The present invention relates, in general, to integrated circuits and systems of integrated circuits. More particularly, the present invention relates to an apparatus, method, system and executable module for configuration and operation of adaptive integrated circuitry having fixed, application specific computational elements.
The first related application discloses a new form or type of integrated circuitry which effectively and efficiently combines and maximizes the various advantages of processors, application specific integrated circuits (“ASICs”), and field programmable gate arrays (“FPGAs”), while minimizing potential disadvantages. The first related application illustrates a new form or type of integrated circuit, referred to as an adaptive computing engine (“ACE”), which provides the programming flexibility of a processor, the post-fabrication flexibility of FPGAs, and the high speed and high utilization factors of an ASIC. This ACE integrated circuitry is readily reconfigurable, is capable of having corresponding, multiple modes of operation, and further minimizes power consumption while increasing performance, with particular suitability for low power applications, such as for use in hand-held and other battery-powered devices. The second related application discloses a preferred system embodiment that includes an ACE integrated circuit coupled with one or more sets of configuration information. This configuration information is required to generate, in advance or in real-time (or potentially at a slower rate), the configurations and reconfigurations which provide and create one or more operating modes for the ACE circuit, such as wireless communication, radio reception, personal digital assistance (“PDA”), MP3 or MP4 music playing, or any other desired functions. Various methods, apparatuses and systems are also illustrated in the second related application for generating and providing configuration information for an ACE integrated circuit, for determining ACE reconfiguration capacity or capability, for providing secure and authorized configurations, and for providing appropriate monitoring of configuration and content usage.
A need remains, however, for an apparatus, method and system for not only configuring, but also operating such adaptive integrated circuitry, with one or more operating modes or other functionality of ACE circuitry and other ACE devices. Such an apparatus, method and system should be capable of configuring and operating the adaptive IC, utilizing both configuration information provided independently of user data or other content, and utilizing configuration information provided concurrently with user data or other content. Such an apparatus, method and system should provide the means to, among other things, coordinate configuration with data, provide self-routing of configuration and data, and provide power control within ACE circuitry.
The adaptive computing engine (“ACE”) circuit of the present invention, for adaptive or reconfigurable computing, includes a plurality of heterogeneous computational elements coupled to an interconnection network (rather than the same, homogeneous repeating and arrayed units of FPGAs). The plurality of heterogeneous computational elements include corresponding computational elements having fixed and differing architectures, such as fixed architectures for different functions such as memory, addition, multiplication, complex multiplication, subtraction, configuration, reconfiguration, control, input, output, routing, and field programmability.
In response to configuration information, the interconnection network is operative, in advance, in real-time or potentially slower, to configure and reconfigure the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements for a plurality of different functional modes, including linear algorithmic operations, non-linear algorithmic operations, finite state machine operations, memory operations, and bit-level manipulations. In turn, this configuration and reconfiguration of heterogeneous computational elements, forming various computational units and adaptive matrices, generates the selected, higher-level operating mode of the ACE integrated circuit, for the performance of a wide variety of tasks.
The present invention illustrates various means for both configuring and operating such adaptive integrated circuitry, for one or more operating modes or other functionality of ACE circuitry and other ACE devices. The present invention provides such configuration and operation of the adaptive IC, utilizing both configuration information provided independently of user data or other content, and utilizing configuration information provided concurrently with user data or other content. The present invention also provides the means to, among other things, coordinate configuration with data, provide self-routing of configuration and data, and provide power control within ACE circuitry.
A preferred method of providing such configuration and operation utilizes a “silverware” module (also referred to as “silverware”) comprised of a plurality of information sequences. A first information sequence (or field) provides configuration control, which may be either configuration information or a reference (such as a flag or other designation) to corresponding configuration information cached or stored in memory (or stored in a configuration of computational elements). A second information sequence provides operand data for use by configured computational elements. A third information sequence provides routing control, to direct the other information sequences to their appropriate locations within the matrix environment of the ACE integrated circuitry. Also in the preferred embodiment a fourth information sequence is utilized to provide power control, to clock on or off various computational elements. Other information sequences may also be utilized, for example, to maintain configuration instantiations for repeated use, or to define new fields or types of information for future use (which are currently undefined).
For example, one of the preferred system embodiments provides, first, means for routing configuration information to a plurality of computational elements; second, means for configuring and reconfiguring a plurality of computational elements to form a plurality of configured computational elements for the performance of a plurality of selected functions; third, means for providing operand data to the plurality of configured computational elements; and fourth, means for controlling configuration timing to precede a receipt of corresponding operand data.
Another preferred system embodiment provides, first, means for spatially configuring and reconfiguring a plurality of computational elements to form a first plurality of configured computational elements for the performance of a first plurality of selected functions; second, means for temporally configuring the plurality of computational elements to form a second plurality of configured computational elements for the performance of a second plurality of selected functions; third, means for providing data to the first and second pluralities of configured computational elements; and fourth, means for coordinating the spatial and temporal configurations of the plurality of computational elements with the provision of the data to the first and second pluralities of configured computational elements.
Numerous other advantages and features of the present invention will become readily apparent from the following detailed description of the invention and the embodiments thereof, from the claims and from the accompanying drawings.
While the present invention is susceptible of embodiment in many different forms, there are shown in the drawings and will be described herein in detail specific embodiments thereof, with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered as an exemplification of the principles of the invention and is not intended to limit the invention to the specific embodiments illustrated.
As indicated above, a need remains for an apparatus, method and system for configuring and operating adaptive integrated circuitry, to provide one or more operating modes of ACE circuitry and other devices incorporating ACE technology. Such an apparatus, method and system are provided in accordance with the present invention, and are capable of configuring and operating the adaptive IC, utilizing both configuration information provided independently of user data or other content, and utilizing configuration information provided concurrently with user data or other content. The present invention also provides the means to, among other things, coordinate configuration with data, provide self-routing of configuration and data, and provide power control within ACE circuitry.
The apparatus, systems and methods of the present invention utilize a new form of integrated circuitry, referred to as an adaptive computing engine. The ACE architecture utilizes a plurality of fixed computational elements, such as correlators, multipliers, complex multipliers, adders, routers, demodulators, and combiners, which may be configured and reconfigured, in advance, in real-time or potentially at a slower rate, through an interconnection network, in response to configuration information, to form the functional blocks (computational units and matrices) which may be needed, at any given time, to execute or perform the selected operating mode, such as to perform wireless communication functionality. The methodology and systems of the present invention also minimize power consumption and are especially suitable for low power applications, such as for use in hand-held and other battery-powered devices.
Next, fields 72-78 illustrate configuration information with corresponding self-routing information. As discussed in greater detail below, this routing information has two purposes: first, it directs the configuration information to a cache or memory location for storage within the various matrices of the ACE architecture, and second, it directs the configuration information to its designated or specified location to configure computational elements within the various matrices of the ACE architecture. (It should be noted that once configured, the computational elements and interconnection network effectively also operate as a memory, storing the configuration information as the actual configuration.) The routing information may be provided to the ACE by an external source or may be self-generated by the ACE architecture. As illustrated in
Such routing and configuration information, in the preferred embodiment, are provided for all configurations to be utilized in providing one or more operating modes for ACE circuits and devices. As illustrated below, there are many instances in which only configuration information is provided to an ACE device, which may then internally generate its own routing information. In other cases, both types of information may be provided to an ACE from an external source. Following such configuration, for example, as a mobile communication device, user data may be provided separately, such as voice data during a mobile communication session.
In yet other cases, such configuration and routing information may be provided concurrently with user data. For example, an MPEG file may be downloaded to an ACE device, consisting of both configuration information and the music content to be played. For these circumstances, and for the internal operation of the ACE architecture as discussed in greater detail below, additional information is included in the module 70.
Referring to
Continuing to refer to
As illustrated, fields 83 and 84 provide routing information for the data for configuration “A” and the data to be used in or by configuration “A”, respectively; field 85 provides a reference or flag to generate configuration “C”; fields 86 and 87 provide routing information for the data for configuration “B” and the data to be used in or by configuration “B”, respectively; field 88 provides a second or substitute routing location for configuration “D” (such as a different location within the various matrices), and field 89 provides a reference or flag to generate configuration “D”; fields 90 and 91 provide routing information for the data for configuration “A” and additional data to be used in or by configuration “A”, respectively; fields 92 and 93 provide routing information for the data for configuration “C” and the data to be used in or by configuration “C”, respectively; fields 94 and 95 provide routing information for the data for configuration “D” and the data to be used in or by configuration “D”, respectively; and fields 96 and 97 provide routing information for the data for configuration “B” and the data to be used in or by configuration “B”, respectively. Another field (98) may be used to provide information concerning or designating an information type (for example, that configuration information will be the next fields in the module 70). As another option, an additional field (field 99) may also be utilized for “loop” instructions, to indicate that a particular instantiation of a configuration is to remain in place for a particular duration or number of cycles. Other fields may also be utilized, for example, to define new types of information for future use (which are currently undefined), or otherwise to be self-extensible. As illustrated, the module 70 may continue, providing more configuration information and data (with corresponding routing information, power control, type designations, and so on), for as long as the ACE architecture is being utilized or operated.
The use of the information provided in module 70 is also discussed in greater detail below.
As a point of clarification, the terminology “configuration information”, as used herein, should be understood generally to have and include its linguistic, plural connotation, i.e., configuration information is a plurality of information bits, groups or sets of information, namely, a “plurality” of configuration information. For example, “configuration information” may be viewed as being a set of configuration information comprised of a plurality of subsets, such subsets being first configuration information, second configuration information, third configuration information, and so on, through nth configuration information. Although a subset of configuration information may be singular (one bit of information contained in the subset), each such subset of configuration information is also generally plural, typically including more information than may be encoded by a single bit, such as 8, 16, 32 or 64 information bits. Configuration information, such as that illustrated in module 70, with or without user or coefficient data, may also exist in a variety of forms, and at any given time, may have a stored (or fixed) nature, or may have a transient or temporal nature. For example, as illustrated in
Referring to
These various server, switching, routing and other entities may also be connected through network 40 to one or more intelligent network devices referred to as an adjunct network entities, such as adjunct network entity 50, which may be an additional type of server, database, a service control point (“SCP”), a service circuit node (“SCN”) (also referred to as a service node), an intelligent peripheral (“IP”), a gateway, or another intelligent network device. One or more adjunct network entities 50 are preferably connected or coupled to a network 40, for direct or indirect connection to wireline switching center 56, MSC 52, local area network (LAN) 41, wireless LAN 43, wide area network (WAN) 42, routers 53 and servers 54. In the preferred embodiment, an adjunct network entity 50 provides a node or platform for particular applications (“application nodes”) 51, illustrated as application nodes 51A, 51B through 51N, to perform various functions such as providing downloads of configuration information, executable modules 70, authentication, security, authorization, and compatibility evaluation. In addition to inclusion within an adjunct network entity 50, these various application nodes 51 may also be distributed among or included within the other various devices, such as within one or more servers 54. For example, one server 54 may be utilized to provide configuration information, with an adjunct network entity 50 utilized for authentication and security, with tracking and accounting occurring at yet another server 54 or computer 55.
