The present application claims the benefits, under 35 U.S.C. §119(e), of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/728,567, filed Oct. 19, 2005, entitled “Design of a Large Low Maintenance Battery Pack for a Hybrid Locomotive” to Jarrett et al., which is incorporated herein by this reference.
The present invention relates generally to the design of a large battery pack suitable for a hybrid locomotive and specifically to a battery pack using a predominantly free convection cooling system.
The use of energy storage batteries in combination with a generator is known for automobiles, buses and other road and highway vehicles. Electric batteries have been used to store electric power to drive electric locomotives as, for example, disclosed by Manns in U.S. Pat. No. 1,377,087 which is incorporated herein by reference. Donnelly has disclosed the use of a battery-dominant hybrid locomotive which has a ratio of energy storage capacity to charging power in the range of 4 to 40 hours in U.S. Pat. No. 6,308,639 which is also incorporated herein by reference.
One of the principal objectives of hybrid locomotive design is to create a locomotive that can be operated in such a way as to maximize the lifetime of its energy storage unit. This is because the cost structure of an energy storage unit such as, for example, a battery pack or capacitor bank is primarily one of capital cost and secondarily of operating costs. It is known, for example, that operating a lead-acid battery pack in a preferred state-of-charge (“SOC”) range or with a preferred charging algorithm or with both tends to extend serviceable lifetime of cells in cyclical service towards that of float service.
Large energy storage battery systems are known, for example, from diesel submarines. In this application, a pack of large storage batteries are used to provide power principally when the submarine is operating underwater. These submarine battery packs are designed to provide high energy storage capacity for extended underwater operations during which the battery pack cannot be recharged. Battery pack cost and lifetime are generally not major concerns.
In the late 1990s, a large stationary battery system was installed at the island village of Metlakatla, Ak. The 1.4 MW-hr, 756 volt battery system was designed to stabilize the island's power grid providing instantaneous power into the grid when demand was high and absorbing excess power from the grid to allow its hydroelectric generating units to operate under steady-state conditions. Because the battery pack is required to randomly accept power as well as to deliver power on demand to the utility grid, it is continuously operated at between 70 and 90% state-of-charge. Equalization charges are conducted during maintenance periods scheduled only twice each year.
It has long been thought that to achieve optimum life and performance from a lead-acid battery, it is necessary to float the battery under rigid voltage conditions to overcome self-discharge reactions while minimizing overcharge and corrosion of the cell's positive grid. This has resulted in batteries being used primarily in a standby mode. As used in a hybrid locomotive or as a power grid storage and control system, the battery is rapidly and continuously cycled between discharge and charge over a preferred range of total charge (the so-called Hybrid Electric Vehicle [“HEV”] duty cycle).
It has been possible to assess aging and performance capabilities over time in this controlled cycling type of service by detailed monitoring. Data has been generated to demonstrate the long-term viability of cells in this type of use, performing functions such as load leveling, peak shaving and power quality enhancement. Detailed examination of the cells plates and separators have shown little wear indicating that controlled operation such as described above can result in battery lifetimes that can approach design lifetimes associated with float service.
However, there remains a need for a more comprehensive procedure suitable for designing large battery pack assemblies with long lifetimes for hybrid locomotives that satisfies a number of additional diverse requirements for locomotive performance, maintenance, safety and cost-effective operation.
A principal design objective for many applications is maximum energy storage capacity. When this objective is achieved, the power output of the battery pack is usually more than sufficient. In many applications, a principal design objective is low capital and operating cost. This usually means a lead-acid battery with some compromise in power or capacity. In applications such as hybrid locomotives used as yard or road switcher locomotives or commuter locomotives, maximum power out is a principal design objective. A further principal design objective is battery pack lifetime since this directly relates to the unit cost of power supplied indirectly through a battery system.
The design objectives of a large battery pack for a hybrid locomotive has a unique set of problems to achieve its principal design goals of high storage capacity, high power on demand, HEV duty cycle, long lifetime and a cost effective design for a large battery pack. These objectives must be met on a locomotive platform subject to shock and vibration as well as extreme changes in ambient temperature conditions. There therefore remains a need for a battery pack design for a hybrid locomotive that is capable of operation requiring a combination of high storage capacity, high power capability for rapid acceleration, long battery pack lifetime, and a low cost capital and replacement cost structure under diverse locomotive operating environments. These and other objectives are met by the design approach described in the present invention.
These and other needs are addressed by the various embodiments and configurations of the present invention. The present invention is directed generally to a method for design and operation of an energy storage battery pack for a large hybrid vehicle, such as a hybrid locomotive, hybrid gantry crane, maritime vessel, hybrid bus, hybrid subway or hybrid light rail vehicle. The method disclosed herein may also be applied to an energy storage unit comprised of energy storage capacitors.
In one embodiment, a hybrid vehicle is provided that includes:
(a) a prime mover for generating electrical energy;
(b) a battery pack for receiving, storing, and providing, as needed, the electrical energy, the battery pack comprising a number of battery cells; and
(c) at least one motor for consuming the electrical energy.
