Detection and handling of semiconductor wafer and wafer-like objects

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6631935
  • Patent Number
    6,631,935
  • Date Filed
    Friday, August 4, 2000
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 14, 2003
    20 years ago
Abstract
An end-effector includes multiple vortex chucks for supporting a wafer. Vortex chucks are located along the periphery of the end-effector to help prevent a flexible wafer from curling. The end-effector has limiters to restrict the lateral movement of a supported wafer. In one example, the end-effector has a detector for detecting the presence of a wafer. The detector is mounted at a shallow angle to allow the end-effector to be positioned close to a wafer to be picked-up, thereby allowing detection of deformed wafers contained in a wafer cassette. The shallow angle of the detector also minimizes the thickness of the end-effector. Also disclosed is a wafer station with features similar to that of the end-effector.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The present invention generally relates to semiconductor wafer processing, and more particularly to methods and associated apparatus for handling semiconductor wafers and wafer-like objects.




2. Description of the Related Art




In a semiconductor wafer processing system, semiconductor wafers are transferred from one station to another using a manipulator such as a robot. A typical robot used in the semiconductor industry has a body, an arm, and an end-effector attached to the arm. The end-effector is the part of the robot that supports a wafer.




Conventional end-effectors are ineffective in supporting flexible and/or deformed wafers. For example, end-effectors employing vacuum suction do not adequately support a deformed wafer because vacuum sealing requires a relatively flat surface. End-effectors that support a wafer from the bottom by gravity are also ineffective because deformed wafers have unpredictable shapes, and thus cannot provide an end-effector a consistent bottom surface contact area.




End-effectors utilizing the Bernoulli principle are likewise inadequate to support wafers that are not relatively flat. Existing Bernoulli end-effectors can only accommodate 1 to 2 millimeters (mm) of deformation for every 150 mm of length whereas wafer deformation can exceed 8 mm as substrates and deposited films get thinner.




PCT Application WO 97/45862, published Dec. 4, 1997 shows an end-effector that uses vortex chucks to support a wafer. While the end-effector in the aforementioned PCT application is generally more effective in handling flexible wafers than current non-vortex designs, that end-effector does not have, at least, an effective means for detecting and supporting very thin, flexible wafers.




SUMMARY




The present invention relates to a method and associated apparatus for handling relatively non-flat wafers and wafer-like objects. The invention can be employed in a semiconductor wafer processing system and generally for transporting objects including flat panel displays, very thin wafers, and deformed wafers.




An end-effector in accordance with one embodiment includes multiple vortex chucks for supporting a wafer. Vortex chucks are located along the periphery of the end-effector to help prevent a flexible wafer from curling. The end-effector has limiters to restrict the lateral movement of the supported wafer.




In one embodiment, the limiters are retractable to allow the end-effector to press a supported wafer against a surface (e.g., sticky tape). In one example, the limiters are spring loaded pins which retract as the end-effector presses the supported wafer against the surface.




In one embodiment, an edge of the end-effector is chamfered to prevent a flexible wafer from contacting a sharp portion of the end-effector.




In one embodiment, the end-effector has an outline which follows that of the center cut-out portion of a conventional wafer cassette to increase the area of the end-effector for supporting a wafer.




In one embodiment, the end-effector has a detector for detecting the presence of a wafer. The detector is mounted at a shallow angle to allow the end-effector to be positioned close to a wafer to be picked-up, thereby allowing detection of deformed wafers contained in a wafer cassette. The shallow angle of the detector also minimizes the thickness of the end-effector.




A wafer station in accordance with one embodiment includes multiple vortex chucks for supporting a wafer. Vortex chucks are located along the periphery of the station to fully support a flexible wafer.




In one embodiment, the top surface of the wafer station is very flat and has a very smooth finish so that a wafer that is curled down can be picked-up from the station without damaging the edges of the wafer as the wafer curls up during the pick-up step.




In one embodiment, the wafer station has a hole in the middle to accommodate various detectors for detecting the presence of a wafer.




These and other features of the invention will be apparent to a person of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the following detailed description and figures.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIGS. 1A-1E

show various views of an end-effector in one embodiment.





FIGS. 2A and 2B

show a three-dimensional view and a wireline view, respectively, of a vortex chuck.





