Apparatus for retaining a workpiece upon a workpiece support and method of manufacturing same

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6259592
  • Patent Number
    6,259,592
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, November 19, 1998
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 10, 2001
    22 years ago
Abstract
Apparatus for retaining a workpiece on a workpiece support and method for manufacturing same. The apparatus contains an adhesive layer, an insulating layer made of a base material having a first resistivity, an electrode layer, a hybrid/adhesive layer and a workpiece support layer made of a base material and a dopant, the dopant having a second resistivity wherein a resistivity of the resultant workpiece support layer is lower than the first resistivity. The multi-resistivity layers establish a Johnsen-Rahbek effect for electrostatic chucking while not unduly compromising chuck strength or longevity. The method consists of the steps of disposing an adhesive layer, disposing an insulating layer, disposing an electrode layer, disposing a hybrid/adhesive layer, disposing a workpiece support layer, curing the layers and forming a plurality of grooves in the workpiece support layer.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The invention relates generally to an apparatus for retaining a workpiece within a semiconductor wafer processing system and, more specifically, to an improved composition of a polyimide based electrostatic chuck that maximizes electrostatic clamping ability without loss of material strength or modulus of elasticity.




2. Description of the Background Art




Electrostatic chucks are used for retaining a workpiece in various applications including retaining a semiconductor wafer within a semiconductor wafer process chamber. Although electrostatic chucks vary in design, they all are based on the principle of applying a voltage to one or more electrodes in the chuck so as to induce opposite polarity charges in the workpiece and electrodes, respectively. The electrostatic attractive force between the opposite charges presses the workpiece against the chuck, thereby retaining the workpiece.




In semiconductor wafer processing equipment, electrostatic chucks are used for clamping wafers to a pedestal during processing. The pedestal may form an electrode and a heat sink or heater as used in etching, physical vapor deposition (PVD) or chemical vapor deposition (CVD) applications. For example,

FIG. 1

depicts a cross-sectional view of a reaction chamber used in semiconductor wafer processing. For a detailed understanding of the reaction chamber and its operation in processing the wafer, the reader should refer to the drawings and the detailed description contained in U.S. Pat. No. 5,228,501, issued Jul. 20, 1993, incorporated herein by reference. That patent teaches a PVD wafer processing chamber manufactured by Applied Materials, Inc. of Santa Clara, Calif. Additionally, the operation of a conventional electrostatic chuck is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,350,479 issued Sep. 27, 1994 to the assignee hereof, and its disclosure is incorporated herein by reference.




The chamber


100


contains a pedestal


106


supporting an electrostatic chuck


104


. The electrostatic chuck


104


has at least one electrode


116


which is insulated from a wafer


102


placed upon an upper surface


105


of the electrostatic chuck


104


. Specifically, the electrode


116


is either embedded within the body of the electrostatic chuck


104


or encased in layers of dielectric material which comprise the electrostatic chuck. The electrode(s)


116


are coupled to a power supply (not shown) via electrical conductors


118


. The voltage from the power supply creates the electrostatic (or clamping) force which draws the wafer


102


to the chuck


104


. Additionally, a variety of components may circumscribe the pedestal


106


to protect the wafer


102


and chamber


100


from improper or excessive deposition, etching or the like. Specifically, a deposition ring


108


contacts the edges of the wafer


102


and a deposition shield


124


circumscribes the deposition ring


108


to define a reaction zone


126


. Lift pins


110


are mounted on a platform


112


. The platform is coupled to an actuator shaft


114


located below the pedestal


106


. The lift pins


110


engage the wafer and lift it off the pedestal


106


after processing is completed.