To control operating conditions for the battery cells, the vehicle includes one or more of the following features:
(i) a hood assembly, the hood assembly comprising a chimney vent and hood and wall members respectively defining upper and lower plenums, the upper and lower plenums being in fluid communication with the chimney vent and separated by the wall member, the wall member inhibiting airflow between the upper and lower plenums, and the lower plenum being in fluid communication with and removing heated air from the battery pack, whereby heated air in the upper and/or lower plenums passes, by free convection, through the chimney vent and into the external environment;
(ii) a number of airflow channels in communication with the lower plenum, a first set of airflow channels being positioned between adjacent battery cells and a second set of airflow channels being positioned between battery cells and the wall member, the airflow channels in the first set having a first cross-sectional area normal to the direction of airflow and the airflow channels in the second set having a second cross-sectional area normal to the direction of airflow, wherein the first cross-sectional area is greater than the second cross-sectional area;
(iii) a rack structure, the rack structure comprising a number of vertical and horizontal fire wall members defining a number of containment sections, each section receiving a corresponding set of battery cells, whereby a fire in one section is retarded from spreading to an adjacent section;
(iv) a fan positioned in a fan duct, the fan duct being in communication with the chimney vent, wherein, when the battery pack is less than a first temperature, the fan is disabled and removal of heated air from the battery pack is done by free convection alone and wherein, when the battery pack is more than a second temperature, the fan is enabled and removal of heated air from the battery pack is done by forced convection;
(v) a number of vertical and longitudinal shock absorbers, a set of vertical and longitudinal shock absorbers being positioned in each containment section to absorb at least a portion of shock imparted to the absorbers by movement of and impacts to the vehicle;
(vi) an electrically insulating material positioned between the rack structure and a supporting deck of the vehicle and/or between each cell and a supporting member in the rack structure; and
(vii) a support plate structure supporting the battery rack, the support plate structure being operable to permit and limit movement of the battery rack relative to the support plate structure.
The battery pack is preferably operated to maintain cells within a specified temperature difference relative to all other battery cells. This is done by removing thermal energy generated within individual cells primarily by free convection cooling means applied to selected outside surfaces of the cells. This cooling system may supplemented by forced convective cooling during more severe portions of the duty cycle and or in severe environmental conditions.
The temperature operating range for a large hybrid locomotive battery pack is typically between minus 40° C. and plus 50° C. The temperature differential between any individual cells is preferably less than about 5° C. and more preferably less than about 3° C. The temperature of individual battery cells is maintained by stacking several battery cells in columns in a specially designed rack and allowing natural convection to create a moderate flow of air up the sides of the batteries, preferably the sides of the cells perpendicular to the orientation of the internal plate pairs. This practice of tightly controlling the temperature differences amongst cells of the pack extends the useful lifetime of the battery pack as a whole.
In one configuration, the invention has combination of natural convection and forced convection features that minimize the need for forced convection. This can reduce the amount of auxiliary electrical power needed to keep the battery system cooled. The air enters through the base louvers and flows along the rack base and enters natural convection gaps between the stacked battery cells. Vertical solid wall plates are used to provide fire walls and provide vertical flow barriers for the convecting air. The batteries act as constant heat flux sources and are preferably oriented in the rack so the largest surface area sides are exposed to the natural convection air gaps. The air flows vertically up into a plenum that guides the air to the fan duct which provides a chimney effect.
Another important natural convection feature is the upper plenum positioned between the lower plenum and the hood member. A louvered soffit can be positioned on the side of the upper plenum to allow air to enter this cavity and naturally or freely convect to the fan duct and enter the duct via slots that are cut into the duct wall. These slots are located vertically above the fan plane so when the fan is running it will not draw air from this cavity but pull air from the area below the plenum where the battery cells are contained. This overall features provides a means for minimizing the solar radiation heat source that is created in the upper plenum by the solar load on the outer hood surface. The hood outer surface can, for example, be painted with a high reflectivity paint. The hood inner surface and the upper wall between the upper and lower plenums can also be thermally insulated. When the solar load heats the hood assembly, the air in the upper plenum between the hood member and the dividing wall member the heated air will naturally convect from the soffit opening and out the duct slots and subsequently out the duct. The air will also provide an additional insulating layer between the warm hood member and the dividing wall.
In another configuration, a similar concept is used for the side(s) of the hood which is typically the battery pack hood doors. The doors can be double walled with the same insulation features described for the hood and plenum. The bottom and tops of the double paneled doors preferably have air flow slots that allow the air to naturally convect vertically between the door walls. The top slots can open into the plenum. By opening into the lower plenum, the door interiors can be protected from rain, snow, dust and other debris and will have the benefits of the forced air convection created by the fans when they are running.
In another configuration, the air gaps or channels between the battery cells are sized to optimize the natural convection cooling for these constant heat sources. Where two adjacent cells do not have a vertical fire wall, they both provide heat to the gap. This shared gap is moderately larger than the gap that is needed between a battery and a fire wall. These gaps should be sized for optimum natural convection cooling since gaps that are too large will result in natural convection re-circulation. The horizontal fire walls are slotted to match the air gaps between the batteries while maintaining some fire wall capability.
In another configuration, during extreme temperature conditions one or more fans are activated, and air is forced through the air gaps. The fan or fans are sized to provide sufficient velocity to keep the battery cells within a preferred temperature range in these extreme conditions.
In another configuration, a system of shock absorbers is used to control longitudinal, vertical and lateral shock and vibration loading of the entire battery pack so as to isolate the cells from mechanical shock and vibration, such as is commonly experienced in rail systems. This control of mechanical environment also acts to extend the lifetime of the battery cells and the battery pack as a whole.
In yet another configuration, a small number of cells (typically between about two and about six) are mounted on a tray that allows battery cells to be readily inspected, serviced and/or replaced no matter where in the battery pack they are located.
In yet another configuration, the trays are at least a part of the system to provide electrical isolation of individual battery cells from each other so as to avoid the possibilities for inadvertently shorting out battery cells. This design feature is important in a battery pack where the cells are commonly connected electrically in series so there can be a large voltage drop across the battery pack. This feature also acts to extend the lifetime of the battery cells, and the battery pack as a whole, by minimizing or eliminating inadvertent short circuits which can cause one or a group of cells to overheat.