FIG. 3A

shows a schematic diagram of the end-effector shown in

FIGS. 1A-1E

used with a robot.





FIG. 3B

shows a top x-ray view of a wafer cassette.





FIG. 3C

shows a front view of a wafer cassette.





FIG. 4

shows a schematic diagram of a detector configuration in one embodiment.





FIG. 5

shows a schematic diagram of the end-effector shown in

FIGS. 1A-1E

used with a wafer station in one embodiment.





FIG. 6A

shows a three-dimensional view of a wafer station in one embodiment.





FIG. 6B

shows a top x-ray view of the wafer station shown in FIG.


6


A.





FIG. 6C

illustrates the physical orientation of the vortex chucks of the wafer station shown in FIG.


6


A.





FIGS. 7A and 7B

schematically show the top view and side view, respectively, of an end-effector in one embodiment.





FIGS. 8A and 8B

schematically illustrate an application of the end-effector shown in

FIGS. 7A and 7B

.











The use of the same reference symbol in different figures indicates the same or identical elements.




DETAILED DESCRIPTION





FIG. 1A

shows a three-dimensional view of an end-effector


10


in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. In a typical application, end-effector


10


is attached to an arm of a conventional robot for picking-up and placing semiconductor wafers in a semiconductor manufacturing equipment. In one example, end-effector


10


is utilized in the TRU-ETCH 2000/3000™ wafer processing system from Tru-Si Technologies of Sunnyvale, Calif. Of course, the invention is not so limited and can be generally used for transporting semiconductor wafers and wafer-like objects.




Referring to

FIG. 1A

, end-effector


10


includes multiple vortex chucks


12


for supporting a semiconductor wafer. Only some vortex chucks


12


are labeled in

FIG. 1A

for clarity. Vortex chucks are also described in the following documents: PCT Application WO 97/45862; European Patent Application EP 0 807 964 A1; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/038,642, “HOLDERS SUITABLE TO HOLD ARTICLES DURING PROCESSING, AND ARTICLE PROCESSING METHODS”, filed on Mar. 10, 1998; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/041,284, “ARTICLE HOLDERS AND HOLDING METHODS”, filed on Mar. 11, 1998; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/456,135, “NON-CONTACT WORKPIECE HOLDER”, filed on Dec. 7, 1999; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/633,086 entitled “NON-CONTACT WORKPIECE HOLDER USING VORTEX CHUCK WITH CENTRAL GAS FLOW”, by inventor Sam Kao, filed on Aug. 4, 2000. The above documents are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. The aforementioned U.S. patent applications are assigned to Tru-Si Technologies, Inc., the assignee of the present invention.





FIGS. 2A and 2B

show a three-dimensional view and a wireline view, respectively, of a vortex chuck


12


. Pressurized gas (e.g., air, nitrogen) is fed into an inlet


15


, follows the curvature of a wall


16


, and exits a chamber


17


through an open portion. The foregoing actions form a vortex that creates a varying pressure differential distribution extending radially from the center of vortex chuck


12


. The varying pressure differential distribution holds a wafer in place without contacting the wafer.




As shown in

FIG. 1B

, a top X-ray view of end-effector


10


, pressurized gas introduced through a main inlet


19


is distributed to all vortex chucks


12


via an injection channel


20


. In one example, vortex chucks


12


are sandwiched between a bottom plate


14


and a top plate


21


shown in the side view of FIG.


1


C. Bottom plate


14


and top plate


21


are conventionally fastened together. Injection channel


20


can be machined in top plate


21


, bottom plate


14


, or both. In one example, main inlet


19


has a diameter of 0.25″ (i.e., 0.25 inch) to 0.375″ while injection channel


20


is a square channel having a cross-sectional dimension of 0.10″×0.10″ to 0.20″×0.20″. Inlet


15


(

FIGS. 2A and 2B

) of each vortex chuck


12


is coupled to receive pressurized gas from injection channel


20


. Each hole in bottom plate


14


where a vortex chuck


12


fits through is sealed (e.g., by using an o-ring or by gluing) to prevent gas leaks. In one example, each vortex chuck hole in bottom plate


14


is 0.28″ in diameter.




