Automatic calibration systems and methods of use

Abstract
The disclosed automatic calibration systems and methods provide a repeatable way to detect internal catheter reflections and to shift the internal catheter reflections to calibrate an image.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention generally relates to calibration systems and methods of use, and more particularly to calibration systems for optical imaging systems.


BACKGROUND

Accurate Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) measurements or dimensional analysis require the displayed tomographic image to correctly represent physical space (i.e. conversion from image pixels to physical mm). This requirement is complicated by factors such as varying object refractive indexes (catheter optics, sheath, lumen, tissue) and the arbitrary location (in z) of relevant image features due to mismatch in the interferometer's sample and reference paths.


Most current methods require the user to manually calibrate the image by adjusting the Z-Offset position (reference arm path length) until the outer diameter of the catheter sheath aligns with fixed tick marks on the screen. This method can be time consuming and lends itself to operator error. Additionally, once the catheter is shifted from the original calibrated position, the calibration can be thrown off due to time-varying mechanical strain (e.g. pullback motion or manipulation of PIM cable) or thermal changes (room temp vs. body temp).


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention addresses the above-identified problems and relates to automatic calibration. A catheter can be calibrated, according to the invention, by taking an image in a catheter and utilizing a template to identify the position of the catheter reflection lines. Another way to calibrate a catheter is to image a catheter pullback, align the image data to ensure any shifts to the reflection positions during image acquisition are corrected, and track the reflection positions through each image frame. Yet another way to calibrate a catheter is take an image of a catheter, track the reflection lines of the catheter, not detect the reflection lines in an image, and reacquire the lost track image with a graph search step or a template matching step.


The foregoing and other features, advantages, and objects of the invention will become more apparent with reference to the disclosure that follows. The following description of exemplary embodiments, read in conjunction with the accompanying figures, is merely illustrative rather than limiting.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The following brief descriptions are provided for a more complete understanding of the figures, but it should be understood that embodiments according to the invention are not necessarily limited to the precise arrangements and configurations shown.



FIG. 1 is a graph showing the sample frame demonstrating catheter reflections used for calibration, in accordance with one embodiment.



FIG. 2A is a graph of a template matching algorithm identifying a peak at bin 340, in accordance with one embodiment; and FIG. 2B is a graph of the zoomed in region A showing template match at bin 340, in accordance with one embodiment.



FIG. 3 is an enlarged image of reflection motion through one frame (motion due to tortuous pull back), in accordance with one embodiment.



FIG. 4 is a graph search algorithm, in accordance with one embodiment.



FIG. 5 is an image frame of a catheter pullback sequence and the track maintained through image frame, in accordance with one embodiment.



FIG. 6 is an image frame 40 of a catheter pullback sequence and the catheter reflection lines not being present and the track is lost, in accordance with one embodiment.



FIG. 7 is an image frame 50 of a catheter pullback sequence and the catheter reflections reappearing and the track reacquired for autocalibration, in accordance with one embodiment.



FIG. 8A is a flowchart displaying the first mode of the template matching step 100, in accordance with one embodiment; and FIG. 8B is a flowchart displaying the first mode of the template matching step 100, in accordance with an alternative embodiment.



FIG. 9 is a flowchart displaying the second mode of the playback tracking step 200, in accordance with one embodiment.



FIG. 10 is a flowchart displaying the third mode of the reacquiring lost track step 300, in accordance with one embodiment.



FIG. 11 is a flowchart displaying the auto-calibration in playback method 400, in accordance with one embodiment.



FIG. 12 is a flowchart displaying the auto-calibration initial lock method 500, in accordance with one embodiment.



FIGS. 13A-13D are graphs of the first step in the initial lock mode of searching for a strong reflection using the mean amplitude or gradients and adjusting the Z-Offset until detected.



FIGS. 14A-14B are graphs of the second step in the initial lock mode of aligning the reflections across the A-scans in the rectangular image.



FIGS. 15A-15B are graphs of the third step of identifying the catheter reflections using the gradient and amplitude.



FIGS. 16A-16B are graphs of the fourth step in the initial lock mode of generating the template of reflections and storing for later use.



FIG. 17 is flow chart of the Initial Z-Offset Calibration.



FIGS. 18A-18D are graphs of the first step in the live tracking mode shifting the template to search the location and creating the “Full Template” with a mirrored signal.



FIG. 19 is a graph and equation for the second step in the live tracking mode for computing the correlation coefficient for the template and all A-scans, which is limited to template size.



FIG. 20 is a graph of the third step in the live tracking mode for finding the maximum correlation per A-scan and taking the median of the top “n” A-scans.



FIGS. 21A-21B are OCT images before and after calibrations in the fourth step by applying the digital shift to the image and scan-convert.



FIG. 22 is a flow chart of the live-mode tracking, in accordance with one embodiment.



FIGS. 23A-23B are graphs of the first step in the playback tracking mode to determine the starting position of the reflection tracking using maximum correlation across all A-scans with large search region,



FIG. 24 is a graph of the second step of the playback tracking mode from the starting Position, track reflections backward and forwards A-scan by A-scan using the same correlation technique but with small search region.



FIGS. 25A-25B are graphs of the third step in the playback tracking mode and continuing to track A-scan by A-scan through all frame in dataset and store reflection position for later alignment and display to a viewer on a video monitor or other physical display device.



FIG. 26 is a flow chart of the Playback Mode Tracking Algorithm.



FIG. 27 is a flow chart of one embodiment of the automatic calibration.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

In general, automatic calibration systems and methods according to the invention provide a repeatable way of detecting the internal catheter reflections and shifting the internal catheter reflections to calibrate an image. In one embodiment, the internal catheter reflections comprise reflections due to the end of the fiber optic cable, minor, lens, sheath, fluids, biological vessels, or any other objects that cause reflections and the like. The internal catheter reflections can be shifted mechanically and/or digitally. Generally, the automatic calibration comprises a first mode, a second mode, and a third mode. The calibration systems and methods update and maintain the calibration on a continuous frame-by-frame basis after an initial calibration.


An Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) system may include a Fourier domain OCT (“FD-OCT”), sometimes known as Spectral Domain OCT (“SD-OCT”), or a Time-Domain OCT scanning (“TD-OCT”), where the optical path length of light in the reference arm of the interferometer is rapidly scanned over a distance corresponding to the imaging depth range. The OCT systems may be polarization-sensitive or phase-sensitive and adjusted accordingly. Alternatively, the imaging system may be any other optical imaging based system including, but not limited to spectroscopy, (including fluorescence, absorption, scattering, and Raman spectroscopies)


OCT Depth Calibration and Automated Range Adjustment


Circular and cylindrical OCT scanning devices, i.e. the rotation catheter scanning devices, sample physical space in an inherently polar coordinate system (e.g. radius and angle rather than length and width). Circular and cylindrical OCT scanning devices are applied to image physiological structures with cylindrical-like cross sections e.g., airways and blood vessel lumens). Digital representations of the images (i.e. arrays of pixels representing numeric values) are inherently rectangular. A method for detecting and using OCT image features, either intentionally or artifactually generated comprises automatically adjusting the depth range in polar (“radar-like”) OCT images.


Polar OCT images are converted from their rectangular representation before displaying to the viewer on a video monitor or other physical display device. Additionally, if quantitative values (e.g. lumen diameters, lumen areas, circumferences, etc.) are to be measured on the polar image, then the transformation from rectangular-to-polar preserves relative distances between pixels in all dimensions (radial and angular). Generally, the OCT depth scan (y axis in rectangular coordinates) maps directly to radius and the OCT circumferential scan (x axis in rectangular coordinates) maps to some increment of 2*Pi radians (or 360°) polar angle.


For example: y=0 (the top row of the rectangular image) maps to radius=0 (the center of the polar image) and y=ymax (the bottom row of the rectangular image) maps to radius=ymax (the perimeter of the polar image). Likewise, x=0 (the left column in the rectangular image) maps to angle=0° and x=xmax/2 maps to approximately 180° and x=xmax maps to an angle of approximately 359°.


For accurate quantitative dimensional measurement in polar images, pixels mapping to radius=0 represent the actual physical space at the center of the axis of rotation of the imaging probe, otherwise the polar image will be artificially warped (expanded or contracted) in the radial direction. However, in an arbitrary OCT image, the pixels at y=0 do not necessarily satisfy this requirement and must be shifted in the y-dimension until this is satisfied before mapping to a polar representation. Differential displacements (either controlled or uncontrolled) in the path length of the sample vs. reference arms of the interferometer will shift the pixels in the y-dimension.


Uncontrollable displacements can occur when using cylindrical or helical-scanning fiber-optic OCT catheters. For example, when the catheter is pushed or pulled longitudinally, the fiber-optic cable can be compressed or stretched and thus a path length displacement is incurred.


The method generally comprises automatically recognizing the uncontrolled displacement effect by searching for image features that are stationary but are not due to uncontrollable displacement, and calibrating successive OCT image data so that polar representations can be used for accurate dimensional measurements. In one embodiment, the method further comprises removing of image features in the image prior to display on a video monitor or other display device.


Image features used by the method are generated within the catheter itself (not within the imaged subject or surroundings) and appear somewhat stable in depth and consistent in intensity throughout the 360° rotation of the catheter. These image features include, but are not limited to, back reflections at interfaces between optical components (aka “ghost-lines” or “echo artifacts”, these occur along the optical axis of rotating parts and thus appear as uniform circles in the polar image when no differential path length displacement occurs over the course of one catheter rotation), or reflections from the boundaries of or from within the stationary (non-rotating) catheter sheath (if it is circular in cross-sectional profile and also mechanically concentric with the rotating portion).


The embodiments disclosed herein include 3 methods for automatic calibration that utilize a plurality of back reflections to identify the required shift to achieve proper calibration. While there may be overlap between each of the 3 methods, each of the 3 methods are documented in a separate section for descriptive purposes only, and each of the 3 methods may be combined in alternative configuration, methods, parameters and the like. The first method includes an Automatic Calibration of the Z-offset, which is averaging and a general auto-calibration implementation. The second method includes an Automatic Calibration of Z-offset, which includes a Template Matching and a Graph Search method. The third method is an Automatic Calibration of Z-offset, which includes a Full Template Correlation.


Method 1: Automatic Calibration of Z-offset and Averaging. In one embodiment, steps in the automatic recognition and calibration method include: (1) Averaging the OCT image frame along the x- (i.e. angular) dimension to selectively enhance the feature(s) that are rotationally stable in the y-dimension (i.e. radius) vs. other image features generated by subject or surroundings. Efficacy of the averaging step is improved by selecting image feature(s) that have a high intensity relative to the surrounding pixels and if the subject/environment features (noise) do not have strong circumferential symmetry. In one embodiment, the method further comprises: (2) Finding image feature(s) using peak searching, correlation, thresholding, or other pattern recognition algorithms. Efficacy of the finding image features step is improved if the range over which uncontrolled path length displacements can occur is known a priori, thus limiting the required search space. In one embodiment, the method further comprises: (3) Comparing the y-value(s) of the image feature(s) found in step 2 to a pre-calibrated y-value that represents the actual physical location(s) of that image feature(s) relative to the rotational axis, or to the location of a known “conjugate image” or “aliased image” of that feature(s) when using spectral-domain OCT. In one embodiment, the method further comprises: (4) Calibrating by shifting the OCT image pixels in the y-dimension by the difference between searched image feature(s) and pre-calibrated image feature(s). Multiple features can be used to improve efficacy of the algorithm. After shifting the rectangular image in the y-dimension, mapping to polar image coordinates may take place. Radii measured to the center of the calibrated polar image represent actual radii measured to the rotational axis in physical space. Some image features due to the catheter are unwanted for effective and distraction-free display of the subject/environment features on a video monitor or other physical display device. For example, the catheter image features could overlap the subject/environment features.


In one embodiment, steps to remove (or make less noticeable) the image features include: cropping out the image feature(s) extent in the radial y-direction and in all columns/angles; calculating the average value of the pixels immediately inside and outside (above and below) of the cropped region for all columns/angles; and inserting this averaged row/circumference in the cropped location. The cropping operation can also remove subject/environment features and distorts the image in the radial dimension. This distortion makes measurement of accurate quantitative values on such images more complicated, because the measurement tool must then consider where pixels have and have not been cropped (or make the measurement on the un-cropped image).


In the calibration embodiment described above, the calibration method averages over a frame to identify a reflection, then adjusts the image digitally based on the feature location, and applies a constant shift for all A-scans within an image. An alternative method for an automatic calibration of the Z-offset uses internal catheter features that appear in the image to identify the required shift, which does not average the image intensities across a frame to find the image features, but uses a pattern of the reflections in the form of a template to identify the position of the reflections in an initial locking algorithm. “Template” generally refers to the catheter reflections pattern. This method applies a line-by-line shift to ensure that every A-scan is properly aligned for measurements in the playback mode algorithm. This method of Binary Template Matching and Graph Searching for Automatic Calibration of Z-offset is described in more detail below.


Method 2: Automatic Calibration of Z-offset and Template Matching and Graph Search.


In one embodiment, the Automatic Calibration of Z-offset comprises a first mode of calibrating catheter reflections including an initial lock step. The initial lock comprises utilizing a template to identify the position of the catheter reflection lines unique to a particular catheter, as shown in FIG. 1. The template for each catheter is stored with the specific catheter. In one embodiment, the template is stored on a Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) chip, alternatively, the template may be stored on a computer chip, and the like. Alternatively, RFID or computer chip may be removable and then be used as a portable template or medical record. Alternatively, if the catheter is approved for reuse, the Patient Interface Module or PIM may down load specific information regarding the template for the particular catheter. This template information may be stored and tracked on the catheter monitor and limit the number of uses or hours of use to a predetermined amount also stored on the catheter. In one embodiment the RFID chip may be a Maxwell ME1 or ME2 RFID chip, mounted on the connector on the proximal end of the catheter for storing information and communicating with the interface device. In an alternative embodiment, the catheter may have a second RFID chip (not shown) mounted 180 degrees from the first RFID chip of the connector so catheter can be connected to interface device at more than one circumferential orientation. The RFID chip may have a memory of 128 bytes, alternatively 1K byte, alternatively 2K bytes alternatively 4K bytes to store catheter specific information, including for example catheter serial number, name, make or model, calibration coefficients, imaging element sensitivity, time gain control, post amp gain, number of permissible uses, geographic location of permissible use, boot mode, pulse width, or expiration date of the catheter.


The template is convolved with a binary version of the gradient image and a peak is identified in a template matching step, as shown in FIG. 2A. The template matching step includes selecting a peak that corresponds to a strongest template match. In one embodiment, the peak is above a certain value to ensure that the strongest template match is identified. If no template match is identified, the Z-Offset position is adjusted and an image at the new position is evaluated with the template matching step or algorithm. Once the position of the catheter reflection lines are identified, the catheter reflection lines are shifted by adjusting the Z-Offset to move the reflections to their desired location and the image/catheter is now calibrated, as shown in FIG. 2B. In one embodiment, the adjusting Z-Offset comprises the mechanical shifting of the Variable Delay Line (VDL)). If the template matching algorithm is unable to identify a strong template match, the user is warned and given the option to retry auto-calibration or manually calibrate.


