The present application relates to image sensors suitable for sensing radiation in deep UV (DUV) and vacuum UV (VUV) wavelengths, and to methods for making such image sensors. These sensors are suitable for use in photomask, reticle, or wafer inspection systems and for other applications.
The following description and examples are not admitted to be prior art by virtue of their inclusion in this section.
The integrated circuit industry requires inspection tools with increasingly higher resolution to resolve ever smaller features of integrated circuits, photomasks, reticles, solar cells, charge coupled devices etc., as well as detect defects whose sizes are of the order of, or smaller than, those feature sizes.
Inspection systems operating at short wavelengths, e.g. wavelengths shorter than about 250 nm, can provide such resolution in many cases. In particular for photomask or reticle inspection, it is desirable to inspect using a wavelength identical, or close, to the wavelength that will be used for lithography, i.e. close to 193.4 nm for current generation lithography and close to 13.5 nm for future EUV lithography, as the phase-shifts of the inspection light caused by the patterns will be identical or very similar to those caused during lithography. For inspecting semiconductor patterned wafers, inspection systems operating over a relatively broad range of wavelengths, such as a wavelength range that includes wavelengths in the near UV, DUV, and/or VUV ranges, can be advantageous because a broad range of wavelengths can reduce the sensitivity to small changes in layer thicknesses or pattern dimensions that can cause large changes in reflectivity at an individual wavelength.
In order to detect small defects or particles on photomasks, reticles, and semiconductor wafers, high signal-to-noise ratios are required. High photon flux densities are required to ensure high signal-to-noise ratios when inspecting at high speed because statistical fluctuations in the numbers of photons detected (Poisson noise) is a fundamental limit on the signal-to-noise ratio. In many cases, approximately 100,000 or more photons per pixel are needed. Because inspection systems are typically in use 24 hours per day with only short stoppages, the sensors are exposed to large doses of radiation after only a few months of operation.
A photon with a vacuum wavelength of 250 nm has energy of approximately 5 eV. The bandgap of silicon dioxide is about 10 eV. Although it may appear such wavelength photons cannot be absorbed by silicon dioxide, silicon dioxide as grown on a silicon surface must have some dangling bonds at the interface with the silicon because the silicon dioxide structure cannot perfectly match that of the silicon crystal. In addition, because the single dioxide is amorphous, there will be dangling bonds within the material. In practice, there will be a non-negligible density of defects and impurities within the oxide, as well as at the interface to underlying semiconductor, that can absorb photons with DUV wavelengths, particularly those shorter than about 220 nm in wavelength. Furthermore, under high radiation flux density, two high-energy photons may arrive near the same location within a very short time interval (nanoseconds or picoseconds), which can lead to electrons being excited to the conduction band of the silicon dioxide by two absorption events in rapid succession or by two-photon absorption.
A further requirement for sensors used for inspection, metrology and related applications is high sensitivity. As explained above, high signal-to-noise ratios are required. If the sensor does not convert a large fraction of the incident photons into signal, then a higher intensity light source would be required in order to maintain the same inspection or measurement speed compared with an inspection or metrology system with a more efficient sensor. A higher intensity light source would expose the instruments optics and the sample being inspected or measured to higher light intensities, possibly causing damage or degradation over time. A higher intensity light source would also be more expensive or, particularly at DUV and VUV wavelengths, may not be available. Silicon reflects a high percentage of DUV and VUV light incident on it. For example, near 193 nm in wavelength, silicon with a 2 nm oxide layer on its surface (such as a native oxide layer) reflects approximately 65% of the light incident on it. Growing an oxide layer of about 21 nm on the silicon surface reduces the reflectivity to close to 40% for wavelengths near 193 nm. A detector with 40% reflectivity is significantly more efficient than one with 65% reflectivity, but lower reflectivity, and hence higher efficiency, is desirable.
Anti-reflection coatings are commonly used on optical elements such as lenses and mirrors. However, many coating materials and processes commonly used for optical elements are often not compatible with silicon-based sensors. For example, electron and ion-assisted deposition techniques are commonly used for optical coatings. Such coating processes cannot generally be used to coat semiconductor devices because the electrons or ions can deposit sufficient charge on the surface of the semiconductor device to cause electrical breakdown resulting in damage to the circuits fabricated on the semiconductor.
DUV and VUV wavelengths are strongly absorbed by silicon. Such wavelengths may be mostly absorbed within about 10 nm or a few tens of nm of the surface of the silicon. The efficiency of a sensor operating at DUV or VUV wavelengths depends on how large a fraction of the electrons created by the absorbed photons can be collected before the electrons recombine. Silicon dioxide can form a high-quality interface with silicon with a low density of defects. Most other materials including many of those commonly used for anti-reflection coatings, if deposited directly on silicon, result in a very high density of electrical defects at the surface of silicon. A high density of electrical defects on the surface of silicon may not be an issue for a sensor intended to operate at visible wavelengths, as such wavelengths may typically travel about 100 nm or more into the silicon before being absorbed and may, therefore, be little affected by electrical defects on the silicon surface. However, DUV and VUV wavelengths are absorbed so close to the silicon surface that electrical defects on the surface and/or trapped charged within the layer(s) on the surface can result in a significant fraction of the electrons created recombining at, or near, the silicon surface and being lost, resulting in a low efficiency sensor.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,496,425, 9,818,887 and 10,121,914, all to Chern et al., describe image sensor structures and methods of making image sensors that include a boron layer deposited on, at least, an exposed back surface of the image sensor. Different ranges of temperature for deposition of the boron are disclosed, including a range of about 400-450° C. and a range of about 700-800° C. The inventors have discovered that one advantage of a higher deposition temperature for the boron, such as a deposition temperature between about 600° C. and about 900° C., is that at such temperatures boron diffuses into the silicon providing a very thin, heavily p-type doped silicon layer on the light-sensitive back surface. This p-type doped silicon layer is important for ensuring a high quantum efficiency to DUV and VUV radiation because it creates a static electric field near the surface that accelerates electrons away from the surface into the silicon layer. The p-type silicon also increases the conductivity of the back surface of the silicon, which is important for high-speed operation of an image sensor, since a return path is needed for ground currents induced by the switching of signals on electrodes on the front surface of the sensor.
