Patent Grant
10240161
This application contains a sequence listing including a file named P34078US00_SequenceListing.txt, which is 73,728 bytes in size (measured in MS-DOS) and was created on May 23, 2013, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The present invention, in some embodiments thereof, relates to methods of introducing dsRNA to plant seeds for modulating gene expression.
With a growing world population, increasing demand for food, fuel and fiber, and a changing climate, agriculture faces unprecedented challenges. Development of plants with improved traits is highly desirable, with some of the major traits that are of major interest to farmers and seed companies include improved abiotic stress tolerance, fertilizer use efficiency, disease resistance, yield and more.
Plant trait improvement is typically performed by either genetic engineering or classical breeding. New methods for trait improvement through specific gene alteration are highly desirable. These include methods for over-expression of genes or gene silencing. A powerful technique for sequence-specific gene silencing is through RNA interference (RNAi). First discovered in the nematode C. elegans (Fire et al 1998, Nature, 391:806-811), RNAi is a mechanism in which expression of an individual gene can be specifically silenced by introducing a double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) that is homologous to the selected gene, into cells. Inside the cell, dsRNA molecules are cut into shorter fragments of 21-27 nucleotides by an RNase III-related enzyme (Dicer). These fragments, called small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), get incorporated into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). After additional processing, the siRNAs are transformed into single-stranded RNAs that act as guide sequences to eventually cleave target messenger RNAs. By using RNAi to specifically silence relevant target genes, one can alter basic traits of an organism. Specifically for plants, it holds incredible potential for modifications that may lead to increased stress resistance and better crop yield.
In plants, RNAi is typically performed by producing transgenic plants that over-express a DNA fragment that is transcribed to produce a dsRNA. This dsRNA is then processed into siRNAs that mediate the cleavage and silencing of target genes.
The major technical limitation for this technology is that many important plant crop species are difficult or impossible to transform, precluding the constitutive expression of constructs directing production of dsRNA. Moreover, questions concerning the potential ecological impact of virus-resistant transgenic plants have so far significantly limited their use [Tepfer, 2002, Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 40, 467-491].
An additional hurdle for obtaining transgenic plants is attributed to the difficulty of having the transformation and regeneration events occur in the same cell types.
Therefore the development of a method for obtaining transformed seeds which is independent of the methods inherent to tissue culture procedures is at the cutting edge of plant molecular biology research.
Additional Background Art Includes:
U.S. 20040055041 teach seed transformation by making use of the sonication system followed by infection by Agrobacterium.
Chee et al. 1989 Plant Physiol. 91:1212-1218 teach soybean transformation by inoculating the plumule, cotyledonary node and adjacent cotyledon tissues of germinating soybean using an Agrobacterium that contained a binary vector expressing a transgene.
Additional related background art: WO2011/001434, U.S. 20080022423, WO 2011112570, WO 2007/080127 WO 2007/080126, U.S. 20060272049, U.S. 2010068172, U.S. 20070250947, WO9926467, U.S. 20030154508, WO 02/14472, U.S. 20030150017, U.S. 201000154083.
According to an aspect of some embodiments of the present invention there is provided a method of introducing naked dsRNA into a seed, the method comprising contacting the seed with the naked dsRNA under conditions which allow penetration of the dsRNA into the seed, thereby introducing the dsRNA into the seed.
According to an aspect of some embodiments of the present invention there is provided an isolated seed comprising an exogenous naked dsRNA, wherein the seed is devoid of a heterologous promoter for driving expression of the dsRNA in a plant.
According to an aspect of some embodiments of the present invention there is provided an isolated seed comprising an exogenous naked dsRNA.
According to an aspect of some embodiments of the present invention there is provided an isolated seed comprising an exogenous dsRNA being present at a similar concentration in an embryo and an endosperm of the seed.
According to an aspect of some embodiments of the present invention there is provided an isolated seed comprising an exogenous dsRNA being spatially distributed in an embryo and an endosperm of the plant seed in a spatial distribution that differs from a spatial distribution of the exogenous dsRNA in a seed derived from a transgenic plant that recombinantly expresses the exogenous dsRNA.
According to an aspect of some embodiments of the present invention there is provided an isolated seed comprising an exogenous dsRNA, wherein a concentration ratio of the exogenous dsRNA to siRNA maturing therefrom is higher in the seed as compared to a transgenic seed recombinantly expressing the exogenous dsRNA.
According to an aspect of some embodiments of the present invention there is provided an isolated seed comprising an exogenous dsRNA, wherein the plant seed is devoid of a heterologous promoter for driving expression of the exogenous dsRNA, wherein a spatial distribution of the exogenous dsRNA and/or siRNA maturing therefrom is altered in the seed as compared to same in a transgenic seed recombinantly expressing the exogenous dsRNA.
According to an aspect of some embodiments of the present invention there is provided a plant or plant part comprising an exogenous naked dsRNA and being devoid of a heterologous promoter for driving expression of the dsRNA in the plant.
According to an aspect of some embodiments of the present invention there is provided a seed containing device comprising a plurality of the seeds.
According to an aspect of some embodiments of the present invention there is provided a sown field comprising a plurality of any of the seeds.
According to some embodiments of the invention, the method further comprises drying said seed following said contacting.
According to some embodiments of the invention, the method further comprises growing said plant under abiotic or biotic stress following said generating.
According to some embodiments of the invention, the naked dsRNA is designed for down regulating expression of a gene of the plant.
According to an aspect of some embodiments of the present invention there is provided a method of producing a plant, the method comprising:
(a) providing any of the seeds; and
(b) germinating the seed so as to produce the plant.
According to an aspect of some embodiments of the present invention there is provided a method of modulating gene expression, the method comprising:
(a) contacting a seed of a plant with a naked dsRNA, under conditions which allow penetration of the dsRNA into the seed, thereby introducing the dsRNA into the seed; and optionally
(b) generating a plant of the seed.
According to some embodiments of the invention, the naked dsRNA is designed for down regulating expression of a gene of the plant.
According to some embodiments of the invention, the naked dsRNA is designed for down regulating expression of an edogenous gene of the plant.
According to some embodiments of the invention, the naked dsRNA is designed for down regulating expression of a gene of a viral pathogen.
According to some embodiments of the invention, the penetration is to an endosperm and alternatively or additionally an embryo of the seed.
According to some embodiments of the invention, the naked dsRNA does not integrate into the genome of the seeds.
According to some embodiments of the invention, the conditions result in presence of the dsRNA in the plant for at least 10 days following germination.
According to an aspect of some embodiments of the present invention there is provided a method of inhibiting expression of a target gene in a plant virus, the method comprising providing to the plant virus the plant or plant part, thereby inhibiting expression of a target gene in the plant virus.
According to some embodiments of the invention, the method further comprises observing reduced infectability or replicability of the viral pathogen following the providing.
According to an aspect of some embodiments of the present invention there is provided a kit for introducing naked dsRNA to seeds comprising;
(i) naked dsRNA; and
(ii) a priming solution.
According to some embodiments of the invention, the naked dsRNA and the priming solutions are comprised in separate containers.
According to some embodiments of the invention, the dsRNA comprises siRNA.
According to some embodiments of the invention, the dsRNA comprises siRNA and dsRNA.
According to some embodiments of the invention, the contacting is effected by inoculating the seed with the dsRNA.
According to some embodiments of the invention, the method further comprises priming the seed prior to the contacting.
According to some embodiments of the invention, the priming is effected by:
(i) washing the seed prior to the contacting; and
(ii) drying the seed following step (i).
According to some embodiments of the invention, the washing is effected in the presence of double deionized water.
According to some embodiments of the invention, the washing is effected for 2-6 hours.
According to some embodiments of the invention, the washing is effected at 4-28° C.
According to some embodiments of the invention, the drying is effected at 25-30° C. for 10-16 hours.
According to some embodiments of the invention, the contacting is effected in a presence of the naked dsRNA at a final concentration of 0.001-100 μg/μl.
According to some embodiments of the invention, the contacting is effected in a presence of the naked dsRNA at a final concentration of 0.001-0.5 μg/μl.
According to some embodiments of the invention, the method further comprises treating the seed with an agent selected from the group consisting of a pesticide, a fungicide, an insecticide, a fertilizer, a coating agent and a coloring agent following the contacting.
According to some embodiments of the invention, the treating comprises coating the seed with the agent.
According to some embodiments of the invention, the seed is free of an agent selected from the group consisting of a pesticide, a fungicide, an insecticide, a fertilizer, a coating agent and a coloring agent.
According to some embodiments of the invention, the dsRNA is for downregulating expression of a coding gene.
According to some embodiments of the invention, the dsRNA is for downregulating expression of a non-coding gene.
According to some embodiments of the invention, the seed is of the Viridiplantae super-family.
According to some embodiments of the invention, the conditions allow accumulation of the dsRNA in the endosperm and alternatively or additionally embryo of the seed.
According to some embodiments of the invention, a concentration of the naked dsRNA is adjusted according to a parameter selected from the group consisting of, seed size, seed weight, seed volume, seed surface area, seed density and seed permeability.
According to some embodiments of the invention, the contacting is effected prior to breaking of seed dormancy and embryo emergence.
According to some embodiments of the invention, the seed is a primed seed.
According to some embodiments of the invention, the seed or the plant comprises RNA dependent RNA polymerase activity for amplifying expression of the dsRNA.
According to some embodiments of the invention, the seed is a hybrid seed.
According to an aspect of some embodiments of the present invention there is provided a seed obtainable according to the methods described herein.
Unless otherwise defined, all technical and/or scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which the invention pertains. Although methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of embodiments of the invention, exemplary methods and/or materials are described below. In case of conflict, the patent specification, including definitions, will control. In addition, the materials, methods, and examples are illustrative only and are not intended to be necessarily limiting.
Some embodiments of the invention are herein described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings. With specific reference now to the drawings in detail, it is stressed that the particulars shown are by way of example and for purposes of illustrative discussion of embodiments of the invention. In this regard, the description taken with the drawings makes apparent to those skilled in the art how embodiments of the invention may be practiced.
In the drawings:
The present invention, in some embodiments thereof, relates to methods of introducing dsRNA to plant seeds for modulating gene expression.
Before explaining at least one embodiment of the invention in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not necessarily limited in its application to the details set forth in the following description or exemplified by the Examples. The invention is capable of other embodiments or of being practiced or carried out in various ways.
With the extensive growth of the world-population and the limited habitats for plant growth and cultivation, there is an urging need to improve plant yields under these changing conditions.
RNAi has emerged as a powerful tool for modulating gene expression which can be used for generating plants with improved stress tolerance.
In plants, RNAi is typically performed by producing transgenic plants that express a DNA fragment that is transcribed to produce a dsRNA. This dsRNA is then processed into siRNAs that mediate the silencing of target genes, typically by targeting cleavage of the target gene by an RNA Induced Silencing Complex (RISC) or by translational repression.
The major technical limitation for this technology is that many important plant crop species are difficult or impossible to transform, precluding the constitutive expression of constructs directing production of dsRNA. Moreover, questions concerning the potential ecological impact of virus-resistant transgenic plants have so far significantly limited their use [Tepfer, 2002, Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 40, 467-491].
The present inventors have now devised a novel technology for introducing dsRNA molecules directly to the plant seed. These dsRNA molecules enter seeds and start a silencing process, which is continued during the life cycle of the plant, resulting in a plant with an improved trait of interest. The introduced dsRNA is naked and as such no exogenous transcription regulatory elements are introduced into the plant thus lowering the environmental concerns associated with transgenic plants. In addition, the modified seed can be germinated to generate a plant without the need of going through the laborious and cumbersome steps of tissue culture regeneration.
As is illustrated herein below and in the Examples section, which follows, embodiments of the present invention includes configuring the conditions necessary to introduce naked dsRNA into the seeds (see e.g., Example 1). The naked dsRNA doesn't integrate into the genome and is highly stable in the plant and in solution (Examples 2-4). The naked dsRNA penetrates through the seed coat (i.e., testa) of both monocot and dicot plants and distributes in the endosperm and seed embryo (Examples 5-6). In one aspect, embodiments of the present invention include altering expression of endogenous genes (Examples 7-14). In another aspect, embodiments of the present invention include introducing into seeds dsRNA directed to viral genes (Example 2). These results were reproduced over a number of plants of both monocot and dicot groups. In a further aspect, embodiments of the present invention include providing a wide range of doses and kinetics which resulted in a significant alteration of gene expression (see e.g., Examples 23-29). These results are further established in wheat and substantiated by a biological effect showing delayed germination ((Example 30). Further, as shown in Examples 31 and 32, gene expression is altered in Corn following introduction of dsRNA for various targets. Examples 33-37 show dsRNA treatment of other vegetables, including cucumber and lettuce ( ). In a further aspect, embodiments of the present invention include altering gene expression in another commercial crop i.e., soy (see, e.g., Example 42). Thus, the present results are sufficient to show that the present teachings provide a cost-effective treatment of plant seeds to achieve a desired agricultural and horticultural phenotype. Without being bound by theory, it is suggested that the newly suggested transformation modality and modulation of gene expression is dependent on and associated with:
(i) Introduction of naked dsRNA into the interior of seeds (as opposed to mere seed coating). The introduction is effected by soaking the seeds in a solution which comprises the dsRNA such that the dsRNA penetrates through the seed coat or by dipping such that the dsRNA coats the seed and penetrates through the coat after sowing;
(ii) Amplification of the dsRNA signal; and
(iii) Spreading of the dsRNA signal throughout the plant.
The first step occurs only once, during and shortly after the initial seed treatment, while the second and third steps occur in a repetitive loop for as long as the silencing signal remains active in the plant.
A suggested unbinding mode of action for the described invention is based on each step:
Introduction of dsRNA into Seeds
A typical mature seed consists of an embryo encapsulated within a maternal seed coat (testa) and an abundant layer of endosperm tissue between the embryo and seed coat. The endosperm serves as a nutrient source for the embryo during seed development, germination and seedling establishment.
Seed germination typically begins with exposure of the seeds to water, which is absorbed by the embryo and endosperm. The endosperm then expands in volume, with the endosperm of some plant species being able to grow several-fold from their original volume. The embryo, which was dormant until this stage, is now released from dormancy and cell division, expansion and differentiation begin. The endosperm feeds the developing embryo until it is developed enough to begin photosynthesis and autotrophic growth.
Based on these known mechanisms of seed germination, two possible modes of action for the initial step of “Introduction of dsRNA into seeds” are suggested:
The dsRNA molecules enter the embryo directly, carried by the water-based solution which is used for the seed treatment.
The dsRNA molecules enter the endosperm as part of the endosperm's water-absorption process. These molecules then feed the embryo as it develops as part of the nutrient flow from the endosperm during germination and seed development.
Based on the results described in
Amplification of the dsRNA Signal
Once the dsRNA molecules enter the embryo, they are recognized and processed by RNase III-like enzymes such as Dicer or Dicer-like (DCL) enzymes. DCL enzymes process the long dsRNA molecules into short, double strand RNAs (known as siRNAs or shRNAs), which are typically 21-24 nucleotides (nt) long. One of the siRNA strands is typically rapidly degraded and the second one can be incorporated in RISC (RNA Induced Silencing Complex) protein complexes, which contain an Argonaute (AGO) protein. AGO proteins contain a PIWI domain to bind siRNAs and a PAZ domain with RNase activity. Subsequently, the siRNA/AGO complex identifies an mRNA molecule, which is complementary to the siRNA and results in its silencing by cleavage or translational repression.
The siRNA is then released from the RISC complex and can now act as a primer for an RNA-Dependant RNA Polymerase (RDRP), this is an enzyme which is unique to the plant kingdom and can generate amplification of the silencing signal by generating new dsRNA molecules (secondary siRNA). These newly-synthesized dsRNAs can be processed again as described above, therefore maintaining and amplifying the silencing signal.
Spreading of the Silencing Signal
Silencing spreading is a known and well-understood phenomenon in plants. It is believed that short distance, cell-to-cell spreading occurs through plasmodesmata. This process is thought to be mediated by a 21nt-long siRNA, which is the product of a DCL enzyme. Additionally, systemic spreading is achieved through the phloem across the entire plant from source to sink.
It is assumed that in the described methodology, spreading of the silencing signal occurs once the silencing signal begins and is amplified as described above. This may include both short-distance and systematic spreading by various siRNA signal molecules.
Thus according to an aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of introducing naked double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) into a seed, the method comprising contacting the seed with the naked dsRNA under conditions which allow penetration of the dsRNA into the seed, thereby introducing the dsRNA into the seed.
As used herein the phrase “naked dsRNA” refers to a dsRNA nucleic acid molecule which is non-transcribable in the plant cell. Thus, the naked dsRNA molecule is not comprised in a nucleic acid expression construct such as a viral vector. According to some embodiments of the invention, the naked dsRNA molecule is not derived from a viral vector. According to other embodiments of the invention, the naked dsRNA molecule is not produced from a natural viral infection. The naked dsRNA may comprise regulatory elements for in-vitro transcription, such as the T7 promoter. According to some embodiments of the invention, the naked dsRNA may be modified e.g., chemically modified, to confer higher bioavailability, penetration into the seeds and/or improved shelf-life.
As used herein the term “dsRNA” relates to two strands of anti-parallel polyribonucleic acids held together by base pairing. The two strands can be of identical length or of different lengths provided there is enough sequence homology between the two strands that a double stranded structure is formed with at least 80%, 90%, 95% or 100% complementarity over the entire length. According to an embodiment of the invention, there are no overhangs for the dsRNA molecule. According to another embodiment of the invention, the dsRNA molecule comprises overhangs. According to other embodiments, the strands are aligned such that there are at least 1, 2, or 3 bases at the end of the strands which do not align (i.e., for which no complementary bases occur in the opposing strand) such that an overhang of 1, 2 or 3 residues occurs at one or both ends of the duplex when strands are annealed.
As mentioned any dsRNA molecule can be used in accordance with the present teachings. In some embodiments, dsRNA used in the present application is subject to amplification by RNA-Dependant RNA Polymerase (RDRP). Without being limited, dsRNA can be siRNA, shRNA, pre-miRNA, or pri-miRNA.
The present teachings relate to various lengths of dsRNA, whereby the shorter version i.e., x is shorter or equals 50 bp (e.g., 17-50), is referred to as siRNA or miRNA. Longer dsRNA molecules of 51-600 are referred to herein as dsRNA, which can be further processed for siRNA molecules.
In one embodiment, the dsRNA in the present application is between 20 and 100 bp, between 25 and 90 bp, between 30 and 80 bp, between 30 and 70 bp, between 30 and 60 bp, or between 30 and 50 bp. In another embodiment, the dsRNA in the present application is about 50 bp. In a further embodiment, the 5′ and/or 3′ ends of the sense and/or antisense strands of the dsRNA comprise 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or more nucleotide overhangs. In some embodiments, the dsRNA comprises 1, 2, or 3 nucleotide overhangs on the 5′ and/or 3′ ends of the sense and/or antisense strands. In another embodiment, the ends of the dsRNA are blunt.
In one embodiment, the dsRNA in the present application is between 15 and 500 bp, between 15 and 450 bp, between 15 and 400 bp, between 15 and 350 bp, between 15 and 300 bp, between 15 and 250 bp, between 15 and 200 bp, between 15 and 150 bp, between 15 and 100 bp, between 15 and 90 bp, between 15 and 80 bp, between 15 and 70 bp, between 15 and 60 bp, between 15 and 50 bp, between 15 and 40 bp, between 15 and 35 bp, between 15 and 30 bp, or between 15 and 25 bp. In another embodiment, the dsRNA in the present application is at least about 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 500, 600, 800, 900, 1000 nucleotides long. In a further embodiment, the dsRNA in the present application is between 100 and 1000 bp, between 200 and 1000 bp, between 300 and 1000 bp, between 400 and 1000 bp, between 500 and 1000 bp, between 600 and 1000 bp, between 700 and 1000 bp, between 800 and 1000 bp, or between 900 and 1000 bp. The term “siRNA” refers to small inhibitory RNA duplexes (generally between 17-30 basepairs, but also longer e.g., 31-50 bp) that induce the RNA interference (RNAi) pathway. Typically, siRNAs are chemically synthesized as 21mers with a central 19 bp duplex region and symmetric 2-base 3′-overhangs on the termini, although it has been recently described that chemically synthesized RNA duplexes of 25-30 base length can have as much as a 100-fold increase in potency compared with 21mers at the same location. The observed increased potency obtained using longer RNAs in triggering RNAi is theorized to result from providing Dicer with a substrate (27mer) instead of a product (21mer) and that this improves the rate or efficiency of entry of the siRNA duplex into RISC.
It has been found that position of the 3′-overhang influences potency of an siRNA and asymmetric duplexes having a 3′-overhang on the antisense strand are generally more potent than those with the 3′-overhang on the sense strand (Rose et al., 2005). This can be attributed to asymmetrical strand loading into RISC, as the opposite efficacy patterns are observed when targeting the antisense transcript.
The strands of a double-stranded interfering RNA (e.g., an siRNA) may be connected to form a hairpin or stem-loop structure (e.g., an shRNA). Thus, as mentioned the RNA silencing agent of some embodiments of the invention may also be a short hairpin RNA (shRNA).
The term “shRNA”, as used herein, refers to an RNA agent having a stem-loop structure, comprising a first and second region of complementary sequence, the degree of complementarity and orientation of the regions being sufficient such that base pairing occurs between the regions, the first and second regions being joined by a loop region, the loop resulting from a lack of base pairing between nucleotides (or nucleotide analogs) within the loop region. The number of nucleotides in the loop is a number between and including 3 to 23, or 5 to 15, or 7 to 13, or 4 to 9, or 9 to 11. Some of the nucleotides in the loop can be involved in base-pair interactions with other nucleotides in the loop. Examples of oligonucleotide sequences that can be used to form the loop include 5′-UUCAAGAGA-3′ (Brummelkamp, T. R. et al. (2002) Science 296: 550, SEQ ID NO: 22) and 5′-UUUGUGUAG-3′ (Castanotto, D. et al. (2002) RNA 8:1454, SEQ ID NO: 23). It will be recognized by one of skill in the art that the resulting single chain oligonucleotide forms a stem-loop or hairpin structure comprising a double-stranded region capable of interacting with the RNAi machinery.
As used herein, the phrase “microRNA (also referred to herein interchangeably as “miRNA” or “miR”) or a precursor thereof” refers to a microRNA (miRNA) molecule acting as a post-transcriptional regulator. Typically, the miRNA molecules are RNA molecules of about 20 to 22 nucleotides in length which can be loaded into a RISC complex and which direct the cleavage of another RNA molecule, wherein the other RNA molecule comprises a nucleotide sequence essentially complementary to the nucleotide sequence of the miRNA molecule.
Typically, a miRNA molecule is processed from a “pre-miRNA” or as used herein a precursor of a pre-miRNA molecule by proteins, such as DCL proteins, present in any plant cell and loaded onto a RISC complex where it can guide the cleavage of the target RNA molecules.
Pre-microRNA molecules are typically processed from pri-microRNA molecules (primary transcripts). The single stranded RNA segments flanking the pre-microRNA are important for processing of the pri-miRNA into the pre-miRNA. The cleavage site appears to be determined by the distance from the stem-ssRNA junction (Han et al. 2006, Cell 125, 887-901, 887-901).
As used herein, a “pre-miRNA” molecule is an RNA molecule of about 100 to about 200 nucleotides, preferably about 100 to about 130 nucleotides which can adopt a secondary structure comprising an imperfect double stranded RNA stem and a single stranded RNA loop (also referred to as “hairpin”) and further comprising the nucleotide sequence of the miRNA (and its complement sequence) in the double stranded RNA stem. According to a specific embodiment, the miRNA and its complement are located about 10 to about 20 nucleotides from the free ends of the miRNA double stranded RNA stem. The length and sequence of the single stranded loop region are not critical and may vary considerably, e.g. between 30 and 50 nt in length. The complementarity between the miRNA and its complement need not be perfect and about 1 to 3 bulges of unpaired nucleotides can be tolerated. The secondary structure adopted by an RNA molecule can be predicted by computer algorithms conventional in the art such as mFOLD. The particular strand of the double stranded RNA stem from the pre-miRNA which is released by DCL activity and loaded onto the RISC complex is determined by the degree of complementarity at the 5′ end, whereby the strand which at its 5′ end is the least involved in hydrogen bounding between the nucleotides of the different strands of the cleaved dsRNA stem is loaded onto the RISC complex and will determine the sequence specificity of the target RNA molecule degradation. However, if empirically the miRNA molecule from a particular synthetic pre-miRNA molecule is not functional (because the “wrong” strand is loaded on the RISC complex), it will be immediately evident that this problem can be solved by exchanging the position of the miRNA molecule and its complement on the respective strands of the dsRNA stem of the pre-miRNA molecule. As is known in the art, binding between A and U involving two hydrogen bounds, or G and U involving two hydrogen bounds is less strong that between G and C involving three hydrogen bounds. Exemplary hairpin sequences are provided in Tables 1-8, below.
Naturally occurring miRNA molecules may be comprised within their naturally occurring pre-miRNA molecules but they can also be introduced into existing pre-miRNA molecule scaffolds by exchanging the nucleotide sequence of the miRNA molecule normally processed from such existing pre-miRNA molecule for the nucleotide sequence of another miRNA of interest. The scaffold of the pre-miRNA can also be completely synthetic. Likewise, synthetic miRNA molecules may be comprised within, and processed from, existing pre-miRNA molecule scaffolds or synthetic pre-miRNA scaffolds. Some pre-miRNA scaffolds may be preferred over others for their efficiency to be correctly processed into the designed microRNAs, particularly when expressed as a chimeric gene wherein other DNA regions, such as untranslated leader sequences or transcription termination and polyadenylation regions are incorporated in the primary transcript in addition to the pre-microRNA.
According to the present teachings, the dsRNA molecules may be naturally occurring or synthetic.
The dsRNA can be a mixture of long and short dsRNA molecules such as, dsRNA, siRNA, siRNA+dsRNA, siRNA+miRNA, or a combination of same. According to a specific embodiment, the dsRNA is an siRNA (100%). According to a specific embodiment the dsRNA is an siRNA+dsRNA combination in various ratios. Any dsRNA to siRNA ratio can be used for the siRNA+dsRNA combination. For example a ratio of 1 to 1:one dsRNA mixed with the same sequence after RNAse III treatment. According to another embodiment, the dsRNA to siRNA ratio is 2:1, 1.5:1, 1.3:1, 1:0.01, 1:0.05 or 1:0.1. According to a further embodiment, the dsRNA to siRNA ratio is 2:1 to 1:0.1. According to a specific embodiment, the dsRNA is purified dsRNA (100%). According to another embodiment, the dsRNA to siRNA ratio is 1:2, 1:5, 1:10, 1:20, or 1:50. According to a further embodiment, the dsRNA is purified siRNA (100%).
