The present invention relates generally to laser-induced material printing, and particularly to methods and system for printing at a controlled ejection angle.
In laser direct-write (LDW) techniques, a laser beam creates a patterned surface with spatially-resolved three-dimensional structures by controlling material ablation or deposition. Laser-induced forward transfer (LIFT) is an LDW technique that can be applied in depositing micro-patterns on a surface. LIFT is a technology for high quality printing of various materials such as metals and polymers. Examples of prior art techniques are provided below.
PCT International Publication WO 2013/165241, to Meinders, et al., whose disclosure is incorporated herein by reference, describes a light induced forward transfer manufacturing method for transfer of material from a donor sheet. A donor sheet is used that comprises a trench in a surface of the donor sheet, with transfer material in the trench. The material is transferred by scanning a light spot along the bottom of the trench.
Further examples of metal jetting using LIFT are provided by Willis et al., in “Microdroplet deposition by laser-induced forward transfer,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 244103 (2005); by Willis et al., in “The effect of melting-induced volumetric expansion on initiation of laser-induced forward transfer,” Appl. Surf. Sci., 253:4759-4763 (2007); and by Banks et al., in “Nanodroplets deposited in microarrays by femtosecond Ti:sapphire laser-induced forward transfer,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 89, 193107 (2006), which are all incorporated herein by reference.
Documents incorporated by reference in the present patent application are to be considered an integral part of the application except that, to the extent that any terms are defined in these incorporated documents in a manner that conflicts with definitions made explicitly or implicitly in the present specification, only the definitions in the present specification should be considered.
An embodiment of the present invention that is described herein provides an apparatus for material deposition on an acceptor surface that includes a transparent donor substrate having opposing first and second surfaces, and a donor film on the second surface. The apparatus additionally includes an optical assembly, which is configured to direct a beam of radiation to pass through the first surface of the donor substrate and impinge on the donor film at a location on the second surface so as to induce ejection of droplets of molten material from the donor film at an angle that is not normal to the second surface at the location onto the acceptor surface.
In some embodiments, the optical assembly is configured to generate an asymmetry in the beam that is selected so as to cause the droplets to be ejected at a selected angle that is not normal to the second surface. In other embodiments, the optical assembly includes an acousto-optic deflector (AOD), which is configured to form the beam of radiation as a plurality of sub-beams exiting from the AOD at respective different angles, the sub-beams together forming a composite beam having the asymmetry. In yet other embodiments, the apparatus further includes a driver circuit, which is configured to input a drive signal having multiple frequencies to the AOD so as to form the sub-beams by diffraction in the AOD.
In an embodiment, the apparatus further includes a processor which is configured to synchronize between the beam of radiation and the multiple frequencies of the drive signal so as to form the composite beam having the asymmetry. In another embodiment, the optical assembly includes a plurality of mirrors, which are configured to form the beam of radiation as a plurality of sub-beams which together form a composite beam having the asymmetry. In yet another embodiment, the optical assembly is configured to introduce the asymmetry into the composite beam by switching-off one or more selected sub-beams using the mirrors.
In some embodiments, the optical assembly is configured to introduce the asymmetry into the composite beam by controlling respective phases of one or more selected sub-beams using the mirrors. In other embodiments, the optical assembly includes a liquid crystal cell array, which is configured to form the beam of radiation as a plurality of sub-beams which together form a composite beam having the asymmetry. In yet other embodiments, the optical assembly is configured to introduce the asymmetry into the composite beam by controlling respective phases of one or more selected sub-beams using cells of the liquid crystal cell array. In alternative embodiments, the donor film has a non-uniformity at a position on the second surface, and the optical assembly is configured to direct the beam to impinge on the donor film in proximity to the position in order to cause the droplets to be ejected at a selected angle that is not normal to the second surface.
In an embodiment, the beam impinging on the donor film is spherically symmetric. In another embodiment, the non-uniformity includes at least one of a hole and a trench in the donor film. In yet another embodiment, the non-uniformity has a predefined shape chosen to cause the droplets to be ejected at the selected angle. In an alternative embodiment, a distance of a point of impingement of the beam from the position is chosen to cause the droplets to be ejected at the selected angle.
In some embodiments, the optical assembly is configured to form the non-uniformity in the donor film using the beam of radiation. In other embodiments, the non-uniformity includes first and second non-uniformities, and the optical assembly is configured to form the second non-uniformity after a formation of the first non-uniformity, and before or after the ejection of the droplets.
There is additionally provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, a method for material deposition on an acceptor surface including providing a transparent donor substrate having opposing first and second surfaces and a donor film on the second surface. A beam of radiation is directed to pass through the first surface of the donor substrate and impinge on the donor film at a location on the second surface so as to induce ejection of droplets of molten material from the donor film at an angle that is not normal to the second surface at the location onto the acceptor surface.