However, processing temperatures higher than 450° C. cannot be used on semiconductor wafers that include conventional CMOS circuits because 450° C. is close to the melting point metals such as aluminum and copper commonly used in fabricating CMOS devices. At high temperatures, such as those greater than 450° C., these metals expand, become soft and can delaminate. Furthermore, at high temperatures copper can easily diffuse through silicon which will modify the electrical properties of the CMOS circuits. Thinning a wafer before any metals are deposited on it allows a boron layer to be deposited on the back surface as described in the aforementioned patents at a temperature between 600 and 900° C. enabling boron to diffuse into the surface during, or subsequent to, the deposition of the boron layer. Subsequently metal interconnects can be formed on the front surface. After the image sensor regions of the wafer have been thinned, for example to a thickness of about 25 μm or thinner, the thinned region can be significantly warped and may have peak-to-valley non-flatness of many tens of microns or more. So, it is necessary to use relatively wide metal interconnect lines and vias, such as multiple microns wide or more, to ensure that the lines and vias connect in spite of any misalignment caused by the non-flatness. Such wide metal interconnects and vias increase the capacitance per unit area associated with those lines and vias. Furthermore, wide interconnects and vias can make it difficult, or impossible, to interconnect all the signals on a large area sensor with about one million or more pixels. In some cases, polysilicon jumpers may be needed to connect together metal interconnects, but polysilicon has much higher resistivity than any metal, so the use of such jumpers can limit the maximum operating speed of a sensor.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,376,810 to Hoenk et al. describes a delta-doping technique for image sensors that may be performed at a temperature of 450° C. or lower. This technique includes a 1.5 nm cap layer of nominally undoped silicon. This cap layer may be deliberately oxidized or may oxidize due to water and oxygen in the environment. This oxide layer will degrade under high intensity DUV, VUV, EUV or charged-particle radiation and can cause the sensor to degrade.
Therefore, a need arises for an image sensor capable of efficiently detecting high-energy photons without degrading yet overcoming some, or all, of the above disadvantages. In particular, a method of fabricating a back-thinned image sensor with a boron layer and boron doping on its back surface while allowing formation of metal interconnects on a relatively flat wafer (i.e. with a flatness of about 10 μm or less) would allow the use of finer design rules (such as the design rules corresponding to a 0.35 μm process or finer). Such a method would allow narrower metal lines connecting to critical features such as the floating diffusion, enabling smaller floating-diffusion capacitance and higher charge to voltage conversions ratios. Finer design rules also allow more interconnect lines per unit area of the sensor and allow more flexibility in connecting the circuits on the image sensor.
Image sensors and methods of fabricating image sensors with high-quantum-efficiency for imaging DUV, VUV, EUV, X-rays and/or charged particles (such as electrons) are described. These image sensors are capable of long-life operation under high fluxes of radiation. These methods include process steps to form light sensitive active and/or passive circuit elements in a layer on a semiconductor (preferably silicon) wafer, as well as forming metal interconnections between the electrical elements of the sensor. These image sensors can include fine metal interconnects and vias (such as those conforming to about 0.35 μm, or finer, design rules), while having a backside surface coated with an amorphous boron layer and having a highly doped p-type silicon layer immediately adjacent to the boron layer. The metal interconnections may comprise tungsten, aluminum, copper or other metals used in fabricating interconnects in known CMOS processes.
An exemplary method of fabricating an image sensor includes forming a first epitaxial silicon layer on a substrate, forming a gate layer on the first epitaxial silicon layer, the gate layer comprising one or more layers of dielectric materials such as silicon dioxide and silicon nitride, forming circuit elements on the gate layer comprising poly-silicon and dielectric materials, forming metal vias and metal interconnects to connect together at least some of those circuit elements, thinning the substrate to expose at least a portion of the first epitaxial silicon layer (the exposed first epitaxial silicon layer is referred to herein as a semiconductor membrane), growing a second epitaxial silicon layer directly on the exposed portions of the first epitaxial layer, the second epitaxial silicon layer incorporating a concentration gradient of a p-type dopant such as boron, forming an amorphous pure boron layer directly on the surface of the second epitaxial silicon layer, and optionally forming one, or more, anti-reflection layers directly on the surface of the amorphous boron layer. As used herein, the phrase “circuit elements” refers to light sensitive devices such as charge-coupled devices and photodiodes, other semiconductor devices such as transistors, diodes, resistors and capacitors, and electrical interconnections (often called metal interconnects or interconnects) between them. These circuit elements are formed using standard semiconductor manufacturing processes including, but not limited to, photolithography, deposition, etching, ion implantation and annealing. The second epitaxial silicon layer may comprise an epitaxial silicon layer with a low concentration of the p-type dopant adjacent to the surface of the first epitaxial silicon layer and high concentration of the p-type dopant adjacent to the pure boron layer. The second epitaxial silicon layer may be formed by molecular-beam epitaxy (MBE). Thinning the substrate (e.g. a wafer) can be performed using reactive-ion etching, chemical etching and/or polishing. Notably, this thinning can increase the sensitivity of the image sensor to light impinging the back surface. An anti-reflection coating may be formed on the boron layer. Alternatively, a thin metal coating may be deposited on the boron layer. The thin metal coating may be particularly useful when the sensor is used to detect charged particles (such as electrons), EUV or X-rays. Such a thin metal coating may reduce to sensitivity of the sensor to stray light, may protect the surface of the sensor, and may facilitate in-situ cleaning of contaminants, such as carbon and organic molecules from the sensor surface.