The mechanism of attraction in the electrostatic chuck used in these types of wafer processing systems is generally Coulombic force. That is, the increase of charges in the insulated electrode


116


induce opposite charges to gather on the backside of the wafer. The resultant force is generally weak per unit area i.e., 15 g/cm


2


at 1500V DC because of the composition of the chuck. For example, a commonly used type of dielectric material for fabricating electrostatic chucks is polyimide. Specifically, electrodes are usually sandwiched between two sheets of polyimide to form an electrostatic chuck. Among the beneficial characteristics of polyimide are its high strength and high modulus of elasticity. This material also has high volume resistivity (on the order of 10


14


ohm-cm) and surface resistivity (on the order of 10


14


ohm/cm


2


). Since the electrode(s) are insulated and a high resistivity dielectric is used, the charges creating the chucking force are not mobile i.e., the electrode and wafer are separated by the dielectric layer. As such, the wafer must come into contact with a large area of the chuck so that an adequate charge accumulation is established for wafer retention.




Additionally, the backside of the wafer


102


and the top surface


105


of the electrostatic chuck


104


are relatively smooth. However, imperfections in each of these surfaces create interstitial spaces when these surfaces come into contact. As such, not all of the wafer is in direct thermal contact with the chuck. Maintaining a uniform temperature across the entire wafer is essential to proper wafer processing. To maintain proper thermal transfer conditions at the wafer during processing, an inert thermal transfer gas is pumped into the interstitial spaces or specially formed grooves in the chuck surface when the clamping force is applied. More specifically, a feed-through pipe


122


in the pedestal


106


provides thermal transfer gas to an aperture


120


in the top surface


105


of the electrostatic chuck


104


. The gas, usually Helium or Argon, acts as a thermal conduction medium between the wafer


102


and the chuck


104


that has better thermal transfer characteristics than the vacuum it replaces. To further enhance thermal transfer conditions (i.e., cooling or heating of the wafer), the pedestal temperature is typically controlled using water-cooled conduits within a cooling plate (not shown) below the chuck


104


and/or with resistive heating elements buried in or clamped to the chuck


104


. This cooling technique is known as backside gas cooling.




Since the distribution of thermal transfer gas to the interstitial spaces and chuck groove is osmotic and the interstitial spaces may not all be interconnected, some spaces do not receive any gas. This condition can also lead to a non-uniform temperature profile across the backside of the wafer


108


during processing and result in wafer damage. As such, it is advantageous to have as large a gas aperture and groove width as possible to maximize thermal transfer gas flow and pressure beneath the wafer. However, the limited attractive wafer clamping (Coulombic) force establishes a limit on the size of this aperture and the gas pressure therein. Additionally chuck groove width is limited to approximately 1-2 mm. Specifically, if the thermal transfer gas pressure becomes greater than the Coulombic chucking force, the wafer may shift on the pedestal thereby causing a processing anomaly on the wafer. In an extreme situation, the wafer may even pop off the pedestal onto the chamber floor and likely break, rendering the wafer useless. Since effective and uniform heat conduction away from and/or into the wafer is an important aspect of the manufacturing process, different types of chucks are designed in an attempt to maximize clamping force and thermal transfer.




One example of an improved electrostatic chuck is one that employs the Johnsen-Rahbek (J-R) effect. In such a chuck, the dielectric material has an intermediate resistivity instead of a high resistivity. As such, there are mobile charges present in the dielectric material. These mobile charges create a small but effective current flow between the backside of the wafer and the top surface of the electrostatic chuck. Specifically, at points where these two surfaces come into contact, a zero potential exists. These contact points are extremely small in comparison to the total area of a wafer being retained on the chuck. As such, not all of the mobile charges are able to pass through the contact points. The resultant movement and accumulation of the mobile charges within the top surface of the electrostatic chuck and the backside of the wafer creates a very high electrostatic force across the interstitial spaces between the surfaces. This electrostatic force clamps the wafer to the chuck.




