled syringes (e.g., liquid syringes and lyosyringes) are provided. The therapeutically effective amount of an antibody construct of the invention protein-containing pharmaceutical composition to be employed will depend, for example, upon the therapeutic context and objectives. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the appropriate dosage levels for treatment will vary depending, in part, upon the molecule delivered, the indication for which the antibody construct of the invention is being used, the route of administration, and the size (body weight, body surface or organ size) and/or condition (the age and general health) of the patient. In certain embodiments, the clinician may titer the dosage and modify the route of administration to obtain the optimal therapeutic effect. A typical dosage may range from about 0.1 μg/kg to up to about 30 mg/kg or more, depending on the factors mentioned above. In specific embodiments, the dosage may range from 1.0 μg/kg up to about 20 mg/kg, optionally from 10 μg/kg up to about 10 mg/kg or from 100 μg/kg up to about 5 mg/kg.
A therapeutic effective amount of an antibody construct of the invention preferably results in a decrease in severity of disease symptoms, in increase in frequency or duration of disease symptom-free periods or a prevention of impairment or disability due to the disease affliction. For treating CDH19-expressing tumors, a therapeutically effective amount of the antibody construct of the invention, e.g. an anti-CDH19/CD3 antibody construct, preferably inhibits cell growth or tumor growth by at least about 20%, at least about 40%, at least about 50%, at least about 60%, at least about 70%, at least about 80%, or at least about 90% relative to untreated patients. The ability of a compound to inhibit tumor growth may be evaluated in an animal model predictive of efficacy in human tumors.
Pharmaceutical compositions may be administered using a medical device. Examples of medical devices for administering pharmaceutical compositions are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,475,196; 4,439,196; 4,447,224; 4,447,233; 4,486,194; 4,487,603; 4,596,556; 4,790,824; 4,941,880; 5,064,413; 5,312,335; 5,312,335; 5,383,851; and 5,399,163, all incorporated by reference herein.
In one embodiment the invention provides the antibody construct of the invention or produced according to the process of the invention for use in the prevention, treatment or amelioration of a melanoma disease or metastatic melanoma disease.
The invention also provides a method for the treatment or amelioration of a melanoma disease or metastatic melanoma disease, comprising the step of administering to a subject in need thereof the antibody construct of the invention or produced according to the process of the invention.
In a preferred embodiment method of use of the invention the melanoma disease or metastatic melanoma disease is selected from the group consisting of superficial spreading melanoma, lentigo maligna, lentigo maligna melanoma, acral lentiginous melanoma and nodular melanoma.
In a further embodiment, the invention provides a kit comprising an antibody construct of the invention, or produced according to the process of the invention, a vector of the invention, and/or a host cell of the invention.
It should be understood that the inventions herein are not limited to particular methodology, protocols, or reagents, as such can vary. The discussion and examples provided herein are presented for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention, which is defined solely by the claims.
All publications and patents cited throughout the text of this specification (including all patents, patent applications, scientific publications, manufacturer's specifications, instructions, etc.), whether supra or infra, are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. Nothing herein is to be construed as an admission that the invention is not entitled to antedate such disclosure by virtue of prior invention. To the extent the material incorporated by reference contradicts or is inconsistent with this specification, the specification will supersede any such material.
The following examples are provided for the purpose of illustrating specific embodiments or features of the present invention. These examples should not be construed as to limit the scope of this invention. The examples are included for purposes of illustration, and the present invention is limited only by the claims.
1.1 Immunization:
Fully human antibodies to Cadherin-19 (CDH19) were generated using XENOMOUSE® technology, transgenic mice engineered to express diverse repertoires of fully human IgGκ and IgGλ antibodies of the corresponding isotype. (U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,114,598; 6,162,963; 6,833,268; 7,049,426; 7,064,244, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety; Green et al., 1994, Nature Genetics 7:13-21; Mendez et al., 1997, Nature Genetics 15:146-156; Green and Jakobovitis, 1998, J. Ex. Med. 188:483-495; Kellermann and Green, Current Opinion in Biotechnology 13, 593-597, 2002).
Mice were immunized with multiple forms of Cadherin-19 immunogen, including: (1) full length human and cynomologous (“cyno”) monkey cadherin-19, (2) secreted Cadherin-19 ecto-domain (amino acids 1-596), and (3) a truncated membrane bound form of human cadherin-19 (amino acids 1-624). Mice were immunized over a period of 8 to 10 weeks with a range of 16-18 boosts.
Sera were collected at approximately 5 and 9 weeks after the first injection and specific titers were determined by FACs staining of recombinant Cadherin-19 receptor transiently expressed on CHO-S cells. A total of 37 animals were identified with specific immune responses, these animals were pooled into 3 groups and advanced to antibody generation.
1.2 Preparation of Monoclonal Antibodies
Animals exhibiting suitable titers were identified, and lymphocytes were obtained from draining lymph nodes and, if necessary, pooled for each cohort. Lymphocytes were dissociated from lymphoid tissue by grinding in a suitable medium (for example, Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM); obtainable from Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.) to release the cells from the tissues, and suspended in DMEM. B cells were selected and/or expanded using standard methods, and fused with suitable fusion partner using techniques that were known in the art.
After several days of culture, the hybridoma supernatants were collected and subjected to screening assays as detailed in the examples below, including confirmation of binding to human and cynomologous monkey as well as the ability to kill cell lines in secondary antibody-drug conjugate Bioassays. Hybridoma lines that were identified to have the binding and functional properties of interest were then further selected and subjected to standard cloning and subcloning techniques. Clonal lines were expanded in vitro, and the secreted human antibodies obtained for analysis and V gene sequencing was performed.
1.3 Selection of Cadherin-19 Receptor Specific Binding Antibodies by FMAT
After 14 days of culture, hybridoma supernatants were screened for CDH19-specific monoclonal antibodies by Fluorometric Microvolume Assay Technology (FMAT) (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.). The supernatants were screened against adherent CHO cells transiently transfected with human Cadherin-19 and counter screened against CHO cells transiently transfected with the same expression plasmid that did not contain the Cadherin-19 gene.
After multiple screening campaigns, a panel of 1570 anti-Cadherin-19 binding hybridoma lines were identified and advanced to further characterization assays.
2.1 Additional Binding Characterization by Flow Cytometry (FACs)
FACS binding assays were performed to evaluate the binding of the anti-Cadherin-19 receptor specific antibodies to endogenous Cadherin-19 receptor expressed on the CHL-1 tumor cell lines. In addition, cross-reactive binding to murine and cynomologous monkey Cadherin-19 orthologues was also evaluated by FACs using recombinant forms of the various receptors transiently expressed on 293T cells.
FACs assays were performed by incubating hybridoma supernatants with 10,000 to 25,000 cells in PBS/2% Fetal bovine serum/2 mM Calcium Chloride at 4° C. for one hour followed by two washes with PBS/2% Fetal bovine serum/2 mM Calcium Chloride. Cells were then treated with florochrome-labeled secondary antibodies at 4° C. followed by one wash. The cells were resuspended in 50 μl of PBS/2% FBS and antibody binding was analyzed using a FACSCalibur™ instrument.
2.2 Antibody Drug Conjugate Screening of Fully Human Antibodies Derived from XenoMouse® Hybridomas
Cell killing through antibody drug conjugates requires the delivery of the conjugate into a cell through internalization and the catabolism of the drug-conjugate into a form that it is toxic to the cell. To identify antibodies with these properties, CDH19-positive cell lines (Colo-699 or CHL-1) were seeded at low cell densities and allowed to adhere overnight in a 384 well plate. XENOMOUSE® hybridoma samples containing fully human anti-CDH19 antibodies were then added to these cells in the presence of a high concentration of a goat anti-human Fc monovalent Fab conjugated with DM1 (DM1-Fab) at a relatively low drug-antibody ratio (DAR) (˜1.3). The cells were incubated for 96 hours at 37° C. and 5% CO2 in the presence of the antibody samples and the DM1-Fab. At the end of this time, the cell viability was assessed using the CellTiter-Glo® Luminescent Cell Viability reagent (Promega) according to manufacturer's recommendations.