The dsRNA molecule is designed for specifically targeting a target gene of interest. It will be appreciated that the dsRNA can be used to down-regulate one or more target genes. If a number of target genes are targeted, a heterogenic composition which comprises a plurality of dsRNA molecules for targeting a number of target genes is used. Alternatively said plurality of dsRNA molecules are separately applied to the seeds (but not as a single composition). According to a specific embodiment, a number of distinct dsRNA molecules for a single target are used, which may be separately or simultaneously (i.e., co-formulation) applied.
According to an embodiment of the invention, the target gene is endogenous to the plant. Downregulating such a gene is typically important for conferring the plant with an improved, agricultural, horticultural, nutritional trait (“improvement” or an “increase” is further defined hereinbelow). It will be appreciated that the treatment with the dsRNA may result in an up-regulation of the target gene (which follows a suggested mechanism that is provided hereinbelow) however such an up-regulation may be transient. The present inventors are able to confer resistance to biotic stress by modulating expression of endogenous genes in cucumber and tomato thereby conferring resistance to infections as demonstrated in Examples 35 and 41.
As used herein “endogenous” refers to a gene which expression (mRNA or protein) takes place in the plant. Typically, the endogenous gene is naturally expressed in the plant or originates from the plant. Thus, the plant may be a wild-type plant. However, the plant may also be a genetically modified plant (transgenic).
Downregulation of the target gene may be important for conferring improved one of-, or at least one of (e.g., two of- or more), biomass, vigor, yield, abiotic stress tolerance, biotic stress tolerance or improved nitrogen use efficiency.
Exemplary target genes include, but are not limited to, an enzyme, a structural protein, a plant regulatory protein, a miRNA target gene, or a non-coding RNA such as a miRNA of the plant. WO2011067745, WO 2009125401 and WO 2012056401 provide examples of miRNA sequences or targets of miRNAs (e.g., mRNA167, miRNA 156, miR164 and targets thereof NFY, SPL17 and NAC, respectively) which expression can be silenced to improve a plant trait. Other examples of target genes which may be subject to modulation according to the present teachings are described in the Examples section which follows.
The target gene may comprise a nucleic acid sequence which is transcribed to an mRNA which codes for a polypeptide.
Alternatively, the target gene can be a non-coding gene such as a miRNA or a siRNA.
For example, in order to silence the expression of an mRNA of interest, synthesis of the dsRNA suitable for use with some embodiments of the invention can be selected as follows. First, the mRNA sequence is scanned including the 3′ UTR and the 5′ UTR.
Second, the mRNA sequence is compared to an appropriate genomic database using any sequence alignment software, such as the BLAST software available from the NCBI server (wwwdotncbidotnlmdotnihdotgov/BLAST/). Putative regions in the mRNA sequence which exhibit significant homology to other coding sequences are filtered out.
Qualifying target sequences are selected as template for dsRNA synthesis. Preferred sequences are those that have as little homology to other genes in the genome to reduce an “off-target” effect.
In one embodiment, the dsRNA of the present application may comprise a target sequence in an intron, exon, 3′ UTR, 5′ UTR, or a regulatory element of an endogenous gene, or combinations thereof. In one embodiment, the dsRNA of the present application may comprise a target site residing in a promoter.
It will be appreciated that the RNA silencing agent of some embodiments of the invention need not be limited to those molecules containing only RNA, but further encompasses chemically-modified nucleotides and non-nucleotides.
The dsRNA may be synthesized using any method known in the art, including either enzymatic syntheses or solid-phase syntheses. These are especially useful in the case of short polynucleotide sequences with or without modifications as explained above. Equipment and reagents for executing solid-phase synthesis are commercially available from, for example, Applied Biosystems. Any other means for such synthesis may also be employed; the actual synthesis of the oligonucleotides is well within the capabilities of one skilled in the art and can be accomplished via established methodologies as detailed in, for example: Sambrook, J. and Russell, D. W. (2001), “Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual”; Ausubel, R. M. et al., eds. (1994, 1989), “Current Protocols in Molecular Biology,” Volumes I-III, John Wiley & Sons, Baltimore, Md.; Perbal, B. (1988), “A Practical Guide to Molecular Cloning,” John Wiley & Sons, New York; and Gait, M. J., ed. (1984), “Oligonucleotide Synthesis”; utilizing solid-phase chemistry, e.g. cyanoethyl phosphoramidite followed by deprotection, desalting, and purification by, for example, an automated trityl-on method or HPLC.
As mentioned, the naked dsRNA molecule is directly contacted with the seed.
The seed may be of any plant, such as of the Viridiplantae super family including monocotyledon and dicotyledon plants. Other plants are listed hereinbelow. According to an embodiment of the invention, the cells of the plant comprise RNA dependent RNA polymerase activity and the target RNA molecule of the dsRNA to ensure amplification of the dsRNA.
The term “plant” as used herein encompasses whole plants, ancestors and progeny of the plants and plant parts, including seeds, shoots, stems, roots (including tubers), and isolated plant cells, tissues and organs. The plant may be in any form including suspension cultures, embryos, meristematic regions, callus tissue, leaves, gametophytes, sporophytes, pollen, and microspores. It will be appreciated, that the plant or seed thereof may be transgenic plants.
As used herein the phrase “plant cell” refers to plant cells which are derived and isolated from disintegrated plant cell tissue or plant cell cultures. Plant cells may be reproductive cells (i.e., cells from a tissue contributing directly to the sexual reproduction of a plant) or non-reproductive cells (i.e., cells from a tissue not involved in the sexual reproduction of a plant). Plant cells may be cells that are capable of regenerating into a whole plant or cells that cannot regenerate into a whole plant, for example, enucleated mature sieve tube cells.
As used herein the phrase “plant cell culture” refers to any type of native (naturally occurring) plant cells, plant cell lines and genetically modified plant cells, which are not assembled to form a complete plant, such that at least one biological structure of a plant is not present. Optionally, the plant cell culture of this aspect of the present invention may comprise a particular type of a plant cell or a plurality of different types of plant cells. It should be noted that optionally plant cultures featuring a particular type of plant cell may be originally derived from a plurality of different types of such plant cells.
Any commercially or scientifically valuable plant is envisaged in accordance with some embodiments of the invention. Plants that are particularly useful in the methods of the invention include all plants which belong to the super family Viridiplantae, in particular monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants including a fodder or forage legume, ornamental plant, food crop, tree, or shrub selected from the list comprising Acacia spp., Acer spp., Actinidia spp., Aesculus spp., Agathis australis, Albizia amara, Alsophila tricolor, Andropogon spp., Arachis spp, Areca catechu, Astelia fragrans, Astragalus cicer, Baikiaea plurijuga, Betula spp., Brassica spp., Bruguiera gymnorrhiza, Burkea africana, Butea frondosa, Cadaba farinosa, Calliandra spp, Camellia sinensis, Canna indica, Capsicum spp., Cassia spp., Centroema pubescens, Chacoomeles spp., Cinnamomum cassia, Coffea arabica, Colophospermum mopane, Coronillia varia, Cotoneaster serotina, Crataegus spp., Cucumis spp., Cupressus spp., Cyathea dealbata, Cydonia oblonga, Cryptomeria japonica, Cymbopogon spp., Cynthea dealbata, Cydonia oblonga, Dalbergia monetaria, Davallia divaricata, Desmodium spp., Dicksonia squarosa, Dibeteropogon amplectens, Dioclea spp, Dolichos spp., Dorycnium rectum, Echinochloa pyramidalis, Ehraffia spp., Eleusine coracana, Eragrestis spp., Erythrina spp., Eucalyptus spp., Euclea schimperi, Eulalia vi/losa, Pagopyrum spp., Feijoa sellowlana, Fragaria spp., Flemingia spp, Freycinetia banksli, Geranium thunbergii, GinAgo biloba, Glycine javanica, Gliricidia spp, Gossypium hirsutum, Grevillea spp., Guibourtia coleosperma, Hedysarum spp., Hemaffhia altissima, Heteropogon contoffus, Hordeum vulgare, Hyparrhenia rufa, Hypericum erectum, Hypeffhelia dissolute, Indigo incamata, Iris spp., Leptarrhena pyrolifolia, Lespediza spp., Lettuca spp., Leucaena leucocephala, Loudetia simplex, Lotonus bainesli, Lotus spp., Macrotyloma axillare, Malus spp., Manihot esculenta, Medicago saliva, Metasequoia glyptostroboides, Musa sapientum, Nicotianum spp., Onobrychis spp., Ornithopus spp., Oryza spp., Peltophorum africanum, Pennisetum spp., Persea gratissima, Petunia spp., Phaseolus spp., Phoenix canariensis, Phormium cookianum, Photinia spp., Picea glauca, Pinus spp., Pisum sativam, Podocarpus totara, Pogonarthria fleckii, Pogonaffhria squarrosa, Populus spp., Prosopis cineraria, Pseudotsuga menziesii, Pterolobium stellatum, Pyrus communis, Quercus spp., Rhaphiolepsis umbellata, Rhopalostylis sapida, Rhus natalensis, Ribes grossularia, Ribes spp., Robinia pseudoacacia, Rosa spp., Rubus spp., Salix spp., Schyzachyrium sanguineum, Sciadopitys vefficillata, Sequoia sempervirens, Sequoiadendron giganteum, Sorghum bicolor, Spinacia spp., Sporobolus ftmbriatus, Stiburus alopecuroides, Stylosanthos humilis, Tadehagi spp, Taxodium distichum, Themeda triandra, Trifolium spp., Triticum spp., Tsuga heterophylla, Vaccinium spp., Vicia spp., Vitis vinifera, Watsonia pyramidata, Zantedeschia aethiopica, Zea mays, amaranth, artichoke, asparagus, broccoli, Brussels sprouts, cabbage, canola, carrot, cauliflower, celery, collard greens, flax, kale, lentil, oilseed rape, okra, onion, potato, rice, soybean, straw, sugar beet, sugar cane, sunflower, tomato, squash tea, maize, wheat, barley, rye, oat, peanut, pea, lentil and alfalfa, cotton, rapeseed, canola, pepper, sunflower, tobacco, eggplant, eucalyptus, a tree, an ornamental plant, a perennial grass and a forage crop. Alternatively algae and other non-Viridiplantae can be used for the methods of the present invention.
According to some embodiments of the invention, the plant used by the method of the invention is a crop plant including, but not limited to, cotton, Brassica vegetables, oilseed rape, sesame, olive tree, palm oil, banana, wheat, corn or maize, barley, alfalfa, peanuts, sunflowers, rice, oats, sugarcane, soybean, turf grasses, barley, rye, sorghum, sugar cane, chicory, lettuce, tomato, zucchini, bell pepper, eggplant, cucumber, melon, watermelon, beans, hibiscus, okra, apple, rose, strawberry, chili, garlic, pea, lentil, canola, mums, Arabidopsis, broccoli, cabbage, beet, quinoa, spinach, squash, onion, leek, tobacco, potato, sugarbeet, papaya, pineapple, mango, Arabidopsis thaliana, and also plants used in horticulture, floriculture or forestry, such as, but not limited to, poplar, fir, eucalyptus, pine, an ornamental plant, a perennial grass and a forage crop, coniferous plants, moss, algae, as well as other plants listed in World Wide Web (dot) nationmaster (dot) com/encyclopedia/Plantae.
According to a specific embodiment, the plant is selected from the group consisting of corn, rice, wheat, tomato, cotton and sorghum.
According to a specific embodiment, the seed is an uncoated or fresh seed that hasn't been subjected to chemical/physical treatments.
Washing of the seeds is effected for 30 min to 4 hours. Other exemplary wash ranges are 1 minute to 10 minutes, 10 minutes-30 minutes. According to some embodiments, washing of the seeds can be as short as 5, 10, 20, 30, 45, or 60 seconds. The wash solution may include a weak detergent such as Tween-20. The concentration of the detergent may be 0.01-0.2% or 0.2-1%. According to another embodiment, the detergent concentration can be about 0.001%, 0.005%, 0.01%, 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.5%, 1% or higher.
The seed may be subjected to priming or washing prior to contacting with the dsRNA.
As used herein the term “priming” refers to controlling the hydration level within seeds so that the metabolic activity necessary for germination can occur but radicle emergence is prevented. Different physiological activities within the seed occur at different moisture levels (Leopold and Vertucci, 1989; Taylor, 1997). The last physiological activity in the germination process is radicle emergence. The initiation of radicle emergence requires a high seed water content. By limiting seed water content, all the metabolic steps necessary for germination can occur without the irreversible act of radicle emergence. Prior to radicle emergence, the seed is considered desiccation tolerant, thus the primed seed moisture content can be decreased by drying. After drying, primed seeds can be stored until time of sowing.
Several different priming methods are used commercially. Among them, liquid or osmotic priming and solid matrix priming appear to have the greatest following (Khan et al., 1991).
According to an embodiment of the invention, priming is effected in the presence of salt, a chelating agent, polyethylene glycol or a combination of same (e.g., chelating agent and salt).
Alternatively priming is effected in the presence of water such as deionized water or double deionized water. According to a specific embodiment, the priming is effected in the presence of 100% ddW.
Several types of seed priming are commonly used:
Osmopriming (osmoconditioning)—is the standard priming technique. Seeds are incubated in well aerated solutions with a low water potential, and afterwards washes and dried. The low water potential of the solutions can be achieved by adding osmotica like mannitol, polyethyleneglycol (PEG) or salts like KCl.
Hydropriming (drum priming)—is achieved by continuous or successive addition of a limited amount of water to the seeds. A drum is used for this purpose and the water can also be applied by humid air. ‘On-farm steeping’ is a cheap and useful technique that is practiced by incubating seeds (cereals, legumes) for a limited time in warm water.
Matrixpriming (matriconditioning)—is the incubation of seeds in a solid, insoluble matrix (vermiculite, diatomaceous earth, cross-linked highly water-absorbent polymers) with a limited amount of water. This method confers a slow imbibition.
Pregerminated seeds—is only possible with a few species. In contrast to normal priming, seeds are allowed to perform radicle protrusion. This is followed by sorting for specific stages, a treatment that reinduces desiccation tolerance, and drying. The use of pregerminated seeds causes rapid and uniform seedling development.
Thus, according to an exemplary embodiment, the seeds are primed seeds.
Of note, it may be possible that the seeds are treated with water (double-distilled water, ddW), prior to contacting with the dsRNA without effecting any priming on the seeds. For instance, treatment for a short while with water (e.g., 30 seconds to 1 hours, 30 seconds to 0.5 hour, 30 seconds to 10 min, 30 seconds to 5 min or 45 seconds to 5 min). According to some embodiments, treatment with water can be as short as 5, 10, 20, or 30 seconds.
It will be appreciated that the dsRNA can be comprised in water (e.g., tap water, distilled water or double distilled water) i.e., free of any of the above mentioned priming effective concentration of salts, a chelating agents, polyethylene glycol or combinations of same (e.g., chelating agent and salt).
According to an exemplary embodiment, the seeds are non-primed seeds.
A non-limiting exemplary method of introducing the dsRNA into the seed is provided in Example 1, which is considered as an integral part of the specification.
The temperature at the washing/priming and drying steps may be the same or differ.
According to an exemplary embodiment, the washing/priming is effected at 4-28° C.
According to an exemplary embodiment, the priming/washing solution or the dsRNA containing solution is devoid of a solid carrier.
According to an exemplary embodiment, the priming/washing solution or the dsRNA containing solution is devoid of a transferring agent such as a surfactant or a salt.
According to a further embodiment of the invention, the seeds subject to contacting with the dsRNA molecule are washed in order to remove agents, to which the seeds have been subjected, such as a pesticide, a fungicide, an insecticide, a fertilizer, a coating agent and a coloring agent.
Thus, according to an exemplary embodiment, the seeds (prior to treatment with dsRNA) are substantially free (i.e., do not comprise effective amounts) of pesticide, a fungicide, an insecticide, a fertilizer, a coating agent and a coloring agent.
The seeds are then subjected to drying. In some embodiments, drying is optional.
According to an exemplary embodiment, the drying is effected at 20-37° C., 20-30° C., 22-37° C., 15-22° C. or 20-25° C. for 10-20 hours, 10-16 hours or even 2-5 hours.
Various considerations are to be taken when calculating the concentration of the naked dsRNA in the contacting solution.
These are dependent on at least one of seed size, seed weight, seed volume, seed surface area, seed density and seed permeability.
For example, related to seed size, weight, volume and surface area, it is estimated that corn seeds will require longer treatment than Arabidopsis and tomato seeds. Regarding permeability and density, it is estimated that wheat seeds will require longer treatments at higher concentrations than tomato seeds.
Exemplary concentrations of dsRNA in the treating solution include, but are not limited to, 0.01-0.3 μg/μl, 0.01-0.15 μg/μl, 0.04-0.15 μg/μl, 0.1-100 μg/μl; 0.1-50 μg/μl, 0.1-10 μg/μl, 0.1-5 μg/μl, 0.1-1 μg/μl, 0.1-0.5 μg/μl, 0.15-0.5 μg/μl, 0.1-0.3 μg/μl, 0.01-0.1 μg/μl, 0.01-0.05 μg/μl, 0.02-0.04 μg/μl, 0.001-0.02 μg/μl. According to a specific embodiment, the concentration of the dsRNA in the treating solution is 0.01-0.15 or 0.04-0.15 μg/μl.
In one embodiment, the dsRNA concentration in the treating solution is 0.01-0.3 μg/ml, 0.01-0.15 μg/ml, 0.04-0.15 μg/ml, 0.1-100 μg/ml; 0.1-50 μg/ml, 0.1-10 μg/ml, 0.1-5 μg/ml, 0.1-1 μg/ml, 0.1-0.5 μg/ml, 0.15-0.5 μg/ml, 0.1-0.3 μg/ml, 0.01-0.1 μg/ml, 0.01-0.05 μg/ml, 0.02-0.04 μg/ml, or 0.001-0.02 μg/ml.
In another embodiment, the dsRNA concentration in the treating solution is 0.0001-3 μg/μl, 0.0001-2.5 μg/μl, 0.0001-2 μg/μl, 0.0001-1.5 μg/μl, 0.0001-1 μg/μl, 0.0001-0.9 μg/μl, 0.0001-0.8 μg/μl, 0.0001-0.7 μg/μl, 0.0001-0.6 μg/μl, 0.0001-0.5 μg/μl, 0.0001-0.4 μg/μl, 0.0001-0.3 μg/μl, 0.0001-0.2 μg/μl, 0.0001-0.1 μg/μl, 0.0001-0.05 μg/μl, 0.0001-0.02 μg/μl, 0.0001-0.01 μg/μl, 0.0001-0.005 μg/μl, 0.0001-0.001 μg/μl, or 0.0001-0.0005 μg/μl.
In another embodiment, the dsRNA concentration in the treating solution is 0.0001-3 μg/μl, 0.0005-3 μg/μl, 0.001-3 μg/μl, 0.005-3 μg/μl, 0.01-3 μg/μl, 0.05-3 μg/μl, 0.1-3 μg/μl, 0.2-3 μg/μl, 0.3-3 μg/μl, 0.4-3 μg/μl, 0.5-3 μg/μl, 0.6-3 μg/μl, 0.7-3 μg/μl, 0.8-3 μg/μl, 0.9-3 μg/μl, 1-3 μg/μl, or 2-3 μg/μl.
In another embodiment, the dsRNA concentration in the treating solution is 0.0001-3 μg/μl, 0.0005-2.5 μg/μl, 0.001-2 μg/μl, 0.005-1.5 μg/μl, 0.01-1 μg/μl, 0.05-0.5 μg/μl, 0.1-0.4 μg/μl, or 0.2-0.3 μg/μl.
According to a specific embodiment, the contacting with the dsRNA is effected in the presence of a chelating agent such as EDTA or another chelating agent such as DTPA (0.01-0.1 mM).
The contacting solution may comprise a transferring agent such as a surfactant or a salt.
Examples of such transferring agents include but are not limited salts such as sodium or lithium salts of fatty acids (such as tallow or tallowamines or phospholipids lipofectamine or lipofectin (1-20 nM, or 0.1-1 nM)) and organosilicone surfactants. Other useful surfactants include organosilicone surfactants including nonionic organosilicone surfactants, e.g., trisiloxane ethoxylate surfactants or a silicone polyether copolymer such as a copolymer of polyalkylene oxide modified heptamethyl trisiloxane and allyloxypolypropylene glycol methylether (commercially available as Silwet™ L-77 surfactant having CAS Number 27306-78-1 and EPA Number. CAL.REG.NO. 5905-50073-AA, currently available from Momentive Performance Materials, Albany, N.Y.).
Useful physical agents can include (a) abrasives such as carborundum, corundum, sand, calcite, pumice, garnet, and the like, (b) nanoparticles such as carbon nanotubes or (c) a physical force. Carbon nanotubes are disclosed by Kam et al. (2004) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 126 (22):6850-6851, Liu et al. (2009) Nano Lett., 9(3):1007-1010, and Khodakovskaya et al. (2009) ACS Nano, 3(10):3221-3227. Physical force agents can include heating, chilling, the application of positive pressure, or ultrasound treatment. Agents for laboratory conditioning of a plant to permeation by polynucleotides include, e.g., application of a chemical agent, enzymatic treatment, heating or chilling, treatment with positive or negative pressure, or ultrasound treatment. Agents for conditioning plants in a field include chemical agents such as surfactants and salts.
Contacting of the seeds with the dsRNA can be effected using any method known in the art as long as a suppressive amount of the dsRNA enters the seeds. These examples include, but are not limited to, soaking, spraying or coating with powder, emulsion, suspension, or solution; similarly, the polynucleotide molecules are applied to the plant by any convenient method, e.g., spraying or wiping a solution, emulsion, or suspension.
As used herein “a suppressive amount” refers to an amount of dsRNA which is sufficient to down regulate the target gene by at least 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, or more, say 60%, 70%, 80%, 90% or more even 100%. The suppressive amount can be a result of the formation of amplification in the plant.
According to a specific embodiment contacting may be effected by soaking (i.e., inoculation) so that shaking the seeds with the treating solution may improve penetration and soaking and therefore reduce treatment time. Shaking is typically performed at 50-150 RPM and depends on the volume of the treating solution. Shaking may be effected for 4-24 hours (1-4 hours, 10 minutes to 1 hour or 30 seconds to 10 minutes). The present teachings further envisage short incubation time such as up to 10 minutes. Examples include but are not limited to 30 seconds to 7 min, to 30 seconds to 5 min, to 30 seconds to 3 min, to 30 seconds to 2 min, to 30 seconds to 1 min, 1 min to 10 min or to 1 min to 5 min.
In one embodiment, the incubation time may be between 1 and 60, between 2 and 60, between 5 and 60, between 10 and 60, between 20 and 60, between 30 and 60, between 40 and 60, between 50 and 60, between 1 and 50, between 1 and 40, between 1 and 30, between 1 and 20, between 1 and 10, between 1 and 5, between 5 and 50, between 10 and 40, and between 20 and 30 seconds.
In another embodiment, the incubation time may be between 1 and 60, between 2 and 60, between 5 and 60, between 10 and 60, between 20 and 60, between 30 and 60, between 40 and 60, between 50 and 60, between 1 and 50, between 1 and 40, between 1 and 30, between 1 and 20, between 1 and 10, between 1 and 5, between 5 and 50, between 10 and 40, and between 20 and 30 minutes.
Dipping is also considered under the scope of the present invention. Thus, the seeds are dipped into the dsRNA solution for seconds e.g., 1-10 seconds, 1-5 seconds, 1-3 seconds or 1-2 seconds. During this period, the dsRNA may adsorb on the seed surface. The adsorbed dsRNA which coats the seed may penetrate the seed or the seedling during germination. The incubation takes place in the dark at 4-28° C. or 15-22° C. (e.g., 8-15° C., 4-8° C., 22-28° C.).
In one embodiment, the dipping time may be between 1 and 60, between 2 and 60, between 5 and 60, between 10 and 60, between 20 and 60, between 30 and 60, between 40 and 60, between 50 and 60, between 1 and 50, between 1 and 40, between 1 and 30, between 1 and 20, between 1 and 10, between 1 and 5, between 5 and 50, between 10 and 40, and between 20 and 30 minutes.
In one embodiment, the dipping time may be between 1 and 60, between 2 and 60, between 5 and 60, between 10 and 60, between 20 and 60, between 30 and 60, between 40 and 60, between 50 and 60, between 1 and 50, between 1 and 40, between 1 and 30, between 1 and 20, between 1 and 10, between 1 and 5, between 5 and 50, between 10 and 40, and between 20 and 30 seconds.
According to a specific embodiment, contacting occurs prior to breaking of seed dormancy and embryo emergence.
Following contacting, preferably prior to breaking of seed dormancy and embryo emergence, the seeds may be subjected to treatments (e.g., coating) with the above agents (e.g., pesticide, fungicide etc.).
Contacting is effected such that the dsRNA enters the embryo, endosperm, the coat, or a combination of the three.
After contacting with the treatment solution, the seeds may be subjected to drying for up to 30 hours at 25-37° C. For example, the seeds may be dried for 16 hours at 30° C.
According to a specific embodiment, the seed (e.g., isolated seed) comprises the exogenous naked dsRNA and wherein at least 10 or 20 molecules of the dsRNA are in the endosperm of the isolated seed.
As used herein the term “isolated” refers to separation from the natural physiological environment. In the case of seed, the isolated seed is separated from other parts of the plant. In the case of a nucleic acid molecule (e.g., dsRNA) separated from the cytoplasm.
According to a specific embodiment, the dsRNA is not expressed from the plant genome, thereby not being an integral part of the genome.
According to a specific embodiment there is provided an isolated seed comprising an exogenous dsRNA being present at a similar concentration (e.g., about 1:1, 2:1 or 1:2) in an embryo and an endosperm of the seed. It is suggested that the direct introduction of the naked dsRNA to the seed results in higher concentration of the dsRNA in the endosperm than that observed when the dsRNA is expressed from a nucleic acid expression construct.
