1. Technical Field
Embodiments of the present invention are related to the field of chemical-mechanical polishing, and in particular, to conditioning pads for chemical-mechanical polishing.
2. Description of Related Art
Chemical-mechanical polishing (“CMP”) is a commonly used technique for planarizing a film on a semiconductor wafer prior to processing of the wafer. CMP often requires an introduction of a polishing slurry onto a surface of the film as the wafer is being mechanically polished against a rotating polishing pad.
Use of the polishing pads, as received from the suppliers, may result in significant variations in removal rates during planarization of the wafers. Pad “break-in” is used to re-condition the surface of the pad prior to use in the manufacturing process for semiconductor wafers. For example, in some cases, the break-in procedure may remove a top impervious, hydrophobic layer. The break-in procedure consists of polishing of the dummy wafers using new pads. The exact number of the wafers to be polished to achieve the desired initiation is determined empirically, and is used indiscriminately for different pad types and lots. In general, the number of wafers used should depend on the pad type, CMP process conditions, and a layer on the dummy wafers used for break-in. In one illustrative CMP process, the pad is heated to as high as 100° C. due to mechanical friction between pad and wafer. A typical break-in process consists of the series of approximately 5 minutes long wafer polishes of up to 30 wafers.
It has been discovered that an un-intentional benefit of the thermal cycles of the extended pad break-in procedure is to normalize or initiate the pad properties. Hence, it is empirically known that pad break-in may help to stabilize pad CMP performance, which is determined by the pad properties. However, in this prior art break-in procedure, there is no accurate way to control change of the pad properties caused by the thermal cycling of the break-in process. Since the current state of art is based on empirical knowledge; break-in conditions are not be optimized for specific pads or CMP processes.
Pads may be made of polyurethane and, when received from suppliers, may have crystalline phases of polyurethane. These crystalline phases—which are randomly distributed within the pad as well as within a given pad lot or pad batch—may have an uncontrolled and unpredictable impact on pad performance and may affect pad stability. Hence, the existence of thermally unstable crystalline areas in the new, as received pad, makes a typical polyurethane pad unstable. It is known that when a new, as received, pad is exposed to a single heating ramp reaching a temperature of 200° C. or above, there is a disappearance of exothermic peaks that relate to the break up of the crystalline phase of the polyurethane.
Additionally, processing temperatures for polymer-based CMP pads, during the manufacturing process for the pads, is one of the major contributors to the pad life. Temperature treatment causes irreversible changes in thermoset polymers, such as polyurethane-based pads. Polymer hardness frequently changes in a broad temperature range so that small deviations in temperature may result in a large change of polymer hardness. Establishing accurate criteria for selection of a desired processing temperature is a challenge; pad processing at non-desired temperatures may affect pad CMP performance. It is desirable to conduct processing at the lowest possible temperatures. However, some desirable properties during processing may be only achieved at the elevated temperatures. For example, during one stage of the manufacturing process, softening of the pad allows for pad patterning.
In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the disclosed embodiments of the present invention. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that these specific details are not required in order to practice the disclosed embodiments of the present invention.
With respect to the prior art described above, in the prior art break-in procedure, there is no accurate way to control change of the pad properties. Hence, a controlled thermal cycling (thermocycling) process, according to one method of the present invention, is directed toward achieving control of and improved uniformity of the pad properties. This controlled thermal cycling may be introduced prior to the traditional pad initialization or break-in of a new, as received pad.
Additionally, the break-in procedure of the prior art is an expensive and non-controlled process. Hence, the controlled thermal cycling, according to one method of the present invention, may shorten the traditional pad break-in process and may provide cost savings based upon the reduction of the break-in process. Cost saving of this shortened break-in process may include cost of the CMP consumables, CMP operating tool time, and the wafers used for break-in.
In general, the thermal cycling, according to one method of the present invention, may be applied in an inert atmosphere to the new, as received pad, before use in the CMP processes. This thermal cycling of the pad is conducted in controlled conditions; it does not depend on layer in the dummy wafer, which is being polished-out, and conditions of break-in process. Moreover, for each pad type, the desired cycling conditions may be custom selected. As such, CMP process variations within the pad lots, and from pad to pad, may be reduced. This in turn may lead to a more stable polish process and/or longer pad life.
In one embodiment, the maximum temperature may be approximately 100° C. during the cycles 12. This thermal cycling may change the pad structure so that unstable crystalline areas are destroyed and, due to a maximum temperature of approximately 100° C. or less, may not affect other pad properties which may be affected with the use of a heat ramp to or greater than 200° C. as undertaken in the prior art.