An example of the cell viability data with the Colo-699 cells is shown in
This assay was run concurrently with the FACs antibody binding assay above (2.2), and the results from these two studies were used to select the antibodies for further characterization. In total, 1570 antibodies were run through these cell based viability assays and approximately 44 antibodies were selected on the bases of in vitro cell killing and/or antibody binding for sub-cloning, V gene sequencing and expressed in recombinant form for further characterization assays as described below.
These 44 antibodies were again assayed as in Example 2 and 19 antibodies were selected that contained unique sequences. Of these 19 antibodies, 18 antibodies were analyzed and their properties characterized in Table 2 below. The data in this table was generated using FACs binding on recombinant human and cynomologous CDH-19, +/− Calcium (Ca+2) binding data on 293/CDH-19 transfectants, binding to endogenous CDH-19 on CHL-1 and Colo699 tumor cells and competition with the antibody designated as 4A9 in the table. These experiments provided the further characterizations for the grouping of these antibodies into 5 groups or bins.
Of these 18 antibodies. 8 antibodies were selected for further analysis of their epitope binding as described below. At least one representative antibody from each bin was selected for further analysis.
Epitope Prediction by 4A9 Antibody Competition and by Human/Mouse Cadherin-19 Chimeras
A 4A9 binding competition method was developed to identify antibodies that compete with 4A9 binding. In 96-well V-bottom plates (Sarstedt #82.1583.001), 50,000 transiently transfected 293T cells were incubated with 5 ug/ml of purified anti-CDH19 antibodies for 1 hr at 4° C. followed by one wash with PBS/2% FBS. 25 μl of 5 μg/ml Alexa647-labelled 4A9 was then added to each well and the plates incubated for 1 hour at 4° C. Cells were then washed two times and the amount of cell associated Alexa647-labelled 4A9 was quantitated by flow cytometry.
The experiments included negative controls consisting of PBS/2% FBS only. The average signal observed in these negative control experiments was adopted as the maximum possible signal for the assay. Antibodies were compared to this maximum signal and a percent inhibition was calculated for each well (% Inhibition=(1−(FL4 Geomean with the anti-CDH19 antibodies/Maximum FL4 Geomean signal)).
Domain binding was determined by flow cytometry as above on 293T cells transiently transfected with plasmids consisting of single or dual human CDH19 cadherin repeat domain replacements into the mouse Cadherin19 backbone cloned into the pTT5 expression vector immediately preceded by native human or murine CDH19 leader sequences and a Flag tag (SEQ ID NO: 968). The experiment included assaying the anti-CDH19 antibodies against mouse Cadherin19 to determine suitability for binning on these human/mouse chimeras.
The data from these experiments are presented in the Table below entitled as follows:
Epitope Prediction by Human/Chicken Cadherin-19 Chimeras
Epitope Prediction by Macaque/Dog or Rat/Macaque Cadherin-19 Chimeras
Bin A.1 44-141
Bin A.2 44-141 (44-114)
Bin A.3 44-141 (44-65)
Epitope Prediction by Rat/Mouse or Human/Mouse Cadherin-19 Chimeras
Bin B.1 250-364
Bin B.2 250-364 (324-327)) by rodent numeration as referenced in table 6, corresponding to residues (326-329) within human and macaque CDH19.
A total of 18 antibodies were analyzed for potential hotspots and covariance violations. The designed variants (shown below) outline amino acid substitutions capable of reducing and/or avoiding isomerization, deamidation, oxidation, covariance violations, and the like. The 80 engineered variants together with the 15 parental antibodies, thus totaling 95 sequences, were taken forward to the cloning, expression, and purification processes. Site-directed mutagenesis was performed on the engineered variants in a 96-well format. The parental antibodies and engineered variants were expressed by high throughput transient transfection in HEK 293-6E cells, purified using a modified AKTA auto-sampler and assayed for activity and biophysical characteristics. The 3 parental antibodies that had either free (unpaired) Cys or N-glycosylation site were not taken forward in this process. Those were replaced with the engineered version of the parental antibodies. The designed variants outline amino acid substitutions capable of reducing and/or avoiding isomerization, deamidation, oxidation, covariance violations, immunogenicity and the like. It will be appreciated that these variant sequences are examples of engineered antibodies within the meaning of the present application but single point and/or multiple point mutations can be combined in any combinatorial manner in order to arrive at a final desired antigen binding molecule or antibody.
RNA was extracted from individual patient tissues representing tumor (>70% tumor content by cell count) or normal (0% tumor content by cell count). Individual tissues were homogenized using TisssueLyzer (Qiagen, Valencia, Calif.) and total RNA extracted and purified by the mirVana total RNA extraction kit (Life Technologies, Foster City, Calif.). RNA quality and quantity checked by NanoDrop (NanoDrop, Wilmington, Del.) spectrophotometer readings and Bioanalyzer RNA profiling (Agilient Technologies, Santa Clara, Calif.). RNA was DNAse treated with DNA-free kit (Life Technologies, Foster City, Calif.) and reverse transcribed according to manufacturer's specifications using random hexamers in the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Life Technologies, Foster City, Calif.). Quantitative Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR) was performed on cDNA using primers to CDH19, probeset Hs00253534_m1, (Life Technologies, Foster City, Calif.) or the housekeeping gene human ACTB (primers CCT GGC ACC CAG CAC AA; GCC GAT CCA CAC GGA GTA CT; probe ATC AAG ATC ATT GCT CCT CCT GAG CG). 10 μL qRT-PCR reaction components; 1.0 ng/μL cDNA, 2×Universal PCR Master Mix (Life Technologies, Foster City, Calif.), gene expression assay (ACTB; 75 nM primers, 150 nM probe. EPOR; 300 nM primers, 250 nM probe) Following the qRT-PCR amplification program: (1) activation at 50° C. for 2 min; (2) denaturation at 95° C. for 10 min; (3) amplification 40 cycles at 95° C. for 15 s and 60° C. for 1 min with fluorescence capture at each step (ABI PRISM 7900HT Sequence Detection Systems, Applied Biosystems). Threshold cycle values (CT) were determined, using Sequence Detector software version 2.3 (Applied Biosystems) and transformed to 2−ΔCT for relative expression of CDH19 specific transcript to ACTB. The results are shown in
Expression of CDH19 protein was analyzed in human tumor samples by IHC and the results are shown in
Tumor cell lines were analyzed by flow cytometry and IHC to identify model systems with CDH19 expression similar to human tumors. Human anti-huCDH19 IgG4 antibody 4A2 was purified directly from hybridoma conditioned media. For flow cytometry, 2×105 cells were incubated with 200 nM of the CDH19 4A2 antibody that was conjugated to PE at a 1:1 ratio. The incubation and subsequent wash steps were performed in the presence of 1.2 mM calcium. A tube of QuantiBRITE PE lyophilized beads with four levels of PE (BD, cat #340495) was simultaneously prepared according to the manufacturer's instructions. The beads were analyzed by flow cytometry to generate a standard curve. The PE median values obtained from the melanoma lines after FACS analysis were then calibrated against the standard curve to calculate the antibodies bound per cell (ABC), which provides an estimate of the number of receptors on each cell. IHC was performed as described in Example 6 and the results are provided in
Bispecific Binding and Interspecies Cross-Reactivity
For confirmation of binding to human CDH19 and to human and macaque CD3, bispecific antibodies were tested by flow cytometry using indicated cell lines. L1.2 transfected with human CDH19, the human melanoma cell lines CHL-1 and A2058 expressing native human CDH19, CD3-expressing human T cell leukemia cell line HPB-ALL (DSMZ, Braunschweig, ACC483) and the CD3-expressing macaque T cell line 4119LnPx (Knappe A, et al., Blood, 2000, 95, 3256-3261) were used as antigen positive cell lines. Moreover, untransfected L1.2 cells were used as negative control.