In a second embodiment, a combination of the above procedures are used collectively to substantially maximize the ampere-hour lifetime of a battery pack. First, individual battery cells are maintained within a specified temperature difference range of each other as described above. Second, the temperature level of all the cells is maintained within a second predetermined range by controlling the inflow and outflow of air to the battery pack compartment in response to ambient temperature conditions. Third, the shock and vibration environment of individual battery cells are controlled within predetermined maximum values. Fourth, the battery pack is operated such that its state of charge (“SOC”) is preferably between about 20% to about 95% and more preferably between about 50% and about 95%. This practice reduces the tendency of the condition of individual battery cells to diverge, thereby requiring fewer equalization charges which can reduce overall battery pack lifetime. Fifth, the battery pack is operated to avoid deep discharging the battery cells for example below about 20% SOC so as not to cause unnecessary level of stress on the cell plates which tends to reduce battery lifetime. Sixth, when it is necessary to overcharge the battery pack (perform an equalization charge), a current interrupt charging algorithm is used. This type of charging algorithm is known to significantly extend battery cell lifetime because it allows the cells to cool down during charging and avoid the oxygen recombination cycle which leads to early failure of the negative plate by oxidation of the sulfuric acid to sulfate. Seventh, it is also preferable to perform equalization charges at a high rate of current and/or controlled over-voltage so as to more evenly pass current through the plates, a practice which is also known to extend cell lifetime.
When one or more of the above procedures are followed at least for most of the operational lifetime of the battery pack, the lifetime of the battery pack can be extended as measured by the equivalent full discharge cycles calculated for the battery pack. This extension in lifetime then directly reduces the cost to store energy in the battery pack since the capital cost of the battery pack is typically 90% or more of the total cost (capital plus operating) of the battery pack.
These and other advantages will be apparent from the disclosure of the invention(s) contained herein.
The above-described embodiments and configurations are neither complete nor exhaustive. As will be appreciated, other embodiments of the invention are possible utilizing, alone or in combination, one or more of the features set forth above or described in detail below.
The following definitions are used herein:
A “battery cell” is an individual sealed or vented unit comprised of one or more internal plate assemblies, each plate assembly comprised of a negative plate, a separator material and a positive plate. The battery cell may have one or more external negative and positive terminals.
A “plate pair” is the basic unit of a cell and is comprised of a negative plate, a separator material and a positive plate. When the separator is impregnated with an appropriate electrolyte, a voltage typical of the particular battery chemistry is developed between the positive and negative plates. In a lead-acid battery, this voltage is typically about 2.13 volts at full charge.
A “battery rack” is a mechanical structure in which battery cells are mounted.
A “battery module” is a collection of cells mounted in a battery rack frame assembly of convenient size.
A “battery pack” is an assembly of many individual battery cells connected electrically. The assembly may be comprised of subassemblies or modules comprised of individual battery cells. The battery pack usually, but not always, has one overall positive and negative terminals for charging and discharging the cells in the pack.
“Float service” as applied to a battery means operating the battery under rigid voltage conditions to overcome self-discharge reactions while minimizing overcharge and corrosion of the cell's positive grid.
“At least one”, “one or more”, and “and/or” are open-ended expressions that are both conjunctive and disjunctive in operation. For example, each of the expressions “at least one of A, B and C”, “at least one of A, B, or C”, “one or more of A, B, and C”, “one or more of A, B, or C” and “A, B, and/or C” means A alone, B alone, C alone, A and B together, A and C together, B and C together, or A, B and C together.
The energy storage capacity of a battery cell can be characterized by its ampere-hour rating. The lifetime of the battery cell can also be characterized by a number of ampere-hours throughput of expected service. For example, a lead-acid battery cell may have a capacity rating of 1,500 ampere-hours and a lifetime estimated at 1.5 million ampere-hours total throughput. The ratio of expected lifetime to storage capacity is therefore equivalent to the number of cycles of full discharges that the battery cell can deliver over its lifetime. In the example above, this would be 1,000 full discharge cycles. This does not necessarily mean the battery cell can actually be fully discharged 1,000 times but it is a means to characterize the lifetime of the battery cell under the operating conditions recommended to achieve its specified lifetime. This method of estimating lifetime for a battery is appropriate to batteries that are continually discharged and recharged (cycled) during service, where the discharging and recharging may be held within a predetermined range that need not include full discharging and recharging. This can be contrasted to float service where the battery is operated under rigid voltage conditions which usually result in a lifetime measured in years of operation rather than in equivalent full discharge cycles.
An objective of hybrid locomotive design is to operate the locomotive in such a way as to maximize the lifetime of its energy storage unit. This is because the cost structure of an energy storage unit, such as for example a battery pack or capacitor bank, is primarily one of capital cost and secondarily of operating costs. It is known, for example, that operating a lead-acid battery pack generally within a predetermined range of state-of-charge (“SOC”) range (preferably between about 20% to about 95% and more preferably between about 50% and about 95%), as well as applying known charging algorithms and procedures, tends to extend serviceable lifetime towards that of float service.
