Compliance monitoring module for an inhaler

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11944425
  • Patent Number
    11,944,425
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, January 14, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 2, 2024
    7 months ago
Abstract
A compliance monitoring module for an inhaler comprising: a miniature pressure sensor, a sensor port of said sensor being configured to be pneumatically coupled to a flow channel of said inhaler through which a user can inhale; a processor configured to: receive data from a sensing element of the pressure sensor; receive data from a mode sensor configured to detect when the inhaler changes from an inactive mode to an active mode; and based on said data from said pressure sensor sensing element and said data from said mode sensor, compile a compliance report; and a transmitter configured to issue said compliance report.
Description

The present disclosure generally relates to monitoring of patient compliance to medicament administration via an inhaler. More particularly, the disclosure relates to the use of a miniature pressure sensor for compliance monitoring in an inhaler.


Inhalers or puffers are used for delivering medication into the body via the lungs. They can be used, for example, in the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Types of inhalers include metered dose inhalers (MDIs), nebulisers and dry powder inhalers (DPIs).


MDIs comprise three major components: a canister, which is normally aluminium or stainless steel, where the drug formulation resides; a metering valve, which allows a metered quantity of the formulation to be dispensed with each actuation; and an actuator (or mouthpiece) which allows the patient to operate the device and directs aerosolised drug into the patient's lungs. The formulation itself is made up of the drug, a liquefied gas propellant and, in many cases, stabilising excipients. The actuator contains a mating discharge nozzle and generally includes a dust cap to prevent contamination. To use the inhaler the patient presses down on the top of the canister, with their thumb supporting the lower portion of the actuator. Actuation of the device releases a single metered dose of the formulation which contains the medication either dissolved or suspended in the propellant. Breakup of the volatile propellant into droplets, followed by rapid evaporation of these droplets, results in the generation of an aerosol consisting of micrometre-sized medication particles that are then inhaled.


Jet nebulisers, also known as atomisers, are connected by tubing to a compressor that causes compressed air or oxygen to flow at high velocity through a liquid medicine to turn it into an aerosol, which is then inhaled by the patient. Jet nebulisers are commonly used for patients in hospitals who have difficulty using other inhalers, such as in serious cases of respiratory disease, or severe asthma attacks.


DPIs deliver medication to the lungs in the form of a dry powder. DPIs are commonly used to treat respiratory diseases such as asthma, bronchitis, emphysema and COPD. DPIs may require some procedure to allow a measured dose of powder to be ready for the patient to take. The medication is commonly held either in a capsule for manual loading or in a hopper/reservoir inside the inhaler. Once loaded or actuated, the patient puts the mouthpiece of the inhaler into their mouth and takes a deep inhalation, holding their breath for 5 to 10 seconds.


A common problem faced in respiratory drug delivery, regardless of the device used, is how to monitor patient adherence and compliance.


Adherence deals with the patient following the prescription label, for example taking the prescribed number of doses per day. If the prescription calls for two doses each day, and the patient is taking two doses a day, they are considered 100% adherent. If the patient is only taking one dose a day, they are only 50% adherent. In the latter case, the patient is not getting the treatment prescribed by their doctor.


Compliance, on the other hand, relates to how the patient uses their drug delivery device. If used in the manner recommended for effective treatment, they are 100% compliant. If not used properly however, they are less than 100% compliant.


As one example, consider a patient prescribed a pMDI. Many such devices require the drug canister to be shaken prior to use, in order that the drug and propellant be properly mixed within the canister. This overcomes the so called “creaming effect” that occurs between uses, the phenomenon whereby medication separates from the propellant and floats to the top (i.e. creams).


Without shaking, the patient may receive less than a recommended dose of medicament. Another issue with pMDI devices is the coordinated hand/breath maneuver required to ensure medicament is actually delivered to the lungs. Said requirement involves 1) inhaling and then, while continuing to inhale, 2) dispensing the medicament by pressing down on the canister, followed by 3) continued inhalation, and finally 4) holding of one's breath for a brief period of time. This last step is important for ‘sedimentation’ of drug to occur within the lungs. The flow rate during inhalation may need to exceed some minimum threshold value for the drug to be delivered effectively. For many patients, compliance to such a multi-step process is not easy, either because they are not familiar with the procedure or, e.g. in the case of children and the elderly, find it difficult to perform.


As another example, most DPIs rely on the force of patient inhalation to entrain powder from the device and subsequently break-up the powder into particles that are small enough to reach the lungs. For this reason, insufficient patient inhalation flow rates may lead to reduced dose delivery and incomplete de-aggregation of the powder, leading to unsatisfactory treatment outcomes. In addition, if a user exhales into the device, some of the dose may be lost to the surrounding air. This both reduces the dose delivered to the patient such that they are not fully compliant, and can pose a risk to others in the vicinity by exposing them to a drug they have not been prescribed.


When a doctor prescribes a medication, the efficacy of that treatment is totally dependent on the patient using their device properly and the proper number of times each day. If they fall to do so, the patient is likely to experience no improvement in their condition. Absent any means of verifying patient adherence/compliance, yet faced with a patient for whom no improvement can be seen, the doctor may have no choice but to prescribe a stronger dose or even a stronger medication. In some cases, this may put the patient at risk. This could be avoided if the doctor had some way of confirming that the patient was actually getting the medication prescribed.


The approach followed by some pharmaceutical companies has been to add integral dose counters to their drug delivery products. For example, a dose counter may be triggered by the press of an actuation button or the opening of a cap or cover. While this provides patients, and caregivers, objective evidence that a device has been handled, it still fails to provide any kind of compliance information. There is no means of determining whether the user has inhaled the entire dose. As such, there is a need for a product that provides not only adherence information, but compliance information as well.


A spirometer is an apparatus for measuring the volume of air inspired and expired by a patient's lungs. Spirometers measure ventilation, the movement of air into and out of the lungs. From the traces, known as spirograms, output by spirometers, it is possible to identify abnormal (obstructive or restrictive) ventilation patterns. Existing spirometers use a variety of different measurement methods including pressure transducers, ultrasonic and water gauge.


In order to monitor the flows associated with breathing, a pressure sensor is most convenient because pressure information can be used to determine flow, which can then be used to determine volume.


Pressure sensors used for breath detection generally measure the pressure difference across a section of the patient airway. This is commonly done using two connections, by tubing or other suitable conduits, to connect the sensor to the airway. It is also possible to use a single connection to the airway, with the other port open to the atmosphere. A single port gauge type sensor can also be used if the pressure within the airway is measured both before and after flow is applied, the difference in readings representing the desired pressure drops across the air path resistance. However, the uncertainty associated with the first (no flow) reading is generally high.


Another problem with conventional pressure sensors is thermal drift; the phenomenon by which the pressure reading can change over time with changes in local temperature. It is possible to compensate for such drift using additional circuitry, but this adds cost and volume and increases power requirements. Such circuitry can be located within the pressure sensor itself, but considering that the sensor is generally somewhat removed from the gas being measured, the temperature detected may not be representative of that gas. The temperature monitoring circuitry could be located at the patient, but this adds additional components, plus cost and complexity.


Yet another problem with conventional pressure sensors is susceptibility to high radio frequency (RF) exposure. This can be a real issue when operating in close proximity to a radio transmitter, such as a mobile phone. Other potential sources include wireless communications devices, such as WI-FI routers and cordless phones, and various other forms of information technology (IT) equipment such as wirelessly networked printers.


Another issue with some conventional pressure sensors is hysteresis, the reluctance of a pressure sensing material such as a diaphragm to return to its original form, shape or position after being deformed. This is observed as a difference in output when passing through the same pressure from different directions (either from above or below the target pressure). When dealing with very low pressure changes, such an offset can be large enough to mask the signal being measured.


There are described herein new means of compliance monitoring.