As illustrated in

FIGS. 1A and 1B

, vortex chucks are located in the middle section, in the center section, and along the periphery of end-effector


10


. The additional vortex chucks


12


on the periphery support the outermost portions of a wafer and thereby help prevent the wafer from curling. This makes end-effector


10


specially suitable for supporting very thin, flexible wafers such as those having a thickness of 150 μm or less. The additional vortex chucks


12


also help prevent the wafer from contacting end-effector


10


by increasing the volume of gas flowing between end-effector


10


and the wafer. The increased gas volume results in more air protection between the wafer and end-effector


10


, thereby decreasing the possible points of contact between the two. A person of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the number and placement of vortex chucks


12


depend on, among other considerations, the size and type of the wafer to be supported. Preferably, the peripheral vortex chucks


12


are located as close to the outside edge of end-effector


10


as possible. In one example, the center of each vortex chuck


12


on the periphery of end-effector


10


is located 0.15″ to 0.35″ from the outside edge of end-effector


10


.




In one embodiment, each vortex chuck


12


is physically oriented such that its exit gas uniformly flows outwards of end-effector


10


as schematically illustrated by arrows


29


in the top view of FIG.


1


D. This orientation of vortex chucks


12


keeps a supported wafer relatively stable. Referring to

FIG. 1A

, rear retaining lips


31


and front retaining lips


30


are provided to limit the lateral movement of the supported wafer. In one example where the distance between the supported wafer and bottom plate


14


(also known as the wafer's flying height) ranges from 0.008″ to 0.026″, the topmost portion of front retaining lips


30


is 0.050″ from bottom plate


14


while that of rear retaining lips


31


is 0.180″. Of course, the flying height of the supported wafer will vary depending on, among other considerations, the number and location of vortex chucks used, the size and type of the wafer, and the pressure of the gas provided to the vortex chucks. Thus, the height of front retaining lips


30


and rear retaining lips


31


depends on the specifics of the application and is selected such that the supported wafer is confined by end-effector


10


.




Referring to

FIG. 1D

, cavities


32


are provided adjacent to vortex chucks


12


that are near rear retaining lips


31


.

FIG. 1E

, a magnified view of portion


27


shown in

FIG. 1A

, provides a closer view of some cavities


32


. Cavities


32


provide a path for gases exiting from vortex chucks


12


to escape rearward of end-effector


10


, thereby preventing the gases from building up on rear retaining lips


31


and causing wafer instability. Cavities


32


are conventionally machined in the block including rear retaining lips


31


.




In one embodiment, outside edge


23


of end-effector


10


, shown in

FIGS. 1D and 1E

, is chamfered to prevent a supported wafer from touching a sharp portion of end-effector


10


when the wafer curls. Chamfer


28


of outside edge


23


, in one example, is chamfered at a ratio of 2.5:1 to 1.5:1. As illustrated in dashed section


33


of

FIG. 1E

, the structure that includes rear retaining lips


31


extends past outside edge


23


to provide additional wafer support and help prevent the wafer from contacting end-effector


10


.




In one embodiment, end-effector


10


includes pick-up blocks


34


shown in FIG.


1


D.

FIG. 1E

shows a closer view of one of the pick-up blocks


34


. During a wafer pick-up step, surface


35


of each pick-up block


34


contacts an edge of the wafer and slides the wafer 0.05″ to 0.15″ into a position within a pick-up window, which is a designated area where a wafer is expected to be found for pick-up. The capability to slide a wafer into the pick-up window enables end-effector


10


to pick-up the wafer even if the wafer is not exactly within the pick-up window.





FIG. 3A

is a schematic representation of an end-effector


10


being extended by a robot


24


to place a wafer


22


into a conventional wafer holder such as a cassette


25


. As illustrated in

FIG. 3A

, end-effector


10


picks-up and supports wafer


22


from the top (i.e., device side of the wafer), with the top of wafer


22


facing bottom plate


14


. Of course, end-effector


10


can also support a wafer from thee bottom. Robot


24


can be any conventional robot used in the semiconductor industry including the model GB8 from Genmark Automation, Inc. of Sunnyvale Calif. End-effector


10


is conventionally attached to an arm of robot


24


. Robot


24


includes a conventional control system (not shown) for directing the movement and operation of robot


24


.





FIG. 3B

shows a top X-ray view of cassette


25


. Just like any conventional wafer cassette, cassette


25


includes a center cut-out portion


26


. In one embodiment, end-effector


10


has an outline, defined by outside edge


23


shown in

FIG. 1D

, which follows that of center cut-out portion


26


. That outline increases end-effector


10


's support area and thus provides increased wafer support.

