This disclosure relates to autonomous coverage robots for cleaning floors or other surfaces.
Autonomous robots are robots which can perform desired tasks in unstructured environments without continuous human guidance. Many kinds of robots are autonomous to some degree. Different robots can be autonomous in different ways. An autonomous coverage robot traverses a work surface without continuous human guidance to perform one or more tasks. In the field of home, office and/or consumer-oriented robotics, mobile robots that perform household functions such as vacuum cleaning, floor washing, patrolling, lawn cutting and other such tasks have been widely adopted.
Mobile robots for cleaning floors have been described in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,883,201 to JONES et al. (“JONES”), which discloses an autonomous floor-cleaning robot that traverses a floor while removing debris using rotating brushes, vacuums, or other cleaning mechanisms. JONES further describes a robot having a generally round form factor supported by three wheels, which can rotate freely to maneuver around obstacles, inter alia.
Presently disclosed is a compact mobile robot for cleaning floors, countertops, and other related surfaces, such as tile, hardwood or carpeted flooring. The robot has a rectangular front form factor that facilitates cleaning along wall edges or in corners. In one example, the robot includes both a rounded section and a rectangular section, in which a cleaning mechanism within the rectangular section is disposed proximally to opposite side corners of the rectangular section. As an advantage, the robot can maneuver so as to bring the rectangular section flush with a wall corner or wall edge, with the cleaning mechanism extending into the wall corner or wall edge.
In one aspect, an autonomous coverage robot includes a chassis having forward and rearward portions and a drive system carried by the chassis. The forward portion of the chassis defines a substantially rectangular shape. The robot includes a cleaning assembly mounted on the forward portion of the chassis and a bin disposed adjacent the cleaning assembly. The bin is configured to receive debris agitated by the cleaning assembly. A bin cover is pivotally attached to a lower portion of the chassis and configured to rotate between a first, closed position providing closure of an opening defined by the bin and a second, open position providing access to the bin opening. The robot includes a body attached to the chassis and a handle disposed on an upper portion of the body. A bin cover release is configured to control movement of the bin cover between its first and second positions. The bin cover release is actuatable from substantially near the handle.
Implementations of this aspect of the disclosure may include one or more of the following features. In some implementations, the bin cover release is configured to move between a first, locking position which locks the bin cover in its first, closed position and a second, disengaged position which allows the bin cover to move to its second, open position. The bin cover release may be a spring biased latch. In some examples, the bin cover release includes a button disposed on the handle configured to actuate the latch, thereby allowing actuation of the bin cover release while holding the handle. In some implementations, the drive system includes right and left differentially driven drive wheels rotatably mounted to the rearward portion of the chassis. The drive system is capable of maneuvering the robot to pivot in place.
In another aspect, an autonomous coverage robot includes a chassis having forward and rearward portions, and a drive system carried by the rearward portion of the chassis. The drive system is configured to maneuver the robot over a cleaning surface. The robot includes a controller in communication with the drive system. The controller is configured to maneuver the robot to pivot in place. The robot includes a cleaning assembly mounted on the forward portion of the chassis. The robot includes a bump sensor in communication with the controller which is configured to detect movement in multiple directions. A body is flexibly attached to the chassis and substantially covers the chassis. Contact with the body is translated to the bump sensor for detection. The controller is configured to alter a drive direction of the robot in response to a signal received from the bump sensor. The bump sensor includes a sensor base, a sensor shroud positioned adjacent the sensor base and connected to the body, an emitter housed by the sensor shroud, and at least three detectors carried by the sensor base. The emitter emits a signal onto the sensor base, and the detectors are configured to detect the emitted signal. Movement of the sensor shroud causes movement of the emitted signal over the detectors. In some implementations, the robot includes a bin disposed adjacent the cleaning assembly and configured to receive debris agitated by the cleaning assembly.
Implementations of this aspect of the disclosure may include one or more of the following features. In some implementations, the bump sensor detects 360 degrees of movement of the body about the bump sensor. Preferably, the bump sensor includes four detectors arranged in a rectangular configuration with respect to each other. The sensor shroud defines an orifice through which the emitter emits its signal onto the sensor base. The emitter comprises an infrared light emitter and the detectors comprise infrared light detectors, the orifice collimating the emitted signal onto the sensor base. In some examples, the robot includes a bumper guide configured to confine body movements to along two directions. The bumper guide may include two orthogonal grooves defined by the body and configured to receive a guide pin disposed on the chassis. The forward portion defines a substantially rectangular shape, in some examples. The drive system, in some examples, includes right and left drive wheels differentially driven by corresponding right and left motors.
In yet another aspect, an autonomous coverage robot includes a chassis having forward and rearward portions, and a drive system carried by the rearward portion of the chassis. The forward portion defines a substantially rectangular shape and the rearward portion of the chassis defines an arcuate shape. The drive system is configured to maneuver the robot over a cleaning surface and includes right and left drive wheels differentially driven by corresponding right and left motors. The robot includes a controller in communication with the drive system. The controller is configured to maneuver the robot to pivot in place. The robot includes a cleaning assembly mounted on the forward portion of the chassis. The robot includes an accelerometer in communication with the controller, which controls the drive system in response to a signal received from the accelerometer. In some implementations, the robot includes a bin disposed adjacent the cleaning assembly and configured to receive debris agitated by the cleaning assembly.
Implementations of this aspect of the disclosure may include one or more of the following features. In some implementations, the controller alters a drive direction of the robot in response to a signal received from the accelerometer indicating an abrupt speed change. The controller alters a drive direction of the robot in response to a signal received from the accelerometer indicating stasis of the robot. The controller reduces a drive speed of the robot in response to a signal received from the accelerometer indicating a maximum speed. In some examples, the maximum speed is between about 200 mm/s and about 400 mm/s.
Implementations of the above aspects of the disclosure may include one or more of the following features. In some implementations, the cleaning assembly includes a first roller brush rotatably mounted substantially near a front edge of the chassis. The cleaning assembly may include a second roller brush rotatably mounted substantially parallel to and rearward of the first roller brush, the first and second roller brushes rotate in opposite directions. The bin is disposed rearward of the first and second roller brushes and forward of the drive system. Each roller brush includes right and left end brushes extending from respective ends of the roller brush beyond a lateral extend of the body, each end brush extending at angle φ of between 0° and about 90° from a longitudinal axis defined by the roller brush. In other implementations, the cleaning assembly includes a front roller brush rotatably mounted substantially near the front edge of the chassis, and right and left side roller brushes rotatably mounted orthogonal to the front brush substantially near the respective right and left side edges of the chassis. The bin is disposed rearward of the front roller brush and substantially between the right and left side roller brushes and forward of the drive system.
In another aspect, an autonomous coverage robot includes a chassis having forward and rearward portions, and a drive system carried by the rearward portion of the chassis. The forward portion defines a substantially rectangular shape and the rearward portion defines an arcuate shape. The drive system is configured to maneuver the robot over a cleaning surface and includes right and left drive wheels differentially driven by corresponding right and left motors. The robot includes a controller in communication with the drive system. The controller is configured to maneuver the robot to pivot in place. The robot includes a cleaning assembly mounted on the forward portion of the chassis and includes a first roller brush rotatably mounted substantially near a front edge of the chassis and a second roller brush rotatably mounted substantially parallel to and rearward of the first roller brush. The first and second roller brushes rotate in opposite directions. A bin is disposed rearward of the cleaning assembly and is configured to receive debris agitated by the cleaning assembly. A bin cover is pivotally attached to a lower portion of the chassis and is configured to rotate between a first, closed position providing closure of an opening defined by the bin and a second, open position providing access to the bin opening. The robot includes a bin cover release configured to control movement of the bin cover between its first and second positions. A handle is disposed on the chassis. The bin cover release is actuatable from substantially near the handle. A body is flexibly attached to the chassis and substantially covers the chassis. The body is movable in relation to the handle and the chassis. The robot includes a bump sensor in communication with the controller and configured to detect movement in multiple directions. Contact with the body is translated to the bump sensor for detection. The controller is configured to alter a drive direction of the robot in response to a signal received from the bump sensor.
Implementations of this aspect of the disclosure may include one or more of the following features. In some implementations, the bump sensor includes a sensor base, a sensor shroud positioned adjacent the sensor base and connected to the body, an emitter housed by the sensor shroud, and at least three detectors carried by the sensor base. The emitter emits a signal onto the sensor base and the detectors detect the emitted signal. Movement of the sensor shroud causes movement of the emitted signal over the detectors.
In some implementations, the robot includes a bumper guide configured to confine body movements to along two directions. The bumper guide may include two orthogonal grooves defined by the body and configured to receive a guide pin disposed on the chassis.
The robot may include an idler wheel disposed on the bin cover. In some examples, the rearward portion of the chassis defines a substantially semi-circular shape and the idler wheel is position at least ⅓ the radius of the substantially semi-circular shaped rearward portion forward of the drive wheels.
In specific examples, the drive wheels are disposed less than 9 cm rearward of the cleaning assembly. The robot may include a power source disposed in the rearward portion of the chassis substantially between the right and left wheels. The power source is disposed adjacent and rearward of the bin. The cleaning assembly further comprises a brush motor configured to drive the first and second roller brushes. In some examples, the brush motor is disposed substantially near a forward edge of the chassis. The first roller brush may be disposed substantially near a forward edge of the chassis.
Implementations of the disclosure may include one or more of the following features. In some implementations, the right and left drive wheels are rotatably mounted to the rearward portion of the chassis, and the drive system is capable of maneuvering the robot to pivot in place. Preferably, the rearward portion of the chassis defines an arcuate shape; however other shapes are possible as well, such as rectangular or polygonal. In some examples, the rearward portion of the chassis defines a substantially semi-circular shape and the axes of the right and left drive wheels are disposed on or rearward of a center axis defined by the rearward portion of the chassis. In some implementations, the chassis and the body together have a length of less than 23 cm and a width of less than 19 cm.
In some implementations, the robot includes at least one proximity sensor carried by a dominant side of the robot. The at least one proximity sensor responds to an obstacle substantially near the body. The controller alters a drive direction in response to a signal received from the at least one proximity sensor.
In some implementations, the robot includes at least one cliff sensor carried by a forward portion of the body and arranged substantially near a front edge of the body. The at least one cliff sensor responds to a potential cliff forward of the robot. The drive system alters a drive direction in response to a signal received from the cliff sensor indicating a potential cliff. In some examples, right and left front cliff sensors are disposed at the respective right and left corners of a forward portion of the robot. This allows the robot to detect when a either of the front corners swing over a cliff edge, so as to avoid moving the drive wheels any closer to the cliff edge. In some implementations, the robot includes at least one cliff sensor carried by a rearward portion of the body and arranged substantially near the rear edge of the body. The at least one cliff sensor responds to a potential cliff rearward of the robot. The drive system alters a drive direction in response to a signal received from the cliff sensor indicating a potential cliff. In some examples, right and left rear cliff sensors are disposed directly rearward of the respective right and left drive wheels. This allow the robot to detect a cliff edge while driving in reverse at an angle or in an arc, in which the drive wheel may encounter the cliff edge before the rear center portion of the robot.
In some implementations, the robot includes an idler wheel disposed on the bin cover. Preferably, the rearward portion of the chassis defines a substantially semi-circular shape, which allows the robot to spin in place without catching any portion of the rearward portion of the chassis on a detected obstacle. The idler wheel is position at least ⅓ the radius of the substantially semi-circular shaped rearward portion forward of the drive wheels. In some examples, the idler wheel is a stasis detector including a magnet disposed in or on the idler wheel, and a magnet detector disposed adjacent the wheel for detecting the magnet as the idler wheel rotates.
In other more general aspects that are combinable with any of the above implementations, an autonomous coverage robot includes a chassis and a drive system carried by the chassis. The drive system is configured to maneuver the robot over a cleaning surface. In some examples, the drive system includes right and left differentially driven drive wheels; however other means of driving the robot are applicable as well, such as skid steer tracks. In some examples, the chassis has forward and rearward portions with the forward portion defining a substantially rectangular shape. Optionally, the rearward portion can define an arcuate shape.
In some implementations, the robot includes a cleaning assembly mounted on the forward portion of the chassis (e.g. substantially near a forward edge of the chassis). A bin is disposed adjacent the cleaning assembly and configured to receive debris agitated by the cleaning assembly. In some examples, a bin cover is pivotally attached to the robot and is configured to rotate between a first, closed position providing closure of an opening defined by the bin and a second, open position providing access to the bin opening. In other examples, the bin cover is slidably attached to the robot and slides between the first, closed position and the second, open position.
In some implementations, a body is attached to the chassis. The body may conform to the profile of the chassis. In some examples, the body is flexibly or movably attached to the chassis. The robot may include a handle for carrying the robot. The handle can be disposed on the body or on the chassis. If the handle is disposed on the chassis, the body is allowed to move in relation to the handle and/or the chassis. The robot may include a bin cover release configured to control movement of the bin cover between its first and second positions. Preferably, the bin cover release is actuatable from substantially near the handle. However, the bin cover release may be actuatable from substantially near or on the bin cover.
In some implementations, the robot includes a bump sensor, which may be configured to detect movement in multiple directions. In some examples, contact with the body is translated to the bump sensor for detection. The robot may include a controller configured to alter a drive direction of the robot in response to a signal received from the bump sensor. In some examples, the robot includes an accelerometer in communication with the controller, such that the controller controls the drive system in response to a signal received from the accelerometer.
The details of one or more implementations of the disclosure are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
Like reference symbols in the various drawings indicate like elements.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The advantage of the conventional cylindrical robot with drives wheels disposed on the diameter of the robot is that it is not hindered from turning in the presence of obstacles. This enables a simple and effective escape strategy—spin in place until no objects are detected forward of the robot. If the robot is non-cylindrical or the axes of wheel rotation are not on a diameter of the robot then the normal and tangential forces on the robot change as the robot rotates while in contact with an object. To ensure that such a non-conventional robot is able to escape an arbitrary collision, the forces and torques applied to the robot by the environmental cannot combine with the robot-generated forces and torques to halt robot motion. In practice this means that the robot shape should be constant width (to within the shell compliance distance) and that the robot's wheels be capable of lateral motion. Particular shapes then yield different requirements for maximum lateral wheel forces and maximum allowable environmental coefficient of friction. However, the robot 100 presently disclosed, in some examples, has a rectangular forward portion 210 to allow cleaning fully into corners.
Referring again to the example shown in
Referring to
Referring to
Preferably, the debris chamber/bin 610 is defined by, and thus formed integrally with, the chassis 200. In an alternative configuration, the robot 101 may include a modular, removable cartridge or bag serving as the debris chamber/bin 610, such that the user can remove the debris by removing and emptying the cartridge or bag. The cartridge or bag 610 is removably secured to the chassis 200.