According to a specific embodiment there is provided an isolated seed comprising an exogenous dsRNA being spatially distributed in an embryo and an endosperm of the plant seed in a spatial distribution that differs from a spatial distribution of the exogenous dsRNA in a seed derived from a transgenic plant that recombinantly expresses said exogenous dsRNA.
Methods of measuring the localization of RNA molecules in the seed are well known in the art. The use of siGlo as described in the Examples section is an example for such.
According to an alternative or an additional embodiment, there is provided an isolated seed comprising an exogenous dsRNA, wherein a concentration ratio of said exogenous dsRNA to siRNA maturing therefrom is higher in the seed as compared to a transgenic seed recombinantly expressing said exogenous dsRNA.
As used herein the term “higher” refers to at least about 3%, 5%, 7%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90% or even a few folds higher.
According to an alternative or an additional embodiment, there is provided an isolated seed comprising an exogenous dsRNA, wherein the plant seed is devoid of a heterologous promoter for driving expression of said exogenous dsRNA, wherein a spatial distribution of said exogenous dsRNA and/or siRNA maturing therefrom is altered in the seed as compared to same in a transgenic seed recombinantly expressing said exogenous dsRNA.
The term “recombinantly expressing” refers to an expression from a nucleic acid construct.
According to a further embodiment there is provided a plant seed obtainable (or obtained) by any of the methods described herein.
Methods of qualifying successful introduction of the dsRNA include but are not limited to, RT-PCR (e.g., quantifying the level of the target gene or the naked dsRNA), phenotypic analysis such as biomass, vigor, yield and stress tolerance, root architecture, leaf dimensions, grain size and weight, oil content, cellulose, as well as cell biology techniques.
According to embodiments of the invention, up regulation of the gene targeted by the Seed treatment, as described herein, is sometimes observed. This has been mostly noted in genes that function as master regulators, such as targets of microRNAs (e.g. SPL and NAC) and other genes involved in regulating key processes (e.g. HY5). See for instance Examples 23 and 32 of the Examples section which follows.
Without being bound by theory, it is suggested that this phenomenon could be related to a potential feedback loop in the regulation of the expression of these genes. These genes are probably tightly regulated and therefore plants could react to changes in their expression in one direction by over compensating a strong change in the genes' expression in the opposite direction. Accordingly, it is possible for example that a gene will initially present down-regulation in the first hours or days following treatment, which could be altered into up-regulation later on in the plant's life cycle. See for instance Example 32 of the Examples section which follows. Thus, the present inventors observed up regulation of the NAC gene in corn five days following treatment and down regulation 10 and 12 days following treatment. This is further substantiated in lettuce for the Hy 5.5 or 5.6 gene.
Seeds may be stored for 1 day to several months prior to planting (e.g., at 4-10° C.).
The resultant seed can be germinated in the dark so as to produce a plant.
Thus there is provided a plant or plant part comprising an exogenous naked dsRNA and devoid of a heterologous promoter for driving expression of the dsRNA in the plant.
As used herein “devoid of a heterologous promoter for driving expression of the dsRNA” means that the plant or plant cell doesn't include a cis-acting regulatory sequence (e.g., heterologous) transcribing the dsRNA in the plant. As used herein the term “heterologous” refers to exogenous, not-naturally occurring within the native plant cell (such as by position of integration, or being non-naturally found within the plant cell). Thus the isolated seed in the absence of a heterologous promoter sequence for driving expression of the dsRNA in the plant, comprises a homogenic (prior to amplification) or heterogenic (secondary siRNAs, following amplification) population of plant non-transcribable dsRNA.
The present methodology can be used for modulating gene expression such as in a plant, the method comprising:
(a) contacting a seed of the plant with a naked dsRNA, under conditions which allow penetration of the dsRNA into the seed, thereby introducing the dsRNA into the seed; and optionally
(b) generating a plant of the seed.
When used for down-regulating a plant gene, the naked dsRNA is designed of the desired specificity using bioinformatic tools which are well known in the art (e.g., BLAST).
This methodology can be used in various applications starting from basic research such as in order to asses gene function and lasting in generating plants with altered traits which have valuable commercial use.
Such plants can exhibit agricultural beneficial traits including altered morphology, altered flowering, altered tolerance to stress (i.e., viral biotic stress and/or abiotic), altered biomass vigor and/or yield and the like.
The phrase “abiotic stress” as used herein refers to any adverse effect on metabolism, growth, viability and/or reproduction of a plant. Abiotic stress can be induced by any of suboptimal environmental growth conditions such as, for example, water deficit or drought, flooding, freezing, low or high temperature, strong winds, heavy metal toxicity, anaerobiosis, high or low nutrient levels (e.g. nutrient deficiency), high or low salt levels (e.g. salinity), atmospheric pollution, high or low light intensities (e.g. insufficient light) or UV irradiation. Abiotic stress may be a short term effect (e.g. acute effect, e.g. lasting for about a week) or alternatively may be persistent (e.g. chronic effect, e.g. lasting for example 10 days or more). The present invention contemplates situations in which there is a single abiotic stress condition or alternatively situations in which two or more abiotic stresses occur.
According to an exemplary embodiment the abiotic stress refers to salinity.
According to another exemplary embodiment the abiotic stress refers to drought.
According to another exemplary embodiment the abiotic stress refers to a temperature stress.
As used herein the phrase “abiotic stress tolerance” refers to the ability of a plant to endure an abiotic stress without exhibiting substantial physiological or physical damage (e.g. alteration in metabolism, growth, viability and/or reproducibility of the plant).
As used herein the phrase “nitrogen use efficiency (NUE)” refers to a measure of crop production per unit of nitrogen fertilizer input. Fertilizer use efficiency (FUE) is a measure of NUE. Crop production can be measured by biomass, vigor or yield. The plant's nitrogen use efficiency is typically a result of an alteration in at least one of the uptake, spread, absorbance, accumulation, relocation (within the plant) and use of nitrogen absorbed by the plant. Improved NUE is with respect to that of a non-transgenic plant (i.e., lacking the transgene of the transgenic plant) of the same species and of the same developmental stage and grown under the same conditions.
As used herein the phrase “nitrogen-limiting conditions” refers to growth conditions which include a level (e.g., concentration) of nitrogen (e.g., ammonium or nitrate) applied which is below the level needed for optimal plant metabolism, growth, reproduction and/or viability.
As used herein the term/phrase “biomass”, “biomass of a plant” or “plant biomass” refers to the amount (e.g., measured in grams of air-dry tissue) of a tissue produced from the plant in a growing season. An increase in plant biomass can be in the whole plant or in parts thereof such as aboveground (e.g. harvestable) parts, vegetative biomass, roots and/or seeds or contents thereof (e.g., oil, starch etc.).
As used herein the term/phrase “vigor”, “vigor of a plant” or “plant vigor” refers to the amount (e.g., measured by weight) of tissue produced by the plant in a given time. Increased vigor could determine or affect the plant yield or the yield per growing time or growing area. In addition, early vigor (e.g. seed and/or seedling) results in improved field stand.
As used herein the term/phrase “yield”, “yield of a plant” or “plant yield” refers to the amount (e.g., as determined by weight or size) or quantity (e.g., numbers) of tissues or organs produced per plant or per growing season. Increased yield of a plant can affect the economic benefit one can obtain from the plant in a certain growing area and/or growing time.
According to an exemplary embodiment the yield is measured by cellulose content, oil content, starch content and the like.
According to another exemplary embodiment the yield is measured by oil content.
According to another exemplary embodiment the yield is measured by protein content.
According to another exemplary embodiment, the yield is measured by seed number, seed weight, fruit number or fruit weight per plant or part thereof (e.g., kernel, bean).
A plant yield can be affected by various parameters including, but not limited to, plant biomass; plant vigor, plant growth rate; seed yield; seed or grain quantity; seed or grain quality; oil yield; content of oil, starch and/or protein in harvested organs (e.g., seeds or vegetative parts of the plant); number of flowers (e.g. florets) per panicle (e.g. expressed as a ratio of number of filled seeds over number of primary panicles); harvest index; number of plants grown per area; number and size of harvested organs per plant and per area; number of plants per growing area (e.g. density); number of harvested organs in field; total leaf area; carbon assimilation and carbon partitioning (e.g. the distribution/allocation of carbon within the plant); resistance to shade; number of harvestable organs (e.g. seeds), seeds per pod, weight per seed; and modified architecture [such as increase stalk diameter, thickness or improvement of physical properties (e.g. elasticity)].
Improved plant NUE is translated in the field into either harvesting similar quantities of yield, while implementing less fertilizers, or increased yields gained by implementing the same levels of fertilizers. Thus, improved NUE or FUE has a direct effect on plant yield in the field.
As used herein the term “improving” or “increasing” refers to at least about 2%, at least about 3%, at least about 4%, at least about 5%, at least about 10%, at least about 15%, at least about 20%, at least about 25%, at least about 30%, at least about 35%, at least about 40%, at least about 45%, at least about 50%, at least about 60%, at least about 70%, at least about 80%, at least about 90% or greater increase in NUE, in tolerance to stress, in yield, in biomass or in vigor of a plant, as compared to a native or wild-type plants [i.e., isogenic plants (not modified to comprise the dsRNA) of the invention].
As mentioned, the target gene of the dsRNA may not be an endogenous plant gene but rather a gene exogenous to the plant, such as that of a plant virus or bacteria which feeds on the plant or depends thereon for growth, replication and/or survival.
Thus, according to an aspect of the invention there is provided a method of inhibiting expression of a target gene in a plant virus, the method comprising providing (contacting under infecting conditions) to the plant virus the plant as described herein (at least part thereof includes the naked dsRNA), thereby inhibiting expression of a target gene in the plant virus.
A number of virus genera are transmitted, both persistently and non-persistently, by soil borne zoosporic protozoa. These protozoa are not viral pathogenic themselves, but parasitic. Transmission of the virus takes place when they become associated with the plant roots. Examples include Polymyxa graminis, which has been shown to transmit plant viral diseases in cereal crops and Polymyxa betae which transmits Beet necrotic yellow vein virus. Plasmodiophorids also create wounds in the plant's root through which other viruses can enter.
Specific examples of viruses which can be targeted according to the present teachings include, but are not limited to:
(1) Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV, RNA virus) which infects plants, especially tobacco and other members of the family Solanaceae).
(2) Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV, RNA virus) which causes serious diseases of many economically important plants representing 35 plant families, including dicots and monocots. This wide host range of ornamentals, vegetables, and field crops is unique among plant-infecting viruses. Belongs to tospoviruses in the Mediterranean area, affect vegetable crops, especially tomato, pepper and lettuce (Turina et al., 2012, Adv Virus Res 84; 403-437).
(3) Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) which is transmitted by whitefly, mostly affects tomato plants. Geminiviruses (DNA viruses) in the genus Begomovirus (including sweepoviruses and legumoviruses)—most devastating pathogens affecting a variety of cultivated crops, including cassava, sweet potato, beans, tomato, cotton and grain legumes (Rey et al 2012, Viruses 4; 1753-1791). Members include TYLCV above and tomato leaf curl virus (ToLCV).
(4) Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV)—CMV has a wide range of hosts and attacks a great variety of vegetables, ornamentals, and other plants (as many as 191 host species in 40 families). Among the most important vegetables affected by cucumber mosaic are peppers (Capsicum annuum L.), cucurbits, tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.), and bananas (Musa L. spp.).
Other vegetable hosts include: cucumber, muskmelon, squash, tomato, spinach, celery, peppers, water cress, beet, sweet potato, turnip, chayote, gherkin, watermelon, pumpkin, citron, gourd, lima bean, broad bean, onion, ground-cherry, eggplant, potato, rhubarb, carrot, dill, fennel, parsnip, parsley, loofah, and artichoke (Chabbouh and Cherif, 1990, FAO Plant Prot. Bull. 38:52-53.).
Ornamental hosts include: China aster, chrysanthemum, delphinium, salvia, geranium, gilia, gladiolus, heliotrope, hyacinth, larkspur, lily, marigold, morning glory, nasturtium, periwinkle, petunia, phlox, snapdragon, tulip, and zinnia (Chupp and Sherf, 1960; Agrios, 1978).
(5) Potato virus Y (PVY)—one of the most important plant viruses affecting potato production.
(6) Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV, DNA virus (Rothnie et al., 1994)).
(7) African cassava mosaic virus (ACMV).
(8) Plum pox virus (PPV) is the most devastating viral disease of stone fruit from the genus Prunus.
(9) Brome mosaic virus (BMV)—commonly infects Bromus inermis and other grasses, can be found almost anywhere wheat is grown.
(10) Potato virus X (PVX)—There are no insect or fungal vectors for this virus. This virus causes mild or no symptoms in most potato varieties, but when Potato virus Y is present, synergy between these two viruses causes severe symptoms in potatoes.
Additional Viruses:
Citrus tristeza virus (CTV)—causes the most economically damaging disease to Citrus, including sour orange (Citrus aurantium), and any Citrus species grafted onto sour orange root stock, sweet orange (C. sinensis), grapefruit (C. paradisi), lime and Seville orange (C. aurantifolia), and mandarin (C. reticulata). CTV is also known to infect Aeglopsis chevalieri, Afraegle paniculata, Pamburus missionis, and Passiflora gracilis. CTV is distributed worldwide and can be found wherever citrus trees grow.
Barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV)—most widely distributed viral disease of cereals. It affects the economically important crop species barley, oats, wheat, maize, triticale and rice.
Potato leafroll virus (PLRV) infects potatoes and other members of the family Solanaceae.
Tomato bushy stunt virus (TBSV), RNA virus, a member of the genus Tombusvirus and mostly affects tomatoes and eggplant.
Additional reviews:
Additional scientific papers:
The target gene of the plant virus encodes a product essential to the viability and/or infectivity of the viral pathogen, therefore its down-regulation (by the naked dsRNA) results in a reduced capability of the pathogen to survive and infect host cells. Hence, such down-regulation results in a “deleterious effect” on the maintenance viability and/or infectivity of the viral pathogen, in that it prevents or reduces the pathogen's ability to feed off and survive on nutrients derived from host cells. By virtue of this reduction in the viral pathogen's viability and/or infectivity, resistance and/or enhanced tolerance to infection by a pathogen is facilitated in the cells of the plant. Genes in the pathogen may be targeted at the mature (adult), immature (juvenile) or embryo stages.
As used herein, a “plant virus resistance” trait is a characteristic of a plant that causes the plant host to be resistant to attack from a viral pathogen that typically is capable of inflicting damage or loss to the plant. Once the viral pathogen is provided with the plant material comprising the naked dsRNA, expression of the gene within the target virus is suppressed by the dsRNA, and the suppression of expression of the gene in the target virus results in the plant being resistant to the virus.
To substantiate the anti-viral activity, the present teachings also contemplate observing reduced infectability or replicability and the degree of host symptomatology following said providing.
To improve the anti-viral activity, embodiments of the present invention further provide a composition that contains two or more different agents each toxic to the same plant virus, at least one of which comprises a dsRNA described herein. In certain embodiments, the second agent can be an agent selected from the group consisting of inhibitors of metabolic enzymes involved in amino acid or carbohydrate synthesis; inhibitors of cell division; cell wall synthesis inhibitors; inhibitors of DNA or RNA synthesis, gyrase inhibitors, tubulin assembly inhibitors, inhibitors of ATP synthesis; oxidative phosphorylation uncouplers; inhibitors of protein synthesis; MAP kinase inhibitors; lipid synthesis or oxidation inhibitors; sterol synthesis inhibitors; and melanin synthesis inhibitors.
In addition, plants generated according to the teachings of the present invention or parts thereof can exhibit altered nutritional or therapeutic efficacy and as such can be employed in the food or feed and drug industries. Likewise, the plants generated according to the teachings of the present invention or parts thereof can exhibit altered oil or cellulose content and as such can be implemented in the construction or oil industry.
The seeds of the present invention can be packed in a seed containing device which comprises a plurality of seeds at least some of which (e.g., 5%, 10% or more) containing an exogenous naked dsRNA, wherein the seed is devoid of a heterologous promoter for driving expression of the dsRNA.
The seed containing device can be a bag, a plastic bag, a paper bag, a soft shell container or a hard shell container.
Reagents of the present invention can be packed in a kit including the naked dsRNA, instructions for introducing the dsRNA into the seeds and optionally a priming solution.
Compositions of some embodiments of the invention may, if desired, be presented in a pack or dispenser device, which may contain one or more dosage forms containing the active ingredient. The pack may, for example, comprise metal or plastic foil, such as a blister pack. The pack or dispenser device may be accompanied by instructions for introduction to the seed.
According to an exemplary embodiment, the naked dsRNA and priming solution are comprised in separate containers.
As used herein the term “about” refers to ±10%.
The terms “comprises”, “comprising”, “includes”, “including”, “having” and their conjugates mean “including but not limited to”.
The term “consisting of” means “including and limited to”.
The term “consisting essentially of” means that the composition, method or structure may include additional ingredients, steps and/or parts, but only if the additional ingredients, steps and/or parts do not materially alter the basic and novel characteristics of the claimed composition, method or structure.
As used herein, the singular form “a”, “an” and “the” include plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. For example, the term “a compound” or “at least one compound” may include a plurality of compounds, including mixtures thereof.
Throughout this application, various embodiments of this invention may be presented in a range format. It should be understood that the description in range format is merely for convenience and brevity and should not be construed as an inflexible limitation on the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the description of a range should be considered to have specifically disclosed all the possible subranges as well as individual numerical values within that range. For example, description of a range such as from 1 to 6 should be considered to have specifically disclosed subranges such as from 1 to 3, from 1 to 4, from 1 to 5, from 2 to 4, from 2 to 6, from 3 to 6 etc., as well as individual numbers within that range, for example, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. This applies regardless of the breadth of the range.
Whenever a numerical range is indicated herein, it is meant to include any cited numeral (fractional or integral) within the indicated range. The phrases “ranging/ranges between” a first indicate number and a second indicate number and “ranging/ranges from” a first indicate number “to” a second indicate number are used herein interchangeably and are meant to include the first and second indicated numbers and all the fractional and integral numerals therebetween.
As used herein the term “method” refers to manners, means, techniques and procedures for accomplishing a given task including, but not limited to, those manners, means, techniques and procedures either known to, or readily developed from known manners, means, techniques and procedures by practitioners of the chemical, pharmacological, biological, biochemical and medical arts.
It is appreciated that certain features of the invention, which are, for clarity, described in the context of separate embodiments, may also be provided in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features of the invention, which are, for brevity, described in the context of a single embodiment, may also be provided separately or in any suitable subcombination or as suitable in any other described embodiment of the invention. Certain features described in the context of various embodiments are not to be considered essential features of those embodiments, unless the embodiment is inoperative without those elements.
Various embodiments and aspects of the present invention as delineated hereinabove and as claimed in the claims section below find experimental support in the following examples.
Reference is now made to the following examples, which together with the above descriptions, illustrate the invention in a non limiting fashion.
Generally, the nomenclature used herein and the laboratory procedures utilized in the present invention include molecular, biochemical, microbiological and recombinant DNA techniques. Such techniques are thoroughly explained in the literature. See, for example, “Molecular Cloning: A laboratory Manual” Sambrook et al., (1989); “Current Protocols in Molecular Biology” Volumes I-III Ausubel, R. M., ed. (1994); Ausubel et al., “Current Protocols in Molecular Biology”, John Wiley and Sons, Baltimore, Md. (1989); Perbal, “A Practical Guide to Molecular Cloning”, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1988); Watson et al., “Recombinant DNA”, Scientific American Books, New York; Birren et al. (eds) “Genome Analysis: A Laboratory Manual Series”, Vols. 1-4, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York (1998); methodologies as set forth in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,666,828; 4,683,202; 4,801,531; 5,192,659 and 5,272,057; “Cell Biology: A Laboratory Handbook”, Volumes I-III Cellis, J. E., ed. (1994); “Culture of Animal Cells—A Manual of Basic Technique” by Freshney, Wiley-Liss, N. Y. (1994), Third Edition; “Current Protocols in Immunology” Volumes I-III Coligan J. E., ed. (1994); Stites et al. (eds), “Basic and Clinical Immunology” (8th Edition), Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, Conn. (1994); Mishell and Shiigi (eds), “Selected Methods in Cellular Immunology”, W. H. Freeman and Co., New York (1980); available immunoassays are extensively described in the patent and scientific literature, see, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,791,932; 3,839,153; 3,850,752; 3,850,578; 3,853,987; 3,867,517; 3,879,262; 3,901,654; 3,935,074; 3,984,533; 3,996,345; 4,034,074; 4,098,876; 4,879,219; 5,011,771 and 5,281,521; “Oligonucleotide Synthesis” Gait, M. J., ed. (1984); “Nucleic Acid Hybridization” Hames, B. D., and Higgins S. J., eds. (1985); “Transcription and Translation” Hames, B. D., and Higgins S. J., eds. (1984); “Animal Cell Culture” Freshney, R. I., ed. (1986); “Immobilized Cells and Enzymes” IRL Press, (1986); “A Practical Guide to Molecular Cloning” Perbal, B., (1984) and “Methods in Enzymology” Vol. 1-317, Academic Press; “PCR Protocols: A Guide To Methods And Applications”, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif. (1990); Marshak et al., “Strategies for Protein Purification and Characterization—A Laboratory Course Manual” CSHL Press (1996); all of which are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. Other general references are provided throughout this document. The procedures therein are believed to be well known in the art and are provided for the convenience of the reader. All the information contained therein is incorporated herein by reference.
Generating the dsRNA/siRNA Sequences
The dsRNA sequences were custom-created for each gene using in vitro transcription of PCR products. Part of the mRNA, including either the ORF, 3′ UTR or 5′ UTR for which dsRNA to be produced was PCR-amplified using gene-specific primers, which contain the sequence of the T7 promoter on either side. This product was used as a template for dsRNA production using commercial kits such as the MaxiScript dsRNA kit (Life Technologies) or T7 High Yield RNA Synthesis kit (NEB). Next, the sample is treated with DNase Turbo at 37° C. for 15-30 min followed by phenol treatment and nucleic acid precipitation. Next, one of two different reactions is carried out: (1) dsRNA is ready to use, (2) processing of the dsRNA with Dicer (Shortcut RNase III (NEB)) to create small interfering RNAs (siRNA).
Either dsRNA or a combination of dsRNA and siRNA were used for seed treatments as described below. All dsRNA sequences provided herein are listed as DNA (simple transformation is done by converting T>U).
General Seed Treatment Protocol for Gene Silencing Using a dsRNA/siRNA Mixture
Uncoated organic corn seeds were from variety “popcorn”, uncoated organic whole grain rice seeds and organic soybean were purchased from Nitsat Haduvdevan (Israel). Wheat seeds were from A.B. Seeds (Israel). Lettuce seeds were from the variety Sun Valley. Fresh tomato seeds were retrieved from M82 tomato fruits, which are propagated in-house. Uncoated or fresh plant seeds were washed with double distilled water (DDW) prior to treatment for four hours. Next, seeds were dried at 20-30° C. for up to 24 hours. Following the drying step, seeds were treated with a solution containing the dsRNA formulation, which is made of dsRNA at a final concentration of 1-261 μg/ml in 0.1 mM EDTA. Treatment was performed by gently shaking the seeds in the solution for up to 60 hours in a dark growth chamber at 15-25° C. Finally, seeds were washed up to three times briefly and planted on soil or germinated at 25° C. in a dark growth chamber and planted in soil or dried for 0-30 hours and germinated at 25° C. in a dark growth chamber and planted in soil or planted directly in soil. Control seeds were treated in a similar way, with a formulation that lacked the dsRNA or with non-specific dsRNA.
As an example for an exogenous gene that is not present/expressed in plants, the ORFs encoding the replicase and coat protein of CGMMV (Cucumber green mottle mosaic virus, accession number AF417242) were used as targets for dsRNA treatment of plant seeds using the protocol described in Example 1. Rice, tomato and sorghum seeds were washed for 4 hours at 20° c., tomato and sorghum were dried at 30° C. and rice at 20° C. for overnight. Seeds were immediately treated at 15° C. with 132.7 μg/ml dsRNA (final concentration) for 39 hours for rice, as shown in
The exogenous dsRNA was found to be stable for at least three weeks in rice seedlings as can be seen in
Rice seeds were treated with an exogenous dsRNA as in Example 2. Plants were germinated and grown for five weeks, DNA was extracted and PCR reactions were performed to demonstrate that the dsRNA did not integrate into the Rice's genome (
Corn seeds were treated using the protocol described in Example 1, seeds were washed for 4 h at 20° c., dried at 30° c. overnight and immediately treated with 40 μg/ml dsRNA (final concentration) directed against the 3-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene for 60 hours at 15° C., dried and were germinated. Leaves and roots were harvested from control and dsGUS-treated plants 7 and 15 days following germination. RNA was extracted from the harvested tissues and RT-PCR with specific GUS primers was run (Table 3). In addition, a corn endogenous housekeeping gene (ubiquitin) was used as a positive control for the PCR reaction. The GUS dsRNA molecules were found to be extremely stable in the treated seeds, and can be detected in corn plants 7 and 15 days post germination of the seeds (
Plant seeds were treated as per the protocol described in Example 1. Seeds were washed for 4 h at 20° C., dried at 25° C. and were immediately treated with a fluorescent siRNA (siGLO, 2 μM final concentration, Thermo Scientific) at 15° C. for 24 h.
The quality of the siGLO was verified by gel electrophoresis analysis as can be seen on
Fluorescent pictures of the seeds were taken 24-48 hours post treatment using an Olympus microscope at the lowest objective magnification (5× for bigger seeds such as rice and tomato seeds, and 10× for smaller seeds such as arabidopsis seeds). To eliminate the possibility of non-specific auto-fluorescence, each dsRNA-treated seed is shown alongside a control seed that was left untreated (
In order to evaluate the distribution efficiency of the fluorescent siRNA inside the seeds, different plant seeds were cut into slices and imaged with a fluorescent binocular 48 hours after treatment. Each treated seed was imaged alongside a control untreated seed. Light and fluorescent images were taken where applicable for rice, tomato, cucumber, bean, sorghum and wheat seed samples (
The dsRNA molecules enter the embryo directly, carried by the water-based solution which is used for the seed treatment.
The dsRNA molecules enter the endosperm as part of the endosperm's water-absorption process. These molecules then feed the embryo as it develops as part of the nutrient flow from the endosperm during germination and seed development.
These present findings suggest the RNA molecules used to treat the seeds both penetrate the embryo and function in the embryo as it develops and also penetrate the endosperm and feed the embryo following germination.