Electrostatic chucks using the J-R effect are usually fabricated from a ceramic having an intermediate or “leaky” dielectric characteristic. Materials such as aluminum and silicon oxides and nitrides are popular and well known for use in electrostatic chucks. However, these types of materials must be carefully machined when creating the gas aperture or similar openings grooves or features; otherwise, they may fracture and become unusable. Additionally, the different coefficients of thermal expansion of the wafer and the ceramic may contribute to the phenomenon of “microgrinding” during processing. Microgrinding causes minute contaminant particles from the surface of the electrostatic chuck to become embedded on the backside of the wafer. Such particles may also be released in the process chamber and contaminate succeeding wafers. Polyimide, exhibits none of the undesirable microgrinding or fracturing characteristics of ceramics. Unfortunately, polyimide exhibits only high resistivity characteristics which is not useful in establishing the J-R effect.




Therefore, there is a need in the art for an improved apparatus for retaining a wafer having a strength and modulus of elasticity comparable to polyimide, but have a reduced resistivity level so as to take advantage of the J-R effect for clamping the wafer. Additionally, such an apparatus must be simple and cost-effective in design and construction to allow for optimal thermal transfer gas aperture and groove size in the apparatus and flow of the thermal transfer gas beneath the wafer.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The disadvantages heretofore associated with the prior art are overcome by an apparatus for retaining a workpiece on a workpiece support having improved clamping force and a relatively high modulus of elasticity. The inventive apparatus contains an insulating layer disposed on a top surface of the workpiece support, the insulating layer having a first resistivity; an electrode layer disposed on top of the insulating layer; and a workpiece support layer disposed on top of the electrode layer, the workpiece support layer having a second resistivity wherein the second resistivity is lower than the first resistivity. A hybrid/adhesive layer having the second resistivity may also be disposed between the electrode layer and the workpiece support layer. With the altered resistivity of the workpiece support layer, a Johnsen-Rahbek effect is established. As such, a workpiece, e.g., a semiconductor wafer, is retained on the workpiece support with a greater force than previously possible, i.e., when using just the workpiece support layer having the first, higher resistivity.




Additionally, a method of manufacturing such an apparatus is disclosed. The method consists of the steps of disposing an insulating layer upon the top surface of a workpiece support; disposing an electrode layer on top of the insulating layer; disposing a doped workpiece support layer on top of the electrode layer and curing the layers. Alternately, an adhesive layer can be disposed between the top surface of the workpiece support and the insulating layer and a hybrid/adhesive layer can be disposed between the electrode layer and the doped workpiece support layer. The described method allows for manufacturing of an electrostatic chuck with a layered polyimide construction that exploits the Johnson-Rahbek effect on its top-most layer to electrostatically retain a workpiece, e.g., a semiconductor wafer, to the workpiece support.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES




The teachings of the present invention can be readily understood by considering the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:





FIG. 1

is a cross-sectional view of a prior art wafer processing chamber;





FIG. 2



a


is a cross-sectional view of a first embodiment of the inventive apparatus;





FIG. 2



b


is a cross-sectional view of a second embodiment of the inventive apparatus;





FIGS. 3



a


through


3




i


are a step-by-step schematic depiction of the fabrication process of the first embodiment of the inventive apparatus;





FIGS. 4



a


through


4




g


are a step-by-step schematic depiction of the fabrication process of the second embodiment of the inventive apparatus;





FIG. 5

is a graph of volume resistivity of a material vs. the percentage by weight of a dopant added to the material;





FIG. 6

is a graph of surface resistance of a material vs. the percentage by weight of a dopant added to the material; and





FIG. 7

is a top perspective view of the inventive apparatus.











To facilitate understanding, identical reference numerals have been used, where possible, to designate identical elements that are common to the figures.




DETAILED DESCRIPTION





FIG. 2



a


depicts a detailed, cross-sectional view of a first embodiment on the inventive electrostatic chuck


202


mounted on a workpiece support


106


(e.g., a pedestal) for supporting a workpiece


102


(e.g., a semiconductor wafer) in a semiconductor wafer processing chamber (e.g., chamber


100


of FIG.