FIG. 1D

shows the extent of outside edge


23


relative to the diameter of supported wafer


22


. In one example, end-effector


10


has an outline which follows that of the center cut-out portion of a conventional 200 mm wafer cassette.





FIG. 3C

shows a front view of cassette


25


. Cassette


25


has multiple slots, with each slot having two shoulders for supporting the wafer. In

FIG. 3C

for example, wafer


45


is resting on shoulders


43


A and


43


B of slot


44


. To pick up a wafer from cassette


25


, end-effector


10


is first extended to the topmost portion


40


. End-effector


10


is then lowered down center cut-out portion


26


until end-effector


10


detects a wafer, such as wafer


22


in slot


39


. Thereafter, end-effector


10


picks-up the detected wafer.




In one embodiment, end-effector


10


includes a detector for detecting the presence of a wafer. Referring to

FIG. 1D

, fiber optics


36


A and


36


B (also shown in FIG.


1


E and

FIG. 4

) on one side of end-effector


10


are provided to detect the portion of a wafer resting on one shoulder of a slot while fiber optics


37


A and


37


B are provided on the other side of end-effector


10


to detect the portion of the wafer on the other shoulder of the slot. Utilizing a pair of fiber optics on each side of end-effector


10


allows detection of a cross-slotted wafer, which is a single wafer occupying two slots. If a wafer is detected by fiber optics


36


A and,


36


B but not fiber optics


37


A and


37


B, an alarm is generated to alert a human operator, that a wafer in the cassette is likely to be cross-slotted.




As end-effector


10


is lowered from topmost portion


40


of cassette


25


, gas pressure that is a fraction of the gas pressure required to firmly hold a wafer is flown into main inlet


19


(

FIGS. 1B and 1C

) to partially activate vortex chucks


12


, thereby attracting and slightly flattening out a bowed wafer in the path of end-effector


10


. As the bowed wafer flattens out, the fiber optics on each side of end-effector


10


detect the portions of the wafer resting on the shoulders of the slot. After detecting the wafer, sufficient gas pressure is then flown into main inlet


19


to pick-up and hold the wafer. In one example, the gas pressure to firmly hold the wafer is 5 psi to 40 psi (pounds per square inch) at a flow rate of 30 slpm to 100 slpm (standard liters per minute) while the gas pressure to slightly flatten out a bowed wafer is 1.5 psi to 5 psi at a flow rate of 5 slpm to 30 slpm.




Further details regarding the detector configuration on the sides of end-effector


10


are now described with reference to fiber optics


36


A and


36


B. However, the same description also applies to fiber optics


37


A and


37


B. Referring to

FIG. 1E

, fiber optics


36


A and


36


B are conventional fiber optic cables mounted on one side of end-effector


10


. In one example, fiber optic


36


A is mounted on a groove of pick-up block


34


while fiber optic


36


B is mounted on a groove of outside edge


23


. Fiber optics


36


A and


36


B are conventionally attached (e.g., glued) in place.




As shown in the schematic diagram of

FIG. 4

, fiber optics


36


A and


36


B are coupled to a conventional sensor


41


. Light beam emitted from fiber optic


36


B is received by fiber optic


36


A (or vice versa) and detected by sensor


41


. Sensor


41


detects when the light beam is broken, for example by a wafer between fiber optic


36


A and fiber optic


36


B, and accordingly informs a conventional data acquisition and control system


42


(e.g., a computer or a programmable controller) coupled to robot


24


. In one example, fiber optics


36


A and


36


B are of the same type as the part number LL3-TR03-2 fiber optics from SICK, Inc. (sickoptic.com) while sensor


41


is of the same type as the FX-


7


sensor from SUNX Ltd. (sunx-ramco.com). Other conventional detectors can also be used. For example, a person of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that fiber optic


36


A, fiber optic


36


B, and sensor


41


can be replaced with a beam break detector consisting of a transmitter and a receiver.




