Carbon nanotube MEMS assembly

Abstract
A carbon nanotube MEMS assembly comprises a plurality of carbon nanotubes oriented into a patterned frame, the patterned frame defining at least two components of a MEMS device. An interstitial material at least partially binds adjacent carbon nanotubes one to another. At least one component of the frame is fixed and at least one component of the frame is movable relative to the fixed component.
Description
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/239,281, filed Sep. 26, 2008, entitled Carbon Nanotube Assembly; and is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/239,339, filed Sep. 26, 2008, entitled X-Ray Radiation Window with Carbon Nanotube Frame, issued on Jul. 13, 2010 as U.S. Pat. No. 7,756,251.


BACKGROUND

Interest in the use of carbon nanotubes (“CNTs”) in engineering applications continues to increase. CNTs are tubes of graphite typically grown from iron nanoparticles or iron, and can be categorized as single-walled nano-tubes (“SWNTs”) or multi-walled nanotubes (“MWNTs”). CNTs have many interesting properties, including exhibiting the highest tensile strength and elastic modulus of any known material.


While the behavior of CNTs has been widely studied, the use of CNTs as structural components has proved problematic due to a variety of issues, including the difficulty of manipulating individual CNTs, the difficulty of incorporating CNTs into other structures, and the inherently fragile nature CNTs.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with one embodiment, the invention provides a carbon nanotube MEMS assembly, including a plurality of carbon nanotubes arranged into a patterned frame, the patterned frame defining at least two components of a MEMS device. An interstitial material can at least partially bind the carbon nanotubes one to another. At least one component of the frame can be fixed and at least one component of the frame can be free to move relative to the fixed component.


In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a method of forming a carbon nanotube MEMS assembly is provided, including: applying a catalyst to a substrate to create a defined pattern on the substrate; initiating growth of a plurality of carbon nanotubes from the catalyst applied in the pattern to form a patterned frame, the patterned frame including at least two components of a MEMS device; and releasing from the substrate at least one component of the MEMS device while leaving at least one component of the MEMS device fixed relative to the released component.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Additional features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the detailed description which follows, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which together illustrate, by way of example, features of the invention; and, wherein:



FIG. 1 is an SEM image of a high-density carbon nanotube assembly in accordance with an embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 2 is another SEM image of a high-density carbon nanotube assembly in accordance with an embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 3A is an SEM image of a carbon nanotube bistable mechanism in accordance with an embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 3B is an SEM image of the bistable mechanism of FIG. 3A, shown in a second position;



FIG. 4 illustrates a series of intervals of a fabrication process used in forming a carbon nanotube frame assembly in accordance with an aspect of the invention;



FIG. 5 is a partially sectioned view of a carbon nanotube frame assembly in accordance with an aspect of the invention; and



FIG. 6 is an SEM image of a portion of a cleaved carbon nanotube frame assembly in accordance with an embodiment of the invention, illustrating a series of interstitial material access openings formed therein.





Reference will now be made to the exemplary embodiments illustrated, and specific language will be used herein to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXAMPLE EMBODIMENTS

The following detailed description of exemplary embodiments of the invention makes reference to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof and in which are shown, by way of illustration, exemplary embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. While these exemplary embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, it should be understood that other embodiments may be realized and that various changes to the invention may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.


In describing and claiming the present invention, the following terminology will be used.


As used here, the term “vertically grown” is used to describe nanotubes that are generally grown upward from a substrate or catalyst material. While such nanotubes exhibit a generally vertical attitude, it is to be understood that such tubes are not necessarily perfectly straight or perfectly upright, but will tend to grow, twist or otherwise meander laterally to some degree, as would be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art.


As used herein, relative terms, such as “upper,” “lower,” “upwardly,” “downwardly,” “vertically,” etc., are used to refer to various components, and orientations of components, of the systems discussed herein, and related structures with which the present systems can be utilized, as those terms would be readily understood by one of ordinary skill in the relevant art. It is to be understood that such terms are not intended to limit the present invention but are used to aid in describing the components of the present systems, and related structures generally, in the most straightforward manner. For example, one skilled in the relevant art would readily appreciate that a “vertically grown” carbon nanotube turned on its side would still constitute a vertically grown nanotube, despite its lateral orientation.


As used herein, the term “interstitial” material is used to refer to a material that at least partially fills interstices, or small spaces, between or in individual nanotubes that form an array of nanotubes.


As used herein, the term “patterned frame” is to be understood to refer to a framework or latticework or grate that includes an often planar base and an often planar face with constituent materials of the patterned frame arranged laterally relative to, and generally beginning or terminating at, the base and the face of the patterned frame. In most cases, the patterned frame will include one or more laterally extending walls that define, circumscribe or surround one or more passages extending through the frame from the base of the frame to the face of the frame.


One non-limiting example of a patterned frame in accordance with one aspect of the present invention is a grate structure having a repeating pattern of a plurality of intersecting walls that define a plurality of equally shaped and spaced passages. Such an exemplary grate structure is shown by example in FIGS. 1 and 2. Another non-limiting example of a patterned frame is exhibited by the MEMS device of FIGS. 3A and 3B.


As used herein, the term “passage” refers to an opening or a void formed in a patterned frame by the carbon nanotubes that define or constitute the frame. A passage can be completely devoid of material, or it can be filled, or partially filled, with an interstitial material used to fill interstices between and/or in the carbon nanotubes. In most cases, a passage that serves as an interstitial material access hole will include an opening size larger than interstices formed between adjacent nanotubes.


As used herein, the term “interlocked” is to be understood to refer to a relationship between two or more carbon nanotubes in which the nanotubes are held together, to at least some degree, by forces other than those applied by an interstitial coating or filling material (e.g., forces that exist prior to, or in the absence of, application of the interstitial material). Interlocked nanotubes may be intertwined with one another (e.g., wrapped about one another), or they may be held together by surface friction forces, van der Waals forces, and the like.


When nanotubes are discussed herein as being “linearly arranged” or “extending linearly,” it is to be understood that the nanotubes, while possibly being slightly twisted, curved, or otherwise having a bodies that that meander in direction, are generally arranged or grown so as to extend lengthwise.