The present invention will be more fully understood from the following detailed description of the embodiments thereof, taken together with the drawings in which:
State-of-the-art electronic devices often comprise 3D structures that conform to a non-flat surface on which they are being built. Such structures are hard to coat, re-pattern (e.g., complete missing structures), or build upon (e.g., add metal pillars). Laser-induced forward transfer (LIFT) techniques provide high quality and cost-effective printing, but are typically limited to ejecting micro-droplets orthogonally to a donor's surface. Thus, a conventional LIFT system is capable of printing micro-droplets on horizontal surfaces of the acceptor but may be incapable of printing on the side-walls of 3D structures at acceptable quality.
Embodiments of the present invention that are described hereinbelow overcome limitations of the prior art, such as those exemplified above, by providing several novel optical assemblies and donor structures, and corresponding methods of operation of LIFT systems. Embodiments of the present invention include printing of both metallic and non-metallic materials.
In some embodiments, a system for material deposition on an acceptor surface comprises a transparent donor substrate having opposing first and second surfaces, and also comprises a donor film on the second surface of the donor. The system further comprises an optical assembly, which is configured to direct a beam of radiation to pass through the first surface of the donor substrate and to impinge on the donor film at a selected location on the second surface of the donor. The beam of radiation is able to induce ejection of droplets of molten material from the donor film, at an angle that is not normal (i.e., not orthogonal) to the second surface of the donor at the selected location.
Typical LIFT techniques require close proximity between the donor and the acceptor (e.g., substantially less than 1 mm), thus the donor and the acceptor are typically positioned parallel to each other. The droplets are ejected from the donor film onto the acceptor surface and may land, typically in the case that the donor and acceptor are parallel, at an angle that is not orthogonal to a top surface of the acceptor, and thus, the system can print the droplets on the side-walls of 3D structures.
In an embodiment, an asymmetric heating profile in the donor film may cause ejection (or jetting) of droplets at the required angle. The disclosed techniques may be used to create the asymmetric heating profile by impinging an asymmetric beam on the donor film, or by introducing some non-uniformity (that causes the asymmetry) in the material of the donor film and impinging a spherically symmetric beam on the donor film. A thermal “nozzle”, which reflects the heating asymmetry, is formed in the donor film and creates a pressure gradient in the molten material. The pressure gradient and the asymmetry of the nozzle dictate the jetting angle of the droplet. Thus, controlling the asymmetry in the donor film allows a user to control the jetting angle while the donor is positioned parallel to the acceptor.
In some embodiments the optical assembly is configured to split an incoming beam from a laser into a multiplicity of sub-beams. The sub-beams are typically modulated and directed to the lower surface of the donor so as to form an asymmetric beam on the donor film. The spot asymmetry may be selected so as to cause the droplets to be ejected from the donor film (on the second surface of the donor) at a selected angle that is not normal to the second surface of the donor. In one embodiment, the optical assembly comprises an acousto-optic device which generates multiple output sub-beams that are combined to produce the desired composite asymmetric beam.
In alternative embodiments, the optical assembly may comprise a Micro-Opto-Electro-Mechanical-system (MOEMS) device having an array of micro-mirrors. The MOEMS device typically controls the rotation or elevation positions of each micro-mirror so as to control the phase or deflection angle of sub-beams produced by the device. By controlling the local phase or direction of the output sub-beams, a user may form various profiles of a composite output beam. Optics of the optical assembly of the present invention may be configured to combine the output sub-beams so as to form the desired asymmetric spot on the donor film.
In an alternative embodiment, the donor film comprises non-uniformity, such as a trench or a hole, in the film. In the alternative embodiment the optical assembly may be configured to direct the beam of radiation, typically in this case a spherically symmetric beam, to impinge on the donor film in proximity to the position of the non-uniformity. The interaction between the beam and the donor film melts the material of the donor film at the impinging position, and the non-uniformity acts as a heat barrier. The heat barrier creates an asymmetric thermal conductivity profile around the melted material, so that the melted material in turn has an asymmetric profile, causing the droplets to be ejected at a non-normal angle to the donor film.
In some embodiments, the system controls the azimuth and size of the ejection angle by selecting a specific proximity between the pattern and the beam. In alternative embodiments, the ejection angle is controlled using a combination of a pattern shape (e.g., a round hole, or a rectangular trench) and the proximity between the pattern and the beam.
The above techniques enable a LIFT system to print on complicated 3D structures, such as side-walls, using simple and cost-effective optical assemblies and flat donor structures. Embodiments using an asymmetric beam may be used to print at a predefined and controlled non-orthogonal angle using any conventional donor. Embodiments using a non-uniformity in the donor film also allow printing at a controlled non-orthogonal angle. The disclosed capabilities may be easily implemented in an operational high volume manufacturing line.
Print and direct write system 10 operates on substrate 24 of an electronic circuit 12, such as a flat panel display (FPD) or a printed circuit board (PCB), which is held on a mounting surface 14. In generic LIFT processes substrate 24 is also termed a receiver or an acceptor. The terms “Flat panel Display”, “FPD”, “printed circuit board”, and “PCB” are used herein to refer generally to any sort of a dielectric or metal or a semiconductor substrate on which conductive materials such as metals, or non-conductive materials such as dielectrics and polymers are deposited, regardless of the type of substrate material and the process used for deposition. System 10 may be used to deposit new layers such as printing metal circuitry on various substrates or in any other electronic devices.
