Information
-
Patent Grant
-
6251215
-
Patent Number
6,251,215
-
Date Filed
Wednesday, June 3, 199826 years ago
-
Date Issued
Tuesday, June 26, 200123 years ago
-
Inventors
-
Original Assignees
-
Examiners
- Mills; Gregory
- Powell; A. C.
Agents
-
CPC
-
US Classifications
Field of Search
-
International Classifications
-
Abstract
A carrier head for a chemical mechanical polishing apparatus includes a retaining ring having a flexible lower portion and a rigid upper portion.
Description
BACKGROUND
The present invention relates generally to chemical mechanical polishing of substrates, and more particularly to a carrier head for a chemical mechanical polishing apparatus.
Integrated circuits are typically formed on substrates, particularly silicon wafers, by the sequential deposition of conductive, semiconductive or insulative layers. After each layer is deposited, it is etched to create circuitry features. As a series of layers are sequentially deposited and etched, the outer or uppermost surface of the substrate, i.e., the exposed surface of the substrate, becomes increasingly non-planar. This non-planar surface presents problems in the photolithographic steps of the integrated circuit fabrication process. Therefore, there is a need to periodically planarize the substrate surface.
Chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) is one accepted method of planarization. This planarization method typically requires that the substrate be mounted on a carrier or polishing head. The exposed surface of the substrate is placed against a rotating polishing pad. The polishing pad may be either a “standard” or a fixed-abrasive pad. A standard polishing pad has durable roughened surface, whereas a fixed-abrasive pad has abrasive particles held in a containment media. The carrier head provides a controllable load, i.e., pressure, on the substrate to push it against the polishing pad. A polishing slurry, including at least one chemically-reactive agent, and abrasive particles, if a standard pad is used, is supplied to the surface of the polishing pad.
The effectiveness of a CMP process may be measured by its polishing rate, and by the resulting finish (absence of small-scale roughness) and flatness (absence of large-scale topography) of the substrate surface. The polishing rate, finish and flatness are determined by the pad and slurry combination, the relative speed between the substrate and pad, and the force pressing the substrate against the pad.
A reoccurring problem in CMP is the so-called “edge-effect”, i.e., the tendency of the edge of the substrate to be polished at a different rate than the center of the substrate. The edge effect typically results in over-polishing (the removal of too much material from the substrate) at the substrate perimeter, e.g., the outermost five to ten millimeters of a 200 mm wafer. Over-polishing reduces the overall flatness of the substrate, causing the edge of the substrate to be unsuitable for integrated circuit fabrication and decreasing the process yield.
SUMMARY
In one aspect, the invention is directed to a carrier head for a chemical mechanical polishing apparatus. The carrier head has a substrate mounting surface and a retaining ring to maintain a substrate beneath the mounting surface during polishing. The retaining ring includes a lower portion having a bottom surface for contacting a polishing pad during polishing and made of a first material, and an upper portion made of a second material which is more rigid than the first material.
Implementations of the invention may include the following. The first material may be a plastic, e.g., polyphenylene sulfide, polyethylene terephthalate, polyetheretherketone, or polybutylene terephthalate, which is substantially inert to a chemical mechanical polishing process. The second material may be a metal, e.g., steel, aluminum, or molybdenum, or a ceramic. The lower portion may be thicker than a substrate to be polished, e.g., between about 100 and 400 mils thick. The first material may provide a durometer measurement between about 80 and 95 on the Shore D scale. The second material may have an elastic modulus about ten to one-hundred, e.g., fifty times the elastic modulus of the first material. The lower portion may be adhesively attached, e.g., with a slow curing epoxy, or press fit to the upper portion.
In another aspect of the carrier head, the lower portion is made of a first material having a first elastic modulus and the upper portion is made of a second material having a second elastic modulus, and the second elastic modulus is selected to be sufficiently larger than the first elastic modulus to substantially prevent deflection of the lower surface of the retaining ring during polishing.
In another aspect of the carrier head, the lower portion is made of a first material having a first elastic modulus and the upper portion is made of a second material having a second elastic modulus, and the second elastic modulus is selected to be sufficiently larger than the first elastic modulus to substantially prevent deformation of the lower surface of the retaining ring where the retaining ring is joined to the carrier head.
In another aspect, the invention is directed to a retaining ring for a carrier head having a mounting surface for a substrate. The retaining ring has a generally annular lower portion having a bottom surface for contacting a polishing pad during polishing and made of a first material which is inert in a chemical mechanical polishing process, and a generally annular upper portion joined to the lower portion and made of a second material which is more rigid than the first material.