As used herein, the term “substantially” refers to the complete or nearly complete extent or degree of an action, characteristic, property, state, structure, item, or result. As an arbitrary example, when an object or group of objects is/are referred to as being “substantially” symmetrical, it is to be understood that the object or objects are either completely symmetrical or are nearly completely symmetrical. The exact allowable degree of deviation from absolute completeness may in some cases depend on the specific context. However, generally speaking the nearness of completion will be so as to have the same overall result as if absolute and total completion were obtained.


The use of “substantially” is equally applicable when used in a negative connotation to refer to the complete or near complete lack of an action, characteristic, property, state, structure, item, or result. As an arbitrary example, an opening that is “substantially free of” material would either completely lack material, or so nearly completely lack material that the effect would be the same as if it completely lacked material. In other words, an opening that is “substantially free of” material may still actually contain some such material as long as there is no measurable effect as a result thereof


INVENTION

The present invention provides systems and methods utilizing carbon nanotubes (sometimes referred to as “CNTs”) in mechanically useful support structures and machines. In accordance with one aspect, the invention provides a high-density carbon nanotube assembly that includes a plurality of carbon nanotubes arranged into a patterned frame. The patterned frame can have a height of at least about 10 μm or greater. An interstitial material can at least partially fill interstices between at least some of the carbon nanotubes, and will also generally coat and/or bind together the outer surfaces of the patterned frame. The interstitial material will generally serve as a matrix binding the CNTs into a relatively rigid patterned frame having a shape generally corresponding to the shape outlined by the collective bodies of the CNTs.


One exemplary patterned frame 10 is shown in the SEM image of FIG. 1. In this embodiment, the frame includes a series of walls 12 with a series of passages (e.g., openings or cavities) 14 defined therebetween. The walls 12 can extend in divergent directions, forming right angles relative to one another, or a variety of other angles (e.g., 30 degrees, 45 degrees, etc.), depending upon the desired pattern of the frame. The line A-B in FIG. 1 indicates the generally upright, vertical, or linear orientation of the CNTs that form or define the walls of the patterned frame (note that, due to the very small scale of the CNTs, individual CNTs are not visible in the SEM image of FIG. 1). The tubes in a typical assembly generally grow vertically up from a substrate, in a direction that is generally parallel to the line A-B. It can be seen from this indicative line that the regions where the CNTs grow form or define the walls of the patterned frame. A series of CNTs are illustrated schematically at 21 in FIG. 5.


As will be discussed in further detail below, the pattern, shape and geometry of the patterned frame can be relatively easily manipulated during the CNT growth process, providing a great deal of flexibility in designing patterned frames for a variety of uses. In the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 1, the patterned frame includes a series of walls that extend at right angles to one another to form a series of square passages. In other embodiments, the walls may run at 30, 45 or 60 degrees relative to one another, and form diamond-shaped passages, triangular-shaped passages, rectangular-shaped passages, etc. Also, circular-shaped passages can be formed should such a pattern be found advantageous.


The CNTs utilized in the patterned frame can take a variety of forms. The CNTs can include single-wall CNTs or multi-wall CNTs. One particular advantage of the present invention lies in the ability to form high density arrays of CNTs with high aspect ratios. Patterned frames with high and narrow walls can be precisely formed into a variety of desired frame configurations. In one aspect, the CNTs utilized can include heights on the order of 10 μm and greater. While not so required, the CNTs can include diameters as small as 20 nm or less. The CNTs can be grown or fabricated in a variety of manners, many of which will be familiar to those of ordinary skill in the art. An exemplary grouping of CNTs is illustrated schematically at 21 in FIG. 5. In this illustration, the generally linear arrangement of the CNTs from a base 33 of the frame 10 (or wall 12) to a face 31 of the frame can be appreciated.


While not so required, many of the patterned frames formed in accordance with the present invention will include a generally planar face and a generally planar base, with the CNTs of the frame extending from the face to the base. For example, FIG. 1 illustrates one exemplary patterned frame 10, with the face 31 of the frame being defined by upper portions of the CNTs which collectively form a grid surface. While the faces and bases of the various examples shown in the figures are generally planar, it is to be understood that the faces and/or the bases may include a curvature.


In one specific example of the invention, CNTs can be grown by first preparing a sample by applying 30 nm of alumina on an upper surface of a supporting silicon wafer. A patterned, 3-4 nm Fe film can be applied to the upper surface of the alumina. The resulting sample can be placed on a quartz “boat” in a one inch quartz tube furnace and heated from room temperature to about 750 degrees C. while flowing 500 sccm of H2. When the furnace reaches 750 degrees C. (after about 8 minutes), a C2H4 flow can be initiated at 700 sccm (if slower growth is desired, the gases may be diluted with argon). After a desired CNT length (or height) is obtained, the H2 and C2H4 gases can be removed, and Ar can be initiated at 350 sccm while cooling the furnace to about 200 degrees C. in about 5 minutes.


The above example generated multi-walled CNTs with an average diameter of about 8.5 nm and a density of about 9.0 kg/m3. It was also found that the conditions above produced a CNT “forest” of high density, interlocked or intertwined CNTs that can be grown very tall while maintaining very narrow features in the patterned frame.


The intertwining of the CNTs during growth is advantageous in that the CNTs maintain a lateral pattern (generally defined by a catalyst from which the CNTs are grown) while growing vertically upward, as the CNTs maintain an attraction to one another during growth. Thus, rather than achieving random growth in myriad directions, the CNTs collectively maintain a common, generally vertical attitude while growing.


The interstitial material can be selected to provide the patterned frame with a variety of desirable characteristics. Generally speaking, the interstitial material can be selected to provide advantages tailored to the intended use of the patterned frame. Examples of suitable filler or interstitial material can include, without limitation, Si, SiO2, Si3N4, SiC, aluminum oxide, zinc oxide, titanium oxide, titanium, tungsten, amorphous carbon, ceramics, other metals, other semiconductors, other oxides, and combinations thereof, to name only a few suitable materials. Examples of attributes for which the interstitial material can be selected to optimize include, without limitation: mechanical stability; rigidity; stiffness; toughness; electrical conductivity; molecular, chemical and ion transport and storage; piezoelectricity; ferroelectricity; high temperature stability; etc.