A positioning assembly, in the form of a bridge 18, positions an optical assembly 16 over pertinent sites on substrate 24 in question, by moving assembly 16 linearly along the axes of system 10. In other embodiments, the positioning assembly may be in other forms, such as a moving stage along one (X) axis, two (X, Y) axes, or three (X, Y, Z) axes. A control unit 27 controls the operation of the optical and positioning assemblies, and carries out additional functions such as temperature control, so as to carry out the required printing, patterning and/or other manufacturing operations. Typically, control unit 27 communicates with an operator terminal (not shown), comprising a general-purpose computer including a processor and a display (not shown), along with a user interface and software.
Optical assembly 16 comprises a laser 40 and optics 44 for applying Laser-Induced Forward Transfer (LIFT) techniques from a donor 11. Insert 38 is a schematic side view showing components and modules of optical assembly 16, and a process of ejection of droplets from a donor film 62 at an ejection angle θ that is not normal to a lower surface 69 of donor 11.
Laser 40 emits a pulsed beam 52 into a beam manipulation assembly 41, and assembly 41 is configured to split beam 52 into multiple output sub-beams 54. Sub-beams 54 exit assembly 41 as two or more sub-beams which diverge from one another. Optics 44 converges sub-beams 54 into a composite asymmetric beam 43, and the composite beam is focused by the optics to form a composite asymmetric spot 23 at lower surface 69. The operation of assembly 41 is described in more detail with reference to
Optics 44 focus asymmetric beam 43 onto donor 11, which comprises a donor substrate 60 on a lower surface of which are deposited one or more donor films 62. Typically, substrate 60 comprises a transparent optical material, such as a glass or plastic sheet. Optics 44 focus beam 43 through a top surface 59 of substrate 60 onto film 62. The asymmetry of spot 23 causes droplets of molten material to be ejected from film 62, at a non-normal ejection angle θ measured with respect to film 62, onto a film 25 of circuit 12. Mechanisms for ejection at a selected angle are described in greater detail with reference to
In order to generate multiple sub-beams 54, a multi-frequency driver circuit 48 applies a drive signal to a piezoelectric crystal 50, which drives deflector 42 in order to generate acoustic waves in the deflector for splitting beam 52. Although only a single mirror 46 is shown in
Driver circuit 48 may drive acousto-optic deflector in various different modes in order to generate multiple output beams 54. A number of suitable drive techniques, along with ancillary focusing and scanning optics, that may be adapted for use in optical assembly 24 are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 8,395,083, to Naveh, et al., whose disclosure is incorporated herein by reference. In accordance with one of these techniques, driver circuit 48 generates a multi-frequency drive signal, which causes the acousto-optic deflector to diffract beam 52 into multiple output beams 54 at different, respective angles. Further details of this sort of multi-frequency drive are described by Hecht in “Multifrequency Acoustooptic Diffraction,” IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics SU-24, pages 7-18 (1977), which is incorporated herein by reference; and by Antonov et al. in “Efficient Multiple-Beam Bragg Acoustooptic Diffraction with Phase Optimization of a Multifrequency Acoustic Wave,” Technical Physics 52:8, pages 1053-1060 (2007), which is likewise incorporated herein by reference.
Driver circuit 48 provides each of deflectors 42A and 42B with multiple drive-signals having close frequencies. The term “close frequencies” refers to a frequency-difference smaller than the frequency resolution Δf of system 10, which is given by the ratio Δf=V/D, in which V is the velocity of sound, and D is the size of the aperture.
The disclosed technique uses short-duration laser pulses that are substantially shorter than the time it takes for sound to traverse the optical aperture formed by the diffraction grating of the deflector (also denoted “rise time”). For example, for an aperture width of D=6 mm and assuming sound velocity V of 59000 meter/sec the rise time equals approximately 1.02 microseconds.
Beam 52 that passes through the deflectors may form two or more spots on the surface of the donor that partially overlap one another, so as to form an asymmetric beam. The use of deflectors with signals having close frequencies may generate a two-dimensional (2D) array of asymmetric sub-beams (54A or 54B). Each sub-beam impinges on the donor so as to jet a droplet at a desired angle, which is related to the shape of the asymmetric beam. The 2D array of asymmetric sub-beams may jet multiple droplets simultaneously, wherein droplets created by different sub-beams are jet at angles corresponding to the shape of the respective asymmetric sub-beams.
Alternatively, deflector 42A may scan its incoming beam in the X-direction, while deflector 42B is driven to split its incoming beams into multiple asymmetric beams that are separated in the Y-direction. Deflectors 42A and 42B are comprised in assembly 41 and driven by respective piezoelectric crystals 50A and 50B. Compared to assembly 16, assembly 17 provides greater versatility and steering speed, though at the cost of higher beam intensity losses.