For purposes of explanation and not limitation, the various systems of the present invention, as illustrated in
Other network or distribution level systems are also included within the scope of the present invention. Exemplary network systems may include one or more application nodes 51, in an adjunct network entity 50 or other server 54, which provide configuration information or silverware modules (configuration information coupled with data), such as a module 70, for use by an ACE 100. By storing such configuration and other information, such network or distribution level systems effectively store “hardware” on the “net”. Such network or distribution level systems, in response to a request from or on behalf of an ACE 100, in the preferred embodiment, may provide one or more of the following: one or more sets of configuration information; content or other data modified for use with configuration information; silverware modules (70) combining configuration information with corresponding data or other content; configuration information tailored or watermarked for a unique device; and/or encryption of configuration information or silverware modules.
Distributed systems are also within the scope of the present invention, as configuration information does not need to be local to any given ACE 100 device. For example, configuration information or silverware may be stored across a network 40, such as between and among application nodes 51, adjunct network entity 50, other server 54, and the other illustrated elements of
Other distributed systems, within the scope of the present invention, are comprised of clusters of ACE 100 devices, which are configured to be aware of each other. For example, wireless IP routing could occur by nearest neighboring ACEs, each configured for both reception and transmission operating modes. Other ACE clusters could perform parallel processing tasks, act as a distributed antenna system, or otherwise perform interactive functions.
The interface 62 is utilized for appropriate connection to a relevant channel, network or bus; for example, the interface 62 may provide impedance matching, drivers and other functions for a wireline interface, may provide demodulation and analog to digital conversion for a wireless interface, and may provide a physical interface for the memory 61 with other devices. In general, the interface 62 is used to receive and transmit data, depending upon the selected embodiment, such as voice information, configuration information, silverware modules (70), control messages, authentication data and other pertinent information. The ACE 100 may also be configured to provide the functionality of the interface 62, including internal IC input/output (“1/0”) and external (off-chip) I/O, such as for PCI bus control. The memory 61 may be an integrated circuit or portion of an integrated circuit, such as various forms of RAM, DRAM, SRAM, FeRAM, MRAM, ROM, EPROM, E2PROM, flash, and so on. For non-IC (or non-SOC) embodiments, the memory 61 may also be a magnetic (hard of floppy) drive, an optical storage device, or any other type of data storage apparatus and, as indicated above, may be distributed across multiple devices. In addition, depending upon the selected embodiment, and as discussed in greater detail below, the memory 61 may also be included within the ACE 100, through memory computational elements or within the matrix interconnection network (MIN). One or more processing elements 65 optionally may be included within system 60, to provide any additional processing capability, such as reduced instruction set (“RISC”) processing, or may be included as computational elements within the ACE 100.
The use and/or creation of modules 70, and the operation of the various systems illustrated in
A significant departure from the prior art, the ACE 100 does not utilize traditional (and typically separate) data, direct memory access (“DMA”), random access, configuration and instruction busses for signaling and other transmission between and among the reconfigurable matrices 150, the controller 120, and the memory 140, or for other I/O functionality. Rather, data, control (such as power and timing information) and configuration information are transmitted between and among these matrix 150 elements, utilizing the matrix interconnection network 110, which may be configured and reconfigured, to provide any given connection between and among the reconfigurable matrices 150, including those matrices 150 configured as the controller 120 and the memory 140, as discussed in greater detail below.
It should also be noted that once configured, the MIN 110 also and effectively functions as a memory, directly providing the interconnections for particular functions, until and unless it is reconfigured. In addition, such configuration and reconfiguration may occur in advance of the use of a particular function or operation, and/or may occur in real-time or at a slower rate, namely, in advance of, during or concurrently with the use of the particular function or operation. Such configuration and reconfiguration, moreover, may be occurring in a distributed fashion without disruption of function or operation, with computational elements in one location being configured while other computational elements (having been previously configured) are concurrently performing their designated function. This configuration flexibility of the ACE 100 contrasts starkly with FPGA reconfiguration, both which generally occurs comparatively slowly, not in real-time or concurrently with use, and which must be completed in its entirety prior to any operation or other use.
The matrices 150 configured to function as memory 140 may be implemented in any desired or preferred way, utilizing computational elements (discussed below) of fixed memory elements, and may be included within the ACE 100 or incorporated within another IC or portion of an IC (such as memory 61). In the preferred embodiment, the memory 140 is included within the ACE 100, and preferably is comprised of computational elements which are low power consumption random access memory (RAM), but also may be comprised of computational elements of any other form of memory, such as flash, DRAM, SRAM, MRAM, ROM, EPROM or EPROM. As mentioned, this memory functionality may also be distributed across multiple matrices 150, and may be temporally embedded, at any given time, as a particular MIN 110 configuration. In addition, in the preferred embodiment, the memory 140 preferably includes direct memory access (DMA) engines, not separately illustrated.
The controller 120 is preferably implemented, using matrices 150A and 150B configured as adaptive finite state machines, as a reduced instruction set (“RISC”) processor, controller or other device or IC capable of performing the two types of functionality discussed below. (Alternatively, these functions may be implemented utilizing a conventional RISC or other processor, such as a processing element 65 of
The matrix interconnection network 110 of
It should be pointed out, however, that while any given switching or selecting operation of or within the various interconnection networks (110, 210, 240 and 220) may be implemented as known in the art, the design and layout of the various interconnection networks (110, 210, 240 and 220), in accordance with the present invention, are new and novel, as discussed in greater detail below. For example, varying levels of interconnection are provided to correspond to the varying levels of the matrices 150, the computational units 200, and the computational elements 250, discussed below. At the matrix 150 level, in comparison with the prior art FPGA interconnect, the matrix interconnection network 110 is considerably more limited and less “rich”, with lesser connection capability in a given area, to reduce capacitance and increase speed of operation. Within a particular matrix 150 or computational unit 200, however, the interconnection network (210, 220 and 240) may be considerably more dense and rich, to provide greater adaptation and reconfiguration capability within a narrow or close locality of reference.
The various matrices or nodes 150 are reconfigurable and heterogeneous, namely, in general, and depending upon the desired configuration: reconfigurable matrix 150A is generally different from reconfigurable matrices 150B through 150N; reconfigurable matrix 150E is generally different from reconfigurable matrices 150A and 150C through 150N; reconfigurable matrix 150C is generally different from reconfigurable matrices 150A, 150B and 150D through 150N, and so on. The various reconfigurable matrices 150 each generally contain a different or varied mix of adaptive and reconfigurable computational (or computation) units (200); the computational units 200, in turn, generally contain a different or varied mix of fixed, application specific computational elements (250), discussed in greater detail below with reference to
Several different, insightful and novel concepts are incorporated within the ACE 100 architecture of the present invention, and provide a useful explanatory basis for the real-time operation of the ACE 100 and its inherent advantages.
The first novel concepts of the present invention concern the adaptive and reconfigurable use of application specific, dedicated or fixed hardware units (computational elements 250), and the selection of particular functions for acceleration, to be included within these application specific, dedicated or fixed hardware units (computational elements 250) within the computational units 200 (
The next and perhaps most significant concept of the present invention, and a marked departure from the concepts and precepts of the prior art, is the concept of reconfigurable “heterogeneity” utilized to implement the various selected algorithms mentioned above. As indicated in the related application, prior art reconfigurability has relied exclusively on homogeneous FPGAs, in which identical blocks of logic gates are repeated as an array within a rich, programmable interconnect, with the interconnect subsequently configured to provide connections between and among the identical gates to implement a particular function, albeit inefficiently and often with routing and combinatorial problems. In stark contrast, in accordance with the present invention, within computation units 200, different computational elements (250) are implemented directly as correspondingly different fixed (or dedicated) application specific hardware, such as dedicated multipliers, complex multipliers, and adders. Utilizing interconnect (210 and 220), these differing, heterogeneous computational elements (250) may then be adaptively configured, in advance, in real-time or perhaps at a slower rate, to perform the selected algorithm, such as the performance of discrete cosine transformations often utilized in mobile communications. As a consequence, in accordance with the presentinvention, different “heterogeneous”) computational elements (250) are configured and reconfigured, at any given time, to optimally perform a given algorithm or other function. In addition, for repetitive functions, a given instantiation or configuration of computational elements may also remain in place over time, i.e., unchanged, throughout the course of such repetitive calculations. Such temporal stability of a given configuration may be indicated in a module 70, for example, through a loop field (discussed above), or simply left in place by not providing another (competing) configuration of the same computational elements.
The temporal nature of the ACE 100 architecture should also be noted. At any given instant of time, utilizing different levels of interconnect (110, 210, 240 and 220), a particular configuration may exist within the ACE 100 which has been optimized to perform a given function or implement a particular algorithm, such as to implement pilot signal searching for a CDMA operating mode in a mobile station 30 or 32. At another instant in time, the configuration may be changed, to interconnect other computational elements (250) or connect the same computational elements 250 differently, for the performance of another function or algorithm, such as multipath reception for a CDMA operating mode. Two important features arise from this temporal reconfigurability. First, as algorithms may change over time to, for example, implement a new technology standard, the ACE 100 may co-evolve and be reconfigured to implement the new algorithm. Second, because computational elements are interconnected at one instant in time, as an instantiation of a given algorithm, and then reconfigured at another instant in time for performance of another, different algorithm, gate (or transistor) utilization is maximized, providing significantly better performance than the most efficient ASICs relative to their activity factors. This temporal reconfigurability also illustrates the memory functionality inherent in the MIN 110, as mentioned above.
This temporal reconfigurability of computational elements 250, for the performance of various different algorithms, also illustrates a conceptual distinction utilized herein between configuration and reconfiguration, on the one hand, and programming or reprogrammability, on the other hand. Typical programmability utilizes a pre-existing group or set of functions, which may be called in various orders, over time, to implement a particular algorithm. In contrast, configurability and reconfigurability, as used herein, includes the additional capability of adding or creating new functions which were previously unavailable or non-existent.
Next, the present invention also utilizes a tight coupling (or interdigitation) of data and configuration (or other control) information, within a plurality of packets or within one, effectively continuous stream of information. This coupling or commingling of data and configuration information, referred to as “silverware” or as a “silverware” module, is illustrated in
This use of silverware modules, such as module 70, as a commingling of data and configuration information, in conjunction with the reconfigurability of a plurality of heterogeneous and fixed computational elements 250 to form adaptive, different and heterogeneous computation units 200 and matrices 150, enables the ACE 100 architecture to have multiple and different modes of operation. For example, when included within a hand-held device, given a corresponding silverware module, the ACE 100 may have various and different operating modes as a cellular or other mobile telephone, a music player, a pager, a personal digital assistant, and other new or existing functionalities. In addition, these operating modes may change based upon the physical location of the device. For example, in accordance with the present invention, while configured for a first operating mode, using a first set of configuration information, as a CDMA mobile telephone for use in the United States, the ACE 100 may be reconfigured using a second set of configuration information for an operating mode as a GSM mobile telephone for use in Europe.
Referring again to
Continuing to refer to
This timing information may be embodied, for example, as the references or flags in fields 80, 81, 85, and 89 as illustrated in module 70 of
As a consequence, when an ACE 100 has not been provided with a module 70 directly, but has been provided with configuration information separately from user data, the matrix (MARC) 150B effectively creates such a module 70 for use in configuring the other matrices 150 to create the appropriate operating mode and use or operate upon the user data (incoming and outgoing).
As a consequence, the matrix (MARC) 150B may be viewed as a control unit which “calls” the configurations and reconfigurations of the matrices 150, computation units 200 and computational elements 250, in real-time, in synchronization or coordination with any corresponding data to be utilized by these various reconfigurable hardware units, and which performs any residual or other control processing. Other matrices 150 may also include this control functionality, with any given matrix 150 capable of calling and controlling a configuration and reconfiguration of other matrices 150.
Continuing to refer to
In the preferred embodiment, the various computational elements 250 are designed and grouped together, into the various adaptive and reconfigurable computation units 200 (as illustrated, for example, in
With the various types of different computational elements 250 which may be available, depending upon the desired functionality of the ACE 100, the computation units 200 may be loosely categorized. A first category of computation units 200 includes computational elements 250 performing linear operations, such as multiplication, addition, finite impulse response filtering, and so on (as illustrated below, for example, with reference to
In the preferred embodiment, in addition to control from other matrices or nodes 150, a matrix controller 230 may also be included or distributed within any given matrix 150, also to provide greater locality of reference and control of any reconfiguration processes and any corresponding data manipulations. For example, once a reconfiguration of computational elements 250 has occurred within any given computation unit 200, the matrix controller 230 may direct that that particular instantiation (or configuration) remain intact for a certain period of time to, for example, continue repetitive data processing for a given application.
Forming the conceptual data and Boolean interconnect networks 240 and 210, respectively, the exemplary computation unit 200 also includes a plurality of input multiplexers 280, a plurality of input lines (or wires) 281, and for the output of the CU core 260 (illustrated as line or wire 270), a plurality of output demultiplexers 285 and 290, and a plurality of output lines (or wires) 291. Through the input multiplexers 280, an appropriate input line 281 may be selected for input use in data transformation and in the configuration and interconnection processes, and through the output demultiplexers 285 and 290, an output or multiple outputs may be placed on a selected output line 291, also for use in additional data transformation and in the configuration and interconnection processes.
In the preferred embodiment, the selection of various input and output lines 281 and 291, and the creation of various connections through the interconnect (210, 220 and 240), is under control of control bits 265 from a computational unit controller 255, as discussed below. Based upon these control bits 265, any of the various input enables 251, input selects 252, output selects 253, MUX selects 254, DEMUX enables 256, DEMUX selects 257, and DEMUX output selects 258, may be activated or deactivated.
The exemplary computation unit 200 includes the computational unit controller 255 which provides control, through control bits 265, over what each computational element 250, interconnect (210, 220 and 240), and other elements (above) does with every clock cycle. Not separately illustrated, through the interconnect (210, 220 and 240), the various control bits 265 are distributed, as may be needed, to the various portions of the computation unit 200, such as the various input enables 251, input selects 252, output selects 253, MUX selects 254, DEMUX enables 256, DEMUX selects 257, and DEMUX output selects 258. The CU controller 295 also includes one or more lines 295 for reception of control (or configuration) information and transmission of status information.
As mentioned above, the interconnect may include a conceptual division into a data interconnect network 240 and a Boolean interconnect network 210, of varying bit widths, as mentioned above. In general, the (wider) data interconnection network 240 is utilized for creating configurable and reconfigurable connections, for corresponding routing of data and configuration information. The (narrower) Boolean interconnect network 210, while also utilized for creating configurable and reconfigurable connections, is utilized for control of logic (or Boolean) decisions of data flow graphs (DFGs), generating decision nodes in such DFGs, and may also be used for data routing within such DFGs.
As may be apparent from the discussion above, this use of a plurality of fixed, heterogeneous computational elements (250), which may be configured and reconfigured to form heterogeneous computation units (200), which further may be configured and reconfigured to form heterogeneous matrices 150, through the varying levels of interconnect (110, 210, 240 and 220), creates an entirely new class or category of integrated circuit, which may be referred to interchangeably as an adaptive computing architecture or adaptive computing engine. It should be noted that the adaptive computing architecture of the present invention cannot be adequately characterized, from a conceptual or from a nomenclature point of view, within the rubric or categories of FPGAs, ASICs or processors. For example, the non-FPGA character of the adaptive computing architecture is immediately apparent because the adaptive computing architecture does not comprise either an array of identical logical units, or more simply, a repeating array of any kind. Also for example, the non-ASIC character of the adaptive computing architecture is immediately apparent because the adaptive computing architecture is not application specific, but provides multiple modes of functionality and is reconfigurable, preferably in real-time. Continuing with the example, the non-processor character of the adaptive computing architecture is immediately apparent because the adaptive computing architecture becomes configured, to directly operate upon data, rather than focusing upon executing instructions with data manipulation occurring as a byproduct.
Referring again to
Such configuration and reconfiguration may occur in a wide variety of ways. For example, an entire ACE 100 may be configured in advance of any particular use, such as pre-configured as a mobile communication device. In other embodiments, an ACE 100 may be configured to have an operating system, to power on (boot), and obtain and load other configurations for particular operating modes and functions, such as through a network 40. An ACE 100 may also be partially configured, with some matrices 150 configured and operating, while other matrices 150 are being configured for other functions.
Such an operating system in the ACE 100 may provide for a variety of automatic functions. For example, such an OS may provide for auto-routing, inserting routing fields and routing information, with configuration information, into data streams, to internally create a silverware module. Operating systems may also provide means to self-configure or self-modify, for example, using neural network and other self-learning technologies. Other operating system functions include authorization, security, hardware capability determinations, and other functions, as discussed below.
As mentioned above, such configuration information may be interleaved with data to form silverware (or a silverware module), such as executable module 70. In addition, such configuration information may also be separate from any data (effectively distributing a module 70 across time). For example, a first set of configuration information may be provided to an ACE 100 for a first operating mode, such as for mobile communications. Data may be subsequently provided separately, such as voice data, during any given communication session. The various controller 120 functions of the ACE 100 then interleave the appropriate subsets of configuration information with corresponding data, routing, configuration references, loop instructions, and power control, to provide silverware modules to the matrices 150. As mentioned above, such controller functions may be distributed within the various matrices 150, or may be embedded within the configuration information itself.
Referring to
In addition, a need or request for such configuration information may also arise from a plurality of sources, including a system user, an element of infrastructure, an ACE 100, another device including an ACE 100, or an independent device. For example, a system user may request a download of new configuration information to upgrade a device to a new standard, or may purchase a memory module (such as flash 10 or silverware storage medium 15) containing new configuration information or one or more complete modules 70 for playing additional, copyrighted MP3 music. Infrastructure elements may also initiate downloads of new configurations, either transmitted to an individual ACE 100 device (a single user, with a one-to-one (1:1) correspondence of provider and receiver) or broadcast to many ACE 100 devices (multiple users, with a one-to-many (1:many) correspondence of provider and receivers), to provide system upgrades, to adapt to new standards, or to provide other, real-time performance enhancements.
Another novel element of the present invention concerns a configuration or reconfiguration request generated by an ACE 100 itself (or another device including an ACE 100) providing, among other things, mechanisms for self-modification and self-configuration. For example, an ACE 100 (in a mobile station 30 or 32) typically having a first, CDMA configuration for use in the United States may be powered on in Europe; in the absence of standard CDMA signaling, the ACE 100 may request a wireless download of a second set of configuration information applicable to its current location, enabling the ACE 100 to have a GSM configuration for use in Europe.
As indicated above, configuration information is generally plural, consisting of a plurality of subsets of configuration information, such as first configuration information, second configuration information, through nth configuration information. One “set” of configuration information may be considered to correspond to a particular operating mode of the ACE 100. For example, a first set of configuration information may provide a CDMA operating mode, while a second set of configuration information may provide a GSM operating mode.
Also as indicated above, for a given or selected higher-level operating mode of an ACE 100 (or, equivalently, for a given or selected set of configuration information), the various fixed, heterogeneous computational elements 250 are correspondingly configured and reconfigured for various lower-level or lower-order functional modes in response to the subsets of the configuration information, such as configuration for discrete cosine transformation in response to first configuration information and reconfiguration for fast Fourier transformation in response to second configuration information.
The configuration information may also have different forms. In one embodiment, configuration information may include one or more discrete packets of binary information, which may be stored in memory 140, distributively stored within the matrices 150, or directly stored as a configuration of MIN 110. Configuration information may also be embodied in a continuous form, such as a continuous stream of binary or other information. As directed, configuration and other control bits from the configuration information are interdigitated with data to form silverware modules, for use in real-time within an ACE 100. In another embodiment, configuration information may be provided in real-time with corresponding data, in the form of a continuous stream (continuous for the duration of the selected function). For example, configuration information for a MP3 player may be provided in real-time in a silverware stream with the data bit file for the music to be played.
Two additional features are utilized to provide this capability for an ACE 100 to be safely and effectively configured and/or reconfigured in response to configuration information. First, a concept of “unit hardware”, a parameter for or measurement of ACE 100 resources or capability, is utilized to gauge the capacity for a given ACE 100 to take on a new configuration and perform the new functionality, either in light of maintaining current configurations and functions and providing performance at sufficient or adequate levels, or in light of replacing current configurations and functions altogether. For example, a first generation ACE 100 may have sufficient resources, measured as unit hardware, to configure as a CDMA mobile station and simultaneously as a personal digital assistant. An attempt to load a new configuration, for example, for an MP3 player, may be inadvisable due to insufficient system resources, such that the new configuration would cause CDMA performance to degrade below acceptable levels. Conversely, a first generation ACE 100 initially configured as a PDA may have sufficient remaining resources to load the new configuration, as greater performance degradation may be allowable for these applications. Continuing with the example, a second or third generation ACE 100 may have sufficient computational element, interconnect and other ACE 100 resources to support not only its currently existing configurations, but also such new configurations (with corresponding additional functionality), such as maintaining existing CDMA configurations while simultaneously having sufficient resources for additional GSM and MP3 configurations.