In one specific example, an assembly was formed by creating a forest of CNTs formed into a patterned frame (as outlined above). The frame was then filled and/or coated with an interstitial material by a low-pressure chemical vapor deposition (“LPCVD”) process using undoped polycrystalline silicon. In this process, a LPCVD furnace was used at 200 mTorr and substrate temperature of 580 degrees C., flowing 20 sccm of SiH4, for 2 hours and 50 minutes. This process resulted in a deposition rate on a planar surface (or a radial deposition rate on the carbon nanotubes) of about 1.8 nm/min. Upon completion, the LPCVD furnace was vented with N2, and the sample was removed at a rate of about 1 cm/s.


In another specific example, the frame was filled and/or coated with an amorphous carbon interstitial material by an atmospheric CVD process. The filling or coating process was performed immediately after the growth of the CNT forest and prior to removal of the forest from the furnace. The temperature was raised to 900 degrees C. flowing Ar at 500 sccm. A one-hour carbon deposition with ethylene (25 sccm) and argon (225 sccm) followed by a 30 minute anneal at 1000 degrees C. (500 sccm of argon) substantially fills the CNT forest.


The present invention advantageously allows the selection of the interstitial material based upon an intended use, or desired attributes, of the resulting patterned frame. For example, in some applications, a greater or lesser degree of thermal or electrical conductivity may be desired. A greater or lesser degree of physical strength and/or weight may be desired. Resistance to various chemicals or environments can also be considerations that can affect selection of the interstitial material. The present invention can advantageously be adapted for a variety of materials to address these and other design goals.


While the present invention provides patterned CNT frames having high aspect ratios, the inventors have found that walls of patterned frames grown above certain heights can tend to “fold” over due to the large height-to-thickness ratio. To address this issue, reinforcing nubs, extensions, or protuberances can be formed in the walls of the patterned frame during growth of the frame. One exemplary protuberance 18 is illustrated in FIG. 5. The protuberance can provide rigidity to the wall to enable growth of taller and narrower wall features while avoiding unwanted “fold over” of the wall.


Also illustrated in FIGS. 5 and 6 are a series of interstitial material access holes 20 that can be utilized to enhance the filling/coating process of the present invention. The access holes 20 can be formed so as to extend substantially fully from the base 33 of the wall to the face 31 of the wall. The material access holes can be substantially devoid of nanotubes and can serve to increase penetration of the interstitial material into the forest of CNTs to ensure a fully (or more fully) impregnated forest. Thus, a finished patterned frame 10 can include one or more passages (e.g., 14 in FIGS. 1 and 2) that are substantially devoid of any material, and interstitial material access holes 20 that are devoid of CNTs but that may be partially filled during the manufacturing process by the interstitial material (in many cases, the interstitial material access contain little or no interstitial material).


The interstitial material access holes 20 can be formed in a variety of manners. As will be discussed in further detail below, growth of the CNTs can be accomplished by applying a catalyst material to a substrate in a defined pattern. Where desired, voids can be created in the catalyst pattern as, or after, the catalyst is applied to the substrate. As the CNTs grow upwardly around these voids, the material access holes will be formed in the CNT forest. In one example, it was found that square access holes of about 3 μm in width, spaced 3 μm from one another, allowed a polysilicon interstitial material to fill the CNT forest to a depth about ten times greater than if the holes were not present (forest heights of 170 μm and taller have been formed using this method). FIG. 6 includes an SEM image of a sectioned wall of a patterned frame showing two interstitial material access holes formed in the wall.


Generally speaking, the passages 14 are of larger diameter or opening size than are the interstitial material access holes 20, which are in turn of larger diameter or opening size than are the interstices between adjacent CNTs. While not so required, in one embodiment of the invention adjacent CNTs are spaced about 200-300 nm from one another, with the interstitial material access holes formed having a diameter or opening size of about 3 to about 20 μm, and the larger passages formed with a diameter or opening size of 100 μm or greater. In some applications, the larger passages may be as small as 10 μm in diameter.


The patterned frames of the present invention can be advantageously used in a variety of applications. In one specific example, the frames can be utilized as microelectromechanical systems (“MEMS”), or as specific components of MEMS. Due to the flexibility provided by the manner in which the present frames can be formed (discussed in more detail below), frames with very small feature sizes can be constructed with a high degree of precision. These aspects make the present invention well suited for use in MEMS applications. One exemplary MEMS device is illustrated in FIGS. 3A and 3B. In this application, the techniques of the present invention were utilized to form a bistable mechanism 24. The bistable mechanism provides a mechanical manner in which a condition can be expressed as one of two positions (analogous to a computer “bit”−1 or 0). FIG. 3A illustrates the bistable mechanism in a first state, with the second state illustrated in FIG. 3B.


The example illustrated in FIGS. 3A and 3B was formed by filling a patterned frame of CNTs with silicone nitride. The silicon nitride was deposited at 720 degrees C. and 200 mTorr in an LPCVD furnace. The tube of the furnace was evacuated and NH3 was flowed for 3 minutes at 14 sccm for a “pre-soak.” The NH3 flow was maintained and dichlorosilane was added at a flow rate of 10 sccm. After 3 hours, the dichlorosilane was turned off and NH3 was allowed to continue flowing for 3 minutes to remove un-reacted dichlorosilane. Finally, the LPCVD tube was flushed and vented with N2 and the sample was extracted at a rate of about 1 cm/s.


This process resulted in a nearly stoichiometric silicon nitride, evidenced by the index of refraction of a 200 nm film deposited on a planar Si substrate which was measured to be about 1.9 (compared to 2.0 for a truly stoichiometric Si3N4). In this example, the devices were not grown on a pre-deposited SiO2 sacrificial layer (as discussed further below), but were instead grown on a Si wafer (with the necessary 30 nm alumina diffusion barrier layer). The underlying silicon was etched to release the devices in 45% KOH solution at 60 degrees C. for 70 minutes.