In one embodiment of Method 2 for the Automatic Calibration of Z-offset for the Template Matching and Graph Search, the second mode of calibrating catheter reflections comprises playback tracking. Playback tracking generally includes aligning the image data after recording a catheter pullback to ensure any shifts to the reflection positions during acquisition are corrected to allow for proper analysis and/or measurements. Tracking the reflections through the recorded dataset is slightly more difficult due to the motion during pullbacks and the position of the reflections can vary significantly over a single frame. FIG. 3 demonstrates an example of significant shifting of the catheter reflections during a tortuous pullback. A graph searching step or algorithm is utilized to track the reflection through each frame. The graph search initial is identified by the template matching step or algorithm described above. Once an initial lock is acquired, the reflection lines are tracked through the image based on their amplitude and relative position. In one embodiment, the lines are tracked through the image based on their amplitude and relative position by maintaining a constant distance. The graph search step begins at the first A-scan and then looks at the neighboring pixels in the following A-scan to determine the direction for the next step. This process is then repeated for each A-scan. The algorithm also allows for “look ahead” which includes evaluating the next A-scan and looking ahead at the next “n” A-scans before determining the step direction. The black lines tracing the reflection in FIG. 3 demonstrate the results of the graph search algorithm. FIG. 4 provides a slightly more detailed explanation of the graph search algorithm. Once the lines have been traced through an entire frame they are digitally aligned and the frame is then properly calibrated for display and measurements.


In one embodiment, the third mode of calibrating catheter reflections comprises a reacquiring lost track step. The reacquiring lost track step comprises reacquiring a track if the reflection lines are not detected in the previous image frames. As shown in FIGS. 5-7, the track of the reflections are lost during a tortuous pullback and then reacquired once the reflections reappear. To reacquire a lost track both the graph search step 220 and the template matching algorithms may be used. The graph search step expands the region of allowable solutions to search a wider number of bins for the reappearing reflections. A “guard band” is identified to limit the possible search region and prevents from locking on to the bright returns from the vessel wall. The template matching step may also be performed as described in the Initial Locking step. Once the track is reacquired, the algorithm transitions back to Playback Tracking mode to continue tracking the reflections through each subsequent frame.


With reference to FIG. 8A, an illustrated method of the first mode and the initial lock step 100 is shown. The process begins at step 110 by taking an OCT image in a catheter. Then, step 120 utilizes a template to identify the position of the catheter reflection lines unique to a particular catheter from a module or other software device, as shown in FIG. 2B. The template for each catheter is stored or operably accessible with the specific catheter. In one embodiment, the template is stored on a Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) chip or transponder or tag; alternatively, the template may be stored on a computer chip, cache, flash drive, and any other storage medium. The template matching step or algorithm 130 convolves the template with a binary version of the gradient OCT image and a peak is identified, as shown in FIG. 2A. The template matching step includes step 140 for selecting a peak that corresponds to a strongest template match. In one embodiment, the peak is above a certain value to ensure that the strongest template match is identified. If no template match is identified in decision 150, the method proceeds to step 170 where the Z-Offset position is adjusted and an image at the new position is evaluated with the template matching step or algorithm 130. If the template matching algorithm is unable to identify a strong match, the user is warned and given the option to retry auto-calibration or manually calibrate. If a template match is identified in decision 150, the position of the catheter reflection lines are identified, the catheter reflection lines are shifted by adjusting the Z-Offset to move the reflections to their desired location, and the image/catheter is now calibrated, as shown in FIG. 2B. In one embodiment, the adjusting Z-Offset comprises the mechanical shifting of the Variable Delay Line (VDL).


With reference to FIG. 8B, an alternative method of the first mode and the initial lock step 100b is shown. The process 100b begins similar as process 100a at step 110 by taking an OCT image in a catheter. Then, step 120 utilizes a template to identify the position of the catheter reflection lines unique to a particular catheter from a module or other software device, as shown in FIG. 2B. The template for each catheter is stored or operably accessible with the specific catheter. In one embodiment, the template is stored on a Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) chip or transponder or tag; alternatively, the template may be stored on a computer chip, cache, flash drive, and any other storage medium. The template matching step 130 convolves the template with a binary version of the gradient OCT image and a peak is identified, as shown in FIG. 2A. The template matching step includes step 140 for selecting a peak that corresponds to a strongest template match. In one embodiment, the peak is above a certain value to ensure that the strongest template match is identified. If no template match is identified in decision 150, the method proceeds to step 170 where the Z-Offset position is adjusted and an image at the new position is evaluated with the template matching step 130. If the template matching algorithm is unable to identify a strong template match, the user is warned and given the option to retry auto-calibration or manually calibrate. If a template match is identified in decision 150, the position of the catheter reflection lines are identified, the catheter reflection lines are shifted by adjusting the Z-Offset to move the reflections to their desired location, and the image/catheter is now calibrated, as shown in FIG. 2B.


With reference to FIG. 9, an illustrated method of the second mode and the playback tracking 200 is shown. The playback tracking method 200 begins with step 210 of recording a catheter pullback or push-forward. The objective of the playback mode tracking is to digitally aligning the image data to ensure any shifts to the reflection positions during image acquisition are corrected to allow for proper analysis and/or measurements. Tracking the reflections through the recorded dataset is slightly more difficult due to the motion during pullbacks and the position of the reflections can vary significantly over a single frame. FIG. 3 demonstrates an example of significant shifting of the catheter reflections during a tortuous pullback. The playback tracking method, 200, utilizes a graph searching algorithm to track the reflection through each image frame. Prior to beginning the graph search algorithm in step 220 the initial position of the reflections are identified using the template matching algorithm described 130 above. Once an initial lock 230 is acquired, step 240 tracks the reflection lines through the image based on their amplitude and relative position. In one embodiment, the lines are tracked through the image based on their amplitude and relative position by maintaining a constant distance. Step 250 begins with the first A-scan, then looks at the neighboring pixels in the following A-scan to determine the direction for the next step, and repeated for each A-scan. Step 260 allows for “look ahead” that includes evaluating the next A-scan and looking ahead at the next “n” A-scans before determining the step direction. Step 270 uses the information from steps 250 and 260 to determine the direction of the reflections in the current A-Scan. In 280 the algorithm increments to the next A-Scan and repeats the same processing until all A-Scans in the playback have been evaluated. The black lines tracing the reflection in FIG. 3 demonstrate the results of the graph search algorithm. FIG. 4 provides a slightly more detailed explanation of the graph search algorithm. Step 290 traces the reflection lines through an entire frame they are digitally aligned and the frame is then properly calibrated for display and measurements.


With reference to FIG. 10, an illustrated method of the third mode and the reacquiring lost track method 300 are shown. The reacquiring lost track method 300 begins at step 310 if the reflection lines are not detected in the previous image frames. In one embodiment, the reflection lines may be lost during a tortuous pullback of the catheter. Once the reflections reappear at step 320, the lost track may be reacquired with the graph search step 220 and the template matching algorithms 120, as indicated above. The graph search step 220 expands the region of allowable solutions to search a wider number of bins for the reappearing reflections in step 330. In step 340, the “guard band” is identified to limit the possible search region and then locking on to the bright returns from the vessel wall is prevented. The template matching step 120 may also be performed as described in the Initial Locking step above. In step 350, once the track is reacquired, the algorithm transitions back to the Playback Tracking mode to continue tracking the reflections through each subsequent frame.


With reference to FIG. 11, an alternative embodiment of the auto-calibration in playback method 400 is shown. The method 400 generally comprises acquiring pullback or push-forward data 402 and obtaining a threshold image 404. A number of inputs 410 may be coupled to the threshold image, such as B-Scan data 412, noise estimates 414, or current Z-offset 416. Next, step 420 is the graph search algorithm 420, which includes computing the difference of template and pixel amplitude for allowable shifts 422, computing the difference for n-look aheads 424, finding the shift direction with the minimum amplitude difference 426, and updating the template location and storing the reflection amplitudes 428. Next, decision 430 determines if all A-scans have been processed. If so, the method proceeds to step 440 in storing all A-scan shifts for future alignment and display, and then playback method for autocalibration is complete 480. A further output 490 may include the data of the A-scan shift 492 for the playback method 400. If all the A-scans have not been processed at decision 430, then step 450 is determining if reflections are detected at an expected amplitude value. Decision 452 determines if the lock is lost. If the lock is not lost, the step 454 proceeds to step to the next A-scan and to the Graph Search algorithm 420 and step 422 of computing the difference of template and pixel amplitude values for allowable shifts. If the lock is lost, then the Re-Acquire the lost track step 460 is implemented. The Re-Acquire lost track step 460 begins with step 462 of computing the guard band region, then applying the graph search step of the template matching algorithm to the larger region in step 464, as described previously. Next, decision 466 determines if the lock has been regained. If the lock has been regained, then the Graph Search algorithm 420 is initiated and the step 422 of computing the difference of template and pixel amplitude values for allowable shifts. If the lock has not been regained, decision 468 determines if the lock lost time has been exceeded. If the lock lost time has been exceeded, the step 472 warns the user that calibration is unable to be completed, and the playback method of the auto-calibration is complete in step 480 to be reinstituted or adjusted by the user. If the lock lost time has not been exceeded, step 470 steps to the next image and retries to acquire the lock and proceeds to step 462 to compute the guard band region once again in the Re-Acquire track step 460.


With reference to FIG. 12, an alternative embodiment of the auto-calibration initial lock method 500 is shown. The method 500 generally comprises selecting an image on mode and proceeds to decision 504 to determine whether the first image is on mode. If it is not the first instance of the image on mode for a catheter, step 506 proceeds in reacquiring the lock without shifting the Z-offset position. If it is the first instance of the image on mode, then the template matching step 510, as described above. The template matching step 501 starts with step 512 of converting the image to a binary B-scan, proceeds to step 514 of computing the X and Y gradients, proceeds to step 516 convolving the gradients with the template (Forward and CC), and finds the peak 518 at step 518. The template matching step 510 is finished and proceeds to decision 520 to determine if the peak threshold is obtained. If the peak threshold is obtained, then step 522 finds the peak with a signal-to-noise ratio threshold in the region. If the peak threshold is not obtained, then decision 524 determines if the all the Z-offset positions have been evaluated. Step 522 proceeds to decision 530 to determine if at least 2 peaks have been found. If at least two peaks have not been found, then decision 524 is initiated. If at least two peaks have been found, then step 532 shifts the Z-offset to +n Bins. Then step 534 waits for the Z-offset position to be reached and proceeds to decision 540. Decision 540 determines if the signal is moved to Bin +n. If the signal is moved to Bin +n, the step 542 shifts the peaks to the desired location. If the signal is not move to Bin +n, the Decision 550 determines if the signal is moved to Bin −n. If the signal is moved to Bin −n, then it proceeds to step 542. If the signal is not moved to Bin −n, then it proceeds to Decision step 526 to shift the Z-offset ¼ of the A-scan size. Decision 524 also shifts to step 526 if all the Z-offset positions have not been evaluated. If all the Z-offset position have been evaluated, then step 528 warns the user that there is trouble in the auto-calibration and to try initiation of the method 500 again. Then step 528 proceeds to Decision 560 to determine if the user is requesting the auto-calibration method again. If the user is requesting the auto-calibration method again, then step 562 resets the Z-offset to the starting position. Step 562 then proceeds to step 564 to wait for the Z-offset position to be reached, which then proceeds to the template matching step 510 and step 512 of converting the image to a binary B-scan.


Step 542 proceeds to step 544 to prompt the user that auto-calibration is complete for entry of manual calibrations or accepting the auto-calibration. Step 544 then proceeds to decision 570, which determines if the user is okay with the calibration. If the user accepts the calibration, then the initial lock method is complete in step 572. The outputs 580 for the initial lock include the current Z-offset 532, the reflection locations 584, or the reflection amplitudes 586. If the user does not accept the calibration, then step 574 transitions to manual calibration mode through a Graphical User Interface (GUI). Then decision 590 allows the user to complete the calibration. If the user completes the calibration, then step 592 maintains the Z-offset unless calibration is further requested. If the user does not complete the calibration, the step 574 transitions to manual calibration mode for additional attempts by the user.


Automatic Calibration of Z-offset Method 3: Auto-Template Generation and Full Correlation. Alternatively, the template may not be stored on a memory chip or the RFID, as in the previous Method 2, and the template may be automatically generated during an initial lock mode process, as described below for Method 3. The previous method utilized a binary template for template matching, while Method 3 generates a template with amplitude information and the complex conjugate signal information. Utilizing amplitude information and generating the minor signal increases the likelihood of locking on to the correct reflection lines. Additionally, Method 3 step or algorithm performs Auto-Calibration during initial lock and playback mode, and Method 3 also maintains calibration during a live mode (when the catheter is imaging but is not recording data).


In one embodiment for the first mode is the initial lock, which utilizes the internal catheter reflections (fiber, minor and lens) to identify the required VDL shift to reach the calibration position, as described in previous methods. The initial lock Z-Offset calibration is the step in which the reflection pattern or the template is determined. The template identified in the initial Z-offset calibration is utilized in each subsequent calibration mode to track the shift of the reflections and apply the analog and digital shifts, as required or implemented. The template region is identified using gradient and amplitude information. Once the template is identified and stored for later use, the VDL shift is applied and the catheter is ready for calibration during live and playback mode. Acceptable error in this position will be determined by the ability of the next mode (maintenance of Z-offset during live imaging) to lock onto the reference pattern of catheter reflection lines in the OCT image.



FIGS. 13-16 provide an overview of the alternative steps for the initial Z-Offset calibration. FIGS. 13A-13D are graphs of the first step in the initial lock mode of searching for a strong reflection using the mean amplitude or gradients and adjusting the Z-Offset until detected. FIG. 13A shows that there are reflections present for the fiber, mirror, lens, sheath, and reflections for the template. The algorithm utilizes X and Y gradients of the image to determine if reflections are present. FIG. 13B is the change of the X gradient and FIG. 13C is the change of the Y gradient. If no reflections are found, the VDL is shifted to the next possible Z-offset location. Once strong reflections are identified, a slight positive VDL shift is applied to verify the orientation of reflections. If the reflections shift towards the center of the image, then the reflections are oriented properly for calibration. If the reflections shift outward, the image is the complex conjugate signal and a large negative VDL shift is applied to unwrap the image. After the image is determined to be properly oriented, the reflections are shifted to the center of the window to ensure the full template region is visible. If at any point during each of the shifting steps the reflection lines are no longer detected, the algorithm applies a new Z-offset and starts over looking for strong returns. FIG. 17 provides a more detailed version of the algorithm and user interaction.


Once the reflections have been centered in the image window the template is computed. The template is an array of pixel numbers versus average amplitude values beginning at the fiber reflection and ending at the lens reflection. The first step in identifying the template is to align the image based on the first strong reflection using a simple graph search algorithm, as shown in FIG. 14A. Aligning the reflections across the A-scans is in the rectangular image is the second step for the initial lock Z-offset calibration mode. Image alignment is done to increase the likelihood reflections are straight in the rectangular image and will be easily identified by their gradients and amplitude, as shown in FIG. 14B. Once the image alignment is complete, the internal catheter reflections are identified using 4 characteristics: (1) Strong X and Weak Y Gradients (Assuming A-Scans Along the Y axis); (2) Consistently High Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) of at least greater than 15 dB; (3) Maximum Distance from First Reflection (Fiber) to Last Reflection (Lens); and (4) Minimum of at least 2 Reflections.


As shown in FIGS. 15A-15B, the third step in the initial lock mode is to identify the catheter reflections using the X and Y gradients. Step 4 of the initial lock generates template of reflections and stores the template for later use. The template region is then defined as the mean across A-Scans (i.e. angular) starting from the first reflection and ending at the last reflection (with a 5 pixel margin on either side), as shown in FIG. 16A. To prevent small templates due to weak lens reflection, the minimum template size is 100 bins. Alternatively, the minimum template size is at least between about 20 and 1000 bins. Therefore, if the Lens reflection is not detected, the 100 bins after the fiber reflection are selected as the template region. This minimum distance threshold may be determined based on the minimum distance from the fiber to the Inner Diameter (ID) of the sheath. The accuracy of the template is highly dependent on locating the fiber reflection. If the fiber reflection is not found, the template may include the sheath or vessel region and result in improper calibration.


As shown in FIG. 16B, once the template is found, it is stored for later use in the subsequent auto-calibration algorithms. The VDL is then shifted to position the fiber reflection at a pre-determined location and the system transitions to live mode. If the reference pattern is not found at this initial VDL position (unlikely but still non-zero probability), the value is assumed to be incorrect and a backup initial estimate search is performed by the system. The backup search procedure sweeps through VDL positions in a pre-determined fashion while the pattern recognition algorithm attempts to lock onto the reference pattern. Entering this backup search procedure is undesirable, because additional time is used to find the correct initial calibration. If the backup search fails (i.e. is unable to lock onto the reference pattern), the system assumes that the catheter or its connection to the PIM is faulty and the user is notified to use an alternate catheter.



FIG. 17 is flow chart of the Initial Lock Z-Offset Calibration method 600. The first step is 690 where the user selects the image on mode. If this is the first image on mode, decision 692, the algorithm proceeds to 612 searching for a strong reflection. Various inputs 610 such as the B-Scan, noise estimate, and current Z-offset may be coupled with step 612. If it is not the first image on mode, the algorithm moves to completion box 694 to reacquire the template by simply shifting the VDL to the position the last template was acquired. After step 612, decision 620 determines if a reflection line has been found. If a reflection has been found, the step 622 proceeds to shift the reflection left n-number of bins for a +Z-shift. In one embodiment, the shift of the reflections may be between about 25 to 100 bins. If the reflection has not been found, then step 624 shifts to a new Z-offset. After step 622, step 626 finds a strong reflection meeting a certain threshold using the mean amplitude or gradient, as indicated previously. Then decision 630 determines if the reflection line move has been to the left. If the reflection line has moved, the step 632 shifts to a particular bin number. If the reflection line has not been moved, then step 602 shifts the VDL to the complex conjugate (CC) of the start location (−Z-shift) to reset to find a strong reflection 612. After step 632, step 634 finds the strong reflection and proceeds to decision 640 to determine if the line has been detected at a particular bin. If the line has been detected at a particular bin, then step 642 computes the template. If the line has not been detected, then decision 650 determines if all the Z-offsets have been attempted. If all the Z-offset have not been attempted, then step 624 shifts to a new Z-offset position and step 612 to find the strong reflection. If all the Z-offsets have been attempted, then step 652 warns the user that the program is unable to calibrate. After step 652, decision 654 warns the user to try again. If the user selects to try again, then step 624 shifts to a new Z-offset and step 612 to find the strong reflection. If the user does not select to try again, then step 660 allows for manual calibration and warns user of manual calibration mode. After step 660, results 662 provides for the initial calibration and complete transition of the live calibration mode. Outputs 670 may be provided for the final Z-offset and the template.


After step 642, decision 644 determines if at least two reflections are found. If at least two reflections are found, step 646 shifts to the calibrated location. If at least two reflections are not found, then decision 650 is attempted to determine if all the Z-offsets have been attempted. In one embodiment, a timer 680 may be coupled with the decision 680 to determine if the autocalibration time has been exceeded. If the autocalibration time has been exceeded, then step 684 warns the user that the program is unable to calibrate. After step 684, decision 686 allows the user to try again. If the user selects to try again, the step 624 shifts to a new Z-offset to find a strong reflection. If the user does not select to try again, the step 660 allows for manual calibration.


In an alternative embodiment of the second mode, a live mode tracking step may be employed. During live mode auto-calibration, the template computed during the initial lock step is utilized to maintain the initial lock calibration position for all frames displayed on the screen on a video monitor or other display device. In one embodiment, the initial lock calibration position for all frames may be at a rate of at least 30 frames-per-second (fps), alternatively, between about 10 to 50 fps. The catheter system may become un-calibrated due to shifts in the optical path length caused by changes in temperature when the catheter is inserted into the body or mechanical strain on the fiber when the catheter is longitudinally pushed or pulled. The live mode algorithm detects the position of the catheter reflections using the template and updates the digital and analog calibration settings to maintain the proper calibration setting. If only a small shift is necessary to maintain the calibration position, a digital shift is applied to the image prior to display. However, if the system becomes significantly un-calibrated or a large shift is necessary to maintain calibration, a Z-offset update is applied (VDL shift).


The reflections are identified during live-mode tracking by finding the maximum correlation between the template and A-scans (i.e. template matching). The search region for identifying the reflections is limited based on the maximum expected shift from frame to frame. The template matching algorithm is slightly different than most standard template matching implementations, since it modifies the template based on the search position to account for the wrapped complex conjugate signal. Prior to computing the correlation, the “full template” is generated which includes the mirrored complex conjugate signal, as shown in FIGS. 18A-18D. To compute the full template, first the original template is shifted to a search position, as shown in FIG. 18A, and second the signal is summed with the mirrored version of the same signal, as shown in FIG. 18B. The correlation coefficient of the full template and each A-scan is then computed, as shown in FIG. 19. This process is then repeated for each possible shift position in the search region. Once all correlations have been computed, the position of maximum correlation for each A-scan is found, as shown in FIG. 20. The final reflection position is assigned as the median position of the top “n” correlations. Once the calibration shift is identified, the image is digitally adjusted to return the reflections to their calibrated position, as shown in FIGS. 21A-21B. If the shift is beyond a pre-determine threshold for “n” frames, an update to the Z-offset (VDL) is applied. This algorithm is repeated for every image displayed on a screen in live mode and utilizes the previous frames correlation match and Z-offset to determine the search region for the next frame.



FIG. 22 provides a flowchart of the algorithm and the user interaction for the live mode tracking process 700. In the live mode calibration process, the calibration continues until “image off” is selected or a catheter longitudinal pullback is initiated. The position of the reflections just before the pullback begins is stored for use in a Playback Mode autocalibration setting, as described below. Various inputs 710 may be coupled with the live-mode tracking process, such as the B-scan, the current Z-offset, and the like, as previously indicated. Step 712 determines if the autocalibration of the initial lock has been completed. Then step 714 computes the full template for all allowable shift positions. Then step 716 computes the correlation for the subset of A-scans and the template. Then step 718 finds the maximum correlation for each scan. Then step 720 finds the median shift of the top n-correlations. Then decision 730 determines if the correlation is above a particular threshold. If the correlation is above a particular threshold, then step 732 compute the correlation threshold based on the running average. If the correlation is not above a particular threshold, the step 734 incremental lock lost counter proceeds. After step 734, decision 740 determines if the lock lost counter threshold has been exceeded. If the lock lost counter threshold has been exceeded, then decision 742 checks if the user has selected autocalibration as “on” to determine if the user needs to be warned for the error. If the lock lost counter threshold has not been exceeded, then step 744 proceeds to increment to the next image, which is followed by step 714 to compute the full template for all allowable shifts positions for live-mode tracking. In decision 742, if the autocalibration is selected “on” by the user, then decision 750 determines if the lock lost counter threshold is exceeded by 1. If the autocalibration is not selected “on” by the user, the step 744 proceeds to increment to the next image. If the lock lost counter threshold is not exceeded by 1, then step 744 proceeds to increment to the next image. If the lock lost counter threshold is exceeded by 1, then step 752 warns the user that the autocalibration lock was lost, whereby the program can fade in the window or status bar of the computer.


After step 732, step 736 resets the lock lost to 0. Then decision 760 determines if the autocalibration has been selected “on” by the user. If the autocalibration has been selected “on” by the user, then step 762 applies a digital shift to the current image for display. If the autocalibration has not been selected “on” by the user, then step 764 updates the reflection position for the next image. After step 764, step 744 increments the program to the next image. After step 762, decision 770 determines if the digital shift threshold has been met. If the digital shift threshold has been met, the step 772 proceeds with the incremental digital shift counter. If the digital shift threshold has not been met, then step 774 resets the digital shift counter to 0, which then proceeds to step 784 to update the reflection position for the next image. After step 772, decision 780 determines if the digital shift counter threshold has been exceeded. If the digital shift counter threshold has been exceeded, then step 782 applies a VDL shift. If the digital shift counter threshold has not been exceeded, then step 744 increments to the next image for the live mode tracking process. In the live mode calibration process, the calibration continues until “image off” is selected or a catheter longitudinal pullback is initiated. The position of the reflections just before the catheter pullback begins is stored for use in a Playback Mode autocalibration setting, as described below.


In an alternative embodiment of the third mode, a playback mode tracking occurs after the user has recorded an image dataset. The playback mode tracking performs auto-calibration on every A-scan in the dataset. Similar to live mode tracking, the playback mode utilizes the correlation of the template and image A-scans at limited shift locations to determine the position of the reflections. Identifying the initial position of the reflections is such that the first frame of the dataset is treated different from the other frames. In the first frame of the dataset, the correlations for all allowable shifts and all A-scans are computed to find the maximum correlation, as shown in FIGS. 23A-23B. From the point of the maximum correlation, the algorithm then traces through each A-scan backwards and forwards computing the correlation for each possible shift, as shown in FIG. 24. The allowable shift region for the first search is broad to allow for sudden jumps that may occur during the transition from live mode to playback mode. Once the start position is determined, the A-scan by A-scan search is limited to a small region given that the time and possible movement between A-scans is small relative to the frame to frame motion. For example, for the first frame the search region may be set to −50 to +50 pixels from the last location, once the maximum correlation is found, the search region is limited to −1 to +1 pixels for each A-scan. Alternatively, the search region may be set to at least about −500 to +500 pixels, alternatively between at least about −400 to +400, alternatively between about −300 to +300, and the like. The search region may be limited to between about −10 to +10, alternatively, between about −5 to +5, alternatively between about −0.1 and +0.1. Once the first frame has been fully traced, as shown in FIG. 25A, the algorithm moves on to the next frame beginning with the first A-scan and limited the search region based on the position of the reflection in the last A-scan. FIG. 25B shows that the reflection position is stored for later alignment and display through storing the template match position for alignment prior to the display of the image on a screen of a video monitor or other display device. This is repeated for each A-scan in all frames.


The detailed flow chart of the playback mode calibration process 800 is provided in FIG. 26. The playback mode calibration initializes by searching all A-scans within an image to identify the peak correlation. From the peak, the correlation tracker tracks forwards and backwards to identify the reflection position for each A-scan in the first frame. This search is applied to the first frame to guarantee a strong initial lock. Each of the following frames after the first frame is tracked A-scan by A-scan with limited search regions. The manual mode 840 is transitioned when the lock lost counter threshold has been exceeded and the user selects manual mode. Alternatively, the manual mode 840 may be selected if the pull or push data has been recorded 842. If manual mode has been selected, then no playback mode autocalibration will be applied in step 844. If manual mode has not been selected, then step 850 identifies the allowable shifts for the first frame based on the push or pull of the catheter. Then step 852 computes the full template for all allowable shift positions. Then step 854 computes the correlation for all A-scans and template positions. Then step 856 finds the maximum correlation for each A-scan. Then step 858 finds the maximum correlation and corresponding A-scan. Then step 860 applies the correlation tracking algorithm 810 to each A-scan in the image.


The correlation tracking algorithm 810 starts with step 812 of computing the correlation for allowable template shifts in the current A-scan. Then step 814 finds the maximum correlation for that A-scan. Then step 816 computes the correlation confidence threshold of the running average. Then decision 820 determines if the correlation is above a particular confidence threshold. If the correlation is above a particular confidence threshold, then step 822 resets the lock lost counter to 0. If the correlation is not above a particular confidence threshold, then step 824 proceeds to increment the lock lost counter. After step 824, decision 830 determines if the lock lost counter threshold has been exceeded. If the lock lost counter threshold has not been exceeded, the step 832 uses the track position of the previous A-scan. If the lock lost counter threshold has been exceeded, then step 834 it warns the user and transitions to manual mode. Both step 822 and 832 proceed to step 836 to update the track position and steps to the next A-scan. After step 836, step 812 computes the correlation for allowable shifts in the current A-scan.


After step 864 of applying the correlation tracking algorithm to each A-scan in the image, decision 870 determines if it is the last frame. If it is the last frame, then step 872 stores the calibration positions for the display. If there are more frames, then decision 880 determines if the transition to manual mode is required or commanded. If the transition to manual mode has been selected, then step 862 increments to the next frame. If the transition to manual mode has not been selected, then step 882 warns the use and transitions to manual mode. After step 872, step 874 determines that the playback mode calibration has been completed. Various inputs 890 may be coupled with the playback mode process, such as the B-scan, current Z-offset, and the pull or push indicator for the catheter.


Generally, in one embodiment for the auto-calibration 900 is shown in FIG. 27. Any of the previously discussed calibration methods may be used to continuously update and maintain the calibration on a frame-by-frame basis after the initial calibration. Step 902 performs the initial automatic calibration or manual calibration as previously discussed. Step 904 monitors at least one parameter indicative of the calibration position. Decision 906 determines if the calibration needs to be updated on the existing frame or subsequent frame. If the calibration does not need to be updated for the frame, then the automatic calibration continues to monitor the parameter indicative of the calibration position in step 904. If the calibration does need to be updated for the frame, the step 908 automatically updates the calibration (such as to digitally shift the image, apply the z-offset shift, or any of the methods previously discussed. The frame may be an A-scan, or set of frames.


It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations, as well any portion of the module, systems and methods disclosed herein, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These program instructions may be provided to a processor to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute on the processor, create means for implementing the actions specified in the flowchart block or blocks or described for the tissue classifier, imager, control module, systems and methods disclosed herein. The computer program instructions may be executed by a processor to cause a series of operational steps to be performed by the processor to produce a computer implemented process. The computer program instructions may also cause at least some of the operational steps to be performed in parallel. Moreover, some of the steps may also be performed across more than one processor, such as might arise in a multi-processor computer system. In addition, one or more processes may also be performed concurrently with other processes or even in a different sequence than illustrated without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention.


The computer program instructions can be, stored on any suitable computer-readable medium including, but not limited to, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by a computing device.


It will be understood that the catheter pullback may be performed by pulling the catheter from a proximal end to a distal end of the region being imaged. It also will be understood that the intravascular imaging techniques described above can also be used with other types of imaging techniques that use a catheter insertable into patient vasculature. For example, the intravascular imaging techniques can be used with any imaging techniques configured and arranged to assess one or more measurable characteristics of patient tissue (e.g., intravascular magnetic resonance imaging, spectroscopy, temperature mapping, or the like).


The systems and methods described herein may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Accordingly, the disclosed systems and methods may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment, or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects. The systems and methods of use described herein can be performed using any type of computing device, such as a computer that includes a processor or any combination of computing devices where each device performs at least part of the process or method.


Suitable computing devices typically include mass memory and typically include communication between devices. The mass memory illustrates a type of computer-readable media, namely computer storage media. Computer storage media may include volatile, nonvolatile, removable, and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information, such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data. Examples of computer storage media include RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory, or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, Radiofrequency Identification tags or chips, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by a computing device. Communication between devices or components of a system can include both wired and wireless (e.g., RF, optical, or infrared) communications.


While the invention has been described in connection with various embodiments, it will be understood that the invention is capable of further modifications. This application is intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the invention following, in general, the principles of the invention and including such departures from the present disclosure as are within the known and customary practice within the art to which the invention pertains.

Claims
  • 1. A method for automatic calibration, comprising: performing an initial calibration of a catheter, based on internal catheter reflections that are stable in depth and consistent in intensity throughout the 360 degree rotation of the catheter, for a calibration position, the calibration including: averaging an OCT image frame to selectively enhance high intensity features;comparing a value of the image features to a pre-calibrated value; andshifting the OCT image based on the comparison;monitoring the internal catheter reflections of the calibration position;determining if the calibration position needs updating on an image frame; andupdating the calibration position on a frame-by-frame basis.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the image frame is an A-scan.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the image frame includes a set of image frames.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/243,399, which was filed Sept. 23, 2011, which is a continuation of 12/172,980 (now Pat. NO. 8,049,900), which was filed Jul. 14, 2008 and which claims priority to U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/949,467 filed Jul. 12, 2007, and the entirety of each of which is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (1004)
Number Name Date Kind
3301258 Werner Jan 1967 A
3617880 Cormack et al. Nov 1971 A
3789841 Antoshkiw Feb 1974 A
3841308 Tate Oct 1974 A
4050450 Polanyi Sep 1977 A
4140364 Yamashita et al. Feb 1979 A
4274423 Mizuno et al. Jun 1981 A
4344438 Schultz Aug 1982 A
4398791 Dorsey Aug 1983 A
4432370 Hughes et al. Feb 1984 A
4552554 Gould et al. Nov 1985 A
4577543 Wilson Mar 1986 A
4676980 Segal et al. Jun 1987 A
4682895 Costello Jul 1987 A
4733665 Palmaz Mar 1988 A
4744619 Cameron May 1988 A
4762129 Bonzel Aug 1988 A
4766386 Oliver et al. Aug 1988 A
4771774 Simpson et al. Sep 1988 A
4794931 Yock Jan 1989 A
4800886 Nestor Jan 1989 A
4803639 Steele et al. Feb 1989 A
4816567 Cabilly et al. Mar 1989 A
4819740 Warrington Apr 1989 A
4821731 Martinelli et al. Apr 1989 A
4824435 Giesy et al. Apr 1989 A
4830023 de Toledo et al. May 1989 A
4834093 Littleford et al. May 1989 A
4841977 Griffith et al. Jun 1989 A
4864578 Proffitt et al. Sep 1989 A
4873690 Adams Oct 1989 A
4877314 Kanamori Oct 1989 A
4887606 Yock et al. Dec 1989 A
4917085 Smith Apr 1990 A
4917097 Proudian et al. Apr 1990 A
4928693 Goodin et al. May 1990 A
4932413 Shockey et al. Jun 1990 A
4932419 de Toledo Jun 1990 A
4948229 Soref Aug 1990 A
4951677 Crowley et al. Aug 1990 A
4969742 Falk et al. Nov 1990 A
4987412 Vaitekunas et al. Jan 1991 A
4993412 Murphy-Chutorian Feb 1991 A
4998972 Chin et al. Mar 1991 A
5000185 Yock Mar 1991 A
5024234 Leary et al. Jun 1991 A
5025445 Anderson et al. Jun 1991 A
5032123 Katz et al. Jul 1991 A
5037169 Chun Aug 1991 A
5039193 Snow et al. Aug 1991 A
5040548 Yock Aug 1991 A
5041108 Fox et al. Aug 1991 A
5054492 Scribner et al. Oct 1991 A
5065010 Knute Nov 1991 A
5065769 de Toledo Nov 1991 A
5085221 Ingebrigtsen et al. Feb 1992 A
5095911 Pomeranz Mar 1992 A
5100424 Jang et al. Mar 1992 A
5120308 Hess Jun 1992 A
5125137 Corl et al. Jun 1992 A
5135486 Eberle et al. Aug 1992 A
5135516 Sahatjian et al. Aug 1992 A
5155439 Holmbo et al. Oct 1992 A
5158548 Lau et al. Oct 1992 A
5163445 Christian et al. Nov 1992 A
5167233 Eberle et al. Dec 1992 A
5174295 Christian et al. Dec 1992 A
5176141 Bom et al. Jan 1993 A
5176674 Hofmann Jan 1993 A
5178159 Christian Jan 1993 A
5183048 Eberle Feb 1993 A
5188632 Goldenberg Feb 1993 A
5201316 Pomeranz et al. Apr 1993 A
5202745 Sorin et al. Apr 1993 A
5203779 Muller et al. Apr 1993 A
5220922 Barany Jun 1993 A
5224953 Morgentaler Jul 1993 A
5226421 Frisbie et al. Jul 1993 A
5240003 Lancee et al. Aug 1993 A
5240437 Christian Aug 1993 A
5242460 Klein et al. Sep 1993 A
5243988 Sieben et al. Sep 1993 A
5257974 Cox Nov 1993 A
5266302 Peyman et al. Nov 1993 A
5267954 Nita Dec 1993 A
5301001 Murphy et al. Apr 1994 A
5312425 Evans et al. May 1994 A
5313949 Yock May 1994 A
5313957 Little May 1994 A
5319492 Dorn et al. Jun 1994 A
5321501 Swanson et al. Jun 1994 A
5325198 Hartley et al. Jun 1994 A
5336178 Kaplan et al. Aug 1994 A
5346689 Peyman et al. Sep 1994 A
5348017 Thornton et al. Sep 1994 A
5348481 Ortiz Sep 1994 A
5353798 Sieben Oct 1994 A
5358409 Obara Oct 1994 A
5358478 Thompson et al. Oct 1994 A
5368037 Eberle et al. Nov 1994 A
5373845 Gardineer et al. Dec 1994 A
5373849 Maroney et al. Dec 1994 A
5375602 Lancee et al. Dec 1994 A
5377682 Ueno et al. Jan 1995 A
5383853 Jung et al. Jan 1995 A
5387193 Miraki Feb 1995 A
5396328 Jestel et al. Mar 1995 A
5397355 Marin et al. Mar 1995 A
5405377 Cragg Apr 1995 A
5411016 Kume et al. May 1995 A
5419777 Hofling May 1995 A
5421338 Crowley et al. Jun 1995 A
5423806 Dale et al. Jun 1995 A
5427118 Nita et al. Jun 1995 A
5431673 Summers et al. Jul 1995 A
5436759 Dijaili et al. Jul 1995 A
5439139 Brovelli Aug 1995 A
5443457 Ginn et al. Aug 1995 A
5453575 O'Donnell et al. Sep 1995 A
5456693 Conston et al. Oct 1995 A
5459570 Swanson et al. Oct 1995 A
5480388 Zadini et al. Jan 1996 A
5485845 Verdonk et al. Jan 1996 A
5492125 Kim et al. Feb 1996 A
5496997 Pope Mar 1996 A
5507761 Duer Apr 1996 A
5512044 Duer Apr 1996 A
5514128 Hillsman et al. May 1996 A
5529674 Hedgcoth Jun 1996 A
5541730 Chaney Jul 1996 A
5546717 Penczak et al. Aug 1996 A
5546948 Hamm et al. Aug 1996 A
5565332 Hoogenboom et al. Oct 1996 A
5573520 Schwartz et al. Nov 1996 A
5581638 Givens et al. Dec 1996 A
5586054 Jensen et al. Dec 1996 A
5592939 Martinelli Jan 1997 A
5596079 Smith et al. Jan 1997 A
5598844 Diaz et al. Feb 1997 A
5609606 O'Boyle Mar 1997 A
5630806 Inagaki et al. May 1997 A
5651366 Liang et al. Jul 1997 A
5660180 Malinowski et al. Aug 1997 A
5667499 Welch et al. Sep 1997 A
5667521 Keown Sep 1997 A
5672877 Liebig et al. Sep 1997 A
5674232 Halliburton Oct 1997 A
5675513 Hammer Oct 1997 A
5693015 Walker et al. Dec 1997 A
5713848 Dubrul et al. Feb 1998 A
5745634 Garrett et al. Apr 1998 A
5771895 Slager Jun 1998 A
5779731 Leavitt Jul 1998 A
5780958 Strugach et al. Jul 1998 A
5798521 Froggatt Aug 1998 A
5800450 Lary et al. Sep 1998 A
5803083 Buck et al. Sep 1998 A
5814061 Osborne et al. Sep 1998 A
5817025 Alekseev et al. Oct 1998 A
5820594 Fontirroche et al. Oct 1998 A
5824520 Mulligan-Kehoe Oct 1998 A
5827313 Ream Oct 1998 A
5830222 Makower Nov 1998 A
5848121 Gupta et al. Dec 1998 A
5851464 Davila et al. Dec 1998 A
5857974 Eberle et al. Jan 1999 A
5872829 Wischmann et al. Feb 1999 A
5873835 Hastings et al. Feb 1999 A
5882722 Kydd Mar 1999 A
5912764 Togino Jun 1999 A
5916194 Jacobsen et al. Jun 1999 A
5921931 O'Donnell et al. Jul 1999 A
5925055 Adrian et al. Jul 1999 A
5949929 Hamm Sep 1999 A
5951586 Berg et al. Sep 1999 A
5974521 Akerib Oct 1999 A
5976120 Chow et al. Nov 1999 A
5978391 Das et al. Nov 1999 A
5997523 Jang Dec 1999 A
6021240 Murphy et al. Feb 2000 A
6022319 Willard et al. Feb 2000 A
6031071 Mandeville et al. Feb 2000 A
6036889 Kydd Mar 2000 A
6043883 Leckel et al. Mar 2000 A
6050949 White et al. Apr 2000 A
6059738 Stoltze et al. May 2000 A
6068638 Makower May 2000 A
6074362 Jang et al. Jun 2000 A
6078831 Belef et al. Jun 2000 A
6080109 Baker et al. Jun 2000 A
6091496 Hill Jul 2000 A
6094591 Foltz et al. Jul 2000 A
6095976 Nachtomy et al. Aug 2000 A
6097755 Guenther, Jr. et al. Aug 2000 A
6099471 Torp et al. Aug 2000 A
6099549 Bosma et al. Aug 2000 A
6102938 Evans et al. Aug 2000 A
6106476 Corl et al. Aug 2000 A
6120445 Grunwald Sep 2000 A
6123673 Eberle et al. Sep 2000 A
6134003 Tearney et al. Oct 2000 A
6139510 Palermo Oct 2000 A
6141089 Thoma et al. Oct 2000 A
6146328 Chiao et al. Nov 2000 A
6148095 Prause et al. Nov 2000 A
6151433 Dower et al. Nov 2000 A
6152877 Masters Nov 2000 A
6152878 Nachtomy et al. Nov 2000 A
6159225 Makower Dec 2000 A
6165127 Crowley Dec 2000 A
6176842 Tachibana et al. Jan 2001 B1
6179809 Khairkhahan et al. Jan 2001 B1
6186949 Hatfield et al. Feb 2001 B1
6190353 Makower et al. Feb 2001 B1
6200266 Shokrollahi et al. Mar 2001 B1
6200268 Vince et al. Mar 2001 B1
6203537 Adrian Mar 2001 B1
6208415 De Boer et al. Mar 2001 B1
6210332 Chiao et al. Apr 2001 B1
6210339 Kiepen et al. Apr 2001 B1
6212308 Donald Apr 2001 B1
6231518 Grabek et al. May 2001 B1
6245066 Morgan et al. Jun 2001 B1
6249076 Madden et al. Jun 2001 B1
6254543 Grunwald et al. Jul 2001 B1
6256090 Chen et al. Jul 2001 B1
6258052 Milo Jul 2001 B1
6261246 Pantages et al. Jul 2001 B1
6275628 Jones et al. Aug 2001 B1
6283921 Nix et al. Sep 2001 B1
6283951 Flaherty et al. Sep 2001 B1
6295308 Zah Sep 2001 B1
6299622 Snow et al. Oct 2001 B1
6312384 Chiao Nov 2001 B1
6325797 Stewart et al. Dec 2001 B1
6328696 Fraser Dec 2001 B1
6343168 Murphy et al. Jan 2002 B1
6343178 Burns et al. Jan 2002 B1
6350240 Song et al. Feb 2002 B1
6364841 White et al. Apr 2002 B1
6366722 Murphy et al. Apr 2002 B1
6367984 Stephenson et al. Apr 2002 B1
6373970 Dong et al. Apr 2002 B1
6375615 Flaherty et al. Apr 2002 B1
6375618 Chiao et al. Apr 2002 B1
6375628 Zadno-Azizi et al. Apr 2002 B1
6376830 Froggatt et al. Apr 2002 B1
6379352 Reynolds et al. Apr 2002 B1
6381350 Klingensmith et al. Apr 2002 B1
6387124 Buscemi et al. May 2002 B1
6396976 Little et al. May 2002 B1
6398792 O'Connor Jun 2002 B1
6417948 Chowdhury et al. Jul 2002 B1
6419644 White et al. Jul 2002 B1
6421164 Tearney et al. Jul 2002 B2
6423012 Kato et al. Jul 2002 B1
6426796 Pulliam et al. Jul 2002 B1
6428041 Wohllebe et al. Aug 2002 B1
6428498 Uflacker Aug 2002 B2
6429421 Meller et al. Aug 2002 B1
6440077 Jung et al. Aug 2002 B1
6443903 White et al. Sep 2002 B1
6450964 Webler Sep 2002 B1
6457365 Stephens et al. Oct 2002 B1
6459844 Pan Oct 2002 B1
6468290 Weldon et al. Oct 2002 B1
6475149 Sumanaweera Nov 2002 B1
6480285 Hill Nov 2002 B1
6491631 Chiao et al. Dec 2002 B2
6491636 Chenal et al. Dec 2002 B2
6501551 Tearney et al. Dec 2002 B1
6504286 Porat et al. Jan 2003 B1
6508824 Flaherty et al. Jan 2003 B1
6514237 Maseda Feb 2003 B1
6520269 Geiger et al. Feb 2003 B2
6520677 Iizuka Feb 2003 B2
6535764 Imran et al. Mar 2003 B2
6538778 Leckel et al. Mar 2003 B1
6544217 Gulachenski Apr 2003 B1
6544230 Flaherty et al. Apr 2003 B1
6545760 Froggatt et al. Apr 2003 B1
6546272 MacKinnon et al. Apr 2003 B1
6551250 Khalil Apr 2003 B2
6566648 Froggatt May 2003 B1
6570894 Anderson May 2003 B2
6572555 White et al. Jun 2003 B2
6579311 Makower Jun 2003 B1
6584335 Haar et al. Jun 2003 B1
6592612 Samson et al. Jul 2003 B1
6594448 Herman et al. Jul 2003 B2
6602241 Makower et al. Aug 2003 B2
6611322 Nakayama et al. Aug 2003 B1
6611720 Hata et al. Aug 2003 B2
6612992 Hossack et al. Sep 2003 B1
6615062 Ryan et al. Sep 2003 B2
6615072 Izatt et al. Sep 2003 B1
6621562 Durston Sep 2003 B2
6624893 Schmit et al. Sep 2003 B1
6631284 Nutt et al. Oct 2003 B2
6638227 Bae Oct 2003 B2
6645152 Jung et al. Nov 2003 B1
6646745 Verma et al. Nov 2003 B2
6655386 Makower et al. Dec 2003 B1
6659957 Vardi et al. Dec 2003 B1
6660024 Flaherty et al. Dec 2003 B1
6663565 Kawagishi et al. Dec 2003 B2
6665456 Dave et al. Dec 2003 B2
6669716 Gilson et al. Dec 2003 B1
6671055 Wavering et al. Dec 2003 B1
6673015 Glover et al. Jan 2004 B1
6673064 Rentrop Jan 2004 B1
6685648 Flaherty et al. Feb 2004 B2
6689056 Kilcoyne et al. Feb 2004 B1
6689144 Gerberding Feb 2004 B2
6696173 Naundorf et al. Feb 2004 B1
6701044 Arbore et al. Mar 2004 B2
6701176 Halperin et al. Mar 2004 B1
6709444 Makower Mar 2004 B1
6712836 Berg et al. Mar 2004 B1
6714703 Lee et al. Mar 2004 B2
6719717 Johnson et al. Apr 2004 B1
6725073 Motamedi et al. Apr 2004 B1
6726677 Flaherty et al. Apr 2004 B1
6730107 Kelley et al. May 2004 B2
6733474 Kusleika May 2004 B2
6738144 Dogariu May 2004 B1
6740113 Vrba May 2004 B2
6746464 Makower Jun 2004 B1
6780157 Stephens et al. Aug 2004 B2
6795188 Ruck et al. Sep 2004 B2
6795196 Funakawa Sep 2004 B2
6798522 Stolte et al. Sep 2004 B2
6822798 Wu et al. Nov 2004 B2
6830559 Schock Dec 2004 B2
6832024 Gerstenberger et al. Dec 2004 B2
6842639 Winston et al. Jan 2005 B1
6847449 Bashkansky et al. Jan 2005 B2
6855115 Fonseca et al. Feb 2005 B2
6856138 Bohley Feb 2005 B2
6856400 Froggatt Feb 2005 B1
6856472 Herman et al. Feb 2005 B2
6860867 Seward et al. Mar 2005 B2
6866670 Rabiner et al. Mar 2005 B2
6878113 Miwa et al. Apr 2005 B2
6886411 Kjellman et al. May 2005 B2
6891984 Petersen et al. May 2005 B2
6895106 Wang et al. May 2005 B2
6898337 Averett et al. May 2005 B2
6900897 Froggatt May 2005 B2
6912051 Jensen Jun 2005 B2
6916329 Zhao Jul 2005 B1
6922498 Shah Jul 2005 B2
6937346 Nebendahl et al. Aug 2005 B2
6937696 Mostafavi Aug 2005 B1
6943939 DiJaili et al. Sep 2005 B1
6947147 Motamedi et al. Sep 2005 B2
6947787 Webler Sep 2005 B2
6949094 Yaron Sep 2005 B2
6952603 Gerber et al. Oct 2005 B2
6954737 Kalantar et al. Oct 2005 B2
6958042 Honda Oct 2005 B2
6961123 Wang et al. Nov 2005 B1
6966891 Ookubo et al. Nov 2005 B2
6969293 Thai Nov 2005 B2
6969395 Eskuri Nov 2005 B2
6985234 Anderson Jan 2006 B2
7004963 Wang et al. Feb 2006 B2
7006231 Ostrovsky et al. Feb 2006 B2
7010458 Wilt Mar 2006 B2
7024025 Sathyanarayana Apr 2006 B2
7027211 Ruffa Apr 2006 B1
7027743 Tucker et al. Apr 2006 B1
7033347 Appling Apr 2006 B2
7035484 Silberberg et al. Apr 2006 B2
7037269 Nix et al. May 2006 B2
7042573 Froggatt May 2006 B2
7044915 White et al. May 2006 B2
7044964 Jang et al. May 2006 B2
7048711 Rosenman et al. May 2006 B2
7049306 Konradi et al. May 2006 B2
7058239 Singh et al. Jun 2006 B2
7060033 White et al. Jun 2006 B2
7060421 Naundorf et al. Jun 2006 B2
7063679 Maguire et al. Jun 2006 B2
7068852 Braica Jun 2006 B2
7074188 Nair et al. Jul 2006 B2
7095493 Harres Aug 2006 B2
7110119 Maestle Sep 2006 B2
7113875 Terashima et al. Sep 2006 B2
7123777 Rondinelli et al. Oct 2006 B2
7130054 Ostrovsky et al. Oct 2006 B2
7139440 Rondinelli et al. Nov 2006 B2
7153299 Tu et al. Dec 2006 B1
7171078 Sasaki et al. Jan 2007 B2
7175597 Vince et al. Feb 2007 B2
7177491 Dave et al. Feb 2007 B2
7190464 Alphonse Mar 2007 B2
7215802 Klingensmith et al. May 2007 B2
7218811 Shigenaga et al. May 2007 B2
7236812 Ballerstadt et al. Jun 2007 B1
7245125 Harer et al. Jul 2007 B2
7245789 Bates et al. Jul 2007 B2
7249357 Landman et al. Jul 2007 B2
7291146 Steinke et al. Nov 2007 B2
7292715 Furnish Nov 2007 B2
7292885 Scott et al. Nov 2007 B2
7294124 Eidenschink Nov 2007 B2
7300460 Levine et al. Nov 2007 B2
7335161 Von Arx et al. Feb 2008 B2
7337079 Park et al. Feb 2008 B2
7355716 de Boer et al. Apr 2008 B2
7356367 Liang et al. Apr 2008 B2
7358921 Snyder et al. Apr 2008 B2
7359062 Chen et al. Apr 2008 B2
7359554 Klingensmith et al. Apr 2008 B2
7363927 Ravikumar Apr 2008 B2
7366376 Shishkov et al. Apr 2008 B2
7382949 Bouma et al. Jun 2008 B2
7387636 Cohn et al. Jun 2008 B2
7391520 Zhou et al. Jun 2008 B2
7397935 Kimmel et al. Jul 2008 B2
7399095 Rondinelli Jul 2008 B2
7408648 Kleen et al. Aug 2008 B2
7414779 Huber et al. Aug 2008 B2
7440087 Froggatt et al. Oct 2008 B2
7447388 Bates et al. Nov 2008 B2
7449821 Dausch Nov 2008 B2
7450165 Ahiska Nov 2008 B2
RE40608 Glover et al. Dec 2008 E
7458967 Appling et al. Dec 2008 B2
7463362 Lasker et al. Dec 2008 B2
7463759 Klingensmith et al. Dec 2008 B2
7491226 Palmaz et al. Feb 2009 B2
7515276 Froggatt et al. Apr 2009 B2
7527594 Vardi et al. May 2009 B2
7534251 WasDyke May 2009 B2
7535797 Peng et al. May 2009 B2
7547304 Johnson Jun 2009 B2
7564949 Sattler et al. Jul 2009 B2
7577471 Camus et al. Aug 2009 B2
7583857 Xu et al. Sep 2009 B2
7603165 Townsend et al. Oct 2009 B2
7612773 Magnin et al. Nov 2009 B2
7633627 Choma et al. Dec 2009 B2
7645229 Armstrong Jan 2010 B2
7658715 Park et al. Feb 2010 B2
7660452 Zwirn et al. Feb 2010 B2
7660492 Bates et al. Feb 2010 B2
7666204 Thornton et al. Feb 2010 B2
7672790 McGraw et al. Mar 2010 B2
7680247 Atzinger et al. Mar 2010 B2
7684991 Stohr et al. Mar 2010 B2
7711413 Feldman et al. May 2010 B2
7720322 Prisco May 2010 B2
7728986 Lasker et al. Jun 2010 B2
7734009 Brunner et al. Jun 2010 B2
7736317 Stephens et al. Jun 2010 B2
7742795 Stone et al. Jun 2010 B2
7743189 Brown et al. Jun 2010 B2
7762954 Nix et al. Jul 2010 B2
7766896 Kornkven Volk et al. Aug 2010 B2
7773792 Kimmel et al. Aug 2010 B2
7775981 Guracar et al. Aug 2010 B1
7777399 Eidenschink et al. Aug 2010 B2
7781724 Childers et al. Aug 2010 B2
7783337 Feldman et al. Aug 2010 B2
7787127 Galle et al. Aug 2010 B2
7792342 Barbu et al. Sep 2010 B2
7801343 Unal et al. Sep 2010 B2
7801590 Feldman et al. Sep 2010 B2
7813609 Petersen et al. Oct 2010 B2
7831081 Li Nov 2010 B2
7846101 Eberle et al. Dec 2010 B2
7853104 Oota et al. Dec 2010 B2
7853316 Milner et al. Dec 2010 B2
7860555 Saadat Dec 2010 B2
7862508 Davies et al. Jan 2011 B2
7872759 Tearney et al. Jan 2011 B2
7880868 Aoki Feb 2011 B2
7881763 Brauker et al. Feb 2011 B2
7909844 Alkhatib et al. Mar 2011 B2
7921854 Hennings et al. Apr 2011 B2
7927784 Simpson Apr 2011 B2
7929148 Kemp Apr 2011 B2
7930014 Huennekens et al. Apr 2011 B2
7930104 Baker et al. Apr 2011 B2
7936462 Jiang et al. May 2011 B2
7942852 Mas et al. May 2011 B2
7947012 Spurchise et al. May 2011 B2
7951186 Eidenschink et al. May 2011 B2
7952719 Brennan, III May 2011 B2
7972353 Hendriksen et al. Jul 2011 B2
7976492 Brauker et al. Jul 2011 B2
7977950 Maslen Jul 2011 B2
7978916 Klingensmith et al. Jul 2011 B2
7981041 McGahan Jul 2011 B2
7981151 Rowe Jul 2011 B2
7983737 Feldman et al. Jul 2011 B2
7993333 Oral et al. Aug 2011 B2
7995210 Tearney et al. Aug 2011 B2
7996060 Trofimov et al. Aug 2011 B2
7999938 Wang Aug 2011 B2
8021377 Eskuri Sep 2011 B2
8021420 Dolan Sep 2011 B2
8036732 Milner Oct 2011 B2
8040586 Smith et al. Oct 2011 B2
8047996 Goodnow et al. Nov 2011 B2
8049900 Kemp et al. Nov 2011 B2
8050478 Li et al. Nov 2011 B2
8050523 Younge et al. Nov 2011 B2
8052605 Muller et al. Nov 2011 B2
8057394 Dala-Krishna Nov 2011 B2
8059923 Bates et al. Nov 2011 B2
8070800 Lock et al. Dec 2011 B2
8080800 Hoctor et al. Dec 2011 B2
8088102 Adams et al. Jan 2012 B2
8100838 Wright et al. Jan 2012 B2
8104479 Glynn et al. Jan 2012 B2
8108030 Castella et al. Jan 2012 B2
8114102 Galdonik et al. Feb 2012 B2
8116605 Petersen et al. Feb 2012 B2
8125648 Milner et al. Feb 2012 B2
8126239 Sun et al. Feb 2012 B2
8133199 Weber et al. Mar 2012 B2
8133269 Flechsenhar et al. Mar 2012 B2
8140708 Zaharia et al. Mar 2012 B2
8148877 Jiang et al. Apr 2012 B2
8167932 Bourang et al. May 2012 B2
8172757 Jaffe et al. May 2012 B2
8177809 Mavani et al. May 2012 B2
8187191 Hancock et al. May 2012 B2
8187267 Pappone et al. May 2012 B2
8187830 Hu et al. May 2012 B2
8199218 Lee et al. Jun 2012 B2
8206429 Gregorich et al. Jun 2012 B2
8208995 Tearney et al. Jun 2012 B2
8222906 Wyar et al. Jul 2012 B2
8233681 Aylward et al. Jul 2012 B2
8233718 Klingensmith et al. Jul 2012 B2
8238624 Doi et al. Aug 2012 B2
8239938 Simeral et al. Aug 2012 B2
8277386 Ahmed et al. Oct 2012 B2
8280470 Milner et al. Oct 2012 B2
8289284 Glynn et al. Oct 2012 B2
8289522 Tearney et al. Oct 2012 B2
8298147 Huennekens et al. Oct 2012 B2
8298149 Hastings et al. Oct 2012 B2
8301000 Sillard et al. Oct 2012 B2
8309428 Lemmerhirt et al. Nov 2012 B2
8317713 Davies et al. Nov 2012 B2
8323201 Towfiq et al. Dec 2012 B2