Specific examples of conducted thermo-analytical tests of the pad samples with a thermal cycle process having five heating-cooling cycles 12 are provided wherein the test results are compared with and without the thermal cycling process. More specifically, the results from a Differential Scanning Calorimeter (DSC), a Thermal Mechanical Analyzer (TMA), a Dynamic Mechanical Analyzer (DMA) cycling tests are shown in
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
In one embodiment, the thermal cycling process of
Referring to
The apparatus 40 further includes a temperature sensor 66 (such as a thermocouple), a computer 68, and a heating temperature controller 70 and a cooling temperature controller 72. Temperature data from the temperature sensor 66 may be recorded and processed in the computer 68. The computer 68 includes a temperature program for implementing the thermal cycling of
In processing the CMP pad during the manufacture of the CMP pad, a desired processing temperature range is determined using a temperature selection process according to another method of the present invention. Processing the wafer within the desired temperature range may avoid degradation of the pad properties, which may result in the release of pad fillers, polymer residuals and the like during a subsequent CMP polishing. Consequently, in this temperature selection process, the pad processing temperature range may be selected to improve CMP pad performance. As previously discussed, one of the stages during manufacture needing elevated temperatures includes a stage wherein the pad is soften to allow for pad patterning. This manufacturing stage is called embossing, or patterning, and it creates an “imprint” of a certain geometry on the pad surface. It is believed that pad embossing may improve the polishing process by providing flow channels for access of the fresh slurry to the polished sites and by removing the excess and used slurry from the polished sites. The temperature used for processing the CMP pad during manufacture is referred to as the “processing temperature”. This processing temperature falls within the above-mentioned processing temperature range, which will now be described in more detail.
Temperature selection may be achieved in part by comparing a potential processing temperature with the temperature of decomposition of polymer-based pad (the pad's “decomposition temperature”); the latter is determined using complimentary set of thermo-analytical tools. If the selected processing temperature is too high, equal to or above the decomposition temperature, it may cause pad decomposition, subsequent reduction of pad life, and an increase in the number of the defects. If the selected processing temperature is too low, below or close to a temperature of glass transition (the pad's “glass transition temperature”), it may not allow desirable changes of the pad mechanical properties, such as hardness. In the above-described stage of the pad manufacturing process referred to as “embossing” or “patterning”, if temperatures are well below a pad's “softening temperature”, then a desired pad groove depth in the pad may not be achieved and this may negatively impact CMP performance. In summary, there is a narrow range of the acceptable processing temperatures between the softening and the decomposition temperatures which define an acceptable processing temperature range.
Polymers, and polymer based pads, frequently may be characterized by a wide range of the glass transition and decomposition temperatures. For a given polymer-based pad, a desired processing temperature may be established using combined thermo-analytical metrologies, such as TMA, DSC, and Thermal Gravimetric Analysis (TGA). In the illustrative tests described below, a soft polishing pad formed of polyurethane was used. As previously mentioned, the desired processing temperatures may prevent pad decomposition during polishing. This may lead to the increase in pad life, and reduction in wafer defects. This also may lead to improved CMP pad performance. Initially, prior to the tests described below, a pressure sensitive adhesive layer was mechanically removed from the pad.
With respect to
With respect to
With respect to
In order to provide reliable pad softening (needed, for example, for the pad patterning at elevated temperatures), the pad should be heated at least to or above its softening temperature. Softening temperature, determined as the midpoint of the dimension change in the TMA test, was equal to approximately 160° C. The softening temperature is close to but greater than glass transition temperature, Tg. In order to prevent material decomposition and disintegration of the pad, it should not be heated above the onset of decomposition, which was determined at approximately 195° C. using DSC and TGA tests. As such, for the tested pad, there may be a narrow operating window or range of acceptable processing temperatures, with the window staring at a lower temperature which is equal to or greater than 160° C. (softening temperature) and extends upward to a higher temperature which is less than 195° C. (decomposition temperature).
As shown experimentally for the tested pad, accurate definition of the processing temperature is important, since deviation from this temperature by only ±5° C. may change the pad hardness by 15 to 20%, as confirmed using Thermal Mechanical Analysis. A change of the pad hardness may affect the manufacturer's ability to achieve, in one example, well defined pad patterning, or, in another example, to preserve pad mechanical integrity. In the first example, the highest possible processing temperature should not exceed 195° C., to insure avoiding pad decomposition.
With reference to
Although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that any arrangement which is calculated to achieve the same purpose may be substituted for the specific embodiment shown. This application is intended to cover any adaptations or variations of the present invention. Therefore, it is manifestly intended that this invention be limited only by the claims and the equivalents thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5225766 | O'Neill | Jul 1993 | A |
20020052174 | Nishimura et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20030104769 | Brunelli | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20050003738 | He | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050101228 | Prasad | May 2005 | A1 |
20050148185 | Hirabayashi et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050170760 | Homma et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |