The disclosed embodiments relate generally to plasma machines, and more specifically to dense plasma focus devices.
A dense plasma focus device is a plasma machine that produces, by electromagnetic acceleration and compression, short-lived plasma that is so hot and dense that the dense plasma focus device becomes a copious multi-radiation source. The basic dense plasma focus device was invented in the early 1960s by J. W. Mather and also independently invented by N. V. Filippov.
The standard Mather design for a dense plasma focus device is characterized by coaxial cylindrical anodes and cathodes. Since the inductance of the anode/cathode (“a/k”) assembly of the dense plasma focus device is a function of the ratio of the radii of the anode and the cathode, the “Mather” design is a constant inductance design.
In one embodiment, a dense plasma focus device is disclosed as having an anode with a non-constant radius and a cathode coupled to the anode, the cathode also having a non-constant radius. In various embodiments, the anode and cathode may be coaxially coupled. In other embodiments the anode and/or the cathode may be tapered. In addition, a ratio of the non-constant radius of the anode and the non-constant radius of the cathode may be held constant along the length of the dense plasma focus device in order to maintain constant inductance. In other embodiments, the inductance may be varied by varying the ratio of the anode and cathode radii along the length of the dense plasma focus device.
The word “exemplary” is used herein to mean “serving as an example, instance, or illustration.” Any embodiment described herein as “exemplary” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other embodiments. In addition, references to “an,” “one,” “other,” “another,” “alternative,” or “various” embodiments should not be construed as limiting since various aspects of the disclosed embodiments may be used interchangeably within other embodiments.
Reference is now made to the figures wherein like parts are referred to by like numerals throughout. Referring first to
Specifically, the radius 104 of the anode 102 represents a distance between a centerline 106 of the dense plasma focus device 100 and the outer surface 108 of the anode 102. The radius 104 is the radius of the anode 102 along a proximal section 110 of the dense plasma focus device 100. However, the radius of the anode 102 decreases (e.g., is non-constant) along the length of the anode 102. For example, the radius 112 of the anode 102, which represents the distance between centerline 106 of the dense plasma focus device 100 and outer surface 108 of the anode 102, is continually decreasing throughout the distal section 114 of the dense plasma focus device 100.
The dense plasma focus device 100 also includes a cathode 116, which is coupled to the anode 102 and disposed coaxially relative to the anode 102. Cathode 116 may function as a negative electrode of the dense plasma focus device 100. Similar to the radius of the anode 102, the radius of the cathode 116 is also non-constant. For example, the radius 118 of the cathode 116 represents a distance between centerline 106 of the dense plasma focus device 100 and outer surface 120 of the cathode 116. The radius 118 is the radius of the cathode 116 along proximal section 110 of the dense plasma focus device 100. However, the radius of the cathode 116 decreases (e.g., is non-constant) along the length of the cathode 116. Specifically, the radius 122 of the cathode 116, which represents the distance between centerline 106 of the dense plasma focus device 100 and outer surface 120 of the cathode 116, is continually decreasing throughout the distal section 114 of the dense plasma focus device 100.
Thus, both the radius of the anode 102 and the radius of the cathode 116 are non-constant (e.g., change) at some point between a proximal end 124 of the dense plasma focus device 100 and a distal end 126 of the dense plasma focus device 100. In the embodiment shown in
It is also worth noting that due to the non-constant nature of the radii of the anode 102 and the cathode 116, the termination end geometry (in size, shape, or the like) of the anode 102 and the cathode 116 at distal end 126 may be different than the initial end geometry (in size, shape, or the like) of the anode 102 and the cathode 116 at proximal end 124.
Referring now to
Specifically, the radius 204 of the anode 202 represents a distance between a centerline 206 of the dense plasma focus device 200 and an outer surface 208 of the anode 202. As seen in
The dense plasma focus device 200 also includes a cathode 212, which is coupled to the anode 202 and disposed coaxially relative to the anode 202. Cathode 212 may function as a negative electrode of the dense plasma focus device 200. Similar to the radius of the anode 202, the radius of the cathode 212 is also non-constant. For example, the radius 214 of the cathode 212 represents a distance between a centerline 206 of the dense plasma focus device 200 and an outer surface 216 of the cathode 212. The radius 214 of the cathode 212 decreases (e.g., is non-constant) along length 210 of the cathode 212. Similar to the anode 202, although the cathode 212 is generally tapered throughout length 210 of the dense plasma focus device 200, only a portion of the cathode 212 may be tapered in other embodiments (e.g., as shown by the cathode 116 of
Thus, both the radius of the anode 202 and the radius of the cathode 212 are non-constant (e.g., change) at some point between proximal end 218 of the dense plasma focus device 200 and distal end 220 of the dense plasma focus device 200. In the embodiment shown in
Referring now to
Specifically, the radius 304 of the anode 302 represents a distance between a centerline 306 of the dense plasma focus device 300 and an outer surface 308 of the anode 302. As seen in
The dense plasma focus device 300 also includes a cathode 312, which is coupled to the anode 302 and disposed coaxially relative to the anode 302. Cathode 312 may function as a negative electrode of the dense plasma focus device 300. Similar to the radius of the anode 302, the radius of the cathode 312 is also non-constant. For example, the radius 314 of the cathode 312 represents a distance between centerline 306 of the dense plasma focus device 300 and outer surface 316 of the cathode 312. The radius 314 is the radius of the cathode 312 along proximal section 318 of the dense plasma focus device 300. However, the radius of the cathode 312 decreases (e.g., is non-constant) along the length of the cathode 312. Specifically, the radius 320 of the cathode 312, which represents the distance between a centerline 306 and an outer surface 316 along distal section 322, is continually decreasing.
Thus, both the radius of the anode 302 and the radius of the cathode 312 are non-constant (e.g., change) at some point between proximal end 324 of the dense plasma focus device 300 and distal end 326 of the dense plasma focus device 300. In the embodiment shown in
In this regard, although
Referring now to
The whole process proceeds at many times the speed of sound in the ambient gas. As the current sheath continues to move axially, the portion in contact with the anode 402 slides across the face of the anode, axisymmetrically. When the imploding front of the shock wave coalesces onto the axis, a reflected shock front 416 emanates from the axis until it meets the driving current sheath which then forms the axisymmetric boundary of the “pinched” or focused hot plasma column.
The dense plasma column rapidly “pinches” and undergoes instabilities and breaks up. The intense electromagnetic and particle bursts, collectively referred to as ‘multi-radiation’ occur during the dense plasma and breakup phases. The whole process, including axial and radial phases, may last, for a conventional Mather dense plasma focus device, a few microseconds (for a small focus) to 10 microseconds (for a large focus). However, the pulsewidth of a dense plasma focus device with non-constant radii of the anode and the cathode, has been measured to be less than 50 nanoseconds (and even as low as 10 nanoseconds), which is significantly less than conventional Mather designs that may have a pulsewidth of many hundreds of nanoseconds. The full width at half maximum (“FWHM”) is usually measured on the detector as the width of the radiation burst from the Z-pinch in time. In the present invention, it is understood that the FWHM occurs during a small fraction of time at the end of the radial implosion phase. This reduction of pulsewidth may be achieved using the principles of the embodiments disclosed herein (e.g., utilizing a dense plasma focus device with an anode and a cathode with non-constant radii).
The goal of pulsewidth reduction for the dense plasma focus device is twofold: eliminating multiple pulses and reducing the duration of the pinch. Under some circumstances, the dense plasma focus device generates several small pulses spaced closely in time instead of one relatively larger pulse. For most experiments requiring short duration neutron pulses, this problem may be worse than long duration neutron pulses since it obscures the times of interest in the experiment.
The other major effect on the duration of the neutron pulse is the radial stability of the plasma shockwave. This is primarily controlled by operating voltages, experimental gas parameters, and insulator height. These factors combine to determine the strength and stability of the plasma shockwave as it travels down the bore of the plasma focus tube. An additional factor that determines the stability of the plasma shockwave as it reaches the end of the anode in the plasma focus tube is the height of the cathode cage. All of these design characteristics may be altered as needed to obtain the desired output characteristics of the dense plasma focus device.
For example, the dense plasma focus device can be used for a variety of research and non-research tasks. Among the non-research tasks is providing a pulsed neutron output for characterizing neutron detectors for the national laboratories. Many of the neutron detectors that are tested with the dense plasma focus device are for measuring pulsed neutron outputs in strong gamma and x-ray backgrounds. Having the ability to produce pulses similar to those that clients expect to see in their experiments is a great benefit to those clients using the embodiments of the dense plasma focus device disclosed herein to operationally test detectors and diagnostic systems.
Referring now to
Although the steps of
The steps of a method or algorithm described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be embodied directly in hardware, in a software module executed by a processor, or in a combination of the two. A software module may reside in RAM memory, flash memory, ROM memory, EPROM memory, EEPROM memory, registers, hard disk, a removable disk, a CD-ROM, or any other form of storage medium known in the art. An exemplary storage medium is coupled to the processor such the processor can read information from, and write information to, the storage medium. In the alternative, the storage medium may be integral to the processor. The processor and the storage medium may reside in an ASIC. The ASIC may reside in a user terminal. In the alternative, the processor and the storage medium may reside as discrete components in a user terminal.
The previous description is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the disclosed embodiments. Various modifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of these principles. Thus, the disclosed embodiments are not intended to be limited as described herein but are to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20050271181 | Winterberg | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060273732 | Korobochko et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20080089460 | Sved | Apr 2008 | A1 |