8329053 Martin et al. Dec 2012 B2
8336643 Harleman Dec 2012 B2
8349000 Schreck Jan 2013 B2
8353945 Andreas et al. Jan 2013 B2
8353954 Cai et al. Jan 2013 B2
8357981 Martin et al. Jan 2013 B2
8361097 Patel et al. Jan 2013 B2
8386560 Ma et al. Feb 2013 B2
8398591 Mas et al. Mar 2013 B2
8412312 Judell et al. Apr 2013 B2
8417491 Trovato et al. Apr 2013 B2
8449465 Nair et al. May 2013 B2
8454685 Hariton et al. Jun 2013 B2
8454686 Alkhatib Jun 2013 B2
8475522 Jimenez et al. Jul 2013 B2
8478384 Schmitt et al. Jul 2013 B2
8486062 Belhe et al. Jul 2013 B2
8486063 Werneth et al. Jul 2013 B2
8491567 Magnin et al. Jul 2013 B2
8500798 Rowe et al. Aug 2013 B2
8550911 Sylla Oct 2013 B2
8594757 Boppart et al. Nov 2013 B2
8597349 Alkhatib Dec 2013 B2
8600477 Beyar et al. Dec 2013 B2
8600917 Schimert et al. Dec 2013 B1
8601056 Lauwers et al. Dec 2013 B2
8620055 Barratt et al. Dec 2013 B2
8644910 Rousso et al. Feb 2014 B2
20010007940 Tu et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010029337 Pantages et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010037073 White et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010046345 Snyder et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010049548 Vardi et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020034276 Hu et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020041723 Ronnekleiv et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020069676 Kopp et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020089335 Williams Jul 2002 A1
20020099289 Crowley Jul 2002 A1
20020186818 Arnaud et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020196446 Roth et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020197456 Pope Dec 2002 A1
20030004412 Izatt et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030016604 Hanes Jan 2003 A1
20030018273 Corl et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030023153 Izatt et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030032886 Dgany et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030050871 Broughton Mar 2003 A1
20030065371 Satake Apr 2003 A1
20030069723 Hegde Apr 2003 A1
20030077043 Hamm et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030085635 Davidsen May 2003 A1
20030090753 Takeyama et al. May 2003 A1
20030092995 Thompson May 2003 A1
20030093059 Griffin et al. May 2003 A1
20030103212 Westphal et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030152259 Belykh et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030181802 Ogawa Sep 2003 A1
20030187369 Lewis et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030194165 Silberberg et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030195419 Harada Oct 2003 A1
20030208116 Liang et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030212491 Mitchell et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030219202 Loeb et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030220749 Chen et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030228039 Green Dec 2003 A1
20040015065 Panescu et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040023317 Motamedi et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040028333 Lomas Feb 2004 A1
20040037742 Jen et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040042066 Kinoshita et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040054287 Stephens Mar 2004 A1
20040067000 Bates et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040068161 Couvillon Apr 2004 A1
20040082844 Vardi et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040085543 Xie et al. May 2004 A1
20040092830 Scott et al. May 2004 A1
20040106853 Moriyama Jun 2004 A1
20040111552 Arimilli et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040126048 Dave et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040143160 Couvillon Jul 2004 A1
20040146546 Gravett et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040186369 Lam Sep 2004 A1
20040186558 Pavcnik et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040195512 Crosetto Oct 2004 A1
20040220606 Goshgarian Nov 2004 A1
20040225220 Rich Nov 2004 A1
20040239938 Izatt Dec 2004 A1
20040242990 Brister et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040248439 Gernhardt et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040260236 Manning et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050013778 Green et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050031176 Hertel et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050036150 Izatt et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050078317 Law et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050101859 Maschke May 2005 A1
20050140582 Lee et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050140682 Sumanaweera et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050140981 Waelti Jun 2005 A1
20050140984 Hitzenberger Jun 2005 A1
20050147303 Zhou et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050165439 Weber et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050171433 Boppart et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050171438 Chen et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050182297 Gravenstein et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050196028 Kleen et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050197585 Brockway et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050213103 Everett et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050215942 Abrahamson et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050234445 Conquergood et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050243322 Lasker et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050249391 Kimmel et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050251567 Ballew et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050254059 Alphonse Nov 2005 A1
20050264823 Zhu et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060013523 Childlers et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060015126 Sher Jan 2006 A1
20060029634 Berg et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060036167 Shina Feb 2006 A1
20060038115 Maas Feb 2006 A1
20060039004 de Boer et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060041180 Viswanathan et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060045536 Arahira Mar 2006 A1
20060055936 Yun et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060058622 Tearney et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060064009 Webler et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060067620 Shishkov et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060072808 Grimm et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060074442 Noriega et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060098927 Schmidt et al. May 2006 A1
20060100694 Globerman May 2006 A1
20060106375 Werneth et al. May 2006 A1
20060132790 Gutin Jun 2006 A1
20060135870 Webler Jun 2006 A1
20060142703 Carter et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060142733 Forsberg Jun 2006 A1
20060173299 Romley et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060179255 Yamazaki Aug 2006 A1
20060184048 Saadat Aug 2006 A1
20060187537 Huber et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195269 Yeatman et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060204119 Feng et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060229591 Lee Oct 2006 A1
20060239312 Kewitsch et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241342 Macaulay et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241465 Huennekens et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241503 Schmitt et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060244973 Yun et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060258895 Maschke Nov 2006 A1
20060264743 Kleen et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060267756 Kates Nov 2006 A1
20060270976 Savage et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060276709 Khamene et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060279742 Tearney et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060279743 Boesser et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060285638 Boese et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060287595 Maschke Dec 2006 A1
20060293597 Johnson et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070015969 Feldman et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070016029 Donaldson et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070016034 Donaldson Jan 2007 A1
20070016062 Park et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070027390 Maschke et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070036417 Argiro et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070038061 Huennekens et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070038121 Feldman et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070038125 Kleen et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070043292 Camus et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070043597 Donaldson Feb 2007 A1
20070049847 Osborne Mar 2007 A1
20070060973 Ludvig et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070065077 Childers et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070066888 Maschke Mar 2007 A1
20070066890 Maschke Mar 2007 A1
20070066983 Maschke Mar 2007 A1
20070084995 Newton et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070100226 Yankelevitz et al. May 2007 A1
20070135887 Maschke Jun 2007 A1
20070142707 Wiklof et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070156019 Larkin et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070161893 Milner et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070161896 Adachi et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070161963 Smalling Jul 2007 A1
20070162860 Muralidharan et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070165141 Srinivas et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070167710 Unal et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070167804 Park et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070191682 Rolland et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070201736 Klingensmith et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070206193 Pesach Sep 2007 A1
20070208276 Kornkven Volk et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070225220 Ming et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070225590 Ramos Sep 2007 A1
20070229801 Tearney et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070232872 Prough et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070232874 Ince Oct 2007 A1
20070232890 Hirota Oct 2007 A1
20070232891 Hirota Oct 2007 A1
20070232892 Hirota Oct 2007 A1
20070232893 Tanioka Oct 2007 A1
20070232933 Gille et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070238957 Yared Oct 2007 A1
20070247033 Eidenschink et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250000 Magnin et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250036 Volk et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070258094 Izatt et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070260138 Feldman et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070278389 Ajgaonkar et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070287914 Cohen Dec 2007 A1
20080002183 Yatagai et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080013093 Izatt et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080021275 Tearney et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080027481 Gilson et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080043024 Schiwietz et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080045842 Furnish Feb 2008 A1
20080051660 Kakadaris et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080055591 Walton Mar 2008 A1
20080063304 Russak et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080085041 Breeuwer Apr 2008 A1
20080095465 Mullick et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080095714 Castella et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080097194 Milner Apr 2008 A1
20080101667 Begelman et al. May 2008 A1
20080108867 Zhou May 2008 A1
20080114254 Matcovitch et al. May 2008 A1
20080119739 Vardi et al. May 2008 A1
20080124495 Horn et al. May 2008 A1
20080125772 Stone et al. May 2008 A1
20080130950 Miklos et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080139897 Ainsworth et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080143707 Mitchell Jun 2008 A1
20080146941 Dala-Krishna Jun 2008 A1
20080147111 Johnson et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080154128 Milner Jun 2008 A1
20080161696 Schmitt et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080171944 Brenneman et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080175465 Jiang et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080177183 Courtney et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080180683 Kemp Jul 2008 A1
20080181477 Izatt et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080187201 Liang et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080228086 Ilegbusi et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080247622 Aylward et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080247716 Thomas et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080262470 Lee et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080262489 Steinke Oct 2008 A1
20080269599 Csavoy et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080281205 Naghavi et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080281248 Angheloiu et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080285043 Fercher et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080287795 Klingensmith et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080291463 Milner et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080292173 Hsieh et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080294034 Krueger et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080298655 Edwards Dec 2008 A1
20080306766 Ozeki et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090009801 Tabuki Jan 2009 A1
20090018393 Dick et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090034813 Dikmen et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090043191 Castella et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090046295 Kemp et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090052614 Hempel et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090069843 Agnew Mar 2009 A1
20090079993 Yatagai et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090088650 Corl Apr 2009 A1
20090093980 Kemp et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090122320 Petersen et al. May 2009 A1
20090138544 Wegenkittl et al. May 2009 A1
20090149739 Maschke Jun 2009 A9
20090156941 Moore Jun 2009 A1
20090174886 Inoue Jul 2009 A1
20090174931 Huber et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090177090 Grunwald et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090177183 Pinkernell et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090195514 Glynn et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090196470 Carl et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090198125 Nakabayashi et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090203991 Papaioannou et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090264768 Courtney et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090269014 Winberg et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090270695 McEowen Oct 2009 A1
20090284322 Harrison et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090284332 Moore et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090284749 Johnson et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090290167 Flanders et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090292048 Li et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090299195 Muller et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090299284 Holman et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090318951 Kashkarov et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090326634 Vardi Dec 2009 A1
20100007669 Bethune et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100030042 Denninghoff et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100061611 Xu et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100063400 Hall et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100087732 Eberle et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100094125 Younge et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100094127 Xu Apr 2010 A1
20100094135 Fang-Yen et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100094143 Mahapatra et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100113919 Maschke May 2010 A1
20100125238 Lye et al. May 2010 A1
20100125268 Gustus et al. May 2010 A1
20100125648 Zaharia et al. May 2010 A1
20100128348 Taverner May 2010 A1
20100152717 Keeler Jun 2010 A1
20100160788 Davies et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100161023 Cohen et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100168714 Burke et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100179421 Tupin Jul 2010 A1
20100179426 Davies et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100220334 Condit et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100226607 Zhang et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100234736 Corl Sep 2010 A1
20100249601 Courtney Sep 2010 A1
20100256616 Katoh et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100272432 Johnson Oct 2010 A1
20100284590 Peng et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100290693 Cohen et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100331950 Strommer Dec 2010 A1
20110010925 Nix et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110021926 Spencer et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110025853 Richardson Feb 2011 A1
20110026797 Declerck et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110032533 Izatt et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110034801 Baumgart Feb 2011 A1
20110044546 Pan et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110066073 Kuiper et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110071401 Hastings et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110072405 Chen et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110077528 Kemp et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110080591 Johnson et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110087104 Moore et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110137140 Tearney et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110144502 Zhou et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110152771 Milner et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110157597 Lu et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110160586 Li et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110178413 Schmitt et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110190586 Kemp Aug 2011 A1