When beam 52 enters deflector 42, each of the gratings in the crystal diffracts beam 52 at a different angle, depending on the grating spacing. Thus, deflector 42 splits beam 52 into multiple sub-beams 54 at different angles θ1, θ2, . . . , corresponding to different frequencies f1, f2, . . . provided by crystal 50. For example, two drive-signals having close frequencies driven into deflector 42 cause the formation of two adjacent diffracted sub-beams that partially overlap when impinging on donor film 62, so as to form an asymmetric beam 43.
In addition to providing multiple frequencies f1, f2, driver circuit 48 is configured to provide respective amplitudes of the frequencies, so as to control the intensity of the corresponding sub-beams 54 generated by each pulse of beam 52. As is explained in more detail below, circuit 48 controls the intensity of the sub-beams by modulating the amplitudes of the signals at the corresponding frequencies in appropriate synchronization with the pulses of beam 52. More particularly, driver circuit 48 may turn the corresponding frequency components on and off in order to choose the combination of output beams 54 to generate at each pulse.
It will be understood that when the first and second sub-beams 54 are focused to spot 23, the difference between the values of f1 and f2 results in small positional shifts of the peaks of the two beams at the spot, and thus creates the asymmetric profile shown in the graph.
Typically, when applying signals comprising two close frequencies to deflector 42, the acoustic signal within deflector 42 is modulated with a period given by the frequency difference between the two signals, thus, generating constructive and destructive interference. In order to obtain maximum diffraction efficiency, control unit 27 is configured to synchronize the pulse of laser with the constructive interference occurring in deflector 42. In addition, the temporal width of the laser pulse must be substantially smaller than the modulation period, so that the laser pulse synchronizes with the constructive interference.
As shown below optical assembly 16 may be configured to modify or refresh the shape of spot 23 at a high rate that corresponds to high repetition rate lasers, such as laser 40, which typically refresh at rates of 1 MHz or less.
If the spatial pulse width of laser 40 is D, then the time taken, tT, for the acoustic wave in AOD 42 to transit the pulse width is given by equation (1):
where vs is the acoustic wave velocity in the AOD.
The wavelength λ in the AOD is given by equation (2):
where F is the frequency of the acoustic wave.
For effective diffraction by the AOD, the width D of the optical pulse should cover a large number of waves in the diffraction grating generated in the AOD, i.e.,
Combining equations (1) and (3) gives:
Since F for an AOD may be 200 MHz or higher, a transit time tT for 20 waves (for example) in an AOD driven at 200 MHz is 10−7 s. This transit time corresponds to a laser refresh rate of 10 MHz, which is an order of magnitude greater than the typical rate of 1 MHz cited above. Thus, embodiments of the present invention allow substantially higher refresh rates for laser 40 than are typical. The above description and numerical values are given purely by way of example. Any other suitable operational scheme, laser parameters, or other numerical values can be used in alternative embodiments.
MEMS devices such as MEMS device 63 are commercially available from multiple manufacturers, such as micro-mirror products manufactured by Fraunhofer Institute, Munich, Germany, and may also be denoted MOEMS (Micro-Opto-Electro-Mechanical-System). Devices of this sort are described, for example, by Gehner, in “MEMS Adaptive Optics Development at IPMS,” 2007, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Device 63 typically comprises one or more arrays of micro-mirrors 64 (e.g., one million micro-mirrors 64, in a mega-pixel device), and typically controls rotation or elevation of each micro-mirror 64 in the array. In some embodiments, the optical assembly is configured to switch off one or more of sub-beams 54 by rotating the respective micro-mirrors to a suitable rotation angle. This technique is widely used (for example by Texas Instruments) and allows the formation of asymmetric beams with desired intensity shapes by switching off certain micro-mirrors. Typically, rotation control of each micro-mirror 64 enables control of the deflection angle of each sub-beam 54, at high resolution. Optics 44 focus sub-beams 54 to form composite asymmetric beam 43, and beam forms spot 23 on film 62, as already described with respect to
In other embodiments, the optical assembly is configured to control the elevation of one or more of micro-mirrors 64, thereby adjusting the optical lengths of the paths traversed by the respective sub-beams. This adjustment varies the relative phase between sub-beams, so as to form the desired beam profile. This technique was developed by Fraunhofer Institute (denoted IPMS). The micro-mirror-based techniques allow device 63 to serve as a high spatial resolution Spatial Light Modulator.
In yet other embodiments, alternatively to MEMS device 63, assembly 19 may comprise a liquid crystal cell array, such as Liquid Crystal on Silicon Spatial Light Modulator (LCOS-SLM), for asymmetric beam shaping. Each cell in the liquid crystal cell array is controlled electrically, so as to create a distinct phase delay for the reflected sub-beam. Such SLM devices are provided, for example, by Hamamatsu Photonics K.K. (Hamamatsu city, Japan).