A bin cover 620 is pivotally attached to a lower portion 203 of the chassis 200 and configured to rotate between a first, closed position providing closure of an opening 612 defined by the bin 610 and a second, open position providing access to the bin opening 610. In some examples, the bin cover 620 is releasably connected to the chassis 200 by one or more hinges 622. The bin assembly 600 includes a bin-cover release 630 configured to control movement of the bin cover 620 between its first and second positions. The bin-cover release 630 is configured to move between a first, locking position which locks the bin cover 620 in its first, closed position and a second, disengaged position which allows the bin cover 620 to move to its second, open position (see
The robot 100 includes a power source 160 (e.g., battery) in communication with the drive system 400 and/or the controller 450, and removably secured to the chassis 200. In the examples shown in
Referring to
The cliff sensors 710 may be used to sense when the robot 100 has encountered the edge of the floor or work surface, such as when it encounters a set of stairs. The robot 100 may have behaviors that cause it to take an action, such as changing its direction of travel, when an edge is detected. In the examples shown in
Robots defining shapes of constant width can turn in place about their centroid locus of the respective shape. A shape of constant width is a convex planar shape whose width, measured by the distance between two opposite parallel lines touching its boundary, is the same regardless of the direction of those two parallel lines. The width of the shape in a given direction is defined as the perpendicular distance between the parallels perpendicular to that direction. The Reuleaux triangle is the simplest example (after the circle) of shapes of constant width. However, in the examples shown, the robot 100 has a rectangular shaped forward portion 210 of the chassis 200, and thus not a robot of constant width, which can prevent the robot from spinning in place to escape from various stuck positions, such as with canyoning situations, inter alia. Canyoning situations arise when the robot 100 drives down a narrow corridor (with side walls) or plank (with side cliffs) that is slightly wider than the robot 100. When the robot 100 reaches the end of the corridor or plank it can only escape by driving in reverse back out of the corridor or off of the plank. If the robot 100 tries to spin in place (e.g., to rotate 180°) one of the robot's corners will hit a wall or go off a cliff. In the case of cliffs, the placement of cliff sensors 710 substantially along a rearward edge 304 of the body 300 or a rearward edge 204 of the chassis 200 allows the robot 100 to backup intelligently to escape without backing off a cliff. Similarly, the bump sensor 800, which will be described below, detects reward bumps, allowing the robot 100 to back out of narrow corridors.
Referring to
Again due to the compact nature of the robot 100 and the compact positioning of components, the stasis wheel 722 acts as a third wheel for stable ground contact. If the stasis wheel 722 was placed forward of the cleaning assembly 500, it would need to be a caster wheel, rather than a directional wheel, which would drag in an arc when the robot 100 turns. However, the need for a rectangular forward portion 210 of the chassis 200, so as to fully clean in corners, prohibits placement of the stasis wheel 722 forward of the cleaning assembly 500 (e.g., which would result in a shape other than rectangular). A wheel is needed forward of the drive wheels 410, 420 to lift the forward portion 210 of the chassis 200 to an appropriate height for cleaning and brush rotation.
Referring to again
The examples shown in
Referring to
In a preferred implementation, as shown, the side of the robot 100 having the proximity sensor 730 is the dominant side of the robot 100, which in this case is the right-hand side relative to a primary direction of travel 105. In some examples, the wall proximity sensor 730 is an infrared light sensor composed of an emitter and detector pair collimated so that a finite volume of intersection occurs at the expected position of a wall. This focus point is approximately three inches ahead of the drive wheels 410, 420 in the direction of robot forward motion. The radial range of wall detection is about 0.75 inches. The proximity sensor 730 may be used to execute wall following behaviors, examples of which are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,809,490, the entire contents of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
In some implementation, the proximity sensor 730 includes an emitter and a detector disposed substantially parallel. The emitter has an emission field projected substantially parallel to a detection field of the detector. The proximity sensor 730 provides a signal to the controller 450, which determines a distance to a detected object (e.g., a wall). The proximity sensor 730 needs to be calibrated to accurately detect and allow the controller 450 to determine an object distance. To calibrate the proximity sensor 730 to the albedo (e.g., color or reflectivity) of an adjacent object, the robot 100 bumps into the object on its dominant side and records a reflection characteristic. In the example of an infrared emitter and detector, the controller 450 records a reflection intensity at the moment of contact with the object, which is assumed to be a wall. Based on the recorded reflection intensity at the known calibration distance between the edge of the body 300 and the proximity sensor 730, the controller 450 can determine a distance to the wall thereafter while driving alongside the wall. The controller 450 can implement servo control on the drive motors 412, 422 to drive at a certain distance from the wall, and hence wall follow. The robot 100 may periodically turn into the wall to side-bump the wall and re-calibrate the proximity sensor 730. If the proximity sensor 730 senses an absence of the wall, the robot 100 may decide to re-calibrate the proximity sensor 730 upon recognition of the wall again.
The robot 100 can actively wall follow on its dominant side by using the proximity sensor 730. The robot 100 can passively wall follow on its non-dominant side (or the dominant side if the proximity sensor 730 is not present or active). After bumping into an object (e.g., sensed by the bump sensor 800), the robot 100 can assume that the object is a wall and turn to follow the wall. The robot 100 may back-up before turning, so as to not catch a front corner of the body 300 on the object/wall, thus re-triggering the bump sensor 800 in a forward direction. After turning (e.g., about 90°), the robot 100 drives straight (e.g., along the wall) and slightly turns into the wall, so as to scrape along the wall. The robot 100 can sense that it's scraping along the wall by detecting a side-bump via the multi-directional bump sensor 800, which will be described below. The robot 100 can continue to passively wall follow until the bump sensor 800 no longer detects a side-bump on the current wall-following side of the robot 100 for a certain period of time.
The robot 100 can passively wall follow due in-part to its flat sides of the body 300 and the rear placement of the drive wheels 410, 420. The flat sides allow the robot 100 to scrape along the wall (e.g., substantially parallel to the wall). The positioning of the drive wheels 410, 420 in the rear portion 220 of the chassis 200 allows the robot 100 to swing its forward portion 210 of the chassis 200 into the wall, so as to scrape along the wall. Referring to
τ=rF(cos θ sin θ−μ sin2 θ)
Where μ is the coefficient of friction between the wall and the robot. Given a value for μ there is some critical angle θc where the torques are balanced. For θ<θc the first term to the right in the equation is larger and the robot tends to align with the wall. If θ>θc then the second term is larger and the robot 100 tends to turn into the wall.
Certain robot geometries, such as the tombstone shape of the robot disclosed can achieve useful values for θc. Note that the standard cylindrical geometry has θc=π/2 regardless of the robot's approach angle to the wall. Thus, passive wall following cannot be achieved with this configuration. To successfully passively wall follow, the offset between the natural axis of robot rotation and the contact point with the wall should be as far forward as possible when robot motion is aligned with the wall. Also, the maximum wall step height that allows passive recovery is an important consideration and is affected by robot shape.
In some examples, the robot 100 can semi-passively wall follow. The robot 100 wall follows on its dominant side, which has the side proximity sensor 730. After detecting an object, assumed to be a wall, by either the bump sensor 800 or the proximity sensor 730, the robot 100 turns to align the dominant side of the robot 100 with the assumed wall. The robot 100 then proceeds to drive along the wall while turning slightly into the wall so as to scrape along the wall. The robot 160 maintains contact with the wall by sensing contact with the wall via the bump sensor 800 or the proximity sensor 730 and the controller 450 implements servo control or the drive motors 412, 422 to drive accordingly along the wall.
In some examples, as shown in
The bump sensor 800 is used to determine when the robot 100 has physically encountered an object. Such sensors may use a physical property such as capacitance or physical displacement within the robot 100 to determine when it has encountered an obstacle. In some implementations, the bump sensor 800 includes contract sensors disposed about the periphery of the body 300. In preferred implementations, the bump sensor 800 is configured to detect movement of the body 300 over the chassis 200. Referring to
In the example shown in
In the examples shown in
The robot 100 has a forward drive direction and carries the omni-directional receiver 900 on an upper portion 305 of the body 300 above the forward portion 202 of the chassis 200.
The controller 450 may be configured to propel the robot 100 according to a heading setting and a speed setting. Signals received from the navigational sensor system 700 may be used by a control system to issue commands that deal with obstacles, such as changing the commanded speed or heading of the robot 100. For instance, a signal from the proximity sensor 730 due to a nearby wall may result in the control system issuing a command to slow down. In another instance, a collision signal from the bump sensor 800 due to an encounter with an obstacle may cause the control system to issue a command to change heading. In other instances, the speed setting of the robot 100 may be reduced in response to the contact sensor and/or the heading setting of the robot 100 may be altered in response to the proximity sensor 730.
The controller 450 may include a first independent behavioral routine configured to adjust the speed setting of the robot 100; and a second independent behavioral routine configured to alter the heading setting of the robot 100, in which the first and second independent behavioral routines are configured to execute concurrently and mutually independently. The first independent behavioral routine may be configured to poll the proximity sensor 730, and the second independent behavioral routine may be configured to poll the bump sensor 800. While implementations of the robot 100 discussed herein may use behavioral based control only in part or not at all, behavior based control is effective at controlling the robot to be robust (i.e. not getting stuck or failing) as well as safe.
In an example configuration, the form factor of the robot 101 is about 15 cm in diameter, about 7.5 cm in height, and functions on battery power to clean for about six hours before requiring recharge. Also, for example, the robot 101 may effectively clean the floor of a single average-size room in about 45 minutes, or several smaller areas.
Referring to
The robot 101 includes a cleaning assembly 500 mounted on the front portion 210 of the chassis 200 includes a first, front roller brush 510 rotatably mounted substantially near and substantially parallel to the front edge 202 of the chassis 200. The cleaning assembly 500 includes second and third side roller brushes 550, 560 rotatably mounted orthogonally to the front roller brush 510 substantially near respective right and left side edges 306, 308 of the body 300. The roller brushes 510, 550, 560 are driven by a cleaning motor 530 coupled to the roller brushes 510, 550, 560 by a gear box 532. The cleaning motor 530 is positioned rearward of the front roller brush 510 and between the side roller brushes 550, 560.
The robot 101, in a preferred implementation, includes only one kind of cleaning mechanism. For example, the robot 101 shown in
In the some examples, the front roller brush 510 and the side roller brushes 550, 560, each rotate about a horizontal axis parallel to the work surface, thereby providing a horizontal cleaning assembly 500, although the main work width of the coverage robot 100 may include vertically rotating brushes, no brushes in lieu of a vacuum, a reciprocating brush, a circulating belt member, and other known cleaning implements. Each roller brush 510, 520, 550, 560 may have a cylindrical body that defines a longitudinal axis of rotation. Bristles are attached radially to the cylindrical body, and, in some examples, flexible flaps are attached longitudinally along the cylindrical body. As the roller brush 510, 520, 550, 560 rotates, the bristles and the flexible flaps move debris on the work surface, directing it toward the bin 610 in the robot 100. In examples including a vacuum unit, the brushes 510, 520, 550, 560 may also direct debris or dirt toward a suction path under the cleaning robot 100. In the case of a wet cleaning robot, the brushes 510, 520, 550, 560 may have instead a scrubbing function, and a vacuum or other collector may collect waste fluid after scrubbing.
In the examples shown, the effective components of the cleaning assembly 500 such as the brushes 510, 550, 560 are disposed toward the extreme front corners of the forward portion 210 of the chassis 200. As a result, the area of floor that the rectangular forward portion 210 of the chassis 200 can cover is maximized, and portions of the floor that are not covered are minimized, as illustrated in
By including only a single cleaning mechanism, such as the cleaning assembly 500, rather than a combination of two or more varieties of cleaning mechanisms (such as, for example, both a roller brush and a vacuum; or both wet and dry cleaning mechanisms, which may necessitate two or more storage chambers, inter alia), the robot 101 may be made more compact relative to otherwise.
Referring to
The bin cover 620, in the example shown, is releasably connected to the chassis 200 by one or more hinges 622 (e.g., living hinge, peg and socket, etc.). In some implementations, the bin-cover release 630 is actuatable from substantially near or at the handle 330, thereby allowing actuation of the bin-cover release 630 while holding the handle 330. In other implementations, the bin-cover release 630 is actuatable near or on the bin cover 620, such that a user holds the handle 330 with one hand and opens the bin cover 620 via the bin-cover release 630 with another hand (see
In the examples shown, the robot 101 includes a handle 330 is disposed on or defined by an upper portion 305 of the body 300. A user can grasp the handle 330 to lift the robot 101 and transport it manually. In addition, the robot 101 may include one or more buttons 632 proximal to the handle 330. The button 632 is preferably operable by one hand, while the user's hand grips the robot 101 by the handle 330. The button 632 is configured to actuate a bin-cover release 630, which is operable to control holding the bin cover 620 in its closed position and releasing the bin cover 620 to move to its open position. In one example, as illustrated in
The robot 101 includes a power source 160 (e.g., battery) in communication with the drive system 400 and/or the controller 450, and removably secured to the chassis 200. In the examples shown in
The compact dimensions of the robot 101 allow the robot 101 to navigate under potential obstacles such as chairs, tables, sofas, or other household objects, and perform floor cleaning in these hard-to-reach areas. In addition, the robot 101 may include a clearance sensor disposed on a top surface thereof, such as a sonar range-finder or light-sensitive diode, that scans directly overhead. When the clearance sensor detects the presence of an object within a threshold distance—such as, for example, two feet—the robot 101 may continue moving until the overhead space is clear. Accordingly, the robot 101 may avoid becoming “lost” underneath furniture, out of view of the user, for example.
As the drive system 400 propels the robot 101 over the floor, the front roller brush 510 preferably rotates in the same direction as the drive wheels 410, 420 but at a rate faster than the rate of the robot 101 traversing over the floor, so as to sweep debris into the debris chamber 610. In addition, the side brushes 550, 560 also sweep debris inward at the same time. In one example, the bristles of the brushes 510, 550, 560 may extend downward by about 0.015 to 0.025 inches beyond the extent of the wheels 410, 420, while rotating at between about 600 and about 1600 RPM.