For flow cytometry 200,000 cells of the respective cell lines were incubated for 30 min on ice with 50 μl of purified bispecific antibody at a concentration of 5 μg/ml. The cells were washed twice in PBS/2% FCS and binding of the constructs was detected with a murine PentaHis antibody (Qiagen; diluted 1:20 in 50 μl PBS/2% FCS). After washing, bound PentaHis antibodies were detected with an Fc gamma-specific antibody (Dianova) conjugated to phycoerythrin, diluted 1:100 in PBS/2% FCS. Samples were measured by flow cytometry on a FACSCanto II instrument and analyzed by FACSDiva software (both from Becton Dickinson).
The CDH19/CD3 bispecific antibodies stained L1.2 cells transfected with human CDH19, the human CDH19-expressing melanoma cell lines CHL-1 and A2058 as well as human and macaque T cells. Moreover, there was no staining of untransfected L1.2 cells (see
Cytotoxic Activity
FACS-Based Cytotoxicity Assay with Unstimulated Human PBMC
Isolation of Effector Cells
Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were prepared by Ficoll density gradient centrifugation from enriched lymphocyte preparations (e.g. buffy coats), a side product of blood banks collecting blood for transfusions. Buffy coats were supplied by a local blood bank and PBMC were prepared on the same day of blood collection. After Ficoll density centrifugation and extensive washes with Dulbecco's PBS (Gibco), remaining erythrocytes were removed from PBMC via incubation with erythrocyte lysis buffer (155 mM NH4Cl, 10 mM KHCO3, 100 μM EDTA). Platelets were removed via the supernatant upon centrifugation of PBMC at 100×g. Remaining lymphocytes mainly encompass B and T lymphocytes, NK cells and monocytes. PBMC were kept in culture at 37° C./5% CO2 in RPMI medium (Gibco) with 10% FCS (Gibco).
Depletion of CD14+ and CD56+ Cells
For depletion of CD14+ cells, human CD14 MicroBeads (Milteny Biotec, MACS, #130-050-201) were used, for depletion of NK cells human CD56 MicroBeads (MACS, #130-050-401). PBMC were counted and centrifuged for 10 min at room temperature with 300×g. The supernatant was discarded and the cell pellet resuspended in MACS isolation buffer [80 μL/107 cells; PBS (Invitrogen, #20012-043), 0.5% (v/v) FBS (Gibco, #10270-106), 2 mM EDTA (Sigma-Aldrich, #E-6511)]. CD14 MicroBeads and CD56 MicroBeads (20 μL/107 cells) were added and incubated for 15 min at 4-8° C. The cells were washed with MACS isolation buffer (1-2 mL/107 cells). After centrifugation (see above), supernatant was discarded and cells resuspended in MACS isolation buffer (500 μL/108 cells). CD14/CD56 negative cells were then isolated using LS Columns (Miltenyi Biotec, #130-042-401). PBMC w/o CD14+/CD56+ cells were cultured in RPMI complete medium i.e. RPM11640 (Biochrom AG, #FG1215) supplemented with 10% FBS (Biochrom AG, #S0115), lx non-essential amino acids (Biochrom AG, #K0293), 10 mM Hepes buffer (Biochrom AG, #L1613), 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Biochrom AG, #L0473) and 100 U/mL penicillin/streptomycin (Biochrom AG, #A2213) at 37° C. in an incubator until needed.
Target Cell Labeling
For the analysis of cell lysis in flow cytometry assays, the fluorescent membrane dye DiOC18 (DiO) (Molecular Probes, #V22886) was used to label human CDH19-as target cells and distinguish them from effector cells. Briefly, cells were harvested, washed once with PBS and adjusted to 106 cell/mL in PBS containing 2% (v/v) FBS and the membrane dye DiO (5 μL/106 cells). After incubation for 3 min at 37° C., cells were washed twice in complete RPMI medium and the cell number adjusted to 1.25×106 cells/mL. The vitality of cells was determined using 0.5% (v/v) isotonic EosinG solution (Roth, #45380).
Flow Cytometry Based Analysis
This assay was designed to quantify the lysis of human CDH19-transfected CHO cells in the presence of serial dilutions of CDH19 bispecific antibodies.
Equal volumes of DiO-labeled target cells and effector cells (i.e., PBMC w/o CD14+ cells) were mixed, resulting in an E:T cell ratio of 10:1. 160 μL of this suspension were transferred to each well of a 96-well plate. 40 μL of serial dilutions of the CDH19 bispecific antibodies and a negative control bispecific (an CD3-based bispecific antibody recognizing an irrelevant target antigen) or RPMI complete medium as an additional negative control were added. The bispecific antibody-mediated cytotoxic reaction proceeded for 48 hours in a 7% CO2 humidified incubator. Then cells were transferred to a new 96-well plate and loss of target cell membrane integrity was monitored by adding propidium iodide (PI) at a final concentration of 1 μg/mL. PI is a membrane impermeable dye that normally is excluded from viable cells, whereas dead cells take it up and become identifiable by fluorescent emission.
Samples were measured by flow cytometry on a FACSCanto II instrument and analyzed by FACSDiva software (both from Becton Dickinson).
Target cells were identified as DiO-positive cells. PI-negative target cells were classified as living target cells. Percentage of cytotoxicity was calculated according to the following formula:
Using GraphPad Prism 5 software (Graph Pad Software, San Diego), the percentage of cytotoxicity was plotted against the corresponding bispecific antibody concentrations. Dose response curves were analyzed with the four parametric logistic regression models for evaluation of sigmoid dose response curves with fixed hill slope and EC50 values were calculated. The results are shown in
In Vivo Tumor Growth Inhibition Experiments
5 million Colo699 or CHL-1 tumor cells were admixed with 2.5 million freshly isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and injected subcutaneously in the left flank of female athymic nude mice on Day 0. The same day, mice were treated intraperitoneally with either CDH19 BiTE 2G6 or non-specific control BiTE (MEC14) at the indicated doses. Dosing continued daily for the first 10 days post-tumor inoculation.
Tumor volumes and body weights were measured twice per week using calipers and an analytical scale, respectively.
The results of experiments with Colo699 or CHL-1 tumor cells are shown in
Cytotoxic Activity
Imaging-based cytotoxicity assay with unstimulated human t-cells
Effector Cells
Purified, naïve human T cells were obtained from AllCcells LLC, Alameda, USA.
Image Based Analysis
This assay measures the T cell mediated lysis of melanoma cells. 3000 A2058 cells (CDH19 positive) or 2500 LOX IMVI cells (CDH19 negative) are combined with naïve human T cells in a 1:10 ratio in the wells of 384 well plates. After addition of a serial dilution of CDH19 targeting BiTE molecules as well as a negative control bispecific (a CD3-based bispecific antibody recognizing an irrelevant target antigen), the cells are incubated for 48 h at 37° C. Next, the samples are treated for 2 h with 30 μM Hoechst 33342 to stain the nuclei of all cells and 2 μM propidium iodide (PI) to identify dead cells.