The angle of fiber optic


36


B, shown in

FIG. 4

as angle θ, with respect to an ideally flat wafer supported by end-effector


10


is relatively shallow (e.g., 6° to 12°) so that the fiber optics can be positioned close to the shoulders of a cassette slot, thereby allowing detection of deformed wafers. In one example, end-effector


10


can be moved such that fiber optics are 0.05″ to 0.25″ from the shoulders of a cassette slot. The shallow angle of fiber optic


36


B also helps keep the thickness of end-effector


10


to a minimum. Further, the angle of fiber optic


36


B allows detection of transparent wafers because transparent wafers will reflect the light beam emitted from such a shallow angle, thereby preventing the light beam from reaching fiber optic


36


A.




In one embodiment, end-effector


10


is used together with a wafer station


50


shown in the schematic diagram of

FIG. 5. A

wafer station is generally a location where a wafer can be placed. It is to be noted that wafer station


50


can be employed independent of end-effector


10


. Station


50


can be used in a variety of wafer handling apparatus including wafer pods, intermediate stations, carousels, and shuttles.




Station


50


has vortex chucks


12


for supporting a wafer from the bottom of the wafer (i.e., a supported wafer is on top of station


50


). However, station


50


can also support a wafer from the top. The vortex chucks


12


in station


50


are sandwiched between a top plate


51


and a bottom plate


52


, which are conventionally fastened together. The holes in top plate


51


where vortex chucks


12


fit through are sealed (e.g., with an o-ring or by gluing) to prevent gas leaks. In one example, each vortex chuck hole in top plate


51


is 0.28″ in diameter. Limiting pins


53


are provided on the periphery of station


50


to prevent a supported wafer from laterally slipping out. In one example, limiting pins


53


are 0.10″ to 0.25″ tall as measured from top plate


51


.





FIG. 6A

shows a three-dimensional view of station


50


. Only some vortex chucks


12


are labeled in

FIG. 6A

for clarity. As shown in

FIG. 6A

, station


50


has vortex chucks


12


on its periphery and middle section for supporting a flexible wafer. Preferably, the peripheral vortex chucks


12


are located as close as possible to the outer diameter of station


50


. In one example where station


50


has an outer diameter of 7.5″ to 8.5″ to accommodate a 200 mm wafer, there are thirty (30) equally spaced vortex chucks


12


on the periphery of station


50


that are disposed along a circle having a diameter of 6.5″ to 7.5″. In the same example, there are five (5) equally spaced vortex chucks


12


that are disposed along a circle having a diameter of 2.5″ to 5.5″. Station


50


has a main inlet


55


for accepting pressurized gas.




In one embodiment, the center section of station


50


has a hole


57


to allow a detector (not shown) from above or underneath station


50


to detect the presence of a wafer. Any conventional sensor can be used including beam break and reflective sensors. In one example, hole


57


is 2.0″ in diameter.




In one embodiment, the surface of top plate


51


is very flat and has a very smooth finish so that a wafer that is curled down can be picked-up from station


50


without damaging the edges of the wafer as the wafer curls up towards end-effector


10


during the pick-up step. In one example, the surface of top plate


51


has a finish of approximately 6 RA to 32 RA (Roughness Average) and a flatness of approximately 0.001″ to 0.010″. Conventional machining practices are used to achieve the aforementioned finish and flatness.




Optionally, station


50


has a notched portion


54


(also shown in

FIG. 5

) to make room for rear retaining lips


31


of end-effector


10


. This allows end-effector


10


to be positioned close to station


50


. Whether notched portion


54


is required or not depends on the dimensions of the end-effector used. In one example, notched portion


54


has a diameter of 7.0″ to 8.0″ while outside edge


56


has a diameter of 7.5″ to 8.5″.




Referring to

FIG. 6B

, which shows a top x-ray view of station


50


, pressurized gas introduced through main inlet


55


passes through injection channel


58


to inlet


15


of vortex chucks


12


(FIGS.


2


A and


2


B). In one example, injection channel


58


is a rectangular channel with a cross-sectional dimension of 0.375″×0.10″.