1


). More specifically, the electrostatic chuck


202


is a multilayer device that covers the top surface


105


of the pedestal


106


. Preferably, the pedestal


106


is fabricated from a durable material (i.e., a metallic substance such as an alloy of aluminum or copper, stainless steel or the like or a ceramic such as aluminum nitride, silicon nitride, silicon dioxide or the like. The electrostatic chuck


202


is affixed to the top surface


105


of the pedestal


106


in stages to form a complete device.




In the first embodiment of the invention, the electrostatic chuck


202


has five layers. The first layer


204


is an adhesive layer. Preferably, the adhesive layer


204


is fabricated from an insulating material such as ordinary polyimide. Polyimide is a widely known and used product in the field of electrostatic chuck manufacturing. The polyimide can be in the form of a thin (e.g., 20-50 μm thick) sheet or is preferably a layer of a paste-like material that can be spread across the top surface


105


to a thickness of approximately 30 μm. The next layer


208


is an insulating layer that is preferably a polyimide film approximately 30-300 μm thick. The insulating layer


208


is applied to a top surface


206


of the adhesive layer


204


. The insulating layer


208


forms an electrical barrier between the workpiece support


106


and electrical elements within the electrostatic chuck


202


described below.




The next layer of the electrostatic chuck is an electrode layer


212


. The electrode layer


212


contains at least one electrode and, in the depicted bipolar chuck of

FIG. 2



a,


contains a pair of coplanar electrodes


116


disposed on a portion


222


of the insulating layer


208


. The electrodes


116


are fabricated from a conductive material (i.e., copper) are approximately 20-300 μm thick and may be in any shape required to maximize chucking force applied to the wafer


102


. For example, the electrodes may be in the form of two half-moons, concentric circles, a plurality of individual pads electrically connected by an interconnection trace or the like. The electrode layer


212


is connected to a power source


210


via electrical conductors


118


and electrical feedthroughs


218


. The electrical feedthroughs


218


are disposed in insulating conduits


220


within the workpiece support


106


. The power source


210


provides the necessary voltage to the electrode layer


212


to clamp the wafer


102


to the pedestal


106


. The electrodes


116


may be connected to the power source in any configuration necessary to form the required chucking force.

FIG. 2

depicts a bipolar configuration, but this does not preclude the use of other types of configurations including a monopolar configuration.




The next layer of the electrostatic chuck is a hybrid/adhesive layer


214


. The hybrid/adhesive layer


214


is disposed over electrode layer


212


and a portion


224


of insulating layer


208


not covered by the electrode layer


212


. Preferably, hybrid/adhesive layer


214


is a special semiconducting layer. This semiconducting layer differs in composition and function from the other layers


204


and


208


. Specifically, the hybrid/adhesive layer


214


is fabricated from a base material and a dopant. The base material and dopant each have a resistivity that is based on the properties of said material. The resistivity of the base material is greater than the resistivity of the dopant. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the base material is polyimide and the dopant is carbon. Alternatively, the dopant is a polymer. This doping material increases the conductivity of the polyimide. Thus, it is possible to control the volume and surface resistivity of the chuck by altering the composition of the hybrid/adhesive layer


214


of the chuck. Adding the doping material creates a modified polyimide that is characteristically more conducting than previously possible. That is, more mobile charges are introduced into the polyimide as a result of the doping. As such, the resistivity of the hybrid/adhesive layer is less than the original base material (polyimide). The principle mechanism of attraction in the chuck changes from the weak Coulombic forces to the highly desirable Johnson-Rahbek effect. This hybrid/adhesive layer


214


effectively encapsulates and affixes the electrode layer


212


between layers


208


and


214


.




The next and final layer


216


is a workpiece support layer that completes the construction of the inventive electrostatic chuck


202


. Preferably, the workpiece support layer


216


is also a semiconducting layer of the same doped polyimide as the hybrid/adhesive layer


214


. However, the workpiece support layer


216


is preferably in the form of a doped polymide film approximately 20-300 μm thick and not necessarily a paste. Nonetheless, it contains the same resistivity properties of the hybrid/adhesive layer.