In addition to operating the battery pack as described above, it is important to maintain all individual battery cells under nearly identical conditions, such as operating temperature for example, so that individual cells can age at approximately the same rate by minimizing the number of equalization charges that are required. When individual battery cells are exposed to substantially different environments, they may diverge in performance because of, for example, different reaction rates on the plates as a result of differing operating temperatures. The corrosion rates observed on battery plates are known to be temperature dependent so maintaining individual battery cells in a battery pack at approximately the same temperature reduces the uneven buildup of corrosion on the battery cell plates thereby extending the useful lifetime of the battery pack as a whole. From time to time, these diverging cells can be brought back into rough balance by applying one or more equalization charges. A large number of equalization charges is known to reduce the lifetime of all the battery cells. This has always been a problem in large battery packs since the battery cells in the interior of the battery pack are usually much more thermally insulated than cells on the outside of the battery pack and therefore tend to operate at a higher temperature than cells on the outside of the battery pack. The present invention can overcome this thermal variation amongst individual cells. When coupled with the practice of operating the battery pack in a predetermined SOC range, the operating lifetime of the battery pack can be extended further.
In order to be cost-effective for application to rail and other transportation hybrid systems, an energy storage unit must be:
A large battery pack suitable for use in a hybrid locomotive typically consists of one or more modules of cells where all the cells are typically connected electrically in series. One or more modules may be connected electrically in series or electrically in parallel. In the embodiment described herein, all the cells are connected electrically in series so that the voltage across the battery pack is the sum of the individual voltages across the cells while the current output of the pack is the same as the current through each of the cells.
The following is a description of a hybrid locomotive battery pack design that utilizes a free convection cooling system supplemented from time to time by an auxiliary forced air convection system to provide cooling for battery cells. The rack used to house the cells is designed to: provide a structural housing for the cells of the pack; provide shock and vibration mitigation for the cells; provide electrical isolation of the cells from one another; allow relatively straightforward access for inspection, maintenance and cell replacement; to have provision for a battery monitoring system; and provide a means of fire containment through isolation of small numbers of battery cells in the event that one or more cells begins to degrade or fail. This latter is an important consideration since a large battery pack can be comprised of about 50 to 500 large battery cells electrically connected in series. As can be appreciated, when all the cells are connected electrically in series, the current through each cell is the same as the output current of the battery pack, so a degrading or failed cell can rapidly become a thermal energy hotspot that can cause locomotive shut down or lead to a cell meltdown and potential battery pack fire.
A large battery pack commonly includes at least one module. A module is typically comprised of at least 12 rows, more typically 21 to 30 rows, and can be comprised of as many as 60 rows. A row commonly contains from 2 to about 6 cells, depending on the size and weight of the individual cells. The weight of a large energy storage cell is typically in the range of about 50 to about 120 kg so a row of cells is typically in the range of about 150 kg to about 500 kg. A cell must be able to be removed by means such as for example an overhead crane, a forklift, a mobile crane or manually by including lifting handles on the battery cells. Each row of cells must be able to be removed by means such as for example an overhead crane, a forklift or a mobile crane. A typical battery pack may be comprised of two modules. The size of the battery pack can be made larger by adding additional modules.
An important component of a preferred embodiment of the present invention is a row in which a relatively small number of battery cells are housed. The number of cells housed in an individual row are preferably between 2 and 10 and more preferably between 3 and 5 cells. Expressed alternately, the energy storage capacity of the cells housed in an individual row is preferably between approximately 2,000 and 20,000 kW-hours, where the capacity is based on a 10 hour discharge time.
The battery rack is preferably made from a high strength, high heat conducting metal such as for example a steel alloy, an aluminum alloy and the like. This type of material is preferred because it provides mechanical strength which is retained if the batteries contained within overheat and melt down. It also provides high heat carrying capacity to help carry away and distribute heat throughout the battery pack if the batteries inside overheat and meltdown.
The battery rack which holds all the cells of the pack may be mounted using shock and vibration resistant spacers which maintains the rack within a small controlled distance relative to its desired position while mitigating any mechanical vibration and shock loading experienced by the battery pack as a whole. The spacers also function to provide electrical isolation of battery pack as will be discussed below. The battery pack and its components are preferably capable of normal operation under longitudinal or vertical shock loading of no less than 2 times the acceleration due to gravity (2 gs). Individual cells are preferably able to withstand shock loading of no less than 2 gs and a constant vibration loading of no less than 0.00003-m deflection at 100 cycles per sec and 0.03-m deflection at 1 cps, and in between being approximately linear on a log-log plot.
It is preferable to design a battery pack having a life expectancy expressed as a number of equivalent full discharge cycles greater than about 500, more preferably a number of equivalent full discharge cycles greater than about 1,000 and most preferably a number of equivalent full discharge cycles greater than about 1,500. It is also preferred to design a battery pack having a period between routine servicing expressed as a number of equivalent full discharge cycles greater than about 100 and more preferably greater than about 500.
In the present invention, a large energy storage battery pack is described which includes a number of key design areas. These are:
The natural convection features include a corrugated, perforated metal inlet louver 201 at the base of the rack. This allows a greater than 100% projected area opening for minimizing flow loss while maintaining structural and filtering requirements. The air enters through the base louvers and flows as indicated by dotted paths 202 along the rack base and enters natural convection gaps 203 between the stacked battery cells 204. Vertical solid wall plates 205 are used to provide fire walls and provide vertical flow barriers for the convecting air. The battery cells 204 act as approximately constant heat flux sources and are oriented in the rack so the largest surface area sides (preferably the sides where the cell plates are aligned perpendicular to the exposed sides) are exposed to the natural convection air gaps 203. The air flows vertically up into a lower plenum 240 that guides the air to the fan duct 231 which provides a chimney effect. The chimney vent 245 has a cap 208 that prevents rain and debris from entering chimney vent 245 and duct 231.