Other examples of MEMS applications for which the present invention are suitable include, without limitation, thermomechanical in-plane microactuators (“TIMs”), comb drives, sensors, cantilevers, etc.


Formation of the patterned frames can be accomplished in a variety of manners. FIG. 4 illustrates a series of processes exemplary of one manner of doing so. The process can begin at frame (a) of FIG. 4., where 30 nm of alumina is evaporated by electron beam evaporation onto a SiO2 substrate. At (b), AZ330 photo resist is spun and patterned (note that the pattern is not evident from the view of FIG. 4—it would be apparent from a top view of the substrate). At (c), 4 nm of Fe is thermally evaporated on top of the photo resist. At (d), the photo resist is lifted off in a resist stripper. At (e), a forest of generally vertically-aligned CNTs is grown from the patterned iron film by chemical vapor deposition at 750 degrees C. using C2H4 and H2 feedstock gases (note that, while the CNTs are shown schematically as generally straight and upright, there will likely be a considerable amount of intertwining of the CNTs as they are grown). At (f), the CNT forest is coated (and/or infiltrated, bound together, etc., depending upon the materials utilized) with Si or other suitable materials by various chemical vapor deposition processes (e.g., low-pressure, atmospheric, high-pressure CVD, etc.).


It will be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art having possession of this disclosure that the infiltration step illustrated in frame (f) will often result in a “floor layer” of interstitial or infiltration material being applied near the base of the patterned frame within the passages defined by the CNTs (e.g., at the bottom of “wells” or “cups” formed by the passages and the Al2O3). This floor layer can be removed in order to expose the underlying sacrificial layer for etching. The removal of the floor layer can be accomplished in a number of manners.


In one aspect of the invention, a short reactive ion etch can be utilized. For example, a Reactive Ion Etch (RIE) can be accomplished at 100 W, 100 mTorr, flowing 3.1 sccm of O2 and 25 sccm of CF4, etching for 5-9 minutes (depending on the size of the features being etched). In another example, a CH3F/O2 Inductively Coupled Plasma RIE etch can be utilized. It is also contemplated that a wet etch can be utilized, for example by placing the sample in KOH or a similar solution to etch away the floor layer.


While each of these process may result etching or removing some of the interstitial material from the CNT forest, it has been found that the floor layer is removed before significant etching of the structure CNT structure occurs. Generally speaking, creation of the “floor layer,” and subsequent removal of the floor layer, will be considerations in most of the processes utilized in coating or infiltrating the CNT patterned frame of the present invention.


At (g), the underlying SiO2 is etched to release portions of the structure. This can be accomplished in a number of manners, including by immersion in HF. The resulting patterned frame will, in the example shown, include some portions that remain attached to the substrate (e.g., portion 30 of frame (g)), while other portions (e.g., portion 32 of frame (g)) have been removed from the substrate. Depending upon the desired use of the patterned frame, all of the frame could be left attached to the substrate, only some of the frame can be removed from the substrate (to form, for example, moveable portions for use in MEMS applications), or all of the frame can be removed from the substrate.


Removal of the frame from the substrate can be accomplished in a number of manners. In one embodiment, the frame can be simply pried off the substrate using mechanical force. Other embodiments can include the use of an etching process to remove the underlying sacrificial layer (e.g., SiO2 in the example given above) or to attack the interface between layers to release the frame from the substrate.


In addition to the process steps outlined above, in some embodiments of the invention, a densification process can be implemented prior to applying the interstitial material to the CNTs arranged into the patterned frame. For example, in one embodiment, CNT “forest” can be exposed to ethanol vapor prior to being exposed to a Si interstitial material to densify the CNTs. This process was found to decrease feature size by as much as 10-100 times.


While the forgoing examples are illustrative of the principles of the present invention in one or more particular applications, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that numerous modifications in form, usage and details of implementation can be made without the exercise of inventive faculty, and without departing from the principles and concepts of the invention. Accordingly, it is not intended that the invention be limited, except as by any claims associated with this or related applications.

Claims
  • 1. A carbon nanotube MEMS assembly, comprising: a plurality of carbon nanotubes oriented in a generally linear orientation into a patterned frame, the plurality of nanotubes extending vertically from a base of the frame to a face of the frame, the patterned frame defining at least two components of a MEMS device, the frame comprising one or more passages;an interstitial material, at least partially binding adjacent carbon nanotubes one to another;at least one component of the frame being fixed and at least one component of the frame being movable relative to the fixed component;wherein the nanotubes oriented into the frame define in the frame one or more interstitial material access holes, wherein each of the interstitial material access holes extends from the face of the frame to the base of the frame and is substantially devoid of nanotubes;wherein the one or more passages are substantially devoid of nanotubes coated with the interstitial material, andwherein the size of the one or more passages is greater than the size of the one or more interstitial material access holes.
  • 2. The MEMS assembly of claim 1, wherein the at least one fixed component is attached to a substrate.
  • 3. The MEMS assembly of claim 1, wherein the size of the interstitial material access holes is greater than the size of interstices between adjacent nanotubes.
  • 4. The MEMS assembly of claim 3, wherein adjacent nanotubes are interlocked one with another.
  • 5. The MEMS assembly of claim 3, wherein the size of the one or more passages is 10 microns or greater and the size of the one or more interstitial material access holes is from about 3 to about 20 microns.
  • 6. The MEMS assembly of claim 5, wherein the interstitial material access holes have a size larger than an interstice between adjacent nanotubes.
  • 7. The MEMS assembly of claim 1, wherein the assembly comprises a thermomechanical in-plane microactuator.
  • 8. The MEMS assembly of claim 1, wherein the assembly comprises a comb drive.
  • 9. The MEMS assembly of claim 1, wherein the assembly comprises a bistable mechanism.
  • 10. The MEMS assembly of claim 1, wherein the interstitial material comprises a material applied by a vapor deposition process.
  • 11. The MEMS assembly of claim 10, wherein the interstitial material floor layer in areas adjacent to movable components is removed to enable the release etch.
  • 12. The MEMS assembly of claim 11, wherein the floor layer adjacent to the movable parts is removed via Reactive Ion Etching.
  • 13. The MEMS assembly of claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of carbon nanotubes extends substantially linearly from the base of the frame to the face of the frame.
PRIORITY