Related to this concept of unit hardware to measure reconfiguration capacity is the concept of multiple versions or libraries of configuration information or one or more complete modules 70 for the addition of new functionalities. Such multiple versions or libraries of configuration information or modules 70 are tailored to correspond to potentially differing capabilities of ACE 100 devices, particularly for application to the then current ACE architectures compared to legacy architectures. Such forward “binary compatibility” will allow a module 70, designed for a current ACE 100, to operate on any newer, future ACE. For example, a suite of different sets of configuration information may be developed to provide a particular operating mode, with differences pertaining to matters such as performance quality and the number and types of features. Each of the various sets or versions of the configuration information are generated to have system requirements corresponding to the available and varying levels of ACE 100 reconfiguration capacity. Such libraries of configuration information, having requirements levels corresponding to levels of “unit hardware”, may be generated in advance of a requested download or other provision, or may be generated as needed, on a real-time basis, tailored to the particular configuration capacity of the receiving ACE 100. For example, corresponding, tailored configuration information downloads may be determined in real-time, based upon a negotiation or interactivity between the ACE 100 and the configuration provider, generating and providing configuration information suitable for a negotiated or predetermined level of performance for a given operating mode.
Also for example, configuration information for a particular operating mode may be available only with one version having predetermined system requirements. In that event, if the particular ACE 100 does not have the corresponding capacity to meet those requirements, the ACE 100 itself may reject or decline such a potential download. As a consequence, prior to a configuration (and/or reconfiguration) of a particular ACE architecture for a particular operating mode, the capabilities of that ACE 100 are determined, to avoid a download or reception of a configuration which potentially may alter or harm pre-existing operating modes or other functionalities of the device, or to provide a more suitable download tailored for the capabilities of the particular ACE 100.
The nature of the malleable ACE 100 architecture, with different physical connections created or removed in response to configuration information, renders security for configuration and reconfiguration of paramount importance. Given that such configurations are capable of altering the operating mode of the ACE architecture, in the preferred method, system and apparatus embodiments, authorization and security measures are implemented to avoid potentially destructive or harmful configurations, such as due to viruses or other unwanted, rogue configuration information. In the preferred module 70 embodiment, such security information is included within the header field 71.
Several levels of security may be implemented to control the configurability and reconfigurability of an ACE 100. A first level of security is implemented at a level of authorization to request or receive configuration information. For example, an ACE 100 may have a unique identifier or digital signature transmitted to a server 54 during a “handshake” or other initial exchange of information (such as unit hardware information) prior to a download of configuration information. The server 54 may access a database of authorized recipients, and if the particular ACE 100 is included, the server 54 will authorize the download. Such authorization measures are important for the protection of intellectual property, such as copyrighted material, and other information which may be confidential or otherwise restricted. Another level of security may be implemented to protect against the possible download of rogue, virus or corrupted configuration information, utilizing various encryption and decryption technologies, for example.
Various forms of monitoring, tracking and other record keeping are also utilized for determining and accounting for the various configuration and content usage possibilities, and may involve numerous different network entities. For example, a particular download of a module 70 or other configuration information may be generated from more than one network entity, with one transaction for a particular download of a module 70 or other configuration information also distributed across more than one network entity. Continuing with the example, a request for a download of a module 70 (or other configuration information or silverware) may be received at a base station 25 of a wireless service provider “A”. To fulfill the request, the wireless service provider “A” determines the authorization status of the requesting ACE 100 and when authorized, forwards the request to another provider, such as content provider “B”, which provides requested data, such as a music bit file, using a content server 54. Also in response to the request from provider “A”, a set of MP3 configuration information is simultaneously provided by configuration provider “C”, using a second, different server 54 under its control, such as a configuration information server. The content (data) and configuration information are provided to silverware module provider “D”, who in turn interleaves the data and configuration to form a silverware module 70, using a first adjunct network entity 50 having a silverware module application node 51. Next, an encryption provider “E” encrypts the silverware module, using a second adjunct network entity 50 having an encryption application node 51, providing the encrypted silverware module to the service provider “A” for transmission to the requesting ACE 100. Corresponding accounting and other records may be generated for each such distributed transaction, with corresponding distributions of royalties, use and license fees. Content usage may also be tracked by, for example, a content server.
The generation and provision of configuration information may also be distributed across time, in addition to distributed across space, with the various functions referred to above performed during different intervals of time. For example, one or more versions or sets of configuration information may be generated and stored during a first predetermined period of time, such as in advance of any particular use. Subsequently, such a set of configuration information may be provided during a second predetermined period of time, such as following a security and financial authorization process.
In summary, the present invention provides a method of configuration and operation or an adaptive and reconfigurable circuit, preferably utilizing an executable module comprised of a plurality of information sequences. A first information sequence (or field) provides configuration control, which may be either configuration information or a reference (such as a flag or other designation) to corresponding configuration information cached or stored in memory. A second information sequence provides operand data for use by configured computational elements. A third information sequence provides routing control, to direct the other information sequences to their appropriate locations within the matrix environment of the ACE integrated circuitry. Also in the preferred embodiment a fourth information sequence is utilized to provide power control, to clock on or off various computational elements, and a fifth information sequence may be utilized for loop or iteration control.
Also in summary, one of the preferred system embodiments provides, first, means for routing configuration information to a plurality of computational elements; second, means for configuring and reconfiguring a plurality of computational elements to form a plurality of configured computational elements for the performance of a plurality of selected functions; third, means for providing operand data to the plurality of configured computational elements; and fourth, means for controlling configuration timing to precede a receipt of corresponding operand data.
Another preferred system embodiment provides, first, means for spatially configuring and reconfiguring a plurality of computational elements to form a first plurality of configured computational elements for the performance of a first plurality of selected functions; second, means for temporally configuring and reconfiguring the plurality of computational elements to form a second plurality of configured computational elements for the performance of a second plurality of selected functions; third, means for providing data to the first and second pluralities of configured computational elements; and fourth, means for coordinating the spatial and temporal configurations of the plurality of computational elements with the provision of the data to the first and second pluralities of configured computational elements.
Also in summary, one of the system embodiments provides for configuring and operating an adaptive circuit. The system comprises a first mutable and executable information module, the module having first configuration information and second configuration information, the module further having first operand data and second operand data, the module further having a first routing sequence for routing; a plurality of heterogeneous computational elements, the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements designated by the first routing sequence of the first executable information module, a first computational element of the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements having a first fixed architecture and a second computational element of the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements having a second fixed architecture, the first fixed architecture being different than the second fixed architecture; and an interconnection network coupled to the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements, the interconnection network capable of selectively providing the module to the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements, the interconnection network further capable of configuring and providing the first operand data to the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements for a first functional mode of a plurality of functional modes in response to the first configuration information, and the interconnection network further capable of reconfiguring and providing the second operand data to the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements for a second functional mode of the plurality of functional modes in response to the second configuration information, the first functional mode being different than the second functional mode.
The first mutable and executable information module may provide a first system operating mode. A second routable and executable information module may provide a second system operating mode, and further having the first routing sequence for routing to the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements. The plurality of heterogeneous computational elements may be configured to generate a request for a second routable and executable information module, the second routable and executable information module providing a second system operating mode.
The system may further include a memory coupled to the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements and to the interconnection network, the memory capable of storing the first configuration information and the second configuration information. In addition, the first configuration information and the second configuration information may be stored in a second plurality of heterogeneous computational elements configured for a memory functional mode, stored as a configuration of the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements, stored in a machine-readable medium, transmitted through an air interface, or transmitted through a wireline interface. The first routable and executable information module may be embodied as a plurality of discrete information data packets, or embodied as a stream of information data bits.
The first fixed architecture and the second fixed architecture may be selected from a plurality of specific architectures, with the plurality of specific architectures comprising at least two of the following corresponding functions: memory, addition, multiplication, complex multiplication, subtraction, configuration, reconfiguration, routing, control, input, output, and field programmability. The plurality of functional modes may comprise at least two of the following functional modes: linear algorithmic operations, non-linear algorithmic operations, finite state machine operations, controller operations, memory operations, and bit-level manipulations.
The system may also include a controller coupled to the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements and to the interconnection network, with the controller capable of coordinating the configuration of the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements for the first functional mode with the first operand data and further coordinating the reconfiguration of the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements for the second functional mode with the second operand data. The system may also include a second plurality of heterogeneous computational elements coupled to the interconnection network, with the second plurality of heterogeneous computational elements configured for a controller operating mode, the second plurality of heterogeneous computational elements capable of coordinating the configuration of the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements for the first functional mode with the first operand data and further coordinating the reconfiguration of the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements for the second functional mode with the second operand data.
The system may be embodied within a mobile station having a plurality of operating modes, such as a mobile telecommunication mode, a personal digital assistance mode, a multimedia reception mode, a mobile packet-based communication mode, and a paging mode. The system may be embodied within a server having a plurality of operating modes, within an adjunct network entity having a plurality of operating modes, Or within an integrated circuit. In various embodiments, the first routing sequence may be coupled to the first configuration information to provide routing of the first configuration information within the interconnection network, and the first routable and executable information module further may further comprise a second routing sequence coupled to the second configuration information to provide selective routing of the second configuration information within the interconnection network to the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements, the second routing sequence being identical to the first routing sequence. The first executable information module may also include a power control sequence to direct the interconnection network to not provide a clock signal to a selected heterogeneous computational element of the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements, and/or an iteration control sequence to direct a temporal continuation of a selected configuration of the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements. The first configuration information may be a reference to a previously stored configuration sequence.
In addition, a first portion of the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements may be operating in the first functional mode while a second portion of the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements are being configured for the second functional mode.
Also in summary, the present invention provides a routable and executable information module for operating an adaptive system, the adaptive system including a plurality of computational elements having a corresponding plurality of fixed and differing architectures, with the adaptive system further including an interconnect network responsive to configure the plurality of computational elements for a plurality of operating modes. The module comprises a plurality of information sequences; wherein a first information sequence of the plurality of information sequences provides a first configuration sequence to direct a first configuration of the plurality of computational elements; wherein a second information sequence of the plurality of information sequences provides first operand data to the first configuration of the plurality of computational elements; and wherein a third information sequence of the plurality of information sequences provides routing information for selective routing of the first information sequence and the second information sequence to the plurality of computational elements.
The first information sequence may be a configuration specification, may be a reference to a stored configuration specification. The first information sequence, the second information sequence and the third information sequence may have a discrete packet form, or a continuous stream form.