The methods described above for producing an asymmetric spot on a donor film are by way of example, and other methods for producing an asymmetric spot will be apparent to those having ordinary skill in the art. All such methods are included in the scope of the present invention.
The configurations of assemblies 16, 17, 19 (and assembly 21 shown in
Film 62 comprises one or more non-uniformities 68 comprising trenches or holes patterned in film 62. In some embodiments, non-uniformities 68 are patterned in film 62 during a preparation process of donor 11. Once film 62 comprises all designed non-uniformities 68, the donor is mounted on the system so as to start the LIFT printing process as described above.
In alternative embodiments, film 62 may be patterned during the LIFT process. Donor 11 is mounted on the system before film 62 is being patterned, or is partially patterned with non-uniformities 68. Laser 40 is configured to jet material from film 62, typically by using a different irradiation regime, so as to form one or more non-uniformities 68. In an embodiment, the laser forms the non-uniformities before starting the LIFT printing process. In another embodiment, the laser may complete part of the LIFT process (e.g., covering a first area of the donor) and then pattern additional non-uniformities 68 (e.g., in a different area of the donor). This capability allows a user to adapt the pattern (e.g., layout of the non-uniformities) to the printing process requirements and may also allow better utilization of the material in film 62 by optimizing the non-uniformities 68 patterns to meet the LIFT printing requirements.
In operation, optical assembly 21 may be configured to direct beam 52, herein assumed to be a spherically symmetric beam, to impinge on film 62 in proximity to the position of a given non-uniformity in film 62. The interaction between beam 52 and film 62 melts the material of film 62 at the impinging position, and the non-uniformity acts as a heat barrier. The heat barrier creates an asymmetric thermal conductivity profile around the melted material, so that the melted material in turn has an asymmetric profile. As a result, droplets 70 are ejected from film 62, at non-normal ejection angle θ, onto film 25 of circuit 12, and may land, typically in the case that the donor and acceptor are parallel, at an angle that is not orthogonal to the top surface of film 25. The non-normal ejection process and mechanism are described with more detail with reference to
The interaction between beam 52 and film 62 melts the material of film 62 at location 73 and forms a thermal “nozzle.” The thermal nozzle (typically metal) in film 62 dissipates heat through film 62 and to the surrounding environment (e.g., air) around the film.
It will be understood from
When beam 52 impinges on film 62, the resultant heat dissipates around spot 100, creating a non-uniform temperature gradient around spot 100 due to the proximity to barrier 98. The gradient between spot 100 and barrier 98 is steep. Due to the rectangular shape of barrier 98, point 95 is very close to the heat barrier, and thus, even though both points 93 and 95 are located at a similar distance from the edge of spot 90, their temperatures are different. As for the situation of
When beam 52 impinges on film 62, the resultant heat dissipates around spot 102, creating a non-uniform temperature gradient around spot 102 due to the proximity to barrier 104. As for the situation of
From the above description of
The systems described above have used a single beam 52. However, those having ordinary skill in the art will be able to adapt the description for the case of parallel printing, where multiple input beams are used in concurrently. U.S. patent application 62/078,450 to Kotler, et al., whose disclosure is incorporated herein by reference, and describes a method for producing multiple beams that may be used for parallel printing.
It will be appreciated that the embodiments described above are cited by way of example, and that the following claims are not limited to what has been particularly shown and described hereinabove. Rather, the scope includes both combinations and sub-combinations of the various features described hereinabove, as well as variations and modifications thereof which would occur to persons skilled in the art upon reading the foregoing description and which are not disclosed in the prior art.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IL2016/050585 | 6/7/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2017/006306 | 1/12/2017 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1393637 | Ohashi | Oct 1921 | A |
3787210 | Roberts | Jan 1974 | A |
3935566 | Snopko | Jan 1976 | A |
3963852 | Baxter | Jun 1976 | A |
3964389 | Peterson | Jun 1976 | A |
4608328 | Schwartz et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4714628 | Eloy | Dec 1987 | A |
4752455 | Mayer | Jun 1988 | A |
4891183 | Corwin | Jan 1990 | A |
4895735 | Cook | Jan 1990 | A |
4931323 | Manitt | Jun 1990 | A |
4970196 | Kim | Nov 1990 | A |
4987006 | Williams | Jan 1991 | A |
5090828 | Shimura et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5137382 | Miyajima | Aug 1992 | A |
5138482 | Hatori et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5173441 | Yu | Dec 1992 | A |
5204696 | Schmidlin et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5292559 | Joyce, Jr. | Mar 1994 | A |
5322986 | Nutt | Jun 1994 | A |
5492861 | Opower | Feb 1996 | A |
5683601 | Tatah | Nov 1997 | A |
5692844 | Harrison et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5885929 | Brock et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5935462 | Tatah | Aug 1999 | A |
5935758 | Patel et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5963569 | Baumgart et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6014245 | Xu et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6025110 | Nowak | Feb 2000 | A |
6155330 | Kinane et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159832 | Mayer | Dec 2000 | A |