The form factor of the robot 101 may be made more compact by omitting a caster wheel or other support structure. Due to the width of the front brush roller 510, as well as the side brushes 550, 560 disposed at opposite lateral sides of the robot 101, the robot 101 may omit a third caster or free wheel aside from the drive wheels 410, 420 without significantly impacting the balance or stability of the robot 101. Alternatively, the robot 101 may further include support bearings 490, as shown in
Referring to
The bump sensor 800 is used to determine when the robot 100 has physically encountered an object. Such sensors may use a physical property such as capacitance or physical displacement within the robot 100 to determine when it has encountered an obstacle. In the example shown in
Since the robot 101 preferably has a compact and lightweight form, the momentum carried by the robot 101 may be lighter than a standard-size robot. Accordingly, the robot 101 preferably includes “light touch” or contactless bump sensors. For example, the robot 101 may include one or more accelerometers 458 in communication with the controller 450 (see
In some examples, the robot 101 may utilize the accelerometer 458 as a stasis detector 720. As a benefit, processing accelerometer data for stasis detection may require only a processing rate of about 30 hertz. For example, as the robot 101 is moving over a floor, vibrations cause the accelerometer 458 to detect acceleration of a particular amplitude profile. However, when the robot 101 stops moving, because of either a normal state or it has been blocked by an obstacle, the amplitude of the vibrations detected by the accelerometer 458 decrease accordingly. Therefore, the robot 101 can respond to such decreased acceleration according to a stasis-escape behavior, for example. By monitoring a single accelerometer 458 for purposes of both bump detection and/or stasis detection, the robot 101 may omit bump switches and/or other stasis detection hardware, thus potentially requiring less space aboard the robot 101.
Referring to
The operation of the robot 101 is preferably controlled by a microcontroller 450, such as a FREESCALE™ QG8 or other microcontroller suitable to receive input from the robot's sensors and operate the motors or other output devices of the robot 101. As illustrated in
The rectangular outline of the front portion 210 of the chassis 200 may cause the corners thereof to collide with obstacles which might not be detected by bump sensors or cliff sensors, in contrast to round-outline robots that can rotate freely without such risk, the robot 101 preferably responds to bumps detected while rotating in place by halting the rotation and backing up directly in reverse. As a result, the robot 101 may be less likely to become inextricably wedged or stuck, notwithstanding the square corners of the front portion 210 of the chassis 200. Alternatively, the robot 101 may behave in accordance with control software generally similar to the ROOMBA™ or SCOOBA™ robots, as examples.
In accordance with a further example, the robot 100, 101 may automatically return to a cradle or base station for storage after completing a cleaning cycle. The robot 100, 101 may also include an electrical interface for recharging on-board batteries. Additionally, the cradle or base station may include a receptacle positioned below a “home” position of the robot 100, 101. When the robot 100, 101 interfaces the cradle and stops at the home position, the robot 100, 101 may automatically actuate the bin-cover release 630 and evacuate the debris from the debris chamber 610 into the cradle's receptacle positioned below the robot 100, 101.
In robot implementations using the omni-directional receiver 900, the base station may include an omni-directional beam emitter and two navigational field emitters. The robot 100 may maneuver towards base station by detecting and advancing along one of the lateral field edges of the overlapping fields aligned with a docking direction until docked with the base station. The robot 100 may detect the emissions of base station with the omni-directional receiver 900 and maneuver to detect an outer lateral field edge of at least one field emission. The robot 100 may then advance along the outer lateral field edge to the aligned lateral field edge of the overlapping fields. Upon detecting the aligned lateral field edge, the robot 100 advances along the aligned lateral field edge until docked with base station.
The reactive behaviors have, as their enabling conditions or triggers, various sensors and detections of phenomena, but, in general, not (arbitrary) states of a sequence. As shown in
Actual physical sensors may be represented in the architecture by “virtual” sensors synthesized from the conditioning and drivers. Additional “virtual” sensors that are synthesized from detectable or interpreted physical properties, proprioceptive or interpreted upon the robot 100, 101, such as over-current of a motor, stasis or stuck condition of the robot 100, 101, battery charge state via coulometry, and other virtual sensors “virtual N.”
In some implementations, the robot 100 includes the following behaviors listed in priority order from high to low: 1) User Interface Group 1100, 2) Factory Test Group 1200, 3) Reverse Bump Follow Group 1300, 4) Cliff Avoid Group 1400, 5) Bounce Rear 1500, 6) Bump Follow Group 1600, 7) Bounce 1700, and 8) Drive 1800. A behavior group refers to a set of behaviors that work together to implement an overall behavior. For example, the “User Interface Group” behavior is a set of three behaviors that handles the user interface while the robot is at rest.
The robot may include a user interface 370, which is a single clean/power button in the examples shown in
The following sub-behaviors, prioritized from high to low, implement the Reverse Bump Follow escape behavior 1300: 1) Reverse Bump Follow Escape Swing 1310, 2) Reverse Bump Follow Turn Out 1320, and 3) Reverse Bump Follow Arc In 1330. Due to the rectangular shape of the front portion 210 of the chassis 200, it is possible for the robot 100 to drive into a space that is too narrow to turn around in (e.g., like a parking space). These confinement areas are referred to as canyons. The term “canyon” refers generically to any narrow confinement source. If a cliff is similarly confining the robot 100 to a narrow space, this is referred to as a plank. Since the strategy for escaping these confinement obstacles is the same, the directional cliff sensor and bumper sensor data is aggregated into a set of four “directional confinement” sensors which are the basis for the discussion below. The four sensors are front-left, front-right, rear-left and rear-right. The direction of a reverse bump follow is clockwise if the Reverse Bump Follow Arc In behavior 1330 is driving the robot 100 backward while rotating clockwise. The direction of a reverse bump follow is counterclockwise if the Reverse Bump Follow Arc In behavior 1330 is driving the robot 100 backward while rotating counterclockwise.
The Reverse Bump Follow Escape Swing behavior 1310 causes the robot 100 to turn in place with enough angular progress to deduce that the presence of a canyon. The activation condition for the Reverse Bump Follow Escape Swing behavior 1310 is evaluated at the end of the Reverse Bump Follow Turn Out behavior 1320. After the Reverse Bump Follow Escape Swing behavior 1310 is armed, it executes once and then disables itself until armed again by the Reverse Bump Follow Turn Out behavior 1320. At the start of the Reverse Bump Follow Escape Swing behavior 1310, an escape angle is set to a random number between 120 and 160 degrees. The robot 100 then turns in place in the opposite direction of the reverse bump follow direction until the escape angle is achieved. If any rear directional confinement sources appear while turning in place, the robot 100 moves forward to avoid them. If a front directional confinement source is encountered, the turn in place is aborted. After completion of the turn in place, the success of the escape is determined in the following order. First, if the turn in place was aborted due to detection of a front confinement source, the angular progress of the turn in place is compared to a minimum escape angle which is computed by generating a random number between 80 and 120 degrees. If the angular progress does not exceed this amount, a similar maneuver for the Reverse Bump Follow Turn Out behavior 1320 is performed. This is done to return the robot 100 back to an orientation conducive to continuing the reverse bump follow. Second, if the turn in place was aborted due to detection of a front confinement source, and the angular progress exceeded the minimum escape angle computed above but fell short of the escape angle computed at the beginning of the behavior, the following is done. The reverse bump follow activation is cancelled, and a forward bump follow is triggered if the confinement source that stopped the turn in place was a bump. This improves the chances that the robot 100 will find its way out of a tight spot without detecting a new canyon and retriggering the reverse bump follow. Third, if the turn in place completed due to achieving the escape angle computed at the start of the behavior, the reverse bump follow activation is cancelled.
The Reverse Bump Follow Turn Out behavior 1320 attempts to orient the robot 100 relative to an obstacle such that forward progress can be made while arcing toward the obstacle again. Simply turning in place as a circular robot would is not sufficient for the robot 100 since the rectangular forward portion 210 of the chassis 200 would, at some point, hit the obstacle and prevent the robot 100 from turning in place further. To avoid this problem, the robot 100 instead follows a tight arc to maintain space from the obstacle. The Reverse Bump Follow Turn Out behavior 1320 begins after the backing up along an arc that is performed in the Reverse Bump Follow Arc In behavior 1330 finishes as a result of the rear bumper getting activated. The first task of the Reverse Bump Follow Turn Out behavior 1320 is to release the bumper 300 from the rear hit. This is done by driving the robot 100 forward until the bumper 300 is released. In the course of doing this, front confinement sources are handled in the following way. A front-left confinement source causes the robot 100 to turn clockwise. A front-right confinement source causes the robot 100 to turn counterclockwise. After the bumper 300 is released, the robot 100 computes a constrained random arc radius and angular progress that it must travel in the forward direction in order to reorient the robot 100 for the next iteration of the Reverse Bump Follow Arc In behavior 1330. The robot 100 travels along this arc until the computed angular progress is achieved. While doing this, the robot 100 responds to the front confinement sensor 710, 730, 800 (e.g., cliff sensor 710, proximity sensor 730, and/or bump sensor 800) on the opposite side of the robot 100 to the obstacle being followed. When this is detected, the robot 100 turns in place in the same rotational direction as the arc it is following. The Reverse Bump Follow Turn Out behavior 1320 ends when the computed angular progress is achieved or the front confinement sensor 710, 730, 800 on the same side of the robot 100 as the obstacle being followed is triggered. At the end of the behavior, a random number generator is used to decide whether or not to trigger a Reverse Bump Follow Escape Swing behavior 1310. At a minimum, the probability of triggering the Reverse Bump Follow Escape Swing behavior 1310 will be about 20%. If the angular progress of the Reverse Bump Follow Turn Out behavior 1320 was between about 2 and about 5 degrees, the probability increases to about 50%. If the angular progress is less than 2 degrees, the probability is about 100%.
The Reverse Bump Follow Arc In behavior 1330 attempts to make forward progress while keeping an obstacle close to one side of the robot 100 by driving backward in an arc that begins shallow and gets progressively more severe with elapsed time in the behavior. The Reverse Bump Follow Arc In behavior 1330 executes when the robot 100 is in the reverse bump following mode 1300 and none of the other reverse bump follow behaviors 1310, 1320 are activated. While traveling in the arc, the robot 100 will respond to the front confinement sensor 710, 730, 800 (e.g., cliff sensor 710, proximity sensor 730, and/or bump sensor 800) on the opposite side of the robot 100 to the obstacle. It does this by turning in place in the opposite rotational direction to the arc being followed. The Reverse Bump Follow Arc In behavior 1330 ends when a rear confinement sensor 710, 800 (e.g., cliff sensor 710 and/or bump sensor 800) is triggered or the arc has made over 120 degrees of angular progress.
The Cliff Avoid Group behavior 1400 is a group of escape behaviors that includes the following sub-behaviors, prioritized from high to low: 1) Cliff Avoid Rear 1410, and 2) Cliff Avoid 1420. Referring to
The Cliff Avoid Rear behavior 1410 executes whenever the rear cliff sensors 710C, 710D are triggered. Front cliffs sensors 710A, 710B are also handled in this behavior 1410 since it is higher priority than Cliff Avoid 1420. At the beginning of the Cliff Avoid Rear behavior 1410, an escape direction of clockwise or counterclockwise is selected. The decision is made in the following order. 1) If front-left cliff sensor 710B is triggered, set to clockwise. 2) If front-right cliff sensor 710A is triggered, set to counterclockwise. 3) If rear-right cliff sensor 710C is triggered, set to clockwise. 4) If rear-left cliff sensor 710D is triggered, set to counterclockwise. After the direction is set, the robot 100 turns in the specified direction along an arc that is centered on a drive wheel 410, 420. While traveling, the front cliff sensors 710 are monitored and used to alter the direction of travel as follows. If the front-right cliff sensor 710A is triggered, the robot 100 turns in place counterclockwise. If the front-left cliff sensor 710B is triggered, the robot 100 turns in place clockwise. The robot 100 continues to travel as described above until both rear cliff sensors 710C, 710D are not triggering.
The Cliff Avoid behavior 1420 only handles the front cliff sensors 710A, 710B of the robot 100 and typically executes when the robot 100 is driving forward. At the beginning of the Cliff Avoid behavior 1420, an escape direction is chosen based on which front cliff sensors 710A, 710B have been triggered. If only the front-left cliff sensor 710B is triggered, the clockwise escape direction is chosen. If only the front-right cliff sensor 710A is triggered, counterclockwise escape direction is chosen. If both front cliff sensors 710A, 710B are triggered, the escape direction is randomly selected. An escape angle is randomly chosen between about 25 and about 50 degrees. The Cliff Avoid behavior 1420 starts by backing up straight until both of the front cliff sensors 710A, 710B are not triggering. Then, the robot 100 turns in place until the escape angle is achieved. If any of the front cliff sensor 710A, 710B is retriggered as part of the turn in place, the entire Cliff Avoid behavior 1420 is retriggered and hence re-executed.
The Bounce Rear behavior 1500 runs when the bumper 300 is activated from the rear direction. This most commonly happens when the robot 100 drives backward to release the front part of the bumper 300 as part of the Bounce behavior 1700. The robot 100 drives forward until the bumper 300 is released, and then continues forward another 5 mm in order to reduce the chance that the turn in place about to be performed will not retrigger a rear bump. A rotational direction for the turn in place is decided based on the direction of the original rear bumper hit. If the hit came from the rear-right side of the robot 100, counterclockwise is chosen. If the hit came from the rear-left side of the robot 100, clockwise is chosen. If the hit was in the center part of the rear, the direction is randomly chosen. An escape angle is randomly chosen between about 10 degrees and about 200 degrees. The robot 100 turns in the chosen direction until the escape angle is achieved.
The Bump Follow Group 1600 includes the following sub-behaviors prioritized from high to low: 1. Bump Follow Wall Align 1610, 2. Bump Follow Arc In 1620. Bump following is used to escape from and clean cluttered areas. It is also used to follow a wall with the goal of dispersing the robot 100 evenly through its floor space.
The Bump Follow Wall Align behavior 1610 is designed to align the side of the robot 100 with an obstacle such as a wall. If the bump-follow-direction is clockwise, the goal is to have the robot's left side against the wall. If the direction is counterclockwise, the goal is to have the robot's right side against the wall. When bump following is enabled, the Bump Follow Wall Align behavior 1610 begins when a front bump is triggered. The location of the bumper hit is used to decide how much the robot 100 should turn in place before performing another iteration of the Bump Follow Arc In behavior 1620. If the bumper 300 is triggered on the side of the bumper 300 that should not be near the obstacle, the robot 100 sets a turn in place goal of between about 25 and about 45 degrees. This larger increment saves time in the alignment process. If the bumper 300 is triggered on the side that should be near the obstacle, the robot 100 turns in place in the direction that swings the bumper 300 into the obstacle even more. The goal of this maneuver is to see if the bumper 300 tends to stay engaged or releases. If it releases, it suggests that the robot 100 is not yet at a very shallow angle to the wall, and a turn in place goal of between about 5 and about 25 degrees is selected. Otherwise, the robot 100 is probably at a shallow angle to the wall, and a turn in place goal of between about 1 and about 5 degrees is selected. If the turn in place goal was selected to be greater than 5 degrees, the robot 100 backs up until the bumper 300 is released. The robot 100 turns in place in the direction that swings the front of the robot 100 away from the obstacle until the target angle is achieved. If the bumper 300 is retriggered during the turn in place, the robot 100 backs up enough to release it.