A time course experiment was performed on rice seeds to monitor the kinetics of siGLO penetration into the seeds following the seed treatment (
Rice seeds were washed in wash solution for 4 h at 20° C., dried at 25° C. and immediately treated with a mixture of dsRNA/siRNA at a total concentration of 60 μg/ml at 15° C. for 40 hours. Seeds were germinated at room temperature for several days and seed development was monitored. Seeds treated with the PDS and dsRNA/siRNA mixture exhibited stunted and delayed development, as seen by smaller seedlings and reduced rooting. In these experiments, two products of the PDS-1 gene are combined (see Table 4).
Zea mays
The experiment was performed in three biological repeats and the results are presented in
Rice seeds were treated as described in Example 7 and their subsequent development and seedling growth were monitored. Thirty days post PDS-1 silencing treatment the overall phenotype of the two plant groups, control and PDS-silenced, was recorded. PDS silencing has been reported to cause chlorophyll bleaching and growth inhibition (Peretz et al., 2007, Plant Physiol 145: 1251-1263), which correlates with the phenotype of the PDS-silenced plants of the invention, as they appeared smaller in size and paler in color, respectively, compared to control plants (see
Following treatment with the dsRNA/siRNA mixture (ratio 1:1) as described in Example 7, expression levels of PDS-1 gene products are determined by real-time PCR using specifically designed primers (Forward: GATTGCTGGAGCAGGATTAG SEQ ID NO: 46, Reverse: CCCTTGCCTCAAGCAATATG, SEQ ID NO: 47). For normalization purposes, UBQ5 expression was also determined using primers (forward—ACCACTTCGACCGCCACTACT, SEQ ID NO: 48, reverse—ACGCCTAAGCCTGCTGGTT, SEQ ID NO: 49). The results are shown in
Rice seeds were treated using the protocol described in Example 1, Seeds were washed for 4 h at room temperature, dried overnight at 25° C. and immediately treated with a Hap2e dsRNA concentration of 152 μg/ml, for 41 hours at 15° C. (for Hap2e dsRNA sequences see Table 11, below). Control and Hap2e dsRNA-treated rice seeds that were germinated 5 days post treatment did not exhibit any differences in their root development (
Other rice seeds were treated under the same conditions as in
Corn seeds were treated using the protocol described in Example 1, Seeds were washed for 4 h at room temperature, dried overnight at 30° C. and immediately treated with a NFY dsRNA concentration of 56 g/ml, for 40 hours at 15° C. (for NFY dsRNA sequence see table 11). RT-PCR on RNA extracted from shoots of control and NFY dsRNA-treated corn seeds 10 days after germination was performed to determine the expression level of NFY target gene (see Table 6). Down-regulation of the gene was successfully achieved as exhibited in
Tomato seeds were treated using the protocol described in Example 1. Un washed seeds were treated with a NFY dsRNA concentration of 200 μg/ml, for 24 hours at 15° C., seeds were washed twice briefly and immediately planted in soil without drying. RT-PCR on RNA extracted from shoots of control and NFY dsRNA-treated tomato seeds 3 weeks after germination was performed to determine the expression level of NFY target gene (see Table 7). Down-regulation of the gene was successfully achieved as exhibited in
Tomato plants 55 days post treatment with NFY dsRNA molecules were compared to same age control plants. Major phenotypic differences were evident upon comparison, most notably was a shift in height, where treated plants appeared significantly shorter than untreated control plants (
Corn seeds were treated using the protocol described in Example 1, seeds were washed for 4 h at room temperature, dried overnight at 30° C. and immediately treated with a NAC dsRNA concentration of 90 μg/ml, for 40 hours at 15° C. and immediately germinated (for NAC dsRNA sequence see Table 11). RT-PCR on RNA extracted from shoots of control and NAC dsRNA-treated corn seeds 10 days after germination was performed to determine the expression level of NAC target gene (see Table 8). Down-regulation of the gene was successfully achieved as exhibited in
Rice seeds were treated using the protocol described in Example 1, seeds were washed for 4 h, dried overnight at 20° C. and immediately treated with an ARF-8 dsRNA concentration of 66.2 μg/ml, for 42 hours at 15° C. RT-PCR on RNA extracted from control and ARF-8 dsRNA-treated rice seeds 18 days after germination was performed to determine the expression level of ARF-8 target gene (see Table 9). Down-regulation of the gene was successfully achieved as exhibited in
Rice seeds were treated using the protocol described in Example 1, seeds were washed for 4 h, dried overnight at 20° C. and immediately treated with a SPL17 dsRNA concentration of 200 μg/ml, for 41 hours at 15° C. (for SPL17 dsRNA sequence see table 11). Control and SPL17 dsRNA-treated rice seeds that were germinated 5 days post treatment did not exhibit any visual differences (
The high specificity and efficiency of posttranscriptional gene silencing by target gene-specific dsRNA has become a preferred method to generate preferred phenotype eukaryotic organisms, wherein expression of one or more genes is reduced or inactivated. Specific dsRNA sequences designed to silence corn (Zea mays) and rice (Oryza sative) microRNA target genes. Specifically, microRNAs shown to associate with improved abiotic stress tolerance will be used. Table 11 below provides several examples for target gene sequences that are produced using PCR amplification to test the gene silencing capabilities of their respective dsRNA/siRNA mixture. These dsRNA molecules will then be used to knock down the endogenous level of the selected target genes.
Zea mays
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Zea mays
Oryza
sativa
Zea mays
Tomato seeds were treated using the protocol described in Example 1, unwashed seeds were treated with an ARF-8 dsRNA concentration of 200 μg/ml, for 24 hours at 15° C. and immediately planted in soil. Expression levels of the gene were examined using RT-PCR, 3 and 8 weeks after treatment (see Table 12). Changes in expression were observed in dsRNA-treated plants 3 weeks after treatment (
Plants that were treated with dsRNA molecules specific for the ARF8 gene showed a phenotypic difference compared to control plants. This phenotypic difference was observed at different time points (55, 62 and 72 days) and was demonstrated by a decrease in height (
Tomato seeds were treated using the protocol described in Example 1, unwashed seeds were treated with a FW2.2 dsRNA concentration of 100 μg/ml, for 24 hours at 15° C. and immediately planted in soil Expression levels of the gene were examined using RT-PCR, 9 weeks following germination (primers are listed in Table 13). An approximate 2-fold reduction in the expression level of FW2.2 in dsRNA treated plants compared to control plants was detected (
Even so, plants that were treated with dsRNA molecules specific for the FW2.2 gene showed no phenotypic differences compared to control plants, ruling out a toxic effect as an alternative explanation for the phenotypic effects seen in the previous example. The plants presented similar height and appearance 72 days after treatment (
Rice seeds were treated using the protocol described in Example 1, seeds were washed for 4 h, dried for 24 h at room temperature and immediately treated with a DELLA dsRNA concentration of 66 g/ml, for 36 hours at 15° C. Rice seeds were treated with dsRNA directed against the Della gene (see Table 15 below), which is a known plant growth repressor. Arabidopsis seedlings with mutant Della gene are larger with a longer root system (Josse, E. M., Gan, Y., Bou-Torrent, J., Stewart, K. L., Gilday, A. D., Jeffree, C. E., Vaistij, F. E., Martinez-Garcia, J. F., Nagy, F., Graham, I. A., and Halliday, K. J. (2011). A DELLA in disguise: SPATULA restrains the growth of the developing Arabidopsis seedling. Plant Cell 23: 1337-1351.).
Rice seeds were treated using the protocol described in Example 1, seeds were washed for 4 h, dried for 24 h at room temperature and immediately treated with a NRR dsRNA concentration of approximately 13 μg/ml, for 36 hours at 15° C. Rice seeds were treated with dsRNA directed against the NRR gene, which was found to regulate root growth in response to macronutrients in rice (Zhang et al., 2012, Mol Plant 5(1):63-72). Transgenic rice seedlings, with reduced NRR levels using RNAi were shown to have longer roots when grown under nitrogen limiting conditions.
In the present example, the effect of silencing three genes simultaneously is tested. Rice seeds were treated using the protocol described in Example 1, seeds were washed for 4 h, dried overnight at room temperature and immediately treated with a solution containing a mixture (152.3 g/ml final concentration) of dsRNA against three genes: Hap2e (59.9 μg/ml, see Table 11), Della (44 μg/ml see table 15 below) and SQS (48.4 g/ml see table 16 below) for 42 h at 15° C. RNA was extracted from shoots of germinated seeds, 18 days post germination, and RT-PCR for each of the three genes was run (see Table 15 below). As can be seen in
Tomato seeds were treated with a fluorescent siRNA (siGLO, 1 μM final concentration, Thermo Scientific) at 15° C. for 24 h.
The seeds were cut into slices and fluorescent pictures were taken 24 hours post treatment using Leica confocal microscope. As shown in
Tomato seeds were treated with a dsRNA (SEQ ID NO: 126) derived from the SPL gene and with GUS dsRNA as a control according to the protocol described in Example 1. Treatment was performed by gently shaking the seeds in the solution for up to 24 hours in a dark growth chamber at 15-25° C. followed by washing with water three times for one minute. After treatment, seeds were planted in soil and grown at about 25° C. with 16 hours photoperiod. The plants were watered with tap water as necessary. The primers used for in-vitro transcription of SPL dsRNA and the sequence of the dsRNA are listed in Table 16. The sequence of GUS dsRNA appears in Table 3.
Prior to treatment, the dsRNA concentration and purity were assessed by absorbance (NanoDrop) and by HPLC. The concentration of the dsRNA according to the NanoDrop measurement was 1864 μg/ml for SPL and 1964 μg/ml for GUS. HPLC showed that the sample contains mostly dsRNA but other molecules (including nucleotides and ssRNA) were present in the solution as well. According to the HPLC analysis, the SPL solution contained 1219 μg/ml of dsRNA and 838 μg/ml of ssRNA. The GUS solution contained 633 μg/ml of dsRNA and 167 μg/ml of ssRNA (see
Seeds were treated with dsRNA at a concentration of 50 μg/ml (determined by the HPLC measurement) for 10 minutes, 2, 6 and 24 hours. An additional HPLC analysis of the SPL and GUS dsRNA solutions following seed incubation revealed that the ssRNA peak has disappeared (see
Total RNA was extracted from leaves of germinated seeds, 17 days (in plants treated for 24 hours) and 18 days (in plants treated for 10 minutes, 2 and 6 hours) post treatment. cDNA was prepared using oligo-dT primers and the expression level of SPL mRNA was determined in treated and control plants by real-time PCR with SYBR Green (Quanta BioSciences). Primers used for real-time PCR of SPL were located outside of the dsRNA region, at the 3′ UTR. Primers sequences are listed in Table 17 together with the house-keeping genes (Expressed and CAC) that were used as normalizers (in the case of SPL Expressed was used as the normalizer).
This analysis showed a significant (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p-value <0.05) up-regulation of SPL mRNA at all incubation times. The median expression level of SPL in plants treated with SPL dsRNA for 10 minutes, 2 hours, 6 hours and 24 hours was 2.54, 2.85, 2.69 and 2.73-fold higher than in control plants treated with GUS dsRNA, respectively (
To verify that the effect on SPL mRNA results specifically from treatment with SPL dsRNA, the level of SPL mRNA was measured after treatment with both GUS dsRNA (a control sequence having no silencing relevant homology in the tomato genome) and FW2.2 dsRNA (which is a tomato endogenous sequence, see Table 13). Plants treated with 50 μg/ml dsRNA for 24 hours showed up-regulation of SPL when treated with SPL sequence, but not when treated with GUS or FW2.2 sequences (
In another experiment, tomato seeds of the Oregon Spring variety were treated with an independently made dsRNA for the SPL gene at a concentration of 50 μg/ml for 24 hours. The seeds were then washed 3 times with water, and transferred to seed germination boxes (9 seeds per box) containing 12 ml water. Seeds in boxes were germinated in a growth chamber in the light at 25° C. for 7 days, and shoot tissue was then harvested for RNA analysis. RNA analysis was conducted by Taqman, using a tomato CAC assay for normalization of the values to correct for differences in sample concentration (Table 17). Table 18 shows that in seedlings germinated from seeds treated with SPL dsRNA, mRNA levels of the SPL gene was elevated about 7-fold compared to seedlings germinated from seeds treated with GUS dsRNA. Treatment with AFR8 dsRNA and 0.1 mM EDTA (buffer) had no significant effect on SPL mRNA levels compared to treatment with GUS dsRNA.
Tomato seeds were treated with a dsRNA derived from the SPL gene as described in Examples 1 and 23.
Treatment with dsRNA at a concentration of 50 μg/ml was done by dipping the seeds in the dsRNA solution at room temperature and immediately washing with double distilled water (DDW). Total RNA was extracted from leaves of germinated seeds, 13 days post treatment. cDNA was prepared using oligo-dT primers and the expression level of SPL mRNA was determined in treated and control plants by real-time PCR, as described in Example 23.
This analysis showed a significant (p-value <0.05) up-regulation of SPL mRNA (
Tomato seeds were treated with a dsRNA derived from the SPL gene as described in Examples 1 and 23.
Seeds were treated with dsRNA at a concentration of 25 μg/ml for 10 minutes, 2 and 24 hours. Total RNA was extracted from leaves of germinated seeds, 17 days (in plants treated for 24 hours) and 18 days (in plants treated for 10 minutes and 2 hours) post treatment. cDNA was prepared using oligo-dT primers and the expression level of SPL mRNA was determined in treated and control plants by real-time PCR, as described in Example 23.
This analysis showed a significant (p-value <0.05) up-regulation of SPL mRNA for incubation times of 2 and 24 hours, and an up-regulation trend for 10 minutes incubation time (
Tomato seeds were treated with a dsRNA derived from the SPL gene as described in Examples 1 and 23.
Seeds were treated with dsRNA at a concentration of 1 or 5 μg/ml for 10 minutes, 2 and 24 hours. Total RNA was extracted from leaves of germinated seeds, 17 days (in plants treated for 24 hours) and 18 days (in plants treated for 10 minutes and 2 hours) post treatment. cDNA was prepared using oligo-dT primers and the expression level of SPL mRNA was determined in treated and control plants by real-time PCR, as described in Example 23.
An up-regulation trend in SPL mRNA expression was detected for all incubation times treated with 1 μg/ml dsRNA (
dsRNA derived from the SPL gene (Table 16) was processed with ShortCut® RNase III (NEB) as described in Example 1.
Tomato seeds were treated with the resulting siRNA at a concentration of 50 μg/ml for 2 hours at 25° C. Total RNA was extracted from leaves of germinated seeds 13 days post treatment. cDNA was prepared using oligo-dT primers and the expression level of SPL mRNA was determined in treated and control plants by real-time PCR, as described in Example 23.
An up-regulation trend in SPL mRNA expression was detected. The median expression level of SPL in plants treated with SPL siRNA was 1.89 higher than in control plants treated with GUS siRNA (
Tomato seeds were treated with a dsRNA derived from the FW2.2 gene as described in Examples 1 and 23. As a control, seeds were treated with GUS dsRNA at the same concentration. The FW2.2 dsRNA sequence appears in Table 13.
Before treatment, the dsRNA concentration and purity were assessed by absorbance (NanoDrop) and by HPLC. The concentration of the dsRNA according to the NanoDrop measurement was 1791 μg/ml. HPLC showed that the sample contains mostly dsRNA but other species (nucleotides and ssRNA) were present in the solution as well. According to the HPLC analysis, the FW2.2 solution contained 1410 μg/ml of dsRNA and 473 μg/ml of ssRNA (see
Seeds were treated with dsRNA at a concentration of 50 μg/ml (determined by the HPLC measurement) for 2, 6 and 24 hours. Total RNA was extracted from leaves of germinated seeds, 17 days (in plants treated for 24 hours) and 18 days (in plants treated for 2 and 6 hours) post treatment. cDNA was prepared using oligo-dT primers and the expression level of FW2.2 mRNA was determined in treated and control plants by real-time PCR. Primers used for real-time PCR of FW2.2 were TCTCTGGGCTTGTATCATCC (Forward primer, SEQ ID NO: 137) and GCTGCTCAAGGTGTTTGTG (Reverse primer, SEQ ID NO: 138). These primers are located outside of the dsRNA region, at the 3′UTR.
Down-regulation of FW2.2 mRNA following seed treatment was achieved at all incubation times (p-value ≤0.1). The median expression level of FW2.2 in plants treated with FW2.2 dsRNA for 2, 6 and 24 hours was 1.26, 1.09 and 1.41-fold lower than in control plants treated with GUS dsRNA, respectively (
Rice seeds were treated using the protocol described in Example 1. Seeds were washed for 4 h, dried over night at room temperature and treated with DELLA dsRNA (see Table 15) at a concentration of 142 μg/ml, for 24 hours at 15° C. Total RNA was extracted from leaves of germinated seeds 13 days post treatment. cDNA was prepared using oligo-dT primers and the expression level of DELLA mRNA was determined in treated and control plants by real-time PCR (see Table 15).
This analysis showed a significant (p-value <0.05) down-regulation of DELLA mRNA. The median expression level of DELLA in plants treated with DELLA dsRNA was 3.73-fold lower than in control plants treated with GUS dsRNA (
Wheat seeds were treated using the protocol described in Example 1. Seeds were treated with a mixture of two PDS dsRNA fragments (see Table 19) for 4 hours at 15° C. and then germinated on a wet paper towel. The concentration of dsRNAs in the mixture was 136 μg/ml for fragment #1 (SEQ ID NO: 141) and 125 μg/ml for fragment #2 (SEQ ID NO: 144). Three days post treatment, seeds treated with the PDS dsRNA mixture exhibited stunted and delayed development, as seen by smaller seedlings and reduced rooting compared with control seeds treated with either 200 μg/ml GUS dsRNA or 0.1 mM EDTA (
Corn seeds were treated using the protocol described in Example 1. Seeds were washed for 4 h, dried over night at 30° C. and treated with TB1 dsRNA (see Table 20) at a concentration of 25 μg/ml, for 24 hours at 15° C. As a control, seeds were treated with CGMMV dsRNA (Table 1, product 1, SEQ ID NO: 8) at the same concentration. Total RNA was extracted from leaves of germinated seeds 7.5 weeks post germination. cDNA was prepared using oligo-dT primers and the expression level of TB1 mRNA was determined in treated and control plants by real-time PCR, using GPM 120 as a normalizer (see Table 20).
This analysis showed down-regulation of TB1 mRNA following dsRNA treatment. The median expression level of TB in plants treated with TB1 dsRNA was 9.88-fold lower than in control plants treated with CGMMV dsRNA (
The two indicated NAC dsRNA sequences (Table 11) were synthesized in vitro using a convergent T7 RNA polymerase method, and diluted in 0.1 mM EDTA to a concentration of 50 μg/ml total nucleic acid. Fifteen inbred (LH244) maize seeds were incubated in 7.5 ml of this dsRNA solution in a 15 ml tube in the dark at 15° C., with gentle oscillation, for 24 hours. One set of seeds was washed 3 times with water after treatment with dsRNAs, and then dried overnight at 30° C. A second set of seeds was planted directly after imbibition in the dsRNA solution.
Following treatment, seeds were either transferred to seed germination boxes (15 seed per box) containing moistened filter paper and germinated in a growth chamber set at 25° C. in the dark, or were planted in soil and germinated in a greenhouse.
Shoot tissues, including mesocotyl and coleoptile base, were harvested from the germinating seeds in the germination boxes 5 days after treatment for RNA analysis. Seeds that had been dried had only 4 days to germinate, while seeds that were germinated without the drying step had 5 days for germination. However, drying resulted in improved synchronicity in germination so that the 2 sets of plants spanned similar developmental stages. RNA analysis was conducted by Taqman, using the Zm.GPM 120 gene for normalization of the values to correct for differences in sample concentration (Table 21). RQ values were transformed to log 10 for analysis. Outlier data points are defined as being 3 standard deviations from the mean, and were removed from the dataset before analysis.
Treatment of seeds with NAC dsRNAs resulted in increased NAC expression so that NAC mRNA levels were 1.7 to 2.2 times those of GUS control values (Table 22 and
In another experiment, seeds were treated as described above and directly planted in soil. 12 days after planting, there was a decreased NAC mRNA expression in the V1 leaf in seeds that were not washed and dried before planting (
GUS_dry and NAC_dry, seeds were washed and dried after treatment with dsRNAs. The other set was put directly into seed germination boxes after treatment with dsRNAs. Comparisons with a control using Dunnett's Method, Control Group=GUS_dry or GUS, as appropriate.
The LONG HYPOCOTYL 5 (HY5) gene encodes a key positive regulator of plant response to light (Oyama, Shimura et al. 1997). Lettuce contains 2 genes related to Arabidopsis HY5 on chromosomes 5 and 6 which have 79% DNA sequence identity to each other. A ˜500 bp region was selected from the cDNA sequence of each gene as a trigger (Table 25), and dsRNA was made in vitro using the convergent T7 RNA polymerase method. The dsRNAs were solubilized in 0.1 mM EDTA at a concentration of 50 μg/ml. Thirty lettuce seeds of the variety Sun Valley were incubated in 1.5 ml of this dsRNA solution in a 2 ml eppendorf tube in the dark at 15° C., with gentle shaking, for 24 hours. The seeds were then washed 3 times with water, and then either transferred to seed germination boxes (9 seeds per box) containing 12 ml water, or to soil. Seeds in boxes were germinated in the light at 25° C. for 7 days, and shoot tissue was then harvested for RNA analysis. RNA analysis was conducted by Taqman, using a lettuce ubiquitin assay for normalization of the values to correct for differences in sample concentration (Table 25).
Table 26 and
In another experiment, plants were treated as described above and were grown for 2 weeks in the greenhouse. Then, a leaf punch was harvested and analyzed for mRNA concentration. In these older plants, a decrease in HY5 expression was observed. Table 28 and
Dihydroflavonol 4-Reductase (DHFR) is an enzyme in the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway. One DHFR gene was identified in lettuce, and a 524 bp region was selected from the cDNA sequence as a trigger (Table 30). dsRNA was made in vitro using the convergent T7 RNA polymerase method for DFR and for the GUS control sequence.
The dsRNAs were solubilized in 0.1 mM EDTA at a concentration of 50 μg/ml. Lettuce variety 8N LLF 65-2713141 Batavia is a highly pigmented red variant used for these studies. Thirty lettuce seeds were incubated in 1.5 ml of the dsRNA solution in a 2 ml eppendorf tube in the dark at 15° C., with gentle shaking, for 24 hours. The seeds were then washed 3 times with water, and then either transferred to seed germination boxes (10 seeds per box) containing 12 ml water, or to soil. Seeds in boxes were germinated in the light at 20° C. for 7 days, and shoot tissue was then harvested for RNA analysis. RNA analysis was conducted by Taqman, using a lettuce ubiquitin assay for normalization of the values to correct for differences in sample concentration (Tables 25 and 30).
mRNA levels for DHFR were significantly reduced when seeds were treated with dsRNA for DHFR compared to seeds treated with GUS dsRNA or the buffer control (Table 31 and
DND1, defense no death, is a negative regulator of plant defenses. Mutations in DND1 lead to constitutive systemic resistance and elevated levels of salicylic acid (Clough et al. 2000). Seeds of Straight 8 cucumber variety were placed in a monolayer in a plastic box and covered with 5-12 volumes of water at room temperature (˜20 C). Seeds were washed for 4 hours in water with gentle agitation. Following the washing, seed were air dried on filter paper at ˜30 C for 12-24 hr. Cucumber DND1 dsRNAs (Table 32) were resuspended in 0.1 mM EDTA (diluted from a 0.5M pH8.0 stock solution) to 100 μg/ml. A 1:5 (w/v) ratio of dsRNA solution to seed (e.g. for 1 gr of seed a 5 mL solution of dsRNA in EDTA) was used. Seeds were placed in a 50 mL conical tube and incubated in the dark at 15 C with gentle agitation for 24 hr. Following incubation, seeds were washed three times with gentle agitation for 1 minute each in a volume of water to completely fill the plastic container, and dried on filter paper before planting.
RNA analysis was conducted by Taqman real time PCR using a cucumber ELF1a assay for normalization of the values to correct for differences in sample concentration (see Table 32 for primers and Taqman probes sequences). Analysis on samples from fifteen days old cucumber leaves germinated from seeds treated with DND1 dsRNAs have demonstrated altered expression of the DND1 gene compared to control seeds treated with GFP dsRNA (see Table 32 for GFP dsRNA sequence and Table 33 and
In another experiment, One hundred cucumber seeds were treated with dsRNA containing the cucumber DND1 transcribed sequence (Table 32, dsRNA #2 T33788) as described above. Treated seeds were plated on 1/4 MS plates for 3 days. Ten ml dry sand was added to each glass vial and seedlings were planted by tilting the vial and laying the seedling in the correct orientation so that the cotyledons are just above the sand and then tilting back to cover the radicles with sand. 3.3 ml water was added to each vial and the vials placed in racks under fluorescent light banks. 250 vermiform eggs or 300 J2 RKN were inoculated in each tube in 50 ul of deionized or spring water. Plants were watered as needed. Harvest of the cucumber plants was performed at 11 days after inoculation by washing sand off the roots. A percent gall rating of the roots was taken for each sample, demonstrating a 26% and 21% reduction in RKN galling when compared to control treatments with 0.1 mM EDTA and GFP dsRNA, respectively (
PMR5 belongs to a family of plant-specific genes of unknown function. Mutations in the Arabidopsis gene PMR5, powdery mildew resistance, have pectin enriched cell walls and confer powdery mildew resistance (Vogel et al. 2004).
Cucumber seeds were treated with PMR5 dsRNAs (Table 34) as described in Example 35. Leaves germinated from treated seeds were analyzed as described in Example 35. An altered expression of the PMR5 gene was demonstrated in PMR5 treated seeds compared to GFP treated seeds (Table 35 and
TubG encodes a γ-tubulin protein (Snustad, D. P., et al. 1992). Cucumber seeds were treated with TubG dsRNAs (Table 36) as described in Example 35. Leaves germinated from treated seeds were analyzed as described in Example 35. An altered expression of the TubG gene was demonstrated in leaves of treated seeds compared to GFP treated seeds (Table 37 and
Microtom variety tomato seeds were treated with DND1 dsRNAs (Table 38) as described in Example 35 (except for using 2 ml Eppendorf tube instead of a 50 ml Conical tube in the dsRNA incubation step). RNA analysis was conducted by Taqman real time PCR using a tomato TIP41 assay for normalization of the values to correct for differences in sample concentration (see Table 38 for primers and Taqman probes sequences). An altered expression of the DND1 gene was demonstrated in leaves of treated seeds compared to GFP treated seeds (Table 39 and
Tomato seeds were treated with PMR5 dsRNAs (Table 40) as described in Example 35 and 39. Leaves germinated from treated seeds were analyzed as described in Example 38. An altered expression of the PMR5 gene was demonstrated in leaves of treated seeds compared to GFP treated seeds (Table 41 and
MLO, mildew resistance locus O protein encodes a plant-specific membrane protein and been demonstrated to play a role in powdery mildew resistance in Arabidopsis, barley and tomato (Bai et. Al 2007). Tomato seeds were treated with MLO dsRNAs (Table 42) as described in Examples 35 and 38. Leaves germinated from treated seeds were analyzed as described in Example 38. An altered expression of the MLO gene was demonstrated in leaves of treated seeds compared to GFP treated seeds (Table 43 and
Bi1 is a negative regulator of programmed cell death. Microtom tomato seeds were treated with dsRNAs containing the tomato Bi1 (Table 44, dsRNA #2) and PMR5 (Table 40, dsRNA #1) dsNAs as described Examples 35 and 38.
Seeds treated with dsRNA were planted in M200 soil with fertilizer (Hummerts) and placed in a growth chamber. One tomato seed is planted per pot, approximately 1/4″ into the soil and the top of the soil was drenched with water. The growth chamber settings were at 26/24 C, 16 hr light cycle, 50% humidity, light intensity 3 and watered 4×/week by automated subirrigation. Fourteen days after planting pots were organized by similar size. The number of reps was 5 plants/treatment. On day 15 plants were randomized and shifted to the following growth chamber conditions: 22/20 C, 16 hr light cycle, 70%/0 humidity, light intensity 3 and watered M, W, F. Infection with Tomato Powdery Mildew (Oidium Neolycopersici) was as follows:
Eight days post-infection samples were taken for qPCR. PMR5 (Table 40, dsRNA #1) treated plants showed a significant up-regulation of PMR5 expression compare to plants treated with GFP and 0.1 mM EDTA (Formulation) as controls (Table 45).
Fourteen days post-infection disease development was scored for the percentage of leaf area covered with powdery mildew. Ratings were set at 0, 10, 25 and 50% infection. Data was analyzed using Anova Single Factor Analysis (α=0.1). The 1/2 LSD was calculated and custom error bars were created for the graphs. Treatment averages are used to graph a percent disease reduction compared to the GFP control. This analysis demonstrated a 23% reduction in disease compared with GFP treated tomato seeds (p-value <0.1,
Soybean Phytochrome A (PHYA) genes E3 and E4 were targeted by treating seeds with dsRNAs containing sequences from those genes. PHYAE3 and PHYAE4 dsRNA sequences (Table 46) were synthesized in vitro using a convergent T7 RNA polymerase method. dsRNAs for the two genes were combined and brought to a final concentration of 50 μg/ml total nucleic acid in 0.1 mM EDTA. Fifteen soy (Williams 82) seeds were incubated in 7.5 ml of this dsRNA solution or in dsRNA from a GUS control in a 15 ml tube in the dark at 15 C, with gentle oscillation, for 24 hours. After treatment, seeds were transferred to seed germination boxes (15 seed per box) containing moistened filter paper and germinated in a growth chamber set at 25 C in the dark.
Shoot tissues, excluding cotyledons, were harvested from the germinating seeds in the germination boxes 5 days after treatment for RNA analysis. RNA analysis was conducted by Taqman, using the Gm.ref16 gene for normalization of the values to correct for differences in sample concentration (Table 46). RQ values were transformed to log 10 for analysis after outlier removal.
Treatment of seeds with PHYAE3 and PHYAE4 dsRNAs resulted in increased PHYAE3 expression in seedling shoots so that PHYAE3 mRNA levels were 1.7 those of GUS control values (Table 47 and
Although the invention has been described in conjunction with specific embodiments thereof, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications and variations are apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, it is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications and variations that fall within the spirit and broad scope of the appended claims.
All publications, patents and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated in their entirety by reference into the specification, to the same extent as if each individual publication, patent or patent application is specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated herein by reference. In addition, citation or identification of any reference in this application shall not be construed as an admission that such reference is available as prior art to the present invention. To the extent that section headings are used, they should not be construed as necessarily limiting.
This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 61/651,131 filed May 24, 2012, 61/814,888 filed Apr. 23, 2013, 61/814,890 filed Apr. 23, 2013, 61/814,892 filed Apr. 23, 2013, 61/814,899 filed Apr. 23, 2013. Each of the foregoing applications is herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3687808 | Merigan et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
| 3791932 | Schuurs et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
| 3839153 | Schuurs et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
| 3850578 | McConnell | Nov 1974 | A |
| 3850752 | Schuurs et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
| 3853987 | Dreyer | Dec 1974 | A |
| 3867517 | Ling | Feb 1975 | A |
| 3879262 | Schuurs et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
| 3901654 | Gross | Aug 1975 | A |
| 3935074 | Rubenstein et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
| 3984533 | Uzgiris | Oct 1976 | A |
| 3996345 | Ullman et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
| 4034074 | Miles | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4098876 | Piasio et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4469863 | Ts'o et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4476301 | Imbach et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4535060 | Comai | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4581847 | Hibberd et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4666828 | Gusella | May 1987 | A |
| 4683202 | Mullis | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4761373 | Anderson et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4769061 | Comai | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4801531 | Frossard | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4810648 | Stalker | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4879219 | Wands et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4940835 | Shah et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4971908 | Kishore et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 5004863 | Umbeck | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5011771 | Bellet et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5013659 | Bedbrook et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5015580 | Christou et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5023243 | Tullis | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5034506 | Summerton et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5094945 | Comai | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5141870 | Bedbrook et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5145783 | Kishore et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5159135 | Umbeck | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5166315 | Summerton et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5177196 | Meyer, Jr. et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5185444 | Summerton et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5188642 | Shah et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5188897 | Suhadolnik et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5192659 | Simons | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5214134 | Weis et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5216141 | Benner | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5235033 | Summerton et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5264423 | Cohen et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5264562 | Matteucci | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5264564 | Matteucci | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5272057 | Smulson et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5276019 | Cohen et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5281521 | Trojanowski et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5286634 | Stadler et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5286717 | Cohen et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5304732 | Anderson et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5310667 | Eichholtz et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5312910 | Kishore et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5321131 | Agrawal et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5331107 | Anderson et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5339107 | Henry et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5346107 | Bouix et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5378824 | Bedbrook et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5390667 | Kumakura et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5392910 | Bell et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5393175 | Courville | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5399676 | Froehler | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5405938 | Summerton et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5405939 | Suhadolnik et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5416011 | Hinchee et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5453496 | Caruthers et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5455233 | Spielvogel et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5459127 | Felgner et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5460667 | Moriyuki et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5462910 | Ito et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5463174 | Moloney et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5463175 | Barry et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5466677 | Baxter et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5470967 | Huie et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5476925 | Letsinger et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5489520 | Adams et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5489677 | Sanghvi et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5491288 | Chaubet et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5510471 | Lebrun et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5518908 | Corbin et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5519126 | Hecht | May 1996 | A |
| 5536821 | Agrawal et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5538880 | Lundquist et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5541306 | Agrawal et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5541307 | Cook et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5550111 | Suhadolnik et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5550318 | Adams et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5550398 | Kocian et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5550468 | Häberlein et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5558071 | Ward et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5561225 | Maddry et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5561236 | Leemans et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5563253 | Agrawal et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5569834 | Hinchee et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5571799 | Tkachuk et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5587361 | Cook et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5591616 | Hiei et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5593874 | Brown et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5596086 | Matteucci et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5597717 | Guerineau et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5602240 | De Mesmaeker et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5605011 | Bedbrook et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5608046 | Cook et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5610289 | Cook et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5618704 | Sanghvi et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5623070 | Cook et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5625050 | Beaton et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5627061 | Barry et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5633360 | Bischofberger et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5633435 | Barry et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5633448 | Lebrun et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5639024 | Mueller et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5646024 | Leemans et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5648477 | Leemans et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5663312 | Chaturvedula | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5677437 | Teng et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5677439 | Weis et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5719046 | Guerineau et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5721138 | Lawn | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5731180 | Dietrich | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5739180 | Taylor-Smith | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5746180 | Jefferson et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5767361 | Dietrich | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5767373 | Ward et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5780708 | Lundquist et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5804425 | Barry et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5824877 | Hinchee et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5837848 | Ely et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5859347 | Brown et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5866775 | Eichholtz et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5874265 | Adams et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5879903 | Strauch et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5914451 | Martinell et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5919675 | Adams et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5928937 | Kakefuda et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5939602 | Volrath et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5969213 | Adams et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5981840 | Zhao et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5985793 | Sandbrink et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| RE36449 | Lebrun et al. | Dec 1999 | E |
| 6040497 | Spencer et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6056938 | Unger et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6069115 | Pallett et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6084089 | Mine et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6084155 | Volrath et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6118047 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6121513 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6130366 | Herrera-Estrella et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6140078 | Sanders et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6153812 | Fry et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6160208 | Lundquist et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6177616 | Bartsch et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6194636 | McElroy et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6225105 | Sathasivan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6225114 | Eichholtz et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6232526 | McElroy et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6245968 | Boudec et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6248876 | Barry et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6252138 | Karimi et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| RE37287 | Lebrun et al. | Jul 2001 | E |
| 6268549 | Sailland et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6271359 | Norris et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6282837 | Ward et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6288306 | Ward et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6288312 | Christou et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6294714 | Matsunaga et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6326193 | Liu et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6329571 | Hiei | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6348185 | Piwnica-Worms | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6365807 | Christou et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6384301 | Martinell et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6385902 | Schipper et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6399861 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6403865 | Koziel et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6414222 | Gengenbach et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6421956 | Boukens et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6426446 | McElroy et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6433252 | McElroy et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6437217 | McElroy et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6453609 | Soli et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6479291 | Kumagai et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6506559 | Fire et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6642435 | Antoni et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6644341 | Chemo et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6645914 | Woznica et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6768044 | Boudec et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6992237 | Habben et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 7022896 | Weeks et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7026528 | Cheng et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| RE39247 | Barry et al. | Aug 2006 | E |
| 7105724 | Weeks et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7297541 | Moshiri et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7304209 | Zink et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7312379 | Andrews et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7323310 | Peters et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7371927 | Yao et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7392379 | Le Pennec et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7405347 | Hammer et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7406981 | Hemo et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7462379 | Fukuda et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7485777 | Nakajima et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7525013 | Hildebrand et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7550578 | Budworth et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7622301 | Ren et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7657299 | Huizenga et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7671254 | Tranel et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7714188 | Castle et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7738626 | Weese et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7807791 | Sekar et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7838263 | Dam et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7838733 | Wright et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7842856 | Tranel et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7884262 | Clemente et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7910805 | Duck et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7935869 | Pallett et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7943819 | Baum et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7973218 | McCutchen et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 8090164 | Bullitt et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8143480 | Axtell et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8548778 | Hart et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
| 8554490 | Tang et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 9121022 | Sammons et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9445603 | Baum et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| 20010006797 | Kumagai et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20010042257 | Connor-Ward et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020069430 | Kiaska et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020114784 | Li et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20030150017 | Mesa et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030154508 | Stevens et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030167537 | Jiang | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20040029275 | Brown et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040053289 | Allen et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040055041 | Labate et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040072692 | Hoffman et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040082475 | Hoffman et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040123347 | Hinchey et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040126845 | Eenennaam et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040133944 | Hake et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040147475 | Li et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040177399 | Hammer et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040216189 | Houmard et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040244075 | Cal et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040250310 | Shukla et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050005319 | della-Cioppa et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050044591 | Yao et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050215435 | Menges et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050250647 | Hills et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060009358 | Kibler et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060021087 | Baum et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060040826 | Eaton et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060111241 | Gerwick, III et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060130172 | Whaley et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060135758 | Wu | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060200878 | Lutfiyya et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060223708 | Hoffman et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060223709 | Helmke et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060247197 | Van De Craen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060272049 | Waterhouse et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060276339 | Windsor et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070011775 | Allen et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070021360 | Nyce et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070050863 | Tranel et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070124836 | Baum et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070199095 | Allen et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070250947 | Boukharov et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070259785 | Heck et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070269815 | Rivory et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070281900 | Cui et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070300329 | Allen et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080022423 | Roberts et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080050342 | Fire et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080092256 | Kohn | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080113351 | Naito et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080155716 | Sonnewald et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080214443 | Baum et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20090011934 | Zawierucha et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090018016 | Duck et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090036311 | Witschel et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090054240 | Witschel et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090075921 | Ikegawa et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090098614 | Zamore et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090118214 | Paldi et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090137395 | Chicoine et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090165153 | Wang et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090165166 | Feng et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090172838 | Axtell et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090188005 | Boukharov et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090205079 | Kumar et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090215628 | Witschel et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090285784 | Raemaekers et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090293148 | Ren et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090298787 | Raemaekers et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090306189 | Raemaekers et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090307803 | Baum et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100005551 | Roberts et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100048670 | Biard et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100068172 | Van De Craen | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100071088 | Sela et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100099561 | Selby et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100100988 | Tranel et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100152443 | Hirai et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100154083 | Ross et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100192237 | Ren | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100247578 | Salama | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20110015084 | Christian et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110015284 | Dees et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110028412 | Cappello et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110035836 | Eudes et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110041400 | Trias Vila | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110053226 | Rohayem | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110098180 | Michel et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110105327 | Nelson | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110105329 | Song et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110112570 | Mannava et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110126310 | Feng et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110126311 | Velcheva et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110152339 | Brown et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110152346 | Karleson et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110152353 | Koizumi | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110160082 | Woo et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110166022 | Israels et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110166023 | Nettleton-Hammond et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110171176 | Baas et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110171287 | Saarma et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110177949 | Krapp et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110185444 | Li et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110185445 | Bogner et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110191897 | Poree et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110201501 | Song et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110296555 | Ivashuta et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110296556 | Sammons | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120036594 | Cardoza et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120107355 | Harris et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120108497 | Paldi et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120137387 | Baum et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120150048 | Kang et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120156784 | Adams, Jr. et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120164205 | Baum et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120185967 | Sela et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120198586 | Narva et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120230565 | Steinberg et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120258646 | Sela et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20130003213 | Kabelac et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130041004 | Drager et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130047297 | Sammons et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130047298 | Tang | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130060133 | Kassab et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130067618 | Ader et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130084243 | Goetsch et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130096073 | Sidelman | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130097726 | Ader et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130212739 | Giritch et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130226003 | Edic et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130247247 | Ader et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130254940 | Ader et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130254941 | Ader et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130288895 | Ader et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130318657 | Avniel et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130318658 | Ader et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130324842 | Mittal et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130326731 | Ader et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140018241 | Sammons et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140057789 | Sammons et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140109258 | Van De Craen et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140230090 | Avniel | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140274712 | Finnessy et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140275208 | Hu et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140296503 | Avniel et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20150096079 | Avniel | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150143580 | Beattie et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150159156 | Inberg et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150203867 | Beattie et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150240258 | Beattie et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20160015035 | Tao | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160029644 | Tao | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2008258254 | Jul 2014 | AU |
| 101279950 | Oct 2008 | CN |
| 101279951 | Oct 2008 | CN |
| 101914540 | Dec 2010 | CN |
| 102822350 | Dec 2012 | CN |
| 288618 | Apr 1991 | DE |
| 10000600 | Jul 2001 | DE |
| 10116399 | Oct 2002 | DE |
| 10256353 | Jun 2003 | DE |
| 10256354 | Jun 2003 | DE |
| 10256367 | Jun 2003 | DE |
| 10204951 | Aug 2003 | DE |
| 10234875 | Feb 2004 | DE |
| 10234876 | Feb 2004 | DE |
| 102004054666 | May 2006 | DE |
| 102005014638 | Oct 2006 | DE |
| 102005014906 | Oct 2006 | DE |
| 102007012168 | Sep 2008 | DE |
| 102010042866 | May 2011 | DE |
| 0 804 600 | Nov 1997 | EP |
| 1 157 991 | Nov 2001 | EP |
| 1 238 586 | Sep 2002 | EP |
| 1 416 049 | May 2004 | EP |
| 2 147 919 | Jan 2010 | EP |
| 2 160 098 | Nov 2010 | EP |
| 2 530 159 | Mar 2011 | EP |
| 2 305 813 | Apr 2011 | EP |
| 2 545 182 | Jan 2013 | EP |
| 2001253874 | Sep 2001 | JP |
| 2002080454 | Mar 2002 | JP |
| 2002138075 | May 2002 | JP |
| 2002145707 | May 2002 | JP |
| 2002220389 | Aug 2002 | JP |
| 2003064059 | Mar 2003 | JP |
| 2003096059 | Apr 2003 | JP |
| 2004051628 | Feb 2004 | JP |
| 2004107228 | Apr 2004 | JP |
| 2005008583 | Jan 2005 | JP |
| 2005239675 | Sep 2005 | JP |
| 2005314407 | Nov 2005 | JP |
| 2006232824 | Sep 2006 | JP |
| 2006282552 | Oct 2006 | JP |
| 2007153847 | Jun 2007 | JP |
| 2007161701 | Jun 2007 | JP |
| 2007182404 | Jul 2007 | JP |
| 2008074840 | Apr 2008 | JP |
| 2008074841 | Apr 2008 | JP |
| 2008133207 | Jun 2008 | JP |
| 2008133218 | Jun 2008 | JP |
| 2008169121 | Jul 2008 | JP |
| 2009067739 | Apr 2009 | JP |
| 2009114128 | May 2009 | JP |
| 2009126792 | Jun 2009 | JP |
| 2009137851 | Jun 2009 | JP |
| WO 8911789 | Dec 1989 | WO |
| WO 9534659 | Dec 1995 | WO |
| WO 9534668 | Dec 1995 | WO |
| WO 96005721 | Feb 1996 | WO |
| WO 96033270 | Oct 1996 | WO |
| WO 96038567 | Dec 1996 | WO |
| WO 96040964 | Dec 1996 | WO |
| WO 9749816 | Dec 1997 | WO |
| WO 99024585 | May 1999 | WO |
| WO 9926467 | Jun 1999 | WO |
| WO 9926467 | Jun 1999 | WO |
| WO 9927116 | Jun 1999 | WO |
| WO 9932619 | Jul 1999 | WO |
| WO 9961631 | Dec 1999 | WO |
| WO 9967367 | Dec 1999 | WO |
| WO 0032757 | Jun 2000 | WO |
| WO 00044914 | Aug 2000 | WO |
| WO 0107601 | Feb 2001 | WO |
| WO 0214472 | Feb 2002 | WO |
| WO 0214472 | Feb 2002 | WO |
| WO 02066660 | Aug 2002 | WO |
| WO 03000679 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| WO 03006422 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| WO 03012052 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| WO 03013247 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| WO 03016308 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| WO 03020704 | Mar 2003 | WO |
| WO 03022051 | Mar 2003 | WO |
| WO 03022831 | Mar 2003 | WO |
| WO 03022843 | Mar 2003 | WO |
| WO 03029243 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| WO 03037085 | May 2003 | WO |
| WO 03037878 | May 2003 | WO |
| WO 03045878 | Jun 2003 | WO |
| WO 03050087 | Jun 2003 | WO |
| WO 03051823 | Jun 2003 | WO |
| WO 03051824 | Jun 2003 | WO |
| WO 03051846 | Jun 2003 | WO |
| WO 03064625 | Aug 2003 | WO |
| WO 03076409 | Sep 2003 | WO |
| WO 03077648 | Sep 2003 | WO |
| WO 03087067 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| WO 03090539 | Nov 2003 | WO |
| WO 03091217 | Nov 2003 | WO |
| WO 03093269 | Nov 2003 | WO |
| WO 03104206 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| WO 2004002947 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004002981 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004005485 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004009761 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004011429 | Feb 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004022771 | Mar 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004029060 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004035545 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004035563 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004035564 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004037787 | May 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004049806 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004062351 | Jul 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004067518 | Aug 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004067527 | Aug 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004074443 | Sep 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004077950 | Sep 2004 | WO |
| WO 2005000824 | Jan 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005003362 | Jan 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005007627 | Jan 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005007860 | Jan 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005007860 | Jan 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005040152 | May 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005047233 | May 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005047281 | May 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005061443 | Jul 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005061464 | Jul 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005068434 | Jul 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005070889 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005089551 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005095335 | Oct 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005107437 | Nov 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005110068 | Nov 2005 | WO |
| WO 2006006569 | Jan 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006024820 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006029828 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006029829 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006037945 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006050803 | May 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006074400 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006090792 | Aug 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006123088 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006125687 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006125688 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006138638 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| WO 2007003294 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007007316 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007024783 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007026834 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007035650 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007039454 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007039454 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007050715 | May 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007070389 | Jun 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007071900 | Jun 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007074405 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007077201 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007077247 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007080126 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007080127 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007080127 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007083193 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007096576 | Aug 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007051462 | Oct 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007051462 | Oct 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007119434 | Oct 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007134984 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| WO 2008007100 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008009908 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008029084 | Mar 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008042231 | Apr 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008059948 | May 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008063203 | May 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008071918 | Jun 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008074991 | Jun 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008084073 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008100426 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008102908 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008148223 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008152072 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008152073 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| WO 2009000757 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| WO 2009005297 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009035150 | Mar 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009046384 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009063180 | May 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009068170 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009068171 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009086041 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009090401 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009090402 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009115788 | Sep 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009116558 | Sep 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009125401 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009125401 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009152995 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009158258 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| WO 2010012649 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010026989 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010034153 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010049270 | May 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010049369 | May 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010049405 | May 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010049414 | May 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010056519 | May 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010063422 | Jun 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010069802 | Jun 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010078906 | Jul 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010078912 | Jul 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010104217 | Sep 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010108611 | Sep 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010112826 | Oct 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010116122 | Oct 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010119906 | Oct 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010130970 | Nov 2010 | WO |
| WO 2011001434 | Jan 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011001434 | Jan 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011003776 | Jan 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011035874 | Mar 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011045796 | Apr 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011065451 | Jun 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011067745 | Jun 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011067745 | Jun 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011080674 | Jul 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011112570 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011112570 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011132127 | Oct 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011132127 | Oct 2011 | WO |
| WO 2012001626 | Jan 2012 | WO |
| WO 2012001626 | Jan 2012 | WO |
| WO 2012056401 | May 2012 | WO |
| WO 2012056401 | May 2012 | WO |
| WO 2012092580 | Jul 2012 | WO |
| WO 2013010691 | Jan 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013025670 | Feb 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013039990 | Mar 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013040005 | Mar 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013040021 | Mar 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013040033 | Mar 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013040049 | Mar 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013040057 | Mar 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013040116 | Mar 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013040117 | Mar 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013153553 | Oct 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013175480 | Nov 2013 | WO |
| WO 2014022739 | Feb 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014106837 | Jul 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014106838 | Jul 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014151255 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014164761 | Oct 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014164797 | Oct 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014164797 | Oct 2014 | WO |
| WO 2015010026 | Jan 2015 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Unnamalai et al, 2006, FEBS Letters, 566:307-310. |
| Salanenka et al, 2011, HortScience, 46:622-626. |
| Hagio, 2009, Electroporation and Sonoporation in Developmental Biology, p. 285-293. |
| Li et al, 2009, Agricultural Science in China, 8:658-663. |
| Alarcón-Reverte et al., “Resistance to ACCase-inhibiting herbicides in the weed Lolium multiflorum,” Comm. Appl. Biol. Sci., 73(4):899-902 (2008). |
| Amarzguioui et al., “An algorithm for selection of functional siRNA sequences,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 316:1050-1058 (2004). |
| An et al., “Transient RNAi Induction against Endogenous Genes in Arabidopsis Protoplasts Using in Vitro-Prepared Double-Stranded RNA,” Biosci Biotechnol Biochem, 69(2):415-418 (2005). |
| Andersson et al., “A novel selection system for potato transformation using a mutated AHAS gene,” Plant Cell Reports, 22(4):261-267 (2003). |
| Anonymous, “A handbook for high-level expression and purification of 6xHis-tagged proteins,” The QUIexpressionist, (2003). |
| Anonymous, “Agronomy Facts 37: Adjuvants for enhancing herbicide performance,” n.p. 1-8, (Jan. 26, 2000), Web, (Jan. 21, 2014). |
| Anonymous, “Devgen, The mini-Monsanto,” KBC Securities (2006). |
| Anonymous, “Do Monsanto have the next big thing?,” Austalian Herbicide Resistance Initiative (AHRI), (Apr. 23, 2013) Web. (Jan. 19, 2015). |
| Aoki et al., “In Vivo Transfer Efficiency of Antisense Oligonucleotides into the Myocardium Using HVJ-Liposome Method,” Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 231:540-545 (1997). |
| Arpaia et al., “Production of transgenic eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) resistant to Colorado Potato Beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say),” (1997) Theor. Appl. Genet., 95:329-334 (1997). |
| Artmymovich, “Using RNA interference to increase crop yield and decrease pest damage,” MMG 445 Basic Biotech., 5(1):7-12 (2009). |
| Australian Patent Examination report No. 1 dated Nov. 11, 2013, in Australian Application No. 2011224570. |
| Axtell et al., “A Two-Hit Trigger for siRNA Biogenesis in Plants,” Cell, 127:565-577 (2006). |
| Baerson et al., “Glyphosate-Resistant Goosegrass. Identification of a Mutation in the Target Enzyme 5-Enolpyruvylshikimate-3-Phosphate Synthase,” Plant Physiol., 129(3):1265-1275 (2002). |
| Bannerjee et al., “Efficient production of transgenic potato (S. tuberosum L. ssp. andigena) plants via Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation,” Plant Sci., 170:732 738 (2006). |
| Baulcombe, “RNA silencing and heritable epigenetic effects in tomato and Arabidopsis,” Abstract 13th Annual Fall Symposium, Plant Genomes to Phenomes, Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, 28-30 (2011). |
| Bayer et al., “Programmable ligand-controlled riboregulators of eukaryotic gene expression,” Nature Biotechnol., 23(3):337-343 (2005). |
| Beal, et al., “Second Structural Motif for Recognition of DNA by Oligonucleotide-Directed Triple-Helix Formation,” Science, 251:1360-1363 (1992). |
| Becker et al., “Fertile transgenic wheat from microprojectile bombardment of scutellar tissue,” The Plant Journal, 5(2):299-307 (1994). |
| Bhargava et al., “Long double-stranded RNA-mediated RNA interference as a tool to achieve site-specific silencing of hypothalamic neuropeptides,” Brain Research Protocols, 13:115-125 (2004). |
| Boletta et al., “High Efficient Non-Viral Gene Delivery to the Rat Kidney by Novel Polycationic Vectors,” J. Am Soc. Nephrol., 7:1728 (1996). |
| Bolognesi et al., “Characterizing the Mechanism of Action of Double-Stranded RNA Activity against Western Corn Rootworm(Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte),” PLoS ONE 7(10):e47534 (2012). |
| Bolter et al., “A chloroplastic inner envelope membrane protease is essential for plant development,” FEBS Letters, 580:789-794 (2006). |
| Breaker et al. “A DNA enzyme with Mg2+-dependent RNA phosphoesterase activity,” Chemistry and Biology, 2:655-660 (1995). |
| Brodersen et al., “The diversity of RNA silencing pathways in plants,” Trends in Genetics, 22(5):268-280 (2006). |
| Busi et al., “Gene flow increases the initial frequency of herbicide resistance alleles in unselectedpopulations,” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environments, Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL, 142(3):403-409 (2011). |
| Bytebier et al., “T-DNA organization in tumor cultures and transgenic plants of the monocotyledon Asparagus officinalis,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 84:5345-5349 (1987). |
| Chakravarty et al., “Genetic Transformation in Potato: Approaches and Strategies,” Amer J Potato Res, 84:301 311 (2007). |
| Chen et al., “In Vivo Analysis of the Role of atTic20 in Protein Import into Chloroplasts,” The Plant Cell, 14:641-654 (2002). |
| Cheng et al., “Production of fertile transgenic peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) plants using Agrobacterium tumefaciens,” Plant Cell Reports, 15:653-657 (1996). |
| Chinese Office Action dated Aug. 28, 2013 in Chinese Application No. 201180012795.2. |
| Clough et al., “Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana,” The Plant Journal, 16(6):735-743 (1998). |
| CN101914540 Patent Diclosure, “Introduction of RNA into plant by interference,” (2010). |
| Colbourne et al., “The Ecoresponsive Genome of Daphnia pulex,” Science, 331(6017):555-561 (2011). |
| Colombian Office Action dated Aug. 2, 2013 in Application No. 12 152898. |
| Colombian Office Action dated Feb. 21, 2014 in Application No. 12 152898. |
| Cooney et al., “Site-Specific Oligonucleotide Binding Represses Transcription of the Human c-myc Gene in Vitro,” Science ,241:456-459 (1988). |
| COST Action FA0806 progress report “Plant virus control employing RNA-based vaccines: A novel non-transgenic strategy” (2010). |
| Coticchia et al., “Calmodulin modulates Akt activity in human breast cancer cell lines,” Breast Cancer Res. Treat, 115:545-560 (2009). |
| Dalmay et al., “An RNA-Depenedent RNA Polymerase Gene in Arabidopsis Is Required for Posttranscriptional Gene Silencing Mediated by a Transgene but Not by a Virus,” Cell, 101:543-553 (2000). |
| Database EMBL CBIB Daphnia—XP-002732239 (2011). |
| Davidson et al., “Engineering regulatory RNAs,” TRENDS in Biotechnology, 23(3):109-112 (2005). |
| De Block, et al. “Engineering herbicide resistance in plants by expression of a detoxifying enzyme,” EMBO J. 6(9):2513-2519 (1987). |
| De Framond, “MINI-Ti: A New Vector Strategy for Plant Genetic Engineering,” Nature Biotechnology, 1:262-269 (1983). |
| della-Cioppa et al., “Import of a precursor protein into chloroplasts is inhibited by the herbicide glyphosate,” The EMBO Journal, 7(5):1299-1305 (1988). |
| Diallo et al., “Long Endogenous dsRNAs Can Induce Complete Gene Silencing in Mammalian Cells and Primary Cultures,” Oligonucleotides, 13:381-392 (2003). |
| Dietemann et al.,“Varroa destructor: research avenues towards sustainable control,” Journal of Apicultural Research, 51(1):125-132 (2012). |
| Du et al., “A systematic analysis of the silencing effects of an active siRNA at all single-nucleotide mismatched target sites,” Nucleic Acids Research, 33(5):1671-1677 (2005). |
| Dunoyer et al., “Small RNA Duplexes Function as Mobile Silencing Signals Between Plant Cells,” Science, 328:912-916 (2010). |
| Ellington et al., “In vitro selection of RNA molecules that bind specific ligands,” Nature, 346:818-822 (1990). |
| Eurasian Office Action dated Feb. 24, 2014, in Application No. 201201264. |
| European Cooperation in the field of Scientific and Technical Research—Memorandum of Understanding for COST Action FA0806 (2008). |
| European Supplemental Search Report dated Oct. 8, 2013 in Application No. 11753916.3. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Feb. 2, 2015, in European Patent Application No. 12 830 932.5. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Feb. 27, 2015, in European Patent Application No. 12 832 160.1. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Feb. 3, 2015, in European Patent Application No. 12 831 945.6. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Jan. 21, 2015, in European Patent Application No. 12 832 415.9. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Jan. 29, 2015, in European Patent Application No. 12 831 567.8. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 17, 2015, in European Patent Application No. 12 831 684.1. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 3, 2015, in European Patent Application No. 12 831 166.9. |
| Fukuhara et al., “The Unusual Structure of a Novel RNA Replicon in Rice,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 270(30):18147-18149 (1995). |
| Further Examination Report issued in New Zealand Patent Application No. 601784 dated May 16, 2014. |
| GenBank Accession No. AY545657.1, published 2004. |
| GenBank Accession No. DY640489, PU2_plate27_F03 PU2 Prunus persica cDNA similar to expressed mRNA inferred from Prunus persica hypothetical domain/motif containing IPR011005:Dihydropteroate synthase-like, MRNA sequence (2006) [Retrieved on Feb. 4, 2013]. Retrieved from the internet <URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nucest/DY640489>. |
| GenBank Accession No. EU24568—“Amaranthus hypochondriacus acetolactate synthase (ALS) gene,” (2007). |
| GenBank Accession No. FJ972198, Solanum lycopersicum cultivar Ailsa Craig dihydropterin pyrophosphokinase-dihydropteroate synthase (HPPK-DHPS) gene, complete cds (2010) [Retrieved on Nov. 26, 2012]. Retrieved from the internet ,URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/FJ972198>. |
| GenBank Accession No. GI:186478573, published Jan. 22, 2014. |
| GenEmbl FJ861243, published Feb. 3, 2010. |
| Gong et al., “Silencing of Rieske iron-sulfur protein using chemically synthesised siRNA as a potential biopesticide against Plutella xylostella,” Pest Manag Sci, 67:514-520 (2011). |
| Gressel et al., “A strategy to provide long-term control of weedy rice while mitigating herbicide resistance transgene flow, and its potential use for other crops with related weeds,” Pest Manag Sci, 65(7):723-731 (2009). |
| Gutensohn et al., “Functional analysis of the two Arabidopsis homologues of Toc34, a component of the chloroplast protein import apparatus,” The Plant Journal, 23(6):771-783 (2000). |
| Hamilton et al., “Two classes of short interfering RNA in RNA silencing,” EMBO J., 21(17):4671-4679 (2002). |
| Hannon, “RNA interference,” Nature,481:244-251 (2002). |
| Harrison et al., “Does Lowering Glutamine Synthetase Activity in Nodules Modigy Nitrogen Metabolism and Growth of Lotus japonicus?,” Plant Physiology, 133:253-262 (2003). |
| Herman et al., “A three-component dicamba O-demethylase from Pseudomonas maltophilia, strain DI-6: gene isolation, characterization, and heterologous expression,” J. Biol. Chem., 280: 24759-24767 (2005). |
| Hewezi et al., “Local infiltration of high- and low-molecular-weight RNA from silenced sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) plants triggers post-transcriptional gene silencing in non-silenced plants,” Plant Biotechnology Journal, 3:81-89 (2005). |
| Hidayat et al., “Enhanced Metabolism of Fluazifop Acid in a Biotype of Digitaria sanguinalis Resistant to the Herbicide Fluazifop-P-Butyl,” Pesticide Biochem. Physiol., 57:137-146 (1997). |
| Himber et al., “Transitivity-dependant and -independent cell-to-cell movement of RNA silencing,” The EMBO Journal, 22(17):4523-4533 (2003). |
| Hirschberg et al., “Molecular Basis of Herbicide Resistance in Amaranthus hybridus,” Science, 222:1346-1349 (1983). |
| Hoekema et al., “A binary plant vector strategy based on separation of vir- and T-region of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens Ti-plasmid,” Nature, 303:179-180 (1983). |
| Hofgen et al., “Repression of Acetolactate Synthase Activity through Antisense Inhibition: Molecular and Biochemical Analysis of Transgenic Potato (Solanum tuberosum L. cv Desiree) Plants,” Plant Physiol., 107(2):469-477 (1995). |
| Hsieh et al., “A library of siRNA duplexes targeting the phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway: determinants of gene silencing for use in cell-based screens,” Nucleic Acids Res., 32(3):893-901 (2004). |
| Huesken et al., “Design of a genome-wide siRNA library using an artificial neural network,” Nature Biotechnology, 23(8): 995-1001 (2005). |
| Hunter et al., “RNA Interference Strategy to suppress Psyllids & Leafhoppers,” International Plant and Animal Genome XIX, 15-19 (2011). |
| Ichihara et al., “Thermodynamic instability of siRNA duplex is a prerequisite for dependable prediction of siRNA activities,” Nucleic Acids Res., 35(18):e123 (2007). |
| International Search Report and the Written Opinion dated Feb. 25, 2013, in International Application No. PCT/US12/054883. |
| International Search Report and the Written Opinion dated Feb. 27, 2013, in International Application No. PCT/US12/054814. |
| International Search Report and the Written Opinion dated Feb. 27, 2013, in International Application No. PCT/US12/054842. |
| International Search Report and the Written Opinion dated Feb. 27, 2013, in International Application No. PCT/US12/054862. |
| International Search Report and the Written Opinion dated Feb. 27, 2013, in International Application No. PCT/US12/054894. |
| International Search Report and the Written Opinion dated Feb. 27, 2013, in International Application No. PCT/US12/054974. |
| International Search Report and the Written Opinion dated Feb. 27, 2013, in International Application No. PCT/US12/054980. |
| International Search Report and the Written Opinion dated May 10, 2011, in International Application No. PCT/US11/027528. |
| International Search Report dated Mar. 12, 2013, in International Application No. PCT/US 12/54789. |
| Invitation to Pay Additional Fees dated May 6, 2014, in International Application No. PCT/IL2013/051083. |
| Invitation to Pay Additional Fees dated May 6, 2014, in International Application No. PCT/IL2013/051085. |
| Invitation to Pay Additional Fees dated Nov. 25, 2014, in International Application No. PCT/US2014/047204. |
| Isaacs et al., “Engineered riboregulators enable post-transcriptional control of gene expression,” Nature Biotechnology, 22(7):841-847 (2004). |
| Jones-Rhoades et al., “MicroRNAs and Their Regulatory Roles in Plants,” Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 57:19-53 (2006). |
| Katoh et al., “Specific residues at every third position of siRNA shape its efficient RNAi activity,” Nucleic Acids Res., 35(4): e27 (2007). |
| Kertbundit et al., “In vivo random β-glucuronidase gene fusions in Arabidopsis thaliana,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A., 88:5212-5216 (1991). |
| Khachigian, “DNAzymes: Cutting a path to a new class of therapeutics,” Curr Opin Mol Ther 4(2):119-121 (2002). |
| Kirkwood, “Use and Mode of Action of Adjuvants for Herbicides: A Review of some Current Work,” Pestic Sci., 38:93-102 (1993). |
| Klahre et al., “High molecular weight RNAs and small interfering RNAs induce systemic posttranscriptional gene silencing in plants,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, PNAS, 99(18):11981-11986 (2002). |
| Kronenwett et al., “Oligodeoxyribonucleotide Uptake in Primary Human Hematopoietic Cells Is Enhanced by Cationic Lipids and Depends on the Hematopoietic Cell Subset,” Blood, 91(3):852-862 (1998). |
| Kumar et al., “Sequencing, De Novo Assembly and Annotation of the Colorado Potato Beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata,Transcriptome,” PLoS One, 9(1):e86012 (2014). |
| Kusaba et al., “Low glutelin content1: A Dominant Mutation That Suppresses the Glutelin Multigene Family via RNA Silencing ni Rice,” The Plant Cell, 15(6):1455-1467 (2003). |
| Kusaba, “RNA interference in crop plants,” Curr Opin Biotechnol, 15(2):139-143 (2004). |
| Lavigne et al., “Enhanced antisense inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in cell cultures by DLS delivery system,” Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 237:566-571 (1997). |
| Lee et al., “Aptamer Database,” Nucleic Acids Research, 32:D95-D100 (2004). |
| Lermontova et al., “Reduced activity of plastid protoporphyrinogen oxidase causes attenuated photodynamic damage during high-light compared to low-light exposure,” The Plant Journal, 48(4):499-510 (2006). |
| Lesnik et al., “Prediction of rho-independent transcriptional terminators in Escherichia coli,” Nucleic Acids Research, 29(17):3583-3594 (2001). |
| Li et al., “Establishment of a highly efficient transformation system for pepper (Capsicum annuum L.),” Plant Cell Reports, 21: 785-788 (2003). |
| Li et al., “The FAST technique: A simplified Agrobacterium-based transformation method for transient gene expression analysis in seedlings of Arabidopsis and other plant species,” Plant Methods, 5(6):1-15 (2009). |
| Liu et al., “Comparative study on the interaction of DNA with three different kinds of surfactants and the formation of multilayer films,” Bioelectrochemistry, 70:301-307 (2007). |
| Liu et al., “DNAzyme-mediated recovery of small recombinant RNAs from a 5S rRNA-derived chimera expressed in Escherichia coli,” BMC Biotechnology, 10:85 (2010). |
| Llave et al., “Endogenous and Silencing-Associated Small RNAs in Plants,” The Plant Cell, 14:1605-1619 (2002). |
| Lu et al., “OligoWalk: an online siRNA design tool utilizing hybridization thermodynamics,” Nucleic Acids Research, 36:W104-W108 (2008). |
| Lu et al., “RNA silencing in plants by the expression of siRNA duplexes,” Nucleic Acids Res., 32(21):e171 (2004). |
| Luft, “Making sense out of antisense oligodeoxynucleotide delivery: getting there is half the fun,” J Mol Med, 76:75-76 (1998). |
| Maas et al., “Mechanism and optimized conditions for PEG mediated DNA transfection into plant protoplasts,” Plant Cell Reports, 8:148-149 (1989). |
| Maher III et al., “Inhibition of DNA binding proteins by oligonucleotide-directed triple helix formation,” Science, 245(4919):725-730 (1989). |
| Mandal et al., “Adenine riboswitches and gene activation by disruption of a transcription terminator,” Nature Struct. Mol. Biol., 11(1):29-35 (2004). |
| Mandal et al., “Gene Regulation by Riboswitches,” Nature Reviews | Molecular Cell Biology, 5:451-463 (2004). |
| Manoharan, “Oligonucleotide Conjugates as Potential Antisense Drugs with Improved Uptake, Biodistribution, Targeted Delivery, and Mechanism of Action,” Antisense & Nucleic Acid Drug Development, 12:103-128 (2002). |
| Masoud et al., “Constitutive expression of an inducible β-1,3-glucanase in alfalfa reduces disease severity caused by the oomycete pathogen Phytophthora megasperma f. sp medicaginis, but does not reduce disease severity of chitincontaining fungi,” Transgenic Research, 5:313-323 (1996). |
| Matveeva et al., “Prediction of antisense oligonucleotide efficacy by in vitro methods,” Nature Biotechnology, 16:1374-1375 (1998). |
| Meinke, et al., “Identifying essential genes in Arabidopsis thaliana,” Trends Plant Sci., 13(9):483-491 (2008). |
| Meins et al., “RNA Silencing Systems and Their Relevance to Plant Development,” Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol., 21:297-318 (2005). |
| Melnyk et al., “Intercellular and systemic movement of RNA silencing signals,” The EMBO Journal, 30:3553-3563 (2011). |
| Misawa et al., “Expression of an Erwinia phytoene desaturase gene not only confers multiple resistance to herbicides interfering with carotenoid biosynthesis but also alters xanthophyll metabolism in transgenic plants,” The Plant Journal, 6(4):481-489 (1994). |
| Misawa et al., “Functional expression of the Erwinia uredovora carotenoid biosynthesis gene crtl in transgenic plants showing an increase of β-carotene biosynthesis activity and resistance to the bleaching herbicide norflurazon,” The Plant Journal, 4(5):833-840 (1993). |
| Miura et al., “The Balance between Protein Synthesis and Degradation in Chloroplasts Determines Leaf Variegation in Arabidopsis yellow variegated Mutants,” The Plant Cell, 19:1313-1328 (2007). |
| Molnar et al., “Plant Virus-Derived Small Interfering RNAs Originate redominantly from Highly Structured Single-Stranded Viral RNAs,” Journal of Virology, 79(12):7812-7818 (2005). |
| Molnar et al., “Small Silencing RNAs in Plants Are Mobile and Direct Epigenetic Modification in Recipient Cells,” Science, 328:872-875 (2010). |
| Morrissey et al., “Potent and persistent in vivo anti-HBV activity of chemically modified siRNAs,” Nat Biotechnol. 23(8):1002-1007 (2005). |
| Moser et al., “Sequence-Specific Cleavage of Double Helical DNA by Triple Helix Formation,” Science, 238:645-646 (1987). |
| Nowak et al., “A new and efficient method for inhibition of RNA viruses by DNA interference,” The FEBS Journal, 276:4372-4380. |
| Office Action dated Feb. 17, 2014, in Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2012/010479. |
| Office Action dated Jan. 6, 2015, in Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-557165. |
| Office Action dated Nov. 19, 2014, in Eurasian Patent Application No. 201201264/28. |
| Ongvarrasopone et al., “A Simple and Cost Effective Method to Generate dsRNA for RNAi Studies in Invertebrates,” Science Asia, 33:35-39 (2007). |
| Ouellet et al., “Members of the Acetohydroxyacid Synthase Muligene Family of Brassica napus Have Divergent Patterns of Expression,” The Plant Journal, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, GB, 2(3):321-330 (1992). |
| Paddison et al., “Stable suppression of gene expression by RNAi in mammalian cells,” Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 99(3):1443-1448 (2002). |
| Palauqui et al., “Activation of systemic acquired silencing by localised introduction of DNA,” Current Biology, 9:59-66 (1999). |
| Partial Supplementary European Search Report dated Mar. 2, 2015, in European Patent Application No. 12 831 494.5. |
| Paungfoo-Lonhienne et al., “DNA is Taken up by Root Hairs and Pollen, and Stimulates Root and Pollen Tube Growth,” Plant Physiology, 153:799-805 (2010). |
| Pei et al., “On the art of identifying effective and specific siRNAs,” Nature Methods, 3(9):670-676 (2006). |
| Pornprom et al., “Glutamine synthetase mutation conferring target-site-based resistance to glufosinate in soybean cell selections,” Pest Manag Sci, 2009; 65(2):216-222 (2009). |
| Preston et al., “Multiple effects of a naturally occurring proline to threonine substitution within acetolactate synthase in two herbicide-resistant populations of Lactuca serriola,” Pesticide Biochem. Physiol., 84(3):227-235 (2006). |
| Qiwei,“ Advance in DNA interference,” Progress in Veterinary Medicine, 30(1):71-75 (2009). |
| Rajur et al., “Covalent Protein—Oligonucleotide Conjugates for Efficient Delivery of Antisense Molecules,” Bioconjug Chem., 8:935-940 (1997). |
| Reddy et al “Organosilicone Adjuvants Increased the Efficacy of Glyphosate for Control of Weeds in Citrus (Citrus spp.)” HortScience 27(9):1003-1005 (1992). |
| Reddy et al., “Aminomethylphosphonic Acid Accumulation in Plant Species Treated with Glyphosate,” J. Agric. Food Chem., 56(6):2125-2130 (2008). |
| Reither et al., “Specificity of DNA triple helix formation analyzed by a FRET assay,” BMC Biochemistry, 3:27 (2002). |
| Reynolds et al., “Rational siRNA design for RNA interference,” Nature Biotechnology, 22:326-330 (2004). |
| Ryabov et al., “Cell-to-Cell, but Not Long-Distance, Spread of RNA Silencing That Is Induced in Individual Epidermal Cells,” Journal of Virology, 78(6):3149-3154 (2004). |
| Santoro et al., “A general purpose RNA-cleaving DNA enzyme,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94:4262-4266 (1997). |
| Sathasivan et al., “Nucleotide sequence of a mutant acetolactate synthase gene from an imidazolinone-resistant Arabidopsis thaliana var. Columbia,” Nucleic Acids Research, 18(8):2188-2193 (1990). |
| Second Chinese Office Action issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201180012795.2, dated Jun. 10, 2014. |
| Seidman et al., “The potential for gene repair via triple helix formation,” J Clin Invest., 112(4):487-494 (2003). |
| Sharma et al., “A simple and efficient Agrobacterium-mediated procedure for transformation of tomato,” J. Biosci., 34(3):423 433 (2009). |
| Silwet L-77 Spray Adjuvant for agricultural applications, product description from Momentive Performance Materials, Inc. (2003). |
| Singh et al., “Absorption and translocation of glyphosate with conventional and organosilicone adjuvants,” Weed Biology and Management, 8:104-111 (2008). |
| Steeves et al., “Transgenic soybeans expressing siRNAs specific to a major sperm protein gene suppress Heterodera glycines reproduction,” Funct. Plant Biol., 33:991-999 (2006). |
| Stock et al., “Possible Mechanisms for Surfactant-Induced Foliar Uptake of Agrochemicals,” Pestic. Sci., 38:165-177 (1993). |
| Strat et al., “Specific and nontoxic silencing in mammalian cells with expressed long dsRNAs,” Nucleic Acids Research, 34(13):3803-3810 (2006). |
| Sudarsan et al., “Metabolite-binding RNA domains are present in the genes of eukaryotes,” RNA, 9:644-647 (2003). |
| Sun et al., “A Highly efficient Transformation Protocol for Micro-Tom, a Model Cultivar for Tomato Functional Genomics,” Plant Cell Physiol., 47(3):426-431 (2006). |
| Sun et al., “Antisense oligodeoxynucleotide inhibition as a potent strategy in plant biology: identification of SUSIBA2 as a transcriptional activator in plant sugar signalling,” The Plant Journal, 44:128-138 (2005). |
| Sun et al., “Sweet delivery—sugar translocators as ports of entry for antisense oligodeoxynucleotides in plant cells,” The Plant Journal, 52:1192-1198 (2007). |
| Takasaki et al., “An Effective Method for Selecting siRNA Target Sequences in Mammalian Cells,” Cell Cycle, 3:790-795 (2004). |
| Temple et al., “Can glutamine synthetase activity levels be modulated in transgenic plants by the use of recombinant DNA technology?” Transgenic Plants and Plant Biochemistry, 22:915-920 (1994). |
| Temple et al., “Down-regulation of specific members of the glutamine synthetase gene family in Alfalfa by antisense RNA technology,” Plant Molecular Biology, 37:535-547 (1998). |
| Templeton et al., “Improved DNA: liposome complexes for increased systemic delivery and gene expression,” Nature Biotechnology, 15:647-652 (1997). |
| Tenllado et al., “Crude extracts of bacterially expressed dsRNA can be used to protect plants against virus infection,” BMC Biotechnology, 3(3):1-11 (2003). |
| Tenllado et al., “RNA interference as a new biotechnological tool for the control of virus diseases in plants,” Virus Research, 102:85-96 (2004). |
| Third Party Submission filed on Nov. 29, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/042,856. |
| Thompson, et al., “Clustal W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice,” Nucl. Acids Res., 22(22):4673-4680 (1994). |
| Timmons et al., “Specific interference by ingested dsRNA,” Nature, 395:854 (1998). |
| Tomari et al., “Perspective: machines for RNAi,” Genes & Dev., 19:517-529 (2005). |
| Toriyama et al., “Transgenic Rice Plants After Direct Gene Transfer Into Protoplasts,” Bio/Technology, 6:1072-1074 (1988). |
| Tran et al., “Control of specific gene expression in mammalian cells by co-expression of long complementary RNAs,” FEBS Lett.;573(1-3):127-134 (2004). |
| Tuschl, “Expanding small RNA interference,” Nature Biotechnol., 20: 446-448 (2002). |
| Tuschl, “RNA Interference and Small Interfering RNAs,” ChemBiochem. 2(4):239-245 (2001). |
| Ui-Tei et al., “Guidelines for the selection of highly effective siRNA sequences for mammalian and chick RNA interference,” Nucleic Acids Res., 32(3): 936-948 (2004). |
| Unnamalai et al., “Cationic oligopeptide-mediated delivery of dsRNA for post-transcriptional gene silencing in plant cells,” FEBS Letters, 566:307-310 (2004). |
| Unniraman et al., “Alternate Paradigm for Intrinsic Transcription Termination in Eubacteria,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 276(45)(9):41850-41855 (2001). |
| van de Wetering et al., “Specific inhibition of gene expression using a stably integrated, inducible small-interfering-RNA vector,” EMBO Rep., 4(6):609-615 (2003). |
| Vasil et al., “Herbicide Resistant Fertile Transgenic Wheat Plants Obtained by Microprojectile Bombardment of Regenerable Embryogenic Callus,” Bio/Technology,10:667-674 (1992). |
| Vaucheret, “Post-transcriptional small RNA pathways in plants: mechanisms and regulations,” Genes Dev., 20:759-771 (2006). |
| Vencill et al., “Resistance of Weeds to Herbicides,” Herbicides and Environment, 29:585-594 (2011). |
| Verma et al., “Modified oligonucleotides: synthesis and strategy for users,” Annu. Rev. Biochem., 67:99-134 (1998). |
| Vert et al., “An accurate and interpretable model for siRNA efficacy prediction,” BMC Bioinformatics, 7:520 (2006). |
| Vionnet et al., “Systemic Spread of Sequence-Specific Transgene RNA Degradation in Plants Is Initiated by Localized Introduction of Ectopic Promoterless DNA,” Cell, 95:177-187 (1998). |
| Wakelin et al., “A target-site mutation is present in a glyphosate-resistant Lolium rigidum population,” Weed Res. (Oxford), 46(5):432-440 (2006). |
| Walton et al., “Prediction of antisense oligonucleotide binding affinity to a structured RNA target,” Biotechnol Bioeng 65(1):1-9 (1999). |
| Wan et al., “Generation of Large Numbers of Independently Transformed Fertile Barley Plants,” Plant Physiol., 104:37-48 (1994). |
| Wardell, “Floral Induction of Vegetative Plants Supplied a Purified Fraction of Deoxyribonucleic Acid from Stems of Flowering Plants,” Plant Physiol, 60:885-891 (1977). |
| Wardell,“Floral Activity in Solutions of Deoxyribonucleic Acid Extracted from Tobacco Stems,” Plant Physiol, 57:855-861 (1976). |
| Waterhouse et al., “Virus resistance and gene silencing in plants can be induced by simultaneous expression of sense and antisense RNA,” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 95 13959-13964 (1998). |
| Welch et al., “Expression of ribozymes in gene transfer systems to modulate target RNA levels,” Curr Opin Biotechnol. 9(5):486-496 (1998). |
| Wilson, et al., “Transcription termination at intrinsic terminators: The role of the RNA hairpin,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 92:8793-8797 (1995). |
| Winkler et al., “Thiamine derivatives bind messenger RNAs directly to regulate bacterial gene expression,” Nature, 419:952-956 (2002). |
| Written Opinion dated May 8, 2014, in International Application No. PCT/IL2013/050447. |
| Written Opinion dated Sep. 1, 2014, in Singapore Patent Application No. 201206152-9. |
| Xu et al., Characterization and Functional Analysis of the Calmodulin-Binding Domain of Rac1 GTPase, Plos One, 7(8)1-12:e42975 (2012). |
| Yin et al., “Production of double-stranded RNA for interference with TMV infection utilizing a bacterial prokaryotic expression system,” Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 84(2):323-333 (2009). |
| YouTube video by General Electric Company “Silwet Surfactants,” screen shot taken on Jan. 11, 2012 of video of www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBw7nXMqHk8 (uploaded Jul. 13, 2009). |
| Zagnitko, “Lolium regidum clone LS1 acetyl-CoA carboxylase mRNA, partial cds; nuclear gene for plastid product,” GenBank: AF359516.1, 2 pages (2001). |
| Zagnitko, et al., “An isoleucine/leucine residue in the carboxyltransferase domain of acetyl-CoA carboxylase is critical for interaction with aryloxyphenoxypropionate and cyclohexanedione inhibitors,” PNAS, 98(12):6617-6622 (2001). |
| Zhang et al., “Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana using the floral dip method,” Nature Protocols, 1(2):1-6 (2006). |
| Zhang et al., “Cationic lipids and polymers mediated vectors for delivery of siRNA,” Journal of Controlled Release, 123:1-10 (2007). |
| Zhang et al., “DEG: a database of essential genes,” Nucleic Acids Res., 32:D271-D272 (2004). |
| Zhang et al., “Transgenic rice plants produced by electroporation-mediated plasmid uptake into protoplasts,” The Plant Cell Rep., 7:379-384 (1988). |
| Zhao et al.,“Phyllotreta striolata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae):Arginine kinase cloning and RNAi-based pest control,” European Journal of Entomology, 105(5):815-822 (2008). |
| Zhu et al., “Ingested RNA interference for managing the populations of the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata,” Pest Manag Sci, 67:175-182 (2010). |
| Agrios, G., Plant Pathology (Second Edition) 2:466-470 (1978). |
| Arnbms et al., “The Diverse Roles of RNA Helicases in RNAi,” Cell Cycle, 8(21):3500-3505 (2009). |
| Bai, Y., et al. “Naturally Occurring Broad-Spectrum Powdery Mildew Resistance in a Central American Tomato Accession Is Caused by Loss of Mlo Function,” MPMI 21:30-39 (2007). |
| Butler et al., “Priming and re-drying improve the survival of mature seeds of Digitalis purpurea during storage,” Annals of Botany, 103:1261-1270 (2009). |
| Chabbouh et al., “Cucumber mosaic virus in artichoke,” FAO Plant Prot. Bull., 38:52-53 (1990). |
| Chi et al., “The Function of RH22, a DEAD RNA Helicase, in the Biogenesis of the 50S Ribosomal Subunits of Arabidopsis Chloroplasts,” Plant Physiology, 158:693-707 (2012). |
| Chupp et al., “Vegetable diseases and their control,” pp. 267-269. The Ronald Press Company. New York. 693 pp. (1960). |
| Farooq et al., “Rice seed priming,” IPRN, 30(2):45-48 (2005). |
| Fire et al., “Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans,” Nature, 391:806-811 (1998). |
| Fukuhara et al., “Enigmatic double-stranded RNA in Japonica rice,” Plant Molecular Biology, 21:1121-1130 (1993). |
| Fukuhara et al., “The wide distribution of endornaviruses, large double-stranded RNA replicons with plasmid-like properties,” Archives of Virology, 151:995-1002 (2006). |
| Ilaigh, “The Priming of Seeds: Investigation into a method of priming large quantities of seeds using salt solutions,” Thesis submitted to Macquarie University (1983). |
| Hamilton et al., “Guidelines for the Identification and Characterization of Plant Viruses,” J. gen. Virol., 54:223-241 (1981). |
| Han et al., “Molecular Basis for the Recognition of Primary microRNAs by the Drosha-DGCR8 Complex,” Cell, 125(5):887-901 (2006). |
| Hardegree, “Drying and storage effects on germination of primed grass seeds,” Journal of Range Management, 47(3):196-199 (1994). |
| Ji et al., “Regulation of small RNA stability: methylation and beyond,” Cell Research, 22:624-636 (2012). |
| Kam et al., “Nanotube Molecular Transporters: Internalization of Carbon Nanotube—Protein Conjugates into Mammalian Cells,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 126(22):6850-6851 (2004). |
| Khan, et al., “Matriconditioning of Vegetable Seeds to Improve Stand Establishment in Early Field Plantings,” J. American Soc. Hort. Sci. 117(1):41-47 (1992). |
| Khodakovskaya et al., “Carbon Nanotubes Are Able to Penetrate Plant Seed Coat and Dramatically Affect Seed Germination and Plant Growth,” ACS Nano, 3(10):3221-3227 (2009). |
| Leopold, el al., “Moisture as a Regulator of Physiological Reaction in Seeds,” Seed Moisture ,CSSA Special Publication No. 14 , pp. 51-67 (1989). |
| Liu et al., “Carbon Nanotubes as Molecular Transporters for Walled Plant Cells,” Nano Letters, 9(3):1007-1010 (2009). |
| Makkouk et al., “Virus diseases of peas, beans, and faba bean in the Mediterranean region,” Adv Virus Res, 84:367-402 (2012). |
| Moriyama et al., “Double-stranded RNA in rice: a novel RNA replicon in plants,” Mol Gen Genet, 248:364-369 (1995). |
| Moriyama et al., “Stringently and developmentally regulated levels of a cytoplasmic double-stranded RNA and its high-efficiency transmission via egg and pollen in rice,” Plant Molecular Biology, 31:713-719 (1996). |
| Peretz et al., “A Universal Expression/Silencing Vector in Plants,” Plant Physiology, 145:1251-1263 (2007). |
| Rey et al., “Diversity of Dicotyledenous-Infecting Geminiviruses and Their Associated DNA Molecules in Southern Africa, Including the South-West Indian Ocean Islands,” Viruses, 4:1753-1791 (2012). |
| Ryan, “Human endogenous retroviruses in health and disease: a symbiotic perspective,” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 97:560-565 (2004). |
| Schwab et al., “RNA silencing amplification in plants: Size matters,” PNAS, 107(34):14945-14946(2010). |
| Schwember et al., “Drying Rates following Priming Affect Temperature Sensitivity of Germination and Longevity of Lettuce Seeds,” HortScience, 40(3):778-781 (2005). |
| Selvarani et al., “Evaluation of seed priming methods to improve seed vigour of onion (Allium cepa cv. Aggregatum) and carrot (Daucus carota),” Journal of Agricultural Technology, 7(3):857-867 (2011). |
| Sijen et al., “On the Role of RNA Amplification in dsRNA-Triggered Gene Silencing,” Cell, 107:465-476 (2001). |
| Taylor, A., “Seed Storage, Germination and Quality,” The Physiology of Vegetable Crops , 1-36 (1997). |
| Tepfer, “Risk assessment of virus resistant transgenic plants,” Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 40:467-491 (2002). |
| The Seed Biology Place, Website Gerhard Leubner Lab Royal Holloway, University of London, <http://www.seedbiology.de/seedtechnology.asp>, 6 pages, 2000. |
| Turina et al., “Tospoviruses in the Mediterranean Area,” Advances in Virus Research, 84:403-437 (2012). |
| Töpfer et al., “Uptake and Transient Expression of Chimeric Genes in Seed-Derived Embryos,” Plant Cell, 1:133-139 (1989). |
| Urayama et al., “Knock-down of OsDCL2 in Rice Negatively Affects Maintenance of the Endogenous dsRNA Virus, Oryza sativa Endornavirus,” Plant and Cell Physiology, 51(1):58-67 (2010). |
| Zhang el al., “A novel rice gene, NRR responds to macronutrient deficiency and regulates root growth,” Mol Plant, 5(1):63-72 (2012). |
| Bourgeois et al., “Field and producer survey of ACCase resistant wild oat in Manitoba,” Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 709-715 (1997). |
| Brugière et al., “Glutamine Synthetase in the Phloem Plays a Major Role in Controlling Proline Production,” The Plant Cell, 11:1995-2011 (1999). |
| Campbell et al., “Gene-knockdown in the honey bee mite Varroa destructor by a non-invasive approach: studies on a glutathione S-transferase,” Parasites & Vectors, 3(1):73, pp. 1-10 (2010). |
| Chang et al., “Cellular Internalization of Fluorescent Proteins via Arginine-rich Intracellular Delivery Peptide in Plant Cells,” Plant Cell Physiol., 46(3):482-488 (2005). |
| Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Mar. 24, 2016, in European Patent Application No. 12 831 684.1. |
| Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Mar. 4, 2016, in European Patent Application No. 12 830 932.5. |
| Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Mar. 9, 2016, in European Patent Application No. 12 831 166.9. |
| Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Mar. 18, 2016, in European Patent Application No. 12 832 160.1. |
| Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Jan. 14, 2016, in European Patent Application No. 12 832 415.9. |
| Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Jun. 26, 2015, in European Patent Application No. 11 753 916.3. |
| Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Oct. 23, 2015, in European Patent Application No. 12 831 945.6. |
| Database Accession No. HD315444, “Sequence 192160 from Patent EP2213738,” (2010). |
| Desai et al., “Reduction in deformed wing virus infection in larval and adult honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) by double-stranded RNA ingestion,” Insect Molecular Biology, 21(4):446-455 (2012). |
| Emery et al., “Radial Patterning of Arabidopsis Shoots by Class III HD-ZIP and Kanadi Genes,” Current Biology, 13:1768-1774 (2003). |
| Extended European Search Report dated Jan. 20, 2016, in European Patent Application No. 13 794 339.5. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Jun. 29, 2015, in European Patent Application No. 12 831 494.5. |
| Final Office Action dated Nov. 10, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,985. |
| Final Office Action dated Nov. 30, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,948. |
| Final Office Action dated Nov. 7, 2013, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/042,856. |
| First Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2015, in Chinese Patent Application No. 201280053985.3. |
| First Office Action dated Feb. 2, 2016, in Chinese Patent Application No. 201380039346.6. |
| First Office Action dated Jul. 7, 2015, in Chinese Patent Application No. 201280054820.8. |
| First Office Action dated Mar. 12, 2015, in Chinese Patent Application No. 201280053984.9. |
| First Office Action dated Mar. 2, 2015, in Chinese Patent Application No. 201280054819.5. |
| First Office Action dated May 27, 2015, in Chinese Patent Application No. 201280054179.8. |
| First Office Action dated Sep. 9, 2015, in Chinese Patent Application No. 201280055409.2. |
| Fukunaga et al., “dsRNA with 5′ overhangs contributes to endogenous and antiviral RNA silencing pathways in plants,” The EMBO Journal, 28(5):545-555 (2009). |
| Further Examination Report dated May 16, 2014, in New Zealand Patent Application No. 601784. |
| Gaines et al., “Gene amplification confers glyphosate resistance in Amaranthus palmeri,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107(3):1029-1034 (2010). |
| Gallie et al., “Identification of the motifs within the tobacco mosaic virus 5′-leader responsible for enhancing translation,” Nucleic Acids Res., 20(17):4631-4638 (1992). |
| Gan et al., “Bacterially expressed dsRNA protects maize against SCMV infection,” Plant Cell Rep, 11:1261-1268 (2010). |
| Gao et al., “Down-regulation of acetolactate synthase compromises 01-1-mediated resistance to powdery mildew in tomato,” BMC Plant Biology, 14 (2014). |
| Garbian et al., “Bidirectional Transfer of RNAi between Honey Bee and Varroa destructor: Varroa Gene Silencing Reduces Varroa Population,” 8(12):1-9:e1003035 (2012). |
| Ge et al., “Rapid vacuolar sequestration: the horseweed glyphosate resistance mechanism,” Pest Management Sci., 66:345-348 (2010). |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Chapter II) dated Jul. 24, 2015, in International Application No. PCT/US2014/047204. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 8, 2015, in International Application No. PCT/US2015/011408. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 26, 2015, in International Application No. PCT/US2014/069353. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 24, 2015, in International Application No. PCT/US2015/037522. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 27, 2015, in International Application No. PCT/US2015/037015. |
| Invitation to Pay Additional Fees dated Sep. 8, 2015, in International Application No. PCT/US2015/037015. |
| Invitation to Pay Additional Fees dated Sep. 9, 2015, in International Application No. PCT/US2015/037522. |
| Jofre-Garfias et al., “Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Amaranthus hypochondriacus: light- and tissue-specific expression of a pea chlorophyll a/b-binding protein promoter,” Plant Cell Reports, 16:847-852 (1997). |
| Kim et al., “Synthetic dsRNA Dicer substrates enhance RNAi potency and efficacy,” Nature Biotechnology, 23(2):222-226 (2005). |
| Lein et al., “Target-based discovery of novel herbicides,” Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 7:219-225 (2004). |
| MacKenzie et al., “Transgenic Nicotiana debneyii expressing viral coat protein are resistant to potato virus S infection,” Journal of General Virology, 71:2167-2170 (1990). |
| Maori et al., “IAPV, a bee-affecting virus associated with Colony Collapse Disorder can be silenced by dsRNA ingestion,” Insect Molecular Biology, 18(1):55-60 (2009). |
| Molina et al., “Inhibition of protoporphyrinogen oxidase expression in Arabidopsis causes a lesion-mimic phenotype that induces systemic acquired resistance,” The Plant Journal, 17(6):667-678 (1999). |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 11, 2013, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/042,856. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 12, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,936. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 13, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,929. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 23, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/335,135. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 30, 2014, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/042,856. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 5, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,948. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 8, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,941. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 30, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/583,302. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated May 15, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/608,951. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated May 22, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,985. |
| Nord-Larsen et al., “Cloning, characterization and expression analysis of tonoplast intrinsic proteins and glutamine synthetase in ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.),” Plant Cell Reports, 28(10):1549-1562 (2009). |
| Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 5, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/583,302. |
| Nowak et al., “A new and efficient method for inhibition of RNA viruses by DNA interference,” The FEBS Journal, 276:4372-4380 (2009). |
| Office Action dated Aug. 2, 2013, in Colombian Patent Application No. 12 152898. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 28, 2013, in Chinese Patent Application No. 201180012795.2. |
| Office Action dated Feb. 21, 2014, in Colombian Patent Application No. 12 152898. |
| Office Action dated Feb. 24, 2014, in Eurasian Patent Application No. 201201264. |
| Office Action dated Jul. 23, 2015, in Ukrainian Patent Application No. 201211548. |
| Office Action dated Oct. 5, 2015, in Eurasian Patent Application No. 201201264/28. |
| Orbović et al., “Foliar-Applied Surfactants and Urea Temporarily Reduce Carbon Assimilation of Grapefruit Leaves,” J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 126(4):486-490 (2001). |
| Patent Examination Report No. 1 dated Feb. 8, 2016, in Australian Patent Application No. 2014262189. |
| Patent Examination Report No. 1 dated Nov. 11, 2013, in Australian Patent Application No. 2011224570. |
| Paungfoo-Lonhienne et al., “DNA uptake by Arabidopsis induces changes in the expression of CLE peptides which control root morphology,” Plant Signaling & Behavior, 5(9):1112-1114 (2010). |
| Pratt et al., “Annaranthus rudis and A. tuberculatus, One Species or Two?,” Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society, 128(3):282-296 (2001). |
| Restriction Requirement dated Apr. 21, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,954. |
| Restriction Requirement dated Feb. 12, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,985. |
| Restriction Requirement dated Mar. 12, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,948. |
| Restriction Requirement dated Mar. 4, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,941. |
| Restriction Requirement dated May 4, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,929. |
| Restriction Requirement dated May 5, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,936. |
| Restriction Requirement dated May 7, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,925. |
| Restriction Requirement dated May 7, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,995. |
| Restriction Requirement dated Oct. 2, 2012, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/042,856. |
| Restriction Requirement dated Oct. 21, 2014, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/583,302. |
| Riggins et al., “Characterization of de novo transcriptome for waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) using GS-FLX 454 pyrosequencing and its application for studies of herbicide target-site genes,” Pest Manag. Sci., 66:1042-1052 (2010). |
| Rose et al., “Functional polarity is introduced by Dicer processing of short substrate RNAs,” Nucleic Acids Research, 33(13):4140-4156 (2005). |
| Schweizer et al., “Double-stranded RNA interferes with gene function at the single-cell level in cereals,” The Plant Journal, 24(6):895-903 (2000). |
| Second Office Action dated Mar. 4, 2016, in Chinese Patent Application No. 201280054820.8. |
| Second Office Action dated Feb. 25, 2016, in Chinese Patent Application No. 201280054179.8. |
| Senthil-Kumar et al., “A systematic study to determine the extent of gene silencing in Nicotiana benthamiana and other Solanaceae species when heterologous gene sequences are used for virus-induced gene silencing,” New Phytologist, 176:782-791 (2007). |
| Shintani et al., “Antisense Expression and Overexpression of Biotin Carboxylase in Tobacco Leaves,” Plant Physiol., 114:881-886 (1997). |
| Snead et al., “Molecular basis for improved gene silencing by Dicer substrate interfering RNA compared with other siRNA variants,” Nucleic Acids Research, 41(12):6209-6221 (2013). |
| Stevens et al., “New Formulation Technology—Silwet® Organosilicone Surfactants Have Physical and Physiological Properties Which Enhance the Performance of Sprays,” Proceedings of the 9th Australian Weeds Conference, pp. 327-331 (1990). |
| Street, “Why is DNA (and not RNA) a stable storage form for genetic information?,” Biochemistry Revisited, pp. 1-4 (2008). |
| Sutton et al., “Activity of mesotrione on resistant weeds in maize,” Pest Manag. Sci., 58:981-984 (2002). |
| Tank Mixing Chemicals Applied to Peanut Crops: Are the Chemicals Compatible?, College of Agriculture & Life Sciences, NC State University, AGW-653, pp. 1-11 (2004). |
| Tranel et al., “Resistance of weeds to ALS-inhibiting herbicides: what have we learned?,” Weed Science, 50:700-712 (2002). |
| Tsugawa et al., “Efficient transformation of rice protoplasts mediated by a synthetic polycationic amino polymer,” Theor Appl Genet, 97:1019-1026 (1998). |
| Vermeulen et al., “The contributions of dsRNA structure to Dicer specificity and efficiency,” RNA, 11(5):674-682 (2005). |
| Wang et al., “Foliar uptake of pesticides—Present status and future challenge,” ScienceDirect, 87:1-8 (2007). |
| Hilson et al., “Versatile Gene-Specific Sequence Tags for Arabidopsis Functional Genomics: Transcript Profiling and Reverse Genetics Applications,” Genome Research, 14:2176-2189 (2004). |
| Lee et al., “A systematic RNAi screen identifies a critical role for mitochondria in C. elegans longevity,” Nature Genetics, 33:40-48 (2003). |
| Agricultural Chemical Usage 2006 Vegetables Summary, Agricultural Statistics Board, NASS, USDA, pp. 1-372 (2007). |
| Agrios, Plant Pathology (Second Edition), 2:466-470 (1978). |
| Al-Kaff et al., “Plants rendered herbicide-susceptible by cauliflower mosaic virus—elicited suppression of a 35S promoter-regulated transgene,” Nature Biotechnology, 18:995-999 (2000). |
| Andersen et al., “Delivery of siRNA from lyophilized polymeric surfaces,”Biomaterials, 29:506-512 (2008). |
| Anonymous, “A handbook for high-level expression and purification of 6xHis-tagged proteins,” The QiaExpressionist, (2003). |
| Artymovich, “Using RNA interference to increase crop yield and decrease pest damage,” MMG 445 Basic Biotech., 5(1):7-12 (2009). |
| Bachman et al., “Characterization of the spectrum of insecticidal activity of a double-stranded RNA with targeted activity against Western Corn Rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte),” Transgenic Res., pp. 1-16 (2013). |
| Bai et al., “Naturally Occurring Broad-Spectrum Powdery Mildew Resistance in a Central American Tomato Accession Is Caused by Loss of Mlo Function,” MPMI, 21(1):30-39 (2008). |
| Balibrea et al., “Extracellular Invertase is an Essential Component of Cytokinin-Mediated. Delay of Senescence,” The Plant Cell, 16(5):1276-1287 (2004). |
| Bart et al., “A novel system for gene silencing using siRNAs in rice leaf and stem-derived protoplasts,” Plant Methods, 2(13):1-9 (2006). |
| Basu et al., “Weed genomics: new tools to understand weed biology,” Trends in Plant Science, 9(8):391-398 (2004). |
| Busch et al., “RNAi for discovery of novel crop protection products,” Pflanzenschutz-Nachrichten Bayer, 58(1):34-50 (2005). |