Another important natural convection feature is the section between the upper plenum 230 and the hood 209. A louvered soffit 210 is used on the side of the hood 209 to allow air flow as indicated by dotted path 221 to enter this cavity and naturally convect to the fan duct 231 and enter the chimney vent 245 via slots that are cut into the vent wall. These slots are located vertically above the fan plane so when the fan 211 is running it will not draw air from this cavity but pull air from the lower plenum 240 below which the battery cells 204 are contained. These overall features provides a means for minimizing the solar radiation heat source 212 that is created by the solar load on the outer hood 209 surface. The hood 209 outer surface is preferably painted with a high reflectivity paint. The hood 209 inner surface is preferably thermally insulated. The wall 206 separating the upper and lower plenums, 230 and 240 respectively is also preferably thermally insulated. When the solar load heats the hood 209, the air between the hood 209 and upper plenum 230 will naturally convect from the soffit opening 210 and out the duct slots and subsequently out the chimney vent 245 as shown by air flow 220. The air will also provide an additional insulating layer between the warm hood 209 and the upper plenum 230. All these features will minimize the solar heating from the hood 209 to the battery cells 204.
A similar concept may be used for the sides of the hood which are typically the battery hood doors. The doors are preferably double walled with the same insulation features described for the hood 209 and wall 206. The bottom and tops of the double paneled doors may have air flow slots that allow the air to naturally convect vertically between the door walls. The top slots may open into the lower plenum 240. By opening into the lower plenum 240, the door interiors will be protected from rain, snow, dust and other debris. They will also have the benefit of the forced air convection created by the fans 211 when the fans 211 are running.
The air gaps 203 between the cells are sized to optimize the natural convection cooling for the approximately constant heat output of the cells 204. Where two adjacent battery cells 204 do not have a vertical fire wall 205 and they both provide heat to the gap 203, this gap is specified to be moderately larger than the gap 203 that is needed between a cell 204 and a fire wall 205. These gaps 203 should be sized in the range of approximately 15 mm to about 30 mm range for the smaller gaps with the larger gaps being about 1.2 to 1.3 times the width of smaller gaps for optimum natural convection cooling. Gaps 203 that are too large will result in natural convection re-circulation.
Horizontal fire walls 213 are slotted to match the air gaps between the battery cells while maintaining some fire wall capability. During extreme temperature conditions, a fan 211 is activated and air is forced through the air gaps. The fan 211 is sized to provide sufficient velocity to keep the battery cells 204 cool and within the preferred temperature variance under these extreme conditions. As can be appreciated one large fan or several smaller fans may be used. Testing on a 24 cell battery rack has shown that both the natural convection and forced convection systems work as designed.
The natural convection system described above may be made more efficient by integrating into or onto the battery cell surfaces enhanced area features such as fins, pins, slots, dimples, and so on. These will act to increase the heat transfer coefficient between the cell walls and the air flow past them.
Fire Containment and Mitigation
The free convection system allows for a passive fire-suppression and fire containment strategy wherein any anomalous heating event (including a battery cell fire) is confined to a small number of cells, typically from about two to about six cells. The use of horizontal and vertical fire walls provides a containment system that is also part of the battery rack structural system. If an anomalous heating event or cell fire is detected by a battery monitoring system, then the forced air cooling fan or fans are typically turned off. A number of cells in a row constitute a containment section which is bounded by horizontal fire walls on top and bottom and by vertical fire walls on each side. Because the rack utilizes free convection, heat or flames can propagate upwards through the free convection channels. Thus a containment zone is considered to be comprised of all the rows of cells in a column. This containment zone is bounded by vertical fire walls on each side and by horizontal fire walls at the top of the top row and at the bottom of the bottom row. The free convection channels may be shut off utilizing a fusible slot damper at each horizontal fire wall which may be activated (closed) when the battery monitoring system detects an anomalous heating event or cell fire.
Thermal Management
A principal design objective of the battery pack of the present invention is to maintain all the cells in the pack within a narrow temperature range, typically temperature variation amongst all cells in the pack of no more than about 5° C. and preferably no more than about 3° C. The design objective is important because the cells are typically electrically connected in series and maintaining uniformity of cell temperature helps to equalize the rate of deterioration of active negative plate and positive plate material so that each cell has approximately the same lifetime as measured by ampere-hour throughput. A free convection cooling system (augmented during high power charging or discharging periods by some forced convection cooling) minimizes the parasitic power required for cooling by requiring only a small number of large circulation fans. The forced convection system (comprised typically of air fans for supplemental cooling during more demanding portions of the duty cycle and/or while operating in severe environmental conditions) may also be required to help control the absolute temperature of all the cells in the pack. For example, on hot days, the forced convection portion of the system can be used to increase the flow of cooler air past the cells to reduce overall pack temperature and maintain the temperature of the pack below about 50° C. On cold days, the forced convection portion of the system can be operated to re-circulate warm air from the engines, a heater and/or the heat generated by the cells themselves to increase the flow of warmer air past the cells to increase overall pack temperature to a more preferable range, typically above about 0° C.
The operation of the system is preferably managed by a battery monitoring system that includes temperature monitors located at numerous locations within the pack (up to and including monitors on every cell). As one of its functions, this monitoring system can be used to control the operation of the forced convection portion of the system as needed.
The free convection system was designed using well-known free convection heat transfer analyses. The forced convection system was designed using well-known forced convection heat transfer analyses. The parameters used in the analysis were established by measuring cell temperatures under expected operating conditions. Heat transfer coefficients were estimated using the known material properties of materials typically used in the construction of the cells and rack components.
The thermal output of the cells in a large battery pack is a result of I2R losses occurring inside the cells of the pack. The level of current typical of an average current generated in a hybrid locomotive yard switching application is in the range of about 250 to about 500 amperes, with peak currents as high as about 1,500 amperes. Numerical simulations of a free convection air cooling system show that a free convection air cooling system for the cells is sufficient for most operational yard switcher and road switcher duty cycles.