In another aspect, the invention is directed to a chemical mechanical polishing system with a rotatable polishing pad, a slurry supply to dispense a slurry onto the polishing pad, and a carrier head having a substrate mounting surface and a retaining ring to maintain a substrate beneath the mounting surface during polishing. The retaining ring includes a lower portion for contacting a polishing pad during polishing and made of a first material, and an upper portion made of a second material which is more rigid than the first material.
Advantages of the invention may include the following. The edge effect is reduced, and the resulting flatness and finish of the substrate are improved.
Other advantages and features of the invention will be apparent from the following description, including the drawings and claims.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1
is an exploded perspective view of a chemical mechanical polishing apparatus.
FIG. 2
is a schematic cross-sectional view of a carrier head according to the present invention.
FIG. 3
is an enlarged view of the carrier head of
FIG. 2
showing a retaining ring.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Referring to
FIG. 1
, one or more substrates
10
will be polished by a chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) apparatus
20
. A description of a similar CMP apparatus may be found in U.S. Pat. No. 5,738,574, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
The CMP apparatus
20
includes a lower machine base
22
with a table top
23
mounted thereon and a removable upper outer cover (not shown). Table top
23
supports a series of polishing stations
25
a
,
25
b
and
25
c
, and a transfer station
27
for loading and unloading the substrates. Transfer station
27
may form a generally square arrangement with the three polishing stations
25
a
,
25
b
and
25
c.
Each polishing station
25
a
-
25
c
includes a rotatable platen
30
on which is placed a polishing pad
32
. If substrate
10
is an eight-inch (200 millimeter)or twelve-inch (300 millimeter) diameter disk, then platen
30
and polishing pad
32
will be about twenty or thirty inches in diameter, respectively. Platen
30
may be connected to a platen drive motor (not shown) located inside machine base
22
. For most polishing processes, the platen drive motor rotates platen
30
at thirty to two-hundred revolutions per minute, although lower or higher rotational speeds may be used. Each polishing station
25
a
-
25
c
may further include an associated pad conditioner apparatus
40
to maintain the abrasive condition of the polishing pad.
A slurry
50
containing a reactive agent (e.g., deionized water for oxide polishing) and a chemically-reactive catalyzer (e.g., potassium hydroxide for oxide polishing) may be supplied to the surface of polishing pad
32
by a combined slurry/rinse arm
52
. If polishing pad
32
is a standard pad, slurry
50
may also include abrasive particles (e.g., silicon dioxide for oxide polishing). Typically, sufficient slurry is provided to cover and wet the entire polishing pad
32
. Slurry/rinse arm
52
includes several spray nozzles (not shown) which provide a high pressure rinse of polishing pad
32
at the end of each polishing and conditioning cycle.
A rotatable multi-head carousel
60
, including a carousel support plate
66
and a cover
68
, is positioned above lower machine base
22
. Carousel support plate
66
is supported by a center post
62
and rotated thereon about a carousel axis
64
by a carousel motor assembly located within machine base
22
. Multi-head carousel
60
includes four carrier head systems
70
a
,
70
b
,
70
c
, and
70
d
mounted on carousel support plate
66
at equal angular intervals about carousel axis
64
. Three of the carrier head systems receive and hold substrates and polish them by pressing them against the polishing pads of polishing stations
25
a
-
25
c
. One of the carrier head systems receives a substrate from and delivers the substrate to transfer station
27
. The carousel motor may orbit carrier head systems
70
a
-
70
d
, and the substrates attached thereto, about carousel axis
64
between the polishing stations and the transfer station.
Each carrier head system
70
a
-
70
d
includes a polishing or carrier head
100
. Each carrier head
100
independently rotates about its own axis, and independently laterally oscillates in a radial slot
72
formed in carousel support plate
66
. A carrier drive shaft
74
extends through slot
72
to connect a carrier head rotation motor
76
(shown by the removal of one-quarter of cover
68
) to carrier head
100
. There is one carrier drive shaft and motor for each head. Each motor and drive shaft may be supported on a slider (not shown) which can be linearly driven along the slot by a radial drive motor to laterally oscillate the carrier head.
During actual polishing, three of the carrier heads, e.g., those of carrier head systems
70
a
-
70
c
, are positioned at and above respective polishing stations
25
a
-
25
c
. Each carrier head
100
lowers a substrate into contact with a polishing pad
32
. Generally, carrier head
100
holds the substrate in position against the polishing pad and distributes a force across the back surface of the substrate. The carrier head also transfers torque from the drive shaft to the substrate.