Image acquisition and analysis is performed on a ThermoFisher ArrayScan with a 10× objective. Data for two channels is collected, at 386 nm (Hoechst 33342) and at 549 nm (propidium iodide).
Live cells are identified as Hoechst positive, PI negative events, dead cells as Hoechst positive, PI positive.
Percentage of cytotoxicity is determined as described in example 7. Representative results are shown in
Domain Specificity and Biochemical Affinity Determination of Bi-Specific Binders
Purification of CDH19 Sub-Domains Lacking Post-Translational Modifications
A methionine initiation codon followed by nucleotide sequences encoding CDH19 sub-domain protein A=huCDH19(140-367 of SEQ ID NO:944), immediately preceding a G4S linker and poly-Histidine tag was cloned into a suitable pET vector; whereas, nucleotides sequences encoding sub-domain proteins B=huCDH19(44-367 of SEQ ID NO:944) and C=rhCDH19(44-367 of SEQ ID NO:1457) were cloned into the pET-SUMO vector (Life Technologies, Invitrogen) by methods known in the art. Each was expressed in E coli, isolated from the soluble fraction and purified to homogeneity by metal chelate affinity chromatography, followed by anion exchange, and size exclusion chromatography in HEPES buffered saline, 3 mM CaCl2), pH 8. Sub-domain protein A retained its linker and C terminal polyhistidine tag, but His-SUMO tags constituent to the N termini of proteins B and C were removed by digestion with SUMO protease (Life Technologies, Invitrogen) prior to anion exchange. All proteins were determined to have their expected molecular weight by ESI LC/MS. Proteins used in binding experiments described below were randomly biotinylated by typical methods known in the art.
Purification of CDH19 Sub-Domains with Post-Translational Modifications
CDH19 sub-domain proteins D=huCDH19(44-367 of SEQ ID NO:944), and E=rhCDH19(44-367 of SEQ ID NO:1457) were generated by cloning nucleotide sequences encoding respective amino acid residues 1-367 into the pSURETech235b vector (Selexis) each immediately preceded a G4S linker and poly-Histidine tag were cloned into the pSURETech235b vector (Selexis), transfected into CHO-S cells (Life Technologies, Invitrogen), and stable pools were generated following hygromycin selection by methods known in the art. Stable pools were expanded and conditioned media was collected after 7 days culture in serum free media. CM was exchanged by UF/DF with 5 diavolumes HEPES buffered saline plus CaCl2 using a 1 sq ft 10K PES Pellicon 2 membrane and purified to homogeneity as described above. CDH19 sub-domain proteins D and E retained constituent linker and C terminal polyhistidine tags. N terminal sequence of each protein was determined to be G44 as expected, while ESI LC/MS of purified proteins as compared with same subjected to PNGase F digestion revealed the presence of both N- and O-linked glycans. Proteins used in binding experiments described below were randomly biotinylated by methods well known in the art.
Methods for Binding Affinity Determination by Octet
The Octet RED384 biosensor was used to characterize kinetics and affinity of protein-protein interactions. Minimally biotinylated CDH19 domain target proteins A-E were bound to streptavidin tips in the machine while serial dilutions of analyte bi-specific binder proteins were made in 96-well or 384-well plates. Empirical target loading conditions were found from assay development to be 10-20 nM target concentration and loading for 600 seconds to give a 2 nm signal. Binding experiments were performed by setting up a plate with 6-point (Tables 7-9) or 3-point (Table 10) 1:3 serial dilutions from 30 nM starting concentrations of each analyte, with two reference wells per column having buffer alone. Octet Buffer: 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, +/−1 mM CaCl2, 0.13% Triton X-100 and 0.10 mg/ml BSA. Additional baseline and dissociation wells in the plate also contained buffer alone. The binding method was as follows: ForteBio Octet streptavidin tips were (1) soaked in buffer for 10 minutes; (2) transferred to the plate baseline wells and incubated for 5 minutes; (3) transferred to the target loading wells and incubated for 10 minutes; (4) transferred to the plate baseline wells and incubated for 5 minutes; (5) transferred to the sample wells and incubated for 5 minutes (Table 9) or 20 minutes (Tables 7, 8, 10); (6) transferred to the dissociation wells and incubated for 8.3 minutes (Table 9) or 1.5 hr (Tables 7, 8, 10). Raw data was processed in the following manner: (a) reference tip curves were averaged and subtracted from sample curves; (b) the association and dissociation curves were isolated and aligned to the Y axis; (c) the association and dissociation interstep was aligned; (d) Savitzky-Golay filtering was implemented to reduce the signal noise and (e) the resulting set of association and dissociation curves for each sample-target interaction were fit globally with a single 1:1 binding model to determine the measured values of the association (Ka) and dissociation (Kd) rate constants to calculate the equilibrium dissociation constant, KD.
The data summarized in table 7 confirmed CDH19 epitope region specificity of bi-specific binders and allowed for their relative affinity ranking.
The data summarized in table 8 allowed determination of calcium sensitivity of bi-specific binders and for their relative affinity ranking. Data further suggests conformational epitopes, with Bin B.1 more dependent on CDH19/Ca2+ association than epitope Bin A.2
The data summarized in table 9 allowed relative affinity ranking of bi-specific binders to human and non-human primate CDH19 domains lacking glycosylation.
The data summarized in table 10 allowed determination of calcium sensitivity of bi-specific binders and relative affinity ranking toward glycosylated human and non-human primate CDH19 domain proteins. As compared to data in Table 8, affinities are similar to those with domains lacking post-translational modifications. Data further suggests conformational epitopes, with epitope Bins B.1 and B.2 being more dependent on CDH19/Ca2+ association than epitope Bin A.2
Bispecific Binding and Interspecies Cross-Reactivity:
For confirmation of binding to human CDH19 and to human CD3, bispecific antibodies were tested by flow cytometry using indicated cell lines. HEK293 transfected with human CDH19 (see example 14) and CD3-expressing human T cell leukemia cell line HPB-ALL (DSMZ, Braunschweig, ACC483) were used as antigen positive cell lines.
For flow cytometry 200,000 cells of the respective cell lines were incubated for 30 min on ice with 100 μl of BiTE containing cell culture supernatant. The cells were washed twice in PBS/2% FCS and binding of the constructs was detected with a murine anti-CD3scFv antibody (3E5.A5, Amgen; diluted to 2 μg/ml PBS/2% FCS). After washing, bound anti-CD3scFv antibodies were detected with an Fc gamma-specific antibody (Dianova) conjugated to phycoerythrin, diluted 1:100 in PBS/2% FCS. Samples were measured by flow cytometry on a FACSCanto II instrument and analyzed by FACSDiva software (both from Becton Dickinson).
The CDH19/CD3 bispecific antibodies stained HEK293 cells transfected with human CDH19 as well as human and macaque T cells (see
Cytotoxic Activity
Chromium release assay with stimulated human T cells
Isolation of Effector Cells
A petri dish (145 mm diameter, Greiner bio-one GmbH, Kremsmünster) was coated with a commercially available anti-CD3 specific antibody (OKT3, Orthoclone) in a final concentration of 1 μg/ml for 1 hour at 37° C. Unbound protein was removed by one washing step with PBS. 3-5×107 human PBMC were added to the precoated petri dish in 120 ml of RPMI 1640 with stabilized glutamine/10% FCS/IL-2 20 U/ml (Proleukin®, Chiron) and stimulated for 2 days. On the third day, the cells were collected and washed once with RPMI 1640. IL-2 was added to a final concentration of 20 U/ml and the cells were cultured again for one day in the same cell culture medium as above.
Depletion of CD4+ and CD56+ Cells
CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) were enriched by depletion of CD4+ T cells and CD56+ NK cells using Dynal-Beads according to the manufacturer's protocol.