Other numerical simulations of a forced convection air cooling system, such as might be used to augment the free convection system during times when the cells are being discharged at a higher than normal rate, show that a fully turbulent forced air cooling system of 7,000 cfm would be sufficient to maintain the required uniformity of cell temperature for a hybrid locomotive battery pack of approximately 300 to 350 cells where each cell typically has a storage capacity in the range of about 800 to about 1,500 ampere-hours.
Shock and Vibration Control
Another principal design objective is to control the shock and vibration environment of the cells in the battery pack. This is necessary in order to prevent, for example, active material on the positive and negative cells plates from damage that could cause electrical shorting which, in turn, can lead to a cell fire. This type of damage would more likely substantially reduce cell lifetime by changing the internal electrical characteristics of cell plates, resulting in reduced capacity for the affected cells.
The shock and vibration design criteria cited below were derived from calculations and measurements of the mechanical environment of a yard switcher locomotive. For example, it is often the case that a yard switcher will impact a string of rail cars at speeds of about 1 to about 5 mph, resulting in an abrupt deceleration of approximately 5 gs or greater (1 g is the acceleration due to gravity). This impact generates a shock that must be mitigated before it propagates into the cells of the battery pack. The design goals of a shock mitigation system for a large battery pack for a battery dominant hybrid locomotive are typically for a response reduction of about a factor of 10 in peak acceleration (or deceleration) as seen by the cells compared to the acceleration (or deceleration) seen by the locomotive frame. Thus the shock mitigation system is designed to protect the cells in the battery pack from no more than:
These design goals are for a shock mitigation system that must accommodate typically several thousand impacts.
The system must also be able to mitigate vibration generated for example by the locomotive traveling along the rails at speeds up to about 30 mph in the case of a yard switcher. The vibration suppression system is designed to protect the cells in the battery pack from no more than typically:
The battery rack suspension system of the present invention has been designed based on expected shock and vibration requirements for a yard switcher hybrid locomotive. For example, shock isolation is based on the locomotive decelerating at 5 times the acceleration of gravity (5 Gs) from 5 mph to a complete stop such that the motion response of a large battery pack mounted on the deck of a locomotive is confined to displacements in the range of about ±30 mm during deceleration to rest. This system is also compatible with response of a large battery pack to vibrations in the range of approximately 1 to approximately 3 hertz using the marshmallow type mounts under the battery pack.
Electrical Ground Fault Protection
Another principal design objective is to create a ground fault system for the cells in the battery pack. As discussed previously, the cells in the pack are typically connected electrically in series so that the voltage across the battery pack is typically in the range of about 300 volts to about 1,200 volts. Therefore it is important that the cells be protected from unintended ground faults that might be caused, for example, by:
Since the entire rack is electrically isolated form the main locomotive ground by the shock and vibration isolation system discussed previously, one battery pack grounding strategy is to provide a ground strap from the electrical ground of the locomotive (typically the metal deck of the locomotive) to a point on the negative side of the battery pack. While the ground strap can be attached anywhere on the negative side, it is preferable to ground the battery pack at the midpoint of the series string of cells so that the maximum voltage differential to ground is half the total battery pack voltage. The grounding strap can also be used as source for measuring currents caused by short circuits or unintended ground faults caused by battery leakage such as described above. The battery pack can be grounded as a whole or each battery pack module can be grounded individually.
Individual cells may be isolated from the rack structure by placing the cells on a thin non-conductive plate such as for example a thin sheet of plastic such as nylon, polyethylene, mylar or the like. Another method is to place cells on plastic battery trays. This approach can save cost, weight, and most importantly provides a non-conducting reservoir to collect any leaking battery acid to further prevent unintended shorts or ground faults which can lead to, for example, initiation of a cell meltdown or fire initiation. Further, these trays can have rollers attached or built into the trays for ease of service and maintainability.
In addition, provisions must be made to avoid the rack or cells from contacting the sides of the hood during operation, especially deceleration during yard switching operations. This can be done by providing space for sway and providing non-conductive stops (hard rubber bumpers for example) for sway beyond normal operating conditions.
Battery Pack and Cell Monitoring System
A monitoring system is preferably required to monitor the temperatures, voltages and state-of-charge (“SOC”) of cells or groups of cells in the pack. The monitoring system is also preferably required to monitor current and state-of-charge (“SOC”) of the pack (as has been noted, the cells are typically electrically connected in series so the current is common to all cells and can be used to compute the SOC). Temperatures may be monitored by any number of well known sensors such as for example, thermocouples, thermal resistors and the like. Voltages may be monitored by any number of well known sensors such as for example, voltmeters, viewing resistors and the like. The current through the pack may be monitored by any number of well-known current sensors. The current is the same through each cell (unless a cell of group of cells is electrically by-passed by a shunt). The SOC of the cells may be determined by their open circuit voltage or by accounting for its current input/output history.
The monitoring system is typically managed automatically by a controller which can be configured to continuously or intermittently display data to the engineer in the locomotive cab or to activate warning devices if any parameter is detected out of its normal operating range.
Structural Soundness
The structural elements of a battery rack suitable for a battery-dominant hybrid locomotive (or locomotive with a smaller battery pack but still capable of providing substantial additional power and energy storage capacity for the propulsion system) must be capable of performing:
The rack structure must also be lightweight, typically no more than about 50% of the weight of the cells it contains and preferably no more than about 20% of the weight of the cells it contains. For example, a rack assembly might weigh about 6,000 kg and contain about 15,000 kg of cells for a total assembled battery pack weight of about 21,000 kg. In addition the rack must fit on the deck of a locomotive with enough room for walkways on either side. The height of the rack assembly should allow for good visibility especially if the operator's cab is at the rear of the locomotive.