The Bump Follow Arc In behavior 1620 runs when the bump following mode 1600 is enabled and Bump Follow Wall Align 1610 is not active. The robot 100 drives forward in a shallow arc, at first, in order to make forward progress. As more time elapses, the arc gradually tightens to bring the robot 100 back in contact with the obstacle. This allows the obstacle to be followed closely which can help the robot 100 find its way around it. If the bump follow mode 1600 was selected to maneuver through clutter, the robot 100 can continue arcing in without a bumper hit for up to about 100 degrees of angular progress. At that point, the bump follow 1600 is considered ended due to the robot escaping. If the bump follow mode 1600 was selected to help disperse the robot 100 through its space, it can continue arcing in without a bumper hit for up to about 210 degrees to allow for turning wall corners. At that point, the wall is considered lost and the bump follow behavior 1600 ends.
The Bounce behavior 1700 runs when the bumper 300 is activated from the front direction. The robot 100 drives backward until the bumper 300 is released. It then continues backward another 30 mm in order to reduce the chance that the turn in place about to be performed will not retrigger the bumper 300 from the front. This large additional clearance is required due to the rectangular shape of the forward portion of the bumper 300 creating the potential for the corner of the bumper 300 to swing into contact with the obstacle when turning in place. A rotational direction for the turn in place is decided based on the direction of the original front hit on the bumper 300. If the hit came from the front-right side of the robot 100, counterclockwise is chosen. If the hit came from the front-left side of the robot 100, clockwise is chosen. If the hit was in the center part of the front, the direction is randomly chosen. An escape angle is randomly chosen between about 10 degrees and about 200 degrees. The robot 100 turns in the chosen direction until the escape angle is achieved.
The drive behavior 1800 may run when no other behavior is active. The robot 100 drives straight until it experiences an event that triggers another behavior.
The robot 100 maintains concurrent processes 2000, “parallel” processes that are not generally considered reactive behaviors. As noted, filters and conditioning 2400 and drivers 2500, can interpret and translate raw signals. These processes are not considered reactive behaviors, and exercise no direct control over the motor drives or other actuators.
Some parallel processes 2000 are important in assisting the activation and execution of various behaviors. These processes are software finite state machines that are evaluated at a frequency of 64 Hertz, for example. The period is referred to as the processing interval.
In some implementations, the robot 100 includes a Canyon Detect process 2100, which assists in identifying canyons. A canyon is declared by monitoring four signals. Each of these signals is evaluated every processing interval. When the input signal is true, the output signal becomes true. The output signal becomes false after 100 consecutive processing intervals of the input signal being false. The four input signals are evaluated as follows: 1) The front-left cliff sensor 710B is active and the front-right cliff sensor 710A is inactive, or the rear-left cliff sensor 710D is active and the rear-right cliff sensor 710C is inactive. 2) The front-right cliff sensor 710A is active and the front-left cliff sensor 710B is inactive, or the rear-right cliff sensor 710C is active and the rear-left cliff sensor 710D is inactive. 3) The bumper 300 is depressed at the front-left side of the robot 100. 4) The bumper 300 is depressed at the front-right side of the robot 100. The processed versions of these signals are named, respectively, as follows: 1) cliff-left-held; 2) cliff-right-held; 3) bump-left-held; and 4) bump-right-held. A canyon is detected when cliff-left-held or bump-left-held are true while cliff-right-held or bump-right-held are true. When a canyon is detected, the Reverse Bump Following Group 1300 is enabled.
In some implementations, the robot 100 includes a Forward Progress process 2200. In the Forward Progress process 2200, every processing interval, the forward progress of the robot 100 is added to an accumulator while a fixed distance quantity corresponding to 1 millimeter is subtracted. When this accumulator reaches 100 millimeters, forward progress is declared to be true. The accumulator is not allowed to exceed 200 millimeters. When forward progress is true for 10 seconds, the Reverse Bump Following Group 1300 is enabled to escape the excessively cluttered environment the robot 100 is traveling in.
In some implementations, the robot 100 includes a Reverse Bump Follow Arc In Progress process 2300. While the robot 100 is in the reverse bump following mode 1300, the forward progress of each iteration of the Reverse Bump Follow Arc In behavior 1330 is fed into a low pass filter. At the beginning of a reverse bump follow, this filter is initialized to 60 millimeters. When the output falls below 50 millimeters, the arc in progress is considered poor. This triggers a toggle in the reverse bump follow direction, i.e. the side of the robot 100 where the primary obstacle is assumed to be.
Other robot details and features combinable with those described herein may be found in the following U.S. patent applications, entitled “AUTONOMOUS COVERAGE ROBOT,” filed on May 9, 2008, having assigned Ser. No. 12/118,219, and published as U.S. Pat. App. Pub. 2008/0276408 A1; and “AUTONOMOUS COVERAGE ROBOT SENSING,” filed on May 9, 2008, having assigned Ser. No. 12/118,250, and published as U.S. Pat. App. Pub. 2008/0281470 A1; the entire contents of the aforementioned applications are hereby incorporated by reference.
A number of implementations have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. Accordingly, other implementations are within the scope of the following claims.
This U.S. patent application is a continuation, and claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §120, from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/245,118, filed Sep. 26, 2011, entitled Compact Autonomous Coverage Robot, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/118,117, filed May 9, 2008 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,239,992), which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application 60/938,699, filed on May 17, 2007 and U.S. Provisional Application 60/917,065, filed on May 9, 2007. The disclosure of each of these prior applications is considered to be part of the disclosure of this application and each of these prior applications is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The contents of U.S. Pre-grant Publications 2003/0192144, 2006/0200281, and 2007/0016328, and also U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,748,297 and 6,883,201 are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1755054 | Darst | Apr 1930 | A |
1780221 | Buchmann | Nov 1930 | A |
1970302 | Gerhardt | Aug 1934 | A |
2136324 | John | Nov 1938 | A |
2302111 | Dow et al. | Nov 1942 | A |
2353621 | Sav et al. | Jul 1944 | A |
2770825 | Pullen | Nov 1956 | A |
3119369 | Harland et al. | Jan 1964 | A |
3166138 | Dunn | Jan 1965 | A |
3333564 | Waters | Aug 1967 | A |
3375375 | Robert et al. | Mar 1968 | A |
3381652 | Schaefer et al. | May 1968 | A |
3457575 | Bienek | Jul 1969 | A |
3550714 | Bellinger | Dec 1970 | A |
3569727 | Aggarwal et al. | Mar 1971 | A |
3674316 | De Brey | Jul 1972 | A |
3678882 | Kinsella | Jul 1972 | A |
3744586 | Leinauer | Jul 1973 | A |
3756667 | Bombardier et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
3809004 | Leonheart | May 1974 | A |
3816004 | Bignardi | Jun 1974 | A |
3845831 | James | Nov 1974 | A |
RE28268 | Autrand | Dec 1974 | E |
3853086 | Asplund | Dec 1974 | A |
3863285 | Hukuba | Feb 1975 | A |
3888181 | Kups | Jun 1975 | A |
3937174 | Haaga | Feb 1976 | A |
3952361 | Wilkins | Apr 1976 | A |
3989311 | Debrey | Nov 1976 | A |
3989931 | Phillips | Nov 1976 | A |
4004313 | Capra | Jan 1977 | A |
4012681 | Finger et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4070170 | Leinfelt | Jan 1978 | A |
4099284 | Shinozaki et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4119900 | Kremnitz | Oct 1978 | A |
4175589 | Nakamura et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4175892 | De brey | Nov 1979 | A |
4196727 | Verkaart et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4198727 | Farmer | Apr 1980 | A |
4199838 | Simonsson | Apr 1980 | A |
4209254 | Reymond et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
D258901 | Keyworth | Apr 1981 | S |
4297578 | Carter | Oct 1981 | A |
4306329 | Yokoi | Dec 1981 | A |
4309758 | Halsall et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4328545 | Halsall et al. | May 1982 | A |
4367403 | Miller | Jan 1983 | A |
4369543 | Chen et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4401909 | Gorsek | Aug 1983 | A |
4416033 | Specht | Nov 1983 | A |
4445245 | Lu | May 1984 | A |
4465370 | Yuasa et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4477998 | You | Oct 1984 | A |
4481692 | Kurz | Nov 1984 | A |
4482960 | Pryor | Nov 1984 | A |
4492058 | Goldfarb et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4513469 | Godfrey et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
D278732 | Ohkado | May 1985 | S |
4518437 | Sommer | May 1985 | A |
4534637 | Suzuki et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4556313 | Miller et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4575211 | Matsumura et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4580311 | Kurz | Apr 1986 | A |
4601082 | Kurz | Jul 1986 | A |
4618213 | Chen | Oct 1986 | A |
4620285 | Perdue | Oct 1986 | A |
4624026 | Olson et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4626995 | Lofgren et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4628454 | Ito | Dec 1986 | A |
4638445 | Mattaboni | Jan 1987 | A |
4644156 | Takahashi et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4649504 | Krouglicof et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4652917 | Miller | Mar 1987 | A |
4654492 | Koerner et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4654924 | Getz et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4660969 | Sorimachi et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4662854 | Fang | May 1987 | A |
4674048 | Okumura | Jun 1987 | A |
4679152 | Perdue | Jul 1987 | A |
4680827 | Hummel | Jul 1987 | A |
4696074 | Cavalli | Sep 1987 | A |
D292223 | Trumbull | Oct 1987 | S |
4700301 | Dyke | Oct 1987 | A |
4700427 | Knepper | Oct 1987 | A |
4703820 | Reinaud | Nov 1987 | A |
4710020 | Maddox et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4716621 | Zoni | Jan 1988 | A |
4728801 | O'Connor | Mar 1988 | A |
4733343 | Yoneda et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4733430 | Westergren | Mar 1988 | A |
4733431 | Martin | Mar 1988 | A |
4735136 | Lee et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4735138 | Gawler et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4748336 | Fujie et al. | May 1988 | A |
4748833 | Nagasawa | Jun 1988 | A |
4756049 | Uehara | Jul 1988 | A |
4767213 | Hummel | Aug 1988 | A |
4769700 | Pryor | Sep 1988 | A |
4777416 | George et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
D298766 | Tanno et al. | Nov 1988 | S |
4782550 | Jacobs | Nov 1988 | A |
4796198 | Boultinghouse et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4806751 | Abe et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4811228 | Hyyppa | Mar 1989 | A |
4813906 | Matsuyama et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4815157 | Tsuchiya | Mar 1989 | A |
4817000 | Eberhardt | Mar 1989 | A |
4818875 | Weiner | Apr 1989 | A |
4829442 | Kadonoff et al. | May 1989 | A |
4829626 | Harkonen et al. | May 1989 | A |
4832098 | Palinkas et al. | May 1989 | A |
4851661 | Everett | Jul 1989 | A |
4854000 | Takimoto | Aug 1989 | A |
4854006 | Nishimura et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4855915 | Dallaire | Aug 1989 | A |
4857912 | Everett et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4858132 | Holmquist | Aug 1989 | A |
4867570 | Sorimachi et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4880474 | Koharagi et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4887415 | Martin | Dec 1989 | A |
4891762 | Chotiros | Jan 1990 | A |
4893025 | Lee | Jan 1990 | A |
4901394 | Nakamura et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4905151 | Weiman et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4912643 | Beirne | Mar 1990 | A |
4918441 | Bohman | Apr 1990 | A |
4919224 | Shyu et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4919489 | Kopsco | Apr 1990 | A |
4920060 | Parrent et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4920605 | Takashima | May 1990 | A |
4933864 | Evans et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4937912 | Kurz | Jul 1990 | A |
4953253 | Fukuda et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4954962 | Evans et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4955714 | Stotler et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4956891 | Wulff | Sep 1990 | A |
4961303 | McCarty et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4961304 | Ovsborn et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4962453 | Pong et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4971591 | Raviv et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4973912 | Kaminski et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4974283 | Holsten et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4977618 | Allen | Dec 1990 | A |
4977639 | Takahashi et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4986663 | Cecchi et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5001635 | Yasutomi et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5002145 | Wakaumi et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5012886 | Jonas et al. | May 1991 | A |
5018240 | Holman | May 1991 | A |
5020186 | Lessig et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5022812 | Coughlan et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5023788 | Kitazume et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5024529 | Svetkoff et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
D318500 | Malewicki et al. | Jul 1991 | S |
5032775 | Mizuno et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5033151 | Kraft et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5033291 | Podoloff et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5040116 | Evans et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5045769 | Everett | Sep 1991 | A |
5049802 | Mintus et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5051906 | Evans et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5062819 | Mallory | Nov 1991 | A |
5070567 | Holland | Dec 1991 | A |
5084934 | Lessig et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5086535 | Grossmeyer et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5090321 | Abouav | Feb 1992 | A |
5093955 | Blehert et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5094311 | Akeel | Mar 1992 | A |
5105502 | Takashima | Apr 1992 | A |
5105550 | Shenoha | Apr 1992 | A |
5109566 | Kobayashi et al. | May 1992 | A |
5115538 | Cochran et al. | May 1992 | A |
5127128 | Lee | Jul 1992 | A |
5136675 | Hodson | Aug 1992 | A |
5136750 | Takashima et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5142985 | Stearns et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5144471 | Takanashi et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5144714 | Mori et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5144715 | Matsuyo et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5152028 | Hirano | Oct 1992 | A |
5152202 | Strauss | Oct 1992 | A |
5155684 | Burke et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5163202 | Kawakami et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5163320 | Goshima et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5164579 | Pryor et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5165064 | Mattaboni | Nov 1992 | A |
5170352 | McTamaney et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5173881 | Sindle | Dec 1992 | A |
5182833 | Yamaguchi et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5202742 | Frank et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5204814 | Noonan et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5206500 | Decker et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5208521 | Aoyama | May 1993 | A |
5216777 | Moro et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5227985 | DeMenthon | Jul 1993 | A |
5233682 | Abe et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5239720 | Wood et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5251358 | Moro et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5261139 | Lewis | Nov 1993 | A |
5276618 | Everett | Jan 1994 | A |
5276939 | Uenishi | Jan 1994 | A |
5277064 | Knigga et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5279672 | Betker et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5284452 | Corona | Feb 1994 | A |
5284522 | Kobayashi et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5293955 | Lee | Mar 1994 | A |
D345707 | Alister | Apr 1994 | S |
5303448 | Hennessey et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5307273 | Oh et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5309592 | Hiratsuka | May 1994 | A |
5310379 | Hippely et al. | May 1994 | A |
5315227 | Pierson et al. | May 1994 | A |
5319827 | Yang | Jun 1994 | A |
5319828 | Waldhauser et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5321614 | Ashworth | Jun 1994 | A |
5323483 | Baeg | Jun 1994 | A |
5324948 | Dudar et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5341186 | Kato | Aug 1994 | A |
5341540 | Soupert et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5341549 | Wirtz et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5345649 | Whitlow | Sep 1994 | A |
5353224 | Lee et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5363305 | Cox et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5363935 | Schempf et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5369347 | Yoo | Nov 1994 | A |
5369838 | Wood et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5386862 | Glover et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5399951 | Lavallee et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5400244 | Watanabe et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5404612 | Ishikawa | Apr 1995 | A |
5410479 | Coker | Apr 1995 | A |
5435405 | Schempf et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5440216 | Kim | Aug 1995 | A |
5442358 | Keeler et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5444965 | Colens | Aug 1995 | A |
5446356 | Kim | Aug 1995 | A |
5446445 | Bloomfield et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5451135 | Schempf et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5454129 | Kell | Oct 1995 | A |
5455982 | Armstrong et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5465525 | Mifune et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5465619 | Sotack et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5467273 | Faibish et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5471560 | Allard et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5491670 | Weber | Feb 1996 | A |
5497529 | Boesi | Mar 1996 | A |
5498948 | Bruni et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5502638 | Takenaka | Mar 1996 | A |
5505072 | Oreper | Apr 1996 | A |
5507067 | Hoekstra et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5510893 | Suzuki | Apr 1996 | A |
5511147 | Abdel | Apr 1996 | A |
5515572 | Hoekstra et al. | May 1996 | A |
5534762 | Kim | Jul 1996 | A |
5537017 | Feiten et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5539953 | Kurz | Jul 1996 | A |
5542146 | Hoekstra et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5542148 | Young | Aug 1996 | A |