A fourth information sequence of the plurality of information sequences may provide power control for a selected computational element. A fifth information sequence of the plurality of information sequences may provide instantiation duration control for a configuration of computational elements. A sixth information sequence of the plurality of information sequences may provide security control for a configuration of computational elements.
The various embodiments include a method for adaptive configuration and operation, comprising: receiving a first routable and executable information module, the module having a first routing sequence, first configuration information and second configuration information, the module further having first operand data and second operand data; using the first routing sequence, selectively routing the first configuration information and the first operand data to a plurality of heterogeneous computational elements; in response to the first configuration information, configuring and providing the first operand data to the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements for a first functional mode of a plurality of functional modes, a first computational element of the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements having a first fixed architecture and a second computational element of the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements having a second fixed architecture, the first fixed architecture being different than the second fixed architecture; and in response to the second configuration information, reconfiguring and providing the second operand data to the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements for a second functional mode of the plurality of functional modes, the first functional mode being different than the second functional mode.
The first mutable and executable information module may provide a first operating mode. The method may also include receiving a second routable and executable information module, the second executable information module providing a second operating mode; and selectively routing the second routable and executable information module to the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements. The method may also include using a second routing sequence, selectively routing the second configuration information and the second operand data to the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements, the second routing sequence identical to the first routing sequence.
The method may also include coordinating the configuration of the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements for the first functional mode with the first operand data and coordinating the reconfiguration of the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements for the second functional mode with the second operand data.
The various embodiments include a method for adaptive configuration, comprising: transmitting a first mutable and executable information module, the module having a first routing sequence, first configuration information and second configuration information, the module further having first operand data and second operand data; using the first routing sequence, selectively routing the first configuration information and the first operand data to a plurality of heterogeneous computational elements; wherein when a first executable information module is received, configuring and providing the first operand data to the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements for a first functional mode of a plurality of functional modes in response to the first configuration information, and reconfiguring and providing the second operand data to the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements for a second functional mode of the plurality of functional modes in response to the second configuration information, the first functional mode being different than the second functional mode; and wherein a first computational element of the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements has a first fixed architecture and a second computational element of the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements has a second fixed architecture, the first fixed architecture being different than the second fixed architecture.
The method may be operable within a local area network, within a wide area network, or within a wireline transmitter, for example.
The various embodiments include an adaptive integrated circuit, comprising: routable configuration information and operand data; a plurality of fixed and differing computational elements; and an interconnection network coupled to the plurality of fixed and differing computational elements, the interconnection network adapted to use a routing sequence to selectively route the configuration information and operand data to the plurality of fixed and differing computational elements, the interconnection network further adapted to configure the plurality of fixed and differing computational elements for a plurality of functional modes in response to the configuration information. The plurality of fixed and differing computational elements may be configured to identify and select the configuration information from a singular bit stream containing the operand data commingled with the configuration information. The routing sequence may be coupled to the configuration information to provide the selective routing of the configuration information.
The various embodiments include an adaptive integrated circuit, comprising: a plurality of executable information modules, a first executable information module of the plurality of executable information modules and a second executable information module of the plurality of executable information modules each having corresponding operand data and corresponding routing sequences; a plurality of reconfigurable matrices, the plurality of reconfigurable matrices including a plurality of heterogeneous computation units, each heterogeneous computation unit of the plurality of heterogeneous computation units formed from a selected configuration, of a plurality of configurations, of a plurality of fixed computational elements, the plurality of fixed computational elements including a first computational element having a first architecture and a second computational element having a second architecture, the first architecture distinct from the second architecture, the plurality of heterogeneous computation units coupled to an interconnect network and reconfigurable in response to the plurality of executable information modules; and a matrix interconnection network coupled to the plurality of reconfigurable matrices, the matrix interconnection network capable of using the corresponding routing sequences to selectively route the plurality of executable information modules among the plurality of reconfigurable matrices, the matrix interconnection network further capable of configuring the plurality of reconfigurable matrices in response to the first executable information module for a first operating mode and providing corresponding operand data to the plurality of reconfigurable matrices for the first operating mode, and capable of reconfiguring the plurality of reconfigurable matrices in response to the second executable information module for a second operating mode and providing corresponding operand data to the plurality of reconfigurable matrices for the second operating mode. A controller may be coupled to the plurality of reconfigurable matrices, the controller capable of providing the plurality of executable information modules to the reconfigurable matrices and to the matrix interconnection network.
The various embodiments include an adaptive integrated circuit, comprising: a first executable information module, the module having first configuration information and second configuration information, the module further having first operand data and second operand data; a plurality of heterogeneous computational elements, a first computational element of the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements having a first fixed architecture and a second computational element of the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements having a second fixed architecture, the first fixed architecture being different than the second fixed architecture; an interconnection network coupled to the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements, the interconnection network capable of configuring the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements for a first functional mode of a plurality of functional modes in response to the first configuration information, and capable of providing the first operand data to the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements for the first operating mode, and the interconnection network further capable of reconfiguring the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements for a second functional mode of the plurality of functional modes in response to the second configuration information, the first functional mode being different than the second functional mode, and capable of providing the second operand data to the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements for the second operating mode; wherein a first subset of the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements is configured for a controller operating mode, the controller operating mode comprising at least two of the following corresponding functions: directing configuration and reconfiguration of the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements, selecting the first configuration information and the second configuration information from the first executable information module, and coordinating the configuration and reconfiguration of the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements with respective first operand data and second operand data; and wherein a second subset of the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements is configured for a memory operating mode for storing the first configuration information and the second configuration information.
The various embodiments include an adaptive integrated circuit, comprising: a first executable information module, the module having first configuration information and second configuration information, the module further having first operand data and second operand data, the module further having a first routing sequence for routing; a plurality of heterogeneous computational elements, the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements designated by the first routing sequence of the first executable information module, a first computational element of the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements having a first fixed architecture of a plurality of fixed architectures and a second computational element of the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements having a second fixed architecture of the plurality of fixed architectures, the first fixed architecture being different than the second fixed architecture, and the plurality of fixed architectures comprising at least two of the following corresponding functions: memory, addition, multiplication, complex multiplication, subtraction, configuration, reconfiguration, control, input, output, and field programmability; and an interconnection network coupled to the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements, the interconnection network capable of selectively providing the module to the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements, the interconnection network capable of configuring the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements for a first functional mode of a plurality of functional modes in response to the first configuration information, the interconnection network further capable of reconfiguring the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements for a second functional mode of the plurality of functional modes in response to the second configuration information, the first functional mode being different than the second functional mode, and the plurality of functional modes comprising at least two of the following functional modes: linear algorithmic operations, non-linear algorithmic operations, finite state machine operations, memory operations, and bit-level manipulations, and the interconnection network further capable of respectively providing first operand data and second operand data to the plurality of heterogeneous computational elements for the first functional mode and for the second functional mode.
The various embodiments include an adaptive integrated circuit, comprising: a routable and executable information module, the module having a first routing sequence, first configuration information and second configuration information, the module further having operand data; a plurality of fixed and differing computational elements; and an interconnection network coupled to the plurality of fixed and differing computational elements, the interconnection network capable of using the first routing sequence to selectively provide the module to the plurality of fixed and differing computational elements, the interconnection network further capable of responding to the first configuration information to configure the plurality of fixed and differing computational elements to have an operating system, the operating system further capable of controlling, routing and timing configuration of the plurality of fixed and differing computational elements for a plurality of functional modes in response to the second configuration information, the plurality of functional modes capable of utilizing the operand data.
Numerous advantages of the various embodiments of the present invention are readily apparent. The present invention provides an apparatus, method and system for configuration and operation of adaptive integrated circuitry, to provide one or more operating modes or other functionality of ACE circuitry and other devices incorporating ACE technology. The apparatus, method and systems of the invention combine silverware modules or other configuration information with an ACE circuit (or ACE IC), for the provision of a selected operating mode. In addition, the various embodiments of the present invention provide coordination of configuration with data reception and provide independent control of power usage for different portions of the IC.
Yet additional advantages of the present invention may be further apparent to those of skill in the art. The ACE 100 architecture of the present invention effectively and efficiently combines and maximizes the various advantages of processors, ASICs and FPGAs, while minimizing potential disadvantages. The ACE 100 includes the concepts or ideals of the programming flexibility of a processor, the post-fabrication flexibility of FPGAs, and the high speed and high utilization factors of an ASIC, with additional features of low power consumption and low cost. The ACE 100 is readily reconfigurable, in real-time, and is capable of having corresponding, multiple modes of operation. In addition, through the selection of particular functions for reconfigurable acceleration, the ACE 100 minimizes power consumption and is suitable for low power applications, such as for use in hand-held and other battery-powered devices.
From the foregoing, it will be observed that numerous variations and modifications may be effected without departing from the spirit and scope of the novel concept of the invention. It is to be understood that no limitation with respect to the specific methods and apparatus illustrated herein is intended or should be inferred. It is, of course, intended to cover by the appended claims all such modifications as fall within the scope of the claims.
This application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/589,583, filed Aug. 20, 2012, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/962,979, filed Dec. 21, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,250,339, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/241,009, filed Sep. 30, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,320,062, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/997,987, filed Nov. 30, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,986,021, all of which are incorporated by reference herein, commonly assigned herewith, and with priority claimed for all commonly disclosed subject matter (the “parent applications”). This application is related to Paul L. Master et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,836,839 B2, issued Dec. 28, 2004, entitled “Adaptive Integrated Circuitry With Heterogeneous And Reconfigurable Matrices Of Diverse And Adaptive Computational Units Having Fixed, Application Specific Computational Elements”, filed Mar. 22, 2001, incorporated by reference herein, commonly assigned herewith, and with priority claimed for all commonly disclosed subject matter (the “first related application”). This application is related to Paul L. Master et al., U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/997,530, entitled “Apparatus, System And Method For Configuration Of Adaptive Integrated Circuitry Having Fixed, Application Specific Computational Elements”, filed Nov. 30, 2001, incorporated by reference herein, commonly assigned herewith, and with priority claimed for all commonly disclosed subject matter (the “second related application”).