Rack and Battery Retention Derailments
The following features of the battery rack provide retention of the rack to the locomotive deck and retention of the batteries in the rack during a locomotive derailment. The rack is mounted on shock isolators to reduce the load on the rack, batteries and accessory equipment for normal shock and vibration loads and motions. However, excessive motion stop features have been added that capture the rack during extraordinary locomotive events.
Maintenance and Servicing
The battery pack of the present invention is also designed for accessibility to the cells and ease of replacement under field conditions. Battery cell access is preferably from both sides of the battery pack. In some cases it is desirable to remove any cell in a tray from only one side, for example when removal equipment can only be positioned on that side. When removal equipment can be positioned on either side, it is most preferable to be able to remove the cell from the side of the pack closest to the cell that is to be removed. This results in the minimum number of other cells that need be removed in order to remove the desired cell. The design preferably also allows for lifting entire rack on or off the locomotive. The design more preferably allows for lifting only modules on or off the locomotive. The rack assembly is based on a modular design which can be easily configured for other applications (such as for a tugboat).
A number of variations and modifications of the invention can be used. As will be appreciated, it would be possible to provide for some features of the invention without providing others. For example in one alternative embodiment, the various inventive features are applied to vehicles other than locomotives, such as cars, gantry cranes, railroad cars, and trucks. The control logic set forth above may be implemented as a logic circuit, software, or as a combination of the two.
The present invention, in various embodiments, includes components, methods, processes, systems and/or apparatus substantially as depicted and described herein, including various embodiments, sub-combinations, and subsets thereof. Those of skill in the art will understand how to make and use the present invention after understanding the present disclosure. The present invention, in various embodiments, includes providing devices and processes in the absence of items not depicted and/or described herein or in various embodiments hereof, including in the absence of such items as may have been used in previous devices or processes, for example for improving performance, achieving ease and\or reducing cost of implementation.
The foregoing discussion of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. The foregoing is not intended to limit the invention to the form or forms disclosed herein. In the foregoing Detailed Description for example, various features of the invention are grouped together in one or more embodiments for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed invention requires more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive aspects lie in less than all features of a single foregoing disclosed embodiment. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into this Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate preferred embodiment of the invention.
Moreover though the description of the invention has included description of one or more embodiments and certain variations and modifications, other variations and modifications are within the scope of the invention, e.g. as may be within the skill and knowledge of those in the art, after understanding the present disclosure. It is intended to obtain rights which include alternative embodiments to the extent permitted, including alternate, interchangeable and/or equivalent structures, functions, ranges or steps to those claimed, whether or not such alternate, interchangeable and/or equivalent structures, functions, ranges or steps are disclosed herein, and without intending to publicly dedicate any patentable subject matter.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
384580 | Julien | Jun 1888 | A |
744187 | Gibbs | Nov 1903 | A |
1199752 | Baker | Oct 1916 | A |
1377087 | Manns | May 1921 | A |
1535175 | Mancha | Apr 1925 | A |
2403933 | Lillquist | Apr 1946 | A |
2472924 | Schwendner | Jun 1949 | A |
2510753 | Multhaup | Jun 1950 | A |
2704813 | Stamm | Mar 1955 | A |
3169733 | Barrett, Jr. | Feb 1965 | A |
3443115 | Timmerman, Jr. | May 1969 | A |
3569810 | Thiele | Mar 1971 | A |
3596154 | Gurwicz et al. | Jul 1971 | A |
3668418 | Godard | Jun 1972 | A |
3728596 | Hermansson et al. | Apr 1973 | A |
3737745 | Chevaugeon et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3792327 | Waldorf | Feb 1974 | A |
3832625 | Gyugyi | Aug 1974 | A |
3898937 | Johnson | Aug 1975 | A |
3919948 | Kademann | Nov 1975 | A |
3930189 | Smith | Dec 1975 | A |
3970160 | Nowick | Jul 1976 | A |
3982164 | de Buhr | Sep 1976 | A |
3997822 | Logston et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4035698 | Soderberg | Jul 1977 | A |
4070562 | Kuno et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4075538 | Plunkett | Feb 1978 | A |
4090577 | Moore | May 1978 | A |
4095147 | Mountz | Jun 1978 | A |
4096423 | Bailey et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4107402 | Dougherty et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4152758 | Bailey et al. | May 1979 | A |
4199037 | White | Apr 1980 | A |
4204143 | Coleman | May 1980 | A |
4217527 | Bourke et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4284936 | Bailey et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4309645 | De Villeneuve | Jan 1982 | A |
4344139 | Miller et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4347569 | Allen, Jr. et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4369397 | Read | Jan 1983 | A |
4417194 | Curtiss et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4423362 | Konrad et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4471276 | Cudlitz | Sep 1984 | A |
4471421 | Brown et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4495449 | Black et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4498016 | Earleson et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4523134 | Kinoshita et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4644232 | Nojiri et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4700283 | Tsutsui et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4701682 | Hirotsu et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4719861 | Savage et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4799161 | Hirotsu et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4896090 | Balch et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4900944 | Donnelly | Feb 1990 | A |
4936610 | Kumar et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4941099 | Wood et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4944539 | Kumar et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4950964 | Evans | Aug 1990 | A |
4961151 | Early et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5129328 | Donnelly | Jul 1992 | A |
5212431 | Origuchi et al. | May 1993 | A |
5264764 | Kuang | Nov 1993 | A |
5281900 | Park | Jan 1994 | A |
5289093 | Jobard | Feb 1994 | A |
5306972 | Hokanson et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5317669 | Anderson et al. | May 1994 | A |
5331261 | Brown et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5332630 | Hsu | Jul 1994 | A |
5343970 | Severinsky | Sep 1994 | A |
5359228 | Yoshida | Oct 1994 | A |
5376868 | Toyoda et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5392716 | Orschek et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5424948 | Jordan, Jr. | Jun 1995 | A |
5428538 | Ferri | Jun 1995 | A |
5436538 | Garvey et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5436540 | Kumar | Jul 1995 | A |
5436548 | Thomas | Jul 1995 | A |
5453672 | Avitan | Sep 1995 | A |
5480220 | Kumar | Jan 1996 | A |
5508924 | Yamashita | Apr 1996 | A |
5510203 | Hamada et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5510693 | Theobald | Apr 1996 | A |
5511749 | Horst et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5528148 | Rogers | Jun 1996 | A |
5564795 | Engle | Oct 1996 | A |
5568023 | Grayer et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5580677 | Morishita et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5580685 | Schenk et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5585706 | Avitan | Dec 1996 | A |