According to a first aspect, there is provided a compliance monitoring module for an inhaler comprising: a miniature pressure sensor, a sensor port of said sensor being configured to be pneumatically coupled to a flow channel of said inhaler through which a user can inhale; a processor configured to: receive data from a sensing element of the pressure sensor; receive data from a mode sensor configured to detect when the inhaler changes from an inactive mode to an active mode; and based on said data from said pressure sensor sensing element and said data from said mode sensor, compile a compliance report; and a transmitter configured to issue said compliance report.


The miniature pressure sensor could be a microelectromechanical system (MEMS) pressure sensor or a nanoelectromechanical system (NEMS) pressure sensor.


Said mode sensor could be an orientation sensor. Said mode sensor could be a means of determining that the inhaler has been primed for use. Said mode sensor could be one of: an accelerometer, a gyroscope, a mechanical switch, an optical sensor, a Hall effect sensor, a microphone, a temperature sensor and a further pressure sensor.


Where the mode sensor is an accelerometer or a gyroscope, said processor could be further configured to determine an orientation of said inhaler using said accelerometer or gyroscope.


Where the mode sensor is an accelerometer and the inhaler is a jet nebuliser, said processor could be further configured to determine that a compressor of the inhaler has activated based on data received from said accelerometer. Alternatively, where the mode sensor is a further pressure sensor, said processor could be further configured to determine that a compressor of the inhaler has activated based on data received from said further pressure sensor.


Where the mode sensor is an accelerometer and the inhaler is a dry powder inhaler (DPI) configured to receive dry powder medicament stored in capsules, said processor could be further configured to determine that a capsule has been opened and/or vibrated/rotated within a chamber based on data received from said accelerometer.


The compliance monitoring module could be configured to be located entirely within the inhaler in use.


Alternatively, the compliance monitoring module could be configured to be located at least partially external to the inhaler in use.


The compliance monitoring module could further comprise a capillary tube configured for pneumatically coupling said sensor port to said flow channel.


Said capillary tube could comprise a seal between the sensor port and the flow channel, said seal being configured to transfer pressure from the flow channel to the sensor port.


The inhaler could be a pressurised metred dose inhaler (pMDI).


Said flow channel could be a gap between an inhaler boot and a gas canister at least partially received therein.


The compliance monitoring module could be configured to be mounted on a vertical outside edge of the inhaler that is uppermost in use.


The compliance monitoring module could further comprise a lip for clipping the module to the inhaler, configured such that said pneumatic coupling is via a gap between said lip and an interior surface of an outermost wall of said inhaler boot.


The inhaler could be a jet nebuliser.


The compliance monitoring module could be configured to be mounted on an exterior surface of the inhaler that faces substantially away from a patient in use.


The compliance monitoring module could comprise a user interface for indicating that dosing is complete.


The processor could be further configured to determine, from said data from said pressure sensor sensing element, a level of liquid medicament remaining in the nebuliser.


The inhaler could be a dry powder inhaler (DPI).


Said DPI could be configured to receive dry powder medicament stored in capsules.


Said processor could be further configured to determine from said data received from the miniature pressure sensor whether one or more predetermined requirements for successful dosing are met. Said one or more requirements could comprise one or more of: flow rate exceeding a predetermined threshold value; inhalation duration exceeding a predetermined threshold value; flow rate exceeding a predetermined threshold value for at least a predetermined threshold duration; total volume inhaled exceeding a predetermined threshold value; and peak inspired flow (PIF) exceeding a predetermined threshold value.


The module could be configured for use with an inhaler comprising means for user-actuated priming of a dosing mechanism.


Said transmitter could be wireless.


Any two or more of the pressure sensor, processor and transmitter could be comprised in a single integrated circuit or System on Chip (SoC).


The module could further comprise said flow channel, the pressure sensor being located inside the flow channel, the pressure sensor optionally being located in a recess in an internal wall of the flow channel.


The module could further comprise said flow channel, the pressure sensor being located external to the flow channel and said sensor port being pneumatically coupled to the flow channel via an opening in a wall of the flow channel.


The module could further comprise a seal arranged to pneumatically couple the sensor port to said opening, at least a part of said seal optionally being sandwiched between the pressure sensor and the wall, at least a part of said seal optionally extending from an exterior surface of said wall to a surface on which the pressure sensor is mounted so as to encapsulate the pressure sensor in a pneumatic chamber adjacent the wall.


Said wall and said seal could be formed by a two-shot moulding process.


The module could further comprise a thermally conductive gasket sandwiched between the pressure sensor and the wall, said thermally conductive gasket optionally acting as the seal.


The module could further comprise an air-permeable, water-impermeable filter separating said sensor port from said flow channel.


The pressure sensor could comprise a metal housing.


The pressure sensor could be a MEMS barometric pressure sensor. The sensor could be a piezo-resistive or capacitive MEMS pressure sensor.


Said processor could be comprised in the pressure sensor.


The module could further comprise a data buffer configured to store data received from a sensing element of the pressure sensor. Said data buffer could optionally be comprised in the pressure sensor. Said data buffer could be configured to store data corresponding to one inhalation/exhalation waveform. Said data buffer could be a first in, first out (FIFO) data buffer.


The module could further comprise an additional MEMS barometric pressure sensor configured for monitoring environmental barometric activity.


The transmitter could be comprised in a transceiver configured to communicate data from and/or to the pressure sensor. The transmitter could be wireless. Said wireless transmitter could be a Bluetooth™ subsystem, optionally a Bluetooth™ Low Energy (BLE) integrated circuit or System on Chip (SoC).


The pressure sensor and/or the transmitter could be mounted on a printed circuit board (PCB).


The module could further comprise a battery, optionally a coin cell, arranged to power the pressure sensor.


The pressure sensor could have a sensitivity of 20 Pascals or less.


The pressure sensor could comprise a sensing element. The processor could be configured to poll said sensing element at a frequency of greater than or equal to 100 Hz.


The module could further comprise control means for switching on the pressure sensor and/or waking the pressure sensor from a low power state.


Said control means could be a mechanical switch, an optical sensor, an accelerometer or a Hall effect sensor.


The processor could be configured to respond to said control means switching on and/or waking up the pressure sensor by taking a tare reading from said sensing element and calibrating data received from the sensing element subsequently using said tare reading.


The processor could be configured to determine a dynamic zero from a moving average of measurements by the pressure sensor, and dynamically calibrate the pressure sensor according to said dynamic zero.


The processor could be configured to filter out electrical noise inherent to the pressure sensor and/or environmental anomalies in data received from a sensing element of the pressure sensor.


The module could further comprise a temperature sensor, optionally integral with the pressure sensor. The processor, optionally comprised in one of the pressure and temperature sensors, could be configured to apply temperature compensation determined from data received from a sensing element of the temperature sensor to data received from a sensing element of the pressure sensor.


The inhaler could further comprise a mouthpiece, said sensor port being pneumatically coupled to a flow channel in pneumatic communication with said mouthpiece.


According to a second aspect there is provided an inhaler accessory comprising the module of the first aspect, configured to be connected to an inhaler such that said sensor port is pneumatically coupled to a flow channel in pneumatic communication with a mouthpiece of said inhaler.


According to a third aspect there is provided an inhaler comprising the compliance monitoring module of the first aspect.


According to a fourth aspect there is provided a method for monitoring compliance of use of an inhaler comprising: receiving data from a mode sensor configured to detect when the inhaler changes from an inactive mode to an active mode; receiving data from a sensing element of a miniature pressure sensor, a sensor port of said sensor being configured to be pneumatically coupled to a flow channel of said inhaler through which a user can inhale; based on said data from said pressure sensor sensing element and said data from said mode sensor, compiling a compliance report; and issuing said compliance report.


The miniature pressure sensor could be a microelectromechanical system (MEMS) pressure sensor or a nanoelectromechanical system (NEMS) pressure sensor. The pressure sensor could be a MEMS barometric pressure sensor. The sensor could be a piezo-resistive or capacitive MEMS pressure sensor.