In one embodiment, each vortex chuck


12


in station


50


is physically oriented such that the general direction of its exit gas is perpendicular to a line which is at an angle α with respect to another line that extends radially from the center of station


50


. Direction


61


of the exit gas of each vortex chuck


12


in station


50


is schematically shown in the top view of

FIG. 6C

, wherein only some vortex chucks


12


are used for illustration in the interest of clarity. As shown in

FIG. 6C

, direction


61


of the exit gas is generally perpendicular to line


62


, which is at an angle a with respect to line


63


. In one example, angle a is 10° to 45°. This physical orientation of vortex chucks


12


has been found to be optimum for holding a wafer in a circular station


50


. Note that the above described physical orientation of vortex chucks


12


can also be made with direction


61


pointing in the counter-clockwise direction (by locating angle α on the other side of line


63


, for example).




Hand-off sequences for transferring a wafer from end-effector


10


to station


50


and vice versa are now described. In the following description, “ON” indicates that gas pressure sufficient to firmly hold a wafer is provided to vortex chucks


12


while “OFF” indicates that there is no gas pressure to vortex chucks


12


. To transfer a wafer from end-effector


10


to station


50


:




(a) Station


50


is turned OFF.




(b) End-effector


10


is positioned such that the supported wafer is 0.05″ to 0.35″ from top plate of station


50


(FIG.


5


).




(c) Station


50


is turned ON.




(d) End-effector


10


is turned OFF, thus transferring the wafer to station


50


.




Similarly, to transfer a wafer from station


50


to end-effector


10


:




(a) End-effector


10


is turned OFF.




(b) End-effector


10


is positioned such that its bottom plate


14


is 0.05″ to 0.35″ from the wafer supported by station


50


(see FIG.


5


).




(c) End-effector


10


is turned ON.




(d) Station


50


is turned OFF, thus transferring the wafer to end-effector


10


.




In both hand-off sequences described above, wafer transfer is smoothest when step (c) is performed by abruptly (as opposed to gradually) turning off the handing vortex chucks


12


. Further, some experimentation may be required to find the optimum “ON” gas pressure for a particular application. In one experiment, the gas pressure for turning ON station


50


was made slightly less than the gas pressure for turning ON end-effector


10


to prevent station


50


from overpowering end-effector


10


.





FIGS. 7A and 7B

schematically show a top view and a side view, respectively of an end-effector


70


. End-effector


70


is the same as end-effector


10


except that end-effector


70


uses retractable-limiters


71


instead of fixed rear and front retailing lips to contain a supported wafer. Limiters


71


can be any retractable structure for limiting lateral movement including spring-loaded pins. Like end-effector


10


, end-effector


70


supports a wafer using multiple vortex chucks


12


in its middle section and along its periphery.




While end-effector


70


can be generally used to pick-up and support a wafer, it is specially useful in applications where the supported wafer needs to be pushed against a surface. An example of such application is schematically illustrated in

FIGS. 8A and 8B

. In

FIG. 8A

, wafer


22


supported by end-effector


70


is to be pressed against and attached onto a sticky tape


72


(also known as dicing tape or adhesive tape). Sticky tapes are well known in the semiconductor industry. As end-effector


70


is lowered down towards sticky tape


72


, limiters


71


contact sticky tape


72


and retract to allow end-effector


70


to continue its downward movement. This enables wafer


22


to be pressed against sticky tape


72


as shown in FIG.


8


B. Wafer


22


can be pressed against sticky tape


72


with sufficient force because the multiple vortex chucks


12


of end-effector


70


supply a high volume of gas between end-effector


70


and wafer


22


.




While specific embodiments of this invention have been described, it is to be understood that these embodiments are illustrative and not limiting. Many additional embodiments that are within the broad principles of this invention will be apparent to persons skilled in the art.



