This application relates to an apparatus and a method for coaxially aligning two rotatable shafts, particularly shafts of a rotary machine, such as a pump and a motor, connected by a rotary coupling.
When two rotatable shafts are coaxially coupled together it is very important to minimize coaxial misalignment. Even a small amount of misalignment can result in power losses, unnecessary bearing loads and premature coupling failure. Accordingly, the shafts must be carefully initially aligned and periodically inspected and adjusted as necessary.
Motor driven pumps used in municipal water systems and in sewage collection and treatment facilities are typical users of large motor and pump pairs which must be maintained in proper coaxial alignment. Further, many industrial and chemical facilities use very large motor and pump pairs, turbines and generators, motors and compressors, and other co-axially aligned rotatable machines which need to be maintained in proper coaxial alignment.
Various devices have been used to align two coaxial rotatable shafts in the past ranging from traditional mechanical surface plate gauges to a laser and a detector mounted to adjacent shafts to be inspected while the shafts are manually rotated as illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 8,533,965.
An apparatus and method for aligning two coaxially coupled rotatable shafts is provided. Alignment can be, and is preferably, measured while the shafts are rotating in their normal operating condition. A base is positioned adjacent to the shafts to be aligned. The base supports a servo operated positioning device which is movable along a longitudinal axis parallel to the axis of the shafts, and movable to vertically position spots on the shaft measured by a laser range finder (LRF) adjacent to the two rotatable shafts. The LRF measures the distance between the LRF and a spot on the shaft. A controller having a processor and memory communicates with the positioning device to cause the LRF to scan a plurality of spots on the shafts spaced over a vertical range and collects data at two or more axial positions on each shaft. At each position the LRF measures the distance to the shaft and stores the measurement and location data. The spot measured by the LRF is vertically repositioned and the measurement and storing steps are repeated over a scan distance sufficient to provide enough data to determine the location of the shaft center. The processor then calculates and compares the shaft centerlines and determines the necessary adjustments needed to move the shafts into alignment.
An exemplary embodiment of the apparatus for aligning two rotatable shafts has a base which is positionable adjacent to two rotatable shafts while they are coaxially coupled together and rotating. A servo operated positioning device is attached to the base, movable along a longitudinal X-axis parallel to the axis of the rotating shafts, and movable vertically along a Y-axis. A laser range finder (LRF) is affixed to the positioning device and spaced a distance from the two rotating shafts, to measure the distance between the LRF and a spot on the rotating shafts parallel to a Z-axis. A controller is provided which communicates with the positioning device and the LRF. The controller has a processor programmed to position the LRF at a first axial location on a first one of the rotating shafts, measuring distance to the shaft and stores the measurement and spot location data. The controller vertically repositions the LRF and repeats the measurement and data storage steps. Vertical repositioning and measurement steps are repeated until enough data is collected to determine the location of the shaft center at the first axial location. The processor is programmed to reposition the LRF at a second X-axis location on a first one of the rotating shafts and the Y-axis scan is repeated and the location of the first shaft axis is calculated. The processor is programmed to reposition the LRF at a third and fourth X-axis location on a second one of the rotating shafts and the Y-axis scan is repeated and the location of the second shaft axis is calculated. The alignment of the two shafts axes are compared. The processor then determines the adjustment of one of the two shafts that is necessary to move the shafts in to coaxial alignment.
Another exemplary embodiment of the apparatus for aligning two rotatable shafts has a base which is positionable adjacent to two rotatable shafts while they are coaxially coupled together and rotating. A servo operated positioning device, in the form of a multi axis robotic arm, is attached to the base, movable along a longitudinal X-axis parallel to the axis of the rotating shafts. The robotic arm has an end which is movable along at least the Z and Y axes using servo motors or other means of electronic positioning. Preferably, the robotic arm also operates along the X axis as well. A laser range finder (LRF) is pivotably affixed to the end of the robotic arm to measure the distance between the LRF and a spot on the rotating shaft. A controller is provided which communicates with the robotic arm and the LRF. The controller has a processor programmed to position the LRF at a first axial location on the first one of the rotating shafts. The robotic arm positions the LRF adjacent to the rotating shaft to measuring distance between the shaft and the LRF. The LRF measurement and the LRF location on the robotic arm end is used to determine and store location data of a spot on the shaft peripheral surface. The controller repositions the robotic arm and the LRF to measure a different spot on the peripheral surface and repeats the measurement and data storage steps. The repositioning and measurement steps are repeated until enough data is collected to determine the location of the shaft center at the first axial location.
The processor is programmed to reposition the LRF at a second X-axis location on a first one of the rotating shafts and the scan is repeated and the location of the first shaft axis is calculated. The processor is programmed to reposition the LRF at a third and fourth X-axis location on a second one of the rotating shafts and the scan is repeated and the location of the second shaft axis is calculated. The alignment of the two shafts axes are compared. The processor then determines the adjustment of one of the two shafts that is necessary to move the shafts in to coaxial alignment.