If the inhaler is a jet nebuliser, said method could further comprise determining, from said data from said pressure sensor sensing element, a level of liquid medicament remaining in the inhaler.


If the mode sensor is an accelerometer or a gyroscope, said method could further comprise determining an orientation of said inhaler using said accelerometer or gyroscope.


If the mode sensor is an accelerometer or a further pressure sensor and the inhaler is a jet nebuliser, said method could further comprise determining that a compressor of the inhaler has activated using said accelerometer or further pressure sensor.


If the mode sensor is an accelerometer and the inhaler is a dry powder inhaler (DPI) configured to receive dry powder medicament stored in capsules, said method could further comprise determining that a capsule has been opened and/or vibrated/rotated within a chamber using said accelerometer.


Said mode sensor could be an orientation sensor. Said mode sensor could be a means of determining that the inhaler has been primed for use. Said mode sensor could be one of: an accelerometer, a gyroscope, a mechanical switch, an optical sensor, a Hall effect sensor, a microphone, and a temperature sensor.


The method could be performed entirely by the inhaler.


Alternatively, the method could be performed at least partially by apparatus external to the inhaler.


There could be a capillary tube configured for pneumatically coupling said sensor port to said flow channel.


Said capillary tube could comprise a seal between the sensor port and the flow channel, said seal being configured to transfer pressure from the flow channel to the sensor port.


The inhaler could be a pressurised metered dose inhaler (pMDI).


Said flow channel could be a gap between an inhaler boot and a gas canister at least partially received therein.


The method could be performed by a module mounted on a vertical outside edge of the inhaler that is uppermost in use. Said module could further comprise a lip for clipping the module to the inhaler, configured such that said pneumatic coupling is via a gap between said lip and an interior surface of an outermost wall of said inhaler boot.


The inhaler could be a jet nebuliser.


The method could be performed by a module mounted on an exterior surface of the inhaler that faces substantially away from a patient in use.


The method could further comprise indicating, via a user interface, that dosing is complete.


The method could further comprise determining, from said data from said pressure sensor sensing element, a level of liquid medicament remaining in the inhaler.


The inhaler could be a dry powder inhaler (DPI).


Said DPI could be configured to receive dry powder medicament stored in capsules.


Said method could further comprise determining from said data received from said pressure sensor whether one or more predetermined requirements for successful dosing are met. Said one or more requirements could comprise one or more of: flow rate exceeding a predetermined threshold value; inhalation duration exceeding a predetermined threshold value; flow rate exceeding a predetermined threshold value for at least a predetermined threshold duration; total volume inhaled exceeding a predetermined threshold value; and peak inspired flow (PIF) exceeding a predetermined threshold value.


The inhaler could comprise means for user-actuated priming of a dosing mechanism.


Said issuing could be by means of wireless transmission.


Any two or more of the pressure sensor, a processor and a transmitter for performing the method could be comprised in a single integrated circuit or System on Chip (SoC).


The pressure sensor could be located inside the flow channel, the pressure sensor optionally being located in a recess in an internal wall of the flow channel.


The pressure sensor could be located external to the flow channel and said sensor port could be pneumatically coupled to the flow channel via an opening in a wall of the flow channel.


A seal could be arranged to pneumatically couple the sensor port to said opening, at least a part of said seal optionally being sandwiched between the pressure sensor and the wall, at least a part of said seal optionally extending from an exterior surface of said wall to a surface on which the pressure sensor is mounted so as to encapsulate the pressure sensor in a pneumatic chamber adjacent the wall.


Said wall and said seal could be formed by a two-shot moulding process.


There could be a thermally conductive gasket sandwiched between the pressure sensor and the wall, said thermally conductive gasket optionally acting as the seal.


There could be an air-permeable, water-impermeable filter separating said sensor port from said flow channel.


The pressure sensor could comprise a metal housing.


The pressure sensor could be a MEMS barometric pressure sensor. The sensor could be a piezo-resistive or capacitive MEMS pressure sensor.


A processor could be comprised in the pressure sensor.


The method could further comprise storing data received from a sensing element of the sensor in a data buffer. Said data could correspond to one inhalation/exhalation waveform. Said data buffer could optionally be comprised in the pressure sensor. Said data buffer could be a first in, first out (FIFO) data buffer.


The method could further comprise: monitoring environmental barometric activity using an additional MEMS barometric pressure sensor; and calibrating said sensor having the sensor port pneumatically coupled to said flow channel against said additional sensor.


Said issuing could be by means of wireless transmission. Said wireless transmitting could use a Bluetooth™ protocol, optionally the Bluetooth™ Low Energy (BLE) protocol.


The issuing could be by means of a transmitter comprised in a transceiver configured to communicate data from and/or to the pressure sensor. The transmitter could be wireless. Said wireless transmitter could be a Bluetooth™ subsystem, optionally a Bluetooth™ Low Energy (BLE) integrated circuit or System on Chip (SoC).


The pressure sensor and/or the transmitter could be mounted on a printed circuit board (PCB).


The pressure sensor could be powered by a battery, optionally a coin cell.


The pressure sensor could have a sensitivity of 20 Pascals or less.


The pressure sensor could comprise a sensing element. The method could comprise polling said sensing element at a frequency of greater than or equal to 100 Hz.


The method could further comprise using control means to switch on the pressure sensor and/or wake the pressure sensor from a low power state.


Said control means could be a mechanical switch, an optical sensor, an accelerometer or a Hall effect sensor.


The method could further comprise, in response to said control means switching on and/or waking up the pressure sensor, taking a tare reading from said sensing element and calibrating data received from the sensing element subsequently using said tare reading.


The method could further comprise determining a dynamic zero from a moving average of measurements by the pressure sensor, and dynamically calibrating the pressure sensor according to said dynamic zero.


The method could further comprise filtering out electrical noise inherent to the pressure sensor and/or environmental anomalies in data received from a sensing element of the pressure sensor.


The method could further comprise applying temperature compensation to data received from a sensing element of the pressure sensor using data received from a sensing element of a temperature sensor.


The inhaler could further comprise a mouthpiece, said sensor port being pneumatically coupled to a flow channel in pneumatic communication with said mouthpiece.


The method could further comprise determining the volume of air inspired or expired by a user of the inhaler from data sensed by a sensing element of the sensor.


According to a fifth aspect there is provided a computer program product comprising instructions for execution by a computer processor to perform the method of the fourth aspect.


According to a sixth aspect, there is provided a compliance monitoring module substantially as herein described with reference to the accompanying figures.


According to a seventh aspect, there is provided an inhaler accessory substantially as herein described with reference to the accompanying figures.


According to an eighth aspect, there is provided an inhaler substantially as herein described with reference to the accompanying figures.


According to a ninth aspect, there is provided a method substantially as herein described with reference to the accompanying figures.


According to a tenth aspect, there is provided a computer program product substantially as herein described with reference to the accompanying figures.





Examples of the present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:



FIGS. 1 to 5 illustrate example arrangements for a miniature pressure sensor for breath detection with respect to a flow channel;



FIG. 6 is a schematic of example sensor electronics;



FIGS. 7 to 12 illustrate example configurations of compliance modules in inhalers;



FIG. 13 is a flowchart illustrating an example compliance monitoring method; and



FIGS. 14A and 14B are graphs showing test data.





Elements shown in the Figures are not drawn to scale, but only to illustrate operation. Like elements are indicated by like reference numerals.


In addition to the differential (two port) type pressure sensors and the single port gauge type sensors, with separate measurements made before and after use, discussed above, absolute or barometric pressure sensors are available. Barometric pressure sensors are referenced to vacuum. They are sometimes referred to as altimeters since altitude can be deduced from barometric pressure readings. Sensors of this type have not generally been considered for use in breath detection because of their extremely wide range (20 to 110 kPa) and low resolution. Considering how a typical breath profile may generate pressure changes of the order of only 0.2 kPa, this would require operating the sensor over an extremely narrow portion of its operating range.