6177151 | Chrisey | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6261493 | Gaylo et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6412143 | Chen | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6440503 | Merdan et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6583381 | Duignan | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6649861 | Duignan | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6766764 | Chrisey | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6792326 | Duignan et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6805918 | Auyeung | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6815015 | Young | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6822189 | Hong et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6896429 | White et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6899988 | Kidnie et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6905738 | Ringeisen | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6936311 | Ringeisen | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7014885 | Pique | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7019891 | Johnson | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7116907 | Nakazawa et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7198879 | Tredwell | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7236334 | Ding et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7277770 | Huang et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7294367 | Barron | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7358169 | Zhu et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7364996 | Kawase et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7375819 | Courville et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7423286 | Handy et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7534543 | Kreilich et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7534544 | Principe et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7538929 | Wasilousky | May 2009 | B2 |
7608308 | Liu et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7633035 | Kirmeier | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7667888 | Wasilousky | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7784173 | Wolkin et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7799699 | Nuzzo et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7938855 | Gregorich et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7942987 | Crump et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7982296 | Nuzzo et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8025542 | Birrell et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8056222 | Pique et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8101247 | Ringeisen | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8215371 | Batchelder et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8216931 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8221822 | Flanagan et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8262916 | Smalley et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8395083 | Naveh | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8420978 | Jain | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8440546 | Nuzzo et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8535041 | Slafer | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8545931 | Szuch | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8563431 | Miyairi | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8574615 | Tenney et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8729524 | Rogers et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8741194 | Ederer et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8743165 | Sandstriim | Jun 2014 | B2 |
9027378 | Crump et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9029058 | Martin | May 2015 | B2 |
9044805 | Prest et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9446618 | Batt et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9859247 | Smits | Jan 2018 | B2 |
10018889 | Rozsa et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10144034 | Zenou | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10193004 | Zenou | Jan 2019 | B2 |
20020071901 | Ringeisen | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020085085 | Fischer et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020122898 | Ringeisen | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020141039 | Mermelstein et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020197401 | Auyeung | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030006534 | Taboas et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030017277 | Young | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040029039 | Tutt | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040069471 | Corduan et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040233408 | Sievers | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050056626 | Gross et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050095367 | Babiarz et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050112015 | Bampton | May 2005 | A1 |
20050211163 | Li et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050212888 | Lehmann | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060188697 | Lee | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060213886 | Sanders | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070075063 | Wilbanks | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070203584 | Bdyopadhyay et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080006966 | Mannella | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080041725 | Klein et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080233291 | Chandrasekaran | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080286488 | Li et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080314881 | Ringeisen | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080317893 | Gruber | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090074987 | Auyeung | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090130427 | Grigoropoulos | May 2009 | A1 |