51Cr Release Based Analysis
Human CDH19-transfected HEK293 target cells (production see example 14) were washed twice with PBS and labeled with 11.1 MBq 51Cr in a final volume of 50 μl supplemented RPMI for 60 minutes at 37° C. Subsequently, the labeled target cells were washed 3 times with 5 ml RPMI and then used in the cytotoxicity assay. The assay was performed in a 96-well plate in a total volume of 200 μl supplemented RPMI with an E:T ratio of 10:1. A starting concentration of 0.1-1 μg/ml of purified bispecific antibody and threefold dilutions thereof were used. Incubation time for the assay was 18 hours. Cytotoxicity was determined as relative values of released chromium in the supernatant relative to the difference of maximum lysis (addition of Triton-X) and spontaneous lysis (without effector cells). All measurements were carried out in quadruplicates. Measurement of chromium activity in the supernatants was performed in a Wizard 3″ gamma counter (Perkin Elmer Life Sciences GmbH, Köln, Germany). Analysis of the results was carried out with Prism 6 for Windows (version 6.02, GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, Calif., USA). EC50 values calculated by the analysis program from the sigmoidal dose response curves were used for comparison of cytotoxic activity (see
Production and Purification of BITE Antibodies
Standardized research scale production of CDH19 BiTE antibodies was performed in roller bottles. Harvested culture supernatant was subjected after filtration to two step BiTE antibody purification based either on immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) capture and subsequent size exclusion chromatography or Protein_A capture and subsequent size exclusion chromatography (SEC).
15.1 IMAC Capture Step of BITE Antibodies
Äkta® Explorer Systems (GE Healthcare) controlled by Unicorn® Software were used for chromatography. Immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) was performed using Fractogel EMD chelate® (Merck, Darmstadt) which was loaded with ZnCl2 according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer. The column was equilibrated with buffer A (20 mM sodium phosphate buffer, 0.1 M NaCl, 10 mM imidazole, pH 7.2) and the cell culture supernatant (1000 ml) applied to the column (10 ml packing volume) at a flow rate of 4 ml/min. The column was washed with buffer A to remove unbound sample. Bound protein was eluted using a two step gradient of buffer B (20 mM sodium phosphate buffer, 0.1 M NaCl, 0.5 M imidazole, pH 7.2) according to the following procedure:
Step 1: 10% buffer B in 5 column volumes
Step 2: 100% buffer B in 5 column volumes
Eluted protein fractions from step 2 were pooled for further purification and concentrated to 3 ml final volume using Vivaspin (Sartorius-Stedim, Gottingen-Germany) centrifugation units with PES membran and a molecular weight cut-off of 10 kDa. All chemicals were of research grade and purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany).
15.2 Protein_A Capture of BiTE Antibodies
Äkta® Explorer Systems (GE Life Sciences) controlled by Unicorn® Software were used for chromatography. Affinity columns which containing beads with covalently bound Protein_A were used for the capture step. The column was equilibrated with equilibration buffer pH 7.4 and the cell culture supernatant applied. After washing the column with three column volumes of equilibration buffer to wash out unbound sample the bound BITE antibodies were eluted by application of an elution buffer at pH 3.0. Eluted solution was immediately neutralized in pH by a Trishydroxymethylamine Tris solution pH 8.0 already contained in the fractionation tubes in the fraction collector.
Eluted protein fractions from step 2 were pooled for further purification and concentrated to 3 ml final volume using Vivaspin (Sartorius-Stedim, Gottingen-Germany) centrifugation units with PES membran and a molecular weight cut-off of 10 kDa. All chemicals were of research grade and purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany).
15.3 Size Exclusion Chromatography
Size exclusion chromatography was performed on a HiLoad 16/60 Superdex 200 prep grade column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with SEC buffer (20 mM NaCl, 30 mM NaH2PO4, 100 mM L-Arginin, pH 7.0) at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. BiTE antibody monomer and dimer fractions were pooled and a 24% trehalose stock solution was added to reach a final trehalose concentration of 4%. Eluted protein samples were subjected to reducing SDS-PAGE and Anti His TAG Western Blot for analysis.
Protein pools were measured at 280 nm in polycarbonate cuvettes with 1 cm lightpath (Eppendorf, Hamburg-Germany) and protein concentration was calculated on the base of the Vector NTI sequence analysis software calculated factor for each protein.
BiTE monomer pools were adjusted to 250 μg/ml with additional BITE formulation buffer (20 mM NaCl, 30 mM NaH2PO4, 100 mM L-Arginin, 4% Trehalose, pH 7.0). An amount of a minimum of 600 μg for each BITE was taken and transferred for immediate protein analytics as described in example 16.
Remaining protein pools of BITE antibody monomer and BITE antibody dimer were aliquoted in 15 and 50 μg protein aliquots and shock frozen in liquid nitrogen. Further storage until usage was done in a −80° C. freezer until analysis of biologic activity and affinity measurements.
The purity of isolated BITE antibody monomer was determined by SDS-PAGE to be >95%. As expected, purified monomeric BITE antibody appeared as protein bands in the molecular weight range of 54-56 kDa.
Protein Properties
The freshly prepared BITE monomer solution generated in example 15 was applied to the following analytical methods
16.1 BiTE Monomer Conversion into Dimer by Incubation for 7 Days
15 μg of the monomeric CDH19 BITE antibody at a concentration of 250 μg/ml were incubated at 37° C. for 7 days.
A high resolution SEC Column TSK Gel G3000 SWXL (Tosoh, Tokyo-Japan) was connected to an Äkta Purifier 10 FPLC (GE Lifesciences) equipped with an A905 Autosampler. Column equilibration and running buffer consisted of 100 mM KH2PO4-200 mM Na2SO4 adjusted to pH 6.6. After 7 days of incubation, the BITE antibody solution (15 μg protein) was applied to the equilibrated column and elution was carried out at a flow rate of 0.75 ml/min at a maximum pressure of 7 MPa. The whole run was monitored at 280, 254 and 210 nm optical absorbance. Analysis was done by peak integration of the 210 nm signal recorded in the Äkta Unicorn software run evaluation sheet. Dimer content was calculated by dividing the area of the dimer peak by the total area of monomer plus dimer peak.
16.2. BiTE Monomer Conversion into Dimer by Three Freeze/Thaw Cycles
15 μg of monomeric BITE antibody at 250 μg/ml were frozen at −80° C. for 30 min followed by thawing for 30 min at room temperature. After three freeze/thaw cycles the dimer content was determined by HP-SEC as described in example 16.1.
16.3 High Resolution Analytical Ion Exchange Chromatography
A 1 ml BioPro SP column manufactured by YMC (YMC Europe GmbH, Dinslaken-Germany) with sulphpropyl groups coupled to solid beads was connected to a Äkta Micro FPLC (GE Healthcare) device.
For column equilibration, sample dilution and washing a buffer consisting of 20 mM sodium dihydrogen phosphate and 30 mM sodium chloride adjusted with sodium hydroxide to a pH of 5.5 was used.
For elution a buffer consisting of 20 mM NaH2PO4 and 1000 mM NaCl adjusted with sodium hydroxide to a pH of 5.5 was used.
50 μg of BITE antibody monomer were diluted with dilution buffer to 50 ml final volume. After column equilibration 40 ml of the diluted protein solution was applied to the column followed by a wash step.
Elution was carried out by a steadily increasing gradient with elution buffer from zero to 100% over a total volume corresponding to 200 column volumes. The whole run was monitored at 280 (blue line) and 254 nm (red line) optical absorption.
Percentage of Main Peak was calculated by dividing the peak area of the main peak by the sum of peak area of all detected peaks followed by multiplication with a factor of 100.