However, with miniaturisation, including the introduction of MEMS and NEMS technologies, much improved sensors are now available. A typical MEMS barometric sensor is capable of operation from 20 kPa to 110 kPa and can detect flow rates of less than 30 lpm (litres per minute) when pneumatically coupled to a flow path having a known flow resistance.


Using a barometric sensor enables use of the barometric pressure as a baseline throughout the measurement cycle, thereby addressing the uncertainty of other single port approaches.


Also, having knowledge of the local barometric pressure can provide some insight into patient lung function. It is suspected that changes in atmospheric pressure, such as those associated with approaching storm fronts, may have an effect on patient breathing, possibly even related to asthma and COPD events.


arometric pressure sensors are already in stressed condition, having an integral reference port sealed within the device under vacuum. This means that they have low hysteresis in the region of interest.


Due to the extremely small size and mass of their sensing elements, MEMS sensors are capable of reacting to extremely small pressure changes. Some are capable of resolving pressure changes as low as 1 Pa.


MEMS pressure sensors can include all of the requisite analogue circuitry within the sensor package. Temperature compensation and/or digital interfaces can also be integrated with the pressure sensor.


For example, the Freescale MPL3115A2 MEMS barometer/altimeter chip (pressure sensor) is digital, using an I2C interface to communicate pressure information to a host micro-computer.


MEMS pressure sensors can be packaged in metal. This provides RF shielding and good thermal conductivity for temperature compensation.


MEMS pressure sensors are also low cost, exhibit low power consumption and are very small. This makes them especially suitable for use in portable and/or disposable devices which may, for example, be powered by batteries such as coin cells.


The small size of MEMS pressure sensors makes it easy to incorporate them into existing designs of inhalers. It may be easier to incorporate them in or close to a mouthpiece to more accurately measure the pressure change caused by a patient's inhalation or exhalation.


In some device designs, a miniature barometric pressure sensor can be connected directly to the patient airway using only a small hole to the air path which does not require tubing of any kind. This minimizes the possibility of moisture condensation and potential bacterial growth associated with elastomeric tubing. An internal seal, for example a gel seal, can be included to protect the sensor element from contamination.


An example of this type of arrangement is shown in FIG. 1. A miniature barometric pressure sensor 110 is placed against the flow channel 120 through which a patient breathes. Airflow is substantially axial as indicated by arrow 130. The sensor port 111 is sealed in line with an opening 121 in flow channel wall 122 by a pneumatic (airtight) seal 140. (Note that, so long as there is a pneumatic connection between the sensor port and the flow channel, the seal need not be completely airtight.) Sensor port 111 optionally comprises a filter, for example an air-permeable, water-impermeable filter. The flow channel and the seal could be formed by a two-shot moulding process. The pressure sensor 110 can be mounted on a printed circuit board (PCB) 150 to provide connection to power sources and other electronics.


Instead of positioning the seal 140 around the channel between opening 121 and sensor port 111, the entire miniature sensor could be encapsulated within a chamber adjacent to the flow channel as illustrated in FIG. 2. Pneumatic seal 240 is located outside of the sensor footprint and extends all the way from the exterior of flow channel wall 222 to the surface 250 on which the sensor 210 is mounted (for example the component surface of a PCB). FIG. 2 shows a cross-section; pneumatic seal 240 surrounds the perimeter of the sensor 210 whether it is circular, square, rectangular or any other shape. The seal 240, sensor mount 250 and flow channel wall 222 thus form a cavity pneumatically isolated from the external environment except for the flow channel in the location of the opening 221. The pressure at the sensor port 211 is therefore equalised with the pressure in the flow channel at the opening 221.


Since MEMS sensors are available with built-in temperature compensation, there may not be any need for use of external thermal sensors. Compensation can be provided right at the measurement site, increasing the accuracy of the compensation. A MEMS sensor with built-in temperature compensation can also act as a compact breath thermometer, providing further information to the patient and/or their caregiver. If the housing of the sensor is metal, then not only is the sensitive internal circuitry isolated from RF fields, such as those associated with mobile phones or nearby disturbances, but the sensor will also rapidly equilibrate to the local temperature in order to provide optimum temperature compensation.


In the embodiments of FIGS. 1 and 2, the miniature sensor is separated from the flow channel wall by an air gap. To improve the ability of the miniature sensor to rapidly detect changes in flow channel temperature, a thermally conductive gasket can be used as shown in FIG. 3. (FIG. 3 is in other respects similar to FIG. 2.)


In the example arrangement of FIG. 3, a thermally conductive gasket 360, such as the silicone types used for transistor heat sinks, is provided between the (optionally metal) housing of the miniature sensor 310 and the flow channel wall 322. The greater the adjacent surface areas covered by the gasket the quicker the temperature equilibration. The gasket 360 could therefore extend over substantially the entire surface of the sensor 310 facing the flow channel wall 322.



FIG. 4 shows an example arrangement in which a thermally conductive gasket 460 is made of an air-impermeable substance which deforms to the contours of the surfaces of the sensor 410 and flow channel wall 422 it is compressed between. It thus provides a good thermal connection while at the same time acting as a pneumatic seal, eliminating the need for a separate sealing element.


An alternative to positioning the sensor adjacent the flow channel is to place the entire sensor within the low pressure airway of the device to be monitored as illustrated in FIG. 5. For example, the sensor could be placed within the body of a DPI or the ‘boot’ of a pressurised MDI (pMDI). (The term boot refers to the body of the inhaler that generally holds the drug canister.) in this arrangement the sensor is truly measuring the pressure (and optionally, temperature) of the airflow itself, providing improved accuracy. Therefore there is also no need for any sealing element to create a pneumatic conduit between the flow channel 520 and the sensor port 511, or for any thermally conductive gasket to aid in temperature equilibration between them. It is also not necessary to provide the sensor with any access to the external pressure environment for reference purposes because the reference is already built into the sensor itself in the form of a vacuum reference.


In the example of FIG. 5, the miniature barometric pressure sensor 510 is mounted on the interior of flow channel wall 522, optionally via a PCB 550. The flow channel wall 522 may comprise a recessed part 523 in which the sensor 510 is located as shown to reduce disruption to the airflow indicated at 530. For example, the depth of such a recess 523 could be substantially equal to the thickness of the sensor 510 so that the surface of the sensor comprising the sensor port 511 lies flush with the parts of the interior surface of flow channel wall 522 to either side of the sensor 510. Recess 523 could be a volume cut out of the wall 522 or a part of the wall that extends radially outwards relative to the rest as shown.


It should be noted that due to their small size, miniature pressure sensors can be used to monitor patient flow through, for example, pMDIs, jet nebulisers or DPIs, thus facilitating low cost compliance monitoring, in addition to/in place of adherence monitoring, which confirms device actuation. Said compliance monitoring could be implemented using an accessory device that couples to the dosing device through a small hole to the airway to be monitored, through a capillary tube in fluid communication with the airway to be monitored, or in the dosing device itself. The small size, high performance and low cost of MEMS sensors make them ideally suited to such applications where size and weight are major considerations for users who may have to carry their inhaler with them at all times.


If output from the miniature pressure sensor is digital, all low level signal processing can be done within the sensor, shielding it from outside interference. This makes it possible to work with signals of the order of tens of Pascals without much difficulty, something that traditional sensors with external circuitry would be challenged to do.



FIG. 6 shows schematically some electronic components of an example MEMS barometric pressure sensor. Sensor element 601 passes analogue signals to analogue to digital converter (ADC) 602. The digital output signal of ADC 602 is then averaged by a rolling average filter over many cycles to reduce noise. Various averages can be selected under program control in order to balance noise against response time.


As one example, block 603 represents a means of selecting one of eight different oversample (i.e. filter) ratios to output at 604. The fastest response is associated with OSR=1, but this is also the noisiest setting. Conversely, OSR=128 introduces the least noise, but has the slowest response. The optimum setting can be chosen depending on the particular application. With an OSR setting of 16, the output is clean enough and the update time quick enough for most respiratory applications.


It may be desired, for example in order to record patient flow profiles, to create a waveform associated with the real time fluctuations of pressure detected by the sensor. If one were to construct such a waveform from single readings of the sensor each time new data became available, the resulting waveform would exhibit blocky artefacts, rather than a smooth waveform, due to the delays associated with each tap. However, by driving the ADC 602 at a suitable frequency, for example approximately 100 Hz, and reading data at the same rate, the data presented to each tap is further averaged, resulting in a much smoother waveform.


The averaged output can then be passed to a circular first in, first out (FIFO) buffer (not shown) for storage until the data can be processed by a connected processor integrated into the device, or transmitted for offloaded processing. Such a FIFO buffer could, for example, store a number of samples approximately equivalent to, or a little greater than, one typical breath waveform to ensure that an entire inhalation/exhalation profile can be captured. Using a buffer reduces the demand on the serial port of the sensor in cases where the waveform is not required in real time.


With the addition of communications it is possible to monitor patient adherence and compliance and communicate such information, for example including patient flow profiles, to a user device such as a smart phone or tablet. From a user device data can optionally be communicated to a caregiver's device, for example a doctor's personal computer (PC). This could be done using a wired connection, for example via a Universal Serial Bus (USB) port. Alternatively, using wireless technology, it is possible to communicate results to the outside world without interrupting the product housing in any significant way. Suitable wireless technologies could include, for example, WIFI technologies such as IEEE 802.11, Medical Body Area Network (MBAN) technologies such as IEEE 802.15, Near Field Communication (NFC) technologies, mobile technologies such as 3G and Bluetooth™ technologies such as Bluetooth™ Low Energy (BLE). A wireless transceiver, for example in the form of a BLE chip, could be connected to the miniature pressure sensor or integrated with it.


Such wireless connectivity could be used, for example, to report device actuation and/or sensed inhalation with date and time stamps in real time. This data could be processed externally and if the result of such processing is that it is determined that the patient is not fully compliant or that a prescription should be refilled, an alert can be sent to the patient and/or caregiver and/or pharmacist. Alerts could be provided via one or more user interfaces of the inhaler (for example an LED and/or a buzzer) or via text message or email. As another example, if no dosing report is received within a predetermined period following a scheduled dosing time, a reminder could be sent to the patient and/or caregiver. Alerts could also be generated for example if use frequency is exceeding a safe threshold.


The compliance module could communicate directly or indirectly with one or more of: a user device (such as a mobile phone e.g. a smartphone, a tablet, a laptop or a desktop computer) of a patient, or of a caregiver (such as a doctor, nurse, pharmacist, family member or carer), a server e.g. of a health service provider or inhaler or drug manufacturer or distributor or a cloud storage system. Such communication could be via a network such as the internet and may involve a dedicated app, for example on the patient's smartphone.


Compliance monitoring means (such as one or more sensors, e.g. a device actuation sensor such as a mechanical switch, an orientation sensor to check the device is in the proper orientation for efficient dosing such as an accelerometer or a gyroscope and a miniature pressure sensor to detect sufficient flow for proper dose delivery) and compliance reporting means (such as a wireless transmitter or wired output port) could be included in a single module. This module could be sold as a separate inhaler accessory/upgrade for attachment to an existing or slightly modified design of inhaler. Alternatively, the compliance monitoring module could be incorporated into the inhaler during manufacture. It is not required for all components of the compliance monitoring module to be comprised in a single physical unit, though this may be the case (for example the electronic components could all be mounted on a single PCB or even incorporated into a single integrated circuit). In the case of an inhaler accessory version, the module could consist of one or more attachable units. In the case of a module incorporated into an inhaler, the individual components could be located in any suitable locations in or on the inhaler and need not be grouped together or connected any further than required for them to function.


The sensors may communicate with the processor and transmitter by wired or wireless means. For example, if all three are mounted on a single PCB, the sensor port of the miniature pressure sensor may be directly pneumatically coupled to the flow channel by means of a vent or may be indirectly coupled by means of a capillary tube. (If a capillary tube is used a pressure-transferring seal could close the flow channel end of the tube to avoid drug and/or moisture entering the tube and damaging the pressure sensor, blocking the tube or affecting the hygiene of the device.) Alternatively, the miniature pressure sensor could be located within the flow channel itself and communicate wirelessly with one or more of the other compliance module components located in or on another part of the inhaler. With the miniaturisation of electronic components, it may be possible to locate the entire compliance module within the flow channel without obstructing the flow.


The compliance monitoring module could, for example, be used in the types of pMDIs described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,446,627 or U.S. patent application publication Ser. No. 13/110,532. These inhalers comprise dose counters for monitoring adherence. For example, in US 2011/0283997 a spooled ribbon marked with numerals to indicate the number of does remaining is driven to unwind by a ratchet wheel in turn driven by an actuator pawl actuated by movement of the canister.


However, these inhalers do not comprise any means of determining whether the dose has been successfully administered. The addition of a miniature barometric pressure sensor anywhere in the airflow path through the inhaler or anywhere in fluid communication with the airflow path could enable compliance monitoring since such a miniature sensor could collect sufficient data to indicate whether or not the patient inhaled in an appropriate manner (e.g. hard enough and for long enough) to receive a full dose of medicament.


This information, combined with a signal originating from the dose counter mechanism is sufficient to confirm that a dose has been successfully administered.


A signal could be obtained from the dose counter system in any convenient manner. For example, an electronic switch could be arranged such that it is actuated by motion of the pawl or rotation of the spool. This switch could be connected to an input of the processor such that the processor receives an electronic pulse when a dose is metered. Since dose count will be available electronically, the ribbon could be omitted.



FIGS. 7 to 10 illustrate further details of how a compliance module could be integrated into a pMDI. FIGS. 7 and 8 illustrate how compliance modules could be added to an existing pMDI without any modification, and could therefore be provided separately from the pMDI itself as an accessory/upgrade pack. FIGS. 9 to 10 illustrate how compliance modules could be integrated in pMDIs with some minor modifications.



FIG. 7 illustrates an example in which a compliance module 710 is clipped on to a pMDI 700. pMDI 700 comprises a canister 720 received in a boot 730. A lip 711 of the compliance module hooks over the top of the boot wall in the radial gap between the boot wall and the canister. The compliance module is thereby clipped onto the inhaler without any modification to the inhaler. Arrow A shows the airflow when a user inhales through mouthpiece 740. Air passes down the radial gap between the canister and the boot, entrains aerosol sprayed from nozzle 721 on device actuation, and passes out into the user's mouth through mouthpiece 740. A MEMS pressure sensor 712 in the compliance module is pneumatically coupled to the flow channel formed by the radial gap between the boot and the canister by a capillary tube 713. The capillary tube follows the line of the external wall of the lip round into the gap but stops short of the bottom of the lip. This ensures that the lip blocks all air to the capillary tube except for that from below, i.e. within the boot. In an alternative arrangement, the lip could be shaped and positioned to provide sufficient fluid isolation such that no tube is needed.


An alternative arrangement is shown in FIG. 8 where a compliance module 810 comprises an electronics unit 814 (including a MEMS pressure sensor) affixed to the underside of a cover 815. This all slips over the top of pMDI 800 surrounding the upper section of the boot 830 and the exposed part of the canister 820. With the compliance module in place and dust cap 850 removed, when a user inhales through mouthpiece 840 air flows in through the gap between cover 815 and boot 830, past electronics unit 814 including the MEMS pressure sensor, down the radial gap between the boot and canister, entrains aerosol sprayed from the canister nozzle on device actuation, and passes out into the user's mouth through mouthpiece 840.



FIG. 9A is a partially exploded view of an example pMDI 900 comprising a compliance module 910 incorporated into the bottom of the boot 930. FIGS. 9B and 9C are interior views of the bottom part of the boot respectively before and during device activation. Compliance module 910 comprises MEMS pressure sensor 912, mechanical click dome switch 916 and processor (e.g. microcontroller unit, MCU) 917 mounted on PCB 918 and powered by coin cell battery 919. Before device actuation there is a gap above the upper click dome surface. During device activation the canister 920 is pushed down further into boot 930. A spring arm 960 affixed to the bottom of canister 920 consequently also moves down and pushes down on the upper surface of click dome 916, actuating the switch. This results in an actuation pulse signal being sent to the MCU. This signal can be used to determine patient adherence, while a signal sent from the pressure sensor to the MCU can be used to determine compliance. An accelerometer (e.g. a three-axis accelerometer) could also be provided on the PCB and connected to the MCU to provide compliance data indicating whether the inhaler was shaken before use if required. The accelerometer could also be used to sense the orientation of the inhaler during loading of a dose into the metering chamber to determine whether the inhaler is held upright as required for proper loading. The click dome switch could also act to connect the battery to the pressure sensor or, if no accelerometer is present, to the whole PCB. This would save battery power for only when it is needed. A thermistor could also be included on the PCB, providing further compliance data by indicating whether the temperature drop associated with completion of drug aerosolising occurs.


The compliance module could alternatively be provided as a ‘backpack’ as shown in FIG. 10. Compliance module 1010 is affixed to the exterior of the boot 1030. A hole in boot 1030 provides fluid communication between the port of a MEMS pressure sensor 1012 and the flow channel formed in the radial gap between the boot 1030 and canister 1020. The sliding contact 1071 of a linear potentiometer 1070 is affixed to the canister such that it moves up and down with the canister. The contact 1071 slides in a slit in the boot 1030. The signal from the potentiometer indicates when the device is actuated and how long it is actuated for. The potentiometer could also act a switch to connect coin cell battery 1019 to PCB 1018 so that the PCB is only powered when the device is being actuated. The slit in which the contact 1071 slides could also provide fluid communication between the flow channel and the MEMS pressure sensor.


Compliance monitoring modules could also be used in jet nebulisers. FIG. 11 illustrates how this could be achieved. A compliance module 1110 comprising a MEMS pressure sensor 1112 is affixed to the exterior of a jet nebuliser 1100. The sensor port of the pressure sensor communicates with the interior of the nebuliser by means of a capillary tube 1113. The distal end of the tube extends down through a baffle 1120. Baffle 1120 is a flat plate which large aerosol droplets emitted by nozzle 1130 (powered by compressed air inlet 1131) reflect off of such that droplets exiting mouthpiece 1140 into the user's airway are of a uniform size. Locating the end of the capillary tube below the baffle prevents aerosol droplets from entering the tube; provided the nebuliser handset is not shaken so much that liquid medicament from reservoir 1150 splashes up into it, the interior of the tube should remain fairly dry.


Since the baffle is perforated, the pressure above and below it is equalised so the pressure sensor effectively measures the pressure in the mouthpiece 1140. The airflow in the mouthpiece comprises a stream drawn in by user inhalation through vents indicated by arrow A, and a stream emitted by the nozzle. Thus, monitoring the pressure in the mouthpiece can provide both information about patient inhalation and information about the compressor, liquid drug level etc. This could enable feedback to the patient to indicate that treatment is complete or that the reservoir is empty. Patient adherence is often poor with jet nebulisers since the long treatment time (typically of the order of ten minutes) and high noise levels caused by the compressor and handset make it difficult for users to know when the treatment is complete. Thus, use of the compliance monitoring module could improve adherence. The pressure sensor could also be used to check pump function, and as a switch to wake up the rest of the compliance module when one of the large pulsations created by the pump is detected.


An accelerometer could also be included in the compliance monitoring module. For full compliance, some jet nebulisers require the user to tap the handset to shake liquid droplets that have condensed in the mouthpiece back into the reservoir. An accelerometer could detect this tap. An accelerometer could also detect vibrations caused by the compressor to confirm that it is in use.


Dry powder inhalers could also benefit from the addition of compliance monitoring modules. An example DPI 1200 with a compliance monitoring module 1210 affixed thereto is shown in FIG. 12. Patient airflow is again shown by arrow A. It passes in through a vent in the inhaler body, passes through a dosing chamber 1220 comprising a medicament capsule 1230 (which has previously been pierced) and then passes out through mouthpiece 1240. The compliance module comprises a MEMS pressure sensor 1212 with a sensor port in fluid communication with the dosing chamber via a capillary tube 1213. An accelerometer or microphone could be included to detect structure-borne vibrations generated by movement of capsule 1230 within chamber 1220 during inhalation. A mechanical switch which feeds back compliance data to a compliance module processor could be actuated by a piercing or peeling mechanism (not shown) which primes the inhaler for use by opening the capsule 1230.


It should be noted that because MEMS barometric pressure sensors respond to environmental barometric pressure, which can change over time, attention should be paid to the initial reading that any subsequent sensor output signal analysis is based upon. An automatic zero reading (i.e. tare) could be performed immediately prior to monitoring any inhalation signal. While it is possible for this value to change over time in response to changes in local environmental barometric pressure, it would not be expected to cause any issues if a treatment is completed within a few minutes. Alternatively, a second barometer chip could be used to keep track of barometric activity, allowing the primary chip to be used exclusively for breath detection.


In a jet nebuliser, the point at which dosing is complete (i.e. where lung volume peaks), could correspond to the point at which flow reverses direction. Thus, the processor can make a determination that dosing is complete when the data from the pressure sensor indicates that flow direction has reversed.


Not all processing needs to be done by the module. Any or all processing could be offloaded to an external data processing device. A wireless scheme (for example comprising a BLE module) could be used to transmit patient flow profiles to an app which could then calculate specific breathing parameters. The inhaler could thereby offload the processing required for such a task to, for example, a smart phone processor. This would facilitate the smallest form factors possible for the inhalers. A further advantage of this approach is that software running on a smart phone can be changed more readily than software running on an inhaler.



FIG. 13 is a flowchart illustrating an example compliance monitoring method. At step 1310 a processor receives data from a mode sensor indicating that the inhaler has changed from being in an inactive mode to an active mode. At step 1320 the processor receives data from a sensing element of a miniature pressure sensor, a sensor port of said sensor being configured to be pneumatically coupled to a flow channel of said inhaler through which a user can inhale. At step 1330 the processor processes the data from the mode sensor and the pressure sensor in order to compile a compliance report. At step 1340 the processor passes the compliance report to a transmitter by which it is issued.



FIGS. 14A and 14B show the mean pressures measured using a miniature relative pressure sensor affixed to the upper part of the casing of 10 different inhalers versus a series of air flow rates applied through the device. Repeat measurements were included for start, middle and end of life of each inhaler (in terms of progress through the number of “shots” before the doses run out). In FIG. 14A, error bars are shown for a +/−3 sigma variation. In FIG. 14B, error bars are shown for a +/−2 sigma variation, capturing a band that 95% of inhalers would fall into. We can thus get an idea of flow uncertainty for pressure measurements by such a sensor used in an inhaler.


For typical inhalation flow rates (30-60 l/min), the uncertainty can be calculated from FIG. 14A as 16 l/min. (The uncertainty in flow rate for each measurement can be estimated as the flow axis differential between the top of the error bar for the measurement and the point at which a line joining the bottoms of the error bars for that measurement and the next reaches the measured pressure. So, for the 30 l/min measurement, the differential is ˜41 l/min minus 30 l/min=11 l/min. For 45 l/min the differential is 15 l/min and for 60 l/min it is 22 l/min.) The equivalent value taken from FIG. 14B is ˜10 l/min. Sufficient precision can thus be obtained to provide useful compliance data.


The above description relates to exemplary uses of the invention, but it will be appreciated that other implementations and variations are possible.


In addition, the skilled person can modify or alter the particular geometry and arrangement of the particular features of the apparatus. Other variations and modifications will also be apparent to the skilled person. Such variations and modifications can involve equivalent and other features which are already known and which can be used instead of, or in addition to, features described herein. Features that are described in the context of separate embodiments can be provided in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, features which are described in the context of a single embodiment can also be provided separately or in any suitable sub-combination.

Claims
  • 1. A pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) comprising: a boot-shaped housing;a medication reservoir comprising medicament, wherein the medication reservoir is housed within the boot-shaped housing;a top cover configured to be attached to an upper section of the boot-shaped housing; anda monitoring module located between an underside of the top cover and a top of the medication reservoir, the monitoring module comprising: a pressure sensor comprising a sensor port, wherein the sensor port is configured to be pneumatically coupled to a flow channel of the inhaler through which a user can inhale;a processor configured to receive data from the pressure sensor; anda wireless transmitter configured to transmit the data to a user device; andwherein the pressure sensor, the processor, and the wireless transmitter are located between the underside of the top cover and the top of the medication reservoir.
  • 2. The inhaler of claim 1, wherein the top cover is configured to conceal a top side of the medication reservoir.
  • 3. The inhaler of claim 2, wherein the monitoring module is affixed to the underside of the top cover.
  • 4. The inhaler of claim 2, wherein the top cover is removable from the boot-shaped housing.
  • 5. The inhaler of claim 1, wherein the monitoring module further comprises an electronic switch that is configured to be actuated when a dose of medicament is metered from the inhaler.
  • 6. The inhaler of claim 1, wherein the monitoring module further comprises a mechanical switch configured to determine that the inhaler has been primed for use.
  • 7. The inhaler of claim 1, wherein the monitoring module further comprises an orientation sensor, and wherein the processor is further configured to determine that the inhaler has been primed for use based on feedback from the orientation sensor.
  • 8. The inhaler of claim 1, wherein the pressure sensor comprises a barometric pressure sensor.
  • 9. The inhaler of claim 8, wherein the monitoring module further comprises a switch that is configured to wake the pressure sensor from a low power state, wherein the monitoring module is configured to take a tare reading after waking from the low power state.
  • 10. The inhaler of claim 1, wherein the monitoring module further comprises a temperature sensor, and wherein the processor is configured to receive data from the temperature sensor and the wireless transmitter is configured to transmit the data from the temperature sensor to the user device.
  • 11. The inhaler of claim 1, wherein the monitoring module further comprises an optical sensor that is configured to determine whether the inhaler has been primed for use.
  • 12. The inhaler of claim 1, wherein the data comprises an indication of an actuation of the inhaler and sensed inhalation data with associated time stamps.
  • 13. The inhaler of claim 1, wherein the monitoring module is further configured to determine whether one or more predetermined requirements for successful dosing are met based on the data received from the pressure sensor, wherein the one or more predetermined requirements comprise one or more of: a flow rate exceeding a predetermined threshold value;an inhalation duration exceeding a predetermined threshold value;a flow rate exceeding a predetermined threshold value for at least a predetermined threshold duration;a total volume inhaled exceeding a predetermined threshold value; ora peak inspired flow (PIF) exceeding a predetermined threshold value.
  • 14. The inhaler of claim 1, further comprising a light emitting diode (LED), wherein the processor is configured to generate an alert using the LED to indicate a user's non-compliance with a dosing regimen of the inhaler or to provide a dose reminder to the user of the inhaler.
  • 15. The inhaler of claim 1, wherein the medication reservoir comprises beclomethasone dipropionate.
  • 16. A system comprising: a user device comprising a processor; anda pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) comprising: a boot-shaped housing;a medication reservoir comprising medicament, wherein the medication reservoir is housed within the boot-shaped housing;a top cover configured to be attached to an upper section of the boot-shaped housing; anda monitoring module located in a space between an underside of the top cover and a top of the medication reservoir, the monitoring module comprising: a sensor comprising a sensor port, wherein the sensor port is configured to be pneumatically coupled to a flow channel of the inhaler through which a user can inhale;a processor configured to receive data from the sensor; anda wireless transmitter configured to transmit the data to the user device; andwherein the processor of the user device is configured to process the data from the sensor and determine, based on the data, whether one or more predetermined requirements for successful dosing are met.
  • 17. The system of claim 16, wherein the top cover is configured to conceal a top side of the medication reservoir, and wherein the monitoring module is affixed to the underside of the top cover.
  • 18. The system of claim 16, wherein the sensor comprises a pressure sensor; and wherein the monitoring module further comprises a switch that is configured to wake the pressure sensor from a low power state, and the monitoring module is configured to take a tare reading after waking from the low power state.
  • 19. The system of claim 16, wherein the processor of the user device is configured to determine, based on the data, that successful dosing is met when an inhalation duration exceeds a predetermined threshold value, when a flow rate exceeds a predetermined threshold value for at least a predetermined threshold duration, when a total volume inhaled exceeds a predetermined threshold value, or when a peak inspired flow (PIF) exceeds a predetermined threshold value.
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/507,386, filed Feb. 28, 2017, which is the National Stage Entry under 35 U.S.C. § 371 Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/US2015/047369, filed Aug. 28, 2015, which claims the benefit of the United States Provisional Application No. 62/043,114 filed on Aug. 28, 2014, the contents of which are incorporated fully herein by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (184)
Number Name Date Kind
955201 Rand Apr 1910 A
4984158 Hillsman Jan 1991 A
5071453 Hradek et al. Dec 1991 A
5363842 Mishelevich et al. Nov 1994 A
5505192 Samiotes et al. Apr 1996 A
5692492 Bruna et al. Dec 1997 A
5809997 Wolf Sep 1998 A
5839429 Marnfeldt et al. Nov 1998 A
5842468 Denyet et al. Dec 1998 A
5887586 Dahlback et al. Mar 1999 A
5957125 Sagstetter et al. Sep 1999 A
6148815 Wolf et al. Nov 2000 A
6283923 Finkelstein et al. Sep 2001 B1
6285731 Marnfeldt et al. Sep 2001 B1
6390088 Sprenger et al. May 2002 B1
6446627 Bowman et al. Sep 2002 B1
6651651 Bonney et al. Nov 2003 B1
6693546 Skardon Feb 2004 B2
6752145 Bonney et al. Jun 2004 B1
6932083 Jones et al. Aug 2005 B2
6958691 Anderson et al. Oct 2005 B1
6978780 Marnfeldt et al. Dec 2005 B1
6981499 Anderson et al. Jan 2006 B2
6990975 Jones et al. Jan 2006 B1
7072738 Bonney et al. Jul 2006 B2
7151456 Godfrey et al. Dec 2006 B2
7191777 Brand et al. Mar 2007 B2
7198172 Harvey et al. Apr 2007 B2
7233228 Lintell et al. Jun 2007 B2
7249687 Anderson et al. Jul 2007 B2
7347200 Jones et al. Mar 2008 B2
7383837 Robertson et al. Jun 2008 B2
7424888 Harvey et al. Sep 2008 B2
7495546 Lintell et al. Feb 2009 B2
7587988 Bowman et al. Sep 2009 B2
7837648 Blair et al. Nov 2010 B2
8231541 Colquitt et al. Jul 2012 B2
8231573 Edwards et al. Jul 2012 B2
8240301 Spaargaren et al. Aug 2012 B2
8251056 Pearson et al. Aug 2012 B2
8342172 Levy et al. Jan 2013 B2
8403865 Halperin et al. Mar 2013 B2
8424517 Sutherland et al. Apr 2013 B2
8464707 Jongejan et al. Jun 2013 B2
8491493 Colquitt et al. Jul 2013 B2
8547239 Peatfield et al. Oct 2013 B2
8620591 Wegerich Dec 2013 B2
8758262 Rhee et al. Jun 2014 B2
8795170 Pipke Aug 2014 B2
8807131 Tunnell et al. Aug 2014 B1
8960189 Morrison et al. Feb 2015 B2
8978966 Walsh et al. Mar 2015 B2
8997735 Zierenberg et al. Apr 2015 B2
9056174 Bradshaw et al. Jun 2015 B2
9174009 Peatfield et al. Nov 2015 B2
9188579 Shen et al. Nov 2015 B2
9237862 Bussa et al. Jan 2016 B2
9242056 Andersen et al. Jan 2016 B2
9265445 Shinar et al. Feb 2016 B2
9339616 Denny et al. May 2016 B2
9364619 Overfield et al. Jun 2016 B2
9427534 Bruin et al. Aug 2016 B2
9463291 Imran et al. Oct 2016 B2
9468729 Sutherland et al. Oct 2016 B2
9550031 Van Sickle et al. Jan 2017 B2
9555200 Hosemann et al. Jan 2017 B2
9555201 Collins et al. Jan 2017 B2
9638084 Saiki May 2017 B2
9694147 Peatfield et al. Jul 2017 B2
9736642 Ostrander et al. Aug 2017 B2
9782551 Morrison et al. Oct 2017 B2
9839398 Yamamori et al. Dec 2017 B2
9911308 Edwards et al. Mar 2018 B2
9956360 Germinario et al. May 2018 B2
9962507 Germinario et al. May 2018 B2
9962508 Bruin et al. May 2018 B2
10016134 Hansen et al. Jul 2018 B2
10046121 Kolb et al. Aug 2018 B2
10255412 Hogg et al. Apr 2019 B2
10363384 Dyche et al. Jul 2019 B2
10406305 Collins et al. Sep 2019 B2
10531838 Barretto et al. Jan 2020 B2
10556070 Van Sickle et al. Feb 2020 B2
10664572 Bitran et al. May 2020 B2
10726954 Su et al. Jul 2020 B2
10810283 Shetty et al. Oct 2020 B2
10849314 Genzow et al. Dec 2020 B2
10905356 Morrison Feb 2021 B2
20020185128 Theobald et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030192535 Christrup et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030205229 Crockford et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040089299 Bonney et al. May 2004 A1
20040117062 Bonney et al. Jun 2004 A1
20050043674 Blair et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050076904 Jones et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050119604 Bonney et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050161467 Jones et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050172958 Singer et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050247312 Davies et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050251289 Bonney et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060254581 Genova et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070017506 Bell et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070251950 Bacon Nov 2007 A1
20070295329 Lieberman et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080173301 Deaton et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080178872 Genova et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080230057 Sutherland et al. Sep 2008 A1
20090151718 Hunter et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090151723 Lang et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090194104 Van Sickle Aug 2009 A1
20090221308 Lerner et al. Sep 2009 A1
20100036266 Nysaether et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100094099 Levy et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100242960 Zangerle et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100250280 Sutherland et al. Sep 2010 A1
20110041845 Solomon et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110226242 Von Hollen et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110253139 Guthrie et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110282693 Craft et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110283997 Walsh et al. Nov 2011 A1
20130008436 Von Hollen et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130053719 Wekell Feb 2013 A1
20130151162 Harris et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130239957 Pinfold Sep 2013 A1
20130269685 Wachtel et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130298905 Levin et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140106324 Adams et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140182584 Sutherland et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140264653 Cheng et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140305429 Lewis Oct 2014 A1
20150061867 Engelhard Mar 2015 A1
20150150484 Wekell Jun 2015 A1
20150174348 Tunnell et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150283341 Adams et al. Oct 2015 A1
20160082208 Ballam et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160089089 Kakkar et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160128389 Lamb et al. May 2016 A1
20160129182 Schuster et al. May 2016 A1
20160144141 Biswas et al. May 2016 A1
20160166766 Schuster et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160228657 Sutherland et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160256639 Van Sickle et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160283686 Hu et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160314256 Su et al. Oct 2016 A1
20170079557 Lauk et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170109493 Hogg et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170140125 Hogg et al. May 2017 A1
20170161461 Delangre et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170164892 Sezan et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170173279 Sutherland et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170213145 Pathak et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170246406 Sutherland et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170258993 Pizzochero et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170262613 Ljungberg et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170325734 Sutherland et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170363673 Mukherjee et al. Dec 2017 A1
20180011988 Ziegler et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180052964 Adelson et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180056018 Canvin et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180085540 Dantsker et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180125365 Hunter et al. May 2018 A1
20180161530 Ganton et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180221600 Shears et al. Aug 2018 A1
20190014824 Yazbeck et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190030262 Ziegler et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190102522 Barrett et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190108912 Spurlock et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190111222 Wang et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190134330 Germinario et al. May 2019 A1
20190189258 Barrett et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190272925 Barrett et al. Sep 2019 A1
20190290129 Hanina et al. Sep 2019 A1
20190307648 Bartos Oct 2019 A1
20190313919 Pritchard et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190328278 Zabel et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190385727 Manice et al. Dec 2019 A1
20200003437 Breen Jan 2020 A1
20200058403 Barrett et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200098459 Hanina et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200135334 Rajasekhar et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200143939 Semen et al. May 2020 A1
20200188613 Van Sickle et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200193806 Finke et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200250554 Shao et al. Aug 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (47)
Number Date Country
101176804 May 2008 CN
667168 Aug 1995 EP
0667168 Aug 1995 EP
1135056 Aug 2006 EP
1992381 Nov 2008 EP
3228345 Oct 2017 EP
H04500915 Feb 1992 JP
H11511676 Oct 1999 JP
2002543935 Dec 2002 JP
2003516199 May 2003 JP
2009507540 Feb 2009 JP
2013-516265 May 2013 JP
2013532019 Aug 2013 JP
2014513591 Jun 2014 JP
8911823 Dec 1989 WO
WO1995022365 Aug 1995 WO
9638084 Dec 1996 WO
WO1999063901 Dec 1999 WO
WO 1999064095 Dec 1999 WO
0069496 Nov 2000 WO
0141849 Jun 2001 WO
WO2003063754 Aug 2003 WO
2005020023 Mar 2005 WO
2007028992 Mar 2007 WO
WO2009003989 Jan 2009 WO
2011010282 Jan 2011 WO
WO2011083377 Jul 2011 WO
2011157561 Dec 2011 WO
2012123448 Sep 2012 WO
2013085910 Jun 2013 WO
2013098714 Jul 2013 WO
WO2016043601 Mar 2016 WO
WO2017005605 Jan 2017 WO
WO2017051389 Mar 2017 WO
WO2017129521 Aug 2017 WO
WO2017141194 Aug 2017 WO
WO2017176693 Oct 2017 WO
WO2017176704 Oct 2017 WO
WO2017180980 Oct 2017 WO
2017192778 Nov 2017 WO
WO2017189712 Nov 2017 WO
WO2018128976 Jul 2018 WO
WO2018134552 Jul 2018 WO
WO2018134553 Jul 2018 WO
2018160073 Sep 2018 WO
2019022620 Jan 2019 WO
2019226576 Nov 2019 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (4)
Entry
Kumar, et al., “Biomedical Applications Of Mems & Nems Pressure Transducers/ Sensors”, International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, vol. 2. Issue 5, May 2013, pp. 1832-1841.
“Freescale Semiconductor Data Sheet”, Data Sheet for the Freescale MPL31152A2 Altimeter, Rev 2.2, Jul. 2012, 44 pages.
Liu, Andrew , et al., “Advances in Asthma 2015: Across the Lifespan”, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 138, No. 2., Aug. 3, 2016, pp. 397-404.
Safioti, Guilherme , et al., “A Predictive Model for Clinical Asthma Exacerbations Using Albuterol eMDPI (ProAir Digihaler): A Twelve-Week, Open-Label Study”, ATS Annual Conference, Dallas, Texas, May 22, 2019, p. 693.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20210128018 A1 May 2021 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62043114 Aug 2014 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 15507386 US
Child 17148991 US