5589743 | King | Dec 1996 | A |
5610499 | Rogers | Mar 1997 | A |
5610819 | Mann et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5629567 | Kumar | May 1997 | A |
5629596 | Iijima et al. | May 1997 | A |
5629601 | Feldstein | May 1997 | A |
5631532 | Azuma et al. | May 1997 | A |
5646510 | Kumar | Jul 1997 | A |
5659240 | King | Aug 1997 | A |
5661378 | Hapeman | Aug 1997 | A |
5677610 | Tanamachi et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5685507 | Horst et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5696438 | Hamilton | Dec 1997 | A |
5698955 | Nii | Dec 1997 | A |
5710699 | King et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5735215 | Tegeler | Apr 1998 | A |
5751137 | Kiuchi et al. | May 1998 | A |
5765656 | Weaver | Jun 1998 | A |
5820172 | Brigham et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5856037 | Casale et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5898281 | Bossoney et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5898282 | Drozdz et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5939861 | Joko et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5964309 | Kimura et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5992950 | Kumar et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5998880 | Kumar | Dec 1999 | A |
6012011 | Johnson | Jan 2000 | A |
6021251 | Hammer et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6023137 | Kumar et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6025086 | Ching | Feb 2000 | A |
6027181 | Lewis et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6068944 | Witzigreuter | May 2000 | A |
6082834 | Kolbe et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6104148 | Kumar et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6175272 | Takita | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6189635 | Schuler et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208097 | Reddy et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211646 | Kouzu et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218807 | Sakaue et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6274998 | Kaneko et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6308639 | Donnelly et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6331365 | King | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6359346 | Kumar | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6367891 | Smith et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371573 | Goebels et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6384489 | Bluemel et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6405705 | Dunsworth et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408766 | McLaughlin et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6417646 | Huykman et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421618 | Kliman et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6441581 | King et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449536 | Brousseau et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456674 | Horst et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456908 | Kumar | Sep 2002 | B1 |
D464622 | Donnelly | Oct 2002 | S |
6470245 | Proulx | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6486568 | King et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6497182 | Melpolder et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6507506 | Pinas et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6532405 | Kumar et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6537694 | Sugiura et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6564172 | Till | May 2003 | B1 |
6581464 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6591758 | Kumar | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6608396 | Downer et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6611116 | Bachman et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6612245 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6612246 | Kumar | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6615118 | Kumar | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6618662 | Schmitt et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6627345 | Zemlok et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6634303 | Madsen et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6653002 | Parise | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6658331 | Horst et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6678972 | Naruse et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6688481 | Adner et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6691005 | Proulx | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6697716 | Horst | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6725134 | Dillen et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6728606 | Kumar | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6737822 | King | May 2004 | B2 |
6765315 | Hammerstrom et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6812656 | Donnelly et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6821671 | Hinton et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6823835 | Dunsworth et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6829529 | Trefzer et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6829556 | Kumar | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6879054 | Gosselin | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6885920 | Yakes et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6909200 | Bouchon | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6909201 | Murty et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6909959 | Hallowell | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6941218 | Wolf et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6973880 | Kumar | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6984946 | Donnelly et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7064507 | Donnelly et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7084602 | Donnelly | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7102313 | Kadota et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7124691 | Donnelly et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
20020190525 | Worden et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030151387 | Kumar | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030226653 | Takedomi et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233959 | Kumar | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040133315 | Kumar et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050206230 | Donnelly | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050206331 | Donnelly | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050251299 | Donnelly | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050269995 | Donnelly et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050279242 | Maier et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050279243 | Bendig et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060001399 | Salasoo et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060061307 | Donnelly | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060076171 | Donnelly et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060091832 | Donnelly | May 2006 | A1 |
20060260265 | Zatkulak | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070129000 | Rasmussen et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1283472 | Oct 1987 | CA |
2411132 | Nov 2002 | CA |
0 348 938 | Jan 1990 | EP |
873167 | Mar 1960 | GB |
1129709 | Nov 1966 | GB |
1 312 699 | Oct 1970 | GB |
2 005 205 | Sep 1977 | GB |
WO 30072388 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 2004042890 | May 2004 | WO |
WO 2005030550 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2005079504 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2005084335 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2005086910 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2005097573 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO 2005114810 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO2005114811 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO 2006020587 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 2006020667 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 2006028638 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO2006116479 | Nov 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070144804 A1 | Jun 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60728567 | Oct 2005 | US |