Another method of fabricating an image sensor includes forming a first epitaxial silicon layer on a substrate, then forming circuit elements on the first epitaxial silicon layer. This step includes forming metal interconnects. The metal interconnects may comprise tungsten, molybdenum, aluminum, copper or another metal. A protective layer may be formed on the circuit elements. A handle wafer may be bonded to the surface that includes the circuit elements. The substrate is then thinned to expose, at least part of, the first epitaxial silicon layer. As indicated above, this thinning can increase the sensitivity of the image sensor to light impinging on the back surface. A second epitaxial silicon layer is grown on the exposed surface of the semiconductor membrane. The second epitaxial layer is doped with a p-type dopant such as a boron. The second epitaxial silicon layer may be grown at a temperature less than or about 450° C. The p-type dopant may be incorporated into the second epitaxial silicon layer during growth of that layer by including a dopant (such as boron) or a dopant precursor (such as diborane) in a growth chamber during a growth process. The partial pressure of the dopant or dopant precursor may be increased over time as the second epitaxial silicon layer grows thereby forming a dopant concentration profile within the second epitaxial silicon layer that is highest at the outer surface of the second epitaxial silicon layer and lowest at surface immediately adjacent to the first epitaxial silicon layer. A pure boron layer is formed on the surface of the p-type doped epitaxial silicon layer. The pure boron layer may be deposited at a temperature between about 300° C. and about 450° C. An anti-reflection coating may be formed on the boron layer. The anti-reflection coating may be formed by an atomic-layer deposition (ALD) or other process. Alternatively, a thin metal coating may be deposited on the boron layer. The thin metal coating may be particularly useful when the sensor is used to detect charged particles (such as electrons), EUV or X-rays. Such a thin metal coating may reduce to sensitivity of the sensor to stray light, may protect the surface of the sensor, and may facilitate in-situ cleaning of contaminants, such as carbon and organic molecules from the sensor surface.
Image sensors with high-quantum-efficiency and long-life operation for DUV, VUV, EUV and/or X-ray radiation are described. These image sensors are thinned from the back-side to expose at least a portion of a first epitaxial silicon layer so that they are highly sensitive to radiation impinging on the back-side of the image sensors (wherein these image sensors are back-illuminated). A second epitaxial silicon layer is grown directly on the exposed back surface of the first epitaxial silicon layer. The second epitaxial silicon layer is in-situ doped with a p-type dopant such that the concentration of the p-type dopant increases away from the surface of the first epitaxial layer. A thin (e.g. between about 2 nm and about 20 nm thick), high-purity, amorphous boron layer is deposited on the second epitaxial silicon layer. In some embodiments, one or more additional layers of material may be coated on the boron. The thickness and material of each layer may be chosen to increase the transmission of a wavelength of interest into the image sensor, and/or to protect the boron layer from damage.
The image sensors described herein may be fabricated using CCD (charge coupled device) or CMOS (complementary metal oxide semiconductor) technology. The image sensors may be two-dimensional area sensors, or one-dimensional array sensors.
Although claimed subject matter will be described in terms of certain embodiments, other embodiments, including embodiments that do not provide all of the benefits and features set forth herein, are also within the scope of this disclosure. Various structural, logical, process step, and electronic changes may be made without departing from the scope of the disclosure. Accordingly, the scope of the disclosure is defined only by reference to the appended claims.
The following description is presented to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the disclosure as provided in the context of a particular application and its requirements. As used herein, directional terms such as “top,” “bottom,”, “front,” “back,” “over,” “under,” “upper,” “upward,” “lower,” “down,” and “downward” are intended to provide relative positions for purposes of description, and are not intended to designate an absolute frame of reference. Various modifications to the preferred embodiment will be apparent to those with skill in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments. Therefore, the present disclosure is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiments shown and described, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features herein disclosed.
In one embodiment, first epitaxial layer 101 comprises a layer of lightly p-doped epitaxial silicon having a thickness T1 in a range of 10 μm to 40 μm and a p-type (e.g., boron) dopant concentration in a range of about 1013 cm−3 to 1014 cm−3.
Circuit element 103 includes a sensor device (e.g., a light sensitive device such as a photodiode) and associated control transistors that are formed on (i.e., into and over) an upper (first) surface 101U of first epitaxial layer 101 using known techniques. In the depicted exemplary embodiment, circuit element 103 includes spaced-apart n+ doped diffusion regions 103-11, 103-12 and 103-12 that extend from upper surface 101U into corresponding portions of epitaxial layer 101, and polycrystalline silicon (polysilicon) gate structures 103-21 and 103-22 that are respectively separated from upper surface 101U by intervening gate oxide layers. First metal interconnects 110 and second metal interconnects 120, along with corresponding first metal vias 115 and second metal vias 125, are formed over circuit element 113 and are operably electrically connected to associated regions of circuit element 113 using known techniques. First metal interconnects 110 are formed in or on one or more dielectric layers 112 deposited over circuit element 113, and first metal vias 115 extend through dielectric layers 112 using known via formation techniques. Second metal interconnects 120 are formed in a second dielectric layer 122 that is disposed over first metal interconnects 110, and second metal vias 125 extend through one or both dielectric layers 112 and 122. In one embodiment, a protection layer (not shown in
Second epitaxial layer 101 is disposed on lower surface 101L of first epitaxial layer 101 and has a thickness T2 in the range of 1 nm to 100 nm, and more preferably in the range of about 2 nm and about 20 nm.