Referring to
FIG. 2
, carrier head
100
includes a housing
102
, a base
104
, a gimbal mechanism
106
, a loading chamber
108
, a retaining ring
110
, and a substrate backing assembly
112
. A description of a similar carrier head may be found in U.S. application Ser. No. 08/745,670 by Zuniga, et al., filed Nov. 8, 1996, entitled A CARRIER HEAD WITH A FLEXIBLE MEMBRANE FOR A CHEMICAL MECHANICAL POLISHING SYSTEM, and assigned to the assignee of the present invention, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
The housing
102
can be connected to drive shaft
74
to rotate therewith during polishing about an axis of rotation
107
which is substantially perpendicular to the surface of the polishing pad during polishing. The loading chamber
108
is located between housing
102
and base
104
to apply a load, i.e., a downward pressure, to base
104
. The vertical position of base
104
relative to polishing pad
32
is also controlled by loading chamber
108
.
The substrate backing assembly
112
includes a support structure
114
, a flexure diaphragm
116
connecting support structure
114
to base
104
, and a flexible member or membrane
118
connected to support structure
114
. The flexible membrane
118
extends below support structure
114
to provide a mounting surface
120
for the substrate. Pressurization of a chamber
190
positioned between base
104
and substrate backing assembly
112
forces flexible membrane
118
downwardly to press the substrate against the polishing pad.
The housing
102
is generally circular in shape to correspond to the circular configuration of the substrate to be polished. A cylindrical bushing
122
may fit into a vertical bore
124
extending through the housing, and two passages
126
and
128
may extend through the housing for pneumatic control of the carrier head.
The base
104
is a generally ring-shaped body located beneath housing
102
. The base
104
may be formed of a rigid material such as aluminum, stainless steel or fiber-reinforced plastic. A passage
130
may extend through the base, and two fixtures
132
and
134
may provide attachment points to connect a flexible tube between housing
102
and base
104
to fluidly couple passage
128
to passage
130
.
An elastic and flexible membrane
140
may be attached to the lower surface of base
104
by a clamp ring
142
to define a bladder
144
. Clamp ring
142
may be secured to base
104
by screws or bolts (not shown). A first pump (not shown) may be connected to bladder
144
to direct a fluid, e.g., a gas, such as air, into or out of the bladder and thereby control a downward pressure on support structure
114
and flexible membrane
118
.
Gimbal mechanism
106
permits base
104
to pivot with respect to housing
102
so that the base may remain substantially parallel with the surface of the polishing pad. Gimbal mechanism
106
includes a gimbal rod
150
which fits into a passage
154
through cylindrical bushing
122
and a flexure ring
152
which is secured to base
104
. Gimbal rod
150
may slide vertically along passage
154
to provide vertical motion of base
104
, but it prevents any lateral motion of base
104
with respect to housing
102
.
An inner edge of a rolling diaphragm
160
may be clamped to housing
102
by an inner clamp ring
162
, and an outer clamp ring
164
may clamp an outer edge of rolling diaphragm
160
to base
104
. Thus, rolling diaphragm
160
seals the space between housing
102
and base
104
to define loading chamber
108
. Rolling diaphragm
160
may be a generally ring-shaped sixty mil thick silicone sheet. A second pump (not shown) may be fluidly connected to loading chamber
108
to control the pressure in the loading chamber and the load applied to base
104
.
The support structure
114
of substrate backing assembly
112
is located below base
104
. Support structure
114
includes a support plate
170
, an annular lower clamp
172
, and an annular upper clamp
174
. Support plate
170
may be a generally disk-shaped rigid member with a plurality of apertures
176
therethrough. In addition, support plate
170
may have a downwardly-projecting lip
178
at its outer edge.
Flexure diaphragm
116
of substrate backing assembly
112
is a generally planar annular ring. An inner edge of flexure diaphragm
116
is clamped between base
104
and retaining ring
110
, and an outer edge of flexure diaphragm
116
is clamped between lower clamp
172
and upper clamp
174
. The flexure diaphragm
116
is flexible and elastic, although it could be rigid in the radial and tangential directions. Flexure diaphragm
116
may formed of rubber, such as neoprene, an elastomeric-coated fabric, such as NYLON™ or NOMEX™, plastic, or a composite material, such as fiberglass.
Flexible membrane
118
is a generally circular sheet formed of a flexible and elastic material, such as chloroprene or ethylene propylene rubber. A portion of flexible membrane
118
extends around the edges of support plate
170
to be clamped between the support plate and lower clamp
172
.
The sealed volume between flexible membrane
118
, support structure
114
, flexure diaphragm
116
, base
104
, and gimbal mechanism
106
defines pressurizable chamber
190
. A third pump (not shown) may be fluidly connected to chamber
190
to control the pressure in the chamber and thus the downward forces of the flexible membrane on the substrate.
Retaining ring
110
may be a generally annular ring secured at the outer edge of base
104
, e.g., by bolts
194
(only one is shown in the cross-sectional view of FIG.
2
). When fluid is pumped into loading chamber
108
and base
104
is pushed downwardly, retaining ring
110
is also pushed downwardly to apply a load to polishing pad
32
. An inner surface
188
of retaining ring
110
defines, in conjunction with mounting surface
120
of flexible membrane
118
, a substrate receiving recess
192
. The retaining ring
110
prevents the substrate from escaping the substrate receiving recess.
Referring to
FIG. 3
, retaining ring
110
includes multiple sections, including an annular lower portion
180
having a bottom surface
182
that may contact the polishing pad, and an annular upper portion
184
connected to base
104
. Lower portion
180
may be bonded to upper portion
184
with an adhesive layer
186
.
The lower portion is formed of a material which is chemically inert in a CMP process. In addition, lower portion
180
should be sufficiently elastic that contact of the substrate edge against the retaining ring does not cause the substrate to chip or crack. On the other hand, lower portion
180
should not be so elastic that downward pressure on the retaining ring causes lower portion
180
to extrude into substrate receiving recess
192
. Specifically, the material of the lower portion
180
may have a durometer measurement of about 80-95 on the Shore D scale. In general, the elastic modulus of the material of lower portion
180
may be in the range of about 0.3-1.0×10
6
psi. The lower portion should also be durable and have a low wear rate. However, it is acceptable for lower portion
180
to be gradually worn away, as this appears to prevent the substrate edge from cutting a deep grove into inner surface
188
. For example, lower portion
180
may be made of a plastic, such as polyphenylene sulfide (PPS), available from DSM Engineering Plastics of Evansville, Indiana, under the trade name Techtron™. Other plastics, such as DELRIN™, available from Dupont of Wilmington, Del., polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyetheretherketone (PEEK), or polybutylene terephthalate (PBT), or a composite material such as ZYMAXX™, also available from Dupont, may be suitable.
The thickness T
1
of lower portion
180
should be larger than the thickness T
S
of substrate
10
. Specifically, the lower portion should be thick enough that the substrate does not brush against the adhesive layer when the substrate is chucked by the carrier head. On the other hand, if the lower portion is too thick, the bottom surface of the retaining ring will be subject to deformation due to the flexible nature of the lower portion. The initial thickness of lower portion 180 may be about 200 to 400 mils (with grooves having a depth of 100 to 300 mils). The lower portion may be replaced when the grooves have been worn away. Thus, the thickness T
1
of lower portion
180
may vary between about 400 mils (assuming an initial thickness of 400 mils) and about 100 mils (assuming that grooves 300 mils deep were worn away). If the retaining ring does not include grooves, the lower portion may be replaced when it's thickness is about equal to the substrate thickness.
The bottom surface of the lower portion
180
may be substantially flat, or it may have a plurality of channels or grooves
196
(shown in phantom in
FIG. 3
) to facilitate the transport of slurry from outside the retaining ring to the substrate.
The upper portion
184
of retaining ring
110
is formed of a rigid material, such as a metal, e.g., stainless steel, molybdenum, or aluminum, or a ceramic, e.g., alumina, or other exemplary materials. The material of the upper portion may have an elastic modulus of about 10-50×10
6
psi, i.e., about ten to one hundred times the elastic modulus of the material of the lower portion. For example, the elastic modulus of the lower portion may be about 0.6×10
6
psi, the elastic modulus of the upper portion may be about 30×10
6
psi, so that the ratio is about 50:1. The thickness T
2
of upper portion
184
should be greater than the thickness T
1
of lower portion
182
. Specifically, the upper portion may have a thickness T
2
of about 300-500 mils.
The adhesive layer
186
may be a two-part slow-curing epoxy. Slow curing generally indicates that the epoxy takes on the order of several hours to several days to set. The epoxy may be Magnobond-6375™, available from Magnolia Plastics of Chamblee, Ga. Alternately, instead of being adhesively attached the lower layer may be connected with screws or press-fit to the upper portion.
It appears that the flatness of the bottom surface of the retaining ring has a bearing on the edge effect. Specifically, if the bottom surface is very flat, the edge effect is reduced. If the retaining ring is relatively flexible, it can be deformed where it is joined to the base, e.g., by bolts
194
. This deformation creates a non-planar bottom surface, thereby increasing the edge effect. Although the retaining ring can be lapped or machined after installation on the carrier head, lapping tends to embed debris in the bottom surface which can damage the substrate or contaminate the CMP process, and machining is time-consuming and inconvenient. On the other hand, an entirely rigid retaining ring, such as a stainless steel ring, can cause the substrate to crack or contaminate the CMP process.