Priority is claimed of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/995,881, filed Sep. 28, 2007, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (251)
Number Name Date Kind
1276706 Snook et al. May 1918 A
1881448 Forde et al. Oct 1932 A
1946288 Kearsley Feb 1934 A
2291948 Cassen Aug 1942 A
2316214 Atlee et al. Apr 1943 A
2329318 Atlee et al. Sep 1943 A
2340363 Atlee et al. Feb 1944 A
2502070 Atlee et al. Mar 1950 A
2683223 Hosemann Jul 1954 A
2952790 Steen Sep 1960 A
3218559 Applebaum Nov 1965 A
3397337 Denholm Aug 1968 A
3434062 Cox Mar 1969 A
3358368 Oess Nov 1970 A
3665236 Gaines et al. May 1972 A
3679927 Kirkendall Jul 1972 A
3691417 Gralenski Sep 1972 A
3741797 Chavasse, Jr. et al. Jun 1973 A
3751701 Gralenski et al. Aug 1973 A
3801847 Dietz Apr 1974 A
3828190 Dahlin et al. Aug 1974 A
3851266 Conway Nov 1974 A
3872287 Kooman Mar 1975 A
3882339 Rate et al. May 1975 A
3962583 Holland et al. Jun 1976 A
3970884 Golden Jul 1976 A
3356559 Mohn et al. Dec 1976 A
4007375 Albert Feb 1977 A
4075526 Grubis Feb 1978 A
4160311 Ronde et al. Jul 1979 A
4178509 More et al. Dec 1979 A
4184097 Auge Jan 1980 A
4293373 Greenwood Oct 1981 A
4368538 McCorkle Jan 1983 A
4393127 Greschner et al. Jul 1983 A
4421986 Friauf et al. Dec 1983 A
4443293 Mallon et al. Apr 1984 A
4463338 Utner et al. Jul 1984 A
4504895 Steigerwald Mar 1985 A
4521902 Peugeot Jun 1985 A
4532150 Endo et al. Jul 1985 A
4573186 Reinhold Feb 1986 A
4576679 White Mar 1986 A
4584056 Perret et al. Apr 1986 A
4591756 Avnery May 1986 A
4608326 Neukermans et al. Aug 1986 A
4645977 Kurokawa et al. Feb 1987 A
4675525 Amingual et al. Jun 1987 A
4679219 Ozaki Jul 1987 A
4688241 Peugeot Aug 1987 A
4696994 Nakajima et al. Sep 1987 A
4705540 Hayes Nov 1987 A
4777642 Ono Oct 1988 A
4797907 Anderton Jan 1989 A
4818806 Kunimune et al. Apr 1989 A
4819260 Haberrecker Apr 1989 A
4862490 Karnezos et al. Aug 1989 A
4870671 Hershyn Sep 1989 A
4876330 Higashi et al. Oct 1989 A
4878866 Mori et al. Nov 1989 A
4885055 Woodbury et al. Dec 1989 A
4891831 Tanaka et al. Jan 1990 A
4933557 Perkins Jun 1990 A
4939763 Pinneo et al. Jul 1990 A
4957773 Spencer et al. Sep 1990 A
4960486 Perkins et al. Oct 1990 A
4969173 Valkonet Nov 1990 A
4979198 Malcolm et al. Dec 1990 A
4979199 Cueman et al. Dec 1990 A
5010562 Hernandez et al. Apr 1991 A
5063324 Grunwald et al. Nov 1991 A
5066300 Isaacson et al. Nov 1991 A
5077771 Skillicorn et al. Dec 1991 A
5077777 Daly Dec 1991 A
5090046 Friel Feb 1992 A
5105456 Rand et al. Apr 1992 A
5117829 Miller et al. Jun 1992 A
5153900 Nomikos et al. Oct 1992 A
5161179 Suzuki et al. Nov 1992 A
5173612 Imai et al. Dec 1992 A
5178140 Ibrahim Jan 1993 A
5217817 Verspui et al. Jun 1993 A
5226067 Allred et al. Jul 1993 A
RE34421 Parker et al. Oct 1993 E
5258091 Imai et al. Nov 1993 A
5267294 Kuroda et al. Nov 1993 A
5302523 Coffee et al. Apr 1994 A
5343112 Wegmann Aug 1994 A
5391958 Kelly Feb 1995 A
5392042 Pellon Feb 1995 A
5400385 Blake et al. Mar 1995 A
5422926 Smith et al. Jun 1995 A
5428658 Oettinger et al. Jun 1995 A
5432003 Plano et al. Jul 1995 A
5469429 Yamazaki et al. Nov 1995 A
5469490 Golden et al. Nov 1995 A
5478266 Kelly Dec 1995 A
5521851 Wei et al. May 1996 A
5524133 Neale et al. Jun 1996 A
RE35383 Miller et al. Nov 1996 E
5571616 Phillips et al. Nov 1996 A
5578360 Viitanen Nov 1996 A
5602507 Suzuki Feb 1997 A
5607723 Plano et al. Mar 1997 A
5621780 Smith et al. Apr 1997 A
5627871 Wang May 1997 A
5631943 Miles May 1997 A
5680433 Jensen Oct 1997 A
5682412 Skillicorn et al. Oct 1997 A
5696808 Lenz Dec 1997 A
5706354 Stroehlein Jan 1998 A
5729583 Tang et al. Mar 1998 A
5774522 Warburton Jun 1998 A
5812632 Schardt et al. Sep 1998 A
5835561 Moorman et al. Nov 1998 A
5870051 Warburton Feb 1999 A
5898754 Gorzen Apr 1999 A
5907595 Sommerer May 1999 A
6002202 Meyer et al. Dec 1999 A
6005918 Harris et al. Dec 1999 A
6044130 Inazura et al. Mar 2000 A
6062931 Chuang et al. May 2000 A
6063629 Knoblauch May 2000 A
6069278 Chuang May 2000 A
6073484 Miller et al. Jun 2000 A
6075839 Treseder Jun 2000 A
6097790 Gasegawa et al. Aug 2000 A
6129901 Moskovits et al. Oct 2000 A
6133401 Jensen Oct 2000 A
6134300 Trebes et al. Oct 2000 A
6184333 Gray Feb 2001 B1
6205200 Boyer et al. Mar 2001 B1
6277318 Bower Aug 2001 B1
6282263 Arndt et al. Aug 2001 B1
6288209 Jensen Sep 2001 B1
6307008 Lee et al. Oct 2001 B1
6320019 Lee et al. Nov 2001 B1
6351520 Inazaru Feb 2002 B1
6385294 Suzuki et al. May 2002 B2
6388359 Duelli et al. May 2002 B1
6438207 Chidester et al. Aug 2002 B1
6477235 Chornenky et al. Nov 2002 B2
6487272 Kutsuzawa Nov 2002 B1
6487273 Takenaka et al. Nov 2002 B1
6494618 Moulton Dec 2002 B1
6546077 Chornenky et al. Apr 2003 B2
6567500 Rother May 2003 B2
6645757 Okandan et al. Nov 2003 B1
6646366 Hell et al. Nov 2003 B2
6658085 Sklebitz Dec 2003 B2
6661876 Turner et al. Dec 2003 B2
6740874 Doring May 2004 B2
6778633 Loxley et al. Aug 2004 B1
6799075 Chornenky et al. Sep 2004 B1
6803570 Bryson, III et al. Oct 2004 B1
6803571 Mankos et al. Oct 2004 B1
6816573 Hirano et al. Nov 2004 B2
6819741 Chidester Nov 2004 B2
6838297 Iwasaki et al. Jan 2005 B2