20110216378 Poon et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110220985 Son et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110238061 van der Weide et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110238083 Moll et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110245669 Zhang Oct 2011 A1
20110249094 Wang et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110257545 Suri Oct 2011 A1
20110264125 Wilson et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110274329 Mathew et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110282334 Groenhoff Nov 2011 A1
20110301684 Fischell et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110306995 Moberg Dec 2011 A1
20110319752 Steinberg et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120004529 Tolkowsky et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120004668 Wallace et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120013914 Kemp et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120016344 Kusakabe Jan 2012 A1
20120016395 Olson Jan 2012 A1
20120022360 Kemp Jan 2012 A1
20120026503 Lewandowski et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120029007 Graham et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120059253 Wang et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120059368 Takaoka et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120062843 Ferguson et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120065481 Hunter et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120071823 Chen Mar 2012 A1
20120071838 Fojtik Mar 2012 A1
20120075638 Rollins et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120083696 Kitamura Apr 2012 A1
20120095340 Smith Apr 2012 A1
20120095372 Sverdlik et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120108943 Bates et al. May 2012 A1
20120113108 Dala-Krishna May 2012 A1
20120116353 Arnold et al. May 2012 A1
20120130243 Balocco et al. May 2012 A1
20120130247 Waters et al. May 2012 A1
20120136259 Milner et al. May 2012 A1
20120136427 Palmaz et al. May 2012 A1
20120137075 Vorbach May 2012 A1
20120155734 Barratt et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120158101 Stone et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120162660 Kemp Jun 2012 A1
20120165661 Kemp et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120170848 Kemp et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120172698 Teo et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120176607 Ott Jul 2012 A1
20120184853 Waters Jul 2012 A1
20120184859 Shah et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120184977 Wolf Jul 2012 A1
20120215094 Rahimian et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120220836 Alpert et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120220851 Razansky et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120220865 Brown et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120220874 Hancock et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120220883 Manstrom et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120224751 Kemp et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120226153 Brown et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120230565 Steinberg et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120232400 Dickinson et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120238869 Schmitt et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120238956 Yamada et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120244043 Leblanc et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120250028 Schmitt et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120253186 Simpson et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120253192 Cressman Oct 2012 A1
20120253276 Govari et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120257210 Whitney et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120262720 Brown et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120265077 Gille et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120265268 Blum et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120265296 McNamara et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120271170 Emelianov et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120271175 Moore et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120271339 O'Beirne et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120274338 Baks et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120276390 Ji et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120277722 Gerber et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120279764 Jiang et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120283758 Miller et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120289987 Wilson et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120299439 Huang Nov 2012 A1
20120310081 Adler et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120310332 Murray et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120319535 Dausch Dec 2012 A1
20120323075 Younge et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120323127 Boyden et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120330141 Brown et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130015975 Huennekens et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130023762 Huennekens et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130023763 Huennekens et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130026655 Lee et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130030295 Huennekens et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130030303 Ahmed et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130030410 Drasler et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130053949 Pintor et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130109958 Baumgart et al. May 2013 A1
20130109959 Baumgart et al. May 2013 A1
20130137980 Waters et al. May 2013 A1
20130150716 Stigall et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130158594 Carrison et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130218201 Obermiller et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130218267 Braido et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130223789 Lee et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130223798 Jenner et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130296704 Magnin et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130303907 Corl Nov 2013 A1
20130303920 Corl Nov 2013 A1
20130310698 Judell et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130331820 Itou et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130338766 Hastings et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130339958 Droste et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140039294 Jiang Feb 2014 A1
20140180067 Stigall et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140180128 Corl Jun 2014 A1
20140200438 Millett et al. Jul 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (101)
Number Date Country
1041373 Oct 2000 EP
01172637 Jan 2002 EP
2178442 Apr 2010 EP
2438877 Apr 2012 EP
2280261 Jan 1995 GB
2000-037355 Feb 2000 JP
2000-262461 Sep 2000 JP
2000-292260 Oct 2000 JP
2000-329534 Nov 2000 JP
2001-125009 May 2001 JP
2001-272331 Oct 2001 JP
2002-503134 Jan 2002 JP
2002-088660 Mar 2002 JP
2002-523162 Jul 2002 JP
2002-374034 Dec 2002 JP
2003-143783 May 2003 JP
2003-172690 Jun 2003 JP
2003-256876 Sep 2003 JP
2003-287534 Oct 2003 JP
2004004080 Jan 2004 JP
2004-510132 Apr 2004 JP
2004-528111 Sep 2004 JP
2005-274380 Oct 2005 JP
2005-533610 Nov 2005 JP
2006-184284 Jul 2006 JP
2006-266797 Oct 2006 JP
2006-313158 Nov 2006 JP
2007-510143 Apr 2007 JP
2009-233001 Oct 2009 JP
2009-536425 Oct 2009 JP
2010014459 Jan 2010 JP
2010-516302 May 2010 JP
2010-516304 May 2010 JP
2011-056786 Mar 2011 JP
2011-508677 Mar 2011 JP
2013-546256 Dec 2013 JP
2014-501163 Jan 2014 JP
2014-506806 Mar 2014 JP
8906781 Jul 1989 WO
9101156 Feb 1991 WO
9216865 Oct 1992 WO
9306213 Apr 1993 WO
9308829 May 1993 WO
9838907 Sep 1998 WO
9857583 Dec 1998 WO
0011511 Mar 2000 WO
0044296 Aug 2000 WO
0111409 Feb 2001 WO
03032936 Apr 2003 WO
03062802 Jul 2003 WO
03073950 Sep 2003 WO
2004010856 Feb 2004 WO
2004023992 Mar 2004 WO
2004096049 Nov 2004 WO
2005047813 May 2005 WO
2005106695 Nov 2005 WO
2006016434 Feb 2006 WO
2006029634 Mar 2006 WO
2006037132 Apr 2006 WO
2006039091 Apr 2006 WO
2006061829 Jun 2006 WO
2006068875 Jun 2006 WO
2006111704 Oct 2006 WO
2006119416 Nov 2006 WO
2006121851 Nov 2006 WO
2006130802 Dec 2006 WO
2007002685 Jan 2007 WO
2007025230 Mar 2007 WO
2007045690 Apr 2007 WO
2007058895 May 2007 WO
2007060973 May 2007 WO
2007067323 Jun 2007 WO
2007084995 Jul 2007 WO
2008058084 May 2008 WO
2008069991 Jun 2008 WO
2008107905 Sep 2008 WO
2009009799 Jan 2009 WO
2009009801 Jan 2009 WO
2009046431 Apr 2009 WO
2009121067 Oct 2009 WO
2009137704 Nov 2009 WO
2011006886 Jan 2011 WO
2011038048 Mar 2011 WO
2011081688 Jul 2011 WO
2012003369 Jan 2012 WO
2012061935 May 2012 WO
2012071388 May 2012 WO
2012087818 Jun 2012 WO
2012098194 Jul 2012 WO
2012109676 Aug 2012 WO
2012130289 Oct 2012 WO
2012154767 Nov 2012 WO
2012155040 Nov 2012 WO
2013033414 Mar 2013 WO
2013033415 Mar 2013 WO
2013033418 Mar 2013 WO
2013033489 Mar 2013 WO
2013033490 Mar 2013 WO
2013033592 Mar 2013 WO
2013126390 Aug 2013 WO
2014109879 Jul 2014 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (188)
Entry
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2013/26834, mailed Apr. 24, 2013.
DC Adler, et al., “Phase-Sensitive Optical Coherence Tomography at up to 370,000 Lines Per Second Using Buffered Fourier Domain Mode-Locked Lasers”, Optics Letters, vol. 32, No. 6, pp. 626-628, (2007). Abstract Only.
Eigenwillig et al., “K-Space Linear Fourier Domain Mode Locked Laser and Applications for Optical Coherence Tomography”, Optics Express, vol. 16, No. 12, pp. 8916-8937, (2008).
Herget et al., “Infrared Spectrum of Hydrogen Fluoride: Line Positions and Line Shapes. Part II. Treatment of Data and Results”, Journal of the Optical Society of America, vol. 52, pp. 1113-1117, (1962).
Huber et al., “Amplified, Frequency Swept Lasers for Frequency Domain Reflectometry and OCT Imaging: Design and Scaling Principles”, Optics Express, vol. 13, No. 9, pp. 3513-3528, (2005).
Huber et al., “Fourier Domain Mode Locking (FDML): A New Laser Operating Regime and Applications for Optical Coherence Tomography”, Optics Express, vol. 14, No. 8, pp. 3225-3237, (2006).
MA Choma, et al., “Sensitivity Advantage of Swept Source and Fourier Domain Optical Coherence Tomography”, Optics Express, vol. 11, No. 18, pp. 2183-2189, (2003).
Oldenburg et al., “Fast-Fourier-Domain Delay Line for In Vivo Optical Coherence Tomography with a Polygonal Scanner”, Applied Optics, vol. 42, No. 22, pp. 4606-4611, (2003).
Sarunic et al., “Instantaneous Complex Conjugate Resolved Spectral Domain and Swept-Source OCT Using 3×3 Fiber Couplers”, Optics Express, vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 957-967, (2005).
SMRM Nezam, “High Speed Polygon-Scanner-Based Wavelength-Swept Laser Source in the Telescope-Less Configurations with Application in Optical Coherence Tomography”, Optics Letters, vol. 33, No. 15, pp. 1741-1743, (2008). Abstract Only.
Vakoc et al., “Phase-Resolved Optical Frequency Domain Imaging:”, Optics Express, vol. 13, No. 14, pp. 5483-5493, (2005).
Written Opinion for International (PCT) Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/070010, mailed Oct. 8, 2008.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Apr. 9, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US13/75089, filed Dec. 13, 2013 (7 pages).
Larin et al., 2004, Measurement of Refractive Index Variation of Physiological Analytes using Differential Phase OCT, Proc of SPIE 5325:31-34.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Feb. 28, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US13/75653, filed Dec. 17, 2013 (7 pages).
Kruth et al., 2003, Lasers and materials in selective laser sintering, Assembly Automation, 23(4):357-371.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Mar. 11, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US13/76449, filed Dec. 19, 2013 (9 pages).
Kumagai et al., 1994, Ablation of polymer films by a femtosecond high-peak-power Ti:sapphire laser at 798 nm, Applied Physics Letters, 65(14):1850-1852.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Mar. 19, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/076587, filed Dec. 19, 2013 (10 pages).
Lefevre et al., 2001, Stenting of bifurcation lesions:a rational approach, J. Interv. Cardiol., 14(6):573-585.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Mar. 7, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/076512, filed Dec. 19, 2013 (8 pages).
Fischler et al., 1973, The representation and matching of pictorial structures, IEEE Transactions on Computer 22:67-92.
Canny, 1986, A computational approach to edge detection, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 8:679-698.
Marks et al., 1992, By-Passing Immunization:Building High Affinity Human Antibodies by Chain Shuffling, BioTechnol., 10:779-783.
Othonos, 1997, Fiber Bragg gratings, Review of Scientific Instruments 68(12):4309-4341.
Maruno et al., 1991, Fluorine containing optical adhesives for optical communications systems, J. Appl. Polymer. Sci. 42:2141-2148.
Kheir et al., 2012, Oxygen Gas-Filled Microparticles Provide Intravenous Oxygen Delivery, Science Translational Medicine 4(140):140ra88 (10 pages).
McCafferty et al., 1990, Phage antibodies: filamentous phage displaying antibody variable domains, Nature 348:552-554.
Larin et al., 2002, Noninvasive Blood Glucose Monitoring with Optical Coherence Tomography: a pilot study in human subjects, Diabetes Care, 25(12):2263-7.
Nissen, 2001, Coronary Angiography and Intravascular Ultrasound, American Journal of Cardiology, 87(suppl):15A-20A.
Turk et al., 1991, Eigenfaces for Recognition, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 3(1):71-86.
Nitenberg et al., 1995, Coronary vascular reserve in humans: a critical review of methods of evaluation and of interpretation of the results, Eur Heart J. 16(Suppl 1):7-21.
Mendieta et al., 1996, Complementary sequence correlations with applications to reflectometry studies, Instrumentation and Development 3(6):37-46.
Oesterle et al., 1986, Angioplasty at coronary bifurcations: single-guide, two-wire technique, Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn., 12:57-63.
Morrison et al., 1984, Chimeric human antibody molecules: mouse antigen-binding domains with human constant region domains, PNAS 81:6851-6855.
Oldenburg et al., 2003, Fast-Fourier-Domain Delay Line for In Vivo Optical Coherence Tomography with a Polygonal Scanner, Applied Optics, 42(22):4606-4611.
Okuno et al., 2003, Recent Advances in Optical Switches Using Silica-based PLC Technology, NTT Technical Review 1(7):20-30.
Pain et al., 1981, Preparation of protein A-peroxidase mono conjugate using a heterobifunctional reagent, and its use in enzyme immunoassays, J Immunol Methods, 40:219-30.
Pasquesi et al., 2006, In vivo detection of exercise induced ultrastructural changes in genetically-altered murine skeletal muscle using polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography, Optics Express 14(4):1547-1556.
Persson et al., 1985, Acoustic impedance matching of medical ultrasound transducers, Ultrasonics, 23(2):83-89.
Amini et al., 1990, Using dynamic programming for solving variational problems in vision, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 12(9):855-867.
Kersey et al., 1991, Polarization insensitive fiber optic Michelson interferometer, Electron. Lett. 27:518-520.
Cavalli et al., 2010, Nanosponge formulations as oxygen delivery systems, International Journal of Pharmaceutics 402:254-257.
Mindlin et al., 1936, A force at a point of a semi-infinite solid, Physics, 7:195-202.
Deterministic Data Streaming in Distributed Data Acquisition Systems, NI Developer Zone, “What is Developer Zone?”, http://zone.ni.eom/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/3105, accessed Jul. 23, 2007.
Riechmann et al., 1988, Reshaping human antibodies for therapy, Nature, 332:323-327.
Rivers et al., 1992, Correction of steal syndrome secondary to hemodialysis access fistulas: a simplified quantitative technique, Surgery, 112(3):593-7.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Apr. 23, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/075328, filed Dec. 16, 2013 (8 pages).
Tanimoto et al., 2008, A novel approach for quantitative analysis of intracoronary optical coherence tomography: high inter-observer agreement with computer-assisted contour detection, Cathet Cardiovascular Intervent., 72(2):228-235.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Mar. 10, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/076212, filed Dec. 18, 2013 (8 pages).
Munson et al., 1980, Ligand: a versatile computerized approach for characterization of ligand-binding systems, Analytical Biochemistry, 107:220-239.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Mar. 7, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/076304, filed Dec. 18, 2013 (9 pages).
Smith et al., 1989, Absolute displacement measurements using modulation of the spectrum of white light in a Michelsor interferometer, Applied Optics, 28(16):3339-3342.
Jakobovits et al., 1993, Analysis of homozygous mutant chimeric mice:deletion of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain joining region blocks B-cell development and antibody production, PNAS USA 90:2551-255.
Milstein et al., 1983, Hybrid hybridomas and their use in immunohistochemistry, Nature 305:537-540.
Kohler et al., 1975, Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity, Nature, 256:495-7.
Soller, 2003, Polarization diverse optical frequency domain interferometry:All coupler implementation, Bragg Grating, Photosensitivity, and Poling in Glass Waveguides Conference MB4:30-32.
Mamas et al., 2010, Resting Pd/Pa measured with intracoronary pressure wire strongly predicts fractional flow reserve, Journal of Invasive Cardiology 22(6):260-265.
Stenqvist et al., 1983, Stiffness of central venous catheters, Acta Anaesthesiol Scand., 2:153-157.
Nygren, 1982, Conjugation of horseradish peroxidase to Fab fragments with different homobifunctional and heterobifunctional cross-linking reagents. A comparative study, J. Histochem. and Cytochem. 30:407-12.
Sutcliffe et al., 1986, Dynamics of UV laser ablation of organic polymer surfaces, Journal of Applied Physics, 60(9):3315-3322.
Placht et al., 2012, Fast time-of-flight camera based surface registration for radiotherapy patient positioning, Medical Physics 39(1):4-17.
Vakhtin et al., 2003, Common-path interferometer for frequency-domain optical coherence tomography, Applied Optics, 42(34):6953-6958.