A method for aligning two rotating shafts which are coaxially coupled together is disclosed which includes providing a positioning device attached to a base to be placed adjacent to the shafts to be aligned. The positioning device has a holder movable along a longitudinal axis parallel to an axis of two axially coupled rotating shafts, and movable vertically to position a laser range finder (LRF) affixed to the positioning device and spaced a distance from the two rotating shafts. The LRF measures the distance between the LRF and a plurality of vertically spaced spots on the rotating shafts. A controller, having a processor and memory, is provided which communicates with the LRF and a user interface. The LRF is positioned at a first axial location on a first one of the rotating shafts, the controller communicating with the LRF to measure distance to a spot on the shaft and stores the measurement and spot location data. Data is collected at a minimum of three spot locations or until enough data is collected to determine the location of the shaft center at the first axial location. This process is repeated at a second X-axis location on the first shaft and at a third and fourth X-axis location of the second shaft. The processor then calculates the centerline of the two shafts using stored measurement and spot location data using a best-fit circle algorithm to define the axis of the two shafts and then determines the adjustment of one of the two shafts needed to move the shafts in to proper alignment.
In the robotic arm embodiment, the LRF is moved in both the Z and Y directions. Preferably the LRF axis is oriented perpendicular to the shaft axis prior to making measurements.
In an alternative embodiment the diameter of the shaft is known or is measured and input into the processor. With the shaft diameter known it is only necessary to collect data at a minimum of two Y-axis locations.
In yet another embodiment rather than vertically moving the LRF, the LRF is located at the approximate shaft center height. The beam of LRF then pivots about an axis generally parallel to the shaft to scan a plurality of measurements at one or more Y-axis locations. The pivoting LRF can also be used in a system of unknown shaft diameters if data is collected at three Y-axis locations.
As required, detailed embodiments of the present invention are disclosed herein; however, it is to be understood that the disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary of the invention that may be embodied in various and alternative forms. The figures are not necessarily to scale; some features may be exaggerated or minimized to show details of particular components. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the present invention.
The disclosed preferred embodiment of the apparatus 10 and the method are used to calculate the adjustments necessary to realign two coupled, rotatable shafts which are inspected while “hot and rotating” in a steady state operating condition. The two shafts are typically associated with a large co-axially aligned rotating machines such as motor and pump pairs, turbines and generators, and motors and compressors, and other co-axially aligned rotating machines. which need to be maintained in proper alignment. While a motor M and pump P are described in this preferred embodiment the claims are not limited to any specific types or size of co-axially aligned rotating machines. Similarly, the disclosed example is oriented horizontally however the apparatus and method could also be used in machines of other orientations such as a vertical turbine and generator. The apparatus and method can be used on the two shafts when not rotating but it has been found that more practical results can be achieved while the shafts are rotating.
In the sample embodiment shown in
The apparatus 10 computes the amount of adjustment necessary to reposition the motor feet along the Y-axis and Z-axis to realign the two shafts by measuring shaft location while the motor and pump is “hot and rotating”.
As illustrated in
The following input parameters are input into the controller 44 via a user interface before running the alignment scan. Note that X-axis refers to left-and-right in above
As previously stated, the pump P should be considered stationary. Therefore, the imaginary centerline of the pump shaft is the foundation used for all calculations. The motor M must be moved through shims 28 and adjustment screws 30 to align or realign with the pump.
First, the X-values for PS, PC, MC, and MS are entered into the system, typically by moving the LRF (through the User Interface UI) to the preferred positions and storing these X-values. Once the scan is initiated, the laser scans the surface (up and/or down) at PSx and PCx as shown in
The Y-servo in the illustrated embodiment has a travel of 1.0 inches which is sufficient for many commonly used shaft sizes. Ideally the Y-servo scan distance is at least 20%, preferably over 20% and less than 50% of the radius of the rotating section being scanned. When used on large diameter shafts and couplings the scan distance increases accordingly. The scan is done while the motor is on and the shafts are rotating and have reached a steady state operating condition. The collected averaged scanned measurements at each point PS, PC, MC, and MS are evaluated programmatically in a Z-Y diagram as shown in
Using a best-fit-circle algorithm, such as Levenberg-Marquardt, the center point 40 of the shaft can be calculated in three dimensions, at both PSx and PCx. The best-fit circle 44 has a center point 40 which defines a point on a line representing the axis of the shaft, as illustrated in
Important outputs from the algorithms include the pump pitch (Y-axis slope) and the pump yaw (Z-axis slope) relative to apparatus 10, computed from (PCy-PSy)/(PCx-PSx). Pump yaw is computed from (PCz-PSz)/(PCx-PSx). Note there is no need for the pump or apparatus to be perfectly level since all measurements are relative. We now have two 3D points, that define an imaginary centerline in three dimensions that extends from the pump through the motor. Next, we can align the shaft 14 of the motor M to match the pump shaft 12 in all three dimensions.