FIG. 2



b


depicts an alternate embodiment of the invention wherein the electrostatic chuck


202


is formed of only three layers. In accordance with the previous embodiment, the chuck


202


is affixed to the top surface


105


of a pedestal


106


similar to that shown in

FIG. 2



a.


However, in this embodiment, there are no film layers of either doped or ordinary polyimide. Specifically, a coating of ordinary polyimide paste


204


is applied to the top surface


105


of the pedestal


106


preferably to a thickness of approximately 30-300 μm. In this embodiment, the layer


204


is both an adhesive and insulating layer. Next, an electrode layer


212


identical to the one depicted in

FIG. 2



a


is disposed upon a portion


226


of the polyimide paste layer


204


. The electrical connections and feedthroughs are likewise identical to that of

FIG. 2



a.


The third and final layer is the workpiece support layer


216


. As discussed in the first embodiment, the workpiece support layer


216


for this embodiment is a coating of doped polyimide paste, preferably applied to a thickness of approximately 20-400 μm over the electrode layer


212


and a portion


228


of the ordinary polyimide paste layer


204


not covered by the electrode layer


212


. This workpiece support layer has the same resistivity properties as the hybrid/adhesive layer of the previous embodiment.





FIG. 7

depicts a perspective view of the electrostatic chuck


202


without a wafer retained thereon. Specifically, the workpiece support layer


216


is shown in detail. A plurality of grooves


702


are provided in the workpiece support layer


216


. The grooves


702


extend radially outward from a center aperture


704


provided in the chuck


202


. That is, the center aperture extends through the pedestal


106


(though not specifically shown in

FIGS. 2A

or


2


B) into the chuck


202


to provide a path for a backside gas similar to the port


120


in the prior art apparatus of FIG.


1


and described previously. The backside gas then travels along the grooves


702


to act as a heat transfer medium between the wafer


102


and the chuck


202


. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, eight (8) grooves are provided in the workpiece support layer


216


.




The gas grooves


702


are formed into layer


216


by any known method for providing surface features in a polyimide-based structure. Such methods include but are not limited to etching or laser cutting after curing (explained in greater detail below). The improved polyimide of the layers above the electrode layer create a chucking force that is approximately 2 times stronger than the chucking force established in conventional electrostatic chucks. As such, wider gas grooves are provided in the subject invention. The width of the gas grooves are approximately two times greater than width of prior art chuck grooves and preferably in the range of approximately 2-4 mm. The wider gas grooves result in a greater volume of backside gas being provided to the wafer. Hence, temperature control of the wafer is also improved.




Additionally, a method of manufacture of an improved electrostatic chuck is disclosed.

FIGS. 3



a-i


depict the manufacturing process of the first embodiment of the chuck seen in

FIG. 2



a


in a step-by-step manner as follows.

FIG. 3



a


depicts the first step of the process wherein a bare pedestal


106


is provided. In the next step, depicted in

FIG. 3



b,


one or more insulating conduits


220


are formed in the bare pedestal


106


for providing an insulated path between the electrode layer


212


and the bottom of the pedestal


106


. In

FIG. 3



c,


the bare pedestal


106


is coated with an adhesive layer


204


. Preferably, the adhesive layer


204


is an ordinary polyimide paste approximately 30 μm thick. The coating process can be performed by any means known in the art of electrostatic chuck manufacturing including screen printing and the like. In Step


3




d,


an insulating layer


208


is applied over the adhesive layer


204


. The insulating layer


208


is preferably an ordinary polyimide film. A preferred thickness of the first insulating layer


208


is approximately 30-300 μm.