20090217517 | Pique et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090284826 | Langdon | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100022078 | Rockenberger et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100100635 | Gold et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100264123 | Jennings | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100278521 | Sandler et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110037953 | Nizani | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110089412 | Fujimori | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110097550 | Matusovsky et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110136162 | Sun et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110188016 | De Jager et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110210103 | Bruland | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110304900 | Widzgowski et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120025182 | Umeda | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120080088 | Grabitz | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120247740 | Gertner et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130029480 | Niklaus | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130176699 | Tonchev | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130302154 | Finlayson | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130313756 | Chen et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130335504 | Sandstrom | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140071421 | De Jager et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140097277 | Kumta et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140160452 | De Jager | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140231266 | Sherrer et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140238574 | Kinser et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140312009 | Okabe | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140347641 | Koek et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150024317 | Orrock et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150024319 | Martin | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150086705 | Meinders | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150097316 | DeSimone | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150167147 | Schupp et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150197063 | Shinar et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150197862 | Engel et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150259783 | Lai | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150328838 | Erb et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150346483 | Ehrmann | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150375456 | Cheverton | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150382476 | Zenou | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160114425 | Liu | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160187646 | Ehrmann | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160218287 | McAlpine et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160233089 | Zenou | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160336303 | Tsai | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170189995 | Zenou | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170210142 | Kotler et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170306495 | Kotler | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170365484 | Kotler | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180193948 | Zenou | Jul 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102566193 | Jul 2012 | CN |
1847632 | Oct 2007 | EP |
2660352 | Nov 2013 | EP |
2453774 | Apr 2009 | GB |
S4960538 | Jun 1974 | JP |
H0634283 | Feb 1994 | JP |
3871096 | Jan 2007 | JP |
2015144252 | Aug 2015 | JP |
2003056320 | Jul 2003 | WO |
2007134300 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2010100635 | Sep 2010 | WO |
2013023874 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2013080030 | Jun 2013 | WO |
2013124114 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2013165241 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2013182367 | Dec 2013 | WO |
2014061024 | Apr 2014 | WO |
2015003404 | Jan 2015 | WO |
2015056253 | Apr 2015 | WO |
2015155662 | Oct 2015 | WO |
2015181810 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2016063270 | Apr 2016 | WO |
2016116921 | Jul 2016 | WO |
WO-2016116921 | Jul 2016 | WO |
20160124708 | Aug 2016 | WO |
20160124712 | Aug 2016 | WO |
2017006306 | Jan 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Application # PCT/IL2016/050585 Search report dated Sep. 19, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/524,282 office action dated Sep. 27, 2018. |
Frohlich et al., “A two-frequency acousto-optic modulator driver to improve the beam pointing stability during intensity ramps”, Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 78, pp. 043101/1-4, Apr. 2, 2007. |
Singh et al., “Suppression of FWM Crosstalk on WDM Systems Using Unequally Spaced Channel Algorithms—A Survey”, International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, vol. 3, Issue 12, pp. 25-31, Dec. 2013. |
Wadhwa et al., “Golomb Ruler Sequence Generation and Optimization using Modified Firefly Algorithm”, SSRG Intemational Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering (SSRG-IJECE) , vol. 1, issue 5, 8 pages, Jul. 2014. |
Isomet Corp., ‘Acousto-Optic Modulation’ , Application Note—AN0510, 13 pages, Jan. 27, 2014. |
Gazalet et al., “Acousto-optic multifrequency modulators: reduction of the phase-grating, intermodulation products”, Applied Optics, vol. 32, No. 13, pp. 2455-2460, May 1, 1993. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/644,857 office action dated Aug. 1, 2018. |
Grant-Jacob et al., “Micron-scale copper wires printed using femtosecond laser-induced forward transfer with automated donor replenishment”, Optical Materials Express, vol. 3, No. 6, pp. 747-754, Jun. 1, 2013. |
Eason et al., “Nanofabrication technologies: high-throughput for tomorrow's metadevices”, Conference paper, University of Southampton, UK, 50 pages, Jan. 2014. |
Xiao., “Nanosecond Laser Assisted Fabrication of Large Area Metallic Nanostructures and Their Potential Applications”, Thesis dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, 98 pages, 2015. |
Pique et al., “Laser Forward Transfer of Electronic and Power Generating Materials”, Laser Ablation and its Applications, Chapter 14, pp. 339-373, Dec. 31, 2007. |
Young et al., “Dielectric properties of oxide structures by a laser-based direct-writing method”, Journal of Materials Research, vol. 16, No., pp. 1720-1725, Jun. 30, 2001. |
Nagel et al., “Laser-Induced Forward Transfer for the Fabrication of Devices”, Nanomaterials: Processing and Characterization with Lasers, First Edition, pp. 255-316, year 2012. |
Papavlu et al.,“Laser Induced Forward Transfer for Materials Patterning”, Romanian Reports in Physics, vol. 63, supplement, pp. 1285-1301, year 2011. |
Zergioti et al., “Microdeposition of metals by femtosecond excimer lase”, Applied Surface Science, vols. 127-129, pp. 601-605, year 1998. |
Vispute et al., “Reactive deposition of YlBa2Cu30 7-x superconductor films by pulsed laser ablation from an unreacted mixture of Y203, BaCO 3 and CuO”, Bulletin of Materials Science, vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 377-384, Aug. 1992. |