16.4 Sepharose Octyl FF
Elution of monomeric BITE antibodies was evaluated on a hydrophobic interaction chromatography C8 Sepharose Octyl FF column (GE Healthcare) with 1 ml gel volume.
50 μg of BITE antibody monomeric protein was filled up with buffer (10 mM Citric acid—75 mM Lysine×HCl—4% Trehalose—pH 7.2) to a final volume of 300 μl. The column was connected to an Äkta Purifier 10 system (GE Healthcare). A 500 μl sample loop was connected to the system. The system and column were equilibrated with running buffer (10 mM Citric acid—75 mM Lysine×HCl—200 mM NaCl—pH 7.2).
The complete sample was injected into the sample loop and the content of the sample loop was applied to the column. After sample injection a volume of 10 ml running buffer was applied to the column at a flow rate of 0.2 ml/min while recording the optical absorption at 254 and 280 nm together with conductivity.
CDH19 BiTE CH19 2G6 302×12C SA21: Rapid and complete elution
16.5 Concentration of BiTE Monomer to 2500 μg/Ml Followed by Over Night Storage and Turbidity Measurement
1000 μl of CDH19 BiTE monomer were concentrated in two Vivaspin 500 centrifugation units with 10 kDa PES membran (Sartorius-Stedim, Göttingen-Germany) to a final volume of 100 μl. This volume as stored over night at 5° C. in a cooling cabinet. Turbidity was measured three times at 340 nm optical wavelength absorption. Afterwards the mean value of the three measurement values was calculated.
OD340 Turbidity of CDH19 BiTE CH19 2G6 302×12C SA21: 0.034
16.6 Aggregation Temperature TA Determination by Heated Dynamic Light Scattering Measurement
A volume of 40 μl monomeric BITE antibody at 250 μg/ml was transferred into the inner core of a disposable plastic cuvette. The deeper placed outer core was filled up with generic BITE formulation buffer. The top of the cuvette was sealed with a rubber top to avoid liquid loss by evaporation in the process of sample heating.
The cuvette was placed in a Nanostar Dynamic Light Scattering device (Wyatt) and heated from 40° C. to 70° C. at a heating increment of 0.5° C./min
Aggregation status was permanently monitored and recorded in the whole heating process. Evaluation was executed with the software package supplied by the device manufacturer.
Aggregation temperature of CDH19 BiTE CH19 2G6 302×12C SA21: 52.4° C.
16.7 PEGylation of BiTE Antibodies with CysLoop
Monomeric BITE antibody containing an c-terminal CysLoop (see for methodical details WO 2006/008096) was dialyzed against a Tris/NaCl buffer pH 7.4 and reduced by the addition of the reduction agent Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine TCEP (Perbio Pierce) to create two reduced cysteins of the now opened CysLoop.
TCEP was removed by dialysis. PEG Maleimid capable of covalent binding to reduced cystein was added in molar excess and incubated for 3 hours at room temperature.
A Sepharose SP column cation exchange column (GE Healthcare) was connected to an Äkta FPLC system and equilibrated with binding buffer (low molar Phosphat/NaCl buffer of pH 5.0)
The protein solution was diluted with binding buffer adjusted to pH 5.0 to enable binding of the BiTE protein to the cation exchange column. Unbound PEG was removed in the wash step with further binding puffer pH 5.0 over 10 column volumes. Bound protein was eluted by a linear increasing percentage of elution buffer 20 mM phosphate 1 M NaCl.
PEGylated BiTE antibody eluted at lower molarity of the elutionbuffer compared to the unmodified BiTE antibody.
Sequence Table:
Anti-CDH19 Variable Region Amino Acid Sequences and Polynucleotide Sequences
Anti-CDH19 Variable and Constant Region Polynucleotide and Amino Acid Sequences
Human and Cynomologous Monkey Cadherin-19 Sequences
Macaca
fascicularis
Macaca
fascicularis
Bispecific Binding Molecules
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3691016 | Patel et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
| 3773919 | Boswell et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
| 3969287 | Jaworek et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
| 4179337 | Davis et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
| 4195128 | Hildebrand et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
| 4229537 | Hodgins et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
| 4247642 | Hirohara et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
| 4301144 | Iwashita et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4330440 | Ayers et al. | May 1982 | A |
| 4485045 | Regen | Nov 1984 | A |
| 4496689 | Mitra | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4544545 | Ryan et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4640835 | Shimizu et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4670417 | Iwasaki et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4751180 | Cousens et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4791192 | Nakagawa et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4816567 | Cabilly et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4935233 | Bell et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4946778 | Ladner et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 5013556 | Woodle et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5292658 | Cormier et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5418155 | Cormier et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5476996 | Wilson et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5545806 | Lonberg et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5545807 | Surani et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5565332 | Hoogenboom et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5569825 | Lonberg et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5591669 | Krimpenfort et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5612205 | Kay et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5625126 | Lonberg et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5625825 | Rostoker et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5633425 | Lonberg et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5643763 | Dunn et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5648260 | Winter et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5661016 | Lonberg et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5683888 | Campbell | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5698767 | Wilson et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5721367 | Kay et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5741668 | Ward et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5770429 | Lonberg et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5777079 | Tsien et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5789215 | Berns et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5789650 | Lonberg et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5804387 | Cormack et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5814318 | Lonberg et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5874299 | Lonberg et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5874304 | Zolotukhin et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5876995 | Bryan | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5877397 | Lonberg et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5939598 | Kucherlapati et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5958765 | Brams et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5981175 | Loring et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6023010 | Krimpenfort et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6075181 | Kucherlapati et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6114598 | Kucherlapati et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6150584 | Kucherlapati et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6162963 | Kucherlapati et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6255458 | Lonberg et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6673986 | Kucherlapati et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6833268 | Green et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 7049426 | Green et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7064244 | Jakobovits et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 9243058 | Armitage et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 10294300 | Raum et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
| 10301391 | Raum et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