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3409175 | Byrne | Nov 1968 | A |
3666143 | Weston | May 1972 | A |
3938639 | Birrell | Feb 1976 | A |
3949903 | Benasutti et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
3960298 | Birrell | Jun 1976 | A |
3967062 | Dobias | Jun 1976 | A |
3991911 | Shannon et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
3995441 | McMillin | Dec 1976 | A |
4076145 | Zygiel | Feb 1978 | A |
4143793 | McMillin et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4172669 | Edelbach | Oct 1979 | A |
4174872 | Fessler | Nov 1979 | A |
4181242 | Zygiel et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
RE30301 | Zygiel | Jun 1980 | E |
4218014 | Tracy | Aug 1980 | A |
4222972 | Caldwell | Sep 1980 | A |
4237536 | Enclow et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4252253 | Shannon | Feb 1981 | A |
4302775 | Widergren et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4333587 | Fessler et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4354613 | Desai et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4377246 | McMillin et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4380046 | Fung et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4393468 | New | Jul 1983 | A |
4413752 | McMillin et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4458584 | Annese et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4466342 | Basilc et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4475448 | Shoaf et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4509690 | Austin et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4520950 | Jeans | Jun 1985 | A |
4549675 | Austin | Oct 1985 | A |
4553573 | McGarrah | Nov 1985 | A |
4560089 | McMillin et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4577782 | Fessler | Mar 1986 | A |
4578799 | Scholl et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
RE32179 | Sedam et al. | Jun 1986 | E |
4633386 | Terepin et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4658988 | Hassell | Apr 1987 | A |
4694416 | Wheeler et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4711374 | Gaunt et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4713755 | Worley, Jr. et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4719056 | Scott | Jan 1988 | A |
4726494 | Scott | Feb 1988 | A |
4747516 | Baker | May 1988 | A |
4748585 | Chiarulli et al. | May 1988 | A |
4758985 | Carter | Jul 1988 | A |
4760525 | Webb | Jul 1988 | A |
4760544 | Lamb | Jul 1988 | A |
4765513 | McMillin et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4766548 | Cedrone et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4781309 | Vogel | Nov 1988 | A |
4800492 | Johnson et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4811214 | Nosenchuck et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4824075 | Holzboog | Apr 1989 | A |
4827426 | Patton et al. | May 1989 | A |
4850269 | Hancock et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4856684 | Gerstung | Aug 1989 | A |
4870302 | Freeman | Sep 1989 | A |
4901887 | Burton | Feb 1990 | A |
4905231 | Leung et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4921315 | Metcalfe et al. | May 1990 | A |
4930666 | Rudick | Jun 1990 | A |
4932564 | Austin et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4936488 | Austin | Jun 1990 | A |
4937019 | Scott | Jun 1990 | A |
4960261 | Scott et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4961533 | Teller et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4967340 | Dawes | Oct 1990 | A |
4974643 | Bennett et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4982876 | Scott | Jan 1991 | A |
4993604 | Gaunt et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5007560 | Sassak | Apr 1991 | A |
5021947 | Campbell et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5040106 | Maag | Aug 1991 | A |
5044171 | Farkas | Sep 1991 | A |
5090015 | Dabbish et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5099418 | Pian et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5129549 | Austin | Jul 1992 | A |
5139708 | Scott | Aug 1992 | A |
5144166 | Camarota et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5156301 | Hassell et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5156871 | Goulet et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5165023 | Gifford | Nov 1992 | A |
5165575 | Scott | Nov 1992 | A |
5190083 | Gupta et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5190189 | Zimmer et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5193151 | Jain | Mar 1993 | A |
5193718 | Hassell et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5202993 | Tarsy et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5203474 | Haynes | Apr 1993 | A |
5218240 | Camarota et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5240144 | Feldman | Aug 1993 | A |
5245227 | Furtek et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5261099 | Bigo et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5263509 | Cherry et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5269442 | Vogel | Dec 1993 | A |
5280711 | Motta et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5297400 | Benton et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5301100 | Wagner | Apr 1994 | A |
5303846 | Shannon | Apr 1994 | A |
5335276 | Thompson et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5336950 | Popli et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5339428 | Burmeister et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5343716 | Swanson et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5361362 | Benkeser et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5368198 | Goulet | Nov 1994 | A |
5379343 | Grube et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5381546 | Servi et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5381550 | Jourdenais et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5388062 | Knutson | Feb 1995 | A |
5388212 | Grube et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5392960 | Kendt et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5437395 | Bull et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5450557 | Kopp et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5454406 | Rejret et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5465368 | Davidson et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5475856 | Kogge | Dec 1995 | A |
5479055 | Eccles | Dec 1995 | A |
5490165 | Blakeney, II et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5491823 | Ruttenberg | Feb 1996 | A |
5507009 | Grube et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5515519 | Yoshioka et al. | May 1996 | A |
5517600 | Shimokawa | May 1996 | A |
5519694 | Brewer et al. | May 1996 | A |
5522070 | Sumimoto | May 1996 | A |
5530964 | Alpert et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5534796 | Edwards | Jul 1996 | A |
5542265 | Rutland | Aug 1996 | A |
5553755 | Bonewald et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5555417 | Odnert et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5560028 | Sachs et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5560038 | Haddock | Sep 1996 | A |
5570587 | Kim | Nov 1996 | A |
5572572 | Kawan et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5590353 | Sakakibara et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5594657 | Cantone et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5600810 | Ohkami | Feb 1997 | A |
5600844 | Shaw et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5602833 | Zehavi | Feb 1997 | A |
5603043 | Taylor et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5607083 | Vogel et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5608643 | Wichter et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5611867 | Cooper et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5623545 | Childs et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5625669 | McGregor et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5626407 | Westcott | May 1997 | A |
5630206 | Urban et al. | May 1997 | A |
5635940 | Hickman et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5646544 | Iadanza | Jul 1997 | A |
5646545 | Trimberger et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5647512 | Assis Mascarenhas deOliveira et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5667110 | McCann et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5684793 | Kiema et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5684980 | Casselman | Nov 1997 | A |
5687236 | Moskowitz et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5694613 | Suzuki | Dec 1997 | A |
5694794 | Jerg et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5699328 | Ishizaki et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5701398 | Glier et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5701482 | Harrison et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5704053 | Santhanam | Dec 1997 | A |
5706191 | Bassett et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5706976 | Purkey | Jan 1998 | A |
5712996 | Schepers | Jan 1998 | A |
5720002 | Wang | Feb 1998 | A |
5721693 | Song | Feb 1998 | A |
5721854 | Ebcioglu et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5729754 | Estes | Mar 1998 | A |
5732563 | Bethuy et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5734808 | Takeda | Mar 1998 | A |
5737631 | Trimberger | Apr 1998 | A |
5742180 | DeHon et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742821 | Prasanna | Apr 1998 | A |
5745366 | Highma et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
RE35780 | Hassell et al. | May 1998 | E |
5751295 | Becklund et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754227 | Fukuoka | May 1998 | A |
5758261 | Wiedeman | May 1998 | A |
5768561 | Wise | Jun 1998 | A |
5778439 | Trimberger et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784636 | Rupp | Jul 1998 | A |
5787237 | Reilly | Jul 1998 | A |
5790817 | Asghar et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5791517 | Avital | Aug 1998 | A |
5791523 | Oh | Aug 1998 | A |
5794062 | Baxter | Aug 1998 | A |
5794067 | Kadowaki | Aug 1998 | A |
5802055 | Krein et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818603 | Motoyama | Oct 1998 | A |
5822308 | Weigand et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822313 | Malek et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822360 | Lee et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828858 | Athanas et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5829085 | Jerg et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5835753 | Witt | Nov 1998 | A |
5838165 | Chatter | Nov 1998 | A |
5845815 | Vogel | Dec 1998 | A |
5860021 | Klingman | Jan 1999 | A |
5862961 | Motta et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5870427 | Teidemann, Jr. et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873045 | Lee et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5881106 | Cartier | Mar 1999 | A |
5884284 | Peters et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5886537 | Macias et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5887174 | Simons et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889816 | Agrawal et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5890014 | Long | Mar 1999 | A |
5892900 | Ginter et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5892961 | Trimberger | Apr 1999 | A |
5892962 | Cloutier | Apr 1999 | A |
5894473 | Dent | Apr 1999 | A |
5901884 | Goulet et al. | May 1999 | A |
5903886 | Heimlich et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907285 | Toms et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907580 | Cummings | May 1999 | A |
5910733 | Bertolet et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5912572 | Graf, III | Jun 1999 | A |
5913172 | McCabe et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5917852 | Butterfield et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920801 | Thomas et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5931918 | Row et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5933642 | Greenbaum et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940438 | Poon et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5949415 | Lin et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5950011 | Albrecht et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5950131 | Vilmur | Sep 1999 | A |
5951674 | Moreno | Sep 1999 | A |
5953322 | Kimball | Sep 1999 | A |
5956518 | DeHon et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956967 | Kim | Sep 1999 | A |
5959811 | Richardson | Sep 1999 | A |
5959881 | Trimberger et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5963048 | Harrison et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5966534 | Cooke et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5970254 | Cooke et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5987105 | Jenkins et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987611 | Freund | Nov 1999 | A |
5991302 | Berl et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991308 | Fuhrmann et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993739 | Lyon | Nov 1999 | A |
5999734 | Willis et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005943 | Cohen et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006249 | Leong | Dec 1999 | A |
6016395 | Mohamed | Jan 2000 | A |
6021186 | Suzuki et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6021492 | May | Feb 2000 | A |
6023742 | Ebeling et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6023755 | Casselman | Feb 2000 | A |
6028610 | Deering | Feb 2000 | A |
6036166 | Olson | Mar 2000 | A |
6039219 | Bach et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041322 | Meng et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041970 | Vogel | Mar 2000 | A |
6046603 | New | Apr 2000 | A |
6047115 | Mohan et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6052600 | Fette et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055314 | Spies et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6056194 | Kolls | May 2000 | A |
6059840 | Click, Jr. | May 2000 | A |
6061580 | Altschul et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073132 | Gehman | Jun 2000 | A |
6076174 | Freund | Jun 2000 | A |
6078736 | Guccione | Jun 2000 | A |
6085740 | Ivri et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6088043 | Kelleher et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091263 | New et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091765 | Pietzold, III et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094065 | Tavana et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094726 | Gonion et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6111893 | Volftsun et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111935 | Hughes-Hartogs | Aug 2000 | A |
6115751 | Tam et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6119178 | Martin et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120551 | Law et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122670 | Bennett et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6128307 | Brown | Oct 2000 | A |
6134605 | Hudson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6138693 | Matz | Oct 2000 | A |