Referring to the bubble located at the bottom of
In one embodiment, pure boron layer 106 is formed using techniques described below such that pure boron layer 106 has a thickness T3 in the range of 2 nm and 10 nm. In one embodiment, pure boron layer 106 comprises a boron concentration of 80% or higher, with inter-diffused silicon atoms and oxygen atoms predominantly making up the remaining 20% or less.
In one specific embodiment, thickness T3 of pure boron layer 106 is in the range of 3 nm to 10 nm, and optional anti-reflection coating 108 comprises a silicon dioxide layer deposited on a lower (outward-facing) surface 106L of pure boron layer 106.
In step 203, the front-side surface of the wafer can be protected. This protection may include depositing one or more protective layers on top of the circuit elements formed during step 201. The one or more protective layers may comprise silicon dioxide, silicon nitride or other material. This protection may include attaching the wafer to a handling wafer, such as a silicon wafer, a quartz wafer, or a wafer made of other material. The handling wafer may include through-wafer vias for connecting to the circuit elements.
Step 205 involves thinning the wafer from the back-side so as to expose the first epitaxial layer in, at least, the active sensor areas. This step may involve polishing, etching, or both. In some embodiments, the entire wafer is back-thinned. In other embodiments, only the active sensor areas are thinned all the way to the first epitaxial layer.
Step 207 includes cleaning and preparing the back-side surface prior to deposition of a second epitaxial layer. During this cleaning, the native oxide and any contaminants, including organics and metals, should be removed from the back-side surface. In one embodiment, this cleaning can be performed using a dilute HF solution or using an RCA clean process. After cleaning, the wafer can be dried using the Marangoni drying technique or a similar technique to leave the surface dry and free of water marks.
In preferred embodiments, the wafer is protected in a controlled environment between steps 207 and 208 (e.g. in a vacuum environment or in an environment purged with a dry, inert gas such as nitrogen) to minimize native oxide regrowth after the cleaning.
In step 208, a second epitaxial silicon layer is grown (deposited) on, at least, the exposed portion of the first epitaxial layer. In one embodiment the second epitaxial layer is grown by molecular-beam epitaxy (MBE) or other process at a temperature of about 350° C. or lower. In another embodiment, the second epitaxial layer is grown by a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) or plasma-enhanced CVD (PECVD) process at a temperature of about 450° C. or lower. As depicted in
In step 209, boron is deposited on the surface of the second epitaxial layer. In one preferred embodiment, this deposition can be done using diborane, or a diborane-hydrogen mixture, diluted in nitrogen at a temperature between about 300° C. and about 450° C., thereby creating a high-purity amorphous boron layer. In an alternative embodiment, the deposition may be done at a temperature lower than about 350° C., for example, by using a gas containing elemental boron. The thickness of the deposited boron layer depends on the intended application for the sensor. Typically, the boron layer thickness will be between about 2 nm and 20 nm, preferably between about 3 nm and 10 nm. The minimum thickness is set by the need for a pinhole-free uniform film, whereas the maximum thickness depends on the absorption of the photons or charged particles of interest by the boron, as well as the maximum length of time that the wafer can be kept at the deposition temperature.
More details on depositing boron from diborane gas can be found in “Chemical vapor deposition of a-boron layers on silicon for controlled nanometer-deep p+-n junction formation,” Sarubbi et al., J. Electron. Material, vol. 39, pp. 162-173, 2010, which is incorporated by reference herein.
After step 209, other layers may be deposited on top of the boron layer. These other layers may include anti-reflection coatings comprised of one or more materials, such as silicon dioxide, silicon nitride, aluminum oxide, hafnium dioxide, magnesium fluoride, and lithium fluoride. These other layers may include a thin protective layer comprising a metal such as aluminum, ruthenium, tungsten or molybdenum. One or more of these other layers may be deposited using ALD. An advantage of using an ALD process for depositing these layers is that ALD processes typically allow very precise (single monolayer) control of the thickness of the deposited layer(s). In an alternative embodiment, other layers may be deposited on top of the boron layer after step 213.
In one embodiment, the protective front-side layer may be removed in step 213. In another embodiment, in step 213, holes or vias can be opened or exposed in the handling wafer and/or protective front-side layer, or through-silicon vias around the edges of the device can be exposed, thereby allowing connection to the circuit elements.
In step 215, the resulting structure may be packed in a suitable package. The packing step may comprise flip-chip bonding or wire bonding of the device to a substrate. The package may include a window that transmits wavelengths of interest, or may comprise a flange or seal for interface to a vacuum seal.
The above examples are not meant to limit the scope of the invention disclosed herein. They are meant merely as illustrations of how a p-type doped second epitaxial layer may be deposited on a back-side surface of a first epitaxial layer. The second epitaxial layer is subsequently coated with a boron layer on its photo-sensitive surface. Because the second epitaxial layer includes a concentration gradient of the p-type dopant which has its maximum value adjacent to the boron, the image sensor has high efficiency even for short-wavelength light, or low-energy charged particles, which may penetrate only a few nm, or a few tens of nm into the epitaxial layers.