6852365 Smart et al. Feb 2005 B2
6866801 Mau et al. Mar 2005 B1
6876724 Zhou Apr 2005 B2
6900580 Dai et al. May 2005 B2
6956706 Brandon Oct 2005 B2
6962782 Livache et al. Nov 2005 B1
6976953 Pelc Dec 2005 B1
6987835 Lovoi Jan 2006 B2
7035379 Turner et al. Apr 2006 B2
7046767 Okada et al. May 2006 B2
7049735 Ohkubo et al. May 2006 B2
7050539 Loef et al. May 2006 B2
7075699 Oldham et al. Jul 2006 B2
7085354 Kanagami Aug 2006 B2
7108841 Smalley et al. Sep 2006 B2
7110498 Yamada Sep 2006 B2
7130380 Lovoi et al. Oct 2006 B2
7130381 Lovoi et al. Oct 2006 B2
7189430 Ajayan et al. Mar 2007 B2
7203283 Puusaari Apr 2007 B1
7206381 Shimono et al. Apr 2007 B2
7215741 Ukita May 2007 B2
7224769 Turner May 2007 B2
7233071 Furukawa et al. Jun 2007 B2
7233647 Turner et al. Jun 2007 B2
7286642 Ishikawa et al. Oct 2007 B2
7305066 Ukita Dec 2007 B2
7317784 Durst et al. Jan 2008 B2
7358593 Smith et al. Apr 2008 B2
7382862 Bard et al. Jun 2008 B2
7428298 Bard et al. Sep 2008 B2
7448801 Oettinger et al. Nov 2008 B2
7448802 Oettinger et al. Nov 2008 B2
7486774 Cain Feb 2009 B2
7526068 Dinsmore Apr 2009 B2
7529345 Bard et al. May 2009 B2
7618906 Meilahti Nov 2009 B2
7634052 Grodzins et al. Dec 2009 B2
7649980 Aoki et al. Jan 2010 B2
7650050 Haffner et al. Jan 2010 B2
7657002 Burke et al. Feb 2010 B2
7675444 Smith et al. Mar 2010 B1
7680652 Giesbrecht et al. Mar 2010 B2
7693265 Hauttmann et al. Apr 2010 B2
7709820 Decker et al. May 2010 B2
7737424 Xu et al. Jun 2010 B2
7756251 Davis et al. Jul 2010 B2
20020075999 Rother Jun 2002 A1
20020094064 Zhou Jul 2002 A1
20030096104 Tobita et al. May 2003 A1
20030117770 Montgomery et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030142169 Maeng et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030152700 Asmussen et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030165418 Ajayan et al. Sep 2003 A1
20040076260 Charles Jr. et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040131835 Schmitt et al. Jul 2004 A1
20050018817 Oettinger et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050141669 Shimono et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050207537 Ukita Sep 2005 A1
20060032329 Rubinstein et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060073682 Furukawa et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060098778 Oettinger et al. May 2006 A1
20060131646 Wu Jun 2006 A1
20060210020 Takahashi et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060233307 Dinsmore Oct 2006 A1
20060269048 Cain Nov 2006 A1
20060280289 Hanington et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070025516 Bard et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070087436 Miyawaki et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070111617 Meilahti May 2007 A1
20070133921 Haffner et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070142781 Sayre Jun 2007 A1
20070165780 Durst et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070172104 Nishide Jul 2007 A1
20070183576 Burke et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070217574 Beyerlein Sep 2007 A1
20080199399 Chen et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080296479 Anderson et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080296518 Xu et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080317982 Hecht Dec 2008 A1
20090085426 Davis et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090086923 Davis et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090213914 Dong et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090243028 Dong et al. Oct 2009 A1
20100119708 Overzet et al. May 2010 A1
20100126660 O'Hara May 2010 A1
20100189225 Ernest et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100239828 Cornaby et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100243895 Xu et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100248343 Aten et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100285271 Davis et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100323419 Aten et al. Dec 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (31)
Number Date Country
1030936 May 1958 DE
4430623 Mar 1996 DE
19818057 Nov 1999 DE
0297808 Jan 1989 EP
0330456 Aug 1989 EP
1252290 Nov 1971 GB
57082954 Aug 1982 JP
3170673 Jul 1991 JP
05066300 Mar 1993 JP
5135722 Jun 1993 JP
06119893 Jul 1994 JP
6289145 Oct 1994 JP
6343478 Dec 1994 JP
8315783 Nov 1996 JP
2003007237 Jan 2003 JP
2003088383 Mar 2003 JP
2003-510236 Mar 2003 JP
2003211396 Jul 2003 JP
4171700 Jun 2006 JP
2006-297549 Nov 2006 JP
10-2005-0107094 Nov 2005 KR
WO96-19738 Jun 1996 WO
WO9965821 Dec 1999 WO
WO0009443 Feb 2000 WO
WO0017102 Mar 2000 WO
WO03076951 Sep 2003 WO
WO 2008052002 May 2008 WO
WO 2009009610 Jan 2009 WO
WO 2009045915 Apr 2009 WO
WO 2009085351 Jul 2009 WO
WO 2010107600 Sep 2010 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (73)
Entry
Vajtai et al.,“Building Carbon Nanotubes and their smart architectures”, Smart Mater.Struct. 11 (2002) 691-698.
Anderson et al., U.S. Appl. No. 11/756,962, filed Jun. 1, 2007.