5546631 | Chambon | Aug 1996 | A |
5548511 | Bancroft | Aug 1996 | A |
5551525 | Pack et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5553349 | Kilstrom et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5555587 | Guha | Sep 1996 | A |
5560077 | Crotchett | Oct 1996 | A |
5568589 | Hwang | Oct 1996 | A |
D375592 | Ljunggren | Nov 1996 | S |
5608306 | Rybeck et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5608894 | Kawakami et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5608944 | Gordon | Mar 1997 | A |
5610488 | Miyazawa | Mar 1997 | A |
5611106 | Wulff | Mar 1997 | A |
5611108 | Knowlton et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5613261 | Kawakami et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5613269 | Miwa | Mar 1997 | A |
5621291 | Lee | Apr 1997 | A |
5622236 | Azumi et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5634237 | Paranjpe | Jun 1997 | A |
5634239 | Tuvin et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5636402 | Kubo et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5642299 | Hardin et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5646494 | Han | Jul 1997 | A |
5647554 | Ikegami et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5650702 | Azumi | Jul 1997 | A |
5652489 | Kawakami | Jul 1997 | A |
5682313 | Edlund et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5682839 | Grimsley et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5696675 | Nakamura et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5698861 | Oh | Dec 1997 | A |
5709007 | Chiang | Jan 1998 | A |
5710506 | Broell et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5714119 | Kawagoe et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5717169 | Liang et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5717484 | Hamaguchi et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5720077 | Nakamura et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5732401 | Conway | Mar 1998 | A |
5735959 | Kubo et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745235 | Vercammen et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5752871 | Tsuzuki | May 1998 | A |
5756904 | Oreper et al. | May 1998 | A |
5761762 | Kubo | Jun 1998 | A |
5764888 | Bolan et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5767437 | Rogers | Jun 1998 | A |
5767960 | Orman | Jun 1998 | A |
5777596 | Herbert | Jul 1998 | A |
5778486 | Kim | Jul 1998 | A |
5781697 | Jeong | Jul 1998 | A |
5781960 | Kilstrom et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5786602 | Pryor et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5787545 | Colens | Aug 1998 | A |
5793900 | Nourbakhsh et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794297 | Muta | Aug 1998 | A |
5812267 | Everett et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814808 | Takada et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815880 | Nakanishi | Oct 1998 | A |
5815884 | Imamura et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5819008 | Asama et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5819360 | Fujii | Oct 1998 | A |
5819936 | Saveliev et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5820821 | Kawagoe et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5821730 | Drapkin | Oct 1998 | A |
5825981 | Matsuda | Oct 1998 | A |
5828770 | Leis et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5831597 | West et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5839156 | Park et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5839532 | Yoshiji et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5841259 | Kim et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5867800 | Leif | Feb 1999 | A |
5869910 | Colens | Feb 1999 | A |
5896611 | Haaga | Apr 1999 | A |
5903124 | Kawakami | May 1999 | A |
5905209 | Oreper | May 1999 | A |
5907886 | Buscher | Jun 1999 | A |
5910700 | Crotzer | Jun 1999 | A |
5911260 | Suzuki | Jun 1999 | A |
5916008 | Wong | Jun 1999 | A |
5924167 | Wright et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5926909 | McGee | Jul 1999 | A |
5933102 | Miller et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5933913 | Wright et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5935179 | Kleiner et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940346 | Sadowsky et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940927 | Haegermarck et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940930 | Oh et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5942869 | Katou et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943730 | Boomgaarden | Aug 1999 | A |
5943733 | Tagliaferri | Aug 1999 | A |
5947225 | Kawakami et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5950408 | Schaedler | Sep 1999 | A |
5959423 | Nakanishi et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5968281 | Wright et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974348 | Rocks | Oct 1999 | A |
5974365 | Mitchell | Oct 1999 | A |
5983448 | Wright et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5984880 | Lander et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987383 | Keller et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989700 | Krivopal | Nov 1999 | A |
5991951 | Kubo et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995883 | Nishikado | Nov 1999 | A |
5995884 | Allen et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5996167 | Close | Dec 1999 | A |
5998953 | Nakamura et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
5998971 | Corbridge | Dec 1999 | A |
6000088 | Wright et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009358 | Angott et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6021545 | Delgado et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6023813 | Thatcher et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6023814 | Imamura | Feb 2000 | A |
6025687 | Himeda et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026539 | Mouw et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6030464 | Azevedo | Feb 2000 | A |
6030465 | Marcussen et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032542 | Warnick et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6036572 | Sze | Mar 2000 | A |
6038501 | Kawakami | Mar 2000 | A |
6040669 | Hog | Mar 2000 | A |
6041471 | Charky et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041472 | Kasen et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6046800 | Ohtomo et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6049620 | Dickinson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6052821 | Chouly et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055042 | Sarangapani | Apr 2000 | A |
6055702 | Imamura et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061868 | Moritsch et al. | May 2000 | A |
6065182 | Wright et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073432 | Schaedler | Jun 2000 | A |
6076025 | Ueno et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6076026 | Jambhekar et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6076226 | Reed | Jun 2000 | A |
6076227 | Schallig et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6081257 | Zeller | Jun 2000 | A |
6088020 | Mor | Jul 2000 | A |
6094775 | Behmer | Aug 2000 | A |
6099091 | Campbell | Aug 2000 | A |
6101670 | Song | Aug 2000 | A |
6101671 | Wright et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108031 | King et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108067 | Okamoto | Aug 2000 | A |
6108076 | Hanseder | Aug 2000 | A |
6108269 | Kabel | Aug 2000 | A |
6108597 | Kirchner et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112143 | Allen et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112996 | Matsuo | Sep 2000 | A |
6119057 | Kawagoe | Sep 2000 | A |
6122798 | Kobayashi et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6124694 | Bancroft et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125498 | Roberts et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6131237 | Kasper et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6138063 | Himeda | Oct 2000 | A |
6142252 | Kinto et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6146278 | Kobayashi | Nov 2000 | A |
6154279 | Thayer | Nov 2000 | A |
6154694 | Aoki et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6160479 | Ahlen et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167332 | Kurtzberg et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167587 | Kasper et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6192548 | Huffman | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6216307 | Kaleta et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6220865 | Macri et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226830 | Hendriks et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230362 | Kasper et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6237741 | Guidetti | May 2001 | B1 |
6240342 | Fiegert et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243913 | Frank et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6255793 | Peless et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6259979 | Holmquist | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261379 | Conrad et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263539 | Baig | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263989 | Won | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272936 | Oreper et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6276478 | Hopkins et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278918 | Dickson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282526 | Ganesh | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283034 | Miles | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6285778 | Nakajima et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6285930 | Dickson et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6300737 | Bergvall et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6321337 | Reshef et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321515 | Colens | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6323570 | Nishimura et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324714 | Walz et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6327741 | Reed | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332400 | Meyer | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6339735 | Peless et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6362875 | Burkley | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6370453 | Sommer | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6374155 | Wallach et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374157 | Takamura | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381802 | Park | May 2002 | B2 |
6385515 | Dickson et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6388013 | Saraf et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6389329 | Colens | May 2002 | B1 |
6400048 | Nishimura et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6401294 | Kasper | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6408226 | Byrne et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6412141 | Kasper et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6415203 | Inoue et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421870 | Basham et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427285 | Legatt et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6430471 | Kintou et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6431296 | Won | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6437227 | Theimer | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6437465 | Nishimura et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438456 | Feddema et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438793 | Miner et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442476 | Poropat | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443509 | Levin et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6444003 | Sutcliffe | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6446302 | Kasper et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6454036 | Airey et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
D464091 | Christianson | Oct 2002 | S |
6457206 | Judson | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6459955 | Bartsch et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463368 | Feiten et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6465982 | Bergvall et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473167 | Odell | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480762 | Uchikubo et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6481515 | Kirkpatrick et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490539 | Dickson et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6491127 | Holmberg et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493612 | Bisset et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493613 | Peless et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6496754 | Song et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6496755 | Wallach et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6502657 | Kerrebrock et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6504610 | Bauer et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6507773 | Parker et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6525509 | Petersson et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
D471243 | Cioffi et al. | Mar 2003 | S |
6532404 | Colens | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6535793 | Allard | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6540607 | Mokris et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6548982 | Papanikolopoulos et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553612 | Dyson et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556722 | Russell et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556892 | Kuroki et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6557104 | Vu et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
D474312 | Stephens et al. | May 2003 | S |
6563130 | Dworkowski et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6571415 | Gerber et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6571422 | Gordon et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6572711 | Sclafani et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6574536 | Kawagoe et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6580246 | Jacobs | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6584376 | Van Kommer | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6586908 | Petersson et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6587573 | Stam et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6590222 | Bisset et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594551 | McKinney et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6594844 | Jones | Jul 2003 | B2 |
D478884 | Slipy et al. | Aug 2003 | S |
6601265 | Burlington | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6604021 | Imai et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6604022 | Parker et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6611120 | Song et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6611734 | Parker et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6611738 | Ruffner | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6615108 | Peless et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6615885 | Ohm | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6622465 | Jerome et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6624744 | Wilson et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629028 | Paromtchik et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6639659 | Granger | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6658325 | Zweig | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6658354 | Lin | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6658692 | Lenkiewicz et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6658693 | Reed | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6661239 | Ozick | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6662889 | De Fazio et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6668951 | Won | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6670817 | Fournier et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6671592 | Bisset et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6687571 | Byrne et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6690134 | Jones et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6690993 | Foulke et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6697147 | Ko et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6711280 | Stafsudd et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6732826 | Song et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6737591 | Lapstun et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6741054 | Koselka et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6741364 | Lange et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6748297 | Song et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6756703 | Chang | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6760647 | Nourbakhsh et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6764373 | Osawa et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6769004 | Barrett | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6774596 | Bisset | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6779380 | Nieuwkamp | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6781338 | Jones et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6809490 | Jones et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6810305 | Kirkpatrick | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6830120 | Yashima et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6832407 | Salem et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836701 | McKee | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6845297 | Allard | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6856811 | Burdue et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6859010 | Jeon et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6859682 | Naka et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6860206 | Rudakevych et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6865447 | Lau et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6870792 | Chiappetta | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6871115 | Huang et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6883201 | Jones et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6886651 | Slocum et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6888333 | Laby | May 2005 | B2 |
6901624 | Mori et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6906702 | Tanaka et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6914403 | Tsurumi | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6917854 | Bayer | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6925357 | Wang et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6925679 | Wallach et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6929548 | Wang | Aug 2005 | B2 |
D510066 | Hickey et al. | Sep 2005 | S |