As seen in

FIG. 3



e,


an electrode layer


212


is disposed over a portion


222


of the insulating layer


208


in the next step of electrostatic chuck fabrication method. The electrode layer


212


as described earlier is preferably at least one copper sheet that is applied over the insulating layer


208


. One or more electrical feedthroughs


218


extend from the electrodes


116


through the pedestal


106


. The feedthroughs are connected to one or more conductors


118


that conduct power from a chucking power supply (not shown) to the electrode layer


212


. In the next step, a hybrid/adhesive layer


214


is applied over the electrode layer


212


and a portion


224


of the insulating layer


208


not covered by the electrode layer


212


as seen in

FIG. 3



f.


Preferably, this hybrid/adhesive layer


214


is the doped polyimide paste described earlier and is applied to a thickness of 20-300 μm. This hybrid/adhesive layer effectively affixes and encapsulates the electrode layer


212


thereby preventing the electrode from contacting any other layers.





FIG. 3



g


depicts the next step of the electrostatic chuck fabrication process in which a workpiece support layer


216


is disposed over the hybrid/adhesive layer


214


. Specifically, a premade sheet of doped polyimide is applied to the hybrid/adhesive layer


214


to form the complete electrostatic chuck


202


. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the workpiece support layer


216


is approximately 20-300 μm thick. In step


3




h,


the entire pedestal/chuck assembly


106


/


202


is placed in a furnace for curing. For example, the assembly is cured at a temperature of approximately 100-350° C. at a pressure of approximately 1 atm for approximately 30 min.-10 hrs. This curing step cures the adhesive and hybrid/adhesive polyimide paste layers


204


and


214


respectively. In step


3




i,


a plurality of grooves (see in FIG.


7


and described above) are formed in the workpiece support layer


216


. The final product is therefore a pedestal


106


with a layered electrostatic chuck


202


on the top surface


105


of the pedestal


106


wherein the top (workpiece support) layer


216


of the chuck


202


is a doped polyimide. The doped layer exhibits a lower resistivity than ordinary polyimide. As such, a greater number of mobile charges exist in the polyimide and which leads to establishment of the Johnson-Rahbek effect. Further, the increased chucking force established by this chuck


202


allows for wider grooves having greater backside gas flow.




A method of manufacture of the alternate embodiment of the improved electrostatic chuck is also disclosed.

FIGS. 4



a-g


depict the manufacturing process of the alternate embodiment of the chuck seen in

FIG. 2



b


in a step-by-step manner as follows.

FIG. 4



a


depicts the first step of the process wherein a bare pedestal


106


is provided. In the next step, depicted in

FIG. 4



b,


one or more insulating conduits


220


are formed in the bare pedestal


106


for providing an insulated path between the electrode layer


212


and the bottom of the pedestal


106


. In

FIG. 4



c,


the bare pedestal


106


is coated with an insulating and adhesive layer


204


. Preferably, the insulating and adhesive layer


204


is an ordinary polyimide paste approximately 30-300 μm thick. The coating process can be performed by any means known in the art of electrostatic chuck manufacturing including screen printing and the like. In Step


4




d,


an electrode layer


212


is disposed over a portion


226


of the insulating and adhesive layer


204


. In step


4




e,


a workpiece support layer


216


is applied over the electrode layer


212


and a portion


228


of insulating and adhesive layer


204


not covered by the electrode layer


212


. Preferably, this workpiece support layer


216


is the doped polyimide paste described earlier and is applied to a thickness of 20-400 μm. This workpiece support layer


216


effectively affixes and encapsulates the electrode layer


212


thereby preventing the electrode from contacting any other layers and forms a support surface upon which a workpiece (


102


of

FIG. 2



b


) is retained.




In step


4




f,


the entire pedestal/chuck assembly


106


/


202


is placed in a furnace for curing. For example, the assembly is cured at a temperature of approximately 100-350° C. at a pressure of approximately 1 atm for approximately 30 min.-10 hrs. This final curing step cures the insulation and workpiece support paste layers


204


and


216


respectively. In step


4




g,


a plurality of grooves (see in FIG.


7


and described above) are formed in the workpiece support layer


216


.