With the retaining ring of the present invention, the rigidity of upper portion
184
of retaining ring
110
increases the overall flexural rigidity of the retaining ring, e.g., by a factor of 30-40 times, as compared to a retaining ring formed entirely of a flexible material such as PPS. The increased rigidity provided by the rigid upper portion reduces or eliminates this deformation caused by the attachment of the retaining ring to the base, thereby reducing the edge effect. Furthermore, the retaining ring need not be lapped after it is secured to the carrier head. In addition, the PPS lower portion is inert in the CMP process, and is sufficiently elastic to prevent chipping or cracking of the substrate edge.
Another benefit of the increased rigidity of the retaining ring of the present invention is that it reduces the sensitivity of the polishing process to pad compressibility. Without being limited to any particular theory, one possible contribution to the edge effect, particularly for flexible retaining rings, is what may be termed “deflection” of the retaining ring. Specifically, the force of the substrate edge on the inner surface of the retaining ring at the trailing edge of the carrier head may cause the retaining ring to deflect, i.e., locally twist slightly about an axis parallel to the surface of the polishing pad. This forces the inner diameter of the retaining ring more deeply into the polishing pad, generates increased pressure on the polishing pad and causes the polishing pad material to “flow” and be displaced toward the edge of the substrate. The displacement of the polishing pad material depends upon the elastic properties of the polishing pad. Thus, a relatively flexible retaining ring which can deflect into the pad, makes the polishing process extremely sensitive to the elastic properties of the pad material. However, the increased rigidity provided by the rigid upper portion decreases the deflection of the retaining ring, thereby reducing pad deformation, sensitivity to pad compressibility, and the edge effect.
The present invention has been described in terms of a number of embodiments. The invention, however, is not limited to the embodiments depicted and described. Rather, the scope of the invention is defined by the appended claims.
Claims
- 1. A carrier head for a chemical mechanical polishing apparatus, comprising:a substrate mounting surface; and a retaining ring to maintain a substrate beneath the mounting surface during polishing, the retaining ring including a lower portion having a bottom surface for contacting a polishing pad during polishing and made of a first material and an upper portion made of a second material which is more rigid than the first material; wherein the first material is polyphenylene sulfide with a durometer measurement between about 80 and 95 on the Shore D scale, the second material is metal, and the lower portion is affixed to the upper portion by an epoxy.
- 2. The carrier head of claim 1, wherein the first material is substantially inert to a chemical mechanical polishing process.
- 3. The carrier head of claim 1, wherein the lower portion is thicker than a substrate to be polished.
- 4. The carrier head of claim 3, wherein the lower portion is between about 100 and 400 mils thick.
- 5. The carrier head of claim 1, wherein the upper and lower portions are substantially annular in shape.
- 6. The carrier head of claim 1, wherein the second material is selected from the group consisting of steel, aluminum, and molybdenum.
- 7. The carrier head of claim 1, wherein the epoxy is a slow curing epoxy.
- 8. A retaining ring for a carrier head having a mounting surface for a substrate, comprising:a generally annular lower portion having a bottom surface for contacting a polishing pad during polishing and made of a first material which is inert in a chemical mechanical polishing process; and a generally annular upper portion joined to the lower portion and made of a second material which is more rigid than the first material; wherein the first material is polyphenylene sulfide with a durometer measurement between about 80 and 95 on the Shore D scale, the second material is metal, and the lower portion is affixed to the upper portion by an epoxy.
- 9. A chemical mechanical polishing system, comprising:a rotatable polishing pad; a slurry supply to dispense a slurry onto the polishing pad; and a carrier head having a substrate mounting surface and a retaining ring to maintain a substrate beneath the mounting surface during polishing, the retaining ring including a lower portion for contacting a polishing pad during polishing and made of a first material, and an upper portion made of a second material which is more rigid than the first material; wherein the first material is polyphenylene sulfide with a durometer measurement between about 80 and 95 on the Shore D scale, the second material is metal, and the lower portion is affixed to the upper portion by an epoxy.
US Referenced Citations (9)
Foreign Referenced Citations (4)
Number |
Date |
Country |
0 747 167 A2 |
Dec 1996 |
EP |
0 790 100 A1 |
Aug 1997 |
EP |
0 841 123 A1 |
May 1998 |
EP |
2 307 342 |
May 1997 |
GB |