Scanning the motor shaft 14 is done similar to the scanning of the pump shaft 12. The LRF scans the motor shaft 14 or the motor coupling 18, or at two or more spaced apart X-axis points (i.e. MCx, MSx, etc.) and computes at least two center points MCx, MCy, MCz and MSx, MSy, MSz and the resultant motor centerline which is best fit using a best-fit-line algorithm. Like with the pump, the motor's relative pitch (MSy-MCy)/(MSx-MCx) and yaw (MSz-MCz)/(MSx-MCx) are computed for the motor's centerline. Even after precise “cold” alignment, the motor centerline is typically out of alignment with the pump centerline once “hot and running”. To be in near-perfect alignment, the motor must be shut down and the feet adjusted (up/down and in/out) so that its centerline is aligned with the centerline of the “stationary” pump.
We have computed the two 3D points that define the pump shaft centerline. We have also computed the pump pitch and yaw relative to the apparatus. To align the two shafts, we need to make the motor pitch and yaw the same as the pump pitch and yaw, and that the two shaft axes intersect at the coupling connecting the shafts together. A translation (up/down, in/out) may also be required of the motor shaft in addition to adjusting the pitch and yaw to obtain proper co-axial alignment. For both MC and MS, we can compute the ideal 3D coordinates that would put the motor shaft in perfect alignment with the pump shaft. We will call these ideal coordinates MCx, MCyi, MCzi and MSx, MSyi, MSzi.
It should be noted that the 3D alignment problem can be broken down into two, 2D alignments, namely up/down and in/out (the motor is not adjusted left/right once coupled to the pump). First, we will discuss the adjustment calculations in the Y-axis (i.e. pitch alignment) and separately the adjustment calculation for the Z-axis (i.e. yaw alignment). We are solving for how much to adjust the feet of the motor such that the two center points at MCx, MCyi, MCzi and MSx, MSyi, MSzi fall perfectly on the imaginary extended centerline projected out from the pump.
Pitch Calculation: A 2D line can be described by the equation y=mx+b, where m is the pitch and b is the y-intercept. For pump pitch, we have two baseline points PSx, PSy and PCx, PCy which can be used to compute the perfect pitch m=(y2−y1)/(x2−x1) and the y-intercept (b=y−mx). With m and b known, we can compute the ideal (i.e. aligned) y-value (yi) for any x-value, specifically at MCx and MSx. This provides us with MCx, MCyi and MSx, MSyi.
Yaw Calculation: Similarly, we can represent the pump's 2D yaw line with the equation z=nx+c, where n is the yaw and c is the z-intercept. For pump yaw, we have two baseline points PSx, PSz and PCx, PSz which can be used to compute the perfect yaw n=(z2−z1)/(x2−x1) and the z-intercept (c=z−nx). With n and c known, we can compute the ideal (i.e. aligned) z-value (zi) for any x-value, specifically at MCx and MSx. This provides us with MCx, MCzi and MSx, MSzi.
By combining the results from the ideal pitch and yaw calculations, we now have 3D coordinates MCx, MCyi, MCzi and MSx, MSyi, MSzi, and any additional points in between. These are where the motor center points need to be in order for the two shafts to be in perfect alignment, and typically vary from MCx, MCy, MCz and MSx, MSy, MSz which is where they were measured to be.
Calculating the difference between the existing, measured motor center points MCx, MCy, MCz and MSx, MSy, MSz and their ideal, aligned locations MCx, MCyi, MCzi and MSx, MSyi, MSzi is simple subtraction. The only complication is that the motor feet adjustments are not directly below MC and MS. Instead, the adjustments are some distance away which creates a “lever arm” at MF and MR.
However, we can use a simple ratio to determine the amount of adjustment at some point further away. We know the distance from PS-to-MC is (PSx-MCx). We also know the distance from PS-to-MF is ((PCx-PSx)+LE+MF). If the second distance is twice the first, for example, then we must double the amount of adjustment at the front foot. Similarly, we know the distance from PS-to-MR is ((PCx-PSx)+LE+MR). If the distance to MR is three times the distance to MC, for example, then we must triple the amount of adjustment at the rear foot. This is true for both pitch adjustments (i.e. shims) and yaw adjustments (screws 30).
The apparatus uses precise positioning of the laser along the X-axis, surface scanning in the Y-axis using a LRF making high-precision laser distance measurements in the Z-axis and precise incremental repositioning of the laser along the Y-axis to establish a baseline position for the pump and motor shaft surfaces. Outliers are filtered from the raw data and the best available measurement data is run through a best-fit-circle algorithm to determine two or more center points for each shaft. Adjustments to the motor feet are then calculated, and the motor can be put into near perfect alignment with the pump. No other alignment system can measure alignment of a motor and pump shaft while “hot and running” or align two shafts to this level of precision.