Controlling the amount of dopant material is critical to the functionality of the inventive electrostatic chuck. Essentially, the quantity of dopant material must be controlled during the manufacturing of the doped polyimide sheet so as to yield the desired results. Specifically, the ratio of the weight of the dopant material versus the total weight of the improved polyimide is adjusted until the desired volume and surface resistivity are attained.

FIG. 5

depicts a graph of volume resistivity vs. percentage by weight of dopant material in the improved polyimide. As a greater amount of dopant material is added to the improved polyimide, the resistivity drops. By increasing the dopant level to 50% by weight of the total improved polyimide, it is possible to reduce the resistivity level by a factor of 10


4


.

FIG. 6

depicts a graph of surface resistivity vs. percentage by weight of dopant material in the improved polyimide. Similar reductions in this characteristic are also realized as the dopant level approaches 50% by weight of the total improved polyimide. The dark points on each graph represent post-cured resistivity and the white points represent pre-cured resistivity.




Table 1 displays important dielectric characteristics of ordinary and improved polyimide as the level of dopant material is increased. As seen from this table, there is approximately a 30% drop in the modulus of elasticity, extension and strength of ordinary polyimide as dopant levels are increased through 50% by weight. The reduced levels of these characteristics are not considered to be detrimental to the chuck's longevity.















Mechanical Characteristics of Improved Polyimide Film
















Quantity of




Modulus of









doped material




elasticity





Strength







(wt %)




(kgf/mm2)




Extension (%)




(kgf/mm2)



















Ordinary




0




750




18




35






polyimide






Improved




25




530




16




27






polyimide 1






Improved




40




515




13




24






polyimide 2






Improved




50




520




10




24






polyimide 3














In sum, the above described method and apparatus provide an electrostatic chuck with altered physical properties of a top layer (i.e., the layer that supports the wafer) of polyimide to establish an improved chucking force to retain a substrate material (i.e., a semiconductor wafer). Specifically, ordinary polyimide is doped to alter the mechanism of attraction from Coulombic force to the Johnsen-Rahbek effect. The resultant device is capable of retaining a wafer with a greater attractive force. As such, a greater thermal transfer gas flow and pressure can be attained under the wafer without the wafer popping off of the chuck due to an inadequate chucking force. The increased thermal transfer gas conditions promote greater temperature control of the wafer and more accurate temperature uniformity during wafer processing.




Although various embodiments which incorporate the teachings of the present invention have been shown and described in detail herein, those skilled in the art can readily devise many other varied embodiments that still incorporate these teachings.