6938298 | Aasen | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6940291 | Ozick | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6941199 | Bottomley et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6956348 | Landry et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6957712 | Song et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6960986 | Asama et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6965209 | Jones et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6965211 | Tsurumi | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6968592 | Takeuchi et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6971140 | Kim | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6975246 | Trudeau | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6980229 | Ebersole | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6985556 | Shanmugavel et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6993954 | George et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7013527 | Thomas et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7024278 | Chiappetta et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7024280 | Parker et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7027893 | Perry et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7030768 | Wanie | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7031805 | Lee et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7032469 | Bailey | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7054716 | McKee et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7057120 | Ma et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7057643 | Iida et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7065430 | Naka et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7066291 | Martins et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7069124 | Whittaker et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7079923 | Abramson et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7085623 | Siegers | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7085624 | Aldred et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7113847 | Chmura et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7133746 | Abramson et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7142198 | Lee | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7148458 | Schell et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155308 | Jones | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7167775 | Abramson et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171285 | Kim et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7173391 | Jones et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7174238 | Zweig | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7188000 | Chiappetta et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7193384 | Norman et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7196487 | Jones et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7201786 | Wegelin et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7206677 | Huldén | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7211980 | Bruemmer et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7246405 | Yan | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7275280 | Haegermarck et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7283892 | Boillot et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7288912 | Landry et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7318248 | Yan | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7320149 | Huffman et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7324870 | Lee | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7328196 | Peters | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7332890 | Cohen et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7352153 | Yan | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7359766 | Jeon et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7363108 | Noda et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7388879 | Sabe et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7389166 | Harwig et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7408157 | Yan | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7418762 | Arai et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7430455 | Casey et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7430462 | Chiu et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7441298 | Svendsen et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7444206 | Abramson et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7448113 | Jones et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7459871 | Landry et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7467026 | Sakagami et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7474941 | Kim et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7515991 | Egawa et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7557703 | Yamada et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7568259 | Yan | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7571511 | Jones et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7578020 | Jaworski et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7600521 | Woo | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7617557 | Reindle | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7636982 | Jones et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7647144 | Haegermarck | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7650666 | Jang | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7660650 | Kawagoe et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7663333 | Jones et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7693605 | Park | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7706917 | Chiappetta et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7765635 | Park | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7784139 | Sawalski et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7801645 | Taylor et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7805220 | Taylor et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7809944 | Kawamoto | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7853645 | Brown et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7920941 | Park et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7937800 | Yan | May 2011 | B2 |
7953526 | Durkos et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7957836 | Myeong et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8392021 | Konandreas et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
20010004719 | Sommer | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010013929 | Torsten | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010020200 | Das et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010025183 | Shahidi | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010037163 | Allard | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010043509 | Green et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010045883 | Holdaway et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047231 | Peless et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047895 | De Fazio et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020011367 | Kolesnik | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020011813 | Koselka et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016649 | Jones | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020021219 | Edwards | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020027652 | Paromtchik et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020036779 | Kiyoi et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020081937 | Yamada et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020095239 | Wallach et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020097400 | Jung et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020104963 | Mancevski | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020108209 | Peterson | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020112742 | Bredo et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020113973 | Ge | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116089 | Kirkpatrick | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020124343 | Reed | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020153185 | Song et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156556 | Ruffner | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020159051 | Guo | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020166193 | Kasper | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169521 | Goodman et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020173877 | Zweig | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020189871 | Won | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009259 | Hattori et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030019071 | Field et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023356 | Keable | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030024986 | Mazz et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030025472 | Jones et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030028286 | Glenn et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030030399 | Jacobs | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030058262 | Sato et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060928 | Abramson et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030067451 | Tagg et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030097875 | Lentz et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030124312 | Autumn | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030126352 | Barrett | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030137268 | Papanikolopoulos et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030146384 | Logsdon et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030192144 | Song et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030193657 | Uomori et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030216834 | Allard | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030221114 | Hino et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229421 | Chmura et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030229474 | Suzuki et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233171 | Heiligensetzer | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233177 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233870 | Mancevski | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233930 | Ozick | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040016077 | Song et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040020000 | Jones | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030448 | Solomon | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030449 | Solomon | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030450 | Solomon | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030451 | Solomon | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030570 | Solomon | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030571 | Solomon | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040031113 | Wosewick et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049877 | Jones et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040055163 | McCambridge et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040068351 | Solomon | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040068415 | Solomon | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040068416 | Solomon | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040074038 | Im et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040076324 | Burl et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083570 | Song et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040085037 | Jones et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040088079 | Lavarec et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093122 | Galibraith | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098167 | Yi et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111184 | Chiappetta et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040113777 | Matsuhira et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117064 | McDonald | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117846 | Karaoguz et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040118998 | Wingett et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128028 | Miyamoto et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133316 | Dean | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040134336 | Solomon | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040134337 | Solomon | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143919 | Wilder | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148419 | Chen et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148731 | Damman et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040153212 | Profio et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040156541 | Jeon et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040158357 | Lee et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040181706 | Chen et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040187249 | Jones et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040187457 | Colens | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040196451 | Aoyama | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040200505 | Taylor et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040204792 | Taylor et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210345 | Noda et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210347 | Sawada et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040211444 | Taylor et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040221790 | Sinclair et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236468 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040244138 | Taylor et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040255425 | Arai et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050000543 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010330 | Abramson et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015914 | You et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050067994 | Jones et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050076466 | Yan | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085947 | Aldred et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050137749 | Jeon et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144751 | Kegg et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050150074 | Diehl et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050154795 | Kuz et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050156562 | Cohen et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165508 | Kanda et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050166354 | Uehigashi | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050166355 | Tani | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050172445 | Diehl et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050183229 | Uehigashi | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050183230 | Uehigashi | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050187678 | Myeong et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192707 | Park et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050204717 | Colens | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209736 | Kawagoe | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050211880 | Schell et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050212929 | Schell et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213082 | DiBernardo et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213109 | Schell et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050218852 | Landry et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050222933 | Wesby | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050235451 | Yan | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050251292 | Casey et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050255425 | Pierson | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050258154 | Blankenship et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050273967 | Taylor et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288819 | de Guzman | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060000050 | Cipolla et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060010638 | Shimizu et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020369 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020370 | Abramson | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060025134 | Cho et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060037170 | Shimizu | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060042042 | Mertes et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060044546 | Lewin et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060060216 | Woo | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060061657 | Rew et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060087273 | Ko et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089765 | Pack et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060100741 | Jung | May 2006 | A1 |
20060119839 | Bertin et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143295 | Costa-Requena et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060146776 | Kim | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060190133 | Konandreas et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060220900 | Ceskutti et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060259194 | Chiu | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259494 | Watson et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060293787 | Kanda et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070017061 | Yan | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070028574 | Yan | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070032904 | Kawagoe et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070042716 | Goodall et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043459 | Abbott et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070061041 | Zweig | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070114975 | Cohen et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070136981 | Dilger et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150096 | Yeh et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070157415 | Lee et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070157420 | Lee et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070179670 | Chiappetta et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070226949 | Hahm et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070234492 | Svendsen et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244610 | Ozick et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250212 | Halloran et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070266508 | Jones et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080007203 | Cohen et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080039974 | Sandin et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052846 | Kapoor et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080091304 | Ozick et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080184518 | Taylor | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080276407 | Schnittman et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281470 | Gilbert et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294288 | Yamauchi | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080302586 | Yan | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080307590 | Jones et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090007366 | Svendsen et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090038089 | Landry et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090049640 | Lee et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090055022 | Casey et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090102296 | Greene et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090292393 | Casey et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100011529 | Won et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100049365 | Jones et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100063628 | Landry et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100107355 | Won et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100257690 | Jones et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100257691 | Jones et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100263158 | Jones et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100268384 | Jones et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100312429 | Jones et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2003275566 | Jun 2004 | AU |