The basic components of the measurement apparatus 10 are illustrated schematically in
The method for aligning two rotating shafts which are coaxial coupled together is shown in block diagram in
In another embodiment, shown in
In another an alternative embodiment the diameter of the shaft is known in advance or is measured and input into the processor. When the shaft diameter is known it is only necessary to collect data for at least two Y-axis locations. The center location of a known diameter shaft can be determined with only two points as shown in
In another embodiment of the apparatus 60, shown
The servo motors in the robotic arm enable the LRF to be precisely located in space and be circumferentially moved about the shaft. The laser beam formed by the LRF can be oriented perpendicular to the shaft. The use of a robotic arm enables the LRF to be located relatively close to the shaft, preferably within 40 mm, and more preferably with 20 mm, resulting in a high degree of accuracy. Of course, the multi axis robotic arm embodiment of the apparatus 60 can be used in the manner of the apparatus embodiments disclosed in
The robot arm 62 mounted on carriage 63 can be moved along the base 64, as shown in
The method for aligning two rotating shafts which are coaxial coupled together using the multi axis robotic arm embodiment of the apparatus 60 has an initial step of providing a servo operated multi axis robotic arm attachable to a base affixed in spaced relation to axis of two axially coupled rotating shafts oriented along a Y-axis. The robotic arm has a distal end pivotably attached to a laser range finder (LRF) to orient the LRF a distance from the two rotating shafts to measures the location of a plurality of peripherally spaced spots on the shafts on two axial positions on each.
A controller is provided, having a processor and memory, communicating with the servo motors of the multi axis robotic arm, the LRF and a user interface. The controller positions the LRF at a first X-axis location on a first one of the rotating shafts. The controller communicating the servo motors of the multi axis robotic arm, and the X-axis servo to move the LRF peripherally about the shaft and while storing the LRF location and the measured distance to a plurality of peripherally spaced spots.
Next the controller positions the LRF at a second X-axis location on the first rotating shaft, causing the controller communicating the servo motors of the multi axis robotic arm, to move the LRF peripherally about the shaft and storing the LRF location and the measured distance to a plurality of peripherally spaced spots.
The controller moves the LRF to a third X-axis location on a second one of the rotating shafts, causing the controller communicating the servo motors of the multi axis robotic arm, to move the LRF peripherally about the shaft and storing the LRF location and the measured distance to a plurality of peripherally spaced spots.
The controller moves the LRF to a fourth X-axis location on the second rotating shaft, measuring causing the controller communicating the servo motors of the multi axis robotic arm, to move the LRF peripherally about the shaft and storing the LRF location and the measured distance to a plurality of peripherally spaced spots.
With the data collected the controller calculates, in the processor, the centerline of the two shafts at each of the four X-axis locations using stored LRF location and the measured distance to a plurality of peripherally spaced spots, using a best-fit circle algorithm to define two spaced apart axis location points for each shaft. The processor determines the adjustment of one of the two shafts needed to move the shafts in to coaxial alignment. The adjustment information needed to align the shafts is then output to the user via a user interface.
Another embodiment of the servo operated multi axis positioning device 80 is shown in
While exemplary embodiments are described above, it is not intended that these embodiments describe all possible forms of the invention. Rather, the words used in the specification are words of description rather than limitation, and it is understood that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Additionally, the features of various implementing embodiments may be combined to form further embodiments of the invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 17/522,303 filed Nov. 9, 2021 which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Pat. No. 11,193,760 issued Dec. 7, 2021, which claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 62/869,768 filed Jul. 2, 2019, the disclosures of which is hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4518855 | Malak | May 1985 | A |
6040903 | Lysen | Mar 2000 | A |
6915582 | Engels | Jul 2005 | B1 |
7609364 | Zhao | Oct 2009 | B2 |
8533965 | Stroemberg | Sep 2013 | B2 |
9410787 | Raab et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
20050243315 | Foley | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20070271800 | Hersey et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080201097 | Stromberg | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20110161034 | Barth | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110194103 | Stroemberg | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20150300802 | Linde | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160223320 | Hoelzl | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20180181096 | Harris | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180299263 | Jywe et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2021/012177, Prepared by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, mailing date Apr. 8, 2021. |
Manual SKF Shaft Alignment Tool TKSA 31 & TKSA 41, SKF Group, Aug. 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20240093986 A1 | Mar 2024 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62869768 | Jul 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17522303 | Nov 2021 | US |
Child | 18307852 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16915728 | Jun 2020 | US |
Child | 17522303 | US |