Claims
  • 1. Apparatus for retaining a workpiece on a workpiece support comprising:a workpiece support layer disposed on the workpiece support, the workpiece support layer fabricated of a base material and a dopant selected from the group consisting of carbon and a polymer, wherein a resistivity of said workpiece support layer is less than a resistivity of the base material.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1 further comprising:a top surface of the workpiece support; an insulating layer disposed on the top surface of the workpiece support and an electrode layer disposed on top of the insulating layer wherein the workpiece support layer is disposed on top of the electrode layer.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 2 further comprising a hybrid/adhesive layer disposed between the electrode layer and the workpiece support layer.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 3 wherein the hybrid/adhesive layer is fabricated from a base material and a dopant wherein a resistivity of the hybrid/adhesive layer is less than a resistivity of the base material.
  • 5. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein the workpiece support layer and hybrid/adhesive layer base material is polyimide.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 2 wherein the electrode layer is at least one sheet of copper having a thickness of approximately 20-300 μm.
  • 7. Apparatus for retaining a workpiece on a workpiece support comprising:a top surface of the workpiece support; an insulating layer disposed upon the top surface of the workpiece support; an electrode layer disposed upon the insulating layer; a hybrid/adhesive layer disposed upon the electrode layer; and a workpiece support layer disposed upon the hybrid/adhesive layer wherein the workpiece support layer and hybrid/adhesive layer are doped variations of the insulating layer, said doped variations doped with material selected from the group consisting of carbon and a polymer.
  • 8. The apparatus of claim 7 wherein the insulating layer is polyimide.
  • 9. The apparatus of claim 7 wherein the hybrid-adhesive layer and workpiece support are doped polymide.
  • 10. The apparatus of claim 7 wherein the workpiece support layer establishes a Johnsen-Rahbek effect.
  • 11. The apparatus of claim 7 wherein an adhesive layer is disposed between the top surface of the workpiece support and the insulating layer.
  • 12. The apparatus of claim 11 wherein the adhesive layer is polyimide.
  • 13. Method for making an apparatus for retaining a workpiece to a workpiece support, the apparatus having a top surface of the workpiece support; an insulating layer; an electrode layer; and a doped workpiece support layer, the method comprising the steps of:(a) providing the workpiece support; (b) disposing the insulating layer over the workpiece support; (c) disposing the electrode layer on a portion of the insulating layer; and (d) disposing the doped workpiece support layer over the electrode layer and a portion of the insulating layer not covered by the electrode layer, said workpiece support layer doped with the material selected from the group consisting of carbon and a polymer; (e) curing the layers.
  • 14. The method of claim 13 further comprising after step (a) but before step (b), the step of disposing an adhesive layer on the top surface of the workpiece support.
  • 15. The method of claim 14 wherein the step of disposing the adhesive layer on the top surface of the workpiece support further comprises applying a polyimide paste.
  • 16. The method of claim 14 wherein the step of disposing the insulating layer on top of the adhesive layer further comprises applying a polyimide film.
  • 17. The method of claim 14 further comprising after step (a) but before the step of claim 14, forming one or more insulating conduits in the workpiece support.
  • 18. The method of claim 13 wherein the step of disposing the electrode layer on top of the insulating layer further comprises applying a copper sheet.
  • 19. The method of claim 13 further comprising after step (c) but before step (d) the step of disposing a hybrid/adhesive layer on top of the electrode layer.
  • 20. The method of claim 19 wherein the step of disposing the hybrid/adhesive layer on top of the electrode layer further comprises applying a doped polyimide paste.
  • 21. The method of claim 20 wherein the step of disposing the workpiece support layer on top of the hybrid/adhesive layer further comprises applying a doped polyimide film.
  • 22. The method of claim 13 wherein the step of curing the layers further comprises placing the workpiece support with the disposed layers in a furnace for approximately 30 min.-10 hrs. at approximately 100° C.-350° C.
  • 23. The method of claim 13 further comprising after step (e), forming a plurality of grooves in the workpiece support layer.
US Referenced Citations (22)
Number Name Date Kind
4480284 Tojo et al. Oct 1984
4551192 Di Milia et al. Nov 1985
4771730 Tezuka Sep 1988
4990464 Baumgart et al. Feb 1991
5104834 Watanabe et al. Apr 1992
5117121 Watanabe et al. May 1992
5151845 Watanabe et al. Sep 1992
5191506 Logan et al. Mar 1993
5255153 Nozawa et al. Oct 1993
5324053 Kubota et al. Jun 1994
5463526 Mundt Oct 1995
5486974 Kasahara Jan 1996
5486975 Shamouilian et al. Jan 1996
5539179 Nozawa et al. Jul 1996
5583736 Anderson et al. Dec 1996
5631803 Cameron et al. May 1997
5646814 Shamouilian et al. Jul 1997
5745331 Shamouilian et al. Apr 1998
5745332 Burkhart et al. Apr 1998
5764471 Burkhart Jun 1998
5777838 Tamagawa et al. Jul 1998
5909355 Parkhe Jun 1999
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
63-194345 Aug 1988 JP
7-74233 Mar 1995 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
Hartsough, Larry D., “Electrostatic Wafer Holding”, Solid State Technology, pp. 87-90, Jan. 1993.
Singer, Peter, “Electrostatic Chucks in Wafer Processing”, Semiconductor International, pp. 57-62, Apr. 1995.