2128842 | Dec 1980 | DE |
3317376 | Nov 1984 | DE |
3536907 | Feb 1989 | DE |
3404202 | Dec 1992 | DE |
199311014 | Oct 1993 | DE |
4414683 | Oct 1995 | DE |
4338841 | Aug 1999 | DE |
19849978 | Feb 2001 | DE |
10242257 | Apr 2003 | DE |
10357636 | Jul 2005 | DE |
102004041021 | Aug 2005 | DE |
102005046813 | Apr 2007 | DE |
198803389 | Dec 1988 | DK |
265542 | May 1988 | EP |
281085 | Sep 1988 | EP |
307381 | Jul 1990 | EP |
358628 | May 1991 | EP |
437024 | Jul 1991 | EP |
433697 | Dec 1992 | EP |
479273 | May 1993 | EP |
294101 | Dec 1993 | EP |
554978 | Mar 1994 | EP |
615719 | Sep 1994 | EP |
861629 | Sep 1998 | EP |
792726 | Jun 1999 | EP |
930040 | Oct 1999 | EP |
845237 | Apr 2000 | EP |
1018315 | Jul 2000 | EP |
1172719 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1228734 | Jun 2003 | EP |
1331537 | Jul 2003 | EP |
1380246 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1553472 | Jul 2005 | EP |
1642522 | Nov 2007 | EP |
2238196 | Nov 2006 | ES |
2601443 | Nov 1991 | FR |
2828589 | Dec 2003 | FR |
702426 | Jan 1954 | GB |
2128842 | Apr 1986 | GB |
2213047 | Aug 1989 | GB |
2225221 | May 1990 | GB |
2284957 | Jun 1995 | GB |
2267360 | Dec 1995 | GB |
2283838 | Dec 1997 | GB |
2300082 | Sep 1999 | GB |
2404330 | Jul 2005 | GB |
2417354 | Feb 2006 | GB |
53021869 | Feb 1978 | JP |
53110257 | Sep 1978 | JP |
943901 | Mar 1979 | JP |
57014726 | Jan 1982 | JP |
57064217 | Apr 1982 | JP |
59005315 | Feb 1984 | JP |
59094005 | May 1984 | JP |
59099308 | Jul 1984 | JP |
59112311 | Jul 1984 | JP |
59033511 | Aug 1984 | JP |
59120124 | Aug 1984 | JP |
59131668 | Sep 1984 | JP |
59164973 | Sep 1984 | JP |
59184917 | Oct 1984 | JP |
59212924 | Dec 1984 | JP |
59226909 | Dec 1984 | JP |
60089213 | Jun 1985 | JP |
60211510 | Oct 1985 | JP |
60259895 | Dec 1985 | JP |
61097712 | May 1986 | JP |
61023221 | Jun 1986 | JP |
62074018 | Apr 1987 | JP |
62070709 | May 1987 | JP |
62120510 | Jul 1987 | JP |
62154008 | Sep 1987 | JP |
62164431 | Oct 1987 | JP |
62263507 | Nov 1987 | JP |
62263508 | Nov 1987 | JP |
62189057 | Dec 1987 | JP |
63079623 | Apr 1988 | JP |
63158032 | Jul 1988 | JP |
63183032 | Jul 1988 | JP |
63241610 | Oct 1988 | JP |
1162454 | Jun 1989 | JP |
2006312 | Jan 1990 | JP |
2026312 | Jun 1990 | JP |
2283343 | Nov 1990 | JP |
3051023 | Mar 1991 | JP |
3197758 | Aug 1991 | JP |
3201903 | Sep 1991 | JP |
4019586 | Mar 1992 | JP |
4084921 | Mar 1992 | JP |
5023269 | Apr 1993 | JP |
5091604 | Apr 1993 | JP |
5042076 | Jun 1993 | JP |
5046246 | Jun 1993 | JP |
5150827 | Jun 1993 | JP |
5150829 | Jun 1993 | JP |
5046239 | Jul 1993 | JP |
5054620 | Jul 1993 | JP |
5040519 | Oct 1993 | JP |
5257527 | Oct 1993 | JP |
5257533 | Oct 1993 | JP |
5285861 | Nov 1993 | JP |
6003251 | Jan 1994 | JP |
6026312 | Apr 1994 | JP |
6137828 | May 1994 | JP |
6293095 | Oct 1994 | JP |
6327598 | Nov 1994 | JP |
6105781 | Dec 1994 | JP |
7129239 | May 1995 | JP |
7059702 | Jun 1995 | JP |
7222705 | Aug 1995 | JP |
7270518 | Oct 1995 | JP |
7281742 | Oct 1995 | JP |
7281752 | Oct 1995 | JP |
7295636 | Nov 1995 | JP |
7311041 | Nov 1995 | JP |
7313417 | Dec 1995 | JP |
7319542 | Dec 1995 | JP |
8000393 | Jan 1996 | JP |
8016241 | Jan 1996 | JP |
8016776 | Feb 1996 | JP |
8063229 | Mar 1996 | JP |
8083125 | Mar 1996 | JP |
8089449 | Apr 1996 | JP |
8089451 | Apr 1996 | JP |
2520732 | May 1996 | JP |
8123548 | May 1996 | JP |
8152916 | Jun 1996 | JP |
8256960 | Oct 1996 | JP |
8263137 | Oct 1996 | JP |
8286741 | Nov 1996 | JP |
8322774 | Dec 1996 | JP |
8322774 | Dec 1996 | JP |
8335112 | Dec 1996 | JP |
9043901 | Feb 1997 | JP |
9044240 | Feb 1997 | JP |
9047413 | Feb 1997 | JP |
9066855 | Mar 1997 | JP |
9145309 | Jun 1997 | JP |
9160644 | Jun 1997 | JP |
9179625 | Jul 1997 | JP |
9179685 | Jul 1997 | JP |
9185410 | Jul 1997 | JP |
9192069 | Jul 1997 | JP |
9204223 | Aug 1997 | JP |
9206258 | Aug 1997 | JP |
9233712 | Sep 1997 | JP |
9251318 | Sep 1997 | JP |
9265319 | Oct 1997 | JP |
9269807 | Oct 1997 | JP |
9269810 | Oct 1997 | JP |
02555263 | Nov 1997 | JP |
9319431 | Dec 1997 | JP |
9319432 | Dec 1997 | JP |
9319434 | Dec 1997 | JP |
9325812 | Dec 1997 | JP |
10055215 | Feb 1998 | JP |
10117973 | May 1998 | JP |
10118963 | May 1998 | JP |
10177414 | Jun 1998 | JP |
10214114 | Aug 1998 | JP |
10228316 | Aug 1998 | JP |
10240342 | Sep 1998 | JP |
10260727 | Sep 1998 | JP |
10295595 | Nov 1998 | JP |
11015941 | Jan 1999 | JP |
11065655 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11085269 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11102219 | Apr 1999 | JP |
11102220 | Apr 1999 | JP |
11162454 | Jun 1999 | JP |
11174145 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11175149 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11178764 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11178765 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11212642 | Aug 1999 | JP |
11213157 | Aug 1999 | JP |
11508810 | Aug 1999 | JP |
11248806 | Sep 1999 | JP |
11510935 | Sep 1999 | JP |
11282532 | Oct 1999 | JP |
11282533 | Oct 1999 | JP |
11295412 | Oct 1999 | JP |
11346964 | Dec 1999 | JP |
2000047728 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000056006 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000056831 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000066722 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2000075925 | Mar 2000 | JP |
10240343 | May 2000 | JP |
2000275321 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2000353014 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2001022443 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001067588 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2001087182 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001121455 | May 2001 | JP |
2001125641 | May 2001 | JP |
2001216482 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2001258807 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001265437 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001274908 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2001289939 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2001306170 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2001320781 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2001525567 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002204768 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002204769 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002247510 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002532178 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2002323925 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2002333920 | Nov 2002 | JP |
03356170 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2002355206 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2002360471 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2002360479 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2002360482 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2002366227 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2002369778 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2003005296 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003010076 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003010088 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003015740 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003028528 | Jan 2003 | JP |
03375843 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003036116 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003047579 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003052596 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003505127 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003061882 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2003084994 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2003167628 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003180586 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003180587 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003186539 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003190064 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003241836 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2003262520 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2003285288 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2003304992 | Oct 2003 | JP |
200330543 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2003310489 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2003310509 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2004016385 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004123040 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004148021 | May 2004 | JP |
2004160102 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004166968 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004174228 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004198330 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004219185 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2005118354 | May 2005 | JP |
2005135400 | May 2005 | JP |
2005211360 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2005224265 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2005230032 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2005245916 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2005296511 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2005346700 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2005352707 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2006031503 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006043071 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006155274 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2006164223 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2006227673 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2006247467 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2006260161 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2006293662 | Oct 2006 | JP |
2006296697 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2007034866 | Feb 2007 | JP |
2007213180 | Aug 2007 | JP |
04074285 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2009015611 | Jan 2009 | JP |
2010198552 | Sep 2010 | JP |
WO9526512 | Oct 1995 | WO |
WO9530887 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO9617258 | Feb 1997 | WO |
WO9715224 | May 1997 | WO |
WO9740734 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO9741451 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO9853456 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO9905580 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO9916078 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO9928800 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO9938056 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO9938237 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO9943250 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO9959042 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO0004430 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO0036962 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO0038026 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO0038028 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO0038029 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO0078410 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO0106904 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO0106905 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO0180703 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO0191623 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO0239864 | May 2002 | WO |
WO0239868 | May 2002 | WO |
WO02058527 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO02062194 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO02067744 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO02067745 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO02067752 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO02069774 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO02075350 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO02075356 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO02075469 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO02075470 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO02081074 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO03015220 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO03024292 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO02069775 | May 2003 | WO |
WO03040546 | May 2003 | WO |
WO03040845 | May 2003 | WO |
WO03040846 | May 2003 | WO |
WO03062850 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO03062852 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO02101477 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO03026474 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO2004004533 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO2004004534 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO2004005956 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO2004006034 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO2004025947 | May 2004 | WO |
WO2004043215 | May 2004 | WO |
WO2004058028 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO2005006935 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO2005036292 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO2005055796 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO2005076545 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO2005077243 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO2005077244 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO2005081074 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO2005082223 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO2005083541 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO2005098475 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO2005098476 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO2006046400 | May 2006 | WO |
WO2006068403 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO2006073248 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO2007036490 | May 2007 | WO |
WO2007065033 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO2007137234 | Nov 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Borges et al. “Optimal Mobile Robot Pose Estimation Using Geometrical Maps”, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 87-94, Feb. 2002. |
Braunstingl et al. “Fuzzy Logic Wall Following of a Mobile Robot Based on the Concept of General Perception” ICAR '95, 7th International Conference on Advanced Robotics, Sant Feliu De Guixols, Spain, pp. 367-376, Sep. 1995. |
Bulusu, et al. “Self Configuring Localization systems: Design and Experimental Evaluation”, ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems vol. 3 No. 1 pp. 24-60, 2003. |
Caccia, et al. “Bottom-Following for Remotely Operated Vehicles”, 5th IFAC conference, Alaborg, Denmark, pp. 245-250 Aug. 1, 2000. |
Chae, et al. “StarLITE: A new artificial landmark for the navigation of mobile robots”, http://www.irc.atr.jp/jk-nrs2005/pdf/Starlite.pdf, 4 pages, 2005. |
Chamberlin et al. “Team 1: Robot Locator Beacon System” NASA Goddard SFC, Design Proposal, 15 pages, Feb. 17, 2006. |
Champy “Physical management of IT assets in Data Centers using RFID technologies”, RFID 2005 University, Oct. 12-14, 2005. |
Chiri “Joystick Control for Tiny OS Robot”, http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/Programs/ugrad/superb/papers2002/chiri.pdf. 12 pages, Aug. 8, 2002. |
Christensen et al. “Theoretical Methods for Planning and Control in Mobile Robotics” 1997 First International Conference on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Electronic Systems, Adelaide, Australia, pp. 81-86, May 21-27, 1997. |
Clerentin, et al. “A localization method based on two omnidirectional perception systems cooperation” Proc of IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, San Francisco, CA vol. 2, pp. 1219-1224, Apr. 2000. |
Corke “High Performance Visual serving for robots end-point control”. SPIE vol. 2056 Intelligent robots and computer vision 1993. |
Cozman et al. “Robot Localization using a Computer Vision Sextant”, IEEE International Midwest Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 106-111, 1995. |
D'Orazio, et al. “Model based Vision System for mobile robot position estimation”, SPIE vol. 2058 Mobile Robots VIII, pp. 38-49, 1992. |
De Bakker, et al. “Smart PSD—array for sheet of light range imaging”, Proc. of SPIE vol. 3965, pp. 1-12, May 15, 2000. |
Desaulniers, et al. “An Efficient Algorithm to find a shortest path for a car-like Robot”, IEEE Transactions on robotics and Automation vol. 11 No. 6, pp. 819-828, Dec. 1995. |
Dorfmüller-Ulhaas “Optical Tracking From User Motion to 3D Interaction”, http://www.cg.tuwien.ac.at/research/publications/2002/Dorfmueller-Ulhaas-thesis, 182 pages, 2002. |
Dorsch, et al. “Laser Triangulation: Fundamental uncertainty in distance measurement”, Applied Optics, vol. 33 No. 7, pp. 1306-1314, Mar. 1, 1994. |
Dudek, et al. “Localizing a Robot with Minimum Travel” Proceedings of the sixth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms, vol. 27 No. 2 pp. 583-604, Apr. 1998. |
Dulimarta, et al. “Mobile Robot Localization in Indoor Environment”, Pattern Recognition, vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 99-111, 1997. |
EBay “Roomba Timer → Timed Cleaning—Floorvac Robotic Vacuum”, Cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBay|SAP|.dll?viewitem&category=43526&item=4375198387&rd=1, 5 pages, Apr. 20, 2005. |
Electrolux “Welcome to the Electrolux trilobite” www.electroluxusa.com/node57.asp?currentURL=node142.asp%3F, 2 pages, Mar. 18, 2005. |
Eren, et al. “Accuracy in position estimation of mobile robots based on coded infrared signal transmission”, Proceedings: Integrating Intelligent Instrumentation and Control, Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, 1995. IMTC/95. pp. 548-551, 1995. |
Eren, et al. “Operation of Mobile Robots in a Structured Infrared Environment”, Proceedings. ‘Sensing, Processing, Networking’, IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, 1997 (IMTC/97), Ottawa, Canada vol. 1, pp. 20-25, May 19-21, 1997. |
Becker, et al. “Reliable Navigation Using Landmarks” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 0-7803-1965-6, pp. 401-406, 1995. |
Benayad-Cherif, et al., “Mobile Robot Navigation Sensors” SPIE vol. 1831 Mobile Robots, VII, pp. 378-387, 1992. |
Facchinetti, Claudio et al. “Using and Learning Vision-Based Self-Positioning for Autonomous Robot Navigation”, ICARCV '94, vol. 3 pp. 1694-1698, 1994. |
M. Betke and L. Gurvits, “Mobile robot localization using landmarks”, IEEE Trans. Robot. Automat, vol. 13, pp. 251-263 1997. |
Facchinetti, Claudio et al. “Self-Positioning Robot Navigation Using Ceiling Images Sequences”, ACCV '95, 5 pages, Dec. 5-8, 1995. |
Fairfield, Nathaniel et al. “Mobile Robot Localization with Sparse Landmarks”, SPIE vol. 4573 pp. 148-155, 2002. |
Favre-Bulle, Bernard “Efficient tracking of 3D—Robot Position by Dynamic Triangulation”, IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference IMTC 98 Session on Instrumentation and Measurement in Robotics, vol. 1, pp. 446-449, May 18-21, 1998. |
Fayman “Exploiting Process Integration and Composition in the context of Active Vision”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part C: Application and reviews, vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 73-86, Feb. 1999. |
Franz, et al. “Biomimetric robot navigation”, Robotics and Autonomous Systems vol. 30 pp. 133-153, 2000. |
Friendly Robotics “Friendly Robotics—Friendly Vac, Robotic Vacuum Cleaner”, www.friendlyrobotics.com/vac.htm. 5 pages Apr. 20, 2005. |
Fuentes, et al. “Mobile Robotics 1994”, University of Rochester. Computer Science Department, TR 588, 44 pages, Dec. 7, 1994. |
Bison, P et al., “Using a structured beacon for cooperative position estimation” Robotics and Autonomous Systems vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 33-40, Oct. 1999. |
Fukuda, et al. “Navigation System based on Ceiling Landmark Recognition for Autonomous mobile robot”, 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 95. ‘Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots’, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 1466/1471, Aug. 5-9, 1995. |