Barkan et al., “Improved window for low-energy x-ray transmission a Hybrid design for energy-dispersive microanalysis,” Sep. 1995, 2 pages, Ectroscopy 10(7).
Blanquart et al.; “XPAD, a New Read-out Pixel Chip for X-ray Counting”; IEEE Xplore; Mar. 25, 2009.
Comfort, J. H., “Plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition of in situ doped epitaxial silicon at low temperatures,” J. Appl. Phys. 65, 1067 (1989).
Das, D. K., and K. Kumar, “Chemical vapor deposition of boron on a beryllium surface,” Thin Solid Films, 83(1), 53-60.
Das, K., and Kumar, K., “Tribological behavior of improved chemically vapor-deposited boron on beryllium,” Thin Solid Films, 108(2), 181-188.
Gevin, et al IDe-XV1.0: Performances of a New CMOS Multi channer Analogue Readout ASIC for Cd (Zn) Te Detectors; IEEE 2005.
Grybos et al.; “DEDIX—Development of Fully Integrated Multichannel ASIC for High Count Rate Digital X-ray Imagining systems”; IEEE 2006; Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.
Grybos, “Pole-Zero Cancellations Circuit With Pulse Pile-Up Tracking System for Low Noise Charge-Sensitive Amplifiers”; Mar. 25, 2009; from IEEE Xplore.
Grybos, et al “Measurements of Matching and High Count Rate Performance of Multichannel ASIC for Digital X-Ray Imaging Systems”; IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 54, No. 4, 2007.
Hanigofsky, J. A., K. L. More, and W. J. Lackey, “Composition and microstructure of chemically vapor-deposited boron nitride, aluminum nitride, and boron nitride + aluminum nitride composites,” J. Amer. Ceramic Soc. 74, 301 (1991).
Komatsu, S., and Y. Moriyoshi, “Influence of atomic hydrogen on the growth reactions of amorphous boron films in a low-pressure B.sub.2 H.sub.6 +He+H.sub.2 plasma”, J. Appl. Phys. 64, 1878 (1988).
Komatsu, S., and Y. Moriyoshi, “Transition from amorphous to crystal growth of boron films in plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition with B.sub.2 H.sub.6 +He,” J. Appl. Phys., 66, 466 (1989).
Komatsu, S., and Y. Moriyoshi, “Transition from thermal-to electron-impact decomposition of diborane in plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition of boron films from B.sub.2 H.sub.6 +He,” J. Appl. Phys. 66, 1180 (1989).
Lee, W., W. J. Lackey, and P. K. Agrawal, “Kinetic analysis of chemical vapor deposition of boron nitride,” J. Amer. Ceramic Soc. 74, 2642 (1991).
Lines, U.S. Appl. No. 12/352,864, filed Jan. 13, 2009.
Lines, U.S. Appl. No. 12/726,120, filed Mar. 17, 2010.
Ma, R.Z., et al., “Processing and properties of carbon nanotubes-nano-SIC ceramic”, Journal of Materials Science 1998, pp. 5243-5246, vol. 33.
Maya, L., and L. A. Harris, “Pyrolytic deposition of carbon films containing nitrogen and/or boron,” J. Amer. Ceramic Soc. 73, 1912 (1990).
Michaelidis, M., and R. Pollard, “Analysis of chemical vapor deposition of boron,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 132, 1757 (1985).
Moore, A. W., S. L. Strong, and G. L. Doll, “Properties and characterization of codeposited boron nitride and carbon materials,” J. Appl. Phys. 65, 5109 (1989).
Nakamura, K., “Preparation and properties of amorphous boron nitride films by molecular flow chemical vapor deposition,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 132, 1757 (1985).
Panayiotatos, et al., “Mechanical performance and growth characteristics of boron nitride films with respect to their optical, compositional properties and density,” Surface and Coatings Technology, 151-152 (2002) 155-159.
PCT Application PCT/US08/65346; filed May 30, 2008; Keith Decker.
PCT Application PCT/US10/56011; filed Nov. 9, 2010; Krzysztof Kozaczek.
Perkins, F. K., R. A. Rosenberg, and L. Sunwoo, “Synchrotronradiation deposition of boron and boron carbide films from boranes and carboranes: decaborane,” J. Appl. Phys. 69,4103 (1991).
Powell et al., “Metalized polyimide filters for x-ray astronomy and other applications,” SPIE, pp. 432-440, vol. 3113.
Rankov. A. “A Novel Correlated Double Sampling Poly-Si Circuit for Readout System in Large Area X-Ray Sensors”, 2005.
Roca i Cabarrocas, P., S. Kumar, and B. Drevillon, “In situ study of the thermal decomposition of B.sub.2 H.sub.6 by combining spectroscopic ellipsometry and Kelvin probe measurements,” J. Appl. Phys. 66, 3286 (1989).
Scholze et al., “Detection efficiency of energy-dispersive detectors with low-energy windows” X-Ray Spectrometry, X-Ray Spectrom, 2005: 34: 473-476.
Shirai, K., S.-I. Gonda, and S. Gonda, “Characterization of hydrogenated amorphous boron films prepared by electron cyclotron resonance plasma chemical vapor deposition method,” J. Appl. Phys. 67, 6286 (1990).
Tamura, et al “Developmenmt of ASICs for CdTe Pixel and Line Sensors”, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 52, No, 5, Oct. 2005.
Tien-Hui Lin et al., “An investigation on the films used as teh windows of ultra-soft X-ray counters.” Acta Physica Sinica, vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 276-83, May 1978, abstract only.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/640,154, filed Dec. 17, 2009; Krzysztof Kozaczek.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/726,120, filed Mar. 17, 2010; Michael Lines.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/783,707, filed May 20, 2010; Steven D. Liddiard.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/899,750, filed Oct. 7, 2010; Steven Liddiard.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/018,667, filed Feb. 1, 2011; Lei Pei.