6141283 | Bogin et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6150838 | Wittig et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154494 | Sugahara et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157997 | Oowaki et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6173389 | Pechanek et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175854 | Bretscher | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175892 | Sazzad et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181981 | Varga et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185418 | MacLellan et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192070 | Poon et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192255 | Lewis et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192388 | Cajolet | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195788 | Leaver et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198924 | Ishii et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6199181 | Rechef et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6202130 | Scales, III et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6202189 | Hinedi et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6219697 | Lawande et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219756 | Kasamizugami | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219780 | Lipasti | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223222 | Fijolek et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226387 | Tewfik et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230307 | Davis et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6237029 | Master et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246883 | Lee | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6247125 | Noel-Baron et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249251 | Chang et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258725 | Lee et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263057 | Silverman | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266760 | DeHon et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272579 | Lentz et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6272616 | Fernando et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281703 | Furuta et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282627 | Wong et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289375 | Knight et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289434 | Roy | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289488 | Dave et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292822 | Hardwick | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292827 | Raz | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292830 | Taylor et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301653 | Mohamed et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6305014 | Roediger et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311149 | Ryan et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6321985 | Kolls | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6326806 | Fallside et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6346824 | New | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6347346 | Taylor | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6349394 | Brock et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353841 | Marshall et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356994 | Barry et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6359248 | Mardi | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6360256 | Lim | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6360259 | Bradley | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6360263 | Kurtzberg et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363411 | Dugan et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366999 | Drabenstott et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377983 | Cohen et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6378072 | Collins et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381293 | Lee et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381735 | Hunt | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385751 | Wolf | May 2002 | B1 |
6405214 | Meade, II | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408039 | Ito | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6410941 | Taylor et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411612 | Halford et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6421372 | Bierly et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421809 | Wuytack et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426649 | Fu et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430624 | Jamtgaard et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6433578 | Wasson | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434590 | Blelloch et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438737 | Morelli et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6456996 | Crawford, Jr. et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459883 | Subramanian et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6467009 | Winegarden et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6469540 | Nakaya | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6473609 | Schwartz et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6483343 | Faith et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6507947 | Schreiber et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510138 | Pannell | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510510 | Garde | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6538470 | Langhammer et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6556044 | Langhammer et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6563891 | Eriksson et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6570877 | Kloth et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6577678 | Scheuermann | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6587684 | Hsu et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6590415 | Agrawal et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6601086 | Howard et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601158 | Abbott et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6604085 | Kolls | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6604189 | Zemlyak et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6606529 | Crowder, Jr. et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6615333 | Hoogerbrugge et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6618434 | Heidari-Bateni et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6640304 | Ginter et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6647429 | Semal | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6653859 | Sihlbom et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6675265 | Barroso et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6675284 | Warren | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6691148 | Zinky et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6694380 | Wolrich et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6711617 | Bantz et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6718182 | Kung | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6721286 | Williams et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6721884 | De Oliveira Kastrup Pereira et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6732354 | Ebeling et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6735621 | Yoakum et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6738744 | Kirovski et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6748360 | Pitman et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751723 | Kundu et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6754470 | Hendrickson et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6760587 | Holtzman et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6760833 | Dowling | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6766165 | Sharma et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6778212 | Deng et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785341 | Walton et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6819140 | Yamanaka et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6823448 | Roth et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6829633 | Gelfer et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6832250 | Coons et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6836839 | Master et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6859434 | Segal et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6865664 | Budrovic et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6871236 | Fishman et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6883084 | Donohoe | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6894996 | Lee | May 2005 | B2 |
6901440 | Bimm et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6912515 | Jackson et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6941336 | Mar | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6980515 | Schunk et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6985517 | Matsumoto et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6986021 | Master et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6986142 | Ehlig et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6988139 | Jervis et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7032229 | Flores et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7044741 | Leem | May 2006 | B2 |
7082456 | Mani-Meitav et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7139910 | Ainsworth et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7142731 | Toi | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7151925 | Ting et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7249242 | Ramchandran | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7320062 | Master et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
20010003191 | Kovacs et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010023482 | Wray | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010029515 | Mirsky | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034795 | Moulton et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010039654 | Miyamoto | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010048713 | Medlock et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010048714 | Jha | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010050948 | Ramberg et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020010848 | Kamano et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013799 | Blaker | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013937 | Ostanevich et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020015435 | Rieken | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020015439 | Kohli et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020023210 | Tuomenoksa et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020024942 | Tsuneki et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020024993 | Subramanian et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020031166 | Subramanian et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020032551 | Zakiya | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020035623 | Lawande et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020041581 | Aramaki | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020042907 | Yamanaka et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020061741 | Leung et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020069282 | Reisman | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020072830 | Hunt | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078337 | Moreau et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083305 | Renard et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083423 | Ostanevich et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087829 | Snyder et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020089348 | Langhammer | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020101909 | Chen et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107905 | Roe et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107962 | Richter et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020119803 | Bitterlich et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120672 | Butt et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020133688 | Lee et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138716 | Master et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020141489 | Imaizumi | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147845 | Sanchez-Herrero et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020159503 | Ramachandran | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020162026 | Neuman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020168018 | Scheuermann | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020181559 | Heidari-Bateni et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020184275 | Dutta et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020184291 | Hogenauer | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020184498 | Qi | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020191790 | Anand et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030007606 | Suder et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030012270 | Zhou et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018446 | Makowski et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018700 | Giroti et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023830 | Hogenauer | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030026242 | Jokinen et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030030004 | Dixon et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046421 | Horvitz et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061260 | Rajkumar | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061311 | Lo | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030063656 | Rao et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074473 | Pham et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076815 | Miller et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030099223 | Chang et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030102889 | Master et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030105949 | Master et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110485 | Lu et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030142818 | Raghunathan et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030154357 | Master et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163723 | Kozuch et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030172138 | McCormack et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030172139 | Srinivasan et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030200538 | Ebeling et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030212684 | Meyer et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229864 | Watkins | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040006584 | Vandeweerd | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010645 | Scheuermann et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015970 | Scheuermann | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040025159 | Scheuermann et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040057505 | Valio | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040062300 | McDonough et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081248 | Parolari | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040093479 | Ramchandran | May 2004 | A1 |
20040168044 | Ramchandran | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050044344 | Stevens | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050166038 | Wang et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050198199 | Dowling | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060031660 | Master et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
100 18 374 | Oct 2001 | DE |
0 301 169 | Feb 1989 | EP |
0 166 586 | Jan 1991 | EP |
0 236 633 | May 1991 | EP |
0 478 624 | Apr 1992 | EP |
0 479 102 | Apr 1992 | EP |
0 661 831 | Jul 1995 | EP |
0 668 659 | Aug 1995 | EP |
0 690 588 | Jan 1996 | EP |
0 691 754 | Jan 1996 | EP |
0 768 602 | Apr 1997 | EP |
0 817 003 | Jan 1998 | EP |
0 821 495 | Jan 1998 | EP |
0 866 210 | Sep 1998 | EP |
0 923 247 | Jun 1999 | EP |
0 926 596 | Jun 1999 | EP |
1 056 217 | Nov 2000 | EP |
1 061 437 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1 061 443 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1 126 368 | Aug 2001 | EP |
1 150 506 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1 189 358 | Mar 2002 | EP |
2 067 800 | Jul 1981 | GB |
2 237 908 | May 1991 | GB |
62-249456 | Oct 1987 | JP |
63-147258 | Jun 1988 | JP |
4-51546 | Feb 1992 | JP |
7-064789 | Mar 1995 | JP |
7066718 | Mar 1995 | JP |
10233676 | Sep 1998 | JP |
10254696 | Sep 1998 | JP |
11296345 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2000315731 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2001-053703 | Feb 2001 | JP |
WO 8905029 | Jun 1989 | WO |
WO 8911443 | Nov 1989 | WO |
WO 9100238 | Jan 1991 | WO |
WO 9313603 | Jul 1993 | WO |
WO 9511855 | May 1995 | WO |
WO 9633558 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO 9832071 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9903776 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 9921094 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 9926860 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 9965818 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0019311 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0065855 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0069073 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0111281 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0122235 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0176129 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0212978 | Feb 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Abno et al., “Ultra-Low-Power Domain-Specific Multimedia Processors,” VLSI Signal Processing, IX, 1998, IEEE Workshop in San Francisco, CA, USA, Oct. 30-Nov. 1, 1998, pp. 461-470 (Oct. 30, 1998). |
Aggarwal et al.., “Efficient Huffman Decoding,” International Conference on Image Processing IEEE 1:936-939 (Sep. 10-13, 2000). |
Allan et al., “Software Pipelining,” ACM Computing Surveys, 27(3):1-78 (Sep. 1995). |
Alsolaim et al., “Architecture and Application of a Dynamically Reconfigurable Hardware Array for Future Mobile Communication Systems,” Field Programmable Custom Computing Machines, 2000 IEEE Symposium, Napa Valley, Los Alamitos, CA. IEEE Comput. Soc. pp. 205-214 (Apr. 17-19, 2000). |
Bacon et al., “Compiler Transformations for High-Performance Computing,” ACM Computing Surveys 26(4):368-373 (Dec. 1994). |
Balasubramonian et al., “Reducing the Complexity of the Register File in Dynamic Superscalar Processors,” Proceedings of the 34th Annual ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Microarchitecture, pp. 237-248 (Dec. 1, 2001). |
Banerjee et al., “A MATLAB Compiler for Distributed, Heterogeneous, Reconfigurable Computing Systems,” 2000 IEEE Symposium, pp. 39-48, (Apr. 17-19, 2000). |
Bapte et at, “Uniform Execution Environment for Dynamic Reconfiguration,” Darpa Adaptive Computing Systems, http:/ /isis.vanderbilt.edu/publications/archive/babty—T—#—0—1999—Uniform—Ex.pdf, pp. 1-7 (1999). |
Becker et al., “An Application-Tailored Dynamically Reconfigurable Hardware Architecture for Digital Baseband Processing,” IEEE Conference Proceedings Article pp. 341-346 (Sep. 18, 2000). |
Becker et al., “Design and Implementation of a Coarse-Grained Dynamically Reconfigurable Hardware Architecture,” VLSI 2001, Proceedings IEEE Computer Soc. Workshop, Piscataway, NJ, USA, pp. 41-46 (Apr. 19-20, 2001). |
Bishop & Loucks, “A HeterogeneoEnvironment for Hardware/Software Cosimulation,” Proceedings of the 30th Annual Simulation Symposium, pp. 14-22 (Apr. 7-9, 1997). |
Brown et al., “Quick PDA Data Exchange,” PC Magazine pp. 1-3 (May 22, 2001). |
Buck et al., “Ptolemy: A Framework for Simulating and Prototyping HeterogeneoSystems,” International Journal of Computer Simulation 4:155-182 (Apr. 1994). |
Burns et al., “A Dynamic Reconfiguration Run-Time System,” Proceedings of the 5th Annual Symposium on Field-Programmable Custom Computing Machines, pp. 166-175 (Apr. 16, 1997). |
Buttazzo et al., “Optimal Deadline Assignment for Scheduling Soft Aperiodic Tasks in Hard Real-Time Environments,” Engineering of Complex Computer Systems, Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Conference on Como, pp. 39-48 (Sep. 8, 1997). |
Callaiian et al., “Adapting Software Pipelining for Reconfigurable Computing,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Compilers, Architectrue and Synthesis for Embedded Systems p. 8, ACM (CASES '00, San Jose, CA) (Nov. 17-18, 2000). |
Chapman & Mehrotra, “OpenMP and HPF: Integrating Two Paradigms,” Proceedings of the 4th International Euro-Par Conference (Euro-Par'98), Springer-Verlag Heidelberg, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1470:650-658 (1998). |
Chen et al., “A Reconfigurable Multiprocessor IC for Rapid Prototyping of Algorithmic-Specific High-Speed DSP Data Paths,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, IEEE 35:74-75 (Feb. 1, 2001). |
Conte et al., “Dynamic Rescheduling: A Technique for Object Code Compatibility in VLIW Architectures,” Proceedings of the 28th Annulal International Symposium on Microarchitecture pp. 208-218 (Nov. 29, 1995). |
Conte et al., “Instruction Fetch Mechanisms for VLIW Architectures with Compressed Encodings,” Proceedings of the Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO) 29:201-211 (Dec. 2, 1996). |
Cummings et al., “FPGA in the Software Radio,” IEEE Communications Magazine . 37(2):108-112 (Feb. 1999). |
Dandalis et al., “An Adaptive Cryptograhic Engine for IPSec Architectures,” IEEE pp. 132-141 (Jan. 2000). |
David et al., “DART: A Dynamically Reconfigurable Architecture Dealing with Future Mobile Telecommunication Constraints,” Proceedings of the International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium pp. 156-163 (Apr. 15, 2002). |
Dehon et al., “Reconfigurable Computing: What, Why and Implications for Design Automation,” Design Automation Conference Proceedings pp. 610-615 (1999). |
Dipert, “Figuring Out Reconfigurable Logic,” EDN 44(16):107-114 (Aug. 5, 1999). |
Drozdowski, “Scheduling Multiprocessor Tasks—An Overview,” Instytut Informatyki Politechnika, pp. 1-31 (Jan. 31, 1996). |
Ebeling et al., “RaPiD Reconfigurable Pipelined Datapath,” Springer-Verlag, 6th International Workshop on Field-Programmable Logic and Applications pp. 126-135 (1996). |
Fawer et al., “A Multiprocessor Approach for Implementing a Time-Diversity Spread Specturm Receiver,” Proceeding sof the 1990 International Zurich Seminal on Digital Communications, pp. 173-180 (Mar. 5-8, 1990). |
Fisher, “Gone Flat,” Forbes pp. 76-79 (Oct. 2001). |
Fleischmann et al., “Prototyping Networked Embedded Systems,” Integrated Engineering, pp. 116-119 (Feb. 1999). |
Forbes “Best of the Web—Computer Networking/Consumer Durables,” The Forbes Magnetic 40 p. 80 (May 2001). |
Gluth, “Integrierte Signalprozessoren,” Elektronik 35(18):112-118 Franzis Verlag GMBH, Munich, Germany (Sep. 5, 1986). |
Gokhale & Schlesinger, “A Data Parallel C and Its Platforms,” Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium on the Frontiers of Massively Parallel Computation pp. 194-202 (Frontiers '95) (Feb. 1995). |
Grimm et al., “A System Architecture for Pervasive Computing,” Washington University, pp. 1-6 (Sep. 2000). |
Hammes et al., “Cameron: High Level Language Compilation for Reconfigurable Systems,” Proc. of the Intl. Conf. on Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques, pp. 236-244 (Oct. 1999). |
Hanna et al., “A Normalized Backpropagation Learning Algorithm for Multilayer Feed-Forward Neural Adaptive Filters,” Neural Networks for Signal Processing XI, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Signal Processing Society Workshop pp. 63-72 (Sep. 2001). |
Hartenstein, “Coarse Grain Reconfigurable Architectures,” Design Automation Conference, 2001. Proceedings of the ASP-Dac 2001, Asian and South Pacific Jan. 30, 2001-Feb. 2, 2001, Piscataway, Nj, US, IEEE, pp. 564-569 (Jan. 30, 2001). |
Hinden et al., “The DARPA Internet: Interconnecting HeterogeneoComputer Networks with Gateways,” IEEE Computer Magazine pp. 38-48 (1983). |
Horton, “Beginning Java 2: JDK 1.3 Edition,” Wrox Press, Chapter 8, pp. 313-316 (Feb. 2001). |
Huff et al., “Lifetime-Sensitive Modulo Scheduling,” 6th Conference on Programming Language, Design and Implementation, pp. 258-267, ACM (1993). |
IBM, “Multisequencing a Single Instruction Stream Scheduling with Space-time Trade-offs,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin 36(2):105-108 (Feb. 1, 1993). |
Ishii et al., “Parallel Variable Length Decoding with Inverse Quantization for Software MPEG-2 Decoders,” Workshop on Signal Processing Systems, Design and Implementation, IEEE pp. 500-509 (Nov. 3-5, 1997). |
Jain et al., “An Alternative Approach Towards the Design of Control Units,” Microelectronics and Reliability 24(6):1009-1012 (1984). |
Jain, “Parallel Processing with the TMS320C40 Parallel Digital Signal Processor,” Sonitech International Inc., pp. 13-46. Retrieved from: http:/ /www-s.ti.com/sc/psheets/spra031/spra031.pdf retrieved on Apr. 14, 2004 (Feb. 1994). |
Janssen et al., “Partitioned Register File for TTAs,” Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Symposium on Microarchitecture, pp. 303-312 (Nov. 1995). |
Jong-Pyng et al., “Real-Time Virtual Channel Flow Control,” Proceedings of the Annual International Phoenix Conference on Computers and Communications, Conf. 13, pp. 97-103 (Apr. 12, 1994). |
Jung et al., “Efficient Hardware Controller Synthesis for SynchronoDataflow Graph in System Level Design,” Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on System Synthesis pp. 79-84 (ISSS'00) (Sep. 2000). |
Kaufmann et al., “Digital Spread-Spectrum Multipath-Diversity Receiver for Indoor Communication,” from Pioneers to the 21st Century; Denver, Proceedings of the Vehicular Technology Socity [sic] Conference, NY, IEEE, 2(Conf. 42):1038-1041 (May 10-13, 1992). |
Kneip et al., “An Algorithm Adapted AutonomoControlling Concept for a Parallel Single-Chip Digital Signal Processor,” Journal of VLSI Signal Processing Systems for Signal, Image, an dVideo Technology 16(1):31-40 (May 1, 1997). |
Lee & Messerschmitt, “Pipeline Interleaved Programmable DSP's: SynchronoData Flow Programming,” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing ASSP-35(9):1334-1345 (Sep. 1987). |
Lee & Messerschmitt, “SynchronoData Flow,” Proceedings of the IEEE 75(9):1235-1245 (Sep. 1987). |
Lee & Parks, “Dataflow Process Networks,” Proceedings of the IEEE 83(5):773-799 (May 1995). |
Liu et al., “Scheduling Algorithms for Multiprogramming in a Hard-Real-Time Environment,” Journal of the Association for Computing 20(1):46-61 (1973). |
Llosa et al., “Lifetime-Sensitive Modulo Scheduling in a Production Environment,” IEEE Trans. on Comps. 50(3):234-249 (Mar. 2001). |
Lu et al., “The Morphosys Dynamically Reconfigurable System-On-Chip,” Proceedings of the First NASA/DOD Workshop on Evolvable Hardware, pp. 152-160 (Jul. 19, 1999). |
Mangione-Smith et al., “Seeking Solutions in Configurable Computing,” Computer 30(12):38-43 (Dec. 1997). |
McGraw, “Parallel Functional Programming in Sisal: Fictions, Facts, and Future,” Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory pp. 1-40 (Jul. 1993). |
Najjar et al., “High-Level Language Abstraction for Reconfigurable Computing,” Computer 36(8):63-69 (Aug. 2003). |
Nichols et al., “Data Management and Control-Flow Constructs in a SIMD/SPMD Parallel Language/Compiler,” Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on the Frontiers of Massively Parallel Computation pp. 397-406 (Oct. 1990). |
OPENMP Architecture Review Board, “OpenMP C and C++ Application Program Interface,” pp. 7-16 (Oct. 1998). |
Oracle Corporation, “Oracle8i JDBC Developer's Guide and Reference,” Release 3, 8.1.7, pp. 10-8-10-10 (Jul. 2000). |
Ramamritiiam et al., “On Scheduling Algorithms for Real-Time Multiprocessor Systems,” Algorithms and Applications, Proceedings of the International conference on Parallel Processing 3:143-152 (Aug. 8, 1989). |
Schneider, “A Parallel/Serial Trade-Off Methodology for Look-Up Table Based Decoders,” Proceedings of the Design Automation Conference 34:498-503 (Jun. 9-13, 1997). |
Souza, “Computing's New Face—Reconfigurable Devices Could Rattle Supply Chain,” Electronic Buyers' News Issue 1205, p. P.1 (Apr. 3, 2000). |
Sriram et al., “MPEG-2 Video Decoding on the TMS320C6X DSP Architecture,” Conference Record of the 32nd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, IEEE pp. 1735-1739 (Nov. 1-4, 1998). |
Sun Microsystems, “FORTRAN 3.0.1 User's Guide, Revision A,” pp. 57-68 (Aug. 1994). |
Wang et al., “Cell Search in W-CDMA,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 18(8):1470-1482 (Aug. 2000). |
Wardell, “Help for Hurried Cooks?,” Popular Science, p. 32 (May 2000). |
Williamson & Lee, “Synthesis of Parallel Hardware Implementations from SynchronoDataflow Graph Specifications,” Conference Record of the Thirtieth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers 1340-1343 (Nov. 1996). |
Wirthlin et al., “A Dynamic Instruction Set Computer,” Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on FPGA's for Custom Computing Machines, pp. 99-107 (Apr. 21, 1995). |
WWW.GATEWAY.COM, World Wide Web, http:/ /web.archive.org/web/20000229192734/www.gateway.com/productpages/9300splash/index.shtml Available on Mar. 3, 2000, 1 page (Mar. 3, 2000). |
WWW.ICL.COM, from the World Wide Web at http:/ /www.icl.com printed on Apr. 30, 2008. |
Xilinx, “Virtex-II Pro Platform FPGAs: Functional Description DS083-2 (v2.5),” Product Specification, pp. 13-46 (Jan. 20, 2003). |
Young, “Architecture Powers up IPSec, SSL,” EETimes, Los Gatos, CA, pp. 1-4 http:/ /www.eetimes.com/story/OEG20011102S0065 (Nov. 2, 2001). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150039857 A1 | Feb 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13589583 | Aug 2012 | US |
Child | 14453947 | US | |
Parent | 11962979 | Dec 2007 | US |
Child | 13589583 | US | |
Parent | 11241009 | Sep 2005 | US |
Child | 11962979 | US | |
Parent | 09997987 | Nov 2001 | US |
Child | 11241009 | US |