D'Agostino et al., 2001, Validation of the Framingham coronary heart disease prediction score: results of a multiple ethnic group investigation, JAMA 286:180-187.
Verhoeyen et al., 1988, Reshaping human antibodies: grafting an antilysozyme activity, Science, 239:1534-1536.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Mar. 11, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US13/75675, filed Dec. 17, 2013 (7 pages).
Wang et al., 2009, Robust Guidewire Tracking in Fluoroscopy, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition—CVPR 2009:691-698.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Mar. 18, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/076788, filed Dec. 20, 2013 (7 pages).
Wang et al., 2002, Optimizing the Beam Patten of a Forward-Viewing Ring-Annular Ultrasound Array for Intravascular Imaging, Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 49(12).
Karp et al., 2009, The benefit of time-of-flight in PET imaging, J Nucl Med 49:462-470.
Felzenszwalb et al., 2005, Pictorial Structures for Object Recognition, International Journal of Computer Vision, 61(1):55-79.
Goel et al., 2006, Minimally Invasive Limited Ligation Endoluminal-assisted Revision (MILLER) for treatment of dialysis access-associated steal syndrome, Kidney Int 70(4):765-70.
Juviler et al., 2008, Anorectal sepsis and fistula-in-ano, Surgical Technology International, 17:139-149.
Bain, 2011, Privacy protection and face recognition, Chapter 3, Handbook of Face Recognition, Stan et al., Springer-Verlag.
Kirkman, 1991, Technique for flow reduction in dialysis access fistulas, Surg Gyn Obstet, 172(3):231-3.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Feb. 21, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/076965, filed Dec. 20, 2013 (6 pages).
Wyawahare et al., 2009, Image registration techniques: an overview, International Journal of Signal Processing, Image Processing and Pattern Recognition, 2(3):11-28.
Little et al., 1991, The underlying coronary lesion in myocardial infarction:implications for coronary angiography, Clinica Cardiology, 14(11):868-874.
Suzuki, 2013, A novel guidewire approach for handling acute-angle bifurcations, J Inv Cardiol 25(1):48-54.
Evans et al., 2006, Optical coherence tomography to identify intramucosa carcinoma and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus, Clin Gast Hepat 4(1):38-43.
West et al., 1991, Arterial insufficiency in hemodialysis access procedures: correction by banding technique, Transpl Proc 23(2):1838-40.
Bail et al., 1996, Optical coherence tomography with the “Spectral Radar”-Fast optical analysis in volume scatterers by short coherence interferometry, Optics Letters 21(14):1087-1089.
Notice of Reason(s) for Refusal dated Apr. 30, 2013, for Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-508677 for Optical Imaging Catheter for Aberation Balancing to Volcano Corporation, which application is a Japanese national stage entry of PCT/US2009/043181 with international filing date May 7, 2009, of the same title, published on Nov. 12, 2009, as WO 2009/137704, and accompanying English translation of the Notice of Reason(s) for Refusal and machine translations of JP11-56786 and JP2004-290548 (56 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Jan. 16, 2009, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US08/78963 filed on Oct. 6, 2008 (7 Pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Jul. 30, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US14/21659, filed Mar. 7, 2014 (15 pages).
Yasuno et al., 2004, Polarization-sensitive complex Fourier domain optical coherence tomography for Jones matrix imaging of biological samples, Applied Physics Letters 85(15):3023-3025.
Maintz et al., 1998, An Overview of Medical Image Registration Methods, Technical Report UU-CS, (22 pages).
Zhang et al., 2004, Full range polarization-sensitive Fourier domain optical coherence tomography, Optics Express, 12(24):6033-6039.
Jang et al., 2002, Visualization of Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaques in Patients Using Optical Coherence Tomography: Comparison With Intravascular Ultrasound, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 39:604-609.
Fatemi et al., 1999, Vibro-acoustography: an imaging modality based on ultrasound-stimulated acoustic emission, PNAS U.S.A., 96(12):6603-6608.
Owens et al., 2007, A Survey of General-Purpose Computation on Graphics Hardware, Computer Graphics Forum 26(1):80-113.
Griffiths et al., 1993, Human anti-self antibodies with high specificity from phage display libraries, The EMBO Journal, 12:725-734.
Kelly et al., 2005, Detection of Vascular Adhesion Molecule-1 Expression Using a Novel Multimodal Nanoparticle, Circulation Research 96:327-336.
Harrison et al., 2011, Guidewire Stiffness: What's in a name?, J Endovasc Ther, 18(6):797-801.
Khuri-Yakub et al., 2011, Capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers for medical imaging and therapy, J Micromech Microeng. 21(5):054004-054014.
Rollins et al., 1998, In vivo video rate optical coherence tomography, Optics Express 3:219-229.
Koo et al., 2011, Diagnosis of IschemiaCausing Coronary Stenoses by Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve Computed From Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiograms, J Am Coll Cardiol 58(19):1989-1997.
Zitova et al., 2003, Image registration methods: A survey. Image and Vision Computing, 21(11):977-1000.
Brown, 1992, A survey of image registration techniques, ACM Computing Surveys 24(4):325-376.
Wegener, 2011, 3D Photonic Metamaterials and Invisibility Cloaks: The Method of Making, MEMS 2011, Cancun, Mexico, Jan. 23-27, 2011.
Loo, 2004, Nanoshell Enabled Photonics-Based Imaging and Therapy of Cancer, Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment 3(1):33-40.
Jiang et al., 1992, Image registration of multimodality 3-D medical images by chamfer matching, Proc. SPIE 1660, Biomedical Image Processing and Three-Dimensional Microscopy, 356-66.
Bouma et al., 1999, Power-efficient nonreciprocal interferometer and linear-scanning fiber-optic catheter for optical coherence tomography, Optics Letters, 24(8):531-533.
Marks et al., 1991, By-passing Immunization Human Antibodies from V-gene Libraries Displayed on Phage, J. Mol. Biol. 222:581-597.
Blanchet et al., 1993, Laser Ablation and the Production of Polymer Films, Science, 262(5134):719-721.
Mickley, 2008, Steal Syndrome-strategies to preserve vascular access and extremity, Nephrol Dial Transplant 23:19-24.
Li et al., 2000, Optical Coherence Tomography: Advanced Technology for the Endoscopic Imaging of Barrett's Esophagus, Endoscopy, 32(12):921-930.
Miller et al., 2010, The MILLER banding procedure is an effective method for treating dialysis-associated steal syndrome, Kidney International 77:359-366.
Bruining et al., 2009, Intravascular Ultrasound Registration/Integration with Coronary Angiography, Cardiology Clinics, 27(3):531-540.
Ferring et al., 2008, Vasculature ultrasound for the pre-operative evaluation prior to arteriovenous fistula formation for haemodialysis: review of the evidence, Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 23(6):1809-1815.
Clarke et al., 1995, Hypoxia and myocardial ischaemia during peripheral angioplasty, Clinical Radiology, 50(5):301-303.
Tuzel et al., 2006, Region Covariance: A Fast Descriptor for Detection and Classification, European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV).
David et al., 1974, Protein iodination with solid-state lactoperoxidase, Biochemistry 13:1014-1021.
Park et al., 2005, Real-time fiber-based multi-functional spectral-domain optical coherence tomography at 1.3 um., Optics Express 13(11):3931-3944.
Elghanian et al., 1997, Selective colorimetric detection of polynucleotides based on the distance-dependent optical properties of gold nanoparticles, Science, 277(5329):1078-1080.
Pepe et al., 2004, Limitations of the odds ratio in gauging the performance of a diagnostic, prognostic, or screening marker, American Journal of Epidemiology 159(9):882-890.
Gould et al., 1974, Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis, American Journal of Cardiology, 33:87-94.
Rabbani et al., 1999, Review: Strategies to achieve coronary arterial plaque stabilization, Cardiovascular Research 41:402-417.
Tearney et al., 1997, In vivo Endoscopic Optical Biopsy with Optical Coherence Tomography, Science, 276:2037-2039.
Agresti, 1996, Models for Matched Pairs, Chapter 8, An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis, Wiley-Interscience a John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Publication, Hoboken, New Jersey.
Brummer, 1997, An euclidean distance measure between covariance matrices of speechcepstra for text-independent speaker recognition, in Proc. South African Symp. Communications and Signal Processing:167-172.
Burr et al., 2005, Searching for the Center of an Ellipse in Proceedings of the 17th Canadian Conference on Computational Geometry:260-263.
Jakobovits et al., 1993, Germ-line transmission and expression of a human-derived yeast artificial chromosome, Nature 362:255-258.
Communication Mechanisms for Distributed Real-Time Applications, NI Developer Zone, http://zone.ni.eom/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/3105, accessed Jul. 23, 2007.
Johnson et al., 1993, Human antibody engineering: Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 3:564-571.
Davies et al., 1993, Risk of thrombosis in human atherosclerotic plaques: role of extracellular lipid, macrophage, and smooth muscle cell content, British Heart Journal 69:377-381.
Jones et al., 1986, Replacing the complementarity-determining regions in a human antibody with those from a mouse, Nature, 321:522-525.
Ergun et al., 2003, Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers:Theory and Technology, Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 16(2):76-84.
Barnea et al., 1972, A class of algorithms for fast digital image registration, IEEE Trans. Computers, 21(2):179-186.
Gotzinger et al., 2005, High speed spectral domain polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography of the human retina, Optics Express 13(25):10217-10229.
Sihan et al., 2008, A novel approach to quantitative analysis of intraluminal optical coherence tomography imaging, Comput. Cardiol:1089-1092.
Bonnema, 2008, Imaging Tissue Engineered Blood Vessel Mimics with Optical Tomography, College of Optical Sciences dissertation, University of Arizona (252 pages).
Karapatis et al., 1998, Direct rapid tooling:a review of current research, Rapid Prototyping Journal, 4(2):77-89.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Apr. 14, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/076148, filed Dec. 18, 2013 (8 pages).
Kozbor et al., 1984, A human hybrid myeloma for production of human monoclonal antibodies, J. Immunol., 133:3001-3005.
Radvany et al., 2008, Plaque Excision in Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Arterial Disease with the SilverHawk Atherectomy Catheter, Seminars in Interventional Radiology, 25(1):11-19.
Reddy et al., 1996, An FFT-Based Technique for Translation, Rotation, and Scale-Invariant Image Registration, IEEE Transaction on Image Processing 5(8):1266-1271.
Abdi et al., 2010, Principal component analysis, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics 2:433-459.
Robbin et al., 2002, Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Fistula Maturity: US Evaluation, Radiology 225:59-64.
Akasheh et al., 2004, Development of piezoelectric micromachined ultrasonic transducers, Sensors and Actuators A Physical, 111:275-287.
Breiman, 2001, Random forests, Machine Learning 45:5-32.
Satiani et al., 2009, Predicted Shortage of Vascular Surgeons in the United States, J. Vascular Surgery 50:946-952.
Fookes et al., 2002, Rigid and non-rigid image registration and its association with mutual information:A review, Technical Report ISBN:1 86435 569 7, RCCVA, QUT.
Schneider et al., 2006, T-banding: A technique for flow reduction of a hyper-functioning arteriovenous fistula, J Vase Surg. 43(2):402-405.
Collins, 1993, Coronary flow reserve, British Heart Journal 69:279-281.
Sen et al., 2012, Development and validation of a new adenosine-independent index of stenosis severity from coronary wave-intensity analysis, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 59(15):1392-1402.
Cook, 2007, Use and misuse of receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction, Circulation 115(7):928-35.
Setta et al., 2005, Soft versus firm embryo transfer catheters for assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Human Reproduction, 20(11):3114-3121.
Davies et al., 1985, Plaque fissuring—the cause of acute myocardial infarction, sudden ischaemic death, and crescendo angina, British Heart Journal 53:363-373.
Seward et al., 1996, Ultrasound Cardioscopy: Embarking on New Journey, Mayo Clinic Proceedings 71(7):629-635.
Kemp et al., 2005, Depth Resolved Optic Axis Orientation in Multiple Layered Anisotropic Tissues Measured with Enhanced Polarization Sensitive Optical Coherence Tomography, Optics Express 13(12):4507-4518.
Shen et al., 2006, Eigengene-based linear discriminant model for tumor classification using gene expression microarray data, Bioinformatics 22(21):2635-2642.
Siwy et al., 2003, Electro-responsive asymmetric nanopores in polyimide with stable ion-current signal, Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing 76:781-785.
Fleming et al., 2010, Real-time monitoring of cardiac radio-frequency ablation lesion formation using an optical coherence tomography forward-imaging catheter, Journal of Biomedical Optics 15 (3):030516-1 (3 pages).
Smith, 1997, The Scientist and Engineer's Guide to Digital Signal Processing, California Technical Publishing, San Diego, CA:432-436.
Grund et al., 2010, Analysis of biomarker data:logs, odds, ratios and ROC curves, Curr Opin HIV AIDS 5(6):473-479.
Griffiths et al., 1994, Isolation of high affinity human antibodies directly from large synthetic repertoires, The EMBO Journal, 13(14):3245-3260.
Song et al., 2012, Active tremor cancellation by a “Smart” handheld vitreoretinal microsurgical tool using swept source optical coherence tomography, Optics Express, 20(21):23414-23421.
Strobl et al., 2009, An Introduction to Recursive Partitioning:Rationale, Application and Characteristics of Classification and Regression Trees, Bagging and Random Forests, Psychol Methods., 14(4):323-348.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Nov. 2, 2012, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US12/53168, filed Aug. 30, 2013 (8 pages).
Strickland, 1970, Time-Domain Reflectometer Measurements, Tektronix, Beaverton, OR, (107 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Mar. 19, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US13/075353, filed Dec. 16, 2013 (8 pages).
Tonino et al., 2009, Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention, The New England Journal of Medicine, 360:213-224.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Apr. 21, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/076015, filed Dec. 18, 2013 (7 pages).
Toregeani et al., 2008, Evaluation of hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula maturation by color-flow Doppler ultrasound, J Vasc. Bras. 7(3):203-213.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Apr. 29, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US13/76093, filed Dec. 18, 2013 (6 pages).
Traunecker et al., 1991, Bispecific single chain molecules (Janusins) target cytotoxic lymphocytes on HIV infected cells EMBO J., 10:3655-3659.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Feb. 21, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US13/76053, filed Dec. 18, 2013 (9 pages).
Trolier-McKinstry et. al., 2004, Thin Film Piezoelectric for MEMS, Journal of Electroceramics 12:7-17.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Feb. 27, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US13/75416, filed Dec. 16, 2013 (7 pages).
Tuniz et al., 2010, Weaving the invisible thread: design of an optically invisible metamaterial fibre, Optics Express 18(17):18095-18105.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Feb. 28, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US13/75990, filed Dec. 18, 2013 (7 pages).
Urban et al., 2010, Design of a Pressure Sensor Based on Optical Bragg Grating Lateral Deformation, Sensors (Basel), 10(12):11212-11225.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Mar. 11, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US13/76173, filed Dec. 16, 2013 (9 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Mar. 18, 2014, for International Patent Application No.PCT/US2013/076502, filed Dec. 19, 2013 (7 pages).
Wang et al., 2006, Multiple biomarkers for the prediction of first major cardiovascular events and death, The New England Journal of Medicine, 355(25):2631-2639.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Mar. 19, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US13/75349, filed Dec. 16, 2013 (10 pages).
Villard et al., 2002, Use of a blood substitute to determine instantaneous murine right ventricular thickening with optical coherence tomography, Circulation, 105:1843-1849.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Mar. 19, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/076909, filed Dec. 20, 2013 (7 pages).
Forstner & Moonen, 1999, A metric for covariance matrices, In Technical Report of the Dpt of Geodesy and Geoinformatics, Stuttgart University, 113-128.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Mar. 7, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/076480, filed Dec. 19, 2013 (8 pages).
Waterhouse et. al., 1993, Combinatorial infection and in vivo recombination: a strategy for making large phage antibody repertoires, Nucleic Acids Res., 21:2265-2266.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Mar. 7, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/076531, filed Dec. 19, 2013 (10 pages).
Yaqoob et al., 2006, Methods and application areas of endoscopic optical coherence tomography, J. Biomed. Opt., 11, 063001-1-063001-19.
Wang et al., 2011, In vivo intracardiac optical coherence tomography imaging through percutaneous access: toward image-guided radio-frequency ablation, J. Biomed. Opt. 0001 16(11):110505-1 (3 pages).
Laufer, 1996, Introduction to Optics and Lasers in Engineering, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK:156-162.
Extended European Search Report for PCT/US2013/026834 dated Oct. 5, 2015 (6 pages).
Extended European Search Report for PCT/US2008/070010 dated Apr. 7, 2016 (13 pages).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120224751 A1 Sep 2012 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60949467 Jul 2007 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12172980 Jul 2008 US
Child 13243399 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13243399 Sep 2011 US
Child 13402798 US