Vandenbulcke, L. G., “Theoretical and experimental studies on the chemical vapor deposition of boron carbide,” Indust. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 24, 568 (1985).
Viitanen Veli-Pekka et al., Comparison of Ultrathin X-Ray Window Designs, presented at the Soft X-rays in the 21st Century Conference held in Provo, utah Feb. 10-13, 1993, pp. 182-190.
Wagner et al, “Effects of Scatter in Dual-Energy Imaging: An Alternative Analysis”; IEEE; Sep. 1989, vol. 8. No. 3.
Winter, J., H. G. Esser, and H. Reimer, “Diborane-free boronization,” Fusion Technol. 20, 225 (1991).
www.moxtek,com, Moxtek, Sealed Proportional Counter X-Ray Windows, Oct. 2007, 3 pages.
www.moxtek.com, Moxtek, AP3 Windows, Ultra-thin Polymer X-Ray Windows, Sep. 2006, 2 pages.
www.moxtek.com, Moxtek, DuraBeryllium X-Ray Windows, May 2007, 2 pages.
www.moxtek.com, Moxtek, ProLine Series 10 Windows, Ultra-thin Polymer X-Ray Windows, Sep. 2006, 2 pages.
www.moxtek.com, X-Ray Windows, ProLINE Series 20 Windows Ultra-thin Polymer X-ray Windows, 2 pages. Applicant believes that this product was offered for sale prior to the filed of applicant's application.
Hutchison, “Vertically aligned carbon nanotubes as a framework for microfabrication of high aspect ration mems,” 2008, pp. 1-50.
Ma, R. Z., at al., “Processing and properties of carbon nanotubes-nano-SiC ceramic,” Journal of Materials Science 1998, pp. 5243-5246, vol. 33.
Chen, Xiaohua et al., “Cabon-nanotube metal-matrix composites prepared by electroless plating,” Composites Science and Technology, 2000, pp. 301-306, vol. 60.
Flahaut, E. et al., “Carbon Nanotube-metal-oxide nanocomposites: microstructure, electrical conductivity and mechanical properties,” Acta mater., 2000, pp. 3803-3812, vol. 48.
Peigney, et al., “Carbon nanotubes in novel ceramic matrix nanocomposites,” Ceramics International, 2000, pp, 677-683, vol. 26.
Satishkumar B.C., et al., “Synthesis of metal oxide nanorods using carbon nanotubes as templates,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2000, pp. 2115-2119, vol. 10.
Li, Jun et al., “Bottom-up approach for carbon nanotube interconnects,” Applied Physics Letters, Apr. 14, 2003, pp. 2491-2493, vol. 82 No. 15.
Jiang, Linqin et al., “Carbon nanotubes-metal nitride composites: a new class of nanocomposites with enhanced electrical properties,” J. Mater.Chem., 2005, pp. 260-266, vol. 15.
Yan, Xing-Bin, et al., Fabrication of Three-Dimensional ZnO-Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Hybrids Using Self-Assembled CNT Micropatterns as Framework, 2007, pp. 1724-17259, vol. 111.
http://www.orau.org/ptp/collectio/xraytubescollidge/MachlettCW250T.htm, 1999, 2 pages.
Micro X-ray Tubem Operation Manual, X-ray and Specialty Instruments Inc., 1996, 5 pages.
Sheather, “The support of thin windows for x-ray proportional countrers,” Journal Phys. E., Apr. 1973, pp. 319-322, vol. 6, No. 4.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/640,154, filed Dec. 17, 2009; Krzysztof Kozaczek; office action issued Apr. 26, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/640,154, filed Dec. 17, 2009; Krzysztof Kozaczek; notice of allowance issued May 23, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/640,154, filed Dec. 17, 2009; Krzysztof Kozaczek; office action issued Jun. 9, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/407,457, filed Mar. 19, 2009; Sterling W. Cornaby; office action issued Jun. 14, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/239,281, filed Sep. 26, 2008; Robert C. Davis; office action issued Dec. 13, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/814,912, filed Jun. 14, 2010; Degao Xu; office action issued Dec. 5, 2011.
Vajtai et al; Building Carbon Nanotubes and Their Smart Architectures; Smart Mater. Struct. 2002; pp. 691-698; vol. 11.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/239,281, filed Sep. 26, 2008; Robert C. Davis; office action issued May 24, 2012.
PCT Application PCT/US2011/044168; filed Jul. 15, 2011; Dongbing Wang; International Search Report mailed Mar. 28, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/783,707, filed May 20, 2010; Steven D. Liddiard; office action issued Jun. 22, 2012.
PCT Application PCT/US2011/046371; filed Aug. 3, 2011; Steven Liddiard; International Search Report mailed Feb. 29, 2012.
PCT Application PCT/US2010/056011; filed Nov. 9, 2010; Krysztof Kozaczek; International Search Report mailed Jul. 13, 2011.
Chakrapani et al.; Capillarity-Driven Assembly of Two-Dimensional Cellular Carbon Nanotube Foams; PNAS; Mar. 23, 2004; pp. 4009-4012; vol. 101; No. 12.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20090085426 A1 Apr 2009 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60995881 Sep 2007 US