In one aspect of the present invention, the detector assembly 500 may include one or more light sensitive sensors 504 disposed on the surface of an interposer 502. In one embodiment, the one or more interposers 502 of the assembly 500 may include, but are not limited to, a silicon interposer. In a further aspect of the present invention, the one or more light sensitive sensors 504 of the assembly 500 are back-thinned and further configured for back-illumination including a boron layer and a p-type doped second epitaxial layer adjacent to the boron layer as described above.
In another aspect of the present invention, various circuit elements of the assembly 500 may be disposed on or built into the interposer 502. In one embodiment, one or more amplification circuits (e.g., charge conversion amplifier) (not shown) may be disposed on or built into the interposer 502. In another embodiment, one or more conversion circuits 508 (e.g., analog-to-digital conversion circuits, i.e. digitizers 508) may be disposed on or built into the interposer 502. In another embodiment, one or more driver circuits 506 may be disposed on or built into the interposer 502. For example, the one or more driver circuits 506 may include a timing/serial drive circuit. For instance, the one or more driver circuits 506 may include, but are not limited to, clock driver circuitry or reset driver circuitry. In another embodiment, one or more decoupling capacitors (not shown) may be disposed on or built into the interposer 502. In a further embodiment, one or more serial transmitters (not shown in
In another aspect of the present invention, one or more support structures may be disposed between the bottom surface of the light sensitive array sensor 504 and the top surface of the interposer 502 in order to provide physical support to the sensor 504. In one embodiment, a plurality of solder balls 516 may be disposed between the bottom surface of the light sensitive array sensor 504 and the top surface of the interposer 502 in order to provide physical support to the sensor 504. It is recognized herein that while the imaging region of the sensor 504 might not include external electrical connections, the back-thinning of the sensor 504 causes the sensor 504 to become increasingly flexible. As such, solder balls 516 may be utilized to connect the sensor 504 to the interposer 502 in a manner that reinforces the imaging portion of the sensor 504. In an alternative embodiment, an underfill material may be disposed between the bottom surface of the light sensitive array sensor 504 and the top surface of the interposer 502 in order to provide physical support to the sensor 504. For example, an epoxy resin may be disposed between the bottom surface of the light sensitive array sensor 504 and the top surface of the interposer 502.
In another aspect of the present invention, the interposer 502 and the various additional circuitry (e.g., amplification circuit, driver circuits 506, digitizer circuits 508, and the like) are disposed on a surface of a substrate 510. In a further aspect, the substrate 510 includes a substrate having high thermal conductivity (e.g., ceramic substrate). In this regard, the substrate 510 is configured to provide physical support to the sensor 504/interposer 502 assembly, while also providing a means for the assembly 500 to efficiently conduct heat away from the imaging sensor 504 and the various other circuitry (e.g., digitizer 506, driver circuitry 508, amplifier, and the like). It is recognized herein that the substrate may include any rigid highly heat conductive substrate material known in the art. For example, the substrate 510 may include, but is not limited to, a ceramic substrate. For instance, the substrate 510 may include, but is not limited to, aluminum nitride.
In another embodiment, the substrate 510 may be configured to provide an interface to a socket or an underlying printed circuit board (PCB). For example, as shown in
The various embodiments of the structures and methods of this invention that are described above are illustrative only of the principles of this invention and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention to the particular embodiments described. For example, additional steps may be added to the flow chart depicted in
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/778,445, entitled “BACK-ILLUMINATED SENSOR AND A METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A SENSOR”, which was filed on Dec. 12, 2018, and is incorporated by reference herein. This application also is related to U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,496,425, 9,818,887 and 10,121,914, all to Chern et al., and all entitled “Back-illuminated sensor with boron layer”. These patents and applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3755704 | Spindt et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
3870917 | Cuny | Mar 1975 | A |
3947707 | Shannon et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
4099198 | Howorth et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4210922 | Shannon | Jul 1980 | A |
4275326 | Houtkamp | Jun 1981 | A |
4348690 | Jastrzebski et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4467189 | Tsuchiya | Aug 1984 | A |
4555731 | Zinchuk | Nov 1985 | A |
4644221 | Gutierrez et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4760031 | Janesick | Jul 1988 | A |
4853595 | Alfano et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
5054683 | Haisma et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5120949 | Tomasetti | Jun 1992 | A |
5144630 | Lin | Sep 1992 | A |
5227313 | Gluck et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5272096 | de Fresart | Dec 1993 | A |
5315126 | Field | May 1994 | A |
5376810 | Hoenk et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5428392 | Castro et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5563702 | Emery et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5717518 | Shafer et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5719069 | Sparks | Feb 1998 | A |
5731584 | Beyne et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5742626 | Mead et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5760809 | Malhotra et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5760899 | Eismann | Jun 1998 | A |
5852322 | Speckbacher | Dec 1998 | A |
5940685 | Loomis et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5999310 | Shafer et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6013399 | Nguyen | Jan 2000 | A |
6030852 | Sano et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6064759 | Buckley et al. | May 2000 | A |
6162707 | Dinh et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6201257 | Stettner et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6201601 | Vaez-Iravani et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6220914 | Lee et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6271916 | Marxer et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278119 | Nikzad et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285018 | Aebi et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297879 | Yang et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307586 | Costello | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6346700 | Cunningham et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6362484 | Beyne et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6373869 | Jacob | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6403963 | Nikzad et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6535531 | Smith et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6545281 | McGregor et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6608676 | Zhao et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6711283 | Soenksen | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6837766 | Costello | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7005637 | Costello et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7039157 | Fujii et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7126699 | Wihl et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7130039 | Vaez-Iravani et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7136159 | Tsai et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7141791 | Masnaghetti et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7238583 | Swain et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7283166 | Billman | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7313155 | Mu et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7321468 | Herkommer et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7345825 | Chuang et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7352457 | Kvamme et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7432517 | Botma et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7446474 | Maldonado et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7465935 | Urano et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7471315 | Silsby et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7525649 | Leong et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7528943 | Brown et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7586108 | Nihtianov et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7609303 | Lee et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7609309 | Brown et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7714287 | James et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
7741666 | Nozaki et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7750280 | Hwang et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7791170 | Chiang et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7800040 | Blacksberg et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7813406 | Nguyen et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7838833 | Lent et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7875948 | Hynecek et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7928382 | Hatakeyama et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7952633 | Brown et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7985658 | Lei et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7999342 | Hsu et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8017427 | Manabe | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8138485 | Nihtianov et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8309443 | Tanaka et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8323406 | Bondokov et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8450820 | Nanver et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8455971 | Chen et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8513587 | Wang et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8514587 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8629384 | Biellak et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8680637 | Hoenk et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8686331 | Armstrong | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8755417 | Dribinski | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8803075 | Menge et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8828852 | Hoenk et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8873596 | Dribinski et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8891079 | Zhao et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8929406 | Chuang et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9024344 | Hoenk | May 2015 | B2 |
9123622 | Hoenk et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9165971 | Greer et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9305949 | Chen et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9411244 | Ryzhikov et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9426400 | Brown et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9478402 | Chuang et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9496425 | Chern et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9529182 | Chuang et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9601299 | Chuang et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9608399 | Chuang et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9748294 | Muramatsu et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9818887 | Chern et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
10115663 | Or-Bach et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10121914 | Chern et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10197501 | Chuang et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
20010017344 | Aebi | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010024684 | Steiner et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020191834 | Fishbaine | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030043876 | Lublin et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030111707 | Takaura et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030222579 | Habib et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040021061 | Bijkerk | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040056279 | Niigaki et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040074261 | Caron et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040227070 | Bateman et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050122021 | Smith et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050167575 | Benz et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050190452 | Govorkov et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050196059 | Inoue et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050233493 | Augusto et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050255625 | Janesick et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050264148 | Maldonado et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050287479 | Moon et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060054778 | Suhling | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060055321 | Maldonado et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069460 | Smith et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060170324 | Machuca et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060188869 | Zeskind et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070002465 | Chuang et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070023770 | Miyajima et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070034987 | Costello et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070064135 | Brown et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070072326 | Zheng et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070096648 | Nakajima et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070103769 | Kuwabara | May 2007 | A1 |