Hecht.,“Multifrequency Acoustooptic Diffraction,” IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics, vol. SU-24, No. 1, pp. 7-18, year 1977. |
Trypogeorgos et al., “Precise shaping of laser light by an acousto-optic deflector”, Optics Express, vol. 21, No. 21, pp. 24837-24846, Oct. 21, 2013. |
Tan et al., “Selective surface texturing using femtosecond pulsed laser induced forward transfer”, Applied Surface Scienc, vol. 207, pp. 365-371, year 2003. |
Adrian et al., “A study of the mechanism of metal deposition by the laser-induced forward transfer process”, Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology B, vol. 5, No. 5, pp. 1490-1494, Sep./Oct. 1987. |
Baseman.,“Formation of Metal Silicon Alloys by Laser Induced Forward Transfer”, An IP.com Prior Art Database Technical Disclosure, 2 pages, Jul. 1, 1988. |
Gehner., “MEMS Adaptive Optics Development at IPMS”, Fraunhofer, Feb. 15, 2007. |
Kumpulainen et al., “Low Temperature Nanoparticle Sintering with Continuous Wave and Pulse Lasers”, Optics & Laser Technology 43 , pp. 570-576, year 2011. |
Theodorakos et al., “Selective Laser Sintering of Ag Nanoparticles Ink for Applications in Flexible Electronics”, Applied Surface Science 336 , pp. 157-162, 2015. |
Wang et al., “Silicon solar cells based on all-laser-transferred contacts”, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 23 , pp. 61-68 Jul. 19, 2013. |
Willis et al., “Microdroplet deposition by laser-induced forward transfer”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 86, pp. 244103-1-244103-3, year 2005. |
Antonov., “Angular Splitting of the Bragg Diffraction Order in an Acoustooptical Modulator Due to a Frequency-Modulated Acoustic Wave”, Technical Physics, vol. 50, No. 4, pp. 513-516, year 2005. |
Banks et al., “Nanodroplets deposited in microarrays by femtosecond Ti:sapphire laser-induced forward transfer”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 89, pp. 193107-1-193107-3, year 2006. |
Antonov., “Acoustooptic Nonpolar Light Controlling Devices and Polarization Modulators Based on Paratellurite Crystals”, Technical Physics, vol. 49, No. 10, pp. 1329-1334, year 2004. |
Antonov et al., “Improving the Efficiency of an Acoustooptic Modulator with a Two-Lobe Directivity Pattern by Correcting the Two-Frequency Electric Signal”, ISSN 1063-7842, Technical Physics, vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 57-62, year 2006. |
Antonov et al., “Inverse Acoustooptic Problem: Coherent Summing of Optical Beams into a Single Optical Channel”, ISSN 1063-7842, Technical Physics, vol. 52, No. 5, pp. 610-615, year 2007. |
Antonov et al., “Efficient Multiple-Beam Bragg Acoustooptic Diffraction with Phase Optimization of a Multifrequency Acoustic Wave”, ISSN 1063-7842, Technical Physics, vol. 52, No. 8, pp. 1053-1060, year 2007. |
Antonov et al., “Formation of the Multibeam Pattern of the Bragg Diffraction of Light by a Periodically Phase Modulated Acoustic Signal”, ISSN 1064-2269, Journal of Communications Technology and Electronics, vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 453-459, year 2008. |
Antonov et al., “Highly Effective Acoustooptic Diffraction of Light by Multifrequency Sound Using a Nonaxial Deflector”, ISSN 1063-7842, Technical Physics, vol. 53, No. 6, pp. 752-756, year 2008. |
Antonov et al., “Switch multiplexer of fiber-optic channels based on multibeam acousto-optic diffraction”, Applied Optics, vol. 48, No. 7, pp. C171-C181, Mar. 1, 2009. |
Zenou et al., “Laser Transfer of Metals and Metal Alloys for Digital Microfabrication of 3D Objects”, Small, vol. 11, issue 33, pp. 4082-4089, Sep. 2, 2015. |
Zenou et al., “Solar cell metallization by laser transfer of metal micro-droplets”, ScienceDirect, Energy Procedia, vol. 67, pp. 147-155, year 2015. |
Bera et al., “Optimization study of the femtosecond laser-induced forward-transfer process with thin aluminum films”, Applied Optics, vol. 46, No. 21, pp. 4650-4659, Jul. 20, 2007. |
Li et al., “Microdroplet deposition of copper film by femtosecond laser-induced forward transfer”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 89, pp. 161110-4-161110-4, year 2006. |
Roder et al., “Low Temperature Laser Metallization for Silicon Solar Cells”, ScienceDirect, Energy Procedia, vol. 8, pp. 552-557, year 2011. |
Tien et al., “Precision laser metallization”, Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 56, pp. 273-279, year 2001. |
Fraunhofer IPMS, Spatial Light Modulators (SLM), 2 pages, Jun. 7, 2016. |
Fraunhofer IPMS, “Micro Mirror Arrays (MMA) from DUV to NIR”, 2 pages, Jun. 7, 2016. |
Gehner et al., “Mems AO Micro Mirror Development at IPMS”, Status and Perspectives, Fraunhofer IPMS, 30 pages, May 4, 2016. |
BWT Beijing, “K915FG2RN-150.0W, 915nm 150W High Power Fiber Coupled Diode Laser”, 4 pages, Jul. 1, 2016. |
Zenou et al., “Digital laser printing of aluminum microstructure on thermally sensitive substrates”, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 48 , 205303 12 pages , 2015. |
Willis et al., “The effect of melting-induced volumetric expansion on initiation of laser-induced forward transfer”, Applied Surface Science 253, pp. 4759-4763, 2007. |
Schultze et al., “Laser-induced forward transfer of aluminium”, Applied Surface Science 52, pp. 303-309, 1991. |
Pique, A., “Laser Transfer Techniques for Digital Microfabrication”, vol. 135 of the series Springer Series in Materials Science, Chapter 11, pp. 259-291, Jun. 30, 2010. |
Bohandy et al., “Metal deposition from a supported metal film using an excimer laser”, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 60, No. 4, pp. 1538-1539, Aug. 15, 1986. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/644,857 office action dated Jan. 9, 2019. |
Japanese patent application No. 2017-504395 office action dated Jan. 29, 2019. |
Baseman et al., “Laser Induced Forward Transfer”, Proceedings of Materials Research Society Symposium, vol. 101, pp. 237-242, year 1988. |
TW Application # 104137228 office action dated May 3, 2019. |
CN Application # 201680040497.7 office action dated Apr. 17, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/644,857 office action dated Jun. 24, 2019. |
CN Application # 201680065145.7 office action dated Aug. 2, 2019. |
JP Application # 2017-517354 office action dated Aug. 28, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180193948 A1 | Jul 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62190276 | Jul 2015 | US |