Gionis “A hand-held optical surface scanner for environmental Modeling and Virtual Reality”, Virtual Reality World, 16 pages 1996. |
Goncalves et al. “A Visual Front-End for Simultaneous Localization and Mapping”, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 44-49, Apr. 2005. |
Hamamatsu “SI PIN Diode S5980, S5981 S5870—Multi-element photodiodes for surface mounting”, Hamatsu Photonics, 2 pages Apr. 2004. |
Hammacher Schlemmer “Electrolux Trilobite Robotic Vacuum” www.hammacher.com/publish/71579.asp?promo=xsells, 3 pages, Mar. 18, 2005. |
Haralick et al. “Pose Estimation from Corresponding Point Data”, IEEE Transactions on systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 19, No. 6, pp. 1426-1446, Nov. 1989. |
Hausler “About the Scaling Behaviour of Optical Range Sensors”, Fringe '97, Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Automatic Processing of Fringe Patterns, Bremen, Germany, pp. 147-155, Sep. 15-17, 1997. |
Blaasvaer, et al. “AMOR—An Autonomous Mobile Robot Navigation System”, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pp. 2266-2271, 1994. |
Hoag, et al. “Navigation and Guidance in interstellar space”, ACTA Astronautica vol. 2, pp. 513-533 , Feb. 14, 1975. |
Huntsberger et al. “CAMPOUT: A Control Architecture for Tightly Coupled Coordination of Multirobot Systems for Planetary Surface Exploration”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part A: Systems and Humans, vol. 33, No. 5, pp. 550-559, Sep. 2003. |
Iirobotics.com “Samsung Unveils Its Multifunction Robot Vacuum”, www.iirobotics.com/webpages/hotstuff.php?ubre=111, 3 pages, Mar. 18, 2005. |
Jarosiewicz et al., “Final Report—Lucid,” University of Florida, Departmetn of Electrical and Computer Engineering, EEL 5666—Intelligent Machine Design Laboratory, 50 pages, Aug. 1999. |
Jensfelt et al., “Active Global Localization for a mobile robot using multiple hypothesis tracking,” IEEE Transactions on Robots and Automation, 17(5): 748-760, Oct. 2001. |
Kahney, “Robot Vacs are in the House,” Retrieved from the Internet: URL<www.wired.com/news/technology/o,1282,59237,00.html>. 6 pages, Jun. 2003. |
Karcher, “Product Manual Download Karch”, available at www.karcher.com, 16 pages, 2004. |
Karcher “Karcher RoboCleaner RC 3000,” Retrieved from the Internet: URL<www.robocleaner.de/english/screen3.html>. 4 pages, Dec. 2003. |
Karcher USA “RC 3000 Robotics cleaner,” : Retrieved from the Internet: URL<www.karcher-usa.com, 3 pages, Mar. 2005. |
Karlsson et al, “Core Technologies for service Robotics,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2004), vol. 3, pp. 2979-2984, Sep. 2004. |
Karlsson et al., The vSLAM Algorithm for Robust Localization and Mapping, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 24-29, Apr. 2005. |
Kleinberg, The Localization Problem for Mobile Robots, Laboratory for Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1994 IEEE, pp. 521-531, 1994. |
Knights, et al., “Localization and Identification of Visual Landmarks,” Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 16(4):312-313, May 2001. |
Kolodko et al., “Experimental System for Real-Time Motion Estimation,” Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM 2003), pp. 981-986, 2003. |
Komoriya et al., “Planning of Landmark Measurement for the Navigation of a Mobile Robot,” Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE/RSJ International Cofnerence on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Raleigh, NC pp. 1476-1481, Jul. 1992. |
Krotov et al., “Digital Sextant,” Downloaded from the internet at: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/˜epk/ , 1 page, 1995. |
Krupa et al., “Autonomous 3-D Positioning of Surgical Instruments in Robotized Laparoscopic Surgery Using Visual Servoin,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 19(5):842-853, Oct. 2003. |
Kuhl et al., “Self Localization in Environments using Visual Angles,” VRCAI '04 Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGGRAPH international conference on Virtual Reality continuum and its applications in industry, pp. 472-475, 2004. |
Kurth, “Range-Only Robot Localization and Slam with Radio”, http://www.ri.cmu.edu/pub—files/pub4/kurth—derek—2004—1/kurth—derek—2004—1.pdf. 60 pages, May 2004, accessed Jul. 27, 2012. |
Lambrinos et al., “A mobile robot employing insect strategies for navigation,” Retrieved from the Internat: URL<http://www8.cs.umu.se/kurser/TDBD17/VT04/dl/Assignment%20Papers/lambrinos-RAS-2000.pdf>. 38 pages, Feb. 1999. |
Lang et al., “Visual Measurement of Orientation Using Ceiling Features”, 1994 IEEE, pp. 552-555, 1994. |
Lapin, “Adaptive position estimation for an automated guided vehicle,” SPIE, vol. 1831 Mobile Robots VII, pp. 82-94, 1992. |
LaValle et al., “Robot Motion Planning in a Changing, Partially Predictable Environment,” 1994 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control, Columbus, OH, pp. 261-266, Aug. 1994. |
Lee et al., “Development of Indoor Navigation system for Humanoid Robot Using Multi-sensors Integration”, ION NTM, San Diego, CA pp. 798-805, Jan. 2007. |
Lee et al., “Localization of a Mobile Robot Using the Image of a Moving Object,” IEEE Transaction on Industrial Electronics, 50(3):612-619, Jun. 2003. |
Leonard et al., “Mobile Robot Localization by tracking Geometric Beacons,” IEEE Transaction on Robotics and Automation, 7(3):376-382, Jun. 1991. |
Li et al., “Making a Local Map of Indoor Environments by Swiveling a Camera and a Sonar,” Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 954-959, 1999. |
Lin et al., “Mobile Robot Navigation Using Artificial Landmarks,” Journal of robotics System, 14(2): 93-106, 1997. |
Linde, Dissertation—“On Aspects of Indoor Localization,” Available at: https://eldorado.tu-dortmund.de/handle/2003/22854, University of Dortmund, 138 pages, Aug. 2006. |
Lumelsky et al., “An Algorithm for Maze Searching with Azimuth Input”, 1994 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Diego, CA vol. 1, pp. 111-116, 1994. |
Luo et al., “Real-time Area-Covering Operations with Obstacle Avoidance for Cleaning Robots,” IEEE, pp. 2359-2364, 2002. |
Ma, Thesis—“Documentation On Northstar,” California Institute of Technology, 14 pages, May 2006. |
Madsen et al., “Optimal landmark selection for triangulation of robot position,” Journal of Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 13 pp. 277-292, 1998. |
Matsutek Enterprises Co. Ltd, “Automatic Rechargeable Vacuum Cleaner,” http://matsutek.manufacturer.globalsources.com/si/6008801427181/pdtl/Home-vacuum/10 . . . , Apr. 2007, 3 pages. |
McGillem et al., “Infra-red Lacation System for Navigation and Autonomous Vehicles,” 1988 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 2, pp. 1236-1238, Apr. 1988. |
McGillem,et al. “A Beacon Navigation Method for Autonomous Vehicles,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 38(3):132-139, Aug. 1989. |
Miro et al., “Towards Vision Based Navigation in Large Indoor Environments,” Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing, China, pp. 2096-2102, Oct. 2006. |
MobileMag, “Samsung Unveils High-tech Robot Vacuum Cleaner,” Retrieved from the Internet: URL<http://www.mobilemag.com/content/100/102/C2261/>. 4 pages, Mar. 2005. |
Monteiro et al., “Visual Servoing for Fast Mobile Robot: Adaptive Estimation of Kinematic Parameters,” Proceedings of the IECON '93., International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Maui, HI, pp. 1588-1593, Nov. 1993. |
Moore et al., “A simple Map-bases Localization strategy using range measurements,” SPIE, vol. 5804 pp. 612-620, 2005. |
Munich et al., “ERSP: A Software Platform and Architecture for the Service Robotics Industry,” Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2005. (IROS 2005), pp. 460-467, Aug. 2005. |
Munich et al., “SIFT-ing Through Features with ViPR”, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, pp. 72-77, Sep. 2006. |
Nam et al., “Real-Time Dynamic Visual Tracking Using PSD Sensors and extended Trapezoidal Motion Planning”, Applied Intelligence 10, pp. 53-70, 1999. |
Nitu et al., “Optomechatronic System for Position Detection of a Mobile Mini-Robot,” IEEE Ttransactions on Industrial Electronics, 52(4):969-973, Aug. 2005. |
On Robo, “Robot Reviews Samsung Robot Vacuum (VC-RP30W),” Retrieved from the Internet: URL <www.onrobo.com/reviews/AT—Home/vacuum—cleaners/on00vcrb30rosam/index.htm>. 2 pages, 2005. |
InMach “Intelligent Machines,” Retrieved from the Internet: URL<www.inmach.de/inside.html>. 1 page , Nov. 2008. |
Innovation First, “2004 EDU Robot Controller Reference Guide,” Retrieved from the Internet: URL<http://www.ifirobotics.com>. 13 pages, Mar. 2004. |
Pages et al., “A camera-projector system for robot positioning by visual serving,” Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop (CVPRW06), 8 pages, Jun. 2006. |
Pages et al., “Optimizing Plane-to-Plane Positioning Tasks by Image-Based Visual Servoing and Structured Light,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 22(5):1000-1010, Oct. 2006. |
Pages et al., “Robust decoupled visual servoing based on structured light,” 2005 IEEE/RSJ, Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 2676-2681, 2005. |
Park et al., “A Neural Network Based Real-Time Robot Tracking Controller Using Position Sensitive Detectors,” IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence., 1994 IEEE International Conference on Neutral Networks, Orlando, Florida pp. 2754-2758, Jun./Jul. 1994. |
Park et al., “Dynamic Visual Servo Control of Robot Manipulators using Neutral Networks,” The Korean Institute Telematics and Electronics, 29-B(10):771-779, Oct. 1992. |
Paromtchik et al., “Optical Guidance System for Multiple mobile Robots,” Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 3, pp. 2935-2940, May 2001. |
Penna et al., “Models for Map Building and Navigation”, IEEE Transactions on Systems. Man. And Cybernetics., 23(5):1276-1301, Sep./Oct. 1993. |
Pirjanian et al. “Representation and Execution of Plan Sequences for Multi-Agent Systems,” Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Maui, Hawaii, pp. 2117-2123, Oct. 2001. |
Pirjanian et al., “A decision-theoretic approach to fuzzy behavior coordination”, 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation, 1999. CIRA '99., Monterey, CA, pp. 101-106, Nov. 1999. |
Pirjanian et al., “Distributed Control for a Modular, Reconfigurable Cliff Robot,” Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Washington, D.C. pp. 4083-4088, May 2002. |
Pirjanian et al., “Improving Task Reliability by Fusion of Redundant Homogeneous Modules Using Voting Schemes,” Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Albuquerque, NM, pp. 425-430, Apr. 1997. |
Pirjanian et al., “Multi-Robot Target Acquisition using Multiple Objective Behavior Coordination,” Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, San Francisco, CA, pp. 2696-2702, Apr. 2000. |
Pirjanian, “Challenges for Standards for consumer Robotics,” IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social impacts, pp. 260-264, Jun. 2005. |
Pirjanian, “Reliable Reaction,” Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE/SICE/RSJ International Conference on Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems, pp. 158-165, 1996. |
Prassler et al., “A Short History of Cleaning Robots,” Autonomous Robots 9, 211-226, 2000, 16 pages. |
Remazeilles et al., “Image based robot navigation in 3D environments,” Proc. of SPIE, vol. 6052, pp. 1-14, Dec. 2005. |
Rives et al., “Visual servoing based on ellipse features,” SPIE, vol. 2056 Intelligent Robots and Computer Vision pp. 356-367, 1993. |
Robotics World, “A Clean Sweep,” 5 pages, Jan. 2001. |
Ronnback, “On Methods for Assistive Mobile Robots,” Retrieved from the Internet: URL<http://www.openthesis.org/documents/methods-assistive-mobile-robots-595019.html>. 218 pages, Jan. 2006. |
Roth-Tabak et al., “Environment Model for mobile Robots Indoor Navigation,” SPIE, vol. 1388 Mobile Robots, pp. 453-463, 1990. |
Malik et al., “Virtual Prototyping for Conceptual Design of a Tracked Mobile Robot,” Electrical and Computer Engineering, Canadian Conference on, IEEE, PI. pp. 2349-2352, May 2006. |
Sahin et al., “Development of a Visual Object Localization Module for Mobile Robots,” 1999 Third European Workshop on Advanced Mobile Robots, (Eurobot '99), pp. 65-72, 1999. |
Salomon et al., “Low-Cost Optical Indoor Localization system for Mobile Objects without Image Processing,” IEEE Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, 2006. (ETFA '06), pp. 629-632, Sep. 2006. |
Sato, “Range Imaging Based on Moving Pattern Light and Spatio-Temporal Matched Filter,” Proceedings International Conference on Image Processing, vol. 1., Lausanne, Switzerland, pp. 33-36, Sep. 1996. |
Schenker et al., “Lightweight rovers for Mars science exploration and sample return,” Intelligent Robots and Computer Vision XVI, SPIE Proc. 3208, pp. 24-36, 1997. |
Shimoga et al., “Touch and Force Reflection for Telepresence Surgery,” Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1994. Engineering Advances: New Opportunities for Biomedical Engineers. Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, Baltimore, MD, pp. 1049-1050, 1994. |
Sim et al, “Learning Visual Landmarks for Pose Estimation,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 3, Detroit, MI, pp. 1972-1978, May 1999. |
Sobh et al., “Case Studies in Web-Controlled Devices and Remote Manipulation,” Automation Congress, 2002 Proceedings of the 5th Biannual World, pp. 435-440, Dec. 2002. |
Special Reports, “Vacuum Cleaner Robot Operated in Conjunction with 3G Celluar Phone,” 59(9): 3 pages, 2004, Retrieved from the Internet: URL<http://www.toshiba.co.jp/tech/review/2004/09/59—0>. |
Stella et al., “Self-Location for Indoor Navigation of Autonomous Vehicles,” Part of the SPIE conference on Enhanced and Synthetic Vision SPIE vol. 3364, pp. 298-302, 1998. |
Summet, “Tracking Locations of Moving Hand-held Displays Using Projected Light,” Pervasive 2005, LNCS 3468, pp. 37-46, 2005. |
Svedman et al., “Structure from Stereo Vision using Unsynchronized Cameras for Simultaneous Localization and Mapping,” 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 2993-2998, 2005. |
Takio et al., “Real-Time Position and Pose Tracking Method of Moving Object Using Visual Servo System,” 47th IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, pp. 167-170, 2004. |
Teller, “Pervasive pose awareness for people, Objects and Robots,” http://www.ai.mit.edu/lab/dangerous-ideas/Spring2003/teller-pose.pdf, 6 pages, Apr. 2003. |
Terada et al., “An Acquisition of the Relation between Vision and Action using Self-Organizing Map and Reinforcement Learning,” 1998 Second International Conference on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Electronic Systems, Adelaide, Australia, pp. 429-434, Apr. 1998. |
The Sharper Image, eVac Robotic Vacuum—Product Details, www.sharperiamge.com/us/en/templates/products/pipmoreworklprintable.jhtml, 1 page, Mar. 2005. |
TheRobotStore.com, “Friendly Robotics Robotic Vacuum RV400—The Robot Store,” www.therobotstore.com/s.nl/sc.9/category.-109/it.A/id.43/.f, 1 page, Apr. 2005. |
TotalVac.com, RC3000 RoboCleaner website, Mar. 2005, 3 pages. |
Trebi-Ollennu et al., “Mars Rover Pair Cooperatively Transporting a Long Payload,” Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Washington, D.C. pp. 3136-3141, May 2002. |
Tribelhorn et al., “Evaluating the Roomba: A low-cost, ubiquitous platform for robotics research and education,” IEEE, pp. 1393-1399, 2007. |
Tse et al., “Design of a Navigation System for a Household Mobile Robot Using Neural Networks,” Department of Manufacturing Engg. & Engg. Management, City University of Hong Kong, pp. 2151-2156, 1998. |
UAMA (Asia) Industrial Co., Ltd., “RobotFamily,” 2005, 1 page. |
UBOT, cleaning robot capable of wiping with a wet duster, Retrieved from the Internet: URL<http://us.aving.net/news/view.php?articleId=23031>. 4 pages, accessed Nov. 2011. |
Watanabe et al., “Position Estimation of Mobile Robots With Internal and External Sensors Using Uncertainty Evolution Technique,” 1990 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Cincinnati, OH, pp. 2011-2016, May 1990. |
Watts, “Robot, boldly goes where no man can,” The Times—pp. 20, Jan. 1985. |
Wijk et al., “Triangulation-Based Fusion of Sonar Data with Application in Robot Pose Tracking,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 16(6):740-752, Dec. 2000. |
Andersen et al., “Landmark based navigation strategies”, SPIE Conference on Mobile Robots XIII, SPIE vol. 3525, pp. 170-181, Jan. 8, 1999. |
Ascii, Mar. 25, 2002, http://ascii.jp/elem/000/000/330/330024/ accessed Nov. 1, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/605,066 as provided to WIPO in PCT/US2005/030422, corresponding to U.S. National Stage Entry Application No. 11/574,290, U.S. publication 2008/0184518, filed Aug. 27, 2004. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/605,181 as provided to WIPO in PCT/US2005/030422, corresponding to U.S. National Stage Entry Application No. 11/574,290, U.S. publication 2008/0184518, filed Aug. 27, 2004. |
Derek Kurth, “Range-Only Robot Localization and SLAM with Radio”, http://www.ri.cmu.edu/pub—files/pub4/kurth—derek—2004—1/kurth—derek—2004—1.pdf. 60 pages, May 2004, accessed Jul. 27, 2012. |
Electrolux Trilobite, Jan. 12, 2001, http://www.electrolux-ui.com:8080/2002%5C822%5C833102EN.pdf, accessed Jul. 2, 2012, 10 pages. |
Florbot GE Plastics, 1989-1990, 2 pages, available at http://www.fuseid.com/, accessed Sep. 27, 2012. |
Gregg et al., “Autonomous Lawn Care Applications,” 2006 Florida Conference on Recent Advances in Robotics, Miami, Florida, May 25-26, 2006, Florida International University, 5 pages. |
Hitachi ‘Feature’, http://kadenfan.hitachi.co.jp/robot/feature/feature.html, 1 page, Nov. 19, 2008. |
Hitachi, http://www.hitachi.co.jp/New/cnews/hi—030529—hi—030529.pdf , 8 pages, May 29, 2003. |
Home Robot—UBOT; Microbotusa.com, retrieved from the WWW at www.microrobotusa.com, accessed Dec. 2, 2008. |
King and Weiman, “Helpmate™ Autonomous Mobile Robots Navigation Systems,” SPIE vol. 1388 Mobile Robots, pp. 190-198 (1990). |
Li, Z.; Trappe, W.; Zhang, Y.; Badri Nath; , “Robust statistical methods for securing wireless localization in sensor networks,” Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2005. IPSN 2005. Fourth International Symposium on , vol., no., pp. 91-98, Apr. 15, 2005. |
Yuri V. Martishevcky, “Accuracy of point light target coordinate determination by dissectoral tracking system”, Proc. SPIE 2591, 25 (1995) (Oct. 23, 1995). |
Maschinemarkt Würzburg 105, Nr. 27, pp. 3, 30, Jul. 5, 1999. |
Miwako Doi “Using the symbiosis of human and robots from approaching Research and Development Center,” Toshiba Corporation, 16 pages, available at http://warp.ndl.go.jp/info:ndljp/pid/258151/www.soumu.go.jp/joho—tsusin/policyreports/chousa/netrobot/pdf/030214—1—33—a.pdf, Feb. 26, 2003. |
Paromtchik “Toward Optical Guidance of Mobile Robots,” Proceedings of the Fourth World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybermetics and Informatics, Orlando, FL, USA, Jul. 23, 2000, vol. IX, pp. 44-49, available at http://emotion.inrialpes.fr/˜paromt/infos/papers/paromtchik:asama:sci:2000.ps.gz, accessed Jul. 3, 2012. |
Roboking—not just a vacuum cleaner, a robot!, Jan. 21, 2004, infocom.uz/2004/01/21/robokingne-prosto-pyilesos-a-robot/, accessed Oct. 10, 2011, 7 pages. |
Sebastian Thrun, “Learning Occupancy Grid Maps With Forward Sensor Models,” Autonomous Robots 15, 111-127, Sep. 1, 2003. |
SVET Computers—New Technologies—Robot Vacuum Cleaner, Oct. 1999, available at http://www.sk.rs/1999/10/sknt01.html, accessed Nov. 1, 2011. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2004/001504, Aug. 20, 2012, 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130117952 A1 | May 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60938699 | May 2007 | US | |
60917065 | May 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13245118 | Sep 2011 | US |
Child | 13719784 | US | |
Parent | 12118117 | May 2008 | US |
Child | 13245118 | US |