20070138378 | Chang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070177289 | Shim et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070188744 | Leslie et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070210395 | Maruyama et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070235829 | Levine et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070291810 | Luo et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080044932 | Samoilov et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080173903 | Imai et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080267241 | Brown et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080315092 | Kley | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080315121 | Nihtianov et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090021717 | Nihtianov et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090045325 | Tomuta et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090091752 | Terasawa et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090108207 | Liu | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125242 | Choi et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090128912 | Okada et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090168152 | Gelernt et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090180176 | Armstrong et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090324234 | Kashima | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100026865 | Tivarus et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100038540 | Hannebauer | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100102213 | Garris | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100103409 | Ohshima et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100140675 | Rhodes | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100148667 | Niigaki et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100164042 | Manabe | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100188655 | Brown et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100208979 | Abbott et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100233869 | Park et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100301437 | Brown et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110062499 | Burke | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110073982 | Armstrong et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110101219 | Uchiyama et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110116077 | Chuang et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110168886 | Shadman et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110169116 | Nanver et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110234790 | True | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110256655 | Nikzad et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110261354 | Sinfield et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110291109 | Wraback et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120007920 | Takahashi | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120012811 | Deflumere et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120012957 | Larsen et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120081684 | Den et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120132823 | Menge et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120160993 | Nevet et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120170021 | Walsh | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120217558 | Togashi | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120228485 | Iwakiri et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120268722 | Nihtianov et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130009069 | Okada | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130016346 | Romanovsky et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130017205 | Giaccia et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130020491 | Mazzillo | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130056843 | Lee et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130077086 | Chuang et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130082241 | Kub et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130088706 | Chuang et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130126705 | Maleev | May 2013 | A1 |
20130149807 | Jangjian et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130169957 | Wolf et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130176552 | Brown et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130194445 | Brown et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130270663 | Lin et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130313440 | Chuang et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130320211 | Park et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130334638 | Chen et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130336574 | Nasser-Ghodsi et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130341504 | Neill et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140111799 | Lei et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140151552 | Jiang et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140203386 | Bui et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140204963 | Chuang et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140246595 | Menge et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140302630 | Tian et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140305367 | Chuang et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140362203 | Delaney et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150007765 | Dribinski | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150177159 | Brown et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150275393 | Bondokov et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150294998 | Nihtianov et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20170338257 | Muramatsu | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180061872 | Ohtani et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180315747 | Agam | Nov 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0602983 | Jun 1994 | EP |
0746871 | Dec 1996 | EP |
1939917 | Jul 2008 | EP |
2346094 | Jul 2011 | EP |
H0511287 | Jan 1993 | JP |
H08241977 | Sep 1996 | JP |
H10171965 | Jun 1998 | JP |
2002033473 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2003043533 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2004031452 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2007040909 | Feb 2007 | JP |
2007086108 | Apr 2007 | JP |
2007249092 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2007298932 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2009117454 | May 2009 | JP |
2010003755 | Jan 2010 | JP |
2011216623 | Oct 2011 | JP |
100688497 | Mar 2007 | KR |
100826407 | May 2008 | KR |
2297070 | Apr 2007 | RU |
9532518 | Nov 1995 | WO |
9617372 | Jun 1996 | WO |
2007035858 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2011091159 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2013006867 | Jan 2013 | WO |
2014067754 | May 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 61/720,700—Certified Copy corres to PCT/EP2013/071080, pp. 1-44. |
Allen et al., Work Function, Photoelectric Threshold, and Surface . . . ; Physical Review, vol. 127, No. 1, Jul. 1, 1962, pp. 150-158. |
Armstrong, Carter M.The Quest for the Ultimate Vacuum Tube, Spectrum IEEE, Dec. 2015, 4 pgs. |
Ding, MengField Emission from Silicon, MIT 2001, 277 pgs. |
Fanton et al, Multiparameter Measurements of Thin Film . . . , Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 73, No. 11, p. 7035 (1993). |
Field Emitter Review, 7 pgs in Japanese. |
Fowler, R. H., et al, Electron Emission in Intense Electric Fields, Mar. 31, 1928, 9 pgs. |
Fu et al., Optimizing GaN photocathode structure for higher . . . ; Optik, vol. 123, No. 9, May 2012, pp. 756-768. |
Hecht, Optics, Fourth Edition, India: Pearson Education Pte, Ltd. 2004. |
Hecht, Optics, Second Edition, Adelphi University, 1987, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., 3 pages. |
Henderson, Brian S., Study of Negative Electron Affinity . . . , Dept. of Physics, Rice Univ., Aug. 7, 2009, 18 pgs. |