| 20070161018 | Inazawa et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20100131432 | Kennedy et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20140322218 | Xiao et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20150322151 | Xiao et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20160115241 | Yan et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160326594 | Srivastava et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20170029502 | Raum et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170029512 | Raum et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170037149 | Raum et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170129961 | Raum et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170218078 | Raum et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170218079 | Raum et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170349668 | Rattel et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20200071405 | Xiao | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20210163592 | Goudar | Jun 2021 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0 036 676 | Sep 1981 | EP |
| 0 058 481 | Aug 1982 | EP |
| 0 088 046 | Sep 1983 | EP |
| 0 133 988 | Mar 1985 | EP |
| 0 143 949 | Jun 1985 | EP |
| 0 463 151 | Jan 1992 | EP |
| 0 773 288 | May 1997 | EP |
| 0 843 961 | May 1998 | EP |
| 2258874 | Mar 2015 | EP |
| 3 068 180 | Jul 2000 | JP |
| 3 068 506 | Jul 2000 | JP |
| 3 068 507 | Jul 2000 | JP |
| 2008-521411 | Jun 2008 | JP |
| 2009-504191 | Feb 2009 | JP |
| 2010-524851 | Jul 2010 | JP |
| I323734 | Apr 2010 | TW |
| WO-198705330 | Sep 1987 | WO |
| WO-198809344 | Dec 1988 | WO |
| WO-199203918 | Mar 1992 | WO |
| WO-199215673 | Sep 1992 | WO |
| WO-199222647 | Dec 1992 | WO |
| WO-199222670 | Dec 1992 | WO |
| WO-199312227 | Jun 1993 | WO |
| WO-199315722 | Aug 1993 | WO |
| WO-199400569 | Jan 1994 | WO |
| WO-199402602 | Feb 1994 | WO |
| WO-199410308 | May 1994 | WO |
| WO-199425585 | Nov 1994 | WO |
| WO-199507463 | Mar 1995 | WO |
| WO-199614436 | May 1996 | WO |
| WO-199634096 | Oct 1996 | WO |
| WO-199713852 | Apr 1997 | WO |
| WO-199814605 | Apr 1998 | WO |
| WO-199824884 | Jun 1998 | WO |
| WO-199824893 | Jun 1998 | WO |
| WO-199826277 | Jun 1998 | WO |
| WO-199949019 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| WO-1999054440 | Oct 1999 | WO |
| WO-2000076310 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| WO-2003047336 | Jun 2003 | WO |
| WO-2004003019 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| WO-2005067391 | Jul 2005 | WO |
| WO-2006071441 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006138181 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| WO-2007024715 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007042261 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| WO-2008119567 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| WO-2009055937 | May 2009 | WO |
| WO-2010037835 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Henry et al (Frontiers in Immunology 8:1-15 (Dec. 12, 2017). |
| Kim et al. (Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1844 (2014) 1983-2001). |
| Altschul et al., Basic local alignment search tool, J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-10 (1990). |
| Altschul et al., Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs, Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-402 (1997). |
| Altschul et al., Local alignment statistics, Methods in Enzymology. 266:460-80 (1996). |
| Aplin et al., Preparation, properties, and applications of carbohydrate conjugates of proteins and lipids, CRC Crit. Rev. Biochem. 259-306 (1981). |
| Arakawa et al., Protein-Solvent interactions in pharmaceutical formulations, Pharm Res. 8:285-91 (1991). |
| Artsaenko et al., Expression of a single-chain Fv antibody against abscisic acid creates a wilty phenotype in transgenic tobacco, The Plant J. 8:745-50 (1995). |
| Bendig, Humanization of Rodent Monoclonal Antibodies by CDR Grafting, Methods: A Companion to Methods in Enzymology. 8:83-93 (1995). |
| Brühl, Depletion of CCR5-expressing cells with bispecific antibodies and chemokine toxins: a new strategy in the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases and HIV, Immunol. 166:2420-6 (2001). |
| Carter et al., High level Escherichia coli expression and production of a bivalent humanized antibody fragment, Biotechnology. 10:163-7 (1992). |
| Chalfie et al., Green fluorescent protein as a marker for gene expression, Science. 263:802-5 (1994). |
| Cheadle et al., Cloning and expression of the variable regions of mouse myeloma protein MOPC315 in E. coli: recovery of active FV fragments, Mol. Immunol. 29:21-30 (1992). |
| Chen et al., The melanosomal protein PMEL17 as a target for antibody drug conjugate therapy in melanoma. J. Biol. Chem. 287:24082-91 (2012). |
| Cheson et al., Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. NCI Sponsored International Working Group, J. Clin. Oncol. 17:1244 (1999). |
| Chothia et al., Canonical structures for the hypervariable regions of immunoglobulins, J. Mol. Biol. 196:901 (1987). |
| Chothia et al., Conformations of immunoglobulin hypervariable regions, Nature. 342:877 (1989). |
| Chothia, et al., Structural repertoire of the human VH segments, J. Mol. Biol. 227:799-817 (1987). |
| Clackson et al., Making antibody fragments using phage display libraries, Nature. 352:624-8 (1991). |
| Cole et al., The EBV-Hybridoma technique and its application to human lung cancer, Monoclonal Antibodies and Cancer Therapy, Alan R. Liss, Inc., 77-96 (1985). |
| Creighton, Proteins: Structure and Molecular Properties, W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco, 79-86 (1983). |
| Cunningham et al., High-resolution epitope mapping of hGH-receptor interactions by alanine-scanning mutagenesis, Science. 244:1081-5 (1989). |
| Dall'Acqua et al., Contribution of domain interface residues to the stability of antibody CH3 domain homodimers, Biochem. 37:9266-73 (1998). |
| Devereux et al., A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX, Nucl. Acid Res. 12:387-95 (1984). |
| Duskin et al., Relationship of the structure and biological activity of the natural homologues of tunicamycin, J. Biol. Chem. 257:3105 (1982). |
| Edge et al., Deglycosylation of glycoproteins by trifluoromethanesulfonic acid, Anal. Biochem. 118:131 (1981). |
| Eppstein et al., Biological activity of liposome-encapsulated murine interferon gamma is mediated by a cell membrane receptor, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 82:3688-92 (1985). |
| Fanslow et al., Structural characteristics of CD40 ligand that determine biological function, Semin. Immunol. 6:267-78 (1994). |
| Fecker et al., Expression of single-chain antibody fragments (scFV) specific for beet necrotic yellow vein virus coat protein or 25 kDa protein in Escherichia coli and Nicotiana benthamiana, Plant Mol. Biol. 32:979-86 (1996). |
| Feng et al., Progressive sequence alignment as a prerequisite to correct phylogenetic trees, J. Mol. Evol. 35:351-60 (1987). |
| Gabizon et al., Pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of doxorubicin encapsulated in stable liposomes with long circulation times, J. National Cancer Inst. 81:1484 (1989). |
| Genbank Accession No. U55762, Cloning vector pEGFP-N1, complete sequence, enhanced green fluorescent protein (egfp) and neomycin phosphotransferase genes, dated Jun. 17, 1996. |
| George et al., Current Methods in Sequence Comparison and Analysis, Macromolecule Sequencing and Synthesis, Selected Methods and Applications, 127-49 Alan R. Liss, Inc. (1988). |
| Graham et al., Characteristics of a human cell line transformed by DNA from human adenovirus type 5, J. Gen Virol. 36:59 (1977). |
| Green et al., Antigen-specific human monoclonal antibodies from mice engineered with human Ig heavy and light chain YACs, Nature Genetics. 7:13-21 (1994). |
| Green et al., Regulation of B cell development by variable gene complexity in mice reconstituted with human immunoglobulin yeast artificial chromosomes, J. Exp. Med. 188:483-95 (1998). |
| Hakimuddin et al., A chemical method for the deglycosylation of proteins, Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 259:52 (1987). |
| Hawkins et al., Selection of phage antibodies by binding affinity, J. Mol. Biol. 254:889-96 (1992). |
| Heim et al., Engineering green fluorescent protein for improved brightness, longer wavelengths and fluorescence resonance energy transfer, Curr. Biol. 6:178-82 (1996). |
| Hiatt et al., Production of antibodies in transgenic plants, Nature. 342:76-8 (1989). |
| Higgins et al., Fast and sensitive multiple sequence alignments on a microcomputer, CABIOS. 5:151-3 (1989). |
| Holt et al., Domain antibodies: Proteins for therapy, Trends in Biotechnology. 21:484-90 (2003). |
| Hoppe et al., A parallel three stranded alpha-helical bundle at the nucleation site of collagen triple-helix formation, FEBS Letters. 344:191 (1994). |