Claims
  • 1. An end-effector suitable for picking up a deformed flexible wafer, wherein the wafer is to be positioned on a first side of the end-effector, and the end-effector has a second side opposite to the first side, the end-effector comprising:a surface on the first side, wherein said surface is to face the wafer when the wafer is supported by the end-effector; a plurality of vortex chucks for emitting gas vortices from said surface towards the wafer to support the wafer in the end-effector while impeding contact between the wafer and said surface, wherein at least some of said vortex chucks are located along the periphery of said surface, the vortex chucks impeding the wafer curling if the wafer is flexible; and a chamfered edge extending laterally outward from a boundary of said surface towards the second side of the end-effector, wherein the wafer is allowed to extend beyond the chamfered edge when the wafer is supported by the end-effector.
  • 2. The end-effector of claim 1 wherein said end-effector is coupled to a robot.
  • 3. The end-effector of claim 1 wherein said edge is chamfered at a ratio of 2.5:1 to 1.5:1.
  • 4. A method for picking up an object, the method comprising:moving an end-effector having a plurality of vortex chucks towards the object; supplying a gas to the plurality of vortex chucks at a first gas pressure, the vortex chucks emitting a plurality of gas vortices from the end-effector towards the object; and in response to a detecting of the object, supplying the gas to the plurality of vortex chucks at a second gas pressure; whereby the object is picked up by the plurality of gas vortices, and wherein the object is detected in a detecting operation which comprises detecting the presence of a first portion and a second portion of the object that respectively rest on a first shoulder and a second shoulder of an object holder; and wherein the end-effector is operable to generate an alarm if the first portion is detected and the second portion is not detected.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein said first gas pressure is less than the second gas pressure.
  • 6. The method of claim 5 wherein the object is deformed but is at least partially flattened by the gas vortices emitted with the first gas pressure.
  • 7. The method of claim 6 wherein the object is detected by one or more detectors mounted on the end-effector, and the one or more detectors are operable to detect flat or flattened objects.
  • 8. The method of claim 5, wherein the first gas pressure is between 1.5 to 5 pounds per square inch.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the second gas pressure is between 5 to 40 pounds per square inch.
US Referenced Citations (50)
Number Name Date Kind
3438668 Olsson et al. Apr 1969 A
3945505 Frisbie et al. Mar 1976 A
4029351 Apgar et al. Jun 1977 A
4566726 Correnti et al. Jan 1986 A
4773687 Bush et al. Sep 1988 A
5004399 Sullivan et al. Apr 1991 A
5044752 Thurfjell et al. Sep 1991 A
5169196 Safabakhsh Dec 1992 A
5375291 Tateyama et al. Dec 1994 A
5445486 Kitayama et al. Aug 1995 A
5452078 Cheng Sep 1995 A
5456179 Lamelot Oct 1995 A
5540098 Ohsawa Jul 1996 A
5546179 Cheng Aug 1996 A
5556147 Somekh et al. Sep 1996 A
5622400 George Apr 1997 A
5647626 Chen et al. Jul 1997 A
5669752 Moon Sep 1997 A
5746460 Marohl et al. May 1998 A
5765889 Nam et al. Jun 1998 A
5767627 Siniaguine Jun 1998 A
5863170 Boitnott et al. Jan 1999 A
5870488 Rush et al. Feb 1999 A
5911461 Sauter et al. Jun 1999 A
5967578 Frey Oct 1999 A
6013920 Gordon et al. Jan 2000 A
6032997 Elliott et al. Mar 2000 A
6040548 Siniaguine Mar 2000 A
6067977 Wark et al. May 2000 A
6083811 Riding et al. Jul 2000 A
6095582 Siniaguine et al. Aug 2000 A
6099056 Siniaguine et al. Aug 2000 A
6109677 Anthony Aug 2000 A
6113165 Wen et al. Sep 2000 A
6139678 Siniaguine Oct 2000 A
6164894 Cheng Dec 2000 A
6168697 Siniaguine et al. Jan 2001 B1
6174011 Keigler Jan 2001 B1
6176023 Doche Jan 2001 B1
6183026 Cai et al. Feb 2001 B1
6183183 Goodwin et al. Feb 2001 B1
6184060 Siniaguine Feb 2001 B1
6187103 Huang et al. Feb 2001 B1
6198976 Sundar et al. Mar 2001 B1
6199927 Shamlou et al. Mar 2001 B1
6202482 Blew et al. Mar 2001 B1
6206441 Wen et al. Mar 2001 B1
6217034 Smelt et al. Apr 2001 B1
6220808 Bonora et al. Apr 2001 B1
6244641 Szapucki et al. Jun 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (10)
Number Date Country
2631502 Jan 1978 DE
3642937 Aug 1987 DE
0 807 964 Nov 1997 EP
0058480 May 1977 JP
199337 Sep 1987 JP
404341438 Nov 1992 JP
0066578 Mar 1999 JP
1320057 Jun 1987 SU
1390022 Apr 1989 SU
WO 9745862 Dec 1997 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Burg et al., “Orienting Bernoulili Effect Wafer Transfer Mechanism,” Nov. 1975, IBM Techincal Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 18, No. 6.