Howarth et al., Transmission silicon photoemitters . . . , Jrnl of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 9, No. 5, Apr. 1, 1976, pp. 785-794. |
ISR and Written Opinion dated Mar. 31, 2014 for PCT/US2013/074124. |
Janesick, James R., Scientific Charge-Coupled Devices, SPIE Press, 2001, pp. 556-561. |
KLA-Tencor Coporation, filed application U.S. Appl. No. 62/059,368, filed Oct. 3, 2014 and entitled “183nm Laser and Inspection System”. |
Koike, AkifumiField Emitter Equipped With a Suppressor to Control Emission Angel, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 34, No. 5, May 2013, 3 pgs. |
Martinelli, Ramon U., Infrared Photoemission from Silicon, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 16, No. 7, Apr. 1, 1970, pp. 261-262. |
Martinelli, Ramon U., Reflection and Transmission Secondary Emission . . . , Applied Physics Letters, vol. 17, No. 8, Oct. 15, 1970, pp. 313-314. |
Nagao, Masayoshi, Cathode Technologies for Field Emission Displays, IEEJ Trans 2006; 1:171-178, 8 pgs. |
Nagao, MasayoshiFabrication of a Field Emitter Array with a Built-In Einzel Lens, JJAP 48 (2008) 06FK02, 4 pgs. |
Nanver et al., Pure-Boron Chemical-Vapor-Deposited Layers: a New Material for Silicon Device Processing, 18th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Thermal Processing of Semiconductors (RTP), Sep. 28, 2010-Oct. 1, 2010, pp. 136-139. |
Nanver, Silicon Photodiodes for Low Penetration Depth Beams such as DUV/VUV/EUV Light and Low-Energy Electrons, Advances in Photodiodes, G. Betta, ed., Mar. 22, 2011, pp. 205-224, www.intechopen.com. |
Neo, YoichiroElectron Optical Properties of Microcolumn with Field Emitter, JJAP 52 (2013) 036603, 5 pgs. |
Pain; et al., “Pain et al., “A Back-Illuminated Megapixel CMOS Image Sensor”, Jun. 9, 2005, IEEE Workshop on Charge-Coupled Devices and Advanced Image Sensors, Karuizawa, Japan, 4 pgs.” |
Rakhshandehroo, M.R. et al, Fabrication of a self-aligned silicon field emission . . . , JVSTB, 16, 765 (1998); doi: 10.1116/1,589900, 6 pgs. |
Rakhshandehroo, M.R. et al, Field emission from gated Si emitter tips with precise . . . , JVSTB, 15, 2777 (1997); doi: 10.1116/1.589726, 6 pgs. |
Raoult, Efficient generation of narrow-bandwidth . . . , Jul. 15, 1998, vol. 23, No. 14, Optics Letters, pp. 1117-1119. |
Sarubbi et al., Chemical Vapor Deposition of α-Boron Layers on Silicon for Controlled Nanometer-Deep p+ n Junction Formation, J. Electron. Mat., vol. 39, No. 2, Feb. 2010, pp. 162-173. |
Sarubbi et al., Pure boron-doped photodiodes . . . IEEE, Sep. 15, 2008, pp. 278-281. |
Sato, T., et al, Fabrication and characterization of HfC coated . . . , J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 2194), published Jul. 31, 2003, 5 pgs. |
Serbun Pavel et al, Stable field emission of single B-doped . . . , JVSTB, 31, 02B101 (2013); doi: 10.1116/1.4765088, 7 pgs. |
Sobieski, Stanley, Intensified Charge Coupled Devices For Ultra Low Light Level Imaging, NASA, Goddard Space Flight Center, SPIE vol. 78 (1976) Low Light Level Devices, pp. 73-77. |
Tobin, Kenneth W., Inspection in Semiconductor Manufacturing, Webster's Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, vol. 10, pp. 242-262, Wiley & Sons, NY, NY, 1999. |
Utsumi, Takao, Vacuum Microelectrnoics: What's New and Exciting, IEEE vol. 38, No. 10, Oct. 1991, 8 pgs. |
Fu, Xiaogian, et al.,Higher Quantum Efficiency by Optimizing . . . 978-1-4244-6644-3/10 IEEE, pp. 234-235. |
Omatsu, Takashige et al., High repetition rate Q-switching performance in transversely diode-pumped Nd doped mixed gadolinium . . . , Optics Express vol. 14, Issue 7, 9 pages, 2006 Optical Society of America. |
Sakic, Agata et al., Boron-layer silicon photodiodes for high-efficiency . . . , Solid-State Electronics, 2011, 7 pages. |
Dulinski, Wojciech et al., article entitled “Tests of a backside illuminated monolithic CMOS pixel sensor in an HPD set-up”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 546 (2005) 274-280, 7 pgs. |
Grubisic et al., New Silicon Reach-Through Avalanche Photodiodes with Enhanced Sensitivity in the DUV/UV Wavelength Range, MIPRO 2013, May 20-24, 2013, pp. 48-54. |
Grunthaner, P. J et al., article entitled “Hydrogen-Terminated SiliconSubstrates for Low-Temperature Molecular Beam Epitaxy,” Thin Solid Films, 183,pp. 197-212,May 30, 1989. |
Hoenk, Michael E et al., article entitled “Growth of a delta-doped silicon layer by molecular beam epitaxy on a charge-coupled device for reflection-limited ultraviolet quantum efficiency,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 61, pp. 1084-1086 plus cover page(1992). |
Hoenk, Michael E et al., article entitled “Superlattice-doped detectors for UV through gamma-ray imaging and spectroscopy,” International Image Sensors Workshop, Jun. 8-11, 2015, 4 pages. |
Hoenk, Michael E et al., article entitled “The DUV Stability of Superlattice-dopedCMOS Detector Arrays,” International Image SensorWorkshop Jun. 12-16, 2013, 4 pages. |
Huang et al., Back-Side Illuminated Photogate CMOS . . . , IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 11, No. 9, Sep. 2011, 5 pgs. |
Itzler et al., InP-based Geiger-mode . . . , Proc. SPIE vol. 7320 (2000), 12 pgs. |
Jorke, H., et al., article entitled “Boron delta doping in Si and Si0.8 Ge0.2 layers”, Appl. Phys. Lett., 57 (17), pp. 1763-1765 (1990). |
Liaw, H.M. and Rose, J.W., Chapter 1 Silicon Vapor-Phase Epitaxy, Section 1.3.1 entitled “Growth from Silane”, pp. 20-22 inB.J. Baliga (ed.), “Epitaxial Silicon Technology,” Academic Press, 1986. |
Liehr, M et al., article entitled “Kinetics of silicon epitaxy using SiH4in a rapid thermal chemical vapor deposition Yeactor,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 56(7), pp. 629-631 plus cover page (1990). |
Lim, Seunghuyn, Low-Power Analog-to-Digital Converters for . . . ; Graduate School, Yonsei Univ. Dept. of EEE, Feb. 2010, pp. 16-21. |
Mattey, N.L., et al. article entitled “p-type delta doped layers in silicon: Structural and Electronic Properties”, Appl. Phys. Lett., 57 (16), pp. 1648-1650 (1990). |
Meyerson, Bernard S., et al. article entitled “Bistable conditions for low-temperature silicon epitaxy”, , Appl. Phys. Lett. 57 (10), pp. 1034-1036 (1990). |
Mouchart et al., Thin Film Optical Coatings. 7: Two Layer Coatings Close To Antireflection, Applied Optics, vol. 18, No. 8, Apr. 15, 1979, pp. 1226-1232. |
Nanver, Lis K., Silicon Photodiodes for Low Penetration Depth Beams such as DUV/VUV/EUV Light and Low-Energy Electrons, Delta Institute of Microsystems and Nanoelectornics (DIMES), (2011) 21 pgs. |
Niclass et al., Design and Characterization of a CMOS 3-D . . . , IEEE Journal Solid-State Circuits, vol. 40, No. 9, Sep. 2005, 8 pgs. |
Nikzad, Shouleh et al., article entitled “Delta-doped CCDs High QE with long-term stability at UV and visible wavelengths”; SPIE vol. 2198 (1994) pp. 907-915. |
Paetzel et al., Activation of Silicon Wafer by Excimer Laser, 18th IEEE Conf. Advanced Thermal Processing of Semiconductors-RTP 2010, 5 pgs. |
Stevanovic et al., A CMOS Image Sensor for High-Speed Imaging, 2000 IEEE int'l. Solid-State Circuits Conf., 3 pgs. |
Vaillant, Joel et al., Int'l. Conf. on Space Optics, High performance UV antirelection coating for back thinned CCD and CMOS Image sensors, Oct. 4-8, 2010, 4 pgs. |
Shiraki, Yasuhiro, article entitled “Silicon molecular beam epitaxy”, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B Microelectronics Processing and Phenomena (1985) published by the American Institute of Physics, 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200194476 A1 | Jun 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62778445 | Dec 2018 | US |