| Chabannes et al., “In situ analysis of lignins in transgenic tobacco reveals a differential impact of individual transformations on the spatial patterns of lignin deposition at the cellular and subcellular levels,” The Plant Journal, 28(3):271-282 (2001). |
| Chabbouh et al., “Cucumber mosaic virus in artichoke,” FAO Plant Protection Bulletin, 38:52-53 (1990). |
| Chee et al., “Transformation of Soybean (Glycine max) by Infecting Germinating Seeds with Agrobacterium tumefaciens,” Plant Physiol., 91:1212-1218 (1989). |
| Chen et al., “Transfection and Expression of Plasmid DNA in Plant Cells by an Arginine-Rich Intracellular Delivery Peptide without Protoplast Preparation,” FEBS Letters 581, pp. 1891-1897 (2007). |
| Chupp et al., “Chapter 8: White Rust,” Vegetable Diseases and Their Control, The Ronald Press Company, New York, pp. 267-269 (1960). |
| Colliver et al., “Differential modification of flavonoid and isoflavonoid biosynthesis with an antisense chalcone synthase construct in transgenic Lotus corniculatus,” Plant Molecular Biology, 35:509-522 (1997). |
| Concise Descriptions of Relevance filed by a third party on Nov. 29, 2012, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/042,856. |
| Dalakouras et al., “Induction of Silencing in Plants by High-Pressure Spraying of In vitro-Synthesized Small RNAs,” Frontiers in Plant Science, 7(1327):1-5 (2016). |
| Dawson et al., “cDNA cloning of the complete genome of tobacco mosaic virus and production of infectious transcripts,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 83:1832-1836 (1986). |
| Extended European Search Report dated Oct. 8, 2013, in European Patent Application No. 11753916.3. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Sep. 29, 2016, in European Patent Application No. 14778840.0. |
| Feuillet et al., “Crop genome sequencing: lessons and rationales,” Trends Plant Sci., 16:77-88 (2011). |
| Final Office Action dated Apr. 7, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/619,980. |
| Final Office Action dated Dec. 17, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/335,135. |
| Final Office Action dated Feb. 17, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,929. |
| Final Office Action dated Feb. 4, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,936. |
| Final Office Action dated Jun. 30, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/901,326. |
| Final Office Action dated Mar. 2, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,995. |
| Final Office Action dated Mar. 21, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,925. |
| Final Office Action dated May 26, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/532,596. |
| Final Office Action dated Nov. 10, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/583,302. |
| Final Office Action dated Nov. 19, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,941. |
| Final Office Action dated Oct. 20, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/480,199. |
| Final Office Action dated Oct. 22, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/608,951. |
| Final Office Action dated Sep. 9, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,954. |
| Final Office Action dated Sep. 9, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/608,951. |
| Final Office Action dated Sep. 9, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/603,347. |
| First Examination Report dated Apr. 23, 2013, in New Zealand Patent Application No. 601784. |
| First Examination Report dated Jul. 28, 2014, in New Zealand Patent Application No. 627060. |
| Fraley et al., “Liposome-mediated delivery of tobacco mosaic virus RNA into tobacco protoplasts: A sensitive assay for monitoring liposome-protoplast interactions,” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A., 79(6):1859-1863 (1982). |
| Fukunaga et al., “dsRNA with 5′ overhangs v contributes to endogenous and antiviral RNA silencing pathways in plants,” The EMBO Journal, 28(5):545-555 (2009). |
| Gan et al., “Inhibition of Leaf Senescence by Autoregulated Production of Cytokinin,” Science, 270:1986-1988 (1995). |
| Gao et al., “Nonviral Methods for siRNA Delivery,” Molecular Pharmaceutics, 6(3):651-658 (2008). |
| GenBank Accession No. AY545657.1 (2004). |
| GenBank Accession No. CB377464, “CmaE1_37_J02_J3 Cowpea weevil larvae Lambda Zap Express Library Callosobruchus maculatus cDNA, mRNA sequence,” (2007). |
| GenBank Accession No. DY640489, “PU2_plate27_F03 PU2 Prunus persica cDNA similar to expressed mRNA inferred from Prunus persica hypothetical domain/motif cont aining IPR011005:Dihydropteroate synthase-like, MRNA sequence” (2006). |
| GenBank Accession No. EU024568, “Amaranthus hypochondriacus acetolactate synthase (ALS) gene” (2007). |
| GenBank Accession No. EW765249, “ST020010B10C12 Normalized and subtracted western corn rootworm female head cDNA library Diabrotica virgifera virgifera cDNA clone STO20010B10C12 5-, mRNA sequence,” (2007). |
| GenBank Accession No. EW771198, “ST020010BI0C12 Normalized and subtracted western corn rootworm female head cDNA library Diabrotica virgifera virgifera cDNA clone STO20010BI0C12 5-, mRNA sequence,” (2007). |
| GenBank Accession No. FE348695, “CBIB7954.fwd CBIB_Daphnia_pulex_Chosen_One_Library_2 Daphnia pulex cDNA clone CBIB7954 5′, mRNA sequence” (2011). |
| GenBank Accession No. FJ972198, “Solanum lycopersicum cultivar Ailsa Craig dihydropterin pyrophosphokinase-dihydropteroate synthase (HPPK-DHPS) gene, complete cds” (2010). |
| GenBank Accession No. GI:186478573 (2014). |
| GenBank Accession No. GU120406, “Chrysomela tremulae ribosomal protein L7 (RpL7) mRNA, complete cds” (2009). |
| GenBank Accession No. HD315444, “Sequence 192160 from Patent EP2213738” (2010). |
| GenBank Accession No. Q4GXM3_BIPLU, “Ribosomal protein L7e” (2006). |
| GenBank Accession No. U87257.1, “Daucus carota 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase mRNA, complete cds” (1997). |
| GenBank Accession. No. XM_014456745.1, Predicted: Myotis lucifugus ribonucleoprotein, PTB-binding 2 (RAVER2), transcript variant X3, mRNA,: (2015). |
| GenBank Accession No. Y08611.1, “P.sativum mRNA for dihydropterin pyrophosphokinase/dihydropteroate synthase.” (2006). |
| GenEmbl Accession No. FJ861243 (2010). |
| Gossamer Threads, Compendium of Herbicide Adjuvants: Organo-Silicone Surfactant, p. 1-4 (1998). |
| Gudkov, “Minireview: The L7/L12 ribosomal domain of the ribosome: structural and functional studies,” FEBS Letters, 407:253-256 (1997). |
| Hajirezaei et al., “Impact of elevated cytosolic and apoplastic invertase activity on carbon metabolism during potato tuber development,” Journal of Experimental Botany, 51:439-445 (2000). |
| Heffer et al., “Rapid isolation of gene homologs across taxa: Efficient identification and isolation of gene orthologs from non-model organism genomes, a technical report,” EvoDevo Journal, 2(7):1-5 (2011). |
| Holtra et al., “Assessment of the Physiological Condition of Salvinia Natans L. Exposed to Copper(II) Ions,” Environ. Protect. Eng., 41:147-158 (2015). |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 11, 2012, in International Application No. PCT/US2011/027528. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 11, 2014, in International Application No. PCT/IL2013/050447. |
| International Rice Genome Sequencing Project, The map-based sequence of the rice genome, Nature, 436(10:793-800 (2005). |
| International Search Report and the Written Opinion dated Feb. 25, 2013, in International Application No. PCT/US2012/054883. |
| International Search Report and the Written Opinion dated Feb. 27, 2013, in International Application No. PCT/US2012/054814. |
| International Search Report and the Written Opinion dated Feb. 27, 2013, in International Application No. PCT/US2012/054842. |
| International Search Report and the Written Opinion dated Feb. 27, 2013, in International Application No. PCT/US2012/054862. |
| International Search Report and the Written Opinion dated Feb. 27, 2013, in International Application No. PCT/US2012/054894. |
| International Search Report and the Written Opinion dated Feb. 27, 2013, in International Application No. PCT/US2012/054974. |
| International Search Report and the Written Opinion dated Feb. 27, 2013, in International Application No. PCT/US2012/054980. |
| International Search Report and the Written Opinion dated Jul. 15 2014, in International Application No. PCT/US2014/025305. |
| International Search Report and the Written Opinion dated Jul. 22 2014, in International Application No. PCT/IL2013/051083. |
| International Search Report and the Written Opinion dated Jul. 22 2014, in International Application No. PCT/IL2013/051085. |
| International Search Report and the Written Opinion dated Jul. 24 2014, in International Application No. PCT/US2014/026036. |
| International Search Report and the Written Opinion dated May 10, 2011, in International Application No. PCT/US2011/027528. |
| International Search Report and the Written Opinion dated Oct. 1, 2013, in International Application No. PCT/IL2013/050447. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 25, 2014, in International Application No. PCT/US2014/023503. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 27, 2014, in International Application No. PCT/US2014/023409. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 23, 2015, in International Application No. PCT/US2014/063832. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 26, 2016, in International Application No. PCT/US2016/014344. |
| International Search Report dated Mar. 12, 2013, in International Application No. PCT/US2012/054789. |
| Jin et al., “Posttranslational Elevation of Cell Wall Invertase Activity by Silencing its Inhibitor in Tomato Delays Leaf Senescence and Increases Seed Weight and Fruit Hexose Level,” The Plant Cell, 21:2072-2089 (2009). |
| Josse et al., “A DELLA in Disguise: SPATULA Restrains the Growth of the Developing Arabidopsis Seedling,” Plant Cell, 23:1337-1351 (2011). |
| Kaloumenos et al., “Identification of a Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Biotype Resistant to ACCase-Inhibiting Herbicides in Northern Greece,” Weed Technol, 23:470-476 (2009). |
| Kambiranda et al., “Relationship Between Acid Invertase Activity and Sugar Content in Grape Species,” Journal of Food Biochemistry, 35:1646-1652 (2011). |
| Khan et al., “Matriconditioning of Vegetable Seeds to Improve Stand Establishment in Early Field Plantings,” J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 117(1):41-47 (1992). |
| Kim et al., “Optimization of Conditions for Transient Agrobacterium-Mediated Gene Expression Assays in Arabidopsis,” Plant Cell Reports, 28:1159-1167 (2009). |
| Kirkwood, “Herbicides and Plants,” Botanical Journal of Scotland, 46(3):447-462 (1993). |
| Knudsen, “Promoter2.0: for the recognition of Poll promoter sequences,” Bioniformatics, 15(5):356-361 (1999). |
| Leopold et al., “Chapter 4: Moisture as a Regulator of Physiological Reaction in Seeds,” Seed Moisture, CSSA Special Publication No. 14, pp. 51-69 (1989). |
| Liu et al., “Identification and Application of a Rice Senescence-Associated Promoter,” Plant Physiology, 153:1239-1249 (2010). |
| Liu, “Influence of Sugars on the Foliar Uptake of Bentazone and Glyphosate,” New Zealand Plant Protection, 55:159-162 (2002). |
| Luque et al., “Water Permeability of Isolated Cuticular Membranes: A Structural Analysis,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 317(2):417-422 (1995). |
| Migge et al., “Greenhouse-grown conditionally lethal tobacco plants obtained by expression of plastidic glutamine synthetase antisense RNA may contribute to biological safety,” Plant Science 153:107-112 (2000). |
| Mora et al., “How Many Species Are There on Earth and in the Ocean?,” PLOS Biol., 9(8):e100127, p. 1-8 (2011). |
| Moriyama et al., “Double-stranded RNA in rice: a novel RNA replicon in plants,” Molecular & General Genetics, 248(3):364-369 (1995). |
| Mount et al., “Gene and Metabolite Regulatory Network Analysis of Early Developing Fruit Tissues Highlights New Candidate Genes for the Control of Tomato Fruit Composition and Development,” Plant Physiology, 149:1505-1528 (2009). |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 29, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/583,302. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 10, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,995. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,925. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,929. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 3, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/015,715. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 5, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/015,785. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 8, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,936. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 17, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/532,596. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 23, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/603,347. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 23, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/608,951. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 1, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,954. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 9, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/901,003. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 3, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/403,491. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 1, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,954. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 11, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,925. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 4, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,995. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 6, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/335,135. |
| Nookaraju et al., “Molecular approaches for enhancing sweetness in fruits and vegetables,” Scientia Horticulture, 127:1-15 (2010). |
| Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 11, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,985. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 19, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,941. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 20, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,948. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 23, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/042,856. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 2, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/042,856. |
| Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2016, in Chinese Patent Application No. 201280053985.3. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 25, 2016, in Eurasian Patent Application No. 201201264. |
| Office Action dated Dec. 13, 2016, in Ukrainian Patent Application No. a 2014 03843. |
| Office Action dated Dec. 14, 2016, in Ukrainian Patent Application No. a 2014 03850. |
| Office Action dated Dec. 15, 2016, in Ukrainian Patent Application No. a 2014 03845. |
| Office Action dated Dec. 15, 2016, in Ukrainian Patent Application No. a 2014 03852. |
| Office Action dated Dec. 15, 2016, in Ukrainian Patent Application No. a 2014 03849. |
| Office Action dated Dec. 27, 2016, in Ukrainian Patent Application No. a 2012 11548. |
| Office Action dated Jul. 18, 2016, in Indonesian Patent Application No. W00201203610. |
| Office Action dated Jun. 20, 2016, in Chinese Patent Application No. 201280054819.5. |
| Office Action dated Jun. 24, 2016, in Chinese Patent Application No. 201280053984.9. |
| Office Action dated Mar. 16, 2017, in Chinese Patent Application No. 201280054819.5. |
| Office Action dated Nov. 15, 2016, in Mexican Patent Application. No. MX/a/2014/003068. |
| Office Action dated Sep. 5, 2016, in Ukrainian Patent Application No. a 2014 03846. |
| Office Action dated Nov. 3, 2014, in Chinese Patent Application No. 201180012795.2. |
| Parera et al., “Dehydration Rate after Solid Matrix Priming Alters Seed Performance of Shrunken-2 Corn,” J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 119(3):629-635 (1994). |
| Patent Examination Report No. 1 dated Jun. 17, 2016, in Australian Patent Application No. 2012308659. |
| Patent Examination Report No. 1 dated Jun. 17, 2016, in Australian Patent Application No. 2012308660. |
| Promoter Prediction for Seq ID No. 1702 from 13/612929/MK/, Promoter 2.0 Prediction Results, pp. 1-4 (2016). |
| Promoter Prediction for Seq ID No. 4 from 13/612995/MK/, Promoter 2.0 Prediction Results, pp. 1-3 (2016). |
| Promoter Prediction for Seq ID No. 7 from 13/612936/MK/, Promoter 2.0 Prediction Results, pp. 1-2 (2016). |
| Promoter Prediction for Seq ID No. 8 from 13/612,925/MK/, Promoter 2.0 Prediction Results, pp. 1-6 (2016). |
| Regalado, “The Next Great GMO Debate,” MIT Technology Review,pp. 1-19 (2015) <https://www.technologyreview.com/s/540136/the-next-great-gmo-debate/>. |
| Restriction Requirement dated Jul. 15, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/143,748. |
| Restriction Requirement dated Jul. 18, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/143,836. |
| Restriction Requirement dated Oct. 13, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/206,707. |
| Restriction Requirement dated Oct. 28, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/603,347. |
| Restriction Requirement dated Sep. 2, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/532,596. |
| Roberts, “Fast-track applications: The potential for direct delivery of proteins and nucleic acids to plant cells for the discovery of gene function,” Plant Methods, 1(12):1-3 (2005). |
| Robson et al., “Leaf senescence is delayed in maize expressing the Agrobacterium IPT gene under the control of a novel maize senescence-enhanced promoter,” Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2:101-112 (2004). |
| Roitsch et al., “Extracellular invertase: key metabolic enzyme and PR protein,” Journal of Experimental Botany, 54(382):513-524 (2003). |
| Roitsch et al., “Function and regulation of plant invertases: sweet sensations,” Trades in Plant Science, 9(12):606-613 (2004). |
| Rothnie et al., Pararetroviruses and Retroviruses: A Comparative Review of Viral Structure and Gene Expression Strategies, Advances in Virus Research, 44:1-67 (1994). |
| Ruan et al., “Suppression of Sucrose Synthase Gene Expression Represses Cotton Fiber Cell Initiation, Elongation, and Seed Development,” The Plant Cell, 15:952-964 (2003). |
| Salanenka et al., “Seedcoat Permeability: Uptake and Post-germination Transport of Applied Model Tracer Compounds,” HortScience, 46(4):622-626 (2011). |
| Schönherr, “Water Permeability of Isolated Cuticular Membranes: The Effect of pH and Cations on Diffusion, Hydrodynamic Permeability and Size of Polar Pores in the Cutin Matrix,” Planta, 128:113-126 (1976). |
| Scott et al., Botanical Insecticides for Controlling Agricultural Pests: Piperamides and the Colorado Potato Beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology, 54:212-225 (2003). |
| Second Chinese Office Action dated Jun. 10, 2014, in Chinese Patent Application No. 201180012795.2. |
| Shaoquan, “The action target of herbicide and the innovation of a new variety,” Chemical Industry Press, pp. 23-24 (2001). |
| Showalter, “Structure and Function of Plant Cell Wall Proteins,” The Plant Cell, 5:9-23 (1993). |
| Song et al., “Herbicide,” New Heterocyclic Pesticide, Chemical Industry Press, 354-356 (2011). |
| Stevens, “Organosilicone Surfactants as Adjuvants for Agrochemicals,” Journal of Pesticide Science, 38:103-122 (1993). |
| Tang et al., “Efficient delivery of small interfering RNA to plant cells by a nanosecond pulsed laser-induced stress wave for posttranscriptional gene silencing,” Plant Science, 171:375-381 (2006). |
| Taylor, “Seed Storage, Germination and Quality,” The Physiology of Vegetable Crops, pp. 1-36 (1997). |
| Temple et al., “Can glutamine synthetase activity levels be modulated in transgenic plants by the use of recombinant DNA technology?” Transgenic Plants and Plant Biochemistry, 22(4):915-920 (1994). |
| Tenllado et al., “Double-Stranded RNA-Mediated Interference with Plant Virus Infection,” Journal of Virology, 75(24):12288-12297 (2001). |
| Tepfer, “Risk assessment of virus resistant transgenic plants,” Annual Review of Phytopathology, 40:467-491 (2002). |
| Thomas et al., “Size constraints for targeting post-transcriptional gene silencing and for RNA-directed methylation in Nicotiana benthamiana using a potato virus X vector,” The Plant Journal, 25(4):417-425 (2001). |
| Tomlinson et al., “Evidence that the hexose-to-sucrose ratio does not control the switch to storage product accumulation in oilseeds: analysis of tobacco seed development and effects of overexpressing apoplastic invertase,” Journal of Experimental Botany, 2004, 55:2291-2303. |
| Unniraman et al., “Conserved Economics of Transcription Termination in Eubacteria,” Nucleic Acids Research, 30(3):675-684 (2002). |
| Voinnet et al., “Systemic Spread of Sequence-Specific Transgene RNA Degradation in Plants Is Initiated by Localized Introduction of Ectopic Promoterless DNA,” Cell, 95:177-187 (1998). |
| Widholm et al., “Glyphosate selection of gene amplification in suspension cultures of 3 plant species,” Phyisologia Plantarum, 112:540-545 (2001). |
| Wiesman et al., “Novel cationic vesicle platform derived from vernonia oil for efficient delivery of DNA through plant cuticle membranes,” Journal of Biotechnology, 130:85-94 (2007). |
| Wild Carrot, Noxious Weed Control Board (NWCB) of Washington State (2010) <www.nwcb.wa.gov/detailasp?weed=46>. |
| Written Opinion dated Apr. 7, 2016, in Singapore Patent Application No. 201206152-9. |
| Written Opinion dated Mar. 6, 2017, in Singaporean Patent Application No. 2012061529. |
| Zhang et al., “Chapter 10: New Characteristics of Pesticide Research & Development,” New Progress of the world agriculture chemicals, p. 209 (2010). |
| Ascencio-Ibanez et al., “DNA abrasion onto plants is an effective method for geminivirus infection and virus-induced gene silencing,” Journal of Virological Methods, 142:198-203 (2007). |
| Bedell et al., “Sorghum Genome Sequencing by Methylation Filtration,” PLOS Biology, 3(1):E13/104-115 (2005). |
| Burgos et al., “Review: Confirmation of Resistance to Herbicides and Evaluation of Resistance Levels,” Weed Science, 61 (1):4-20 (2013). |
| Chen et al., “Exploring MicroRNA-Like Small RNAs in the Filamentous Fungus Fusarium oxysporum,” PLOS One, 9(8):e104956:1-10 (2014). |
| Constan et al., “An outer envelope membrane component of the plastid protein import apparatus plays an essential role in Arabidopsis,” The Plant Journal, 38:93-106 (2004). |
| Di Stilio et al., “Virus-Induced Gene Silencing as a Tool for Comparative Functional Studies in Thalictrum,” PLoS One, 5(8):e12064 (2010). |
| Eamens et al., “RNA Silencing in Plants: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow,” Plant Physiology, 147(2):456-468 (2008). |
| Fassler, BLAST Glossary, National Center for Biotechnology Information (2011). |
| Fernandez et al., “Uptake of Hydrophilic Solutes Through Plant Leaves: Current State of Knowledge and Perspectives of Foliar Fertilization,” Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 28:36-38 (2009). |
| Friedberg, “Automated protein function prediction—the genomic challenge,” Briefings in Bioinformatics, 7(3):225-242 (2006). |
| Funke et al., “Molecular basis for herbicide resistance in Roundup Ready crops,” PNAS, 103:13010-13015 (2006). |
| Gan et al., “Bacterially expressed dsRNA protects maize against SCMV infection,” Plant Cell Rep, 29(11):1261-1268 (2010). |
| Gaskin et al., “Novel organosillicone adjuvants to reduce agrochemical spray volumes on row crops,” New Zealand Plant Protection, 53:350-354 (2000). |
| GenBank Accession No. EF143582 (2007). |
| Hagio, “Chapter 25: Direct Gene Transfer into Plant Mature Seeds via Electroporation After Vacuum Treatment,” Electroporation and Sonoporation in Developmental Biology, p. 285-293 (2009). |
| Hess, “Surfactants and Additives,” 1999 Proceedings of the California Weed Science Society, 51:156-172 (1999). |
| Huang et al., “In Vivo Analyses of the Roles of Essential Omp85-Related Proteins in the Chloroplast Outer Envelope Membrane,” Plant Physiol., 157:147-159 (2011). |
| Ivanova et al., “Members of the Toc159 Import Receptor Family Represent Distinct Pathways for Protein Targeting to Plastids,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, 15:3379-3392 (2004). |
| Jacque et al., “Modulation of HIV-1 replication by RNA interference,” Nature, 418, 435-438 (2002). |
| Jang et al., “Resistance to herbicides caused by single amino acid mutations in acetyl-CoA carboxylase in resistant populations of grassy weeds,” New Phytologist, 197(4):1110-1116 (2013). |
| Kikkert et al., “Stable Transformation of Plant Cells by Particle Bombardment/Biolistics,” Methods in Molecular Biology, 286:61-78 (2005). |
| Li et al., “A Simplified Seed Transformation Method for Obtaining Transgenic Brassica napus Plants,” Agricultural Sciences in China, 8(6):658-663 (2009). |
| Liu et al, “The Helicase and RNaseIIIa Domains of Arabidopsis Dicer-Like1 Modulate Catalytic Parameters during MicroRNA Biogenesis,” Plant Physiology, 159:748-758 (2012). |
| McGinnis, “RNAi for functional genomics in plants,” Brief Funct Genomics, 9(2):111-7 (2010). |
| Office Action dated Aug. 1, 2017, in European Patent Application No. 12 830 932.5. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2017, in Israeli Patent Application No. 235878. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 22, 2017, in Korean Patent Application No. 10-2012-7023415. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 3, 2017, in Chinese Patent Application No. 201480014392.5 (with English translation). |
| Office Action dated Aug. 3, 2017, in European Patent Application No. 12 831 684.1. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 8, 2017, in Chilean Patent Application No. 201501874. |
| Office Action dated Jul. 11, 2017, in Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2015/013118 (with English translation). |
| Office Action dated Jul. 3, 2017, in Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2015/012632 (with English translation). |
| Office Action dated Jul. 6, 2017, in Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2015/013103 (with English translation). |
| Office Action dated May 3, 2016, in Chilean Patent Application No. 201601057. |
| Office Action dated Nov. 15, 2016, in Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2014/003068 (with English translation). |
| Office Action dated Sep. 6, 2017, in Chinese Patent Application No. 2014800154012 (with English translation). |
| Patent Examination Report No. 1 dated Jun. 8, 2017, in Australian Patent Application No. 2012308686. |
| Powles el al., “Evolution in Action: Plants Resistant to Herbicides,” Annual Review of Plant Biology, 61(1):317-347 (2010). |
| Rakoczy-Trojanowska, “Alternative Methods of Plant Transformation—a short review,” Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters, 7:849-858 (2002). |
| Richardson et al., “Targeting and assembly of components of the TOC protein import complex at the chloroplast outer envelope membrane,” Frontiers in Plant Science, 5:1-14 (2014). |
| Search Report dated Jul. 24, 2017, in Chinese Patent Application No. 201480014392.5 (with English translation). |
| Small, “RNAi for revealing and engineering plant gene functions,” Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 18:148-153 (2007). |
| Statement of Grounds and Particulars dated Sep. 1, 2017, in Australian U.S. Patent No. 2014262189. |
| Stevens, “Formulation of Sprays to Improve the Efficacy of Foliar Fertilisers,” New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 24(1):27-34 (1994). |
| Stevens, “Organosilicone Surfactants as Adjuvants for Agrochemicals,” New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 24:27-34 (1994). |
| Trucco et al., “Amaranthus hybridus can be pollinated frequently by A. tuberculatus under filed conditions,” Heredity, 94:64-70 (2005). |
| Voinnet, “Origin, Biogenesis, and Activity of Plant MicroRNAs,” Cell, 136:669-687 (2009). |
| Wool et al., “Structure and evolution of mammalian ribosomal proteins,” Biochem. Cell Biol., 73:933-947 (1995). |
| Xu et al., “Characterization and Functional Analysis of the Calmodulin-Binding Domain of Rac1 GTPase,” PLoS One, 7(8):e42975 (2012). |
| Zhang et al., “Development and Validation of Endogenous Reference Genes for Expression Profiling of Medaka (Oryzias latipes) Exposed to Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals by Quantitative Real-Time RT-PCR,” Toxicological Sciences, 95(2):356-368 (2007). |
| Zhang, “Artificial trans-acting small interfering RNA: a tool for plant biology study and crop improvements,” Planta, 239:1139-1146 (2014). |
| Zhang, Chapter 10: New Characteristics of Pesticide Research & Development, p. 209 (2010). |
| Zhong et al., “A forward genetic screen to explore chloroplast protein import in vivo identifies Moco sulfurase, pivotal for ABA and IAA biosynthesis and purine turnover,” The Plant Journal, 63:44-59 (2010). |
| Baulcombe, RNA silencing in plants, Nature, 431:356-363 (2004). |
| Declaration of Jerzy Zabkiewicz executed Nov. 28, 2017, as filed by Opponent in Australian Patent Application No. 2014262189, pp. 1-73. |
| Declaration of Jerzy Zabkiewicz executed Nov. 28, 2017, as filed by Opponent in Australian Patent Application No. 2014262189, pp. 1-4. |
| Declaration of Neena Mitter executed Nov. 30, 2017, as filed by Opponent in Australian Patent Application No. 2014262189, pp. 1-114. |
| Declaration of Neena Mitter executed Nov. 30, 2017, as filed by Opponent in Australian Patent Application No. 2014262189, pp. 1-25. |
| Dietzgen et al., “Transgenic gene silencing strategies for virus control,” Australasian Plant Pathology, 35:605-618 (2006). |
| Kirkwood, “Recent developments in our understanding of the plant cuticle as a barrier to the foliar uptake of pesticides,” Pestic Sci, 55:69-77 (1999). |
| Lucas et al., “Plasmodesmata—bridging the gap between neighboring plant cells,” Trends in Cell Biology, 19:495-503 (2009). |
| Qichuan et al., Seed Science, China Agriculture Press, pp. 101-103, Table 2-37 (2001). |
| Wang et al., “Principle and technology of genetic engineering in plants,” in Plant genetic engineering principles and techniques, Beijing: Science Press, pp. 313-315 (1998). |
| Zabkiewicz, “Adjuvants and herbicidal efficacy—present status and future prospects,” Weed Research, 40:139-149 (2000). |
| Zaimin et al., Botany, Chapter III—Seeds and Seedlings, Northwest A&F University Press, p. 87-92 (2009). |
| Chang et al., “Dual-target gene silencing by using long, sythetic siRNA duplexes without triggering antiviral responses,” Molecules and Cells, 27(6)″689-695 (2009). |
| Cheng et al., “Transient Expression of Minimum Linear Gene Cassettes in Onion Epidermal Cells Via Direct Transformation,” Appl Biochem Biotechnol, 159:739-749 (2009). |
| Examination Report dated Mar. 1, 2018, in Australian Patent Application No. 2013264742. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Apr. 13, 2018, in European Patent Application No. 15812530.0. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 15, 2018, in European Patent Application No. 17181861.0. |
| Hu et al., “High efficiency transport of quantum dots into plant roots with the aid of silwet L-77,” Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 48:703-709 (2010). |
| Jiang et al., Chapter III Seeds and Seedlings, Botany, Northwest A&F University Press, pp. 87-92 (2009). |
| Liu Gengling, “The Transformation of Nucleic Acid Degradants in Plants,” China Organic Fertilizers, Agriculture Press, pp. 216-217 (1991) (English translation only). |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 21, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/619,980. |
| Office Action dated Feb. 21, 2018, in Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2015/012632 (with English translation). |
| Office Action dated Mar. 8, 2018 (with English translation), in Chilean Patent Application No. 201403192. |
| Partial Supplementary European Search Report dated Jan. 11, 2018, in European Patent Application No. 15812530.0. |
| Sun, “Characterization of Organosilicone Surfactants and Their Effects on Sulfonylurea Herbicide Activity,” Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University dated Apr. 5, 1996. |
| Yan et al., Seed Science, China Agriculture Press, pp. 101-103, Tables 2-37 (2001). |
| Zhao et al. Vegetable Standardized Production Technologies, Zhejiang Science and Technology Press, pp. 18-20 (2008). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20130318657 A1 | Nov 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61651131 | May 2012 | US | |
| 61814888 | Apr 2013 | US | |
| 61814890 | Apr 2013 | US | |
| 61814892 | Apr 2013 | US | |
| 61814899 | Apr 2013 | US |