| Huston et al., Protein engineering of antibody binding sites: recovery of specific activity in an antidigoxin single-chain Fv analogue produced in Escherichia coli, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 85:5879-83 (1988). |
| Hwang et al., Hepatic uptake and degradation of unilamellar sphingomyelin/cholesterol liposomes: a kinetic study, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 77:4030 (1980). |
| Ichiki et al., Regulation of the expression of human C epsilon germline transcript. Identification of a novel IL-4 responsive element, J. Immunol. 150:5408-17 (1993). |
| International Preliminary Reporton Patentability, PCT/EP2014/051550 (dated Jul. 28, 2015). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/EP2014/051550, dated May 22, 2014. |
| Karlin et al., Applications and statistics for multiple high-scoring segments in molecular sequences, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 90:5873-7 (1993). |
| Kellermann et al., Antibody discovery: the use of transgenic mice to generate human monoclonal antibodies for therapeutics, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 13:593-7 (2002). |
| Kendrick et al., Physical stabilization of proteins in aqueous solution, Pharm. Biotechnol. 13:61-84 (2002). |
| Kipriyanov, Bispecific tandem diabody for tumor therapy with improved antigen binding and pharmacokinetics, J. Mol. Biol. 293:41-56 (1999). |
| Knappe et al., Herpesvirus saimiri-transformed macaque T cells are tolerated and do not cause lymphoma after autologous reinfusion, Blood. 95:3256-61 (2000). |
| Kohler et al., Continous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity, Nature. 256:495-7 (1975). |
| Kools et al., Characterization of three novel human cadherin genes (CDH7, CDH19, and CDH20) clustered on chromosome 18q22-q23 and with high homology to chicken cadherin-7, Genomics. 68:283-95 (2000). |
| Kozbor, Comparison of the specific IgM and IgG antibody response in humans induced by antigen (tetanus toxoid) or a polyclonal activator (EBV) in vitro, Immunology Today. 4:72(1983). |
| Kufer, Construction and biological activity of a recombinant bispecific single-chain antibody designed for therapy of minimal residual colorectal cancer, Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 45:193-197 (1997). |
| Landschulz et al., The leucine zipper: a hypothetical structure common to a new class of DNA binding proteins, Science. 240:1759 (1988). |
| Langer et al., Biocompatibility of polymeric delivery systems for macromolecules, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 15:267-277 (1981). |
| Langer, Controlled release of macromolecules, Chem. Tech. 12:98-105 (1982). |
| Löffler, A recombinant bispecific single-chain antibody, CD19 x CD3, induces rapid and high lymphoma-directed cytotoxicity by unstimulated T lymphocytes, Blood. 95:2098-103(2000). |
| Lowman et al., Selecting high-affinity binding proteins by monovalent phage display, Biochemistry. 30:10832-7 (1991). |
| MacCallum et al., Antibody-antigen interactions: Contact analysis and binding site topography, J. Mol. Biol. 262:732 (1996). |
| Mack, A small bispecific antibody construct expressed as a functional single-chain molecule with high tumor cell cytotoxicity, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 92:7021-5 (1995). |
| Mack, Biologic properties of a bispecific single-chain antibody directed against 17-1A (EpCAM) and CD3: tumor cell-dependent T cell stimulation and cytotoxic activity, J. Immunol. 158:3965-70 (1997). |
| Malmborg, BIAcore as a tool in antibody engineering, J. Immunol. Methods. 183:7-13 (1995). |
| Marks et al., By-passing immunization. Human antibodies from V-gene libraries displayed on phage J. Mol. Biol. 222:581-97 (1991). |
| Martin et al., Irreversible coupling of immunoglobulin fragments to preformed vesicles. An improved method for liposome targeting, J. Biol. Chem. 257:286-8 (1982). |
| Martin et al., Protein Sequence and Structure Analysis of Antibody Variable Domains, Antibody Engineering. 2:33-51 (2010). |
| Martin et al., Structural families in loops of homologous proteins: automatic classification, modelling and application to antibodies, J. Mol. Biol. 263:800 (1996). |
| Mather et al., Culture of testicular cells in hormone-supplemented serum-free medium Annals N. Y Acad. Sci. 383:44-68 (1982). |
| Mather, Establishment and characterization of two distinct mouse testicular epithelial cell lines, Biol. Reprod. 23:243-51 (1980). |
| Mendez et al., Functional transplant of megabase human immunoglobulin loci recapitulates human antibody response in mice, Nature Genetics. 15:146-56 (1997). |
| Needleman et al., A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins, J. Mol. Biol. 48:443 (1970). |
| Nolan et al., Fluorescence-activated cell analysis and sorting of viable mammalian cells based on beta-D-galactosidase activity after transduction of Escherichia coli lacZ, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 85:2603-7 (1988). |
| Owen et al., Synthesis of a functional anti-phytochrome single-chain Fv protein in transgenic tobacco, Biotechnology. 10:790-4 (1992). |
| Paul, Fundamental Immunology, pp. 292-295 (3rd ed. 1993). |
| Pearson et al., Improved tools for biological sequence comparison, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 85:2444 (1988). |
| Raag et al., Single-chain Fvs, FASEB J. 9:73-80 (1995). |
| Randolph et al., Surfactant-protein interactions, Pharm Biotechnol. 13:159-75 (2002). |
| Rudikoff et al., Single amino acid substitution altering antigen-binding specificity, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 79:1979-83 (1982). |
| Schier, Efficient in vitro affinity maturation of phage antibodies using BIAcore guided selections, Human Antibodies Hybridomas, 7:97-105 (1996). |
| Schlereth et al., T-cell activation and B-cell depletion in chimpanzees treated with a bispecific anti-CD19/anti-CD3 single-chain antibody construct, Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 55:503-14 (2006). |
| Sidman et al., Controlled release of macromolecules and pharmaceuticals from synthetic polypeptides based on glutamic acid, Biopolymers. 2:547-56 (1983). |
| Smith et al., Comparison of Biosequences, Adv. Appl. Math. 2:482 (1981). |
| Stauber, Development and applications of enhanced green fluorescent protein mutants, Biotechniques. 24:462-6 (1998). |
| Takahashi et al., Identification of a novel type II classical cadherin: rat cadherin19 is expressed in the cranial ganglia and Schwann cell precursors during development, Devl. Dynamics. 232:200 (2005). |
| Thotakura et al., Enzymatic deglycosylation of glycoproteins, Meth. Enzymol. 138:350 (1987). |
| Tomlinson et al., The structural repertoire of the human V kappa domain, EMBO J. 14:4628-38 (1995). |
| Urlaub et al., Isolation of Chinese hamster cell mutants deficient in dihydrofolate reductase activity, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 77:4216 (1980). |
| Anti-CDH19 Product Datasheet, <<https://atlasantibodies.com/print_datasheet/R74953>> retrieved May 13, 2014. |
| Bertucci et al., Gene expression profiling of human melanoma cell lines with distinct metastatic potential identifies new progression markers. Int. J. Cancer Res. Treatment. 27:3441-9 (2007). |
| CDH19 monoclonal antibody (M01), clone 1G4, <<http://www.abnova.com/protocol_pdf/DS_H00028513-M01.pdfs>> retrieved May 13, 2014. |
| Kischel et al., Characterization of novel CD33-and MCSP-specific BiTE antibodies for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia and melanoma, receptively, that are fully human in sequence. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 49: 567-8 (2008). |
| Kumar et al., Molecular cloning and expression of the Fabs of human autoantibodies in Escherichia coli. Determination of the heavy or light chain contribution to the anti-DNA/-cardiolipin activity of the Fab, J. Biol. Chem. 275:35129-36 (2000). |
| Niu et a., Monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)-1 promotes angiogenesis via a novel transcription factor, MCP-1 induced protein (MCPIP). J. Biol. Chem. 283:14542-51 (2008). |
| Smith-Gill et al., Contributions of immunoglobulin heavy and light chains to antibody specificity for lysozyme and two haptens, J. Immunol. 139:4135-44 (1987). |
| Song et al., Light chain of natural antibody plays a dominant role in protein antigen binding, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Common. 268:390-4 (2000). |
| Ward et al., Binding activities of a repertoire of single immunoglobulin variable domains secreted from Escherichia coli, Nature. 341:544-6 (1989). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20190016805 A1 | Jan 2019 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61756991 | Jan 2013 | US | |
| 61785147 | Mar 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14761839 | US | |
| Child | 16040927 | US |
